Next Article in Journal
Organic Electro-Optic Materials with High Electro-Optic Coefficients and Strong Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Benzothiazoles Bearing 1,3,4-Thiadiazole as Antiproliferative Hybrids Targeting VEGFR-2 and BRAF Kinase: Design, Synthesis, BIO Evaluation and In Silico Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ferroelectric and Relaxor-Ferroelectric Phases Coexisting Boosts Energy Storage Performance in (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-Based Ceramics

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
2
College of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(13), 3187; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133187
Submission received: 4 June 2024 / Revised: 23 June 2024 / Accepted: 1 July 2024 / Published: 4 July 2024

Abstract

:
With the intensification of the energy crisis, it is urgent to vigorously develop new environment-friendly energy storage materials. In this work, coexisting ferroelectric and relaxor-ferroelectric phases at a nanoscale were constructed in Sr(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3 (SZN)-modified (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 (BNBT) ceramics, simultaneously contributing to large polarization and breakdown electric field and giving rise to a superior energy storage performance. Herein, a high recoverable energy density (Wrec) of 5.0 J/cm3 with a conversion efficiency of 82% at 370 kV/cm, a practical discharged energy density (Wd) of 1.74 J/cm3 at 230 kV/cm, a large power density (PD) of 157.84 MW/cm3, and an ultrafast discharge speed (t0.9) of 40 ns were achieved in the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics characterized by the coexistence of a rhombohedral-tetragonal phase (ferroelectric state) and a pseudo-cubic phase (relaxor-ferroelectric state). Furthermore, the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics also exhibited excellent temperature stability (25–120 °C) and cycling stability (104 cycles) of their energy storage properties. These results demonstrate the great application potential of 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics in capacitive pulse energy storage devices.

1. Introduction

With the growing demand for advanced electrical power systems, dielectric capacitors, as essential elements for electrostatic energy storage, play a decisive role in high-power applications and pulsed power technologies, owing to their unique advantages of fast charge-and-discharge speed, ultrahigh power density, and excellent stability and reliability [1,2,3]. Compared to polymer-based capacitors [4], the ceramic-based capacitors possess higher capacitance and better temperature stability, and thus, have received increasing attention both in academic research and commercial applications. However, the relatively low recoverable energy density (Wrec) caused by the low breakdown electric field (Eb) in dielectric ceramics limits their energy storage applications, for which device miniaturization and system intellectualization are necessary [5,6]. Therefore, a great deal of research has been carried out to explore high-performance dielectric ceramics with high Wrec and energy efficiency (η) as well as excellent temperature and cycling stability. In general, the total energy density (Wtot), the recoverable energy density (Wrec), and the efficiency (η) of ceramic-based dielectric capacitors can be obtained by the Equations (1)–(3) [7,8]:
W tot = 0 P max E dP
W rec = P r P max E dP
η = W rec W tot × 100 %
where Pmax and Pr present the maximum polarization and remanent polarization, respectively; E is the applied external electric field. Equations (1)–(3) indicate that a high Wrec can be achieved through improving Pmax, reducing Pr, and simultaneously enhancing Eb.
Different from linear dielectrics (LDs) and anti-ferroelectrics (AFEs), relaxor ferroelectrics (RFEs) have the combined advantages of a high difference (ΔP = Pmax − Pr) and a relatively large breakdown electric field (Eb), and thus, they possess a pronounced energy storage performance [7,9,10,11,12,13,14]. It is recognized that this pronounced energy storage performance for RFEs is generally strongly related to polar nanoregions (PNRs), which are usually driven by random fields caused by composition disorder disrupting ranged ferroelectric domains [15,16,17,18]. In the nonergodic relaxor (NR) state, the PNRs freeze and the ferroelectric domains with micro-scale generate strong hysteresis, a large Pr and inferior energy storage performance. By increasing the content of the composition and/or temperatures, the power and size of the PNRs increases considerably and decreases rapidly, respectively, and quick merging is achieved, resulting in a large reduction in Pr [19]. In the dominated ergodic relaxor (ER) state, PNRs with random dipole orientation are easily deflected and ergodic, and the polarization direction and intensity of them can alter with the application of an external electric field [20,21]. Despite the transformation from the RFE to the ferroelectric state with the help of random fields, the long-range ferroelectric domains are disrupted, thus producing disordered PNRs with the removal of electric field [22,23]; that is, Pr is significantly suppressed and Pmax remains relatively high. Accordingly, tailoring RFEs to the dominated ER state using PNRs that generate a small Pr, a large Pmax, reduced hysteresis, and enhanced thermal stability is the main collaborative optimization strategy (domain engineering), and enhances the energy storage performance, as shown by the slim polarization versus electric field (P (E)) loops with a significantly delayed polarization saturation. Moreover, a higher electric field can drive a larger Pmax, which supports the idea that improving Eb by multiple effects is crucial for achieving a high energy density of dielectrics. As a result, simultaneous optimization of the external (sample thickness, electrode shape/size, etc.) and internal (e.g., grain size, defects, and grain orientation) factors has been performed to enhance the Eb [24,25]. For instance, a large Eb value of 420 kV/cm was obtained in BiFeO3-BaTiO3-NaNbO3 ceramics via reducing the grain size [25]. Hence, tailoring the grain size, which aims to enhance Eb, was also adopted as a collaborative optimization strategy (i.e. grain size engineering). The decreased grain size means the increased fraction of the grain boundary, which can increase the depletion space charge layers and hence, offers higher potential barriers for charge carriers [26].
It is well known the Wrec and η of the typical ferroelectric system (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 are too small to satisfy the requirements of the system’s practical application, as a result of premature polarization saturation and a large Pr. In this work, Sr(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3, selected as an endmember, was introduced to (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 to partially reduce the ferroelectricity and enhance the relaxation behavior, and eventually, the coexisting ferroelectric and relaxor-ferroelectric phases were constructed, which gave rise to superior energy storage properties (Wrec = 5.0 J/cm3, η = 82%) in the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a displays the XRD patterns of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN (x = 0–0.18) ceramics with different doping concentrations of SZN. All samples exhibit a typical perovskite structure, and not any impurity phase was detected, indicating that the SZN have completely diffused into the BNBT matrix crystal lattice and formed new solid solutions. The enlarged XRD patterns in the 2θ range of 46–47° are depicted in Figure 1b. It is evident that the (200) diffraction peaks gradually move to lower degrees with increasing the SZN content, indicating a lattice expansion, which is due to the substitutions of Sr2+ with a relative large ionic radius (RSr2+ = 1.44 Å) for Na+ (RNa+ = 1.39 Å) and Bi3+ (RBi3+ = 1.38 Å) on the A-sites, and the substitutions of Zn2+ (RZn2+ = 0.74 Å) and Nb5+ (RNb5+ = 0.64 Å) for Ti4+ (RTi4+ = 0.605 Å) on the B-sites [27]. The rietveld refinements of the XRD patterns for (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics, and the TEM selected area electron diffraction (SAED) for representative 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics are given in Figure 2 to further identify the phase structures. The low values of all the reliability factor of patterns (Rp < 7%), the reliability factor of weighted patterns (Rwp < 8%), and the goodness-of-fit indicator (χ2 < 2%), as shown in Figure 2a–e, indicate that the structural model is valid and the refinement results are consistent with the experimental data. Therefore, we can infer that the crystal structures evolve from R and T phases for the ceramics with x = 0 to coexisting R, T, and C phases for the ceramics with x = 0.08–0.15, and eventually, to the C phase for the ceramics with x = 0.18. The detailed phase volume fractions of the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN (x = 0–0.18) ceramics are displayed in the insets of Figure 2a–e. Figure 2f and Figure 2g show the SAED patterns along [001]c and [110]c directions, respectively, for the representative sample x = 0.15. The 1/2(ooe) and 1/2(ooo) superlattice spots (where o and e stand for odd and even Miller indices, respectively) were observed in the sample, demonstrating the existence of T and R phases in a pseudo-cubic matrix, which is consistent with the results of the Rietveld refinement of XRD pattern (Figure 2d). It should be pointed out that these superlattice diffractions are not observed in the XRD patterns, as these superlattice diffractions are weak. Combined with the results of XRD refinements and SAED patterns, we can infer that R, T, and pseudo-cubic phases coexist in the x = 0.15 sample. It is worth noting that the desired coexistence of a ferroelectric state (R and T phases) and a relaxor-ferroelectric state (pseudo-cubic phase) constructed by introducing SZN into BNBT ceramics is conducive to enhancing the Pmax and Eb values simultaneously, and thus, results in an excellent energy storage density.
The SEM images of surface morphologies and the corresponding grain size distributions of the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics are shown in Figure 3a–e. It can be seen that all the samples present a compact microstructure and clear grain boundary, suggesting good sintering behavior. The average grain size and relative density as a function of SZN doping content are presented in Figure 3f. It is evident that the grain size first increases slightly and then decreases with increasing SZN content. The slight increase in grain size for the ceramics x ≤ 0.10 may be related to the fact that a trace amount of SZN dopant acts as a sintering assistant and raises the kinetic energy of grain growth. However, the consistent reduction of grain size with further increase of SZN doping content (x > 0.10) can be explained as follows. The substitution of larger Sr2+ ions for smaller Na+ and Bi3+ on the A-sites, and the large Zn2+ and Nb5+ ions for smaller Ti4+ ions on the B-sites increases the lattice strain energy and thus, the grain boundary mobility is inhibited [28]. It is worth noting that the relative density of all samples is larger than 97.5%, demonstrating a dense microstructure. It is well known that a dense microstructure and refined grains can substantially increase the breakdown electric field (Eb) [29,30].
The temperature dependence of permittivity curves is a powerful tool for revealing the composition-induced transition between the ferroelectric and relaxor-ferroelectric states. Figure 4a,b display the temperature dependences of the permittivity (ε) and loss tangent (tanδ) measured at different frequencies for two representative compositions x = 0 and x = 0.15, respectively. It is evident that two dielectric peaks (labeled as Tm and Ts) exist in the ε-T curves. The dielectric peak Tm is originated from the transition from the ferroelectric to the paraelectric phase, while the dielectric peak Ts is caused by the transformation of ferroelectric rhombohedral to tetragonal PNRs [31]. As compared to the ceramic with x = 0, a strong frequency dependence of Tm and an apparent broadening of Tm peaks are observed in the ceramic with x = 0.15, demonstrating frequency dispersion and diffused phase transition behaviors, which are the typical characteristics of relaxor ferroelectrics [32]. In order to clearly compare the changes of dielectric properties, the temperature dependence of ε and tanδ curves of the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN (x = 0–0.18) ceramics at 100 kHz is depicted in Figure 4c. It can be seen that the Tm and Ts move to a lower temperature and a widened permittivity platform can be found near Tm with the increasing of SZN concentration, which may be attributed to the increased disorder degree of A- and B-site ions, the reduced structural stability, and thus, the enhanced relaxor behavior through the introduction of SZN [33,34,35]. Furthermore, the values of room temperature ε, εm (the maximum of ε at Tm) and tanδ exhibit a gradual downward tendency with the increase of SZN content, which may be attributed to the enhanced relaxor behavior, and are conducive to enhancing the Eb. In addition, the relaxor behavior of dielectric ceramics can be quantitatively assessed by the diffusion coefficient (γ), which can be calculated through the modified Curie-Weiss law [36]:
1 ε 1 ε m = ( T   -   T m ) γ C
where ε is the permittivity, εm is the maximum of ε at Tm, and C is the Curie constant. The γ value can be obtained from the slope of the linearly fitted curve of ln(1/ε − 1/εm) as a function of ln(T − Tm), as shown in Figure 4d; the γ increases as the doping content increases and is determined to be 1.96 for the sample with x = 0.15, suggesting a strong relaxor behavior.
Figure 5a displays the bipolar P(E) loops of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics measured at 120 kV/cm. The (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 ceramic (i.e., x = 0) presents a square-like P(E) hysteresis loop with high values of both Pmax and Pr, indicating a strong ferroelectric characteristic. With the increase of SZN concentration, both the Pmax and Pr values decrease and the P(E) loops become slim, implying the long-range order in the ferroelectric state is gradually disrupted and transformed into a relaxor-ferroelectric state [37]. Moreover, the Eb values are summarized in Figure 5b, and the Weibull distribution plots prove the reliability of the test results of Eb, as all the shape parameters β (the slope of the fitted lines) are larger than 11 [38,39]. Figure 5c shows the unipolar P(E) loops of the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics measured at Eb; the corresponding energy storage properties (Wrec and η) are calculated using Equations (1)–(3) and displayed in Figure 5d. It is worth noting that the optimal energy storage properties (Wrec ~ 5.0 J/cm3, η ~ 82%) are obtained in the ceramics with x = 0.15 under an electric field of 370 kV/cm. The ferroelectric properties and energy storage performance of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics are summarized in Table 1. The comparison of Wrec and η between the sample with x = 0.15 obtained in this work and some other representative BNT-based ceramics is presented in Figure 5e [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. One can see that the sample with x = 0.15 exhibits a satisfactory energy storage performance.
The prominent advantages of pulsed power devices are their exceptional power density and fast discharge speed, which exceed those of other conventional power supplies. Therefore, in order to accurately evaluate the practical pulsed charge-and-discharge properties, the under-damped and over-damped discharge current curves of 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics under various electric fields were measured, and the results are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen from Figure 6a that the peak current (Imax) increases significantly with the increment of an applied electric field. The current density (CD) and power density (PD) can be obtained from the under-damped discharge current curves using Equations (5) and (6), respectively:
CD = Imax/S
PD = E Imax/2S
where S is the electrode area, E is the applied electric field, and Imax is the peak current [48]. Figure 6b gives the CD and PD values of the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics as a function of electric field. Obviously, the CD and PD values gradually increase with increasing electric field, and the maximum values of 1434.94 A/cm2 and 157.84 MW/cm3, respectively, are obtained at 220 kV/cm. Figure 6c shows the over-damped discharge current curves (I(t)) of the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics under various electric fields. Generally, the discharge energy density (Wd) can be obtained by integrating the I(t) curves according to Equation (7):
W d = R I ( t ) 2 dt / V
where R is the load resistance (200 Ω in this work), I is the discharge current, t is the discharge time, and V is the volume of sample. It is obvious that the Wd values gradually increase from 0.67 J/cm3 to 1.74 J/cm3 as the electric field increases from 130 kV/cm to 230 kV/cm. It should be pointed out that the recoverable energy density (Wrec) obtained by integrating the P(E) loop is usually higher than the discharged energy density (Wd) measured by the discharge current curve under the same electric field. This phenomenon can be attributed to different testing mechanisms. The P(E) loop test is almost in the millisecond level (i.e., 1–100 Hz), while the charge-and-discharge test is mostly in the order of microseconds or nanoseconds, and the hysteresis effect caused by fast domain switching is more significant [49]. Therefore, the discharged energy density is lower than the recoverable energy storage density. In addition, the discharge speed is also a crucial parameter for the application of pulse power devices. Generally, the discharge speed is determined by the time (t0.9) required to release 90% of the total energy density (Wd) [50]. The discharge time (t0.9) is determined to be only 40 ns, proving the ultrafast discharge speed of the ceramic x = 0.15. These results suggest that the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics exhibit great potential for applications in high power pulse systems.
To better reveal the microscopic origin of the outstanding energy storage performance of the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics, the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were carried out. Figure 7a,b show the bright field TEM (BF-TEM) images of two representative grains in the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics. Of particular interest is that both lamellar-shaped domains, which are the signature of the ferroelectric phase [51], and blotchy domains, which correspond to the PNRs, are observed in the ceramics with x = 0.15. Figure 7c,d shows the HR-TEM lattice fringe images obtained from the areas of the lamellar-shaped domains (Figure 7a) and the polar nanoregions (Figure 7b), respectively, indicating the ordered arrangement of atoms and the fine crystalline quality. To further elucidate the local polarization fluctuation behavior of the ferroelectric domains and PNRs, the inverse FFT patterns of the selected polar regions (30 × 30 nm2, marked by the red box in Figure 7c,d) are given in Figure 7e and Figure 7f, respectively. The yellow regions in the inverse FFT images represent the local polar regions [52,53]. Interestingly, both areas display a remarkable local structural heterogeneity characteristic, which is caused by the random field generating due to the cations with different valences and sizes occupying the A- (Na+, Bi3+, Ba2+, and Sr2+) and B- (Ti4+, Zn2+, and Nb5+) sites in the unit cell [54]. It is well known the local heterogeneity can impede the coherent length of dipoles and disrupt the long-range polar correlation [20,55]. Therefore, one can see the inverse FFT images (Figure 7e) obtained from the lamellar-shaped domains display larger sized and more tightly connected polar regions as compared with those (Figure 7f) obtained from polar nano-regions, providing solid evidence that SZN doping disrupted the ferroelectric long-range order, reduced the size of local polar regions, and formed PNRs. It is worth noting that the lamellar-shaped domains (i.e., the ferroelectric phase) can help to enhance the Pmax under an external electric field, while the PNRs (i.e., the relaxor-ferroelectric phase) can delay polarization saturation to realize a high Eb in the dielectric ceramics. Hence, we can infer that the coexistence of ferroelectric and relaxor-ferroelectric phases gives rise to a high energy storage density (Wrec). Furthermore, the not-too-high efficiency (η < 90%) may be closely associated with the switching of the residual lamellar-shaped ferroelectric domains under an external electric field, which usually results in a hysteretic P(E) loop.
The temperature and cycle stability are crucial for energy storage applications. The temperature and cycle dependent unipolar P(E) loops are given in Figure 8a,b, and corresponding Wrec and η values of the x = 0.15 ceramics under an electric field of 200 kV/cm are given in Figures 8c and 8d, respectively. Apparently, all the P(E) loops do not change significantly and the Pr and Pmax values present minimal variation, leading to slight fluctuations of Wrec (<13%) and η (<11%) in the temperature range of 25–120 °C and incredibly small variations of Wrec (<2%) and η (<4%) during 104 cycles for the ceramics with x = 0.15, suggesting superior temperature stability and fatigue-resistant behavior of energy storage performance. Figure 9a and 9b show the over-damped discharge current curves and Wd(t) curves at different temperatures under 150 kV/cm for the x = 0.15 ceramics, respectively. Meanwhile, the corresponding Wd and t0.9 values under various temperatures are calculated and summarized in Figure 9c and 9d, respectively. It should be noted here that the Wd and η decrease slightly, from 1.0 J/cm3 to 0.9 J/cm3, and from 52 ns to 41 ns when the temperature rises from 25 °C to 120 °C, exhibiting variations of less than 10% and 21%, respectively, which means the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics have an excellent temperature stability of charge-and-discharge properties. The outstanding temperature stability may be closely related to the gentle fluctuation of permittivity (ε) with respect to temperature, as shown in Figure 4c. The reliable temperature stability of the energy storage performance widens the temperature usage range of the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics in dielectric capacitors.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Synthesis

(1 − x)(Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3-xSr(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3 (abbreviated as (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN, x = 0, 0.08, 0.10, 0.15 and 0.18) ceramics were prepared via the conventional solid-state reaction method. High-purity raw materials of Bi2O3 (99%), Na2CO3 (99.8%), TiO2 (99.9%), BaCO3 (99.99%), SrCO3 (99.95%), ZnO (99.99%), and Nb2O5 (99.9%), weighted according to the stoichiometric chemical formula, were mixed by ball milling in anhydrous ethanol for 24 h. After drying the slurry, the mixed powders were calcined at 850 °C for 5 h, and then milled again for 24 h. Subsequently, the dried powders were mixed with polyvinyl alcohol binder and then were pressed into disks with a diameter of 10 mm. Finally, the green bodies were sintered at 1060–1120 °C for 3 h to form densified ceramics.

3.2. Characterization

The phase structure of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics was identified by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, TD-3700, Dandong Tongda Technology Co. Ltd., Dandong, China). Structural refinement was performed using the Rietveld refinement program GSAS. The microstructure was characterized by means of field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The grain size distributions of the samples were obtained using Nano Measurer software (version number 1.2). The domain morphology was observed by using transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Talos F200X, Waltham, MA, USA) operated at 200 kV. The temperature dependence of dielectric properties was tested by a precision LCR meter (Agilent E4980A, Santa Clara, CA, USA). For energy storage measurements, the samples were polished to a thickness of ~0.06 mm, and then both sides were sputtered gold electrodes with a diameter of 0.5 mm. The polarization-electric field (P-E) hysteresis loops were measured by a ferroelectric analyzer (RT1-Premier II, Radiant Technologies Inc., Alpharetta, GA, USA) at room temperature in a frequency of 10 Hz. A commercial charge-discharge system (CFD-003, Tongguo Technology, Shanghai, China) was employed to measure the practical energy release performance.

4. Conclusions

In summary, (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN (x = 0, 0.08, 0.10, 0.15 and 0.18) dielectric ceramics were synthesized by a conventional solid-state reaction method. The optimal energy storage properties, with a high Wrec of 5.0 J/cm3 and an acceptable η of 82% under 370 kV/cm, were obtained for the x = 0.15 ceramics. The XRD refinement and TEM measurements demonstrate that the introduction of SZN disrupted the long-range ferroelectric order, driving the formation of PNRs and eventually resulting in the coexistence of ferroelectric and relaxor-ferroelectric phases in the x = 0.15 ceramics. The coexistence of ferroelectric and relaxor-ferroelectric phases contributes to simultaneously enhanced Pmax and Eb values, and thus, gives rise to excellent energy storage properties. Meanwhile, the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics exhibited a large power density (PD = 157.84 MW/cm3 under 220 kV/cm) and ultrafast discharge speed (t0.9 = 40 ns). Moreover, an outstanding temperature stability of energy storage and charge-and-discharge properties, as well as a cycle stability, were also achieved in the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics, which is of great importance for the operation of energy storage dielectric materials in harsh environments. All the merits demonstrate that the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramic is a promising candidate for high-power energy storage devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L., P.L., J.H. and W.L.; methodology, Y.L., Y.Z., R.Z. and W.B.; software, Y.L., G.L. and J.Z.; validation, P.L. and W.L.; formal analysis, Y.L. and G.L.; investigation, Y.L.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, P.L. and W.L.; supervision, Y.L.; project administration, P.L. and W.L.; funding acquisition, P.L., J.H. and W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 52102132), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (grant numbers ZR2020QE043, ZR2020ME031, and ZR2020ME033), the Innovation Team of Higher Educational Science and Technology Program in Shandong Province (grant number 2019KJA025), and the Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Liaocheng University (grant number 318051932).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Feng, M.G.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, T.D.; Li, J.L.; Chen, Q.G.; Chi, Q.G.; Lei, Q.Q. Recent advances in multilayer-structure dielectrics for energy storage application. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2102221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, G.; Lu, Z.L.; Li, Y.; Li, L.H.; Ji, H.F.; Feteira, A.; Zhou, D.; Wang, D.W.; Zhang, S.J.; Reaney, I.M. Electroceramics for high-energy density capacitors: Current status and future perspectives. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 6124–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, Z.T.; Du, H.L.; Jin, L.; Poelman, D. High-performance lead-free bulk ceramics for electrical energy storage applications: Design strategies and challenges. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 18026–18085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Luo, H.; Wang, F.; Guo, R.; Zhang, D.; He, G.H.; Chen, S.; Wang, Q. Progress on polymer dielectrics for electrostatic capacitors application. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2202438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pan, H.; Lan, S.; Xu, S.Q.; Zhang, Q.H.; Yao, H.B.; Liu, Y.Q.; Meng, F.Q.; Guo, E.J.; Gu, L.; Yi, D. Ultrahigh energy storage in superparaelectric relaxor ferroelectrics. Science 2021, 374, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pan, H.; Li, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.H.; Wang, M.; Lan, S.; Zheng, Y.P.; Ma, J.; Gu, L.; Shen, Y. Ultrahigh–energy density lead-free dielectric films via polymorphic nanodomain design. Science 2019, 365, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Che, Z.Y.; Ma, L.; Luo, G.G.; Xu, C.; Cen, Z.Y.; Feng, Q.; Chen, X.Y.; Ren, K.L.; Luo, N.N. Phase structure and defect engineering in (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-based relaxor antiferroelectrics toward excellent energy storage performance. Nano Energy 2022, 100, 107484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, P.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, N.; Wu, H.; Bokov, A.A.; Ren, W.; Ye, Z.G. New antiferroelectric perovskite system with ultrahigh energy-storage performance at low electric field. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 979–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, W.; Zhang, L.Y.; Shi, W.J.; Yang, Y.L.; Alikin, D.; Shur, V.; Lou, Z.H.; Wang, D.; Zhang, A.M.; Gao, J.H. Enhanced energy storage properties in lead-free (Na0.5Bi0.5)0.7Sr0.3TiO3-based relaxor ferroelectric ceramics through a cooperative optimization strategy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 6990–7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, W.J.; Zhang, L.Y.; Jing, R.Y.; Hu, Q.Y.; Zeng, X.Y.; Alikin, D.; Shur, V.Y.; Wei, X.Y.; Gao, J.H.; Liu, G. Relaxor antiferroelectric-like characteristic boosting enhanced energy storage performance in eco-friendly (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-based ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 4528–4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Deng, S.Q.; Liu, H.; Wu, J.; Qi, H.; Chen, J. Giant energy-storage density with ultrahigh efficiency in lead-free relaxors via high-entropy design. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, W.; Zhang, L.Y.; Yang, Y.L.; Shi, W.J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Alikin, D.; Shur, V.Y.; Lou, Z.H.; Zhang, A.M.; Wei, X.Y. Enhancing energy storage performance in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-based lead-free relaxor ferroelectric ceramics along a stepwise optimization route. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 2641–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, W.J.; Lin, R.J.; Hou, X.; Li, L.; Li, F.; Bo, D.F.; Ge, B.H.; Song, D.S.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, Z.X. Interfacial polarization restriction for ultrahigh energy-storage density in lead-free ceramics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2301027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yan, F.; Bai, H.R.; Ge, G.L.; Lin, J.F.; Zhu, K.; Li, G.H.; Qian, J.; Shen, B.; Zhai, J.W.; Liu, Z.F. Boosting Energy Storage Performance of Lead-Free Ceramics via Layered Structure Optimization Strategy. Small 2022, 18, 2202575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ji, H.F.; Wang, D.W.; Bao, W.C.; Lu, Z.L.; Wang, G.; Yang, H.J.; Mostaed, A.; Li, L.H.; Feteira, A.; Sun, S.K. Ultrahigh energy density in short-range tilted NBT-based lead-free multilayer ceramic capacitors by nanodomain percolation. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 38, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, D.; Zhou, D.; Wang, D.; Zhao, W.C.; Guo, Y.; Shi, Z.Q.; Zhou, T.; Sun, S.K.; Singh, C.; Trukhanov, S. Lead-free relaxor ferroelectric ceramics with ultrahigh energy storage densities via polymorphic polar nanoregions design. Small 2023, 19, 2206958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhu, C.Q.; Cai, Z.M.; Luo, B.C.; Cheng, X.; Guo, L.M.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, X.H.; Fu, Z.X.; Li, L.T.; Wang, X.H. Multiphase engineered BNT-based ceramics with simultaneous high polarization and superior breakdown strength for energy storage applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 28484–28492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhu, X.P.; Gao, Y.F.; Shi, P.; Kang, R.R.; Kang, F.; Qiao, W.J.; Zhao, J.Y.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Lou, X.J. Ultrahigh energy storage density in (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.65Sr0.35TiO3-based lead-free relaxor ceramics with excellent temperature stability. Nano Energy 2022, 98, 107276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, L.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Z.F.; Yu, H.F.; Wu, J.; Deng, S.Q.; Liu, H.; Qi, H.; Chen, J. Local Diverse Polarization Optimized Comprehensive Energy-Storage Performance in Lead-Free Superparaelectrics. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2205787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bokov, A.; Ye, Z.G. Recent progress in relaxor ferroelectrics with perovskite structure. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 31–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Burns, G.; Dacol, F. Glassy polarization behavior in ferroelectric compounds Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 and Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3. Solid State Commun. 1983, 48, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, Q.Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, Q.S.; Bian, J.H.; Jin, L.; Du, H.L.; Alikin, D.; Shur, V.Y.; Feng, Y.J.; Xu, Z. Achieve ultrahigh energy storage performance in BaTiO3–Bi(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3 relaxor ferroelectric ceramics via nano-scale polarization mismatch and reconstruction. Nano Energy 2020, 67, 104264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, H.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, J.; Luo, H.J.; Zhang, Q.H.; Yao, Y.H.; Deng, S.H.; Qi, H.; Liu, J.; Gallington, L.C. Chemical design of Pb-free relaxors for giant capacitive energy storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 11764–11772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, J.K.; Li, P.; Li, C.Y.; Bai, W.F.; Wu, S.T.; Zheng, P.; Zhang, J.G.; Zhai, J.W. Synergy of a stabilized antiferroelectric phase and domain engineering boosting the energy storage performance of NaNbO3-based relaxor antiferroelectric ceramics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 17662–17673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Qi, H.; Xie, A.W.; Tian, A.; Zuo, R.Z. Superior Energy-Storage Capacitors with Simultaneously Giant Energy Density and Efficiency Using Nanodomain Engineered BiFeO3-BaTiO3-NaNbO3 Lead-Free Bulk Ferroelectrics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Waser, R. TrI4: The role of grain boundaries in conduction and breakdown of perovskite-type titanates. Ferroelectrics 1992, 133, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shannon, R.D.J. Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Study of Inter Atomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogra A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boonlakhorn, J.; Thongbai, P.; Putasaeng, B.; Yamwong, T.; Maensiri, S. Very high-performance dielectric properties of Ca1-3x/2YbxCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 612, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, L.T.; Kong, X.; Li, F.; Hao, H.; Cheng, Z.X.; Liu, H.X.; Li, J.F.; Zhang, S.J. Perovskite lead-free dielectrics for energy storage applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 102, 72–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, R.R.; Wang, Z.P.; Yang, W.J.; Zhu, X.P.; He, L.Q.; Gao, Y.F.; Zhao, J.T.; Shi, P.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Mao, P. Enhanced energy storage performance in Sr0.7La0.2Zr0.15Ti0.85O3-modified Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 ceramics via constructing local phase coexistence. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hiruma, Y.J.; Nagata, H.M.; Takenaka, T. Thermal depoling process and piezoelectric properties of bismuth sodium titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 084112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dai, Z.H.; Xie, J.L.; Chen, Z.B.; Zhou, S.; Liu, J.J.; Liu, W.G.; Xi, Z.Z.; Ren, X.B. Improved energy storage density and efficiency of (1 − x)Ba0.85Ca0.15Zr0.1Ti0.9O3-xBiMg2/3Nb1/3O3 lead-free ceramics. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 410, 128341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, D.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, H.B. Achieved ultrahigh energy storage properties and outstanding charge–discharge performances in (Na0.5Bi0.5)0.7Sr0.3TiO3-based ceramics by introducing a linear additive. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 392, 123729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, D.; Xu, D.; Zhao, W.; Avdeev, M.; Jing, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, T.; Liu, W.; Wang, D.; Zhou, D. A high-temperature performing and near-zero energy loss lead-free ceramic capacitor. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 4511–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qiao, X.S.; Zhang, F.D.; Wu, D.; Chen, B.; Zhao, X.M.; Peng, Z.H.; Ren, X.D.; Liang, P.F.; Chao, X.L.; Yang, Z.P. Superior comprehensive energy storage properties in Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-based relaxor ferroelectric ceramics. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 388, 124158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Uchino, K.; Nomura, S. Critical exponents of the dielectric constants in diffused-phase-transition crystals. Ferroelectrics 1982, 44, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qi, H.; Zuo, R.Z. Linear-like lead-free relaxor antiferroelectric (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3–NaNbO3 with giant energy-storage density/efficiency and super stability against temperature and frequency. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 3971–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dissado, L.A.; Fothergill, J.C.; Wolfe, S.V.; Hill, R.M. Weibull Statistics in Dielectric Breakdown; Theoretical Basis, Applications and Implications. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 1984, 3, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fabiani, D.; Simoni, L. Discussion on application of the Weibull distribution to electrical breakdown of insulating materials. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2005, 12, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, W.G.; Zhu, Y.W.; Marwat, M.A.; Fan, P.Y.; Xie, B.; Salamon, D.; Ye, Z.G.; Zhang, H.B. Enhanced energy-storage performance with excellent stability under low electric fields in BNT–ST relaxor ferroelectric ceramics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chu, B.K.; Hao, J.G.; Li, P.; Li, Y.C.; Li, W.; Zheng, L.M.; Zeng, H.R. High-energy storage properties over a broad temperature range in La-modified BNT-based lead-free ceramics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 19683–19696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, X.C.; Lu, Y.; Li, P.; Du, J.; Fu, P.; Hao, J.G.; Li, W. Achieving High Energy Storage Performance under a Low Electric Field in KNbO3-Doped BNT-Based Ceramics. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 7080–7088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pan, Z.B.; Hu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.J.; Shen, B.; Zhai, J.W. Achieving high discharge energy density and efficiency with NBT-based ceramics for application in capacitors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 4072–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, Y.S.; Li, W.H.; Tang, X.G.; Meng, K.; Zhang, S.Y.; Xiao, X.Z.; Guo, X.B.; Jiang, Y.P.; Tang, Z.H. Energy storage and charge-discharge performance of B-site doped NBT-based lead-free ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 911, 165074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, H.B.; Yan, F.; Lin, Y.; Wang, T.; He, L.; Wang, F. A lead free relaxation and high energy storage efficiency ceramics for energy storage applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 710, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yan, F.; Yang, H.B.; Lin, Y.; Wang, T. Dielectric and ferroelectric properties of SrTiO3–Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3–BaAl0.5Nb0.5O3 lead-free ceramics for high-energy-storage applications. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13510–13516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yan, Y.X.; Qin, W.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Li, Z.M.; Zhang, D.Y.; Zhang, M.L.; Xu, Y.H.; Jin, L. Enhanced energy storage in temperature stable Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-modified BaTiO3-Bi (Zn2/3Nb1/3)O3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 36478–36489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, M.G.; Liang, R.H.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Dong, X.L. Superior energy storage properties and excellent stability of novel NaNbO3-based lead-free ceramics with A-site vacancy obtained via a Bi2O3 substitution strategy. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 17896–17904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, F.B.; Dai, Z.H.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J.J.; Liu, W.G.; Karaki, T. Enhanced energy storage properties of Sr(Ti0.5Zr0.5)O3 modified (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 ceramics. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 11492–11500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dai, Z.H.; Zhang, F.B.; Wang, S.B.; Lei, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Pan, Y.; Ding, X.D. High energy storage properties for BiMg0.5Ti0.5O3-modified KNN ceramics under low electric fields. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 15919–15928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, C.; Tan, X.L.; Kin, E.D.; Roth, M. Domain structure-dielectric property relationship in lead-free (1 − x)(Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-xBaTiO3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 104105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, L.L.; Liu, Y.; Hao, J.G.; Chen, J.W.; Li, P.; Chen, S.; Fu, P.; Li, W.; Zhai, J.W. Multi-scale collaborative optimization of SrTiO3-based energy storage ceramics with high performance and excellent stability. Nano Energy 2023, 109, 108275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, X.; Zhai, J.W.; Shen, B. Novel bismuth ferrite-based lead-free incipient piezoceramics with high electromechanical response. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 5122–5130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shvartsman, V.V.; Lupascu, D.C. Lead-free relaxor ferroelectrics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, F.; Zhang, S.J.; Damjanovic, D.; Chen, L.Q.; Shrout, T.R. Local structural heterogeneity and electromechanical responses of ferroelectrics: Learning from relaxor ferroelectrics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1801504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics in the 2θ range of (a) 20–80° and (b) 46–47°.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics in the 2θ range of (a) 20–80° and (b) 46–47°.
Molecules 29 03187 g001
Figure 2. Rietveld refinement of XRD patterns of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics with (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.08, (c) x = 0.10, (d) x = 0.15, and (e) x = 0.18; SAED patterns along [001]c (f) and [110]c (g) directions for the sample with x = 0.15.
Figure 2. Rietveld refinement of XRD patterns of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics with (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.08, (c) x = 0.10, (d) x = 0.15, and (e) x = 0.18; SAED patterns along [001]c (f) and [110]c (g) directions for the sample with x = 0.15.
Molecules 29 03187 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.08, (c) x = 0.10, (d) x = 0.15, and (e) x = 0.18. The insets in Figure 3a–e show the grain size distributions. (f) The average grain size and relative density as a function of SZN doping content.
Figure 3. SEM images of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.08, (c) x = 0.10, (d) x = 0.15, and (e) x = 0.18. The insets in Figure 3a–e show the grain size distributions. (f) The average grain size and relative density as a function of SZN doping content.
Molecules 29 03187 g003
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent permittivity (ε-T) and dielectric loss (tanδ-T) at different frequencies for the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics (a) x = 0 and (b) x = 0.15. (c) Temperature dependent ε and tanδ for the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics at 100 kHz. (d) ln(1/ε − 1/εm) versus ln(T − Tm) for the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics.
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent permittivity (ε-T) and dielectric loss (tanδ-T) at different frequencies for the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics (a) x = 0 and (b) x = 0.15. (c) Temperature dependent ε and tanδ for the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics at 100 kHz. (d) ln(1/ε − 1/εm) versus ln(T − Tm) for the (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics.
Molecules 29 03187 g004
Figure 5. (a) Bipolar P(E) hysteresis loops measured at 120 kV/cm and 10 Hz. (b) Weibull distribution of breakdown electric fields. (c) Unipolar P(E) hysteresis loops measured at Eb and 10 Hz. (d) Wrec and η of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN (x = 0–0.18) ceramics calculated at their breakdown electric fields. (e) Comparison of Wrec and η between the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN sample and some other representative BNT-based lead-free ceramics.
Figure 5. (a) Bipolar P(E) hysteresis loops measured at 120 kV/cm and 10 Hz. (b) Weibull distribution of breakdown electric fields. (c) Unipolar P(E) hysteresis loops measured at Eb and 10 Hz. (d) Wrec and η of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN (x = 0–0.18) ceramics calculated at their breakdown electric fields. (e) Comparison of Wrec and η between the 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN sample and some other representative BNT-based lead-free ceramics.
Molecules 29 03187 g005
Figure 6. (a) Under-damped pulse discharge current curves of 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics at various electric fields. (b) Variation of CD and PD as a function of the applied electric field. (c) Over-damped pulse discharge current curves of 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics at various electric fields. (d) Discharge energy density (Wd) as a function of time for 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics.
Figure 6. (a) Under-damped pulse discharge current curves of 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics at various electric fields. (b) Variation of CD and PD as a function of the applied electric field. (c) Over-damped pulse discharge current curves of 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics at various electric fields. (d) Discharge energy density (Wd) as a function of time for 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics.
Molecules 29 03187 g006
Figure 7. (a,b) TEM bright-field images of two representative grains for the sample with x = 0.15. (c,d) HR-TEM lattice fringe images. (e,f) Inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) images converted from the areas marked with the red square lines in Figure 7c and Figure 7d, respectively, for 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics.
Figure 7. (a,b) TEM bright-field images of two representative grains for the sample with x = 0.15. (c,d) HR-TEM lattice fringe images. (e,f) Inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) images converted from the areas marked with the red square lines in Figure 7c and Figure 7d, respectively, for 0.85BNBT-0.15SZN ceramics.
Molecules 29 03187 g007
Figure 8. (a,b) Unipolar P-E loops and (c,d) corresponding Wrec and η values as functions of temperature and cycles for the ceramics with x = 0.15 under an electric field of 200 kV/cm.
Figure 8. (a,b) Unipolar P-E loops and (c,d) corresponding Wrec and η values as functions of temperature and cycles for the ceramics with x = 0.15 under an electric field of 200 kV/cm.
Molecules 29 03187 g008
Figure 9. (a) Over-damped discharge current curves, (b) Wd dependence of time measured at different temperatures, and variations of (c) Wd and (d) t0.9 as a function of temperature for the ceramics with x = 0.15 under an electric field of 150 kV/cm.
Figure 9. (a) Over-damped discharge current curves, (b) Wd dependence of time measured at different temperatures, and variations of (c) Wd and (d) t0.9 as a function of temperature for the ceramics with x = 0.15 under an electric field of 150 kV/cm.
Molecules 29 03187 g009
Table 1. Summary of ferroelectric properties and energy storage performance of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics.
Table 1. Summary of ferroelectric properties and energy storage performance of (1 − x)BNBT-xSZN ceramics.
xPr (μC/cm2)Pmax (μC/cm2)Ec (kV/cm)Eb (kV/cm)Wrec (J/cm3)η
05.3720.9243.302261.0856%
0.087.2550.7720.573424.4571%
0.105.2149.4616.223474.9477%
0.153.9643.4217.753835.0082%
0.185.4439.1514.433213.8171%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Lu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, J.; Hao, J.; Bai, W.; Li, P.; Li, W. Ferroelectric and Relaxor-Ferroelectric Phases Coexisting Boosts Energy Storage Performance in (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-Based Ceramics. Molecules 2024, 29, 3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133187

AMA Style

Li Y, Lu G, Zhao Y, Zhao R, Zhao J, Hao J, Bai W, Li P, Li W. Ferroelectric and Relaxor-Ferroelectric Phases Coexisting Boosts Energy Storage Performance in (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-Based Ceramics. Molecules. 2024; 29(13):3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133187

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yunting, Guangrui Lu, Yan Zhao, Rui Zhao, Jiaqi Zhao, Jigong Hao, Wangfeng Bai, Peng Li, and Wei Li. 2024. "Ferroelectric and Relaxor-Ferroelectric Phases Coexisting Boosts Energy Storage Performance in (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-Based Ceramics" Molecules 29, no. 13: 3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133187

APA Style

Li, Y., Lu, G., Zhao, Y., Zhao, R., Zhao, J., Hao, J., Bai, W., Li, P., & Li, W. (2024). Ferroelectric and Relaxor-Ferroelectric Phases Coexisting Boosts Energy Storage Performance in (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-Based Ceramics. Molecules, 29(13), 3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133187

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop