Next Article in Journal
PVP Passivated δ-CsPbI3: Vacancy Induced Visible-Light Absorption and Efficient Photocatalysis
Previous Article in Journal
Network Pharmacology Analysis of Liquid-Cultured Armillaria ostoyae Mycelial Metabolites and Their Molecular Mechanism of Action against Gastric Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rearrangement of Arylsulfamates and Sulfates to Para-Sulfonyl Anilines and Phenols
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules29071667
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A General Method to Access Underexplored Ylideneamino Sulfates as Interrupted Beckmann-Type Rearrangement Intermediates

by
Yifei Zhou
and
Alan M. Jones
*
School of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(7), 1667; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071667
Submission received: 18 March 2024 / Revised: 26 March 2024 / Accepted: 3 April 2024 / Published: 8 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Themed Issue Dedicated to Professor Carsten Bolm—Sulfoximines and Related Sulfur Compounds and Their Biological Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Beckmann rearrangement of ketoximes to their corresponding amides, using a Brønsted acid-mediated fragmentation and migration sequence, has found wide-spread industrial application. We postulated that the development of a methodology to access ylideneamino sulfates using tributylsulfoammonium betaine (TBSAB) would afford isolable Beckmann-type intermediates and competent partners for subsequent rearrangement cascades. The ylideneamino sulfates generated, isolated as their tributylammonium salts, are sufficiently activated to undergo Beckmann rearrangement without additional reagent activation. The generation of sulfuric acid in situ from the ylideneamino sulfate giving rise to a routine Beckmann rearrangement and additional amide bond cleavage to the corresponding aniline was detrimental to reaction success. The screening of bases revealed inexpensive sodium bicarbonate to be an effective additive to prevent classic Brønsted acid-mediated fragmentation and achieve optimal conversions of up to 99%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The amide functional group is one of the most important and widely encountered structural units in organic chemistry and biochemistry. The amide bond is commonly found in bioactive drug molecules including valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) [1]; sitagliptin, an anti-diabetic medicine used to treat type-2 diabetes [2]; olaparib, a PARP inhibitor used to treat BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer [3]; and apixaban, an anti-coagulant used to prevent stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation via the inhibition of Factor Xa (Figure 1) [4].
The Beckmann rearrangement, which involves the conversion of an oxime to an amide [5,6], represents an attractive method for the synthesis of amides due to its simple operation, high selectivity, and atom economy. The Beckmann rearrangement is typically carried out by treating a ketoxime with a strong acid, such as sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid, at an elevated temperature (130 °C). The Beckmann rearrangement has been modified and updated using catalysts [7,8], acidic ionic liquids [9,10,11], radicals [12], photochemistry [13], reagent improvements [14,15], and recently, an example of an interrupted Beckmann rearrangement [16]. In turn, the amides generated are important substrates for electrosynthesis applications [17,18,19,20].
There are limited known methods for the use of ylideneamino sulfates as a Beckmann intermediate (Scheme 1). The rearrangement of potassium salts of ketoxime O-sulfates prepared via the reaction of the respective ketone with hydroxylamine-O-sulfonic acid gave amide products in very limited examples (5 exemplars, 7–47% yield) with multiple by-products formed using anhydrous hydrochloric acid mediated rearrangement conditions [21].
The use of reactive liquid sulfur trioxide in dioxane resulted in the isolation of the O-sulfate of cyclohexanone oxime [22,23,24]. Kelly observed that cyclohexanone oxime sulfate undergoes exothermic rearrangement under mild heating [22]. This contrasts with the work of Fukui who did not observe this phenomenon but instead explored a range of Lewis bases (alkylamines, arylamines), Lewis acids (sulfur trioxide, zinc chloride, tin tetrachloride), hydrochloric acid, water, and methanol-mediated effects on the cyclohexanone oxime sulfate intermediate [23]. It was found that sulfur trioxide was an optimal additive for the rearrangement step to caprolactam in this single example [23]. A series of complexing agents (pyridine, dioxane, triethyl phosphate, DMF) with sulfur trioxide have been explored to prepare caprolactam via the O-sulfate and subsequent treatment with aqueous sodium hydroxide [24].
Inspired by these findings in Scheme 1, we initially considered whether tributylsulfoammonium betaine (TBSAB) [25,26,27,28,29,30] would be an effective sulfation reagent for the generation of O-sulfated oximes (ylideneamino sulfates), a functional group with a paucity of methods to tractably access [31]. It was anticipated that these ylideneamino sulfates could act as intercepted Beckmann rearrangement intermediates [15].

2. Results and Discussion

Attempts to optimize the O-oxime sulfation step with TBSAB are reported in Table 1 using the model substrate 1-phenylethan-1-one oxime (1a). The optimal conditions identified (Table 1, entry 1) required 2.0 equivalents of TBSAB in acetonitrile at 90 °C for 3 h, consistent with the O-sulfation of alcohol functional groups [30].
Due to a lack of commercially available oximes, 13 additional oximes were synthesized [32] from their respective ketones with hydroxylamine, in excellent yields of 90–99% (Chart 1).
With the optimal conditions in hand (Table 1) and a range of oxime substrates prepared (Chart 1), these were then in turn explored using TBSAB as the O-sulfating agent (Chart 2).
The O-sulfation of ketoximes (Chart 2) all showed good to excellent conversions as measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy and isolated yields (typically 67–98%) after an extractive purification protocol (Supplementary materials). These results also showed that mono-substituted aromatic oximes were not influenced by the attached groups from highly electron-donating methoxy groups (2e) to highly electron-withdrawing nitro groups (2f). However, compound 2o, starting from an aldoxime, gave a relatively low yield in comparison to the ketoximes. A potential rationale for this finding was due to the higher reactivity of the aldehyde functional group in comparison to the more hindered, and stabilized, ketone group found in the precursor to 2a (c.f. 1a). The instability of the aldehyde and resulting imine functionality may be one cause of the lower isolated yield in 2o. For the poly-substituted examples, compounds 2i, 2j, and 2m gave good yields whilst compounds 2g and 2k were affected by the two electron-withdrawing groups, giving a lower rate of conversion but acceptable yield of 67%. This contrasts with both the excellent conversion in 2f containing a para-nitro electron-withdrawing group and a para-chloro inductive withdrawing group and resonance electron-donating group found in 2b. A plausible rationale is both the meta-positioning of the nitro group leading to a destabilizing delta-positive effect adjacent to the carbonyl group and reduced solubility of the halogen and nitro containing 2g and 2k.
With a range of differentially substituted ylideneamino sulfates isolated, our attention turned to whether these intermediates would undergo a Beckmann-type rearrangement. Optimization studies are shown in Table 2.
Entries 1–3 (Table 2) studied the effects of temperature on the rearrangement and identified that 100 °C gave the highest conversion to 3a at 54% (entry 2). With increased temperatures, the formation of aniline (4a) became more pronounced (20%, entry 3) via presumably the hydrolysis of the amide motif in 3a.
The analogous thermal conditions in entries 1–3 were compared with an additional equivalent of TBSAB (entries 4–6) and gave no improvement.
The possibility of the ylideneamino sulfate (2a) undergoing hydrolysis (entries 1–6, Table 2) to generate sulfuric acid and thus undergoing Brønsted-acid catalyzed rearrangement and/or further hydrolysis was initially overlooked. However, the low yields and multiple product formations made us consider two competing reaction pathways (Scheme 2). It should also be noted that the group trans to the oxime O-sulfate should migrate from a molecular orbital perspective [33]. However, under the reaction conditions, the E/Z conversion of the oxime O-sulfate is rapid, such that the following order of migratory capacity is adhered to aryl, alkenyl > tertiary alkyl > secondary alkyl > primary alkyl based on electron density effects.
Entries 7–10 (Table 2) were designed to solve this issue through the addition of different bases to intercept any acid-mediated pathways in operation. Entry 8 (Table 2) was selected as the optimized condition with six equivalents of NaHCO3 together with one equivalent of TBSAB at 100 °C for 4 h. Fortuitously, the increased yield and selectivity gained with the addition of sodium bicarbonate enabled a simple work-up to afford the amide products (Supplementary Materials).
The rationale for additional TBSAB being required is to return the formation of any trace oxime by-product (1a) to a competent reaction partner (2a) and increase the overall conversion to the desired amide product (3a) and concomitantly improve the purification protocol. The sulfur trioxide group in TBSAB may also activate the ylideneamino sulfate via coordination to the oxygen or the formation of pyrosulfate via analogy to the reported reactivity of sulfur trioxide-dioxane [23].
To consider the possibility of a counter ion effect of the base used, a controlled experiment was designed (Scheme 3). After sulfation of 1a, the corresponding 2a (as the HNBu3 salt) was converted into the inorganic salts of sodium, 2a[Na] and potassium 2a[K], respectively, in highly isolated yields for comparison. The lower conversions for the Beckmann-type rearrangement (40 and 15%, sodium and potassium salts, respectively) showed that the exchange of HNBu3 in situ was unlikely with NaHCO3 and the conclusion was that the base acted merely to intercept any hydrolytic acid generated. The lower conversions with the inorganic alkali metal salts may also be due to the tributylammonium cation acting as a phase transfer catalyst for the highly polar sulfate group.
With the optimized conditions in place, the nineteen ylideneamino sulfates were screened for Beckmann-type rearrangement competency (Chart 3).
Electron-rich or moderately withdrawing mono-substituted aryl substrates gave excellent results, with 91–99% isolated yields (3a, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3h in Chart 3), and a trifluoromethyl example (3l in Chart 3) gave a lower 65% isolated yield under these conditions. More powerful electron withdrawing functional groups gave mixed results: 3p, 3g, and 3k did not react and returned complex mixtures of products, whilst 3b and 3f returned the oxime starting material (1b and 1f, respectively). A tentative reason for these unsuccessful examples can be elucidated from the electron withdrawing effect on the migratory capacity of the aryl ring system, which is clear in the starting materials 2p and 2f. Indeed, 2b and 2f gave clean (>99%) conversions back to 1b and 1f via inspection of 1H NMR spectra and comparison to authentic samples.
A similar pattern with poly-substituted substrates with electron-rich 3i, 3j, 3n, and 3m (Chart 3) proceeded in modest to high yields. Electron-withdrawing examples 3g and 3k did not participate. A rationale for this effect derives from the electron-rich nature required for the migratory group. Compound 3o, an example of a sulfated aldoxime, did not participate in the reaction despite the generally increased reactivity of aldoximes in the Beckmann rearrangement [34] or the possibility of benzonitrile formation via dehydration [23]. The degradation of 2o (precursor to 3o) was observed, giving credence to the higher reactivity of the ketoxime example.
A cyclic example (3q) proved recalcitrant to these conditions. This may be attributed to the steric bulk around the reacting O-sulfate oxime and tributylammonium cation effect. This would be especially pronounced in a more rigid cyclic example, as was witnessed.
The deletion of one pyridyl group in 3s vs. 3r led to an excellent 88% yield vs. no reaction, respectively. Most likely, the deactivating nature of a bipyridyl example prevents the migratory step, as it is the phenyl group that migrates, not the pyridyl ring in 3s which is not an available pathway to 3r.

3. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a general methodology to access nineteen isolable ylideneamino sulfates using tributylsulfoammonium betaine (TBSAB) in an up to 99% isolated yield, which was tolerant of a wide range of substituted and cyclic ket(ald)oximes. In turn, these novel ylideneamino sulfates, isolated as their tributylammonium salts, are sufficiently activated to undergo Beckmann-type rearrangement. The generation of sulfuric acid in situ from the ylideneamino sulfate giving rise to a classic Beckmann rearrangement and subsequent additional amide bond cleavage to the corresponding aniline was detrimental to reaction success. The screening of bases revealed inexpensive sodium bicarbonate to be an effective additive to prevent classic Brønsted acid-mediated fragmentation and achieve optimal conversions up to 99% in 11 examples with steric and electronic factors that influenced the outcome explored. A tentative mechanism is proposed based on the control experiments with alternative alkali metal cation intermediates. Taken together, these findings demonstrate an alternative protocol to activate and rearrange oximes to amides.

4. Experimental

All reactions involving moisture-sensitive reagents were carried out using standard Schlenk techniques in a dry reaction vessel under argon. All solvents used under anhydrous conditions were decanted directly from an SPS dispensary or were stored over 4 Å molecular sieves 24 h prior to use.
Solvents used for workup procedures were of technical grade from Sigma-Aldrich, Honeywell, VWR, or Fisher Scientific. Unless stated otherwise, solvents were removed by rotary evaporation under reduced pressure between 30–50 °C. All chemical reagents were used as received unless stated otherwise. Reactions were monitored by TLC analysis on Merck silica gel 60 F254 using UV light (254 nm) and/or potassium permanganate.
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded either on a Bruker AVIII operating at 300 MHz for 1H and fitted with a 5mm BBFO probe or on a Bruker AVANCE NEO operating at 400 MHz for 1H fitted with a 5mm “smart” BBFO probe, respectively. 1H-1H COSY, DEPT-45, 1H-13C HSQC, and 1H-13C HMBC NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE NEO console operating at 400 MHz for 1H and fitted with a nitrogen-cooled BBFO probe. Chemical shift data for 1H are reported in parts per million (ppm, δ scale) downfield from tetramethylsilane (TMS: δ 0.0) and referenced internally to the residual proton in the solvent. The deuterated solvents used for NMR analysis were chloroform (CDCl3: δH 7.26, δC 77.2), methanol (MeOD: δH 3.31, δC 49.2), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6: δH 2.50, δC 39.5). Coupling constants (J) are given in hertz (Hz). The data are presented as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, p = pentet, m = multiple, br = broad, app = apparent and combinations thereof), coupling constant, and integration and assignment.
Mass spectra were recorded on a Waters Xevo G2-XS ToF or Synap G2-S mass spectrometer using Zspray and Electro-spray ionization in negative (ESI-) and positive (ESI+) mode, respectively.
General procedure 1: Synthetic procedure for the preparation of oximes.
A magnetically stirred mixture of the corresponding acetophenone (5.0 mmol), NH2OH·HCl (0.520 g, 7.5 mmol), and sodium acetate (1.025 g, 12.5 mmol) in ethanol/water (20 mL of a 1:3 v/v mixture) was heated under reflux for 2 h. The precipitate was formed upon cooling and the reaction mixture was isolated by filtration and washed with water (3 × 10 mL) to give the desired oximes.
General procedure 2. Synthetic procedure for the preparation of sulfates using tributyl sulfoammonium betaine (Bu3NSO3, TBSAB).
A flask was charged with the respective oxime (1.0 mmol) and TBSAB (528 mg, 2.0 mmol, 2.0 eq) was added under an argon atmosphere. Anhydrous MeCN was added (giving a concentration of 0.50 Mol dm−3 to the limiting oxime reagent). The reaction mixture was heated at 82 °C (reflux) for 3 h and monitored by TLC. After reaction completion, the flask was cooled to room temperature and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The reaction was quenched with cold water (10 mL) and filtered. The aqueous solution was extracted with EtOAc (4 × 50 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and the filtrate solvent was removed in vacuo to afford the desired compound as a clear oil.
General procedure 3. Synthetic procedure for the preparation of amides.
A 25 mL round-bottom flask was charged with the respective O-sulfate (1.0 mmol) from General procedure 1, TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux (100 °C) for 4 h and monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL), filtered, and freeze-dried to afford the desired product.
Selected compound characterization
N-phenylacetamide (3a)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2a (400 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (163 mg, 99%). M.P. 112–114 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.90 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.03 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 168.2, 139.8, 128.6, 122.9, 119.0, 23.6; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 136.07 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C8H10NO requires 136.0711, found 136.0710 ([M+H]+).
N-(4-fluorophenyl)acetamide (3c)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2c (419 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (279 mg, 91%). M.P. 152–153 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.96 (1 H, s), 7.61–7.55 (2 H, m), 7.15–7.09 (2 H, m), 2.02 (3 H, s); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 168.6, 159.5 (d, 1JC-F = 239.4 Hz), 135.0 (d, 4JC-F = 2.5 Hz), 121.2 (d, 3JC-F = 7.5 Hz), 115.8 (d, 2JC-F = 22.3 Hz), 25.0; 19F NMR (377 MHz, MeOD) δ −120.75; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 154.06 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C8H9FNO requires 154.0598, found 154.0599 ([M+H]+).
N-(4-methylphenyl)acetamide (3d)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2d (414 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (148 mg, 99%). M.P. 151–153 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.81 (1 H, s), 7.46–7.43 (2 H, m), 7.09–7.06 (2 H, m), 2.23 (3 H, s), 2.01 (3 H, s); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 168.5, 137.3, 132.6, 129.0, 121.2, 24.4, 19.5; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 150.08 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C9H12NO requires 150.0804, found 150.0802 ([M+H]+).
N-(4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide (3e)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2e (411 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (163 mg, 99%). M.P. 125–128 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.77 (s, 1H), 7.50–7.43 (m, 2H), 6.88–6.82 (m, 2H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 2.00 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 169.7, 154.1, 134.8, 119.7, 115.5, 55.0, 26.0; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 166.08 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C9H12NO2 requires 166.0839, found 166.0842 ([M+H]+).
N-(4-methylthiophenyl)acetamide (3h)
Following general procedure 3: A 25 mL round-bottom flask was charged with 2h (480 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (179 mg, 99%). M.P. 125–128 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.92 (s, 1H), 7.57–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.17 (m, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.02 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 170.6, 136.1, 131.8, 126.2, 118.4, 25.0, 17.1; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 182.06 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C9H12NOS requires 182.0603, found 182.0607 ([M+H]+).
N-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acetamide (3i)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2i (490 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (214 mg, 95%). M.P. 140–142 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.85 (s, 1H), 6.95 (s, 2H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.01 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 169.0, 155.2, 137.7, 134.3, 97.2, 59.5, 55.6, 24.5; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 226.10 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C11H16NO4 requires 226.1027, found 226.1022 ([M+H]+).
N-(3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide (3j)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2j (468 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried and then purified with (SiO2; Hexane/EtOAc, 1:1, Rf = 0.2) to give the desired product as a white solid (119 mg, 65%). M.P. 165–168 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.93 (s, 1H), 7.56 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (ddd, J = 9.0, 2.5, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (t, J = 9.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 2.01 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 168.6 (d, JC-F = 250.2 Hz), 160.1 (d, JC-F = 3.2 Hz), 150.1 (d, JC-F = 13.3 Hz), 146.6 (d, JC-F = 8.4 Hz), 132.1 (d, JC-F = 4.2 Hz), 114.9 (d, JC-F = 1.5 Hz), 108.0 (d, JC-F = 12.6 Hz), 56.6, 24.3; 19F NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6) δF −134.08; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 184.07 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C9H11FNO2 requires 184.0695, found 184.0692 ([M+H]+).
N-(4-trimethylfluorophenyl)acetamide (3l)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2l (468 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered, freeze-dried, and then purified with (SiO2; Hexane/EtOAc, 4:6, Rf = 0.2) to give the desired product as a white solid (132 mg, 65%). M.P. 103–104 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 10.30 (s, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.08 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 169.3, 150.3, 141.9 (d, 2JC-F = 31 Hz), 127.5 (q, 4JC-F = 4.8 Hz), 127.3 (q, 3JC-F = 12.6 Hz), 119.2 (d, 1JC-F = 281.1 Hz), 24.6; 19F NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6) δF −59.25; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 204.06 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C9H9F3NO requires 204.0628, found 204.0627 ([M+H]+).
N-(3-chloro-4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide (3m)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2m (465 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered, freeze-dried, and then purified with (SiO2; Hexane/EtOAc, 1:1, Rf = 0.2) to give the desired product as a white solid (110 mg, 55%). M.P. 82–85 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.93 (s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.01 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 168.5, 150.7, 133.5, 121.0, 120.9, 119.2, 113.4, 56.6, 23.9; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 200.04 ([M35Cl+H]+, 100%), 202.04 ([M37Cl+H]+, 60%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C9H11ClNO2 requires 200.0441, found 200.0439 ([M35Cl+H]+).
N-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)acetamide (3n)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2n (414 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h, monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (159 mg, 80%). M.P. 135–137 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 9.83 (s, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (s, 2H), 1.99 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 168.1, 146.5, 142.4, 134.7, 114.9, 108.9, 101.7, 101.3, 22.9; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 180.06 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C9H10NO3 requires 180.0622, found 180.0620 ([M+H]+).
N-(pyridin-2-yl)benzamide (3s)
Following general procedure 3: A round-bottom flask was charged with 2s (445 mg, 1.0 mmol), TBSAB (256 mg, 1.0 mmol), NaHCO3 (504 mg, 6.0 mmol), and water (10 mL). The reaction was heated under reflux for 4 h while being monitored by TLC. The crude product was washed with cold water (3 × 10 mL) and then filtered and freeze-dried to give the desired product as a white solid (160 mg, 89%). M.P. 78–79 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH 10.62 (s, 1H), 8.74 (ddd, J = 4.8, 1.7, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (dt, J = 7.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (td, J = 7.9, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.93–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.68 (ddd, J = 7.9, 4.8, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.39–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.15–7.10 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC 162.9, 150.4, 148.9, 138.8, 138.6, 131.1, 129.2, 128.5, 127.4, 124.4, 122.8, 120.7; LRMS m/z (ESI+) 199.08 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRMS m/z (ESI+) C12H11N2O requires 199.0809, found 199.0813 ([M+H]+.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29071667/s1, General procedures, compound characterization, and copies of 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectra; References are cited in [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.J.; methodology, Y.Z.; formal analysis, Y.Z. and A.M.J.; investigation, Y.Z..; resources, A.M.J.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and A.M.J.; writing—review and editing, A.M.J.; supervision, A.M.J.; project administration, A.M.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Salim, H.; Jones, A.M. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and manufacturing contamination: A retrospective National Register Study into suspected associated adverse drug reactions. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 88, 4812–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jones, L.; Jones, A.M. Suspected adverse drug reactions of the type 2 antidiabetic drug class dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i): Can polypharmacology help explain? Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2022, 10, e01029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sandhu, D.; Antolin, A.A.; Cox, A.R.; Jones, A.M. Identification of different side effects between PARP inhibitors and their polypharmacological multi-target rationale. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 88, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ferro, C.J.; Solkhon, F.; Jalal, Z.; Al-Hamid, A.M.; Jones, A.M. Relevance of physicochemical properties and functional pharmacology data to predict the clinical safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2020, 8, e00603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Beckmann, E. Zur Kenntniss der Isonitrosoverbindungen. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1886, 19, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaur, K.; Srivastava, S. Beckmann rearrangement catalysis: A review of recent advances. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 18530–18572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hashimoto, M.; Obora, Y.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. Beckmann Rearrangement of Ketoximes to Lactams by Triphosphazene Catalyst. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2894–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mo, X.; Morgan, T.D.R.; Ang, H.T.; Hall, D.G. Scope and Mechanism of a True Organocatalytic Beckmann Rearrangement with a Boronic Acid/Perfluoropinacol System under Ambient Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5264–5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Brzeczek-Szafran, A.; Erfurt, K.; Swadzba-Kwasny, M.; Piotrowski, T.; Chrobok, A. Beckmann Rearrangement with Improved Atom Economy, Catalyzed by Inexpensive, Reusable, Bronsted Acidic Ionic Liquid. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 13568–13575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, H.; Cai, X.; Xu, Z.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, S. Beckmann Rearrangement of Ketoxime Catalyzed by N-methyl-imidazolium Hydrosulfate. Molecules 2018, 23, 1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Munnuri, S.; Verma, S.; Chandra, D.; Anugu, R.R.; Falck, J.R.; Jat, J.L. Cu(OTf)2-Catalyzed Beckmann Rearrangement of Ketones Using Hydroxylamine-O-sulfonic Acid (HOSA). Synthesis 2019, 51, 3709–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mahajan, P.S.; Humne, V.T.; Tanpure, S.D.; Mhaske, S.B. Radical Beckmann Rearrangement and Its Application in the Formal Total Synthesis of Antimalarial Natural Product Isocryptolepine via C–H Activation. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3450–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, Y.; Cantillo, D.; Kappe, C.O. Visible Light-Promoted Beckmann Rearrangements: Separating Sequential Photochemical and Thermal Phenomena in a Continuous Flow Reactor. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 2163–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. De Luca, L.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A. Beckmann Rearrangement of Oximes under Very Mild Conditions. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6272–6274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Furuya, Y.; Ishihara, K.; Yamamoto, H. Cyanuric Chloride as a Mild and Active Beckmann Rearrangement Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11240–11241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tochette, S.J.; Dunkley, E.M.; Lowder, L.L.; Wu, J. Nucleophile-intercepted Beckmann fragmentation reactions. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 7812–7815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alfonso-Súarez, P.; Kolliopoulos, A.V.; Smith, J.P.; Banks, C.E.; Jones, A.M. An experimentalist’s guide to electrosynthesis: The Shono oxidation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 6863–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bal, M.K.; Banks, C.E.; Jones, A.M. Metabolism Mimicry: An Electrosynthetic Method for the Selective Deethylation of Tertiary Benzamides. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 4284–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jones, A.M. Dialling-In New Reactivity into the Shono-Type Anodic Oxidation Reaction. Chem. Rec. 2021, 21, 2120–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jones, A.M.; Banks, C.E. The Shono-type electroorganic oxidation of unfunctionalised amides. Carbon–carbon bond formation via electrogenerated N-acyliminium ions. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 3056–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smith, P.A.S. Ketoxime-O-sulfonic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fukui, K.; Uchida, M.; Masaki, M. Formation and Reaction of Cyclohexanone Oxime Hydrogen Sulfate M. Bull. Jpn Chem. Soc. 1973, 46, 3168–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kelly, K.K.; Matthews, J.S. Use of Lewis base-sulfur trioxide complexes as reagents for the Beckmann rearrangement of ketoximes. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 2159–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Turbak, A.F. A Low Temperature Beckmann Rearrangement with SO3 Including Separation of Caprimidyl Sulfate as a New Composition. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1968, 7, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, Y.; Jones, A.M. Rearrangement of Arylsulfamates and Sulfates to Para-Sulfonyl Anilines and Phenols. Molecules 2024, 29, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alshehri, J.A.; Gill, D.M.; Jones, A.M. A Sulfuryl Group Transfer Strategy to Selectively Prepare Sulfated Steroids and Isotopically Labelled Derivatives. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 776900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gill, D.M.; Povinelli, A.P.R.; Zazeri, G.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Shamir, S.A.; Wilkinson, F.L.; Alexander, M.Y.; Cornelio, M.L.; Jones, A.M. The modulatory role of sulfated and non-sulfated small molecule heparan sulfate-glycomimetics in endothelial dysfunction: Absolute structural clarification, molecular docking and simulated dynamics, SAR analyses and ADMET studies. RSC Med. Chem. 2021, 12, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jones, A.M. Tributylsulfoammonium betaine. In The Encyclopaedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis (e-EROS); John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/047084289X.RN02393 (accessed on 27 March 2024).
  29. Benedetti, A.M.; Gill, D.M.; Tsang, C.W.; Jones, A.M. Chemical Methods for N- and O-Sulfation of Small Molecules, Amino Acids and Peptides. ChemBioChem 2020, 21, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gill, D.M.; Male, L.; Jones, A.M. Sulfation made simple: A strategy for synthesising sulfated molecules. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 4319–4322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nishijima, K.; Nishida, H.; Yamashita, Y.; Ito, M.; Onuki, Y.; Mizota, M.; Miyano, S. Synthesis and diuretic activity of bicyclic fused heterocycles containing oxime-O-sulfonic acid moiety. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.; Gardiner, M.G.; Lan, P.; Banwell, M.G. α-Iodo-α,β-Unsaturated Ketones as Vicinal Dielectrophiles: Their Reactions with Dinucleophiles Provide New Annulation Protocols for the Formation of Carbo- and Heterocyclic Ring Systems. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 6146–6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fernández, A.B.; Boronat, M.; Blasco, T.; Corma, A. Establishing a Molecular Mechanism for the Beckmann Rearrangement of Oximes over Microporous Molecular Sieves. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2370–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sharghi, H.; Sarvari, M.H. One-step Beckmann rearrangement from carbonyl compounds and hydroxylamine hydrochloride in Al2O3/CH3SO3H (AMA) as a new reagent. J. Chem. Res. 2001, 2001, 446–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Han, Z.; Lv, J.; Zhang, J. One-pot synthesis of 2-amino-3,4-dicyanopyridines from ketoximes and tetracyanoethylene via Cu(I)-catalyzed cyclization. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 2162–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sonn, A. Über einige synthetische Versuche mit O-Trimethyl-gallusaldehyd. (Mitbearbeitet von Ernst Müller, Wolfgang Bülow und Walter Meyer). Ber. Chem. Ges. A/B 1925, 58, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mahajan, P.S.; Mahajan, J.P.; Mhaske, S.B. Malonic ester amide synthesis. An efficient methodology for synthesis of amides. Synth. Commun. 2013, 43, 2508–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, L.; Wang, Z.-L.; Wan, H.-L.; He, Y.-H.; Guan, Z. Visible-Light-Induced Beckmann Rearrangement by Organic Photoredox Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 6182–6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bhattacharya, S.; Ghosh, P.; Basu, B. Graphene oxide (GO) catalyzed transamidation of aliphatic amides: An efficient metal-free procedure. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jat, J.L.; Kumar, P.; Verma, S.; Chandra, D.; Singh, V.; Tiwari, B. Metal-free synthesis of secondary amides using N-Boc-O-tosylhydroxylamine as nitrogen source via Beckmann rearrangement. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 14782–14785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ito, A.; Asami, Y.; Asato, M.; Fukuda, K.; Yamasaki, R.; Okamoto, I. Synthesis and conformational analysis of N-aryl-N-(3-thienyl)acetamides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 2454–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ran, M.; He, J.; Yan, B.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Fu, Y.; Li, S.-J.; Yao, Q. Catalyst-free generation of acyl radicals induced by visible light in water to construct C–N bonds. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 1970–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chip, G.K.; Grossert, J.S. Aromatic Halogenation with Titanium (IV) Chloride in Presence of Peroxytrifluoroacetic Acid. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Crisenza, G.E.M.; Sokolova, O.O.; Bower, J.F. Branch-Selective Alkene Hydroarylation by Cooperative Destabilization: Iridium-Catalyzed ortho-Alkylation of Acetanilides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14866–14870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fu, Z.; Wang, X.; Tao, S.; Bu, Q.; Wei, D.; Liu, N. Manganese Catalyzed Direct Amidation of Esters with Amines. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 2339–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 29 01667 g001
Figure 1. Amide bonds found in commonly encountered medicines (highlighted in red).
Figure 1. Amide bonds found in commonly encountered medicines (highlighted in red).
Molecules 29 01667 g001
Molecules 29 01667 sch001
Scheme 1. Prior art and this work. R1 and R2 can be H, alkyl, aryl, or acyl. Dioxane cations omitted for clarity [21,22,23,24].
Scheme 1. Prior art and this work. R1 and R2 can be H, alkyl, aryl, or acyl. Dioxane cations omitted for clarity [21,22,23,24].
Molecules 29 01667 sch001
Molecules 29 01667 ch001
Chart 1. Synthesis of oxime substrates. Percentage conversion is given in parentheses as measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy. An isolated yield is given thereafter.
Chart 1. Synthesis of oxime substrates. Percentage conversion is given in parentheses as measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy. An isolated yield is given thereafter.
Molecules 29 01667 ch001
Molecules 29 01667 ch002
Chart 2. Screening of ylideneamino sulfate formation. *Cation omitted for clarity (+NBu3H). The percentage conversion is given in parentheses as measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy. An isolated yield is given thereafter.
Chart 2. Screening of ylideneamino sulfate formation. *Cation omitted for clarity (+NBu3H). The percentage conversion is given in parentheses as measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy. An isolated yield is given thereafter.
Molecules 29 01667 ch002
Molecules 29 01667 sch002
Scheme 2. (a) Proposed mechanism of this work (blue) versus acid-mediated Beckmann mechanism (red); and (b) mechanism of the O-oxime sulfation step.
Scheme 2. (a) Proposed mechanism of this work (blue) versus acid-mediated Beckmann mechanism (red); and (b) mechanism of the O-oxime sulfation step.
Molecules 29 01667 sch002
Molecules 29 01667 sch003
Scheme 3. A control experiment to explore alternative sodium and potassium counter ion effects in the Beckmann-type rearrangement.
Scheme 3. A control experiment to explore alternative sodium and potassium counter ion effects in the Beckmann-type rearrangement.
Molecules 29 01667 sch003
Molecules 29 01667 ch003
Chart 3. Screening for Beckmann-type rearrangement of the ylideneamino sulfates to amides. Percentage conversion is given in parentheses as measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy. An isolated yield is given thereafter.
Chart 3. Screening for Beckmann-type rearrangement of the ylideneamino sulfates to amides. Percentage conversion is given in parentheses as measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy. An isolated yield is given thereafter.
Molecules 29 01667 ch003
Table 1. Identification of optimal O-oxime sulfation conditions on 1a.
Table 1. Identification of optimal O-oxime sulfation conditions on 1a.
Molecules 29 01667 i001
EntrySolventTemperature [°C]Time [h]Conv. [%]
1MeCN903>99
2MeCN60390
3MeCN30>24<10
Table 2. Optimization of the Beckmann rearrangement from 2a to 3a (and/or 1a and 4a).
Table 2. Optimization of the Beckmann rearrangement from 2a to 3a (and/or 1a and 4a).
Molecules 29 01667 i002
EntryT (°C)Time (h)TBSAB (1.0 Equiv.)Base [6.0 Equiv.]Conv. [%] a 1aConv. [%] a 3aConv. [%] a 4a
1808--926trace
21008--65414
31208--73720
4808Yes-540trace
51008Yes-105710
61208Yes-93725
7 b1004-NaHCO3trace>990
8 b1004YesNaHCO30>990
9 b1004YesKHCO30900
10 b1004Yespyridine0600
a Conversions were determined by 1H NMR with internal standard. b Reaction time for entries 7–10 was reduced to 4 h.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Y.; Jones, A.M. A General Method to Access Underexplored Ylideneamino Sulfates as Interrupted Beckmann-Type Rearrangement Intermediates. Molecules 2024, 29, 1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071667

AMA Style

Zhou Y, Jones AM. A General Method to Access Underexplored Ylideneamino Sulfates as Interrupted Beckmann-Type Rearrangement Intermediates. Molecules. 2024; 29(7):1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071667

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Yifei, and Alan M. Jones. 2024. "A General Method to Access Underexplored Ylideneamino Sulfates as Interrupted Beckmann-Type Rearrangement Intermediates" Molecules 29, no. 7: 1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071667

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop