Next Article in Journal
Bioactive Lyocell Fibers with Inherent Antibacterial, Antiviral and Antifungal Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Antiproliferative Potentials Associated with the Volatile Compounds of Lantana camara Flowers: Selective In Vitro Activity
Previous Article in Journal
External Guide Sequence Effectively Suppresses the Gene Expression and Replication of Herpes Simplex Virus 2
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Extraction, Determination, and Bioactivity of Curcumenol: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Properties of Berberis vulgaris (L.) Stem Bark Dry Extract

Molecules 2024, 29(9), 2053; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092053
by Ionuț Mădălin Ivan 1, Octavian Tudorel Olaru 1,*, Violeta Popovici 2,*, Carmen Lidia Chițescu 3, Liliana Popescu 1, Emanuela Alice Luță 1, Elena Iuliana Ilie 1, Lorelei Irina Brașoveanu 4, Camelia Mia Hotnog 4, George Mihai Nițulescu 1, Rica Boscencu 1 and Cerasela Elena Gîrd 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2024, 29(9), 2053; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092053
Submission received: 30 March 2024 / Revised: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 27 April 2024 / Published: 29 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant-Sourced Natural Compounds as Anticancer Agents)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1, Thank you so much for your time and accurate review report, with valuable comments to improve the quality of our MS. 

We rectified our MS according to your comments, point by point, marking all changes with track changes and indicating our response to them.

Please find it in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments to the Author

The authors have investigated the “Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Properties of Berberis vulgaris (L.) Stem Bark Dry Extract”. I recommend reconsidering after the minor revision.

The main comments are as follows:

Materials and Methods-

1.      Line 99, 110-112. Please check the order of Table 1 and Table 2.

Results and discussion-

1.      Line 99, 315-317. Please add references for this part.

2.      Line 369. Generally, most plants extract active substances by using 80% ethanol as solvent. In this part, the obtained extract (BVE) was extracted with 50% ethanol. Why 50% ethanol was used as extractant, which has higher extraction efficiency or higher extract purity?

3.      Line 385 and Line 391. The total Polyphenols Content (TPC) and total Phenolic Acids (TPA) were determined, the calibration curve in a linear concentration range of 2–9 µg/mL and 11-53 µg/mL, please supplement the standard curve equation for TPC and TPA determination if it is convenient.

4.      Line 408. “The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of water and phosphoric acid = 0.1% (v/v) (solvent A) and 0.1% phosphoric acid in the acetonitrile (solvent B).” What is the reason for adding 0.1% phosphoric acid to mobile phases A and B?

Supplementary Material -

Table S3. What does PAC mean in the table? Please check “PAC” in this table, is PAC or TPA?

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2, Thank you so much for your time and accurate review report, with valuable comments to improve the quality of our MS. 

We rectified our MS according to your comments, point by point, marking all changes with track changes and indicating our response to them.

Please find it in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop