Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Effects of Gossypetin on Liver Health in Diet-Induced Pre-Diabetic Male Sprague Dawley Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Metal-Free Catalytic Synthesis of Tetrasubstituted Furans from α-Hydroxy Ketones and Cyano Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Degradation of Naproxen: Intermediates and Total Reaction Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Construction of MXene-Based Heterostructured Hybrid Separators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

by
Xiao Zhang
1,
Guijie Jin
1,
Min Mao
1,*,
Zirui Wang
1,
Tianyu Xu
1,
Tongtao Wan
2 and
Jinsheng Zhao
1,*
1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Energy Storage and Novel Cell Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Automotive Power Train and Electronic Control, School of Automotive Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(8), 1833; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081833
Submission received: 14 March 2025 / Revised: 10 April 2025 / Accepted: 15 April 2025 / Published: 19 April 2025

Abstract

:
The advancement of lithium–sulfur (Li-S) batteries has been hindered by the shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and sluggish redox kinetics. The engineering of functional hybrid separators is a relatively simple and effective coping strategy. Layered transition-metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, a class of emerging two-dimensional materials termed MXenes, have gained popularity as catalytic materials for Li-S batteries due to their metallic conductivity, tunable surface chemistry, and terminal groups. Nonetheless, the self-stacking flaws and easy oxidation of MXenes pose disadvantages, and developing MXene-based heterostructures is anticipated to circumvent these issues and yield other remarkable physicochemical characteristics. Herein, recent advances in the construction of MXene-based heterostructured hybrid separators for improving the performance of Li-S batteries are reviewed. The diverse conformational forms of heterostructures and their constitutive relationships with LiPS conversion are discussed, and the general principles of MXene surface chemistry alterations and heterostructure designs for enhancing electrochemical performance are summarized. Lastly, tangible challenges are addressed, and advisable insights for future research are shared. This review aims to highlight the immense superiority of MXene-based heterostructures in Li-S battery separator modification and inspire researchers.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the wide application of portable electronic products, electric vehicles, and energy storage stations has greatly improved the convenience of our daily lives. The rapid development of these storage devices has given rise to huge demand and extensive research on energy storage systems with a high capacity and energy density. With a theoretical specific capacity of 1675 mAh g−1 and an energy density of 2600 Wh kg−1, which is 3–5 times higher than that of conventional lithium-ion batteries, lithium–sulfur (Li-S) batteries have the advantages of cost-effectiveness, non-toxicity, and a sulfur-rich content and are considered one of the most promising next-generation secondary storage batteries [1,2,3]. Due to the complex reactions during the charge/discharge process of Li-S batteries, there are still considerable challenges in practical applications. The main reason is the shuttle effect of soluble long-chain lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) (Li2Sx 4     x     8 ) [4,5]. This is because LiPSs move between the cathode and anode during charging/discharging, resulting in the loss of active materials and the decay of battery capacity. It should be emphasized that the shuttling effect is a surface phenomenon, while the reaction kinetics are the root cause. Slow reaction kinetics, stemming from multi-step sulfur redox reactions, inevitably lead to poor cycling and rate performance [6,7]. In addition, the formation of “lithium dendrites” [8] also hinders the practicality of Li-S batteries.
In order to solve the above problems and realize high-performance Li-S batteries, researchers have carried out extensive research involving electrode structure design, novel electrolytes, and functional separators [9,10,11]. A functional separator is a relatively convenient and effective method for achieving high sulfur utilization and long lifespans in Li-S batteries [12,13]. Polypropylene (PP) separators are widely used in commercial lithium batteries, but they cannot sufficiently inhibit the shuttle effect [14] due to their macroporous nature. Modifying PP separators with various functional materials, such as metal oxides [15], carbides [16], nitrides [17], borides [18], and sulfides [19], can not only prevent the migration of polysulfides through physical/chemical interactions with LiPSs but also effectively promote redox kinetics, achieving high-performance Li-S batteries [20].
Layered transition-metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, a class of new two-dimensional (2D) materials called MXenes, have attracted much attention in recent years due to their excellent physical and chemical properties [21,22,23]. The general formula of the MXene family is Mn+1XnTx (n = 1–3), where M represents the transition metal (such as Ti, Mo, V, etc.), X stands for the carbide or nitride group (C or N) [24,25], and Tx refers to the terminations on the surface [25,26,27]. Compared with traditional materials such as carbon, metal compounds, and polymers (Table 1), MXenes exhibit infinite potential for regulating lithium and sulfur conversion in Li-S batteries due to key characteristics such as tunable terminations, high electrical conductivity, abundant defects and vacancies, a large specific surface area, and good mechanical strength, controlled by different chemical compositions and terminating functional groups on their surfaces [28,29]. Nevertheless, hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces within the layers make MXene nanosheets likely to self-restack, limiting the rapid transport of ions and the effective exposure of active sites [30]. Additionally, the easily oxidized nature of MXenes is also a shortcoming that cannot be ignored. By rationally constructing MXene-based heterostructured hybrid separators, on the one hand, the built-in electric field spontaneously generated by the redistribution of electrons at the heterointerfaces can accelerate the migration of charge carriers and the anchoring of polysulfides, and more active sites can be induced through the adjustment of the coordination environment [31,32]. On the other hand, this structure can bypass the drawbacks of MXenes and acquire other amazing physicochemical properties, thereby synergistically enhancing the performance of Li-S batteries (Table 1).
In this review, the research progress on MXene-based heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries is summarized. Different conformational forms of the heterostructures and their intrinsic relationship with the conversion of LiPSs are discussed. The fundamental guidelines for enhancing electrochemical performance by adjusting the surface chemistry of MXenes and designing heterostructures are outlined. At the end of this review, the prospects and challenges in this field are looked ahead to, and a few perspectives are shared.

2. Overview of MXenes and MXene-Based Heterostructures

2.1. Overview of MXenes

MXenes are a new family of 2D materials with the chemical formula Mn+1XnTx, where M stands for the transition metal from the IIIB, IVB, VB, and IVB groups, X stands for carbon or nitrogen, n is usually 1, 2, or 3, and Tx refers to the terminations on the surface [25,27,28]. MXenes are usually prepared in a two-step process. The first step is the synthesis of the MAX phase, which is accomplished by a high-temperature reaction following the chemical formula Mn+1AXn, where A represents the elements from the IIIA or IVA groups (such as Al or Si) (Figure 1a) [33]. Common methods include hot-press sintering and arc melting. The second step is the selective etching of the MAX phase to remove the A layer (e.g., Al from Ti2AlC) and obtain Mn+1XnTx (Figure 1b) [34]. This process produces functional groups (–O, –OH, –F, –S, –Cl, etc.) on the external M-plate of the 2D layered MXenes (Figure 1b). After etching, monolayers or few-layer MXenes are obtained by ultrasonic exfoliation.
Since the discovery of Ti3C2Tx-MXene in 2011, the preparation methods and application fields of MXenes have been expanding. Their large specific surface area (250~1000 m2 g−1), high conductivity (even up to 2.4 × 104 S cm−1), and abundant functional terminals make them promising candidates for energy storage applications, such as lithium-ion batteries, sodium-ion batteries, Li-S batteries, and supercapacitors with a broad application prospect [35,36,37]. Applied to Li-S batteries, MXenes can effectively inhibit the shuttle effect by chemisorption with polysulfides by virtue of their rich surface functional groups, which is a thorny issue plaguing the cycling stability of Li-S batteries. MXenes’ high conductivity can improve the electronic conduction of the sulfur electrode, enhancing the utilization of sulfur as an active substance. In addition, sufficient surface termination in MXenes can induce uniform nucleation and inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites [38,39]. Also, due to the good mechanical stability of MXenes, they can accommodate the large volume change of sulfur species during charging and discharging. In short, MXenes combine all of these advantages into one compared with other 2D materials (graphene, layered hydroxides, etc.). Therefore, MXenes are considered to have strong potential for manufacturing high-performance Li-S batteries.

2.2. Properties of MXene-Based Heterostructures

MXenes demonstrate unique appeal in Li-S batteries due to their excellent physicochemical properties. However, their practical application is hindered by the inherent self-restacking tendency of layered MXene sheets, which severely compromises the vertical electron/ion transport pathways between the layers, leading to a degraded electrochemical performance under high sulfur loading [40]. Furthermore, a single-component system of MXene struggles to simultaneously optimize the physical confinement, chemical adsorption, and catalytic conversion of LiPSs, resulting in only marginal improvements in the overall performance of a battery. To address these limitations, the construction of MXene-based heterostructures has been proposed as a strategic approach. By combining MXene with complementary functional materials, synergistic effects can be engineered to tailor specific physicochemical properties (hierarchical porosity, interfacial charge redistribution, multiple active sites, etc.), thereby fulfilling the multifaceted requirements of advanced Li-S battery systems [41,42].
Heterostructure is a concept widely used in multidisciplinary fields, with its theoretical prototype traceable to the classic model proposed by W. Shockley in the field of semiconductor physics [43]. The fundamental features of this structure stem from the natural evolution of heterogeneous interfacial regions, i.e., the interfacial regions are characterized by chemical compositional reconfiguration, charge redistribution, and changes in physicochemical properties due to spatial discontinuities in key parameters, such as differences in the energy band arrangement, Fermi energy level shifts, and carrier concentration gradients [44,45]. In the field of advanced material engineering, heterostructure refers to a composite system that integrates two or more materials with different crystal structures through precise interfacial engineering, the core of which lies in the realization of synergistic effects between component materials through controllable interfacial construction, thus breaking through the performance limits of traditional homogeneous materials and achieving a leapfrog enhancement in key properties. As for MXene-based heterostructured hybrid separators, the inherent defects of single-phase MXene can be effectively overcome by the multicomponent synergistic integration strategy. On the one hand, a built-in electric field can be formed by exploiting the energy band engineering of interfacial heterojunctions, which can significantly optimize the ion transport kinetics; on the other hand, the charge redistribution is induced by precisely tuning the interfacial electronic structure to construct a multi-site adsorption–catalytic network for LiPSs, which significantly improves the electrocatalytic performance and the reversible capacity of the Li-S battery system.

3. Synthesis of MXenes and MXene-Based Heterostructures

3.1. Synthesis of MXenes

In general, the synthesis of MXenes mainly involves two types of strategies: top-down and bottom-up. The top-down method, which is the primary approach for synthesizing MXenes, involves the selective etching of the A layer from MAX precursors, followed by exfoliation into single or multi-layer nanosheets [46]. The commonly used etching methods include HF etching, in situ generation of HF for etching, and molten-salt etching. For the bottom-up method, direct growth of MXene using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is typical. However, this method is still at an early stage due to strict synthesis conditions and complex processes.

3.1.1. HF Etching

HF was the first etchant used to produce MXenes, and the A layer in MAX dissolves easily in HF. Taking Ti3AlC2 as an example, the etching reactions are as follows [47]:
Ti3AlC2 + 3HF = AlF3 +Ti3C2 + 3/2H2
Ti3C2 + 2H2O = Ti3C2(OH)2 + H2
Ti3C2 + 2HF = Ti3C2F2 + H2

3.1.2. In Situ Generation of HF for Etching

Considering the toxicity of HF, another safer alternative etchant was developed. A mixed solution of LiF/HCl can slowly generate HF, exhibiting the same effect as HF as a mild etchant. Moreover, Li+ and H2O molecules can be simultaneously inserted into the layered structure during the etching process, which helps to expand the interlayer distance and the subsequent exfoliation of the MXene nanosheets [48].

3.1.3. Molten-Salt Etching

Different from acid solution etching, molten-salt etching at high temperatures does not require the use of HF or fluoride-containing acidic solutions, which improves the safety of the synthetic process and reduces waste liquid treatment costs. In the high-temperature molten-salt etching method, appropriate Lewis acid chloride molten salts, such as ZnCl2, CuCl2, etc., are typically selected as etchants. For example, a MAX precursor was mixed with CuCl2, NaCl, and KCl in specific ratios and then heated for 24 h at 680 °C in an argon atmosphere to remove the A atoms [49].

3.1.4. CVD Method

The bottom-up strategy builds from atoms to a layered structure, and the CVD method adopts this approach to synthesize MXene. For instance, Wang and colleagues [50] synthesized Ti2CCl2 via CVD. The carpet-like Ti2CCl2 sheets, perpendicular to the metal, were formed through the reaction of methane and titanium tetrachloride on the titanium surface. These MXene carpets underwent buckling under certain growth conditions, forming vesicles that separated from the substrate.

3.2. Synthesis of MXene-Based Heterostructures

3.2.1. Hydrothermal/Solvothermal Reaction

The hydrothermal/solvothermal method is the in situ growth of oxides, sulfides, or selenides, etc., on the surface of MXene by promoting precursor decomposition and crystallization using solvents in a closed high-temperature and high-pressure environment. For example, a NiS2/Ti3C2Tx heterostructure was synthesized through a two-step hydrothermal route. Ni ions were in situ self-assembled on the surface of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets during the first hydrothermal process, facilitated by the abundant surface groups (including –OH, –O, etc.). Subsequently, NiS2/Ti3C2Tx was obtained through a hydrothermal sulfuration reaction [51].

3.2.2. Electrostatic Self-Assembly

Due to the presence of negatively charged functional groups, such as –OH, –O, and –F, on the surface of MXene nanosheets, they can easily adsorb positively charged ions or materials through electrostatic interaction. Subsequently, MXene-based heterostructures can be formed either through in situ self-assembly or chemical reaction on the MXene surface. Post-treatment operations, such as carbonization or phosphorization, can also be combined for further transformation. For example, positively charged Co and Ni ions were adsorbed onto the negatively charged surfaces of MXenes through electrostatic interactions. Then, assisted by NH3 H2O, the NiCo-precursor underwent in situ self-assembly on the MXenes’ surfaces to form an LDHs-MXenes heterostructure [52].

3.2.3. Lewis Acid Etching and Subsequent Chemical Conversion

Through Lewis acid molten-salt etching, the A-site in the MAX phase can be replaced by transition metal atoms, introducing tightly anchored metal particles on MXenes, which are then transformed into heterostructures through chemical conversions such as selenization or sulfurization. For example, Ti3AlC2 and CoCl2 were reacted to synthesize a Ti3C2Tx@Co hybrid at 750 °C in a molten state. Due to the coordinatively unsaturated nature, Co2+ is a strong electron acceptor and serves as a Lewis acid in molten salt, providing an acidic environment and breaking the weak bonds of Al atoms in Ti3AlC2. Meanwhile, Co2+ was reduced in situ. The Ti3C2Tx@CoSe2 heterostructure was then obtained through a selenization process [53].

3.2.4. Partial Transformation of MXenes

The partial transformation of MXene is realized by means of oxidation, etc., to form a heterostructure. For example, the oxidation treatment of Ta4C3 MXene using dilute H2O2 resulted in the significant exposure of Ta atoms on its surface. Subsequent calcination under an Ar/H2 atmosphere resulted in the formation of a Ta4C3-Ta2O5 heterostructure [54].

3.2.5. Vacuum Filtration Self-Assembly

The dispersion of MXene with other nanomaterials was vacuum-filtered into a film to form a layered heterostructure. For example, a uniform dispersion of MXene/deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-CNT was obtained through a blending process. In the subsequent vacuum filtration process, driven by self-assembly, interconnected networks were formed between DNA and MXene through π–π stacking and coordination interactions, leading to the formation of a DNA-CNT/MXene heterostructure [55].

4. Construction of MXene-Based Heterostructured Hybrid Separators

MXene-based heterostructures can prevent the self-stacking defects of MXene nanosheets to fabricate three-dimensional (3D)/2D conductive heterostructures. The built-in electric field formed at the heterogeneous interfaces can accelerate the migration of charge carriers, the diffusion of lithium ions, and the anchoring/catalysis of polysulfides. Given the excellent properties of MXene and the superior multifunctional components, this structure serves as a functional material to modify PP separators, enabling outstanding Li-S battery performance. This section will summarize the recent research progress on MXene-based heterostructured hybrid separators in terms of MXene/inorganic metal, MXene/inorganic nonmetal, MXene/organic framework and polymer, and MXene/carbon heterostructured materials.

4.1. MXene/Inorganic Metal Heterostructures

Polar-metal materials, including metal sulfides, selenides, oxides, and phosphides, show great potential in capturing polysulfides and catalytically accelerating their conversion reactions to improve redox kinetics. However, separators modified with metal compounds alone exhibit an inadequate electrochemical performance due to their relatively poor conductivity, their single chemical adsorption of LiPSs, and the tendency of nanoparticles to aggregate. Combining metal compounds with high-conductivity MXene substrates to construct heterostructured hybrid separators offers significant advantages.

4.1.1. MXene/Metal Sulfide Heterostructures

Metal sulfides, especially transition-metal sulfides, are highly effective in regulating the shuttle effect due to their strong chemical adsorption of LiPSs. This can be attributed to the special polarized surface generated by the metal-S polar bonds, as well as the strong chemical interaction between the metal sulfides and LiPSs [51]. They also serve as efficient catalysts in Li-S batteries, particularly when combined with MXene, and are highly favored. Wang et al. [51] synthesized a NiS2/MXene (Ti3C2Tx) heterostructure with mesoporous structures through the two-step hydrothermal reaction (Figure 2a), in which 0D ultrafine NiS2 nanoparticles were in situ self-assembled onto 2D conductive MXene nanosheets (Figure 2b). Thanks to the enhanced chemical adsorption, abundant catalytic active sites, and high electronic conductivity of the NiS2/MXene-modified separator, the hybrid separator exhibited remarkable characteristics in capturing and converting LiPSs and achieved efficient transfer pathways for electrons/ions. As a result, Li-S batteries with modified separators demonstrate an outstanding rate performance and cycling stability. Transition-metal disulfides, such as CoS2 [56], MoS2 [57], WS2 [58], and VS2 [59], as well as VS4 [60], ZnS [61], and Co1-xS [62], when combined with MXene to form heterostructured hybrid separators, have also demonstrated good performance in Li-S batteries. Single-component active materials usually struggle to balance the “adsorption–catalysis” throughout the entire redox process due to the multi-stage phase transitions of sulfur. Accordingly, multi-heterostructured catalysts have been emerging, and their multi-component synergistic catalytic effect on the adsorption–conversion of LiPSs is remarkable. Li et al. [63] prepared the heterostructure of ZnS/MoS2@MXene nanosheets uniformly anchored on MXene by hydrothermal and ultrasonic processes (Figure 2c–e). The heterogeneous interface of ZnS/MoS2@MXene can promote the efficient adsorption, catalysis, and conversion of LiPSs, thereby suppressing the shuttle effect and significantly enhancing the sulfur redox kinetics. The Li-S battery with the ZnS/MoS2@MXene modified separator achieved 1504.4 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C and still maintained a high discharge capacity of 741 mAh g−1 after 500 cycles at 1C (Figure 2f). There is also the Bi2S3/MoS2@MX heterostructure studied by Li et al. [31], the MXene/MoS2/SnS@C heterostructure studied by Cui et al. [64], and MXene/NiS2/Co3S4 heterostructure reported by Wang et al. [65]. In the research by Li et al. [31], attributed to the synergistic effect of the heterostructure, the sulfur utilization was enhanced, and the corrosion of the lithium anode was reduced. Ultimately, the battery demonstrated an excellent long-term cycling performance, with a decay rate of only 0.069% per cycle for 500 cycles at 2 C.

4.1.2. MXene/Metal Selenide Heterostructures

Transition-metal selenides not only possess high electrical conductivity and strong bonding with LiPSs, but their unique d-electron configuration also endows them with exceptional electrocatalytic properties for LiPS conversion [66]. Research has shown that CoSe2 possesses conductivity comparable to metals and can effectively capture LiPSs through strong S-Co and Li-Se bonds [67,68]. For example, Han’s team [53] prepared a heterostructure with CoSe2 nanoparticles strongly anchored on an MXene substrate through Lewis acidic etching and subsequent selenization. The Ti3C2Tx@CoSe2 heterostructure exhibited high conductivity and catalyzed the conversion of LiPSs. The heterostructured hybrid separator significantly improved the performance of Li-S batteries. In addition, Zhou et al. [69] synthesized an Fe3Se4/FeSe@MXene heterostructure by in situ growth and selenization (Figure 3a). The MXene framework effectively captured polysulfides, while the Fe3Se4/FeSe heterostructure primarily served a catalytic role. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations confirmed that the interface engineering of Fe3Se4/FeSe increased the density of states at the Fermi level and reduced the activation energy for Li2S decomposition, and the internal electric field accelerated the charge transfer. In situ Raman spectroscopy detected the changes in the intensity of S62− during the discharge/charge process, confirming the good reversibility of the electrochemical reaction (Figure 3b–e).
Differing from the above, Zhang’s group [70] designed multi-heterostructured MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2 catalysts using a combination of vulcanization and selenization, which consisted of single-layer MXene, Fe3S4 nanosheets, and FeSe2 nanoclusters (Figure 3f). The results confirmed that the heterostructure between MXene and Fe3S4 was constructed through chemical bonds, forming free charge carriers on both sides of the contact interface, resulting in an internal electric field. A large number of unsaturated sites contributed to the formation of a vacancy-rich heterostructure of Fe3S4 and FeSe2 (Figure 3g). As such, this heterostructure was rich in multiple catalytic active centers, exhibiting a good synergy of conduction–adsorption–catalysis. The Li-S battery assembled with MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2 achieved an initial discharge capacity of 1185.6 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C. Under a high sulfur loading of 8.16 mg cm−2, the capacity retention after 135 cycles was as high as 82.4% (Figure 3h).

4.1.3. MXene/Other Inorganic Metal Heterostructures

Metal oxides possess high polar surfaces due to metal–oxygen (M-O) bonds, which can chemically bond with LiPSs, thereby fixing sulfur and inhibiting the shuttle effect [71]. Lee et al. [72] successfully designed a nano-whisker-like H2Ti3O7 grown on MXene (M-HTO-0.5) using MXene-derived hydrogenation and ion exchange processes. The multifunctional synergistic effect of the M-HTO-0.5 heterostructured hybrid separator effectively limited the shuttle of LiPSs and the growth of lithium dendrites. As a result, the Li-S battery with the hybrid separator could achieve a stable long-term cycling performance even at 5.0 C. Wang et al. [73] improved the surface structure and electronic distribution of MXene by introducing Nb atoms. They synthesized a Ti3−yNbyC2Tx/TiO2 heterostructure (O-Ti3−yNbyC2Tx) by in situ oxidizing Ti3−yNbyC2Tx MXene in anhydrous ethanol, which was applied in the separators and cathodes of Li-S batteries, demonstrating a superior performance. In addition, a one-stone–two-birds strategy to suppress the shuttling of polysulfides and protect the lithium anode was proposed by Liang et al. [54], which involved constructing a Ta4C3-Ta2O5 heterostructured hybrid separator. As shown in Figure 4a, this novel MXene (Ta4C3) derivative heterostructure effectively combined the structural advantages of Ta4C3 and Ta2O5, providing a synergistic effect for LiPS capture and redox reactions. Furthermore, even at a high current density of 20 mA cm−2/20 mAh cm−2, the hysteresis voltage of the Li||Ta4C3-Ta2O5||Li symmetric cell could still maintain a stable plateau curve (Figure 4b). The optical profilometry images (insets in Figure 4b) also indicate that the lithium surface of Ta4C3-Ta2O5@C-PP exhibits uniformity and low roughness after plating. Metal tellurides have attracted special research interest due to their unique ionic transport dynamics and high conductivity. Li et al. [74] constructed a catalytic 3D Co0.5Ni0.5Te2/MXene heterostructure through a gelation process assisted by bimetallic ions (Ni2+ and Co2+) and subsequent tellurization (Figure 4c–e). Notably, Ni2+ and Co2+ served as cross-linking agents, collaboratively achieving and regulating the 3D macroporous structures (Figure 4d), thereby enriching the multifunctional active sites. As a result, the Li-S battery with a Co0.5Ni0.5Te2/MXene hybrid separator showed a minimum decay rate of only 0.0227% per cycle for 500 cycles at 1 C (Figure 4f). Even under high sulfur loading (9.20 mg cm−2) and low electrolyte/sulfur ratio (E/S = 6.2 µL mg−1) (Figure 4g), the battery could achieve a capacity of 8.46 mAh cm−2, which clearly exceeds the capacity of typical commercial lithium-ion batteries (areal capacity of 4 mAh cm−2) throughout the entire cycle. Furthermore, there are also heterostructured hybrid separators constructed with MXene, such as CoxP [75,76], Co2B [77], WSSe [78], and layered double hydroxides (LDHs) [52], all of which can achieve comparable effects. Additionally, some MXene-derived metallic compound heterostructures, such as Co@M-TiO2/C [79], HPCA-TO [80], TiN@C [81], and CoFe/FeN0.0324/TiN [82], could be easily constructed and were effective for trapping LiPSs and accelerating redox kinetics when used as functional separator coatings.
The MXene/inorganic metal heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries are summarized in Table 2. It can be seen that studies on MXene/metal sulfide heterostructures account for a significant portion of the field. This can be attributed to the strong anchoring–catalytic ability of sulfides toward LiPSs, as well as the excellent structural compatibility between MXene and sulfides, which facilitates the formation of tight 2D/2D heterointerfaces. Additionally, the synthetic process of sulfides (e.g., hydrothermal) is highly compatible with the liquid-phase processing of MXene. In general, the unique polar surface of inorganic metallic materials can significantly inhibit shuttling through strong chemical adsorption, resulting in Li-S batteries with MXene/inorganic metal heterostructured hybrid separators exhibiting an initial capacity generally above 900 mAh g−1 at a relatively high rate of 1C. The superiority of such materials lies in the enhanced catalytic conversion kinetics due to the interfacial electronic coupling of metal ions with different valence states. However, the heterostructures of MXene with other inorganic metals remain to be explored, and the volume expansion leading to limited long-term cycling stability has to be considered for the metal components.

4.2. MXene/Inorganic Non-Metal Heterostructures

g-C3N4 is a unique 2D carbon nitride compound with abundant intrinsic defects and highly polarized sites commonly used in Li-S batteries [83]. However, the excessive substitution of nitrogen atoms in the carbon network significantly weakens the conductivity of g-C3N4. In light of this, Wang et al. [83] synthesized a 2D porous g-C3N4/MXene (CN-MX) heterostructure with numerous intrinsic defects through electrostatic adhesion and in situ thermal polycondensation (Figure 5a–c). MXene nanosheets act as charge transport channels, while the CN layer ensures the rapid dissociation of solvated Li+ and the smooth diffusion of free Li+. The heterogeneous interface also provides active sites to accelerate redox reactions. The CN-MX heterostructure-modified separator exhibited excellent Li-S battery performances, especially under low-temperature and high-sulfur-loading conditions. At a low temperature of 0 °C, the capacity retention rate of the cell was as high as 91.6% at 0.5 C and reached 695 mAh g−1 at 2.0 C (Figure 5d,e). This work provides new ideas for MXene-based heterostructured hybrid separators in Li-S batteries to adapt to various extreme operating conditions and realize energy storage batteries with excellent performances and low cost. BN is a low-bandgap semiconductor material with strong adsorption and catalytic capabilities, and the heterogeneous structures of BN and MXene are potentially complementary [84]. Wang’s team [84] designed a BN@Mxene heterostructure with a staggered layered structure as a functional interlayer of the separator. This unique structure provides a pathway for the smooth transportation of Li+ and physically blocks the shuttle of LiPSs to some extent. In addition, the effective catalytic role of BN@MXene in the conversion of Li2S6 to Li2S was demonstrated by studying the change in Gibbs free energy and the optimized absorption models during the reduction of S8 on BN@MXene and MXene. The Li-S battery with a BN@MXene heterostructured interlayer delivered a reversible charge capacity of 404.9 mAh g−1 after 700 cycles at a current density of 1 C, with an extremely low decay of 0.058% per cycle.
Inorganic non-metals, represented by 2D g-C3N4 and BN (Table 2), are suitable complementary heterostructures with MXene due to their peculiar inherent defects and polar surface groups. Yet, most of the inorganic non-metals have low intrinsic conductivity and weak adsorption ability for LiPSs, which leads to insufficient capability in interfacial charge transfer and polysulfide anchoring when forming heterostructures with MXene. Given this, studies on MXene/inorganic non-metal heterostructured hybrid separators are limited, but their special merits in thermal stability and mechanical strength still make them promising, requiring further development.

4.3. MXene/Organic Framework and Polymer Heterostructures

Two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks (COFs) represent one type of porous material characterized by robust covalent bonds and periodic structural units [85,86], featuring high porosity, excellent stability, and tunable chemical properties [87,88]. The well-defined porous configuration of COFs facilitates the diffusion of lithium ions directly, while N atoms function as lithium-affinitive sites, improving the interface contact with LiPSs and thereby offering significant potential for Li-S batteries [32]. Regrettably, the electronic insulating properties and low redox behavior of COFs significantly hinder the swift transformation of LiPSs. The creation of an MXene/COF heterostructure, an organic–inorganic hybrid material, merges a superior pore architecture with elevated conductivity, forming a complementary interface on the separator of Li-S batteries. Yang et al. [89] enabled the slow growth of COFs with two different pore sizes inside and on the surface of MXene nanosheets by an in situ polymerization reaction. The N sites in the COF monomer were covalently bonded to the Ti sites exposed on the surface of MXene, thus realizing the bridging. This promoted the complementary strengths of MXene and COF to facilitate rapid polysulfide conversion. The suitable pore structure could limit polysulfide shuttling while regulating Li+ flux for uniform lithium deposition. As expected, the MXene@COF integrated separator enabled Li||Li symmetric batteries to achieve up to 4750 h of stable lithium plating/stripping at 10 mA cm−2. Also, the assembled Li-S batteries had a high capacity of 584/563 mAh g−1 at 3 C. Moreover, in the work by Li et al. [32], TBCOFs were obtained by the Schiff-base condensation reaction and then in situ grafted onto the MXene surface at room temperature. As shown in Figure 6a, spherical TBCOF particles grew uniformly on the surface of the MXene nanosheets and formed the MXene@TBCOF heterostructure (Figure 6b). This symbiotic partnership between MXene and TBCOF diminished the Li-S bonds, thereby concurrently suppressing the shuttle effect of LiPSs and acting as a precision sieve for the regulation of ion transport. DFT calculation is displayed in Figure 6c. The blue isosurfaces represent the decrease of the charge density and the yellow regions denote the accumulation of electron density. It is clear that at the TBCOF@MXene heterogeneous interface, more electrons accumulate on the TBCOF side, while the MXene side retains a large number of electron holes (positive charges), suggesting that the presence of a gradient built-in electric field within MXene@TBCOF, which enhances the efficiency of lithium-ion transportation. A battery equipped with an MXene@TBCOF separator achieved excellent cyclability at a current density of 1C over 1500 cycles with a capacity decay rate of only 0.0191% per cycle (Figure 6d). Even with a sulfur content as high as 9.31 mg cm−2, the battery showed an exceptional area capacity of 7.14 mAh cm−2 after 90 cycles. Similarly, Li’s group [90] constructed a PP separator coating consisting of guanidinium-based ionic–covalent organic nanosheets (iCON) uniformly loaded on Ti3C2 nanosheets (Ti3C2@iCON) to exert electrostatic attraction and catalytic effects on polysulfides. The modified separator was effective even at a sulfur content of 90 wt% and a sulfur loading of 7.6 mg cm−2. Additionally, based on the excellent porosity and abundant active sites of the metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), their combination with the high conductivity of MXene can synergistically enhance the performance of Li-S batteries [91,92]. Maryam Sadat Kiai’s research team [93] adopted this idea by coating a glass fiber separator with a conductive Ti3C2Tx nanosheet/Fe-MOF or Ti3C2Tx nanosheet/Cu-MOF layer as the polysulfide trapping layer. Short- and long-chain polysulfides captured on the surface of the separator were reduced to sulfur by accepting electrons from the MXene to improve sulfur utilization. Porous Fe/MOF and Cu/MOF could be used as lithium-ion sieves to intercept polysulfides and reduce the growth of lithium dendrites. The Li-S batteries achieved significant improvements in discharge capacity, cycle stability, and electrochemical conversion through this clever design.
Alternatively, multilayer coatings of MXene/organic polymer material separators can be prepared by the vacuum-assisted layer-by-layer assembly process. Wang et al. [94] formed a stable suspension of porous MXene obtained by etching (Figure 7a–c) and aramid nanofiber (ANF) (Figure 7d,e), followed by layer-by-layer deposition by vacuum filtration to prepare the multilayer holey MXene/ANF (HMA) separator (Figure 7f). The etching process produced hierarchical nanoporous structures (15–30 nm) and various functional groups (–OH; –O) on the surface of the MXene substrate, which shortened the ion channels in the re-stacked films and enhanced the adsorption of LiPSs. The negative charges of the ANF widened the interlayer spacing between the porous MXene nanosheets and prevented them from re-stacking, which further facilitated the ion transport, as illustrated in Figure 7g. The Li-S batteries with the HMA separator had a long cycle life of 3500+ cycles at 3 C with a capacity decay of 0.013% per cycle (Figure 7h). By a similar approach, Wang’s group [95] deposited MXene and Nafion chains onto one side of a PP separator (Figure 7i), attributing that the physical resistance of MXene and the cationic permselectivity of Nafion could synergistically inhibit the shuttling effect to achieve the good cycling stability of the Li-S batteries (Figure 7j). Specifically, the −SO3 groups on Nafion produced strong electrostatic repulsion for negatively charged polysulfides and simultaneously electrostatic attraction for positively charged Li+, so Nafion has cation permselective effect that ensured rapid Li+ transport and inhibited polysulfide transmission. The work highlighted the full synergistic effect of organic and inorganic components in such layered nanostructures. Furthermore, taking the layered GO-Nafion as an example, the research further validated the versatility of this mindset. Furthermore, the monocarboxylic pillar [5] arene (PA5-COOH) was successfully grafted onto Nb2CTx through an esterification reaction, resulting in the formation of the PA5-COOH/Nb2C hybrid separator. This design expanded the application potential of organic macrocyclic molecules [96].
The electrochemical performances of MXene/organic framework and polymer heterostructured hybrid separators are organized in Table 3. Such structures realize multi-level channels through the controllable modification of organic functional groups, effectively improving ionic conductivity while maintaining excellent flexibility. However, the low conductivity of the organic components necessitates ensuring a relatively thin coating (with a loading of less than 0.3 mg cm−2), and electrochemical instability hinders their long-term cycling performance.

4.4. MXene/Carbon Heterostructures

Carbonaceous materials offer the advantages of light weight, excellent electrical conductivity, large specific surface areas, and superior electrochemical stability to immobilize sulfur species, mitigate their volume change, and enhance electrochemical kinetics [97,98]. Carbonaceous materials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene oxide (GO), and 3D porous carbon are introduced into MXene, which not only form crosslinked electron pathways but also act as spacer insertion agents to prevent the buildup of MXene nanosheets [99,100,101]. As such, MXene/carbon material heterostructures have excellent performance in Li-S battery applications, which can effectively inhibit the shuttle effect of polysulfides and improve the cycling stability and capacity of cells.
Jiang et al. [102] prepared a nitrogen-doped Ti3C2/carbon 2D heterostructure (N-Ti3C2/C) as a commercial PP separator coating by in situ decorating ZIF-67 nanoparticles on 2D ultra-thin Ti3C2 nanosheets and subsequent heat treatment (Figure 8a). It should be emphasized that, as shown in Figure 8b, the surface of Ti3C2 was not fully covered by the ZIF-67 nanoparticles but left a large active Lewis acid adsorption surface. The surfaces of the prepared N-Ti3C2/C 2D nanosheets showed a highly developed porous structure (Figure 8c). N-Ti3C2/C@PP could not only effectively prevent the shuttling of polysulfides but also successfully inhibited the growth of lithium dendrites, enabling Li-S batteries to exhibit good electrochemical performances. Shao’s research team [103] prepared a carbon-coated nitrogen and vanadium co-doped MXene (denoted as CNVM) separator coating using a simple one-pot mixing and calcination method. The structure of MXene changed due to the doping of heteroatoms, creating more anchoring sites for LiPSs and promoting the migration of charge carriers. The conductivity was further enhanced by the N-doped carbon while also increasing its chemical affinity with LiPSs. The pouch cells assembled with CNVM could still maintain a stable electrochemical performance and excellent operational characteristics under the high sulfur loading of 7.2 mg cm−2, which demonstrated its practical potential. It is worth mentioning that Zhang and colleagues [104] adopted an innovative one-pot etching method to successfully prepare a fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx with hierarchical porous nitrogen-doped carbon (HPNC) encapsulation, which exhibited adjustable coordination chemistry characteristics. Figure 8d shows a schematic of a gradually etching Ti3AlC2 MAX using room-temperature molten salt (RTMS), which includes the intermediate products of etching (route 1), fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx (route 2), and fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx equipped with the Ti-N structural coordination (route 3). The unique coordination structure between Ti and N in Ti3C2 MXene arises from Ti-based phase reconstruction. The synergistic effect between the Ti-N coordination structure and HPNC enhances the binding energy, reduces the energy barrier, accelerates the redox kinetics, and helps in the stable fixation of polysulfides. This work provides an innovative and universal etching method for synthesizing fluoride-free MXenes with a tunable coordination chemistry.
There are also MXene/carbon hybrid separators produced using vacuum filtration technology, in which the MXene and carbon materials are pushed and stacked or combined in certain ways to form structures with heterogeneous properties through meticulous design and operation. Li et al. [55] first modified CNTs using DNA, which resulted in the uniform distribution of CNTs in water due to the formation of intermolecular π–π stacking between the aromatic bases in the DNA and the unpaired electrons on the surface of the CNTs under ultrasound. Then, the DNA-CNT/MXene/PP hybrid separator was obtained by the vacuum filtration of the aqueous solution of MXene and DNA-CNT, as shown in Figure 8e. There are multiple interactions between DNA molecules and MXene nanosheets. More specifically, the base pairs/phosphate backbone of DNA interact with the graphite structure/titanium elements of MXene through π–π stacking and coordination, forming an interconnected network (see Figure 8e). It is for this reason that the DNA-wrapped CNTs are anchored to the surface of the MXene nanosheets, which not only ensures the smooth flow of the conductive channels but also prevents the re-stacking of the MXene nanosheets. This unique structure not only has an excellent effect on the shuttle of polysulfide and electrolyte wettability but also exhibits high thermal resistance (even at 180 °C) and flame retardancy. This results in the excellent operating performance of Li-S batteries applying the modified separator over a wide temperature range from 25 to 100 °C (Figure 8f). Similarly, CNTs/MXene-PP [105] and Ti3C2Tx/CNTs 10%-PP [106] hybrid separators were also fabricated by CNTs’ surface modification combined with vacuum filtration.
Table 4 encapsulates the electrochemical performance of the MXene/carbon heterostructured hybrid separators. The heterostructure of MXene and carbon material demonstrated a better overall performance. The 3D interconnection of the conductive network enhances the discharge capacity, while the physical–chemical synergistic adsorption effectively reduces the capacity decay rate. The main limitation of this heterostructure lies in the complex preparation process, often requiring high-temperature annealing, which results in high costs.

5. Conclusions and Prospects

5.1. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a comprehensive review of the construction of MXene-based heterostructures for the modification of Li-S battery separators, including the categories of MXene/metal sulfides, MXene/metal selenides, MXene/other inorganic metals, MXene/inorganic non-metals, MXene/organic frameworks and polymers, and MXene/carbon materials, and discussed the efficacy of these heterostructured hybrid separators in facilitating polysulfide conversion and enhancing the safety of lithium anodes. MXenes, with their unique surface functional groups and high conductivity, are responsible for anchoring LiPSs and promoting electron conduction, while the inorganic/organic heterogeneous materials on their surface act as excellent catalysts, boosting and regulating the conversion of sulfur and lithium. In addition, the built-in electric field formed at the heterojunction interface can induce charge redistribution, which significantly optimizes ion transport while building a multi-site adsorption–catalytic network for LiPSs. Integrating the aforementioned properties, the Li-S batteries with MXene-based heterostructured hybrid separators are like a tiger with wings, exhibiting an extraordinary electrochemical performance.
For the construction of MXene-based heterostructures for separator modification, firstly, we summarized the general principles for adjusting the surface chemistry of MXenes to enhance their electrochemical performance. MXenes hold a unique allure owing to their tunable transition metals and surface functional groups. The structure and composition of MXenes can be controlled by atomic substitution and solid solution strategies. The incorporation of heteroatoms can induce electron redistribution and refine the surface structure of MXenes, which is conducive to promoting electron transfer at the reaction interface and further improving the electronic conductivity of MXenes. Importantly, the heteroatoms have an ameliorating effect on the catalysis of LiPSs, thus enhancing the electrochemical cycling stability. The functionalization and modification of the terminal groups of MXenes are also effective means to further enhance the catalytic-adsorption effect. Moreover, the tunable coordination chemical environment of MXenes can be gradually realized through an etching process to improve the binding energy and lower the energy barrier, which benefits the stabilization and conversion of polysulfides. Secondly, effective strategies for designing heterostructures were outlined. For the construction of heterostructures, commonly used designs include the in situ growth of heterogeneous materials on the MXene substrate by chemical reaction or electrostatic self-assembly, obtaining heterostructures by Lewis acid molten-salt etching combined with subsequent chemical transformation, partially converting MXene in situ into its derivatives, laying organic precursors around the MXene and then carbonizing to obtain carbon-based heterostructures, etc. Through the above methods, we can reasonably arrange the interface structure, ensuring the synergistic effect between heterogeneous materials and thereby achieving a significant improvement in key performances.

5.2. Prospects

A vast accumulation of research has confirmed the enormous potential of MXene-based heterostructure-modified separators in the development of high-performance Li-S batteries. However, the research on MXene-based heterostructures is still progressing steadily in the face of ongoing challenges, while the development of Li-S batteries based on MXene-based heterostructures still requires great effort.
(1)
An atomic-scale understanding of MXene termination effects is needed. Although the terminal groups are known to influence MXene’s adsorption and catalytic properties, their site-specific interactions with polysulfides (e.g., their preferential adsorption on –O vs. –F sites) remain ambiguous due to the lack of dynamic operando characterization tools. By integrating operando testing techniques with DFT simulations, it is possible to correlate the real-time distribution of S species with termination-dependent adsorption energies.
(2)
A rational design of the heterointerface charge distribution should be developed. The interfacial electric field in MXene-based heterostructures mainly relies on empirical regulation, lacking precise control over the direction and intensity of charge transfer. By designing the Janus-type heterostructure with asymmetric surface terminations, the internal spontaneous electric field can be created to directionally confine LiPSs. In addition, microscopic probe techniques, such as in situ Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), can be used to directly measure the change in the potential distribution at the heterogeneous interface during charging and discharging, which may establish the quantitative relationship between the charge gradient and polysulfide conversion efficiency.
(3)
The expansion of MXene chemical diversity should be undertaken. MXenes, as a large family of 2D materials, have over 100 stoichiometric phases. Yet, only about 30 kinds of MXenes have been successfully synthesized to date, with most research focusing on Ti-based MXenes. Given the vast number of MXene family members and their tunable termination properties, this presents vast and limitless opportunities for realizing high-performance Li-S batteries. Therefore, exploring new MXene species with enhanced stability and electrochemical properties is a promising and intriguing research direction.
(4)
Scalable manufacturing and economic feasibility should be addressed. Laboratory-scale MXene synthesis (e.g., HF etching) and coating processes (e.g., vacuum filtration) face severe challenges in cost control and industrial compatibility, particularly in achieving ultra-thin but defect-free MXene coatings required for high-energy-density batteries. For the synthesis of low-cost MXenes, developing Lewis acid salts or molten salts as substitutes for HF not only aligns with the principles of green chemistry but also helps reduce production costs. It is also possible to recycle MXene-based materials from waste separators, improving material recycling. For the low-cost industrialization of MXene-based hybrid separators with ultra-thin coatings, one could attempt to develop a 2D MXene self-assembled monolayer deposition process, which would greatly reduce the loading while still effectively blocking polysulfides. Meanwhile, in combination with the roll-to-roll manufacturing technique, it is possible to develop a coating process suitable for the large-scale production of MXene-based separators with ultra-thin coatings.
Overall, this review sought to emphasize the great advantages of MXene-based heterostructures for Li-S battery separator modification, extracting the general principles of heterostructure design, identifying the specific challenges, and suggesting possible research directions. This provides strong guidance for Li-S battery separator modification based on MXene-based heterostructures, offering a unique contribution.

Author Contributions

X.Z., M.M. and J.Z. conceived the idea, revised this manuscript, and supervised this project; G.J. performed the literature search and drafted this manuscript; Z.W. and T.X. performed the literature search; and T.W. helped to revise this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [no. ZR2023QB051], the Initial Scientific Research Fund of Liaocheng University [no. 318052280], and the Science and Technology Research Program of the Hubei Provincial Department of Education [Q20231806].

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhou, L.; Mai, L. Rechargeable metal (Li, Na, Mg, Al)-sulfur batteries: Materials and advances. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 61, 104–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ji, X.; Nazar, L.F. Advances in Li-S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 9821–9826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheng, Q.; Chen, Z.X.; Li, X.Y.; Hou, L.P.; Bi, C.X.; Zhang, X.Q.; Huang, J.Q.; Li, B.Q. Constructing a 700 Wh kg−1 -level rechargeable lithium-sulfur pouch cell. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 76, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fang, R.; Zhao, S.; Sun, Z.; Wang, D.W.; Cheng, H.M.; Li, F. More reliable lithiumsulfur batteries: Status, solutions and prospects. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, S.; Zou, K.; Qian, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, G. Insight to the synergistic effect of N-doping level and pore structure on improving the electrochemical performance of sulfur/N-doped porous carbon cathode for Li-S batteries. Carbon 2019, 144, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peng, H.J.; Huang, J.Q.; Cheng, X.B.; Zhang, Q. Review on high-loading and highenergy lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fang, M.; Han, J.; He, S.; Ren, J.C.; Li, S.; Liu, W. Effective screening descriptor for MXenes to enhance sulfur reduction in lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 12601–12608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tang, T.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, B.; Li, W.; Xu, J.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Hou, Y. Multifunctional V3S4-nanowire/graphene composites for high performance Li-S batteries. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 1910–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shi, C.; Yu, M. Flexible solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries based on structural designs. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 57, 429–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, Z.; Li, S.; Sun, M.; He, R.; Zhong, W.; Yu, C.; Cheng, S.; Xie, J. Fluorobenzene diluted low-density electrolyte for high-energy density and high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 68, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sul, H.; Bhargav, A.; Manthiram, A. Lithium Trithiocarbonate as a Dual-Function Electrode Material for High-Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2200680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, H.J.; Wang, D.W.; Huang, J.Q.; Cheng, X.B.; Yuan, Z.; Wei, F.; Zhang, Q. Janus Separator of polypropylene-supported cellular graphene framework for sulfur cathodes with high utilization in Lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Pasta, M.; Zhou, G.; Li, Y.; Liu, W.; Xiong, F.; Cui, Y. Entrapment of Polysulfides by a black-phosphorus-modified separator for Lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9797–9803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, H.; Alcoutlabi, M.; Toprakci, O.; Xu, G.; Watson, J.V.; Zhang, X. Preparation and characterization of electrospun nanofiber-coated membrane separators for lithium-ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 18, 2451–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, B.; Guo, W.; Fu, Y. Anodized aluminum oxide separators with aligned channels for high-performance LiS batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 5831–5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Shao, A.; Xiong, D.; Liu, J.; Lao, C.; Xi, K.; Lu, S.; Jiang, Q.; Yu, J.; et al. Recyclable cobalt-molybdenum bimetallic carbide modified separator boosts the polysulfide adsorption-catalysis of lithium sulfur battery. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 2443–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kong, Y.; Wang, L.; Mamoor, M.; Wang, B.; Qu, G.; Jing, Z.; Pang, Y.; Wang, F.; Yang, X.; Wang, D.; et al. Co/MoN invigorated bilateral kinetics modulation for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2310143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gu, H.; Jia, H.; Long, Z.; Yan, X. Niobium boride/graphene directing high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries derived from favorable surfacepassivation. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 8863–8875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghazi, Z.A.; He, X.; Khattak, A.M.; Khan, A.; Liang, B.; Iqbal, A.; Wang, J.; Sin, H.; Li, L.; Tang, Z. MoS2/Celgard separator as efficient polysulfide barrier for long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qin, J.; Li, B.; Huang, J.; Kong, L.; Chen, X.; Peng, H.; Xie, J.; Liu, R.; Zhang, Q. Graphene-based Fe-coordinated framework porphyrin as an interlayer for lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Z. MXene-based materials for electrochemical energy storage. J. Energy Chem. 2018, 27, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Naguib, M.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. Ten years of progress in the synthesis and development of MXenes. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2103393–2210402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, X.; Cao, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Wang, G. Engineering strategies and active site identiffcation of MXene-based catalysts for electrochemical conversion reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 3215–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Naguib, M.; Mashtalir, O.; Carle, J.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-dimensional transition metal carbides. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1322–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ronchi, R.M.; Arantes, J.T.; Santos, S.F. Synthesis, structure, properties and applications of MXenes: Current status and perspectives. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 18167–18188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khazaei, M.; Ranjbar, A.; Arai, M.; Sasaki, T.; Yunoki, S. Electronic properties and applications of MXenes: A theoretical review. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 2488–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Naguib, M.; Come, J.; Dyatkin, B.; Presser, V.; Taberna, P.L.; Simon, P.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. MXene: A promising transition metal carbide anode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2012, 16, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deysher, G.; Shuck, C.E.; Hantanasirisakul, K.; Frey, N.C.; Foucher, A.C.; Maleski, K.; Sarycheva, A.; Shenoy, V.B.; Stach, E.A.; Anasori, B.; et al. Synthesis of Mo4ValC4 MAX Phase and two-dimensional Mo4VC4 MXene with five atomic layers of transition metals. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 204–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eklund, P.; Rosen, J. Persson POÅ Layered ternary Mn+1AXn phases and their 2Dderivative MXene: An overview from a thin-fflm perspective. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 113001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gao, X.T.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, X.D.; Sun, K.N.; Xie, X.M.; Liu, Y.T.; Yu, J.Y.; Ding, B. Ultrathin MXene nanosheets decorated with TiO2 quantum dots as an efficient sulfur host toward fast and stable Li–S batteries. Small 2018, 14, 1802443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wei, C.; Tian, K.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, S.; Xi, B.; Feng, J. Boosting polysulffdes conversion kinetics through heterostructure optimization and electrons redistribution for robust lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Engin. J. 2024, 497, 154658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, T.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Hao, H.; Yu, Z.; Liu, H. Covalent organic frameworks integrated MXene as selective “ion-sieving” heterostructure catalyst for kinetics-reinforced Li–S batteries. Chem. Engin. J. 2024, 498, 155817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rehman, Z.; Khan, K.; Yao, S.; Nawaz, M.; Miotello, A.; Assiri, M.A.; Bashir, T.; Tamang, T.; Javed, M. Recent progress in MXene-based materials, synthesis, design, and application in lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater. Today Chem. 2024, 40, 102200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, X.; Kajiyama, S.; Iinuma, H.; Hosono, E.; Oro, S.; Moriguchi, I.; Okubo, M.; Yamada, A. Pseudocapacitance of MXene nanosheets for high-power sodium-ion hybrid capacitors. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, J.; Li, Q.; Shuck, C.E.; Maleski, K.; Alshareef, H.N.; Zhou, J.; Gogotsi, Y.; Huang, L. An aqueous 2.1 V pseudocapacitor with MXene and V-MnO2 electrodes. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zeraati, A.S.; Mirkhani, S.A.; Sun, P.; Naguib, M.; Braun, P.V.; Sundararaj, U. Improved synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXenes resulting in exceptional electrical conductivity, high synthesis yield, and enhanced capacitance. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 3572–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, X.; Kuklin, A.V.; Baev, A.; Ge, Y.; Ågren, H.; Zhang, H.; Prasad, P.N. Two-dimensional MXenes: From morphological to optical, electric, and magnetic properties and applications. Phys. Rep. 2020, 848, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gu, J.; Chen, H.; Shi, Y.; Cao, Z.; Du, Z.; Li, B.; Yang, S. Eliminating lightning-rod effect of lithium anodes via sine-wave analogous MXene layers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2201181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, D.; Wang, S.; Li, B.; Gong, Y.; Yang, S. Horizontal growth of lithium on parallelly aligned MXene layers towards dendrite-free metallic lithium anodes. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1901820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, L.i.; Yue, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, S.; Wang, W.; Lu, D.; Liu, X.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y. Synergistically accelerating adsorption-electrocataysis of sulfur species via interfacial built-in electric field of SnS2-MXene Mott-Schottky heterojunction in Li-S batteries. Small 2023, 19, 2206462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, S.; Wang, Z.; Lim, V.Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yang, H.Y. Recent advances in heterostructure engineering for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pang, J.; Chang, B.; Liu, H.; Zhou, W. Potential of MXenebased heterostructures for energy conversion and storage. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 78–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alferov, Z. The history and future of semiconductor heterostructures. Semiconductors 1998, 32, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, J.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhuo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lu, N.; Li, H.; Zhai, T. Back-gated van der Waals heterojunction manipulates local charges toward fine-tuning hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202203522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhuang, Z.; Xia, L.; Huang, J.; Zhu, P.; Li, Y.; Ye, C.; Xia, M.; Yu, R.; Lang, Z.; Zhu, J.; et al. Continuous modulation of electrocatalytic oxygen reduction activities of singleatom catalysts through p-n junction rectification. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 62, e202212335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, N.; Peng, J.; Ong, W.; Ma, T.; Arramel; Zhang, P.; Jiang, J.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, C. MXenes: An emerging platform for wearable electronics and looking beyond. Matter 2021, 4, 377–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, T.; Zhang, L.; Hou, Y. MXenes: Synthesis strategies and lithium-sulfur battery applications. eScience 2022, 2, 164–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tang, H.; Li, W.; Pan, L.; Tu, K.; Du, F.; Qiu, T.; Yang, J.; Cullen, C.; McEvoy, N.; Zhang, C. A robust, freestanding MXene-sulfur conductive paper for long-lifetime Li-S batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1901907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, L.; Orbay, M.; Luo, S.; Duluard, S.; Shao, H.; Harmel, J.; Rozier, P.; Taberna, P.; Simon, P. Exfoliation and delamination of Ti3C2Tx MXene prepared via molten salt etching route. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, D.; Zhou, C.; Filatov, A.; Cho, W.; Lagunas, F.; Wang, M.; Vaikuntanathan, S.; Liu, C.; Klie, R.; Talapin, D. Direct synthesis and chemical vapor deposition of 2D carbide and nitride MXenes. Science 2023, 379, 1242–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, X.; Guo, J.; Xu, K.; Li, Z.; Liu, S.; Sun, L.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H.; Liu, W. In situ self-assembled NiS2 nanoparticles on MXene nanosheets as multifunctional separators: Regulating shuttling effect and boosting redox reaction kinetics of lithium polysulfides. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 645, 158859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhen, M.; Meng, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, S.; Hu, Z.; Shen, B. Layered double Hydroxides-MXene heterointerfaces with abundant anion vacancies expediting sulfur redox kinetics for High-Performance Lithium–Sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 489, 151285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cai, L.; Ying, H.; Huang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Tan, H.; Han, Q.; Han, W. In-situ grown Ti3C2Tx@CoSe2 heterostructure as trapping-electrocatalyst for accelerating polysulffdes conversion in lithium-sulfur battery. Chem. Engin. J. 2023, 474, 145862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liang, Q.; Wang, S.; Jia, X.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Shao, D.; Feng, L.; Liao, J.; Song, H. MXene derivative Ta4C3-Ta2O5 heterostructure as bi-functional barrier for Li-S batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 151, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, Y.; Li, M.; Zhu, Y.C.; Song, S.; Li, S.N.; Aarons, J.; Tang, L.C.; Bae, J. Polysulffde-inhibiting, thermotolerant and nonffammable separators enabled by DNA co-assembled CNT/MXene networks for stable high-safety Li-S batteries. Compos. Part B 2023, 251, 110465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, C.; Li, Y.; Peng, W.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. In situ N-doped CoS2 anchored on MXene toward an efficient bifunctional catalyst for enhanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhu, F.; Tao, J.; Yan, M.; Huang, S.; Irshad, M.S.; Mei, T.; Lin, L.; Chen, Y.; Qian, J.; Wang, X. NiS2-MoS2@MXene heterostructures for enhancing polysulfide adsorption and conversion of Li-S battery. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2024, 39, e00868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, Q.; Liu, A.; Qiao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, C.; Lei, D.; Shi, X.; He, G.; Zhang, F. Mott-Schottky MXene@WS2 Heterostructure: Structural and Thermodynamic Insights and Application in Ultra Stable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. ChemSusChem 2023, 16, e202300507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, J.; Qiao, W.; Ling, L. In situ construction of 3D 1T-VS2/V2C heterostructures for enhanced polysulfide trapping and catalytic conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 2025, 681, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, D.; Zhu, T.; Shen, S.; Cao, Y.; Mao, Y.; Wang, W.; Bao, E.; Jiang, H. In situ synthesis of VS4/Ti3C2Tx MXene composites as modified separators for lithium-sulfur battery. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 2023, 650, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, R.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Qi, M.; Dai, B.; Wang, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; et al. In Situ Built ZnS/MXene Heterostructure by a Mild Method for Inhibiting Polysulfide Shuttle in Li-S Batteries. Chem. Eur. J. 2024, 30, e202403185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhu, T.; Chen, D.; Mao, Y.; Cao, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Jiang, H.; Shen, S.; Liao, Q. Hollow Structure Co1-xS/3D-Ti3C2Tx MXene Composite for Separator Modification of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2023, 15, 57088–57098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Li, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Huo, P. ZnS/MoS2 heterostructures on MXene: A strategy for improved polysulfide adsorption and conversion in Li-S batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 502, 158151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cui, Y.; Zhou, X.; Huang, X.; Xu, L.; Tang, S. Binary Transition-Metal Sulfides/MXene Synergistically Promote Polysulfide Adsorption and Conversion in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2023, 15, 49223–49232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Q.; Qiao, S.; Huang, C.; Wang, X.; Cai, C.; He, G.; Zhang, F. Multi-heterostructured MXene/NiS2/Co3S4 with S—Vacancies to Promote Polysulfide Conversion in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2024, 16, 24502–24513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ye, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Li, L.; Wu, F.; Chen, R. A high-efficiency CoSe electrocatalyst with hierarchical porous polyhedron nanoarchitecture for accelerating polysulfides conversion in Li–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2002168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, M.; Fan, L.; Sun, X.; Guan, B.; Jiang, B.; Wu, X.; Tian, D.; Sun, K.; Qiu, Y.; Yin, X.; et al. Nitrogen-doped CoSe2 as a bifunctional catalyst for high areal capacity and lean electrolyte of Li–S battery. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3041–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xu, J.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, B.; Jin, Y.; Jin, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, G. Heterostructure ZnSe-CoSe2 embedded with yolk-shell conductive dodecahedral as Two-in-one hosts for cathode and anode protection of Lithium-Sulfur full batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 47, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhou, X.; Cui, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, B.; Tang, S. Interface engineering of Fe3Se4/FeSe heterostructures encapsulated in MXene for boosting LiPS conversion and inhibiting shuttle effect. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 457, 141139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, Q.; Qiao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, C.; He, G.; Zhang, F. Vacancy-rich, multi-heterostructured MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2 catalyst for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 147100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ng, S.F.; Lau, M.Y.L.; Ong, W.J. Lithium-sulfur battery cathode design: Tailoring metal-based nanostructures for robust polysulfide adsorption and catalytic conversion. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2008654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, D.; Choi, C.; Park, J.B.; Jung, S.W.; Kim, D.W. Ingenious Separator Architecture: Revealing the Versatile 3D Heterostructured MXene-Hydrogen Titanate Electrocatalysts for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2024, 70, 103529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Q.; Deng, B.; Zhang, X.; Cao, L.; Wang, K.; Yao, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, H.; Xu, J. Partially oxidized Ti3-yNbyC2Tx MXene nanosheets as efficient sulfur hosts and separator modification for Li-S batteries. J. Mater. 2025, 11, 100920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Hao, H.; Yu, Z.; Liu, H. Electronic redistribution and fast delivery enabled by Co0.5Ni0.5Te2 grafting 3D MXene heterostructure for accelerating High-Durability sulfur redox kinetics. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ren, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, H.; Wu, H.; Bian, H.; Ma, Y.; Lu, H.; Tang, S.; Meng, X. CoP nanocages intercalated MXene nanosheets as a bifunctional mediator for suppressing polysulffde shuttling and dendritic growth in lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yang, K.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, P.; Zou, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhu, X.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Pan, L.; et al. Hierarchical pore CoxP@Ti3C2Tx foams prepared by Co2+ induced Self-assembly and in-situ “micron-reactor” phosphating for novel separator modification of lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2025, 512, 145456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guan, B.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, M.; Fan, L.; Zhang, N. The discovery of interfacial electronic interaction within cobalt boride@MXene for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 2249–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tian, S.; Liu, G.; Xu, S.; Han, C.; Tao, K.; Huang, J.; Peng, S. Deposition Mode Design of Li2S: Transmitted Orbital Overlap Strategy in Highly Stable Lithium-Sulfur Battery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 34, 2309437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chang, Z.; Liu, W.; Feng, J.; Lin, Z.; Shi, C.; Wang, T.; Lei, Y.; Zhao, X.; Song, J.; Wang, G. Cobalt/MXene-derived TiO2 Heterostructure as a Functional Separator Coating to Trap Polysulfide and Accelerate Redox Kinetics for Reliable Lithium-sulfur Battery. Batter. Supercaps 2024, 7, e202300516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shi, C.; Huang, J.; Tang, Y.; Cen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Fu, R. A hierarchical porous carbon aerogel embedded with small-sized TiO2 nanoparticles for high-performance Li-S batteries. Carbon 2023, 202, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fan, Y.; Liu, K.; Ali, A.; Chen, X.; Shen, P.K. 2D TiN@C sheets derived from MXene as highly efficient polysulfides traps and catalysts for lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 384, 138187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wan, P.; Guo, X.; Jing, S.; Li, S.; Lu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, H. Multicomponent synergy and simultaneous improvement of catalytic conversion and chemisorption of polysulfides via CoFe/FeN0.0324/TiN modified Li-S battery separator. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 504, 159014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, J.; Zuo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.; Qiao, W.; Ling, L. Defect-rich porous graphitic phase carbon nitride layer grafted MXene as desolvation promoter for efficient sulfur conversion in extremely harsh conditions. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 2024, 671, 692–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Song, Y.; Tang, P.; Wang, Y.; Bi, L.; Liang, Q.; Yao, Y.; Qiu, Y.; He, L.; Xie, Q.; Dong, P.; et al. Insight into Accelerating Polysulfides Redox Kinetics by BN@MXene Heterostructure for Li-S Batteries. Small 2023, 19, 2302386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lv, H.; Sa, R.; Li, P.; Yuan, D.; Wang, X.; Wang, R. Metalloporphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks composed of the electron donor-acceptor dyads for visible-light-driven selective CO2 reduction. Sci. China Chem. 2020, 63, 1289–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sun, T.; Xie, J.; Guo, W.; Li, D.; Zhang, Q. Covalent–Organic Frameworks: Advanced Organic Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1904199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lv, S.; Ma, X.; Ke, S.; Wang, Y.; Ma, T.; Yuan, S.; Jin, Z.; Zuo, J.L. Metal-coordinated covalent organic frameworks as advanced bifunctional hosts for both sulfur cathodes and lithium anodes in lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 9385–9394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sun, L.; Li, Z.; Zhai, L.; Moon, H.; Song, C.; Oh, K.S.; Kong, X.; Han, D.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, Y.; et al. Electrostatic polarity-regulated, vinylene-linked cationic covalent organic frameworks as an ionic sieve membrane for long-cyclable lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2024, 66, 103222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yang, K.; Zhao, F.; Li, J.; Yang, H.; Wang, Y.; He, Y. Designing Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Materials to Construct a Complementary Interface with Versatility for Li-S Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 16, 2410236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, P.; Lv, H.; Li, Z.; Meng, X.; Lin, Z.; Wang, R.; Li, X. The Electrostatic Attraction and Catalytic Effect Enabled by Ionic-Covalent Organic Nanosheets on MXene for Separator Modiffcation of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Phung, J.; Zhang, X.; Deng, W.; Li, G. An overview of MOF-based separators for lithium-sulfur batteries. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2022, 31, e00374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zheng, S.; Zhou, H.; Xue, H.; Braunstein, P.; Pang, H. Pillared-layer Ni-MOF nanosheets anchored on Ti3C2 MXene for enhanced electrochemical energy storage. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 614, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kiai, M.S.; Ponnada, S.; Eroglu, O.; Mansoor, M.; Aslfattahi, N.; Nguyen, V.; Gadkari, S.; Sharma, R.K. Ti3C2Tx nanosheet@Cu/Fe-MOF separators for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries: An experimental and density functional theory study. Dalton Trans. 2024, 53, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, Y.; Cecen, V.; Wang, S.; Zhao, L.; Liu, L.; Zhu, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, M. Biomimetic nacre-like aramid nanofiber-holey MXene composites for lithium-sulfur batteries. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2023, 4, 101592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, J.; Zhai, P.; Zhao, T.; Li, M.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Huang, J. Laminar MXene-Nafion-modified separator with highly inhibited shuttle effect for long-life lithiumesulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 320, 134558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, X.; He, D.; Liu, X.; Fu, C.; Gu, W.; Lu, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Supramolecular macrocycle grafted Nb-MXene nanosheets constructing self-supporting framework for high-performance lithium-sulphur batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 685, 161985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xiao, Z.; Li, Z.; Meng, X.; Wang, R. MXene-engineered lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 22730–22743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fan, L.; Li, M.; Li, X.; Xiao, W.; Chen, Z.; Lu, J. Interlayer material selection for lithium-sulfur batteries. Joule 2019, 3, 361–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, J.; Jia, L.; Lin, H.; Wang, J. Advances and prospects of 2D graphene-based materials/hybrids for lithium metal-sulfur full battery: From intrinsic property to catalysis modification. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2022, 3, 2100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, Y.; Xu, G.; Kang, Q.; Zhan, L.; Tang, W.; Yu, Y.; Shen, K.; Wang, H.; Chu, X.; Wang, J.; et al. Synergistic electrocatalysis of polysulfides by a nanostructured VS4-carbon nanofiber functional separator for high-performance lithiumsulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16812–16820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gueon, D.; Hwang, J.T.; Yang, S.B.; Cho, E.; Sohn, K.; Yang, D.K.; Moon, J.H. Spherical macroporous carbon nanotube particles with ultrahigh sulfur loading for lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jiang, G.; Zheng, N.; Chen, X.; Ding, G.; Li, Y.; Sun, F.; Li, Y. In-situ decoration of MOF-derived carbon on nitrogen-doped ultrathin MXene nanosheets to multifunctionalize separators for stable Li-S batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zheng, M.; Luo, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhou, M.; Guo, C.; Shi, Y.; Li, L.; Sun, Q.; Shi, B.; Yi, Z.; et al. Carbon-coated nitrogen, vanadium co-doped MXene interlayer for enhanced polysulffde shuttling inhibition in lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 2023, 580, 233445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, X.; Ni, Z.; Bai, X.; Shen, H.; Wang, Z.; Wei, C.; Tian, K.; Xi, B.; Xiong, S.; Feng, J. Hierarchical Porous N-doped Carbon Encapsulated Fluorine-free MXene with Tunable Coordination Chemistry by One-pot Etching Strategy for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2301349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, N.; Cao, W.; Liu, Y.; Ye, H.; Han, K. Impeding polysulffde shuttling with a three-dimensional conductive carbon nanotubes/MXene framework modiffed separator for highly efficient lithium-sulfur batteries. Colloids Surf. A 2019, 573, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, N.; Xie, Y.; Peng, S.; Xiong, X.; Han, K. Ultra-lightweight Ti3C2Tx MXene modified separator for Li-S batteries: Thickness regulation enabled polysulfide inhibition and lithium ion transportation. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 42, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Elements of MAX phase formation [33] (copyright 2024, ELSEVIER SCI LTD). (b) Schematic diagram of selective etching of Al layer from MAX phase to form Ti2CTx MXene [34] (copyright 2015, Springer Nature).
Figure 1. (a) Elements of MAX phase formation [33] (copyright 2024, ELSEVIER SCI LTD). (b) Schematic diagram of selective etching of Al layer from MAX phase to form Ti2CTx MXene [34] (copyright 2015, Springer Nature).
Molecules 30 01833 g001
Figure 2. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the synthetic procedure; (b) TEM and HRTEM (inset) images of the NiS2/MXene heterostructure [51] (copyright 2024, Elsevier). (c) Diagrammatic representation of the synthetic procedure, (d) TEM and (e) HRTEM images of the ZnS/MoS2@MXene heterostructure, and (f) long-term cycling test at 1C of the ZnS/MoS2@MXene hybrid separator [63] (copyright 2024, Elsevier).
Figure 2. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the synthetic procedure; (b) TEM and HRTEM (inset) images of the NiS2/MXene heterostructure [51] (copyright 2024, Elsevier). (c) Diagrammatic representation of the synthetic procedure, (d) TEM and (e) HRTEM images of the ZnS/MoS2@MXene heterostructure, and (f) long-term cycling test at 1C of the ZnS/MoS2@MXene hybrid separator [63] (copyright 2024, Elsevier).
Molecules 30 01833 g002
Figure 3. (a) Depiction of the Fe3Se4/FeSe@MXene synthetic procedure; (be) in situ Raman spectra and Raman contour plots at 0.5C for Fe3Se4/FeSe@MXene-PP [69] (copyright 2023, Elsevier). (f) Synthetic procedure, (g) HRTEM image of MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2, and (h) high sulfur loading performance of Li-S battery combined with MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2 [70] (copyright 2023, Elsevier).
Figure 3. (a) Depiction of the Fe3Se4/FeSe@MXene synthetic procedure; (be) in situ Raman spectra and Raman contour plots at 0.5C for Fe3Se4/FeSe@MXene-PP [69] (copyright 2023, Elsevier). (f) Synthetic procedure, (g) HRTEM image of MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2, and (h) high sulfur loading performance of Li-S battery combined with MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2 [70] (copyright 2023, Elsevier).
Molecules 30 01833 g003
Figure 4. (a) Structural characteristics of the components between Ta4C3 and Ta2O5; (b) voltage–time profiles of symmetrical cells at 20 mA cm−2 for 20 mAh cm−2 (inset: corresponding 3D optical profilometry images of Ta4C3-Ta2O5@C-PP on Li metal surface after cycling [54]) (copyright 2023, Chinese Society of Metals). (c) Synthetic procedure, (d) SEM and (e) HRTEM images of Co0.5Ni0.5Te2/MXene heterostructure, and (f) long cycling performance at 1 C and (g) high sulfur loading test at 9.20 mg cm−2 [74] (copyright 2024, Elsevier).
Figure 4. (a) Structural characteristics of the components between Ta4C3 and Ta2O5; (b) voltage–time profiles of symmetrical cells at 20 mA cm−2 for 20 mAh cm−2 (inset: corresponding 3D optical profilometry images of Ta4C3-Ta2O5@C-PP on Li metal surface after cycling [54]) (copyright 2023, Chinese Society of Metals). (c) Synthetic procedure, (d) SEM and (e) HRTEM images of Co0.5Ni0.5Te2/MXene heterostructure, and (f) long cycling performance at 1 C and (g) high sulfur loading test at 9.20 mg cm−2 [74] (copyright 2024, Elsevier).
Molecules 30 01833 g004
Figure 5. (a) Diagrammatic representation of creation, (b) SEM and (c) HRTEM images of g-C3N4/MXene heterostructure, (d) cycling test, and (e) rate performance of batteries with CN-MX in a cold 0 °C setting [83] (copyright 2024, Academic Press Inc.).
Figure 5. (a) Diagrammatic representation of creation, (b) SEM and (c) HRTEM images of g-C3N4/MXene heterostructure, (d) cycling test, and (e) rate performance of batteries with CN-MX in a cold 0 °C setting [83] (copyright 2024, Academic Press Inc.).
Molecules 30 01833 g005
Figure 6. (a) Synthetic procedure, (b) TEM image (inset: HRTEM image) of MXene@TBCOF, (c) differential charge density diagram of the interaction between TBCOF and MXene, and (d) long cycling performance at 1 C [32] (copyright 2024, Elsevier).
Figure 6. (a) Synthetic procedure, (b) TEM image (inset: HRTEM image) of MXene@TBCOF, (c) differential charge density diagram of the interaction between TBCOF and MXene, and (d) long cycling performance at 1 C [32] (copyright 2024, Elsevier).
Molecules 30 01833 g006
Figure 7. (a) Synthetic procedure of porous MXene nanosheet, TEM images of (b) MXene and (c) holey MXene nanosheets, (d) crafting the ANF using commercial Kevlar yarns, (e) TEM image of ANF, (f) photograph of ANF, MXene, and HMA membrane, (g) diagram of ion transfer in different separator, and (h) long cycling performance at 3 C [94] (copyright 2023, Elsevier). (i) Preparation method and (j) diagrammatic depiction of the roles of MX-NF/PP separator [95] (copyright 2019, Elsevier Ltd.).
Figure 7. (a) Synthetic procedure of porous MXene nanosheet, TEM images of (b) MXene and (c) holey MXene nanosheets, (d) crafting the ANF using commercial Kevlar yarns, (e) TEM image of ANF, (f) photograph of ANF, MXene, and HMA membrane, (g) diagram of ion transfer in different separator, and (h) long cycling performance at 3 C [94] (copyright 2023, Elsevier). (i) Preparation method and (j) diagrammatic depiction of the roles of MX-NF/PP separator [95] (copyright 2019, Elsevier Ltd.).
Molecules 30 01833 g007
Figure 8. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the creation of N-Ti3C2/C and the modified separator, (b) SEM image (inset: TEM image) of Ti3C2/ZIF-67, and (c) TEM image of N-Ti3C2/C [102] (copyright 2019, Elsevier). (d) Diagrammatic representation of etching routes for intermediary products of Ti3AlC2 MAX, fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx, and fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx featuring Ti in coordination with N [104] (copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH). (e) Diagram of synthetic strategy and action mechanism of DNA-CNT/MXene/PP separator and (f) electrochemical stability of PP and DNA-CNT/MXene/PP cells at different temperatures [55] (copyright 2023, Elsevier Ltd.).
Figure 8. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the creation of N-Ti3C2/C and the modified separator, (b) SEM image (inset: TEM image) of Ti3C2/ZIF-67, and (c) TEM image of N-Ti3C2/C [102] (copyright 2019, Elsevier). (d) Diagrammatic representation of etching routes for intermediary products of Ti3AlC2 MAX, fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx, and fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx featuring Ti in coordination with N [104] (copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH). (e) Diagram of synthetic strategy and action mechanism of DNA-CNT/MXene/PP separator and (f) electrochemical stability of PP and DNA-CNT/MXene/PP cells at different temperatures [55] (copyright 2023, Elsevier Ltd.).
Molecules 30 01833 g008
Table 1. Comparison of MXene-based heterostructures with a single MXene and other traditional materials for Li-S battery separator strategies.
Table 1. Comparison of MXene-based heterostructures with a single MXene and other traditional materials for Li-S battery separator strategies.
MaterialsCore AdvantagesMain Disadvantages
Carbon
  • High conductivity
  • Large surface area
  • Non-polar surfaces
  • Brittle structure
Metal compound
  • Polar active sites
  • Metal catalytic sites
  • Poor conductivity
  • Low porosity
  • Pulverization caused by volume expansion
Polymer
  • Robust flexibility
  • Chemical functional groups
  • Poor conductivity
  • Poor mechanical strength
MXene
  • Tunable terminations
  • High conductivity
  • Large surface area
  • Self-restacking
  • Easily oxidized
MXene-based heterostructure
  • Introduction of built-in electric field
  • Adjustment of the coordination environment
  • Stable interface (hindering MXene oxidation and stacking)
  • Ultra-high conductivity
  • Synergistic adsorption–catalysis
Table 2. Summary of electrochemical performance of MXene/inorganic material heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries.
Table 2. Summary of electrochemical performance of MXene/inorganic material heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries.
HeterostructuresCoating/Loading (mg cm−2)Sulfur Loading/mg cm−2Rate Capacity/RateInitial Capacity (mAh g−1)/RateDecay Rate/CyclesRef.
MXene/metal sulfideNiS2/Ti3C2TxBlade/0.81.07921/2 C1129/2C0.038%/1000[51]
N-MX-CoS2Filtration/0.21.2775/4C1031/1C0.052%/700[56]
IL-MoS2/MXFiltration/-1.2–1.5745.4/1C764.4/1C0.059%/700[57]
MXene@WS2Filtration/0.61622.2/3C889.1/2C0.0286%/2000[58]
1T-VS2/V2C 818.2/5 C1131/1C0.056%/1000[59]
VS4/Ti3C2TxFiltration/0.151.2–1.5673/4C932/1C0.059%/500[60]
ZnS/MXeneBlade/-1551/5C810/0.5C0.082%/500[61]
Co1−xS/3D-Ti3C2TxFiltration/0.151.2–1.5 1056/1C0.05%/500[62]
ZnS/MoS2@MXene-/0.51802.6/2C900/1C0.067%/500[63]
Bi2S3/MoS2@MX 0.8–1.2592/5C847/2C0.069%/500[31]
MXene/MoS2/SnS@C-/0.51693.4/4C~800/2C0.051%/1000[64]
MXene/NiS2/Co3S4Filtration/0.81549.0/6C956.3/2C0.026%/2000[65]
MXene/metal selenideTi3C2Tx@CoSe2Filtration/0.51.2694/3C1032.7/0.5C0.059%/800[53]
Fe3Se4/FeSe@MXeneBlade/0.271.2768.5/4C~975/2C0.07%/600[69]
MXene/Fe3S4@FeSe2Filtration/0.81557.1/5C~825/2C0.049%/1000[70]
MXene/other inorganic metalM-HTO-0.5Blade/0.3–0.41.8–2.0822.7/2C~920/5C0.073%/500[72]
Ta4C3-Ta2O5-/0.91.0–1.5738.5/1C801.9/1C0.086%/500[54]
Co0.5Ni0.5Te2/MXeneBlade/0.27–0.301.5773/2C~950/1C0.0227%/500[74]
Ti3C2/CPNCBlade/0.51.5525.4/5C928.4/1C0.039%/1150[75]
CoxP@Ti3C2TxBlade/- 751.61/3C813.33/2C0.037%/400[76]
Co2B@MXeneFiltration/-1.2–1.5597/5C786/2C0.0088%/2000[77]
MX@WSSeFiltration/-1.2–1.5504.4/5C600.2/2C0.016%/1000[78]
Vo-LDHs-MXenesBlade/-2342.9/3C938.9/1C0.084%/300[52]
MXene/inorganic non-metalg-C3N4/MXeneCoating machine/0.181.5945/4C858/1C0.035%/1000[83]
BN@MxeneFiltration/0.061.5–2748/1C686.9/1C0.058%/700[84]
Table 3. Summary of electrochemical performances of MXene/organic framework and polymer heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries.
Table 3. Summary of electrochemical performances of MXene/organic framework and polymer heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries.
HeterostructureCoating/Loading (mg cm−2)Sulfur Loading/mg cm−2Rate Capacity/RateInitial Capacity (mAh g−1)/RateDecay Rate/CyclesRef.
MXene@COF 1.2–1.5563/3C~1050/0.5C0.085%/200[89]
MXene@TBCOF-/0.29–0.311.65493/5C952.2/1C0.0191%/1500[32]
Ti3C2@iCONFiltration/0.11.2687/5C810/2C0.006%/2000[90]
Ti3C2Tx@Cu/Fe-MOFFiltration/-4.1728/983/1C1300/1400/1C0.051%/0.064%/300[93]
MXene/ANFFiltration/-1.0–1.5818/5C~975/3C0.013%/3500[94]
MXene-NafionFiltration/0.22794/3C920/1C0.030%/1000[95]
PA5-COOH/Nb2CFiltration/-1303/10C754/1C0.047%/500[96]
Table 4. Summary of electrochemical performance of MXene/carbon heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries.
Table 4. Summary of electrochemical performance of MXene/carbon heterostructured hybrid separators for Li-S batteries.
HeterostructureCoating/Loading (mg cm−2)Sulfur Loading/mg cm−2Rate Capacity/RateInitial Capacity (mAh g−1)/RateDecay Rate/CyclesRef.
N-Ti3C2/CBlade/0.63.4675/2C1101.54/0.5C0.07%/500[102]
CNVMBlade/0.381.2723/3C867/1C0.075%/660[103]
Ti-N-Ti3C2Cl-C-/0.121.0–1.5518.6/4C761/2C0.053%/500[104]
DNA-CNT/MXeneFiltration/0.11588/2C798/1C0.13%/200[55]
CNTs/MXeneFiltration/0.160.8728/2C987/1C0.06%/600[105]
Ti3C2Tx/CNTs 10%Filtration/0.0161.2640/2C760/1C0.086%/200[106]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Jin, G.; Mao, M.; Wang, Z.; Xu, T.; Wan, T.; Zhao, J. Construction of MXene-Based Heterostructured Hybrid Separators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Molecules 2025, 30, 1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081833

AMA Style

Zhang X, Jin G, Mao M, Wang Z, Xu T, Wan T, Zhao J. Construction of MXene-Based Heterostructured Hybrid Separators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Molecules. 2025; 30(8):1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081833

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiao, Guijie Jin, Min Mao, Zirui Wang, Tianyu Xu, Tongtao Wan, and Jinsheng Zhao. 2025. "Construction of MXene-Based Heterostructured Hybrid Separators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries" Molecules 30, no. 8: 1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081833

APA Style

Zhang, X., Jin, G., Mao, M., Wang, Z., Xu, T., Wan, T., & Zhao, J. (2025). Construction of MXene-Based Heterostructured Hybrid Separators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Molecules, 30(8), 1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081833

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop