Next Article in Journal
Xenobiotic Metabolism: The Effect of Acute Kidney Injury on Non-Renal Drug Clearance and Hepatic Drug Metabolism
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamin-Related Protein 1 Inhibitors Protect against Ischemic Toxicity through Attenuating Mitochondrial Ca2+ Uptake from Endoplasmic Reticulum Store in PC12 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Survivin as a Preferential Target for Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Thylakoid Ascorbate Peroxidase from Jatrophacurcas Enhances Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms15022517
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dominant Repression by Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB44 Causes Oxidative Damage and Hypersensitivity to Abiotic Stress

by
Helene Persak
† and
Andrea Pitzschke
*,†
Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology (DAGZ), University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, Vienna A-1190, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(2), 2517-2537; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022517
Submission received: 11 December 2013 / Revised: 17 January 2014 / Accepted: 28 January 2014 / Published: 13 February 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Redox Signaling in Biology and Patho-Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In any living species, stress adaptation is closely linked with major changes of the gene expression profile. As a substrate protein of the rapidly stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase MPK3, Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB44 likely acts at the front line of stress-induced re-programming. We recently characterized MYB44 as phosphorylation-dependent positive regulator of salt stress signaling. Molecular events downstream of MYB44 are largely unknown. Although MYB44 binds to the MBSII element in vitro, it has no discernible effect on MBSII-driven reporter gene expression in plant co-transfection assays. This may suggest limited abundance of a synergistic co-regulator. MYB44 carries a putative transcriptional repression (Ethylene responsive element binding factor-associated Amphiphilic Repression, EAR) motif. We employed a dominant repressor strategy to gain insights into MYB44-conferred stress resistance. Overexpression of a MYB44-REP fusion markedly compromised salt and drought stress tolerance—the opposite was seen in MYB44 overexpression lines. MYB44-mediated resistance likely results from induction of tolerance-enhancing, rather than from repression of tolerance-diminishing factors. Salt stress-induced accumulation of destructive reactive oxygen species is efficiently prevented in transgenic MYB44, but accelerated in MYB44-REP lines. Furthermore, heterologous overexpression of MYB44-REP caused tissue collapse in Nicotiana. A mechanistic model of MAPK-MYB-mediated enhancement in the antioxidative capacity and stress tolerance is proposed. Genetic engineering of MYB44 variants with higher trans-activating capacity may be a means to further raise stress resistance in crops.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Transcription Factors

Transcription, the initial step at which genes are selected for expression, is essential for the regulation of virtually any biological process in living organisms. By binding to their cognate promoter elements, transcription factors (TF) specifically activate or repress expression of respective target genes. TF activity often depends on developmental or exogenous stimuli and/or the presence of co-regulatory proteins. Thus, living organisms can respond to changes in their environment in a highly specific and flexible manner.

1.2. Transcription Factors Involved in Plant Stress Responses

Over the last two decades substantial progress has been made in plant stress research. Extensive knowledge exists on TFs that mediate stress adaptation responses in various species. TFs are able to control stress resistance both in homologous and heterologous expression systems are particularly attractive for genetic engineering of stress-tolerant crops [1,2].
Many TF genes show a stress-inducible expression profile, suggesting that various transcriptional regulatory mechanisms function in stress signal transduction pathways [3]. Stress-inducible TFs in plants include members of the DRE-binding protein (DREB) family, the ethylene-responsive element binding factor (ERF) family, the zinc-finger family, the WRKY family, the basic-domain leucine zipper (bZIP) family, the NAC family, the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family, the homeodomain TF family, and the MYB family [3,4]. Ample evidence exists that overexpression of a single TF gene can improve tolerance to diverse, and often multiple, types of stress [5]. For instance, ectopic expression of the ERF gene, Tobacco stress-induced gene 1 (Tsi1), enhanced resistance to pathogen and osmotic stress in tobacco [6]. Overexpression of AtDREB1A protected Arabidopsis from drought, high salinity and freezing stress [7]. It also improved abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic rice and soybean [8,9]. Several bZIP proteins are involved in signal transduction triggered by ultraviolet light (UV), salt and drought stress. For instance, biotic as well as abiotic stress responses are controlled by bZIP factor VIP1 [10–12]. Similarly, WRKY proteins modify plant resistance by binding to promoters of diverse stress-related genes. Botrytis cinerea-induced ethylene biosynthesis relies on direct activation of ACS2/ACS6 expression by WRKY33 [13]. Recently, Arabidopsis WRKY22 was shown to function in submergence-conferred immunity [14].
Continuous and aberrant expression of stress-responsive genes leads to substantial changes in the composition of proteins, metabolites and structural components. In the absence of stress, this energy-demanding cellular re-modeling is disadvantageous and frequently correlates with retarded growth. Therefore, TF activity is often controlled in a stress-dependent manner. In many cases, this is achieved via post-translational modifications. For instance, WRKY33 [15], VIP1 [10], ERF6 [16] and C2H2-type zinc finger protein ZAT10 [17] are phosphorylated and regulated by stress-activated kinases.

1.3. Transcriptional Activators and Repressors

Transcription factors constitute a major fraction of an organism’s proteome. In Arabidopsis, approximately 6% of the protein repertoire are TFs [18], an estimated 30% of which function as transcriptional repressors [18,19]. EAR motifs, which adhere to the consensus LxLxL or DLNxxP, are the most predominant transcriptional repression motifs so far identified in plants [19]. A genome-wide bioinformatics analysis allowed identification of the complete repertoire of the “EAR repressome” in Arabidopsis [18]. It comprises 219 (49 experimentally verified, 170 putative) negative regulators of transcription, distributed across 21 TF families. The EAR motif sites are mainly found in the C-terminal region [18]. EAR motifs owe their name to the class of TFs in which they had been originally identified (Ethylene responsive element binding factor-associated Amphiphilic Repression (EAR) motif [20]). EAR motifs were shown to function as dominant repressor domains also in other types of TFs, including B3-domain [21,22], MADS-box [23], AUX/IAA [24] and NIMIN proteins [25]. In the MYB TF family, trans-repressing activities could be ascribed to subgroup S4, comprising MYB3, MYB4, MYB7 and MYB32 [26–28], all of which carry an EAR motif. AtMYB4 controls sinapate ester biosynthesis in UV-exposed plants [28], whereas AtMYB32 is required for pollen development [26]. EAR motifs likely mediate repression by physical interaction with other co-repressors [23,29]. According to a current model, EAR repressors regulate gene expression by recruiting chromatin remodeling factors [19]. Phosphorylation and ubiquitination in turn may influence EAR repressor function and turnover [19]. Interestingly, when tethered to an EAR motif, transcriptional activators can be converted into dominant repressors [30]. The DNA-binding specificity in such chimeric proteins is maintained. The EAR fusion repressor technology has therefore been proposed as a unique opportunity to overcome the challenges of gene redundancy [30].

1.4. Arabidopsis MYB Transcription Factors—Subfamily S22

MYB-type transcription factors form large protein families in eukaryotic species. In plants, diverse developmental processes and physiological responses are mediated by MYB proteins. A distinct subfamily of these TFs is essential for activating phenylpropanoid biosynthesis [31–34]. MYB proteins also act as positive or negative regulators of stress signaling (see below). In addition, MYB transcription factors are promising candidates for engineering of stress-tolerant crops [2].
The plant R2R3 MYB family is particularly large, comprising 126 members in Arabidopsis [35]. R2R3 MYB proteins carry a characteristic, highly conserved N-terminal DNA-binding domain and a variable C-terminal region comprising an activation or repression domain. Based on the conservation of the R2R3 region and of motifs in the C-terminal part, Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB proteins can be divided into 23 subgroups [35]. Most MYB proteins bind to one or more of two types of cis-elements, known as MYB binding sites (MBS), the consensus sequences of which are CNGTT(A/G) (MBSI), C(G/T)T(A/T)GTT(A/G) (MBSII) [36].
MYB subfamily S22 comprises four members, MYB44, MYB70, MYB73 and MYB77. MYB77 functions in auxin signaling and the control of lateral root formation [37]. MYB44 mediates responses to aphid attack [38], high salinity and drought stress [39–41]. MYB73 expression is induced by volatiles of two growth-inhibiting rhizobacteria [42]. Protein functions of MYB70 and MYB73 are still obscure. As we have shown recently [40], members of the S22 family are phosphorylated in vitro by MPK3, a mitogen-activated protein kinase that controls a diversity of abiotic and biotic stress responses [43–46]. In MYB44, the MPK3 phosphorylation site was located to a single residue (Ser145) [40]. Knowledge about MPK3 docking domain(s) in MYB44 is based on in silico predictions only. Ser145 and flanking regions seem to be conserved within the S22 family. Mutation at S145 does not affect MYB44 nuclear localization nor its DNA-binding properties [40]. MYB44 binds to MPK3 in vivo; and it also forms homodimeric MYB44/MYB44 complexes [40]. These protein-protein interactions are nuclear-located and independent of the phosphorylation state at Ser145. Overexpression of MYB44 rendered transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings more tolerant towards salt stress. On the contrary, reduced tolerance was observed for seedlings overexpressing a MYB44 de-phosphomimetic (Ser145Ala) mutant variant. S145Ala molecules may block critical domains in MPK3 or prevent endogenous MYB44 and/or its closest homolog, MYB77, from binding to cognate DNA elements [40].
Molecular factors and mechanisms that act downstream of MYB44 in stress signaling are largely elusive. Here, we investigated the mode of MYB44 action as transcriptional regulator and its possible implication in redox balancing under stress conditions. We sought to manipulate the trans-regulatory activity of MYB44. Our motivation was to propose protein modifications that potentially further accelerate MYB44-mediated stress resistance. This was also done in view of possible biotechnological applications, since ectopic expression of AtMYB44 has been shown to improve salt and drought stress tolerance in soybean [41]. We asked whether the positive effect of MYB44 in stress-exposed plants was primarily due to transcriptional activation or repression of target genes.

2. Results

2.1. MYB S22 Family Members Carry a Putative Repressor Domain

The primary protein sequence alignment of R2R3 MYB subfamily S22 reveals a short peptide stretch that is conserved in all four members. This region adheres to the consensus of EAR motifs (LxLxL) (Figure 1). In addition, MYB44 contains a second peptide (vLPLPi) (Figure 1), which resembles a partial EAR. Accordingly, MYB44, MYB77 and MYB70 are among the 219 candidate proteins potentially constituting the “Arabidopsis repressome” [18].
We aimed to investigate a possible role of the MYB S22 proteins as transcriptional repressors, using MYB44, the best-characterized member of this subfamily. In order to exclude/minimize possible interference with MPK3 binding, we chose not to mutate or delete the endogenous putative EAR motif in the MYB44 protein. Instead, an artificial EAR motif was introduced into MYB44 by fusing a LDLDL peptide to the C-terminal end of the protein. The resultant chimer (named MYB44-REP) was placed under control of the CaMV35S promoter (Figure 2) and ectopically expressed in stable transgenic Arabidopsis plants. As shown previously, transgenic Arabidopsis lines carrying a similar construct, CaMV35S::MYB44, are more tolerant towards osmotic stress [40] consistent with an earlier study by Jung et al. [39]. The identity and direction (activation or repression) of the corresponding stress-responsive MYB44 target genes are still unclear. Two scenarios can be imagined: (i) If MYB44 acted as transcriptional activator of osmotic stress-tolerance-enhancing genes, a hypersensitive phenotype might be expected for 35S::MYB44-REP plants; and (ii) If MYB44 actively repressed negative regulators of stress tolerance, MYB44-REP overexpression should improve tolerance.
MYB44-REP transgenic lines were generated and propagated into a homozygous state. To allow maximal comparability, transformation and propagation was carried out in parallel with 35S::MYB44 lines. Transgene expression was verified by immunoblot analysis using an antibody directed against the (C-terminal) myc epitope tag (Figure 3A).

2.2. MYB44-REP Overexpression Interferes with Early Stress Responses and Antioxidative Defenses in Salt-Exposed Arabidopsis Seedlings

We studied the physiology of confirmed transgenic lines as well as their tolerance to osmotic stress, using the experimental conditions established in our previous study [40]. Under standard conditions, germination and growth of MYB44-REP lines were similar to that of control plants (Col-0) (Figure 3B). Thus, MYB44-REP overexpression in Arabidopsis has no apparent effects on plant development. In contrast, under high-salinity conditions (three-day-old seedlings, transferred onto 150 mM NaCl), fundamental differences became apparent (Figure 4A). All seedlings of MYB44 and Col-0 survived the first day on salt-containing medium. Consistent with our earlier report [40], stress symptoms appeared during the subsequent two days; and seedling survival was higher in MYB44 lines, compared to Col-0. In contrast, 20% of MYB44-REP seedlings died already during the first day of salt exposure. Interestingly, the reduced tolerance in MYB44-REP lines was confined to day one. Furthermore, the data suggest that ectopically expressed MYB44 can delay, but not prevent salt-induced seedling death (under the tested conditions). Reciprocally, MYB44-REP expression appears to accelerate tissue collapse. Histological staining of seedlings after 6 h of salt treatment further support that MYB44-REP interferes with rapid stress responses (Figure 4B).
Numerous biotic and abiotic stresses provoke the formation of reactive oxygen species [47,48]. Cellular damage caused by ROS production can be prevented to some extent through the action of ROS scavenging enzymes. Superoxide (O2−) is particularly aggressive. To determine whether the different salt stress phenotypes exhibited by MYB44 and MYB-REP lines (Figure 4A) were attributable to altered superoxide accumulation, seedlings were exposed to 300 mM NaCl for 6 h and subsequently stained with nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT). NBT is reduced by superoxide to blue, water-insoluble formazan. Untreated seedlings of all lines contained some basal O2− levels, which did not markedly differ (Figure 4B). All lines responded to the high-salt treatment, visible by increased formazan precipitation. Notably, MYB44 seedlings accumulated less O2− than Col-0. The opposite was observed for MYB44-REP seedlings. These findings imply that (i) MYB44 overexpression improves salt tolerance by inhibiting ROS formation and/or by activating ROS scavenging mechanisms; (ii) Rapid death in salt-exposed MYB44-REP plants is, at least partially, attributable to aberrant superoxide accumulation; (iii) Stress-related events caused by MYB44 and MYB44-REP are opposite; and (iv) MYB44 appears to be particularly important during early stages of salt stress exposure.

2.3. MYB44-REP Overexpression Reduces Tolerance to Drought Stress

We further studied MYB44-REP overexpression effects on physiological responses associated with MYB44 function. MYB44 overexpressing plants are reportedly more tolerant towards drought [41]. Consequently, water loss rates were compared in MYB44, MYB44-REP and wild type plants under dehydration conditions (Figure 4C). MYB44 plants exhibited stronger water retention ability, compared to control plants. This is consistent with a recent report [41]. Contrarily, water loss was augmented in MYB44-REP lines. Taken together, the results from salt (Figure 4A,B) and drought stress experiments (Figure 4C) point to a role of MYB44 as activator of genes required for abiotic stress tolerance. Active repression of these target genes is destructive to the plant (Figure 7).

2.4. MYB44 and MYB44-REP Transactivation Studies in Vivo

Next, we aimed to explore the functions of MYB44 and MYB44-REP as transcriptional regulators. Although a microarray study had revealed a number of differentially expressed genes in MYB44-overexpressing or -deficient lines [39], it is still unclear which of these are direct and which are secondary targets. MYB44 is known to preferentially bind the MBSII element [49]. In vitro, this binding is highly efficient and seemingly unaffected by S145 phosphorylation [40]. A synthetic construct consisting of a tandem MBSII element, the CaMV35S minimal promoter and the glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene was generated (Figure 5A).
This reporter construct in combination with one of the following effector constructs: control (YFP), MYB44-myc or MYB44-myc-REP was introduced into Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts or into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves via PEG- or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, respectively. As shown previously, in both expression systems a MYB44-YFP fusion protein locates to the nucleus [40]. This is most likely attributable to the nuclear localization signal located at the N-terminus. It is therefore reasonable to assume that myc or myc-EAR epitope tags (which are shorter than YFP) do not affect the native localization of the MYB44 protein.
Five days after agrobacterial infiltration, GUS activity was assessed in N. benthamiana leaves by histological staining with X-Gluc. In at least six independent repeats of co-infiltration/GUS assay experiments very faint or no blue coloration was detected, and there was no discernible difference in GUS activity between tissue co-infiltrated with MBSII::GUS plus YFP, MYB44 or MYB44-REP (not shown). UV microscopy of the control sample (YFP) revealed strong fluorescence throughout the infiltrated area, documenting high transformation efficiency in N. benthamiana (Figure S1). Also, strong GUS activity was observed in positive control samples (constitutive expression construct, CaMV35S::GUS). N. benthamiana protein extracts were further analyzed by immunoblotting. Specific immune-reactive bands were found in samples of [MBSII::GUS + MYB44] and [MBSII::GUS + MYB44-REP], but not in the control [MBSII::GUS + YFP] (Figure S1). Therefore, the lack of visible effects of MYB44 or MYB44-REP on MBSII promoter activity unlikely results from impaired expression or instability of the putative effector proteins.
Data obtained from co-transfection studies using an alternate transient expression system corroborate these findings. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts were co-transfected with the transgene combinations used in the above-described leaf infiltration experiments. Reproducibly, (independent protoplast isolations, replicate transfections, enzymatic assays), GUS activity in protein extracts from all samples was low. Similarly to N. benthamiana (see above), reporter gene expression did not notably differ between samples carrying any of the effector constructs MYB44, MYB44-REP, or YFP (Figure 5B). Parallel protoplast transformations performed with a CaMV35S::GUS construct for constitutive expression of β-glucuronidase documented functionality of the assay.
Based on the established involvement of MYB44 in osmotic and drought stress signaling, we investigated the cis-regulatory effect of this protein on a (putative direct target) stress-related gene. Selection was based on two main criteria: (i) presence of MBSII motif(s) in the promoter and (ii) well-documented response to abiotic stress. Rd29A is a marker gene for abiotic stress. In proximity to the 5′UTR the Rd29A promoter contains a “GTTAGTTA” signature which matches a tandem MBSII motif. MYB44 reportedly binds strongly and specifically to this signature in vitro [40]. We therefore generated a Rd29A::GUS reporter construct for Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast co-transfection studies. The quantitative assay revealed some GUS activity in protein extracts of all samples. The two effectors, MYB44 and MYB44-REP, did not differ in their trans-activating capacity and were similar to the control effector (YFP). In summary, ectopically expressed MYB44 or MYB44-REP had no discernible trans-activating or -repressing effect on a synthetic MBSII promoter or the Rd29A promoter.

2.5. Ectopic Expression of MYB44-REP Causes Tissue Collapse in N. benthamiana

In the course of N. benthamiana co-infiltration studies, a striking impact of ectopic MYB44-REP expression on leaf tissue vitality was observed: While leaves expressing YFP or the MYB44 transgene displayed no major symptoms caused by bacterial infiltration, MYB44-REP-infiltrated leaves developed severe necrosis. Lesions were visible 3 days after infiltration and became more pronounced later on (Figure 6). Single infiltration experiments—with YFP, MYB44 or MYB44-REP only—substantiated these findings and showed MYB44-REP-related symptoms to be unrelated to the presence of the MBSII reporter construct. Furthermore, the symptoms were consistently observed in N. benthamiana leaves infiltrated at the 14-day seedling or 6-week adult plant stage, indicating that MYB44-REP-triggered necrosis was an age-independent phenomenon. Transfection with the de-phosphomimetic MYB44 variants S145A or S145D [40], respectively, did not provoke necrosis (not shown). Furthermore, MYB44-REP-related necrosis was not prevented or accelerated upon co-infiltration of MKK4 and/or MPK3. Consequently, the symptoms are most probably unrelated to the protein’s Ser145 phosphorylation state.

3. Discussion

3.1. MYB44-REP-Induced Tissue Collapse in N. benthamiana

Transcription factors engineered to encode an EAR motif are able to repress the expression of the target orthologous genes across multiple plant species [50]. A likely explanation for MYB44-REP-triggered tissue collapse therefore is an inappropriate repression of genes that are required for cellular homeostasis. Whether this applies to homeostasis in general or to homeostasis under biotic stress conditions remains elusive. Inherent to the experimental system (agroinfiltration), effects of MYB44-REP expression cannot be assessed in a pathogen-free context. At this point it is interesting to note that stable overexpression of AtMYB4 or its ortholog from Antirrhinum majus, AmMYB308, in N. tabacum leads to slower growth and the formation of premature white lesions [28,51]. Both proteins contain an EAR motif and actively repress genes involved in the biosynthesis of sinaptate esters, UV-protecting compounds [28]. The authors also noted a dose-dependent change in the target specificity of AtMYB4 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants [28]. In our study, transgene-derived protein levels of MYB44 and MYB44-REP were similar, both in stably transformed Arabidopsis lines and infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves. The contrary effects caused by MYB44 and MYB44-REP overexpression unlikely result from altered target gene selectivity but from opposite “orientation” of target gene regulation (trans-activation or repression).

3.2. Lack of MBSII-Related Transactivation/Repression in Co-Transfection Assays

Protein–protein interactions can significantly impact the regulatory activity of MYB transcription factors [2,52]. MYB proteins with two or more MYB repeats bind DNA in vitro as monomers. This is accomplished through cooperative interaction between the tandemly-arranged MYB repeats, which function like “covalently linked” dimers when contacting DNA [53]. Others [49] and we [40] had documented efficient binding of MYB44 to MBSII in vitro. However, MYB44 or MYB44-REP had no discernible effect on MBSII-driven reporter gene expression in plant co-transfection assays. This is unlike the situation in stress-exposed transgenic plants, where MYB44 or MYB44-REP gave rise to clear effects (Figure 4). Exposure of N. benthamiana co-transfected leaves to salt or drought did not stimulate or repress reporter gene expression (data not shown). Co-regulatory protein(s) might be required for MYB44 to be fully active as transcription factor. Such co-regulator might be limited/absent in the expression systems used, i.e., Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts and N. benthamiana leaves. In the former system, lack of a cell-cell context could be a further limiting factor. In infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves, agrobacterial factors might directly or indirectly (by changing host protein properties) prevent binding of MYB44 to the synthetic MBSII motif. Impeded accessibility of a (putative) redox-regulatory factor to the MYB44 protein offers an alternative explanation, particularly since a cysteine residue, shown to be crucial to the conformation and DNA binding activity of the v-myb oncogene [54], is conserved in MYB44 (S43 of R2 repeat, Figure 1).
Transcriptional regulatory activity of some R2R3-MYB factors in vivo requires protein–protein interactions. For instance, members of R2R3 subgroup S15 [35] and basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) proteins [55] cooperatively control gene expression. Associations with bHLH proteins represent the major type of MYB/TF combinations identified so far. Importantly, bHLH interaction is crucial for stable binding of MYB proteins to DNA, as exemplified by TT2/TTG1 a TF pair synergistically regulating tannin biosynthesis [56]. The bHLH interaction signature motif, defined as ((D/E)Lx2(R/K)x3Lx6Lx3R) in the R3 repeat occurs in 20 MYB proteins [57–59]. Since MYB44 or other members of the S22 subfamily do not contain such motif, co-operation with bHLHs similar to those reported seems unlikely. Further modes of synergism between MYB factors and partner TFs in Arabidopsis include MYB30/BES1 in brassinosteroid signaling [60]; MYB18/FHY1 and FHL in phytochrome A signaling [61] and MYB77/ARF7 in auxin signaling and lateral root development [37].
In conclusion, limited availability of a co-regulator or modifying factor seems the most likely explanation for the discrepancy between MYB44 behavior towards MBSII in vitro (strong binding; electrophoretic mobility shift assay [40] and in vivo (co-transfection assays, this study). Future research shall concentrate on identifying proteins that engage in a combinatorial transcriptional control with MYB44.

3.3. Narrowing down the MYB44 Targetome

Using a microarray approach, Jung et al., 2009 [39] could disclose a large number of genes showing elevated or reduced transcript abundance in MYB44 overexpressing or deficient plants; under standard or high-salinity conditions. This data list likely contains both direct and secondary MYB44 target genes. As suggested by the stress tolerance phenotypes of MYB44 vs. MYB44-REP lines (Figure 4), MYB44 more likely acts as inducer of positive stress regulators rather than as repressor of negative stress factors. Therefore, as additional output from the studies of [39,40,49] and the data represented here, the number of putative direct MYB44 target genes may be narrowed down to those that (i) Are rapidly induced under osmotic stress conditions; (ii) Contain MBSII element(s) in their promoters; (iii) Have elevated transcript levels in MYB44oe plants and/or (iv) Reduced transcript levels in myb44 mutants.
The latter criterion is somewhat problematic due to potential redundancy of MYB44 with MYB77. However, the dominant repressor strategy (MYB44-REP) should facilitate verification of suspect target genes in co-transfection studies.

3.4. Effects of MYB44 and MYB44-REP on Osmotic Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis

Various methods exist to study osmotic stress responses in plants. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. We mimicked drought and high-salinity conditions by exposing seedlings to desiccation stress or to NaCl-containing medium, respectively. Seedlings are far more homogenous than adult plants, and many individuals/transgenic lines/sublines can be analyzed side-by-side. For both MYB44 and MYB44-REP, six transgenic lines arising from independent T-DNA integration events were studied in parallel. For histologic stainings of ROS accumulation, seedlings underwent a rapid and harsh treatment (6 h, 300 mM NaCl). Of course, the stress exposures used are rather drastic treatments, which certainly cannot fully reflect osmotic stress encountered by plants in their natural habitats. However, these are generally accepted standard techniques which facilitate data comparison between research reports.
Overall, salt and drought stress tolerance was enhanced in transgenic MYB44 but reduced in MYB44-REP lines. The MYB44-REP fusion protein carries a non-mutagenized S145 residue and therefore likely is accepted as substrate for MPK3 phosphorylation. It cannot be excluded that introduction of the additional EAR peptide affected the efficiency of MPK3 binding and/or phosphorylation. However, the peptide is comparatively short (6 residues), located at the C-terminus and distant from the S145 phosphorylation site (Figure 2).
Interestingly, MYB44-REP seedling survival on salt was lower only at the first day (Figure 4A). MYB44-induced stress gene expression therefore seems particularly important in the early stress response. Accordingly, histological studies revealed substantial differences between Col-0, MYB44 and MYB-REP lines within 6 h of salt stress exposure. Superoxide accumulation was repressed in MYB44, but enhanced in MYB44-REP lines. In summary, from the above-described data and considerations, we come to the following conclusions:
In the absence of stress, phenotypes and superoxide levels in MYB44 and MYB44-REP Arabidopsis transgenics are similar to wild type. TF activity is apparently stress-dependent and most likely regulated by MAPK-mediated phosphorylation. A similar scenario has recently been described for Arabidopsis ERF6. H2O2-activated MPK6 phosphorylates ERF6. The phosphorylated TF subsequently binds to ROS-responsive elements to regulate oxidative gene expression [62].
Under salt stress, (i) MYB44 functions as transcriptional activator rather than as a repressor. It induces positive stress-regulatory genes; (ii) MYB44 acts in the early stress response. At later stages, other tolerance-improving regulators may become sufficiently active. These would mask MYB44-related positive effects and counteract the destructive effects caused by MYB44-REP, respectively; (iii) NBT staining data suggest MYB44 to prevent stress-triggered tissue collapse by rapid removal of destructive superoxide; (iv) This enhanced antioxidative capacity likely results from direct or indirect transcriptional induction of ROS scavenging enzymes; and (v) Salt-responsive MYB44-regulated genes are still elusive; Rd29A is an unlikely direct target or requires presence of a co-regulator.
Along with numerous other TFs that have been implicated in salt stress signaling [6,7,12], MYB44 participates in fine-tuning transcriptome adaptation responses.
Upon heterologous overexpression (N. benthamiana agroinfiltration), MYB44-REP, but not MYB44 negatively affects tissue integrity. Therefore the introduced TF does recognize non-Arabidopsis promoters; and the “direction” of regulation (MYB44 as activator; MYB44-REP as repressor) appears to be maintained across species.
A model proposing MYB44 function in stressed plants is outlined in Figure 7. Future studies will focus on whether MYB44 (and S22 members) are “bivalent” transcriptional regulator(s) that—depending on the type of stress—act as activator or repressor.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Plant Material, Osmotic Stress and Drought Tolerance Test

Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) plants were routinuously grown at 20 °C, 60% humidity under long-day conditions (16/8 h light/dark). To break dormancy, seeds were incubated at 4 °C for 2 days. At least 2–3 individual T3 transgenic lines were used for the stress assays. Experiments were independently repeated at least three times. Seeds were surface-sterilized with NaOCl/90% ethanol for 5 min and washed three times with 96% ethanol. Surface-sterilized seeds were incubated on half-strength MS medium/0.25% sucrose/1% plant agar. After stratification for 2 days at 4 °C, plates were transferred to an incubator (8/16 h dark/night regime, 25 °C).
For osmotic stress tolerance tests, seeds were plated on half-strength MS medium (see above). After 3 days, seedlings were transferred to plates containing half-strength MS supplemented with 150 mM NaCl and grown for further 4 days. About 50 seeds were used for each treatment.

4.2. Water Loss Determination

Three-week-old seedlings grown under standard conditions were detached from their roots and immediately weighted (fresh weight). The plants were kept at room temperature (on a petri dish) and weighted at the times designated. Finally, plants were completely dried for at least 12 h at 70 °C (dry weight). Water loss was calculated according to the formula of [63].
Water content  ( WC )   [ % ] = ( desiccated weight - dry weight ) / ( fresh weight - dry weight ) × 100

4.3. Detection of Superoxide

Twelve-day-old seedlings were incubated in tap water with or without 300 mM NaCl for 6 h. Superoxide radicals were visualized by NBT staining (0.1 mM NBT in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7). Stained plants were bleached in a solution containing acetic acid:glycerol:ethanol (1:1:3, v/v/v) at 70 °C. Photographs were taken using a camera connected to a light microscope.

4.4. Constructs

All constructs for plant transformation are based on the pGreen/pSoup binary vector system [64]. Plasmids 35S::YFP and 35S::MYB44 have been described previously [40]. To generate 35S::MYB44-REP, a DNA fragment comprising a myc tag and the repressor motif (see Figure 2) was added in-frame to the 3′ end (NotI site) of the MYB44 coding region in 35S::MYB44.
35S::GUSint has been described previously [10]. To construct the MBSII element-reporter plasmid, the VIP1 response element in the previously described VRE1-35Smin::GUSint construct was replaced by a tandem MBSII motif. To this end, a DNA fragment was PCR-amplified from VRE1::GUSint using the following primers:
MBSII-35Smin_fo CAGCTAAAGTTAGTTACGATGGCAAGACCCTTCCTC and GUS_re CCACACTTTGCCGTAATGAGTG (see Figure 5). After T/A cloning into pGemTeasy and sequencing, a 84-bp EcoRI-NcoI fragment comprising the MBSII-35Smin region was isolated and inserted into the corresponding sites in VRE1-35Smin::GUSint. Integrity of the plasmid (promoter sequence, GUS encoding region incl. 3′UTR, start codon, open reading frame were verified by sequencing).
A 449 bp Promoter region of Rd29A (At5g52310) was PCR-amplified from genomic Arabidopsis Col-0 DNA with primers Rd29A_fo GAGAAGGATGTGCCGTTTGT and Rd29A_re CTCTGTTTGATCCATGGTCCAAAGAT, inserted into pGemTeasy by T/A cloning and sequence-confirmed. The promoter was placed as EcoRI-NcoI fragment upstream of the GUS start codon.

4.5. β-Glucuronidase Activity Assay, Histological

GUS activity was assessed in N. benthamiana leaves 5 (and 8) days after infiltration. Leaves were infiltrated with substrate solution [0.2% Triton X-100, 50 mM NaHPO4 buffer (pH 7.2), 2 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 2 mM potassium ferricyanide, 1 mM X-Gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-glucuronide cyclohexamine salt—from 100 mM stock in dimethyl formamide)]. Samples were incubated at 37 °C over night. Chlorophyll was removed by replacing the staining solution with a ethanol/acetic acid mix (3:1) and incubation at 70 °C. Destained leaves were subsequently inspected under a light microscope.

4.6. β-Glucuronidase Activity Assay in Protein Extracts

Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts were isolated and transformed with purified plasmids according to [65,66]. (MBSII-GUS or Rd29a-GUS reporter construct with the effectors YFP, MYB44 or MYB44-REP). An additional aliquot of protoplasts was transformed with 35S::YFP to document transformation efficiency. One day after transformation, β-glucuronidase activity in protein extracts was determined as described in [65] using MUG (4-methylumbelliferyl-β-d-glucuronide) as substrate. Six replicate transformations were performed for each promoter/reporter combination.

4.7. Transient Expression in Nicotinana benthamiana

Leaves of 5–6 week-old N. benthamiana plants were infiltrated with agrobacteria (strain GV3101, carrying pSoup and the pGreen construct(s) of interest) according to [67]. To confirm necrosis formation triggered by MYB44-REP expression, infiltrations were also performed with 2-, 3- and 4-week-old plants.

4.8. UV Microscopy

To document transient transformation efficiency in infiltrated N. benthamiana, YFP expression studies were conducted at a UV microscope (Leica DM5500B, Vienna, Austria), equipped with excitation/emission filters: BP450–450 nm/LP515 nm as described previously [40].

4.9. Protein Extraction and Immunoblot Analysis

Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) seedlings or Nicotiana benthamiana leaf discs were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Proteins were extracted as previously described [40].

5. Final Conclusions: MYB44 Manipulation for Optimizing Plant Stress Tolerance

Ectopic expression of MYB44 has been shown to improve salt and drought stress tolerance in soy [41]. As our results suggest, this tolerance-improving effect is most likely attributable to transcriptional activation genes involved in the prevention of excessive ROS accumulation. Therefore, a promising strategy to further enhance the tolerance-improving properties of MYB44 involves mutation or deletion of its latent repressor domain and/or fusion to a transcriptional activation domain. Expressing such MYB44 variant under the control of stress-responsive promoters presents a means of minimizing undesired side effects (e.g., growth retardation) frequently encountered with constitutive overexpression strategies.

Supplementary Information

ijms-15-02517-s001.pdf

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Lukas Mach for various support and the Austrian Science Foundation for funding (FWF P21851 to H.P.; and V167-B09 Elise-Richter-Grant to A.P.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  • Author ContributionsPlanned the experiments: A.P. and H.P.; conducted the experiments: H.P. and A.P.; contributed figures: H.P. and A.P.; wrote the manuscript: A.P.

References

  1. Pitzschke, A. From bench to barn: Plant model research and its applications in agriculture. Adv. Genet. Eng 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pitzschke, A. Make Your Best—MYB Transcription Factors for Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops. In Improving Crop Resistance to Abiotic Stress; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2012; pp. 481–506. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Seki, M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 2003, 6, 410–417. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lindemose, S.; O’Shea, C.; Jensen, M.K.; Skriver, K. Structure, function and networks of transcription factors involved in abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2013, 14, 5842–5878. [Google Scholar]
  5. Singh, K.; Foley, R.C.; Oñate-Sánchez, L. Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 2002, 5, 430–436. [Google Scholar]
  6. Park, J.M.; Park, C.J.; Lee, S.B.; Ham, B.K.; Shin, R.; Paek, K.H. Overexpression of the tobacco Tsi1 gene encoding an EREBP/AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kasuga, M.; Liu, Q.; Miura, S.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat. Biotech 1999, 17, 287–291. [Google Scholar]
  8. Polizel, A.M.; Medri, M.E.; Nakashima, K.; Yamanaka, N.; Farias, J.R.; de Oliveira, M.C.; Marin, S.R.; Abdelnoor, R.V.; Marcelino-Guimaraes, F.C.; Fuganti, R.; et al. Molecular, anatomical and physiological properties of a genetically modified soybean line transformed with rd29A:AtDREB1A for the improvement of drought tolerance. Genet. Mol. Res 2011, 10, 3641–3656. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ravikumar, G.; Manimaran, P.; Voleti, S.R.; Subrahmanyam, D.; Sundaram, R.M.; Bansal, K.C.; Viraktamath, B.C.; Balachandran, S.M. Stress-inducible expression of AtDREB1A transcription factor greatly improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic indica rice. Transgenic Res 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Djamei, A.; Pitzschke, A.; Nakagami, H.; Rajh, I.; Hirt, H. Trojan horse strategy in Agrobacterium transformation: Abusing MAPK defense signaling. Science 2007, 318, 453–456. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pitzschke, A.; Djamei, A.; Teige, M.; Hirt, H. VIP1 response elements mediate mitogen-activated protein kinase 3-induced stress gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 18414–18419. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsugama, D.; Liu, S.; Takano, T. A bZIP protein, VIP1, is a regulator of osmosensory signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2012, 159, 144–155. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, G.; Meng, X.; Wang, R.; Mao, G.; Han, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S. Dual-level regulation of ACC synthase activity by MPK3/MPK6 cascade and its downstream WRKY transcription factor during ethylene induction in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 2012, 8, e1002767. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hsu, F.C.; Chou, M.Y.; Chou, S.J.; Li, Y.R.; Peng, H.P.; Shih, M.C. Submergence confers immunity mediated by the WRKY22 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2699–2713. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mao, G.; Meng, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, S. Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1639–1653. [Google Scholar]
  16. Meng, X.; Xu, J.; He, Y.; Yang, K.Y.; Mordorski, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S. Phosphorylation of an ERF transcription factor by Arabidopsis MPK3/MPK6 regulates plant defense gene induction and fungal resistance. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1126–1142. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nguyen, X.C.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, K.; Kim, K.E.; Liu, X.M.; Han, H.J.; Hoang, M.H.; Lee, S.W.; Hong, J.C.; Moon, Y.H.; et al. Identification of a C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor (ZAT10) from Arabidopsis as a substrate of MAP kinase. Plant Cell Rep 2012, 31, 737–745. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kagale, S.; Links, M.G.; Rozwadowski, K. Genome-wide analysis of ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression motif-containing transcriptional regulators in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2010, 152, 1109–1134. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kagale, S.; Rozwadowski, K. EAR motif-mediated transcriptional repression in plants: An underlying mechanism for epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ohta, M.; Matsui, K.; Hiratsu, K.; Shinshi, H.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1959–1968. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tsukagoshi, H.; Saijo, T.; Shibata, D.; Morikami, A.; Nakamura, K. Analysis of a sugar response mutant of Arabidopsis identified a novel B3 domain protein that functions as an active transcriptional repressor. Plant Physiol 2005, 138, 675–685. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tsukagoshi, H.; Morikami, A.; Nakamura, K. Two B3 domain transcriptional repressors prevent sugar-inducible expression of seed maturation genes in Arabidopsis seedlings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2543–2547. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hill, K.; Wang, H.; Perry, S.E. A transcriptional repression motif in the MADS factor AGL15 is involved in recruitment of histone deacetylase complex components. Plant J 2008, 53, 172–185. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tiwari, S.B.; Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T.J. Aux/IAA proteins contain a potent transcriptional repression domain. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 533–543. [Google Scholar]
  25. Weigel, R.R.; Pfitzner, U.M.; Gatz, C. Interaction of NIMIN1 with NPR1 modulates PR gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1279–1291. [Google Scholar]
  26. Preston, J.; Wheeler, J.; Heazlewood, J.; Li, S.F.; Parish, R.W. AtMYB32 is required for normal pollen development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2004, 40, 979–995. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dubos, C.; le Gourrierec, J.; Baudry, A.; Huep, G.; Lanet, E.; Debeaujon, I.; Routaboul, J.M.; Alboresi, A.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. MYBL2 is a new regulator of flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2008, 55, 940–953. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jin, H.; Cominelli, E.; Bailey, P.; Parr, A.; Mehrtens, F.; Jones, J.; Tonelli, C.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C. Transcriptional repression by AtMYB4 controls production of UV-protecting sunscreens in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 2000, 19, 6150–6161. [Google Scholar]
  29. Szemenyei, H.; Hannon, M.; Long, J.A. TOPLESS mediates auxin-dependent transcriptional repression during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Science 2008, 319, 1384–1386. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hiratsu, K.; Matsui, K.; Koyama, T.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Dominant repression of target genes by chimeric repressors that include the EAR motif, a repression domain, in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2003, 34, 733–739. [Google Scholar]
  31. Galis, I.; Simek, P.; Narisawa, T.; Sasaki, M.; Horiguchi, T.; Fukuda, H.; Matsuoka, K. A novel R2R3 MYB transcription factor NtMYBJS1 is a methyl jasmonate-dependent regulator of phenylpropanoid-conjugate biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant J 2006, 46, 573–592. [Google Scholar]
  32. Deluc, L.; Barrieu, F.; Marchive, C.; Lauvergeat, V.; Decendit, A.; Richard, T.; Carde, J.P.; Merillon, J.M.; Hamdi, S. Characterization of a grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor that regulates the phenylpropanoid pathway. Plant Physiol 2006, 140, 499–511. [Google Scholar]
  33. Uimari, A.; Strommer, J. Myb26: A MYB-like protein of pea flowers with affinity for promoters of phenylpropanoid genes. Plant J 1997, 12, 1273–1284. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sablowski, R.W.; Moyano, E.; Culianez-Macia, F.A.; Schuch, W.; Martin, C.; Bevan, M. A flower-specific Myb protein activates transcription of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes. EMBO J 1994, 13, 128–137. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stracke, R.; Werber, M.; Weisshaar, B. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 2001, 4, 447–456. [Google Scholar]
  36. Romero, I.; Fuertes, A.; Benito, M.J.; Malpica, J.M.; Leyva, A.; Paz-Ares, J. More than 80R2R3-MYB regulatory genes in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1998, 14, 273–284. [Google Scholar]
  37. Shin, R.; Burch, A.Y.; Huppert, K.A.; Tiwari, S.B.; Murphy, A.S.; Guilfoyle, T.J.; Schachtman, D.P. The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB77 modulates auxin signal transduction. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2440–2453. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lu, B.; Sun, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, C.; Qian, J.; Wang, X.; Gao, R.; Dong, H. HrpN Ea-induced deterrent effect on phloem feeding of the green peach aphid Myzus persicae requires AtGSL5 and AtMYB44 genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biosci 2011, 36, 123–137. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jung, C.; Seo, J.S.; Han, S.W.; Koo, Y.J.; Kim, C.H.; Song, S.I.; Nahm, B.H.; Choi, Y.D.; Cheong, J.J. Overexpression of AtMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2008, 146, 623–635. [Google Scholar]
  40. Persak, H.; Pitzschke, A. Tight interconnection and multi-level control of Arabidopsis MYB44 in MAPK cascade signalling. PLoS One 2013, 8, e57547. [Google Scholar]
  41. Seo, J.; Sohn, H.; Noh, K.; Jung, C.; An, J.; Donovan, C.; Somers, D.; Kim, D.; Jeong, S.-C.; Kim, C.-G.; et al. Expression of the Arabidopsis AtMYB44 gene confers drought/salt-stress tolerance in transgenic soybean. Mol. Breed 2012, 29, 601–608. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wenke, K.; Wanke, D.; Kilian, J.; Berendzen, K.; Harter, K.; Piechulla, B. Volatiles of two growth-inhibiting rhizobacteria commonly engage AtWRKY18 function. Plant J 2012, 70, 445–459. [Google Scholar]
  43. Colcombet, J.; Hirt, H. Arabidopsis MAPKs: A complex signalling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem. J 2008, 413, 217–226. [Google Scholar]
  44. Krishna, M.; Narang, H. The complexity of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) made simple. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 2008, 65, 3525–3544. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nakagami, H.; Pitzschke, A.; Hirt, H. Emerging MAP kinase pathways in plant stress signalling. Trends Plant Sci 2005, 10, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pitzschke, A.; Schikora, A.; Hirt, H. MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 2009, 12, 421–426. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pitzschke, A.; Forzani, C.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2006, 8, 1757–1764. [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller, G.; Shulaev, V.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress. Physiol. Plant 2008, 133, 481–489. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kirik, V.; Kolle, K.; Misera, S.; Baumlein, H. Two novel MYB homologues with changed expression in late embryogenesis-defective Arabidopsis mutants. Plant Mol. Biol 1998, 37, 819–827. [Google Scholar]
  50. Shikata, M.; Ohme-Takagi, M. The utility of transcription factors for manipulation of floral traits. Plant Biotech 2008, 25, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tamagnone, L.; Merida, A.; Parr, A.; Mackay, S.; Culianez-Macia, F.A.; Roberts, K.; Martin, C. The AmMYB308 and AmMYB330 transcription factors from antirrhinum regulate phenylpropanoid and lignin biosynthesis in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 135–154. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ogata, K.; Morikawa, S.; Nakamura, H.; Hojo, H.; Yoshimura, S.; Zhang, R.; Aimoto, S.; Ametani, Y.; Hirata, Z.; Sarai, A.; et al. Comparison of the free and DNA-complexed forms of the DNA-binding domain from c-Myb. Nat. Struct. Biol 1995, 2, 309–320. [Google Scholar]
  54. Myrset, A.H.; Bostad, A.; Jamin, N.; Lirsac, P.N.; Toma, F.; Gabrielsen, O.S. DNA and redox state induced conformational changes in the DNA-binding domain of the Myb oncoprotein. EMBO J 1993, 12, 4625–4633. [Google Scholar]
  55. Heim, M.A.; Jakoby, M.; Werber, M.; Martin, C.; Weisshaar, B.; Bailey, P.C. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in plants: A genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol. Biol. Evol 2003, 20, 735–747. [Google Scholar]
  56. Baudry, A.; Heim, M.A.; Dubreucq, B.; Caboche, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. TT2, TT8, and TTG1 synergistically specify the expression of banyuls and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2004, 39, 366–380. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zimmermann, I.M.; Heim, M.A.; Weisshaar, B.; Uhrig, J.F. Comprehensive identification of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors interacting with R/B-like BHLH proteins. Plant J 2004, 40, 22–34. [Google Scholar]
  58. Grotewold, E.; Sainz, M.B.; Tagliani, L.; Hernandez, J.M.; Bowen, B.; Chandler, V.L. Identification of the residues in the Myb domain of maize C1 that specify the interaction with the bHLH cofactor R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13579–13584. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wester, K.; Digiuni, S.; Geier, F.; Timmer, J.; Fleck, C.; Hulskamp, M. Functional diversity of R3 single-repeat genes in trichome development. Development 2009, 136, 1487–1496. [Google Scholar]
  60. Li, L.; Yu, X.; Thompson, A.; Guo, M.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J.; Yin, Y. Arabidopsis MYB30 is a direct target of BES1 and cooperates with BES1 to regulate brassinosteroid-induced gene expression. Plant J 2009, 58, 275–286. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang, S.W.; Jang, I.C.; Henriques, R.; Chua, N.H. FAR-RED ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL1 and FHY1-like associate with the Arabidopsis transcription factors LAF1 and HFR1 to transmit phytochrome A signals for inhibition of hypocotyl elongation. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1341–1359. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, P.; Du, Y.; Zhao, X.; Miao, Y.; Song, C.P. The MPK6-ERF6-ROS-responsive cis-acting Element7/GCC box complex modulates oxidative gene transcription and the oxidative response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2013, 161, 1392–1408. [Google Scholar]
  63. Smart, R.E. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiol 1974, 53, 258–260. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hellens, R.P.; Edwards, E.A.; Leyland, N.R.; Bean, S.; Mullineaux, P.M. pGreen: A versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol 2000, 42, 819–832. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pitzschke, A.; Persak, H. Poinsettia protoplasts—A simple, robust and efficient system for transient gene expression studies. Plant Methods 2012, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wu, F.H.; Shen, S.C.; Lee, L.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Chan, M.T.; Lin, C.S. Tape-Arabidopsis Sandwich—A simpler Arabidopsis protoplast isolation method. Plant Methods 2009, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hellens, R.P.; Allan, A.C.; Friel, E.N.; Bolitho, K.; Grafton, K.; Templeton, M.D.; Karunairetnam, S.; Gleave, A.P.; Laing, W.A. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods 2005, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 15 02517f1 1024
Figure 1. Protein sequence alignment of Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB subfamily 22. The R2R3 repeats of the DNA binding domain (grey) and putative transcriptional repressor motif (yellow) are highlighted. The known MPK3 phosphorylation site in MYB44 (Ser145) is indicated. The N-terminal (aa1-212) MYB44 region known to bind particularly strongly to DNA (MBSII element) is shown in bold. A conserved cysteine residue potentially involved in redox-dependent MYB activity is underlined. “.” “:” and “*” mark residues with low, moderate and high conservation.
Figure 1. Protein sequence alignment of Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB subfamily 22. The R2R3 repeats of the DNA binding domain (grey) and putative transcriptional repressor motif (yellow) are highlighted. The known MPK3 phosphorylation site in MYB44 (Ser145) is indicated. The N-terminal (aa1-212) MYB44 region known to bind particularly strongly to DNA (MBSII element) is shown in bold. A conserved cysteine residue potentially involved in redox-dependent MYB activity is underlined. “.” “:” and “*” mark residues with low, moderate and high conservation.
Ijms 15 02517f1
Ijms 15 02517f2 1024
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of DNA constructs used for overexpression in planta. Relative positions of MPK3 phosphorylation site (*) and the putative endogenous EAR motif (--) are indicated.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of DNA constructs used for overexpression in planta. Relative positions of MPK3 phosphorylation site (*) and the putative endogenous EAR motif (--) are indicated.
Ijms 15 02517f2
Ijms 15 02517f3 1024
Figure 3. Stable expression of MYB44-REP in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. (A) Documentation of overexpression. Eight-day-old seedlings of Col-0 and MYB44-REP transgenic lines were separated by SDS-PAGE. Transgene expression was visualized by immunodetection, using rabbit anti-myc and IRDye800CW-coupled donkey-anti-rabbit (NEB, Frankfurt, Germany) as primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. Strong transgene expression can be seen in five lines; and (B) MYB44-REP overexpression in Arabidopsis does not interfere with normal development; (B1): 10-day-old seedlings grown on standard medium; and (B2): Aerial views of rosettes of 5-week-old plants of wild-type and MYB44-REP overexpressing plants. Images of one representative line, which was phenotypically indistinguishable from other MYB44-REP lines, are shown.
Figure 3. Stable expression of MYB44-REP in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. (A) Documentation of overexpression. Eight-day-old seedlings of Col-0 and MYB44-REP transgenic lines were separated by SDS-PAGE. Transgene expression was visualized by immunodetection, using rabbit anti-myc and IRDye800CW-coupled donkey-anti-rabbit (NEB, Frankfurt, Germany) as primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. Strong transgene expression can be seen in five lines; and (B) MYB44-REP overexpression in Arabidopsis does not interfere with normal development; (B1): 10-day-old seedlings grown on standard medium; and (B2): Aerial views of rosettes of 5-week-old plants of wild-type and MYB44-REP overexpressing plants. Images of one representative line, which was phenotypically indistinguishable from other MYB44-REP lines, are shown.
Ijms 15 02517f3
Ijms 15 02517f4 1024
Figure 4. MYB44-REP overexpression compromises abiotic stress tolerance. (A) Survival under high-salinity conditions. Three-day-old seedlings grown under standard conditions were transferred onto growth medium supplemented with 150 mM NaCl. Seedling survival was monitored over a 4-day period. About 50 seedlings of 4–6 independent lines each were tested. Results of two independent experiments are shown; (B) Superoxide accumulation upon osmotic shock treatment. Twelve-day-old seedlings were incubated in tap water with or without 300 mM NaCl for 6 h. Superoxide radicals were visualized by nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining. Five seedlings per treatment per line were tested in parallel; one representative image is shown. The experiment was repeated twice; and (C) Drought stress. Roots were detached from 3-week-old seedlings that had grown on standard medium. Water loss was determined at regular intervals over a 4 h period. The experiment was repeated twice.
Figure 4. MYB44-REP overexpression compromises abiotic stress tolerance. (A) Survival under high-salinity conditions. Three-day-old seedlings grown under standard conditions were transferred onto growth medium supplemented with 150 mM NaCl. Seedling survival was monitored over a 4-day period. About 50 seedlings of 4–6 independent lines each were tested. Results of two independent experiments are shown; (B) Superoxide accumulation upon osmotic shock treatment. Twelve-day-old seedlings were incubated in tap water with or without 300 mM NaCl for 6 h. Superoxide radicals were visualized by nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining. Five seedlings per treatment per line were tested in parallel; one representative image is shown. The experiment was repeated twice; and (C) Drought stress. Roots were detached from 3-week-old seedlings that had grown on standard medium. Water loss was determined at regular intervals over a 4 h period. The experiment was repeated twice.
Ijms 15 02517f4
Ijms 15 02517f5 1024
Figure 5. Promoter construct and co-transfection assays. (A) Partial sequence of the MBSII-35Smin-GUS construct. The tandem MBSII element is highlighted; the minimal CaMV35S promoter region is underlined. The GUS start codon is shown in bold. For comparison, the DNA fragment efficiently bound by MYB44 [40] is shown in the top line; and (B) Promoter/effector relations were studied in Arabidopsis protoplasts. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts were co-transfected with the reporter constructs MBSII::GUS or Rd29A::GUS, plus one of the following effector constructs: YFP (control), MYB44 or MYB44-REP. β-glucuronidase activity was assessed in protein extracts by quantitative MUG assay. Conversion of the substrate was measured 4 h after incubation at 37 °C. Six aliquots of protoplasts were transformed for each promoter/effector combination. Protoplast transformation of 35S::GUS for constitutive expression of the reporter gene served as positive control. Note that GUS expression from the 35S promoter is approximately 100 times higher than in MBSII or Rd29A. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results.
Figure 5. Promoter construct and co-transfection assays. (A) Partial sequence of the MBSII-35Smin-GUS construct. The tandem MBSII element is highlighted; the minimal CaMV35S promoter region is underlined. The GUS start codon is shown in bold. For comparison, the DNA fragment efficiently bound by MYB44 [40] is shown in the top line; and (B) Promoter/effector relations were studied in Arabidopsis protoplasts. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts were co-transfected with the reporter constructs MBSII::GUS or Rd29A::GUS, plus one of the following effector constructs: YFP (control), MYB44 or MYB44-REP. β-glucuronidase activity was assessed in protein extracts by quantitative MUG assay. Conversion of the substrate was measured 4 h after incubation at 37 °C. Six aliquots of protoplasts were transformed for each promoter/effector combination. Protoplast transformation of 35S::GUS for constitutive expression of the reporter gene served as positive control. Note that GUS expression from the 35S promoter is approximately 100 times higher than in MBSII or Rd29A. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results.
Ijms 15 02517f5
Ijms 15 02517f6 1024
Figure 6. Overexpression of MYB44-REP causes necrotic lesions. N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacteria carrying a construct for overexpression of YFP (control), MYB44 or MYB44-REP. The photo was taken eight days post-infiltration. All leaves shown are derived from the same plant. Consistent results were obtained from infiltration experiments with individual plants (1 plant/construct).
Figure 6. Overexpression of MYB44-REP causes necrotic lesions. N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacteria carrying a construct for overexpression of YFP (control), MYB44 or MYB44-REP. The photo was taken eight days post-infiltration. All leaves shown are derived from the same plant. Consistent results were obtained from infiltration experiments with individual plants (1 plant/construct).
Ijms 15 02517f6
Ijms 15 02517f7 1024
Figure 7. Proposed model of MYB44 function in stressed plants. Upon stress perception, a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade is activated. MAPKK4 phosphorylates and thereby activates MPK3. MPK3 phosphorylates MYB44, thereby stimulating MYB44 function as transcriptional inducer [40]. Right: MYB44-induced target genes, directly or indirectly, enhance the antioxidant capacity, e.g., through activating reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging enzymes. This ultimately leads to a balanced redox state and prevention of cell death; and Left: in contrast, dominant repression of MYB44 target genes adversely affects redox-balancing, leading to massive accumulation of destructive ROS.
Figure 7. Proposed model of MYB44 function in stressed plants. Upon stress perception, a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade is activated. MAPKK4 phosphorylates and thereby activates MPK3. MPK3 phosphorylates MYB44, thereby stimulating MYB44 function as transcriptional inducer [40]. Right: MYB44-induced target genes, directly or indirectly, enhance the antioxidant capacity, e.g., through activating reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging enzymes. This ultimately leads to a balanced redox state and prevention of cell death; and Left: in contrast, dominant repression of MYB44 target genes adversely affects redox-balancing, leading to massive accumulation of destructive ROS.
Ijms 15 02517f7

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Persak, H.; Pitzschke, A. Dominant Repression by Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB44 Causes Oxidative Damage and Hypersensitivity to Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2517-2537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022517

AMA Style

Persak H, Pitzschke A. Dominant Repression by Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB44 Causes Oxidative Damage and Hypersensitivity to Abiotic Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(2):2517-2537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Persak, Helene, and Andrea Pitzschke. 2014. "Dominant Repression by Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB44 Causes Oxidative Damage and Hypersensitivity to Abiotic Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 2: 2517-2537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022517

APA Style

Persak, H., & Pitzschke, A. (2014). Dominant Repression by Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB44 Causes Oxidative Damage and Hypersensitivity to Abiotic Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15(2), 2517-2537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022517

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop