Next Article in Journal
Neuron Membrane Trafficking and Protein Kinases Involved in Autism and ADHD
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Variant in Interleukin-18 Is Associated with Idiopathic Recurrent Miscarriage in Chinese Han Population
Previous Article in Journal
A Ribosomal Protein AgRPS3aE from Halophilic Aspergillus glaucus Confers Salt Tolerance in Heterologous Organisms
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Association of ADORA2A and ADORA2B Polymorphisms with the Risk and Severity of Chronic Heart Failure: A Case-Control Study of a Northern Chinese Population
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms16023071
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pacemaker Activity of the Human Sinoatrial Node: An Update on the Effects of Mutations in HCN4 on the Hyperpolarization-Activated Current

by
Arie O. Verkerk
and
Ronald Wilders
*
Department of Anatomy, Embryology and Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(2), 3071-3094; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16023071
Submission received: 22 December 2014 / Accepted: 22 January 2015 / Published: 29 January 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Disease Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Since 2003, several loss-of-function mutations in the HCN4 gene, which encodes the HCN4 protein, have been associated with sinus node dysfunction. In human sinoatrial node (SAN), HCN4 is the most abundant of the four isoforms of the HCN family. Tetramers of HCN subunits constitute the ion channels that conduct the hyperpolarization-activated “funny” current (If), which plays an important modulating role in SAN pacemaker activity. Voltage-clamp experiments on HCN4 channels expressed in COS-7, CHO and HEK-293 cells, as well as in Xenopus oocytes have revealed changes in the expression and kinetics of mutant channels, but the extent to which especially the kinetic changes would affect If flowing during a human SAN action potential often remains unresolved. In our contribution to the Topical Collection on Human Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Disease Diagnostics, we provide an updated review of the mutation-induced changes in the expression and kinetics of HCN4 channels and provide an overview of their effects on If during the time course of a human SAN action potential, as assessed in simulated action potential clamp experiments. Future research may solve apparent inconsistencies between data from clinical studies and data from in vitro and in silico experiments.

Graphical Abstract

1. HCN4 and Familial Sick Sinus Syndrome

The “sick sinus syndrome” has been defined as the “intrinsic inadequacy of the sinoatrial node (SAN) to perform its pacemaking function due to a disorder of automaticity and/or inability to transmit its impulse to the rest of the atrium” [1]. In 2003, Schulze-Bahr et al. [2] were the first to link familial sick sinus syndrome to mutations in the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) gene family that mediates the hyperpolarization-activated “pacemaker current” or “funny current” (If) in the heart (for reviews, see [3,4,5,6,7]). The HCN channel family comprises four members, HCN1–HCN4, which can form HCN channels in homomeric, as well as heteromeric tetramers. The four HCN family members display distinct expression patterns in the body (for reviews, see [4,8,9,10]), but the dominant HCN transcript in the human SAN is HCN4 [11]. It is, therefore, not surprising that the HCN4 locus has been identified as a modulator of heart rate in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) [12] and that reduced HCN4 expression due to endurance exercise is associated with a lower resting heart rate [13]. A reduced HCN4 expression is also associated with a lower heart rate in animal models of heart failure [14] and aging [15]. Less obviously, the HCN4 locus had already been identified as a susceptibility locus for atrial fibrillation (AF) in another GWAS [16].
Both HCN1-deficient [17] and HCN2-deficient [18] transgenic mice may display a sick sinus syndrome phenotype. However, till now, reports of mutations affecting If in the human heart have been restricted to the HCN4 gene [2,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] or the KCNE2 gene [29], which encodes the MiRP1 modulatory subunit of the If channel. Voltage-clamp experiments on wild-type and mutant human HCN4 channels expressed in COS-7, CHO and HEK-293 cells, as well as in Xenopus oocytes have revealed changes in the expression and/or kinetics of mutant HCN4 channels, but the extent to which especially the kinetic changes would affect If flowing during a human SAN action potential often remains unresolved.
In a previous review, we provided an overview of the HCN4 and KCNE2 mutations associated with sinus node dysfunction [30]. This overview was limited to the seven HCN4 mutations and a single KCNE2 mutation associated with sinus node dysfunction that were known at that time [2,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Today, however, there are as many as 15 newly discovered HCN4 variants and mutations [25,26,27,28], some with clinical manifestations beyond sinus node dysfunction, and research is ongoing (e.g., [31]). Here, we first give an overview of these newly discovered HCN4 variants and mutations and their effects on the characteristics of the HCN4 current. Next, we show how action potentials recorded from isolated human SAN pacemaker cells can be used as the command potential in simulated action potential clamp experiments to assess the effects of HCN4 mutations on If flowing during a human SAN action potential. Furthermore, we point to apparent inconsistencies between data from clinical studies and data from in vitro and in silico experiments.

2. Mutations in HCN4 and KCNE2 Associated with Sinus Node Dysfunction

To date, 22 mutations or variants in HCN4 and one in KCNE2 have been associated with clinically established or potential sinus node dysfunction [2,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Figure 1 indicates the location of each of these mutations and variants on the HCN4 and MiRP1 proteins. Clinical observations, if reported, are summarized in Table 1, in the order of the mutations and variants on the protein. Changes in expression or kinetic properties associated with the mutations and variants are described below, in the same order, and summarized in Table 2. For completeness, previously reviewed mutations [30] are also included. Intriguingly, HCN4 mutations are not only associated with sinus node dysfunction, but also with AF, left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) and atrioventricular (AV) block.
Ijms 16 03071 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic topology of the HCN4 and MiRP1 proteins. The HCN4 α-subunit has six transmembrane segments (S1–S6), a pore-forming loop (P) and intracellular N- and C-termini. The voltage sensor of the channel is formed by the positively-charged S4 helix. The C-terminus comprises the C-linker (dotted line) and the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain (cNBD), which is known to mediate cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent changes in HCN channel gating. The MiRP1 β-subunit has a single transmembrane segment with an extracellular N-terminus and intracellular C-terminus. Red dots indicate the location of the 23 known HCN4 and MiRP1 mutation sites associated with clinically established or potential sinus node dysfunction. The split dots indicate the truncations resulting from the 573X and 695X non-sense (truncating) mutations.
Figure 1. Schematic topology of the HCN4 and MiRP1 proteins. The HCN4 α-subunit has six transmembrane segments (S1–S6), a pore-forming loop (P) and intracellular N- and C-termini. The voltage sensor of the channel is formed by the positively-charged S4 helix. The C-terminus comprises the C-linker (dotted line) and the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain (cNBD), which is known to mediate cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent changes in HCN channel gating. The MiRP1 β-subunit has a single transmembrane segment with an extracellular N-terminus and intracellular C-terminus. Red dots indicate the location of the 23 known HCN4 and MiRP1 mutation sites associated with clinically established or potential sinus node dysfunction. The split dots indicate the truncations resulting from the 573X and 695X non-sense (truncating) mutations.
Ijms 16 03071 g001
In our overview, we did not include the HCN4 mutation in a Brugada syndrome patient described by Ueda et al. [32]. The insertion of four bases at a splicing junction of exon 2 and intron 2 likely results in a defective HCN4 protein without the ability to form functional tetramers. A functional analysis in COS-7 cells demonstrated that almost equal amounts of normal and abnormal splicing products were expressed, but in vitro electrophysiological data are not available [32]. Furthermore, we did not include the “likely pathogenic” A195V and V759I variants in HCN4 that were identified by Evans et al. [33] in two cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), because both clinical and in vitro data on the effects of these variants are lacking.
A recent abstract mentioned five novel HCN4 mutations in patients suffering from sinus node dysfunction, dyspnea and AF [31]. Unfortunately, neither the exact mutations nor their effects on the HCN4 current were specified. Thus, these mutations could not be included in our overview.
Table
Table 1. Clinical observations in carriers of mutations in HCN4 or KCNE2.
Table 1. Clinical observations in carriers of mutations in HCN4 or KCNE2.
MutationMutation CarriersClinical PresentationStudy
Mutations in HCN4
P257Ssingle index patient (65-year-old male)diagnosed with paroxysmal AF at age 29; AF became permanent at age 43 years; sinus node dysfunction during ajmaline test in proband and proband’s father; 73 pauses >2.0 s on 24-h Holter monitoringMacri et al. [26]
A414G3 members of a single familyAF and LVNC in 74-year-old male index patient; combined sinus bradycardia and LVNC in his two mutation-carrying sons; severe sinus bradycardia involving 12 episodes of standstill on Holter monitoring in one of the sonsMilano et al. [27]
G480R8 members of a single familyasymptomatic sinus bradycardia from a young age, with normal chronotropic and exercise capacity; minimum, average and maximum heart rates of 31 ± 8, 48 ± 12 and 101 ± 21 beats/min, respectively, in the 8 mutation carriers vs. 55 ± 9, 73 ± 11 and 126 ± 16 beats/min, respectively, in the 8 non-carriersNof et al. [21]
Y481H4 members of two families with a common ancestral haplotypecombined sinus bradycardia and LVNC; frequent episodes of severe bradycardia (heart rate < 30 beats/min) and pacemaker implantation in the index patient of the first family; severe sinus bradycardia (40 beats/min) in the index patient of the second family and pacemaker implantation in his mutation-carrying mother because of bradyarrhythmiasMilano et al. [27]
G482R6 members of a single familycombined sinus bradycardia and LVNC; pacemaker implanted in three mutation carriers because of bradycardia-related symptoms (average heart rate of 46 beats/min); MVP in two individualsMilano et al. [27]
G482R3 members of a single German familycombined sinus bradycardia, LVNC, and MVP; minimum and average heart rates of 21 and 34 beats/min, respectively, and pacemaker implantation in the index patientSchweizer et al. [28]
A485V14 members of three Moroccan Jewish decent familiessymptomatic familial sinus bradycardia with normal chronotropic and exercise capacity; minimum, average and maximum heart rates of 37 ± 3, 58 ± 6 and 117 ± 27 beats/min in the 14 mutation carriers, respectively, vs. 49 ± 11, 77 ± 12 and 140 ± 32 beats/min, respectively, in the 6 non-carriersLaish-Farkash et al. [23]
K530N6 members of a single familymild, asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (50–60 beats/min) in the index patient; familial age-dependent tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and persistent AF; no AF or any other relevant cardiac arrhythmia in non-carriersDuhme et al. [24]
D553Nsingle index patient (43-year-old female) and two family memberswide spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias, including severe bradycardia (24-h average of 39 beats/min), QT prolongation and Torsade de Pointes in the index patient; QT prolongation in family membersUeda et al. [19]
573Xsingle index patient (66-year-old female)idiopathic sinus bradycardia of 41 beats/min; chronotropic incompetence; intermittent episodes of AFSchulze-Bahr et al. [2]
S672R15 members of a single Italian familyasymptomatic sinus bradycardia; average resting heart rate, corrected for age and gender, of 52.2 ± 1.4 beats/min (range 43–60 beats/min), in the 15 mutation carriers vs. 73.2 ± 1.6 beats/min (range 64–81 beats/min) in the 12 non-affected family membersMilanesi et al. [20]
695X8 members of a single German familymarked sinus bradycardia with no signs of chronotropic incompetence; basal heart rate of 45.9 ± 4.6 beats/min (range 38–51 beats/min) in the 8 mutation carriers vs. 66.5 ± 9.1 beats/min in the 6 non-carriers; minimum heart rate of 35.9 ± 5.6 vs. 47.2 ± 5.9 beats/min; maximum heart rates of 160.3 ± 12.6 vs. 171.8 ± 18.7 beats/min; LVNC in 5 of the mutation carriersSchweizer et al. [22,28]
P883Rsingle male patientsinus bradycardia (35 to 40 beats/min), paroxysmal AF (tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome) and LVNC; pacemaker implantationSchweizer et al. [28]
G1097Wsingle index patient (69-year-old male)complete AV block with wide QRS, but no sinus nodal dysfunction; atrial rate of 132 beats/min; ventricular rate of 33 beats/min; pacemaker implantation at the age of 51 yearsZhou et al. [25]
Mutations in KCNE2
M54Tsingle index patient (55-year-old Caucasian male)history of marked sinus bradycardia; average heart rate of 43 beats/min (range 30–125 beats/min), along with pauses; daughter died suddenly at the age of 13, and post-mortem genetic testing revealed the M54T mutationNawathe et al. [29]
Mutations are heterozygous with autosomal dominant inheritance. AF, atrial fibrillation; LVNC, left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; QT prolongation, prolongation of the rate-corrected QT interval on the electrocardiogram.

2.1. HCN4-K189R

Macri et al. [26] sought to determine if genetic variation in the coding region of HCN4 is associated with AF. They identified seven novel HCN4 variants in their cohort of 527 unrelated individuals with early-onset AF, as well as three novel variants in their cohort of 443 referent individuals without history or ECG evidence of AF. K189R, located in the N-terminus (Figure 1), is one of the HCN4 variants identified in the AF cases. Macri et al. [26] overexpressed wild-type and homomeric K189R variant HCN4 channels in CHO cells and carried out voltage-clamp experiments. They did not observe differences in characteristics of the wild-type and variant HCN4 current (Table 2). Of note, Macri et al. [26] did not study heteromeric wild-type/K189R channels, which would have better resembled the heterozygous condition in individuals carrying the K189R variant.
Table
Table 2. Effect of mutations and variants in HCN4 or KCNE2 on HCN4 current.
Table 2. Effect of mutations and variants in HCN4 or KCNE2 on HCN4 current.
MutationType of ExpressionExpression SystemShift in V1/2 or Activation Threshold (mV)Slope Factor (mV)Time Constant of ActivationTime Constant of DeactivationReversal PotentialFull-Activated Current DensityChannel ExpressionSensitivity to cAMPReference
Mutations and Variants in HCN4
K189RhomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
P257SheteromericCHO==???=≈50%?Macri et al. [26]
homomericCHO 0%↓ Macri et al. [26]
A414GheteromericCHO−23.9=???=??Milano et al. [27]
G480Rheteromericoocyte, HEK≈−15?↑ a?=≈50%?= bNof et al. [21]
homomericoocyte, HEK≈−30?↑ a?=≈12%↓= bNof et al. [21]
oocyte?????≈20%??Laish-Farkash et al. [23]
Y481HheteromericCHO−43.9=???=??Milano et al. [27]
G482RheteromericHEK=====35%=?Schweizer et al. [28]
CHO−38.7=???=??Milano et al. [27]
homomericHEK?????6%=?Schweizer et al. [28]
A485Vheteromericoocyte, HEK≈−30?↑ a↑ a=≈33%=?Laish-Farkash et al. [23]
homomericoocyte, HEK≈−60?↑ a↑ a=≈5%=↓Laish-Farkash et al. [23]
K530NheteromericHEK≈−14=237%===?↑Duhme et al. [24]
homomericHEK======?=Duhme et al. [24]
D553NheteromericCOS==≈90%≈110%?≈37%↓?Ueda et al. [19]
oocyte, COS?????≈54%=?Netter et al. [34]
homomericCOS==≈90%≈110%?≈8%↓?Ueda et al. [19]
oocyte, COS====?≈12%=↓Netter et al. [34]
573XheteromericCOS= c−1.9 c=???=↓Schulze-Bahr et al. [2]
homomericCOS−4.6 c==? a??=↓Schulze-Bahr et al. [2]
S672RheteromericHEK−4.9==≈74%????Milanesi et al. [20]
homomericHEK−8.4==≈63%???=Milanesi et al. [20]
oocyte−6.1?≈180%≈90%???↓Xu et al. [32]
N688ShomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
695XheteromericHEK===??=?↓Schweizer et al. [22]
homomericHEK=−3.572%==??↓Schweizer et al. [22]
T822MhomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
G885RhomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
P945ShomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
A1045VhomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
R1068HhomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
G1077ShomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
G1097WheteromericCHO−7.6=?81%?55%??Zhou et al. [25]
homomericCHO−12=?79%?47%?=Zhou et al. [25]
E1193QhomomericCHO==???=??Macri et al. [26]
Mutations in KCNE2
M54ThomomericNRVM==192%=?18%??Nawathe et al. [29]
Data are the changes relative to wild-type current. ?, not reported; ≈, estimated from presented figures; ↓, decreased; ↑, increased; =, unchanged. a Changes reported, but no quantitative data provided; b performed in oocytes, which lack cAMP modulation, due to high basal activity [21]; c with 15-s hyperpolarizing pulses (at 20–22 °C); oocyte, HEK, COS and NRVM: Xenopus oocytes, HEK-293 cells, COS-7 cells and neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, respectively.

2.2. HCN4-P257S

Like the above K189R variant, P257S, also located in the N-terminus (Figure 1), is one of the seven HCN4 variants identified by Macri et al. [26] in their cohort of individuals with early-onset AF. Expression of homomeric P257S-variant HCN4 channels in CHO cells did not result in any measurable HNC4 current in voltage-clamp experiments, whereas co-expression of wild-type and variant HCN4 did not reveal any changes with respect to wild-type HNC4 current (Table 2). However, with the use of immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy, Macri et al. [26] also demonstrated that P257S variant channels were not detectable at the plasma membrane, but instead were retained in the cytoplasm, which suggests that the P257S variant disrupts trafficking to the cell membrane. Macri et al. [26] further demonstrated that, when co-expressed, wild-type HCN4 channels do not colocalize with P257S variant channels at the cell membrane. The latter findings suggest, despite the similar current density in voltage-clamp experiments (Table 2), that the P257S variant may be related to the clinically observed AF (Table 1) as a result of haploinsufficiency, with only the single wild-type allele contributing to the production of the HCN4 channel protein and current.

2.3. HCN4-A414G

A414G is a mutation in the S4–S5 linker (Figure 1) associated with sinus bradycardia, AF and LVNC in three members of a single family (Table 1). Functional analysis in CHO cells revealed a significant hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of activation of heteromerically expressed A414G mutant HCN4 channels (Table 2). This shift resulted in a dramatic decrease of the fully-activated HCN4 current density in the voltage range of the diastolic depolarization of SAN cells [27].

2.4. HCN4-G480R

G480R is one of the currently known mutations in the pore-forming loop of the HCN4 protein (Figure 1). It is associated with asymptomatic sinus bradycardia from a young age, with normal chronotropic and exercise capacity (Table 1). Western blot analysis demonstrated significantly reduced membrane expression of homomeric HCN4-G480R channels in HEK-293 cells [21]. Functional analysis in Xenopus oocytes and HEK-293 cells revealed a decrease in fully-activated current density, accompanied by a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of activation and slowing of activation kinetics (Table 2). In Xenopus oocytes, neither wild-type nor G480R currents were modulated by β-adrenergic regulation, likely due to the high levels of endogenous cyclic AMP (cAMP) in Xenopus oocytes [35]. Thus, whether the G480R mutation affects the sensitivity to cAMP is unresolved. Laish-Farkash et al. [23] later confirmed the decrease of fully-activated current density in HEK-293 cells.

2.5. HCN4-Y481H

Another, recently discovered mutation in the pore-forming loop of the HCN4 protein is Y481H (Figure 1). It is associated with combined sinus bradycardia and LVNC in four members of two families with a common ancestral haplotype (Table 1). If heteromerically expressed in CHO cells, the Y481H mutation results in a >40-mV shift in the voltage dependence of activation towards more negative potentials (Table 2). As a consequence, the fully-activated HCN4 current density in the voltage range of diastolic depolarization of SAN cells is almost zero [27].

2.6. HCN4-G482R

Recently, both Milano et al. [27] and Schweizer et al. [28] reported an association of the G482R mutation with combined sinus bradycardia and LVNC in a total of nine individuals from two families (Table 1). Like the above G480R and Y481H mutations, the G482R mutation is located in the pore-forming loop of the HCN4 protein (Figure 1). Patch-clamp experiments in HEK-293 cells by Schweizer et al. [28] demonstrated that homomeric G482R mutant channels were non-functional, despite similar surface expression of HCN4 wild-type and mutant subunits. In case of heteromeric expression, the mutation exerted dominant negative effects as revealed by a 65% reduction in fully-activated current density, without affecting the voltage dependence of activation. Milano et al. [27], on the other hand, reported a strong hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of activation of G482R channels that were heteromerically expressed in CHO cells, resulting in a negligible fully-activated HCN4 current density in the voltage range of diastolic depolarization of SAN cells.

2.7. HCN4-A485V

Laish-Farkash et al. [23] observed familial sinus bradycardia in 14 members of three Moroccan Jewish decent families carrying the A485V mutation, which is another mutation in the pore-forming loop (Figure 1). Western blot analysis revealed significantly reduced membrane expression of homomeric A485V mutant channels in HEK-293 cells [23]. Functional analysis of both homomerically and heteromerically expressed mutant channels in Xenopus oocytes and HEK-293 cells demonstrated large hyperpolarizing shifts of the voltage dependence of activation, slowing of both activation and deactivation, and a reduction in fully-activated current density (Table 2).

2.8. HCN4-K530N

Tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and persistent AF were observed in six members of a single family carrying the K530N mutation in HCN4 [24], located in the C-linker of the HCN4 protein (Figure 1). Patch-clamp experiments in HEK-293 cells revealed similar characteristics of wild-type channels and homomerically expressed mutant channels (Table 2). However, experiments on heteromerically expressed channels demonstrated a hyperpolarizing shift of the half-maximal activation voltage and slowed activation of the HCN4 current. Furthermore, heteromeric channels showed a larger sensitivity to cAMP than either homomeric mutant or wild-type channels, as demonstrated by the ≈7-mV larger cAMP-induced shift of the activation curve and the larger change in the activation time constant.

2.9. HCN4-D553N

Also located in the C-linker is the D553N mutation (Figure 1). Several electrophysiological abnormalities, including severe bradycardia and QT prolongation (i.e., prolongation of the rate-corrected QT interval on the electrocardiogram), were noticed in three members of a single family carrying this mutation [24]. A functional study in COS-7 cells [19] showed a reduced membrane expression and decreased current, because of a dominant-negative trafficking defect of the D553N mutant protein. The voltage dependence of activation of the mutant HCN4 channel was comparable to the wild-type, but activation was slightly faster, while deactivation was slightly slower (Table 2). On the other hand, Netter et al. [34] reported that D553N mutant channels have normal trafficking, with similar surface expression of D553N and wild-type channels in COS-7, HeLa and HL-1 cells. In both Xenopus oocytes and COS-7 cells, D553N channels generated currents with reduced amplitude, but unaltered kinetics. Furthermore, homomeric D553N channels did not respond to adrenergic stimulation.

2.10. HCN4-573X

In a single index patient, Schulze-Bahr et al. [2] observed sinus bradycardia with chronotropic incompetence and episodes of AF (Table 1). This patient carried the 573X non-sense (truncating) mutation in the C-linker (Figure 1). The mutation thus resulted in a truncated HCN4 protein that lacks the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain (cNBD), which mediates the cAMP effects on gating of the HCN4 channel. In COS-7 cells, mutant subunits showed normal intracellular trafficking and integration into the cell membrane [2]. Patch-clamp experiments demonstrated a steeper steady-state activation curve with a shift to more hyperpolarized potentials, but this required excessively long hyperpolarizing voltage steps to become apparent (Table 2). Both homomeric and heteromeric channels appeared insensitive to cAMP, demonstrating a dominant-negative effect of the mutant on wild-type subunits.

2.11. HCN4-S672R

Fifteen carriers of the S672R mutation, all members of a single Italian family, showed asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (Table 1). A functional study in HEK-293 cells revealed a shift in channel activation to more hyperpolarized potentials and faster deactivation of both homomeric and heteromeric mutant channels (Table 2). The cAMP-dependent shifts in voltage dependence of activation, as assessed in inside-out macropatches, were similar in wild-type and homomeric mutant channels [20], suggesting that the S672R mutation did not affect the sensitivity to cAMP, notwithstanding its location in the cNBD (Figure 1). Xu et al. [36], on the other hand, made inside-out patch-clamp recordings in Xenopus oocytes and found a reduced sensitivity to cAMP, which, however, was challenged in a review by DiFrancesco [7].

2.12. HCN4-N688S

The N688S variant is also located in the cNBD of the HCN4 subunit (Figure 1). It is one of the three novel variants that Macri et al. [26] observed in their cohort of 443 referent individuals without history or ECG evidence of AF. In patch-clamp experiments on CHO cells, no functional effects of the N688S variant were observed (Table 2). Of note, preservation of cAMP dependence was not assessed.

2.13. HCN4-695X

In a single German family, Schweizer et al. [22] observed marked sinus bradycardia without signs of chronotropic incompetence in eight carriers of the 695X non-sense mutation in HCN4 (Table 1). Recently, Schweizer et al. [28] reported LVNC in five of the eight mutation carriers. Like the above 573X mutation, the 695X mutation results in a truncated cNBD (Figure 1). Patch-clamp experiments in HEK-293 cells demonstrated a steeper slope of the activation curve and faster activation of homomeric 695X mutant current, as well as insensitivity to cAMP (Table 2). Heteromeric channels failed to respond to cAMP, like homomeric mutant channels, indicating a dominant-negative suppression of cAMP responsiveness by the mutant subunits, notwithstanding the apparent absence of signs of chronotropic incompetence in the mutation carriers.

2.14. HCN4-T822M

The T822M variant, located in the distal C-terminus beyond the cNBD (Figure 1), is one of the seven novel variants that Macri et al. [26] observed in their cohort of 527 unrelated individuals with early-onset AF. In patch-clamp experiments on CHO cells, no functional effects of the T822M variant were observed (Table 2).

2.15. HCN4-P883R

The P883R mutation in HCN4 was found by Schweizer et al. [28] in a single patient who showed sinus bradycardia, tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and LVNC and who required pacemaker implantation. Unfortunately, patch-clamp data on the P883R mutant channel are not available. The mutation is therefore not included in Table 2.

2.16. HCN4-G885R, -P945S, -A1045V, -R1068H and -G1077S

Like the T822M variant, the G885R, P945S, A1045V, R1068H and G1077S variants, which are all located in the distal C-terminus beyond the cNBD (Figure 1), are novel HCN4 variants that Macri et al. [26] observed in their cohort of 527 unrelated individuals with early-onset AF (G885R, P945S and G1077S) or in their cohort of 443 referent individuals without history or ECG evidence of AF (A1045V and R1068H). In patch-clamp experiments on CHO cells, none of the five variants showed functional effects (Table 2).

2.17. HCN4-G1097W

Zhou et al. [25] observed the G1097W mutation in a single index patient with AV block, but not sinus nodal dysfunction (Table 1). In patch-clamp experiments on CHO cells, both homomeric and heteromeric channels demonstrated a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of activation, a reduced fully-activated current density and a faster deactivation (Table 2). The sensitivity to intracellular cAMP, as assessed for homomeric channels, was not affected.

2.18. HCN4-E1193Q

The E1193Q variant, located near the end of the C-terminus of the HCN4 protein (Figure 1), is one of the seven novel HCN4 variants that Macri et al. [26] observed in their cohort of 527 unrelated individuals with early-onset AF. Patch-clamp experiments on CHO cells did not reveal any functional effects of the variant (Table 2).

2.19. KCNE2-M54T

Nawathe et al. [29] reported marked sinus bradycardia, along with pauses, in a single index patient who carried the M54T mutation in KCNE2 (Table 1). The mutation is in the transmembrane segment of the KCNE2-encoded MiRP1 protein (Figure 1). Patch-clamp experiments in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes demonstrated that co-expression with M54T MiRP1 decreased HCN4 current density by >80% compared to HCN4 alone or HCN4 co-expressed with wild-type MiRP1. Furthermore, co-expression with M54T MiRP1 slowed HCN4 activation at physiologically relevant voltages, while HCN4 deactivation and the voltage dependence of activation were not affected (Table 2).

3. Functional Effects of Novel HCN4 Mutations on Human If

In our previous review [30], we assessed the functional effects of the then known HCN4 and KCNE2 mutations on human If through simulated action potential clamp experiments. Action potentials recorded from single, isolated human SAN cells [37] were used as command potentials, and If was simulated using mathematical equations based on the voltage clamp data that we had acquired from single, isolated human SAN cells [38,39]. Thus, we reconstructed If during the time course of a human SAN action potential. Here, we apply this approach to the aforementioned P257S, A414G, Y481H, G482R and G1097W mutations in HCN4. We selected these five mutations, because they were not included in our previous review, they have clinically established effects (Table 1), and patch-clamp data on heteromerically expressed mutant channels, resembling the heterozygous mutation carrier situation, are available (Table 2).

3.1. Numerical Reconstruction of If

Figure 2A shows the action potentials that were used, as part of a train of action potentials, in the simulated action potential clamp experiments. The associated rate of change of the membrane potential (dVm/dt) is shown in Figure 2B, whereas a recording of the global intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i), from a different cell with virtually the same cycle length [40], is shown in Figure 2C. With these data, the ion current traces of Figure 2D could be reconstructed, focusing on the diastolic depolarization phase. The noisy grey trace shows the net membrane current (Inet), as computed from Inet = −Cm × dVm/dt, where dVm/dt is taken from Figure 2B, and Cm and Vm denote the membrane capacitance and membrane potential, respectively. The orange and green traces of Figure 2D show the L-type calcium current (ICa,L) and delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr), respectively, which, together with If (blue trace), supposedly constitute the main voltage-dependent ion currents during diastolic depolarization. Figure 2D illustrates the importance of If as a pacemaker current, generating an inward current during diastolic depolarization of similar amplitude as Inet. It should, however, be kept in mind that Inet is the net result of multiple inward and outward currents, including ICa,L and IKr, which may interact in a complex manner [4].
Ijms 16 03071 g002 1024
Figure 2. Membrane currents of a human sinoatrial node (SAN) pacemaker cell assessed by a simulated action potential clamp. (A) Action potentials recorded from a human SAN pacemaker cell used for the action potential clamp; (B) associated rate of change of the membrane potential (dVm/dt); (C) global intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in a different cell with a highly similar cycle length; and (D) numerically reconstructed membrane current (Im): L-type calcium current (ICa,L), If, delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr) and net membrane current (Inet). See the text for details.
Figure 2. Membrane currents of a human sinoatrial node (SAN) pacemaker cell assessed by a simulated action potential clamp. (A) Action potentials recorded from a human SAN pacemaker cell used for the action potential clamp; (B) associated rate of change of the membrane potential (dVm/dt); (C) global intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in a different cell with a highly similar cycle length; and (D) numerically reconstructed membrane current (Im): L-type calcium current (ICa,L), If, delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr) and net membrane current (Inet). See the text for details.
Ijms 16 03071 g002
For the numerical reconstruction of ICa,L and IKr, we followed the approach of Chandler et al. [11], who used the equations of the Courtemanche et al. [41] human atrial cell model, scaled down by 32% and 55%, respectively, in accordance with the relative abundance (human sinus node vs. human right atrium) of mRNAs responsible for the ICa,L and IKr ion channels. IKr could be reconstructed with the train of action potentials of Figure 2A, but for the reconstruction of ICa,L, we also needed the [Ca2+]i data of Figure 2C, because the inactivation kinetics of this current are not only voltage dependent, but also calcium dependent. For the numerical reconstruction of If, we used the mathematical equations that we previously derived from the voltage clamp data that we had acquired from single, isolated human SAN pacemaker cells [38,39].
Figure 3 shows the effects of mutations in HCN4 on If, both under control conditions (blue traces) and upon adrenergic stimulation (red traces). In the absence of action potentials recorded upon adrenergic stimulation, the same train of action potentials (Figure 3A) was used to reconstruct If in the case of elevated cAMP levels. This was achieved by repeating the simulations with the activation and time constant curves shifted by +15 mV [30]. The resulting If trace is shown as a solid red line in Figure 3B. It is immediately apparent from Figure 3B that the amplitude of If is more than doubled upon adrenergic stimulation.
To quantify the contribution of If to diastolic depolarization, we computed the charge carried by If (Qf) during the 25-mV, 550-ms depolarization that starts at the maximum diastolic potential of −63 mV (Figure 3A, double-headed arrow). Under control conditions, Qf amounts to 0.018 pC/pF (Figure 4, leftmost blue bar), which is somewhat smaller than the net charge flow of 0.025 pC/pF or, equivalently, 25 mV (Figure 4, dashed grey line). Upon adrenergic stimulation, Qf increases 2.4-fold to 0.042 pC/pF (Figure 4, leftmost red bar). Thus, one might say that wild-type If has a “depolarization reserve” of 24 mV, i.e., the difference between the “depolarization power” of 18 mV under basal conditions and 42 mV upon adrenergic stimulation.
To simulate the effects of the mutations, we adapted the If parameter settings for the mutation of interest according to the data presented in Table 2. Thus, the P257S mutation is simulated through a 50% reduction in the fully-activated conductance of If, whereas the A414G mutation is simulated through a −23.9 mV shift in its voltage dependence, etc. The parameter settings for each of the aforementioned novel mutations in HCN4, all expressed as changes relative to the wild-type, are listed in Table 3, together with the parameter settings that we applied in our previous review to simulate the then known mutations in HCN4 and KCNE2.

3.2. HCN4-P257S

In the case of the P257S mutation, there is no shift in voltage dependence. Furthermore, sensitivity to cAMP is not affected. However, the current density of heteromeric P257S channels is reduced to ≈50% (Table 2). Accordingly, we reduced the fully-activated conductance of If to 50% of the wild-type, which of course leads to an equivalent reduction in the If amplitude (Figure 3C) and Qf (Figure 4A), both under control conditions and upon adrenergic stimulation. One may question whether these relatively mild functional effects are the main cause of the AF and (hidden) sinus node dysfunction observed in the single index patient.

3.3. HCN4-A414G

In the case of the A441G mutation, there is a >20-mV hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of the If kinetics. As a result, If is significantly reduced throughout diastole (Figure 3D), and the charge carried by If is reduced to 20% of the wild-type under control conditions and 24% upon adrenergic stimulation (Figure 4A). These functional effects may underlie the sinus bradycardia observed in the mutation-carrying family (Table 1).
Ijms 16 03071 g003 1024
Figure 3. Effect of mutations in HCN4 on If in a human SAN pacemaker cell assessed by simulated action potential clamp. (A) Action potentials recorded from a human SAN pacemaker cell used for action potential clamp; (B) computed wild-type (WT) If of a human SAN pacemaker cell during the action potentials of (A) under control conditions (“control”, blue line) and upon adrenergic stimulation (“cAMP”, red line); (C–H) computed If of a human SAN pacemaker cell carrying heterozygous mutation in HCN4, as indicated, during the action potentials of (A) under control conditions (solid blue line) and upon adrenergic stimulation (solid red line). Wild-type If of (B) under control conditions (dashed blue line) and upon adrenergic stimulation (dashed red line) are shown for reference. G482R traces, labelled “a” and “b”, are based on data from Milano et al. [27] and Schweizer et al. [28], respectively.
Figure 3. Effect of mutations in HCN4 on If in a human SAN pacemaker cell assessed by simulated action potential clamp. (A) Action potentials recorded from a human SAN pacemaker cell used for action potential clamp; (B) computed wild-type (WT) If of a human SAN pacemaker cell during the action potentials of (A) under control conditions (“control”, blue line) and upon adrenergic stimulation (“cAMP”, red line); (C–H) computed If of a human SAN pacemaker cell carrying heterozygous mutation in HCN4, as indicated, during the action potentials of (A) under control conditions (solid blue line) and upon adrenergic stimulation (solid red line). Wild-type If of (B) under control conditions (dashed blue line) and upon adrenergic stimulation (dashed red line) are shown for reference. G482R traces, labelled “a” and “b”, are based on data from Milano et al. [27] and Schweizer et al. [28], respectively.
Ijms 16 03071 g003
Ijms 16 03071 g004 1024
Figure 4. Contribution of If to diastolic depolarization for each of the heterozygous mutations in HCN4 or KCNE2. The charge carried by If (Qf) during the 25-mV, 550-ms spontaneous depolarization from the maximum diastolic potential of −63 mV of the human SAN action potential is as indicated in Figure 3A. The blue bars are computed from the If traces under control conditions (“control”). The red bars are computed from the If traces upon adrenergic stimulation (“cAMP”). The dashed grey line indicates the charge of 0.025 pC/pF carried by the net membrane current (Qnet) during the 25-mV depolarization. (A) Mutations of Figure 3; (B) mutations assessed in previous publication [30].
Figure 4. Contribution of If to diastolic depolarization for each of the heterozygous mutations in HCN4 or KCNE2. The charge carried by If (Qf) during the 25-mV, 550-ms spontaneous depolarization from the maximum diastolic potential of −63 mV of the human SAN action potential is as indicated in Figure 3A. The blue bars are computed from the If traces under control conditions (“control”). The red bars are computed from the If traces upon adrenergic stimulation (“cAMP”). The dashed grey line indicates the charge of 0.025 pC/pF carried by the net membrane current (Qnet) during the 25-mV depolarization. (A) Mutations of Figure 3; (B) mutations assessed in previous publication [30].
Ijms 16 03071 g004
Table
Table 3. Parameter settings in simulated action potential clamp experiments.
Table 3. Parameter settings in simulated action potential clamp experiments.
MutationScaling Factor for If ConductanceShift (mV)Shift with cAMP (mV)
HCN4-P257S0.500+15
HCN4-A414G1−23.9−8.9
HCN4-G480R0.50−150
HCN4-Y481H1−43.9−28.9
HCN4-G482R a1−38.7−23.7
HCN4-G482R b0.350+15
HCN4-A485V0.33−30−15
HCN4-K530N1−14+7.8
HCN4-D553N0.370+15
HCN4-573X100
HCN4-S672R1−4.9+10.1
HCN4-695X100
HCN4-G1097W0.55−7.6+7.4
KCNE2-M54T0.180+15
Scaling factor and shifts relative to the wild-type. Shifts applied to both the steady-state activation curve and time constant curve. a According to Milano et al. [27]; b according to Schweizer et al. [28].

3.4. HCN4-Y481H

If is dramatically reduced in the case of the Y481H mutation, which causes a >40-mV hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of the If kinetics (Figure 3E). This is reflected in the charge carried by If during diastole, which amounts to only 5%–6% of the wild-type (Figure 4A). This dramatic functional effect seems compatible with the severe bradycardia in the Y481H mutation carriers (Table 1).

3.5. HCN4-G482R

A severe bradycardia is also observed in carriers of the G482R mutation (Table 1). In line, If is dramatically reduced (Figure 3F), with a Qf of only 7%–9% of the wild-type (Figure 4A), if we base our simulations on the patch-clamp data by Milano et al. [27], which show a very strong hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of If. However, patch-clamp data on the same mutation by Schweizer et al. [28] do show a 65% reduction in the fully-activated conductance of If, rather than a shift in its voltage dependence. If we base our simulations on the latter data, we of course obtain a 65% reduction in If amplitude (Figure 3G) and Qf (Figure 4A), both under control conditions and upon adrenergic stimulation.

3.6. HCN4-G1097W

With the combined effect of a shift in voltage dependence and a 45% reduction in fully-activated conductance, the net effect of the G1097W mutation (Figure 3H) is highly similar to the net effect of a 65% reduction in fully-activated conductance per se (G482R mutation, Figure 3G). Actually, the charge carried by If is reduced to ≈35% in either case (Figure 4A). Yet, no sinus node dysfunction is reported for the G1097W mutation [25]. However, such a dysfunction may have become obscured by the apparent 4:1 AV block in the single index patient (Table 1).

3.7. Limitations in the Reconstruction of If

The above reconstruction of If comes with several limitations. First, we used a single predetermined action potential waveform, with an identical cycle length and identical duration of diastolic depolarization for both wild-type and mutant If reconstructions. Furthermore, this single waveform was used to reconstruct If under control conditions, as well as upon adrenergic stimulation. We did so because recordings of human SAN action potentials upon adrenergic stimulation or with mutant If channels are nonexistent. In a preliminary study [42], we varied the cycle length of human SAN action potential waveforms between 500 and 1500 m by manipulating the rate of diastolic depolarization and used these manipulated action potential waveforms in action potential clamp experiments on undifferentiated human cardiac myocyte progenitor cells. We found that the amplitude of HCN4 current expressed in these cells increased with increasing cycle length. Thus, the longer cycle lengths in bradycardic patients may partially counteract the If reduction due to mutations in HCN4, while shorter cycle lengths due to adrenergic stimulation may partially counteract an increase in If. Furthermore, a prolongation of diastolic depolarization will also be counteracted by a continuing activation of ICa,L and deactivation of IKr (Figure 2D). Overall, the effects of mutations in HCN4 and adrenergic stimulation are likely exaggerated by the use of a single fixed action potential waveform.
Second, our mathematical model of human SAN If [38,39] is inevitably based on a highly limited amount of experimental data. These data were obtained from a small number of SAN pacemaker cells that were isolated from a single patient with inappropriate tachycardias originating from the SAN region [37]. As such, there may have been abnormalities in the electrophysiology of these cells. Although the sudden onset and termination suggested that the tachycardias were based on reentrant excitation, it cannot be excluded that these tachycardias have resulted in If remodeling of the SAN pacemaker cells [4].
Third, the in vitro data on the effects of mutations in HCN4 are often incomplete. For example, data on the If reversal potential are mostly not provided. The same holds for data on the activation or deactivation rate and the effects of adrenergic stimulation (cf. Table 2). In such a case, one can only assume that these are not affected by the mutation of interest.
Despite these limitations, we preferred to study If in simulated action potential clamp experiments, thus ensuring that the action potential followed the course of that of a human SAN pacemaker cell. An alternative would be to incorporate the human If equations into one of the available comprehensive mathematical models of a SAN cell, which are mostly rabbit SAN cells, but one should realize that the thus obtained data on the effects of If on cycle length are largely dependent on the “model environment” [43].

4. Some Concluding Remarks

Since the publication of our previous review [30], a large number of novel HCN4 mutations and variants have been found. The new findings have extended our view. In particular, it has become clear that HCN4 mutations are accompanied by more cardiac abnormalities than just sinus bradycardia and AF. Newly-found abnormalities include ventricular non-compaction [27,28], prolapse of the mitral valve [27,28] and AV block [25]. Yet, the general picture of HCN4 mutations as heterozygous, dominant-negative or dominant-negative-like, loss-of-function mutations remains.
Although our insights are far from complete, there are experimental data that not only relate functional loss of HCN4 to sinus bradycardia, but also to AF and AV block. For example, tachycardia-induced remodeling of ion channel expression may lead to down-regulation of If in dogs [44]. On the other hand, chronic AF causes an up-regulation of If in humans [45]. Furthermore, functional loss of HCN4, which is abundantly expressed in the human AV node [46], has been related to AV block in an inducible cardiac-specific HCN4 knockout mouse model [47].
The ventricular non-compaction and mitral valve prolapse point to a role of HCN4 in the development of the myocardium and a role for dysfunctional HCN4 in structural abnormalities. Indeed, HCN4 is highly expressed throughout the human ventricle at early embryonic stages [48]. However, it is as yet unsolved through which mechanism(s) mutations in HCN4 lead to LVNC, which is a genetically heterogeneous disorder [49] and may also involve the right ventricle [27,28].
The structural determinants of HCN channel function are complex, and numerous key questions about HCN channel function are still unanswered (for detailed reviews, see Biel et al. [50] and He et al. [8]). The increasing number of mutations in HCN4 identified in patients indicates that the pore-forming loop is a hotspot for mutations with severe functional effects, mostly negative shifts in activation and reduced channel expression. The exact molecular mechanisms of the functional defects are as yet unsolved, but the highly conserved GYG motif at Positions 480–482 of the HCN4 protein appears a major determinant of proper channel function. As expected, HCN4 mutations resulting in a lacking or truncated cNBD, i.e., 573X and 695X, respectively, lack cAMP sensitivity [2,22]. Accordingly, the contributions of the 573X and 695X mutant If were not increased upon adrenergic stimulation (Figure 4B).
Mutations or variants in the N-terminus or in the distal end of the C-terminus seem to have less severe functional effects. This holds in particular for the ten variants identified by Macri et al. [26]. Nine did not affect the HCN4 channel characteristics as assessed in patch-clamp experiments (Table 2) and, thus, appeared benign. The kinetic properties were also not affected by the tenth variant, i.e., P257S, but a trafficking defect gave rise to a reduced expression of HCN4 at the membrane. Interestingly, the residue at Position 257 is located in the caveolin-binding domain, and a trafficking defect is in line with the effects that were previously reported for artificially generated mutations in that domain [51]. Thus, the P257S variant does not have a dominant-negative effect on channel function, and its dysrhythmic mechanism is limited to haploinsufficiency. Of note, the HCN4 current was not reduced in patch-clamp experiments on heteromerically expressed P257S channels, which may point to limitations in the use of the CHO cell expression system.
With an increasing amount of data, inconsistencies remain. These include previously identified inconsistencies between clinical and experimental data [30], as well as novel inconsistencies that arise from recent data. Inconsistencies between clinical and experimental data may arise from a relatively low expression or even a complete lack of HCN4 or If channel modulatory elements in the expression systems that are commonly used to assess mutation effects. These elements include MiRP1, PIP2, caveolin-3 and SAP-97 [52,53,54,55,56]. Inconsistencies may also arise because experimental data are often incomplete (cf. Table 2). In future studies involving HCN4 mutations, it may be important to follow a standardized approach, always including data on trafficking, cAMP sensitivity and kinetic properties, using appropriate experimental protocols. Apparent inconsistencies may also arise, because clinical data are, in most cases, limited to a small number of patients or even a single index patient (cf. Table 1). Furthermore, HCN4, although abundant, is not the sole member of the HCN1–HCN4 family in the human SAN [11]. It is therefore conceivable that a considerable amount of HCN tetramers is not fully built from HCN4 subunits, which may not only be important for the behavior of the wild-type current [57], but also for the mutant current.
Inconsistencies arising from recent experimental data are perhaps most striking in patch-clamp data on the G482R mutation in HCN4 obtained by Milano et al. [27] and Schweizer et al. [28], who studied heteromerically expressed G482R channels in CHO and HEK-293 cells, respectively. While Milano et al. [27] found a strong hyperpolarizing shift in voltage dependence, Schweizer et al. [28] found a strong reduction in fully-activated current without such a shift. As emphasized by DiFrancesco [7], differences in protocols to measure activation curves can provide a likely explanation for differences in experimental findings from patch clamp experiments. Furthermore, differences in expression systems, recording temperatures, bath and pipette solutions and patch clamp techniques (whole-cell vs. perforated patch) can also contribute to the observed differences. Although an explanation for the differences in patch-clamp data between the Milano et al. [27] and Schweizer et al. [28] studies remains speculative, the essential difference in observed HCN4 current properties translates into marked differences in the reconstructed If traces (Figure 3F,G), as well as the charge carried by If (Figure 4).
In conclusion, the ongoing identification of HCN4 mutations in relation to cardiac abnormalities has not only provided us with valuable information, but also with intriguing new questions regarding the role of HCN4 and If in the human heart.

Author Contributions

The authors prepared the manuscript in close cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bigger, J.T., Jr.; Reiffel, J.A. Sick sinus syndrome. Annu. Rev. Med. 1979, 30, 91–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schulze-Bahr, E.; Neu, A.; Friederich, P.; Kaupp, U.B.; Breithardt, G.; Pongs, O.; Isbrandt, D. Pacemaker channel dysfunction in a patient with sinus node disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stieber, J.; Hofmann, F.; Ludwig, A. Pacemaker channels and sinus node arrhythmia. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2004, 14, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Verkerk, A.O.; van Ginneken, A.C.G.; Wilders, R. Pacemaker activity of the human sinoatrial node: Role of the hyperpolarization-activated current, If. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009, 132, 318–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nof, E.; Antzelevitch, C.; Glikson, M. The contribution of HCN4 to normal sinus node function in humans and animal models. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2010, 33, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Baruscotti, M.; Bottelli, G.; Milanesi, R.; DiFrancesco, J.C.; DiFrancesco, D. HCN-related channelopathies. Pflüg. Arch. 2010, 460, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. DiFrancesco, D. Funny channel gene mutations associated with arrhythmias. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 4117–4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. He, C.; Chen, F.; Li, B.; Hu, Z. Neurophysiology of HCN channels: From cellular functions to multiple regulations. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 112, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shah, M.M. Cortical HCN channels: Function, trafficking and plasticity. J. Physiol. 2014, 592, 2711–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Herrmann, S.; Schnorr, S.; Ludwig, A. HCN channels—Modulators of cardiac and neuronal excitability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 1429–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chandler, N.J.; Greener, I.D.; Tellez, J.O.; Inada, S.; Musa, H.; Molenaar, P.; DiFrancesco, D.; Baruscotti, M.; Longhi, R.; Anderson, R.H.; et al. Molecular architecture of the human sinus node: Insights into the function of the cardiac pacemaker. Circulation 2009, 119, 1562–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Den Hoed, M.; Eijgelsheim, M.; Esko, T.; Brundel, B.J.J.M.; Peal, D.S.; Evans, D.M.; Nolte, I.M.; Segrè, A.V.; Holm, H.; Handsaker, R.E.; et al. Identification of heart rate-associated loci and their effects on cardiac conduction and rhythm disorders. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. D’Souza, A.; Bucchi, A.; Johnsen, A.B.; Logantha, S.J.R.J.; Monfredi, O.; Yanni, J.; Prehar, S.; Hart, G.; Cartwright, E.; Wisloff, U.; et al. Exercise training reduces resting heart rate via downregulation of the funny channel HCN4. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zicha, S.; Fernández-Velasco, M.; Lonardo, G.; L’Heureux, N.; Nattel, S. Sinus node dysfunction and hyperpolarization-activated (HCN) channel subunit remodeling in a canine heart failure model. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 66, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, X.; Yang, P.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ma, A. Age-related down-regulation of HCN channels in rat sinoatrial node. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2007, 102, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ellinor, P.T.; Lunetta, K.L.; Albert, C.M.; Glazer, N.L.; Ritchie, M.D.; Smith, A.V.; Arking, D.E.; Müller-Nurasyid, M.; Krijthe, B.P.; Lubitz, S.A.; et al. Meta-analysis identifies six new susceptibility loci for atrial fibrillation. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fenske, S.; Krause, S.C.; Hassan, S.I.; Becirovic, E.; Auer, F.; Bernard, R.; Kupatt, C.; Lange, P.; Ziegler, T.; Wotjak, C.T.; et al. Sick sinus syndrome in HCN1-deficient mice. Circulation 2013, 128, 2585–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ludwig, A.; Budde, T.; Stieber, J.; Moosmang, S.; Wahl, C.; Holthoff, K.; Langebartels, A.; Wotjak, C.; Munsch, T.; Zong, X.; et al. Absence epilepsy and sinus dysrhythmia in mice lacking the pacemaker channel HCN2. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ueda, K.; Nakamura, K.; Hayashi, T.; Inagaki, N.; Takahashi, M.; Arimura, T.; Morita, H.; Higashiuesato, Y.; Hirano, Y.; Yasunami, M.; et al. Functional characterization of a trafficking-defective HCN4 mutation, D553N, associated with cardiac arrhythmia. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 27194–27198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Milanesi, R.; Baruscotti, M.; Gnecchi-Ruscone, T.; DiFrancesco, D. Familial sinus bradycardia associated with a mutation in the cardiac pacemaker channel. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nof, E.; Luria, D.; Brass, D.; Marek, D.; Lahat, H.; Reznik-Wolf, H.; Pras, E.; Dascal, N.; Eldar, M.; Glikson, M. Point mutation in the HCN4 cardiac ion channel pore affecting synthesis, trafficking, and functional expression is associated with familial asymptomatic sinus bradycardia. Circulation 2007, 116, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schweizer, P.A.; Duhme, N.; Thomas, D.; Becker, R.; Zehelein, J.; Draguhn, A.; Bruehl, C.; Katus, H.A.; Koenen, M. cAMP sensitivity of HCN pacemaker channels determines basal heart rate but is not critical for autonomic rate control. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2010, 3, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Laish-Farkash, A.; Glikson, M.; Brass, D.; Marek-Yagel, D.; Pras, E.; Dascal, N.; Antzelevitch, C.; Nof, E.; Reznik, H.; Eldar, M.; et al. A novel mutation in the HCN4 gene causes symptomatic sinus bradycardia in Moroccan Jews. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2010, 21, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Duhme, N.; Schweizer, P.A.; Thomas, D.; Becker, R.; Schröter, J.; Barends, T.R.; Schlichting, I.; Draguhn, A.; Bruehl, C.; Katus, H.A.; et al. Altered HCN4 channel C-linker interaction is associated with familial tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and atrial fibrillation. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 2768–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, J.; Ding, W.G.; Makiyama, T.; Miyamoto, A.; Matsumoto, Y.; Kimura, H.; Tarutani, Y.; Zhao, J.; Wu, J.; Zang, W.J.; et al. A novel HCN4 mutation, G1097W, is associated with atrioventricular block. Circ. J. 2014, 78, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Macri, V.; Mahida, S.N.; Zhang, M.L.; Sinner, M.F.; Dolmatova, E.V.; Tucker, N.R.; McLellan, M.; Shea, M.A.; Milan, D.J.; Lunetta, K.L.; et al. A novel trafficking-defective HCN4 mutation is associated with early-onset atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2014, 11, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Milano, A.; Vermeer, A.M.C.; Lodder, E.M.; Barc, J.; Verkerk, A.O.; Postma, A.V.; van der Bilt, I.A.C.; Baars, M.J.H.; van Haelst, P.L.; Caliskan, K.; et al. HCN4 mutations in multiple families with bradycardia and left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schweizer, P.A.; Schröter, J.; Greiner, S.; Haas, J.; Yampolsky, P.; Mereles, D.; Buss, S.J.; Seyler, C.; Bruehl, C.; Draguhn, A.; et al. The symptom complex of familial sinus node dysfunction and myocardial noncompaction is associated with mutations in the HCN4 channel. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nawathe, P.A.; Kryukova, Y.; Oren, R.V.; Milanesi, R.; Clancy, C.E.; Lu, J.T.; Moss, A.J.; DiFrancesco, D.; Robinson, R.B. An LQTS6 MiRP1 mutation suppresses pacemaker current and is associated with sinus bradycardia. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2013, 24, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R. Pacemaker activity of the human sinoatrial node: Effects of HCN4 mutations on the hyperpolarization-activated current. Europace 2014, 16, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Moeller, M.; Wrobel, E.; Strutz-Seebohm, N.; Schulze-Bahr, E.; Seebohm, G. Functional characterization of novel HCN4 mutations associated with cardiac arrhythmia. Acta Physiol. 2014, 210 (Suppl. s695), 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ueda, K.; Hirano, Y.; Higashiuesato, Y.; Aizawa, Y.; Hayashi, T.; Inagaki, N.; Tana, T.; Ohya, Y.; Takishita, S.; Muratani, H.; et al. Role of HCN4 channel in preventing ventricular arrhythmia. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 54, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Evans, A.; Bagnall, R.D.; Duflou, J.; Semsarian, C. Postmortem review and genetic analysis in sudden infant death syndrome: An 11-year review. Hum. Pathol. 2013, 44, 1730–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Netter, M.F.; Zuzarte, M.; Schlichthörl, G.; Klöcker, N.; Decher, N. The HCN4 channel mutation D553N associated with bradycardia has a C-linker mediated gating defect. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 30, 1227–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Singer-Lahat, D.; Lotan, I.; Biel, M.; Flockerzi, V.; Hofmann, F.; Dascal, N. Cardiac calcium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes are modulated by dephosphorylation but not by cAMP-dependent phosphorylation. Recept. Channels 1994, 2, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, X.; Marni, F.; Wu, S.; Su, Z.; Musayev, F.; Shrestha, S.; Xie, C.; Gao, W.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, L. Local and global interpretations of a disease-causing mutation near the ligand entry path in hyperpolarization-activated cAMP-gated channel. Structure 2012, 20, 2116–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R.; van Borren, M.M.G.J.; Peters, R.J.G.; Broekhuis, E.; Lam, K.; Coronel, R.; de Bakker, J.M.T.; Tan, H.L. Pacemaker current (If) in the human sinoatrial node. Eur. Heart J. 2007, 28, 2472–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Verkerk, A.O.; van Borren, M.M.G.J.; Peters, R.J.G.; Broekhuis, E.; Lam, K.Y.; Coronel, R.; de Bakker, J.M.T.; Tan, H.L.; Wilders, R. Single cells isolated from human sinoatrial node: Action potentials and numerical reconstruction of pacemaker current. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2007, 2007, 904–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R. Relative importance of funny current in human versus rabbit sinoatrial node. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010, 48, 799–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Verkerk, A.O.; van Borren, M.M.G.J.; Wilders, R. Calcium transient and sodium-calcium exchange current in human versus rabbit sinoatrial node pacemaker cells. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 507872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Courtemanche, M.; Ramirez, R.J.; Nattel, S. Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: Insights from a mathematical model. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, H301–H321. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Hoekstra, M.; Verkerk, A.O.; van Ginneken, A.C.G.; Wilders, R. HCN4 current during human sinoatrial node action potentials. Heart Rhythm 2010, 7, S410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wilders, R. Computer modelling of the sinoatrial node. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2007, 45, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yeh, Y.H.; Burstein, B.; Qi, X.Y.; Sakabe, M.; Chartier, D.; Comtois, P.; Wang, Z.; Kuo, C.T.; Nattel, S. Funny current downregulation and sinus node dysfunction associated with atrial tachyarrhythmia: A molecular basis for tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome. Circulation 2009, 119, 1576–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stillitano, F.; Lonardo, G.; Giunti, G.; del Lungo, M.; Coppini, R.; Spinelli, V.; Sartiani, L.; Poggesi, C.; Mugelli, A.; Cerbai, E. Chronic atrial fibrillation alters the functional properties of If in the human atrium. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2013, 24, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Greener, I.D.; Monfredi, O.; Inada, S.; Chandler, N.J.; Tellez, J.O.; Atkinson, A.; Taube, M.A.; Billeter, R.; Anderson, R.H.; Efimov, I.R.; et al. Molecular architecture of the human specialised atrioventricular conduction axis. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2011, 50, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Baruscotti, M.; Bucchi, A.; Viscomi, C.; Mandelli, G.; Consalez, G.; Gnecchi-Rusconi, T.; Montano, N.; Casali, K.R.; Micheloni, S.; Barbuti, A.; et al. Deep bradycardia and heart block caused by inducible cardiac-specific knockout of the pacemaker channel gene Hcn4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1705–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sizarov, A.; Devalla, H.D.; Anderson, R.H.; Passier, R.; Christoffels, V.M.; Moorman, A.F.M. Molecular analysis of patterning of conduction tissues in the developing human heart. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2011, 4, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Oechslin, E.; Jenni, R. Left ventricular non-compaction revisited: A distinct phenotype with genetic heterogeneity? Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 1446–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Biel, M.; Wahl-Schott, C.; Michalakis, S.; Zong, X. Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels: From genes to function. Physiol. Rev. 2009, 89, 847–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Barbuti, A.; Scavone, A.; Mazzocchi, N.; Terragni, B.; Baruscotti, M.; DiFrancesco, D. A caveolin-binding domain in the HCN4 channels mediates functional interaction with caveolin proteins. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2012, 53, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Decher, N.; Bundis, F.; Vajna, R.; Steinmeyer, K. KCNE2 modulates current amplitudes and activation kinetics of HCN4: Influence of KCNE family members on HCN4 currents. Pflüg. Arch. 2003, 446, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pian, P.; Bucchi, A.; Robinson, R.B.; Siegelbaum, S.A. Regulation of gating and rundown of HCN hyperpolarization-activated channels by exogenous and endogenous PIP2. J. Gen. Physiol. 2006, 128, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Barbuti, A.; Terragni, B.; Brioschi, C.; DiFrancesco, D. Localization of f-channels to caveolae mediates specific β2-adrenergic receptor modulation of rate in sinoatrial myocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2007, 42, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ye, B.; Balijepalli, R.C.; Foell, J.D.; Kroboth, S.; Ye, Q.; Luo, Y.H.; Shi, N.Q. Caveolin-3 associates with and affects the function of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 12312–12318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Peters, C.J.; Chow, S.S.; Angoli, D.; Nazzari, H.; Cayabyab, F.S.; Morshedian, A.; Accili, E.A. In situ co-distribution and functional interactions of SAP97 with sinoatrial isoforms of HCN channels. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009, 46, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Altomare, C.; Terragni, B.; Brioschi, C.; Milanesi, R.; Pagliuca, C.; Viscomi, C.; Moroni, A.; Baruscotti, M.; DiFrancesco, D. Heteromeric HCN1-HCN4 channels: A comparison with native pacemaker channels from the rabbit sinoatrial node. J. Physiol. 2003, 549, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R. Pacemaker Activity of the Human Sinoatrial Node: An Update on the Effects of Mutations in HCN4 on the Hyperpolarization-Activated Current. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 3071-3094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16023071

AMA Style

Verkerk AO, Wilders R. Pacemaker Activity of the Human Sinoatrial Node: An Update on the Effects of Mutations in HCN4 on the Hyperpolarization-Activated Current. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(2):3071-3094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16023071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verkerk, Arie O., and Ronald Wilders. 2015. "Pacemaker Activity of the Human Sinoatrial Node: An Update on the Effects of Mutations in HCN4 on the Hyperpolarization-Activated Current" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 2: 3071-3094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16023071

APA Style

Verkerk, A. O., & Wilders, R. (2015). Pacemaker Activity of the Human Sinoatrial Node: An Update on the Effects of Mutations in HCN4 on the Hyperpolarization-Activated Current. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(2), 3071-3094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16023071

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop