Next Article in Journal
Interaction of DNA with Simple and Mixed Ligand Copper(II) Complexes of 1,10-Phenanthrolines as Studied by DNA-Fiber EPR Spectroscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Rational Protein Engineering Guided by Deep Mutational Scanning
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of a Liposomal Formulation Incorporating an Antimicrobial Peptide from Tilapia as a New Adjuvant to Epirubicin in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Pluripotent Testicular Embryonic Carcinoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Engineering of Self-Assembled Fibronectin Matrix Protein and Its Effects on Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms160922735
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Non-Natural Amino Acid Incorporation into the Enzyme Core Region on Enzyme Structure and Function

by
H. Edward Wong
1 and
Inchan Kwon
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(9), 22735-22753; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160922735
Submission received: 12 August 2015 / Revised: 2 September 2015 / Accepted: 14 September 2015 / Published: 21 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Engineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Techniques to incorporate non-natural amino acids (NNAAs) have enabled biosynthesis of proteins containing new building blocks with unique structures, chemistry, and reactivity that are not found in natural amino acids. It is crucial to understand how incorporation of NNAAs affects protein function because NNAA incorporation may perturb critical function of a target protein. This study investigates how the site-specific incorporation of NNAAs affects catalytic properties of an enzyme. A NNAA with a hydrophobic and bulky sidechain, 3-(2-naphthyl)-alanine (2Nal), was site-specifically incorporated at six different positions in the hydrophobic core of a model enzyme, murine dihydrofolate reductase (mDHFR). The mDHFR variants with a greater change in van der Waals volume upon 2Nal incorporation exhibited a greater reduction in the catalytic efficiency. Similarly, the steric incompatibility calculated using RosettaDesign, a protein stability calculation program, correlated with the changes in the catalytic efficiency.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Protein engineering frequently creates useful proteins with improved or new functions. Successful protein engineering is often governed by the size of amino acid sequence space available for engineering. The advent of technology to genetically encode and incorporate non-natural amino acids (NNAAs) into proteins greatly expanded the amino acid sequence space by increasing the number of residues available for protein biosynthesis. Currently, over 100 NNAAs have been successfully incorporated into various protein targets [1,2,3,4,5]. A significant advantage of using NNAAs is that they possess unique physical, chemical, and biological properties that natural amino acids do not have.
Site-specific incorporation of NNAAs enables the introduction of NNAAs into a specific site of a target protein for a range of protein engineering applications. For example, fluorinated NNAAs have been used as NMR probes to determine the structure and function of nitroreductase and histidinol dehydrogenase [6]. Tyrosine, phenylalanine and tryptophan analogues, (p-amino-l-phenylalanine, p-methoxy-l-phenylalanine, p-iodo-l-phenylalanine, p-bromo-l-phenylalanine, and 3-(2-naphthyl)-alanine) have been used to substitute tyrosine at position 66 inside the chromophore of a green fluorescent protein (GFP) [7,8,9,10]. These substitution mutations altered the spectral properties of GFP, yielding shifts in fluorescence emission wavelengths corresponding to the strength of each NNAA as an electron donor [7,8,9,10]. Recently, the use of NNAAs has also been applied to improving the properties of enzymes beyond the limits of natural amino acids. Site-specific incorporation of p-aminophenylalanine at Phe124 of nitroreductase (NTR) increased the activity of NTR two-fold over the best natural amino acid mutation [11]. Further, a group of bioorthogonally reactive NNAAs, containing terminal ketones, azides, and alkynes have been developed for bioconjugation applications [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Since NNAA incorporation can be targeted to specific locations in a protein, NNAAs can serve as a chemical handle generating homogeneous conjugation products, which are often very challenging using only natural amino acids, such as cysteine and lysine [20,21,22,23]. Bioconjugation of fatty acids and polyethylene glycol at reactive NNAA sites improved the blood-circulation longevity of pharmaceutically relevant enzymes and antibodies without significant loss of function [24,25,26].
NNAAs have also been used to alter enzyme properties. In CYP102A1, a catalytically promiscuous cytochrome P450, four aromatic NNAAs were site-specifically incorporated at 11 active-site positions, which resulted in certain mutants exhibiting significant shifts in regioselectivity and improvements to catalytic activity [27]. In addition, the replacement of phenylalanine (Phe) at position 31 of murine dihydrofolate reductase with 3-(2-naphthyl)-alanine or p-bromo-phenylalanine led to the alteration of the specificity of murine dihydrofolate reductase towards a less favorable substrate, folate, and reduction of the binding affinity to an inhibitor (methotrexate) [1,28]. In general, one of the big challenges in enzyme engineering is to accurately predict how mutations will affect enzyme function. This is even more challenging when non-natural amino acids are used to engineer enzymes. Therefore, this study investigates how site-specific incorporation of NNAAs into enzymes affects structure and function of the enzymes. Enzymes are a particularly attractive test platform, since enzyme function can be considered a two-step process involving an obligate substrate-binding step and a catalysis step. Both of these steps can be characterized to evaluate the effects of NNAA incorporation on function. In this study, murine dihydrofolate reductase (mDHFR) was used as a model enzyme. There are numerous crystal structures for DHFR, and the enzyme kinetics was well characterized [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. The function of mDHFR was characterized though the saturation kinetics of dihydrofolate (DHF) conversion to tetrahydrofolate (THF) which was fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation to obtain the kinetic parameters Km and kcat, to evaluate the effect of NNAA incorporation on the binding and biocatalytic components of mDHFR function, respectively. The study focused primarily on the effect of site-specific incorporation of NNAAs into the hydrophobic core region, where a mutation can significantly perturb the local and/or global structure of the enzyme. In order to minimize direct interactions of a mutated residue with any substrate, active site residues were excluded from mutation.
Since enzymes require their correctly folded structure to function properly, we hypothesized that mutations minimizing structural changes would have a lesser perturbation on enzyme function [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Since the structure of the hydrophobic core can be governed by its conformational stability, six NNAA incorporation sites were selected from the hydrophobic core of the mDHFR in order to investigate how incorporation of a hydrophobic non-natural amino acid affects the conformational stability and catalytic function of mDHFR. In order to investigate the effect of mutation within the core, we looked at the available hydrophobic NNAAs that had previously been incorporated successfully [28,55,56,57]. Of those, two hydrophobic NNAAs, p-bromophenylalanine (pBrF) and 3-(2-naphthyl)-alanine (2Nal) and their corresponding engineered aminoacyl tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs were available for this work [10,55,58]. While the lower size spectrum of hydrophobic residues is well covered by the natural amino acids in nature, the use of larger sidechains is limited. This presented an opportunity to investigate whether larger hydrophobic amino acids could be successfully incorporated into the enzyme core region, while maintaining enzyme function. 2Nal, a bulky hydrophobic Phe/Trp analogue, was selected for this purpose; it has two conjugated rings and is larger in mass and van der Waals volume than any natural amino acid, as well as pBrF (Supplementary Information Figure S1) [59]. Since 2Nal is bulkier than any natural amino acids, incorporation of 2Nal into the hydrophobic core of mDHFR was expected to significantly perturb the structure and stability of the mDHFR.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Selection of Hydrophobic-Core Incorporation Sites

To select mutation sites, we calculated the accessible solvent area (ASA), a common practice used to locate residues of the hydrophobic core [44,60]. Since solvent accessibility is highly restricted within this area, we restricted our selection to residues (PDB ID: 2W3M) with an ASA less than or equal to 2.0% [44,60]. To eliminate bias that can be associated with using only a single algorithm, we calculated ASA values using three different published calculators to ensure that values were in close accordance with one another (ASA-View, CUPSAT and SDM) [61,62,63]. The ASA cutoff criteria limited selection to five hydrophobic regions. While these selection criteria may not encompass all core residues, this method nearly guarantees the selection of only hydrophobic core residues [44,60,64]. Moreover, we excluded active site and binding pocket residues in order to minimize direct interaction with any substrate or cofactor. With the aforementioned criteria, selection was narrowed to the β-strand portion of the enzyme core. We then carefully selected three pairs of adjacent mutations sites, one pair from each region, for site-specific incorporation of 2Nal. Between variants of adjacent sites, confounding variables—such as differences in location-dependent behavior and local structural environment—were expected to be minimized, which would facilitate pairwise comparison [41,42,44,65,66]. Each adjacent pair of mutation sites consisted of a small valine residue and larger hydrophobic residue. Valine was selected as the smaller residue since it represents an intermediate hydrophobic residue size. The size difference between valine and the adjacent residue allowed a comparison to determine whether the residue size difference between the mutant and native residue (SDMNR) was an important variable that affected enzyme function. Positions Val50, Ile51, Val112, Trp113, Phe134, and Val135 were selected (based on position numbering for PDB:ID 2W3M). Therefore, six mDHFR variants were created, by site-specifically incorporating 2Nal only at the target site. Since 2Nal is an analogue to Trp and Phe, Trp113 and Phe134 serve as conservative mutation sites. Hereinafter mutations are denoted as, for example, V135Z, where natural amino acids are denoted as single letters, and Z indicates 2Nal.

2.2. Expression and Purification of mDHFR Variants

The six mDHFR variants (mDHFRV50Z, mDHFRI51Z, mDHFRV112Z, mDHFRW113Z, mDHFRF134Z, and mDHFRV135Z) as well as mDHFRWT were expressed and purified as described previously; though, mutation sites were different [1]. The mDHFR bands at 23.5 kDa were clearly shown in the protein gel (Supplementary Information Figure S2). In the basis of culture volume, the yields of purified mDHFRWT, mDHFRW113Z, and mDHFRF134Z were 4.7, 2.1, and 1.3 mg/L, respectively. The yields of purified mDHFRV50Z, mDHFRI51Z, mDHFRV112Z, and mDHFRV135Z were 0.7, 0.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mg/L, respectively, which are smaller than those of the other three variants (mDHFRWT, mDHFRW113Z, and mDHFRF134Z). We speculate that the variants with a lower yield (mDHFRV50Z, mDHFRI51Z, mDHFRV112Z, and mDHFRV135Z) are not structurally stable inside cells and so prone to cellular degradation leading to relatively poor expression/purification yields.

2.3. Verification of in Vivo 2Nal Incorporation by MALDI-TOF/MS

Each variant was digested by either trypsin or chymotrypsin to produce a fingerprint of peptide fragments of known length and mass. Then, in vivo site-specific incorporation of 2Nal at each target site was verified by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight/mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS) analysis of the digests. Successful incorporation was expected to yield a peptide fragment containing 2Nal, with monoisotopic mass equivalent to the monoisotopic mass of the native fragment plus the difference in mass between 2Nal and the original residue [1]. As representative cases, site-specific incorporation of 2Nal into F134 and V135 sites were verified by MALDI-TOF/MS spectra (Figure 1). For mDHFRF134Z and mDHFRV135Z, the expected monoisotopic masses for the 2Nal-containing fragments were 685.3 m/z (residue 133–137) and 733.3 m/z (residues 133–137), respectively. The actual monoisotopic masses for the 2Nal-containing fragments were found to be 685.4 m/z and 733.4 m/z for mDHFRF134Z and mDHFRV135Z, respectively (Figure 1). Masses corresponding to 2Nal-containing fragments were not observed in the mDHFRWT spectra, indicating that the 2Nal-containing fragment for each variant is unique and each arises from in vivo incorporation of 2Nal at the correct position. Also, the corresponding wild-type fragment and fragments pertaining to misincorporation of Phe and Trp were not observed in the mutant spectra. These results indicate that 2Nal was successfully incorporated into target sites with high fidelity.
Ijms 16 22735 g001 1024
Figure 1. Confirmation of in vivo 2Nal incorporation by MALDI-TOF/MS analysis. The MS spectra of a tryptic digest (residues 133–147) for (A) mDHFRWT; (B) mDHFRF134Z; and (C) mDHFRV135Z. The peak corresponding to the 2Nal-containing digest is indicated by the arrow (B,C). The counterpart mDHFRWT fragment with the native residue is marked by an arrow (A). The residue numbering corresponds to PDB ID: 2W3M. The horizontal bar indicates the mass difference between the 2Nal-containing fragment and corresponding mDHFRWT fragment with the native residue. a.u. denotes arbitrary units.
Figure 1. Confirmation of in vivo 2Nal incorporation by MALDI-TOF/MS analysis. The MS spectra of a tryptic digest (residues 133–147) for (A) mDHFRWT; (B) mDHFRF134Z; and (C) mDHFRV135Z. The peak corresponding to the 2Nal-containing digest is indicated by the arrow (B,C). The counterpart mDHFRWT fragment with the native residue is marked by an arrow (A). The residue numbering corresponds to PDB ID: 2W3M. The horizontal bar indicates the mass difference between the 2Nal-containing fragment and corresponding mDHFRWT fragment with the native residue. a.u. denotes arbitrary units.
Ijms 16 22735 g001

2.4. Computational Analysis and Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy of mDHFR Variants Containing 2Nal

Assuming that the hydrophobic core region of an enzyme is tightly packed, we hypothesized that incorporation of a bulky non-natural amino acid reduces the conformational stability of the core region due to the steric incompatibility. In order to test this hypothesis, computational analysis using RosettaDesign was performed to evaluate the steric compatibility of 2Nal at each incorporation site (Table 1). The RosettaDesign fa_rep output is the Lennard-Jones repulsive (LJR) score, which is a measure of the deviation of atom distances from optimality [67]. Higher scores reflect a scenario where atoms are closer than the distance preferred by van der Waals forces. The LJR score is a measure of the steric compatibility of a mutation and, for a fixed-backbone technique, also represents the available free energy to drive structural changes to a more stable protein conformation [68,69,70,71,72]. The RosettaDesign LJR score was previously used to evaluate the conformational stability of human copper, zinc superoxide dismutase and was used successfully to predict mutations for both favorable and unfavorable conformational interactions [73,74].
Table
Table 1. Parameters derived from computational and crystal structure analysis.
Table 1. Parameters derived from computational and crystal structure analysis.
VariantWTW113ZV112ZF134ZV135ZI51ZV50Z
fa_rep 1 (kcal/mol)14.1 ± 0.566.5 ± 0.7121.3 ± 34.859.7 ± 2.377.9 ± 1.596.7 ± 0.6121.4 ± 1.2
DTS (Å) 2NA 39126788
1 Lennard-Jones repulsive score derived by computational analysis (RossettaDesign 3.4) using a fixed-backbone method using PDB ID: 2W3M. Standard errors are reported (n = 3); 2 Distance to the substrate. Distances represent the lowest edge-to-edge distance from the native residue to the substrate and are binned to a whole number; 3 Not applicable.
The degree of steric incompatibility (LJR score) is related to the size difference between the mutant and the native residue (Supplementary Information Figure S1 and Table 1). Mutants of adjacent sites (W113Z/V112Z, F134Z/V135Z and I51Z/V50Z) were compared pairwise to minimize effects associated with location-dependence [75,76]. It was observed that the mutation with the smaller SDMNR of each pair (W113Z, F134Z and I51Z) consistently exhibited a lower LJR score than its adjacent counterpart (V112Z, V135Z and V50Z) with the larger SDMNR (Table 1; Supplementary Information Figure S1). As would be expected, these results indicate that between mutants of adjacent sites, the mutation with the smaller SDMNR is more sterically compatible. In other words, the degree of steric incompatibility (LJR score) is related to the SDMNR. These results support our hypothesis that minimizing the SDMNR reduces steric incompatibility.
Far-UV circular dichroism spectroscopy was performed to qualitatively analyze the changes in secondary structure (Supplementary Information Figure S3). Due to the high β-sheet content, the mDHFRWT spectrum is highlighted by a minimum at 212 nm, a β-sheet signature. The mDHFRWT spectrum also exhibits a shoulder at 222 nm associated with α-helical structure. Regarding the mDHFRW113Z and mDHFRF134Z variants, a modest reduction in the signal at 212 nm and an increase signal at 222 nm were observed, indicating some change in secondary structure. Such structural changes might be attributed to steric instability upon 2Nal incorporation. CD spectra could not be obtained for mDHFRV50Z, mDHFRI51Z, mDHFRV112Z, and mDHFRV135Z due to low expression and purification yields, suggesting these variants are structurally unstable and so are prone to degradation inside cells. We speculate that mDHFRW113Z and mDHFRF134Z variants are structurally more stable than other mDHFR variants (mDHFRV50Z, mDHFRI51Z, mDHFRV112Z, and mDHFRV135Z).

2.5. Evaluating the Effects of 2Nal Incorporation on mDHFR Substrate Binding

Next, we examined how the incorporation of 2Nal affected enzyme function. Substrate binding is the obligate step in all enzymatic reactions before biocatalysis can occur [77]. Since reduction of DHF by mDHFR follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics within the measured substrate concentration range (0–40 μM DHF), Km, the inverse measure of binding affinity, was used to evaluate the effect of 2Nal incorporation on the substrate-binding component of enzyme function. The Km values for the conservative mutations W113Z and F134Z were statistically indistinguishable from that of mDHFRWT (Student’s t-test; p > 0.05) (Table 2; Supplementary Information Figure S4). This indicates that the two conservative mutations did not significantly affect DHF binding affinity, though 2Nal incorporation caused the changes in secondary structure.
Table
Table 2. Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters for DHF reduction by mDHFR 1.
Table 2. Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters for DHF reduction by mDHFR 1.
VariantWTW113ZV112ZF134ZV135ZI51ZV50Z
kcat (s−1)3.66 ± 0.022.95 ± 0.0020.029 ± 0.00011.46 ± 0.00020.32 ± 0.00040.028 ± 0.00020.020 ± 0.0002
Km (μM)1.94 ± 0.082.10 ± 0.192.61 ± 0.121.87 ± 0.191.47 ± 0.083.01 ± 0.113.43 ± 0.24
kcat/Km (μM/s)1.9 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.10.011 ± 0.0010.78 ± 0.080.22 ± 0.010.0092 ± 0.0010.0058 ± 0.0004
Rel. kcat/Km (%) 2100.074.5 ± 12.70.6 ± 0.0541.4 ± 8.111.7 ± 1.20.5 ± 0.050.3 ± 0.04
|ΔKm| (μM) 3NA0.160.670.070.471.071.49
1 Reactions were conducted with DHF concentrations of 0–40 and 60 μM of NADPH. Standard errors are shown (n = 3); 2 Relative catalytic efficiency of the particular variant compared to that of mDHFRWT; 3 Absolute difference between the Km of the mutant mDHFR and that of wild-type mDHFR.
The packed structure of the hydrophobic core is held together predominantly by van der Waals interactions, and strongly depends on both the steric compatibility and configuration of its residues [44,47,78]. Therefore, the hydrophobic core structure is highly sensitive to mutations that promote conformational strain or cavitations [42]. Moreover, enzyme-substrate binding affinity is sensitive to structural changes and can be affected by either a change to the binding site structure itself or by a change in the structure outside the binding site that alters the stability of the substrate-bound conformation [77,79,80]. DHF is known to interact with several residues inside the active site (I7, L22, E30, F31 and N64) via multiple non-covalent bonds [81,82]. As expected, a number of mutations have been shown to affect binding site structure and binding affinity of DHFR through the propagation of structural changes between the mutation and binding site [75,77,82,83,84,85,86,87]. Therefore, we suspect that there is a link between the steric compatibility of a mutation in the hydrophobic core and changes in substrate binding affinity.
To determine whether the steric compatibility of a mutation in the hydrophobic core is an important variable that affects substrate binding, variants of adjacent sites were compared pairwise. The LJR score did not trend with Km itself. Instead, we observed that, between variants of adjacent sites, the LJR score trended with the absolute difference between the Km of the variant and that of mDHFRWT (|ΔKm|). 2Nal mutations with lower LJR scores (W113, F134 and I51) consistently resulted in a lower |ΔKm| than ones with higher LJR scores (V112, V135, V50) (Table 1 and Table 2). Also, the difference in the Km values between variants of adjacent sites was found to be statistically significant (Student’s t-test; p < 0.05). Moreover, Km and |ΔKm| did not trend or correlate with the distance of the mutation site from the active site (DTS) (Table 1 and Table 2), nor did they trend or correlate with ASA, which was kept relatively constant through a rigorous mutation selection process.
To determine whether there was a correlation between the LJR score and |ΔKm|, we calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC), r, which is used to evaluate the linearity between two variables. From this analysis, r was determined to be 0.831, and the corresponding p-value was found to be equal to 0.041. Since the p-value was less than 0.05 and the r value was greater than zero, the statistical analysis indicates that a statistically significant positive correlation is present between the LJR score and |ΔKm|. While the sample size was small, it was taken into account during calculation of the PCC and p-value [44,78,88]. Collectively, these results indicate that steric compatibility is predictive to the degree to which Km changes. A similar phenomenon has been observed in a number of cases where the protein stability correlates either positively or negatively with ligand binding affinity [89]. Our results suggest that, for the variants, steric compatibility of the mutation plays a significant role in changing substrate-binding affinity.

2.6. Evaluating the Effect of 2Nal Incorporation on Catalytic Function

Next, we evaluated the effects of each mutation on catalytic function using two kinetic parameters: the substrate turnover rate (kcat) and catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km). While the conservative mutations, W113Z and F134Z, did not significantly change the substrate binding affinity (Table 2), they reduced the substrate turnover rate and the catalytic efficiency (Table 2; Supplementary Information Figure S5). Based on the inspection of the crystal structure of DHFR (PDB ID:2W3M), it is not apparent how these two mutations affected the catalytic efficiency. Both sites are located in the rigid β-sheet core of mDHFR and are not directly associated with loop regions that are essential for catalytic function [77]. However, since secondary structure changes were observed for these two mutations, we found out that preservation of the mDHFR core structure is important for catalytic function [90].
To evaluate the effects of the steric incompatibility caused by 2Nal incorporation on catalytic function, we compared the kcat value of mDHFR variants of adjacent incorporation sites in a pairwise manner. Between the adjacent sites, mutations with the lower LJR scores consistently retained a higher substrate turnover rate and catalytic efficiency (Table 2). W113Z, F134Z and I51Z had 102-, 4.6- and 1.4-fold higher substrate turnover rates, respectively, than their counterpart variant containing Val to 2Nal mutation. The same trend was observed between the LJR score and catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km).
When we calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient for kcat as a function of the LJR score, the r and corresponding p-value were determined to be −0.739 and 0.093, respectively. Since, p > 0.05, this indicates that the LJR score does not correlate linearly with kcat. Since the r value was relatively high (−1 ≤ r ≤ +1), we suspected that a monotonic correlation might be present instead. Therefore, we calculated the Spearman rho correlation coefficient, ρ, which was determined to be −0.886 with a corresponding p-value equal to 0.019. Judging from ρ and p values, kcat has a decreasing monotonic trend with respect to the LJR score in a non-linear manner. A similar correlation was observed between kcat/Km and the LJR score.
Steric incompatibility can affect enzyme function in a number of ways. Steric incompatibility can compromise enzyme function by disrupting global conformation resulting in severely misfolded or denatured enzymes. Steric incompatibility can also affect enzyme function by decreasing the dynamic motion of an enzyme. Protein dynamics have increasingly been shown to be important for enzyme function [91,92,93,94,95,96]. Structural features such as loop regions are known to mediate catalytic function of mDHFR. For example, the opening and occlusion of loop regions around the active site during the unbinding of product and NADP+ are rate-limiting steps in the catalytic pathway [39,77,94,95,97,98,99]. Mutation of G121 in DHFR has been shown to decrease the dynamic range of motion thus inhibiting catalysis [98,100,101]. Therefore, we suspect that the hydrophobic core mutations affect mDHFR function through one of these mechanisms. However, further studies involving structural analysis are necessary to clarify the appropriate mechanism.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

3-(2-naphthy)-alanine (2Nal) was obtained from Chem-Impex (Wood Dale, IL, USA). Nickel-nitrilotriaceticacid (Ni-NTA) affinity column resin and plasmid pQE16 were obtained from Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA). Sequencing-grade trypsin was procured from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). ZipTip C18 was purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). Dihydrofolate (DHF), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), and isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Dallas, TX, USA). All other chemicals, unless otherwise noted, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Expression and Purification of Wild-Type mDHFR and Its Variants

The plasmid pQE16-mDHFRWT-yPheRSnaph encoding wild-type DHFR (mDHFRWT) and engineered yeast phenylalanyl-tRNA/synthetase pair specific for 2Nal was transformed into the E. coli AFWK expression host, as reported previously [1]. For mDHFRWT expression, the transformed expression host was cultured in M9-20AA media (6 g/L Na2HPO4, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.4% glucose, 50 mg/L of each of the 20 natural amino acids) supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. The cells were grown to OD600 = 1.0 and induced with a final concentration of 1 mM IPTG. We used amber suppression technique to incorporate 2Nal into a specific site of mDHFR, as reported previously [1]. We performed a PCR-mutagenesis to introduce an amber codon to each of six sites (Val50, Ile51, Val112, Trp113, Phe134, and Val135) in the core region of mDHFR generating six plasmids (pQE16-XXAmb_mDHFR-yPheRSnaph; XX denotes a residue mutated). With an aid of the engineered yeast phenylalanyl-tRNA/synthetase pair specific for 2Nal, 2Nal was site-specifically introduced to an amber codon site of each mDHFR variant. Cells were harvested after overnight induction at 32 °C. In order to express the mDHFR variants containing 2Nal, the E. coli AFWK host was co-transformed with the two plasmids pQE16-XXAmb_mDHFR-yPheRSnaph and pREP4-ytRNAPheCUA_UG as reported previously except mutation sites [1]. The cells were then grown in M9-20AA, supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 50 μg/mL kanamycin, until OD600 = 1.0. Cells were gently washed twice by repeating centrifugation at 4500× g for 8 min and resuspended using 0.9% NaCl solution. After washing twice, the resulting cell pellet was resuspended in M9-17AA (6 g/L Na2HPO4, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.4% glucose, 0.05 g/L of each of the natural amino acids except phenylalanine (25 μM), tryptophan (50 μM), and lysine (100 μM) as reported previously [24]. The M9-17AA was then supplemented with 3 mM of 2Nal. After incubation at 37 °C for 10 min, induction was initiated by the addition of IPTG (1 mM). The cells were induced overnight at 32 °C. Compared to wild-type mDHFR found in nature, the mDHFR used in this study has the extra residues MRGSGI at to the N-terminus and a hexahistidine purification tag at the C-terminus [1]. Purification of the mDHFRWT and its variants was performed using Ni-NTA resin, according to manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA)—with the exception that 20 and 40 mM imidazole in the lysis and wash buffers, respectively [1]. The protein gel images were taken using a UVP BioSpectrum imager (Upland, CA, USA). Protein concentration was determined by absorbance measurements at 280 nm, using the calculated extinction coefficient of 24,750 cm−1·M−1 [1].

3.3. Confirmation of in Vivo 2Nal Incorporation by MALDI-TOF/MS

Site-specific incorporation of 2Nal into mDHFR was confirmed by MALDI-TOF/MS after digestion of each variant in elution buffer either by trypsin or chymotrypsin. The mDHFRV50Z, mDHFRI51Z, mDHFRF134Z, and mDHFRV135Z variants were digested by trypsin. The mDHFRV112Z and mDHFRW113Z variants were digested by chymotrypsin [1]. After the enzymatic digestion at 37 °C overnight, the reaction was quenched by addition of trifluoroacetic acid. Digested peptides solutions were desalted using ZipTip C18 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Twenty mg/mL of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 2 mg/mL of l-fucose dissolved in 10% ethanol was used as the matrix for MS analysis using a Microflex MALDI-TOF/MS (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).

3.4. Dihydrofolate Reduction Kinetics

The eluted mDHFR was desalted on a PD-10 column (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) per manufacture’s protocol. The reaction kinetics of DHF conversion into tetrahydrofolate was monitored by measuring absorbance at 340 nm, using a Synergy four multimode microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). To determine DHF reduction kinetic parameters, 60 μM of NADPH and varying concentrations of DHF (0–40 μM) were dissolved in MTEN buffer (50 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), 25 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), 25 mM ethanolamine, and 800 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.5) supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL of bovine serum albumin. The mDHFR variant was added to a final concentration of 2 to 100 nM, depending on the variant. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was added to each reaction at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL [102,103]. All measurements were performed in at least triplicates. Kinetic parameters kcat, Km, and kcat/Km were obtained by fitting reaction rates with respect to substrate concentration against the Michaelis-Menten model [1,31,32,33,35,38,104]. The extinction coefficient for DHF conversion into tetrahydrofolate is 12,300 M−1/cm at 340 nm at 25 °C [102,103].

3.5. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

The purified mDHFR variants were diluted using 10 mM phosphate buffer to a final concentration of 2 μM and were subjected to circular dichroism spectroscopy using a Jasco J-710 spectropolarimeter. The reported spectrum for each sample was an average of at least five measurements, and the solvent background spectrum was subtracted.

3.6. Computational Analysis of Conformational Stability and Mutational Steric Compatibility

Computational analysis of the conformational stability of mDHFR upon NNAA incorporation was performed using the molecular modeling program RosettaDesign, version 3.4 [67,89]. The energy score output of RosettaDesign is a linear sum of the Lennard-Jones potential, the Lazaridis-Karplus solvation energy, an empirical hydrogen bonding potential, the internal energy of sidechain rotamers, the Coulombic electrostatic energy potential, the energetic favorability of a specific amino acid based on φ/ψ angles, and a unique reference energy for each amino acid [67,68,89]. For a given crystal structure, RosettaDesign uses a Monte Carlo method to simulate residue annealing by scanning through a large number of rotamers for a given non-natural amino acid (from the SwissSidechain database) to minimize the energy score output. This analysis used a fixed-backbone technique [105]. A fixed backbone technique was previously used successfully for computational design of proteins [73,74,106,107,108,109,110]. Since a crystal structure for wild-type mDHFR bound to either DHF or folate (FOL) is not available, the human DHFR (hDHFR) structure (PDB ID: 2W3M) was used instead. The hDHFR structure is highly homologous to that of mDHFR with a greater than 95% sequence homology [32,40].

4. Conclusions

In this study, we used 2Nal and mDHFR as a model case to investigate how the incorporation of a bulky, hydrophobic non-natural amino acid into the hydrophobic core of an enzyme affects the enzyme structure and catalytic properties. We hypothesized that mutations that are intended to minimize structural changes may be able to minimize effect on mDHFR enzyme function. As expected, the two conservative mutations W113Z and F134Z led to the modest reduction in catalytic efficiency, while non-conservative mutations V50Z, I51Z, V112Z, and V135Z reduced the catalytic efficiency into a level less than 12% of that of mDHFRWT. The steric incompatibility (LJR score calculated by the by RosettaDesign of a given 2Nal substitution was found to have a linear positive correlation with |ΔKm|, the absolute difference between the Km of the variant and that of mDHFRWT. This correlation is likely due to the fact that substrate-binding affinity is closely related to the structure and conformation of an enzyme. Statistical analysis also revealed that kcat and kcat/Km have a negative non-linear monotonic correlation with the LJR score, suggesting that both the binding and catalytic component of mDHFR are dependent on the steric compatibility of the 2Nal mutation. Considering all the results obtained from this study, we conclude that the NNAA incorporation minimizing steric instability has minimal effects on enzyme catalytic properties. In other words, in order to minimize perturbation of the catalytic properties of an enzyme upon NNAA incorporation, researchers need to choose a mutation site minimizing steric instability. In order to further expand our research, we plan to investigate whether steric incompatibility is an important factor to estimate the degree of change in catalytic properties upon NNAA incorporation at non-hydrophobic core region of an enzyme, including enzyme surface, as a follow-up research.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/09/22735/s1.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and a Future Planning (Grant No. 2014R1A2A1A11050322).

Author Contributions

H. Edward Wong and Inchan Kwon designed experiments. H. Edward Wong performed experiments. H. Edward Wong and Inchan Kwon discussed the results, and prepared the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zheng, S.; Kwon, I. Controlling enzyme inhibition using an expanded set of genetically encoded amino acids. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 2361–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, L.; Brock, A.; Herberich, B.; Schultz, P.G. Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli. Science 2001, 292, 498–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chin, J.W.; Cropp, T.A.; Anderson, J.C.; Mukherji, M.; Zhang, Z.W.; Schultz, P.G. An expanded eukaryotic genetic code. Science 2003, 301, 964–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Noren, C.J.; Anthonycahill, S.J.; Griffith, M.C.; Schultz, P.G. A general-method for site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino-acids into proteins. Science 1989, 244, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Park, H.-S.; Hohn, M.J.; Umehara, T.; Guo, L.-T.; Osborne, E.M.; Benner, J.; Noren, C.J.; Rinehart, J.; Soell, D. Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli with phosphoserine. Science 2011, 333, 1151–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jackson, J.C.; Hammill, J.T.; Mehl, R.A. Site-specific incorporation of a 19F-amino acid into proteins as an NMR probe for characterizing protein structure and reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Heim, R.; Prasher, D.C.; Tsien, R.Y. Wavelength mutations and posttranslational autoxidation of green fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 12501–12504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, L.; Xie, J.M.; Deniz, A.A.; Schultz, P.G. Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis of green fluorescent protein. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, F.; Niu, W.; Guo, J.; Schultz, P.G. Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis of fluorescent proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10132–10135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kwon, I.; Tirrell, D.A. Site-specific incorporation of tryptophan analogues into recombinant proteins in bacterial cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10431–10437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jackson, J.C.; Duffy, S.P.; Hess, K.R.; Mehl, R.A. Improving nature’s enzyme active site with genetically encoded unnatural amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11124–11127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, P.; Shui, W.; Carlson, B.L.; Hu, N.; Rabuka, D.; Lee, J.; Bertozzi, C.R. Site-specific chemical modification of recombinant proteins produced in mammalian cells by using the genetically encoded aldehyde tag. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3000–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Francis, M.B.; Carrico, I.S. New frontiers in protein bioconjugation editorial overview. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 771–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. De Graaf, A.J.; Kooijman, M.; Hennink, W.E.; Mastrobattista, E. Nonnatural amino acids for site-specific protein conjugation. Bioconj. Chem. 2009, 20, 1281–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Q.; Chan, T.R.; Hilgraf, R.; Fokin, V.V.; Sharpless, K.B.; Finn, M.G. Bioconjugation by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3 + 2] cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3192–3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jewett, J.C.; Bertozzi, C.R. Cu-free click cycloaddition reactions in chemical biology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1272–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tron, G.C.; Pirali, T.; Billington, R.A.; Canonico, P.L.; Sorba, G.; Genazzani, A.A. Click chemistry reactions in medicinal chemistry: Applications of the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition between azides and alkynes. Med. Res. Rev. 2008, 28, 278–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Moses, J.E.; Moorhouse, A.D. The growing applications of click chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1249–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Sun, R.; Chen, H.; Gao, X.; Yao, W. Designing and engineering of a site-specific incorporation of a keto group in uricase. Chem. Biol. Drug Design. 2011, 78, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rashidian, M.; Dozier, J.K.; Distefano, M.D. Enzymatic labeling of proteins: Techniques and approaches. Bioconj. Chem. 2013, 24, 1277–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wu, P.; Feldman, A.K.; Nugent, A.K.; Hawker, C.J.; Scheel, A.; Voit, B.; Pyun, J.; Frechet, J.M.J.; Sharpless, K.B.; Fokin, V.V. Efficiency and fidelity in a click-chemistry route to triazole dendrimers by the copper(I)-catalyzed ligation of azides and alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3928–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kolb, H.C.; Finn, M.G.; Sharpless, K.B. Click chemistry: Diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sletten, E.M.; Bertozzi, C.R. Bioorthogonal chemistry: Fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6974–6998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lim, S.I.; Mizuta, Y.; Takasu, A.; Kim, Y.H.; Kwon, I. Site-specific bioconjugation of a murine dihydrofolate reductase enzyme by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition with retained activity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, H.; Lu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Liu, J.; Tian, H.; Gao, X.; Yao, W. High-level production of uricase containing keto functional groups for site-specific pegylation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2011, 58, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Axup, J.Y.; Bajjuri, K.M.; Ritland, M.; Hutchins, B.M.; Kim, C.H.; Kazane, S.A.; Halder, R.; Forsyth, J.S.; Santidrian, A.F.; Stafin, K.; et al. Synthesis of site-specific antibody-drug conjugates using unnatural amino acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16101–16106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kolev, J.N.; Zaengle, J.M.; Ravikumar, R.; Fasan, R. Enhancing the efficiency and regioselectivity of p450 oxidation catalysts by unnatural amino acid mutagenesis. ChemBioChem 2014, 15, 1001–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zheng, S.; Kwon, I. Manipulation of enzyme properties by noncanonical amino acid incorporation. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 7, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bailey, S.W.; Ayling, J.E. The extremely slow and variable activity of dihydrofolate reductase in human liver and its implications for high folic acid intake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 15424–15429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Beard, W.A.; Appleman, J.R.; Delcamp, T.J.; Freisheim, J.H.; Blakley, R.L. Hydride transfer by dihydrofolate-reductase—Causes and consequences of the wide-range of rates exhibited by bacterial and vertebrate enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 9391–9399. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Chunduru, S.K.; Cody, V.; Luft, J.R.; Pangborn, W.; Appleman, J.R.; Blakley, R.L. Methotrexate-resistant variants of human dihydrofolate-reductase—Effects of Phe31 substitutions. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 9547–9555. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Cody, V.; Luft, J.R.; Pangborn, W. Understanding the role of Leu22 variants in methotrexate resistance: Comparison of wild-type and Leu22Arg variant mouse and human dihydrofolate reductase ternary crystal complexes with methotrexate and NADPH. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2005, 61, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lewis, W.S.; Cody, V.; Galitsky, N.; Luft, J.R.; Pangborn, W.; Chunduru, S.K.; Spencer, H.T.; Appleman, J.R.; Blakley, R.L. Methotrexate-resistant variants of human dihydrofolate-reductase with substitutions of leucine-22. Kinetics, crystallography, and potential as selectable markers. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 5057–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tsay, J.T.; Appleman, J.R.; Beard, W.A.; Prendergast, N.J.; Delcamp, T.J.; Freisheim, J.H.; Blakley, R.L. Kinetic investigation of the functional-role of phenylalanine-31 of recombinant human dihydrofolate-reductase. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 6428–6436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Thillet, J.; Adams, J.A.; Benkovic, S.J. The kinetic mechanism of wild-type and mutant mouse dihydrofolate reductases. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 5195–5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Thillet, J.; Absil, J.; Stone, S.R.; Pictet, R. Site-directed mutagenesis of mouse dihydrofolate-reductase—Mutants with increased resistance to methotrexate and trimethoprim. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 12500–12508. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Schweitzer, B.I.; Dicker, A.P.; Bertino, J.R. Dihydrofolate-reductase as a therapeutic target. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 2441–2452. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Reyes, P.; Huennekens, F.M. Ion-dependent activation of dihydrofolate reductase from l1210 cells. Biochemistry 1967, 6, 3519–3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sawaya, M.R.; Kraut, J. Loop and subdomain movements in the mechanism of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: Crystallographic evidence. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 586–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, C.T.; Hanoian, P.; French, J.B.; Pringle, T.H.; Hammes-Schiffer, S.; Benkovic, S.J. Functional significance of evolving protein sequence in dihydrofolate reductase from bacteria to humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10159–10164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Reva, B.; Antipin, Y.; Sander, C. Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: Application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, E118–U185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bordo, D.; Argos, P. Suggestions for safe residue substitutions in site-directed mutagenesis. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 217, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guerois, R.; Nielsen, J.E.; Serrano, L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 320, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bowie, J.U.; Reidhaarolson, J.F.; Lim, W.A.; Sauer, R.T. Deciphering the message in protein sequences—Tolerance to amino-acid substitutions. Science 1990, 247, 1306–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ventura, S.; Vega, M.C.; Lacroix, E.; Angrand, I.; Spagnolo, L.; Serrano, L. Conformational strain in the hydrophobic core and its implications for protein folding and design. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vandenburg, B.; Dijkstra, B.W.; Vriend, G.; Vandervinne, B.; Venema, G.; Eijsink, V.G.H. Protein stabilization by hydrophobic interactions at the surface. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 220, 981–985. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lim, W.A.; Sauer, R.T. Alternative packing arrangements in the hydrophobic core of λrepressor. Nature 1989, 339, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lazar, G.A.; Desjarlais, J.R.; Handel, T.M. De novo design of the hydrophobic core of ubiquitin. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kellis, J.T.; Nyberg, K.; Fersht, A.R. Energetics of complementary side-chain packing in a protein hydrophobic core. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 4914–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jackson, S.E.; Moracci, M.; Elmasry, N.; Johnson, C.M.; Fersht, A.R. Effect of cavity-creating mutations in the hydrophobic core of chymotrypsin inhibitor-2. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 11259–11269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Eriksson, A.E.; Baase, W.A.; Zhang, X.J.; Heinz, D.W.; Blaber, M.; Baldwin, E.P.; Matthews, B.W. Response of a protein-structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Science 1992, 255, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Desjarlais, J.R.; Handel, T.M. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. 1995, 4, 2006–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Buckle, A.M.; Cramer, P.; Fersht, A.R. Structural and energetic responses to cavity-creating mutations in hydrophobic cores: Observation of a buried water molecule and the hydrophilic nature of such hydrophobic cavities. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 4298–4305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Adamek, D.H.; Guerrero, L.; Blaber, M.; Caspar, D.L. Structural and energetic consequences of mutations in a solvated hydrophobic cavity. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 346, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, L.; Brock, A.; Schultz, P.G. Adding l-3-(2-naphthyl)alanine to the genetic code of E coli. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1836–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cornette, J.L.; Cease, K.B.; Margalit, H.; Spouge, J.L.; Berzofsky, J.A.; Delisi, C. Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 195, 659–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Young, T.S.; Schultz, P.G. Beyond the canonical 20 amino acids: Expanding the genetic lexicon. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 11039–11044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kwon, I.; Wang, P.; Tirrell, D.A. Design of a bacterial host for site-specific incorporation of p-bromophenylalanine into recombinant proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11778–11783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhao, Y.H.; Abraham, M.H.; Zissimos, A.M. Fast calculation of van der waals volume as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its application to drug compounds. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7368–7373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gilis, D.; Rooman, M. Predicting protein stability changes upon mutation using database-derived potentials: Solvent accessibility determines the importance of local versus non-local interactions along the sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 272, 276–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ahmad, S.; Gromiha, M.; Fawareh, H.; Sarai, A. ASAview: Database and tool for solvent accessibility representation in proteins. BMC Bioinform. 2004, 5, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Parthiban, V.; Gromiha, M.M.; Schomburg, D. CUPSAT: Prediction of protein stability upon point mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W239–W242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Worth, C.L.; Preissner, R.; Blundell, T.L. SDM—A server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability and malfunction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W215–W222. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Eisenberg, D.; McLachlan, A.D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986, 319, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mirny, L.A.; Shakhnovich, E.I. Universally conserved positions in protein folds: Reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 291, 177–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rausell, A.; Juan, D.; Pazos, F.; Valencia, A. Protein interactions and ligand binding: From protein subfamilies to functional specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1995–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rohl, C.A.; Strauss, C.E.M.; Misura, K.M.S.; Baker, D. Protein structure prediction using rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 2004, 383, 66–93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Combs, S.A.; DeLuca, S.L.; DeLuca, S.H.; Lemmon, G.H.; Nannemann, D.P.; Nguyen, E.D.; Willis, J.R.; Sheehan, J.H.; Meiler, J. Small-molecule ligand docking into comparative models with rosetta. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1277–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kuhlman, B.; Dantas, G.; Ireton, G.C.; Varani, G.; Stoddard, B.L.; Baker, D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003, 302, 1364–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jiang, X.; Farid, H.; Pistor, E.; Farid, R.S. A new approach to the design of uniquely folded thermally stable proteins. Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Kussell, E.; Shimada, J.; Shakhnovich, E.I. Excluded volume in protein side-chain packing. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 311, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yasuda, S.; Yoshidome, T.; Oshima, H.; Kodama, R.; Harano, Y.; Kinoshita, M. Effects of side-chain packing on the formation of secondary structures in protein folding. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Gregoire, S.; Glitzos, K.; Kwon, I. Suppressing mutation-induced protein aggregation in mammalian cells by mutating residues significantly displaced upon the original mutation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 91, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gregoire, S.; Zhang, S.; Costanzo, J.; Wilson, K.; Fernandez, E.J.; Kwon, I. Cis-suppression to arrest protein aggregation in mammalian cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014, 111, 462–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wong, K.F.; Selzer, T.; Benkovic, S.J.; Hammes-Schiffer, S. Impact of distal mutations on the network of coupled motions correlated to hydride transfer in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 6807–6812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, L.; Goodey, N.M.; Benkovic, S.J.; Kohen, A. Coordinated effects of distal mutations on environmentally coupled tunneling in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15753–15758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Boehr, D.D.; McElheny, D.; Dyson, H.J.; Wright, P.E. The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Science 2006, 313, 1638–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Worth, C.L.; Gong, S.; Blundell, T.L. Structural and functional constraints in the evolution of protein families. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Colquhoun, D. Binding, gating, affinity and efficacy: The interpretation of structure-activity relationships for agonists and of the effects of mutating receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 125, 924–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Luque, I.; Freire, E. Structural stability of binding sites: Consequences for binding affinity and allosteric effects. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 2000, 41, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Meiering, E.M.; Li, H.J.; Delcamp, T.J.; Freisheim, J.H.; Wagner, G. Contributions of tryptophan-24 and glutamate-30 to binding long-lived water-molecules in the ternary complex of human dihydrofolate-reductase with methotrexate and NADP studied by site-directed mutagenesis and nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 247, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Benkovic, S.J.; Fierke, C.A.; Naylor, A.M. Insights into enzyme function from studies on mutants of dihydrofolate-reductase. Science 1988, 239, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Boehr, D.D.; Schnell, J.R.; McElheny, D.; Bae, S.-H.; Duggan, B.M.; Benkovic, S.J.; Dyson, H.J.; Wright, P.E. A distal mutation perturbs dynamic amino acid networks in dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 4605–4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rod, T.H.; Radkiewicz, J.L.; Brooks, C.L. Correlated motion and the effect of distal mutations in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6980–6985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Adams, J.; Johnson, K.; Matthews, R.; Benkovic, S.J. Effects of distal point-site mutations on the binding and catalysis of dihydrofolate-reductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 6611–6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mayer, R.J.; Chen, J.T.; Taira, K.; Fierke, C.A.; Benkovic, S.J. Importance of a hydrophobic residue in binding and catalysis by dihydrofolate-reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 7718–7720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Adams, J.A.; Fierke, C.A.; Benkovic, S.J. The function of amino-acid-residues contacting the nicotinamide ring of nadph in dihydrofolate-reductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 11046–11054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Todd, A.E.; Orengo, C.A.; Thornton, J.M. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 307, 1113–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kaufmann, K.W.; Lemmon, G.H.; DeLuca, S.L.; Sheehan, J.H.; Meiler, J. Practically useful: What the rosetta protein modeling suite can do for you. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 2987–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Pelletier, J.N.; Campbell-Valois, F.X.; Michnick, S.W. Oligomerization domain-directed reassembly of active dihydrofolate reductase from rationally designed fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 12141–12146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Teilum, K.; Olsen, J.G.; Kragelund, B.B. Protein stability, flexibility and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1814, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Eisenmesser, E.Z.; Millet, O.; Labeikovsky, W.; Korzhnev, D.M.; Wolf-Watz, M.; Bosco, D.A.; Skalicky, J.J.; Kay, L.E.; Kern, D. Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis. Nature 2005, 438, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Francis, K.; Stojkovic, V.; Kohen, A. Preservation of protein dynamics in dihydrofolate reductase evolution. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 35961–35968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, L.; Goodey, N.M.; Benkovic, S.J.; Kohen, A. The role of enzyme dynamics and tunnelling in catalysing hydride transfer: Studies of distal mutants of dihydrofolate reductase. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. 2006, 361, 1307–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Schnell, J.R.; Dyson, H.J.; Wright, P.E. Structure, dynamics, and catalytic function of dihydrofolate reductase. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2004, 33, 119–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Shoichet, B.K.; Baase, W.A.; Kuroki, R.; Matthews, B.W. A relationship between protein stability and protein function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chen, J.; Dima, R.I.; Thirumalai, D. Allosteric communication in dihydrofolate reductase: Signaling network and pathways for closed to occluded transition and back. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 374, 250–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Cameron, C.E.; Benkovic, S.J. Evidence for a functional role of the dynamics of glycine-121 of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase obtained from kinetic analysis of a site-directed mutant. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 15792–15800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ohmae, E.; Iriyama, K.; Ichihara, S.; Gekko, K. Effects of point mutations at the flexible loop glycine-67 of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase on its stability and function. J. Biochem. 1996, 119, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gekko, K.; Kunori, Y.; Takeuchi, H.; Ichihara, S.; Kodama, M. Point mutations at glycine-121 of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate-reductase—Important roles of a flexible loop in the stability and function. J. Biochem. 1994, 116, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Mauldin, R.V.; Sapienza, P.J.; Petit, C.M.; Lee, A.L. Structure and dynamics of the g121v dihydrofolate reductase mutant: Lessons from a transition-state inhibitor complex. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Gauldie, J.; Marshall, L.; Hillcoat, B.L. Purification and properties of dihydrofolate reductase from cultured mammalian-cells. Biochem. J. 1973, 133, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hillcoat, B.L.; Nixon, P.F.; Blakley, R.L. Effect of substrate decomposition on the spectrophotometric assay of dihydrofolate reductase. Anal. Biochem. 1967, 21, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Haber, D.A.; Beverley, S.M.; Kiely, M.L.; Schimke, R.T. Properties of an altered dihydrofolate-reductase encoded by amplified genes in cultured mouse fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 9501–9510. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Kuhlman, B.; Baker, D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 10383–10388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ashworth, J.; Taylor, G.K.; Havranek, J.J.; Quadri, S.A.; Stoddard, B.L.; Baker, D. Computational reprogramming of homing endonuclease specificity at multiple adjacent base pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 5601–5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ashworth, J.; Havranek, J.J.; Duarte, C.M.; Sussman, D.; Monnat, R.J.; Stoddard, B.L.; Baker, D. Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity. Nature 2006, 441, 656–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Cochran, F.V.; Wu, S.P.; Wang, W.; Nanda, V.; Saven, J.G.; Therien, M.J.; DeGrado, W.F. Computational de novo design and characterization of a four-helix bundle protein that selectively binds a nonbiological cofactor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1346–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Jiang, L.; Althoff, E.A.; Clemente, F.R.; Doyle, L.; Rothlisberger, D.; Zanghellini, A.; Gallaher, J.L.; Betker, J.L.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C.F., III; et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 2008, 319, 1387–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Huang, P.-S.; Love, J.J.; Mayo, S.L. A de novo designed protein-protein interface. Protein Sci. 2007, 16, 2770–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wong, H.E.; Kwon, I. Effects of Non-Natural Amino Acid Incorporation into the Enzyme Core Region on Enzyme Structure and Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 22735-22753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160922735

AMA Style

Wong HE, Kwon I. Effects of Non-Natural Amino Acid Incorporation into the Enzyme Core Region on Enzyme Structure and Function. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(9):22735-22753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160922735

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wong, H. Edward, and Inchan Kwon. 2015. "Effects of Non-Natural Amino Acid Incorporation into the Enzyme Core Region on Enzyme Structure and Function" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 9: 22735-22753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160922735

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop