Next Article in Journal
Oleuropein Induces AMPK-Dependent Autophagy in NAFLD Mice, Regardless of the Gender
Next Article in Special Issue
Expression Analysis of PIN Genes in Root Tips and Nodules of Lotus japonicus
Previous Article in Journal
Sulfonamide Inhibition Studies of a New β-Carbonic Anhydrase from the Pathogenic Protozoan Entamoeba histolytica
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proteomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules

1
Department of Science, Columbia College, Columbia, MO 65216, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
3
Charles River Labs, Carson City, NV 89523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(12), 3947; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123947
Submission received: 8 October 2018 / Revised: 26 November 2018 / Accepted: 29 November 2018 / Published: 8 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Nitrogen Fixation)

Abstract

:
The form and physiology of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens after the decline of symbiotic nitrogen fixation has been characterized. Proteomic analyses showed that post-symbiotic B. diazoefficiens underwent metabolic remodeling as well-defined groups of proteins declined, increased or remained unchanged from 56 to 119 days after planting, suggesting a transition to a hemibiotrophic-like lifestyle. Enzymatic analysis showed distinct patterns in both the cytoplasm and the periplasm. Similar to the bacteroid, the post-symbiotic bacteria rely on a non-citric acid cycle supply of succinate and, although viable, they did not demonstrate the ability to grow within the senescent nodule.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In 1879, the German mycologist Heinrich Anton de Bary, defined symbiosis as “the living together of unlike organisms” [1]. Nitrogen-fixing symbioses between rhizobia and legumes have been studied since 1888 [2], with the vast number of investigations describing the infection events and the mature nitrogen-fixing nodule. During nodule formation, the rhizobia transform into a non-growing form capable of reducing atmospheric dinitrogen, called bacteroids. The plant receives reduced nitrogen compounds in exchange for photosynthetically-derived substrates transported to the bacteroids to provide the energy for the nitrogen-fixing reactions.
In determinate nodules, such as those formed between Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens and soybean, the nitrogen fixation activity of the nodule increases in parallel with nodule development and then declines as the plant portion of the nodule senesces. With bacteroids obtained from senescing, determinate nodules are able to de-differentiate into free-living bacteria and thus remain viable [3,4,5,6,7]. Bacteroids within the decaying nodule could take advantage of the abundant supply of metabolites from the decaying plant nodule, in effect becoming hemibiotrophs. A hemibiotroph is an organism that is a saprophyte or parasite in living tissue while the plant is alive, and which upon plant death consumes the decaying tissue [8,9]. According to the original definition of Anton de Bary [1], the senescing nodule is no longer a symbiosis, since the unlike organisms are no longer living together, but rather one is surviving on the remains of the other. This post-symbiotic, hemibiotrophic-like lifestyle of the bradyrhizobia has received scant attention, but has significant ecological relevance, as it may be the primary mechanism by which the bacteria are perpetuated in the rhizosphere and soil. The rhizosphere supports a far greater number of bacteria than the bulk soil [10] because up to 20% of the entire carbon fixed photosynthetically by the plant may be excreted from the roots [11].
Unlike the symbiotic state, in which the symbiotic bacteroids are provide a defined diet of substrates dictated by the plant, the post-symbiotic bacteria are presented with a diverse milieu of metabolites derived from the catabolism of the entire cellular content of plant nodule cells. In contrast to the rhizosphere, where bacteria must compete for excreted materials, the bradyrhiobia are imbedded within a rich metabolic matrix, for which they do not need to compete. Elucidating the genes and molecular events for survival and perpetuation of applied strains beyond symbiosis in the senescent nodule and their eventual release into the soil would be an agricultural and financial benefit to farmers in third world-countries, who lack the resources for annual fertilizer applications.
Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids has been undertaken to better understand the symbiosis between B. diazoefficiens and its obligate legume host soybean (Glycine max) to improve crop production [12,13]. However, the majority of this work has only focused on the early stages of infection to the peak of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Though much is known about the process of nodule senescence with regard to the plant, little is known about the determinate bacteroid and its process of post-symbiotic re-differentiation [6,13,14,15,16]. Only one published proteomics report examines bacteroids past the peak of nitrogen fixation and utilizing soybean root nodules grown under field conditions [12]. This leaves a glaring omission in the critical stage in the natural cycle where the bradyrhizobia return to the soil. This study was undertaken to provide a global proteomic analysis of the post-symbiotic form of B. diazoefficiens. Purified bacteroids were fractionated into their periplasmic and cytoplasmic compartments and marker enzymes were followed over a period of 9 weeks. The fractionated proteins were prepared for analysis via LC-MS/MS and three general patterns were identified: Proteins decreasing in abundance, constitutive proteins, and proteins increasing in abundance. The results of this study should help in understanding how the B. diazoefficiens persists after symbiosis to provide greater insight into how the association could be better exploited to increase crop production.

2. Results

2.1. Nodule Mass and Leghemoglobin Content

Soybean root nodules were measured for mass per nodule and leghemoglobin content over the 9-week (56–119 days after planting) post-symbiotic period. The maximal nitrogen fixation activity was observed on day 43, but by day 55 it had declined to 25% and was negligible by day 95 (data not shown). Nodule mass fluctuated over time, but the leghemoglobin content was consistently between 8–9 mg of leghemoglobin per g fresh weight of nodules until day 112, when leghemoglobin concentration started to decline, with a final concentration of 3 mg per g nodule by day 119 (Figure 1).

2.2. Bacteroid Protein and Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) Content and Enzymes Activities in the Post-Symbiotic Period

Total bacteroid protein fluctuated over the time course with a pattern similar to, but not identical with, that of nodule mass (Figure 2). Isolated bacteroids were fractionated into periplasmic and cytoplasmic fractions. The periplasm is at the interface between the bacteria and the plant and, thus, would be assumed to respond to changes caused by the post-symbiotic environment. β-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, a cytoplasmic enzyme marker necessary for the production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), a bacteroid carbon storage polymer associated with effective symbiosis, displayed cytoplasmic activity, remaining relatively constant, and periplasmic activity increased to 91 days and remained relatively constant until it declined at days 112 and 119 (Figure 3). The PHB content remained relatively unchanged until days 104–112, when it increased nearly 3-fold (Figure 2). The periplasmic marker enzyme cyclic phosphodiesterase displayed a bimodal pattern, while the periplasmic activity increased from day 55 to 91 and then remained constant (Figure 4).
Isocitrate dehydrogenase, another cytoplasmic marker enzyme, has been previously shown to decline over the first five weeks of symbiosis [17,18] and Figure 5 shows it continued to decline and became undetectable at days 112 and 119. Cytoplasmic malate dehydrogenase activity showed a bimodal trend similar to cyclic phosphodiesterase activity and the periplasmic malate dehydrogenase activity showed a gradual increase through 78 days and then a more pronounced increase to 91 days and a decrease at days 112 and 119 (Figure 6). Protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase activity in both fractions showed a bimodal activity profile (Figure 7).

2.3. Proteomics Time Course

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on the proteins of the cytosolic and periplasmic fractions of bacteroids isolated from soybean plants over the nine-week time course. Periplasmic protein samples covered the entirety of the time course, while cytoplasmic analysis covered the seven time points of days 63, 70, 91–119. For the cytosolic fraction, 1869 unique peptides were identified, with 706 proteins identified via SePro. For the periplasmic fraction, 2849 peptides were identified, with 1417 proteins identified via SePro. Trend Quest from Pattern Lab for Proteomics identified three unambiguous progressions of peptide frequencies: Proteins that declined following symbiosis, proteins that increased following symbiosis, and constitutive proteins (Figure 8 and Figure 9). Other patterns displayed significant fluctuations at various sampling times that are difficult to interpret. These proteins may be more responsive to climatic or soil conditions than those of the three unambiguous patterns. The sampling time points include the development of nitrogen fixation activity and proteins known to be involved in this process were identified. Proteins known to participate in nodule initiation were absent and likely have been degraded as they have served their purpose at the first sampling point of functional nodules, actively reducing atmospheric dinitrogen. Proteins associated with symbiotic nitrogen fixation were identified: The nitrogenase metallo cluster biosynthetic protein (blr1756), nitrogenase molybdenum-cofactor synthesis protein (blr1746), nitrogenase stabilizing protein (blr1771), glutathione synthetase (bll0668), alanine dehydrogenase (blr3179) alanine racemase (bll4070), serine hydroxymethyltransferase (bll5033), L-asparaginase (bll4950), aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (bll0501), and aspartate aminotransferase (bll7416). All of these proteins declined markedly during senescence.

2.4. Proteins That Declined Following Symbiosis

The rate of protein synthesis and protein turnover have been shown to decline during nodule development due to the diversion of cellular energy to nitrogen fixation [19] and, as expected in the post-symbiotic period, proteins directly associated with nitrogen fixation, the two component proteins of nitrogenase (blr1743, blr1744), and fixC, a flavoprotein dehydrogenase (blr1774), were found to decrease over the nine-week time course (Table 1). All three proteins are regulated by RegR under microoxic conditions [20,21]. The ability to assimilate fixed nitrogen into transferable amino acids decreased over time as the aminotransferase proteins (blr1686, blr4134), glutamate synthase (blr7743), glutamine synthetase I (blr4949), and two enzymes for branched chain amino acid production, 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase (bll0504), and 3-isopropylmalate isomerase (blr0488) all decreased over the time course. Succinate semi-aldehyde dehydrogenase (blr0807), which is necessary for the breakdown of glutamate and phenylalanine to succinate [22], also declined.
Proteins of glycolysis and gluconeogensis were well represented in the decreasing data set; pyruvate dehydrogenase (bll4782), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (bll8141), fructose bisphosphate aldolase (bll1520), and enolase (bll4794). Pyruvate dehydrogenase (bll4782) provides a link between glycolysis to branched chain amino acid biosynthesis. Citric acid cycle enzymes succinyl-CoA synthetase (bll0455) and succinate dehydrogenase (blr0514) were found to decrease over time as well, indicating the decreases in cellular energy needs for nitrogen fixation and the need for carbon backbones for the production of amino acids.
A large number of proteins associated with the ribosome were found to decline. The symbiotic specific GroEL/S3 (blr2059, blr2060) were notable as they serve as a marker of the decline of the symbiotic state of the bacteroid, as GroEL/S3 were induced during the symbiotic state and are regulated by NifA [23,24]. The decline of several proteases, LA protease (bll4942), serine transmembrane protease (bll6508), and a zinc protease (blr7485), may suggest a physiological adaptation following symbiosis. The 30S ribosomal proteins S1, S4, S7, and S18 and the 50S ribosomal proteins L14 all decreased beyond 91 days.

2.5. Proteins That Increased Following Symbiosis

The number of proteins found to be increasing over the time course (Table 2) was much lower than that for the proteins in decline (Table 1). Half of the proteins associated with this pattern were unknown or hypothetical proteins. Annotated proteins in this pattern include fatty acid metabolism proteins enoyl-CoA hydratase (blr1160), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (blr0191), acyl-CoA thiolase (blr1159), and enoyl-CoA hydratase (bll7821). CheY (bll7795), a two-component transcriptional regulator which was found to be expressed during times of desiccation stress [25], increased over the time course, as did a carboxy-terminal protease (blr0434) and a peptidyl cis-trans isomerase (bll4690), which is required for proper protein folding. Among the proteins without annotation, bll2012 and blr1830 were found to be induced by soybean seed extracts [26].

2.6. Constitutive Proteins

The proteins in this group include a set involved in nitrogen metabolism: An ABC transporter substrate binding protein for oligopeptides (bll2909, bll5596, bll7921), a peptidyl-dipeptidase (bll7756), a glycine hydroxymethyltransferase (bll5033), a probable amino acid binding protein (bll2909), a glu/leu/phe/val dehydrogenase (blr2146), which causes the reversible oxidative deamination of the substrate to its respective α-keto acid, an ATP dependent protease, ClpB (blr1404), and N-utilization substance protein (bll0785) (Table 3). A glycine hydroxymethyltransferase, involved in C1 metabolism, can be coupled to the degradation of vanillate, which would be further metabolized via the β-ketoadipate pathway with final cleavage to acetyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA via β-ketoadipyl CoA thiolase (blr0925), which is known to be constitutively expressed in B. diazoefficiens [27]. In addition to β-ketoadipyl CoA thiolase, the proteins involved in carbon metabolism include the pentose phosphate enzymes transketolase (bll1524) and transaldolase (blr6758), which provides a range of metabolites and a mechanism for redox cofactor balancing [28,29,30,31,32], methymalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (blr3954), which participates in active turnover in branched chain amino acids and propanoate metabolism, leading to a source of acetyl-CoA, and propanoyl-CoA, a putative alcohol dehydrogenase precursor (bll6220) and carbonic anhydrase (bll2065). Superoxide dismutase (bll7774) and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (bll1777), proteins involved in reactive oxygen metabolism, were found. Several soybean proteins, histone H4, histone H3, and glu/leu/phe/val dehydrogenase (Glyma02g38920.1, Glyma06g32880.1, Glyma16g04560.1), were found throughout the period of study.

3. Discussion

Bacteroid is the term that refers to the symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing form of rhizobia. Franck et al. have demonstrated that post-symbiotic bacteroids are transcriptionally active up to 95 days after planting [33]. The data collected over the period of time from 56 to 119 days after planting clearly demonstrate the metabolic activity of the bacteria that reside within the decaying plant nodule. The bacteria, although possessing enzyme activity, do not possess nitrogenase activity, the central metabolic activity of the symbiosis and, furthermore, the symbiosis no longer occurs as per the definition of Anton de Bary [1], who defined symbiosis as “the living together of unlike organisms”. Thus, the post-symbiotic form should not be called “bacteroids”, as they no longer possess two of the key features of the symbiosis, nitrogenase and a living host partner. However, like bacteroids, the post-symbiotic form(s) of the bacteroid do not display any of the proteins or processes consistent with cellular growth and division, but they can be extracted from senescing nodules and grown on artificial medium [3,4,5,6,7,34,35].
Studies during the developmental time course of B. diazoefficiens bacteroids through symbiosis have followed several enzymes during the symbiosis, including nitrogenase, citric acid cycle enzymes, and the carbon storage compound poly-β-hydroxybutyrate [21,36]. These enzymes constitute the fixing of atmospheric dinitrogen, the energy metabolism for nitrogen fixation, and the storage of carbon metabolites in the determinate nodule system. Other studies have looked at the effects of mutations in hydrogenase systems on nitrogen fixation, leghemoglobin content, and nodule physiology up to 71 days after emergence [37]. Beyond these studies, there is no knowledge at present about the changes that the B. diazoefficiens bacteroids experiences during its re-differentiation to a free-living bacterium in the post-symbiotic state [3,4,5,6,7,36,37]. The enzymatic and proteomic analysis reported here and the transcriptomic analysis [33] provide insight into the physiological nature of the post-symbiotic form of B. diazoefficiens. The retention of metabolic and transcriptional [33] activity of the bacteria as the plant cells dies is the definition of hemibiotrophy [8,9]. A hemibiotroph is defined as an organism that is saprophytic or parasitic in living tissue while the plant is alive, and which upon plant death consumes the dead tissue [8,9]. Although a symbiont and not a parasite, B. diazoefficiens survives on plant-supplied metabolites during symbiosis and remains viable by consuming decaying plant compounds. B. diazoefficiens should be considered a highly specialized hemibiotroph, as it is restricted to limited plant hosts and a single, specialized plant organ, the nodule formed via symbiosis. The specificity of the infection process, and sequestration of the symbiont within the senescing nodule, has apparently limited the expression of the hemibiotrophic lifestyle of B. diazoefficiens, as it is not known to be a necrotroph on other plants.
The senescing nodule would be a metabolite-rich environment, with active proteases from the plant cells providing amino acids and peptides as metabolites [38]. A number of enzymatic and transport activities were identified among the constitutive and up-regulated proteins, suggesting the post-symbiotic form of B. diazoefficiens was accumulating and hydrolyzing peptides from the decaying plant nodule cells (Table 2 and Table 3). A previous study of 28-day-old, greenhouse-grown B. diazoefficiens bacteroids, at the period of maximal nitrogenase activity, indicated no defined fatty acid metabolism [12]. Fatty acid metabolism was markedly increased in the post-symbiotic period (Table 2). The symbiosome membrane amounts to approximately 30 times more membrane than that of the plasma membrane [39]. The turnover of membrane lipids derived from the senescing plant cell (both symbiosome and plasma membrane) could provide a rich source of energy for the post-symbiotic, hemibiotrophic-like B. diazoefficiens.
The bacteroids of winged bean appear to be protected from degradation via a 21 kDa nodulin that is homologous to a plant Kunitz trypsin inhibitor [40]. This raises the issue that not only is the senescing nodule a source of nutrients, but also a source of potentially harmful hydrolases from which the post-symbiotic bacteria need protection. The pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (Table 3) further supports a role in bacterial protection, as it was previously found to be one of three PQQ-dependent dehydrogenases induced during osmotic stress [25]. The presence of CheY suggests that post-symbiotic bacteria are able to respond to the changing conditions within the senescing nodule (Table 2). The presence of enzymes in reactive oxygen metabolism suggests a protective mechanism against these species, generated during plant nodule senescence (Table 3).
The senescence of the plant nodule cells leads to the loss of functional symbiosome and plant plasma membranes and, thus, the selectivity of metabolites transported to bacteria is no longer restricted, as the bacterial periplasm must adapt to the diversity of metabolites produced from plant cell degradation. For example, during symbiosis, the bacteroids receive malate from the plant. Post-symbiotically, the source of malate and of dicarboxylates change. Curiously, the protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase and malate dehydrogenase activities display inverse patterns between 56 and 119 days in both periplasm and cytoplasmic fractions (Figure 6 and Figure 7). The two metabolic sources of dicarboxylates, represented by protocatechuate dioxygenase and malate dehydrogenase, are inversely regulated to maintain a constant source of dicarboxylates as the nodule environment changes.
Combined activity profiles of the enzymes, and transcripts [33] of the post-symbiotic bacteria each demonstrate unique patterns, suggesting that post-symbiotic bacteria are actively and purposely expressing metabolic responses to its changing environment. The presence of heat shock (blr0678), cold shock (bsl1386), and peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase (bll5690) suggest the bacteria have the means for the remodeling of the bacteroid as it transitions to the post-symbiotic bacteria (Table 2 and Table 3). However, the 30S ribosomal proteins S1, S4, S7, and S18 and the 50S ribosomal proteins L14 showed a decrease beyond 91 days (Table 1). Franck et al. [33] showed the transcripts for the ribosomal proteins remain fairly constant up to 78 days, but some ribosomal proteins, particularly 30S ribosomal proteins S3, S21, S10, S17, and 50S ribosomal proteins L16 and L30 declined at 95 days after planting. This indicates a loss of overall translational activity despite the increase of select proteins at the last time point (data not shown).
Levels of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB), the major storage compound in determinate nodules, but not indeterminate nodules [41], were stable over the majority of the time course and then surprisingly increased nearly 3-fold between days 104–112 (Figure 2), without a corresponding change in β-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase activity (Figure 3). The reduction of translational activity combined with the increase in PHB suggest the bacteria may have reached a state of nutrient exhaustion and/or the build-up of waste products and will enter a quiescent state until the bacteria can be released from lignified nodule exterior and returned to the soil.
Three soybean proteins, histone H4, histone H3, glu/leu/phe/val dehydrogenase (Glyma02g38920.1, Glyma06g32880.1, Glyma16g04560.1), were present in the periplasm throughout the time course (Table 3). Previously, it was demonstrated that histone H2A and lipoxygenase were localized to the bacteroid surface [18], suggesting a role for these proteins. The presence of the soybean proteins in the periplasmic fractions of the post-symbiotic form of B. diazoefficiens suggests a role for these proteins and implies a continuation, albeit limited to a few specific intermolecular interactions, of the symbiosis among the two former symbionts beyond the period of nitrogen fixation.
In summary, the post-symbiotic form of B. diazoefficiens remains transcriptionally, translationally, and metabolically active late into senescence. During senescence, B. diazoefficiens transitions to a hemibiotrophic-like species that may still benefit from soybean-derived proteins and membranes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Source of Nodules and Bacteroid Preparations

Soybean plants were obtained from the Bradford Research and Extension Center of the University of Missouri over a nine-week period (56–119 days after planting). B. diazoefficiens strains were residual and the seeds were not inoculated prior to planting. Soybean plants were harvested from the same, un-irrigated field between 8 and 9 a.m. Approximately 100 plants were harvested at each sampling. Intact roots and nodules attached to the tap root were placed in ice water and then harvested at 4 °C. Bacteroids were isolated as described previously [17] and enzyme activities were performed on the same day. Cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions were prepared as described previously [42]. Briefly, 30 g of bacteroids from each biological replicate were aliquoted into 10 g amounts and resuspended in 10 mL of 25 mM citrate buffer, pH 4.0. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min, they were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min and the pellet was gently brought up into isolation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 with 2 mM EDTA and 20% (w/v) sucrose) using a #4 tapered-tip artist paint brush. The suspension was treated with ready-lyse lysozyme solution (25,000 U, Epicentre-Madison, WI, USA) and protease inhibitor cocktail (10 uL, Calbiochem, Rockland, MA, USA), mixed gently, and then incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The periplasm was obtained by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pelleted bacteroid spheroplasts were gently suspended in 15 mL of MEP buffer (5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM K-phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) to which 10 uL of protease inhibitor cocktail was added. The spheroplasts were then ruptured in the French press [17].

4.2. Enzymatic, Leghemoglobin, and Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) Analysis

To ascertain the level of purity of the bacteroid periplasmic fraction, several enzymes known to be cytoplasmic were measured in both fractions as well as cyclic phosphodiesterase, a known periplasmic marker, to assay the amount of the periplasmic release, as previously outlined for rhizobia and bradyrhizobia bacteroids [43]. Also measured for activity was the possible periplasmic enzyme protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygnease. Procedures for measurement of enzymes were described previously [17], except protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase, which was measured by adding 50 μL of enzyme extract to 900 μL of 50 mM CHES, pH 9.3, and 50 μL of 40 mM protocatechuate and recording absorbance at 290 nm (molar absorptivity 3.8 mM−1 cm−1). Leghemoglobin concentration was measured using Drabkin’s reagent [44]. Poly-β-hydroxyburyrate (PHB) was measured as described by Karr et al. [45]. The large fluctuations of the data can be attributed to weather over particular sampling periods, but no effort was made to adjust the data accordingly.

4.3. Protein Isolation and Identification

The periplasmic and cytoplasmic fractions were each precipitated using equal volumes of phenol. The fractions were mixed at room temperature for one hour. Phases were then separated by centrifugation at 4000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The phenol phase was collected and four volumes of 100% methanol containing 0.1 M ammonium acetate and 10 mM dithiothreitol added. Protein was precipitated overnight at −20 °C. Protein precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 4000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The protein pellet was washed once with the methanol/ammonium acetate/dithiothreitol (DTT) solution. The protein pellet was then washed three times with 90% ethanol containing 10 mM DTT and then stored in 90% (v/v) ethanol/DTT at −80 °C.
Precipitated protein in 90% (v/v) ethanol/DTT was collected by centrifugation at 4000× g and 4 °C. Reconstitution buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl, 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% (w/v) CHAPS at pH 8.8) was added to the pellet, followed by gentle vortexing for one hour. A 20 µg portion of protein from each sample, quantified by the Bradford method, was removed and diluted to 1 µg/uL with reconstitution buffer. Bovine serum albumin was added as an internal standard to give a protein ratio of 1% (w/w).
Disulfide bonds were reduced with 10 mM DTT (100 mM stock in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate), at 25 °C for 1 h and then alkylated with 40 mM iodoacetamide (200 mM stock in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate), at 25 °C in the dark for 1 h, and finally quenched with additional DTT to 30 mM (100 mM stock in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate) and incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. Urea was brought to 1 M by dilution with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Trypsin (Sequencing Grade Modified-Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was reconstituted to 0.02 ug/uL and activated as per the manufacturer’s instructions in the provided resuspension buffer (1:200 w/w, trypsin:sample). Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. Digests were then lyophilized to dryness.

4.4. Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Lyophilized protein samples were reconstituted in 100 uL of 18 MΩ water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid and 5.0% (v/v) acetonitrile by pipetting and mild vortexing. Samples were spun at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min in a tabletop centrifuge to remove insoluble debris. Twenty uL portions from each sample were placed in polypropylene 96 v-well plates and covered with adhesive film. The plates were centrifuged to collect samples at the bottom of the well, and then placed in the precooled tray of the LC autosampler. Ten 10 µL injections were analyzed on a LTQ ProteomeX linear ion trap LC-MS/MS instrument (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA). C8 captraps (Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, CA, USA) were used to concentrate and desalt peptides before final separation by C18 column chromatography (acetonitrile gradient of 0–90% solvent B (100% acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid), in solvent A (deionized 18 MΩ water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid for a duration of 110 min). The peptide trap and C18 column were re-equilibrated with 100% solvent A for 25 min before applying the next sample.
LC separation was performed using fused silica nanospray needles (26 cm length, 360 μm outer diameter, 150 μm inner diameter; Polymicro Technologies, Phoenix, AZ, USA), packed with “Magic C18” (200 Å, 5 μm particles, Michrom Bioresources) in 100% methanol. Columns were equilibrated for 3–4 h at 200 nL/min (at the column tip) with a 60:40 mix of solvent B to solvent A prior to sample application. Samples analysis was performed in the data-dependent positive acquisition mode on the LC-MS/MS instrument, with a normal scan rate for precursor ion analysis with dynamic exclusion enabled (1 repeat count, 30 s repeat duration, 30 s exclusion, list size of 50). After each full scan (400–2000 m/z), a data-dependent triggered MS/MS scan was obtained for the three most intense parent ions. The nanospray column was maintained at ion sprays of 2.0 kV.

4.5. Database Searching and Spectral Analysis

Tandem mass spectra were obtained using BioWorks version 3.3. SEQUEST (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA, USA; version 2.7) was set up to search a FASTA file containing translated coding regions for both B. diazoefficiens and G. max, with a concatenated random database with fragment ion mass tolerance of 1.0 Da and a parent ion tolerance of 2.0 Da. These protein sequence files, named “brady.p.aa.gz” “Gmax_109_peptide.fa.gz”, were provided at the websites (ftp://ftp.kazusa.or.jp/pub/RhizoBase/Bradyrhizobium/) and (ftp://ftp.jgi-psf.org/pub/JGI_data/phytozome/), respectively. The random concatenated database was generated using the tool “DecoyDBCreateor”, found at (http://p3db.org/p3db1.0/tools/DecoyDBCreator/). Iodoacetamide derivative of cysteine (+57) was specified as a fixed modification. RAW files were analyzed using Bioworks “SEQUEST batch-search”, with 10 matches reported without redundancy reporting. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier: PXD011604 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/). SEQUEST results were saved as .srf files.

4.6. Peptide Match Filtering

In order to filter the SEQUEST matches for nonrandom hits, the files were converted to “.SQT” file formats. Filtering of the “.SQT” files was performed using SEPro (Warrendale, PA, USA) [22] with the following settings: Spectral FDR: 5%, Peptide FDR: 3%, and final filtering of protein hits at: 1%. All filtered data were saved as SEPro file outputs (.spr).

4.7. Protein Expression Trends

Spectral count data associated with the protein IDs provided by SEPro were used for trend analysis via the proteomic analysis software PatternLab [46]. As per the software workflows, PatternLab input files were created using the Regrouper software (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (SparseMatrix and index files). Folders for each time point in the time course were created, and the selected SEPro files for each timepoint were placed into the folders. Regrouper was pointed to these folders, and the SparseMatrix and index files were created. These files were provided to PatternLab in the TrendQuest module. Trends were created using an assigned minimum average signal of 2 per 6 replicates (3 biological, 2 technical), with minimum data points of 2 and minimum items per cluster of 3 and a health of 0.800.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.T. and D.W.E.; Investigation, K.N.S., S.F. and S.S.

Funding

There was no external funding for this research.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant 2004-35604-14708 from the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research Education Service National Research Initiative.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Douglas, A. The Symbiotic Habit; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2010; p. 202. ISBN 0-19-854294-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hellriegel, H.; Wilfarth, H. Untersuchungen uber die Stickstoffnahrung der Gramineon und Leguminosen; Beilageheft zu der Ztschr. Ver. Rü benzucker-Industrie Deutschen Reichs Germany; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Roma, Italy, 1888; p. 234, ISBN 10: 1110628293, ISBN 13: 9781110628292. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cermola, M.; Fedorova, E.; Tate, F.R.; Patriarca, E.J. Nodule invasion and symbiosome differentiation during Rhizobium etli-Phaseolus vulgaris symbiosis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Groten, K.; Dutilleul, C.; van Heerden, P.D.; Vanacker, H.; Bernard, S.; Finkemeier, I.; Dietz, K.J.; Fover, C.H. Redox regulation of peroxiredoxin and proteinases by ascorbate and thiols during pea root nodule senescence. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Muller, J.; Wiemken, A.; Boller, T. Redifferentiation of bacteria isolated from Lotus japonicus root nodules colonized by Rhizobium sp. NGR234. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 2181–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Puppo, A.; Groten, K.; Bastain, F.; Carzaniga, R.; Soussi, M.; Lucas, M.M.; de Felipe, M.R.; Harrison, J.; Vanacker, H.; Fover, C.H. Legume nodule senescence: Roles for redox and hormone signalling in the orchestration of the natural aging process. New Phytol. 2005, 165, 683–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vasse, J.; De Billy, F.; Camut, S.; Truchet, G. Correlation between ultrastructural differentiation of bacteroids and nitrogen fixation in alfalfa nodules. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4295–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, S.-J.; Rose, J.K.C. Mediation of the transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy in hemibriotrophic plant pathogens by secreted effector proteins. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 769–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Spanu, P.D.; Panstruga, R. Editorial: Biotrophic Plant-Microbe Interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hiltner, L. Über neuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiete der Bodenbakteriologie unter bessonderer Berücksichtigung der Gründung und Brache. Arb. Dtsch. Landwirtsch. Ges. Berl. 1904, 98, 59–78. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Academic Press: London, UK, 1995; 889p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarma, A.D.; Emerich, D.W. Global protein expression pattern of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids: A prelude to functional proteomics. Proteomics 2005, 5, 4170–4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Delmotte, N.; Ahrens, C.J.; Knief, C.; Qeli, E.; Koch, M.; Fischer, H.M.; Vorholt, J.A.; Hennecke, H. An integrated proteomics and transcriptomics reference data set provides new insights into the Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroid metabolism in soybean nodules. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarath, G.; Preiffer, N.E.; Sodhi, C.S.; Wagner, F.W. Bacteroids are stable during dark induced senescence of soybean root nodules. Plant Physiol. 1986, 82, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pladys, D.; Vance, C.P. Proteolysis during development and senescence of effective and plant gene-controlled ineffective alfalfa nodules. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Evans, P.J.; Gallesi, D.; Mathieu, C.; Hernandez, M.J.; de Felipe, M.; Halliwell, B.; Puppo, A. Oxidative stress occurs during soybean nodule senescence. Planta 1999, 208, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karr, D.B.; Waters, J.K.; Suzuki, F.; Emerich, D.W. Enzymes of the β-hydroxybutyrate and citric acid cycles of Rhizobium japonicum bacteroids. Plant Physiol. 1984, 75, 1158–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shah, R.; Emerich, D.W. Isocitrate Dehydrogenase of Bradyrhizobium japonicum is not required for symbiotic nitrogen fixation with soybean. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 7600–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Karr, D.B.; Emerich, D.W. Protein synthesis by Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids declines as a function of nodule age. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 3757–3761. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Scotti, M.A.; Chanfon, A.; Hennecke, H.; Fischer, H.-M. Disparate oxygen responsiveness of two regulatory cascades that control expression of symbiotic gene in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 5639–5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lindemann, A.; Moser, A.; Pessi, G.; Hauser, F.; Friberg, M.; Hennecke, H.; Fischer, H.M. New target genes controlled by the Bradyrhizobium japonicum two-component regulatory system RegSR. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8928–8943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Green, L.S.; Li, Y.; Emerich, D.W.; Bergersen, F.J.; Day, D.A. Catabolism of α-ketoglutarate by a sucA mutant of Bradyrhizobium japonicum: Evidence for an alternative tricarboxylic acid cycle. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 2838–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fischer, H.M.; Babst, M.; Kaspar, T.; Acuna, G.; Arigoni, F.; Hennecke, H. One member of a gro-ESL-like chaperonin multigene family in Bradyrhziobium japonicum is co-regulated with symbiotic nitrogen fixation genes. EMBO 1993, 12, 2901–2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hauser, F.; Pessi, G.; Friberg, M.; Weber, C.; Rusca, N.; Lindemann, A.; Fischer, H.M.; Hennecke, H. Dissection of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA+sigma54 regulon, and identification of a ferredoxin gene (fdxN) for symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2007, 278, 255–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cytryn, E.J.; Sangurdekar, D.P.; Streeter, J.G.; Franck, W.L.; Chang, W.-S.; Stacey, G.; Emerich, D.W.; Trupti, J.; Xu, D.; Sadowsky, M.J. Transcriptional and physiological responses of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to dessication-induced stress. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 6751–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wei, M.; Yokoyama, T.; Minamisawa, K.; Mitsui, H.; Itakura, M.; Kaneko, T.; Tabata, S.; Saeki, K.; Omori, H.; Tajima, S.; et al. Soybean seed extracts preferentially express genomic loci of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in the initial interaction with soybean, Glycine max (L). Merr. DNA Res. 2008, 15, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Parke, D.; Ornston, L.N. Enzymes of the beta-ketoadipate pathway are inducible in Rhizobium and Agrobacterium spp. and constitutive in Bradyrhizobium spp. J. Bacteriol. 1986, 165, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hillmer, P.; Gest, H. H2 metabolism in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas capsulate: Production and utilization of H2 by resting cells. J. Bacteriol. 1977, 129, 732–739. [Google Scholar]
  29. Richardson, D.J.; King, G.F.; Kelly, D.J.; McEwan, A.G.; Ferguson, S.J.; Jackson, J.B. The role of auxiliary oxidant in maintaining redox balance during phototrophic growth of Rhodobacter capsulatus on propionate or butyrate. Arch. Microbiol. 1988, 150, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Falcone, D.L.; Tabita, F.R. Expression of endogenous and foreign ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) genes in a Rubisco delection mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 2099–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. McKinlay, J.B.; Harwood, C.S. Carbon dioxide fixation as a central redox cofactor recycling mechanism in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11669–11675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Gourion, B.; Delmotte, N.; Bonaldi, K.; Nouwen, N.; Vorholt, J.A.; Girau, E. Bacterial RubisCO is required for efficient Bradyrhizobium/Aeschynomene symbiosis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Franck, S.; Strodtman, K.N.; Qiu, J.; Emerich, D.W. Transcriptomic analysis of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids reveals a post-symbiotic, hemibiotrophic lifestyle of the bacteria within senescing soybean nodules. Internat. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McDermott, T.R.; Graham, P.H.; Brandwein, D.H. Viability of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids. Arch. Microbiol. 1987, 148, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tsien, H.C.; Cain, P.S.; Schmidt, E.L. Viability of rhizobium bacteroids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977, 34, 854–856. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Wong, P.P.; Evans, H.J. Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate utilization by soybean (Glycine max Merr) nodules and assessment of its role in maintenance of nitrogenase activity. Plant. Physiol. 1971, 47, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Luiz, J.; Rodigues, M.; Melotto, M.; Gomes-Silveria, J.A.; Silveria, D. Nodulin activities, hydrogenase expression and nitrogen fixation in cowpea inoculated with Hup+ and Hup symbionts. Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg. 1998, 10, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pfeiffer, N.E.; Torres, C.M.; Wagner, F.M. Proteolytic activity in soybean root nodules. Activity in host cell cytosol and bacteroids throughout physiological development and senescence. Plant Physiol. 1983, 71, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Winzer, T.; Bairl, A.; Linder, M.; Werner, D.; Muller, P. A novel 53-kDa nodulin of the symbiosome membrane of soybean nodules controlled by Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1999, 12, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Manen, J.F.; Simon, P.; Van Slooten, J.C.; Osteras, M.; Frutiger, S.; Hughes, G.J. A nodulin specifically expressed in senescent nodules of winged bean is a protease inhibitor. Plant Cell 1991, 3, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kereszt, A.; Mergaert, P.; Kondorosi, E. Bacteroid development in legume nodules: Evolution of mutual benefit or of sacrificial victims? Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 1300–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Strodtman, K.N.; Stevenson, S.E.; Waters, J.K.; Mawhinney, T.P.; Thelen, J.J.; Polacco, J.C.; Emerich, D.W. The bacteroid periplasm in soybean nodules is an interkingdom symbiotic space. Mol. Microbe Plant Interact. 2017, 30, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Streeter, J.G.; Le Rudlier, D. Release of periplasmic enzymes from Rhizobium leguminosarum bv phaseoli bacteroids by lysozyme is enhanced by pretreatment of cells at low pH. Curr. Microbiol. 1990, 21, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rice, E.W. Rapid determination of total hemoglobin as hemoglobin cyanide in total blood containing carboxyhemoglobin. Clin. Chim. Acta 1967, 18, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Karr, D.B.; Waters, J.K.; Emerich, D.W. Analysis of Poly-3-Hydroxybutyrate in Rhizobium japonicum bacteroids by ion exclusion HPLC and UV detection. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983, 46, 1339–1343. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Carvalho, P.C.; Fisher, J.S.; Chen, E.I.; Yates, J.R., III; Barbosa, V.C. PatternLab for proteomics: A tool for differential shotgun proteomics. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Soybean nodule mass and leghemoglobin content from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 1. Soybean nodule mass and leghemoglobin content from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Ijms 19 03947 g001
Figure 2. Bacteroid protein content and polyhydroxybutyate content of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 2. Bacteroid protein content and polyhydroxybutyate content of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Ijms 19 03947 g002
Figure 3. β-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 3. β-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Ijms 19 03947 g003
Figure 4. Cyclic phosphodiesterase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 4. Cyclic phosphodiesterase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Ijms 19 03947 g004
Figure 5. Isocitrate dehydrogenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 5. Isocitrate dehydrogenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Ijms 19 03947 g005
Figure 6. Malate dehydrogenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 6. Malate dehydrogenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Ijms 19 03947 g006
Figure 7. Protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 7. Protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase activity of bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules at various days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Ijms 19 03947 g007
Figure 8. Examples of bacteroid proteins displaying declining signal intensities as a function of days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of twelve values (six biological and two technical replicates).
Figure 8. Examples of bacteroid proteins displaying declining signal intensities as a function of days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of twelve values (six biological and two technical replicates).
Ijms 19 03947 g008
Figure 9. Examples of bacteroid proteins displaying increasing signal intensities as a function of days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of twelve values (six biological and two technical replicates).
Figure 9. Examples of bacteroid proteins displaying increasing signal intensities as a function of days after planting. The values are the mean ± standard deviation of twelve values (six biological and two technical replicates).
Ijms 19 03947 g009
Table 1. Proteins identified in cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions of B. diazoefficiens isolated from soybean nodules that declined from symbiosis through senescence.
Table 1. Proteins identified in cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions of B. diazoefficiens isolated from soybean nodules that declined from symbiosis through senescence.
FunctionRhizobaseAccession NumberLocation
67 kDa Myosin-cross-reactive streptococcal antigen homologbll0025NP_766665Cytoplasm
Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenasebll0449NP_767089Cytoplasm
Succinyl-CoA synthetase beta chainbll0455NP_767095Cytoplasm
Malate dehydrogenasebll0456NP_767096Cytoplasm
3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenasebll0504NP_767143Cytoplasm
Protein-export proteinbll0641NP_767281Cytoplasm
ABC transporter glycerol-3-phosphate-binding proteinbll0733NP_767373Cytoplasm
Polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferasebll0779NP_767419Cytoplasm
ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinbll0887NP_767527Cytoplasm
Fructose bisphosphate aldolasebll1520NP_768160Cytoplasm
Hypothetical proteinbll1875NP_768515Cytoplasm
GroEL3 chaperoninbll2059NP_768699Both
GroES3 chaperoninbll2060NP_768700Cytoplasm
phenolhydroxylase homologbll2063NP_768703Both
MoxR family proteinbll2465NP_769105Cytoplasm
Cystathionine beta lyasebll4445NP_771085Cytoplasm
Hypothetical proteinbll4781NP_771421Cytoplasm
Pyruvate dehydrogenase beta subunitbll4782NP_771422Cytoplasm
Enolasebll4794NP_771434Cytoplasm
Translation elongation factor Tsbll4860NP_771500Periplasm
Prolyl-tRNA synthetasebll4877NP_771517Cytoplasm
ATP-dependent protease LAbll4942NP_771582Cytoplasm
Trigger factorbll4945NP_771585Cytoplasm
50S ribosomal protein L14bll5390NP_772030Cytoplasm
Elongation factor TUbll5402NP_772042Cytoplasm
Translation elongation factor Gbll5403NP_772043Cytoplasm
30S ribosomal protein S7bll5404NP_772044Cytoplasm
DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta chainbll5409NP_772049Cytoplasm
DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta chainbll5410NP_772050Cytoplasm
Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase large chainbll5914NP_772554Cytoplasm
Putative hydrolase serine protease transmembrane proteinbll6508NP_773148Cytoplasm
3-oxoadipate CoA-transferase subunit Abll7093NP_773733Cytoplasm
DNA-binding stress response protein, Dps familybll7374NP_774014Cytoplasm
Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinasebll8141NP_774781Cytoplasm
Unknown proteinbll8309NP_774949Periplasm
Hypothetical proteinblr0028NP_766668Cytoplasm
3-isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunitblr0488NP_767128Cytoplasm
Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunitblr0514NP_767154Cytoplasm
30S ribosomal protein S1blr0740NP_767380Cytoplasm
Catalaseblr0778NP_767418.Cytoplasm
Succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenaseblr0807NP_767447Cytoplasm
Putative aminotransferase proteinblr1686NP_768326Both
Nitrogenase molybdenum-iron protein alpha chain (NifD)blr1743NP_768383Both
Nitrogenase molybdenum-iron protein beta chain (NifK)blr1744NP_768384Both
Flavoprotein (FixC)blr1774NP_768414Both
Pantoate--beta-alanine ligaseblr1852NP_768492Cytoplasm
5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine S-methyltransferaseblr2068NP_768708Cytoplasm
Unknown proteinblr2372NP_769012Cytoplasm
Glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenaseblr2616NP_769256Cytoplasm
Aldehyde dehydrogenaseblr2816NP_769456Cytoplasm
Nucleoside diphosphate kinaseblr4119NP_770759Cytoplasm
Aminotransferaseblr4134NP_770774Cytoplasm
NAD-dependent malic enzymeblr4145NP_770785Cytoplasm
Citrate synthaseblr4839NP_771479Both
Glutamine synthetase Iblr4949NP_771589Cytoplasm
Anti-oxidant proteinblr5308NP_771948.Cytoplasm
60 KDA chaperoninblr5626NP_772266Both
Adenylosuccinate lyaseblr5690NP_772330Cytoplasm
30S ribosomal protein S4blr5706NP_772346Cytoplasm
Hypothetical proteinblr6718NP_773358Cytoplasm
Hypothetical proteinblr7070NP_773710Cytoplasm
Hypothetical zinc proteaseblr7485NP_774125Cytoplasm
Glutamate synthase large subunitblr7743NP_774383Cytoplasm
ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinblr8117NP_774757Cytoplasm
Two-component response regulatorblr8144NP_774784Cytoplasm
30S ribosomal protein S18bsl4078NP_770718Cytoplasm
Table 2. Proteins identified in cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions of B. diazoefficiens isolated from soybean nodules that increased from symbiosis through senescence.
Table 2. Proteins identified in cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions of B. diazoefficiens isolated from soybean nodules that increased from symbiosis through senescence.
FunctionRhizobaseAccessionLocation
Hypothetical proteinbll2012NP_768652Cytoplasm
Unknown proteinbll4278NP_770918Cytoplasm
Peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerasebll4690NP_771330Cytoplasm
Hypothetical proteinbll5155NP_771795Cytoplasm
Hypothetical proteinbll7395NP_774035Cytoplasm
CheY, two-component response regulatorbll7795NP_774435.Periplasm
Probable fatty oxidation complex, alpha subunitbll7821NP_774461Periplasm
Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyl transferase α-subunitblr0191NP_766831Cytoplasm
Carboxy-terminal proteaseblr0434NP_767074Periplasm
Acyl-CoA thiolaseblr1159NP_767799Periplasm
Enoyl-CoA hydrataseblr1160NP_767800Periplasm
Unknown proteinblr1830NP_768470Cytoplasm
Hypothetical proteinblr3804NP_770444Cytoplasm
ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinblr4039NP_770679Periplasm
Hypothetical proteinblr5502NP_772142Cytoplasm
Cold shock proteinbsl3986NP_770626Cytoplasm
Table 3. Proteins identified in cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions of B. diazoefficiens isolated from soybean nodules that remained unchanged from symbiosis through senescence.
Table 3. Proteins identified in cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions of B. diazoefficiens isolated from soybean nodules that remained unchanged from symbiosis through senescence.
FunctionRhizobaseAccession NumberFraction
N-utilization substance protein Abll0785NP_767425Periplasm
Transketolasebll1524NP_768164Pperiplasm
Alkyl hydroperoxide reductasebll1777NP_768417Cytoplasm
Carbonic anhydrasebll2065NP_768705Cytoplasm
Nodulate formation efficiency C proteinbll2067NP_768707Periplasm
Probable amino acid binding proteinbll2909NP_769549Both
Glycine hydroxymethyltransferasebll5033NP_771673Periplasm
ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinbll5596NP_772236Cytoplasm
RecA proteinbll5755NP_772395Periplasm
Hypothetical proteinbll6069NP_772709Periplasm
PQQ-dependent alcohol dehydrogenasebll6220NP_772860Cytoplasm
Peptidyl-dipeptidasebll7756NP_774396Periplasm
Superoxide dismutasebll7774NP_774414Cytoplasm
ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (Putative oligopeptide binding protein)bll7921NP_774561Both
Hypothetical proteinbll8229NP_774869Periplasm
Heat shock protein 70blr0678NP_767319Periplasm
Beta-ketoadipyl CoA thiolaseblr0925NP_767565Periplasm
Peptidoglycan acetylation proteinblr0936NP_767576Periplasm
ATP-dependent protease, ATP-binding subunitblr1404NP_768044Periplasm
Dehydrogenaseblr2146NP_768786Periplasm
Methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenaseblr3954NP_770594Periplasm
Probable transaldolaseblr6758NP_773398Periplasm
Histone H4-Glyma02g38920Periplasm
Histone H3-Glyma06g32880Periplasm
Glu/leu/phe/val dehydrogenase-Glyma16g04560Periplasm

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Strodtman, K.N.; Frank, S.; Stevenson, S.; Thelen, J.J.; Emerich, D.W. Proteomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123947

AMA Style

Strodtman KN, Frank S, Stevenson S, Thelen JJ, Emerich DW. Proteomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(12):3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123947

Chicago/Turabian Style

Strodtman, Kent N., Sooyoung Frank, Severin Stevenson, Jay J. Thelen, and David W. Emerich. 2018. "Proteomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 12: 3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123947

APA Style

Strodtman, K. N., Frank, S., Stevenson, S., Thelen, J. J., & Emerich, D. W. (2018). Proteomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(12), 3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123947

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop