Next Article in Journal
Astragaloside IV Protects Against Oxidative Stress in Calf Small Intestine Epithelial Cells via NFE2L2-Antioxidant Response Element Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
Annexin A2 Deficiency Exacerbates Neuroinflammation and Long-Term Neurological Deficits after Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 24
10.3390/ijms20246129
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalytic Reaction Mechanism of NO–CO on the ZrO2 (110) and (111) Surfaces

by
Xuesong Cao
1,
Chenxi Zhang
2,*,
Zehua Wang
1 and
Xiaomin Sun
1,*
1
Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao 266200, China
2
College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Binzhou University, Binzhou 256600, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(24), 6129; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246129
Submission received: 3 October 2019 / Revised: 1 December 2019 / Accepted: 3 December 2019 / Published: 5 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to the large population of vehicles, significant amounts of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and unburned hydrocarbons (HC) are emitted into the atmosphere, causing serious pollution to the environment. The use of catalysis prevents the exhaust from entering the atmosphere. To better understand the catalytic mechanism, it is necessary to establish a detailed chemical reaction mechanism. In this study, the adsorption behaviors of CO and NO, the reaction of NO reduction with CO on the ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces was performed through periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The detailed mechanism for CO2 and N2 formation mainly involved two intermediates N2O complexes and NCO species. Moreover, the existence of oxygen vacancies was crucial for NO reduction reactions. From the calculated energy, it was found that the pathway involving NCO intermediate interaction occurring on the ZrO2 (110) surface was most favorable. Gas phase N2O formation and dissociation were also considered in this study. The results indicated the role of reaction intermediates NCO and N2O in catalytic reactions, which could solve the key scientific problems and disputes existing in the current experiments.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Heterogeneous catalysis always be used to decrease the emission of automobile exhausts (CO, NOx and HC), such as the Rhodium catalytic system to convert toxic gas NO to inactive product N2 [1,2]. However, the rare and expensive characteristics of noble metal Rh limit its widespread use. Thus, quantities of investigations have been conducted to develop effective and economical catalyst systems.
As zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) has high thermal stability, excellent redox properties and an acid–basic site on its surface, it is a good catalyst and support material for various reactions, such as CO2 methanation [3,4], water–gas shift [5,6], NH3 selective catalytic reduction [7,8], and hydrodeoxygenation [9,10]. Especially, the transition metal oxide dispersed onto the surface of ZrO2 exhibits powerful activity for NO reduction. Okamoto et al. [11] found that Cu/ZrO2 catalysts showed high NO conversion to N2 at low temperature through a nitrous oxide (N2O) intermediate for a NO–CO reaction. As the supporter, ZrO2 has better performance than CeO2 in reducing the energy barrier of NO dissociation [12]. Besides, ZrO2 also provides abundant NOx adsorption sites [13,14,15], which is beneficial for NO reduction. Koga et al. discovered that c-ZrO2 (110) ultrathin film covering a Cu surface exhibited high NOx reduction activity [16].
NO reduction by CO may simultaneously eliminate two kinds of pollutants and convert them into harmless CO2 and inactive N2, via the stoichiometric reaction 2CO + 2NO → 2CO2 + N2. Dramatically, isocyanate (NCO) species and gas phase N2O were detected via experimental equipment during the reaction of NO with CO [17,18]. NO–CO reaction mechanisms involving NCO and N2O as intermediate complex have been considered on Co3O4 (110)-B [19], Pd/γ-Al2O3 (110) [20], and Cu-doped SrTiO3 (100) [21] catalyst surfaces. It is widely believed that CO abstracts lattice oxygen of catalyst to produce CO2 and oxygen vacancy through the Mars–van Krevelen mechanism [22], and then NO reduction occur on the defective catalyst surface via NCO or N2O intermediate species to form N2. Although previous studies have provided significant insight on NO–CO catalytic reaction mechanism, the catalytic cycle paths of NO reduction by CO on ZrO2 surfaces remain elusive.
Surface formation energies of three low-index c-ZrO2 (100), (110) and (111) were computed, as shown in Table S1. In this study, we adopted the most stable surface (111) and a relatively reactive surface (110) as the exposed surfaces. The adsorption behaviors of CO and NO on ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces and possible reaction pathways for CO2 and N2 formation with corresponding energy evolution were carefully discussed based on DFT calculations. Through in-depth analysis and research, the role of reaction intermediates NCO and N2O in catalytic reactions will be clarified, which can solve the key scientific problems and disputes existing in the current experiments.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. CO and NO Adsorption on ZrO2 (110) Surface

The structure models of ZrO2 (110) surface, as shown in Figure 1a, exposes threefold coordinated O (O3c) and sixfold coordinated Zr (Zr6c) atoms. In the surface, the Zr–Zr bond distance is 3.710 Å and the Zr–O bond distance is 2.247 Å. The lattice constant of ZrO2 bulk is 5.115 Å, which is in good agreement with experimental result of 5.090 Å [23].
Three adsorption sites were considered (Figure 1b): (1) the top site of Zr (ZrT), (2) the top site of O (OT), and (3) the bridge site between two O atoms (Ob). We have systematically calculated the adsorption energies of CO (C-end and O-end) and NO (N-end and O-end) gas molecules on ZrO2 (110) surface, and the Table 1 lists all the value of Eads.
As shown in Figure 1, after fully structural optimization, CO (C-end and O-end) and NO (N-end and O-end) gas molecules preferred to adsorb on ZrT site of ZrO2 (110) surface. As for CO molecule adsorption, Eads of CO (C-end and O-end) adsorbed on ZrT site was −0.676 eV and −0.360 eV, respectively, indicating the C-end adsorption was more energetically favorable than O-end. In the same way NO N-end adsorption was more stable than NO O-end adsorption on ZrO2 (110) surfaces. Coordinates for all the optimized structures were presented in Table S3.

2.2. Reaction Mechanism of NO Reduction with CO on ZrO2 (110) Surface

2.2.1. Path 1

The Mars−van Krevelen (MvK) mechanism is a universal reaction step for CO oxidation [24] and NO–CO reaction [19] on metal oxide surfaces. As shown in Figure 2, the NO–CO catalytic cycle reaction started when the first CO gas molecule adsorbed on ZrT site (state ii) with an adsorption energy of −0.676 eV, and with the change of lattice O–C distance to 3.098 Å. After adsorption, CO extracted surface oxygen atom to form CO2 and a surface oxygen vacancy (state iii) through the MvK mechanism. In the corresponding transition state (TS1), the lattice O-CO bond decreased to 1.568 Å and the lattice O–C–O angle changed to 116.105°. Moreover, the energy barrier for this process was 1.948 eV, the result clearly shows that CO oxidation reaction can happen smoothly on ZrO2 (110) surface by using exhaust temperature. We calculated two cycle reaction mechanisms (path 1 and path 2) and N2O formation mechanism all share common steps to form oxygen vacancies on ZrO2 (110) surface.
In the next step, CO2 desorption into the gas phase (state iv) costs energy of 0.283 eV, then OV was occupied by the first NO gas molecule forming a OV-NO complex structure (state v), and the energy of 2.310 eV is released. Subsequently, the next CO weakly adsorbed to adjacent O atom of the NO (state vi) with an adsorption energy of −0.510 eV. In TS2, the N-O bond broke and O atom moved toward CO to form OC-O bond by overcoming an energy barrier of 2.263 eV, and the OC-O bond length was changed from 2.683 Å at state vi to 1.637 Å. After TS2, the second CO2 molecule formation occurs (state vii). The reaction was exothermic by 1.246 eV. The similar reaction steps have been explored for Pd/γ-Al2O3 (110), the second CO abstracted lattice O atom from N-loaded Pd/γ-Al2O3 (110) surface with an energy barrier of 1.88 eV [20].
Then, the second CO2 desorbed into the gas phase leaving a N-doped surface (state vii), in which N atom embedded at surface oxygen vacancy site. The desorption energy of CO2 is approximately 0.3 eV, the interaction of ZrO2 surface with CO2 was much weaker than that with NO (Eads ≈ 0.7 eV), which have been reported by Luo et al. [13]. After the second CO2 desorption, the second NO gas molecule located at N-doped ZrO2 (110) surface (state ix) with the binding energy of −0.068 eV. Once NO interacted with the embedded N atom, formation of a relatively stable intermediate complex bent N2O (state x) was very easy. As we can see from the energy profile (Figure 2), the process could facilely occur without energy barrier and release 3.286 eV energy. The energy barrier for N2O dissociation was extremely low only 0.002 eV. After TS3, N-O bond and N-Zr bond dissociated to produce N2 (state xi), then N2 desorption into gas phase cost 0.458 eV, O atom successively diffused to oxygen vacancy site via an obvious barrierless process with releasing energy of 0.510 eV, the integrated ZrO2 (110) surface was recovered eventually.
Accordingly, from calculated energy profile (Figure 2), the overall catalytic cycle is strongly exothermic. However, the second CO oxidation has greater activation energy of 2.263 eV, determining the rate of catalytic cycle. We proposed the other catalytic cycle path to produce CO2 and N2 via NCO species.

2.2.2. Path 2

As presented in Figure 3, the reaction mechanism of OV surface formation is shared with path 1. Subsequently, NO adsorbed on OV site, the value of NO O-end adsorption was −1.605 eV, which bound weaker than that of NO N-end. Then, the second CO directly combined with N atom to generate the NCO intermediate (−1.614 eV, state vi). The second NO adsorbed on ZrT site adjacent to NCO complex (−0.208 eV, state vii). In the co-adsorption configuration, NCO and NO moved toward each other via TS2 to form a NNCO2 four-membered ring intermediate (state viii) with an energy barrier of 0.355 eV. The subsequent step was NNCO2 intermediate dissociation to produce N2 and CO2 (state ix) with a barrier of only 0.141 eV. With N2 and CO2 desorption by costing 0.563 eV energy, the catalytic surface was recovered.
As we can see from the energy profile (Figure 3), the rate-determining step is the CO oxidation by the lattice oxygen, indicting ZrO2 (110) surface exhibits weakly catalytic activity for low-temperature oxidation of CO. Liang et al. observed that c-ZrO2 ultrafine powder showed relatively high activity for CO oxidation with light-off temperature at ~280 °C (50% conversion) and ~550 °C (100% conversion) [25,26]. As reported in the literature, metal doping was particularly effective for the formation of oxygen vacancy [21,27]. As for NO reduction reaction, the formation of oxygen vacancy is crucial for NO adsorption and reduction reaction [28,29,30]. On defective ZrO2 (110) surface, NO decomposition and N2 formation are occur easily as a result of a very small barrier of 0.355 eV via path 2. Although for the defective Co3O4 (110)-B surface [19], the most favorable NO reduction processes are energetically less competitive with a higher barrier of 1.48 eV, i.e., the ZrO2 (110) surface is remarkable for NO reduction.

2.2.3. N2O formation.

Beginning with the oxygen vacancy surface (state iv, Figure 4) the first gas NO molecule located at OV site (state v, Figure 4) by releasing 1.605 eV energy, the second incoming NO molecule N-end bound with surface N atom (state vi, Figure 4) with strong exothermicity of 2.872 eV. Subsequently, the ONN-O bond broke into N2O via TS2 (Figure 4). After TS2, the gas-phase N2O (state vii, Figure 4) formation, the barrier for the process was 0.987 eV, the reaction was exothermic by 1.345 eV. Eventually, N2O desorption into the gas phase (state viii, Figure 4) cost 0.456 eV and ZrO2 (110) surface recovered.
In cold start engines or lean-burn conditions N2O is the main by-product of NO reduction [31], and the formation of N2O on ZrO2 surface has been observed through NO temperature-programmed desorption experiment [13]. N2O is one of the six greenhouse gases specified in the Kyoto Protocol, the greenhouse activity is 310 times of CO2 [32]. Catalytic systems for N2O decomposition should be employed in catalytic converters.
Three reaction pathways have been calculated on the ZrO2 (110) surface: the gas phase N2O was observed via experimental equipment and in [18] it was also formed by theoretical calculation; our work provides the mechanism of N2O formation. Path 1 involving bent N2O intermediate was proposed to produce harmless CO2 and inactive N2, this cycle had a relatively high barrier than path 2 involving surface NCO intermediate, indicting CO2 and N2 formation mainly through path 2. Besides, the activation barriers for N2O and N2 formation on OV-ZrO2 (110) surface were 0.987 eV and 0.355 eV, respectively. The results imply that NO is selectively converted to N2 versus N2O under mild conditions.

2.3. CO and NO Adsorption on ZrO2 (111) Surface

ZrO2 (111) surface consists of 3-fold-coordinated oxygen atoms (O3c) and 7-fold-coordinated zirconium atoms (Zr7c), as shown in Figure 5a.
In Figure 5b three possible adsorption sites are labeled: (1) the top site of Zr (ZrT); (2) the top site of O (OT); (3) the 3-fold O-hollow site (OH). The value of adsorption energies is listed in Table 2.
For the adsorption behavior of CO (C-end and O-end) and NO (N-end and O-end) on ZrO2 (111) surface, we again researched that the ZrT site was the most favorable adsorption site; the CO C-end adsorbed on ZrT site had maximum adsorption energy −0.788 eV, which suggested that CO C-end adsorption was slightly preferred on ZrO2 (111) surface. Moreover, NO O-end adsorption was thermodynamically impossible, because of the positive Eads.

2.4. Reaction Mechanism of NO Reduction with CO on ZrO2 (111) Surface

2.4.1. Path 1’

Based on the lowest energy structures of CO and NO on ZrO2 (111) surface, the first step was gas-phase CO interaction with surface Zr atom (−0.410 eV, state ii), as shown in Figure 6, CO may incorporate lattice O via TS1 where the distance between CO molecule and O atoms was decreased from 2.787 Å to1.246 Å. After TS1, a gas phase CO2 molecule (state iii) formed. The energy barrier was equivalent to 2.949 eV. Next, CO2 overcame 0.130 eV binding energy desorption into gas-phase. Specifically, the following path 1’ and N2O formation mechanisms share as common steps as discussed above.
Note that the energy barrier corresponding to TS1 (2.949 eV, Figure 6) is evidently high and oxygen vacancy formation on ZrO2 (111) surface is difficult at low-temperature. Once oxygen vacancy formation on ZrO2 (111) surface, NO adsorption and reduction are facile.
In state v, the NO molecule N-end was located at OV site with a strong exothermicity of 2.923 eV. Subsequently, the second CO bonded with O atom of the NO to form a NOCO complex (−0.107 eV, state vi). The second CO2 formation (state vii) arose from NOCO complex with an energy barrier of 0.405 eV (TS2). Desorption of CO2 cost 0.134 eV. Then, the second NO adsorption on the N-doped surface (−0.629 eV, state ix) via TS3 forms the intermediate N2O (state x) with a small barrier of 0.350 eV. Followed by a barrierless process of N2O decomposition to generate N2 (state xi). With the N2 desorption, the surface was recovered.

2.4.2. Path 2′

As shown in Figure 7, after the formation of oxygen vacancy, the OV site was naturally replenished by NO molecule O-end (−3.056 eV, state v). The second CO approached toward N atom of adsorbed NO (−0.382 eV, state vi) to generate the NCO intermediate (state vii) through TS2) and an energy barrier of 0.385 eV was needed. The next NO could adsorb close to NCO complex (−1.582 eV, state viii) to realize the formation of four-membered ring intermediate NNCO2 (state ix). The activation barrier for this process was 1.194 eV. Subsequently, the N–C bond and N–O bond cleavage of four-membered ring NNCO2 led to CO2 and N2 formation (state x), with an almost barrierless processes (0.006 eV). Desorption of CO2 and N2 cost 0.255 eV.

2.4.3. Mechanism involving N2O

The formation process of N2O was same as the case found on ZrO2 (110) surface. The second NO bonded with N atom of first adsorbed NO. With the N-O and N-Zr bond dissociation, N2O formation. The energy profile and corresponding structure models of reactant, transition state and product were illustrated in Figure 8.
As N2O is a hazardous by-product, its decomposition processes have been conducted on transition metal surfaces [33,34]. Following with the decomposition mechanism of N2O on Pd-OV/γ-Al2O3 (110) surface proposed by Gao [20]. We calculated N2O decomposition process on OV-ZrO2 (111) surface, as shown in Figure 9. The binding energy of N2O adsorption was equivalent to −0.166 eV, in the corresponding transition state the N–O bond length increased from 1.195 Å to 1.288 Å. By breaking the already activated N–O bond, the desired product N2 was formed and the dissociated O atom filled the OV. The reaction barrier for N2O decomposition is 0.288 eV, and the N2 desorption from the ZrO2 (111) surface requires 0.128 eV.
From calculated energy barriers, we found that CO oxidation by surface lattice oxygen was the rate-determining step during the process of NO reduction with CO, the reaction barriers were 1.948 eV and 2.949 eV on ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces, respectively. The results indicated that compared with ZrO2 (111) surface, ZrO2 (110) surface had more remarkable ability to catalyze NO reduction with CO because of the lower activation barrier. From the calculated adsorption energies, CO and NO all preferred to adsorb on ZrO2 (110) surface, which is consistent with the results of surface formation energies for (110) surface was relatively reactive than (111) surface. For the reaction mechanism of NO reduction by CO, similar reaction processes were found on ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces. Intermediate complex bent N2O was produced during path 1, path 1’ and → NCO intermediate was produced during path 2, path 2’, hazardous N2O gas molecule was formed both on ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces.

3. Materials and Methods

Periodic DFT calculations were executed using DMol3 module of Material Studio software package [35,36]. The exchange-correlation functional was treated by generalized gradient approximation with the Perdew-Wang 91 (GGA-PW91) [37]. The double numerical plus d-functions (DND) basis set was used to optimize all spin unrestricted structures. SCF tolerance was employed to 1.0 × 10−5, the convergence tolerance of maximum energy change, maximum force, and maximum displacement were set as 2.0 × 10−5 Ha, 0.004 Ha/Å, and 0.005 Å, respectively. The transition states (TS) were calculated with linear synchronous transit (LST) and quadratic synchronous transit (QST) method [38,39] and vibrational analysis was performed to identify TS have only one imaginary frequency.
The slab models of ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces were built with a 15–20 Å vacuum thickness to avoid interaction between neighboring slabs. The ZrO2 (110) surface consisting of four atomic layers with the lowest two layers being kept fixed in their bulk positions, whereas the others were allowed to relax with adsorbed molecules. The Brillouin zone was sampled with a (1 × 2 × 1) Monkhorst–Pack k-point grid [40]. The ZrO2 (111) surface consisting of six atomic layers with the bottom four layers were kept fixed and the top two layers were relaxed. A (2 × 2 × 1) Monkost–Pack grid [40] for the ZrO2 (111) surface geometry optimization. In all cases, an orbital cutoff of 5.0 Å was used to improve the computational performance and a 2 × 2 supercell was applied.
The adsorption energies (Eads) of CO and NO gas molecules on ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces were calculated by the following formula,
Eads = E (surface + gas molecules) − E (surface) − E (gas molecules)
where E (surface + gas molecules) is the total energy of the system involving the ZrO2 (110) or (111) catalyst with the adsorbed CO or NO gas molecule, E (surface) is the total energy of isolated ZrO2 (110) or (111) surface, and E (gas molecules) is the total energy of a single CO or NO gas molecule.
To validate the methods, we calculated the energy of NO, CO, N2 and CO2 molecules in a large unit cell of 10 Å × 10 Å × 10 Å, and compared the bond distances with the values calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level [41]. We listed all the values in Table S2, the calculated bond distances were within 1% of ones.

4. Conclusions

In summary, DFT calculations were performed to investigate NO reduction with CO on ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces. For the ZrO2 (110) surface, two cycle reaction pathways (paths 1 and 2) for CO2 and N2 formation were presented, and the path 2 involving the process of the NCO intermediate interaction with NO was energetically favorable. The similar cycle reaction pathways (paths 1’ and 2’) were found on ZrO2 (111) surface, but CO oxidation by lattice O had a significantly higher energy barrier of 2.949 eV. The results indicated that compared with ZrO2 (111) surface, ZrO2 (110) surface had more remarkable ability to catalyze NO reduction with CO. Our calculations also clearly showed that the existence of oxygen vacancies on ZrO2 (110) and (111) surfaces were crucial for NO adsorption and reduction reaction. NO healing OV was a strongly exothermic process (2.0–3.0 eV) and successive reactions all exhibited lower energy barriers, especially path 2 (0.355 eV) and path 1’ (0.405eV). The mechanism involving N2O also was explored, and the activation barriers for N2O formation on OV-ZrO2 (110) and (111) were 0.987 eV and 0.515 eV, respectively. The relatively higher barriers imply that NO is selectively converted to N2 versus N2O under mild conditions.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/24/6129/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z. and X.S.; methodology, X.C. and Z.W.; software, X.C. and Z.W.; validation, X.S.; formal analysis, X.C. and Z.W.; investigation, C.Z. and X.S.; resources, X.S.; data curation, X.C.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and X.S.; supervision, X.S.; project administration, C.Z. and X.S.; funding acquisition, C.Z. and X.S.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21607011, 21976109), the Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (2019GSF109021, 2019GSF109037), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2018MB043), and the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (2018JC027).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Taylor, K.C. Nitric Oxide Catalysis in Automotive Exhaust Systems. Catal. Rev. 1993, 35, 457–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shelef, M.; Graham, G.W. Why Rhodium in Automotive Three-Way Catalysts? Catal. Rev. 1994, 36, 433–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, J.; Ma, C.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Ma, G.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Dong, C.; Zhang, C.; Ding, M. Enhanced low-temperature performance of CO2 methanation over mesoporous Ni/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 243, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Romero-Sáez, M.; Dongil, A.B.; Benito, N.; Espinoza-González, R.; Escalona, N.; Gracia, F. CO2 methanation over nickel-ZrO2 catalyst supported on carbon nanotubes: A comparison between two impregnation strategies. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 237, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, C.; Ruan, C.; Zhan, Y.; Lin, X.; Zheng, Q.; Wei, K. The significant role of oxygen vacancy in Cu/ZrO2 catalyst for enhancing water-gas-shift performance. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kauppinen, M.M.; Melander, M.M.; Bazhenov, A.S.; Honkala, K. Unraveling the Role of the Rh–ZrO2 Interface in the Water-Gas-Shift Reaction via a First-Principles Microkinetic Study. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11633–11647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yao, X.; Chen, L.; Cao, J.; Chen, Y.; Tian, M.; Yang, F.; Sun, J.; Tang, C.; Dong, L. Enhancing the deNOx performance of MnOx/CeO2-ZrO2 nanorod catalyst for low-temperature NH3-SCR by TiO2 modification. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, S.; Wang, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, R.; Royer, S. Morphology-Oriented ZrO2-Supported Vanadium Oxide for the NH3-SCR Process: Importance of Structural and Textural Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 22240–22254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Souza, P.M.; Rabelo-Neto, R.C.; Borges, L.E.P.; Jacobs, G.; Davis, B.H.; Graham, U.M.; Resasco, D.E.; Noronha, F.B. Effect of Zirconia Morphology on Hydrodeoxygenation of Phenol over Pd/ZrO2. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 7385–7398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ohta, H.; Feng, B.; Kobayashi, H.; Hara, K.; Fukuoka, A. Selective hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-related 4-propylphenol into n-propylbenzene in water by Pt-Re/ZrO2 catalysts. Catal. Today 2014, 234, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Okamoto, Y.; Gotoh, H. Copper-zirconia catalysts for NO□CO reactions. Catal. Today 1997, 36, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koga, H.; Hayashi, A.; Ato, Y.; Tada, K.; Hosokawa, S.; Tanaka, T.; Okumura, M. Effect of ceria and zirconia supports on NO reduction over platinum-group metal catalysts: A DFT study with comparative experiments. Catal. Today 2019, 332, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luo, M.F.; Zhong, Y.J.; Zhu, B.; Yuan, X.X.; Zheng, X.M. Temperature-programmed desorption study of NO and CO2 over CeO2 and ZrO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1997, 115, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, C.; Zhu, J.; Lv, Y.; Qi, L.; Liu, B.; Gao, F.; Sun, K.; Dong, L.; Chen, Y. Dispersion, reduction and catalytic performance of CuO supported on ZrO2-doped TiO2 for NO removal by CO. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 103, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, B.; Ran, R.; Wu, X.; Weng, D.; Wu, X.; Huang, C. Comparative study of Mn/TiO2 and Mn/ZrO2 catalysts for NO oxidation. Catal. Commun. 2014, 56, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koga, H.; Tada, K.; Hayashi, A.; Ato, Y.; Okumura, M. High NOx Reduction Activity of an Ultrathin Zirconia Film Covering a Cu Surface: A DFT Study. Catal. Lett. 2017, 147, 1827–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kantcheva, M.; Samarskaya, O.; Ilieva, L.; Pantaleo, G.; Venezia, A.M.; Andreeva, D. In situ FT-IR investigation of the reduction of NO with CO over Au/CeO2-Al2O3 catalyst in the presence and absence of H2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 88, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sica, A.M.; Gigola, C.E. Interaction of CO, NO and NO/CO over Pd/γ-Al2O3 and Pd-WOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2003, 239, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, X.; Huai, L.-Y.; Wen, H.; Yi, W.-C.; Liu, J.-Y. Reduction of NO with CO on the Co3O4(110)-B and CoO(110) Surfaces: A First-Principles Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 1770–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, H. Theoretical analysis of CO+NO reaction mechanism on the single Pd atom embedded in γ-Al2O3 (110) surface. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2017, 529, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carlotto, S.; Natile, M.M.; Glisenti, A.; Vittadini, A. Catalytic Mechanisms of NO Reduction in a CO–NO Atmosphere at Co- and Cu-Doped SrTiO3(100) Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mars, P.; van Krevelen, D.W. Oxidations carried out by means of vanadium oxide catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1954, 3, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Howard, C.J.; Hill, R.J.; Reichert, B.E. Structures of ZrO2 polymorphs at room temperature by high-resolution neutron powder diffraction. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 1988, 44, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, W.; Hensen, E.J.M. A computational DFT study of CO oxidation on a Au nanorod supported on CeO2(110): On the role of the support termination. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 3020–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liang, L.; Dang, S.; Gao, Y. Preparation of cubic ZrO2 ultrafine powders and characterization of their catalytic properties for CO total oxidation. J. Fudan Univ. Nat. Sci. 2003, 266–269. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, L.; Dang, S.; Gao, Y. Preparation of cubic ZrO2 ultrafine powders and characterization of their catalytic properties for CO complete oxidation. Acta Pet. Sin. Pet. Process. Sect. 2003, 70–75. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Carlotto, S.; Natile, M.M.; Glisenti, A.; Paul, J.-F.; Blanck, D.; Vittadini, A. Energetics of CO oxidation on lanthanide-free perovskite systems: The case of Co-doped SrTiO3. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 33282–33286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Azad, S.; Szanyi, J.; Peden, C.H.F.; Wang, L.Q. Adsorption and reaction of NO on oxidized and reduced SrTiO3(100) surfaces. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2003, 21, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rodriguez, J.A.; Azad, S.; Wang, L.Q.; García, J.; Etxeberria, A.; González, L. Electronic and chemical properties of mixed-metal oxides: Adsorption and reaction of NO on SrTiO3(100). J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 6562–6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, J.; Xiao, D.; Li, J.; Yang, X.; Wu, Y. Mechanism of NO decomposition on perovskite (-like) catalysts. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2005, 50, 707–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fritz, A.; Pitchon, V. The current state of research on automotive lean NOx catalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1997, 13, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Song, W.; Zhao, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, C.; Duan, Z. BiMOx Semiconductors as Catalysts for Photocatalytic Decomposition of N2O: A Combination of Experimental and DFT+U Study. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 2811–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tan, L.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Detailed mechanism of the NO+CO reaction on Rh(100) and Rh(111): A first-principles study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 444, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, J.; Gong, X.; Lu, G. DFT + U study of the CO + NOx reaction on a CeO2(110)-supported Au nanoparticle. Chin. J. Catal. 2014, 35, 1305–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Delley, B. An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Delley, B. From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7756–7764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perdew, J.P.; Wang, Y. Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244–13249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Elber, R.; Karplus, M. A method for determining reaction paths in large molecules: Application to myoglobin. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 139, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Halgren, T.A.; Lipscomb, W.N. The synchronous-transit method for determining reaction pathways and locating molecular transition states. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 49, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Irikura, K.K. Systematic Errors in ab Initio Bond Dissociation Energies. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 9031–9039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 06129 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure models of (a) the side view and (b) corresponding top view of ZrO2 (110)-2 × 2 surface. (b) Three possible adsorption sites for CO and NO gas molecules are labeled. Optimized adsorption structures of (c) CO C-end, (d) CO O-end, (e) NO N-end, and (f) NO O-end on ZrT site. Red, cyan, gray, and blue spheres represent the O, Zr, C, and N atoms, respectively.
Figure 1. Structure models of (a) the side view and (b) corresponding top view of ZrO2 (110)-2 × 2 surface. (b) Three possible adsorption sites for CO and NO gas molecules are labeled. Optimized adsorption structures of (c) CO C-end, (d) CO O-end, (e) NO N-end, and (f) NO O-end on ZrT site. Red, cyan, gray, and blue spheres represent the O, Zr, C, and N atoms, respectively.
Ijms 20 06129 g001
Ijms 20 06129 g002 550
Figure 2. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 1 (NO N-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (110) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Figure 2. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 1 (NO N-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (110) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Ijms 20 06129 g002
Ijms 20 06129 g003 550
Figure 3. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 2 (NO O-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (110) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Figure 3. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 2 (NO O-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (110) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Ijms 20 06129 g003
Ijms 20 06129 g004 550
Figure 4. Energy profile (a) and structure models (b) of reactants, transition states and products for N2O formation on ZrO2 (110) surface. The energy profile is placed above, and structure models are placed below.
Figure 4. Energy profile (a) and structure models (b) of reactants, transition states and products for N2O formation on ZrO2 (110) surface. The energy profile is placed above, and structure models are placed below.
Ijms 20 06129 g004
Ijms 20 06129 g005 550
Figure 5. Structure models of (a) the side view and (b) corresponding top view of ZrO2 (111)-2 × 2 surface. (b) Three possible adsorption sites for CO and NO gas molecules are labeled. Optimized adsorption structures of (c) CO C-end, (d) CO O-end, (e) NO N-end, and (f) NO O-end on ZrT site.
Figure 5. Structure models of (a) the side view and (b) corresponding top view of ZrO2 (111)-2 × 2 surface. (b) Three possible adsorption sites for CO and NO gas molecules are labeled. Optimized adsorption structures of (c) CO C-end, (d) CO O-end, (e) NO N-end, and (f) NO O-end on ZrT site.
Ijms 20 06129 g005
Ijms 20 06129 g006 550
Figure 6. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 1’ (NO N-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (111) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Figure 6. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 1’ (NO N-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (111) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Ijms 20 06129 g006
Ijms 20 06129 g007 550
Figure 7. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 2’ (NO O-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (111) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Figure 7. Energy profile and structure models of reactants, transition states and products for path 2’ (NO O-end embed in oxygen vacancy site on ZrO2 (111) surface). The energy profile is placed in the center, and structure models are placed around.
Ijms 20 06129 g007
Ijms 20 06129 g008 550
Figure 8. Energy profile (a) and structure models (b) of reactants, transition states, and products for N2O formation on ZrO2 (111) surface. The energy profile is placed above, and structure models are placed below.
Figure 8. Energy profile (a) and structure models (b) of reactants, transition states, and products for N2O formation on ZrO2 (111) surface. The energy profile is placed above, and structure models are placed below.
Ijms 20 06129 g008
Ijms 20 06129 g009 550
Figure 9. Energy profile (a) and structure models (b) of reactants, transition states and products for N2O adsorb on oxygen vacancy ZrO2 (111) surface to generate N2 (g). The energy profile is placed above, and structure models are placed below.
Figure 9. Energy profile (a) and structure models (b) of reactants, transition states and products for N2O adsorb on oxygen vacancy ZrO2 (111) surface to generate N2 (g). The energy profile is placed above, and structure models are placed below.
Ijms 20 06129 g009
Table
Table 1. Adsorption energies (Eads) of CO and NO gas molecules on the different adsorption sites of ZrO2 (110) surface.
Table 1. Adsorption energies (Eads) of CO and NO gas molecules on the different adsorption sites of ZrO2 (110) surface.
Gas MoleculeAdsorption SiteEads (eV)Figure
COC-endZrT−0.6761(c)
OT−0.675-
Ob−0.227-
O-endZrT−0.3591(d)
OT−0.257-
Ob−0.231-
NON-endZrT−0.7881(e)
OT−0.776-
Ob−0.253-
O-endZrT−0.5751(f)
OT−0.290-
Ob−0.047-
Table
Table 2. Adsorption energies (Eads) of CO and NO gas molecules on the different adsorption sites of ZrO2 (111) surface.
Table 2. Adsorption energies (Eads) of CO and NO gas molecules on the different adsorption sites of ZrO2 (111) surface.
Gas MoleculeAdsorption siteEads (eV)Figure
COC-endZrT−0.4105(c)
OT−0.129-
OH−0.160-
O-endZrT−0.1625(d)
OT−0.133-
OH−0.154-
NON-endZrT−0.0415(e)
OT0.078-
OH0.046-
O-endZrT0.0545(f)
OT0.076-
OH0.055-

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Sun, X. Catalytic Reaction Mechanism of NO–CO on the ZrO2 (110) and (111) Surfaces. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246129

AMA Style

Cao X, Zhang C, Wang Z, Sun X. Catalytic Reaction Mechanism of NO–CO on the ZrO2 (110) and (111) Surfaces. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(24):6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Xuesong, Chenxi Zhang, Zehua Wang, and Xiaomin Sun. 2019. "Catalytic Reaction Mechanism of NO–CO on the ZrO2 (110) and (111) Surfaces" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 24: 6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop