Next Article in Journal
Silencing Core Spliceosome Sm Gene Expression Induces a Cytotoxic Splicing Switch in the Proteasome Subunit Beta 3 mRNA in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Divergent Effect of Cigarette Smoke on Innate Immunity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nicotine-Infection Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
RNA Binding Proteins as Drivers and Therapeutic Target Candidates in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms21124191
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

by
Laura Rindi
Dipartimento di Ricerca Traslazionale e delle Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(12), 4191; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124191
Submission received: 28 May 2020 / Revised: 9 June 2020 / Accepted: 10 June 2020 / Published: 12 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Drugs and Novel Strategies against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Over the last years, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) have emerged as important human pathogens. Infections caused by NTM are often difficult to treat due to an intrinsic multidrug resistance for the presence of a lipid-rich outer membrane, thus encouraging an urgent need for the development of new drugs for the treatment of mycobacterial infections. Efflux pumps (EPs) are important elements that are involved in drug resistance by preventing intracellular accumulation of antibiotics. A promising strategy to decrease drug resistance is the inhibition of EP activity by EP inhibitors (EPIs), compounds that are able to increase the intracellular concentration of antimicrobials. Recently, attention has been focused on identifying EPIs in mycobacteria that could be used in combination with drugs. The aim of the present review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on EPs and EPIs in NTM and also, the effect of potential EPIs as well as their combined use with antimycobacterial drugs in various NTM species are described.

1. Introduction

Infections by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) represent a relevant problem for human health in many countries in the world. NTM, consisting of all Mycobacterium species except for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Mycobacterium leprae, are a group of over 180 environmental species, generally endowed with low pathogenicity to humans [1,2]. However, over the last years, NTM have emerged as important human pathogens and infections caused by these organisms have increased globally [3,4,5]. Such trend is due to not only more accurate identification tools but also an increased awareness to look for NTM as opportunistic pathogens in clinical specimens; the increased life expectancy and the growing use of immunosuppressive therapies are further factors that may explain the raised incidence rate of NTM infections. NTM are associated with a variety of human diseases, especially concomitantly to particular risk factors; respiratory tract infections are the most frequent, followed by lymphadenitis in children, disseminated infections in severely immunocompromised patients, and skin infections [6,7]. Although significant differences in geographic distribution of NTM have been observed, the most relevant NTM species for human diseases are species belonging to Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and other slowly growing mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium xenopi, and Mycobacterium malmoense, and rapidly growing mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, and Mycobacterium fortuitum [8,9,10,11]. In particular, the most frequently reported clinically significant species are MAC and M. abscessus [12].
Infections caused by NTM are often difficult to treat since therapy, that needs the use of a combination drug regimen, is long, expensive, and more toxic and more likely to fail than tuberculosis therapy [13,14]. The highly hydrophobic lipid-rich cell wall constitutes a strong barrier to the penetration of various drugs, representing a major contributor for intrinsic resistance of NTM to many antimicrobial compounds currently available [15], thus encouraging an urgent need for the development of new drugs for the treatment of mycobacterial infections [16].
Efflux pumps (EPs) are further important elements that are involved in drug resistance by expelling toxic substrates and thus preventing intracellular accumulation of antibiotics reducing their clinical efficacy [17]. EP activity can also be induced upon drug exposure, thus contributing to both intrinsic and acquired resistance [18]. Several mycobacterial EPs have been identified and characterized to date. The genome of M. tuberculosis contains genes encoding drug EPs belonging to all the five superfamilies, such as the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), the small multidrug resistance (SMR) superfamily, the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) superfamily, and the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) superfamily. The ABC superfamily members are primary transporters because they are energized by the hydrolysis of ATP, whereas the other families of EPs are typically energized by the proton motive force and are thus classified as secondary transporters [19]. The presence of several EPs has also been showed in NTM [16]. The best characterized EPs in NTM are those present in M. fortuitum conferring resistance to tetracycline and aminoglycoside [20,21], those present in Mycobacterium smegmatis conferring resistance to fluoroquinolones, rifamycins, and isoniazid [22,23], those present in MAC conferring macrolide resistance [18,24], and those present in M. abscessus conferring resistance to clofazimine and bedaquiline [25]. Overexpression or the increased activity of existing EPs in response to prolonged exposure to the subeffective levels of antimycobacterial drugs, such as may be present during management of the NTM-infected patient, may render an organism increasingly resistant to one or more drugs employed in therapy [26].
A promising strategy to increase drug susceptibility is the inhibition of EP activity by EP inhibitors (EPIs). EPIs are compounds that act on EPs and block their efflux function. EPIs were shown to inhibit efflux of antituberculosis drugs, to decrease M. tuberculosis drug resistance and to produce synergistic effects with antimicrobials [27]. Recently, attention has been focused on identifying EPIs in mycobacteria that could be used in combination with drugs [28]. Most studies regarding the use of EPIs to decrease active drug efflux have been performed in M. tuberculosis. Some examples of EPIs in M. tuberculosis include the following compounds: the Ca2+ channel blocker verapamil (VP), which decreased the level of resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, ofloxacin, streptomycin and to the new anti-TB drugs bedaquiline and clofazimine; phenothiazines, such as thioridazine (TZ) and chlorpromazine (CPZ), which have been proven to reduce clarithromycin and isoniazid resistance in M. tuberculosis complex; protonophores, including carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), which decreased the level of resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, ofloxacin, and streptomycin; valinomycin, which acts reducing the gradient generated by K+ and inhibits novobiocin and rifampin resistance mediated by the P55 pump; plant-derived EPI, such as reserpine (RES), which has been shown to influence the level of resistance to numerous anti-TB drugs, and piperine (PIP), which is found to be synergistic with rifampicin treatment in a mouse infection model of M. tuberculosis [29,30].
The aim of the present review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on EPs and EPIs in NTM and describe the effect of potential EPIs as well as their combined use with antimycobacterial drugs in various NTM species. Table 1 summarizes the best characterized EPs in NTM, whereas Table 2 summarizes compounds investigated as EPIs on NTM in recent years and shows drugs where MIC was decreased by EPI. The following paragraphs will consider the studies carried out on each species of NTM.

2. Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC)

Among the NTM, the members of the MAC are responsible for most of the human-associated infections and can cause chronic pulmonary infections in adults, lymphadenitis in children, and disseminated infections in immunocompromised subjects [53]. MAC is a group of slow-growing mycobacteria, consisting of 12 species: Mycobacterium avium, consisting of 4 subspecies, i.e., M. avium subsp. hominissuis, M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. silvaticum, and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium chimaera, Mycobacterium colombiense, Mycobacterium arosiense, Mycobacterium vulneris, Mycobacterium bouchedurhonense, Mycobacterium timonense, Mycobacterium marseillense, Mycobacterium yongonense, Mycobacterium paraintracellulare, and Mycobacterium lepraemurium [54]. The MAC species most frequently isolated from human infections are M. avium, M. intracellulare, and M. chimaera. M. avium is frequently responsible for disseminated disease in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), whereas M. intracellulare appears more likely to cause pulmonary infections in immunocompetent patients [55]. Macrolides, such as clarithromycin, are key drugs for treatment of MAC infections. The development of clarithromycin resistance, that makes the therapy prone to fail [56], has been mainly attributed to mutational alterations of the 23S rRNA gene and to overexpression of EPs [15]. In particular, the upregulation of EP activity, induced upon drug exposure, can significantly decrease the intracellular concentration of clarithromycin, reducing its clinical efficacy.
Genomic analysis of M. avium showed the presence of several genes coding for EPs belonging to almost all the known superfamilies such as ABC, MFS, RND, and SMR. Notably, members of MAC presented a lot of the mycobacterial membrane protein Large (MmpL) proteins, a subclass of RND transporters known to participate in the export of lipid components across the cell envelope; M. avium, M. intracellulare, and M. chimaera have 14, 18, and 21 MmpL, respectively [57]. Mutations in the mmpT5 encoding TetR repressor located ahead of the mmpS5/mmpL5 operon in M. intracellulare were associated with modest resistance levels to bedaquiline and clofazimine [31]. It was demonstrated that there are specific genes that encode EPs associated with macrolide resistance in M. avium, i.e., MAV_3306, encoding an ABC transporter and MAV_1406, encoding a MFS transporter, which are highly conserved in other pathogenic mycobacteria, are induced in a stepwise manner after subtherapeutic azithromycin exposure [18]. Moreover, the contribution of the M. avium EPs MAV_1406 and MAV_1695, belonging to the MFS and ABC transporters, respectively, was proven because they were found to be overexpressed in two isogenic strains showing high-level clarithromycin resistance [24].
The first EPIs investigated for their activity on M. avium were phenothiazines, inhibitors of K+ transport and Ca2+ channels [58]. A study of in vitro activity of CPZ, TZ, promazine, promethazine, and desipramine against a reference and clinical strains of M. avium showed TZ as the most active of the group [37]. However, only later, the role of some phenothiazines in the inhibition of EPs was confirmed. Rodrigues et al. [41,42] demonstrated that intrinsic efflux activity of MAC strains was inhibited by TZ and CPZ as well as by VP, a Ca2+ channel blocker, and CCCP, a protonophore reducing the transmembrane potential. Accumulation of the known EPs substrate ethidium bromide (EtBr) was found to be significantly increased by the above EPIs in a concentration-dependent manner. At half of their intrinsic MIC, both TZ and CPZ, similarly to VP and CCCP, significantly increased the susceptibility of a reference strain of M. avium to erythromycin, suggesting an effect on an EP with EtBr and erythromycin as substrates; moreover, since the susceptibility to amikacin and ethambutol was increased by TZ and CCCP, respectively, and not by CPZ and VP, resistance to these antibiotics may be due to EPs other than the one that extrudes erythromycin and which is affected by all the EPIs tested [41]. A following study on M. avium and M. intracellulare clinical strains from AIDS patients showed that resistance to clarithromycin was significantly reduced in the presence of TZ, CPZ, and VP, and the same EPIs were effective in decreasing the efflux of EtBr from mycobacterial cells; moreover, increased retention of [14C]-erythromycin in the presence of these EPIs further demonstrated that active efflux contributes to MAC resistance to macrolides [42]. A further study evaluated TZ as chemotherapy for MAC diseases by investigating its pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics against a reference strain of M. avium [59].
In 2015, Machado et al. [24] studied a group of 2-phenylquinoline-derived compounds previously reported as potent inhibitors of the EP NorA of Staphylococcus aureus [60]. All four compounds tested were able to inhibit EPs in M. avium; in particular, O-ethylpiperazinyl derivative 2 showed an efflux inhibitory activity comparable to that of VP and was able to significantly reduce the MIC values of macrolides against wild-type as well as resistant M. avium strains. Moreover, the above compound showed synergistic activity with clarithromycin against M. avium-infected macrophages at a concentration below the cytotoxicity threshold. Finally, by using M. avium isogenic strains presenting high level clarithromycin resistance, a correlation between the synergistic effect of the 2-phenylquinoline with macrolides and the inhibition of EP, most likely the MFS pump MAV_1406, was demonstrated [24]. Subsequently, a series of 3-phenylquinolone, designed by modifying the natural isoflavone biochanin A, was showed to be very effective EPIs of different wild-type and resistant strains of M. avium, bringing down the MIC values of macrolides and fluoroquinolones, thus representing the first specifically designed compounds exhibiting potent NTM EPI activity. Interestingly, the 3-phenylquinolones 1e and 1g boosted the activity of antimycobacterial drugs and EtBr against all the M. avium strains, decreasing the MIC values up to very low concentrations, showing a better activity than EPIs VP, CPZ, and TZ [43]. Further efforts were made to improve these compounds, in order to overcome their toxicity toward human macrophages. New 3-phenylquinolone analogues were designed, synthesized, and evaluated. Most compounds were active as M. avium EPIs, with some of them synergizing with clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and EtBr; among these, compounds 11b, 12b, and 16a were active at concentration below their CC50 on human cells. Interestingly, derivative 16a was the most promising compound, showing a significant synergistic activity with clarithromycin at a concentration that was sixfold lower than its CC50, thereby representing the best MAC EPI identified. Moreover, this promising compound showed good activity in M. avium-infected macrophages both alone as well as in combination with clarithromycin, suggesting its high therapeutic potential [44].
Recently, the effect of EPIs further on clarithromycin susceptibility levels in 12 clinical isolates of M. avium and M. intracellulare was investigated. It was shown that berberine (BER), CCCP, PIP, and tetrandrine (TTR) were active against both clarithromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains, reducing the MIC of clarithromycin; in particular, the MIC of clarithromycin showed at least a fourfold reduction in presence of BER (83% of total isolates), CCCP (67%), PIP (25%), and TTR (75%). Notably, among the six resistant isolates, TTR reversed the resistance phenotype of three strains, BER of two strains, and CCCP and PIP of one strain [45].

3. Mycobacterium abscessus

M. abscessus is a rapidly growing mycobacterium associated with several diseases in humans, of which lung disease is the most common, particularly in patients with underlying lung disease such as bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis; it is the second most common cause of NTM pulmonary disease in many countries after MAC [4]. M. abscessus consists of three subspecies, namely, M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. bolletii, and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense [61]. The poor treatment outcomes of M. abscessus diseases are attributable to the resistance to clarithromycin, including acquired resistance, mainly related to mutations in the rrl gene, and inducible resistance conferred by the erm (41) gene, present in M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and subsp. bolletii but absent in M. abscessus subsp. massiliense [62]. Therapeutic regimens are based not only on a macrolide but also on an aminoglycoside and a β-lactam [53]; recently, the introduction of clofazimine and bedaquiline is gaining increasing interest for the treatment of M. abscessus pulmonary disease.
A high number of MmpL transporters are found in M. abscessus [57]. Resistance to thiacetazone derivatives with potent activity against M. abscessus was found in spontaneous resistant mutants where genes encoding one of three MmpS5/MmpL5 EP systems, i.e., MAB_4383c-MAB_4282c, were upregulated [32]. The presence of two other putative MmpS5/MmpL5-coding operons in M. abscessus may represent a resistance mechanism through efflux of further antibiotics with anti-M. abscessus activity. Moreover, the presence of multiple efflux pumps of the MmpL family that participate to low-resistance levels to clofazimine and bedaquiline was reported [25]. In addition, an association between overexpression of the MFS pumps MAB_3142 (homologue of M. tuberculosis P55) and MAB_1409 (homologue of M. avium MAV_1406) and clarithromycin resistance was demonstrated in all the three subspecies of M. abscessus [33]. Finally, in a recent study, three putative EPs, i.e., an ATP binding cassette EP encoded by MAB_2355c (homologue of M. avium MAV_3306), a tap like EP encoded by MAB_1409c, and an ATP binding cassette EP encoded by MAB_1846, as well as their positive regulatory gene whiB7, contributed to clarithromycin resistance exhibited by M. abscessus [34].
It has been reported that usnic acid, a natural compound found in lichens which has shown antimicrobial activity against M. tuberculosis and NTM [63], increased activity of antimicrobials in M. abscessus; in particular, usnic acid was able to reduce the MIC of amikacin and clarithromycin fourfold and was effective on EtBr accumulation, thus suggesting its efflux-inhibiting activity [46]. Based on the therapeutic and pharmacological properties of flow regulators of calcium ions of tetrahydropyridine (THP), recent studies evaluated THP compounds as EPIs in M. abscessus, showing that some of such compounds were able to reduce the MIC of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and clarithromycin in a reference strain and in clinical isolates of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and subsp. bolletii; therefore, THP derivatives may represent potential adjuvants in the treatment of infections caused by M. abscessus [47,48]. Interestingly, computational simulations revealed possible binding sites for the derivative NUUM01 on MmpL5 and Tap protein structure [47]. The same authors strengthened the hypothesis that efflux activity plays a role in M. abscessus resistance to clarithromycin by demonstrating an increase of mRNA expression levels of the EP MAB_3142 and MAB_1409 in M. abscessus strains after exposure to clarithromycin; moreover, they showed that VP increased the susceptibility to clarithromycin from fourfold to >64-fold in nine clinical strains of M. abscessus belonging to the T28 erm (41) sequevar responsible for the inducible resistance to clarithromycin [33]. More recently, consistent with that reported by Vianna et al. [33], three EPs, including MAB_1409, associated with the intrinsic resistance of M. abscessus to clarithromycin were identified; the addition of EPIs phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN), which is a peptidomimetic compound, CCCP, and VP significantly decreased the MIC of clarithromycin for resistant M. abscessus clinical strains overexpressing MAB_1409 [34].

4. Mycobacterium smegmatis

M. smegmatis is a rapidly growing nonpathogenic mycobacterium, often used as a model organism that offers safety and reduced time for carrying out experiments. The M. smegmatis genome contains many genes encoding putative drug EPs that are expressed at detectable levels [22]. Several studies have been conducted on M. smegmatis with the aim of preliminary investigation on EPs and inhibitors to be subsequently evaluated on NTM or M. tuberculosis [64].
A well-characterized M. smegmatis EP is the MFS transporter LfrA, a multidrug EP that contributes to low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones and other toxic compounds such as ethidium bromide [35,36,37]. Li et al. [22] strengthened these features by demonstrating the involvement of LfrA in the intrinsic drug resistance, and also identified further putative EPs. Indeed, it has been proven that the deletions of the lfrA gene or mmr orthologue rendered the mutant more susceptible to multiple drugs such as fluoroquinolones, ethidium bromide, and acriflavine; the deletion of the efpA orthologue also produced increased susceptibility to these agents but also resulted in decreased susceptibility to rifamycins, isoniazid, and chloramphenicol; deletion of the Rv1877 orthologue produced some increased susceptibility to ethidium bromide, acriflavine, and erythromycin [22]. Moreover, De Rossi et al. [38] characterized Tet(V), a tetracycline efflux protein, belonging to the MFS of efflux proteins, and the corresponding gene in M. smegmatis; preliminary evidence suggests that a homologous gene is present in M. fortuitum but not in other mycobacteria [38]. More recently, the MSMEG_2631 gene (mmp) encoding a MATE family protein in M. smegmatis was characterized, and data reported that mmp deletion increased susceptibility for phleomycin, bleomycin, capreomycin, amikacin, kanamycin, cetylpyridinium chloride, and several sulfa drugs [39]. In another study, overexpression of the two ABC transporter genes Ms6509 and Ms6510 remarkably decreased mycobacterial rifampicin resistance and deletion of these two transporter genes resulted in increased rifampicin resistance in M. smegmatis [40]. Finally, M. smegmatis presents a high number of MmpL transporters [57].
In the strain M. smegmatis mc2155, it was demonstrated that the accumulation of EtBr was found to be significantly increased by EPIs TZ, CPZ, VP, and CCCP in a concentration-dependent manner; moreover, VP considerably increased the susceptibility of M. smegmatis to erythromycin [41]. Subsequently, Rodrigues et al. [52], in a study aimed to describe EtBr transport in M. smegmatis using the wild-type strain mc2155 and mutant strains carrying deletions of genes coding for porins and the LfrA pump, reported an overall reduction of MIC of streptomycin, rifampicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin caused by CPZ, TZ, and VP in most of the strains tested. The fact that the effect of these EPIs was not dependent of a given genotype suggested that these inhibitors have a wide range of activity against efflux and are not specific for a particular EP [52]; moreover, the mutant for the LfrA pump showed increased accumulation of EtBr and increased susceptibility to EtBr, ethambutol, and ciprofloxacin, in agreement with previous studies [35,36]. In 2015, Machado et al. [24] studied a group of 2-phenylquinoline-derived compounds previously reported as inhibitors of the EP norA of Staphylococcus aureus [60]. All four compounds tested were able to promote accumulation of EtBr in M. smegmatis mc2155, and O-ethylpiperazinyl derivative 2 showed a highly synergistic activity with clarithromycin [24].
In order to identify new antimycobacterial natural compounds from plants, Lechner et al. screened flavonoids as EPIs in M. smegmatis [49,65]. Each tested plant natural product, namely, epicatechin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, luteolin, myceritin, quercitin, rutin, and taxifolin, caused at least a twofold decrease of the MIC of isoniazid at subinhibitory concentrations in M. smegmatis reference strains; among such compounds, myceritin was the most efficient intensifier of isoniazid susceptibility causing a reduction of the MIC of isoniazid up to 64-fold, followed by quercitin; myceritin did not decrease the MIC values of other antibiotics, suggesting the synergistic activity and specificity for isoniazid potentiation [49]. Moreover, the isoflavone biochanin A has been demonstrated to exhibit EP-inhibiting activity in M. smegmatis mc2155 comparable to that of reference EPI controls, such as VP, by performing an EtBr efflux assay [65]; this last study prompted further investigations of this class of compounds as efflux inhibitors against M. smegmatis and M. avium, as previously described [43,44]. In particular, a series of 3-phenylquinolone, designed by modifying the natural isoflavone biochanin A, showed moderate to good synergistic effects against M. smegmatis when combined with clarithromycin and ciprofloxacin [44]. Additional natural plant metabolites were studied for their EPI activity against M. smegmatis. Farnesol, an isoprenoid component, significantly enhanced the accumulation of EtBr, blocking its efflux, thus suggesting that farnesol act as an EPI in M. smegmatis. Interestingly, farnesol also showed synergism when combined with rifampicin [51]. The plant alkaloid PIP extensively increased accumulation and decreased the efflux of EtBr in M. smegmatis, which suggest that it has an ability to inhibit mycobacterial EPs. PIP achieved EP inhibition levels comparable to the RES standard EPI control, and the EtBr efflux inhibition ability of PIP was greater than CPZ but lower than CCCP; moreover, higher concentration of PIP exhibited a stronger EtBr efflux inhibitory effect, demonstrating that PIP inhibited efflux in a concentration-dependent manner [66]. A very recent study evaluated the antimicrobial and resistance-modifying profile of a range of plant-derived flavonoids, such as skullcapflavone, nobiletin, tangeretin, baicalein, and wogonin; after a screening of all compounds for their synergistic effects with EtBr and rifampicin, authors concluded that skullcapflavone II considerably increased the susceptibility of M. smegmatis to EtBr and rifampicin and that nobiletin was found to be the most potent efflux inhibitor [50].

5. Other NTM Species

A well-characterized EP in NTM is the Tap, an EP of the MFS superfamily, present in M. fortuitum conferring resistance to tetracycline and aminoglycoside [20]. Tap protein from M. fortuitum uses the electrochemical gradient across the cytoplasmic membrane to extrude tetracycline from the cell; this efflux activity is inhibited by CCCP and RES, consistent with the decrease in MIC observed in antibiotic susceptibility testing in the presence of these inhibitors. Moreover, CCCP, RES, and CPZ reduced the MIC of tetracycline in a M. smegmatis strain expressing the Tap protein of M. fortuitum [21]. A study performed to detect LfrA and Tap EPs among 166 clinical isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria demonstrated that lfrA is rare, whereas tap is found more commonly [67]. In fact, the lfrA gene was detected in 4 strains (2.4%), comprising 2 strains of Mycobacterium chelonae, 1 Mycobacterium fortuitum, and 1 Mycobacterium mucogenicum; on the other hand, the tap gene was detected in 109 strains (65.7%), comprising 3 Mycobacterium abscessus, 12 M. chelonae, 75 M. fortuitum, 2 Mycobacterium mageritense, 15 Mycobacterium peregrinum, 1 Mycobacterium alvei, and 1 Mycobacterium porcinum. No correlation was detected between the presence of the EPs and resistance to quinolones or tetracyclines, suggesting that other mechanisms must be involved in antibiotic resistance of these strains [67]. A recent review, comparing the MmpL abundance among different mycobacterial species, reported a higher number of MmpLs in rapid growing mycobacteria when compared with slow-growing mycobacteria. Notably, among the rapid growing mycobacteria, M. fortuitum, together with M. abscessus and M. smegmatis, has the highest number of MmpLs [57].
Plant-derived flavonoids, such as epicatechin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, luteolin, myceritin, quercitin, rutin, and taxifolin, were tested for their ability to decrease the MIC of isoniazid, not only on M. smegmatis but also on references strains of M. phlei and M. fortuitum. Myceritin was the most efficient EPI, decreasing the MIC of isoniazid 8-fold in M. fortuitum and 16-fold in M. phlei [49]. Moreover, a following study reported the investigation on further flavonoids, namely, skullcapflavone, nobiletin, tangeretin, baicalein, and wogonin in a reference strain of Mycobacterium aurum. Nobiletin was shown to be the most effective promoter for EtBr accumulation, with a similar effect to that of VP; skullcapflavone and tangeretin enhanced EtBr-accumulation to a greater extent than CPZ but were less effective than VP; baicalein and wogonin were the least effective of the compounds tested [50].

6. Conclusions

Recent researches have shown that EPIs may represent promising adjuvants to conventional antimycobacterial therapy by enhancing susceptibility to drugs. Several compounds, both known EPIs and new natural plant-derived molecules, have been proven to be very active in increasing the efficacy of many drugs in NTM, even in resistant strains. However, the implementation of EPIs in clinical practice has been hampered by the toxic properties and the pharmacological effects of these inhibitors in human host. Further advanced investigations on this topic are needed since the development of combinational therapies using EPIs and antibiotics could constitute a novel approach that should be considered to control NTM infections.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Pisa, grant “Fondi di Ateneo, 2020”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

BERberberine
CCCPcarbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone
CPZchlorpromazine
DNP2,4-dinitrophenol
EPefflux pump
EPIefflux pump inhibitor
EtBrethidium bromide
MACMycobacterium avium complex
MIC minimal inhibitory concentration
NTMnontuberculous mycobacteria
PAβNphenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide
PIPpiperine
RESreserpine
TTRtetrandrine
THPtetrahydropyridine
TZthioridazine
VPverapamil

References

  1. Forbes, B.A.; Hall, G.S.; Miller, M.B.; Novak, S.M.; Rowlinson, M.-C.; Salfinger, M.; Somoskövi, A.; Warshauer, D.M.; Wilson, M.L. Practice Guidelines for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Parrish, N. An Update on Mycobacterial Taxonomy, 2016–2017. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Brode, S.K.; Daley, C.L.; Marras, T.K. The epidemiologic relationship between tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease: A systematic review. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2014, 18, 1370–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prevots, D.R.; Marras, T.K. Epidemiology of human pulmonary infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria: A review. Clin. Chest Med. 2014, 36, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Donohue, M.J. Increasing nontuberculous mycobacteria reporting rates and species diversity identified in clinical laboratory reports. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Tortoli, E. Clinical manifestations of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 906–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Van Ingen, J. Diagnosis of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 34, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hoefsloot, W.; Van Ingen, J.; Andrejak, C.; Ängeby, K.; Bauriaud, R.; Bemer, P.; Beylis, N.; Boeree, M.J.; Cacho, J.; Chihota, V.; et al. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: An NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur. Respir. J. 2013, 42, 1604–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Henkle, E.; Hedberg, K.; Schafer, S.; Novosad, S.; Winthrop, K.L. Population-based Incidence of Pulmonary Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Disease in Oregon 2007 to 2012. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rindi, L.; Garzelli, C. Increase in non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from humans in Tuscany, Italy, from 2004 to 2014. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 16, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Lin, S.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Shen, X. Increase in Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Isolated in Shanghai, China: Results from a Population-Based Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zweijpfenning, S.; Hoefsloot, W.; Ingen, J. Geographic Distribution of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Isolated from Clinical Specimens: A Systematic Review. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 39, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Griffith, D.E.; Aksamit, T.R. Therapy of refractory nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 25, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Ingen, J.; Boeree, M.J.; Van Soolingen, D.; Mouton, J.W. Resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Drug Resist. Updates 2012, 15, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nasiri, M.J.; Haeili, M.; Ghazi, M.; Goudarzi, H.; Pormohammad, A.; Fooladi, A.A.I.; Feizabadi, M.M. New Insights in to the Intrinsic and Acquired Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Falkinham, J.O.I. Challenges of NTM Drug Development. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Da Silva, P.E.A.; Von Groll, A.; Martin, A.; Palomino, J.-C. Efflux as a mechanism for drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Table 1. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 63, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Schmalstieg, A.M.; Srivastava, S.; Belkaya, S.; Deshpande, D.; Meek, C.; Leff, R.; Van Oers, N.S.C.; Gumbo, T. The Antibiotic Resistance Arrow of Time: Efflux Pump Induction Is a General First Step in the Evolution of Mycobacterial Drug Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4806–4815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. De Rossi, E.; Aínsa, J.A.; Riccardi, G. Role of mycobacterial efflux transporters in drug resistance: An unresolved question. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aínsa, J.A.; Blokpoel, M.C.J.; Otal, I.; Young, D.B.; De Smet, K.A.L.; Martin, C. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Tap, a Putative Multidrug Efflux Pump Present in Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 5836–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ramón-García, S.; Martin, C.; Aínsa, J.A.; De Rossi, E.; Claver, J.A.A. Characterization of tetracycline resistance mediated by the efflux pump Tap from Mycobacterium fortuitum. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 57, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Li, X.-Z.; Zhang, L.; Nikaido, H. Efflux Pump-Mediated Intrinsic Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 2415–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Buroni, S.; Manina, G.; Guglierame, P.; Pasca, M.R.; Riccardi, G.; De Rossi, E. LfrR Is a Repressor That Regulates Expression of the Efflux Pump LfrA in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 4044–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Machado, D.; Cannalire, R.; Costa, S.S.; Manfroni, G.; Tabarrini, O.; Cecchetti, V.; Couto, I.; Viveiros, M.; Sabatini, S. Boosting Effect of 2-Phenylquinoline Efflux Inhibitors in Combination with Macrolides against Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium avium. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015, 1, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gutiérrez, A.V.; Richard, M.; Roquet-Banères, F.; Viljoen, A.; Kremer, L. The TetR Family Transcription Factor MAB_2299c Regulates the Expression of Two Distinct MmpS-MmpL Efflux Pumps Involved in Cross-Resistance to Clofazimine and Bedaquiline in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, 01000–01019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Viveiros, M.; Leandro, C.; Amaral, L. Mycobacterial efflux pumps and chemotherapeutic implications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2003, 22, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, L.; Wu, X.-Q. Development of efflux pump inhibitors in antituberculosis therapy. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 47, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Viveiros, M.; Martins, M.; Rodrigues, L.; Machado, D.; Couto, I.; Ainsa, J.; Amaral, L. Inhibitors of mycobacterial efflux pumps as potential boosters for anti-tubercular drugs. Expert Rev. Anti-infect. Ther. 2012, 10, 983–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pule, C.M.; Sampson, S.L.; Warren, R.; Black, P.A.; Van Helden, P.D.; Victor, T.C.; Louw, G.E. Efflux pump inhibitors: Targeting mycobacterial efflux systems to enhance TB therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 71, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rodrigues, L.; Parish, T.; Balganesh, M.; Ainsa, J.A.; Claver, J.A.A. Antituberculosis drugs: Reducing efflux = increasing activity. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alexander, D.C.; Vasireddy, R.; Vasireddy, S.; Philley, J.V.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Perry, B.J.; Griffith, D.E.; Benwill, J.L.; Cameron, A.D.S.; Wallace, R.J. Emergence ofmmpT5Variants during Bedaquiline Treatment of Mycobacterium intracellulare Lung Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 55, 574–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Halloum, I.; Viljoen, A.; Khanna, V.; Craig, D.; Bouchier, C.; Brosch, R.; Coxon, G.; Kremer, L. Resistance to Thiacetazone Derivatives Active against Mycobacterium abscessus Involves Mutations in the MmpL5 Transcriptional Repressor MAB_4384. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, 2509–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Vianna, J.S.; Machado, D.; Ramis, I.B.; Silva, F.P.; Bierhals, D.V.; Abril, M.A.; Von Groll, A.; Ramos, D.F.; Lourenço, M.C.; Viveiros, M.; et al. The Contribution of Efflux Pumps in Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Resistance to Clarithromycin. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Guo, Q.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Li, B.; Chu, H. Efflux Pumps Contribute to Intrinsic Clarithromycin Resistance in Clinical, Mycobacterium abscessus Isolates. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, J.; Takiff, H.E.; Nikaido, H. Active efflux of fluoroquinolones in Mycobacterium smegmatis mediated by LfrA, a multidrug efflux pump. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 3791–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Takiff, H.E.; Cimino, M.; Musso, M.C.; Weisbrod, T.; Martinez, R.; Delgado, M.B.; Salazar, L.; Bloom, B.R.; Jacobs, W.R. Efflux pump of the proton antiporter family confers low-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sander, P.; De Rossi, E.; Böddinghaus, B.; Cantoni, R.; Branzoni, M.; Böttger, E.C.; Takiff, H.; Rodriquez, R.; Lopez, G.; Riccardi, G. Contribution of the multidrug efflux pump LfrA to innate mycobacterial drug resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 193, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. De Rossi, E.; Blokpoel, M.C.J.; Cantoni, R.; Branzoni, M.; Riccardi, G.; Young, D.B.; De Smet, K.A.L.; Ciferri, O. Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of a Novel Tetracycline Resistance Determinant, tet (V), from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 1931–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mishra, M.N.; Daniels, L. Characterization of the MSMEG_2631 Gene (mmp) Encoding a Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion (MATE) Family Protein in Mycobacterium smegmatis and Exploration of Its Polyspecific Nature Using Biolog Phenotype MicroArray. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 1610–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhang, H.; Gao, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Yang, M.; Zhang, H.; Gao, C.-H.; He, Z. A Novel marRAB Operon Contributes to the Rifampicin Resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodrigues, L.; Wagner, D.; Viveiros, M.; Sampaio, D.; Couto, I.; Vavra, M.; Kern, W.V.; Amaral, L. Thioridazine and chlorpromazine inhibition of ethidium bromide efflux in Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rodrigues, L.; Sampaio, D.; Couto, I.; Machado, D.; Kern, W.V.; Amaral, L.; Viveiros, M. The role of efflux pumps in macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium avium complex. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 34, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Cannalire, R.; Machado, D.; Felicetti, T.; Costa, S.S.; Massari, S.; Manfroni, G.; Barreca, M.L.; Tabarrini, O.; Couto, I.; Viveiros, M.; et al. Natural isoflavone biochanin A as a template for the design of new and potent 3-phenylquinolone efflux inhibitors against Mycobacterium avium. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 140, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Felicetti, T.; Machado, D.; Cannalire, R.; Astolfi, A.; Massari, S.; Tabarrini, O.; Manfroni, G.; Barreca, M.L.; Cecchetti, V.; Viveiros, M.; et al. Modifications on C6 and C7 Positions of 3-Phenylquinolone Efflux Pump Inhibitors Led to Potent and Safe Antimycobacterial Treatment Adjuvants. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 982–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Menichini, M.; Lari, N.; Rindi, L. Effect of efflux pump inhibitors on the susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium complex to clarithromycin. J. Antibiot. 2019, 73, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ramis, I.B.; Vianna, J.S.; Reis, A.J.; Von Groll, A.; Ramos, D.F.; Viveiros, M.; Da Silva, P.E.A. Antimicrobial and Efflux Inhibitor Activity of Usnic Acid Against Mycobacterium abscessus. Planta Med. 2018, 84, 1265–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramis, I.B.; Vianna, J.S.; Junior, L.S.; Von Groll, A.; Ramos, D.F.; Lobo, M.M.M.; Zanatta, N.; Viveiros, M.; Da Silva, P.E.A. In silico and in vitro evaluation of tetrahydropyridine compounds as efflux inhibitors in Mycobacterium abscessus. Tuberculosis 2019, 118, 101853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vianna, J.S.; Ramis, I.B.; Bierhals, D.; Von Groll, A.; Ramos, D.F.; Zanatta, N.; Lourenço, M.C.; Viveiros, M.; Da Silva, P.E.A. Tetrahydropyridine derivative as efflux inhibitor in Mycobacterium abscessus. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 17, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lechner, R.; Gibbons, S.; Bucar, F. Modulation of isoniazid susceptibility by flavonoids in Mycobacterium. Phytochem. Lett. 2008, 1, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Solnier, J.; Martin, L.; Bhakta, S.; Bucar, F. Flavonoids as Novel Efflux Pump Inhibitors and Antimicrobials Against Both Environmental and Pathogenic Intracellular Mycobacterial Species. Molecules 2020, 25, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jin, J.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Guo, N.; Sheng, H.; Li, L.; Liang, J.-C.; Wang, X.-L.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.-Y.; Wu, X.-P.; et al. Farnesol, a Potential Efflux Pump Inhibitor in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Molecules 2010, 15, 7750–7762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rodrigues, L.; Ramos, J.; Couto, I.; Amaral, L.; Viveiros, M. Ethidium bromide transport across Mycobacterium smegmatis cell-wall: Correlation with antibiotic resistance. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Griffith, D.E.; Aksamit, T.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Catanzaro, A.; Daley, C.; Gordin, F.; Holland, S.M.; Horsburgh, R.; Huitt, G.; Iademarco, M.F.; et al. An Official ATS/IDSA Statement: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Diseases. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 175, 367–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Van Ingen, J.; Turenne, C.Y.; Tortoli, E.; Wallace, R.J., Jr.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Wallace, R.J. A definition of the Mycobacterium avium complex for taxonomical and clinical purposes, a review. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 3666–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Han, X.Y.; Tarrand, J.J.; Infante, R.; Jacobson, K.L.; Truong, M. Clinical Significance and Epidemiologic Analyses of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare among Patients without AIDS. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 4407–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Doucet-Populaire, K.B.F. Natural and Acquired Macrolide Resistance in Mycobacteria. Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord. 2002, 2, 355–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Viljoen, A.; Dubois, V.; Girard-Misguich, F.; Blaise, M.; Herrmann, J.-L.; Kremer, L. The diverse family of MmpL transporters in mycobacteria: From regulation to antimicrobial developments. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 104, 889–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Viveiros, M.; Martins, M.; Couto, I.; Kristiansen, J.E.; Molnár, J.; Amaral, L. The in vitro activity of phenothiazines against Mycobacterium avium: Potential of thioridazine for therapy of the co-infected AIDS patient. In Vivo 2005, 19, 733–736. [Google Scholar]
  59. Deshpande, D.; Srivastava, S.; Musuka, S.; Gumbo, T. Thioridazine as chemotherapy for Mycobacterium avium complex ciseases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 4652–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Costa, S.S.; Falcão, C.; Viveiros, M.; Machado, D.; Martins, M.; Cristino, J.M.; Amaral, L.; Couto, I. Exploring the contribution of efflux on the resistance to fluoroquinolones in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tortoli, E.; Kohl, T.A.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Trovato, A.; Leão, S.C.; Garcia, M.J.; Vasireddy, S.; Turenne, C.Y.; Griffith, D.E.; Philley, J.V.; et al. Emended description of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus and Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii and designation of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 4471–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Nash, K.A.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Wallace, R.J. A Novel Gene, erm (41), Confers Inducible Macrolide Resistance to Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus but is Absent from Mycobacterium chelonae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ramos, D.F.; Da Silva, P.E.A. Antimycobacterial activity of usnic acid against resistant and susceptible strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Pharm. Biol. 2010, 48, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pasca, M.R.; Guglierame, P.; De Rossi, E.; Zara, F.; Riccardi, G. mmpL7 Gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is Responsible for Isoniazid Efflux in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4775–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Lechner, R.; Gibbons, S.; Bucar, F. Plant phenolic compounds as ethidium bromide efflux inhibitors in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 62, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Jin, J.; Zhang, J.; Guo, N.; Feng, H.; Li, L.; Liang, J.; Sun, K.; Wu, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, M.; et al. The plant alkaloid piperine as a potential inhibitor of ethidium bromide efflux in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Esteban, J.; Martín-De-Hijas, N.; Ortiz, A.; Kinnari, T.; Sánchez, A.B.; Gadea, I.; Fernández-Roblas, R. Detection of lfrA and tap efflux pump genes among clinical isolates of non-pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 34, 454–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Major nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) efflux pumps (EPs) associated with drug resistance.
Table 1. Major nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) efflux pumps (EPs) associated with drug resistance.
NTM SpeciesEP GeneEP Superfamily a Drugs bReferences
MACMAV_3306ABCAZT[18]
MAV_1406MFSAZT, CLA[18,24]
MAV_1695ABCCLA[24]
MAV_2510 (mmpL5)RNDBDQ, CLO[31]
M. abscessusMAB_2301 (mmpL)RNDBDQ, CLO[25]
MAB_1134c (mmpL)RNDBDQ, CLO[25]
MAB_4382c (mmpl5)RNDTAC derivatives[32]
MAB_3142MFSCLA[33]
MAB_1409MFSCLA[33,34]
MAB_2355ABCCLA[34]
MAB_1846ABCCLA[34]
M. smegmatislfrAMFSFluoroquinolones, TET[22,35,36,37]
emrESMRFluoroquinolones[22]
efpAMFSFluoroquinolones, rifamycins, INH, CHL[22]
Rv1877 orthologueMFSERY, TET, KAN[22]
TetVMFSTET[38]
MSMEG_2631MATECAP, AMI, KAN[39]
Ms6509ABCRIF[40]
Ms6510ABCRIF[40]
M. fortuitumtapMFSTET, aminoglycoside[20,21]
a EP superfamily: ABC, ATP-binding cassette superfamily; MFS, major facilitator superfamily; RND, resistance-nodulation-cell division superfamily; SMR, small multidrug resistance superfamily; MATE, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion superfamily. b Drugs: AZT, azithromycin; CLA, clarithromycin; BDQ, bedaquiline; CLO, clofazimine; TAC, thiacetazone; TET, tetracycline; INH, isoniazid; CHL, chloramphenicol; ERY, erythromycin; KAN, kanamycin; CAP, capreomycin AMI, amikacin; RIF, rifampicin.
Table
Table 2. Combinations of efflux pumps inhibitors (EPIs) and drugs evaluated in NTM species, where EPIs decreased the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the drugs.
Table 2. Combinations of efflux pumps inhibitors (EPIs) and drugs evaluated in NTM species, where EPIs decreased the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the drugs.
NTM SpeciesCombination EPI/Drugs aReferences
MAC
M. avium
ATCC 25291
104		CPZ/ERY, CLA[41,42]
TZ/ERY, AMI, CLA[41,42]
VP/ERY, CLA[41,42]
CCCP/ERY, EMB[41]
2-phenylquinolines/CLA, ERY, AZT[24]
3-phenylquinolones/CLA, ERY, AZT, CPX, OFX[43,44]
M. intracellulare
ATCC 13950		CPZ/CLA, ERY[42]
TZ/CLA, ERY[42]
VP/CLA, ERY[42]
M. avium and
M. intracellulare
clinical strains		CPZ/CLA, ERY[42]
TZ/CLA, ERY[42]
VP/CLA, ERY[42]
2-phenylquinolines/CLA, ERY, AZT[24]
3-phenylquinolones/CLA, ERY, AZT, CPX, OFX[43]
BER/CLA[45]
CCCP/CLA[45]
PIP/CLA[45]
TTR/CLA[45]
M. abscessus
M. abscessus subsp.
abscessus ATCC19977		Usnic acid/AMI, CLA[46]
THP compounds/AMI, CLA, CPX[47,48]
VP/CLA[33]
M. abscessus subsp.
abscessus clinical strains		Usnic acid/AMI, CLA[46]
THP compounds/AMI, CLA, CPX[47,48]
VP/CLA[33,34]
CCCP/CLA[34]
PaβN/CLA[34]
M. abscessus subsp.
bolletii clinical strains		Usnic acid/AMI, CLA[46]
THP compounds/AMI, CLA, CPX[48]
VP/CLA[33]
M. abscessus subsp.
massiliense clinical strains		VP/CLA[33,34]
CCCP/CLA[34]
PaβN/CLA[34]
M. smegmatis
M. smegmatis mc2155, mc22700, ATCC 14468Flavonoids/INH, RIF[49,50]
Farnesol/RIF[51]
CPZ/RIF, AMI, STR, CPX, CLA, ERY[52]
TZ/RIF, AMI, STR, CPX, CLA, ERY[52]
VP/RIF, AMI, STR, CPX, CLA, ERY[41,52]
2-phenylquinolines/CLA[24]
3-phenylquinolones/CLA, CPX[44]
M. aurum
M. aurum ATCC 23366Flavonoids/RIF[50]
M. fortuitum
M. fortuitum ATCC 6841Flavonoids/INH[49]
M. phlei
M. phlei ATCC 11758Flavonoids/INH[49]
a EPI: CPZ, chlorpromazine; TZ, thioridazine; VP, verapamil; CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; BER, berberine; PIP, piperine; TTR, tetrandrine; THP, tetrahydropyridine; PaβN, phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide. Drugs: ERY, erythromycin; CLA, clarithromycin; AMI, amikacin; EMB, ethambutol; AZT, azithromycin; CPX, ciprofloxacin; OFX, ofloxacin; INH, isoniazid; RIF, rifampicin.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rindi, L. Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124191

AMA Style

Rindi L. Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(12):4191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rindi, Laura. 2020. "Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 12: 4191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop