Next Article in Journal
A Peripheral CB1R Antagonist Increases Lipolysis, Oxygen Consumption Rate, and Markers of Beiging in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes Similar to RIM, Suggesting that Central Effects Can Be Avoided
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Protein Scaffold for Arginine Sensing Generated through the Dissection of the Arginine-Binding Protein from Thermotoga maritima
Previous Article in Journal
Roles of Specialized Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators in Autophagy and Inflammation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural Characterization of Covalently Stabilized Human Cystatin C Oligomers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Domain Organization in Plant Blue-Light Receptor Phototropin2 of Arabidopsis thaliana Studied by Small-Angle X-ray Scattering

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(18), 6638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186638
by Masayoshi Nakasako 1,2,*, Mao Oide 1,2, Yuki Takayama 1,2,3, Tomotaka Oroguchi 1,2 and Koji Okajima 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(18), 6638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186638
Submission received: 20 August 2020 / Revised: 6 September 2020 / Accepted: 7 September 2020 / Published: 10 September 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study of Nakasako et al. describes the reorganization of light-oxygen-voltage sensing domains in phototropin2 protein using SAXS.

The study is very comprehensive and was performed carefully and methodologically and is presented well in the manuscript.

Some minor revision is required for spelling correction and grammar, for example: line 20 is written 'LOV2-liker' instead of LOV2-linker.

line 95-96 'as do as' instead of ad do...

line 173 ends with the word 'and'

Overall it is a very good work and I recommend it for publication.

Author Response

First of all, the authors thank to their valuable comments on our previous manuscript. We corrected spelling and grammar throughout the revised manuscript. Although our previous manuscript was edited by a native speaker before submission, equations used were lost during the format change at the Editorial office. Then, many sentences had grammatical errors. In the revised manuscript, we inserted equations (1)-(3) as lines 524-550, and physical variables used throughout the main text. Spelling check were carefully checked throughout the revised manuscript. ‘LOV2-liker’, lines 95-96 and 173 were corrected as lines 20, 95, and 172, respectively. In addition, the references were rearranged according to the arrangement of Figures after the format changes by the Editorial office.

Reviewer 2 Report

Data were presented well, however at the end of discussion or at conclusion, please add a short outlook regarding the implications of these findings to the process of photosynthesis.

Author Response

First of all, the authors thank to their valuable comments on our previous manuscript. We added a short outlook on the implications of the present results as lines 464-469 in the Discussion section and lines 580-583 in the Conclusion section.

Back to TopTop