Next Article in Journal
Reduced Proteasome Activity and Enhanced Autophagy in Blood Cells of Psoriatic Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
3D Structural Insights into β-Glucans and Their Binding Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Computational SNP Analysis and Molecular Simulation Revealed the Most Deleterious Missense Variants in the NBD1 Domain of Human ABCA1 Transporter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Potential of Cathelicidin Peptide LL-37, an Antimicrobial Agent, in a Murine Sepsis Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms21207607
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Skin Barrier Repair in Individuals with Atopic Dermatitis

by
Hai Le Thanh Nguyen
1,2,
Juan Valentin Trujillo-Paez
1,
Yoshie Umehara
1,
Hainan Yue
1,2,
Ge Peng
1,2,
Chanisa Kiatsurayanon
3,
Panjit Chieosilapatham
4,
Pu Song
5,
Ko Okumura
1,
Hideoki Ogawa
1,
Shigaku Ikeda
1,2 and
François Niyonsaba
1,6,*
1
Atopy (Allergy) Research Center, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
2
Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
3
Institute of Dermatology, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
4
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
5
Department of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
6
Faculty of International Liberal Arts, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7607; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207607
Submission received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 9 October 2020 / Accepted: 12 October 2020 / Published: 14 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic Challenge and Therapeutic Approaches in Human Sepsis Based on the Appearance of Endotoxemia and Beta-D-Glucanemia)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease that exhibits a complex interplay of skin barrier disruption and immune dysregulation. Patients with AD are susceptible to cutaneous infections that may progress to complications, including staphylococcal septicemia. Although most studies have focused on filaggrin mutations, the physical barrier and antimicrobial barrier also play critical roles in the pathogenesis of AD. Within the physical barrier, the stratum corneum and tight junctions play the most important roles. The tight junction barrier is involved in the pathogenesis of AD, as structural and functional defects in tight junctions not only disrupt the physical barrier but also contribute to immunological impairments. Furthermore, antimicrobial peptides, such as LL-37, human β-defensins, and S100A7, improve tight junction barrier function. Recent studies elucidating the pathogenesis of AD have led to the development of barrier repair therapy for skin barrier defects in patients with this disease. This review analyzes the association between skin barrier disruption in patients with AD and antimicrobial peptides to determine the effect of these peptides on skin barrier repair and to consider employing antimicrobial peptides in barrier repair strategies as an additional approach for AD management.

1. Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly prevalent, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the complex interplay between skin barrier disruption and immune dysregulation [1,2,3]. From the first report in 2006, describing a loss-of-function mutation in the gene encoding the filament aggregating protein filaggrin (FLG), the role of FLG in the barrier-based pathogenesis of AD has been extensively researched [2,4]. Within the epidermis of human skin, FLG is an indispensable component of the epidermal differentiation complex. FLG generates natural moisturizing factor (NMF) and plays a critical role in epidermal barrier function [5]. Furthermore, FLG mutations increase the risk of early initiation of AD, which may increase the severity and persistence of the disease [4,6,7,8]. In addition to the research characterizing FLG, the physical barrier and antimicrobial barrier have also been determined to play crucial roles in the barrier-based pathogenesis of AD. Regarding the physical barrier, the stratum corneum (SC) and tight junctions (TJs) have been reported to play the most important role [9]. The TJ barrier has consistently been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of AD, in which the structural and functional defects in TJs not only disrupt the physical barrier but also contribute to immunological impairments [10,11,12].
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are considered a rapid and first-line response of the innate immune system to microbial pathogens. Together with their antimicrobial effects, AMPs also exert immunomodulatory effects by inducing cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation, regulating cytokine/chemokine production, improving angiogenesis and wound healing, and sustaining the barrier function of the skin [13,14]. Interestingly, various studies have demonstrated that AMPs, such as cathelicidin LL-37, human β-defensin (hBD)-1, hBD-3, and S100A7 protein, increase the levels of TJ-related proteins and promote epidermal barrier function [15,16,17,18]. In addition, although many advances in the understanding of skin barrier dysfunction in the pathogenesis of AD have been achieved, the treatment of this chronic disease remains unsatisfactory. In this review, we highlight the association between skin barrier dysfunction in patients with AD and skin-derived AMPs to consider employing these peptides in barrier repair strategies as an additional therapeutic approach for AD.

2. Skin Barrier

Human skin, the largest organ of the human body, constitutes a pivotal barrier against environmental pathogens. Functionally, the cutaneous barrier is divided into four different levels: the microbiome barrier, the chemical barrier, the physical barrier, and the immune barrier (Figure 1). The microbiome barrier is the outermost layer of the skin, consisting of numerous microbial communities, and it functions as the first active defense against environmental invaders [19]. Various reports have described how commensal microbes of the skin microbiome interact with pathogenic bacteria. As shown in the study by Iwase et al., the serine protease Esp secreted by Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), a commensal bacterium, impedes biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) [20]. On the other hand, normal bacteria of the skin, such as S. epidermidis, also inhibit inflammatory cytokines expressed by human keratinocytes [21].
The chemical barrier consists of AMPs, NMF, factors that contribute to cutaneous pH, and epidermal lipids [9]. Notably, NMF is located within corneocytes, and changes in SC NMF levels alter cutaneous pH and SC lipids. Other constituents of the NMF, such as lactate and potassium, also play important roles in maintaining the hydration and physical features of the SC [9,22,23]. SC lipids primarily include free fatty acids, ceramides, and cholesterol. Corneocytes, which are derived through epidermal differentiation, are surrounded by a cornified envelope that exhibits chemical crosslinking with a monolayer of nonpolar lipids (ω-hydroxylated ceramides and free fatty acids) [24,25,26]. AMPs have been shown to play important roles in both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities, as discussed in the next section.
The SC and TJ proteins are essential components of the physical barrier (Figure 1). The SC consists of mature, denucleated, flattened keratinocytes, and their membranes are replaced by a “cornified envelope”, resulting from the epidermal differentiation process [27]. The stratum granulosum (SG), the next layer below the SC, is composed of granules containing FLG, loricrin, and keratin filaments and laminar bodies with lipids, corneodesmosin, and kallikrein. Keratinocytes in the SG primarily produce triglycerides and cholesterols, indicating a crosslink between the physical and chemical barriers. Within the SG, most TJ proteins are transmembrane proteins and connect adjacent keratinocytes. TJ proteins are classified into the claudins, occludin, and zonula occluden families and are thought to form a barrier regulating the transport of water and solutes [28].
The immune barrier is dynamic and comprises several resident cell populations of the cutaneous epidermis and dermis (Figure 1). In addition to recruiting immune cells, keratinocytes also promote their viability and persistence. For example, tissue-resident memory T (Trm) cells are long-lived cells that are produced after the clearance of an infection and remain in the skin to exert protective immune effects. Trm cells not only accumulate in the infected area but are also allocated broadly to healthy skin areas to facilitate protection against secondary microbial contamination [29,30]. Because of the wide distribution of resident immune cells within skin layers, the immune barrier is highly interconnected with other levels of the cutaneous barrier to maintain skin homeostasis. Following disruption of the physical barrier, pathogenic invaders might activate resident immune cells, particularly Langerhans cells (LCs), which subsequently initiate the T-cell response. In addition to mounting this essential response, resident cells of the immune barrier also promote barrier repair and homeostasis [31].

3. Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Individuals with AD

In 2006, loss-of-function mutations in the FLG gene were first described as etiological factors of ichthyosis vulgaris, and these mutations were subsequently identified as major risk factors for AD development [4,32]. FLG is a key protein of the epidermal barrier. FLG deficiency is involved in various pathways related to barrier function, including dysregulation of keratinocyte differentiation, impairment of TJ formation, disruption of SC integrity, alterations in lipid formation, induction of a decrease in the level of NMF, and an increase in sensitivity to skin infection [33,34,35,36]. Moreover, the disruption of SC integrity results from a complicated link between an increase in transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin dehydration, and a decrease in the level of NMF, leading to the xerosis that characterizes AD [37]. Since their first description, FLG null mutations have continued to constitute the strongest genetic risk factor for AD. FLG mutations are presumed to predispose patients to an earlier onset of AD, as well as to prolongation and exacerbation of the disease [38]. However, in addition to FLG mutations, other factors likely contribute to AD development. In this context, a significant number of patients with AD do not carry any of the known FLG mutations, and conversely, approximately 40% of individuals with FLG null mutations do not display any AD manifestations [39].
The TJ barrier is located beneath the SC and forms the specific cell–cell junctions that seal the intercellular space. The arrangement of the TJ proteins reveals the complexity of epidermal barriers. TJs play an important role in the epidermal permeability barrier, functioning as gates for electrolytes, solutes, and hormones [40,41]. Together with their permeability function in the granular layer, these proteins are also involved in various cellular functions. De Benedetto et al. indicated that the silencing of the TJ protein claudin-1 in human keratinocytes enhances cell proliferation [11]. Moreover, the absence of claudin-1 in the lower epidermal layer of the AD-like allergic dermatitis mouse model also significantly altered the levels of the cell differentiation markers keratin 10 and keratin 14 [42]. On the other hand, TJ barrier defects were demonstrated to lead to abnormal formation of the SC by altering polar lipid and profilaggrin processing, suggesting that TJ dysfunction is related to an abnormal SC barrier in AD pathogenesis [12,43]. According to Furuse et al., claudin-1 deficiency leads to an increase in TEWL and mortality in mice exhibiting no structural abnormalities but induces a notable decrease in the function of the skin barrier [44]. Claudin-1 expression was found to be significantly decreased in the lesional skin of patients with AD compared with the healthy skin of nonatopic individuals [45]. A decrease in the level of this TJ protein is also associated with an increased risk of infection by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1) in patients with AD [46].
Dysregulation of the structural proteins of the epidermis mentioned above is generally related to a dysfunctional cutaneous barrier that contributes to typical AD manifestations of dry, inflammatory skin and allergic sensitization to antigens. In fact, FLG null mutations are strongly associated with atopic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food allergy [47,48]. Importantly, FLG mutations predispose patients to asthma in the context of atopic eczema, but most known asthma-related genes are not associated with AD [49]. Interestingly, several studies have investigated the emergence of both AD and food allergies as part of transcutaneous sensitization to food allergens. Various reports have described the association between the early appearance of AD in childhood and the development of food allergies, particularly peanut, egg, and milk allergies [50,51]. Additionally, Brown et al. indicated that FLG mutations are not only a highly significant genetic risk factor for AD but also a genetic factor for peanut allergy [52]. These results suggest that FLG mutations associated with cutaneous barrier dysfunction increase the risk of transcutaneous allergen exposure.
Taken together, the evidence outlined above indicates that after skin barrier disruption, transcutaneous antigen exposure is facilitated by antigen-presenting cells in the epidermis. Environmental factors subsequently affect skin barrier integrity and may increase both the risk and severity of AD. Among environmental factors, mechanical damage, such as continuous scratching, the use of detergents, and the release of exogenous proteases, are the most notable factors [53]. Moreover, dysfunction of the epidermal barrier might directly elicit cutaneous inflammatory reactions in the setting of AD and activate innate immune responses, including proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production by keratinocytes and antigen presentation by LCs and dermal dendritic cells (DCs) [54,55,56]. It appears that AD pathogenesis is dominated by CD4+ T-helper type 2 (Th2) cells, characterized by the production of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 [57,58]. In the context of acute dermatitis, AD skin becomes infiltrated with more Th2 cells and additional CD4+ subsets, including Th22 and Th17 cells [57]. Together with CD4+ T-cells, other lymphocyte subsets such as type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and type 2 cytokine-producing CD8+ T-cells were also reported to be increased in AD [59,60]. These cells are thought to be involved in the early sensing tissue damage and initiation of inflammatory reactions prior to the activation of antigen-driven adaptive immune responses. Th2 inflammation in AD also leads to the enrollment of mast cells, eosinophils, and other immune-cell subsets, consequently contributing to the pathological inflammation via the release of mediators such as histamine. Interestingly, proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-31, and histamine may contribute to severe itch in AD [61] (Figure 2). The interplay between skin barrier disruption and immune dysregulation in AD is complicated. Disruption of the epidermal barrier might elicit inflammatory reactions and activate immune responses, and skin inflammation may, in turn, impact skin barrier function. In fact, inflammatory reactions may lead to secondary changes such as suppression of AMP production by Th2 cytokines [62], inhibition of epidermal differentiation complex gene FLG by Th2 and Th22 cytokines [63,64], and induction of epidermal hyperplasia by IL-22 [57], which further provoke AD manifestations.

4. Skin Barrier Dysfunction-Related Infections in AD

Skin barrier dysregulation represents a hallmark of AD pathogenesis, in which a deficiency of the AMP and TJ barriers plays a crucial role. Several recent studies have determined the pivotal role of AMPs in the permeability barrier, suggesting a dynamic interaction between the physical barrier and the chemical fence supported by AMPs to protect against infections. In fact, the AMP barrier and permeability barrier functions are both coregulated and independent [65,66]. Colonization by S. aureus is a characteristic feature of AD and is observed in both the lesional and nonlesional skin of patients with AD [67]. S. aureus colonization can contribute to pruritus and persistent inflammation [68] and may lead to secondary infections in the skin, such as impetiginization, folliculitis, cutaneous abscesses, and cellulitis [69]. Secondary infections in patients with AD subsequently elicit a vicious itch–scratch cycle that may create more entry points for allergens and pathogens, and this cycle further compromises the permeability barrier [68,70]. Colonization with S. aureus was indicated to progress to severe infections, including bacteremia, sepsis, endocarditis, arthritis, pneumonia, and ocular infections [71,72]. Similarly, Hoeger et al. reported two cases of S. aureus bacteremia in AD patients and suggested that chronic scratching of dry skin in AD may lead to the intrusion of S. aureus into the blood circulatory system [72]. Among AD patients with hospital-acquired infections, S. aureus bloodstream infections were reported in 60% of cases; the main foci and entry points were skin/soft tissue infections and exclusive intravascular catheters, respectively [73]. Moreover, in 2018, two epidemiological reviews concluded that patients with AD have an increased risk of bacteremia, but the studies did not specify pathogenic factors or clinical manifestations [74,75]. Eczema herpeticum, a particularly serious complication of AD that is caused by an infection with HSV, is associated with viremia, fever, malaise, lymphadenopathy, and significant systemic complications, such as keratoconjunctivitis, meningitis, and encephalitis [76]. Interestingly, Bin et al. found that staphylococcal toxins may promote cutaneous viral replication, suggesting that S. aureus colonization might disseminate viral infections in the skin [77]. On the other hand, Malassezia spp., a component of the healthy skin flora, was reported to be a trigger factor in AD [78], and sensitization rates against Malassezia spp. are particularly higher in patients with head and neck types of AD [79], indicating a correlation between AD and the IgE-mediated sensitization to Malassezia spp. [80,81]. Furthermore, prior studies have demonstrated that the impaired skin barrier facilitates Malassezia spp. cells to interact with various human skin cells and immune cells, such as keratinocytes, DCs, LCs, natural killer cells (NKCs), and fibroblasts, which consequently maintain the inflammation in patients with AD [82]. Taken together, these findings indicate that infections are a major complication of AD, and characterization of these skin barrier dysregulation-related infections in patients with AD is necessary for prevention and treatment.

5. Roles of AMPs in AD

Skin-derived AMPs, also called host defense peptides, are effector molecules that contribute to both innate and adaptive immune responses and perform one of the first defense responses to microbial pathogens. As antimicrobial molecules of the innate immune system, AMPs directly kill microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Along with these killing activities, AMPs also exhibit immunomodulatory activities, such as inducing cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation, altering cytokine/chemokine expression, mediating improvements in angiogenesis and wound healing, and regulating cutaneous barrier function. In human skin, AMPs are either constitutively or inducibly expressed by resident and infiltrating cells, specifically, keratinocytes, sebocytes, neutrophils, and mast cells [13,14].
Studies conducted in recent decades have reported an association between AMPs and various skin diseases. A disrupted function of AMPs in patients with AD was first reported by Ong et al. [83], who described the decreased expression of human cathelicidin LL-37 and hBD-2 in patients with AD compared with patients with psoriasis. Additionally, the expression of dermcidin, the AMP derived from the sweat gland, is decreased in patients with AD [84]. These findings suggest the presence of a deficiency in AMP secretion in patients with AD. On the other hand, Gambichler et al. reported a higher level of RNase 7 mRNA in the lesional skin of patients with AD than in patients with psoriasis [85]. Moreover, a study of Kisich et al. [86] reported that constitutive levels of hBD-3 in keratinocytes of both healthy subjects and individuals with AD are similar, and treatment of AD skin using Th2 cytokines inhibited the mobilization of hBD-3 and enhanced the deposition of this AMP onto the surface of S. aureus. This study concluded that the high burden of S. aureus in patients with AD is caused by the interference of an increase in Th2 cytokines on constitutive killing by keratinocytes. The hampering effect of the Th2 cytokine milieu on AMP expression in AD was also demonstrated by various studies, partially explaining the frequency of infections observed in patients with this disease [62,87,88]. The studies mentioned above suggest that there is not a generalized defect in the expression of AMPs in patients with AD, and the Th2 cytokine milieu may impede the induction of AMPs in AD.
Interestingly, hBD-1, -2, -3, and -4 recruit and activate a broad range of leukocytes. Indeed, hBD-2 induced the chemotaxis of immature DCs, memory T-cells, and Th17 cells through CCR6 [89]. hBD-2 and hBD-3 also recruit myeloid cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, and function as chemoattractants by binding to CCR2 [90]. Therefore, hBDs contribute to the innate and adaptive immune responses in the skin by functioning as chemoattractants. In addition to hBDs, LL-37 was shown to induce chemotaxis of mast cells through the receptor MrgX2 [91,92]. Notably, hBDs and LL-37 induce the secretion of IL-31 from mast cells, which plays an important role in regulating the itch sensation in patients with cutaneous disorders [93]. Furthermore, LL-37 induces the production of semaphorin 3A, a chemorepulsive factor of the epidermal nerves that is known to be downregulated in AD skin, suggesting a possible itch-suppressing effect of this AMP on patients with AD [94]. Intriguingly, hBDs induce T-cells to produce IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31, which are involved in the pathogenesis of AD [95]. Furthermore, activated T-cells upregulate Th2-related cytokines, including IL-31, IFN-γ, IL-22, and oncostatin M, in the presence of LL-37, implying that this AMP promotes the establishment of an inflammatory cytokine environment in individuals with T-cell-related skin diseases [96]. hBDs and LL-37 also stimulate inflammatory cytokine production in mast cells and improve vascular permeability [93,97]. Taken together, these findings indicate that AMPs are involved in AD pathogenesis, and the overproduction of AMPs may exert negative effects on the inflammatory conditions of patients with AD.

6. Influence of AD Treatments on AMPs

The physiopathological mechanisms of AD are very complex, and they are mediated by interactions between genetic factors, skin barrier dysfunction, and immune abnormalities. Many therapeutic options are available for the management of AD, and these treatments are classified into basic skincare, topical therapy, phototherapy, and systemic therapy. However, the selection of an effective and targeted treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe AD remains challenging. The aim of treatments for this disease is to reduce symptoms, prevent exacerbation, control infections, minimize treatment complications, and restore skin barrier integrity. The principles of the therapeutic approach include education, motivated participation of the patient’s families, enhanced skin hydration and barrier function, reduced exacerbation, and treatment of inflammation. Currently, a curative treatment for AD is unavailable. Thus, in clinical practice, distinct recommendations and approaches for the management of the disease are provided to patients.
The primary goal of basic skin therapy is to restore and maintain cutaneous barrier function. Moisturizers containing urea, hyaluronic acids, or ceramides may improve the integrity of the SC [98,99,100]. More recently, various studies have indicated that moisturizer therapy can decrease the severity of flares and reduce the requirement for topical corticosteroids (TCSs) and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) to treat AD [101,102]. In addition, both TEWL and AMP expression may be modulated by ceramide-dominant emollient application in patients with AD [103]. Therefore, the application of a ceramide-dominant emollient is associated with cutaneous barrier restoration and improvement of the AMP barrier in AD skin and is recommended by several guidelines for AD treatment and prevention [104,105,106].
Until recently, limited treatment options have been available, including TCSs and TCIss, which have been approved worldwide for topical AD therapy. As shown in multiple trials, TCSs may decrease pruritus and improve acute and chronic signs of AD [107,108,109]. However, as AD is a disease requiring long-term treatment, the application of TCSs may cause local cutaneous side effects, such as secondary infection, striae, skin atrophy, telangiectasias, purpura, steroid folliculitis, and acneiform eruptions [110]. Even with short-term use, TCSs were shown to compromise permeability barrier homeostasis and SC integrity. In murine experiments, TCSs may compromise the antimicrobial barrier by downregulating epidermal AMPs, including mouse β-defensin-3 (equivalent to hBD-2) and cathelin-related AMP (CRAMP, equivalent to LL-37) [111,112,113]. TCIs are steroid-sparing, anti-inflammatory agents that are provided as second-line therapy for the acute and chronic phases of AD in individuals who have not responded to other topical therapies or when those therapies are not indicated [114]. Topical tacrolimus has been demonstrated to be safer and more efficacious than low-potency TCSs [115]. In addition to exerting immunomodulatory effects, tacrolimus has also been shown to improve skin barrier function and skin hydration in patients with AD [116]. According to a recent study by Park et al., the expression of hBD-2 is increased after the application of tacrolimus [103]. In addition, pimecrolimus was shown to increase the expression of AMPs, such as LL-37, hBD-2 and hBD-3, in human keratinocytes [117]. Hence, TCI application not only exhibits anti-inflammatory and skin-hydration-restoring effects but is also involved in the normalization of the permeability barrier and the antimicrobial barrier in individuals with AD.
Ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy has been recommended as a treatment option for AD cases that are refractory to basic care and topical therapies [104,118]. Importantly, UVA-1 and narrowband UVB (NB–UVB) are the most effective treatment modalities for improving clinical signs of AD [119,120]. Interestingly, low-dose UVB irradiation was reported to increase AMP expression and improve barrier recovery in the murine epidermis [121]. Additionally, following NB–UVB therapy, the expression of LL-37 and hBD-1 is increased in patients with AD [122,123]. Moreover, Gambichler et al. [122] indicated that NB–UVB phototherapy may normalize the hBD-2 overexpression observed in patients with AD and suggested that the suppression of inflammation and bacterial infections and the recovery of barrier function may be responsible for the normalization of the hBD-2 level. The results of these studies demonstrated that phototherapy using UVB appears to improve the antimicrobial defense barrier in AD skin.

7. AMPs in Skin Barrier Repair: An Option for AD Treatment?

As discussed above in Section 4, defects in the AMP barrier clearly play a critical role in AD pathogenesis. Indeed, LL-37, hBD-2, and hBD-3 are downregulated in AD skin lesions compared to psoriasis lesions [83,87,124]. An explanation for the defect of the antimicrobial barrier was the overexpression of Th2 cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, which impede the production of AMPs in AD skin [87]. In particular, the reduction in AMP expression may be caused by the topical application of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, which increase the rate of microbial superinfections observed in individuals with AD [125]. Regarding antimicrobial activities, LL-37 and hBDs exert potent effects on HSV and S. aureus, which are common infections occurring in patients with AD [126,127,128,129,130]. Meyer-Hoffert et al. [131] also proposed a possible antimicrobial effect of hBD-3 on molluscum contagiosum virus infection, another infection frequently observed in individuals with AD. Thus, it is likely that the AMP barrier must be restored to prevent frequent infections in patients with AD.
Interestingly, in addition to exerting antimicrobial effects, AMPs such as hBD-1, hBD-3, LL-37, and S100A7 are involved in the mechanism regulating the epidermal barrier by improving TJ barrier function [15,16,17,18]. Since the first report of claudin-1-deficient mice revealed the existence of continuous claudin-based TJs in the epidermis and the important role of these TJs in the barrier function of mammalian skin [44], several studies have supported the indispensability of TJs in cutaneous barrier function [132,133,134,135,136]. In subjects with AD, downregulation of claudin-1, the essential TJ protein of the epidermal barrier, has been observed in the lesional skin of different cohorts [42,45], thereby promoting viral invasion and increasing sensitivity to eczema herpeticum [46]. Notably, by using a mouse model of hapten-induced dermatitis, Yokouchi et al. found that skin inflammation may impair the SC barrier by disrupting the TJ barrier, even in the absence of FLG deficiency [137]. Taken together, these findings indicate that TJ dysregulation plays a critical role in the pathological features of AD.
On the other hand, LL-37 may reduce itching in patients with AD by inducing the expression of semaphorin 3A, a chemorepulsive factor in the epidermal nerves that is downregulated in AD [94]. Additionally, Chen et al. discovered that LL-37 inhibited double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-induced expression of CXCL8, CXCL10, CCL5, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin in keratinocytes. This study documented the probable involvement of LL-37 in the suppression of Th2 skin inflammation induced by viral or self dsRNA released from damaged cells [138].
The deficiency of the skin barrier generally plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD resulting from several factors, including epidermal gene mutations, deficiency of AMPs, TJ dysregulation, and immune abnormalities. These factors may interact with each other and modify cutaneous barrier function. In addition, skin barrier dysregulation is associated with increased risk and severity of AD and atopic sensitization. Therefore, various recent studies have focused on skin barrier repair to identify a possible therapy for AD. For instance, Frankel et al. [102] investigated the short-term effectiveness of a ceramide–hyaluronic acid emollient foam as a treatment for AD and compared it with 1% pimecrolimus cream; both the ceramide–hyaluronic acid emollient foam and pimecrolimus cream exhibited good efficacy and safety in the treatment of AD in children and adults. Furthermore, numerous clinical studies have described the efficacy of employing a ceramide-dominant emollient as monotherapy, even in patients with moderate-to-severe AD [98,139]. These findings suggest that skin barrier repair may be an effective approach for AD treatment.
Taken together, the observations mentioned above indicate that AMPs, including hBDs, LL-37, and S100A7, may restore the skin barrier structure and function and may constitute candidates for barrier repair therapy in AD treatment. Several current guidelines for AD management generally recommend the application of moisturizers as basic mainstay therapy for skin barrier failure, along with anti-inflammatory agents [104,118]. However, regularly used moisturizers were recently reported to compromise the skin if they were applied in a context in which the cutaneous barrier was already injured [140]. Therefore, more potent options for barrier repair therapy in the management of AD must be identified. AMPs not only represent potent antimicrobial agents but are also efficacious at restoring the TJ barrier, reducing itching symptoms, and suppressing Th2 inflammation, and, thus, they may become a new option for barrier repair therapy in AD treatment (Figure 3).

8. Conclusions

In recent decades, barrier repair therapy has focused on lipid replacement strategies in patients with AD, with a combination of ceramides, NMF, and pseudoceramide products added to therapeutic moisturizers. However, studies investigating the application of these products in patients with AD have demonstrated their inconsistent efficacy. As AD is a complex disease, skin barrier disruption and immune dysregulation represent the characteristic features of AD, and the treatment of this disease remains challenging. Hence, the ideal and potent skin barrier therapeutic agent currently remains to be investigated. Various observations have suggested the possible option of using AMPs as an additional approach for AD management. In fact, due to their potent antimicrobial activities, AMPs additionally restored the TJ barrier, reduced itching, and suppressed Th2-mediated inflammation. Therefore, further studies are warranted to clarify the involvement of AMPs in the pathogenesis of AD and determine the effect of these peptides on skin barrier repair to determine whether treatment with AMPs constitutes an effective strategy for AD management.

Author Contributions

H.L.T.N., J.V.T.-P., Y.U., H.Y., G.P., C.K., P.C., P.S., K.O., H.O., S.I., and F.N. wrote and critically revised the review and approved the submitted and final versions; H.L.T.N. and F.N. designed and prepared the figures; H.L.T.N., K.O., H.O., S.I., and F.N. coordinated the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (Grant Number 26461703 to F.N.) and the Atopy (Allergy) Research Center, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine. H.L.T.N. is recipient of a Monbukagakusho Scholarship from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Van Quy Nguyen (Hue, Vietnam) for his comments and Michiyo Matsumoto for providing secretarial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Abbreviations

ADatopic dermatitis
AMPantimicrobial peptide
DCdendritic cell
dsRNAdouble-stranded RNA
hBDhuman b-defensin
HDPshost defense peptides
FDAUS Food and Drug Administration
FLGfilaggrin
HSVHerpes simplex virus
ILinterleukin
LCLangerhans cell
NKCnatural killer cell
NMFnatural moisturizing factor
S. aureusStaphylococcus aureus
SCstratum corneum
S. epidermidisStaphylococcus epidermidis
SGstratum granulosum
TCItopical calcineurin inhibitor
TCStopical corticosteroids
TEWLtransepidermal water loss
Thhelper T-cell
TJtight junction
UVultraviolet

References

  1. Kraft, M.T.; Prince, B.T. Atopic dermatitis is a barrier issue, not an allergy issue. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am. 2019, 39, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fujii, M. Current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of atopic dermatitis: Interactions among skin barrier dysfunction, immune abnormalities and pruritus. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2020, 43, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Schneider, L.; Tilles, S.; Lio, P.; Boguniewicz, M.; Beck, L.; LeBovidge, J.; Novak, N.; Bernstein, D.; Blessing-Moore, J.; Khan, D.; et al. Atopic dermatitis: A practice parameter update 2012. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 295–299.e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Palmer, C.N.A.; Irvine, A.D.; Terron-Kwiatkowski, A.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, H.; Lee, S.P.; Goudie, D.R.; Sandilands, A.; Campbell, L.E.; Smith, F.J.D.; et al. Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Enomoto, H.; Hirata, K.; Otsuka, K.; Kawai, T.; Takahashi, T.; Hirota, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Tamari, M.; Otsuka, F.; Fujieda, S.; et al. Filaggrin null mutations are associated with atopic dermatitis and elevated levels of IgE in the Japanese population: A family and case–control study. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 53, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Barker, J.N.; Palmer, C.N.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, H.; Hull, P.R.; Lee, S.P.; Allen, M.H.; Meggitt, S.J.; Reynolds, N.J.; Trembath, R.C.; et al. Null mutations in the filaggrin gene (FLG) determine major susceptibility to early-onset atopic dermatitis that persists into adulthood. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Brown, S.J.; Sandilands, A.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, H.; Relton, C.L.; Meggitt, S.J.; Trembath, R.C.; Barker, J.N.; Reynolds, N.J.; Cordell, H.J.; et al. Prevalent and low-frequency null mutations in the filaggrin gene are associated with early-onset and persistent atopic eczema. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 1591–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Carson, C.G.; Rasmussen, M.A.; Thyssen, J.P.; Menné, T.; Bisgaard, H. Clinical presentation of atopic dermatitis by filaggrin gene mutation status during the first 7 years of life in a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Eyerich, S.; Eyerich, K.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Biedermann, T. Cutaneous barriers and skin immunity: Differentiating a connected network. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Boguniewicz, M.; Leung, D.Y. Atopic dermatitis: A disease of altered skin barrier and immune dysregulation. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 242, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Benedetto, A.; Georas, S.N.; Cheadle, C.; Berger, A.E. Tight junction defects in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yuki, T.; Tobiishi, M.; Kusaka-Kikushima, A.; Ota, Y.; Tokura, Y. Impaired tight junctions in atopic dermatitis skin and in a skin-equivalent model treated with interleukin-17. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Niyonsaba, F.; Nagaoka, I.; Ogawa, H.; Okumura, K. Multifunctional antimicrobial proteins and peptides: Natural activators of immune systems. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 2393–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Niyonsaba, F.; Kiatsurayanon, C.; Chieosilapatham, P.; Ogawa, H. Friends or Foes? Host defense (antimicrobial) peptides and proteins in human skin diseases. Exp. Dermatol. 2017, 26, 989–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Akiyama, T.; Niyonsaba, F.; Kiatsurayanon, C.; Nguyen, T.T.; Ushio, H.; Fujimura, T.; Ueno, T.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H.; Ikeda, S. The human cathelicidin LL-37 host defense peptide upregulates tight junction-related proteins and increases human epidermal keratinocyte barrier function. J. Innate Immun. 2014, 6, 739–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goto, H.; Hongo, M.; Ohshima, H.; Kurasawa, M.; Hirakawa, S.; Kitajima, Y. Human beta defensin-1 regulates the development of tight junctions in cultured human epidermal keratinocytes. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2013, 71, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kiatsurayanon, C.; Niyonsaba, F.; Smithrithee, R.; Akiyama, T.; Ushio, H.; Hara, M.; Okumura, K.; Ikeda, S.; Ogawa, H. Host defense (antimicrobial) peptide, human β-defensin-3, improves the function of the epithelial tight-junction barrier in human keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 2163–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hattori, F.; Kiatsurayanon, C.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H.; Ikeda, S.; Okamoto, K.; Niyonsaba, F. The antimicrobial protein S100A7/psoriasin enhances the expression of keratinocyte differentiation markers and strengthens the skin’s tight junction barrier. Cutan. Biol. 2014, 171, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanford, J.A.; Gallo, R.L. Functions of the skin microbiota in health and disease. Semin. Immunol. 2013, 25, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Iwase, T.; Uehara, Y.; Shinji, H.; Tajima, A.; Seo, H.; Takada, K.; Agata, T.; Mizunoe, Y. Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 465, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lai, Y.; Di Nardo, A.; Nakatsuji, T.; Leichtle, A.; Yang, Y.; Cogen, A.L.; Wu, Z.-R.; Hooper, L.V.; Von Aulock, S.; Radek, K.A.; et al. Commensal bacteria regulate TLR3-dependent inflammation following skin injury. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kezic, S.; O’Regan, G.M.; Lutter, R.; Jakasa, I.; Koster, E.S.; Saunders, S.; Caspers, P.; Kemperman, P.M.J.H.; Puppels, G.J.; Sandilands, A.; et al. Filaggrin loss-of-function mutations are associated with enhanced expression of IL-1 cytokines in the stratum corneum of patients with atopic dermatitis and in a murine model of filaggrin deficiency. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 129, 1031–1039.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Verdier-Sévrain, S.; Bonté, F. Skin hydration: A review on its molecular mechanisms. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2007, 6, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marekov, L.N.; Steinert, P.M. Ceramides are bound to structural proteins of the human foreskin epidermal cornified cell envelope. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 17763–17770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Swartzendruber, D.C.; Wertz, P.W.; Madison, K.C.; Downing, D.T. Evidence that the corneocyte has a chemically bound lipid envelope. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1987, 88, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lazo, N.D.; Meine, J.G.; Downing, D.T. Lipids are covalently attached to rigid corneocyte protein envelopes existing predominantly as β-sheets: A solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance study. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1995, 105, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Eckert, R.L.; Rorke, E.A. Molecular biology of keratinocyte differentiation. Environ. Health Perspect. 1989, 80, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Matsui, T.; Amagai, M. Dissecting the formation, structure and barrier function of the stratum corneum. Int. Immunol. 2015, 27, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jiang, X.; Clark, R.A.; Liu, L.; Wagers, A.J.; Fuhlbrigge, R.C.; Kupper, T.S. Skin infection generates non-migratory memory CD8+ TRM cells providing global skin immunity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 483, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gebhardt, T.; Wakim, L.M.; Eidsmo, L.; Reading, P.C.; Heath, W.R.; Carbone, F.R. Memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissue that provide enhanced local immunity during infection with herpes simplex virus. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Proksch, E.; Brasch, J. Abnormal epidermal barrier in the pathogenesis of contact dermatitis. Clin. Dermatol. 2012, 30, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Smith, F.J.D.; Irvine, A.D.; Terron-Kwiatkowski, A.; Sandilands, A.; Campbell, L.E.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, H.; Evans, A.T.; Goudie, D.R.; Lewis-Jones, S.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding filaggrin cause ichthyosis vulgaris. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vávrová, K.; Henkes, D.; Strüver, K.; Sochorová, M.; Školová, B.; Witting, M.Y.; Friess, W.; Schreml, S.; Meier, R.J.; Schäfer-Korting, M.; et al. Filaggrin deficiency leads to impaired lipid profile and altered acidification pathways in a 3D skin construct. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gruber, R.; Elias, P.M.; Crumrine, D.; Lin, T.-K.; Brandner, J.M.; Hachem, J.-P.; Presland, R.B.; Fleckman, P.; Janecke, A.R.; Sandilands, A.; et al. Filaggrin genotype in ichthyosis vulgaris predicts abnormalities in epidermal structure and function. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 2252–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bosko, C.A. Skin barrier insights: From bricks and mortar to molecules and microbes. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2019, 18, s63–s67. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gao, P.-S.; Rafaels, N.M.; Hand, T.; Murray, T.; Boguniewicz, M.; Hata, T.; Schneider, L.; Hanifin, J.M.; Gallo, R.L.; Gao, L.; et al. Filaggrin mutations that confer risk of atopic dermatitis confer greater risk for eczema herpeticum. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 507–513.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kezic, S.; Kemperman, P.; Koster, E.; De Jongh, C.; Thio, H.; Campbell, L.; Irvine, A.; McLean, I.; Puppels, G.; Caspers, P. Loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene lead to reduced level of natural moisturizing factor in the stratum corneum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2117–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tsakok, T.; Woolf, R.; Smith, C.H.; Weidinger, S.; Flohr, C. Atopic dermatitis: The skin barrier and beyond. Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 180, 464–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Henderson, J.; Northstone, K.; Lee, S.P.; Liao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Pembrey, M.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Smith, G.D.; Palmer, C.N.; McLean, W.H.I.; et al. The burden of disease associated with filaggrin mutations: A population-based, longitudinal birth cohort study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, 872–877.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsukita, S.; Furuse, M. Claudin-based barrier in simple and stratified cellular sheets. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brandner, J.M. Importance of tight junctions in relation to skin barrier function. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 2016, 49, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gruber, R.; Börnchen, C.; Rose, K.; Daubmann, A.; Volksdorf, T.; Wladykowski, E.; Vidal-y-Sy, S.; Peters, E.M.; Danso, M.; Bouwstra, J.; et al. Diverse regulation of claudin-1 and claudin-4 in atopic dermatitis. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 2777–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yuki, T.; Komiya, A.; Kusaka, A.; Kuze, T.; Sugiyama, Y.; Inoue, S. Impaired tight junctions obstruct stratum corneum formation by altering polar lipid and profilaggrin processing. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2013, 69, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Furuse, M.; Hata, M.; Furuse, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Haratake, A.; Sugitani, Y.; Noda, T.; Kubo, A.; Tsukita, S. Claudin-based tight junctions are crucial for the mammalian epidermal barrier. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 156, 1099–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Batista, D.I.S.; Perez, L.; Orfali, R.L.; Zaniboni, M.C.; Samorano, L.P.; Pereira, N.V.; Sotto, M.N.; Ishizaki, A.S.; Oliveira, L.M.S.; Sato, M.N.; et al. Profile of skin barrier proteins (filaggrin, claudins 1 and 4) and Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines in adults with atopic dermatitis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2015, 29, 1091–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Benedetto, A.; Slifka, M.K.; Rafaels, N.M.; Kuo, I.-H.; Georas, S.N.; Boguniewicz, M.; Hata, T.; Schneider, L.C.; Hanifin, J.M.; Gallo, R.L.; et al. Reductions in claudin-1 may enhance susceptibility to herpes simplex virus 1 infections in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 242–246.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dębińska, A.; Danielewicz, H.; Drabik-Chamerska, A.; Kalita, D.; Boznański, A. Filaggrin loss-of-function mutations as a predictor for atopic eczema, allergic sensitization and eczema-associated asthma in Polish children population. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 26, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cubero, J.L.; Isidoro-García, M.; Segura, N.; Pescador, D.B.; Sanz, C.; Lorente, F.; Davila, I.; Colás, C. Filaggrin gene mutations and new SNPs in asthmatic patients: A cross-sectional study in a Spanish population. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2016, 12, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kubo, A.; Nagao, K.; Amagai, M.; Kubo, A.; Nagao, K.; Amagai, M. Epidermal barrier dysfunction and cutaneous sensitization in atopic diseases. J. Clin. Invest. 2012, 122, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lack, G. Epidemiologic risks for food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tsakok, T.; Marrs, T.; Mohsin, M.; Baron, S.; Du Toit, G.; Till, S.; Flohr, C. Does atopic dermatitis cause food allergy? a systematic review. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Brown, S.J.; Asai, Y.; Cordell, H.J.; Campbell, L.E.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, H.; Northstone, K.; Henderson, J.; Alizadehfar, R.; Ben-Shoshan, M.; et al. Loss-of-function variants in the filaggrin gene are a significant risk factor for peanut allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Takai, T.; Ikeda, S. Barrier dysfunction caused by environmental proteases in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. Allergol. Int. 2011, 60, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Dickel, H.; Gambichler, T.; Kamphowe, J.; Altmeyer, P.; Skrygan, M. Standardized tape stripping prior to patch testing induces upregulation of Hsp90, Hsp70, IL-33, TNF-α and IL-8/CXCL8 mRNA: New insights into the involvement of “alarmins”. Contact Dermatitis 2010, 63, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Leyva-Castillo, J.; Hener, P.; Michea, P.; Karasuyama, H.; Chan, S.; Soumelis, V.; Li, M. Skin thymic stromal lymphopoietin initiates Th2 responses through an orchestrated immune cascade. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Black, A.P.B.; Ardern-Jones, M.R.; Kasprowicz, V.; Bowness, P.; Jones, A.; Bailey, A.S.; Ogg, G.S. Human keratinocyte induction of rapid effector function in antigen-specific memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 1485–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gittler, J.K.; Shemer, A.; Suárez-Fariñas, M.; Fuentes-Duculan, J.; Gulewicz, K.J.; Wang, C.Q.F.; Mitsui, H.; Cardinale, I.; De Guzman Strong, C.; Krueger, J.G.; et al. Progressive activation of T(H)2/T(H)22 cytokines and selective epidermal proteins characterizes acute and chronic atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 130, 1344–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Suárez-Fariñas, M.; Tintle, S.J.; Shemer, A.; Chiricozzi, A.; Nograles, K.; Cardinale, I.; Duan, S.; Bowcock, A.M.; Krueger, J.G.; Guttman-Yassky, E. Nonlesional atopic dermatitis skin is characterized by broad terminal differentiation defects and variable immune abnormalities. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 954–964.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Salimi, M.; Barlow, J.L.; Saunders, S.P.; Xue, L.; Gutowska-Owsiak, D.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.-C.; Johnson, D.; Scanlon, S.T.; McKenzie, A.N.; et al. A role for IL-25 and IL-33–driven type-2 innate lymphoid cells in atopic dermatitis. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 2939–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hijnen, D.; Knol, E.F.; Gent, Y.Y.; Giovannone, B.; Beijn, S.J.; Kupper, T.S.; Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C.A.; Clark, R.A. CD8+ T cells in the lesional skin of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis patients are an important source of IFN-γ, IL-13, IL-17, and IL-22. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sonkoly, E.; Muller, A.; Lauerma, A.I.; Pivarcsi, A.; Soto, H.; Kemeny, L.; Alenius, H.; Dieu-Nosjean, M.-C.; Meller, S.; Rieker, J.; et al. IL-31: A new link between T cells and pruritus in atopic skin inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 117, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kopfnagel, V.; Harder, J.; Werfel, T. Expression of antimicrobial peptides in atopic dermatitis and possible immunoregulatory functions. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 13, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Howell, M.D.; Kim, B.E.; Gao, P.; Grant, A.V.; Boguniewicz, M.; DeBenedetto, A.; Schneider, L.; Beck, L.A.; Barnes, K.C.; Leung, D.Y. Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Gutowska-Owsiak, D.; Schaupp, A.; Salimi, M.; Taylor, S.; Ogg, G. Interleukin-22 downregulates filaggrin expression and affects expression of profilaggrin processing enzymes. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 165, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Aberg, K.M.; Man, M.-Q.; Gallo, R.L.; Ganz, T.; Crumrine, D.; Brown, B.E.; Choi, E.-H.; Kim, D.-K.; Schröder, J.M.; Feingold, K.R.; et al. Co-regulation and interdependence of the mammalian epidermal permeability and antimicrobial barriers. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Borkowski, A.W.; Gallo, R.L. The coordinated response of the physical and antimicrobial peptide barriers of the skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2011, 131, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Baker, B.S. The role of microorganisms in atopic dermatitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 144, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Leung, D.Y.; Harbeck, R.; Bina, P.; Reiser, R.F.; Yang, E.; Norris, D.A.; Hanifin, J.M.; Sampson, H.A. Presence of IgE antibodies to staphylococcal exotoxins on the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis. evidence for a new group of allergens. J. Clin. Invest. 1993, 92, 1374–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Elias, P.M.; Hatano, Y.; Williams, M.L. Basis for the barrier abnormality in atopic dermatitis: Outside-inside-outside pathogenic mechanisms. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, 1337–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Schlievert, P.M.; Case, L.C.; Strandberg, K.L.; Abrams, B.B.; Leung, D.Y.M. Superantigen profile of staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with steroid-resistant atopic dermatitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 1562–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Patel, D.; Jahnke, M.N. Serious complications from staphylococcal aureus in atopic dermatitis. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2015, 32, 792–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hoeger, P.H.; Ganschow, R.; Finger, G. Staphylococcal septicemia in children with atopic dermatitis. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2000, 17, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mathé, P.J.; Joost, I.; Peyerl-Hoffmann, G.; Schneider, C.; Kern, W.; Rieg, S. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection in patients with atopic dermatitis, or: Think twice before placing a venous catheter into lesional atopic skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2020, 140, 1870–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Narla, S.; Silverberg, J.I. Association between atopic dermatitis and serious cutaneous, multiorgan and systemic infections in US adults. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018, 120, 66–72.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Oestergaard, L.B.; Schmiegelow, M.D.; Bruun, L.; Skov, R.; Andersen, P.S.; Larsen, A.R.; Gerds, T.A.; Dahl, A.; Petersen, A.; Lauridsen, T.K.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in children aged 5-18 years—risk factors in the new millennium. J. Pediatr. 2018, 203, 108–115.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Leung, D.Y. Why is eczema herpeticum unexpectedly rare? Antivir. Res. 2013, 98, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bin, L.; Kim, B.E.; Brauweiler, A.; Goleva, E.; Streib, J.; Ji, Y.; Schlievert, P.M.; Leung, D.Y.M. Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin modulates skin host response to viral infection. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 130, 683–691.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Scheynius, A.; Johansson, C.; Buentke, E.; Zargari, A.; Linder, M.T. Atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome and Malassezia. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2002, 127, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lange, L.; Alter, N.; Keller, T.; Rietschel, E. Sensitization to malassezia in infants and children with atopic dermatitis: Prevalence and clinical characteristics. Allergy 2008, 63, 486–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Glatz, M.; Buchner, M.; Von Bartenwerffer, W.; Schmid-Grendelmeier, P.; Worm, M.; Hedderich, J.; Fölster-Holst, R. Malassezia spp.-specific immunoglobulin E level is a marker for severity of atopic dermatitis in adults. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2015, 95, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Zhang, E.; Tanaka, T.; Tajima, M.; Tsuboi, R.; Kato, H.; Nishikawa, A.; Sugita, T. Anti-malassezia-specific IgE antibodies production in Japanese patients with head and neck atopic dermatitis: Relationship between the level of specific IgE antibody and the colonization frequency of cutaneous Malassezia species and clinical severity. J. Allergy 2011, 2011, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Buentke, E.; Scheynius, A. Dendritic cells and fungi. APMIS 2003, 111, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ong, P.Y.; Ohtake, T.; Brandt, C.; Strickland, I.; Boguniewicz, M.; Ganz, T.; Gallo, R.L.; Leung, D.Y.M. Endogenous antimicrobial peptides and skin infections in atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Rieg, S.; Steffen, H.; Seeber, S.; Humeny, A.; Kalbacher, H.; Dietz, K.; Garbe, C.; Schittek, B. Deficiency of dermcidin-derived antimicrobial peptides in sweat of patients with atopic dermatitis correlates with an impaired innate defense of human skin in vivo. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 8003–8010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Gambichler, T.; Skrygan, M.; Tomi, N.S.; Othlinghaus, N.; Brockmeyer, N.H.; Altmeyer, P.; Kreuter, A. Differential mRNA expression of antimicrobial peptides and proteins in atopic dermatitis as compared to psoriasis vulgaris and healthy skin. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2008, 147, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kisich, K.O.; Carspecken, C.W.; Fiéve, S.; Boguniewicz, M.; Leung, D.Y. Defective killing of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis is associated with reduced mobilization of human β-defensin-3. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 122, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nomura, I.; Goleva, E.; Howell, M.D.; Hamid, Q.A.; Ong, P.Y.; Hall, C.F.; Darst, M.A.; Gao, B.; Boguniewicz, M.; Travers, J.B.; et al. Cytokine milieu of atopic dermatitis, as compared to psoriasis, skin prevents induction of innate immune response genes. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 3262–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Howell, M.D.; Gallo, R.L.; Boguniewicz, M.; Jones, J.F.; Wong, C.; Streib, J.E.; Leung, D.Y. Cytokine milieu of atopic dermatitis skin subverts the innate immune response to vaccinia virus. Immunity 2006, 24, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Yang, D.; Chertov, O.; Bykovskaia, S.N.; Chen, Q.; Buffo, M.J.; Shogan, J.; Anderson, M.; Schröder, J.M.; Wang, J.M.; Howard, O.M.; et al. Beta-defensins: Linking innate and adaptive immunity through dendritic and T cell CCR6. Science 1999, 286, 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Röhrl, J.; Yang, D.; Oppenheim, J.J.; Hehlgans, T. Human beta-defensin 2 and 3 and their mouse orthologs induce chemotaxis through interaction with CCR2. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 6688–6694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chen, X.; Niyonsaba, F.; Ushio, H.; Nagaoka, I.; Ikeda, S.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H. Human cathelicidin LL-37 increases vascular permeability in the skin via mast cell activation, and phosphorylates MAP kinases p38 and ERK in mast cells. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2006, 43, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Subramanian, H.; Gupta, K.; Guo, Q.; Price, R.; Ali, H. Mas-related gene X2 (MrgX2) is a novel G protein-coupled receptor for the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in human mast cells: Resistance to receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 44739–44749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Niyonsaba, F.; Ushio, H.; Hara, M.; Yokoi, H.; Tominaga, M.; Takamori, K.; Kajiwara, N.; Saito, H.; Nagaoka, I.; Ogawa, H.; et al. Antimicrobial peptides human β-defensins and cathelicidin LL-37 induce the secretion of a pruritogenic cytokine IL-31 by human mast cells. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 3526–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Umehara, Y.; Kamata, Y.; Tominaga, M.; Niyonsaba, F.; Ogawa, H.; Takamori, K. Cathelicidin LL-37 induces semaphorin 3A expression in human epidermal keratinocytes: Implications for possible application to pruritus. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 2887–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Kanda, N.; Watanabe, S. Increased serum human β-defensin-2 levels in atopic dermatitis: Relationship to IL-22 and oncostatin M. Immunobiol. 2012, 217, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kanda, N.; Hau, C.S.; Tada, Y.; Sato, S.; Watanabe, S. Decreased serum LL-37 and vitamin D3 levels in atopic dermatitis: Relationship between IL-31 and oncostatin M. Allergy 2012, 67, 804–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chen, X.; Niyonsaba, F.; Ushio, H.; Hara, M.; Yokoi, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Saito, H.; Nagaoka, I.; Ikeda, S.; Okumura, K.; et al. Antimicrobial peptides human beta-defensin (hBD)-3 and hBD-4 activate mast cells and increase skin vascular permeability. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chamlin, S.L.; Kao, J.; Frieden, I.J.; Sheu, M.Y.; Fowler, A.J.; Fluhr, J.W.; Williams, M.L.; Elias, P.M. Ceramide-dominant barrier repair lipids alleviate childhood atopic dermatitis: Changes in barrier function provide a sensitive indicator of disease activity. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2002, 47, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Miller, D.W.; Koch, S.B.; Yentzer, B.A.; Clark, A.R.; O’Neill, J.R.; Fountain, J.; Weber, T.M.; Fleischer, A.B., Jr. An over-the-counter moisturizer is as clinically effective as, and more cost-effective than, prescription barrier creams in the treatment of children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: A randomized, controlled trial. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2011, 10, 531–537. [Google Scholar]
  100. Bissonnette, R.; Maari, C.; Provost, N.; Bolduc, C.; Nigen, S.; Rougier, A.; Seite, S. A double-blind study of tolerance and efficacy of a new urea-containing moisturizer in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2010, 9, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Grimalt, R.; Mengeaud, V.; Cambazard, F. The steroid-sparing effect of an emollient therapy in infants with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled study. Dermatology 2006, 214, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Frankel, A.J.; Sohn, A.; Patel, R.V.; Lebwohl, M. Bilateral comparison study of pimecrolimus cream 1% and a ceramide-hyaluronic acid emollient foam in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2011, 10, 666–672. [Google Scholar]
  103. Park, K.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Jeong, M.S.; Li, K.; Seo, S.J. Changes of antimicrobial peptides and transepidermal water loss after topical application of tacrolimus and ceramide-dominant emollient in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Korean Med Sci. 2010, 25, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Katayama, I.; Aihara, M.; Ohya, Y.; Saeki, H.; Shimojo, N.; Shoji, S.; Taniguchi, M.; Yamada, H. Japanese guidelines for atopic dermatitis 2017. Allergol. Int. 2017, 66, 230–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ring, J.; AlOmar, A.; Bieber, T.; Deleuran, M.; Fink-Wagner, A.; Gelmetti, C.; Gieler, U.; Lipozencic, J.; Luger, T.; Oranje, A.; et al. Guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) Part I. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2012, 26, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wollenberg, A.; Barbarot, S.; Bieber, T.; Christen-Zaech, S.; Deleuran, M.; Fink-Wagner, A.; Gieler, U.; Girolomoni, G.; Lau, S.; Muraro, A.; et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: Part I. Pract. Guidel. 2018, 32, 657–682. [Google Scholar]
  107. Yawalkar, S.J.; Schwerzmann, L. Double-blind, comparative clinical trials with halobetasol propionate cream in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1991, 25, 1163–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Eichenfield, L.F.; Basu, S.; Calvarese, B.; Trancik, R.J. Effect of desonide hydrogel 0.05% on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in pediatric subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2007, 24, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yentzer, B.A.; Ade, R.A.; Fountain, J.M.; Clark, A.R.; Taylor, S.L.; Borgerding, E.; Feldman, S.R. Improvement in treatment adherence with a 3-day course of fluocinonide cream 0.1% for atopic dermatitis. Cutis 2010, 86, 208–213. [Google Scholar]
  110. Callen, J.; Chamlin, S.; Eichenfield, L.; Ellis, C.; Girardi, M.; Goldfarb, M.; Hanifin, J.; Lee, P.; Margolis, D.; Paller, A.S.; et al. A systematic review of the safety of topical therapies for atopic dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 156, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Sheu, H.M.; Lee, J.Y.; Chai, C.Y.; Kuo, K.W. Depletion of stratum corneum intercellular lipid lamellae and barrier function abnormalities after long-term topical corticosteroids. Br. J. Dermatol. 1997, 136, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kao, J.S.; Fluhr, J.W.; Man, M.-Q.; Fowler, A.J.; Hachem, J.-P.; Crumrine, D.; Ahn, S.K.; Brown, B.E.; Elias, P.M.; Feingold, K.R. Short-term glucocorticoid treatment compromises both permeability barrier homeostasis and stratum corneum integrity: Inhibition of epidermal lipid synthesis accounts for functional abnormalities. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2003, 120, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Aberg, K.M.; Radek, K.A.; Choi, E.-H.; Kim, D.-K.; Demerjian, M.; Hupe, M.; Kerbleski, J.; Gallo, R.L.; Ganz, T.; Mauro, T.; et al. Psychological stress downregulates epidermal antimicrobial peptide expression and increases severity of cutaneous infections in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2007, 117, 3339–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Eichenfield, L.; Tom, W.; Chamlin, S.; Feldman, S.; Hanifin, J.; Simpson, E.; Berfer, T.; Bergman, J.; Cohen, D.; Cooper, K.; et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 1. Diagnosis and assessement of atopic dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 70, 338–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Cury-Martins, J.; Martins, C.; Aoki, V.; Góis, A.F.; Ishii, H.; Da Silva, E.M. Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 2015, 009864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chittock, J.; Brown, K.; Cork, M.; Danby, S.G. Comparing the effect of a twice-weekly tacrolimus and betamethasone valerate dose on the subclinical epidermal barrier defect in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2015, 95, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Büchau, A.S.; Schauber, J.; Hultsch, T.; Stuetz, A.; Gallo, R.L. Pimecrolimus enhances TLR2/6-induced expression of antimicrobial peptides in keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2646–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Sidbury, R.; Davis, D.M.; Cohen, D.E.; Cordoro, K.M.; Berger, T.G.; Bergman, J.N.; Chamlin, S.L.; Cooper, K.D.; Feldman, S.R.; Hanifin, J.M.; et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. Pract. Guideline 2014, 71, 327–349. [Google Scholar]
  119. Garritsen, F.; Brouwer, M.; Limpens, J.; Spuls, P.I. Photo(chemo)therapy in the management of atopic dermatitis: An updated systematic review with implications for practice and research. Br. J. Dermatol. 2014, 170, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Rubiano, M.O.; Arenas, C.M.; Chalela, J.G. UVA-1 phototherapy for the management of atopic dermatitis: A large retrospective study conducted in a low-middle income country. Int. J. Dermatol. 2018, 57, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hong, S.P.; Kim, M.J.; Jung, M.-Y.; Jeon, H.; Goo, J.; Ahn, S.K.; Lee, S.H.; Elias, P.M.; Choi, E.H. Biopositive effects of low-dose UVB on epidermis: Coordinate upregulation of antimicrobial peptides and permeability barrier reinforcement. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2880–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Gambichler, T.; Skrygan, M.; Tomi, N.; Altmeyer, P.; Kreuter, A. Changes of antimicrobial peptide mRNA expression in atopic eczema following phototherapy. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006, 155, 1275–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Vähävihu, K.; Ala-Houhala, M.; Perić, M.; Karisola, P.; Kautiainen, H.; Hasan, T.; Snellman, E.; Alenius, H.; Schauber, J.; Reunala, T. Narrowband ultraviolet B treatment improves vitamin D balance and alters antimicrobial peptide expression in skin lesions of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010, 163, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. De Jongh, G.J.; Zeeuwen, P.L.; Kucharekova, M.; Pfundt, R.; Van Der Valk, P.G.; Blokx, W.A.; Dogan, A.; Hiemstra, P.; Van De Kerkhof, P.C.; Schalkwijk, J. High expression levels of keratinocyte antimicrobial proteins in psoriasis compared with atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2005, 125, 1163–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Jensen, J.-M.; Ahrens, K.; Meingassner, J.; Scherer, A.; Braeutigam, M.; Stütz, A.; Schwarz, T.; Fölster-Holst, R.; Harder, J.; Gläser, R.; et al. Differential suppression of epidermal antimicrobial protein expression in atopic dermatitis and in EFAD mice by pimecrolimus compared to corticosteroids. Exp. Dermatol. 2011, 20, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Howell, M.D.; Wollenberg, A.; Gallo, R.L.; Flaig, M.; Streib, J.E.; Wong, C.; Pavicic, T.; Boguniewicz, M.; Leung, D.Y. Cathelicidin deficiency predisposes to eczema herpeticum. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 117, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Hazrati, E.; Galen, B.; Lu, W.; Wang, W.; Ouyang, Y.; Keller, M.J.; Lehrer, R.I.; Herold, B.C. Human alpha- and beta-defensins block multiple steps in herpes simplex virus infection. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 8658–8666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Harder, J.; Bartels, J.; Christophers, E.; Schroder, J.M. Isolation and characterization of human beta -defensin-3, a novel human inducible peptide antibiotic. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 5707–5713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Vandamme, D.; Landuyt, B.; Luyten, W.; Schoofs, L. A comprehensive summary of LL-37, the factoctum human cathelicidin peptide. Cell. Immunol. 2012, 280, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kang, J.; Dietz, M.J.; Li, B. Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 is bactericidal against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Meyer-Hoffert, U.; Schwarz, T.; Schroder, J.M.; Glaser, R. Increased expression of human beta-defensin 3 in mollusca contagiosum. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2010, 35, 190–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kirschner, N.; Poetzl, C.; Driesch, P.V.D.; Wladykowski, E.; Moll, I.; Behne, M.J.; Brandner, J.M. Alteration of tight junction proteins is an early event in psoriasis. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Kubo, A.; Nagao, K.; Yokouchi, M.; Sasaki, H.; Amagai, M. External antigen uptake by Langerhans cells with reorganization of epidermal tight junction barriers. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 2937–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Kirschner, N.; Houdek, P.; Fromm, M.; Moll, I.; Brandner, J.M. Tight junctions form a barrier in human epidermis. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 89, 839–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ishida-Yamamoto, A.; Kishibe, M.; Murakami, M.; Honma, M.; Takahashi, H.; Iizuka, H. Lamellar granule secretion starts before the establishment of eight junction barrier for paracellular tracers in mammalian epidermis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sugawara, T.; Iwamoto, N.; Akashi, M.; Kojima, T.; Hisatsune, J.; Sugai, M.; Furuse, M. Tight junction dysfunction in the stratum granulosum leads to aberrant stratum corneum barrier function in claudin-1-deficient mice. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2013, 70, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yokouchi, M.; Kubo, A.; Kawasaki, H.; Yoshida, K.; Ishii, K.; Furuse, M.; Amagai, M. Epidermal tight junction barrier function is altered by skin inflammation, but not by filaggrin-deficient stratum corneum. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2015, 77, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chen, X.; Takai, T.; Xie, Y.; Niyonsaba, F.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H. Human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 modulates proinflammatory responses induced by cytokine milieus and double-stranded RNA in human keratinocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 433, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sugarman, J.L.; Parish, L.C. Efficacy of a lipid-based barrier repair formulation in moderate-to-severe pediatric atopic dermatitis. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2009, 8, 1106–1111. [Google Scholar]
  140. Lowe, A.J.; Su, J.C.; Allen, K.J.; Abramson, M.J.; Cranswick, N.; Robertson, C.F.; Forster, D.; Varigos, G.; Hamilton, S.; Kennedy, R.; et al. A randomized trial of a barrier lipid replacement strategy for the prevention of atopic dermatitis and allergic sensitization: The PEBBLES pilot study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 178, e19–e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 07607 g001 550
Figure 1. Components of the cutaneous barrier. DC: dendritic cell, ILC: innate lymphoid cell, NKC: natural killer cell, NMF: natural moisturizing factor; Treg: regulatory T-cell; Trm: resident-memory T-cell.
Figure 1. Components of the cutaneous barrier. DC: dendritic cell, ILC: innate lymphoid cell, NKC: natural killer cell, NMF: natural moisturizing factor; Treg: regulatory T-cell; Trm: resident-memory T-cell.
Ijms 21 07607 g001
Ijms 21 07607 g002 550
Figure 2. Pathogenic factors of AD and their interactions in skin lesions. AMP: antimicrobial peptide; DC: dendritic cell; FLG: filaggrin; HSV: herpes simplex virus; ILC: innate lymphoid cell; TEWL: transepidermal water loss; Th: T-helper cell; TJ: tight junction.
Figure 2. Pathogenic factors of AD and their interactions in skin lesions. AMP: antimicrobial peptide; DC: dendritic cell; FLG: filaggrin; HSV: herpes simplex virus; ILC: innate lymphoid cell; TEWL: transepidermal water loss; Th: T-helper cell; TJ: tight junction.
Ijms 21 07607 g002
Ijms 21 07607 g003 550
Figure 3. Involvement of antimicrobial peptides in skin barrier restoration in patients with AD. AMP: antimicrobial peptide; FLG: filaggrin; TEWL: transepidermal water loss; Th: T-helper cell; TJ: tight junction.
Figure 3. Involvement of antimicrobial peptides in skin barrier restoration in patients with AD. AMP: antimicrobial peptide; FLG: filaggrin; TEWL: transepidermal water loss; Th: T-helper cell; TJ: tight junction.
Ijms 21 07607 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, H.L.T.; Trujillo-Paez, J.V.; Umehara, Y.; Yue, H.; Peng, G.; Kiatsurayanon, C.; Chieosilapatham, P.; Song, P.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H.; et al. Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Skin Barrier Repair in Individuals with Atopic Dermatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207607

AMA Style

Nguyen HLT, Trujillo-Paez JV, Umehara Y, Yue H, Peng G, Kiatsurayanon C, Chieosilapatham P, Song P, Okumura K, Ogawa H, et al. Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Skin Barrier Repair in Individuals with Atopic Dermatitis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(20):7607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Hai Le Thanh, Juan Valentin Trujillo-Paez, Yoshie Umehara, Hainan Yue, Ge Peng, Chanisa Kiatsurayanon, Panjit Chieosilapatham, Pu Song, Ko Okumura, Hideoki Ogawa, and et al. 2020. "Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Skin Barrier Repair in Individuals with Atopic Dermatitis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 20: 7607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207607

APA Style

Nguyen, H. L. T., Trujillo-Paez, J. V., Umehara, Y., Yue, H., Peng, G., Kiatsurayanon, C., Chieosilapatham, P., Song, P., Okumura, K., Ogawa, H., Ikeda, S., & Niyonsaba, F. (2020). Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Skin Barrier Repair in Individuals with Atopic Dermatitis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(20), 7607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop