Exosome/Liposome-like Nanoparticles: New Carriers for CRISPR Genome Editing in Plants
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
- The authors should work on the organization of their ideas, as the article feels like ideas are all over the place.
- Look for more citations, there are a number of long paragraphs with absolutely no citation.
- There are a number of incomplete/hanging sentences.
- Some of the paragraphs and sentences do do connect at all.
- Find a native English speaker to revise the English in the article.
- Choose and stick to one citation style, use either numbering or names but not both.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Our response to your valued comments is attached
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
This manuscript is a comprehensive review regarding CRISPR/Cas9 system in genetic engineering for plants. This review is well-written but has some grammatical errors and typos. I also suggest the authors add one following reference in Section 8 or 9, regarding recent technology on a direct delivery of Cas9/gRNA ribonucleoprotein in plants.
- Odahara et al. ACS Applied Nano Materials DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c00695
After minor revision regarding following points, I think the manuscript would be more attractive and suitable for publication as the review paper in IJMS.
As minor points:
- Page 3 Line 26, SpCas9 is misspelling?
- Page 3 Line 37, the abbreviations crRNA and tracrRNA should be explained at the first usage through the manuscript.
- Page 4, the bottom lines, I am not sure if the authors directly cite website addresses in the manuscript.
- Page 6, Line 24 and 34, reference numbering is weird (21x, 23x).
- Page 9, In Figure 2 caption, Mrna should read mRNA.
- Page 10, Line 33, a reference (Monstafa et al 2021) is not referred in a correct format.
- Page 12, in the second sentence: please revise spacing and the punctuation.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Our response to your valued comments is attached