Next Article in Journal
Loss of ZNF677 Expression Is an Independent Predictor for Distant Metastasis in Middle Eastern Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Biochemical Studies of Mitochondrial Malate: Quinone Oxidoreductase from Toxoplasma gondii
Previous Article in Special Issue
PLEKHA8P1 Promotes Tumor Progression and Indicates Poor Prognosis of Liver Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms22157829
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in Cancer—Is There a Possible Role in Gynecological Malignancies?

by
Riccardo Di Fiore
1,2,*,
Sherif Suleiman
1,
Rosa Drago-Ferrante
3,
Ana Felix
4,
Sharon A. O’Toole
5,
John J. O’Leary
6,
Mark P. Ward
6,
James Beirne
7,
Angel Yordanov
8,
Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva
9,
Yashwanth Subbannayya
10,
Francesca Pentimalli
11,
Antonio Giordano
2,12 and
Jean Calleja-Agius
1,*
1
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta
2
Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
3
BioDNA Laboratories, Malta Life Sciences Park, SGN 3000 San Gwann, Malta
4
Department of Pathology, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa, NOVA Medical School, University NOVA of Lisbon, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal
5
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland
6
Department of Histopathology, Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Trinity College Dublin and Coombe Women’s and Infants University Hospital, D08 RX0X Dublin, Ireland
7
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, St James Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, D08 X4RX Dublin, Ireland
8
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
9
Department of Breast Surgery, Acibadem City Clinic, 1750 Sofia, Bulgaria
10
Centre of Molecular Inflammation Research (CEMIR), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine (IKOM), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
11
Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy
12
Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(15), 7829; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157829
Submission received: 10 June 2021 / Revised: 9 July 2021 / Accepted: 17 July 2021 / Published: 22 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Noncoding RNAs in Cancer: From Cancer Stem Cells to Invasion and Metastases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gynecological cancers (GCs) are currently among the major threats to female health. Moreover, there are different histologic subtypes of these cancers, which are defined as ‘rare’ due to an annual incidence of <6 per 100,000 women. The majority of these tend to be associated with a poor prognosis. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a critical role in the normal development of organisms as well as in tumorigenesis. LncRNAs can be classified into tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes, depending on their function within the cellular context and the signaling pathways in which they are involved. These regulatory RNAs are potential therapeutic targets for cancer due to their tissue and tumor specificity. However, there still needs to be a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which lncRNAs are involved in the regulation of numerous biological functions in humans, both in normal health and disease. The lncRNA Mortal Obligate RNA Transcript (MORT; alias ZNF667-AS1) has been identified as a tumor-related lncRNA. ZNF667-AS1 gene, located in the human chromosome region 19q13.43, has been shown to be silenced by DNA hypermethylation in several cancers. In this review, we report on the biological functions of ZNF667-AS1 from recent studies and describe the regulatory functions of ZNF667-AS1 in human disease, including cancer. Furthermore, we discuss the emerging insights into the potential role of ZNF667-AS1 as a biomarker and novel therapeutic target in cancer, including GCs (ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers).

1. Introduction

Gynecological cancers (GCs) arise from the female reproductive organs and include tubo-ovarian, cervical, uterine, vaginal, and vulvar cancers. One of the main risk factors is the age at presentation, with increasing age being directly related to increased risk of developing GCs [1]. Even though signs and symptoms may overlap, each GC may present with different risk factors and might require different therapeutic approaches [2,3]. The mortality rate among patients with GCs is high because many cancers are detected at an advanced stage [1].
Histologically, different types of tubo-ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers have distinct pathological behavioral patterns that place these tumors into a ‘rare’ category, with an annual incidence of <6 per 100,000 women [4]. Rare gynecological cancers (RGCs) represent over 50% of all gynecologic tumors, which is in contrast with other common solid tumors [5]. RGCs tend to be associated with poor prognosis, and given their rarity and, thus, low incidence in the case of each respective entity, there is a greater risk of delayed diagnosis due to clinical inexperience and the lack of availability of therapeutic options. These are a few of the main challenges in the management of patients with RGCs [5,6,7,8]. Another major hurdle in developing standardized clinical management guidance is the fact that the treatment of RGCs tends to be based on expert opinion, retrospective studies, or extrapolation from other tumor sites with similar histology [5,6].
Despite many studies contributing to understanding disease pathophysiology, research in the field of GCs poses particular scientific and technological difficulties. As such, these challenges require a concerted effort by the scientific and research communities to accelerate the advancement of prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches [6]. Human transcriptomic analyses, by DNA tiling arrays and deep sequencing, have shown that only a minor portion of the genome is transcribed into mRNA, while the vast majority constitutes non-coding RNA (ncRNA) [9,10,11,12]. These ncRNAs are further subdivided into small ncRNA and long ncRNA (lncRNA), based on the nucleotide length, with small ncRNA containing less than 200 nucleotides and lncRNAs exceeding the 200 nucleotides threshold. Furthermore, lncRNAs are transcribed in a similar fashion to the messenger RNA (mRNA) using RNA polymerase II with 5′ end-capping, polyadenylation of the 3′ end tail, and ultimately splicing. Most lncRNAs are likely to be functionally important because they are strictly regulated and evolutionarily conserved [13]. Many studies have shown that lncRNAs have an important role in gene expression. Some short open reading frames of lncRNAs have been shown to encode into micropeptides, which can modify N6-methyladenosine, tumor angiogenesis, cancer metabolism, and signal transduction, and thus have a potential clinical value [14]. Functional studies reveal that the influence on key genes occurs via various mechanisms, such as chromatin modification, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional regulation [15,16]. Furthermore, lncRNAs interact with microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs), mRNAs, proteins, and genomic DNA to bring about physiological and, at times, pathological actions [17,18]. In tumorigenesis, lncRNAs can behave both as tumor suppressors or oncogenes, resulting in up- or downregulation of specific lncRNAs in comparison to corresponding normal tissues [17]. LncRNAs also play regulatory roles in cancer-related pathways, such as the Hedgehog, Wnt, Notch, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, and regulate the plasticity of cancer stem cells [17]. Dysregulation of several lncRNAs has been implicated in different types of cancers, include breast, ovarian, cervical, and prostate cancer. This suggests that lncRNAs could be fundamental as biomarkers for detection of cancer and monitoring prognosis as well therapeutic targets for cancer management [19].
The aim of this review article is to provide an updated overview of the emerging role of mortal obligate RNA transcript (MORT; alias ZNF667 antisense RNA 1 (ZNF667-AS1)), not only as a potential biomarker but also as a therapeutic target for novel oncologic treatments, including management of GCs.

2. LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1): From Discovery to Function

In humans, the ZNF667-AS1 gene is located in the chromosome region 19q13.43 (Figure 1), at position 56,477,874–56,495,437 (Assembly GRCh38.p13) within a cluster of zinc finger genes [20]. Its 1.53 kb RNA consists of a 16 kb intron in between 2 exons of 260 and 1270 bp. The majority of the second ZNF667-AS1 exon consists of repetitive elements—two LINEs (L2 and L1MB3) and an LTR (LTR47B) element [20]. Even though the ZNF667-AS1 promoter is in a CpG island, which is shared with the non-homologous ZNF667 gene, ZNF667-AS1 and ZNF667 genes do not overlap [20].
The molecular function of ZNF667-AS1 remains poorly understood; however, ZNF667-AS1 is preferentially expressed in the cell cytoplasm and may be involved in the regulation of protein translation via interaction with RNA-binding proteins [20]. Vrba et al. have shown that ZNF667-AS1 silencing occurs prior to malignant transformation [20]. The study also demonstrates that ZNF667-AS1 is ubiquitously expressed in normal healthy cells, but is lost when the cells are immortalized, and that ZNF667-AS1 gene silencing occurs following DNA hypermethylation of its promoter. Overall, these findings suggest that ZNF667-AS1 has a potential tumor-suppressive mechanism of action.

3. The Functional Role of LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in Human Diseases

ZNF667-AS1 has also been associated with the pathogenesis of several other human diseases. It has been observed that ZNF667-AS1 inhibits inflammation following spinal cord injury and, in turn, promotes faster recovery via the suppression of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway [21]. This pathway is involved in several key biological processes, including cell differentiation, proliferation, immune regulation, and apoptosis [21]. A deep transcriptomic profiling of macroscopically normal human Achilles’ tendon samples from young and old patients revealed a significantly reduced expression of ZNF667-AS1 in older subjects. Changes observed in lncRNAs might be a contributing factor in age-related degeneration often seen in tendons [22]. A bioinformatics study using gene ontology and KEGG enrichment analysis of genes shows that, in asthmatic patients, the level of ZNF667-AS1 is downregulated when compared to healthy controls. This suggests that it may play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma [23]. ZNF667-AS1 was found to be upregulated in the plasma of patients with myocardial infarction when compared with healthy controls. ZNF667-AS1 was found to increase cardiomyocyte cell death mediated by the downregulation of miR-93 [24]. Furthermore, high levels of ZNF667-AS1 were found to correlate with a relatively lower recurrence rate of periodontitis. ZNF667-AS1 was found to regulate the proliferation of periodontal ligamental stem cells isolated from periodontitis-affected teeth [25].
In cancer, ZNF667-AS1 has been implicated in both promoting tumor progression and tumor suppression depending on the cancer type [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] (Table 1). In laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), decreased ZNF667-AS1 levels were associated with increased migration and invasion together with increased levels of mesenchymal markers and a reduction in epithelial markers. These data suggest that part of ZNF667-AS1′s mechanism of action may lie in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process [26]. In oral squamous cell carcinoma, overexpression of ZNF667-AS1 inhibits proliferation through the downregulation of Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) [27]. Chen et al. has shown that overexpression of ZNF667-AS1 with subsequent binding of miRNA-1290 resulted in increased expression of the actin-binding LIM protein 1 (ABLIM1) and suppression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) progression [28]. The fact that the downregulation of ZNF667-AS1 exhibits an inhibitory effect on the viability, invasion, and migration of esophageal cancer cells suggests that it plays a tumor suppressor role in esophageal cancers [29]. Yang et al. investigated the role of ZNF667-AS1 and its potential mechanism with MEGF10 [30], a type I transmembrane protein consisting of 17 EGF-like domains in the extracellular region, which has increased expression in the central nervous system, retina, myoblasts, and muscle satellite cells in tissues derived from uveal melanoma (UM). A reduced expression of ZNF667-AS1 has been shown in UM tissues and its downregulation is correlated with poor prognosis, indicating that ZNF667-AS1 may have an inhibitory role in the development of UM via the regulation of cellular aggressiveness [30]. Huang et al. investigated the role of ZNF667-AS1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), where it was shown that ZNF667-AS1 is downregulated, while miRNA-223 is upregulated [31]. Moreover, the expression of ZNF667-AS1 is significantly affected by tumor metastasis, but not by the tumor size. The expression of ZNF667-AS1 and miRNA-223 is also inversely correlated in LUAD with overexpression of ZNF667-AS1 inhibiting the invasion and migration of LUAD cells, whereas overexpression of miRNA-223 has an opposite effect. These findings suggest that ZNF667-AS1 may inhibit cancer cell migration and invasion in LUAD via the downregulation of miRNA-223. Zhuang et al. found that ZNF667-AS1 and ankyrin 2 (ANK2) were downregulated in colorectal carcinoma [32]. Downregulated ZNF667-AS1 expression is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. In turn, ZNF667-AS1 overexpression was shown to inhibit the proliferation, invasion, and migration of VOLO cells in vitro and in vivo, as well as down- and upregulated Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and ANK2, respectively [32]. In essence, ZNF667-AS1 interaction with ANK2/JAK2 could be an important driver of colorectal carcinogenesis. A similar study demonstrated that both ZNF667-AS1 downregulation in the tumor tissues and low expression of ZNF667-AS1 are associated with low overall survival rate of patients with colon cancer [33]. Moreover, the overexpression of ZNF667-AS1 resulted in decreased invasion and migration rates of colon cancer cells, whereas treatment with transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) resulted in increased invasion and migration rates of the same cancer cells. Therefore, it is postulated that ZNF667-AS1 inhibits the invasion and migration of colon cancer cells by inactivating TGF-β1 [33]. Another study demonstrated that ZNF667-AS1 is downregulated in bladder cancer, whereas miR-146a-5p is upregulated. Moreover, miR-146a-5p and ZNF667-AS1 seem to function antagonistically with overexpression of miR-146a-5p promoting the invasion, migration, and proliferation of bladder cancer cells, whereas overexpression of ZNF667-AS1 resulted in inhibition of the migratory and proliferative capacity of the cancer cells. Overall, the study suggests that ZNF667-AS1 may modulate the behavior of bladder cancer cells via the downregulation of miR-146a-5p [34]. Lu et al. demonstrated that ZNF667-AS1 expression was downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while the expression of NOTCH1 was upregulated [35]. ZNF667-AS1 and NOTCH1 were also inversely correlated across HCC tissues. Moreover, ZNF667-AS1 expression was lower in metastatic HCC patients than nonmetastatic HCC patients. Furthermore, ZNF667-AS1 overexpression inhibited the migration and invasion of HCC cells, while NOTCH1 overexpression promoted the migration and invasion of HCC cells. This suggests that ZNF667-AS1 overexpression may inhibit HCC by downregulating NOTCH1.
ZNF667-AS1 was found to be upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and predicted poor prognosis [36]. Mechanistically, ZNF667-AS1 acts as a molecular sponge for miR-206 and possibly potentiates AML progression via the targeting of the miR-206/AKAP13 axis. Yuan et al. investigated both the diagnostic value and clinical significance of the ZNF667-AS1 expression in patients with glioma, and their findings suggest that ZNF667-AS1 could be used as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in glioma patients [37].

4. Dysfunction of LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in Gynecological Cancers

Several studies have addressed the role of lncRNAs in GCs [38]. The functional and possible clinical roles of ZNF667-AS1 in GCs are reviewed (Table 2).

4.1. Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the gynecological malignancy with the poorest prognosis [44]. OC has a high mortality rate, which is attributed to the delayed onset of symptoms compounded by lack of effective screening and early detection [45,46,47,48,49]. The incidence of OC varies across the world, with the highest prevalence of 12 per 100,000 in non-Hispanic white women, followed by 10.3 per 100,000 in Hispanic, 9.4 per 100,000 in non-Hispanic black, and 9.2 per 100,000 in Asian/Pacific Islander women [50].
OC is an umbrella term for a highly heterogeneous group of tumors that are behaviorally, morphologically, and molecularly very different. Up to 90% of OCs are of epithelial origin [38]. OC is commonly associated with alterations in TP53 and BRCA1/2, which are linked with an increased risk of cancer and poor prognosis [51,52,53]. In spite of the great efforts made for early detection of OC and the development of radiotherapy, novel chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and multidisciplinary treatments, there still is five-year overall survival rate of less than 50% patients [54]. Thus, the need for highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tools that identify OC at an earlier stage together with the development of new therapeutic approaches are very much needed to improve patient survival rate.
LncRNAs have been investigated in samples of patients with OC using several molecular techniques [55] and compared with samples from healthy patients or adjacent normal tissue in patients with OC. Chen et al. found that ZNF667-AS1 is downregulated, and miRNA-21 is upregulated in tumor tissues relative to adjacent healthy tissues of patients with OC [39]. Such aberrant lncRNA expression has been shown to correlate clinicopathologically. Functionally, the overexpression of ZNF667-AS1 has been shown to suppress the proliferation of OC cells through miRNA-21 inhibition. Although the molecular mechanism of the regulation of miRNA-21 by ZNF667-AS1 is still not understood, this study provides new insights into the underlying pathogenesis of OC.

4.2. Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide [56]. In 2018, over half a million new cases of cervical cancer were reported, with more than 300,000 deaths [56]. Clinically, CC is associated with persistent infection with ‘high-risk’ human papillomaviruses (HPVs). The subtypes HPV16 and HPV18 are responsible for the majority of precancerous cervical lesions and the development of CC [57,58]. Conventional cytology using PAP smears and liquid-based cytology are the main screening tests utilized for the detection of pre-invasive cervical disease [59]. Patients with early-stage CC can be successfully treated with radical hysterectomy without the need for adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, in locally advanced and advanced CC, radical surgery does not improve the chances of survival, and combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the cornerstone of treatment. The disease becomes more difficult to successfully treat as the stage of presentation advances. Although the HPV-associated carcinogenic pathway of cervical cancer is better understood than other gynecological malignancies, further in-depth studies are necessary to aid in the discovery of novel molecular therapeutic targets that would contribute to the management of patients with advanced or recurrent disease.
In CC, there is an aberrant expression of various lncRNAs such as HOTAIR [60], H19 [61], GAS5 [62], CCAT2 [63], ANRIL [64], lncRNA LET [65], and lncRNA-CCHE1 [66]. Li et al. showed that upregulation of ZNF667-AS1 could lead to a reduction in the proliferative and metastatic potential of CC by modulating the miR-93-3p-dependent PEG3. This suggests that this could be a potential therapeutic target for CC treatment [40].
Epigenetic silencing of ZNF667-AS1 in CC is correlated with decreased overall survival and increased tumor bulk [41]. Moreover, the upregulation of ZNF667-AS1 inhibits the proliferation of CC cells. Overall, these findings suggest that ZNF667-AS1 could be used as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target in the management of CC. Zheng et al. established an immune-related lncRNAs (IRLs) signature with a prognostic value for cases of CC [42]. The IRLs could help establish a system whereby CC patients are stratified CC into low- and high-risk groups. In fact, these IRLs, including ZNF667-AS1 among other lncRNAs, significantly correlated with the infiltration of immune cells. These results could provide future immunotherapeutic approaches that may assist with both tumor treatment and tumor prevention.

4.3. Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) includes endometrioid endometrial cancer (80%), clear cell cancer, and uterine serous cancer [67,68]. EC is the second most common type of gynecological tumor [69], comprising 4.8% of worldwide cancer incidence and 2.1% of mortality related to cancer [70]. EC originates in the glandular epithelial cells of the endometrium [71]. Some of the underlying risk factors include early menarche, obesity, diabetes mellitus, dietetic factors nulliparity, late menopause, advanced age, nulliparity, breast cancer tamoxifen therapy, radiotherapy, and high circulating levels of estrogen [72,73,74]. The standard treatment is total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which is usually effective for stage I disease [75]. In advanced stages, surgery is followed by radio- and/or chemotherapy.
There is evidence of the importance of lncRNAs and their inhibitory effects on the proliferation and metastasis of endometrial cancer cells [76,77,78]. Even though the underlying mechanisms of EC cancer initiation and development are not clear, emerging studies highlight the importance of lncRNAs in cancer etiology. Two studies by Vrba et al. [20,43] demonstrated that DNA methylation status of ZNF667-AS1 is linked to tumor progression. Overall, these results present strong circumstantial evidence for a tumor suppressor role for ZNF667-AS1. This gene is among the most common epigenetic aberrations present in human cancers, including EC and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), which is a rare and aggressive variant of endometrial cancer [79,80,81].

5. Epigenetic Silencing of LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in Cancer

The complex multifactorial nature of cancer makes diagnosis and treatment very challenging [82]. The epigenetic basis of cancer development has revolutionized cancer genetics and provided novel therapeutic targets [83,84]. Epigenetic mechanisms involve modification of chromatin structure, conferring differential gene expression without changing the DNA sequence [82]. Epimutations change the genome’s structure and stability. These have been proposed as driver mutations in the initiation of tumors and, in combination with genetic lesions, propagate carcinogenesis [82].
In cancer, epigenetic alterations include aberrant DNA methylation (hypermethylation and hypomethylation), histone modification (acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation), and changes in gene expression by non-coding RNAs [85]. Moreover, several genes that are in charge of proliferation, stem cell differentiation, and apoptosis undergo epigenetic modifications. In particular, the aberrant DNA methylation, catalyzed by the family of DNA methyltransferases (DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B), is commonly linked with genetic instability and carcinogenesis through the inactivation of specific cancer-related genes [82]. Specifically, the abnormal methylation of CpG dinucleotides (CpG islands), which are present in approximately 70% of human promoters, leads to direct interference with RNA polymerase II assembly and transcription factors. DNA methylation can also act as a platform for various chromatin remodeling enzymes, such as histone deacetylases (HDACs), and thus lead to chromatin condensation [86,87]. However, studies show that, during carcinogenesis, there is repression of tumor suppressor genes by hypermethylation of their promoters [88,89].
The ZNF667-AS1 gene, as already described, was found to be a target of epigenetic silencing, specifically at the boundary where finite lifespan human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) transition from mortal to immortal. An important change in gene expression was found during the immortalization step, which involved the downregulation of ZNF667-AS1, secondary to DNA hypermethylation of its CpG island promoter [20]. This was supported by the ability of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, to reactivate the expression of ZNF667-AS1.
The DNA hypermethylation of ZNF667-AS1 and its subsequent gene silencing, has also been identified as an early epigenetic event occurring in human carcinogenesis. This has been observed in cohorts of patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ, suggesting an increased risk of breast cancer transformation and metastasis [90]. It was also reported when comparing colon adenoma and carcinoma cohorts, further confirming that ZNF667-AS1 silencing is likely to occur in the premalignant state [90]. ZNF667-AS1 is known to be frequently silenced in numerous cancers such as melanoma [30], colorectal carcinoma [32], and gastric cancer [91]. In a study characterizing the epigenetic landscape of genes encoding lncRNAs across 6475 tumors and 455 cancer cell lines, ZNF667-AS1 was identified to be a hypermethylated lncRNA in most tumors [92]. Overall, these studies suggest that promoter hypermethylation may be one of the mechanisms in leading to ZNF667-AS1 silencing in cancer.

6. Epigenetic and Gene Therapies for Gynecological Cancer Treatment

ZNF667-AS1 expression is controlled epigenetically and the ZNF667-AS1 loss due to aberrant DNA methylation occurs in several cancers. Several studies suggest that ZNF667-AS1 could serve as a candidate tumor suppressor gene associated with the pathogenesis and progression of several human cancers, including GCs [20,78,90]. Thus, the expression of ZNF667-AS1 could be restored via epigenetic modification, which may suggest therapeutic potential for the treatment of GCs.
Novel therapeutic agents using different modes of action, having synergy with current conventional management, are very much needed, especially in RGCs that carry a poor prognosis. Genetic and epigenetic factors have been shown to have a central role in the development of cancer. Gene therapy approaches have been developed, and these include suicide gene therapy, anti-angiogenic gene therapy, siRNA therapy, immunotherapy, oncolytic virotherapy, pro-apoptotic gene therapy, and gene-directed-enzyme prodrug therapy [93,94].
Epigenetic dysregulation frequently occurs in GCs. This includes histone modifications, altered methylation at CpG islands within gene promoter regions, and global demethylation leading to genome instability [95,96,97,98]. Since the epigenome can be reprogrammed, epigenetic alterations are potentially reversible and have great plasticity, unlike genetic mutations [96,97,98]. Therefore, a promising therapeutic strategy, including the provision of molecular biomarkers for diagnosis, is the possible reprogramming of the epigenome, targeting epigenetic marks and thus changing the cell landscape [83,84,86,88,99,100,101]. Since epigenetic therapies simultaneously target multiple pathways, tumors with complex mutational landscapes may be most responsive to such therapeutic approaches as they are affected by multiple driver mutations. Furthermore, some patients diagnosed with GCs such as ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers may have biomarkers that are potentially sensitive to epigenetic drugs (epi-drugs) [95].
However, the major challenge for epi-drugs is to translate the efficacy in vitro into effective clinical use, which is well tolerated. Several drugs have successfully reactivated otherwise silenced tumor suppressor genes in several cancer cell lines, but failed to achieve a significant response in clinical trials [87,88,102]. Currently, some commonly used epi-drugs, used alone or in combination with other anti-cancer agents, lack specificity and have generated unwanted epigenetic modifications [103,104]. Another stumbling block is the acquired resistance to certain epi-drugs. In the era of personalized medicine, high-throughput mapping technologies allow the genome and epigenome mapping of a specific cell population from an individual patient. This facilitates testing for drug sensitivity, enabling an efficient and specific patient-tailored treatment approach [105].
GCs can also benefit greatly from targeted gene delivery therapies. Gene therapy usually involves directly injecting a gene, or vectors to deliver a gene, into the cells where that specific gene is required. The cell’s gene-reading machinery uses the information in this injected gene to produce RNA and protein molecules [106,107]. The development of safe vectors and optimal delivery to the region of interest determines the successful outcome of this therapy. Several studies have indicated that transcriptional regulatory sequences of the H19 gene are potentially important candidates for cancer gene therapy [108,109,110,111]. H19 is an oncofetal gene that is paternally imprinted and maternally expressed and that encodes a lncRNA. The key feature of H19 is that it is expressed in many human tumor types, but there is little to no expression in normal adult tissues. This suggests a role for H19 in promoting angiogenesis, cancer progression, and metastasis, and targeting the H19 promoter region might be used in gene therapy [112]. This enables the directing of a tumor-selective promoter in conjunction with a cytotoxic gene. The Luc-H19 plasmid carrying a diphtheria toxin subunit regulated by the H19 promoter is effective in early phase studies against several ovarian cancer cell lines and primary cells [109]. The injection of this plasmid into tumor cells can lead to a reduction in tumor size due to the high levels of diphtheria toxin that are produced. Some lncRNAs (e.g., PTENP1, MEG3, or ZNF667-AS1) are downregulated in cancer samples when compared to normal tissues. Thus, in these cases, cancer cells could be treated with the delivery of tumor suppressor RNAs, resulting in the increased expression of the downregulated lncRNAs with subsequent reduction in tumor size and proliferative capacity [112]. However, lncRNA overexpression is usually technically challenging. This is because lncRNA overexpression usually requires vectors and delivery systems able to carry long transgenes with high efficiency of transfection. One possible alternative to circumvent the drawbacks of cell transfection in vivo is to transfect target cells in vitro, which are then transplanted for therapy. In fact, this is carried out in many of the in vivo studies exploring the biological role of lncRNAs [113].

7. Conclusions and Future Directions

GCs continue to have a major impact on the female population. Despite vast improvements in clinical care, survival rates continue to be low for many of these cancers. The development of novel therapies for GCs is of high priority to improve the chances of earlier diagnosis and overall survival. There is a great potential in using lncRNAs for cancer therapy [114]. Despite the increasing amount of research involving lncRNAs, the understanding of their role in GCs is still in its infancy. The dysregulation of many lncRNAs has been linked with clinical features, and this could prove useful for the future development of novel biomarkers for both diagnosis and prognosis. Overall, the studies outlined suggest that ZNF667-AS1 acts as a tumor suppressor in several types of cancer, including GCs (Figure 2) and might be considered as a potential diagnostic marker. It may even prove to be an effective therapeutic target for GCs, including “rare” forms. However, more clinical studies are required to determine the diagnostic and prognostic potential of ZNF667-AS1 in GCs. A deeper understanding of epigenetic changes, particularly involving lncRNAs, are likely to enhance the efficiency of the application of lncRNAs as potential clinical biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.D.F. and J.C.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D.F. and J.C.-A.; writing—review and editing, R.D.F., S.S., R.D.-F., A.F., S.A.O., J.J.O., M.P.W., J.B., A.Y., M.V.-S., Y.S., F.P., A.G. and J.C.-A.; funding acquisition, J.C.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication of this manuscript was funded by the European Cooperation in Science & Technology program (EU COST)–COST Action CA18117: GYNOCARE-“European Network for Gynaecological Rare Cancer Research: From Concept to Cure.” R.D.F., S.S., S.A.O., J.J.O, M.P.W., J.B., A.Y., M.V.-S., Y.S., A.G., and J.C.-A. are Action management committee members and/or form part of Working Groups 1–3, and J.C.-A. is the chairperson of this Action.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable, as no new data on human or animal studies were collected.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable, as no new data on human or animal studies were collected.

Data Availability Statement

This review paper does not report any new data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AMLacute myeloid leukemia
CCcervical cancer
CRCcolorectal carcinoma
ECendometrial cancer
ESCCesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
HPVhuman papillomavirus
IRLsimmune-related lncRNAs
LncRNAlong non-coding RNA
LSCClaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
LUADlung adenocarcinoma
miRNA/miRmicro-RNA
MORTmortal obligate RNA transcript
ncRNAnon-coding RNA
NPCnasopharyngeal carcinoma
OCovarian cancer
OSCCoral squamous cell carcinoma
PAPPapanicolaou
RGCsrare gynecologic cancers
UCSuterine carcinosarcoma
UMuveal melanoma
ZNF667-AS1ZNF667 antisense RNA 1 (head to head)

References

  1. Srivastava, S.K.; Ahmad, A.; Zubair, H.; Miree, O.; Singh, S.; Rocconi, R.P.; Scalici, J.; Singh, A.P. MicroRNAs in gynecological cancers: Small molecules with big implications. Cancer Lett. 2017, 407, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, D.T. EMMPRIN in gynecologic cancers: Pathologic and therapeutic aspects. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 4883–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maheshwari, A.; Kumar, N.; Mahantshetty, U. Gynecological cancers: A summary of published Indian data. South. Asian J. Cancer 2016, 5, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mandilaras, V.; Karakasis, K.; Clarke, B.; Amit Oza, A.; Lheureux, S. Rare tumors in gynaecological cancers and the lack of therapeutic options and clinical trials. Expert Opin. Orphan Drugs 2017, 5, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ray-Coquard, I.; Trama, A.; Seckl, M.J.; Fotopoulou, C.; Pautier, P.; Pignata, S.; Kristensen, G.; Mangili, G.; Falconer, H.; Massuger, L.; et al. Rare ovarian tumours: Epidemiology, treatment challenges in and outside a network setting. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 45, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Di Fiore, R.; Suleiman, S.; Ellul, B.; O’Toole, S.A.; Savona-Ventura, C.; Felix, A.; Napolioni, V.; Conlon, N.T.; Kahramanoglu, I.; Azzopardi, M.J.; et al. GYNOCARE Update: Modern Strategies to Improve Diagnosis and Treatment of Rare Gynecologic Tumors-Current Challenges and Future Directions. Cancers 2021, 13, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cancer Research UK. Available online: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org (accessed on 20 February 2021).
  8. Rare Cancers Europe. Available online: https://www.rarecancerseurope.org (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  9. Andersen, R.E.; Lim, D.A. Forging our understanding of lncRNAs in the brain. Cell Tissue Res. 2017, 371, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Isin, M.; Dalay, N. LncRNAs and neoplasia. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 444, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, Y.; Yangyang, Z.; Lu, J.; Song, G.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhaohui, L.; Shen, B.; Huang, X.; Zhu, H.; et al. Opposing Roles for the lncRNA Haunt and Its Genomic Locus in Regulating HOXA Gene Activation during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Blokhin, I.; Khorkova, O.; Hsiao, J.; Wahlestedt, C. Developments in lncRNA drug discovery: Where are we heading? Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2018, 13, 837–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tornesello, M.L.; Faraonio, R.; Buonaguro, L.; Annunziata, C.; Starita, N.; Cerasuolo, A.; Pezzuto, F.; Tornesello, A.L.; Buonaguro, F.M. The Role of microRNAs, Long Non-coding RNAs, and Circular RNAs in Cervical Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ye, M.; Zhang, J.; Wei, M.; Liu, B.; Dong, K. Emerging role of long noncoding RNA-encoded micropeptides in cancer. Cancer Cell. Int. 2020, 20, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Patty, B.J.; Hainer, S.J. Non-Coding RNAs and Nucleosome Remodeling Complexes: An Intricate Regulatory Relationship. Biology 2020, 9, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yao, R.W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.L. Cellular functions of long noncoding RNAs. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, Y.; Luo, M.; Brooks, M.; Clouthier, S.G.; Wicha, M.S. Biological and clinical significance of cancer stem cell plasticity. Clin. Transl. Med. 2014, 3, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ørom, U.A.; Shiekhattar, R. Long noncoding RNAs usher in a new era in the biology of enhancers. Cell 2013, 154, 1190–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wahlestedt, C. Targeting long non-coding RNA to therapeutically upregulate gene expression. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vrba, L.; Garbe, J.C.; Stampfer, M.R.; Futscher, B.W. A lincRNA connected to cell mortality and epigenetically-silenced in most common human cancers. Epigenetics 2015, 10, 1074–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, J.W.; Kuang, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.F. LncRNA ZNF667-AS1 inhibits inflammatory response and promotes recovery of spinal cord injury via suppressing JAK-STAT pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 22, 7614–7620. [Google Scholar]
  22. Peffers, M.J.; Fang, Y.; Cheung, K.; Wei, T.K.; Clegg, P.D.; Birch, H.L. Transcriptome analysis of ageing in uninjured human Achilles tendon. Arthritis Res. 2015, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Jiang, N.; Gao, J. Integrative analysis of the contribution of mRNAs and long non-coding RNAs to the pathogenesis of asthma. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 2617–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lv, J.; Zhu, Y.; Yao, S. LncRNAMORT is upregulated in myocardial infarction and promotes the apoptosis of cardiomyocyte by downregulating miR-93. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2020, 20, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, P.; Cai, C.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Cai, Q. Long non-coding RNAs mortal obligate RNA transcript regulates the proliferation of human periodontal ligament stem cells and affects the recurrence of periodontitis. Arch. Oral. Biol. 2019, 105, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Meng, W.; Cui, W.; Zhao, L.; Chi, W.; Cao, H.; Wang, B. Aberrant methylation and downregulation of ZNF667-AS1 and ZNF667 promote the malignant progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 26, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jin, Z.; Jiang, S.; Jian, S.; Shang, Z. Long noncoding RNA MORT overexpression inhibits cancer cell proliferation in oral squamous cell carcinoma by downregulating ROCK1. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chen, X.; Huang, Y.; Shi, D.; Nie, C.; Luo, Y.; Guo, L.; Zou, Y.; Xie, C. LncRNA ZNF667-AS1 Promotes ABLIM1 Expression by Adsorbing microRNA-1290 to Suppress Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Progression. Onco Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 4397–4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dong, Z.; Li, S.; Wu, X.; Niu, Y.; Liang, X.; Yang, L.; Guo, Y.; Shen, S.; Liang, J.; Guo, W. Aberrant hypermethylation-mediated downregulation of antisense lncRNA ZNF667-AS1 and its sense gene ZNF667 correlate with progression and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Yang, H.; Cai, M.Y.; Rong, H.; Ma, L.R.; Xu, Y.L. ZNF667-AS1, a positively regulating MEGF10, inhibits the progression of uveal melanoma by modulating cellular aggressiveness. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2021, e22732. [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang, Y.; Zhuang, Q.; Zhuang, W. Mortal Obligate RNA Transcript Inhibits Cancer Cell Invasion and Migration in Lung Adenocarcinoma by Downregulating miRNA-223. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2020, 35, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhuang, L.; Ding, W.; Ding, W.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, X.; Xi, D. lncRNA ZNF667-AS1 (NR_036521.1) inhibits the progression of colorectal cancer via regulating ANK2/JAK2 expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 2178–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, T.; Wu, L.; Zong, Z.; Ma, N.; Li, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Chen, S. Long non-coding RNA mortal obligate RNA transcript inhibits the migration and invasion of colon cancer cells by inactivating transforming growth factor β1. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 1131–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Ji, L.; Wang, G.; Niu, X.; Sun, S. lncRNA MORT Regulates Bladder Cancer Behaviors by Downregulating MicroRNA-146a-5p. Nephron 2020, 144, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, X.; Ge, G.; Ji, F.; Wang, J. LncRNA MORT Overexpression Inhibits Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Downregulating NOTCH1. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, N.; Feng, Y.; Xie, J.; Han, H.; Dong, Q.; Wang, W. Long Non-Coding RNA ZNF667-AS1 Knockdown Curbs Liver Metastasis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Regulating the microRNA-206/AKAP13 Axis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 13285–13300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuan, Q.; Gao, C.; Lai, X.D.; Chen, L.Y.; Lai, T.B. Analysis of Long Noncoding RNA ZNF667-AS1 as a Potential Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Glioma Patients. Dis. Markers 2020, 2020, 8895968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hosseini, E.S.; Meryet-Figuiere, M.; Sabzalipoor, H.; Kashani, H.H.; Nikzad, H.; Asemi, Z. Dysregulated expression of long noncoding RNAs in gynecologic cancers. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chen, X.; Wu, W.; Cao, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, W.; Deng, C.; Huang, Z. lncRNA mortal obligate RNA transcript was downregulated in ovarian carcinoma and inhibits cancer cell proliferation by downregulating miRNA-21. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, Y. Long noncoding RNA ZNF667-AS1 reduces tumor invasion and metastasis in cervical cancer by counteracting microRNA-93-3p-dependent PEG3 downregulation. Mol. Oncol. 2019, 13, 2375–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhao, L.P.; Li, R.H.; Han, D.M.; Zhang, X.Q.; Nian, G.X.; Wu, M.X.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Z.G. Independent prognostic Factor of low-expressed LncRNA ZNF667-AS1 for cervical cancer and inhibitory function on the proliferation of cervical cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 21, 5353–5360. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zheng, J.; Cao, B.; Zhang, X.; Niu, Z.; Tong, J. Immune-Related Four-lncRNA Signature for Patients with Cervical Cancer. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 3641231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vrba, L.; Futscher, B.W. Epigenetic silencing of lncRNA MORT in 16 TCGA cancer types. F1000Research 2018, 7, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Coburn, S.B.; Bray, F.; Sherman, M.E.; Trabert, B. International patterns and trends in ovarian cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 2451–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Yoneda, A.; Lendorf, M.E.; Couchman, J.R.; Multhaupt, H.A. Breast and ovarian cancers: A survey and possible roles for the cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Jacobs, I.J.; Menon, U. Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2004, 3, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Badgwell, D.; Bast, J.R.C. Early detection of ovarian cancer. Dis. Markers 2007, 23, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lowe, K.A.; Chia, V.M.; Taylor, A.; O’Malley, C.; Kelsh, M.; Mohamed, M.; Mowat, F.S.; Goff, B. An international assessment of ovarian cancer incidence and mortality. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013, 130, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hunn, J.; Rodriguez, G.C. Ovarian cancer: Etiology, risk factors, and epidemiology. Clin. Obs. Gynecol. 2012, 55, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Torre, L.A.; Trabert, B.; DeSantis, C.E.; Miller, K.D.; Samimi, G.; Runowicz, C.D.; Gaudet, M.M.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mota, A.; S Oltra, S.; Moreno-Bueno, G. Insight updating of the molecular hallmarks in ovarian carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer Suppl. 2020, 15, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vaughan, S.; Coward, J.I.; Bast, R.C., Jr.; Berchuck, A.; Berek, J.S.; Brenton, J.D.; Coukos, G.; Crum, C.C.; Drapkin, R.; Etemadmoghadam, D.; et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer: Recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Bowtell, D.D.; Böhm, S.; Ahmed, A.A.; Aspuria, P.J.; Bast, R.C., Jr.; Beral, V.; Berek, J.S.; Birrer, M.J.; Blagden, S.; Bookman, M.A.; et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer II: Reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Salamini-Montemurri, M.; Lamas-Maceiras, M.; Barreiro-Alonso, A.; Vizoso-Vázquez, Á.; Rodríguez-Belmonte, E.; Quindós-Varela, M.; Cerdán, M.E. The Challenges and Opportunities of LncRNAs in Ovarian Cancer Research and Clinical Use. Cancers 2020, 12, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Hull, R.; Mbele, M.; Makhafola, T.; Hicks, C.; Wang, S.M.; Reis, R.M.; Mehrotra, R.; Mkhize-Kwitshana, Z.; Kibiki, G.; Bates, D.O.; et al. Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 20, 2058–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Frazer, I.H. Prevention of cervical cancer through papillomavirus vaccination. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kokka, F.; Bryant, A.; Brockbank, E.; Jeyarajah, A. Surgical treatment of stage IA2 cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, CD010870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Peirson, L.; Fitzpatrick-Lewis, D.; Ciliska, D.; Warren, R. Screening for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 2013, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Liu, M.; Jia, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Fan, R. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR promotes cervical cancer progression through regulating BCL2 via targeting miR-143–3p. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2018, 19, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Kim, S.J.; Park, S.E.; Lee, C.; Lee, S.Y.; Jo, J.H.; Kim, J.M.; Oh, Y.K. Alterations in promoter usage and expression levels of insulin-like growth factor-II and H19 genes in cervical carcinoma exhibiting biallelic expression of IGF-II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1586, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gao, J.; Liu, L.; Li, G.; Cai, M.; Tan, C.; Han, X.; Han, L. LncRNA GAS5 confers the radio sensitivity of cervical cancer cells via regulating miR-106b/IER3 axis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 994–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ling, H.; Spizzo, R.; Atlasi, Y.; Nicoloso, M.; Shimizu, M.; Redis, R.S.; Nishida, N.; Gafà, R.; Song, J.; Guo, Z.; et al. CCAT2, a novel noncoding RNA mapping to 8q24, underlies metastatic progression and chromosomal instability in colon cancer. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 1446–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, D.; Sun, G.; Zhang, H.; Tian, J.; Li, Y. Long non-coding RNA ANRIL indicates a poor prognosis of cervical cancer and promotes carcinogenesis via PI3K/Akt pathways. Biomed. Pharm. 2017, 85, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jiang, S.; Wang, H.L.; Yang, J. Low expression of long non-coding RNA LET inhibits carcinogenesis of cervical cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Yang, M.; Zhai, X.; Xia, B.; Wang, Y.; Lou, G. Long noncoding RNA CCHE1 promotes cervical cancer cell proliferation via upregulating PCNA. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 7615–7722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Di Cristofano, A.; Ellenson, L.H. Endometrial carcinoma. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2007, 2, 57–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. WHO Classification of Tumors Editoral Board. Female Genital Tumors. Lyon (France) IARC 2020 (WHO Classification of Tumors Series, 5th ed, vol.4). Available online: https://publications.iarc.fr/592 (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  69. Jemal, A.; Bray, F.; Center, M.M.; Ferlay, J.; Ward, E.; Forman, D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 69–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dikshit, R.; Eser, S.; Mathers, C.; Rebelo, M.; Parkin, D.M.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E359–E386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pichler, M.; Calin, G.A. MicroRNAs in cancer: From developmental genes in worms to their clinical application in patients. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Saso, S.; Chatterjee, J.; Georgiou, E.; Ditri, A.M.; Smith, J.R.; Ghaem-Maghami, S. Endometrial cancer. BMJ 2011, 343, d3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Jordan, V.C. The role of tamoxifen in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Curr. Probl. Cancer 1992, 16, 129–176. [Google Scholar]
  74. Murali, R.; Soslow, R.A.; Weigelt, B. Classification of endometrial carcinoma: More than two types. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, e268–e278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Morice, P.; Leary, A.; Creutzberg, C.; Abu-Rustum, N.; Darai, E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet 2016, 387, 1094–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Trovik, J.; Sun, K.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, P.; Lau, T.S.; Hoivik, E.A.; Salvesen, H.B.; Sun, H.; et al. A novel wnt regulatory axis in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 5103–5117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Ghazal, S.; McKinnon, B.; Zhou, J.; Mueller, M.; Men, Y.; Yang, L.; Mueller, M.; Flannery, C.; Huang, Y.; Taylor, H.S. H19 lncRNA alters stromal cell growth via IGF signaling in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015, 7, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, H.; Wan, J.; Chu, J. Long non-coding RNAs and endometrial cancer. Biomed. Pharm. 2019, 119, 109396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Li, J.; Xing, X.; Li, D.; Zhang, B.; Mutch, D.G.; Hagemann, I.S.; Wang, T. Whole-Genome DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Epigenetic Signatures of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Neoplasia 2017, 19, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Cherniack, A.D.; Shen, H.; Walter, V.; Stewart, C.; Murray, B.A.; Bowlby, R.; Hu, X.; Ling, S.; Soslow, R.A.; Broaddus, R.R.; et al. Integrated Molecular Characterization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Cantrell, L.A.; Blank, S.V.; Duska, L.R. Uterine carcinosarcoma: A review of the literature. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 137, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Miranda Furtado, C.L.; Dos Santos Luciano, M.C.; Silva Santos, R.D.; Furtado, G.P.; Moraes, M.O.; Pessoa, C. Epidrugs: Targeting epigenetic marks in cancer treatment. Epigenetics 2019, 14, 1164–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Park, J.W.; Han, P.J. Targeting epigenetics for cancer therapy. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2019, 42, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Bennett, R.L.; Licht, J.D. Targeting epigenetics in cancer. Annu. Rev. Pharm. Toxicol. 2018, 58, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nowacka-Zawisza, M.; Wiśnik, E. DNA methylation and histone modifications as epigenetic regulation in prostate cancer (Review). Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 2587–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Rodríguez-Paredes, M.; Esteller, M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Salarinia, R.; Sahebkar, A.; Peyvandi, M.; Mirzaei, H.R.; Jaafari, M.R.; Riahi, M.M.; Ebrahimnejad, H.; Nahand, J.S.; Hadjati, J.; Asrami, M.O.; et al. Epi-drugs and Epi-miRs: Moving beyond current cancer therapies. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2016, 16, 773–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jones, P.A.; Issa, J.P.J.; Baylin, S. Targeting the cancer epigenome for therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 17, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kazanets, A.; Shorstova, T.; Hilmi, K.; Marques, M.; Witcher, M. Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes: Paradigms, puzzles, and potential. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1865, 275–288. [Google Scholar]
  90. Vrba, L.; Futscher, B.W. Epigenetic Silencing of MORT Is an Early Event in Cancer and Is Associated with Luminal, Receptor Positive Breast Tumor Subtypes. J. Breast Cancer 2017, 20, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Peng, S.; Yin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Mi, W.; Li, T.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Q.; Fu, Y. Competing endogenous RNA network analysis reveals potential long non-coding RNAs as predictive biomarkers of gastric cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 2185–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, Z.; Yang, B.; Zhang, M.; Guo, W.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jia, L.; Li, S.; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. lncRNA Epigenetic Landscape Analysis Identifies EPIC1 as an Oncogenic lncRNA that Interacts with MYC and Promotes Cell-Cycle Progression in Cancer. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 706–720.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Belete, T.M. The Current Status of Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer. Biologics 2021, 15, 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  94. Li, T.; Kang, G.; Wang, T.; Huang, H. Tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic gene therapy for cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 687–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Ramarao-Milne, P.; Kondrashova, O.; Barry, S.; Hooper, J.D.; Lee, J.S.; Waddell, N. Histone Modifying Enzymes in Gynaecological Cancers. Cancers 2021, 13, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Montalvo-Casimiro, M.; González-Barrios, R.; Meraz-Rodriguez, M.A.; Juárez-González, V.T.; Arriaga-Canon, C.; Herrera, L.A. Epidrug Repurposing: Discovering New Faces of Old Acquaintances in Cancer Therapy. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 605386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yamada, Y.; Yamada, Y. The causal relationship between epigenetic abnormality and cancer development: In vivo reprogramming and its future application. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2018, 94, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Sogabe, Y.; Seno, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamada, Y. Unveiling epigenetic regulation in cancer, aging, and rejuvenation with in vivo reprogramming technology. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 2641–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bates, S.E. Epigenetic Therapies for Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 650–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Egger, G.; Liang, G.; Aparicio, A.; Jones, P.A. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature 2004, 429, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mund, C.; Lyko, F. Epigenetic cancer therapy: Proof of concept and remaining challenges. BioEssays 2010, 32, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Amato, R.J. Inhibition of DNA methylation by antisense oligonucleotide MG98 as cancer therapy. Clin. Genitourin Cancer 2007, 5, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Finsterer, J.; Zarrouk Mahjoub, S. Mitochondrial toxicity of antiepileptic drugs and their tolerability in mitochondrial disorders. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2012, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, H.; Dzitoyeva, S.; Manev, H. Effect of valproic acid on mitochondrial epigenetics. Eur. J. Pharm. 2012, 690, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Lu, Y.; Chan, Y.T.; Tan, H.Y.; Li, S.; Wang, N.; Feng, Y. Epigenetic regulation in human cancer: The potential role of epi-drug in cancer therapy. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gould, D.J.; Favorov, P. Vectors for the treatment of autoimmune disease. Gene Ther. 2003, 10, 912–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhang, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C. Long noncoding RNAs and tumorigenesis: Genetic associations, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Áyen, Á.; Jiménez Martínez, Y.; Boulaiz, H. Targeted Gene Delivery Therapies for Cervical Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mizrahi, A.; Czerniak, A.; Levy, T.; Amiur, S.; Gallula, J.; Matouk, I.; Abu-lail, R.; Sorin, V.; Birman, T.; de Groot, N.; et al. Development of targeted therapy for ovarian cancer mediated by a plasmid expressing diphtheria toxin under the control of H19 regulatory sequences. J. Transl. Med. 2009, 7, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Ayesh, S.; Matouk, I.; Schneider, T.; Ohana, P.; Laster, M.; Al-Sharef, W.; De-Groot, N.; Hochberg, A. Possible physiological role of H19 RNA. Mol. Carcinog. 2002, 35, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Matouk, I.J.; DeGroot, N.; Mezan, S.; Ayesh, S.; Abu-lail, R.; Hochberg, A.; Galun, E. The H19 non-coding RNA is essential for human tumor growth. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Fatima, R.; Akhade, V.S.; Pal, D.; Rao, S.M. Long noncoding RNAs in development and cancer: Potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Mol. Cell. Ther. 2015, 3, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Silva, A.M.; Moura, S.R.; Teixeira, J.H.; Barbosa, M.A.; Santos, S.G.; Almeida, M.I. Long noncoding RNAs: A missing link in osteoporosis. Bone Res. 2019, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Sánchez, Y.; Huarte, M. Long non-coding RNAs: Challenges for diagnosis and therapies. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2013, 23, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 07829 g001 550
Figure 1. MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and ZNF667 genomic location. MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and ZNF667 are head-to-head antisense-sense strands. MORT (ZNF667-AS1) is also located in 19q13.43 (GRCh38p13 database, chr19: 56,477,874-56,495,437; NCBI: NR_036521.1). ZNF667 is also located in 19q13.43 (GRCh38p13 database, chr19: 56,439,329-56,477,345; NCBI: NM_022103.4).
Figure 1. MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and ZNF667 genomic location. MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and ZNF667 are head-to-head antisense-sense strands. MORT (ZNF667-AS1) is also located in 19q13.43 (GRCh38p13 database, chr19: 56,477,874-56,495,437; NCBI: NR_036521.1). ZNF667 is also located in 19q13.43 (GRCh38p13 database, chr19: 56,439,329-56,477,345; NCBI: NM_022103.4).
Ijms 22 07829 g001
Ijms 22 07829 g002 550
Figure 2. Pathological role of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in gynecological cancers. Underexpression of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) could promote tumor initiation in ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers through different molecular mechanisms not yet well explored. In ovarian cancer, MORT (ZNF667-AS1) downregulation and consequent miR-21 overexpression promote the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. In cervical cancer, downregulation of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and consequent overexpression of miR-93-3p reduce the expression of PEG3, thereby allowing cell proliferation and EMT. In endometrial cancer and uterine carcinosarcoma, MORT (ZNF667-AS1) expression is silenced by aberrant DNA methylation. However, its function mechanism in these types of cancer is unknown. BioRender has been used to create parts of this figure. (https://biorender.com, accessed on 18 May 2021).
Figure 2. Pathological role of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in gynecological cancers. Underexpression of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) could promote tumor initiation in ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers through different molecular mechanisms not yet well explored. In ovarian cancer, MORT (ZNF667-AS1) downregulation and consequent miR-21 overexpression promote the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. In cervical cancer, downregulation of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and consequent overexpression of miR-93-3p reduce the expression of PEG3, thereby allowing cell proliferation and EMT. In endometrial cancer and uterine carcinosarcoma, MORT (ZNF667-AS1) expression is silenced by aberrant DNA methylation. However, its function mechanism in these types of cancer is unknown. BioRender has been used to create parts of this figure. (https://biorender.com, accessed on 18 May 2021).
Ijms 22 07829 g002
Table
Table 1. Pathological role of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in cancer.
Table 1. Pathological role of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in cancer.
Cancer TypeRoleMechanismEffectReference
LSCCTumor suppressorUpregulates ZNF667 expressionReduces proliferation, migration, and invasion[26]
OSCCTumor suppressorDownregulates ROCK1 expressionReduces proliferation[27]
NPCTumor suppressorSponge for miR-1290Reduces proliferation both in vitro and in vivo[28]
ESCCTumor suppressorUpregulates ZNF667 expressionReduces viability, migration, and invasion[29]
UMTumor suppressorUpregulates MEGF10 expressionInhibits cell proliferation as well as induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest[30]
LUADTumor suppressorDownregulates
miR-223		Inhibits cancer cell invasion and migration [31]
CRCTumor suppressorRegulates ANK2/JAK2 expression;
Regulates TGF-β1 expression		Inhibits proliferation, invasion and migration;
Reduces migration and invasion		[32,33]
BladderTumor suppressorDownregulates
miR-146a-5p		Inhibits proliferation, invasion and migration[34]
HCCTumor suppressorDownregulates NOTCH1 expressionInhibits the migration and invasion[35]
AMLOncogeneSponge for miR-206Enhances cell proliferation, invasion, tumorigenesis, and metastasis[36]
GliomaOncogeneUnknownEnhances cell proliferation[37]
Abbreviations. LSCC: laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; OSCC: oral squamous cell carcinoma; NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; ESCC: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; UM: uveal melanoma; LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; CRC: colorectal carcinoma; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; AML: acute myeloid leukemia.
Table
Table 2. Expression of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and its association with clinicopathological features in gynecological cancers.
Table 2. Expression of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) and its association with clinicopathological features in gynecological cancers.
Cancer TypeUp-/Downregulated or SilencedRelated mRNA/miRNAEffectsSourcesClinico-
Pathological and Prognostic Significance		Ref.
Ovarian cancerDownmiR-21MORT (ZNF667-AS1)
inhibits cell proliferation by miR-21 inhibition		72 tumor tissues and adjacent healthy tissues; UWB1.289 and UWB1.289+BRCA cellsMORT (ZNF667-AS1) expression is affected by tumor size, but not by tumor metastasis[39]
Cervical cancerDownmiR-93-3p,
PEG3		MORT (ZNF667-AS1) suppresses proliferation and metastasis via the modulation of miR-93-3p-dependent PEG3GEO datasets; 64 cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues; HeLa and C-33A cellsUnknown[40]
DownUnknownMORT (ZNF667-AS1) inhibits cell proliferationGEO and TCGA datasets;
60 cancer tissues and 30 normal tissues; HeLa and SiHa cells, and HcerEpic (used as control cell line)		Low levels of MORT (ZNF667-AS1) are correlated with decreased overall survival as well as increased tumor size[41]
DownUnknownUnknownGSE6791 and TCGA datasetsMORT (ZNF667-AS1) could stratify CC patients into the low- and high-risk groups[42]
Endometrial cancer
(EC)		Silenced by aberrant
DNA methylation		UnknownUnknownTCGA datasetsUnknown[20]
Uterine carcinosarcoma
(UCS)		Silenced by aberrant
DNA methylation		UnknownUnknownTCGA datasetsUnknown[43]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Fiore, R.; Suleiman, S.; Drago-Ferrante, R.; Felix, A.; O’Toole, S.A.; O’Leary, J.J.; Ward, M.P.; Beirne, J.; Yordanov, A.; Vasileva-Slaveva, M.; et al. LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in Cancer—Is There a Possible Role in Gynecological Malignancies? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157829

AMA Style

Di Fiore R, Suleiman S, Drago-Ferrante R, Felix A, O’Toole SA, O’Leary JJ, Ward MP, Beirne J, Yordanov A, Vasileva-Slaveva M, et al. LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in Cancer—Is There a Possible Role in Gynecological Malignancies? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(15):7829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157829

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Fiore, Riccardo, Sherif Suleiman, Rosa Drago-Ferrante, Ana Felix, Sharon A. O’Toole, John J. O’Leary, Mark P. Ward, James Beirne, Angel Yordanov, Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva, and et al. 2021. "LncRNA MORT (ZNF667-AS1) in Cancer—Is There a Possible Role in Gynecological Malignancies?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 15: 7829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157829

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop