Next Article in Journal
Novel A-Ring Chalcone Derivatives of Oleanolic and Ursolic Amides with Anti-Proliferative Effect Mediated through ROS-Triggered Apoptosis
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation and Functional Characterization of Two SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE Homologous Genes from Mango
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 18
10.3390/ijms22189803
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

LPS Induces Opposing Memory-like Inflammatory Responses in Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils

by
Trim Lajqi
1,
Maylis Braun
1,
Simon Alexander Kranig
1,
David Frommhold
1,2,
Johannes Pöschl
1 and
Hannes Hudalla
1,*
1
Department of Neonatology, Heidelberg University Children’s Hospital, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
2
Klinik für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin, D-87700 Memmingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(18), 9803; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189803
Submission received: 27 June 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 7 September 2021 / Published: 10 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A growing body of evidence suggests that innate immune cells can respond in a memory-like (adaptive) fashion, which is referred to as trained immunity. Only few in vivo studies have shown training effects in neutrophils; however, no in vitro setup has been established to study the induction of trained immunity or tolerance in neutrophils by microbial agents. In light of their short lifespan (up to 48 h), we suggest to use the term trained sensitivity for neutrophils in an in vitro setting. Here, we firstly describe a feasible two-hit model, using different doses of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in bone marrow neutrophils. We found that low doses (10 pg/mL) induce pro-inflammatory activation (trained sensitivity), whereas priming with high doses (100 ng/mL) leads to suppression of pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α or IL-6 (tolerance) (p < 0.05). On a functional level, trained neutrophils displayed increased phagocytic activity and LFA-1 expression as well as migrational capacity and CD11a expression, whereas tolerant neutrophils show contrasting effects in vitro. Mechanistically, TLR4/MyD88/PI3Ks regulate the activation of p65, which controls memory-like responses in mouse bone marrow neutrophils (p < 0.05). Our results open a new window for further in vitro studies on memory-like inflammatory responses of short-lived innate immune cells such as neutrophils.

1. Introduction

The innate immune system is continuously challenged by several intracellular and extracellular stressors, resulting in a variety of pro- or anti-inflammatory responses. Innate immunity has long been considered as merely primitive due to a lack of immunological memory, which is classically only attributed to the acquired immune system. However, studies in different myeloid cells (i.e., monocytes, macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells), microglia, or non-immune cells challenge this notion and highlight the ability of innate immune cells to develop non-specific memory-like inflammatory responses to protect against secondary infections (trained immunity) [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Trained immunity is portrayed by an exacerbated immune response characterized with increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators (such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, ROS, and IL-12), whereas the opposing reaction of tolerance is marked by suppressed levels of pro-inflammatory responses in addition to enhanced anti-inflammatory properties (such as IL-10, arginase 1 (Arg-1)) [4,5,7,8]. Immune priming represents a process where prior exposure to sublethal pathogen dose or other stressors triggers elevated immune reactions (resistance) to a subsequent potentially lethal infection [9,10,11]. Pioneering studies disclosed a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-specific induction of trained immunity, where priming by β-glucan or bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) after subsequent challenge by gram (–) bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) triggers an exacerbated inflammatory response [1,12,13,14]. Later on, several studies performed in macrophages and microglia revealed a pathogen dose-dependent development of trained immunity by priming with low doses of LPS or tolerance by high doses of LPS, after subsequent challenge with the same or a different stressor [5,15,16,17]. The maturation state is yet another factor that may influence the induction of memory-like responses, and may explained the magnitude of priming [7,18,19]. Various seminal studies have shown that both memory-like inflammatory responses are accompanied by epigenetic reprogramming with resulting distinct changes in metabolism [8,20,21,22].
Neutrophils are among the first responder cells of the innate immunity that enter the site of infection. They are the most abundant type of immune cells and the largest group of polymorphonuclear cells [23,24,25]. As terminally differentiated cells, neutrophils harbor an armory of antimicrobial agents, such as hydrolytic enzymes and pro-inflammatory mediators, and produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in order to protect against a variety of different viral, bacterial, as well as fungal infections [26,27,28]. Due to their short live-span, in vitro studies are challenging and neutrophils are not the first to come in mind when considering memory-like responses. However, there is evidence that neutrophils may possess memory-like capacity. For example, priming by TNF-α, IL-8, as well as microbiome-derived metabolites improves the recruitment and killing capacities of neutrophils [29,30,31,32,33]. Interestingly, recent reports highlight the important role of primed neutrophils by β-glucan and BCG, driving anti-tumoral immune responses characterized by altered cytokine levels and ROS production, as well as enhanced antimicrobial activities upon a second challenge [34,35]. These long-term effects have been attributed to the process of trained immunity which may occur in the bone marrow during granulopoiesis (central trained immunity), as well as in the peripheral blood (peripheral trained immunity) [36]. However, the translational potential of mouse findings should be handled with caution, since murine neutrophils do not precisely mimic human neutrophils in function, morphology, or physiology [37,38].
Our present study outlines a new in vitro setup to study trained sensitivity, and establishes the role of LPS in the induction of memory-like inflammatory responses in neutrophils. Bone marrow neutrophils from adult mice were primed by increasing doses of LPS, and inflammatory responses upon a second challenge by LPS were evaluated. Low-dose LPS-primed mouse bone marrow neutrophils in vitro display increased pro-inflammatory responses (trained sensitivity), whereas priming by higher doses of LPS triggers immune tolerance characterized by decreased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators and increased IL-10. Trained neutrophils displayed increased phagocytic activity as well as migratory effects, whereas tolerant neutrophils exhibited reduced antimicrobial activity leading to reduced recruitment in vitro. The implications of the LPS priming for the inflammatory response, cellular functions, and related signaling patterns will be discussed.

2. Results

2.1. LPS-Priming Triggers Opposing Inflammatory Responses, Trained Sensitivity and Tolerance, in Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils

Firstly, neutrophils were stimulated (primed) with increasing doses of LPS to verify the inflammatory response in a dose-dependent manner for the production of TNF-α and IL-6 (Figure 1B,C; p < 0.05). Upon a second challenge by a fixed dose of LPS (100 ng/mL), primed neutrophils expressed a distinct biphasic dose-response pattern for the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α and IL-6, exhibiting significantly increased levels by low-dose priming (p < 0.05), especially 10 pg/mL LPS, whereas high-dose (≥1 ng/mL) primed neutrophils showed markedly decreased cytokine amounts compared to unprimed state of neutrophils (Figure 1D,E; p < 0.05).
In order to further elaborate the effects of the LPS dose in the induction of memory-like responses in bone marrow neutrophils, we examined the production of ROS and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) as important mediators of inflammation and neutrophil recruitment. We found that both mediators are increased in neutrophils primed by 10 pg/mL (low-dose) LPS upon a second stimulation by LPS, revealing trained sensitivity responses compared to the unprimed state (Figure 2; p < 0.05). In contrast, priming by 100 ng/mL (high-dose) LPS triggered suppressed levels of ROS as well as MCP-1 upon a second challenge by LPS, displaying tolerance responses of mouse bone marrow neutrophils (Figure 2; p < 0.05).
Further, we asked whether the anti-inflammatory response, assessed by IL-10 production, is equally affected by low- and high-dose LPS priming. Our results show that the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 did not exhibit any changes by low-dose priming, but significantly displayed enhanced levels by high-dose priming (Figure 3; p < 0.05). These data about the anti-inflammatory pattern of neutrophils outline a contrary reaction to the pro-inflammatory status shown above in response to distinct priming doses of LPS.
Next, we asked whether the self-release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, during the resting period of cells may account for the development of trained sensitivity and tolerance in neutrophils. We found that the release of TNF-α and IL-6 during the resting time remained unchanged (Supplementary Figure S1). Interestingly, the production of IL-6 was higher than the production of TNF-α. Moreover, we analyzed the viability of mouse bone marrow neutrophils during the experimental procedure and further measured cytotoxicity to elaborate any cytotoxic effects arising from LPS as a stressing agent. Our data show no significant changes for cell viability as well as cytotoxicity of our cells (Supplementary Figure S2).

2.2. LPS-Priming Is Mainly Promoted by TLR4/PI3K Activation of p65

We next asked for signaling mediators potentially accounting for the change in pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, MCP-1, and ROS, as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, in response to low- and high-dose LPS priming in mouse bone marrow neutrophils. Protein expression analysis of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) as recognition receptor for LPS, and its adaptor protein myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MyD88) revealed similarly dose-response arrangements, where low-dose priming triggered trained sensitivity characterized by an upregulation of TLR4/MyD88, whereas tolerance development induced by high-dose priming was characterized with downregulated protein levels of related proteins (Figure 4A,B; p < 0.05).
Based on previous reports on role of phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) as crucial proteins for the induction of memory-like responses, we then assessed the protein expression of its downstream mediator protein kinase B (Akt). Comparable dose-dependent findings were found, whereas trained neutrophils expressed increased Akt phosphorylation, different from tolerant neutrophils that displayed decreased phosphorylation levels of Akt (Figure 4C; p < 0.05). Concordant responses were observed for the nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) subunit p65 (Figure 4D; p < 0.05).
Altogether, our data show that low-dose LPS-induced trained sensitivity is mainly promoted by the signaling triangle of TLR4/MyD88/PI3Ks triggering the activation of p65, resulting in increased production of the pro-inflammatory mediators such as cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6), chemokine (MCP-1), and ROS. In contrast, high-dose LPS-induced tolerance in mouse bone marrow neutrophils displayed diminished levels of p65 mainly due to the suppressed signaling mechanisms of TLR4/MyD88/PI3Ks, resulting in diminished levels of the related pro-inflammatory mediators and an increased anti-inflammatory response (IL-10).

2.3. Trained Sensitivity and Tolerance Alter the Migratory and Phagocytic Activity of Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils

In order to verify whether LPS-induced memory-like responses also translate to altered cellular functions in mouse bone marrow neutrophils, we assessed the transmigratory effects as well as the neutrophil phagocytic activity in vitro. Our cell culture studies showed that LPS-induced trained sensitivity by low-dose priming resulted in a significant increase in the migratory effects followed by increased expression of its related β2 integrin, important for neutrophil recruitment, and lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) (Figure 5A,B; p < 0.05). In contrast, high-dose priming by LPS led to decreased migratory properties and LFA-1 expression (p < 0.05). We then verified a similar pattern for the expression of the α chain of LFA-1, the CD11a which is highly expressed in leukocytes and represents an important factor of cell recruitment (Figure 5C; p < 0.05).
Lastly, we asked about the role of LPS priming on the phagocytic activity of neutrophils. Our in vitro studies revealed that LPS treatment alone triggers increased phagocytic activity in neutrophils (Figure 5D; p < 0.05). Comparable to migratory effects, trained neutrophils exhibited increased phagocytic activity whereas tolerant neutrophils were characterized by suppressed phagocytosis.
Taken together, our data demonstrate the importance of LPS priming dose in the development of memory-like inflammatory responses that alter cellular functions, such as migration and phagocytosis, in mouse bone marrow neutrophils in vitro.

3. Discussion

Neutrophils as a first line of innate immune cells are an essential component of the host defense against invading organisms. They have long been considered as mere effector cells that express their repertoire of antimicrobial agents, such as hydrolytic enzymes, ROS, cytokines, and chemokines, in a simple reactive fashion in response to conserved molecules known as PAMPs present by infectious microorganisms [24,27,39]. These microbial components, PAMPs, are detected by several germline-encoded host sensors labeled as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that trigger the activation of a cascade of signaling proteins resulting in the release of a wide range of inflammatory components as a resistance mechanism of neutrophils [40,41,42,43]. Neutrophils are key phagocytic players primarily characterized by their antimicrobial potential, but more recent studies have shown that neutrophils may also promote repairing mechanisms by the release of the anti-inflammatory mediator IL-10 [39,44,45,46]. It is, however, important to realize the limitations of translating mouse neutrophil findings to human neutrophil populations. Gene expression patterns in neutrophils which govern major immune functions such as activation, development, and pathogen responses greatly diverge between species [37,47,48]. In particular, the cytokine and chemokine production, which serves as important determinants of memory-like responses, differ drastically between species and cell populations [37,47].
The notion of memory-like responses in innate immune cells has generally challenged the well-known concept of dichotomy between innate and acquired immunity. Initial studies disclosed the stressor-dependent induction of both trained immunity and tolerance in monocytes and macrophages, where priming by β-glucan or BCG triggers training, distinct from LPS-priming that results in tolerance upon a second infection insult [3,4,13,14]. Subsequently, dose-dependent priming effects mediating both memory-like responses in innate immune cells were established [5,15,49,50,51]. Moreover, studies from our group also revealed the magnitude of priming and the cellular maturation state as important factors in the development of memory-like patterns [7]. Both of memory-like responses are accompanied by epigenetic reprogramming regulated by the methylation or acetylation of H3 and H4 histones (i.e., H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K9me3, H4K20me3), with resulting distinct changes in metabolism such as increased glycolysis, glutaminolysis, or accumulation of fumarate during trained immunity or increased itaconate production and fatty acid oxidation during tolerance [8,14,20,21,22,52,53,54].
The current study provides supporting evidence for a dose-dependent induction of training and tolerance in neutrophils in vitro. We show, for the first time, that the patterns of memory-like responses in mouse bone marrow neutrophils can be differentially regulated by the pathogen dose, specifically LPS. Training can occur both in the bone marrow or in the peripheral blood [36]. We chose mouse bone marrow neutrophils for our study in order to reduce the confounder of circulating endotoxins. As expected, a single stimulation by increasing doses of LPS triggered dose-dependent production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Challenging the cells with a second stimulation after 18 h of resting showed a biphasic dose response, similar to hormetic reactions where low-dose LPS (10 pg/mL) displayed enhanced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (trained sensitivity), distinct from high-dose LPS (≥1 ng/mL) priming that resulted in suppressed production of cytokines (tolerance). A previous study demonstrated similar findings in myeloid cells (monocytes), primed continuously by LPS [15]. Similarly, microglia expressed comparable LPS-dose patterns where continuously priming with low or ultra-low doses in vitro upon a second challenge provokes exacerbated pro-inflammatory reactions [5,7,16,55]. In line with our findings, tolerance development was clearly described by high-dose priming with LPS.
ROS is known to be a critical antimicrobial component of neutrophils promoting resistance mechanisms [39]. Furthermore, MCP-1 is well known to orchestrate the migratory actions during physiological and pathological circumstances in leukocytes as well as promoting the killing abilities of myeloid cells [56,57]. Trained sensitivity-induced reactions in mouse bone marrow neutrophils are supported largely by ROS and MCP-1 production leading to increased phagocytic activity and recruitment. Interestingly, tolerant neutrophils displayed suppressed levels of ROS and MCP-1 and increased production of IL-10. Our data are in line with the recent work published by Kalafati et al., showing that trained neutrophils in vivo promote anti-tumoral effects in a ROS-dependent manner [34]. Moreover, suppressed levels of pro-inflammatory mediators escorted by increased IL-10 levels support the resolution of inflammation and drive repairing mechanisms of neutrophils, as reported previously [39,44,45,46]. IL-10 is an important anti-inflammatory mediator not only pivotal for the establishment of tolerance responses by inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, but also playing a regulatory role in neutrophils and protecting the host from exaggerated inflammatory responses to pathogens [58,59]. The non-significant IL-10 production by low-dose LPS priming could be explained by the findings of Yuan et al., which show that low-dose LPS-induced training may be responsible for the removal of B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1 (Blimp-1), thus dismissing the development of adequate anti-inflammatory response and favoring the inflammatory adaptation [15]. During the resting period, mouse bone marrow neutrophils did not display any dose-dependent significant alterations, but the levels of IL-6 tended to be higher than TNF-α. This might be explained by chromatin modulation occurring in the IL-6 regulatory genes mainly promoted by endogenous TNF-α [60,61,62].
LPS as a prominent PAMP is a potent endotoxin that is sensed by the PRR receptor toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 [63,64]. Earlier studies reported that extremely low LPS doses (femtomolar) may trigger the activation of myeloid differentiation factor-2 (MD-2)/TLR4 complex, most probably due to the increased sensitivity driven by CD14 [65,66,67,68]. Activation of TLR4 results in a cascade of signaling events promoting the release of inflammatory mediators mainly by a concordant activation of NFκB, especially p65 [69,70]. Our data show similar activation patterns, with trained neutrophils displaying activation of transcription factor p65 triggered by TLR4/MyD88, as opposed to tolerant neutrophils displaying downregulated levels of TLR4/MyD88 followed by suppressed transcription of p65. Previous reports also revealed that the family of PI3K signaling proteins are prone to mediate inflammatory responses of low-dose LPS in myeloid cells [71,72,73,74]. Similar effects of Akt-PI3K as intermediate mediators promoting the activation of p65 were observed in our study for mouse bone marrow neutrophils.
The pro-inflammatory activity of trained mouse bone marrow neutrophils exhibiting increased migratory activities and phagocytosis in vitro is particularly regulated by the TLR4/PI3K pathway. Complementary to our findings, Zhang et al. showed that neutrophil recruitment and phagocytic activity are guarded mainly by microbiota-induced signaling events driven by the TLR/MyD88 pathway [74,75,76]. Induction of tolerance by suppression of TLR4/PI3K/p65 reduces production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, migration, and phagocytosis, but on the other hand supports increased IL-10 production. These findings are in line with a recent study on LPS-induced tolerance in neutrophils by Porphyromonas gingivalis, demonstrating that altered cytokine responses due to endotoxin favor limited excessive inflammatory responses in order to facilitate survival [77].
We show that increased migratory effects in trained mouse bone marrow neutrophils are accompanied by enhanced expression of the leukocyte β2 integrin LFA-1 as well as its α chain CD11a, which are key molecules of the neutrophil recruitment cascade during inflammation as formerly outlined by numerous reports [78,79,80,81,82,83].
Taken together, the induction of opposing immune reactions shaped by LPS may serve as a binary switch to either efficiently eradicate pathogens (training as a resistance mechanism), or to support the resolution of inflammation (tolerance as persistence response) [25,84]. Recent studies on trained neutrophils, which may alter the diseases state or promote anti-tumoral activities, highlight the importance of memory-like responses during pathologies [34,35]. Our data transfer the concept of pathogen-induced, dose-dependent memory-like responses from macrophages to neutrophils. We further provide an in vitro assay to expand studies of adaptive elements in neutrophils. Whether these in vitro observations are of biological relevance in vivo remains unknown and warrants further investigations. We hope that our work on neutrophils will provoke further discussions and extended investigations about the physiological relevance considering the pivotal role of neutrophils in health and disease.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and the Isolation of Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils

Adult (3–6 months old) locally bred mice, from a C57Bl/6J [Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany)] breeder, were used for the isolation of bone marrow neutrophils. All mice were maintained at a 12-h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water at the Central Animal Facility of the University of Heidelberg, Germany. Experiments were carried out according to the guidelines from Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and approved by the local authorities for animal welfare—Regierungspraesidium Karlsruhe, Germany (permission number for tissue and organ harvesting: Az T-02/20).
Murine bone marrow neutrophils were isolated from femurs and tibias, followed by the discontinuous Percoll (#17-0891-02, GE Healthcare) gradient, as described [85,86,87]. Neutrophils were harvested from the 64%/81% interface, washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium (#R8758, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, #PB-FCS-EU-0500, PeloBiotech; endo-toxin-free and sterile-filtered), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% amphotericin B. The cell viability after isolation was greater than 95%, as assessed by the trypan blue (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) exclusion test, and the purity of neutrophils was greater than 98%, as analyzed by microscopy using Hemacolor staining (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) as previously shown [85,88].

4.2. Neutrophil Cell Stimulation Procedure

Immediately after isolation, neutrophils (1,000,000 cells/well) were primed according to the stimulation scheme depicted in Figure 1A. Cells were stimulated twice following a two-step protocol with an initial stimulation step (“priming”) with increasing doses of LPS (“first challenge”; 10 pg/mL—100 ng/mL for 45 min, respectively; E. coli serotype 055:B5 with obtained from InvivoGen (#tlrl-pb5lps), Toulouse, France) on day 1 immediately after isolation and incubated (37 °C; 5% CO2). Thereafter, cells were centrifuged and the medium was changed twice (“washing up”), and the cells were incubated overnight to rest at 37 °C and 5% CO2. On the next day (day 2), cells were re-stimulated (“second challenge”) with a fixed dose of LPS (100 ng/mL) for 4 h incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. RNAs and protein samples were collected 4 h after the second challenge with LPS and processed for further analysis. In parallel, cells cultivated only in the medium, i.e., the unstimulated (US) group, and cells stimulated once on day 2 for 4 h with a fixed dose of LPS (100 ng/mL), i.e., the unprimed (UP) group, were included as controls for measurements.

4.3. Antibodies

Primary antibodies, such as phospho-Akt (Ser473) (#9271), Akt (#9272), MyD88 (#4283), and TLR4 (#14358), were purchased from Cell Signaling (USA). The antibody against β-actin (#A5441) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Secondary HRP-coupled anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies were purchased from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany).

4.4. SDS-PAGE Western Blotting

Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer containing 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) NP-40, 0.5% (v/v) Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 100 mg/mL Pefa-Block, 1 mg/mL Pepstatin A, 10 mM sodium vanadate, and 1 mg/mL Leupeptin. Samples were centrifuged (13.500× g for 30 min at 4 °C), and supernatants were mixed with 5× protein sample buffer (5% SDS, 33% glycerol, 25% β-mercaptoethanol, 83 mM Tris-HCl with pH to 6.8 and 0.1 mg/mL bromophenol blue) and heated for 5 min at 95 °C. Protein samples were separated on 10% polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a 0.45 μm polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF) membrane, and then immunoblotted with above mentioned primary antibodies. Protein bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence reaction using ChemiDoc XRS+ camera (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Quantification of the protein bands on the membrane was performed using the Image Lab Ver. 6.0.1 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.5. Measurement of the Protein Concentration

Total protein concentration was determined using the Pierce™ 660 nm Protein Assay kit (#22662) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Ionic detergent compatibility reagent (IDCR) (#22663, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used in order to increase the detergent compatibility and reduce interference. Briefly, 10 μL of standard, sample, and blank in duplicates were plated in a 96-well plate, followed by the im-mediate addition of a 150-μL assay reagent supplemented with IDCR. Then, the plate was covered and left shaking for 1 min in a plate shaker. Afterwards, the plate was incubated for an additional 5 min at room temperature without shaking. Absorbance was measured at 660 nm using an iMark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein concentration was then calculated based on the values of the standard curve.

4.6. Measurement of Cytokine and Chemokine Production

Cytokine and chemokine concentrations in supernatants were measured using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for TNF-α (#430901), IL-6 (#431301), MCP-1 (#432701), and IL-10 (#431411) obtained from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA), as described [7]. The absorbance was read at 450 nm with a second reference wavelength at 570 nm in an iMark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Cytokine levels of TNF-α, IL-6, MCP-1, and IL-10 after the second stimulation were normalized against the protein concentrations of each sample and depicted as pg/μg of total protein.

4.7. Measurement of ROS

ROS were measured using the DCFDA/H2DCFDA-Cellular ROS Assay Kit (#ab113851, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The assay is based on the use of 2′,7′ –dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA, also known as H2DCFDA), a membrane-permeable fluorogenic dye that quantitatively measures hydroxyl, peroxyl, and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living cells. After diffusion into the cell, the DCFDA is deacetylated by cellular esterases to a non-fluorescent compound, which is later oxidized by ROS into 2′,7′ –dichlorofluorescein (DCF). DCF is highly fluorescent and is detected by fluorescence spectroscopy.
Briefly, mouse bone marrow neutrophils were seeded into black clear bottom 96-well plates (100,000 cells/well) and stimulated as described above. For measurement, the medium was aspirated and cells were resuspended in 100-μL DCFDA solution (20 μM) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C protected from the light. Thereafter, cells were carefully washed twice with the 1× Buffer solution provided in the kit and resuspended in 1 ×Supplementary Buffer (supplemented with 10% FCS). The levels of intracellular ROS were detected by the fluorescence spectroscopy with excitation (Ex)/emission (Em) at 485 nm/535 nm using a PerkinElmer Wallac Victor3 1420 Multilabel Plate Reader (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Turku, Finland).

4.8. Transmigration/Chemotaxis Assay (In Vitro)

The transmigration/chemotaxis assay was performed using the CytoSelect 96-well Cell Migration Assay kit (#CBA-104, Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA; 3 µm, Fluorometric Format), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, mouse bone marrow neutrophils were primed and then, followed by a second stimulation with LPS (100 ng/mL) the next day, as shown above in FCS-free medium. Next, 100 μL of the resuspended cells per well (106 cells/mL) were placed into the 96-well plate upper chamber (membrane chamber; 3 μm polycarbonate membrane) and the membrane then was placed into the lower compartment (feeder tray) containing 150-μL medium supplemented with 10% FCS (as chemoattractant). After a 5-h incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, the remaining cell suspension from the inside the membrane chamber was carefully discarded and transferred immediately to a clean 96-well plate containing 150 µL of pre-warmed cell detachment solution. This plate was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C to completely dislodge the cells from the underside of the membrane chamber.
Thereafter, 75 µL of the detachment solution were combined with 75 µL of the media from the feeder tray and mixed well in a clear 96-well plate, followed by the addition of 50 µL 4× Lysis buffer/CyQuant GR dye solution to each well. The plate was then incubated for 20 min at room temperature. For the measurement, 150 µL of the mixture (containing 150 µL of migrated cells and 50 µL dye) was transferred to a black clear bottom 96-well plate for fluorescence measurement. Fluorescence was detected using a PerkinElmer Wallac Victor3 1420 Multilabel Plate Reader (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Turku, Finland) with Ex/Em at 485 nm/535 nm and expressed as relative fluorescence units (RFU).

4.9. Phagocytosis Assay (In Vitro)

The phagocytic activity of neutrophils was determined using CytoSelect 96-well Phagocytosis Assay kit (E. coli Substrate) (#CBA-222, Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, isolated mouse bone marrow neutrophils were stimulated, according to the depicted scheme shown above (Figure 1A) in a 96-well plate (100,000 cells/well). Then, 4 h after the second challenge by LPS (100 ng/mL), 10 µL of E. coli suspension was added to each well, mixed well, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 4 h. Afterwards, the plate was centrifuged (300 G for 5 min) and washed using ice cold 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and cells were fixed using 100 µL/well fixation solution for 5 min at room temperature. Next, the plate was centrifuged (300 G for 5 min) and washed twice using 1× PBS. Then, 100 µL/well of 1× blocking solution was added and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 30 min in an orbital shaker. Thereafter, the plate was washed thrice using 1× PBS, and 100 µL/well of 1× permeabilization solution was added. The plate was incubated for 5 min at room temperature and, afterwards, it was washed twice using 1x PBS, followed by the process of initiating the reaction by adding a 100 µL/well substrate solution and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Next, the reaction was stopped using stop solution (100 µL/well) and by placing the plate on an orbital plate shaker for 30 s. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm in the iMark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and the data were given as optical density (OD) values.

4.10. Analysis of Cell Viability and Cytotoxicity

Cell viability was determined using the MTT assay. Murine bone marrow neutrophils were seeded into a 96-well plate (200,000 cell/well) and stimulated according to the stimulation scheme described above. Four hours after the second LPS stimulation, 10 µL/well of 0.5 mg/mL MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution was added to the plate and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Next, 100 µL of solubilization solution was added to each well and the plate was incubated overnight at 37 °C (5% CO2). The absorbance was measured at 570 nm using an iMark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and data were shown as relative viability (UP assigned as 100%) (Supplementary Figure S2A).
In parallel, a second readout was performed to investigate the cytotoxicity of our stressor, LPS, in schema endured in our study using the Cell Cytotoxicity Assay kit (colorimetric; #ab112118, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Isolated cells (10,000 cell/well) were seeded into a 96-well plate and stimulated as described above. Four hours after the second LPS stimulation, 20 µL of assay solution was added to each well and the plate was incubated initially for 30 s at room temperature in an orbital plate shaker. Thereafter, the plate was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 4 h. The absorbance was measured at 570 nm using an iMark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and data were shown as relative cytotoxicity (UP assigned as 100%) (Supplementary Figure S2B).

4.11. RNA Isolation and Real-Time qPCR

To determine gene expression levels, the total RNA was extracted from mouse bone marrow neutrophils 4 h after the 2nd stimulation with LPS (100 ng/mL) using QIAzol Lysis Reagent (#79306) purchased from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer instructions. RNA concentration and quality were checked using the Nanodrop DS-11 FX+ machine (DeNovix, Wilmington, DE, USA). During the whole procedure, RNase Away (#7003, Molecular BioProducts) solution was used to flush pipettes and other equipment in order to prevent any contamination with other RNases or DNAs. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (#K1612) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Real-time qPCR reaction was performed by using StepOnePlusTM real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The following primer pairs were used for this study: p65 forward: CTTCCTCAGCCATGGTACCTCT and p65 reverse: CAAGTCTTCATCAGCATCAAACTG, IL-10 forward: ACCAGCTGGACAACATACTGC and IL-10 reverse: TCACTCTTCACCTGCTCCACT, CD11a forward: AGATCGAGTCCGGACCCACAG and CD11a reverse: GGCAGTGATAGAGGCCTCCCG, LFA-1 forward: CTTGGACTTCCACTTCCACTTC and LFA-1 reverse: ACCTGGTAGACATGCTGGACTT, GAPDH forward: CATGGCCTTCCGTGTTTCCTA and GAPDH reverse: CCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGAT. GAPDH was used as housekeeping gene. Relative gene expression was calculated using the comparative CT (2−∆∆CT) method [89].

4.12. Statistical Analysis

Graphs were prepared using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), whereas statistical analysis was carried out using SigmaPlot Software Version 12.0 Build 12.0.0.182 (Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany). Data are presented as scatter dot plots, mean ± SEM. Comparison between experimental groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post-hoc comparisons were performed by the Holm–Sidak test. p < 0.05 was considered significantly different.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows that the pathogenic stressor, LPS, may trigger the induction of memory-like responses in mouse bone marrow neutrophils in a dose-dependent manner. Low-dose priming triggers trained sensitivity characterized by a pro-inflammatory state, whereas high-dose priming drives toward a tolerant phenotype with an increased anti-inflammatory response. These distinct priming mechanisms translate into opposing cellular functions such as phagocytosis in mouse bone marrow neutrophils. Further investigations are necessary to explore the biological relevance of our in vitro findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22189803/s1, Supplementary Figure S1: Cytokine production of TNF-α and IL-6 before second challenge by LPS. Supplementary Figure S2: Analysis of cell viability and cytotoxicity in primed bone marrow neutrophils.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L. and H.H.; methodology and data acquisition, T.L., S.A.K., M.B., J.P., D.F. and H.H.; formal analysis, T.L., S.A.K., M.B., J.P., D.F. and H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.L. and H.H.; writing—review and editing, T.L., S.A.K., M.B., J.P., D.F. and H.H.; visualization, T.L.; supervision, H.H.; funding acquisition, D.F. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by PRIMAL consortium [HH, DF] funded by Federal Ministry for Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF, grant number 01GL1746E).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University/Regierungspraesidium Karlsruhe (protocol code for tissue and organ harvesting: Az T-02/20).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Britta Heckmann and Silvia Pezer for skillful technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Netea, M.G.; van der Meer, J.W.M. Trained immunity: An ancient way of remembering. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Novakovic, B.; Habibi, E.; Wang, S.-Y.; Arts, R.J.W.; Davar, R.; Megchelenbrink, W.; Kim, B.; Kuznetsova, T.; Kox, M.; Zwaag, J.; et al. β-glucan reverses the epigenetic state of lps-induced immunological tolerance. Cell 2016, 167, 1354–1368.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kleinnijenhuis, J.; Quintin, J.; Preijers, F.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Jacobs, C.; Xavier, R.J.; van der Meer, J.W.M.; van Crevel, R.; Netea, M.G. BCG-induced trained immunity in NK cells: Role for non-specific protection to infection. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 155, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ifrim, D.C.; Quintin, J.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Jacobs, C.; Jansen, T.; Jacobs, L.; Gow, N.A.R.; Williams, D.L.; van der Meer, J.W.M.; Netea, M.G. Trained immunity or tolerance: Opposing functional programs induced in human monocytes after engagement of various pattern recognition receptors. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2014, 21, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lajqi, T.; Lang, G.-P.; Haas, F.; Williams, D.L.; Hudalla, H.; Bauer, M.; Groth, M.; Wetzker, R.; Bauer, R. Memory-like inflammatory responses of microglia to rising doses of LPS: Key role of PI3Kγ. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jentho, E.; Lajqi, T.; Yang, K.; Winkler, R.; Stojiljkovic, M.; Wetzker, R.; Bauer, M. Pathogen-Induced hormetic responses. In The Science of Hormesis in Health and Longevity; Rattan, S.I.S., Kyriazis, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lajqi, T.; Stojiljkovic, M.; Williams, D.L.; Hudalla, H.; Bauer, M.; Witte, O.W.; Wetzker, R.; Bauer, R.; Schmeer, C. Memory-like responses of brain microglia are controlled by developmental state and pathogen dose. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 546415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cheng, S.C.; Quintin, J.; Cramer, R.A.; Shepardson, K.M.; Saeed, S.; Kumar, V.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Martens, J.H.A.; Rao, N.A.; Aghajanirefah, A.; et al. MTOR- and HIF-1α-mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. Science 2014, 345, 1250684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sheehan, G.; Farrell, G.; Kavanagh, K. Immune priming: The secret weapon of the insect world. Virulence 2020, 11, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mauch-Mani, B.; Baccelli, I.; Luna, E.; Flors, V. Defense priming: An adaptive part of induced resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 485–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Divangahi, M.; Aaby, P.; Khader, S.A.; Barreiro, L.B.; Bekkering, S.; Chavakis, T.; van Crevel, R.; Curtis, N.; DiNardo, A.R.; Dominguez-Andres, J.; et al. Trained immunity, tolerance, priming and differentiation: Distinct immunological processes. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Netea, M.G.; Latz, E.; Mills, K.H.; O’neill, L.A. Innate immune memory: A paradigm shift in understanding host defense. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Quintin, J.; Saeed, S.; Martens, J.H.A.A.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Ifrim, D.C.; Logie, C.; Jacobs, L.; Jansen, T.; Kullberg, B.J.; Wijmenga, C.; et al. Candida albicans infection affords protection against reinfection via functional reprogramming of monocytes. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 12, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kleinnijenhuis, J.; Quintin, J.; Preijers, F.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Ifrim, D.C.; Saeed, S.; Jacobs, C.; van Loenhout, J.; de Jong, D.; Stunnenberg, H.G.; et al. Bacille calmette-guerin induces NOD2-dependent nonspecific protection from reinfection via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 17537–17542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yuan, R.; Geng, S.; Li, L. Molecular mechanisms that underlie the dynamic adaptation of innate monocyte memory to varying stimulant strength of TLR Ligands. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Wendeln, A.-C.; Degenhardt, K.; Kaurani, L.; Gertig, M.; Ulas, T.; Jain, G.; Wagner, J.; Häsler, L.M.; Wild, K.; Skodras, A.; et al. Innate immune memory in the brain shapes neurological disease hallmarks. Nature 2018, 556, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Morris, M.; Li, L. Molecular mechanisms and pathological consequences of endotoxin tolerance and priming. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2012, 60, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lajqi, T.; Stojiljkovic, M.; Wetzker, R. Toxin-induced hormesis may restrain aging. Biogerontology 2019, 20, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Namakula, R.; de Bree, L.C.J.; Tvedt, T.H.A.; Netea, M.G.; Cose, S.; Hanevik, K. Monocytes from neonates and adults have a similar capacity to adapt their cytokine production after previous exposure to bcg and β-glucan. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Arts, R.J.W.; Novakovic, B.; ter Horst, R.; Carvalho, A.; Bekkering, S.; Lachmandas, E.; Rodrigues, F.; Silvestre, R.; Cheng, S.C.; Wang, S.Y.; et al. Glutaminolysis and fumarate accumulation integrate immunometabolic and epigenetic programs in trained immunity. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 807–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Arts, R.J.W.; Carvalho, A.; La Rocca, C.; Palma, C.; Rodrigues, F.; Silvestre, R.; Kleinnijenhuis, J.; Lachmandas, E.; Gonçalves, L.G.; Belinha, A.; et al. Immunometabolic pathways in BCG-induced trained immunity. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 2562–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Domínguez-Andrés, J.; Novakovic, B.; Li, Y.; Scicluna, B.P.; Gresnigt, M.S.; Arts, R.J.W.; Oosting, M.; Moorlag, S.J.C.F.M.; Groh, L.A.; Zwaag, J.; et al. The Itaconate pathway is a central regulatory node linking innate immune tolerance and trained immunity. Cell Metab. 2019, 29, 211–220.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. McCracken, J.M.; Allen, L.-A.H. Regulation of human neutrophil apoptosis and lifespan in health and disease. J. Cell Death 2014, 7, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Németh, T.; Sperandio, M.; Mócsai, A. Neutrophils as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 253–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lajqi, T.; Pöschl, J.; Frommhold, D.; Hudalla, H. The role of microbiota in neutrophil regulation and adaptation in newborns. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 568685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Drescher, B.; Bai, F. Neutrophil in viral infections, friend or foe? Virus Res. 2013, 171, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hidalgo, A.; Chilvers, E.R.; Summers, C.; Koenderman, L. The neutrophil life cycle. Trends Immunol. 2019, 40, 584–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaplan, M.J.; Radic, M. Neutrophil extracellular traps: Double-edged swords of innate immunity. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 2689–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ferrante, A. Tumor necrosis factor alpha potentiates neutrophil antimicrobial activity: Increased fungicidal activity against torulopsis glabrata and candida albicans and associated increases in oxygen radical production and lysosomal enzyme release. Infect. Immun. 1989, 57, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yektaei-Karin, E.; Moshfegh, A.; Lundahl, J.; Berggren, V.; Hansson, L.-O.; Marchini, G. The stress of birth enhances in vitro spontaneous and il-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis in the human newborn. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2007, 18, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wikoff, W.R.; Anfora, A.T.; Liu, J.; Schultz, P.G.; Lesley, S.A.; Peters, E.C.; Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3698–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Clarke, T.B.; Davis, K.M.; Lysenko, E.S.; Zhou, A.Y.; Yu, Y.; Weiser, J.N. Recognition of peptidoglycan from the microbiota by nod1 enhances systemic innate immunity. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sridharan, G.V.; Choi, K.; Klemashevich, C.; Wu, C.; Prabakaran, D.; Pan, L.B.; Steinmeyer, S.; Mueller, C.; Yousofshahi, M.; Alaniz, R.C.; et al. Prediction and quantification of bioactive microbiota metabolites in the mouse gut. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kalafati, L.; Kourtzelis, I.; Schulte-Schrepping, J.; Li, X.; Hatzioannou, A.; Grinenko, T.; Hagag, E.; Sinha, A.; Has, C.; Dietz, S.; et al. Innate immune training of granulopoiesis promotes anti-tumor activity. Cell 2020, 183, 771–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moorlag, S.J.C.F.M.; Rodriguez-Rosales, Y.A.; Gillard, J.; Fanucchi, S.; Theunissen, K.; Novakovic, B.; de Bont, C.M.; Negishi, Y.; Fok, E.T.; Kalafati, L.; et al. BCG vaccination induces long-term functional reprogramming of human neutrophils. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Netea, M.G.; Domínguez-Andrés, J.; Barreiro, L.B.; Chavakis, T.; Divangahi, M.; Fuchs, E.; Joosten, L.A.B.; van der Meer, J.W.M.; Mhlanga, M.M.; Mulder, W.J.M.; et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hagai, T.; Chen, X.; Miragaia, R.J.; Rostom, R.; Gomes, T.; Kunowska, N.; Henriksson, J.; Park, J.E.; Proserpio, V.; Donati, G.; et al. Gene expression variability across cells and species shapes innate immunity. Nature 2018, 563, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bardoel, B.W.; Kenny, E.F.; Sollberger, G.; Zychlinsky, A. The balancing act of neutrophils. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 15, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Mantovani, A.; Cassatella, M.A.; Costantini, C.; Jaillon, S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kieser, K.J.; Kagan, J.C. Multi-receptor detection of individual bacterial products by the innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 376–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mogensen, T.H. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 240–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Takeuchi, O.; Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 2010, 140, 805–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Thomas, C.J.; Schroder, K. Pattern recognition receptor function in neutrophils. Trends Immunol. 2013, 34, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Borregaard, N. Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 2010, 33, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Nathan, C. Neutrophils and immunity: Challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Peñaloza, H.F.; Nieto, P.A.; Muñoz-Durango, N.; Salazar-Echegarai, F.J.; Torres, J.; Parga, M.J.; Alvarez-Lobos, M.; Riedel, C.A.; Kalergis, A.M.; Bueno, S.M. Interleukin-10 Plays a key role in the modulation of neutrophils recruitment and lung inflammation during infection by streptococcus pneumoniae. Immunology 2015, 146, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Mestas, J.; Hughes, C.C.W. Of mice and not men: Differences between mouse and human immunology. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 2731–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Zschaler, J.; Schlorke, D.; Arnhold, J. Differences in innate immune response between man and mouse. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 34, 433–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhou, X.Y.; Gao, R.; Hu, J.; Gao, D.P.; Liao, Y.L.; Yang, J.J. Trained Innate immunity by repeated low-dose lipopolysaccharide injections displays long-term neuroprotective effects. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 8191079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Feng, Y.W.; Wu, C.; Liang, F.Y.; Lin, T.; Li, W.Q.; Jing, Y.H.; Dai, P.; Yu, H.X.; Lan, Y.; Pei, Z.; et al. HUCMSCs mitigate LPS-induced trained immunity in ischemic stroke. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lajqi, T.; Marx, C.; Hudalla, H.; Haas, F.; Große, S.; Wang, Z.Q.; Heller, R.; Bauer, M.; Wetzker, R.; Bauer, R. The role of the pathogen dose and PI3Kγ in immunometabolic reprogramming of microglia for innate immune memory. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saeed, S.; Quintin, J.; Kerstens, H.H.D.; Rao, N.A.; Aghajanirefah, A.; Matarese, F.; Cheng, S.C.; Ratter, J.; Berentsem, K.; Van Der Ent, M.A.; et al. Epigenetic programming of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and trained innate immunity. Science 2014, 345, 1251086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, X.; El Gazzar, M.; Yoza, B.K.; McCall, C.E. The NF-KB factor RelB and histone H3 lysine methyltransferase G9a directly interact to generate epigenetic silencing in endotoxin tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 27857–27865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Milite, C.; Feoli, A.; Viviano, M.; Rescigno, D.; Cianciulli, A.; Balzano, A.L.; Mai, A.; Castellano, S.; Sbardella, G. The emerging role of lysine methyltransferase SETD8 in human diseases. Clin. Epigenetics 2016, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Schaafsma, W.; Zhang, X.; van Zomeren, K.C.; Jacobs, S.; Georgieva, P.B.; Wolf, S.A.; Kettenmann, H.; Janova, H.; Saiepour, N.; Hanisch, U.K.; et al. Long-lasting pro-inflammatory suppression of microglia by LPS-preconditioning is mediated by RelB-dependent epigenetic silencing. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2015, 48, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gschwandtner, M.; Derler, R.; Midwood, K.S. More than just attractive: How CCL2 influences myeloid cell behavior beyond chemotaxis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Deshmane, S.L.; Kremlev, S.; Amini, S.; Sawaya, B.E. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): An overview. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2009, 29, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhang, X.; Majlessi, L.; Deriaud, E.; Leclerc, C.; Lo-Man, R. Coactivation of Syk kinase and MyD88 adaptor protein pathways by bacteria promotes regulatory properties of neutrophils. Immunity 2009, 31, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Akdis, C.A.; Akdis, M. Mechanisms of immune tolerance to allergens: Role of IL-10 and tregs. J. Clin. Invest. 2014, 124, 4678–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zimmermann, M.; Aguilera, F.B.; Castellucci, M.; Rossato, M.; Costa, S.; Lunardi, C.; Ostuni, R.; Girolomoni, G.; Natoli, G.; Bazzoni, F.; et al. Chromatin remodelling and autocrine TNFα are required for optimal interleukin-6 expression in activated human neutrophils. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fong, Y.; Tracey, K.J.; Moldawer, L.L.; Hesse, D.G.; Manogue, K.B.; Kenney, J.S.; Lee, A.T.; Kuo, G.C.; Allison, A.C.; Lowry, S.F.; et al. Antibodies to Cachectin/tumor necrosis factor reduce interleukin 1β and interleukin 6 appearance during lethal bacteremia. J. Exp. Med. 1989, 170, 1627–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Benihoud, K.; Esselin, S.; Descamps, D.; Jullienne, B.; Salone, B.; Bobé, P.; Bonardelle, D.; Connault, E.; Opolon, P.; Saggio, I.; et al. Respective roles of TNF-α and IL-6 in the immune response-elicited by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in mice. Gene Ther. 2007, 14, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Triantafilou, M.; Triantafilou, K. Lipopolysaccharide recognition: CD14, TLRs and the LPS-activation cluster. Trends Immunol. 2002, 23, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Park, B.S.; Lee, J.O. Recognition of lipopolysaccharide pattern by TLR4 complexes. Exp. Mol. Med. 2013, 45, e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Beutler, B.; Rietschel, E.T. Innate immune sensing and its roots: The story of endotoxin. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Freudenberg, M.A.; Tchaptchet, S.; Keck, S.; Fejer, G.; Huber, M.; Schütze, N.; Beutler, B.; Galanos, C. Lipopolysaccharide sensing an important factor in the innate immune response to gram-negative bacterial infections: Benefits and hazards of LPS hypersensitivity. Immunobiology 2008, 213, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Teghanemt, A.; Weiss, J.P.; Gioannini, T.L. Radioiodination of an endotoxin·MD-2 complex generates a novel sensitive, high-affinity ligand for TLR4. Innate Immun. 2013, 19, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Romerio, A.; Peri, F. Increasing the chemical variety of small-molecule-based TLR4 modulators: An overview. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.-C. NF-ΚB Signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Neurath, M.F.; Pettersson, S.; Meyer Zum Buschenfelde, K.H.; Strober, W. Local administration of antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides to the P65 subunit of NF-ΚB abrogates established experimental colitis in mice. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Maitra, U.; Gan, L.; Chang, S.; Li, L. Low-Dose endotoxin induces inflammation by selectively removing nuclear receptors and activating CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta. J Immunol. 2011, 186, 4467–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maitra, U.; Deng, H.; Glaros, T.; Baker, B.; Capelluto, D.G.S.; Li, Z.; Li, L. Molecular mechanisms responsible for the selective and low-grade induction of proinflammatory mediators in murine macrophages by lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Morris, M.C.; Gilliam, E.A.; Button, J.; Li, L. Dynamic Modulation of innate immune response by varying dosages of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in human monocytic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 21584–21590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Zhang, D.; Chen, G.; Manwani, D.; Mortha, A.; Xu, C.; Faith, J.J.; Burk, R.D.; Kunisaki, Y.; Jang, J.-E.; Scheiermann, C.; et al. Neutrophil ageing is regulated by the microbiome. Nature 2015, 525, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Deshmukh, H.S.; Liu, Y.; Menkiti, O.R.; Mei, J.; Dai, N.; O’Leary, C.E.; Oliver, P.M.; Kolls, J.K.; Weiser, J.N.; Worthen, G.S. The microbiota regulates neutrophil homeostasis and host resistance to escherichia coli K1 sepsis in neonatal mice. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Balmer, M.L.; Schürch, C.M.; Saito, Y.; Geuking, M.B.; Li, H.; Cuenca, M.; Kovtonyuk, L.V.; McCoy, K.D.; Hapfelmeier, S.; Ochsenbein, A.F.; et al. Microbiota-derived compounds drive steady-state granulopoiesis via MyD88/TICAM signaling. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 5273–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gu, J.Y.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhu, X.Q.; Qiu, J.Y.; Sun, Y. Effects of endotoxin tolerance induced by porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide on inflammatory responses in neutrophils. Inflammation 2020, 43, 1692–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ley, K.; Laudanna, C.; Cybulsky, M.I.; Nourshargh, S. Getting to the site of inflammation: The leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7, 678–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lefort, C.T.; Ley, K. Neutrophil arrest by LFA-1 activation. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Awla, D.; Abdulla, A.; Zhang, S.; Roller, J.; Menger, M.D.; Regnér, S.; Thorlacius, H. Lymphocyte function antigen-1 regulates neutrophil recruitment and tissue damage in acute pancreatitis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 163, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hudalla, H.; Karenberg, K.; Kuon, R.-J.; Pöschl, J.; Tschada, R.; Frommhold, D. LPS-induced maternal inflammation promotes fetal leukocyte recruitment and prenatal organ infiltration in mice. Pediatr. Res. 2018, 84, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fitterer, R.; Lajqi, T.; Kranig, S.A.; Braun, M.; Theissig, N.; Kuss, N.; Pöschl, J.; Frommhold, D.; Hudalla, H. L-arginine modulates neonatal leukocyte recruitment in a gestational age-dependent manner. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kranig, S.A.; Lajqi, T.; Tschada, R.; Braun, M.; Kuss, N.; Pöschl, J.; Hudalla, H. Leukocyte infiltration of cremaster muscle in mice assessed by intravital microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. 2020, 158, e60509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bauer, M.; Weis, S.; Netea, M.G.; Wetzker, R. Remembering pathogen dose: Long-term adaptation in innate immunity. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Schymeinsky, J.; Sindrilaru, A.; Frommhold, D.; Sperandio, M.; Gerstl, R.; Then, C.; Mócsai, A.; Scharffetter-Kochanek, K.; Walzog, B. The vav binding site of the non–receptor tyrosine kinase Syk at Tyr 348 is critical for Β2 integrin (CD11/CD18)–Mediated neutrophil migration. Blood 2006, 108, 3919–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Roberts, R.L.; Gallin, J.I. Rapid method for isolation of normal human peripheral blood eosinophils on discontinuous percoll gradients and comparison with neutrophils. Blood 1985, 65, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Malik, M.; Jividen, K.; Padmakumar, V.C.; Cataisson, C.; Li, L.; Lee, J.; Howard, O.M.Z.; Yuspa, S.H. Inducible NOS-induced chloride intracellular channel 4 (CLIC4) nuclear translocation regulates macrophage deactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6130–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Frommhold, D.; Kamphues, A.; Hepper, I.; Pruenster, M.; Lukić, I.K.; Socher, I.; Zablotskaya, V.; Buschmann, K.; Lange-Sperandio, B.; Schymeinsky, J.; et al. RAGE and ICAM-1 cooperate in mediating leukocyte recruitment during acute inflammation in vivo. Blood 2010, 116, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 09803 g001 550
Figure 1. Cytokine responses of mouse bone marrow neutrophils primed by increasing doses of LPS. (A) Two-step stimulating schema used to induce memory-like inflammatory responses. Bone marrow neutrophils (1,000,000 cells/well) isolated from adult mice were stimulated with different doses of LPS (10 pg/mL to 100 ng/mL) on day 1 immediately after isolation for 45 min. Then, cells were washed and left in medium to rest for 18 h. On the next day (day 2), cells were re-stimulated with a fixed dose of LPS (100 ng/mL) for 4 h, followed by sample collection after the incubation time and processed for further analysis. Cytokine production of (B) TNF-α (n = 4) and (C) IL-6 (n = 4) by mouse bone marrow neutrophils stimulated (primed) with increasing doses of LPS analyzed by ELISA. (D,E) Opposing inflammatory responses of mouse bone marrow neutrophils primed by increasing doses of LPS, after a second challenge by a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL). Cytokine levels ((D): TNF-α, n = 9; E: IL-6, n = 9) assessed by ELISA (normalized to total protein concentration). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unstimulated condition (US) (B,C); # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column) (D,E).
Figure 1. Cytokine responses of mouse bone marrow neutrophils primed by increasing doses of LPS. (A) Two-step stimulating schema used to induce memory-like inflammatory responses. Bone marrow neutrophils (1,000,000 cells/well) isolated from adult mice were stimulated with different doses of LPS (10 pg/mL to 100 ng/mL) on day 1 immediately after isolation for 45 min. Then, cells were washed and left in medium to rest for 18 h. On the next day (day 2), cells were re-stimulated with a fixed dose of LPS (100 ng/mL) for 4 h, followed by sample collection after the incubation time and processed for further analysis. Cytokine production of (B) TNF-α (n = 4) and (C) IL-6 (n = 4) by mouse bone marrow neutrophils stimulated (primed) with increasing doses of LPS analyzed by ELISA. (D,E) Opposing inflammatory responses of mouse bone marrow neutrophils primed by increasing doses of LPS, after a second challenge by a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL). Cytokine levels ((D): TNF-α, n = 9; E: IL-6, n = 9) assessed by ELISA (normalized to total protein concentration). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unstimulated condition (US) (B,C); # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column) (D,E).
Ijms 22 09803 g001
Ijms 22 09803 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of low- and high-dose LPS priming on ROS production and MCP-1 release in bone marrow neutrophils. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL) as described previously. (A) ROS levels (n = 6) were assessed by the 2′,7′–dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) assay, whereas the production of (B) MCP-1 (n = 7) was measured using ELISA (normalized to total protein concentration). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Figure 2. Effects of low- and high-dose LPS priming on ROS production and MCP-1 release in bone marrow neutrophils. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL) as described previously. (A) ROS levels (n = 6) were assessed by the 2′,7′–dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) assay, whereas the production of (B) MCP-1 (n = 7) was measured using ELISA (normalized to total protein concentration). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Ijms 22 09803 g002
Ijms 22 09803 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of low- and high-dose LPS priming on the production of IL-10 as anti-inflammatory cytokine in mouse bone marrow neutrophils. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL) as described. Supernatants and RNA samples were collected 4 h after the second challenge. Production of (A) IL-10 (n = 9) was measured using ELISA (normalized to total protein concentration), whereas (B) gene expression of IL-10 (n = 4) by real-time PCR normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) representing relative values to unprimed state (assigned as 1.0). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Figure 3. Effects of low- and high-dose LPS priming on the production of IL-10 as anti-inflammatory cytokine in mouse bone marrow neutrophils. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL) as described. Supernatants and RNA samples were collected 4 h after the second challenge. Production of (A) IL-10 (n = 9) was measured using ELISA (normalized to total protein concentration), whereas (B) gene expression of IL-10 (n = 4) by real-time PCR normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) representing relative values to unprimed state (assigned as 1.0). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Ijms 22 09803 g003
Ijms 22 09803 g004 550
Figure 4. LPS-induced alterations of the TLR4/MyD88/PI3Ks triangle triggers opposing reactions in p65 transcription, promoting either trained sensitivity or tolerance responses in mouse bone marrow neutrophils. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL) as described. Lysates were collected 4 h after the second stimulation by LPS and the protein expression of (A) TLR4 (n = 6), (B) MyD88 (n = 6) and (C) phospho-Akt were assayed by Western blotting and quantified (unprimed cells assigned as 1.0). RNA samples were collected also 4 h after the second stimulation and analyzed for the gene expression of (D) p65 by real-time PCR normalized to GAPDH representing relative values to unprimed state (assigned as 1.0). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Figure 4. LPS-induced alterations of the TLR4/MyD88/PI3Ks triangle triggers opposing reactions in p65 transcription, promoting either trained sensitivity or tolerance responses in mouse bone marrow neutrophils. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL) as described. Lysates were collected 4 h after the second stimulation by LPS and the protein expression of (A) TLR4 (n = 6), (B) MyD88 (n = 6) and (C) phospho-Akt were assayed by Western blotting and quantified (unprimed cells assigned as 1.0). RNA samples were collected also 4 h after the second stimulation and analyzed for the gene expression of (D) p65 by real-time PCR normalized to GAPDH representing relative values to unprimed state (assigned as 1.0). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Ijms 22 09803 g004
Ijms 22 09803 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of low- and high-dose LPS priming on the migratory effects and phagocytic activity of mouse bone marrow neutrophils in vitro. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL), as described. (A) Transmigration of neutrophils (n = 6) was analyzed by the CytoSelect 96-well Cell Migration Assay, as described (check Materials and methods, Section 4.8) and data were expressed as relative fluorescence units. RNA samples were collected 4 h after the second stimulation by LPS (100 ng/mL) and analyzed for (B) LFA-1 (n = 4) and (C) CD11a (n = 4) by real-time PCR normalized to GAPDH representing relative values to unprimed state (assigned as 1.0). (D) Phagocytic activity of mouse bone marrow neutrophils (n = 6) was assessed using a CytoSelect 96-Well Phagocytosis Assay kit (E. coli Substrate) and data were expressed as optical density (further check Material and methods, Section 4.9). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Figure 5. Effects of low- and high-dose LPS priming on the migratory effects and phagocytic activity of mouse bone marrow neutrophils in vitro. Cells were primed with different doses of LPS (low-dose: 10 pg/mL; high-dose: 100 ng/mL) and re-challenged on day 2 with a fixed dose LPS (100 ng/mL), as described. (A) Transmigration of neutrophils (n = 6) was analyzed by the CytoSelect 96-well Cell Migration Assay, as described (check Materials and methods, Section 4.8) and data were expressed as relative fluorescence units. RNA samples were collected 4 h after the second stimulation by LPS (100 ng/mL) and analyzed for (B) LFA-1 (n = 4) and (C) CD11a (n = 4) by real-time PCR normalized to GAPDH representing relative values to unprimed state (assigned as 1.0). (D) Phagocytic activity of mouse bone marrow neutrophils (n = 6) was assessed using a CytoSelect 96-Well Phagocytosis Assay kit (E. coli Substrate) and data were expressed as optical density (further check Material and methods, Section 4.9). Data are shown as scatter dot plots, mean + SEM, # p < 0.05, # significant differences vs. unprimed condition (UP, gray column).
Ijms 22 09803 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lajqi, T.; Braun, M.; Kranig, S.A.; Frommhold, D.; Pöschl, J.; Hudalla, H. LPS Induces Opposing Memory-like Inflammatory Responses in Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9803. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189803

AMA Style

Lajqi T, Braun M, Kranig SA, Frommhold D, Pöschl J, Hudalla H. LPS Induces Opposing Memory-like Inflammatory Responses in Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(18):9803. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189803

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lajqi, Trim, Maylis Braun, Simon Alexander Kranig, David Frommhold, Johannes Pöschl, and Hannes Hudalla. 2021. "LPS Induces Opposing Memory-like Inflammatory Responses in Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 18: 9803. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189803

APA Style

Lajqi, T., Braun, M., Kranig, S. A., Frommhold, D., Pöschl, J., & Hudalla, H. (2021). LPS Induces Opposing Memory-like Inflammatory Responses in Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(18), 9803. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189803

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop