Next Article in Journal
Mesothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Exosomes in Peritoneal Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
The Genetic Backdrop of Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism
Previous Article in Journal
Genotype-Dependent Effect of Silencing of TaCKX1 and TaCKX2 on Phytohormone Crosstalk and Yield-Related Traits in Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuroendocrine Effects of Carnitines on Reproductive Impairments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Primary Amenorrhea Due to Anatomical Abnormalities of the Reproductive Tract: Molecular Insight

Division of Gynecology, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-535 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(21), 11495; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111495
Submission received: 2 October 2021 / Revised: 17 October 2021 / Accepted: 20 October 2021 / Published: 25 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Hormonal Advances in Amenorrhea)

Abstract

:
Congenital anomalies of the female reproductive tract that present with primary amenorrhea involve Müllerian aplasia, also known as Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome (MRKHS), and cervical and vaginal anomalies that completely obstruct the reproductive tract. Karyotype abnormalities do not exclude the diagnosis of MRKHS. Familial cases of Müllerian anomalies and associated malformations of the urinary and skeletal systems strongly suggest a complex genetic etiology, but so far, the molecular mechanism in the vast majority of cases remains unknown. Primary amenorrhea may also be the first presentation of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, steroid 5α-reductase type 2 deficiency, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency, and Leydig cells hypoplasia type 1; therefore, these disorders should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the congenital absence of the uterus and vagina. The molecular diagnosis in the majority of these cases can be established.

1. Introduction

Congenital malformations of the female genital organs that present with primary amenorrhea involve a congenital absence of the uterus and vagina (CAUV) and some obstructive anomalies of the reproductive tract. Surgical correction of complete uterine or vaginal obstruction results in the occurrence of menses. On the contrary, amenorrhea due to CAUV is irreversible; therefore, this complex malformation is considered the most severe anomaly of the female reproductive tract. Disorders of gonadal development that trigger gonadal dysgenesis and premature ovarian insufficiency as a cause of primary amenorrhea are not the subject of this review.
The most common cause of CAUV (class U5C4V4 of the European Society of Human Reproduction (ESHRE)/the European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification [1]) is Müllerian aplasia, also known as Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome (MRKHS). Isolated Müllerian aplasia is classified as MRKHS type 1 (typical form). Müllerian aplasia associated with at least one concomitant congenital malformation is classified as MRKHS type 2 (atypical form).
Utero-vaginal aplasia was also reported as a cause of primary amenorrhea in patients diagnosed with other syndromes of multiple congenital anomalies. Considering the variety of extragenital malformations attributed to MRKHS type 2, in some cases, the phenotypic features of these patients might overlap. Cat-eye syndrome (CES) (OMIM 115470) is one such example. CES is characterized by ocular coloboma, periauricular tags, and anal atresia and results from the presence of extra copies of the pericentromeric 22q11 region [2]. On the other hand, duplications at the chromosomal region 22q11.21 also have been identified by array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in patients with MRKHS [3]. In both syndromes, renal and heart malformations are frequent. At least two patients with the association of CES and Müllerian aplasia have been reported [2]. Next, complete Müllerian agenesis (absent fallopian tubes and uterus) was found in two sisters with familial Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) caused by the CDKN1C gene mutation [4]. Uterus aplasia was also described in two syndromes that present with shortening of the upper limbs: the Al-Awadi-Raas-Rotschild syndrome (AARRS) (OMIM 276820) [5] and the thrombocytopenia-absent radius (TAR) syndrome (OMIM 274000) [6,7]. The WNT7A loss-of-function mutations cause AARRS, and its main clinical futures include short upper limbs with ulnar deficiency, oligodactyly, hypoplastic nails, and reduction defects of the lower limbs [5]. The key characteristics of TAR syndrome, caused by the deletion of 1q21.1 or mutation at the RBM8A gene, involve the absence of the radius, preservation of the thumbs, and thrombocytopenia [6,7]. On the other hand, in women with MRKHS, radial aplasia was reported as an associated finding [8,9]. Deletions affecting the TAR susceptibility locus and mutations of the RBM8A gene, both located in 1q21.1, were found in patients with MRKHS [10].
The spectrum of diseases that might affect phenotypic females with CAUV and therefore, warrant consideration in the differential diagnosis of MRKHS also involve the following: complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), steroid 5α-reductase type 2 (SRD5A2) deficiency, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 (HSD17B3) deficiency, and Leydig cells hypoplasia (LCH) (Table 1). These conditions belong to the spectrum of 46,XY disorders (differences) of sex development (46,XY DSD). In contrast to patients with MRKHS, patients with these disorders have 46,XY karyotype and gonads corresponding to testes. The female phenotype of these patients results from undervirilization, due to abnormal androgen action or synthesis.

2. Embryogenesis of the Female Genital Tract

In humans, the Müllerian (paramesonephric) ducts (MDs) and the Wolffian (mesonephric) ducts (WDs) are essential for the development of the female and male genital systems, respectively. Although the WDs do not contribute cells to the developing MDs, they are required for proper MDs development [11]. The MDs are of mesodermal origin, and their formation can be divided into three phases: specification, invagination, and elongation. During the first phase, Müllerian precursor cells appear within the coelomic epithelium covering the cranial pole of the mesonephros (the Müllerian surface epithelium, MSE), adjacent to the WD [12]. The initiation phase of MDs formations is regulated by a sequential action of BMP/PAX2 and FGF/LIM1 signaling [13]. During the second phase, the Müllerian duct–specified cells, PAX2/LIM1 positive, invaginate and proliferate in a caudal direction through the mesenchyme (the Müllerian duct mesenchyme, MDM) between the coelomic epithelium and WD [12]. Invagination requires WNT4, which is produced and released from the MDM cells [12]. During the third phase, the invaginating cells form the Müllerian duct epithelium (MDE), come into physical contact with the WD, and form the canalized tube that, through proliferation and migration of the MDE cells, grows caudally alongside the WD until it ultimately fuses with the urogenital sinus [12]. WNT4 and WNT9B, derived from the neighboring WD, are major factors required for MD elongation [14]. At the point where the MDs contact the endodermal urogenital sinus, called the Müllerian tubercule, the urogenital sinus epithelium proliferates and forms the sinovaginal bulbs that finally give rise to the lining epithelium of the vagina [15]. The Müllerian ducts fuse and form the midline uterovaginal canal [16]. In males, MD regression is driven by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a member of the TGFbeta growth factor family secreted by Sertoli cells in the developing testes. AMH binds to its receptors type II (AMHR2) and I (AMHR1) in the MDM. In females, the MDs differentiation into fallopian tubes, uterus, cervix, and upper portion of the vagina is regulated by WNT7A and segmental (from cranial to caudal direction) expression of genes Hoxa9, Hoxa10, Hoxa11, and Hoxa13 [14,17].

3. MRKH Syndrome

MRKHS is characterized by uterovaginal aplasia or hypoplasia in an otherwise phenotypically normal female with a normal 46,XX karyotype (OMIM 277000). MRKHS is a rare disease that affects about 1:5000 newborn females (range 1:4000–10,000) [18]. Nevertheless, it is the second most common cause of primary amenorrhea. The phenotypic heterogeneity of patients with MRKHS is mainly determined by a spectrum of associated congenital extragenital anomalies and, to a lesser degree, by the severity of Müllerian aplasia within the range from the complete absence of vaginal opening, vagina, and uterus to the presence of blind-ending shallow vagina and rudimentary uterine horns with a functional endometrium (Figure 1). The proportion of patients with coexisting malformations, usually renal and skeletal defects, varies in different populations. In the largest published cohort of MRKHS women of Chinese origin, 70% (734/1055) of the women had type 1 MRKHS, and the remaining 30% (321/1055) had type 2 MRKHS [19]. In the largest European cohort of 346 MRKHS women from Germany, a proportion of patients with concomitant malformations was higher (41% had MRKHS type 2 and further 5.5% had MURCS (Müllerian aplasia, renal aplasia, cervicothoracic somite anomalies) association) [8]. The most striking is the difference in the proportion of patients with renal anomalies. Kidney malformations were diagnosed in nearly 10% of the Chinese MRKHS women [19], while in the European cohorts, 27% to 34% of MRKHS women had concomitant renal malformations [8,18]. In some cohorts of patients, skeletal anomalies, most commonly spinal and of upper limbs, preponderated over renal anomalies (22% affected patients in the mentioned Chinese cohort [19]; 32% versus 29% in the Polish cohort [9]).
Although the definition of MRKHS includes normal female karyotype 46,XX, chromosomal aberrations were reported in patients with MRKHS. Rall et al. [8] found abnormal karyotypes in 5 of 346 (1.4%) patients with MRKHS. The abnormalities involved the following: weak Turner mosaicism (45,X[3]/46,XX[37]), a subtelomeric deletion or unbalanced translocation of the chromosomal region 21q22.3 (46,XX,del(21) (q22.3)), Robertsonian translocation of chromosomes 14 and 15 (46,XX, Robertsonian translocation (14;15)), a pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 (46,XX,inv(9) (p11q13)) and a marker chromosome (47,XX,mar[13]/46XX[2]). We found abnormal karyotypes in 4 out of 125 (3.2%) patients with MRKHS, and the abnormalities involved the following: low-level Turner mosaicism (45,X[3]/46,XX[47]), a triple X (47,XXX), low-level mosaicism with presence of Y chromosome (46,XY[2]/46,XX[98]), inversion of chromosome 9 (46,XX, inv(9)(p12q21)) and low level mosaicism of 3 chromosomal rearrangements, including translocation (46,XX, t(1;14)(p11;q11)) and deletion (46,XX,del(5)(p11→pter) [9]. Chromosomal abnormalities, including 46,X/46,XX mosaicism and 47,XXX, were also identified in 2.8% of Dutch women with MRKHS [18]. The coexistence of MRKHS with Turner syndrome was also described [20].
Reports from different studies that searched genomic rearrangements by genome-wide array CGH have revealed chromosomal abnormalities in a larger number of MRKHS cases (about 10–15%) [3,21,22]. The identified recurrent chromosomal imbalances that are considered the regions harboring potentially causative genes for MRKHS typically are microdeletions or microduplications in the chromosomal regions 17q12 (with likely causative genes, LHX1 and HNF1B), 16p11.2 (with likely causative gene, TBX6), 22q11, 1q21 (with likely causative gene, RBM8A) and Xp22, with the most frequent 1.2–1.9 Mb deletions at 17q12 [21,22]. Nevertheless, the pathogenic contribution of these chromosomal changes has not been completely elucidated, and the genotype–phenotype correlations remain unobvious.
The genetic base of MRKHS is largely unsolved, though many candidate genes have been suggested. The molecular determinants of MRKHS remain unknown in the majority of patients. Both phenotypic complexity of the patients and the results of genetic studies that address the etiology of MRKHS indicate that the genetic background of this syndrome is very complex, and the influence of epigenetic and environmental factors cannot be excluded [23]. The latter is mainly based on cases of monozygotic twins discordant for Müllerian aplasia. In the research that involved the largest reported cohort of MRKHS-discordant monozygotic twins, differences in copy number variants (CNVs) patterns between the affected and non-affected siblings were found only in one of the five pairs of twins [24]. The identified duplication of chromosome 14q11.2 was considered significant, as the region contained genes of matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 10 (LRP10) with known relevant roles during embryonic development of the female reproductive tract [24]. Nevertheless, despite the fact that familial cases of MRKHS have been reported [25], most cases are sporadic.
The WNT4 gene mutation was the first one found to cause MRKHS. The first mutation found and proved causative of MRKHS concomitant with hyperandrogenism without clinical signs of virilization (OMIM 158330) was the Q226G missense mutation of the WNT4 protein, due to a heterozygous substitution of guanine for adenine in exon 5 of the WNT4 gene [26]. However, it is worth mentioning that androgen excess is quite common in MRKHS women but is rarely associated with the WNT4 gene mutations. In a study that analyzed the hormonal status of 215 MRKHS patients, hyperandrogenemia was found in 52% of the subjects, but no relevant mutations or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected in the WNT4 gene [27]. So far, three causative WNT4 mutations (p.R83C, p.L12P, p.A233T) were identified in adolescents with MRKHS and hyperandrogenism [28,29].
Exome sequencing (ES), which was performed in one of the largest cohorts of patients with MRKHS, involving 442 Chinese individuals and 150 European and American individuals, in 4.4% (26/592) of the patients identified 12 loss-of-function variants in 7 candidate genes: PAX8, BMP4, BMP7, TBX6, HOXA10, EMX2, and WNT9. PAX8 represented the most significant disease-associated gene, underlying the etiology of MRKHS in 1.2% (7/592) of the patients; in four patients, the variants were paternally inherited, which is consistent with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with the sex-dependent phenotypic expression of the disease trait [30]. PAX8 is also critical for the development of the thyroid gland; microdeletion of 2q12.1q14.1, involving PAX8, was described in a patient with congenital hypothyroidism, due to thyroid gland hypoplasia [31]. Another study based on whole ES (WES), conducted in a group of 111 patients with MRKHS and focused on 72 candidate genes, revealed deleterious candidate variants in 10 genes: WNT4, LAMC1, RARA, HOXA10, PAX2, WNT9B, TBX6, SHOX, MMP14, and LRP10, nearly all of which were heterozygous [32]. The WES of diagnostic and candidate genes undertaken in eight women with MRKHS identified 16 genomic variants in 14 genes; the two affecting LRP10 and DOCK4 genes were considered potentially contributory but had no proof from functional studies [33]. Conversely, the deleterious variants of the GEN1 gene were found and were demonstrated to cause Müllerian aplasia, acting as a single pathogenic variant or synergistically in the combinations with the deleterious variants of other genes (mainly WNT9B gene) [34]. Disease-causing mutations were also identified in the LHX1, also known as LIM1 gene [35,36]. Lastly, causative variants in the GREB1L gene (growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer 1 like) were identified in individuals with MRKHS, mainly type 2 with concomitant anomalies of kidney or urinary tract [37]. The other potential candidate genes associated with MRKHS are the OXTR and the ESR1 genes [38]. The variants that potentially impair the oxytocin receptor and the estrogen receptor-1 function were identified in MRKHS patients, supporting the hypothesis that impaired estrogen receptor function could cease the development of the Müllerian ducts at the attachment of the caudal mesonephric ligament (later the round ligament) [38,39].
Rall et al. [40] compared the whole-genome expression and methylation patterns in the myometrium of uterine rudiments from patients with MRKHS and normal uterine tissue from healthy controls. The overexpression of ESR1 and progesterone receptor (PGR) and hypomethylation of CpG sites within WT1 and GATA4 were found in the rudimentary uterine tissue of MRKHS patients, leading to activation of the AMH gene during embryological development, and thus, are responsible for MD regression. The hypomethylation of specific CpG sites and corresponding overexpression of HOXA9 and HOXA5 was also found to prevent normal differentiation of the MDs. The authors pointed out that the involvement of endocrine disruptors (ED), especially with estrogen-like functions, might mimic this effect [40].
The prevalence of potentially pathogenic mutations in the MRKHS-susceptibility genes in the studied cohorts of MRKHS women was very low, suggesting the involvement of other factors in the disease’s molecular mechanism. The role of epigenetic modifications, which was already hypothesized for other diseases (i.e., endometriosis), the etiology of which is associated with the same HOXA and WNT genes, is possible [23].
Most women with MRKHS have normal ovarian function; however, cases of primary ovarian failure due to ovarian agenesis or dysgenesis have also been reported [8,20].

4. 46,XY Phenotypical Females with CAUV

4.1. Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

The complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) (OMIM 300068) is an X-linked recessive 46,XY DSD. It is the most common cause of DSD in completely feminized 46,XY patients. The patients have normal female external genitalia and present with primary amenorrhea after normal breast development at puberty. The pubic and axillary hair is absent or scanty, the vagina is short and blind-ending, and the uterus is absent. Discordance between the result of prenatal karyotyping and phenotype of external genitalia at birth as well as the presence of a palpable mass that corresponds to testis in the labia majora or inguinal canal can prompt the diagnosis earlier. About 80% to 100% of CAIS are caused by loss-of-function mutations in the coding region of the androgen receptor (AR) gene (AR gene), located on the X chromosome (Xq12), and is composed of 8 exons [41]. The AR is a 920 amino acids–long protein and contains a DNA binding domain (DBD), linked by the short hinge region (HR) to the C-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD), and the N-terminal domain (NTD) [42]. A complete loss of function mutations, clinically associated with CAIS, occur predominantly in the LBD of the AR protein (encoded by exons 4–8) followed by the NTD of the AR protein (encoded by exon 1) and are usually single base–pair missense substitutions [43,44]. More than 350 loss-of-function mutations of the AR gene have been reported in patients with CAIS [42,43]. Nevertheless, in up to 20% of patients with the clinical diagnosis of CAIS and ruled out mutations in the steroid 5α-reductase type 2 gene (SRD5A2 gene), the molecular cause remains unknown [45]. Individuals with CAIS without mutations in the AR gene but disrupted androgen signaling in the genital skin fibroblasts (GFs) were reported to have mutations in the regulatory regions of the AR gene (c. -547C>T affecting upstream open reading frame (uORF) in the 5′untranslated region (5′-UTR) of the AR gene, generating repression of the AR protein translation) [46]. In another patient with CAIS, with no mutations in the AR coding region and undetectable AR protein in the fibroblast from the labia majora, a causative deep intronic mutation c.2450-118A>G in the intron 6 of the AR gene was identified [47]. These two discoveries reinforce a consideration that mutations in the AR coregulators and interacting proteins could account for CAIS in patients lacking mutations in the coding region of the AR gene [43].

4.2. 5α-Reductase Type 2 Deficiency

Steroid 5α-reductase type 2 (SRD5A2) catalyzes the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-dependent reduction of testosterone (T) into dihydrotestosterone (DHT) [48]. The function of the DHT-AR complex is to induce the differentiation of the male urethra, prostate gland, penis, and scrotum during embryogenesis and to induce virilization during puberty. SRD5A2 deficiency (OMIM 264600) is a rare autosomal recessive 46,XY DSD. The SRD5A2 gene is located at 2p23 and is composed of 5 exons. More than 100 SRD5A2 gene mutations have been reported in different ethnic groups [48]. Homozygous mutations predominate over compound heterozygous, mostly affecting exons 1 and 4 [49]. Mutations associated with SRD5A2 deficiency were demonstrated to reduce the enzyme’s catalytic efficiency and binding of T or NADPH, yet reliable information on the kinetic consequences of these mutations is scarce [48]. The SRD5A2 deficiency is characterized by high phenotypical variability of the external genitalia differentiation: from hypospadias in men to normal females with subsequent virilization during puberty. It was observed that carriers of the most cited mutations that diminish testosterone affinity (with the most common homozygous p.G34R) had a predominantly female phenotype, while the patients with the most common mutations decreasing enzymatic activity (the most frequent is homozygous p.R227Q) had less severe phenotypes [50]. Nevertheless, a genotype–phenotype correlation is poor, and even in patients carrying the same homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations, variable phenotypes were observed [49]. In a 46,XY patient with female external genitalia at birth and virilization at puberty, the combination of primary amenorrhea, lack of breast development, clitoromegaly, normal pubic hair development, CAUV, and high T level prompt the diagnosis of SRD5A2 deficiency [51]. In patients with a predominantly female phenotype, early medical referral and diagnosis are usually prompted by either clitoromegaly or the presence of palpable masses in the labial folds or the inguinal canals [52]. Low serum concentration of DHT and increased T to DHT ratio of >20 as biochemical criteria of the diagnosis are not always evident [51]. Molecular evaluation (DNA sequencing of the entire SRD5A2 gene) is necessary for the definitive diagnosis, especially in the pre-pubertal period, when the clinical picture of SRD5A2 deficiency might be very similar to AIS [53]. Nevertheless, in a study of 23 adult 46,XY women with the clinical diagnosis of SRD5A2 deficiency based on urinary steroid profile analysis, sequencing of the SRD5A2 gene revealed pathological mutations and confirmed the diagnosis in 43% (10/23) of subjects [54]. In populations with a high rate of inbreeding, the diagnosis of SRD5A2 deficiency as a cause of 46,XY DSD in a female with an absent uterus might be more probable than CAIS diagnosis [55].

4.3. 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 3 Deficiency

17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 (17β-HSD-3, HSD17B3) is a 310 amino acid–long enzyme encoded by the HSD17B3 gene located at 9q22.32. HSD17B3 is present almost exclusively in the testicular Leydig cells, and in the presence of cofactor NADPH converts Δ4-androstendione (Δ4-A) to T [56]. HSD17B3 deficiency (OMIM 264300) is a very rare autosomal recessive 46,XY DSD, caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the HSD17B3 gene. Approximately 70 different mutations in this gene have been reported [57]. The most frequent site of identified mutations is in exon 9, followed by the R80 in exon 3 [58]. Ethnic differences were noticed in the preponderance of different mutations, with a predominance of c.277 + 4C>7A in Caucasians and p. R80Q in West Asians [59]. The diagnosis of HSD17B3 deficiency should be considered in patients with primary amenorrhea and a mild degree of virilization. The most frequent presentation of the HSD17B3 deficiency, which might be clinically indistinguishable from AIS or SRD5A2 deficiency, is a 46,XY individual with female external genitalia, hypoplastic vagina, and an absent uterus, with or without mild clitoromegaly, in childhood seeking medical attention because of inguinal or intralabial masses, while at puberty or in adulthood because of virilization or primary amenorrhea [56,59]. The biochemical hallmark of HSD17B3 deficiency is a low T/Δ4-A ratio of <0.8, stimulated by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or baseline in post-pubertal patients (sensitivity 100%, specificity 91%) [60]. Definitive diagnosis requires confirmation by genetic testing.

4.4. Leydig Cells Hypoplasia

The Leydig cells hypoplasia (LCH) is a very rare autosomal recessive 46,XY DSD. LCH is due to homozygous or compound heterozygous inactivating or loss-of-function mutations in the luteinizing hormone (LH)/chorionic gonadotropin (CG) receptor gene (LHCGR gene) [61]. The LHCGR gene is located at 2p16.3 and contains 11 coding exons [62]. The LHCGR is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. The mutant LHCG receptors’ impaired function is mainly due to severe receptor intracellular retention and reduced expression at the cell surface [63]. Abnormal development of anatomical sex in 46,XY patients with this disorder results from impaired or completely abolished Leydig cells development and function. Androgen production by testis is partially or fully deficient, due to the inability of Leydig cells to respond to hHG and subsequently, to LH. Sertoli cells are not affected, and therefore AMH secretion during embryogenesis is normal. The predominance of female external genitalia with a blind-ending vaginal dimple and an absent uterus is the severe form of LCH type I (OMIM 238320). The patients have inguinal or intra-abdominal testes and present with a lack of breast development and primary amenorrhea at puberty. The hormonal profile of the patients shows low serum T level (basal and stimulated by hCG), normal male range serum AMH level, elevated serum LH and FSH levels, low serum DHT level, normal serum Δ4-A level. In patients with a severe phenotype, nonsense and missense mutations located in the exons of the LHCGR gene, mostly exon 11, were reported [64]. LCH type I is a very rare disorder. In a study that involved a large international cohort of 278 patients with 46,XY DSD, including 37 patients with disorders in androgen synthesis and action, only one patient was diagnosed with LCH [65]. The prevalence is higher in populations with a high degree of parental consanguinity or endogamy, especially in the Arab countries of North Africa and the Middle East [62].

4.5. Obstructive Uterovaginal Anomalies

Obstructive anomalies of the reproductive tract that preclude the occurrence of menses involve cervical aplasia, partial vaginal aplasia, complete transverse vaginal septa, and imperforate hymen (respectively, classes C4, V4, and V3 of the ESHRE/ESGE classification [1]). Amenorrhea due to these anomalies is rather cryptomenorrhea, as uterine bleeding occurs but vaginal bleeding does not occur because of the completely obstructed outflow. Therefore, the typical presentation of these anomalies is acute or recurrent lower abdominal pain in an amenorrheic girl. The coexistence of partial vaginal aplasia or transverse vaginal septum with primary or secondary ovarian failure might mimic MRKHS, as the patient, prior to surgical correction and pubertal induction, has a short, blind-ending vagina and a hypoplastic uterus. The knowledge about the genetic background of these particular obstructive anomalies is very limited; however, some studies suggest that Müllerian formation anomalies, including MRKHS, and Müllerian fusion anomalies may have a common etiology [66]. Cases of familial occurrence of an imperforate hymen, both in siblings and across consecutive generations, strongly suggest a genetic background [67].

5. Conclusions

In adolescents with syndromic or non-syndromic skeletal or renal malformations, Müllerian aplasia as a cause of primary amenorrhea is highly probable. MRKHS is a complex and heterogeneous disease, usually sporadic. The molecular etiology in the majority of cases remains unknown; however, the contributions of certain causative gene variants were found. In about 10% of MRKHS patients, potentially pathogenic CNVs are identified by array CGH. The WNT4 gene mutations were proved to cause MRKHS in some patients with hyperandrogenism. CAIS is considered the most common diagnosis in 46,XY females with an absent uterus; however, in populations with a high rate of inbreeding, the probability of a diagnosis of SRD5A2 deficiency might be similar. The offspring of consanguineous parents are also at higher risk of HSD17B3 deficiency and LCH type 1. In contrast to patients with MRKHS, the molecular diagnosis can be established in the majority of patients with these 46,XY DSDs.

Author Contributions

K.K.: conceptualization, analysis, writing—original draft preparation. W.K.: supervision, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Karina M. Sasin for her outstanding language and editorial support that greatly improved the manuscript and to thank Katarzyna Zaborowska for preparation of the figure.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grimbizis, G.F.; Gordts, S.; Sardo, A.D.S.; Brucker, S.; DE Angelis, C.; Gergolet, M.; Vasilios, T.; Tanos, V.; Brölmann, H.; Gianaroli, L.; et al. The ESHRE–ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol. Surg. 2013, 10, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. AlSubaihin, A.; Vandermeulen, J.; Harris, K.; Duck, J.; McCready, E. Müllerian Agenesis in Cat Eye Syndrome and 22q11 Chromosome Abnormalities: A Case Report and Literature Review. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2018, 31, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ledig, S.; Schippert, C.; Strick, R.; Beckmann, M.W.; Oppelt, P.G.; Wieacker, P. Recurrent aberrations identified by array-CGH in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 1589–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brabbing-Goldstein, D.; Yaron, Y.; Reches, A. Familial Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: Prenatal manifestation and a possible expansion of the phenotype. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2021, 64, 104137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Al-Qattan, M. Molecular basis of the clinical features of Al-Awadi-Raas-Rothschild (limb/pelvis/uterus-hypoplasia/aplasia) syndrome (AARRS) and Fuhrmann syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2013, 161, 2274–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ahmad, R.; Pope, S. Association of Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser Syndrome with Thrombocytopenia Absent Radii syndrome: A rare presentation. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 139, 257–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jacquinet, A.; Millar, D.; Lehman, A. Etiologies of uterine malformations. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2016, 170, 2141–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rall, K.; Eisenbeis, S.; Henninger, V.; Henes, M.; Wallwiener, D.; Bonin, M.; Brucker, S. Typical and Atypical Associated Findings in a Group of 346 Patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser Syndrome. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2015, 28, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kapczuk, K.; Iwaniec, K.; Friebe, Z.; Kędzia, W. Congenital malformations and other comorbidities in 125 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016, 207, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tewes, A.-C.; Rall, K.K.; Römer, T.; Hucke, J.; Kapczuk, K.; Brucker, S.; Wieacker, P.; Ledig, S. Variations in RBM8A and TBX6 are associated with disorders of the müllerian ducts. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 103, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guioli, S.; Sekido, R.; Lovell-Badge, R. The origin of the Mullerian duct in chick and mouse. Dev. Biol. 2007, 302, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Roly, Z.Y.; Backhouse, B.; Cutting, A.; Tan, T.Y.; Sinclair, A.H.; Ayers, K.L.; Major, A.T.; Smith, C.A. The cell biology and molecular genetics of Müllerian duct development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2018, 7, e310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Atsuta, Y.; Takahashi, Y. Early formation of the Müllerian duct is regulated by sequential actions of BMP/Pax2- and FGF/Lim1 signaling. Development 2016, 143, 3549–3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Carroll, T.J.; Park, J.-S.; Hayashi, S.; Majumdar, A.; McMahon, A.P. Wnt9b Plays a Central Role in the Regulation of Mesenchymal to Epithelial Transitions Underlying Organogenesis of the Mammalian Urogenital System. Dev. Cell 2005, 9, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cunha, G.R.; Robboy, S.J.; Kurita, T.; Isaacson, D.; Shen, J.; Cao, M.; Baskin, L.S. Development of the human female reproductive tract. Differentiation 2018, 103, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Robboy, S.J.; Kurita, T.; Baskin, L.; Cunha, G.R. New insights into human female reproductive tract development. Differentiation 2017, 97, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Du, H.; Taylor, H.S. The Role of Hox Genes in Female Reproductive Tract Development, Adult Function, and Fertility. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 6, a023002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Herlin, M.; Bjørn, A.-M.B.; Rasmussen, M.; Trolle, B.; Petersen, M.B. Prevalence and patient characteristics of Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: A nationwide registry-based study. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2384–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, N.; Pan, H.; Luo, G.; Wang, P.; Xie, Z.; Hua, K.; Luo, X.; Huang, X.; Liu, Q.; Sun, L.; et al. Clinical characteristics of 1,055 Chinese patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A nationwide multicentric study. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 116, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Białka, A.; Gawlik, A.; Drosdzol-Cop, A.; Wilk, K.; Małecka-Tendera, E.; Skrzypulec-Plinta, V. Coexistence of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome and Turner Syndrome: A Case Report. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2016, 29, e35–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fontana, L.; Gentilin, B.; Fedele, L.; Gervasini, C.; Miozzo, M. Genetics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Clin. Genet. 2017, 91, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ledig, S.; Wieacker, P. Clinical and genetic aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Med. Genet. 2018, 30, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maniglio, P.; Ricciardi, E.; Laganà, A.S.; Triolo, O.; Caserta, D. Epigenetic modifications of primordial reproductive tract: A common etiologic pathway for Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome and endometriosis? Med. Hypotheses 2016, 90, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rall, K.; Eisenbeis, S.; Barresi, G.; Rückner, D.; Walter, M.; Poths, S.; Wallwiener, D.; Riess, O.; Bonin, M.; Brucker, S. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome discordance in monozygotic twins: Matrix metalloproteinase 14, low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 10, extracellular matrix, and neoangiogenesis genes identified as candidate genes in a tissue-specific mosaicism. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 103, 494–502.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Herlin, M.; Højland, A.T.; Petersen, M.B. Familial occurrence of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A case report and review of the literature. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2014, 164, 2276–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Biason-Lauber, A.; Konrad, D.; Navratil, F.; Schoenle, E.J. A WNT4 Mutation Associated with Müllerian-Duct Regression and Virilization in a 46, XX Woman. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Oppelt, P.G.; Müller, A.; Stephan, L.; Dittrich, R.; Lermann, J.; Büttner, C.; Ekici, A.B.; Conzelmann, G.; Seeger, H.; Schöller, D.; et al. Hyperandrogenemia and high prolactin in congenital utero–vaginal aplasia patients. Reproduction 2017, 153, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Philibert, P.; Biason-Lauber, A.; Rouzier, R.; Pienkowski, C.; Paris, F.; Konrad, D.; Schoenle, E.; Sultan, C. Identification and Functional Analysis of a New WNT4 Gene Mutation among 28 Adolescent Girls with Primary Amenorrhea and Müllerian Duct Abnormalities: A French Collaborative Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 895–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Philibert, P.; Biason-Lauber, A.; Gueorguieva, I.; Stuckens, C.; Pienkowski, C.; Lebon-Labich, B.; Paris, F.; Sultan, C. Molecular analysis of WNT4 gene in four adolescent girls with mullerian duct abnormality and hyperandrogenism (atypical Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome). Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 2683–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chen, N.; Zhao, S.; Jolly, A.; Wang, L.; Pan, H.; Yuan, J.; Chen, S.; Koch, A.; Ma, C.; Tian, W.; et al. Perturbations of genes essential for Müllerian duct and Wölffian duct development in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2021, 108, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smol, T.; Ribero-Karrouz, W.; Edery, P.; Gorduza, D.B.; Catteau-Jonard, S.; Manouvrier-Hanu, S.; Ghoumid, J. Mayer-Rokitansky-Künster-Hauser syndrome due to 2q12.1q14.1 deletion: PAX8 the causing gene? Eur. J. Med Genet. 2020, 63, 103812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mikhael, S.; Dugar, S.; Morton, M.; Chorich, L.P.; Tam, K.B.; Lossie, A.C.; Kim, H.-G.; Knight, J.; Taylor, H.S.; Mukherjee, S.; et al. Genetics of agenesis/hypoplasia of the uterus and vagina: Narrowing down the number of candidate genes for Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser Syndrome. Hum. Genet. 2021, 140, 667–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Backhouse, B.; Hanna, C.; Robevska, G.; Bergen, J.V.D.; Pelosi, E.; Simons, C.; Koopman, P.; Juniarto, A.Z.; Grover, S.; Faradz, S.; et al. Identification of Candidate Genes for Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome Using Genomic Approaches. Sex. Dev. 2018, 13, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, X.; Dong, S.; Tang, S.; Song, C.; Yang, N.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Shi, H.; et al. Joint utilization of genetic analysis and semi-cloning technology reveals a digenic etiology of Müllerian anomalies. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ledig, S.; Brucker, S.; Barresi, G.; Schomburg, J.; Rall, K.; Wieacker, P. Frame shift mutation of LHX1 is associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 27, 2872–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, W.; Zhou, X.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, C.; Pan, H.; Xing, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. Identification and functional analysis of a novel LHX1 mutation associated with congenital absence of the uterus and vagina. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 8785–8790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jacquinet, A.; Boujemla, B.; Fasquelle, C.; Thiry, J.; Josse, C.; Lumaka, A.; Brischoux-Boucher, E.; Dubourg, C.; David, V.; Pasquier, L.; et al. GREB1L variants in familial and sporadic hereditary urogenital adysplasia and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Clin. Genet. 2020, 98, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brucker, S.Y.; Frank, L.; Eisenbeis, S.; Henes, M.; Wallwiener, D.; Riess, O.; Van Eijck, B.; Schöller, D.; Bonin, M.; Rall, K.K. Sequence variants in ESR1 and OXTR are associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017, 96, 1338–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ludwig, K.S. The Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster syndrome. An analysis of its morphology and embryology. Part I: Morphology. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 1998, 262, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rall, K.; Barresi, G.; Walter, M.; Poths, S.; Haebig, K.; Schaeferhoff, K.; Schoenfisch, B.; Riess, O.; Wallwiener, D.; Bonin, M.; et al. A combination of transcriptome and methylation analyses reveals embryologically-relevant candidate genes in MRKH patients. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2011, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jääskeläinen, J. Molecular biology of androgen insensitivity. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 352, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hornig, N.C.; Holterhus, P.-M. Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity syndromes. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2021, 523, 111146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gottlieb, B.; Beitel, L.K.; Nadarajah, A.; Paliouras, M.; Trifiro, M. The androgen receptor gene mutations database: 2012 update. Hum. Mutat. 2012, 33, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mongan, N.; Cuccaro, R.T.; Bunch, T.; Hughes, I.A. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 29, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, D.; Yao, F.; Tian, T.; Deng, S.; Luo, M.; Tian, Q. Clinical characteristics and molecular genetics of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome patients: A series study of 30 cases from a Chinese tertiary medical center. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 115, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hornig, N.C.; De Beaufort, C.; Denzer, F.; Cools, M.; Wabitsch, M.; Ukat, M.; Kulle, A.E.; Schweikert, H.-U.; Werner, R.; Hiort, O.; et al. A Recurrent Germline Mutation in the 5′UTR of the Androgen Receptor Causes Complete Androgen Insensitivity by Activating Aberrant uORF Translation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Känsäkoski, J.; Jääskeläinen, J.; Jääskeläinen, T.; Tommiska, J.; Saarinen, L.; Lehtonen, R.J.; Hautaniemi, S.; Frilander, M.J.; Palvimo, J.; Toppari, J.; et al. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome caused by a deep intronic pseudoexon-activating mutation in the androgen receptor gene. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ramos, L.; Vilchis, F.; Chávez, B.; Mares, L. Mutational analysis of SRD5A2: From gene to functional kinetics in individuals with steroid 5α-reductase 2 deficiency. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 200, 105691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maimoun, L.L.; Philibert, P.; Cammas, B.B.; Audran, F.F.; Bouchard, P.; Fenichel, P.P.; Cartigny, M.M.; Pienkowski, C.C.; Polak, M.M.; Skordis, N.N.; et al. Phenotypical, Biological, and Molecular Heterogeneity of 5α-Reductase Deficiency: An Extensive International Experience of 55 Patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Avendaño, A.; Paradisi, I.; Cammarata-Scalisi, F.; Callea, M. 5-α-Reductase type 2 deficiency: Is there a genotype-phenotype correlation? A review. Hormones 2018, 17, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fenichel, P.; Paris, F.; Philibert, P.; Hieronimus, S.; Gaspari, L.; Kurzenne, J.-Y.; Chevallier, P.; Bermon, S.; Chevalier, N.; Sultan, C. Molecular Diagnosis of 5α-Reductase Deficiency in 4 Elite Young Female Athletes Through Hormonal Screening for Hyperandrogenism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, E1055–E1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Byers, H.M.; Mohnach, L.H.; Fechner, P.Y.; Chen, M.; Thomas, I.H.; Ramsdell, L.A.; Shnorhavorian, M.; McCauley, E.A.; Oelschlager, A.-M.E.A.; Park, J.M.; et al. Unexpected ethical dilemmas in sex assignment in 46,XY DSD due to 5-alpha reductase type 2 deficiency. Am. J. Med Genet. Part C Semin. Med Genet. 2017, 175, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Akcay, T.; Cancio, M.F.; Turan, S.; Guran, T.; Audi, L.; Bereket, A. AR and SRD5A2 gene mutations in a series of 51 Turkish 46,XY DSD children with a clinical diagnosis of androgen insensitivity. Andrology 2014, 2, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Berra, M.; Williams, E.L.; Muroni, B.; Creighton, S.M.; Honour, J.W.; Rumsby, G.; Conway, G.S. Recognition of 5α-reductase-2 deficiency in an adult female 46XY DSD clinic. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 164, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ata, A.; Özen, S.; Onay, H.; Uzun, S.; Gökşen, D.; Özkınay, F.; Özbaran, N.B.; Ulman, I.; Darcan, Ş. A large cohort of disorders of sex development and their genetic characteristics: 6 novel mutations in known genes. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2021, 64, 104154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. George, M.M.; New, M.I.; Ten, S.; Sultan, C.; Bhangoo, A. The Clinical and Molecular Heterogeneity of 17βHSD-3 Enzyme Deficiency. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2010, 74, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Faienza, M.F.; Baldinotti, F.; Marrocco, G.; Tyutyusheva, N.; Peroni, D.; Baroncelli, G.I.; Bertelloni, S. 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency: Female sex assignment and follow-up. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2020, 43, 1711–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mendonca, B.B.; Gomes, N.L.; Costa, E.M.; Inacio, M.; Martin, R.M.; Nishi, M.Y.; Carvalho, F.M.; Tibor, F.D.; Domenice, S. 46,XY disorder of sex development (DSD) due to 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 165, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yang, Z.; Ye, L.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, W.; Jia, H.; Dong, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Ning, G.; et al. 17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 3 deficiency: Three case reports and a systematic review. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 174, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Phelan, N.; Williams, E.L.; Cardamone, S.; Lee, M.; Creighton, S.M.; Rumsby, G.; Conway, G.S. Screening for mutations in 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and androgen receptor in women presenting with partially virilised 46,XY disorders of sex development. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2015, 172, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hmida, I.B.H.; Mougou-Zerelli, S.; Hadded, A.; Dimassi, S.; Kammoun, M.; Bignon-Topalovic, J.; Bibi, M.; Saad, A.; Bashamboo, A.; McElreavey, K. Novel homozygous nonsense mutations in the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHCGR) gene associated with 46,XY primary amenorrhea. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 225–229.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hassan, H.A.; Essawi, M.L.; Mekkawy, M.K.; Mazen, I. Novel mutations of the LHCGR gene in two families with 46,XY DSD causing Leydig cell hypoplasia I. Hormones 2020, 19, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Newton, C.; Anderson, R.; Katz, A.A.; Millar, R.P. Loss-of-Function Mutations in the Human Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Predominantly Cause Intracellular Retention. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 4364–4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yan, M.; Dilihuma, J.; Luo, Y.; Reyilanmu, B.; Shen, Y.; Mireguli, M. Novel Compound Heterozygous Variants in the LHCGR Gene in a Genetically Male Patient with Female External Genitalia. J. Clin. Res. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2019, 11, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Eggers, S.; Sadedin, S.; Bergen, J.A.V.D.; Robevska, G.; Ohnesorg, T.; Hewitt, J.; Lambeth, L.; Bouty, A.; Knarston, I.; Tan, T.Y.; et al. Disorders of sex development: Insights from targeted gene sequencing of a large international patient cohort. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ledig, S.; Tewes, A.; Hucke, J.; Römer, T.; Kapczuk, K.; Schippert, C.; Hillemanns, P.; Wieacker, P. Array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis in patients with Müllerian fusion anomalies. Clin. Genet. 2018, 93, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sakalkale, R.; Samarakkody, U. Familial Occurrence of Imperforate Hymen. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2005, 18, 427–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. MRKH syndrome (utero-vaginal aplasia, class U5 C4 V4 of the ESHRE/ESGE classification). The dotted line is the contour of absent uterus and vagina.
Figure 1. MRKH syndrome (utero-vaginal aplasia, class U5 C4 V4 of the ESHRE/ESGE classification). The dotted line is the contour of absent uterus and vagina.
Ijms 22 11495 g001
Table 1. Spectrum of diseases affecting phenotypical females with primary amenorrhea and uterovaginal aplasia.
Table 1. Spectrum of diseases affecting phenotypical females with primary amenorrhea and uterovaginal aplasia.
DiseaseOMIMKaryotypeGenetic EtiologyGonads
MRKHS type 127700046,XXLargely unknownNormal ovaries
MRKHS type 2 (including MURCS association)60107646,XXLargely unknownNormal ovaries (rarely ovarian agenesis/dysgenesis)
MRKHS and hyperandrogenism15833046,XXWNT4 mutationsNormal ovaries, hyperandrogenism
CAIS30006846,XYAR mutationsTestes, high T
5α-reductase type 2 deficiency60730646,XYSRD5A2 mutationsTestes, high T
17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency26430046,XYHSD17B3
mutations
Testes, low T
Leydig cells hypoplasia type 123832046,XYLHCGR mutationsTestes, low T
MRKHS—Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hause syndrome, MURCS association—müllerian aplasia, renal aplasia, cervicothoracic somite anomalies association, CAIS—complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, T—testosterone.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kapczuk, K.; Kędzia, W. Primary Amenorrhea Due to Anatomical Abnormalities of the Reproductive Tract: Molecular Insight. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111495

AMA Style

Kapczuk K, Kędzia W. Primary Amenorrhea Due to Anatomical Abnormalities of the Reproductive Tract: Molecular Insight. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(21):11495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111495

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kapczuk, Karina, and Witold Kędzia. 2021. "Primary Amenorrhea Due to Anatomical Abnormalities of the Reproductive Tract: Molecular Insight" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 21: 11495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111495

APA Style

Kapczuk, K., & Kędzia, W. (2021). Primary Amenorrhea Due to Anatomical Abnormalities of the Reproductive Tract: Molecular Insight. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(21), 11495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111495

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop