Next Article in Journal
A Mechanistic Model of NMDA and AMPA Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Transmission in Individual Hippocampal CA3-CA1 Synapses: A Computational Multiscale Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Wavelengths of Laser Irradiation on the Skin Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting Redox Metabolism in Pancreatic Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Hippo Signaling Improves Skin Lesions in a Rosacea-Like Mouse Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Nanostructured Non-Ionic Surfactant Carrier-Based Gel for Topical Delivery of Desoximetasone

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 1535; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041535
by Parinbhai Shah 1,2, Benjamin Goodyear 1,2, Nirali Dholaria 1,2, Vinam Puri 1,2 and Bozena Michniak-Kohn 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 1535; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041535
Submission received: 11 December 2020 / Revised: 31 January 2021 / Accepted: 1 February 2021 / Published: 3 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Barrier Function of Skin and Oral Mucosa)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript demonstrates topical delivery of desoximethasone using niosomal gel formulation. The niosomal formulation was developed to optimize topical delivery of desoximetasone, and the drug content, pH, spreadability, specific gravity, content uniformity, rheology, and physicochemical properties of this formulation were analyzed. The authors found the optimal topical formulation through many experiments and compared the drug delivery efficacy with the reference gel. However, the results (figures, tables, and equations) are not well organized, some data are missing, and the explanation of the experiment is insufficient. Thus, I am sorry, but I do not recommend this manuscript to publish in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

 

  1. In the experimental section: Although the niosome is a major component of drug delivery in this manuscript, a description of the niosome synthesis has been omitted. The authors mentioned that niosomal formulations have already been developed in previous papers, but brief explanation should be provided so that the reader can understand how niosomes are synthesized in which substances.
  2. Niosome analysis data is missing. On page 18, the author claimed that the sustained release of the niosomal formulation is due to the negative charge of the niosome. But there is no data about the niosome. Also, in the conclusion section, it is written that the size of the niosome is below 500 nm. However, there is no evidence related to this in the manuscript. Thus, zeta potential and size analysis of the niosome should be conducted and presented in the manuscript.
  3. In my opinion, it is better to plot Figure 6 as a line graph over time rather than a bar graph to show drug permeability.
  4. In section 3.10.2, Kinetics analysis results, it is necessary to explain how the results were analyzed by applying them to the Higuchi model or Kosemeyer Peppas model.
  5. Please add error bars, standard deviations in all figures and tables, and indicate n numbers in the data.
  6. Tables, figures, and equations should be organized with consistent styles. In the case of figures, each text is too small. The text size is different for each table and equation. Superscript or subscript should be used properly when indicating units. Some typos and grammatical errors have also been found, so you should read the manuscript carefully and reorganize it.

Author Response

We wish to thank the reviewers for taking the time to review our manuscript. We worked to address potential concerns, and we have included additional updates to the manuscript to complete this work satisfactorily. Please see the responses to their comments in the attached file. All the additions are highlighted in red color.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. Please provide the SEM to confirm the nanostructure.
  2. The authors should show how to encapsulate the Desoximetasone in gel.
  3. Please provide the drug release curve v.s. time.
  4. Please explain why the permeation of DNTG-5 is much lower than H882532755.
  5. The authors should do animal studies to prove the gel can be used for topical delivery.

Author Response

We wish to thank the reviewers for taking the time to review our manuscript. We worked to address potential concerns, and we have included additional updates to the manuscript to complete this work satisfactorily. Please see the responses to their comments in the attached file. All the additions are highlighted in red color.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is well-written. The authors carefully reflected the feedback from the reviewers. I recommend the publication of this manuscript in International Journal of Molecular Sciences. But minor points need to be corrected.

Minor comments

On page 18; Please revise Figure 2 to Figure 5.

Author Response

We wish to thank the reviewers for taking the time to review our manuscript. We worked to address potential concerns, and we have included additional updates to the manuscript to complete this work satisfactorily. Please see the responses tothe attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The comments have been addressed.

Author Response

Thank you for the conformation.

Back to TopTop