Next Article in Journal
Identification of Unique Key miRNAs, TFs, and mRNAs in Virulent MTB Infection Macrophages by Network Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Meta’omics: Challenges and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Variation in MicroRNA-423 Promotes Proliferation, Migration, Invasion, and Chemoresistance in Breast Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
16S rRNA of Mucosal Colon Microbiome and CCL2 Circulating Levels Are Potential Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Mycobacterium chelonae Infection Identified by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as the Probable Cause of Acute Contained Rupture of a Biological Composite Graft—A Case Report

1
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
2
Genomic Research Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
3
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
4
Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
5
Applied Microbiology Research, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
6
Bacteriology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(1), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010381
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 21 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 29 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metagenomics and Metatranscriptomics)

Abstract

:
We present the case of a 72-year-old female patient with acute contained rupture of a biological composite graft, 21 months after replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta due to an aortic dissection. Auramine-rhodamine staining of intraoperative biopsies showed acid-fast bacilli, but classical culture and molecular methods failed to identify any organism. Metagenomic analysis indicated infection with Mycobacterium chelonae, which was confirmed by target-specific qPCR. The complexity of the sample required a customized bioinformatics pipeline, including cleaning steps to remove sequences of human, bovine ad pig origin. Our study underlines the importance of multiple testing to increase the likelihood of pathogen identification in highly complex samples.

1. Introduction

Atypical mycobacteria are a rare, but known cause of infectious endocarditis [1]. Case reports and case series reported Mycobacterium chelonae (homotypic synonym: Mycobacteroides chelonae [2]) as the causative agent of endocarditis associated with foreign bodies or native valves [3,4,5,6].
Metagenomics is an emerging approach for direct analysis of genetic material of mixed microbial communities associated with a host (human, animal, or plant) or an environment (terrestrial or aquatic). In the clinical context, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is used to (i) investigate overall microbiota changes associated with different health conditions, and (ii) to identify pathogens, notably in challenging situations, e.g., when other testing procedures fail. mNGS has the potential to become a routine diagnostic approach, faster than traditional culture-based detection [7]. Provided that a sufficient sequencing depth and bacterial genome coverage are achieved, mNGS may be used for typing [8] and predicting antibiotic resistance [7] of bacterial pathogens.
Here we present the case of a patient with acute contained rupture of a biological composite graft, which illustrates the added value of mNGS in the diagnosis of aortic mycobacterial infections.

2. Case Presentation

A 72-year-old female patient presented in deteriorated clinical condition with a reduced state of health, chills, and low diastolic blood pressure for three weeks. The patient had a history of acute aortic dissection Type A twenty-one months earlier. At that time she received aortic root replacement with a biological composite graft consisting of a porcine aortic valve implanted in a tubular, bovine graft (BioIntegral Surgical BioConduit 23 mm, Mississauga, ON, Canada), re-implantation of both coronary ostia, replacement of the distal ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch with a Dacron Graft (Vascutek Gelweave Ante-Flo, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), as well as stenting of the proximal descendant aorta (Gore TAG endostent, Flagstaff, AZ, USA). On present admission, a CT scan showed proximal tear out of the composite annulus as well as the left coronary ostium. Emergency surgery was performed and intraoperatively, a complete destruction and disconnection of the aortic root was witnessed. In all three intraoperative biopsies, acid-fast bacilli were detected using auramin-rhodamin staining (Table 1). Despite the replacement of the aortic graft, the patient died of disseminated intravascular coagulation and multi-organ failure on the following day. At autopsy, necrotizing xantho-granulomatic inflammation was found in the peri-valvular aortic area. Spleen and bone marrow showed no signs of granulomas. All blood cultures remained negative.
Microbiological work-up showed no evidence of bacterial DNA with broad-range 16S rDNA and other PCR tests in analyzed intraoperative biopsies (Table 1). No growth of bacteria on standard aerobic and anaerobic solid as well as in liquid cultures was found (Table 1). In addition, no mycobacteria were cultured on standard Löwenstein-Jensen nor Bactec MGIT (Becton Dickson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 7 weeks at 36 °C, despite the detection of acid-fast bacilli by direct microscopy and the absence of anti-mycobacterial treatment.

3. mNGS and qPCR Analysis

To investigate the discrepancy between the detection of acid-fast bacilli and negative culture, we performed an mNGS analysis of the two intraoperative and one autopsy aorta specimen (Table 1). Each sample was mixed with 100 µL PBS and 150 µL of 10 mg/mL Liberase (TL Research Grade, Sigma-Aldrich, city, state abbreviation, country), incubated for 90 min at 37 °C and passed through a 100 µm-strainer (pluriSelect Life Science, Leipzig, Germany) which was washed twice with 200 µL of the SU buffer from Ultra-Deep Microbiome Prep kit (Molzym, Bremen, Germany). From the obtained suspension, we extracted DNA using an Ultra-Deep Microbiome Prep kit, as per manufacturer recommendations for liquid samples. Negative extraction control (NEC) was performed using the same DNA extraction procedure but omitting the addition of aortic specimens.
Metagenomic DNA libraries were prepared with Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and sequenced on an Illumina iSeq 100 System with 2 × 151 cycles. Our routine mNGS analysis pipeline (HUGe-MAP) included: (i) read quality filtering with Trimmomatic v0.36 (SLIDINGWINDOW:10:30 MINLEN:100) [9] (ii) removal of replicate sequences (script available at https://github.com/GRL-HUG/duplicates, accessed on 2 August 2021); (iii) removal of read pairs that matched human reference genome build GRCh38 using CLARK v1.2.6.1 (-m 0) [10]; and (iv) classification of read pairs with CLARK (-m 0 -c 0.8) against the collection of Latest RefSeq NCBI [11] reference and representative bacterial, archaeal and fungal genomes, as well as Latest RefSeq NCBI genomes of DNA virus families whose members may infect humans (selected from viralzone.expasy.org, accessed on 31st August 2020).
The results of HUGe-MAP showed that most reads in the three aorta samples corresponded to the human genome (Table 2). In the surgically obtained aortic prosthesis (Vascutek) sample, 3.92% (100,770) of paired reads remained unclassified. Mycobacterium malmesburyense (homotypic synonym: Mycolicibacterium malmesburyense [2]) was the most abundant microorganism identified by CLARK, being represented by 0.74% (19,943) of all paired reads and by 79.2% of those assigned to bacteria. However, a routine search for 16S rRNA gene fragments with USEARCH v.11.0.667 (with the parameters -id 0.95 -evalue 0.00001 -query_cov 1) [12] against the EzBioCloud 16S rRNA gene sequence database [13] generated 3 hits only, which was about 10-fold less than expected (assuming that 16S rRNA genes roughly correspond to 0.12% of the bacterial genome sequence, as calculated from [14]). Therefore, we selected the reads assigned by CLARK to M. malmesburyense and queried them against the NCBI genome sequences of bacteria assigned to the genus Mycolicibacterium [2] using BLASTN (with the parameters -word_size 15 -evalue 1e-010) [15]. Since no matches were found, we performed an online BLAST analysis of a subset of 100 randomly selected reads against the entire NCBI database, which revealed significant similarities to bovine (Bos) sequences. Therefore, we performed a BLASTN analysis (-word_size 15 -evalue 1e-010) of all reads that mapped by CLARK to M. malmesburyense against the four representative genomes of the Bos genus in the NCBI database {B. mutus (wild yak), B. indicus × B. taurus (hybrid cattle), B. taurus (cattle), and B. indicus (zebu cattle)}. All reads generated hits, with median (Q1–Q3) sequence identity percentage 99.3 (98.7–100) and median E-value 1.1 × 10−61 (1.6 × 10−70–4 × 10−50). Incidentally, these same reads also mapped to the genomic sequence of Clostridium botulinum strain Mfbjulcb6 (NZ_CP027778.1), though with somewhat lower but still substantial similarity {33,641 (84.3%) reads with hits; median sequence identity percentage 94 (88–97.8); median E-value 4.8 × 10−46 (6 × 10−58–5.2 × 10−37)}. The location of all BLASTN hits in the C. botulinum Mfbjulcb6 chromosomal region representing <1% of the genomic sequence (positions 3,963,803–3,997,481), and the absence of BLASTN hits for other C. botulinum strains, suggested contamination of the genomic assembly of strain Mfbjulcb6 with sequences of bovine origin.
To reduce misclassification of sequencing reads obtained from the complex aortic samples, we removed the reads corresponding to bovine and pig sequences in addition to those matching the human reference genome, using CLARK-based classification. As reference sequences, we used four Bos genomes (see above) and the pig (Sus scrofa) genome assembly (GenBank accession GCA_000003025) from the NCBI/RefSeq database. With such a modified bioinformatics pipeline, nearly 4.6% of all paired reads of the aorta prosthesis sample were classified as belonging to genus Bos, while the fraction of unclassified and bacterial reads dropped 45-fold and 23-fold, respectively, relative to the original analysis. In the bacterial fraction, M. chelonae turned out to be the most abundant (Table 2). All the 518 (paired) reads assigned by CLARK to M. chelonae also were so by BLASTN {median sequence identity percentage 100 (99.3–100); median E-value 2.7 × 10−69 (2.7 × 10−74–1.6 × 10−55)}, and their relative abundance was substantially higher than that of Cutibacterium acnes, the organism with highest counts in our NEC. Moraxella osloensis, Micrococcus luteus, and Pseudomonas massiliensis, identified in the aortic prosthesis specimen, also corresponded to putative reagent contaminants. A low percentage of reads associated with Mycobacterium franklinii (homotypic synonym: Mycobacteroides franklinii [2]) was possibly due to genetic variability of M. chelonae strains and incompleteness of the reference database used.
The results of qPCR-based (Qiagen Microbial DNA qPCR Assay for Mycobacterium spp 2, Hilden, Germany) identification of Mycobacterium abscessus/chelonae complex were in accordance with the NGS data and microscopic examination. These three different tests did not reveal the presence of mycobacteria in the autopsy specimen. In the two intraoperative samples that were NGS- and microscopically-positive for mycobacteria, M. abscessus/chelonae complex was detected by qPCR. Aortic prosthesis sample presented lower Ct and had a higher proportion of bacterial reads assigned to M. chelonae, as compared to the vegetation.
Culture-based identification of non-pathogenic Neisseria, Enterococcus faecium, and mixed anaerobic flora in the aortic autopsy specimen (Table 1) was confirmed by mNGS (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Our study underlines the importance of multiple testing to increase the likelihood of pathogen identification in highly complex samples. While the classification of k-mers extracted from sequence reads using CLARK (or other similar tools) allows fast processing of millions of reads from metagenomic experiments, it may be advantageous to verify the thus obtained information by read-alignment-based methods, at least on a fraction of reads. This control step may reveal possible artifacts generated by the combination of bioinformatics tools, the choice of reference genomes, and the presence of contaminant sequences in the reference database. It has been recently documented that contamination of prokaryotic genome assemblies with human sequences is particularly problematic in metagenomic analyses, leading to erroneous interpretations [16]. Anecdotally, without prior subtraction of bovine sequences, a substantial fraction of sequencing reads obtained from the aortic prosthesis sample of our patient would be misclassified as belonging to M. malmesburyense (using CLARK and NCBI/RefSeq reference/representative genome database) or to C. botulinum (using BLASTN and large database consisting of all NCBI/RefSeq bacterial genomes), while the dominant bacterium identified by the modified pipeline (that includes the removal of bovine sequences) was actually M. chelonae. Intriguingly, in the three samples analyzed, the highest M. chelonae load was associated with the highest proportion of bovine sequences. Our results suggest a possible origin of M. chelonae from the transplanted bovine pericardium or porcine aortic valve. Alternatively, the transplanted bovine or porcine tissue favored de novo colonization by M. chelonae.

5. Conclusions

We present the case of a 72-year-old patient with acute contained rupture of a biological composite graft, macroscopic, and histologic signs of an infection due to atypical mycobacteria, 21 months after replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta. The mNGS analysis detected DNA of M. chelonae as the only potentially causative agent, which was confirmed by specific qPCR. The complexity of the sample required a customized bioinformatics pipeline, including cleaning steps to remove sequences of human, bovine, and pig origin.
In our case, the diagnosis of the infection was complicated by non-conclusive cultures and negative broad-range and species-specific PCRs, despite the detection of acid-fast bacilli using microscopy. Reasons for that might have been the presence of substances in the material obtained by surgery with inhibitory effect on bacterial growth and PCR or contamination with non-living mycobacterial cells. Mycobacteria are a known cause of contamination of foreign material used in cardiovascular surgery [17]. Such contamination may occur via aerosolization arising from contaminated heater-cooler units as has been reported for M. chimaera [17], or direct contamination of a prosthesis related to the prosthetic manufacturing process [3]. Detection of the DNA of M. chelonae by mNGS analysis suggests a potential cause of the clinical signs in our case. Therefore, we reported this case to the national authorization and supervisory authority for drugs and medical products (Swissmedic Vk_20190123_02).

Author Contributions

A.C.B., V.L., A.E. and J.S. wrote the paper. N.G. and V.L. analysed the mNGS data. M.G. performed qPCR and sample preparation for mNGS. F.E. and S.T.S. took clinical care of the patient. A.C.B., F.E., A.E., S.T.S. and J.S. interpreted clinical data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation (EKNZ Req-2021-011233) and institutional requirements.

Informed Consent Statement

A written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Data Availability Statement

After filtering out reads matching human genome sequence, sequencing data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA; www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under study number PRJEB39759.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yuan, S.M. Mycobacterial endocarditis: A comprehensive review. Rev. Bras. Cir. Cardiovasc. 2015, 30, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gupta, R.S.; Lo, B.; Son, J. Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies robustly support division of the genus Mycobacterium into an emended genus Mycobacterium and four novel genera. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Strabelli, T.M.; Siciliano, R.F.; Castelli, J.B.; Demarchi, L.M.; Leão, S.C.; Viana-Niero, C.; Miyashiro, K.; Sampaio, R.O.; Grinberg, M.; Uip, D.E. Mycobacterium chelonae valve endocarditis resulting from contaminated biological prostheses. J. Infect. 2010, 60, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hooda, A.; Pati, P.K.; John, B.; George, P.V.; Michael, J.S. Disseminated Mycobacterium chelonae infection causing pacemaker lead endocarditis in an immunocompetent host. BMJ Case Rep. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Takekoshi, D.; Al-Heeti, O.; Belvitch, P.; Schraufnagel, D.E. Native-valve endocarditis caused by Mycobacterium chelonae, misidentified as polymicrobial gram-positive bacillus infection. J. Infect. Chemother. 2013, 19, 754–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jagadeesan, N.; Patra, S.; Singh, A.P.; Nagesh, C.M.; Reddy, B.; Badnur, S.C.; Nanjappa, M.C. Spontaneous endocarditis caused by rapidly growing non-tuberculous Mycobacterium chelonae in an immunocompetent patient with rheumatic heart disease. J. Cardiovasc. Dis. Res. 2013, 4, 254–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. d’Humières, C.; Salmona, M.; Dellière, S.; Leo, S.; Rodriguez, C.; Angebault, C.; Alanio, A.; Fourati, S.; Lazarevic, V.; Woerther, P.L.; et al. The potential role of clinical metagenomics in infectious diseases: Therapeutic perspectives. Drugs 2021, 81, 1453–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kolb, M.; Lazarevic, V.; Emonet, S.; Calmy, A.; Girard, M.; Gaïa, N.; Charretier, Y.; Cherkaoui, A.; Keller, P.M.; Huber, C. Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of challenging culture-negative endocarditis. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Ounit, R.; Wanamaker, S.; Close, T.J.; Lonardi, S. CLARK: Fast and accurate classification of metagenomic and genomic sequences using discriminative k-mers. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. O’Leary, N.A.; Wright, M.W.; Brister, J.R.; Ciufo, S.; Haddad, D.; McVeigh, R.; Rajput, B.; Robbertse, B.; Smith-White, B.; Ako-Adjei, D.; et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: Current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D733–D745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Edgar, R.C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.-M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Větrovský, T.; Baldrian, P. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Breitwieser, F.P.; Pertea, M.; Zimin, A.V.; Salzberg, S.L. Human contamination in bacterial genomes has created thousands of spurious proteins. Genome Res. 2019, 29, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kohler, P.; Kuster, S.P.; Bloemberg, G.; Schulthess, B.; Frank, M.; Tanner, F.C.; Rössle, M.; Böni, C.; Falk, V.; Wilhelm, M.J.; et al. Healthcare-associated prosthetic heart valve, aortic vascular graft, and disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera infections subsequent to open heart surgery. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 2745–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Summary of microbiological, molecular and mNGS analyses.
Table 1. Summary of microbiological, molecular and mNGS analyses.
Sample Type and Sampling TimeMicroscopyCulturePCRmNGSMycobacterium abscessus/chelonae qPCR Ct *
BioConduit (BioIntegral Surgical)
Day 1
Acid-fast bacilliNo growth of mycobacteria or other bacteriaGeneXpert MTB/RIF negative;
Mycobacterium genus-specific PCR negative;
Mycobacterium chimaera species-specific PCR negative;
Broad-range 16S rDNA PCR negative
NDND
Vegetation on aortic prosthesis
Day 1
Acid-fast bacilliNo growth of mycobacteria or other bacteriaNDM. chelonae detected below the level of major reagent contaminants40.12 ± 0.11
Aortic prosthesis (Vascutek)
Day 1
Acid-fast bacilliNo growth of mycobacteria or other bacteriaGeneXpert MTB/RIF negative;
Mycobacterium genus-specific PCR negative;
M. chimaera species-specific PCR negative;
Broad-range 16S rDNA PCR negative
M. chelonae34.06 ± 0.12
Mediastinal swab
Day 2
NDNo growth of mycobacteria or other bacteriaNDNDND
Aortic autopsy
Day 3
No detectionEnterococcus faecium sporadically;
apathogenic Neisseria spp. 1 CFU;
anaerobic mixed flora sporadically;
no growth of mycobacteria
NDNo detection>42
* The volume of DNA extract used was adjusted so to correspond to 38 mg of the frozen specimen mass. Mean ± standard deviation from triplicates are given. Positive PCR control performed using an artificial DNA sequence and corresponding primers showed no signs of inhibition of the qPCR in tested specimens (Ct 20 ± 0.2 for each sample). ND, not done; Ct, cycle threshold.
Table 2. Number of read pairs obtained by mNGS) and their taxonomic assignments at various steps of data analysis. NCBI taxonomy was used for CLARK-based species assignments. In this taxonomy, some species of the genus Mycobacterium were reassigned to the four new genera including Mycobacteroides and Mycolicibacterium. In the bacterial fraction, species with the relative abundance of reads >2% are presented. Several species of interest in the NEC under this threshold are also indicated. Yellow background: routine pipeline, blue background: modified pipeline.
Table 2. Number of read pairs obtained by mNGS) and their taxonomic assignments at various steps of data analysis. NCBI taxonomy was used for CLARK-based species assignments. In this taxonomy, some species of the genus Mycobacterium were reassigned to the four new genera including Mycobacteroides and Mycolicibacterium. In the bacterial fraction, species with the relative abundance of reads >2% are presented. Several species of interest in the NEC under this threshold are also indicated. Yellow background: routine pipeline, blue background: modified pipeline.
Read PairsAortic ProsthesisVegetation on Aortic ProsthesisAortic AutopsyNEC
Raw5,854,4064,788,1635,689,19632,153
Quality-filtered2,699,0472,823,6681,579,8792128
Human2,572,9532,822,0511,576,184342
BovineNA122,725NA52NA156NA1
PigNA31NA11NA653NA2
Fungi136372825104951312
DNA viruses00000000
Unclassified100,77022131390133032292427934932
Bacteria/Archaea25,1881088201199365364839839
Percentage in bacterial/archaeal fractionMycolicibacterium malmesburyense79Mycobacteroides chelonae48Cutibacterium acnes23Cutibacterium acnes24Rothia mucilaginosa7.7Rothia mucilaginosa6.1Cutibacterium acnes21Cutibacterium acnes21
Anaerobutyricum hallii8.2Cutibacterium acnes4.9Moraxella osloensis8Moraxella osloensis8Blautia obeum6Blautia obeum4.8Sphingomonas echinoides8.6Sphingomonas echinoides8.6
Acetanaerobacterium elongatum3Mycobacteroides franklinii4.2Arcobacter lekithochrous6.5Arcobacter lekithochrous6.5Gemmiger formicilis4.9Gemmiger formicilis3.9Micrococcus luteus7Micrococcus luteus7
Catenibacterium mitsuokai2.9Moraxella osloensis4Sphingomonas echinoides5Sphingomonas echinoides5Streptococcus salivarius4.7Streptococcus salivarius3.7Cloacibacterium normanense4.1Cloacibacterium normanense4.1
Staphylococcus simiae2.2Micrococcus luteus3.8Micrococcus luteus4.5Micrococcus luteus4.5Neisseria mucosa4.1Neisseria mucosa3.3Acinetobacter johnsonii3.6Acinetobacter johnsonii3.6
Mycobacteroides chelonae2.1Pseudomonas massiliensis2.1Mycobacteroides chelonae2.5Mycobacteroides chelonae2.5Arcobacter lekithochrous4.1Arcobacter lekithochrous3.3Enterococcus cecorum2.5Enterococcus cecorum2.5
Modestobacter marinus2Alcanivorax hongdengensis2.5Alcanivorax hongdengensis2.5Akkermansia muciniphila3.3Akkermansia muciniphila2.6Ralstonia pickettii2.2Ralstonia pickettii2.2
Halomonas muralis2.5Halomonas muralis2.5Micrococcus luteus3Micrococcus luteus2.4Pseudomonas massiliensis<2Pseudomonas massiliensis<2
Acinetobacter johnsonii2Acinetobacter johnsonii2Enterococcus faecium3Enterococcus faecium2.4Halomonas muralis<2Halomonas muralis<2
Ruminococcus faecis3Ruminococcus faecis2.4Moraxella osloensis<2Moraxella osloensis<2
Bacteroides vulgatus2.7Bacteroides vulgatus2.2
Streptococcus parasanguinis2.7Streptococcus parasanguinis2.2
Alistipes inops2.2
Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans2.2
PipelineRoutineModifiedRoutineModifiedRoutineModifiedRoutineModified
NEC, negative extraction control; NA, not applicable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Büchler, A.C.; Lazarevic, V.; Gaïa, N.; Girard, M.; Eckstein, F.; Egli, A.; Sutter, S.T.; Schrenzel, J. Mycobacterium chelonae Infection Identified by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as the Probable Cause of Acute Contained Rupture of a Biological Composite Graft—A Case Report. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010381

AMA Style

Büchler AC, Lazarevic V, Gaïa N, Girard M, Eckstein F, Egli A, Sutter ST, Schrenzel J. Mycobacterium chelonae Infection Identified by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as the Probable Cause of Acute Contained Rupture of a Biological Composite Graft—A Case Report. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(1):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Büchler, Andrea C., Vladimir Lazarevic, Nadia Gaïa, Myriam Girard, Friedrich Eckstein, Adrian Egli, Sarah Tschudin Sutter, and Jacques Schrenzel. 2022. "Mycobacterium chelonae Infection Identified by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as the Probable Cause of Acute Contained Rupture of a Biological Composite Graft—A Case Report" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 1: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010381

APA Style

Büchler, A. C., Lazarevic, V., Gaïa, N., Girard, M., Eckstein, F., Egli, A., Sutter, S. T., & Schrenzel, J. (2022). Mycobacterium chelonae Infection Identified by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as the Probable Cause of Acute Contained Rupture of a Biological Composite Graft—A Case Report. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(1), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop