Next Article in Journal
The Role of Transposable Elements of the Human Genome in Neuronal Function and Pathology
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Characteristics of the 5′-Terminal Region of Mouse p53 mRNA and Identification of Proteins That Bind to This mRNA Region
Previous Article in Journal
Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) 2021
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNA and Protein Determinants Mediate Differential Binding of miRNAs by a Viral Suppressor of RNA Silencing Thus Modulating Antiviral Immune Responses in Plants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms23105850
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Structural Potential of Rare Trinucleotide Repeat Tracts in RNA

by
Dorota Magner
,
Rafal Nowak
,
Elzbieta Lenartowicz Onyekaa
,
Anna Pasternak
and
Ryszard Kierzek
*
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(10), 5850; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105850
Submission received: 29 April 2022 / Revised: 17 May 2022 / Accepted: 19 May 2022 / Published: 23 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on RNA Structure)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Among types of trinucleotide repeats, there is some disproportion in the frequency of their occurrence in the human exome. This research presents new data describing the folding and thermodynamic stability of short, tandem RNA repeats of 23 types, focusing on the rare, yet poorly analyzed ones. UV-melting experiments included the presence of PEG or potassium and magnesium ions to determine their effect on the stability of RNA repeats structures. Rare repeats predominantly stayed single-stranded but had the potential for base pairing with other partially complementary repeat tracts. A coexistence of suitably complementary repeat types in a single RNA creates opportunities for interaction in the context of the secondary structure of RNA. We searched the human transcriptome for model RNAs in which different, particularly rare trinucleotide repeats coexist and selected the GABRA4 and CHIC1 RNAs to study intramolecular interactions between the repeat tracts that they contain. In vitro secondary structure probing results showed that the UAA and UUG repeat tracts, present in GABRA4 3′ UTR, form a double helix, which separates one of its structural domains. For the RNA CHIC1 ORF fragment containing four short AGG repeat tracts and the CGU tract, we proved the formation of quadruplexes that blocked reverse transcription.

1. Introduction

The RNA structure determines the activity of transcripts and their interactions with other molecules in cells. The presence and role of short repeat sequences in RNA are puzzling in the context of the structure of the transcripts. RNA repeats are derived from microsatellite sequences, also known as short tandem repeats (STR). They contain motifs of 1–10 nucleotides in length that repeat 5–50 times [1]. Their localization is not random, not limited to specific regions of the transcript, and presumably related to a structurally determined function. In mRNAs, STRs-derived tracts are found in 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTR) as well as introns and exons [2,3,4,5]. STRs may act as cis-regulatory elements affecting transcription, splicing, and translation [6,7]. It was observed that repeats in RNA undergo selective pressure because some types are overrepresented, while others are underrepresented, depending on the length of the tract or region of occurrence. For example, open reading frames (ORFs) contain tri- and hexanucleotide repeats more frequently than other sizes/types of microsatellite repeats, as a result of selective pressure at the level of protein function and codon usage [8,9]. Among STRs, trinucleotide repeats are strongly represented in RNA with an overrepresentation of CNG type, whereas the other types of STR such as AAU, AAC, or CUU are underrepresented [10]. CNG tracts are particularly well-studied repeats as they are a disease-causing factor in several human disorders with neurological symptoms such as X-fragile syndrome, myotonic dystrophy, Huntington’s disease, or different types of spinocerebellar ataxia. Most of the information on RNA repeats comes from studies on the above Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion Disorders (TRED), the course of which is determined by the number of trinucleotide repeats found in ORFs, as well as UTRs of several human genes.
In 2013, the Weeks group demonstrated intramolecular pairing of RNA regions rich in CAG and CCG repeats for the first exon of the huntingtin transcript, proving the highly structured character of this RNA fragment [11]. In the case of normal huntingtin, the CAG repeat region forms extensive base pairing with nucleotides flanking it and containing CCG repeats. In case of abnormal CAG expansion leading to huntingtin mutation, an extended tract of CAG repeats forms itself an additional, stable hairpin, without changing the original interactions of the CAG and CCG repeats. It is well documented that GC-rich trinucleotide repeats in RNA, especially the CNG ones, form stable secondary structures depending on the length of the tract and the type of repeated motif [12]. On the other side, many RNA repeats do not form any particular structure, but their presence in the human genome may suggest some yet-undetermined biological functions. Analysis of genes containing trinucleotide repeats (TNRs) indicated that 11% of them harbor more than one type of TNR, many of them in exons [10]. Prediction of the secondary structure of mRNAs containing various multiple TNR tracts indicates that those repeat tracts can base pair even when they are separated in mRNA structure.
Our research goal was to determine the folding and thermodynamic stability of pairing of various, predominantly rare RNA repeat types. We found that repeats which do not fold in secondary structure by themselves can pair with another similar type of repeat. Based on the analysis of the coexistence of rare repeats in a single transcript, we chose fragments of two RNAs: GABRA4 (gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor subunit alpha4) and CHIC1 (cysteine-rich hydrophobic domain protein 1), containing tandem repeats that may potentially interact. In both cases, we performed an attempt at secondary structure chemical mapping to determine the relationship between the present repeats and their effect on the secondary structure of the RNA molecule.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. RNA Repeats Thermodynamics

Characteristic sequences, such as repeated motifs, may play a special role in the context of RNA secondary and tertiary structure. We analyzed 23 types of RNA repeats by determining their preferred secondary structure, as well as their potential for forming structural motifs with other RNA repeats. For the thermodynamic studies, model oligonucleotides were used, containing three repeats and respective terminal base-pairs. For selected repeats, oligonucleotides containing six RNA repeats were also analyzed. The UV-melting experiments included the following RNA repeats: CAA, CGA, GCU, CGU, GCC, GCG, GCA, AGG, UGG, UAG, UAA, CAU, CUA, CUU, CCU, CCA, UUA, AUG, GAA, UUG, AAG, CCUG, and AUUCU. Collected thermodynamic results (Table S1) indicated that the analyzed RNA repeats can form a duplex, quadruplex, or stay single-stranded/unstructured. (Table 1). The lack of transitions observed for melting curves suggested a single-stranded structure of the RNA repeats.
Duplexes were formed by eight types of repeats: CAA, CGA, GCU, CGU, GCA, GCC, GCG, and CCUG (Figure 1). Oligonucleotides composed of CGA, GCC, CGU, and GCG repeats formed strong duplexes, presenting a two-state character of melting with increasing thermodynamic stabilities (−ΔG⁰37) of 4.22, 5.29, 5.84, and 7.29 kcal/mol, respectively. The observed destabilizing effect of a single mismatch increased in the following order: G-G, U-U, C-C, and A-A, which is consistent with previous reports [13]. The CAA, GCU, and CCUG repeats formed quite stable duplexes, but their melting was not two-state. This may be due to the predominance of non-canonical base pairs (mismatches) in the duplex. A duplex formation by CAA repeat type was not reported previously. In the case of three GCA repeats, we observed a characteristic melting curve containing two transitions that we initially associated with the presence of triplex, in which the lower transition reflects the dissociation of the third strand and the upper one the duplex unfolding. However, a melt performed in pH 5.5 buffer at 295 nm did not confirm the presence of the triplex. The observed transitions correspond to two duplex structures with different folds and stability (−ΔG⁰37) of 4.27 and 8.65 kcal/mol, respectively.
The oligonucleotides containing three consecutive AGG or UGG repeats formed quadruplexes with thermodynamic stability equal to −2.95 and −3.18 kcal/mol, respectively. For the remaining types of RNA repeats, UV-melting curves do not show transitions, which demonstrates the single-stranded character of melting. This large group of RNA repeats, that do not form any structure, includes UAG, UAA, CAU, CUA, CUU, CCU, CCA, UUA, AUG, GAA, UUG, AAG, and AUUCU repeats. However, for some of those repeats (CCA and UAG), a kind of very low Tm transition was observed. Detailed thermodynamic parameters of the analyzed RNA repeats are collected in Table S1.
Increasing the number of repeats in the case of certain GC-rich RNA oligonucleotides promotes their folding into hairpins. A thermodynamic study of oligonucleotides containing six GCU or GCC repeats indicated the formation of a mixture of two hairpins in each case. The free energy of those hairpins was −1.87 and −3.27 (for GCU) or −2.60 and −3.03 kcal/mol (for GCC). The formation of various hairpins structure by oligonucleotides containing six CNG repeats was reported earlier [12,14]. Often, the structural dynamic of TNR hairpin structures is related to the formation of various sizes of hairpin loops (four vs. seven nucleotides) or slipperiness of the double-stranded hairpin stem [12]. Interestingly, the oligonucleotides, each carrying six CGA, GCG, and GCCU repeats in the same conditions, formed single-hairpin structures, and their thermodynamic stabilities (−ΔG⁰37) were 1.10, 2.14, and 0.61 kcal/mol, respectively. Conversely to the information listed above, an oligonucleotide containing six CGU repeats results in the simultaneous formation of duplex and hairpin structures with free energy equal to −9.46 and −1.50 kcal/mol, respectively.
Previously it was shown that RNA composed of 5–69 CUG repeats forms hairpins whose melting temperatures (Tm) are similar (ca. 75 °C), no matter the number of repeats [15]. Detailed thermodynamic studies of RNA formed by CNG repeats (N=A, C, G, and U) indicated that depending on the CNG repeats number, such oligonucleotides can form self-complementary duplexes (2–3 repeats), a mixture of duplexes and hairpins (4–5 repeats), and hairpins alone (six or more repeats). The transition between duplex and hairpin formation was gradual, and the contribution of the hairpin increased with the number of repeats and concentration of the oligonucleotide. Double-stranded fragments of such structures (duplex and hairpin stem) contained a single mismatch for every third pair and, consequently, their thermodynamic stability was low. Moreover, the structure and pattern of hydrogen bonding and stacking was demonstrated by the crystallographic approach for structures containing CAG, CUG, CGG, and CCG repeats [16,17,18,19,20]. Structural diversity of triplet repeat RNAs was also demonstrated by Sobczak et al. [12]. In this study, transcripts containing 17 repeats of the various sequences were used. Using chemical mapping and a UV-melting approach, it was shown that CAA, UUG, AAG, CUU, CCU, CCA, and UAA do not form any structure, whereas the repeats CAU, CUA, UUA, AUG, UAG, CGA, CGU, CUG, CAG, CGG, and CCG form hairpins with various thermodynamic stabilities. Long repeats of AGG and UGG form quadruplexes. Later, also using NMR, circular dichroism (CD), and mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) approaches, it was confirmed that RNA composed of four AGG or UGG repeats forms quadruplexes in a broad spectrum of cations, whereas CGG quadruplex is formed preferentially in presence of potassium cation [21].

2.2. The Effect of Molecular Crowding

UV-melting performed in buffer containing 100 mM sodium chloride only partially reflects intracellular conditions. Cells contain a large number of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, and the total concentration of biomolecules is estimated to be 50–400 g/L, depending on the type of cells and cellular compartments [22,23,24]. To reflect cellular-like conditions in thermodynamic studies, molecular crowders are tested. Among them, the most frequently used are polyethylene glycol (PEG) and dextrin. Recently, the Znosko group determined the nearest neighbor parameters for RNA duplexes under molecular crowding conditions [25]. The thermodynamic measurements were performed in a buffer containing 1 M sodium chloride and a 20% solution of PEG200, in which the total ions concentration was 258 g/L. They found that the PEG presence destabilizes (ΔΔG⁰37) self-complementary RNA duplexes (mostly six- and eight-mers) by ca. 1 kcal/mol. The presence of PEG changed the particular nearest-neighbor parameters for RNA duplexes in the range 0.03–0.17 kcal/mol; however, significant difference (0.54 kcal/mol) was related to the free energy of initiation of RNA duplex formation.
Therefore, we have also determined the thermodynamic stability of duplexes and quadruplexes formed by RNA repeats under molecular crowding conditions. In the case of duplexes, thermodynamic measurements in presence of 200 mM PEG400 (80 g/L) were performed only for the RNA repeats which in standard (PEG-free) melting buffer demonstrated cooperative (two-state) transition (Figure 1, Table S1). Consequently, for RNA duplexes formed by CGA, CGU, GCC, and GCG repeats, PEG400 presence in melting buffer resulted in free-energy change of 0.15, 0.15, −0.02, and −0.10 kcal/mol, respectively, and these differences were within the range of experimental errors.
Oligonucleotide composed of three GCA repeats invariably presented two transitions of melting curves. UV-melting in buffer containing 200 mM PEG400 changed low- and high-temperature transition by 0.98 and −0.29 kcal/mol, respectively, reflecting destabilization of the weaker GCA duplex and stabilization of the GCA core duplex. For quadruplexes formed by AGG and UGG repeats, the presence of PEG in melting buffer changed their free energy by 0.43 and −0.28 kcal/mol, respectively.
The results showed that the presence of the additional 200 mM of PEG 400 in the UV-melting buffer, already containing 100 mM sodium chloride, did not influence RNA structures formed by particular repeats. Moreover, the contribution of PEG400 to thermodynamic stability was also low, usually within 10% of original free-energy values.

2.3. Inter-strand Interactions of Various RNA Repeat Tracts

More than half of the analyzed oligonucleotides formed by the RNA repeats remain single-stranded. These repeats are rich in adenosine, uridine, and cytidine. Among them, we selected pairs that could potentially form duplexes and determined their thermodynamic stability by UV melting in two types of buffers (Table S2). Standard melting was performed in a buffer containing 1 M sodium chloride to provide an optimal temperature range for the melting curves of analyzed oligonucleotides. In addition, a physiological buffer containing 40 mM potassium chloride and 8 mM magnesium chloride was applied. We observed the formation of inter-repeat mismatched duplexes for eleven pairs of repeats (Figure 2).
The free energy of those duplexes ranged from −3.4 to −4.8 kcal/mol, and their melting temperatures did not exceed 30 °C. About half of the analyzed duplexes melted in a two-state manner, which means that no intermediate states between the single-stranded form and the duplex were observed in the solution. For A, U, and C-rich repeats, the formation of a duplex is dependent on the types of mismatches occurring next to conventional Watson–Crick base pairs. For such duplex-forming repeats, the canonical, stabilizing pairs A-U may be insufficient to maintain a helix that contains highly destabilizing mismatches, e.g., C-C or A-A. For duplexes formed by such types of repeats, the G-U Wooble pair’s stabilizing role that supports these duplexes is significant. We observed a stronger destabilization of these duplexes in the presence of magnesium and potassium ions in comparison to the standard buffer, and the destabilizing effect was about 1.5–2 kcal/mol (Table S2). However, this trend was not a rule for repeats including G and C residues, for which the presence of magnesium and potassium ions stabilized duplexes formed by some repeat pairs. These observations suggest that single-stranded, AU-rich trinucleotide RNA repeats have a considerable potential for duplex formation, which is greater the less destabilizing the mismatches and the longer the repeats are.
Interestingly, we observed the impact of several single-stranded RNA repeats on the self-complementary structures of other repeats. For example, G(GCG)3G oligonucleotide forms a stable self-complementary duplex, but adding an equimolar amount of C(UGC)3U results in the formation of intermolecular duplex G(GCG)3G/C(UGC)3U of the stability of −15.35 kcal/mol. On the other hand, the mixing of G(GCG)3G with U(CUU)3C or U(CCU)3C did not disrupt self-complementary G(GCG)3G duplex (Figure 3B). We also observed that quadruplex structures formed by G(AGG)3A (Figure 3A) are disturbed in the presence of C(GCC)3G, U(CGU)3C, U(CUU)3C, and U(CCU)3C repeats. These four oligonucleotides form stable, non-self-complementary duplexes with the G(AGG)3A oligonucleotide and prevent the quadruplex formation (no transition at 295 nm during UV-melting). All four non-self-complementary duplexes melted in a two-state manner. Their stability was significantly higher than the G(AGG)3A quadruplex alone. The most stable duplex was the G(AGG)3A/U(CCU)3C duplex, for which we could obtain parameters in 100 mM NaCl buffer solution but not in 1 M NaCl (the melting temperature was higher than 93 °C). The least stable was G(AGG)3A/U(CGU)3C duplex.
The above results demonstrated that structure-free RNA repeats can bind to the ones that themselves fold into higher-order structures, unfolding them and resulting in the formation of new and more thermodynamically stable RNA structures. In native RNAs, these interactions are also dependent on the persistence of alternative structural motifs that are possible in a particular structural context.

2.4. In Vitro Structure Probing of RNAs with Multiple TNR Tracts

2.4.1. Searching for the Exemplary RNAs

The thermodynamic parameters reported above for short RNA repeats reflect the potential of their mutual interactions, which is interesting, especially for tracts with no structure. We aimed to examine the relation between two selected TNR tracts coexisting in a single RNA in the natural sequence context, determining the secondary structure of the selected RNA fragments.
Analysis of trinucleotide repeats coexistence in mRNAs and ncRNAs confirmed the earlier reports and showed that CNG-type repeats, usually located in the 5′UTR and ORF, are dominant [10,26]. It identified only several transcripts containing more than one tract of rare repeats. The resulting transcripts were filtered by region of occurrence and distance between two tracts (Table 2). The distribution of the number of transcripts identified with four and six repeats of different types is shown on the heatmap (Figure 4). It shows a significant decrease in the number of RNAs found after the number of repeats increased by two. The vast majority of the results concerned the CNG repeats. Coexisting non-CNG repeats greater than six are extremely rare. To analyze the interaction between different repeat types, two RNAs for secondary structure probing were chosen: a fragment of 3′UTR GABRA4 RNA and an ORF fragment of CHIC1 RNA. The first RNA contains thermodynamically weak repeat types of (UUG)10 and (UAA)14; the second one contains thermodynamically stronger repeats (AGG)4 and (CGU)4, interleaved by AAG triplets. The selected RNAs represent two varied, thermodynamically interesting cases of RNA repeats’ interactions.

2.4.2. Interaction of Unstructured Trinucleotide Repeat Tracts—The GABRA4 3′UTR

As we showed above in thermodynamic studies, the oligonucleotides consisting of UUG and UAA repeats do not form secondary structures by themselves but can interact with each other to form a duplex. By screening the transcripts for the coexistence of rare unstructured repeats, we found that the (UUG)10 and (UAA)14 repeats exist in all three variants of the GABRA4 transcript in its 3′UTR region and are approximately 400 nucleotides apart. The structure–function relationship of GABRA4 3′UTR is unknown; however, the relative closeness of the mentioned repeats suggests that they may interact with each other, playing a potential role for the molecule. Its 3′UTR region consists of over 9300 nucleotides, which suggests a wide range of regulation of its expression.
We performed in silico structure prediction of the whole 3′UTR region of GABRA4 (9325 nt) using the RNAFold online tool [27,28]. It showed that repeating sequences of UUG and UAA interact with each other, thus separating a small domain in this UTR (Figure S1). The 404-nucleotide long fragment of the 3′UTR (region of 3933–4337 nt of the whole mRNA) that makes up the domain was selected for detailed secondary structure chemical probing.
The chemical probing of the secondary structure was conducted with the SHAPE method [29] and chemical mapping with DMS, ketoxal, and CMCT [30,31,32]. All obtained data were introduced into the RNAstructure software [33] to predict the secondary structure of the GABRA4 3′UTR fragment. SHAPE data were introduced using “Read SHAPE reactivity—pseudo free energy” mode with slope 2.6 and intercept −0.8. From DMS, ketoxal, and CMCT mapping, only high reactive nucleotides were used as a chemical modification. The predicted model of secondary structure with the lowest free energy is highly structured (65% of the nucleotides are involved in base pairs). The 35% nucleotides are single-stranded and highly reactive with all chemical reagents (Figure 5).
The obtained secondary structure confirmed base pairing between the repeated tracts of UUG and UAA trinucleotides, which form a helix stem specifying the GABRA4 3′UTR domain. The entire domain consists of two major stem-loop structures forming subdomains 1 (region 41–295) and 2 (region 306–360). The subdomains are branching from the internal loop located next to the helix stem formed by the TNR tracts. The subdomain 1 stem includes seven internal loops of different sizes and six small hairpins. Three of the hairpins (regions 145–162, 169–188, 268–284) showed high reactivity to mapping agents, whereas the remaining three (regions 48–63, 65–78, 190–205) showed no reactivity. Within subdomain 1, high reactivity was also demonstrated by the internal loop regions 90–98 and 295–306. The subdomain 2 stem includes a single, seven-nucleotide-long poly-adenosine bulge, two uridine bulges, and a small, four-nucleotide-long loop (region 315–350), and each of the motifs was highly reactive. Regarding the base-pairing probability, it was the most structurally conservative region of the molecule. The region between the subdomains, which connects them, was also widely available for mapping reagents.
Secondary structure probability was performed using a partition function mode of the RNAstructure software. The results were visualized on the secondary structure with the lowest free energy. It was indicated that three hairpins show a very high probability of more than 99%, and one double-stranded region with internal loops (105–137 and 235–249) showed a probability higher than 95%. The TNR-containing helix structure showed a probability of more than 70%. The lower probability of base pairing in this region may suggest the potential lability of the helix and can be related to the dynamic function of this region. A three-dimensional model of the structure obtained in the RNAComposer program [34] showed that highly reactive nucleotides were often exposed outside the helix (Figure S2), which matches with their availability for mapping reagents.
3′UTRs are widely known as regulatory regions containing target sites for microRNAs. In the context of the huge 3′UTR of GABRA4, we have searched miRDB [35] for miRNA target sites. As a result, we have identified 148 potential microRNAs, with a significant target score above 80, from which 11 different ones are localized at 13 sites within the domain of our interest (Figure 6 and Figure S3). Four of them target the repeats (two for UUG and two for UAA repeats); however, from these four only the UAA-targeting ones was reported in the miRBase, as experimentally confirmed by NGS methods [36,37,38]. Nine miRNAs target subdomain 1 and three target subdomain 2. About half of the matched miRNAs bind to conserved regions of the predicted secondary structure. The most interesting site in this structure seems to be the loop of highly conservative hairpin 268–284. This nine-nucleotide-long loop presented very high reactivity during chemical mapping and is also a target site for three different miRNAs. Such high accessibility of the miRNA target sites suggests the possible active regulatory function of this region.
Our studies of the GABRA4 3’UTR fragment show that rare unstructured repeats are also able to mutually interact and fold into secondary structures, determining functional regions within an RNA molecule.

2.4.3. Interaction of Purine-Rich Trinucleotide Repeat Tracts—The CHIC1 ORF

CHIC1, also known as BRX (Brain X-linked gene), is a rare transcript preferentially expressed in the brain [39]. Its protein product is annotated through similarity to a membrane protein; however, its function is poorly understood. The gene is supposed to be the subject of the X-inactivation, as it lies within the XIC region (X-inactivation center). Within the human CHIC1 RNA ORF sequence, several short tracts of AGG repeats are present that are separated by short tracts of AAG and CGU repeats. These repeats cover the codons for glutamate (GAG and GAA) and cysteine (UCG). The accumulation of AGG triplets suggests the formation of quadruplexes (G4 sequences) in the RNA structure. It is not clear whether the trinucleotide repeat pattern present in the transcript is significant at the transcript level due to its secondary and tertiary structure, or whether it is important for the encoded protein. The RNA structure of this region seems to be important; glutamate could be encoded by the GAA codon exclusively, but such repeats do not form a quadruplex, as evidenced by the above thermodynamic studies. G4 sequences in ORFs frequently encode low-complexity amino acid sequences, amino acid repeats, or short motifs [40,41], and contribute to translation-related processes such as elongation [42], ribosomal frameshift [43], no-go mRNA decay [44,45], and translational folding of newly synthesized proteins [46,47,48]. We chose a 170-nucleotide-long fragment of CHIC1 ORF (region of 129–298 nt of the whole mRNA), containing cumulative repeats of AGG spaced by AAG, in the vicinity of (CGU)4 repeats, to define their structural relationships to one another. However, probing for the RNA secondary structure of this fragment failed in the first step due to the inability to obtain a cDNA. As predicted, the selected RNA fragment formed a quadruplex structure that effectively inhibited reverse transcription. The quadruplex formation was observed during UV-melting monitored at 295 nm, both in the presence of sodium and potassium ions; obtained curves were different, however. Due to the length of the analyzed CHIC1 RNA fragment, the observed G4 structure is intramolecular, in contrast with intermolecular quadruplexes formed in the case of the earlier analyzed short oligonucleotides. Direct evidence of quadruplex formation is the melting curve for the guanosine-rich sequence which shows a “reversed” transition at 295 nm. Intramolecular quadruplexes (and hairpins) do not show Tm dependence on RNA concentration, but intermolecular structures (e.g., duplexes) do [49,50]. That is one of the reasons why the thermodynamic parameters of RNA are measured in several concentrations (usually from three to nine). The CHIC1 RNA quadruplexes were also visualized on the non-denaturing gel stained using the NMM (N-Methylmesoporphyrin IX) reagent [51]. Two forms of the CHIC1 RNA fragment have been observed, which suggests the existence of two differently migrating quadruplex structures (Figure 7B). The two independent online tools for G4 prediction, QGRS Mapper and G4PredictorTool, indicate four putative quadruplex-forming regions in the analyzed CHIC1 ORF fragment.
Prediction of the secondary structure of this RNA fragment indicates that the CGU and AGG repeats do not interact directly with each other over their full length, but only at the ends of the tracts (Figure 7A). Unfortunately, it was impossible to reveal the exact manner of this interaction. The observed results indicate that G-quadruplex present in CHIC1 ORF blocks mRNA-based processes, including the reverse transcription in our study. Further experiments are needed to explain the role of the quadruplex in this transcript, which might broaden the cognition perspective for the CHIC1 function.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Oligonucleotide Synthesis

Oligoribonucleotides for UV-melting experiments, DNA primers for PCR reactions, and 5′-FAM labeled DNA primers for reverse transcription in SHAPE experiments were synthesized on a BioAutomation MerMade12 DNA/RNA synthesizer using β-cyanoethyl phosphoramidite chemistry as described previously [52], and commercially available phosphoramidites (ChemGenes (Wilmington, MA, USA); GenePharma (Shanghai, China)). The details of deprotection and purification of oligoribonucleotides were also described previously [52]. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) purification of the oligonucleotides was carried out on Merck 60 F254 TLC plates with the mixture of 1-propanol/aqueous ammonia/water = 55:35:10 (v/v/v). After synthesis and purification, oligonucleotides were verified using mass spectroscopy (MALDI-ToF).

3.2. UV-Melting Experiments

The thermodynamic stability of structures formed by oligonucleotides composed of RNA repeats was analyzed in four buffers. Basic buffer was used to determine thermodynamic stability of the structure formed by RNA repeats and contained 100 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium cacodylate, and 0.5 mM Na2EDTA, pH 7. The second buffer was used for the determination of the influence of the molecular crowding effect on oligonucleotides’ thermodynamic stability and also contained PEG 400 in a concentration of 80 g/L. If UV melting of the model repeat oligonucleotides in the buffers listed above indicated the formation of an unstable RNA structure, the oligonucleotides were analyzed in a buffer containing 1 M sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium cacodylate, and 0.5 mM Na2EDTA, pH 7. The physiological melting buffer contained 150 mM potassium chloride, 4 mM magnesium chloride, and 20 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 7. Oligonucleotide single-strand concentrations were calculated from the absorbance at 80 °C and single-strand extinction coefficients were approximated by a nearest-neighbor model. Absorbance vs. temperature melting curves was measured at 260 nm with a heating rate of 1 °C/min in the range of 4 to 90 °C on a JASCO V-650 spectrophotometer with a thermoprogrammer. Melting curves were analyzed and thermodynamic parameters were calculated from a two-state model with the program MeltWin 3.5. Statistical analysis of thermodynamic data was carried out using MeltWin 3.5 software. Based on results obtained for three to nine concentrations of analyzed oligonucleotides, thermodynamic parameters and melting temperatures were calculated.

3.3. Selection of RNAs for Structural Studies

To determine the possible interactions between various RNA repeat tracts, we searched the human RefSeq RNA database (NCBI) for natural RNAs containing more than one repeat tract. The selection of model RNAs for structural studies was based on the following criteria: (i) the presence of a minimum of two different repeat tracts, (ii) the minimum number of repeats within the tract is four, (iii) relatively close neighborhood of the different tracts (up to 400 nt) within one functional RNA region and (iv) at least one of the repeats is predicted not to form a secondary structure by itself. The inquired sequence contained ten repeats of trinucleotide. A tetranucleotide CCUG repeat was also included in the search for the study, due to the potential for the formation of structures and the connections with human muscle diseases [53]. In this case, an inquired sequence contained six repeats. The RefSeq RNA database was searched using megaBLAST with default algorithm parameters and excluding models (XM/XP). The results of the search were limited to mRNAs and ncRNAs and divided by repeat type and its region of occurrence in RNA.

3.4. Preparation of Target RNA Fragments

RNA fragments for structure probing were prepared by in vitro transcription from a DNA template prepared in a multistep PCR reaction from chemically synthesized oligonucleotides (Table S3). The sequence of interest was preceded by a T7 polymerase promoter sequence and was used as a template for in vitro transcription with the MEGAshortscript™ Kit from Ambion/Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The correctness of obtained PCR products that served as matrices for in vitro transcription was verified each time by Sanger sequencing.

3.5. Structure PROBING for Target RNAs

3.5.1. Chemical Mapping

For a single experiment, 2 pmol of RNA was used. The RNA was folded in a buffer containing 300 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM magnesium chloride, and 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 for 5 min at 65 °C, and slowly cooled down for 30 min. Four separate mapping reactions were conducted, each with different chemical reagents. The SHAPE method with NMIA (N-methylisatoic anhydride) was used to modify flexible 2′-hydroxyl of nucleotide residues. CMCT (1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-m-orpholinoethyl) carbodiimide metho-p-toluene sulfonate) alkylated the N3 of uridines not involved in base pairing and modified N1 of non-paired guanosine. Kethoxal alkylated the N1 and 2-amino group of non-paired guanosines, whereas DMS (dimethyl sulfate) was used to modify unpaired adenosines and cytidines. Depending on the reagent, RNA was treated with 8 mM NMIA for 60 min, 30 mM DMS for 60 min, 9.5 mM of CMCT for 30 min, or 6.7 mM of kethoxal for 20 min. All samples were incubated at 37 °C. A control reaction was performed in the same conditions without particular reagents. Mapping reactions were terminated by ethanol precipitation.

3.5.2. Primer Extension and Mapping Data Analysis

Particular chemically mapped nucleotides were recognized by reverse transcription, starting from proper 5′-FAM labeled primers specific to tested RNAs (Table S3). Some of the primers contained LNA-modified nucleotides that raise the stabilities of RNA–DNA duplexes, simultaneously increasing transcription efficiency [54]. A reverse transcription reaction was performed using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis system (Invitrogen (Waltham, MA, USA)) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with some modifications as described previously [55]. Reactions were terminated by ethanol precipitation. For every probe, four ddNTP ladders were prepared. The final DNA product was separated by capillary electrophoresis using ABI 3130xl Genetic Sequencer. The readout was performed in the Laboratory of Molecular Biology Techniques at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan.
Chemically mapping data, such as ABI files, were analyzed with the Peak Scanner 1.0 Program (Applied Biosystems (Waltham, MA, USA)). Reactive nucleotides were recognized by comparing dideoxy sequencing ladders along with a mass marker. The first 2% of the highest peaks was excluded and the next 8% of the peak intensities was used to calculate the average value. To receive proper nucleotide reactivity, all peak intensities were divided by the average. Reactivities were normalized on a scale of 0 to 1.5, where 0 suggests not reactive site and 1.5 is highly reactive. Reactivities >0.7 are considered as strong, 0.3–0.7 as medium, and <0.3 as weak. All calculated data were used for secondary structure prediction. For all four mapping reagents, NMIA, DMS, CMCT, and kethoxal, at least three datasets were collected.

4. Conclusions

Trinucleotide repeats are among the most common in the transcriptome in terms of motif length. The presented study focused on the poorly described trinucleotide repeats, which are less frequent in the human transcriptome. In our work, we examined the stability and folding of 23 types (different sequences) of trinucleotide repeats, determining their interaction potential within their sequence as well as between different repeat types. The tested RNA repeats form duplexes, quadruplexes, or stay single stranded. Our data show, next to the CNG repeats type, CAA repeats can also self-fold into duplex structures. The presence of PEG, imitating molecular crowding in melting buffer, does not influence the stability of the RNA repeat structures. AU-rich trinucleotide repeats do not fold themselves and remain single stranded in the analyzed buffers, including crowding conditions. We observed their considerable potential for interaction with other repeat types, as the presence of the other partially complementary repeat-type RNA resulted in formation of the weak intermolecular duplex. Such intermolecular repeat interactions were also able to unfold AGG repeats-formed quadruplexes, and this happened in the presence of CGU, CCG, CUU, and CCU repeats. In the presence of magnesium and potassium ions, which bring the analyzed conditions closer to the physiological ones, duplexes formed by AU-rich trinucleotide repeats were destabilized up to 2 kcal/mol. We verified the interactions of the selected repeat tracts, observed in UV-melting experiments, by examining the secondary structure of two exemplary fragments of natural RNAs, in which two different repeat types coexist. Fragments of GABRA4 and CHIC1 RNAs, containing potentially interacting repeat tracts, were subjected to the chemical mapping of the secondary structure. The results obtained for the fragment of GABRA4 RNA confirmed the formation of structures observed in thermodynamic studies of short model oligonucleotides. The in silico predictions performed for analyzed RNAs distinguish motifs formed by the repeats, which are consistent with the in vitro secondary structure probing results. GABRA4 case showed that rare repeats consisting mainly of A and U residues can actively interact intramolecularly, forming a stem that separates a structural domain. The CHIC1 case showed that the presence of a short CGU repeat tract was not able to unfold the G4 structure intramolecularly, which, however, was probably more complex, as it was formed by four short, discontinuous AGG repeat tracts.
Trinucleotide repeats in a number above six, which themselves do not have secondary structures and remain single stranded, are very rare in the human transcriptome. Even more rare is the coexistence of such repeats within one transcript. CNG-type repeats, usually located in the 5′UTR and ORF, are dominant. However, we showed on the GABRA4 example that duplexes formed from different, potentially weak RNA repeats might be structurally important for the molecule function and regulation. RNAs found with more than six repeats usually contain repeat types that themselves easily fold into secondary structures and localize in ORFs. As the RNA sequence context makes up the RNA structure, it is natural that self-unstructured repeats usually interact somewhere in the context in the most optimal manner. Our question in the case of GABRA4 was if the interaction of the repeat tracts UUG and AAU will be more thermodynamically favorable than the other interactions in their sequence context. The obtained experimental structure of the GABRA4 fragment confirmed the superiority of this interaction and its shaping role in the structure of this region.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23105850/s1 [56].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K. and D.M.; methodology, R.K., D.M. and E.L.O.; validation, D.M., E.L.O. and A.P.; formal analysis, D.M., E.L.O. and A.P.; investigation, D.M., R.N., E.L.O. and A.P.; resources, R.K. and D.M.; data curation, D.M. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.; writing—review and editing, R.K., A.P., E.L.O., R.N. and D.M.; visualization, D.M.; supervision, R.K.; project administration, R.K.; funding acquisition, R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science Center grant 2019/33/B/ST4/01422 to R.K.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Elzbieta Kierzek for her critical review of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Richard, G.-F.; Kerrest, A.; Dujon, B. Comparative Genomics and Molecular Dynamics of DNA Repeats in Eukaryotes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72, 686–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Tóth, G.; Gáspári, Z.; Jurka, J. Microsatellites in Different Eukaryotic Genomes: Surveys and Analysis. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Payseur, B.A.; Jing, P.; Haasl, R.J. A Genomic Portrait of Human Microsatellite Variation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sawaya, S.; Bagshaw, A.; Buschiazzo, E.; Kumar, P.; Chowdhury, S.; Black, M.A.; Gemmell, N. Microsatellite Tandem Repeats Are Abundant in Human Promoters and Are Associated with Regulatory Elements. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e31529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rohilla, K.J.; Gagnon, K.T. RNA Biology of Disease-Associated Microsatellite Repeat Expansions. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2017, 5, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Arabfard, M.; Kavousi, K.; Delbari, A.; Ohadi, M. Link between Short Tandem Repeats and Translation Initiation Site Selection. Hum. Genom. 2018, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Yap, K.; Mukhina, S.; Zhang, G.; Tan, J.S.C.; Ong, H.S.; Makeyev, E.V. A Short Tandem Repeat-Enriched RNA Assembles a Nuclear Compartment to Control Alternative Splicing and Promote Cell Survival. Mol. Cell 2018, 72, 525–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, Y.C.; Korol, A.B.; Fahima, T.; Nevo, E. Microsatellites within Genes: Structure, Function, and Evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21, 991–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clark, R.M.; Bhaskar, S.S.; Miyahara, M.; Dalgliesh, G.L.; Bidichandani, S.I. Expansion of GAA Trinucleotide Repeats in Mammals. Genomics 2006, 87, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kozlowski, P.; de Mezer, M.; Krzyzosiak, W.J. Trinucleotide Repeats in Human Genome and Exome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 4027–4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Busan, S.; Weeks, K.M. Role of Context in RNA Structure: Flanking Sequences Reconfigure CAG Motif Folding in Huntingtin Exon 1 Transcripts. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 8219–8225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sobczak, K.; Michlewski, G.; De Mezer, M.; Kierzek, E.; Krol, J.; Olejniczak, M.; Kierzek, R.; Krzyzosiak, W.J. Structural Diversity of Triplet Repeat RNAs. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 12755–12764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kierzek, R.; Burkard, M.E.; Turner, D.H. Thermodynamics of Single Mismatches in RNA Duplexes. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 14214–14223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krzyzosiak, W.J.; Sobczak, K.; Wojciechowska, M.; Fiszer, A.; Mykowska, A.; Kozlowski, P. Triplet Repeat RNA Structure and Its Role as Pathogenic Agent and Therapeutic Target. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tian, B.; White, R.J.; Xia, T.; Welle, S.; Turner, D.H.; Mathews, M.B.; Thornton, C.A. Expanded CUG Repeat RNAs Form Hairpins That Activate the Double-Stranded RNA-Dependent Protein Kinase PKR. RNA 2000, 6, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kiliszek, A.; Kierzek, R.; Krzyzosiak, W.J.; Rypniewski, W. Structural Insights into CUG Repeats Containing the “Stretched U-U Wobble”: Implications for Myotonic Dystrophy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 4149–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kiliszek, A.; Kierzek, R.; Krzyzosiak, W.J.; Rypniewski, W. Atomic Resolution Structure of CAG RNA Repeats: Structural Insights and Implications for the Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion Diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 8370–8376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kiliszek, A.; Kierzek, R.; Krzyzosiak, W.J.; Rypniewski, W. Crystal Structures of CGG RNA Repeats with Implications for Fragile X-Associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 7308–7315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kiliszek, A.; Kierzek, R.; Krzyzosiak, W.J.; Rypniewski, W. Crystallographic Characterization of CCG Repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 8155–8162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kiliszek, A.; Rypniewski, W. Structural Studies of CNG Repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 8189–8199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Malgowska, M.; Gudanis, D.; Kierzek, R.; Wyszko, E.; Gabelica, V.; Gdaniec, Z. Distinctive Structural Motifs of RNA G-Quadruplexes Composed of AGG, CGG and UGG Trinucleotide Repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 10196–10207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Abriata, L.A.; Spiga, E.; Peraro, M.D. Molecular Effects of Concentrated Solutes on Protein Hydration, Dynamics, and Electrostatics. Biophys. J. 2016, 111, 743–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Spitzer, J.; Poolman, B. How Crowded Is the Prokaryotic Cytoplasm? FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 2094–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cheung, M.C.; Lacroix, R.; Mckenna, B.K.; Liu, L.; Winkelman, J.; Ehrlich, D.J. Intracellular Protein and Nucleic Acid Measured in Eight Cell Types Using Deep-Ultraviolet Mass Mapping. Cytom. Part A 2013, 83, 540–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Adams, M.S.; Znosko, B.M. Thermodynamic Characterization and Nearest Neighbor Parameters for RNA Duplexes under Molecular Crowding Conditions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 3658–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jasinska, A.; Michlewski, G.; de Mezer, M.; Sobczak, K.; Kozlowski, P.; Napierala, M.; Krzyzosiak, W.J. Structures of Trinucleotide Repeats in Human Transcripts and Their Functional Implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 5463–5468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Turner, D.H.; Mathews, D.H. NNDB: The Nearest Neighbor Parameter Database for Predicting Stability of Nucleic Acid Secondary Structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lorenz, R.; Bernhart, S.H.; Höner zu Siederdissen, C.; Tafer, H.; Flamm, C.; Stadler, P.F.; Hofacker, I.L. ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 2011, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Merino, E.J.; Wilkinson, K.A.; Coughlan, J.L.; Weeks, K.M. RNA Structure Analysis at Single Nucleotide Resolution by Selective 2′-Hydroxyl Acylation and Primer Extension (SHAPE). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4223–4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peattie, D.A.; Gilbert, W. Chemical Probes for Higher-Order Structure in RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Inoue, T.; Cech, T.R. Secondary Structure of the Circular Form of the Tetrahymena RRNA Intervening Sequence: A Technique for RNA Structure Analysis Using Chemical Probes and Reverse Transcriptase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Tijerina, P.; Mohr, S.; Russell, R. DMS Footprinting of Structured RNAs and RNA-Protein Complexes. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Reuter, J.S.; Mathews, D.H. RNAstructure: Software for RNA Secondary Structure Prediction and Analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Popenda, M.; Szachniuk, M.; Antczak, M.; Purzycka, K.J.; Lukasiak, P.; Bartol, N.; Blazewicz, J.; Adamiak, R.W. Automated 3D Structure Composition for Large RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, Y.; Wang, X. MiRDB: An Online Database for Prediction of Functional MicroRNA Targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D127–D131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Landgraf, P.; Rusu, M.; Sheridan, R.; Sewer, A.; Iovino, N.; Aravin, A.; Pfeffer, S.; Rice, A.; Kamphorst, A.O.; Landthaler, M.; et al. A Mammalian MicroRNA Expression Atlas Based on Small RNA Library Sequencing. Cell 2007, 129, 1401–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Motameny, S.; Wolters, S.; Nürnberg, P.; Schumacher, B. Next Generation Sequencing of MiRNAs—Strategies, Resources and Methods. Genes 2010, 1, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Buermans, H.P.J.; Ariyurek, Y.; van Ommen, G.; den Dunnen, J.T.; ’T Hoen, P.A.C. New Methods for next Generation Sequencing Based MicroRNA Expression Profiling. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Simmler, M.C.; Heard, E.; Rougeulle, C.; Cruaud, C.; Weissenbach, J.; Avner, P. Localization and Expression Analysis of a Novel Conserved Brain Expressed Transcript, Brx/BRX, Lying within the Xic/XIC Candidate Region. Mamm. Genome 1997, 8, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thandapani, P.; Song, J.; Gandin, V.; Cai, Y.; Rouleau, S.G.; Garant, J.M.; Boisvert, F.M.; Yu, Z.; Perreault, J.P.; Topisirovic, I.; et al. Aven Recognition of RNA G-Quadruplexes Regulates Translation of the Mixed Lineage Leukemia Protooncogenes. Elife 2015, 4, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Song, J.; Perreault, J.-P.; Topisirovic, I.; Richard, S. RNA G-Quadruplexes and Their Potential Regulatory Roles in Translation. Translation 2016, 4, e1244031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Endoh, T.; Kawasaki, Y.; Sugimoto, N. Translational Halt during Elongation Caused by G-Quadruplex Formed by mRNA. Methods 2013, 64, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Giedroc, D.P.; Cornish, P.V. Frameshifting RNA Pseudoknots: Structure and Mechanism. Virus Res. 2009, 139, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Doma, M.K.; Parker, R. Endonucleolytic Cleavage of Eukaryotic MRNAs with Stalls in Translation Elongation. Nature 2006, 440, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Harigaya, Y.; Parker, R. No-Go Decay: A Quality Control Mechanism for RNA in Translation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2010, 1, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, G.; Hubalewska, M.; Ignatova, Z. Transient Ribosomal Attenuation Coordinates Protein Synthesis and Co-Translational Folding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. O’Brien, E.P.; Vendruscolo, M.; Dobson, C.M. Prediction of Variable Translation Rate Effects on Cotranslational Protein Folding. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Komar, A.A. A Pause for Thought along the Co-Translational Folding Pathway. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2009, 34, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mergny, J.L.; Lacroix, L. UV Melting of G-Quadruplexes. Curr. Protoc. Nucleic Acid Chem. 2009, 17, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mergny, J.L.; Lacroix, L. Analysis of Thermal Melting Curves. Oligonucleotides 2003, 13, 515–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kreig, A.; Calvert, J.; Sanoica, J.; Cullum, E.; Tipanna, R.; Myong, S. G-Quadruplex Formation in Double Strand DNA Probed by NMM and CV Fluorescence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 7961–7970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kierzek, E.; Ciesielska, A.; Pasternak, K.; Mathews, D.H.; Turner, D.H.; Kierzek, R. The Influence of Locked Nucleic Acid Residues on the Thermodynamic Properties of 2′-O-Methyl RNA/RNA Heteroduplexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 5082–5093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Salisbury, E.; Schoser, B.; Schneider-Gold, C.; Wang, G.L.; Huichalaf, C.; Jin, B.; Sirito, M.; Sarkar, P.; Krahe, R.; Timchenko, N.A.; et al. Expression of RNA CCUG Repeats Dysregulates Translation and Degradation of Proteins in Myotonic Dystrophy 2 Patients. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 748–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Fratczak, A.; Kierzek, R.; Kierzek, E. LNA-Modified Primers Drastically Improve Hybridization to Target RNA and Reverse Transcription. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 514–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lenartowicz, E.; Kesy, J.; Ruszkowska, A.; Soszynska-Jozwiak, M.; Michalak, P.; Moss, W.N.; Turner, D.H.; Kierzek, R.; Kierzek, E. Self-Folding of Naked Segment 8 Genomic RNA of Influenza A Virus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ludwig, N.; Leidinger, P.; Becker, K.; Backes, C.; Fehlmann, T.; Pallasch, C.; Rheinheimer, S.; Meder, B.; Stähler, C.; Meese, E.; et al. Distribution of MiRNA Expression across Human Tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 3865–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 05850 g001 550
Figure 1. Thermodynamic stability of self-duplexing RNA trinucleotide repeats.
Figure 1. Thermodynamic stability of self-duplexing RNA trinucleotide repeats.
Ijms 23 05850 g001
Ijms 23 05850 g002 550
Figure 2. Thermodynamic stability of inter-strand duplexes of non-self-duplexing RNA repeats.
Figure 2. Thermodynamic stability of inter-strand duplexes of non-self-duplexing RNA repeats.
Ijms 23 05850 g002
Ijms 23 05850 g003 550
Figure 3. Thermodynamic stability of intermolecular duplexes formed by G(AGG)3A repeats (A) and G(GCG)3G repeats (B).
Figure 3. Thermodynamic stability of intermolecular duplexes formed by G(AGG)3A repeats (A) and G(GCG)3G repeats (B).
Ijms 23 05850 g003
Ijms 23 05850 g004 550
Figure 4. RNA repeats coexistence in a single transcript. The values on the crossing of particular repeats type row and column represent the number of RNAs found with the four (yellow–green scale) and the six (yellow–red scale) repeat number.
Figure 4. RNA repeats coexistence in a single transcript. The values on the crossing of particular repeats type row and column represent the number of RNAs found with the four (yellow–green scale) and the six (yellow–red scale) repeat number.
Ijms 23 05850 g004
Ijms 23 05850 g005 550
Figure 5. Experimental secondary structure of GABRA4 3′UTR fragment, including normalized nucleotide reactivity’s and base-pairing probability.
Figure 5. Experimental secondary structure of GABRA4 3′UTR fragment, including normalized nucleotide reactivity’s and base-pairing probability.
Ijms 23 05850 g005
Ijms 23 05850 g006 550
Figure 6. Analysis of potential miRNA target site regions within the GABRA4 3′UTR fragment. The sites of interactions significantly overlap with the reactive sites determined by chemical structure probing.
Figure 6. Analysis of potential miRNA target site regions within the GABRA4 3′UTR fragment. The sites of interactions significantly overlap with the reactive sites determined by chemical structure probing.
Ijms 23 05850 g006
Ijms 23 05850 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) Structure prediction for CHIC1 ORF RNA fragment (RNAstructure). Putative quadruplexes are marked black, and CGU repeats are marked green; red—single stranded regions, blue—duplex regions. (B) Native 8% polyacrylamide gel stained with NMM, showing two CHIC1 isoforms containing quadruplex structures (II). Control RNA (I) of similar length is G4-free and therefore invisible.
Figure 7. (A) Structure prediction for CHIC1 ORF RNA fragment (RNAstructure). Putative quadruplexes are marked black, and CGU repeats are marked green; red—single stranded regions, blue—duplex regions. (B) Native 8% polyacrylamide gel stained with NMM, showing two CHIC1 isoforms containing quadruplex structures (II). Control RNA (I) of similar length is G4-free and therefore invisible.
Ijms 23 05850 g007
Table
Table 1. RNA repeats potential for folding into different secondary structures.
Table 1. RNA repeats potential for folding into different secondary structures.
UnstructuredDuplexQuadruplex
A(UUA)3U A(CAA)3CG(AGG)3A
G(AAG)3AA(CGA)3CG(UGG)3U
G(UUG)3UU(GCU)3G
A(GAA)3GU(CGU)3C
A(UAA)3UC(GCC)3G
U(CUU)3CG(GCG)3G
U(CCU)3CA(GCA)3G
A(CCA)3CG(CCUG)3C
A(CUA)3C
U(CAU)3C
G(UAG)3U
G(AUG)3A
U(AUUCU)3A
Table
Table 2. Top results of megaBLAST search for RNAs with multiple TNR tracts in human transcriptome. Records marked in red were chosen for detailed analysis of RNA secondary structure to follow trinucleotide repeat tracts interactions. Records marked with an asterix contain discontinuous tracts of repeats.
Table 2. Top results of megaBLAST search for RNAs with multiple TNR tracts in human transcriptome. Records marked in red were chosen for detailed analysis of RNA secondary structure to follow trinucleotide repeat tracts interactions. Records marked with an asterix contain discontinuous tracts of repeats.
Gene IDVariantRepeat TypeRepeats NumberTranscript RegionRegion LenghtDistance between RepeatsCodon Type
Non-CNG typeGABRA4NM_000809UUG103′UTR9325318-
UAA143′UTR -
ALG13NM_001099922CCA14ORF3414 Pro
CCU13ORF 0Pro
HRCNM_002152AGG8ORF2100 Asp
AUG14ORF 138Glu
ARID3ANM_005224UGG105′UTR292
AGG6ORF1782434Glu
CNG typeZFHX3NM_001164766GCC105′UTR515
AAC9ORF83702642
GCA7ORF 4369Gly
GCG7ORF 947
MAFANM_201589GCG5ORF1062 His
CCA10ORF 352Gly
ATXN8OSNR_002717CUA10ncRNA1472
GCU14 0
RPS6KA6NM_014496GCG115′UTR300
CUA123′UTR59273637
ARNM_000044GCA23ORF2763 Gln
GCG17ORF 1130Gly
VEZF1NM_001330393GCC65′UTR382
GCA13ORF15391298Gln
HTTNM_002111GCA21ORF9435 Gln
GCC7ORF 3Pro
AAK1NM_014911GCA6ORF2886 Gln
GUU103′UTR17,87212,815
POU4F2NM_004575GCG11ORF1230 Gly
CCA6ORF 331His
HMGB3NM_001301228GCC175′UTR262
AGG7ORF603663Glu
** SKIDA1NM_207371GCC10, 8ORF2727 Ala
GCG8, 4ORF 174Ala
CCA7, 6ORF 65His
AGG5, 4ORF 188Glu
** ZSWIM6NM_020928GCC10, 4ORF3648 Ala
GCG6, 6, 6, 6ORF 44Gly
** KCNMA1NM_001014797GCG6, 5, 7ORF3549 Gly
CCU7ORF 60Ser
CUU4ORF 0Ser
** CHIC1NM_001039840CGU4, 5ORF675 Ser
AGG4, 4, 3ORF 23Glu
**: The repeat tracts are discontinuous.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magner, D.; Nowak, R.; Lenartowicz Onyekaa, E.; Pasternak, A.; Kierzek, R. A Structural Potential of Rare Trinucleotide Repeat Tracts in RNA. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105850

AMA Style

Magner D, Nowak R, Lenartowicz Onyekaa E, Pasternak A, Kierzek R. A Structural Potential of Rare Trinucleotide Repeat Tracts in RNA. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(10):5850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105850

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magner, Dorota, Rafal Nowak, Elzbieta Lenartowicz Onyekaa, Anna Pasternak, and Ryszard Kierzek. 2022. "A Structural Potential of Rare Trinucleotide Repeat Tracts in RNA" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 10: 5850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105850

APA Style

Magner, D., Nowak, R., Lenartowicz Onyekaa, E., Pasternak, A., & Kierzek, R. (2022). A Structural Potential of Rare Trinucleotide Repeat Tracts in RNA. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(10), 5850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105850

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop