Next Article in Journal
Neurochemical Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury by the Combined Analysis of Plasma Beta-Synuclein, NfL, and GFAP in Polytraumatized Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of TIMP-2 Polymorphisms on Retinopathy of Prematurity Risk, Severity, Recurrence, and Treatment Response
Previous Article in Journal
MicroRNA Let-7a, -7e and -133a Attenuate Hypoxia-Induced Atrial Fibrosis via Targeting Collagen Expression and the JNK Pathway in HL1 Cardiomyocytes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Association of Erythropoietin and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Hemodialysis Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9634; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179634
by Evelyn-Jou-Chen Huang 1,2, Fung-Chang Sung 3,4,5, Peir-Haur Hung 6,7, Chih-Hsin Muo 4,8, Meei-Maan Wu 9,10,11,† and Chih-Ching Yeh 10,11,12,13,*,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9634; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179634
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 18 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 25 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Development and Therapy in Neovascular Retinal Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors in the manuscript titled “The association of erythropoietin and age-related macular degeneration in hemodialysis patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study” used claims data of Taiwan and investigated the association of erythropoietin (EPO) with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in patients receiving hemodialysis.

The manuscript is interesting to show the lower incidence of AMD in EPO users compared to non-EPO users among patients with hemodialysis. However, there are some points that need more clarification.

Major critics:

- The authors mentioned that EPO and VEGF were both increased in ischemic retinal diseases such as PDR and CRVO. VEGF produced in ischemic states lead neovascularization, so that anti-VEGF agents became main stream of treatment to reduce neovascularization of various retinal diseases. In similar context, EPO may not always play a beneficial role. Accordingly, I think that the sentence that suggests a beneficial role of EPO (lines 61-63) is not properly placed, as the former sentence mentioned that EPO is increased in ischemic conditions (i.e. suggesting a harmful effect such VEGF). That paragraph needs to be revised.

Minor critics due to typo errors

- “EPO and EPO receptors (EPOR) in the retinal” in line 147: should be ‘in the retina’.

- “hypoxia upregulated EOP” in line 180: should be ‘EPO’.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript, the authors concluded that EPO administration may be effective in preventing, to some extent, the development of AMD in patients undergoing hemodialysis for chronic renal failure, based on the observation that the incidence and risk of AMD, especially atrophic AMD, were significantly lower in patients receiving EPO and that there was a negative correlation between EPO dosage and the incidence of AMD. Although the results are relatively clear and the conclusions seem justified at first glance, this reviewer believes that the following points warrant further discussion. 

1.     Since patients with chronic renal failure receive EPO exogenously due to a decrease in endogenous EPO, the effects of EPO in the patient's body should be discussed based on the sum of both endogenous and exogenous effects. This paper does not examine endogenous EPO, and a discussion of this issue is warranted. Measurements of actual patients' blood EPO levels would be more desirable for this study.

2.     In addition, patients on hemodialysis often require oral phosphorus adsorbents to control serum phosphorus levels. Some adsorbents contain iron, which increases hematocrit, and the exogenous EPO dosage should be increased or decreased accordingly. Therefore, the dose of exogenous EPO is not always constant, but may vary depending on the patient's blood test data, and it may not be realistic to use a single data set for a single patient as in this study. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The points raised in the previous peer review were well considered and the quality of the paper seems to have improved sufficiently.

Back to TopTop