Next Article in Journal
An Amidase Contributes to Full Virulence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Next Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Targeting of Glutaminolysis as a Novel Strategy to Combat Cancer Stem Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Proximal Tubular Reabsorption Modulate Microvascular Regulation via the TGF System
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A New Chemotactic Mechanism Governs Long-Range Angiogenesis Induced by Patching an Arterial Graft into a Vein

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11208; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911208
by Dhisa Minerva 1,†, Nuha Loling Othman 2,*,†, Takashi Nakazawa 1, Yukinobu Ito 3, Makoto Yoshida 3, Akiteru Goto 3 and Takashi Suzuki 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11208; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911208
Submission received: 18 August 2022 / Revised: 18 September 2022 / Accepted: 18 September 2022 / Published: 23 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Cell Metabolism in Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is very interesting since it describes a mathematical model that relates VEGF gradients with the speed of vessels growth in a arterial patch. 

My comments for the authors are:

1. In Figure 1, in certain cases, for the same abscissa value the plot shows three values of ordinate. Why? 

2. The mathematical model  distinguished VEGF concentration near the pre-existing vessels from the VEGF concentration near arterial patch. The authors claim that VEGF concentration is higher in pre-existing vessels than in arterial patch. Has this model been validated with experimental data? The patch inclusion can disturb the homeostasis of endothelial cells and causes VEGF release. The authors considered that?

VEGF is a well-known angiogenic promoter, however, in future, it will be interesting to study others angiogenesis-related genes (TGF-beta, HIF-1alpha, FGF, among others). 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Figure 2 a) letters to small to be able to read it.

Figure 3 a) needs to specify wich staining they are using. Figure 3 b) They are talking about average graph but did not specify how many samples they have checked. This need to be specified.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I recommend publishing the manuscript. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop