Next Article in Journal
AmyP53, a Therapeutic Peptide Candidate for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Disease: Safety, Stability, Pharmacokinetics Parameters and Nose-to Brain Delivery
Next Article in Special Issue
Endometrial Microbiota and Immune Tolerance in Pregnancy
Previous Article in Journal
Elucidating the Genetic Relationships on the Original Old Sicilian Triticum Spp. Collection by SNP Genotyping
Previous Article in Special Issue
Caveolin-1 Regulation and Function in Mouse Uterus during Early Pregnancy and under Human In Vitro Decidualization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms232113382
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Immune Tolerance of Embryo Implantation and Pregnancy: The Role of Human Decidual Stromal Cell- and Embryonic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

by
Hsien-Ming Wu
1,
Liang-Hsuan Chen
1,
Le-Tien Hsu
1 and
Chyong-Huey Lai
1,2,*
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
2
Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 13382; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113382
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 30 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 2 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endometrium and Pregnancy Immune Tolerance)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Embryo–endometrial communication plays a critical role in embryo implantation and the establishment of a successful pregnancy. Successful pregnancy outcomes involve maternal immune modulation during embryo implantation. The endometrium is usually primed and immunomodulated by steroid hormones and embryo signals for subsequent embryo implantation and the maintenance of pregnancy. The roles of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and microRNAs for the embryo–maternal interactions have been elucidated recently. New evidence shows that endometrial EVs and trophectoderm-originated EV cargo, including microRNAs, proteins, and lipids in the physiological microenvironment, regulate maternal immunomodulation for embryo implantation and subsequent pregnancy. On the other hand, trophoblast-derived EVs also control the cross-communication between the trophoblasts and immune cells. The exploration of EV functions and mechanisms in the processes of embryo implantation and pregnancy will shed light on a practical tool for the diagnostic or therapeutic approaches to reproductive medicine and infertility.

1. Introduction

The embryo–endometrial communication has a critical role in the successful embryo implantation and pregnancy [1]. Maternal immune modulation during embryo implantation and subsequent pregnancy provides a tolerant microenvironment to keep the fetus from rejection [2]. Since the first human IVF baby was born in 1978, pregnancy and live birth rates following assisted reproductive technologies have improved significantly. Even so, there is still a gap in achieving higher pregnancy and live birth rates, attributed to unresolved problems in embryo quality, endometrium receptivity, and embryo–endometrium interaction [3,4]. Usually, a steroid hormone primes the endometrium for the receptive phase; after that, it is further immunomodulated by embryo signals for subsequent embryo implantation and maintenance of pregnancy [5]. Therefore, successful embryo implantation and the ensuing pregnancy depend on the coordinated interaction between the endometrium and embryos. The classical embryo–endometrial interactions through dynamic intracellular and secreted protein alterations in the stage of embryo implantation are performed to promote the successful maintenance of pregnancy [6]. The role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and microRNAs in the decidualization for the embryo–maternal interactions of decidual endometrial stromal cells has been clarified in the implantation of the embryos [7]. EVs are cell-originated membranous vesicles that deliver bioactive molecules from cells to cells [8]. The cargo of EVs mediates cell–cell communication by delivering numerous factors, including DNA, microRNAs, proteins, and lipids [9]. Innovative insights and approaches have explored the broad features of EVs, including ligands, surface receptors, and cargo from the mother cells. Moreover, the lipid bilayer membranes of EVs contain relatively high levels of ceramide, cholesterol, and sphingomyelin, causing EVs to be steady in extracellular spaces [10]. The biochemical and molecular characteristics of EV cargo from cells of the female reproductive tissue, placenta, and embryo have been recently demonstrated [7,11,12]. In this review, we will highlight the roles of human decidual stromal cell-associated EVs in the immune tolerance of embryo implantation and pregnancy.

2. Decidualization of the Human Endometrium

The endometrium experiences regeneration, differentiation, and shedding during the human menstrual cycle. Usually, the endometrium in the menstrual period undergoes three main stages: the proliferative phase, the secretory phase, and the menstrual phase. Two ovarian steroid hormones, estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4), regulate the endometrial cycle. E2 and P4 functionally and morphologically control the endometrial epithelial, stromal, and immune cells [13]. After the E2-primed proliferative phase, the proliferated endometrial epithelial and stromal cells differentiate into decidual cells in response to increasing P4 in the secretory phase [14]. The corpus luteum-synthesized and released P4 is required for promoting embryo implantation and the maintenance of placentation [15].

2.1. Morphological Differentiation in the Human Endometrium

During embryo implantation and pregnancy, the endometrium experiences decidualization in which the endometrial epithelium, stroma, and vascular structures are transformed into decidua [16,17]. The decidualization results from the elevated levels of E2 and P4 and results in a progressive change in tissue remodeling, cellular functions, and gene expression until the completion of placentation during pregnancy. During the process of decidualization, vascular endothelium, immune cells, glandular epithelium, and endometrial stromal cells react to the integration of multiple factors and mediators. After ovulation, the human endometrial stromal cells transform from fibroblast-like cells to epithelium-like cells with large pale nuclei, cytoplasmic expansion, and globular shapes in the secretory phase [18]. This transforming process features intricate cytoskeletal rearrangements [19]. The complex cytoskeletal rearrangements involve the activation of a myosin light chain and condensed F-actin, promoting intracellular remodeling [20]. P4-transformed epithelium-like decidual stromal cells produce decidual proteins, such as prolactin (PRL), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) [21,22,23].

2.2. Functional Differentiation in Human Endometrium

Progesterone receptor (PR) expression plays a role in the signaling pathways supporting endometrial homeostasis for embryo implantation and pregnancy. PRs are nuclear receptors including two isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) with disparate functions [24]. PRs appear throughout pregnancy [25], indicating that the expression level of the PRs in the human decidua is the consequence of an integrated E2 and P4 regulation and autoregulation of its promoter region [26,27]. Ligand-binding PRs are enrolled to P4 response elements in the promoters of target genes and regulates their transcription [28]. PR pathways with accumulations of cAMP promote the expression of decidual transcriptional regulators, epigenetic modifications, coordination of signal transductions, and post-transcriptional moderation [17]. The physiological role of the dynamic expression of PRs in the endometrium as decidualization initiation and ongoing pregnancy could denote the intrinsic mechanism for a functionally dynamic progesterone change [26]. The initiation of the decidualization induces decidual stromal cells to produce angiogenic factors, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines related to blastocyst implantation.
Consequently, decidual stromal cells release numerous proteins, such as IGFBP-1 and PRL. IGFBP-1 and PRL induce trophoblast invasion and proliferation through the integrins and PRL receptors [29,30]. Through PRL, IGFBP-1, fibronectin, and PR response element signaling, the integrated regulation between the steroid hormones and their receptors delivers important messages that govern decidual transformation and endometrial immune homeostasis for embryo implantation and pregnancy [31,32]. LIF and interleukin (IL)-11 upregulate the expression of adhesion molecules and the adherence of endometrial epithelial cells to collagen IV and fibronectin [33]. LIF activates the adhesion molecules in trophoblasts and increases the attachment of trophoblasts to laminin and fibronectin (elements of the extracellular matrix); meanwhile, IL-11 enhances the adherence of endometrial epithelial cells to trophoblasts [33,34,35]. These LIF- and IL-11-induced effects promote the adhesion and invasion of the blastocyst and maintain the subsequent placentation [34,36].

3. Immune Modulatory Properties of Decidual Stromal Cells

The homeostasis between active immunity and tolerance at the maternal–fetal surface between uterus and embryo is significantly important. Therefore, effective immunity must be supported to protect the mother from external organisms, and tolerance should be provided toward embryos. Decidual stromal cells may play an essential role throughout the pregnancy, and to prevent an allogeneic response against the embryo and fetus, it is crucial to establish a tolerant microenvironment required to inhibit maternal immune response and keep the fetus from rejection [37,38]. Decidual stromal cells behave as the major cellular component of the human decidua and derive from a fibroblast-like stromal cell undergoing differentiation and proliferation [39]. Decidual stromal cells can manifest stem cell properties, including multilineage differentiation into three embryonic layers [40]. Furthermore, decidual stromal cells have immune modulatory properties on cells of innate and adaptive immunity in humans (Table 1). In humans, decidual stromal cells have been demonstrated to inhibit T cell function and to promote Tregs through the activation of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), prostaglandin E2, programmed death ligand (PD-L)1, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) [41]. Meanwhile, peripheral blood (PB) CD14+ monocytes are differentiated into tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs), expressing low CD83 and CD86 and releasing IL-10 in the presence of decidual stromal cells [42]. These decidual stromal cells failed to stimulate T cell proliferation while inducing T cell differentiation into IL-4+ Th2 rather than IFN-γ+ Th1 cells. According to the immunomodulatory effect, the application of decidual stromal cells has been shown to be effective in treating immune disorders [43,44].

3.1. Uterine Natural Killer (uNK) Cells

NK cells are classified as innate immunity and are categorized into cytotoxic NK cells and noncytotoxic NK cells [45]. uNK cells act as neoangiogenesis, tissue remodeling, and regulation of trophoblast invasion during the first trimester of pregnancy [46]. uNK cells are noncytotoxic and constitute about 70% of all leukocytes in the uterus. The recruitment mechanisms of uNK cells have been demonstrated such that NK cells migrate from the peripheral blood vessels to the uterine decidua; furthermore, uNK cells might result from the differentiation of permanent tissue CD34+ hematopoietic precursor cells [47,48]. uNK cells are highly reactive to environmental stimulation with notable functional characters in early pregnancy decidua [49,50]. uNK cells deliver the balanced cell function between activating and inhibitory stimulation, indicating that uNK cells express an intricate mechanism of activating and inhibitory receptors that serve as reactions to specific ligands in target cells or responses to other cells of the host organism to establish self-tolerance and acquire functional capability [51]. CD56bright and CD16-uNK cells function as the setting and maintenance of early pregnancy through the motivation of tissue remodeling, angiogenesis, and trophoblast invasion in the decidua [52,53]. Recent reports demonstrate new insights into the crucial role of innate immune cells in avoiding the senescence in the human endometrium occurring in early pregnancy to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss through human uNK cells in the decidua [54,55]. Concerning the mechanisms of the uNK cell action, exploring the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-specific inhibitory and activating uNK receptors, identifying ligands provided the way to understand the signaling pathway [56]. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) profile of fetal extravillous trophoblast cells (EVTs) is unique with polymorphic HLA-C class I molecules, HLA-E and HLA-G, but without class I HLA-A and HLA-B or class II molecules [57]. Moreover, EVT HLA ligands interact with uNK cell receptors, such as killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) [57,58]. The tissue remodeling, angiogenesis, and trophoblast invasion, with subsequent impacts on placentation and the maintenance of pregnancy, may be promoted by the allorecognition between paternal HLA-C and maternal KIRs [59,60]. Some reproductive outcomes, such as embryo implantation failure, recurrent pregnancy loss, fetal growth restriction, and preeclampsia, have a similar pathogenesis of abnormal angiogenesis and tissue remodeling, associated with maternal KIRs and fetal HLA-C genotypes [61,62]. EVTs release progesterone and profilin-1, which function as the inducer of endometrial stromal cell (ESC) decidualization through the downregulation of arachidonate 5-lipooxygenase (ALOX5) in ESCs [63].

3.2. Cytokines

Functional embryo–maternal interactions occur during embryo implantation and placentation, contributing to a successful pregnancy [64]. Embryo implantation is a vital step in the complex embryo–maternal interactions, indicating that a well-ready and receptive endometrium recognizes and tolerates a good-quality embryo [65]. Cytokines released from the endometrium regulate these complex embryo–maternal interactions throughout pregnancy as the immunoregulatory roles in decidualization and placentation [66]. In order to prime a receptive endometrium, several immune cells, including uNK cells and macrophages, are initiated to release growth factors and proinflammatory cytokines modulating receptive decidualization and maternal tolerance to embryo invasion [67,68,69]. All through the pregnancy, cytokines establish complex immunological stability between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory reactions essential for balancing embryo–maternal interactions [70]. During embryo implantation and pregnancy, the coordination of different immune cells and cytokines in the endometrial immune environment plays a crucial role [71]. It has been demonstrated that uNK cells, macrophages, and T cells are most of the leukocyte in the decidua throughout embryo implantation and pregnancy [50,67,72]. Most immune cells in the early proliferative endometrium are T cells and are classified into helper CD4+ T cells and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells [73]. Various cytokines, which regulate and modulate the immune reactions in the maternal–fetal interface, are secreted by both Th1 and Th2 cells of the CD4+ T cell subtypes [74]. These cytokines can be categorized as proinflammatory Th1-type and anti-inflammatory Th2-type based on their style of paracrine regulation [75]. The Th1-type cells release proinflammatory cytokines, mainly interleukins (IL)-1, 2, 12, 15, 18, and IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). The Th2-type cells release anti-inflammatory cytokines, mainly granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-4, 5, 6, 10, and 13 [67,72].
Furthermore, according to the type of cytokines secreted from the macrophages, the cells are divided into proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory macrophages, which involve trophoblast invasion and vascular and tissue remodeling [76]. Various cytokines synchronize and balance the maternal–fetal immune system modulation, involving embryo implantation and pregnancy maintenance. This unique mechanism is featured by the dynamic production of different cytokines, which means the dynamic changes of the Th1/Th2 ratio during the different phases of embryo implantation and pregnancy [77,78]. An inflammatory environment is organized in the decidua through the maternal–fetal immune system modulation to induce adequate embryo implantation and placentation. Meanwhile, the release of proinflammatory Th1 cytokines during this stage is essential for embryo implantation and maintenance of pregnancy since this inflammatory environment induces extravillous trophoblast invasion, vascular remodeling, and maternal–fetal immune tolerance [79]. Consequently, a shift of the Th1/Th2 immune response throughout the peri-implantation period promotes embryo implantation and placentation [78]. Subsequently, to maintain the pregnancy, a predominating anti-inflammatory Th2 condition establishes normal fetal growth and development, as well as sheltering both the mother and the fetus from potential inflammation [78]. During the third phase of pregnancy, a renascent inflammation that coordinates with a proinflammatory environment initiates labor associated with inducing uterine contraction, infant delivery, and placenta expulsion [79,80]. Taken together, the dynamic changes of the Th1/Th2 ratio during the different pregnancy phases achieve a maximum in the proliferative and primed endometrium for embryo implantation; after that, the ratio decreases during the maintenance of pregnancy and eventually increases again during the initiation of labor course.
IL-15 has an essential role in maternal–fetal interactions through binding the receptors of uNK cells [81]. Many studies have shown that IL15 is significantly expressed during the secretory phase in the human endometrium through quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and histological analysis [18,82]. Furthermore, during the progestin-induced decidualization, IL-15 is highly expressed in cultured human ESCs [83]; meanwhile, IL15 is suggested as an important marker of the endometrial window of embryo implantation in the endometrial receptivity array [84]. Recently, it was also demonstrated that the IL-15 and IL-15RB/G receptor interaction is part of the crucial mechanisms between decidual stromal cells and uNK cells by single-cell analysis during first trimester human pregnancy [57]. Consequently, these reports demonstrate that IL-15 secreted from ESCs plays an important role in the modulation of the differentiation and function of uNK cells in the human endometrium during embryo implantation and placentation. Taken together, malfunctions in the endometrial immune system regulation, mainly resulting from an abnormal expression of Th1/Th2 cytokines or IL-15, are the predisposing factors for complicated pregnancy outcomes, which include embryo implantation failure, miscarriage, preterm labor, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction of the fetus [78,85,86] (Figure 1).

3.3. T Cells

Various T cells are present in the uterus and the decidua. T cells expressing different T cell receptors are defined as distinct subtypes, which include CD4+ T cells, CD4+ T regulatory cells, and CD8+ T cells [87,88].
CD4+ T cells were observed in the peripheral blood with a higher activated memory type in pregnant women compared to those in nulliparous women and maintained a high level one year postpartum [89,90]. Many studies in mice and humans demonstrated that these pregnancy-promoting memory CD4+ T cells could improve reproductive outcomes observed in multiparous pregnancies [91]. CD4+ T cells directly recognize MHCII-bound antigens and indirectly recognize APC-presented antigens in the decidua. CD4+ T cells reveal higher levels of CXCR3 (chemokine receptor) in the decidua to recruit effector memory T cells into the decidua [92]. CD4+ T cells can secrete cytokines in the uterine immune system, in which Th1 and Th17 cells release IFN-γ and IL-17 to promote trophoblast invasion and vascular and tissue remodeling of the uterine spiral arteries and the decidua [93,94]. These dynamic changes and balance of the cytokine secretion also contribute to inflammation and complicated pregnancy outcomes [95].
CD4+ T regulatory cells (Treg cells), which were formerly defined as suppressor T cells, with the co-expression of the transcriptional regulator forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3), contribute to modulating the immune system, which includes preserving tolerance to self-antigens, avoiding autoimmune disease, and dynamically enhancing the decidua during embryo implantation and early pregnancy [96], but they seem to be unnecessary for the maintenance of the third trimester pregnancy in humans [97,98,99]. The recruitment of Treg cells in the decidua and the increase in maternal blood are observed from the first trimester of human pregnancy; however, an inadequate accumulation of Treg cells with impaired function may be associated with poor reproductive outcomes, such as implantation failure, miscarriage, and preeclampsia [100,101,102]. There are reports that the number of effector Treg cells in the decidua is increased in the third trimester of pregnancy compared to the first trimester of pregnancy, and more Treg cells in the decidua are present in pregnancies carrying an HLA-C-mismatched child compared to HLA-C-matched pregnancies [103]. Treg cells in the human decidua can reduce CD4+ T cell growth and cytokine secretion; meanwhile, through the release of IFN-γ and IL-17, Treg cells promote decidual vascular and tissue remodeling [92,104].
CD8+ T cells are dominant lymphocytes in the decidua during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy [57,88]. Notably, during the third trimester of pregnancy, CD8+ T cell receptors with an effector memory phenotype can identify fetal antigens offered by trophoblast HLA-C molecules similar to minor histocompatibility antigens [92,93,105]. In a successfully advanced pregnancy, the allogenic trophoblast is inadequate to actuate potential CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity; however, in the decidua, maternal CD8+ T cells are designated for HLA-A or -B and may cross-react with viral peptides bound to trophoblast HLA-C and drive the CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity [106]. In human pregnancy, CD8+ T cells reveal regulatory or inhibitory roles on effector CD8+ T cell reactions, which include part of the CD8+ T cells co-expressing the immune checkpoint molecules PD1 and TIM3 or negative for the costimulatory molecule CD28 [107,108]. Furthermore, HMOX1 was demonstrated in the placenta [109], which needs to be interpreted as the association between HMOX1 and CD8+ cells in immune regulation and maintenance during pregnancy.

3.4. Macrophages

Macrophages share several features present in most human tissue and function as an important role in tissue homeostasis, including immunity and tissue remodeling. In the uterine endometrium, macrophages are present to protect the embryo by expressing half allogenic antigens from the maternal immune reaction, indicating that macrophages in the decidua contribute to pathogen clearance, trophoblast invasion, and tissue and vascular remodeling for embryo implantation [110]. Therefore, the malfunction of macrophages results in abnormal reproductive outcomes, including implantation failure, miscarriage, preeclampsia, and other obstetrical complications [67,111,112,113,114]. A dynamic equilibrium of macrophage polarization is defined as emerging the phenotypic and functional features for internal and external stimulation. Macrophages were traditionally categorized into two phenotypes: classically activated macrophages (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages; however, the current report demonstrates that the plasticity of macrophages replies on microenvironmental stimulation with dynamic and continuous behavior in different tissues and organs [115,116]. In the decidua of embryo implantation and early pregnancy, macrophages may mainly contribute to immune regulation with tissue and vascular remodeling required for maintaining pregnancy by eliminating cell debris and apoptotic cells [57,117,118]. The cytokine profiles govern the function and phenotype of the macrophages’ response to microenvironmental stimulation. Usually, Th1 cytokines induce macrophages to M1 macrophages with highly inflammatory and phagocytic abilities; on the other hand, Th2 cytokines govern macrophages toward M2 macrophages with a different phenotype and immune regulatory functions [119]. There is acknowledgement that M1 macrophages are present to induce embryo attachment to the decidua during the peri-implantation period [118]. The macrophage profile shifts to an anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage-dominant environment to maintain the embryo implantation and placentation of early pregnancy [120]. The dysregulated transformation of the decidua M1–M2 macrophages results in poor reproductive outcomes, which include embryo implantation failure, miscarriage, preterm labor, and preeclampsia [96,121]. Furthermore, the highly flexible shift of M1–M2 macrophages may reveal more comprehensive functional plasticity [116]. Recently, an alternative classification was proposed according to the surface expression of molecules, the location, and gene expression profiles, such as CD11clow decidual macrophages [118]. Several factors, such as cytokines, hormones, and growth factors in the decidua, contribute to macrophage polarization; however, the underlying controlling mechanisms remain to be elucidated [122,123,124,125]. ALOX5 in macrophages is downregulated by Profilin-1, suggesting that Profilin-1 probably has a role in regulating cytokine secretion and immune tolerance [126]. Meanwhile, maternal macrophages are also observed in the trophoblast-originated placentas, probably resulting from moving maternal macrophages into the developing placenta in response to immune regulation. However, this phenomenon still needs to be probed [57].

3.5. Other Immune Cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) contribute to the connection between innate and adaptive immune reactions through the functions of DCs, such as presenting, capturing, and processing antigens, which is mainly accomplished by three DC subgroups: plasmacytoid DC and myeloid/conventional DC1 (cDC1) and 2 (cDC2) [127]. Conventional DCs (cDC1) are dominant compared to cDC2 in the human decidua. [57,117], in which the abundance of cDC1 may play a role in the increased frequencies of CD8+ dT cells, as cDC1 can crosspresent exogenous antigens, such as fetal antigens, bound to HLA-I molecules to actuate CD8+ T cells [57]. Meanwhile, in the absence of infections, the coexpression of PD1 in decidual cDC1 may abolish local CD8+dT cell activation [57]. The decidual DC phenotype may result from the reactions with extravillous trophoblast cells in the uterus of fertile women associated with Treg cells [117,128].
It is currently acknowledged that more B cells with increased levels of IgM, IgA, IgG3, and IgG4 are present in the peripheral blood of pregnant women compared to nonpregnant women [129]. B cells in the human decidua are a minority of immune cells, and they mildly increase with slight phenotypic and functional alterations throughout pregnancy by pregnancy hormones [88,130].
Higher markers for activated memory B cell phenotypes are observed in the decidua compared to the peripheral B cells at term labor, in which IL-10 production features the B cells with a regulatory phenotype [130]. The progesterone activity and IL-33 signaling drive the phenotype and function of B cells in physiological pregnancies [130]. These interactions regulate B cells to produce PIBF1, which may inhibit dNK cell activity, neutrophil infiltration and activation, and the production of proinflammatory mediators [131]. The role of B cells in pregnancy still needs to be extensively investigated.
Table
Table 1. The roles of immune cells and cytokines in human decidua.
Table 1. The roles of immune cells and cytokines in human decidua.
Immune Cells and CytokinesEffect and MechanismPresent in Uterus *Role in Human Decidua
Cytokines [74,75,76]Immunoregulatory ++Modulating receptive decidualization, maternal tolerance to embryo invasion
Uterine
natural killer cells [46,47,48]		Cytokine secretion, cytotoxicity+++Angiogenesis, tissue remodeling, regulation of trophoblast invasion
T cellsCD 4+
T cells [92,93,94,95]		Cytokine secretion, recruit effector memory T cells ++Promote trophoblast invasion, vascular and tissue remodeling
CD 4+
Treg cells [96]		Immune regulation+Promote decidual vascular and tissue remodeling
CD 8+
T cells [107,108]		Cytotoxicity, cytokine secretion++Immune regulation
Macrophages [110]Phagocytosis, antigen-presenting cells (APCs), cytokine secretion+++Pathogen clearance, trophoblast invasion, tissue and vascular remodeling
Other
immune cells		Dendritic cell (DCs) [117]Antigen-presenting cells (APCs)+T cell induction, immune tolerance
B cells [129,130]Antibody production, cytokine secretion+Immune regulation
* + (weak), ++ (moderate), and +++ (strong); this proves that some populations are more abundant than others, but no quantitative data are provided.

4. Identification of Decidual Stromal Cell-Associated Extracellular Vesicles

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are in body fluids and tissues, which include blood, urine, and extracellular exudates. In the human decidua, EVs contain microRNAs, lipids, proteins, and glycosphingolipids. MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that play critical regulatory roles in regulating gene expression and immune environment in decidual stromal cells for placentation and maintenance of pregnancy (Figure 2). Recent studies have demonstrated that several potential biomarkers for diagnosing pregnancy disorders result in the formation of proinflammatory environments and endothelial cell dysfunction in the decidua and placenta, which is associated with the level of maternal EVs [132]. The identification and characterization of EVs still need to be determined. Analyzing EV elements is challenging, depending on the extraction methods and the type of original cells [133,134]. Flow cytometry and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) can identify the size and level of EVs; additionally, quantitative analysis of CD63, a typical EV marker, can further help recognize EVs [7,135]. Engineered EVs labeled with fluorescent dyes to the delivery system of the EVs within the maternal–fetal interface can elucidate tissue-derived EVs more sharply and directly [136]. There is evidence for the endometrial stromal cell-associated EVs, which have been purified from cultured endometrial stromal cells and decidual stromal cells [137,138,139]. These isolated EVs are about 100 nm in size and represent CD63 and TSG101 markers [137]. The components of endometrial stromal cell-derived EVs, such as tetraspanin-6 (TSPAN6), disintegrin, and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10 (ADAM10) are unique in response to hypoxic conditions as compared to normoxic conditions [137]. The characteristics of isolated EVs from endometrial stromal cells are demonstrated using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and electron microscopy (TEM). Moreover, positive EV protein markers CD63, TSG101, CD9, and CD81 are expressed by TEM and immunogold-EM analysis [7,140,141].

5. The Content of Extracellular Vesicles

Due to the cellular origin and pathophysiological condition, EVs deliver many different bioactive molecules, including DNA, RNA (mRNA and microRNA), protein, and lipids [142]. EVs from the endometrium carry different microRNAs and proteins, periodically regulated by the ovarian steroid hormones [143] (Table 2).

5.1. microRNA

Recent studies indicate that microRNAs establish immune tolerance at embryo implantation and pregnancy and may contribute to the regulatory effects of T regulatory and dendritic cells. MicroRNAs were also demonstrated to modulate inflammatory and hypoxic regulation in placentation [132]. During pregnancy, microRNAs contribute to endometrial receptivity, embryo implantation, placentation, following pregnancy, and labor course [144]. The microRNA-494, microRNA-923, and microRNA-30 families are expressed differentially in regulating endometrial receptivity through the leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) [145]. Many studies show that particular microRNAs involve the modulation of the immune system during embryo implantation and pregnancy [146,147,148]. The importance of microRNAs in the regulation of immune responses through EVs during embryo implantation and pregnancy still needs to be investigated. In humans, a particular cargo of microRNAs in endometrial EVs has been demonstrated using the human endometrial cell line [149], while a total of 13 specific microRNAs were chosen and packaged in EVs. Bioinformatics analysis for microRNAs in the cargo of the EVs showed that EV-associated microRNAs regulate cell proliferation, inflammation, remodeling, and angiogenesis for embryo implantation. Some mammal studies showed that many microRNAs were recognized in the EVs from the uterine fluid of cyclic and pregnant mammals [150,151,152], and the EVs also contained some noncoding small nuclear RNA involved in the chemical modifications of other RNAs, indicating the effects of cellular function that may be regulated following the boosting of the EVs [149]. One microRNA can regulate many genes through modulating the transcription or translation. EVs usually carry many microRNAs; therefore, it is exciting to explore the physiological effects of the molecular cargo packaged within EVs for transport into the uterine microenvironment, which plays an important role in embryo implantation and pregnancy. Functional interactions between the uterus and embryo exist during embryo implantation and placenta development. EVs with microRNAs between human decidual stromal cells have been considered significant for embryo implantation and the programming of human pregnancy [7]. This study newly demonstrates that the miR-138-5p- and GPR124-adjusted NLRP3 inflammasome were identified in the EVs originated from human decidual stromal cells, suggesting that the miR-138-5p, GPR124, and NLRP3 inflammasome play a potential modulatory role in the decidual programming and placenta development of human pregnancy. These results reveal a new concept regarding the role of EVs, miR-138-5p, GPR124, and NLRP3 inflammasome in normal early pregnancy and spontaneous miscarriage. MicroRNA-138-5p acts as the transcriptional regulator of the G protein-coupled receptor 124 (GPR124). Evidence suggests EV-associated microRNA-138-5p regulates embryo implantation and early pregnancy by adjusting GPR124 and downstream signalings in human decidual stromal cells [7].

5.2. Protein

In humans, proteomic analyses of endometrial EVs were demonstrated by mimicking the hormonal profile in the menstrual cycle through estrogen and progesterone treatment [153]. The proteomic analyses of endometrial EVs reveal 663 common proteins recognized in endometrial EVs, which contribute to EV biogenesis, trafficking, sorting, uptake, and recognition. In mammals, proteomic analyses of uterine EVs showed that 195 total proteins were identified [151], including macrophage migration inhibitory factor, peripheral plasma membrane protein CASK, apolipoprotein E, myosin light chain kinase, β actin, ATP citrate synthase, and glycogen phosphorylase. The differences between the EV-packaged proteins and EV function may result from the sensitivity of the proteomic profiling analysis, EV extraction, and enrichment methods. The effects of human endometrial cell-derived EVs on embryo implantation and pregnancy are likely modulated by the protein cargo of EVs, and packaged proteins can regulate embryo apposition, adhesion, and implantation through promoting extracellular matrix remodeling. EVs from steroid hormone-primed ECC-1 endometrial cells contain peptidases, collagens, integrins, galectins, and laminins. Meanwhile, trophectoderm markers of early implantation (cathepsin CTSC, actin ACTA2, and phosphoglucomutase 1[PGM1]) and implantation regulators (AHNAK, S100A10, and PLAT) are also identified through proteomic analysis [153,154]. Furthermore, in the human trophectodermal cell line, HTR8/SVneo cell-associated EVs were demonstrated to enhance the expression of N-cadherin in the primary decidual stromal cell model [139]. In summary, these studies demonstrate the functional role of EVs and their cargo as a mediator of embryo implantation and pregnancy through contribution to maternal–embryo communication.

5.3. Lipids

The cargo of EVs also contains lipids, which include lipids, lipid metabolites, and specific enzymes for lipid metabolism that can adjust the behavior and function of targeted cells [155]. There is evidence that RNA and protein are the main cargo of uterine EVs in embryo implantation and pregnancy. However, new evidence in mammals demonstrated that the lipid profiling of uterine EVs extracted from pregnant and cyclic mammals expressed eight classes of lipids, which vary significantly between EVs from pregnant and cyclic mammals, suggesting that these classes of lipids are involved in different pregnancy phases [156].
A few studies on the role of sphingolipids have demonstrated that sphingolipids isolated from pregnancy induce prostaglandin E2 secretion in decidual stromal cells [157], and sphingolipids are involved in decidual stromal cell apoptosis through inducing p38 MAPK phosphorylation and caspase 9 activations [158]. More studies showed that sphingolipids’ pathways and their receptors are individually modulated during the decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells [159], and the estrogen- and progesterone-primed decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells reveal different expressions of sphingolipids and their receptors during pregnancy progression in response to numerous pregnancy hormones. During embryo implantation and pregnancy, angiogenesis is a critical step to enhance decidualization and placentation. Some studies showed that sphingolipids regulate the endothelial cell invasion in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and ovine uterine artery endothelial cells [160], suggesting that sphingolipids induce angiogenesis for decidualization and placentation by functioning directly on the decidual stromal and endothelial cells. However, this still needs more studies to confirm.

6. Physiological and Immunological Functions of Extracellular Vesicles

In mammal studies, embryos and endometrium could release EVs into their surrounding environment, and these embryo- and endometrium-associated EVs possibly work together to affect embryo development, embryo–endometrial interaction, embryo implantation, and following pregnancy in a paracrine and/or autocrine manner.

6.1. The Immune Modulatory Effects of Extracellular Vesicles

In mammals, during embryo implantation and early pregnancy, the embryo locates and attaches to the endometrium, followed by the invasion of cytotrophoblasts to the decidua with communication with the maternal immune system. The maternal immune system usually needs to reply to embryo implantation timely and appropriately because of the direct communication between cytotrophoblasts and decidual immune cells [161,162,163]. Therefore, we focused on the immune modulatory effects of EVs during embryo implantation and early pregnancy, in which the maternal immune system tolerates the semiallogenic fetus and maintains the pregnancy through endometrial decidualization and placentation. The first study on maternal immune tolerance and modification to the semiallogenic fetus during pregnancy was reported in 1953 [164]. At the embryo–maternal junction, the maternal immune system is composed of many immune cells, which include monocytes/macrophages, natural killer cells, T lymphocytes, B cells, and dendritic cells [38]. A study identifies the effects of EVs in immune modulation during the gestational period through a proteomic analysis of protein cargo of EVs, which were isolated from the human placenta [134]. These proteins play an important role in the response to maternal immune tolerance and modulation during early pregnancy. Some studies reported the immune-suppressive effect of placenta-isolated EVs, which contain TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligands (TRAIL) and Fas ligands (FasL). These proteins provide the local immune tolerance at the fetal–maternal junction by inducing the apoptosis of T cells [165]. HLA-G is released from the EVs, which subsequently declines as the pregnancy progresses in human pregnancies [166]. Some studies revealed that placenta-derived EVs are associated with the Treg cell differentiation and regulation process, thus involving immune tolerance [167]. It has been demonstrated that the stable release of embryo and endometrial EVs offers a protective environment for maternal–fetal communication during embryo implantation and pregnancy. It is well known that immunological tolerance to the fetal allograft must provide the development for conceptus and the subsequent maintenance of pregnancy. During the embryo attachment period, EVs seem to transport molecules potentially able to modulate the local endometrial immune system [168,169,170,171]. This stimulated or inhibited modulation appears to depend on the cargo of EVs, such as microRNAs or proteins.
There are also data supporting the notion that the trophoblasts secrete many molecules that govern the polarization of the decidual macrophage M1/M2 phenotype to modulate the maternal immune tolerance to the fetus [172,173]. EVs seem to control the crosscommunication between the trophoblasts and the immune cells. Through uptaking trophoblast-derived EVs, the monocytes seem to increase the migration and production of cytokines [174]. The progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) has been considered to control NK cell activity. PIBF is identified in embryo-derived EVs, which adhere to the surface of CD4+ and CD8+ peripheral T cells and induce IL-10 synthesis [175]. This function of embryonic EVs can be inhibited by preincubation of EVs with an antiPIBF antibody, suggesting the communication between the embryo and the maternal immune system through EVs during early implantation and pregnancy [175]. Therefore, these observations imply that embryo- and endometrial-derived EVs can recruit and regulate monocytes in a cell contact-independent manner.

6.2. Communication between the Embryo and the Maternal Immune System through Extracellular Vesicles

In mammals, the preimplantation embryos stay in the uterine cavity for a while, and EVs may play a critical role in embryo–endometrial communication for implantation (Figure 3). The human ECC1 cell model demonstrates that endometrial EVs modulate the trophectodermal function, such as adhesive ability [153]. Meanwhile, through proteomic analysis of these endometrial EVs, many important proteins were identified, including fibronectin, total FAK, and phosphorylated FAK proteins, suggesting that these proteins likely contribute to promoting the adhesive capacity of the trophoblasts following EV uptake [153]. Furthermore, the FAK pathway has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in EV interaction within the blastocyst intercellular communication between the trophectodermal and the inner-cell-mass cells [176]. In mammal studies, endometrial EVs function as the embryo–endometrial interaction and enhance endometrial receptivity during embryo implantation and pregnancy [139,154,177,178,179]. Pretreatment with estradiol and progesterone in immortalized endometrial cell lines can alter the molecular features of EV-modulated endometrial receptivity [154,179,180]. During embryo implantation, an increased expression of CD63 and higher numbers of EVs in human endometrium were demonstrated [150]. Additionally, the functional effects of EVs from human primary decidual stromal cells on the trophectoderm that are consistent with the impact on embryo implantation and pregnancy have been demonstrated [139]. Evidence by using immortalized trophectodermal cell lines indicates that the cargo of EVs could potentially serve as regulators of endometrial receptivity for embryo implantation after EV treatment and may provide the concept in the differential diagnosis of female infertility [181]. Consequently, this recent evidence implies the potential role of EVs as modulators of embryo implantation through the contribution to embryo–endometrium interaction, indicating that the analysis of EV cargo could offer a new concept of endometrial receptivity assay in the infertility and reproductive field [182].

7. Conclusions

In EV research in reproductive biology, it is well-documented that proper biochemical and cellular interactions between the embryos and the uterine endometrium are required for embryo implantation and pregnancy. Recent studies suggest that endometrial EVs could have autocrine and/or paracrine physiological functions at different periods of pregnancy. There is considerable evidence that endometrial EVs are correlated and synchronized with ovarian steroid hormones and trophectoderm-originated EV cargo, including microRNAs, proteins, and lipids in the physiological microenvironment of embryo–endometrial communication and maternal immunomodulation for embryo implantation and subsequent pregnancy. Although the mechanisms of the actions in biogenesis and cargo of endometrium- or trophoblast-derived EVs still need to be established, new technological approaches in EVs will shed light on their functions and underlying mechanisms in the processes of embryo implantation and pregnancy. Furthermore, the exploration of EVs could provide a practical tool for diagnostic or therapeutic approaches in reproductive medicine and infertility. Further research is required to identify the differences in the cargo of EVs between physiological and pathological embryo–maternal interactions, which investigate the factors of infertility and improve embryo implantation and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

Author Contributions

H.-M.W., L.-H.C., L.-T.H. and C.-H.L. all contributed to the concept, design, literature review, draft, and final approval of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Chang Gung Foundation (CMRPG3L0801).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gellersen, B.; Reimann, K.; Samalecos, A.; Aupers, S.; Bamberger, A.M. Invasiveness of human endometrial stromal cells is promoted by decidualization and by trophoblast-derived signals. Hum. Reprod. 2010, 25, 862–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Blois, S.M.; Kammerer, U.; Soto, C.A.; Tometten, M.C.; Shaikly, V.; Barrientos, G.; Jurd, R.; Rukavina, D.; Thomson, A.W.; Klapp, B.F.; et al. Dendritic cells: Key to fetal tolerance? Biol. Reprod. 2007, 77, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kliman, H.J.; Frankfurter, D. Clinical approach to recurrent implantation failure: Evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 111, 618–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Evans, J.; Salamonsen, L.A.; Winship, A.; Menkhorst, E.; Nie, G.; Gargett, C.E.; Dimitriadis, E. Fertile ground: Human endometrial programming and lessons in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016, 12, 654–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ashary, N.; Tiwari, A.; Modi, D. Embryo Implantation: War in Times of Love. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1188–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Greening, D.W.; Nguyen, H.P.; Evans, J.; Simpson, R.J.; Salamonsen, L.A. Modulating the endometrial epithelial proteome and secretome in preparation for pregnancy: The role of ovarian steroid and pregnancy hormones. J. Proteom. 2016, 144, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, H.M.; Lo, T.C.; Tsai, C.L.; Chen, L.H.; Huang, H.Y.; Wang, H.S.; Yu, J. Extracellular Vesicle-Associated MicroRNA-138-5p Regulates Embryo Implantation and Early Pregnancy by Adjusting GPR124. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Doyle, L.M.; Wang, M.Z. Overview of Extracellular Vesicles, Their Origin, Composition, Purpose, and Methods for Exosome Isolation and Analysis. Cells 2019, 8, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vyas, N.; Dhawan, J. Exosomes: Mobile platforms for targeted and synergistic signaling across cell boundaries. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pollet, H.; Conrard, L.; Cloos, A.S.; Tyteca, D. Plasma Membrane Lipid Domains as Platforms for Vesicle Biogenesis and Shedding? Biomolecules 2018, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Simon, C.; Greening, D.W.; Bolumar, D.; Balaguer, N.; Salamonsen, L.A.; Vilella, F. Extracellular Vesicles in Human Reproduction in Health and Disease. Endocr. Rev. 2018, 39, 292–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kurian, N.K.; Modi, D. Extracellular vesicle mediated embryo-endometrial cross talk during implantation and in pregnancy. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019, 36, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cha, J.; Sun, X.; Dey, S.K. Mechanisms of implantation: Strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1754–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fox, C.; Morin, S.; Jeong, J.W.; Scott, R.T., Jr.; Lessey, B.A. Local and systemic factors and implantation: What is the evidence? Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hawkins, S.M.; Matzuk, M.M. The menstrual cycle: Basic biology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1135, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brosens, J.J.; Pijnenborg, R.; Brosens, I.A. The myometrial junctional zone spiral arteries in normal and abnormal pregnancies: A review of the literature. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 187, 1416–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gellersen, B.; Brosens, J.J. Cyclic decidualization of the human endometrium in reproductive health and failure. Endocr. Rev. 2014, 35, 851–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Murata, H.; Tanaka, S.; Tsuzuki-Nakao, T.; Kido, T.; Kakita-Kobayashi, M.; Kida, N.; Hisamatsu, Y.; Tsubokura, H.; Hashimoto, Y.; Kitada, M.; et al. The transcription factor HAND2 up-regulates transcription of the IL15 gene in human endometrial stromal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 9596–9605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dunn, C.L.; Kelly, R.W.; Critchley, H.O. Decidualization of the human endometrial stromal cell: An enigmatic transformation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2003, 7, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ihnatovych, I.; Livak, M.; Reed, J.; de Lanerolle, P.; Strakova, Z. Manipulating actin dynamics affects human in vitro decidualization. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Irwin, J.C.; Utian, W.H.; Eckert, R.L. Sex steroids and growth factors differentially regulate the growth and differentiation of cultured human endometrial stromal cells. Endocrinology 1991, 129, 2385–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tabanelli, S.; Tang, B.; Gurpide, E. In vitro decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1992, 42, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sawai, K.; Matsuzaki, N.; Okada, T.; Shimoya, K.; Koyama, M.; Azuma, C.; Saji, F.; Murata, Y. Human decidual cell biosynthesis of leukemia inhibitory factor: Regulation by decidual cytokines and steroid hormones. Biol. Reprod. 1997, 56, 1274–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kastner, P.; Krust, A.; Turcotte, B.; Stropp, U.; Tora, L.; Gronemeyer, H.; Chambon, P. Two distinct estrogen-regulated promoters generate transcripts encoding the two functionally different human progesterone receptor forms A and B. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 1603–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mesiano, S.; Wang, Y.; Norwitz, E.R. Progesterone receptors in the human pregnancy uterus: Do they hold the key to birth timing? Reprod. Sci. 2011, 18, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Goldman, S.; Weiss, A.; Almalah, I.; Shalev, E. Progesterone receptor expression in human decidua and fetal membranes before and after contractions: Possible mechanism for functional progesterone withdrawal. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 11, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tang, M.; Mazella, J.; Gao, J.; Tseng, L. Progesterone receptor activates its promoter activity in human endometrial stromal cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2002, 192, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patel, B.; Elguero, S.; Thakore, S.; Dahoud, W.; Bedaiwy, M.; Mesiano, S. Role of nuclear progesterone receptor isoforms in uterine pathophysiology. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Stefanoska, I.; Krivokuca, M.J.; Vasilijic, S.; Cujic, D.; Vicovac, L. Prolactin stimulates cell migration and invasion by human trophoblast in vitro. Placenta 2013, 34, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matsumoto, H.; Sakai, K.; Iwashita, M. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 induces decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells via alpha5beta1 integrin. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 14, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, J.J.; Buzzio, O.L.; Li, S.; Lu, Z. Role of FOXO1A in the regulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 in human endometrial cells: Interaction with progesterone receptor. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 73, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Tseng, L.; Tang, M.; Wang, Z.; Mazella, J. Progesterone receptor (hPR) upregulates the fibronectin promoter activity in human decidual fibroblasts. DNA Cell Biol. 2003, 22, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Marwood, M.; Visser, K.; Salamonsen, L.A.; Dimitriadis, E. Interleukin-11 and leukemia inhibitory factor regulate the adhesion of endometrial epithelial cells: Implications in fertility regulation. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 2915–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Suman, P.; Shembekar, N.; Gupta, S.K. Leukemia inhibitory factor increases the invasiveness of trophoblastic cells through integrated increase in the expression of adhesion molecules and pappalysin 1 with a concomitant decrease in the expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Evans, J.; Catalano, R.D.; Brown, P.; Sherwin, R.; Critchley, H.O.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Jabbour, H.N. Prokineticin 1 mediates fetal-maternal dialogue regulating endometrial leukemia inhibitory factor. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 2165–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Suman, P.; Poehlmann, T.G.; Prakash, G.J.; Markert, U.R.; Gupta, S.K. Interleukin-11 increases invasiveness of JEG-3 choriocarcinoma cells by modulating STAT3 expression. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2009, 82, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Munoz-Suano, A.; Hamilton, A.B.; Betz, A.G. Gimme shelter: The immune system during pregnancy. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 241, 20–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saito, S.; Nakashima, A.; Shima, T.; Ito, M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oliver, C.; Montes, M.J.; Galindo, J.A.; Ruiz, C.; Olivares, E.G. Human decidual stromal cells express alpha-smooth muscle actin and show ultrastructural similarities with myofibroblasts. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 1599–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Macias, M.I.; Grande, J.; Moreno, A.; Dominguez, I.; Bornstein, R.; Flores, A.I. Isolation and characterization of true mesenchymal stem cells derived from human term decidua capable of multilineage differentiation into all 3 embryonic layers. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 203, 495.e9–495.e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Erkers, T.; Nava, S.; Yosef, J.; Ringden, O.; Kaipe, H. Decidual stromal cells promote regulatory T cells and suppress alloreactivity in a cell contact-dependent manner. Stem Cells Dev. 2013, 22, 2596–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, W.; Morschauser, A.; Zhang, X.; Lu, X.; Gleason, J.; He, S.; Chen, H.J.; Jankovic, V.; Ye, Q.; Labazzo, K.; et al. Human placenta-derived adherent cells induce tolerogenic immune responses. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2014, 3, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kesting, M.R.; Wolff, K.D.; Hohlweg-Majert, B.; Steinstraesser, L. The role of allogenic amniotic membrane in burn treatment. J. Burn Care Res. 2008, 29, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moodley, Y.; Ilancheran, S.; Samuel, C.; Vaghjiani, V.; Atienza, D.; Williams, E.D.; Jenkin, G.; Wallace, E.; Trounson, A.; Manuelpillai, U. Human amnion epithelial cell transplantation abrogates lung fibrosis and augments repair. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 182, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Carrega, P.; Ferlazzo, G. Natural killer cell distribution and trafficking in human tissues. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hanna, J.; Goldman-Wohl, D.; Hamani, Y.; Avraham, I.; Greenfield, C.; Natanson-Yaron, S.; Prus, D.; Cohen-Daniel, L.; Arnon, T.I.; Manaster, I.; et al. Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental processes at the human fetal-maternal interface. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 1065–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hanna, J.; Wald, O.; Goldman-Wohl, D.; Prus, D.; Markel, G.; Gazit, R.; Katz, G.; Haimov-Kochman, R.; Fujii, N.; Yagel, S.; et al. CXCL12 expression by invasive trophoblasts induces the specific migration of CD16− human natural killer cells. Blood 2003, 102, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vacca, P.; Vitale, C.; Montaldo, E.; Conte, R.; Cantoni, C.; Fulcheri, E.; Darretta, V.; Moretta, L.; Mingari, M.C. CD34+ hematopoietic precursors are present in human decidua and differentiate into natural killer cells upon interaction with stromal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2402–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Carlino, C.; Rippo, M.R.; Lazzarini, R.; Monsurro, V.; Morrone, S.; Angelini, S.; Trotta, E.; Stabile, H.; Bastianelli, C.; Albertini, M.C.; et al. Differential microRNA expression between decidual and peripheral blood natural killer cells in early pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 2184–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Faas, M.M.; de Vos, P. Uterine NK cells and macrophages in pregnancy. Placenta 2017, 56, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. He, Y.; Tian, Z. NK cell education via nonclassical MHC and non-MHC ligands. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 14, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Jabrane-Ferrat, N. Features of Human Decidual NK Cells in Healthy Pregnancy and During Viral Infection. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wallace, A.E.; Fraser, R.; Cartwright, J.E. Extravillous trophoblast and decidual natural killer cells: A remodelling partnership. Hum. Reprod. Update 2012, 18, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Dimitriadis, E.; Menkhorst, E.; Saito, S.; Kutteh, W.H.; Brosens, J.J. Recurrent pregnancy loss. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lucas, E.S.; Vrljicak, P.; Muter, J.; Diniz-da-Costa, M.M.; Brighton, P.J.; Kong, C.S.; Lipecki, J.; Fishwick, K.J.; Odendaal, J.; Ewington, L.J.; et al. Recurrent pregnancy loss is associated with a pro-senescent decidual response during the peri-implantation window. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Moretta, L.; Pietra, G.; Montaldo, E.; Vacca, P.; Pende, D.; Falco, M.; Del Zotto, G.; Locatelli, F.; Moretta, A.; Mingari, M.C. Human NK cells: From surface receptors to the therapy of leukemias and solid tumors. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Vento-Tormo, R.; Efremova, M.; Botting, R.A.; Turco, M.Y.; Vento-Tormo, M.; Meyer, K.B.; Park, J.E.; Stephenson, E.; Polanski, K.; Goncalves, A.; et al. Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal-fetal interface in humans. Nature 2018, 563, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Parham, P.; Moffett, A. Variable NK cell receptors and their MHC class I ligands in immunity, reproduction and human evolution. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Moffett, A.; Colucci, F. Co-evolution of NK receptors and HLA ligands in humans is driven by reproduction. Immunol. Rev. 2015, 267, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Moffett, A.; Chazara, O.; Colucci, F.; Johnson, M.H. Variation of maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C genes in reproductive failure: Too early for clinical intervention. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2016, 33, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chazara, O.; Xiong, S.; Moffett, A. Maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C: A fine balance. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011, 90, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Alecsandru, D.; Garrido, N.; Vicario, J.L.; Barrio, A.; Aparicio, P.; Requena, A.; Garcia-Velasco, J.A. Maternal KIR haplotype influences live birth rate after double embryo transfer in IVF cycles in patients with recurrent miscarriages and implantation failure. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 2637–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Menkhorst, E.M.; Van Sinderen, M.L.; Rainczuk, K.; Cuman, C.; Winship, A.; Dimitriadis, E. Invasive trophoblast promote stromal fibroblast decidualization via Profilin 1 and ALOX5. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wu, H.M.; Chen, L.H.; Schally, A.V.; Huang, H.Y.; Soong, Y.K.; Leung, P.C.K.; Wang, H.S. Impact of growth hormone-releasing hormone antagonist on decidual stromal cell growth and apoptosis in vitrodagger. Biol. Reprod. 2022, 106, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sternberg, A.K.; Buck, V.U.; Classen-Linke, I.; Leube, R.E. How Mechanical Forces Change the Human Endometrium during the Menstrual Cycle in Preparation for Embryo Implantation. Cells 2021, 10, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ng, S.W.; Norwitz, G.A.; Pavlicev, M.; Tilburgs, T.; Simon, C.; Norwitz, E.R. Endometrial Decidualization: The Primary Driver of Pregnancy Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, F.; Zheng, Q.; Jin, L. Dynamic Function and Composition Changes of Immune Cells During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Liu, J.; Hao, S.; Chen, X.; Zhao, H.; Du, L.; Ren, H.; Wang, C.; Mao, H. Human placental trophoblast cells contribute to maternal-fetal tolerance through expressing IL-35 and mediating iTR35 conversion. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Krzymowski, T.; Stefanczyk-Krzymowska, S. Advances in understanding the physiological mechanism of maternal immune tolerance to the embryo. Reprod. Biol. 2012, 12, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bert, S.; Ward, E.J.; Nadkarni, S. Neutrophils in pregnancy: New insights into innate and adaptive immune regulation. Immunology 2021, 164, 665–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. PrabhuDas, M.; Bonney, E.; Caron, K.; Dey, S.; Erlebacher, A.; Fazleabas, A.; Fisher, S.; Golos, T.; Matzuk, M.; McCune, J.M.; et al. Immune mechanisms at the maternal-fetal interface: Perspectives and challenges. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Kitazawa, J.; Kimura, F.; Nakamura, A.; Morimune, A.; Takahashi, A.; Takashima, A.; Amano, T.; Tsuji, S.; Kaku, S.; Kasahara, K.; et al. Endometrial Immunity for Embryo Implantation and Pregnancy Establishment. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2020, 250, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Nancy, P.; Erlebacher, A. T cell behavior at the maternal-fetal interface. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2014, 58, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. von Rango, U. Fetal tolerance in human pregnancy—A crucial balance between acceptance and limitation of trophoblast invasion. Immunol. Lett. 2008, 115, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, J.Y.; Lee, M.; Lee, S.K. Role of endometrial immune cells in implantation. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2011, 38, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Jena, M.K.; Nayak, N.; Chen, K.; Nayak, N.R. Role of Macrophages in Pregnancy and Related Complications. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2019, 67, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Harrity, C.; Shkrobot, L.; Walsh, D.; Marron, K. ART implantation failure and miscarriage in patients with elevated intracellular cytokine ratios: Response to immune support therapy. Fertil. Res. Pract. 2018, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Wang, W.; Sung, N.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Kwak-Kim, J. T Helper (Th) Cell Profiles in Pregnancy and Recurrent Pregnancy Losses: Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17/Th22/Tfh Cells. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mor, G.; Cardenas, I.; Abrahams, V.; Guller, S. Inflammation and pregnancy: The role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1221, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Romero, R.; Espinoza, J.; Goncalves, L.F.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Friel, L.A.; Nien, J.K. Inflammation in preterm and term labour and delivery. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006, 11, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Meazza, R.; Azzarone, B.; Orengo, A.M.; Ferrini, S. Role of common-gamma chain cytokines in NK cell development and function: Perspectives for immunotherapy. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 861920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Okada, S.; Okada, H.; Sanezumi, M.; Nakajima, T.; Yasuda, K.; Kanzaki, H. Expression of interleukin-15 in human endometrium and decidua. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 6, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Okada, H.; Nakajima, T.; Yasuda, K.; Kanzaki, H. Interleukin-1 inhibits interleukin-15 production by progesterone during in vitro decidualization in human. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2004, 61, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Diaz-Gimeno, P.; Horcajadas, J.A.; Martinez-Conejero, J.A.; Esteban, F.J.; Alama, P.; Pellicer, A.; Simon, C. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 50–60, 60 e51-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Perez-Sepulveda, A.; Torres, M.J.; Khoury, M.; Illanes, S.E. Innate immune system and preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Sykes, L.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Yap, X.J.; Teoh, T.G.; Bennett, P.R. The Th1:th2 dichotomy of pregnancy and preterm labour. Mediat. Inflamm. 2012, 2012, 967629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Lissauer, D.; Kilby, M.D.; Moss, P. Maternal effector T cells within decidua: The adaptive immune response to pregnancy? Placenta 2017, 60, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bartmann, C.; Segerer, S.E.; Rieger, L.; Kapp, M.; Sutterlin, M.; Kammerer, U. Quantification of the predominant immune cell populations in decidua throughout human pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 71, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Monteiro, C.; Kasahara, T.M.; Castro, J.R.; Sacramento, P.M.; Hygino, J.; Centuriao, N.; Cassano, T.; Lopes, L.M.F.; Leite, S.; Silva, V.G.; et al. Pregnancy favors the expansion of circulating functional follicular helper T Cells. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 121, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kieffer, T.E.; Faas, M.M.; Scherjon, S.A.; Prins, J.R. Pregnancy persistently affects memory T cell populations. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 119, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rowe, J.H.; Ertelt, J.M.; Xin, L.; Way, S.S. Pregnancy imprints regulatory memory that sustains anergy to fetal antigen. Nature 2012, 490, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Powell, R.M.; Lissauer, D.; Tamblyn, J.; Beggs, A.; Cox, P.; Moss, P.; Kilby, M.D. Decidual T Cells Exhibit a Highly Differentiated Phenotype and Demonstrate Potential Fetal Specificity and a Strong Transcriptional Response to IFN. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 3406–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Zeng, W.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Yu, T.; Fu, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Ma, X.; et al. Deep Surveying of the Transcriptional and Alternative Splicing Signatures for Decidual CD8(+) T Cells at the First Trimester of Human Healthy Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Wu, H.X.; Jin, L.P.; Xu, B.; Liang, S.S.; Li, D.J. Decidual stromal cells recruit Th17 cells into decidua to promote proliferation and invasion of human trophoblast cells by secreting IL-17. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Saito, S.; Nakabayashi, Y.; Nakashima, A.; Shima, T.; Yoshino, O. A new era in reproductive medicine: Consequences of third-party oocyte donation for maternal and fetal health. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016, 38, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ticconi, C.; Pietropolli, A.; Di Simone, N.; Piccione, E.; Fazleabas, A. Endometrial Immune Dysfunction in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Bettelli, E.; Carrier, Y.; Gao, W.; Korn, T.; Strom, T.B.; Oukka, M.; Weiner, H.L.; Kuchroo, V.K. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature 2006, 441, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Samstein, R.M.; Josefowicz, S.Z.; Arvey, A.; Treuting, P.M.; Rudensky, A.Y. Extrathymic generation of regulatory T cells in placental mammals mitigates maternal-fetal conflict. Cell 2012, 150, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Mold, J.E.; Venkatasubrahmanyam, S.; Burt, T.D.; Michaelsson, J.; Rivera, J.M.; Galkina, S.A.; Weinberg, K.; Stoddart, C.A.; McCune, J.M. Fetal and adult hematopoietic stem cells give rise to distinct T cell lineages in humans. Science 2010, 330, 1695–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Guerin, L.R.; Prins, J.R.; Robertson, S.A. Regulatory T-cells and immune tolerance in pregnancy: A new target for infertility treatment? Hum. Reprod. Update 2009, 15, 517–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Zhang, X.X.; Kang, X.M.; Zhao, A.M. Regulation of CD4(+)FOXP3(+) T cells by CCL20/CCR6 axis in early unexplained recurrent miscarriage patients. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 9145–9154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Qian, J.; Zhang, N.; Lin, J.; Wang, C.; Pan, X.; Chen, L.; Li, D.; Wang, L. Distinct pattern of Th17/Treg cells in pregnant women with a history of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Biosci. Trends 2018, 12, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Tsuda, S.; Zhang, X.; Hamana, H.; Shima, T.; Ushijima, A.; Tsuda, K.; Muraguchi, A.; Kishi, H.; Saito, S. Clonally Expanded Decidual Effector Regulatory T Cells Increase in Late Gestation of Normal Pregnancy, but Not in Preeclampsia, in Humans. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Nadkarni, S.; Smith, J.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N.; Ledwozyw, A.; Kishore, M.; Haas, R.; Mauro, C.; Williams, D.J.; Farsky, S.H.; Marelli-Berg, F.M.; et al. Neutrophils induce proangiogenic T cells with a regulatory phenotype in pregnancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E8415–E8424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. van der Zwan, A.; Bi, K.; Norwitz, E.R.; Crespo, A.C.; Claas, F.H.J.; Strominger, J.L.; Tilburgs, T. Mixed signature of activation and dysfunction allows human decidual CD8(+) T cells to provide both tolerance and immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. van der Zwan, A.; van der Meer-Prins, E.M.W.; van Miert, P.; van den Heuvel, H.; Anholts, J.D.H.; Roelen, D.L.; Claas, F.H.J.; Heidt, S. Cross-Reactivity of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Against Allogeneic HLA-C: Possible Implications for Pregnancy Outcome. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tilburgs, T.; Scherjon, S.A.; Roelen, D.L.; Claas, F.H. Decidual CD8+CD28- T cells express CD103 but not perforin. Hum. Immunol. 2009, 70, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, S.C.; Li, Y.H.; Piao, H.L.; Hong, X.W.; Zhang, D.; Xu, Y.Y.; Tao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, M.M.; Li, D.J.; et al. PD-1 and Tim-3 pathways are associated with regulatory CD8+ T-cell function in decidua and maintenance of normal pregnancy. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Solano, M.E.; Kowal, M.K.; O’Rourke, G.E.; Horst, A.K.; Modest, K.; Plosch, T.; Barikbin, R.; Remus, C.C.; Berger, R.G.; Jago, C.; et al. Progesterone and HMOX-1 promote fetal growth by CD8+ T cell modulation. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 1726–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Ander, S.E.; Diamond, M.S.; Coyne, C.B. Immune responses at the maternal-fetal interface. Sci. Immunol. 2019, 4, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Vishnyakova, P.; Elchaninov, A.; Fatkhudinov, T.; Sukhikh, G. Role of the Monocyte-Macrophage System in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Yao, Y.; Xu, X.H.; Jin, L. Macrophage Polarization in Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sun, F.; Wang, S.; Du, M. Functional regulation of decidual macrophages during pregnancy. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2021, 143, 103264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Parasar, P.; Guru, N.; Nayak, N.R. Contribution of macrophages to fetomaternal immunological tolerance. Hum. Immunol. 2021, 82, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Palma, A.; Jarrah, A.S.; Tieri, P.; Cesareni, G.; Castiglione, F. Gene Regulatory Network Modeling of Macrophage Differentiation Corroborates the Continuum Hypothesis of Polarization States. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Jantsch, J.; Schultze, J.L.; Kurts, C. Immunophysiology: Macrophages as key regulators of homeostasis in various organs. Pflug. Arch. 2017, 469, 363–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Faas, M.M.; De Vos, P. Innate immune cells in the placental bed in healthy pregnancy and preeclampsia. Placenta 2018, 69, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jiang, X.; Du, M.R.; Li, M.; Wang, H. Three macrophage subsets are identified in the uterus during early human pregnancy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 15, 1027–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Martinez, F.O.; Gordon, S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: Time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Zhang, Y.H.; He, M.; Wang, Y.; Liao, A.H. Modulators of the Balance between M1 and M2 Macrophages during Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, Y.; Ma, L.; Hu, X.; Ji, J.; Mor, G.; Liao, A. The role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in macrophage differentiation and function during pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Wheeler, K.C.; Jena, M.K.; Pradhan, B.S.; Nayak, N.; Das, S.; Hsu, C.D.; Wheeler, D.S.; Chen, K.; Nayak, N.R. VEGF may contribute to macrophage recruitment and M2 polarization in the decidua. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Hamelin-Morrissette, J.; Dallagi, A.; Girouard, J.; Ravelojaona, M.; Oufqir, Y.; Vaillancourt, C.; Van Themsche, C.; Carrier, C.; Reyes-Moreno, C. Leukemia inhibitory factor regulates the activation of inflammatory signals in macrophages and trophoblast cells. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 120, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Yang, H.L.; Wang, C.J.; Lai, Z.Z.; Yang, S.L.; Zheng, Z.M.; Shi, J.W.; Li, M.Q.; Shao, J. Decidual stromal cells maintain decidual macrophage homeostasis by secreting IL-24 in early pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 84, e13261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ding, J.; Yang, C.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, S.; Yan, S.; He, F.; Yin, T.; Yang, J. Trophoblast-derived IL-6 serves as an important factor for normal pregnancy by activating Stat3-mediated M2 macrophages polarization. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 90, 106788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gamliel, M.; Goldman-Wohl, D.; Isaacson, B.; Gur, C.; Stein, N.; Yamin, R.; Berger, M.; Grunewald, M.; Keshet, E.; Rais, Y.; et al. Trained Memory of Human Uterine NK Cells Enhances Their Function in Subsequent Pregnancies. Immunity 2018, 48, 951–962.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Collin, M.; Bigley, V. Human dendritic cell subsets: An update. Immunology 2018, 154, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Liu, S.; Wei, H.; Li, Y.; Huang, C.; Lian, R.; Xu, J.; Chen, L.; Zeng, Y. Downregulation of ILT4(+) dendritic cells in recurrent miscarriage and recurrent implantation failure. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 80, e12998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ziegler, K.B.; Muzzio, D.O.; Matzner, F.; Bommer, I.; Ventimiglia, M.S.; Malinowsky, K.; Ehrhardt, J.; Zygmunt, M.; Jensen, F. Human pregnancy is accompanied by modifications in B cell development and immunoglobulin profile. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 129, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Huang, B.; Faucette, A.N.; Pawlitz, M.D.; Pei, B.; Goyert, J.W.; Zhou, J.Z.; El-Hage, N.G.; Deng, J.; Lin, J.; Yao, F.; et al. Interleukin-33-induced expression of PIBF1 by decidual B cells protects against preterm labor. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Szekeres-Bartho, J.; Polgar, B. PIBF: The double edged sword. Pregnancy and tumor. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 64, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Elfeky, O.; Longo, S.; Lai, A.; Rice, G.E.; Salomon, C. Influence of maternal BMI on the exosomal profile during gestation and their role on maternal systemic inflammation. Placenta 2017, 50, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Lotvall, J.; Hill, A.F.; Hochberg, F.; Buzas, E.I.; Di Vizio, D.; Gardiner, C.; Gho, Y.S.; Kurochkin, I.V.; Mathivanan, S.; Quesenberry, P.; et al. Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: A position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2014, 3, 26913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Tong, M.; Kleffmann, T.; Pradhan, S.; Johansson, C.L.; DeSousa, J.; Stone, P.R.; James, J.L.; Chen, Q.; Chamley, L.W. Proteomic characterization of macro-, micro- and nano-extracellular vesicles derived from the same first trimester placenta: Relevance for feto-maternal communication. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 687–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Sarker, S.; Scholz-Romero, K.; Perez, A.; Illanes, S.E.; Mitchell, M.D.; Rice, G.E.; Salomon, C. Placenta-derived exosomes continuously increase in maternal circulation over the first trimester of pregnancy. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Boriachek, K.; Masud, M.K.; Palma, C.; Phan, H.P.; Yamauchi, Y.; Hossain, M.S.A.; Nguyen, N.T.; Salomon, C.; Shiddiky, M.J.A. Avoiding Pre-Isolation Step in Exosome Analysis: Direct Isolation and Sensitive Detection of Exosomes Using Gold-Loaded Nanoporous Ferric Oxide Nanozymes. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 3827–3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Koh, Y.Q.; Peiris, H.N.; Vaswani, K.; Reed, S.; Rice, G.E.; Salomon, C.; Mitchell, M.D. Characterization of exosomal release in bovine endometrial intercaruncular stromal cells. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2016, 14, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Harp, D.; Driss, A.; Mehrabi, S.; Chowdhury, I.; Xu, W.; Liu, D.; Garcia-Barrio, M.; Taylor, R.N.; Gold, B.; Jefferson, S.; et al. Exosomes derived from endometriotic stromal cells have enhanced angiogenic effects in vitro. Cell Tissue Res. 2016, 365, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Liu, M.; Chen, X.; Chang, Q.X.; Hua, R.; Wei, Y.X.; Huang, L.P.; Liao, Y.X.; Yue, X.J.; Hu, H.Y.; Sun, F.; et al. Decidual small extracellular vesicles induce trophoblast invasion by upregulating N-cadherin. Reproduction 2020, 159, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Shah, R.; Patel, T.; Freedman, J.E. Circulating Extracellular Vesicles in Human Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 958–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bjorge, I.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Mano, J.F.; Kalionis, B.; Chrzanowski, W. Extracellular vesicles, exosomes and shedding vesicles in regenerative medicine—A new paradigm for tissue repair. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 6, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Maas, S.L.N.; Breakefield, X.O.; Weaver, A.M. Extracellular Vesicles: Unique Intercellular Delivery Vehicles. Trends Cell Biol. 2017, 27, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Robbins, P.D.; Dorronsoro, A.; Booker, C.N. Regulation of chronic inflammatory and immune processes by extracellular vesicles. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 1173–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Bidarimath, M.; Khalaj, K.; Wessels, J.M.; Tayade, C. MicroRNAs, immune cells and pregnancy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Altmae, S.; Martinez-Conejero, J.A.; Esteban, F.J.; Ruiz-Alonso, M.; Stavreus-Evers, A.; Horcajadas, J.A.; Salumets, A. MicroRNAs miR-30b, miR-30d, and miR-494 regulate human endometrial receptivity. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 20, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Baltimore, D.; Boldin, M.P.; O’Connell, R.M.; Rao, D.S.; Taganov, K.D. MicroRNAs: New regulators of immune cell development and function. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Taganov, K.D.; Boldin, M.P.; Baltimore, D. MicroRNAs and immunity: Tiny players in a big field. Immunity 2007, 26, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Winger, E.E.; Reed, J.L.; Ji, X. First-trimester maternal cell microRNA is a superior pregnancy marker to immunological testing for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 110, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ng, Y.H.; Rome, S.; Jalabert, A.; Forterre, A.; Singh, H.; Hincks, C.L.; Salamonsen, L.A. Endometrial exosomes/microvesicles in the uterine microenvironment: A new paradigm for embryo-endometrial cross talk at implantation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Vilella, F.; Moreno-Moya, J.M.; Balaguer, N.; Grasso, A.; Herrero, M.; Martinez, S.; Marcilla, A.; Simon, C. Hsa-miR-30d, secreted by the human endometrium, is taken up by the pre-implantation embryo and might modify its transcriptome. Development 2015, 142, 3210–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Burns, G.; Brooks, K.; Wildung, M.; Navakanitworakul, R.; Christenson, L.K.; Spencer, T.E. Extracellular vesicles in luminal fluid of the ovine uterus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Racicot, K.; Schmitt, A.; Ott, T. The myxovirus-resistance protein, MX1, is a component of exosomes secreted by uterine epithelial cells. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 67, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Greening, D.W.; Nguyen, H.P.; Elgass, K.; Simpson, R.J.; Salamonsen, L.A. Human Endometrial Exosomes Contain Hormone-Specific Cargo Modulating Trophoblast Adhesive Capacity: Insights into Endometrial-Embryo Interactions. Biol. Reprod. 2016, 94, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Evans, J.; Rai, A.; Nguyen, H.P.T.; Poh, Q.H.; Elglass, K.; Simpson, R.J.; Salamonsen, L.A.; Greening, D.W. Human Endometrial Extracellular Vesicles Functionally Prepare Human Trophectoderm Model for Implantation: Understanding Bidirectional Maternal-Embryo Communication. Proteomics 2019, 19, e1800423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Record, M.; Silvente-Poirot, S.; Poirot, M.; Wakelam, M.J.O. Extracellular vesicles: Lipids as key components of their biogenesis and functions. J. Lipid. Res. 2018, 59, 1316–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. O’Neil, E.V.; Burns, G.W.; Ferreira, C.R.; Spencer, T.E. Characterization and regulation of extracellular vesicles in the lumen of the ovine uterusdagger. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 102, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Edwin, S.S.; Mitchell, M.D.; Silver, R.M.; Branch, D.W.; Dudley, D.J. Ceramide stimulates prostaglandin production by human amnion and decidual cells. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 1997, 4, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Fonseca, B.M.; Correia-da-Silva, G.; Teixeira, N.A. The endocannabinoid anandamide induces apoptosis of rat decidual cells through a mechanism involving ceramide synthesis and p38 MAPK activation. Apoptosis 2013, 18, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Brunnert, D.; Sztachelska, M.; Bornkessel, F.; Treder, N.; Wolczynski, S.; Goyal, P.; Zygmunt, M. Lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate metabolic pathways and their receptors are differentially regulated during decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 20, 1016–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Dunlap, K.A.; Kwak, H.I.; Burghardt, R.C.; Bazer, F.W.; Magness, R.R.; Johnson, G.A.; Bayless, K.J. The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) signaling pathway is regulated during pregnancy in sheep. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 82, 876–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Fox, C.; Eichelberger, K. Maternal microbiome and pregnancy outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, 1358–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Fu, B.; Li, X.; Sun, R.; Tong, X.; Ling, B.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. Natural killer cells promote immune tolerance by regulating inflammatory TH17 cells at the human maternal-fetal interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E231–E240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Roberts, J.M.; Bell, M.J. If we know so much about preeclampsia, why haven’t we cured the disease? J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 99, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Billingham, R.E.; Brent, L.; Medawar, P.B. Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature 1953, 172, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Stenqvist, A.C.; Nagaeva, O.; Baranov, V.; Mincheva-Nilsson, L. Exosomes secreted by human placenta carry functional Fas ligand and TRAIL molecules and convey apoptosis in activated immune cells, suggesting exosome-mediated immune privilege of the fetus. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 5515–5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Djurisic, S.; Hviid, T.V. HLA Class Ib Molecules and Immune Cells in Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Holder, B.; Jones, T.; Shimizu, V.S.; Rice, T.F.; Donaldson, B.; Bouqueau, M.; Forbes, K.; Kampmann, B. Macrophage Exosomes Induce Placental Inflammatory Cytokines: A Novel Mode of Maternal-Placental Messaging. Traffic 2016, 17, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Giacomini, E.; Alleva, E.; Fornelli, G.; Quartucci, A.; Privitera, L.; Vanni, V.S.; Vigano, P. Embryonic extracellular vesicles as informers to the immune cells at the maternal-fetal interface. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2019, 198, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Benichou, G.; Wang, M.; Ahrens, K.; Madsen, J.C. Extracellular vesicles in allograft rejection and tolerance. Cell. Immunol. 2020, 349, 104063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Ou, Q.; Dou, X.; Tang, J.; Wu, P.; Pan, D. Small extracellular vesicles derived from PD-L1-modified mesenchymal stem cell promote Tregs differentiation and prolong allograft survival. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 389, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cho, K.; Kook, H.; Kang, S.; Lee, J. Study of immune-tolerized cell lines and extracellular vesicles inductive environment promoting continuous expression and secretion of HLA-G from semi-allograft immune tolerance during pregnancy. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2020, 9, 1795364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Svensson-Arvelund, J.; Mehta, R.B.; Lindau, R.; Mirrasekhian, E.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H.; Berg, G.; Lash, G.E.; Jenmalm, M.C.; Ernerudh, J. The human fetal placenta promotes tolerance against the semiallogeneic fetus by inducing regulatory T cells and homeostatic M2 macrophages. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 1534–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Zhang, Y.H.; Aldo, P.; You, Y.; Ding, J.; Kaislasuo, J.; Petersen, J.F.; Lokkegaard, E.; Peng, G.; Paidas, M.J.; Simpson, S.; et al. Trophoblast-secreted soluble-PD-L1 modulates macrophage polarization and function. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 108, 983–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Atay, S.; Gercel-Taylor, C.; Suttles, J.; Mor, G.; Taylor, D.D. Trophoblast-derived exosomes mediate monocyte recruitment and differentiation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 65, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Pallinger, E.; Bognar, Z.; Bogdan, A.; Csabai, T.; Abraham, H.; Szekeres-Bartho, J. PIBF+ extracellular vesicles from mouse embryos affect IL-10 production by CD8+ cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Desrochers, L.M.; Bordeleau, F.; Reinhart-King, C.A.; Cerione, R.A.; Antonyak, M.A. Microvesicles provide a mechanism for intercellular communication by embryonic stem cells during embryo implantation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Nakamura, K.; Kusama, K.; Ideta, A.; Kimura, K.; Hori, M.; Imakawa, K. Effects of miR-98 in intrauterine extracellular vesicles on maternal immune regulation during the peri-implantation period in cattle. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Nakamura, K.; Kusama, K.; Ideta, A.; Imakawa, K.; Hori, M. IFNT-independent effects of intrauterine extracellular vesicles (EVs) in cattle. Reproduction 2020, 159, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Gurung, S.; Greening, D.W.; Catt, S.; Salamonsen, L.; Evans, J. Exosomes and soluble secretome from hormone-treated endometrial epithelial cells direct embryo implantation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 26, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Greening, D.W.; Xu, R.; Gopal, S.K.; Rai, A.; Simpson, R.J. Proteomic insights into extracellular vesicle biology—Defining exosomes and shed microvesicles. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2017, 14, 69–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Tan, Q.; Shi, S.; Liang, J.; Zhang, X.; Cao, D.; Wang, Z. MicroRNAs in Small Extracellular Vesicles Indicate Successful Embryo Implantation during Early Pregnancy. Cells 2020, 9, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Giacomini, E.; Scotti, G.M.; Vanni, V.S.; Lazarevic, D.; Makieva, S.; Privitera, L.; Signorelli, S.; Cantone, L.; Bollati, V.; Murdica, V.; et al. Global transcriptomic changes occur in uterine fluid-derived extracellular vesicles during the endometrial window for embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 36, 2249–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 13382 g001 550
Figure 1. Endometrial receptivity: decidualization, immune cells, cytokines, and immune modulatory properties determine reproductive outcomes. Under the influence of progesterone, ESCs complete decidualization. The decidualized ESCs are critical to the development of surrounding trophoblastic, hematopoietic (e.g., uNK and T cell), and mesenchymal cells (e.g., blood vessels), which play an important role in blastocyst implantation. ESCs: endometrial stromal cells; uNK: uterine natural killer.
Figure 1. Endometrial receptivity: decidualization, immune cells, cytokines, and immune modulatory properties determine reproductive outcomes. Under the influence of progesterone, ESCs complete decidualization. The decidualized ESCs are critical to the development of surrounding trophoblastic, hematopoietic (e.g., uNK and T cell), and mesenchymal cells (e.g., blood vessels), which play an important role in blastocyst implantation. ESCs: endometrial stromal cells; uNK: uterine natural killer.
Ijms 23 13382 g001
Ijms 23 13382 g002 550
Figure 2. Characteristics, cargos, and functions of extracellular vesicles. The three main subtypes of extracellular vesicles (EVs) are exosomes, microvesicles (MVs), and apoptotic bodies, which are generally differentiated through size, content, and function examination. MVB: multivesicular body.
Figure 2. Characteristics, cargos, and functions of extracellular vesicles. The three main subtypes of extracellular vesicles (EVs) are exosomes, microvesicles (MVs), and apoptotic bodies, which are generally differentiated through size, content, and function examination. MVB: multivesicular body.
Ijms 23 13382 g002
Ijms 23 13382 g003 550
Figure 3. Extracellular vesicles provide intercellular communication both between embryos and endometrium. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) extend across the blastocoel and link the mural trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Trophectoderm cell line releases miRNA-containing EVs that stimulate endometrial epithelium. The communication between blastocyst and endometrium triggers successful embryo implantation.
Figure 3. Extracellular vesicles provide intercellular communication both between embryos and endometrium. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) extend across the blastocoel and link the mural trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Trophectoderm cell line releases miRNA-containing EVs that stimulate endometrial epithelium. The communication between blastocyst and endometrium triggers successful embryo implantation.
Ijms 23 13382 g003
Table
Table 2. Characteristics and cargo of extracellular vesicles.
Table 2. Characteristics and cargo of extracellular vesicles.
Characteristics
ContentsOriginSize of EVMemberRole
microRNA
[132,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152]		exosomes, microvesicles30–1500 nmmcroRNA-494, microRNA-923, microRNA-30 family, microRNA-138-5p…immune regulation, endometrial receptivity regulation
Protein
[151,153,154]		exosomes, microvesicles30–1500 nm663 common proteins regulate embryo apposition, adhesion, and implantation
Lipids
[155,156,157,158,159,160]		exosomes, microvesicles30–1500 nmeight classes angiogenesis, decidual stromal cell apoptosis
Note: EV, extracellular vesicle.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, H.-M.; Chen, L.-H.; Hsu, L.-T.; Lai, C.-H. Immune Tolerance of Embryo Implantation and Pregnancy: The Role of Human Decidual Stromal Cell- and Embryonic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113382

AMA Style

Wu H-M, Chen L-H, Hsu L-T, Lai C-H. Immune Tolerance of Embryo Implantation and Pregnancy: The Role of Human Decidual Stromal Cell- and Embryonic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):13382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Hsien-Ming, Liang-Hsuan Chen, Le-Tien Hsu, and Chyong-Huey Lai. 2022. "Immune Tolerance of Embryo Implantation and Pregnancy: The Role of Human Decidual Stromal Cell- and Embryonic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 13382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113382

APA Style

Wu, H. -M., Chen, L. -H., Hsu, L. -T., & Lai, C. -H. (2022). Immune Tolerance of Embryo Implantation and Pregnancy: The Role of Human Decidual Stromal Cell- and Embryonic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(21), 13382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop