Next Article in Journal
The P2Y2 Receptor C-Terminal Tail Modulates but Is Dispensable for β-Arrestin Recruitment
Previous Article in Journal
NAD+ Anabolism Disturbance Causes Glomerular Mesangial Cell Injury in Diabetic Nephropathy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

BcSOC1 Promotes Bolting and Stem Elongation in Flowering Chinese Cabbage

College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3459; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073459
Submission received: 22 February 2022 / Revised: 20 March 2022 / Accepted: 20 March 2022 / Published: 22 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Plant Functional Genomics and Crop Genetic Improvement)

Abstract

:
Flowering Chinese cabbage is one of the most economically important stalk vegetables. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying bolting, which is directly related to stalk quality and yield, in this species remain unknown. Previously, we examined five key stem development stages in flowering Chinese cabbage. Here, we identified a gene, BcSOC1 (SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1), in flowering Chinese cabbage using transcriptome analysis, whose expression was positively correlated with bolting. Exogenous gibberellin (GA3) and low-temperature treatments significantly upregulated BcSOC1 and promoted early bolting and flowering. Additionally, BcSOC1 overexpression accelerated early flowering and stem elongation in both Arabidopsis and flowering Chinese cabbage, whereas its knockdown dramatically delayed bolting and flowering and inhibited stem elongation in the latter; the inhibition of stem elongation was more notable than delayed flowering. BcSOC1 overexpression also induced cell expansion by upregulating genes encoding cell wall structural proteins, such as BcEXPA11 (cell wall structural proteins and enzymes) and BcXTH3 (xyloglucan endotransglycosidase/hydrolase), upon exogenous GA3 and low-temperature treatments. Moreover, the length of pith cells was correlated with stem height, and BcSOC1 interacted with BcAGL6 (AGAMOUS-LIKE 6) and BcAGL24 (AGAMOUS-LIKE 24). Thus, BcSOC1 plays a vital role in bolting and stem elongation of flowering Chinese cabbage and may play a novel role in regulating stalk development, apart from the conserved function of Arabidopsis SOC1 in flowering alone.

1. Introduction

Brassica spp. (family Cruciferae) are cultivated worldwide because of their economically important traits, including flavor [1,2], leafy heads, and enlarged organs (roots, stems, and inflorescences) [3,4]. Although several studies have focused on the development of leafy heads, roots, and stem tubers, there have been only a few studies on stem development in Brassica spp. [5,6]. Flowering Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis (L.) Makino var. utilis Tsenet Lee), a subspecies of Chinese cabbage from southern China, is a typical stalk vegetable [7]. It has 10 chromosomes, and its genome is of the AA type. The genome size of B. rapa, a representative species of the AA genome, is 353.14 Mb [8]. As a diploid, flowering Chinese cabbage is suitable for gene modification and genetic studies. The edible parts of flowering Chinese cabbage, which include flower stalks and leaves, are rich in anticarcinogenic compounds and antioxidants such as glucosinolates, phenols, vitamin C, and carotenoids [1,7,9]. Development of the stem (also referred to as stalk) includes bolting (stem elongation and thickening) and flowering, both of which are directly related to stalk quality and yield. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying stalk development in flowering Chinese cabbage remain to be elucidated. The primary pathways regulating bolting and flowering in this species may be autonomous or dependent on FRIGIDA (FRI) [10].
The genetic pathways underlying floral transition that are responsive to endogenous and environmental stimuli have been elucidated [11]. In Arabidopsis, six important regulatory pathways, namely autonomous, photoperiod, age, vernalization, ambient temperature, and gibberellin (GA) pathways, govern flowering [12,13]. The primary integrators of multiple flowering pathways are FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 (SOC1), and LEAFY (LFY) [14]. SOC1, which belongs to the MADS-box transcription factor family, regulates different stages of plant development, such as meristem differentiation, flowering time, and floral organ development [11,15]. In Arabidopsis, SOC1 interacts with AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 (AGL24) in the shoot apical meristem to directly regulate flowering factors LFY and APETALA1 (AP1) and to promote flowering [16,17]. FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) interacts with SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) to inhibit SOC1 transcription by directly interacting with the SOC1 promoter in the vernalization pathway [18,19]. Gibberellin (GA3) regulates LFY transcription in the shoot apical meristem independent of or dependent on the SOC1 pathway, thereby regulating floral transition [20].
Homologs of SOC1 with conserved functions in flowering have been identified and characterized in numerous plant species. However, SOC1 may also perform varied functions across different species. For example, the overexpression of UNSHAVEN (UNS), a gene isolated from Petunia hybrida and with the highest similarity to SOC1, resulted in early flowering and transformation of petals into leaf-like organs [21]. Strawberry FvSOC1 regulates flowering in the shoot apical meristem and the differentiation of lateral buds into stolons or lateral rosettes through GA3 biosynthesis [22]. Furthermore, SOC1-like genes may alter the duration of dormancy instead of floral transition in kiwifruit [23].
Our previous study indicated that GA3 and low-temperature treatments promoted early bolting and flowering in flowering Chinese cabbage [24]. However, the specific molecular mechanism by which GA3 and low temperature regulate bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage are still rarely studied. In the present study, using RNA-seq data [25], we screened a bolting-related gene BcSOC1. SOC1 is an important flowering regulator in plants that integrates multiple pathways including GA and ambient temperature pathways to regulate bolting and flowering. Therefore, we analyzed the expression of BcSOC1 in the GA and low temperature response pathway for vernalization to characterize the function of BcSOC1 and explore the molecular mechanisms of BcSOC1 that regulate the bolting of flowering Chinese cabbage. The findings of this study will provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying stalk development in flowering Chinese cabbage and other stalk vegetables.

2. Results

2.1. Expression and Subcellular Localization of BcSOC1 in Flowering Chinese Cabbage

In the previous study, we examined five developmental stages (S1–S5) of the flowering Chinese cabbage cultivar ‘Youlv 501 caixin’ to gain insight into stalk development. With this aim, we performed RNA-seq using two biological replicates of shoot tip specimens from S1 (15 d after sowing, the seedling stage), S3 (31 d after sowing, the bolting stage), and S5 (37 d after sowing, the flowering or harvesting stage) [25]. We further analyzed differentially expressed flowering-related genes at these developmental stages (Figure S1). Interestingly, BcSOC1 was significantly upregulated at stages S3 and S5, indicating that BcSOC1 was a potential regulator of bolting and flowering in this species. In addition, the flowering-related genes AP1, LFY, SPL3, SPL5, and SPL9 exhibited higher expression levels at stages S3 or S5 (Figure S1). Given the specificity of BcSOC1 expression, we aimed to determine its role in bolting and flowering of flowering Chinese cabbage.
Based on the reference transcriptome sequences of flowering Chinese cabbage, two genes, namely BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2, were cloned and analyzed. Motif and domain analyses revealed that BcSOC1 belonged to the MADS-box family of transcription factors, with highly conserved MADS-box, K-box domain, and SOC1 motif (Figure 1A). Furthermore, sequence analyses indicated that BcSOC1 was closely related to SOC1 in other crucifer species; BcSOC1-1 exhibited 100% homology with BrSOC1 and BnSOC1, whereas BcSOC1-2 exhibited 100% homology with BjSOC1. Moreover, BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 shared 93% and 94% homology, respectively, with AtSOC1 (Figure 1A,B).
To further elucidate the role of BcSOC1, we examined the expression profile of BcSOC1 in the roots, shoot apex, leaves, and flowers at the blooming stage of flowering Chinese cabbage using qRT-PCR (Figure 1C). BcSOC1-1 transcript levels were significantly higher in the shoot apex than in the other organs, whereas BcSOC1-2 was upregulated in the leaves and roots. Subcellular localization of BcSOC1 revealed that both BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 were localized in the nucleus (Figure 1D and Figure S2).

2.2. GA3 and Low-Temperature Treatments Affect Bolting and BcSOC1 Expression in Flowering Chinese Cabbage

Previous studies have shown that both GA3 and low-temperature treatments promote bolting and flowering in flowering Chinese cabbage [24]. Therefore, to determine whether BcSOC1 is involved in the regulation of bolting and flowering, the seeds of flowering Chinese cabbage were treated with GA3 (200 mg/L) and low temperatures (4 °C or 15 °C), and then cultured in perlite. As shown in Figure S3, plant height slowly increased during the early stages and rapidly after bolting. Furthermore, GA3 treatment promoted bolting, as indicated by increased height, during the entire growth period. The stem diameter of the control (CK) plants increased throughout the growth period, whereas GA3 treatment significantly reduced stem diameter. In the CK plants, budding and flowering time were 25 d and 30 d after sowing, respectively, whereas the budding time and flowering time were advanced to 21 d and 26 d after sowing, respectively, upon GA3 treatment. Additionally, budding and flowering rates were higher in the GA3-treated plants than in the CK plants.
BcSOC1-1 expression was slightly affected by the GA3 treatment during the vegetative phase; however, GA3 notably affected the expression of BcSOC1-1 during the reproductive phase (Figure 2A,B). BcSOC1-1 expression remained low 8–18 d after the GA3 treatment and was not significantly different from that in the CK plants. However, 21–31 d after the GA3 treatment, the expression level of BcSOC1-1 in the leaves rapidly increased 2.82–7.26 times and in the shoot tips 2.16–2.67 times compared with that in the CK plants. Furthermore, the expression level of BcSOC1-2 in the leaves was upregulated 7.00 and 47.95 times compared with that in the CK leaves after 21 d and 31 d of treatment, respectively (Figure 2C). However, the expression level of BcSOC1-2 in the shoot tips was upregulated 18.0, 35.82, 2.82, and 2.09 times compared to the CK plants at 13, 18, 25, and 31 d after treatment, respectively (Figure 2D). Therefore, the expression of BcSOC1-2 was more significantly affected by GA3 treatment than that of BcSOC1-1.
Similarly, low temperatures promoted bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage, thereby increasing plant height and reducing stalk diameter (Figure S3). The expression levels of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 in the leaves were significantly higher at low temperatures than in the CK leaves at 20, 22, and 25 d after treatment (Figure 2E,G). Similarly, BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 were significantly upregulated in the shoot tip at each sampling period, especially 20 d after treatment, which indicated the critical period of bolting and stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage (Figure 2F,H). In addition, the upregulation of BcSOC1-2 expression in shoot tips was much higher than that of BcSOC1-1 at 20 d after the low-temperature treatment, indicating that BcSOC1-2 expression was more significantly affected by low temperature compared with that of BcSOC1-1. These results indicate that BcSOC1 may be involved in the regulation of bolting, flowering, and stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage, as its expression is affected by both GA3 and low temperature.

2.3. BcSOC1 Overexpression Accelerates Stem Elongation and Flowering in Arabidopsis and Flowering Chinese Cabbage

To investigate whether BcSOC1 plays the same role as AtSOC1 in Arabidopsis, we ectopically expressed BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 under the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter in Arabidopsis accession Col. We obtained 25 pBI121:BcSOC1-1 and 30 pBI121:BcSOC1-2 T1 transgenic lines. The bolting and flowering time of all the transgenic lines with the WT background was decreased, with different severity of the phenotype (Figure 3A, Table S7). The pBI121:BcSOC1-1 transgenic plants (OE-1, 2, and 3) flowered 3–4 d earlier than the WT plants, and the phenotype of pBI121:BcSOC1-2 transgenic plants (OE-4 and 5) was similar to that of pBI121:BcSOC1-1 plants. However, a considerably early flowering phenotype was also observed in pBI121:BcSOC1-2 transgenic plants, with the OE-6 line exhibiting the strongest phenotype (flowering 8 d earlier than the WT) (Table 1 and Table S7). Transgenic lines were also significantly taller than the WT, with OE-6 line being the tallest (Figure 3A, Table 1). Interestingly, qRT-PCR analyses revealed that the earliest flowering line (OE-6) exhibited the highest level of transgene expression, and the severity of the phenotype positively correlated with the expression of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 (Figure 3B,C). These results suggest that BcSOC1 plays a role similar to that of AtSOC1, which promotes bolting and flowering in Arabidopsis. In addition, pBI121:BcSOC1-2 lines had earlier bolting and flowering times than pBI121:BcSOC1-1 did (Table 1). Compared with WT, the expression levels of pBI121:BcSOC1-1 and pBI121:BcSOC1-2 were increased 12–20 and 30–44 times, respectively. This suggests that the overexpression level of BcSOC1-2 was higher than that of BcSOC1-1.
To genetically characterize BcSOC1, we optimized Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in flowering Chinese cabbage (Figure S4) and expressed BcSOC1 under the CaMV 35S promoter. All six pBI121:BcSOC1 T1 transgenic lines exhibited early bolting, accelerated stem elongation before flowering, and a significantly taller phenotype compared with the WT. Moreover, the first flower buds appeared markedly earlier in the transgenic lines compared with those in the WT plants, and pBI121:BcSOC1-2 transgenic lines exhibited a more significant phenotype compared to the pBI121:BcSOC1-1 lines (Figure 3D, Table 1). Consistent with these results, BcSOC1 and its downstream gene BcLFY were significantly upregulated in the transgenic lines (Figure 3E–G), indicating that BcSOC1 overexpression promoted early bolting, flowering, and stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage.

2.4. BcSOC1 Silencing Delays Bolting and Stem Elongation in Flowering Chinese Cabbage

We generated BcSOC1 knockdown lines using VIGS (Figure 4) and obtained nine single and six double knockdown lines. We observed and analyzed the phenotypes of control (WT and pTRV2) and knockdown plants when control plants began to flower. Compared with the WT and empty vector control, the knockdown lines exhibited delayed bolting and flowering, increased leaf area and leaf number, and prolonged vegetative growth (Figure 4A–D and Figure S5). Among them, the phenotype of pTRV2:BcSOC1-2 knockdown lines was more prominent than that of pTRV2:BcSOC1-1 lines, and the phenotype of the double knockdown lines was more notable than that of the single knockdown lines. The expression of BcSOC1 in the knockdown lines was significantly reduced compared with that in the CK plants, and the transgene expression was more significantly decreased in the double knockdown lines than in the single knockdown lines (Figure 4E–G). These results demonstrate that reduced BcSOC1 expression in the knockdown lines resulted in delayed bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage, and the functions of the two homologous genes were overlapping and complementary.
We also examined the expression of BcLFY, which acts downstream of BcSOC1, in the knockdown lines [17] and observed that BcLFY was significantly downregulated in the knockdown lines compared with that in the CK plants. Furthermore, the downregulation was more remarkable in the double knockdown lines (Figure 4H).
We selected three knockdown lines (T2, T5, and T7) for further characterization. Notably, as the CK plants entered the end of flowering, the knockdown lines were just blooming and were significantly shorter than the CK plants. This indicates that stem elongation was inhibited before flowering in the knockdown lines (Figure 4I,J) and stems reached optimal height only at the final flowering stage (Figure 4J). These results demonstrate that BcSOC1 knockdown not only delayed bolting and flowering but also inhibited stem elongation to some extent. Additionally, stem elongation inhibition was more significant than delayed flowering, and the phenotype was most significant in T7, followed by T5, which suggested that BcSOC1-2 had the more effective silencing compared with BcSOC1-1. These findings are consistent with the results of overexpression of BcSOC1-2 in Arabidopsis and flowering Chinese cabbage.

2.5. BcSOC1 Overexpression Probably Induces Cell Expansion by Upregulating BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3

To determine whether cell size was affected in the transgenic plants, we compared the size of pith cells in longitudinal sections of the shoot apex at the blooming stage of both WT and overexpression lines (Figure 5A). Compared to the WT, cell length and area in the pBI121:BcSOC1-1 and pBI121:BcSOC1-2 transgenic plants were significantly increased (Figure 5B,C). In a previous study, RNA-seq of flowering Chinese cabbage exposed to 15 °C for 5 d [26] revealed a significant upregulation of cell wall structural proteins and enzymes, including BcEXPA11 and xyloglucan endotransglycosidase/hydrolase BcXTH3, at low temperature (Figure S6). Therefore, we determined the expression of BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 in the shoot apex of pBI121:SOC1 and pTRV2:BcSOC1 lines. Both genes were upregulated in BcSOC1 overexpression lines OE-3 and OE-6 and downregulated in the knockdown lines T2, T5, and T7 (Figure 5D,E). These results suggest that the increase in stalk length was positively correlated with increased pith cell size, which was promoted by the overexpression of BcSOC1 through a significant upregulation of the BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 expression.
We also examined the expression of BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 after GA3 and low-temperature (15 °C) treatments (Figure 5F,G). In the CK group, both genes were significantly upregulated in the shoot apex after 25 or 30 d of sowing. However, GA3 and low-temperature treatments significantly upregulated BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3, with the expression levels rapidly increasing after 25 or 30 d of sowing, which is the critical period for stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage.

2.6. BcSOC1 Interacts with BcAGL6, BcAGL24, and BcSOC1

AtSOC1 forms dimers with AtAGL6 and AtAGL24 to regulate bolting and flowering in Arabidopsis [27]. To determine the putative protein interactions of BcSOC1 in flowering Chinese cabbage, yeast two-hybrid experiments were performed using 53-BD+AD-T and LAM-BD+AD-T as positive and negative controls, respectively. We observed that BcSOC1-2 interacted with BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 to form homologous dimers and with BcAGL6 and BcAGL24 to form heterologous dimers (Figure 6A). However, BcSOC1-1 did not interact with BcAGL6 and BcAGL24 (Figure 6A).
To verify the results of the yeast two-hybrid experiments, bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments were performed in vivo. Yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fluorescence in the nuclei of plant cells confirmed the interactions of BcSOC1-2 with BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, BcAGL6, and BcAGL24 (Figure 6B and Figure S7).

3. Discussion

3.1. SOC1 Expression Pattern Correlates with Bolting in Flowering Chinese Cabbage

Gene expression patterns are closely related to gene function. Previous studies have shown that SOC1 expression in leaves promotes flowering, and it is necessary for the initiation of flowering in the meristem [28,29,30]. In this study, BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 were expressed in the same tissues but at different levels. In flowering Chinese cabbage, BcSOC1-1 was upregulated in the shoot apex (Figure 1D), similar to Chrysanthemum [31], whereas BcSOC1-2 was upregulated in the leaves (Figure 1D), similar to Arabidopsis, rice, and wheat [29,32,33]. Furthermore, BcSOC1 was primarily expressed in vegetative organs, unlike FaSOC1 in strawberry, which is upregulated in the reproductive organs, such as the shoot apex, flower bud, stamen, and sepal [34]. Previous studies on Arabidopsis, strawberry, and soybean suggest that SOC1-like proteins are localized in the cytoplasm [17,34,35]. However, in flowering Chinese cabbage, BcSOC1 was localized in the nucleus (Figure 2E,F), similar to ZmMAD1 and LsSOC1 [36], indicating that SOC1 plays different roles in different species.
ClSOC1-1 and ClSOC1-2 are induced throughout the growth period in Chrysanthemum [31]. The transcript levels of SOC1 in rice and wheat are significantly increased during transition from vegetative to reproductive growth, and then maintained at high levels [32,33]. In the present study, the transcript levels of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 were high throughout growth and development of flowering Chinese cabbage, and were significantly increased during floral transition (Figure S1). This expression profile is consistent with previous reports, indicating that BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 may be involved in the regulation of bolting and flowering in flowering Chinese cabbage.

3.2. GA3 and Low-Temperature Treatments Accelerate Bolting and Flowering in Flowering Chinese Cabbage by Mediating BcSOC1 Expression

SOC1 responds to flowering signals from both endogenous and environmental stimuli and acts on the downstream floral meristem-specific genes to participate in the formation of plant floral meristems and the regulation of flowering time [12,15,37]. Moon et al. [20] reported that exogenous GA3 promoted SOC1 expression in WT A. thaliana (Ler) and shortened flowering time. GA3 treatment increased SOC1 expression and rescued the non-flowering phenotype of ga1-3, whereas SOC1 null mutant exhibited reduced sensitivity to GA3 for flowering. In this study, BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 were upregulated in flowering Chinese cabbage upon exposure to exogenous GA3 after budding (Figure 2A–D), which is consistent with the findings of Dorca-Fornell et al. [38] and suggests that BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 may mediate premature flowering caused by GA3. Moreover, rapid stem elongation and significant increase in plant height (Figure S1) indicate that BcSOC1 regulates stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage.
Lee et al. [39] reported that SOC1 did not express in FRI FLC lines of Arabidopsis without vernalization, whereas SOC1 expression significantly increased after vernalization. In addition, SOC1 expression increased upon vernalization treatment in FLC-3 mutants [20]. In the present study, the expression profiles of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 at 4 °C or 15 °C were the same as that under the GA3 treatment and were rapidly upregulated after budding (Figure 2E–H and Figure S1). This suggests that BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 regulate bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage when induced at low temperatures.

3.3. BcSOC1 Plays a Vital Role in Regulating Bolting and Stem Elongation in Flowering Chinese Cabbage

AtSOC1 integrates different signaling pathways to promote bolting and flowering in Arabidopsis [28,39]. In the present study, BcSOC1 overexpression in Arabidopsis (Col) shortened its flowering time (Figure 3, Table 1), suggesting that BcSOC1 exhibits a high degree of functional conservation in promoting flowering. Additionally, increased plant height in BcSOC1 overexpression lines indicated its role in stalk development. To test this hypothesis, we generated and phenotyped BcSOC1 overexpression lines in the background of flowering Chinese cabbage, and we observed that BcSOC1 overexpression significantly advanced bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage (Figure 3, Table 1). Furthermore, pTRV2:BcSOC1 knockdown lines exhibited delayed bolting and inhibition of stem elongation before flowering (Figure 4), suggesting that BcSOC1 regulates both bolting and stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage. Similar findings were reported by Mauren et al. [40], who found that MtSOC1a promotes flowering and primary stem elongation in Medicago, further verifying the role of SOC1 in the regulation of stalk development. In addition, we determined that the two homologous genes were functionally redundant, and BcSOC1-2 was the key regulatory factor.
Several MADS-box transcription factors regulate the expression of downstream target genes in the form of dimers [12,15,37]. In Arabidopsis, the MADS-box transcription factors AGL6, AGL24, FUL, and SEP3 bind with the regulatory sequences of SOC1 [27,41]. In the present study, BcAGL6, BcAGL24, BcSOC1-1, and BcSOC1-2 formed dimers with BcSOC1-2 (Figure 6). These data suggest that BcSOC1-2 may upregulate the expression of downstream meristem genes through interactions with other MDS-box proteins and thereby regulate bolting of flowering Chinese cabbage. However, BcSOC1-1 did not interact with BcAGL6, BcAGL24, and BcSOC1-1 (Figure 6A). Nayar et al. [42] conducted deletion analysis and revealed that the KC region (K-box and C-terminal domain) plays a pivotal role in dimerization. However, K-box and C-terminal domains are not completely conserved relative to the highly conserved MADS-box. Alternative splicing events were found only at the borders of or within the K-box domain; a small change in the sequence of K-box domain transcript can have strong consequences for the interaction capacity and functioning of the encoded protein [43]. In the present study, amino acid mutations were detected between the K-box of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2, which may be the main reason for the distinct interaction patterns between the two BcSOC1 proteins with interacting partners.
Cell cycle regulation of the shoot apical meristem affects stem elongation and thickening, and BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 are the key factors responsible for cell expansion [44,45]. EXPA11 promotes the sliding of polymers such as cell wall cellulose and hemicellulose by reducing the viscosity of polysaccharides between cell walls and enabling cell wall expansion [46]. XTH3 participates in the regulation of cell wall relaxation by cutting xyloglucan chains [47]. Investigation of the pith cell structure in BcSOC1 overexpression lines revealed that stem elongation was correlated with the increase in pith cell length and area (Figure 5). Therefore, the rapid elongation of stalk in flowering Chinese cabbage may be attributed to increased cell expansion. The present study revealed that GA3 and low temperatures accelerate bolting and flowering in flowering Chinese cabbage, probably by upregulating BcSOC1, BcEXPA11, and BcXTH3 (Figure 2 and Figure 5), and the overexpression of BcSOC1 induces cell expansion by upregulating BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 (Figure 5). Figure 7 demonstrates the role of BcSOC1 in the bolting and flowering of flowering Chinese cabbage.
While numerous SOC1-like genes regulate flowering, others may exhibit both functional conservation and divergence with AtSOC1 [22,23]. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that BcSOC1 may function as a floral integrator gene and promote stem elongation, providing new insights into stalk development in flowering Chinese cabbage. In addition, stalk development in flowering Chinese cabbage is accompanied by both vegetative and reproductive growth, which is different from other cruciferous leaf vegetables such as B. rapa, B. oleracea, and B. campestris. Therefore, further investigation is necessary to understand the synergistic mechanisms underlying vegetative and reproductive growth in regulating stalk development.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Flowering Chinese cabbage cultivar ‘Youlv 501 caixin’ was obtained from the Guangzhou Academy of Agricultural Science and cultivated in a greenhouse at the College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University. The wildtype (WT) and BcSOC1 transgenic plants were grown at 25/20 °C (day/night) under 16/8 h light/dark cycles and light intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1. Knockdown lines generated by VIGS were cultured at 22/20 °C (day/night), and other environmental conditions were the same as above.
Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. accession Columbia (Col) were obtained from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (http://www.Arabidopsis.org/index.jsp, accessed on 19 March 2022), and all Arabidopsis plants were grown in a growth chamber at 22 °C under a 16/8 h light/dark cycle.

4.2. Gene Cloning

Total RNA was extracted from the leaves and shoot apex of flowering Chinese cabbage using a HiPure Plant RNA Mini Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized and subjected to inverse transcription using a HiScript QRT SuperMix for qPCR Reagent Kit (with gDNA Wiper; Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Coding sequences (CDS) of BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, and BcLFY isolated from the shoot apex were cloned using gene-specific primers (Table S1).

4.3. Phylogenetic Analyses of SOC1 Homologs

Amino acid sequences of BrSOC1, BnSOC1, BjSOC1, BoSOC1, CfSOC1, AtSOC1, CcSOC1, GmSOC1, VvSOC1, MdSOC1, FvSOC1, PaSOC1, DeSOC1, TaAGL20, OsAGL20, ZmSOC1, and HaSOC1 were obtained from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 19 March 2022) (Table S2). Nucleotide and amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW and MUSCLE, respectively, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor joining method. All steps of the phylogenetic reconstruction were performed in MEGA7 [48]. Support values were obtained using 1000 bootstrap replicates.

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from the leaves and stems of plants exposed to exogenous GA3 and low-temperature treatments. RNA of the WT and BcSOC1 transgenic plants was isolated from the fourth leaf, and qRT-PCR was performed using a ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme) on a LightCycler 480 real-time PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreutz, Switzerland). Three biological and three technical replicates were used for each sample, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the internal reference to normalize gene expression. The primers used in qRT-PCR analyses are listed in Table S2.

4.5. Subcellular Localization

Full-length BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 CDS were cloned into pEAQ-EGFP vectors and fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. The primers used for cloning are listed in Table S3.
Nicotiana benthamiana leaves were first infiltrated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 transformed with corresponding constructs and nuclear localization signal (NLS-DsRed). After three days, GFP fluorescence and DsRed protein were detected at 448 nm and 550 nm, respectively, using a laser-scanning confocal microscope. To further verify the results of subcellular localization, the plasmids were transformed into onion epidermal cells using a previously described method [49].

4.6. GA3 and Low-Temperature Treatments

Seeds of flowering Chinese cabbage were sterilized using 70% ethanol for 3 min, washed 3–4 times with deionized water, and then placed in a petri dish lined with filter paper. Thereafter, 200 mg/L GA3 solution and the same amount of deionized water were added to GA3 and control (CK) treatments, respectively. Another set of sterilized seeds was exposed to low temperatures in a growth chamber, one group was placed at 4 °C and a second group at 15 °C. After five days of low-temperature treatment, the seeds were sown in perlite. Seedlings with three leaves and one core were transplanted into hydroponic containers and supplied with half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution.
The plants were harvested at 37–40 days after sowing. Plant height (cm) and stem thickness (mm) were measured using the cross method with ruler and vernier caliper, respectively. For GA3 treatment, plant height and stem diameter were measured at 19, 21, 23, 25, and 27 d, bud rate was calculated at 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35 d, and flowering rate was calculated at 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, and 40 d after the treatment. For low-temperature treatment, plant height and stem diameter were measured at 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25 d, bud rate was calculated at 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 36 d, and flowering rate was calculated at 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, and 39 d after the treatment. Leaves and shoot apex were collected at 8, 10, 13, 16, 18, 21, 25, 31 d and 13, 16, 18, 21, 25, 31 d, respectively, after GA3 treatments, and at 9, 12, 15, 17, 20, 22, 25 d and 12, 15, 17, 20, 22, 25 d, respectively, after low-temperature treatments. Samples were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction (three biological replicates per treatment, with 10 plants per replicate).

4.7. Ectopic Expression of BcSOC1 in Arabidopsis

The pBI121:BcSOC1 construct, generated by cloning BcSOC1 CDS into pBI121-GFP under the control of CaMV 35S promoter, was first transformed into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101, which was then transformed into Arabidopsis plants using the floral-dip method [50]. Transformed lines were selected on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (pH 5.8) containing 1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, and 50 mg/L kanamycin (Kan). The primer sequences are listed in Table S4.

4.8. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Assay

BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 CDS were cloned into pTRV2 plasmids to generate silencing vectors pTRV2:BcSOC1-1 and pTRV2:BcSOC1-2, respectively, and VIGS experiments were performed as previously described [51]. The pTRV2:BcSOC1 and pTVR1 vectors were co-infiltrated into the cotyledons of young seedlings of the flowering Chinese cabbage. Two weeks after infection, the second true leaf was collected from each plant, and RNA was extracted for qRT-PCR analysis to evaluate the efficiency of gene silencing. Plants co-infiltrated with pTRV2 and pTRV1 were used as negative controls. Subsequently, plant morphological characteristics were determined. The primers used for VIGS assay are listed in Table S4.

4.9. Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation in Flowering Chinese Cabbage

Cotyledon transformation of the ‘Youlv 501 caixin’ cultivar was performed using a previously described protocol with modifications [52]. After sowing on half-strength MS medium (pH 5.8) containing 1% sucrose and 0.6% agar, the sterilized seeds were placed in a tissue culture at 25/20 °C (day/night) under 16/8 h light/dark cycles and light intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1. The cotyledons and hypocotyls of sterile seedlings were excised 3 d after emergence. The cotyledon and hypocotyl explants were then pre-cultured for callus initiation on MS medium (pH 5.8) containing 0.3 mg/L 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 5.0 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA), 2.0 mg/L AgNO3, 3% sucrose, and 1% agar, in the dark for two days at 25 °C before inoculation and co-culturing with A. tumefaciens EHA105. The preincubated hypocotyls were soaked in Agrobacterium-infection buffer (MS medium containing 3% sucrose and 1 mg/L AS [pH 5.8]) for 10 min and transferred to the co-cultivation medium (MS medium containing 0.3 mg/L NAA, 5.0 mg/L 6-BA, 2.0 mg/L AgNO3, 3% sucrose, and 1% agar [pH 5.8]) in the dark for two days at 25 °C. After one week of delayed selection (MS medium containing 0.3 mg/L NAA, 5.0 mg/L 6-BA, 2.0 mg/L AgNO3, 3% sucrose, 1% agar, 200 mg/L timentin (Tim) [pH 5.8]), the explants were transferred to callus- and shoot-induction media (MS medium containing 0.3 mg/L NAA, 5.0 mg/L 6-BA, 2.0 mg/L AgNO3, 3% sucrose, 1% agar, 200 mg/L Tim, and 15 mg/L Kan [pH 5.8]). The secondary medium was changed every two weeks. When the regenerating shoots reached a height of 2–3 cm, they were transferred to the rooting medium (MS medium containing 0.3 mg/L NAA, 3% sucrose, 1% agar, and 200 mg/L Tim [pH 5.8]) to obtain Kan-resistant plantlets.

4.10. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, BcAGL6, and BcAGL24 CDS were cloned into pGADT7 or pGBKT7 plasmids to generate yeast two-hybrid vectors. The recombinant vector was then delivered into yeast strain Y2HGold to generate fusion proteins according to a previously described protocol [53]. Primer information is given in Table S5.

4.11. Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation Assay

The vectors were produced by amplifying the CDS of BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, BcAGL6, and BcAGL24 without the stop codons from their corresponding cDNAs. The fragments were cloned into the N- or C-terminus of pSPYNE-35S and pSPYCE-35S vectors to generate fusion proteins [54]. The Agrobacterium strain harboring the recombination plasmid and DsRed was co-infiltrated into young tobacco leaves as previously described [53]. After two days of incubation, yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fluorescence was detected at 448 nm using a laser-scanning confocal microscope. To indicate the nuclei, DsRed protein was detected at 550 nm. Primer sequences are listed in Table S6.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we showed that GA3 and low-temperature treatments significantly upregulated BcSOC1, BcEXPA11, and BcXTH3, thereby promoting early bolting and flowering in flowering Chinese cabbage. Furthermore, BcSOC1 knockdown dramatically delayed bolting, flowering, and inhibited stem elongation in this species. We also elucidated the molecular mechanism underlying stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage, wherein the overexpression of BcSOC1 induced cell expansion by upregulating BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3. We further demonstrated that BcAGL6 and BcAGL24 interacted with BcSOC1 to regulate bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage. These findings provide the foundation for further investigations on the mechanisms underlying stalk development in cruciferous stalk vegetables.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23073459/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.W.: Formal analysis, Writing—Original Draft. X.H. (Xiu Huang) and X.H. (Xinmin Huang): Investigation, Formal analysis. W.S. and H.L.: Methodology. Y.H., R.C. and S.S.: Writing—Review and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072656, 31972481), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China (2020B0202010006), and the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Verkerk, R.; Schreiner, M.; Krumbein, A.; Ciska, E.; Dekker, M. Glucosinolates in Brassica vegetables: The infuence of the food supply chain on intake, bioavailability and human health. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, S219–S265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cartea, M.E.; Francisco, M.; Soengas, P.; Velasco, P. Phenolic compounds in Brassica vegetables. Molecules 2010, 16, 251–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhao, J.; Zhao, J.J.; Wang, X.W.; Zhao, J.J.; Wang, X.W.; Deng, B.; Lou, P.; Wu, J.; Sun, R.F.; Xu, Z.Y.; et al. Genetic relationships within Brassica rapa as inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Teor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110, 1301–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cheng, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, X. Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. Hortic. Res. 2014, 1, 14024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sun, Q.; Zhou, G.F.; Cai, Y.F.; Yang, J.P. Transcriptome analysis of stem development in the tumourous stem mustard Brassica juncea var. tumida Tsen et Lee by RNA sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 53. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, F.; Sun, R.F.; Hou, X.L.; Zheng, H.K. Subgenome parallel selection is associated with morphotype diversification and convergent crop domestication in Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, L.Z.; Harnly, J.M. Phenolic component profiles of mustard greens, yu choy, and 15 other Brassica vegetables. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 6850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhang, L.; Cai, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, M.; Grob, S.; Cheng, F.; Liang, J.; Cai, C.C.; Liu, Z.Y.; Liu, B. Improved Brassica rapa reference genome by single-molecule sequencing and chromosome conformation capture technologies. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Manchali, S.; Murthy, K.N.C.; Patil, B.S. Crucial facts about health benefits of popular cruciferous vegetables. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, X.; Wu, C.; Xu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Fan, S.; Wang, H. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of bolting-associated genes in flowering Chinese cabbage. Genes Genom. 2015, 37, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, C.; Thong, Z.; Yu, H. Coming into bloom: The specification of floral meristems. Development 2009, 136, 3379–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fornara, F.; de Montaigu, A.; Coupland, G. SnapShot: Control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 2010, 141, 550–550.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Srikanth, A.; Schmid, M. Regulation of flowering time: All roads lead to Rome. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 2013–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Corbesier, L.; Vincent, C.; Jang, S.; Fornara, F.; Fan, Q.; Searle, L.; Giakountis, A.; Farrona, S.; Gissot, L. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 2007, 316, 1030–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gregis, V.; Sessa, A.; Dorca-Fornell, C.; Kater, M.M. The Arabidopsis floral meristem identity genes AP1, AGL24 and SVP directly repress class B and C floral homeotic genes. Plant J. 2009, 60, 626–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wigge, P.A.; Kim, M.C.; Jaeger, K.E.; Busch, W.; Schmid, M.; Lohmann, J.U.; Weigel, D. Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 309, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, J.; Oh, M.; Park, H.; Lee, I. SOC1 translocated to the nucleus by interaction with AGL24 directly regulates leafy. Plant J. 2008, 55, 832–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hepworth, S.R.; Valverde, F.; Ravenscroft, D.; Mouradov, A.; Coupland, G. Antagonistic regulation of flowering-time gene SOC1 by CONSTANS and FLC via separate promoter motifs. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 4327–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Deng, W.; Ying, H.; Helliwell, C.A.; Taylor, J.M.; Peacock, W.J.; Dennis, E.S. FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) regulates development pathways throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6680–6685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Moon, J.; Suh, S.S.; Lee, H.; Choi, K.R.; Hong, C.B.; Paek, N.C.; Kim, S.G.; Lee, I. The SOC1 MADS-box gene integrates vernalization and gibberellin signals for flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003, 35, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferrario, S.; Busscher, J.; Franken, J. Ectopic Expression of the Petunia MADS Box Gene UNSHAVEN Accelerates Flowering and Confers Leaf-Like Characteristics to Floral Organs in a Dominant-Negative Manner. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1490–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mouhu, K.; Kurokura, T.; Koskela, E.A.; Albert, V.A.; Elomaa, H. The Fragaria vesca homolog of SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 represses flowering and promotes vegetative growth. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3296–3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Voogd, C.; Wang, T.; Varkonyi-Gasic, E. Functional and expression analyses of kiwifruit SOC1-like genes suggest that they may not have a role in the transition to flowering but may affect the duration of dormancy. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 4699–4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Song, S.; Lei, Y.; Huang, X.; Su, W.; Chen, R.; Hao, Y. Crosstalk of cold and gibberellin effects on bolting and flowering in flowering Chinese cabbage. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, X.; Lei, Y.; Guan, H.; Hao, Y.; Liu, H.; Sun, G.; Chen, R.; Song, S. Transcriptomic analysis of the regulation of stalk development in flowering Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris) by RNA sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Huang, X. Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of the Regulation of Stalk Development in Flowering Chinese Cabbage. Ph.D. Thesis, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. Immink, R.G.H.; Pose, D.; Ferrario, S. Characterization of SOC1’s central role in flowering by the identification of its upstream and downstream regulators. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Borner, R.; Kampmann, G.; Chandler, J.; Gleissner, R.; Melzer, S. A MADS domain gene involved in the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2000, 24, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Samach, A.; Onouchi, H.; Gold, S.E.; Ditta, G.S.; Schwarz-Sommer, Z.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Coupland, G. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 2000, 288, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Searle, I.; He, Y.; Turck, F. The transcription factor FLC confers a flowering response to vernalization by repressing meristem competence and systemic signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 898–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fu, J.; Qi, S.; Yang, L.; Dai, Y.; Dai, S. Characterization of Chrysanthemum ClSOC1-1, and ClSOC1-2, homologous genes of SOC1. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 32, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Han, J.J.; Han, M.J.; An, G. Functional analyses of the flowering time gene OsMADS50, the putative SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in rice. Plant J. 2004, 38, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shitsukawa, N.; Ikari, C.; Mitsuya, T.; Sakiyama, T.; Ishikawa, A.; Takumi, S.; Murai, K. Wheat SOC1 functions independently of WAP1/VRN1, an integrator of vernalization and photoperiod flowering promotion pathways. Physiol. Plant 2007, 130, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lei, H.J.; Yuan, H.Z.; Liu, Y.; Guo, X.W.; Liao, X.; Liu, L.L.; Wang, Q.; Li, T.H. Identification and characterization of FaSOC1, a homolog of SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 from strawberry. Gene 2013, 531, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhong, X.; Dai, X.; Xv, J.; Wu, H.; Liu, B.; Li, H. Cloning and expression analysis of GmGAL1, SOC1 homolog gene in soybean. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 6967–6974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Z.; Zhao, W.; Ge, D.; Han, H.; Ning, K.; Luo, C.; Wang, S.; Liu, R.; Zhang, X. LCM-seq reveals the crucial role of LsSOC1 in heat-promoted bolting of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Plant J. 2018, 95, 516–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, C. Regulation of floral patterning by flowering time genes. Dev. Cell. 2009, 16, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dorca-Fornell, C.; Gregis, V.; Grandi, V.; Coupland, G.; Colombo, L.; Kater, M.M. The Arabidopsis SOC1-like genes AGL42, AGL71 and AGL72 promote flowering in the shoot apical and axillary meristems. Plant J. 2011, 67, 1006–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, H.; Suh, S.S.; Park, E. The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 2366–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mauren, J.; Lulu, Z.; Chong, C.; Li, G.F.; Tang, Y.H.; Wen, J.Q.; Mysore, K.S.; Putterill, J. A SOC1-like gene MtSOC1a promotes flowering and primary stem elongation in Medicago. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4867–4880. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao, S.; Zhang, M.L.; Ma, T.L.; Wang, Y. Phosphorylation of ARF2 relieves its repression of transcription of the K+ transporter gene HAK5 in response to low potassium stress. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 3005–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Nayar, S.; Kapoor, M.; Kapoor, S. Post-translational regulation of rice MADS29 function: Homodimerization or binary interactions with other seed-expressed MADS proteins modulate its translocation into the nucleus. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5339–5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Severing, E.I.; van Dijk, A.D.; Morabito, G.; Busscher-Lange, J.; Immink, R.G.; van Ham, R.C. Predicting the Impact of Alternative Splicing on Plant MADS Domain Protein Function. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Shi, H.; Wang, L.L.; Sun, L.T.; Dong, L.L.; Liu, B.; Chen, L.P. Cell division and endoreduplication play important roles in stem swelling of tuber mustard (Brassica juncea Coss. var. tumida Tsen et Lee). Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kou, E.; Huang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Su, W.; Liu, H.; Sun, G.; Chen, R.; Song, S. Crosstalk between auxin and gibberellin during stalk elongation in flowering chinese cabbage. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marowa, P.; Ding, A.; Kong, Y. Expansions: Roles in plant growth and potential applications in crop improvement. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 949–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tenhaken, R. Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Dong, Z.B.; Jiang, C.; Chen, X.Y.; Zhang, T.; Ding, L.; Song, W.B.; Luo, H.B.; Lai, J.S.; Chen, H.B.; Liu, R.Y.; et al. Maize LAZY1 Mediates Shoot Gravitropism and Inflorescence Development through Regulating Auxin Transport, Auxin Signaling, and Light Response. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1306–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Chen, C.; Chen, G.; Hao, X.; Cao, B.; Chen, Q.; Liu, S.; Lei, J. CaMF2, an anther-specific lipid transfer protein (LTP) gene, affects pollen development in Capsicum annuum L. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liang, W. Establishment and Optimization of a High-efficiency Regeneration and Genetic Transformation System of Flowering Chinese Cabbage. Master’s Thesis, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ding, L.; Yan, S.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, W.; Ning, K.; Zhao, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X. HANABA TARANU (HAN) Bridges Meristem and Organ Primordia Boundaries through PINHEAD, JAGGED, BLADE-ON-PETIOLE2 and CYTOKININ OXIDASE 3 during Flower Development in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Walter, M.; Chaban, C.; Schutze, K.; Batistic, O.; Weckermann, K.; Näke, C.; Blazevic, D.; Grefen, C.; Schumacher, K.; Oecking, C.; et al. Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Plant J. 2004, 40, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sequence and expression analysis of BcSOC1 in flowering Chinese cabbage. (A) Amino acid sequence analysis of BcSOC1 and other SOC1-like proteins. BcSOC1 was used as the query sequence, and other SOC1-like proteins with highly similar sequences in Brassica juncea, B. rapa, and Arabidopsis thaliana were retrieved from the NCBI database. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of SOC1 sequences of different plant species was performed using the neighbor joining method in MEGA7, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bo: B. oleracea, Bn: B. napus, Bc: B. campestris, Cf: Cardamine flexuosa, Md: Malus domestica, Fv: Fragaria vesca, Pa: Prunus armeniaca, De: Dendrobium, Ta: Triticum aestivum, Os: Oryza sativa, Zm: Zea mays, Ha: Helianthus annuus, Gm: Glycine max, Vv: Vitis vinifera, Cc: Carya cathayensis. (C) Expression level of BcSOC1 in different tissues (a, b and c) of flowering Chinese cabbage. (D) Subcellular localization of BcSOC1 in Nicotiana benthamiana. Bar = 50 μm.
Figure 1. Sequence and expression analysis of BcSOC1 in flowering Chinese cabbage. (A) Amino acid sequence analysis of BcSOC1 and other SOC1-like proteins. BcSOC1 was used as the query sequence, and other SOC1-like proteins with highly similar sequences in Brassica juncea, B. rapa, and Arabidopsis thaliana were retrieved from the NCBI database. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of SOC1 sequences of different plant species was performed using the neighbor joining method in MEGA7, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bo: B. oleracea, Bn: B. napus, Bc: B. campestris, Cf: Cardamine flexuosa, Md: Malus domestica, Fv: Fragaria vesca, Pa: Prunus armeniaca, De: Dendrobium, Ta: Triticum aestivum, Os: Oryza sativa, Zm: Zea mays, Ha: Helianthus annuus, Gm: Glycine max, Vv: Vitis vinifera, Cc: Carya cathayensis. (C) Expression level of BcSOC1 in different tissues (a, b and c) of flowering Chinese cabbage. (D) Subcellular localization of BcSOC1 in Nicotiana benthamiana. Bar = 50 μm.
Ijms 23 03459 g001
Figure 2. Effects of GA3 and low-temperature treatments on BcSOC1 expression in flowering Chinese cabbage. (AD) Expression levels of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 in the leaves and shoot apex exposed to GA3. (EH) Expression levels of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 in the leaves and shoot apex exposed to low temperature (4 °C and 15 °C). CK as the control. Error bars represent standard errors. Different letters (a, b and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) determined using ANOVA. * represents the reproductive phase.
Figure 2. Effects of GA3 and low-temperature treatments on BcSOC1 expression in flowering Chinese cabbage. (AD) Expression levels of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 in the leaves and shoot apex exposed to GA3. (EH) Expression levels of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 in the leaves and shoot apex exposed to low temperature (4 °C and 15 °C). CK as the control. Error bars represent standard errors. Different letters (a, b and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) determined using ANOVA. * represents the reproductive phase.
Ijms 23 03459 g002
Figure 3. Overexpression of BcSOC1 in Arabidopsis and flowering Chinese cabbage. (A) Ectopic expression of BcSOC1 accelerated early flowering phenotype in Arabidopsis. Bar = 2 cm. (B,C) Expression analyses of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 using qRT-PCR in wild type (WT) and overexpression lines. (D) Phenotypic characterization of the WT and pBI121:BcSOC1 transgenic lines. Bar = 2 cm. (EG) Expression of BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, and BcLFY in the overexpression lines. WT as the control (CK). Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (* represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Overexpression of BcSOC1 in Arabidopsis and flowering Chinese cabbage. (A) Ectopic expression of BcSOC1 accelerated early flowering phenotype in Arabidopsis. Bar = 2 cm. (B,C) Expression analyses of BcSOC1-1 and BcSOC1-2 using qRT-PCR in wild type (WT) and overexpression lines. (D) Phenotypic characterization of the WT and pBI121:BcSOC1 transgenic lines. Bar = 2 cm. (EG) Expression of BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, and BcLFY in the overexpression lines. WT as the control (CK). Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (* represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01).
Ijms 23 03459 g003
Figure 4. Knockdown of BcSOC1 using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in flowering Chinese cabbage. (A) Silencing of BcSOC1 significantly delayed bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage. S1, S2, and S1+2 represent pTRV2:SOC1-1, SOC1-2, and SOC1-1 + SOC1-2, respectively. (BD) Quantification of delayed bolting phenotypes in BcSOC1 knockdown lines. S1, S2 and S1+2 represent averages of the corresponding single and double knockdown lines, respectively. (EH) Expression of BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, and BcLFY in different BcSOC1 knockdown lines. (I,J) Silencing of BcSOC1 inhibited stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage, and the plant height was significantly decreased. WT and pTRV2 as the control (CK). Error bars represent standard errors. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (* represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01). Bar = 5 cm.
Figure 4. Knockdown of BcSOC1 using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in flowering Chinese cabbage. (A) Silencing of BcSOC1 significantly delayed bolting in flowering Chinese cabbage. S1, S2, and S1+2 represent pTRV2:SOC1-1, SOC1-2, and SOC1-1 + SOC1-2, respectively. (BD) Quantification of delayed bolting phenotypes in BcSOC1 knockdown lines. S1, S2 and S1+2 represent averages of the corresponding single and double knockdown lines, respectively. (EH) Expression of BcSOC1-1, BcSOC1-2, and BcLFY in different BcSOC1 knockdown lines. (I,J) Silencing of BcSOC1 inhibited stem elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage, and the plant height was significantly decreased. WT and pTRV2 as the control (CK). Error bars represent standard errors. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (* represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01). Bar = 5 cm.
Ijms 23 03459 g004
Figure 5. Expression of BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 correlates with cell expansion. (A) Pith cell microstructures in the longitudinal sections of the shoot apex of wild type (WT) and BcSOC1 transgenic lines. Bar = 200 μm. (B,C) Pith cell length and area in the shoot apex. (D,E) Relative expression of cell expansion-related genes BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 in BcSOC1 overexpression and knockdown lines. Error bars represent standard errors. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01). (F,G) Expression of BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 under GA3 and low-temperature (15 °C) treatments. CK as the control. Significant differences were determined using ANOVA.
Figure 5. Expression of BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 correlates with cell expansion. (A) Pith cell microstructures in the longitudinal sections of the shoot apex of wild type (WT) and BcSOC1 transgenic lines. Bar = 200 μm. (B,C) Pith cell length and area in the shoot apex. (D,E) Relative expression of cell expansion-related genes BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 in BcSOC1 overexpression and knockdown lines. Error bars represent standard errors. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01). (F,G) Expression of BcEXPA11 and BcXTH3 under GA3 and low-temperature (15 °C) treatments. CK as the control. Significant differences were determined using ANOVA.
Ijms 23 03459 g005
Figure 6. Yeast two-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays to determine protein interactions. (A) Yeast two-hybrid assay for protein–protein interactions between BcSOC1 and BcAGL6, BcAGL24, and BcSOC1. BD and AD represent empty pGBKT7 and pGADT7 vectors, respectively. SD/-Trp-Leu, the synthetic dextrose medium lacked tryptophan and leucine; the SD/-Trp-His-Leu-Ade medium lacked tryptophan, histidine, leucine, and adenine. Positive bacteria were stained using X-α-Gal. (B) Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay was used to detect the interactions of BcSOC1 (fused with N-terminal fragment of YFP) with BcAGL6, BcAGL24, and BcSOC1-1 (fused with C-terminal fragment of YFP). The nuclei were stained with DsRed. Bar = 50 μm.
Figure 6. Yeast two-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays to determine protein interactions. (A) Yeast two-hybrid assay for protein–protein interactions between BcSOC1 and BcAGL6, BcAGL24, and BcSOC1. BD and AD represent empty pGBKT7 and pGADT7 vectors, respectively. SD/-Trp-Leu, the synthetic dextrose medium lacked tryptophan and leucine; the SD/-Trp-His-Leu-Ade medium lacked tryptophan, histidine, leucine, and adenine. Positive bacteria were stained using X-α-Gal. (B) Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay was used to detect the interactions of BcSOC1 (fused with N-terminal fragment of YFP) with BcAGL6, BcAGL24, and BcSOC1-1 (fused with C-terminal fragment of YFP). The nuclei were stained with DsRed. Bar = 50 μm.
Ijms 23 03459 g006aIjms 23 03459 g006b
Figure 7. Model demonstrating GA3- and low temperature-induced bolting and stalk elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage. The arrow represents promotion.
Figure 7. Model demonstrating GA3- and low temperature-induced bolting and stalk elongation in flowering Chinese cabbage. The arrow represents promotion.
Ijms 23 03459 g007
Table 1. Quantification of early bolting and flowering phenotypes in BcSOC1 transgenic lines.
Table 1. Quantification of early bolting and flowering phenotypes in BcSOC1 transgenic lines.
SpeciesLinesDays to Flowering
(d)
Days to Bolting
(d)
Plant Height
(cm)
WT31.58 ± 0.96 a/5.11 ± 0.86 c
ArabidopsispBI121:SOC1-127.72 ± 0.74 b/9.83 ± 1.33 b
pBI121:SOC1-225.77 ± 1.22 c/16.84 ± 3.96 a
WT38.92 ± 1.08 a30.08 ± 0.90 a19.03 ± 1.05 c
B. campestrispBI121:SOC1-132.92 ± 1.51 b24.92 ± 1.24 b25.80 ± 1.21 b
pBI121:SOC1-229.83 ± 1.47 c23.17 ± 1.19 c28.06 ± 1.09 a
Data are mean ± standard error (n = 12). Different letters (a, b and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) determined using ANOVA.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Huang, X.; Su, W.; Hao, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, R.; Song, S. BcSOC1 Promotes Bolting and Stem Elongation in Flowering Chinese Cabbage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073459

AMA Style

Wang Y, Huang X, Huang X, Su W, Hao Y, Liu H, Chen R, Song S. BcSOC1 Promotes Bolting and Stem Elongation in Flowering Chinese Cabbage. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(7):3459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yudan, Xiu Huang, Xinmin Huang, Wei Su, Yanwei Hao, Houcheng Liu, Riyuan Chen, and Shiwei Song. 2022. "BcSOC1 Promotes Bolting and Stem Elongation in Flowering Chinese Cabbage" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7: 3459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop