Next Article in Journal
A Novel Morphine Drinking Model of Opioid Dependence in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Dynamics Studies on the Structural Stability Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Including Multiple Mutants
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of 30 and 60 Min of Hypobaric Hypoxia in Simulated Altitude of 15,000 ft on Human Proteome Profile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Novel GSK-3β Hits Using Competitive Biophysical Assays
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design and Nonadiabatic Photoisomerization Dynamics Study of a Three-Stroke Light-Driven Molecular Rotary Motor

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3908; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073908
by Jianzheng Ma 1, Sujie Yang 1, Di Zhao 1, Chenwei Jiang 1,*, Zhenggang Lan 2,3,* and Fuli Li 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3908; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073908
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 29 March 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 31 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Computational Studies of Biomolecules)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A nice paper discussing several modifications to standard design of light driven motors that may provide insight into how motor operation can be improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The Authors focused on the working cycle of conventional light-driven molecular rotary motors (LDMRMs), especial Feringa-type motors, which usually have four steps, two photoisomerization steps and two thermal helix inversion (THI) steps. The Authors proposed a three-stroke LDMRM, 2-(2,7-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H- inden-1-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrol-3-one (DDIY), which is capable of completing an unidirectional rotation by two photoisomerization steps and one thermal helix inversion step at room temperature. They analysed the mentioned problem using semi-empirical OM2/MRCI level. The article seems to be interesting for a large number of scholars and engineers. It creates a logical semi-empirical research and that is why in my opinion could be published in "International Journal of Molecular Sciences". Some of the comments on the manuscript are listed below.

1) Line 13 and 14; some keywords have been already used in the title of the manuscript. Please change them into different ones (to avoid the keywords repetition with the words used in the title).

2) Please consider adding some more explanations or a drawing concerning the mechanism of rotational movement of your motor.

3) For the Reviewer it is not quite clear what is new in this manuscript in comparison with the published earlier Authors’ articles?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors propose a new chemical substance for light-driven molecular motor applications.  A complete rotation of the molecule involves three steps; two light-induced isomerisations and one thermal helix inversion. The different steps are followed through semiempirical structure calculations and molecular dynamic simulations.  The paper is  transparent, the results are convincing; it certainly deserves publication. Nevertheless, from the discussion it is missing a comparison with the substances cited e.g. in Ref 20-22 of the paper, where no thermal step is involved in the cycle. In the case discussed in the present work, although the light-induced transformation undergo in sub-picosecond time intervals, the thermal conversion slows down the process considerably. Does this have any advantage? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

In this manuscript, the authors propose a three-stroke light-driven molecular rotary motor (LDMRM) that is capable of completing an unidirectional rotation by two photoisomerization steps and one thermal helix inversion step. These results can stimulate further research for the development of new families of efficient LDMRM. I would like to recommend its publication if the authors can clarify the following concerns:

  1. The novelty of this study is not clear. The authors need to list a Table to compare the main findings between this manuscript and previous studies.
  2. The level of English throughout the manuscript needs to be improved. I would suggest the authors to check the manuscript and refine the language carefully.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop