Next Article in Journal
Heterologous DNA Prime- Subunit Protein Boost with Chikungunya Virus E2 Induces Neutralizing Antibodies and Cellular-Mediated Immunity
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Nudt2 in Anchorage-Independent Growth and Cell Migration of Human Melanoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Investigation of BAM Gene Family in Annona atemoya: Evolution and Expression Network Profiles during Fruit Ripening

1
Key Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Zhanjiang 524091, China
2
Key Laboratory of Hainan Province for Postharvest Physiology and Technology of Tropical Horticultural Products, South Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Zhanjiang 524091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10516; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310516
Submission received: 24 May 2023 / Revised: 17 June 2023 / Accepted: 20 June 2023 / Published: 22 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
β-amylase proteins (BAM) are important to many aspects of physiological process such as starch degradation. However, little information was available about the BAM genes in Annona atemoya, an important tropical fruit. Seven BAM genes containing the conservative domain of glycoside hydrolase family 14 (PF01373) were identified with Annona atemoya genome, and these BAM genes can be divided into four groups. Subcellular localization analysis revealed that AaBAM3 and AaBAM9 were located in the chloroplast, and AaBAM1.2 was located in the cell membrane and the chloroplast. The AaBAMs belonging to Subfamily I contribute to starch degradation have the higher expression than those belonging to Subfamily II. The analysis of the expression showed that AaBAM3 may function in the whole fruit ripening process, and AaBAM1.2 may be important to starch degradation in other organs. Temperature and ethylene affect the expression of major AaBAM genes in Subfamily I during fruit ripening. These expressions and subcellular localization results indicating β-amylase play an important role in starch degradation.

1. Introduction

Amylases catalyze starch and convert it into sugars such as glucose and maltose. α-1,4 glycosidic linkages in starch are hydrolyzed by β-amylase to remove successive maltose units from the non-reducing ends of the chains [1,2]. β-amylases are divided into GH-14B presenting in bacteria and GH-14A found in plants according to the sequence similarity between the glycoside hydrolase 14 family (GH-14) [3,4,5]. β-amylase structure is composed of a canonical (βα) eight-barrel core and a C-terminal long loop, and the active site is located in the deep pocket of the (βα) eight-barrel core [6].
The analysis of the conservation of intron positions in the BAM family in land plants revealed that there are two subfamilies of BAMs [7]. Moreover, the amino acid sequence alignments suggested that these proteins are divided into four distinct clades [8]. Subfamily I contains Arabidopsis BAM1, BAM3 and BAM9, and Subfamily II contains BAM2 and BAM4 through BAM8. From the evolution trend of plant BAM gene, it can be inferred that BAM1/3 and BAM2 are probably the ancestral forms of each subfamily in land plants. Other BAM genes in Arabidopsis and angiosperms probably produced by duplication and evolution change from these two original BAMs [9].
BAM genes are widely distributed among the plant kingdom: 9 in Arabidopsis, 10 in rice, 13 in maize, 15 in banana, 10 in Sorghum [10]. It is known that β-amylase is the main way for starch degradation of Arabidopsis leaves, potatoes tubers, fruits, etc. [8,11,12,13,14,15,16]. There are many studies on nine AtBAM genes in Arabidopsis, but the function of those genes is not well demonstrated. BAM1 to BAM4, BAM6, and BAM9 are located in the plastid, BAM7 and BAM8 are located in the nucleus, and BAM5 is located in the cytoplasm. Only AtBAM1 and AtBAM3 are directly involved in starch degradation, playing a central role in the starch decomposition of leaves [8,9,13,16,17,18]. BAM1, BAM3, BAM5 and BAM6 of Arabidopsis have catalytic activity in addition to BAM4, BAM7, BAM8 and BAM9 [9].
Annona atemoya is an economically valuable fruit crop cultivated. Annona atemoya belongs to the family of Annonaceae Annona, also known as Sakya, Matri, and Fotou, native to tropical America. It is a semi-deciduous, exotic subtropical fruit that is consumed in various countries [19]. At present, Annona squamosa Linn and Annona atemoya Hort are the main cultivated varieties. They are mainly planted in southeast coastal areas in mainland China. The Annona atemoya planting area in China reached 11,889.15 hectares in 2021, displaying a growing trend in recent years. These plants are popular because of their fast growth, early bearing, stability to yield, good fruit quality, aromatic flavor, and high edible and medicinal value. But the molecular and genetic mechanisms of fruit development have not been explored extensively. The main form of carbohydrate storage in Annona atemoya is starch, accounting for 10–12% of the fresh weight [20]. Starch, as the content of fruit cells, supports the cell wall. The transformation of starch to soluble sugar significantly affects the expansion of fruit cells, and then participates in fruit softening by affecting the tension in fruit cells [21,22].
Owing to the significant role of starch degradation in the process of fruit ripening and softening after harvest, we intended to explore the impact of AaBAM genes on fruit ripening. We then conducted a series of studies on genome-wide level. The β-amylase gene family was screened and cloned, and its gene structure, phylogeny, and subcellular localization were analyzed. Subsequently, the tissue specificity, expression patterns under different temperatures, ethylene and auxin treatments were emphatically researched to determine the function of AaBAMs. This research provided an insight into the important role of β-amylase genes in Annona atemoya to starch degradation and fruit ripening, and a theoretical basis of the preservation of Annona atemoya after harvest.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Classification of AaBAMs Genes in Annona atemoya

Initially, nine Annona atemoya BAM genes were identified by the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) search. The annotation of these gene models was further checked using transcriptome data. Seven redundant predicted BAM genes were manually curated and two AaBAM8 redundant sequences were then removed. Finally, seven gene models were selected and annotated as BAM genes based on the presence of apparently complete BAM domains (Supplementary Table S1). All the BAM genes in Annona atemoya could be positioned on seven linkage groups, respectively.
The length of the CDS (Coding Sequence), length of the protein sequence, protein molecular weight (MW), Isoelectric point (pI), and subcellular localization are shown in Supplementary Table S2. AaBAM9 was identified to be the smallest protein with 536 amino acids (aa), whereas the largest one was AaBAM5 (899 aa), and the length of four of seven genes 536–588 amino acids (aa). The molecular weight of the corresponding coding protein is 59.23–101.9 kDa, and protein IP ranged from 5.70 to 8.39.

2.2. Multiple Sequence Alignment, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Classification of AaBAM Genes

To study the evolutionary relationship between AaBAM genes and the known BAM genes from Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa, multiple sequence alignments were conducted and then a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on amino acids of BAM genes in Arabidopsis, Glycine max, Citrus trifoliata, and rice. These results indicated the BAM genes can be divided into four subfamilies: Group I including AaBAM1 and AaBAM3, Group II including AaBAM5 and AaBAM6, Group III including AaBAM2, AaBAM7 and AaBAM8, Group IV including AaBAM4 and AaBAM9 (Figure 1). BAMs of rice and trifoliate orange are distributed in four subfamilies, and seven AaBAM genes are distributed in four subfamilies with one in Group II and IV, two in Group III, and three in Group I (Figure 1). Compared with rice, Annona atemoya is closely related to Arabidopsis thaliana.
Alignment of multiple AaBAM was conducted to gain more insight into the structure and function of the BAM family in Annona atemoya. β-amylase structure is composed of canonical (βα) eight barrel cores and a C-terminal long loop, and the structures of β-amylases are known and show that these proteins contain a TIM-barrel fold with a pair of catalytic glutamates in the active site that is required for cleavage of the glycosidic bond [9]. All AaBAM genes identified in Annona atemoya were conserved in catalytic site E380 of soybean GmBAM5 (Supplementary Figure S1). For catalytic site E186 of GmBAM5, only AaBAM9 was not conserved and had an amino acid of Glycine other than glutamate (Supplementary Figure S1). All of the BAM proteins aligned well in the core amylase domain, with most of the differences occurring to the N and C-terminal sides of this domain. Conformational change in some residues close to the active site was induced by sugar binding. Movement of the loop composed of a conserved GGNVGD sequence was observed among AaBAM3, AaBAM5, AaBAM1.2, and AaBAM7.

2.3. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Analysis

To determine the more evolution pattern of AaBAM genes, exon–intron organizations of all the identified genes were examined. The result showed that the closely related genes were usually more similar in gene structure. For instance, genes AaBAM7 and AaBAM8 belonging to Group III have nine exons, and AaBAM3 and AaBAM1.1 belonging to Group I have four exons. However, some closely related genes showed some difference in structural arrangements; for example, AaBAM1.1 has four exons while AaBAM1.2 has five exons (Figure 2). Furthermore, AaBAM genes from four groups showed distinct numbers of exons with 9 in Group III, 13 in Group II, 3 in Group IV, 4–5 in Group I, respectively (Figure 2).
Twenty conserved motifs were identified in the AaBAM proteins by MEME programs. As exhibited in Figure 2, AaBAM members within the same groups were usually found to share a similar motif composition other than Motifs 1, 3, 6, 4, 8, 5, 2, 7 and 9 which are widely distributed (Supplementary Table S3). Moreover, the common motifs existed in all AaBAM genes that were arranged in the same order. To character the motif pattern in a particular BAM group, the rest of the motifs were calculated. For example, Motif 10 and Motif 12 are uniquely present in AaBAM7 and AaBAM8 belonging to Group III. From the perspective of motif amounts in BAM groups, AaBAM1.1 and AaBAM1.2 in Group I have the same motif composition, and they have nine motifs. AaBAM9 in Group IV has 13 motifs, and AaBAMs belonging to Group II have the highest number of motifs which is 17. These result shows that the AaBAM genes of different groups have distinct patterns, and the motif compositions or gene structures of the BAM members in the same group are similar. Together with the phylogenetic analysis results, this evidence could strongly support the reliability of the group classifications.

2.4. The Location and Synteny Relationship Analysis of BAM Genes

A total of seven genes were identified in five Chromosomes, while the Chr03 and Chr06 had no BAM genes (Figure 3). The number of BAM genes on one chromosome was between one and two. chromosome Chr01, Chr04, Chr05, and Chr07 each had one BAM gene, and Chr02 contained the largest number of two BAM genes (Figure 3). There was a positive correlation between the chromosomes’ length and the number of BAM genes.

2.5. Expression Analysis of the AaBAM Genes with RNA-seq

The expression patterns of all seven AaBAM genes in the transcriptome data, which was derived from different developmental stages of Annona atemoya organs/tissues including young leave, root, flower bud, twig, young fruit and seed, were investigated in this research (Figure 4). All seven AaBAM genes were detected to express at least one tissue, with AaBAM3, AaBAM1.2, AaBAM7, AaBAM1.1, AaBAM8, AaBAM9 existing in six organs, and AaBAM5 only expressed in young fruit. The results of the expression pattern reveal that AaBAM1.2 had the highest expression level among the AaBAM genes and the highest value of expression in the tissue of young leave and root. In addition, AaBAM1.1, AaBAM3 expressed lower than other genes in the same family, but had a higher expression in root and twig. Except AaBAM1.2, the rest of the AaBAM genes were evenly expressed in those tissues. AaBAM8 and AaBAM9 had a relatively high expression in seed and root, respectively.
AaBAM genes were randomly selected for quantitative RT-PCR analysis of young fruit and seed to verify the RNA-seq data (Figure 4). The qRT-PCR results confirmed that almost all AaBAM genes had expression in most of the organs, and most of the AaBAM genes expressed higher in seed than in young fruits. These results showed that our RNA-seq data are suitable for investigating the expression patterns of AaBAM genes in different tissues.

2.6. Expression Patterns of Annona atemoya Genes in Response to Temperature Treaments

The Annona atemoya fruits were treated with 32 °C, 28 °C and 15 °C in this study. The analysis of the expression showed that AaBAM3 was the highest in the whole fruit ripening process (Figure 5C). The expression of AaBAM3 genes showed an overall upward trend under the three temperature treatments, indicating that temperature may have an effect (Figure 5C). Further evidence shows that a 15 °C treatment inhibited the expression of AaBAM3 genes, consistent with the result of delaying maturity at 15 °C (Figure 5C).
The expression of AaBAM9 was up-regulated in the first 4 days of the three temperature treatments. However, after the fourth day, the expression of AaBAM9 decreased at 15 °C and 32 °C, while the expression continued to increase at 28 °C (Figure 5E). The expression trends at 28 °C and 32 °C were consistent with AaBAM3, indicating that both AaBAMs may have the same response expression in these two temperature conditions (Figure 5E).
Both AaBAM1.1 and AaBAM1.2 showed an expression trend of first rising and then declining under 32 °C and 28 °C treatments (Figure 5A,B). After 15 °C treatments, they showed an overall trend of inhibiting expression (Figure 5A,B). Finally, the overall expression of AaBAM7 and AaBAM8 was low (Figure 5D,F).
On the whole, AaBAM3, AaBAM9, AaBAM1.1 and AaBAM1.2 with high expression levels were up-regulated under 28 °C treatments, especially for the first 4 days, indicating that 28 °C treatments could accelerate starch degradation (Figure 5). At 15 °C, the overall expression of AaBAM3, AaBAM9, AaBAM1.1 and AaBAM1.2 was lower than that at 28 °C and 32 °C, which was consistent with the results of delaying starch degradation at low temperature (Figure 5).

2.7. Expression Patterns of Annona atemoya Genes in Response to Ethylene and Auxin Treatments

The expression of AaBAM3 began to increase significantly after 24 h of ethylene treatment, while IAA treatment induced the expression of AaBAM3 between 1 and 2 days (Figure 6). The expression of AaBAM9 was up-regulated under ethylene and IAA treatment, and the induction effect of ethylene was the most obvious (Figure 6E). The expression of AaBAM9 was induced by ethylene and auxin during the first 24 h (Figure 6E). AaBAM8 showed induced expression trends under IAA treatment, while the overall expression changed slightly (Figure 6D). Under ethylene and IAA treatment, the expression of AaBAM1.1 and AaBAM1.2 was irregular before 12 h, and was induced after 12 h (Figure 6A,B). The results showed that ethylene significantly induced the expression of AaBAM3 and AaBAM9 genes, and IAA induced the expression of AaBAM8 and AaBAM9 (Figure 6E).

2.8. Subcellular Localization Analysis of AaBAM Protiens

To study the subcellular localization of AaBAM proteins, we generated BAM–GFP fusion constructs and transiently expressed them in Nicotiana benthamiana (tobacco) leaves (Pro35S:BAM-GFP). In agreement with the presence of a predicted chloroplast localization signal, each BAM protein showed exclusively chloroplast localization (Figure 7). The results showed that the empty vector with GFP was expressed in the membrane and nucleus of tobacco leaf cells. AaBAM1.2-GFP was only expressed in the membrane and chloroplast, but not in the nucleus (Figure 7). AaBAM3-GFP was expressed in chloroplasts, which shows that the fluorescence channels of chloroplasts overlap with the AaBAM3-GFP protein channels (Figure 7). AaBAM9-GFP is similar to AaBAM3-GFP, and it is also located in chloroplast according to the analysis of subcellular localization (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

The analysis of BAM gene families was carried out in some special in Arabidopsis, rice, maize, banana, and Sorghum, respectively [10]. In this study, a search for BAM gens in the Annona atemoya genome resulted in the identification of seven members, which were designated on the basis of homology analysis. Amino acid sequence alignments indicate that these proteins fall into four distinct clades, and that none of these proteins are more than 60% identical. This revealed that none of the genes of AaBAM resulted from very recent gene duplications.
Previous analysis of the BAM family in land plants indicated that there are two subfamilies of BAMs that became separated prior to the origin of land plants [7]. Subfamily I contains Arabidopsis BAM1, BAM3 and BAM9, whereas Subfamily II contains BAM2 and BAM4 through BAM8. BAM1/3 and BAM2 are proposed to be the original forms of each subfamily of land plants. Unlike vascular plants that contain both BAM1 and BAM3 genes, BAM1 and BAM3 are not easily distinguished from each other in brophytes Physcomitrella Patens and Marchantia polymorpha, so they are defined as BAM1/3 [9]. In Annona atemoya, AaBAM1.1 cannot be defined as BAM1 or BAM3 according to homology, so AaBAM1.1 was identified as BAM1/3. Annona atemoya contained all types of Subfamily I BAM genes, while the only existing Subfamily II BAM genes were AaBAM5, AaBAM7 and AaBAM8.
BAM plays an important role in starch degradation and serves as a major enzyme in hydrolytic process of linear glucans in the plastid. The degraded maltose is exported to the cytosol by a specific chloroplast membrane protein, which is a maltose transporter, to maintain the cycle balance of sucrose–starch metabolism [23,24]. At present, there are many studies on the nine AtBAM genes of Arabidopsis, but not all the functions of each family member have been clarified. In Arabidopsis, AtBAM1 and AtBAM3, which belong to Type I BAM genes, are critical for plant starch degradation and function in the process of linear glucans in the plastid [8,13,17,25,26]. The subcellular localization of AaBAM3, AaBAM9 and AaBAM1.2 found that Type I AaBAM genes were located in the chloroplast. Combined with the expression pattern, these results indicated the Type I BAM genes in Annona atemoya may serve the conserving function as Arabidopsis. For AaBAM9 as Type I genes, the amino acid of catalytic site as glutamate was replaced by glycine and the expression pattern consistent with AaBAM3 in temperature, auxin, and ethylene treatment, indicating that AaBAM9 perhaps lost the function of the hydrolytic process but influenced the metabolism balance as a regulated role.
Knowing where the genes are expressed is important for understanding the molecular mechanisms of biological process. It was recently discovered that the BAM protein has a remarkably short half-life, such as, for example, BAM3 (0.43 days), indicating that control of the rate of BAM3 expression is important [27]. The extensive expression of the AaBAM gene in Annona atemoya indicates that degradation of starch into monosaccharide occurs widely in various tissues, and AaBAM1.2 may play a major role in this process owing to its high expression in most kinds of tissue under the development state of a plant. A lot of evidence demonstrates that BAM3 plays a prominent role in nocturnal starch degradation in chloroplasts and is expressed in mesophyll cells [8,17,28]. The expression of AaBAM3 in leaves is relatively high, suggesting AaBAM3 and AaBAM1 may jointly regulate starch degradation in leaves. AaBAM5 is uniquely expressed in young fruit, indicating it may have some function in fruit development. BAM5 was found to be elevated in a series of starchless Arabidopsis mutants and its transcriptional function to be induced by sugars, especially sucrose [29,30,31]. These results of AaBAM5 analysis suggest this gene may participate in the degradation of starch together with the AaBAM gene family, especially during fruit ripening. The lacking expression of AaBAM5 indicates that starch degradation in organs other than young fruit is mainly accomplished by other β-amylases.
The transformation of starch into soluble sugar significantly affects the pressure on fruit cells, and then participates in fruit softening by affecting the tension in fruit cells. Previous research shows that the β-amylase gene can be regulated by ethylene, auxin, sugar, temperature and light. Furthermore, β-amylase genes can be induced and regulated by cold in Arabidopsis leaves and potato tubers [13,17,31,32,33,34,35]. These results reveal that these factors may mediate the ripening process of Annona atemoya by regulating the AaBAM genes family. There are two genes, AaBAM1.1 and AaBAM1.2, which are annotated as BAM1 in Annona atemoya. The two genes also have a high level of expression during fruit ripening, but lower than AaBAM3. Combined with the tissue-specific expression analysis, it is believed that AaBAM1.1 and AaBAM1.2 belong to the universal expression genes and are involved in starch degradation of fruit. However, AaBAM3 probably is the main gene that functions in degrading starch and fruit ripening with its dramatic increase in expression after harvest from tree. Its expression pattern is consistent with the fruit ripening process under the three-temperature condition (Figure 5C). Contrary to the research results asserting that BAM gene expression of Arabidopsis leaves and potato tubers is induced by low temperature [13,17,34,35], low-temperature treatment in fruit reduces the expression of major β-amylase genes. Compared with normal temperature, the activity of β-amylase is inhibited and the degradation of starch is delayed. This suggests that the regulation mechanism of starch degradation in response to low temperature in fruit may be different from that in leaves, tubers and other tissues or organs.
The role of ethylene in fruits has been widely studied. It has been shown that ethylene can accelerate fruit ripening and softening [36]. 1-Aminocyclopropylene-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) and IAA enhance the softening and electrical conductivity of the treated fruit, and the respiration of fruits treated with IAA is enhanced. In this study, The expression of most of the AaBAMs genes in the fruit were induced by IAA and ethylene to compare with the control, including AaBAM1.2, AaBAM3, AaBAM9, AaBAM7, and AaBAM8. The most significant expression change is that of AaBAM3 under ethylene treatment, further suggesting AaBAM3 may play an important role in fruit ripening and softening (Figure 6C). Ethylene treatment significantly induced the expression of AaBAM3 and AaBAM9 genes, also suggesting that starch degradation is related to the process of fruit ripening. IAA induced the expression of AaBAM8 and AaBAM9, indicating the AaBAM7 and AaBAM8 may be regulated by the auxin signal (Figure 6E).
Compared with other BAM genes, the expression level of AaBAM7 and AaBAM8 was lower under each treatment. Studies in Arabidopsis determined that AtBAM7 and AtBAM8 are located in the nucleus and have no catalytic activity, but potential homologous to the BES1/BZR1 domains were identified in transcription factors that respond to brassinosteroid (BR) signaling [8,9,37,38]. In Annona atemoya, whether AaBAM7 and AaBAM8 have catalytic or regulation functions needs continued study in the future.
In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of the BAM gene family in Annona atemoya was carried out in the present study. Phylogenetic comparison of BAM genes from several different plant species provided valuable clues about the evolutionary characteristics of Annona atemoya BAM genes. Seven BAM genes were classified into four main groups, with high similar exon–intron structures and motif compositions within the same groups. AaBAM genes are significant to Annona atemoya growth, and mature process as indicated by their expression patterns of different tissues and under physical and physiological treatments. Combined with subcellular localization analysis results, it can be shown that the AaBAMs belonging to Subfamily I contribute to starch degradation, especially for relatively high-expression AaBAM genes such as AaBAM1.1, AaBAM1.2, AaBAM3. These analyses lay a foundation for the functional analysis of AaBAM genes and provide a valuable resource for better understanding the biological roles of individual BAM genes in the Annona atemoya.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Gene Identification

The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) file corresponding to the BAM domain (PF01373) was downloaded from the Pfam protein family database (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/ (accessed on 1 September 2022)). HMMER was used to search the BAM genes from the Annona atemoya genome database by default parameters. The potential genes were then manually examined to ensure the conserved sequence of the predicted BAM domain.
RNA-seq data were used to further check the annotation of the predicted BAM gene models [39]. The incorrectly predicted genes were then manually adjusted and were validated by PCR. The redundant sequences were discarded. The length of sequences, molecular weights, isoelectric points and subcellular location predication of identified AaBAM proteins were obtained by using tools from the ExPasy website (https://web.expasy.org/cgi-bin/protparam/protparam/ (accessed on 5 September 2022)), ProtComp9.0 website and Plant-mPLoc Server (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/ (accessed on 12 September 2022)).

4.2. Classification of AaBAM Genes

BAM genes in Arabidopsis, Glycine max, Citrus trifoliata, and rice were used for classifying the BAM genes. The BAM domain sequences of the characterized BAM proteins were used to create multiple protein sequence alignments using ClustalW with default parameters, and the phylogenetic tree was further annotated by the iTOL program (http://itol.embl.de/ (accessed on 15 October 2022)).

4.3. Gene Distribution, Structure, and Motif Analysis

The MEME online program (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/intro.html/ (accessed on 27 October 2022)) for protein sequence analysis was used to identify conserved motifs in the identified AaBAM proteins [40]. The optimized parameters were employed as follows: the number of repetitions is any; the maximum number of motifs is 20; the optimum motif width is set between 6 and 200. AaBAM genes identified in this study were mapped to Annona atemoya chromosome base on physical location information of genome by the mapchart program.

4.4. Location of AaBAM Genes on Chromosomes

To explore the chromosomal location of AaBAM genes, the software (https://www.wur.nl/en/show/Mapchart.htm/ (accessed on 1 December 2022)) was used to map AaBAM genes onto chromosomes according to the AaBAM gene position on the genome of Annona atemoya.

4.5. Expression Analysis of Annona atemoya BAM Genes in Four Tissues

Expression patterns of AaBAM genes at different tissues (flower bud, root, twig, leaf and young fruit) were analyzed using RNA-Seq data. Flower bud, root, twig, leaf and young fruit were collected from Annona atemoya, and the tissues were stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction and transcriptome analysis. RNA was extracted using the Trizol method as described by Ma et al. [41]. The FPKM values were calculated by the Cufflinks pipeline (http://cufflinks.cbcb.umd.edu/ (accessed on 11 January 2023)), and the FPKM analysis results are shown in Supplementary Table S5. Genes with no expression (FPKM values equal “0” in all tissues) were filtered. The tissue differential expression of genes is shown in the heatmap.

4.6. Plant Materials and Treatments, RNA Extraction and Quantitative qRT-PCR Analysis

The fruit of Annona atemoya Hort (Africa pride) generated in September was used as the test material when the pericarp was between yellow and green, and the scale grooves between scales were expanded. After harvest, the fruits of similar size and color were selected for the experiment, and the different temperatures were set at 15 °C, 28 °C, 32 °C. A total of 15 fruits were deposited at each temperature, and samples were collected after treatment for 0 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 6 days, 8 days and 10 days, respectively. Overall, 3 samples from each treatment were collected and stored at −80 °C after rapid treatment with liquid nitrogen.
Treatment with ethephon and IAA was performed in the following way: The fruit was soaked with 2g/kg (ethephon/water) of ethephon aqueous solution, between 100mg/kg (ethephon/water) IAA [42], and distilled water (control) to remove hormones of the tissue; it was then placed at room temperature. Samples at 0 day, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 days and 5 days, respectively, were taken. A total of 3 samples from each treatment were collected—the sampling part was pulp—and it was quickly treated with liquid nitrogen and store at −80 °C for preparation.
RNA was extracted using the Trizol methods described by Ma et al. [41]. The purity and quantity of extracted RNA were identified by agarose gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Synthesis of cDNA was performed using reverse transcription kit AT311. SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix was used for qRT-PCR analysis in Quant StudioTM 6 Flex System real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR system. Each reaction was performed in biological triplicates and the data from real-time PCR amplification were analyzed using the 2 −ΔΔCT method. Sequences of the primers used in this study re shown in detail in Supplementary Table S4.

4.7. Vector Construction Subcellular Localization Analysis of AaBAM Genes

Primers were designed according to the ORF of AaBAM1.2, AaBAM3, and AaBAM9, as shown in Supplementary Table S4. After cloning and sequencing validation, they were linked to a vector, and then transformed into DH5α after PCR amplification. The clones were screened and the plasmid was extracted to obtain the fusion expression vector of GFP and target gene. The constructed vector plasmid was transferred into Agrobacterium EHA105 by electrotransformation, and cultured at 30 °C for 2 days. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens was cultured in a YEB liquid medium, and the OD600 was adjusted to 0.6. The epidermis of tobacco was injected and cultured under dark/light for 2 days. The tobacco leaves injected with labeled Agrobacterium were taken and made into slides, and observed and photographed with Nikon C2-ER laser confocal microscope.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241310516/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.W. and J.C.; methodology, L.W. and M.J.; software, L.W. and S.G.; validation, L.W. and D.L.; formal analysis, L.W.; investigation, L.W.; resources, L.W. and Z.C.; data curation, L.W. and X.D.; writing—original draft preparation, L.W.; writing—review and editing, L.W. and J.C.; visualization, L.W. and J.C.; supervision, L.W and J.C.; project administration, L.W and J.C.; funding acquisition, J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31901967), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No.2023A1515010190), and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (No.1630062022001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials here.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nag, M.; Lahiri, D.; Garai, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Ray, R.R. Regulation of beta-amylase synthesis: A brief overview. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 6503–6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Manners, D.J. Enzymic Synthesis and Degradation of Starch and Glycogen. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 1963, 17, 371–430. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lombard, V.; Golaconda, R.H.; Drula, E.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D490–D495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Henrissat, B.; Callebaut, I.; Fabrega, S.; Lehn, P.; Mornon, J.P.; Davies, G. Conserved catalytic machinery and the prediction of a common fold for several families of glycosyl hydrolases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 7090–7094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Henrissat, B. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem. J. 1991, 280, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thoma, J.A.; Koshland, D.E., Jr. Three amino acids at the active site of beta amylase. J. Mol. Biol. 1960, 2, 125–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Monroe, J.D.; Breault, J.S.; Pope, L.E.; Torres, C.E.; Gebrejesus, T.B.; Berndsen, C.E.; Storm, A.R. Arabidopsis β-Amylase2 Is a K+-Requiring, Catalytic Tetramer with Sigmoidal Kinetics. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 1525–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fulton, D.C.; Stettler, M.; Mettler, T.; Vaughan, C.K.; Li, J.; Francisco, P.; Gil, M.; Reinhold, H.; Eicke, S.; Messerli, G.; et al. Beta-AMYLASE4, a noncatalytic protein required for starch breakdown, acts upstream of three active beta-amylases in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1040–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Monroe, J.D.; Storm, A.R. Review: The Arabidopsis beta-amylase (BAM) gene family: Diversity of form and function. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miao, H.; Sun, P.; Miao, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Jia, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Jin, Z.; Xu, B. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the β-amylase genes strongly associated with fruit development, ripening, and abiotic stress response in two banana cultivars. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2016, 3, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Scheidig, A.; Frohlich, A.; Schulze, S.; Lloyd, J.R.; Kossmann, J. Downregulation of a chloroplast-targeted beta-amylase leads to a starch-excess phenotype in leaves. Plant J. 2002, 30, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valerio, C.; Costa, A.; Marri, L.; Issakidis-Bourguet, E.; Pupillo, P.; Trost, P.; Sparla, F. Thioredoxin-regulated β-amylase (BAM1) triggers diurnal starch degradation in guard cells, and in mesophyll cells under osmotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Monroe, J.D.; Storm, A.R.; Badley, E.M.; Lehman, M.D.; Platt, S.M.; Saunders, L.K.; Schmitz, J.M.; Torres, C.E. β-Amylase1 and β-Amylase3 Are Plastidic Starch Hydrolases in Arabidopsis that Seem to Be Adapted for Different Thermal, pH, and Stress Conditions. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1748–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Gao, H.; Huang, S.; Dong, T.; Yang, Q.; Yi, G. Analysis of resistant starch degradation in postharvest ripening of two banana cultivars: Focus on starch structure and amylases. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 119, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, A.D.; Wang, W.Q.; Tong, Y.; Li, M.J.; Grierson, D.; Ferguson, I.; Chen, K.S.; Yin, X.R. Transcriptome Analysis Identifies a Zinc Finger Protein Regulating Starch Degradation in Kiwifruit. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 850–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Monroe, J.D. Involvement of five catalytically active Arabidopsis beta-amylases in leaf starch metabolism and plant growth. Plant Direct. 2020, 4, e00199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kaplan, F.; Guy, C.L. RNA interference of Arabidopsis beta-amylase8 prevents maltose accumulation upon cold shock and increases sensitivity of PSII photochemical efficiency to freezing stress. Plant J. 2005, 44, 730–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Flutsch, S.; Wang, Y.; Takemiya, A.; Vialet-Chabrand, S.; Klejchova, M.; Nigro, A.; Hills, A.; Lawson, T.; Blatt, M.R.; Santelia, D. Guard Cell Starch Degradation Yields Glucose for Rapid Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2325–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fabio, Y.; Silva, M.L.H.D.; Azevedo, M.L.D. Effects of packaging and temperature on postharvest of atemoya. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2002, 24, 658–660. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gutiérrez, M.; Del Mar Sola, M.; Pascual, L.; Vargas, A.M. Postharvest Changes of Sugar Concentrations in Chilled-Injured Cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.). J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 143, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rose, J.K.; Cosgrove, D.J.; Albersheim, P.; Darvill, A.G.; Bennett, A.B. Detection of expansin proteins and activity during tomato fruit ontogeny. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Giovannoni, J. Molecular Biology of Fruit Maturation and Ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52, 725–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tan, H.; Xiang, X.; Tang, J.; Wang, X. Nutritional functions of the funiculus in Brassica napus seed maturation revealed by transcriptome and dynamic metabolite profile analyses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 92, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Niittyla, T.; Messerli, G.; Trevisan, M.; Chen, J.; Smith, A.M.; Zeeman, S.C. A previously unknown maltose transporter essential for starch degradation in leaves. Science 2004, 303, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Horrer, D.; Flutsch, S.; Pazmino, D.; Matthews, J.S.; Thalmann, M.; Nigro, A.; Leonhardt, N.; Lawson, T.; Santelia, D. Blue Light Induces a Distinct Starch Degradation Pathway in Guard Cells for Stomatal Opening. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Thalmann, M.; Pazmino, D.; Seung, D.; Horrer, D.; Nigro, A.; Meier, T.; Lling, K.; Pfeifhofer, H.W.; Zeeman, S.C.; Santelia, D. Regulation of Leaf Starch Degradation by Abscisic Acid Is Important for Osmotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, L.; Nelson, C.J.; Trosch, J.; Castleden, I.; Huang, S.; Millar, A.H. Protein Degradation Rate in Arabidopsis thaliana Leaf Growth and Development. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 207–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lao, N.T.; Schoneveld, O.; Mould, R.M.; Hibberd, J.M.; Gray, J.C.; Kavanagh, T.A. An Arabidopsis gene encoding a chloroplast-targeted beta-amylase. Plant J. 1999, 20, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caspar, T.; Lin, T.P.; Monroe, J.; Bernhard, W.; Spilatro, S.; Preiss, J.; Somerville, C. Altered regulation of beta-amylase activity in mutants of Arabidopsis with lesions in starch metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 5830–5833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lin, T.P.; Spilatro, S.R.; Preiss, J. Subcellular localization and characterization of amylases in Arabidopsis leaf. Plant Physiol. 1988, 86, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mita, S.; Suzuki-Fujii, K.; Nakamura, K. Sugar-inducible expression of a gene for beta-amylase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1995, 107, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nascimento, J.; Júnior, A.V.; Bassinello, P.Z.; Cordenunsi, B.R.; Mainardi, J.A.; Purgatto, E.; Lajolo, F.M. Beta-amylase expression and starch degradation during banana ripening. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 40, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Purgatto, E.; Lajolo, F.M.; Nascimento, J.R.O.D.; Cordenunsi, B.R. Inhibition of beta-amylase activity, starch degradation and sucrose formation by indole-3-acetic acid during banana ripening. Planta 2001, 212, 823–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wiberley-Bradford, A.E.; Busse, J.S.; Bethke, P.C. Temperature-dependent regulation of sugar metabolism in wild-type and low-invertase transgenic chipping potatoes during and after cooling for low-temperature storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 115, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hou, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Reid, S.; Liu, T.; Xu, S.; Tian, Z.; Sonnewald, U.; Song, B.; Xie, C. Amylases StAmy23, StBAM1 and StBAM9 regulate cold-induced sweetening of potato tubers in distinct ways. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2317–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Broughton, W.J.; Tan, G. Storage conditions and ripening of the custard apple Annona squamosa L. Sci. Hortic-Amst. 1979, 10, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, T.W.; Wang, Z.Y. Brassinosteroid signal transduction from receptor kinases to transcription factors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 681–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yin, Y.; Vafeados, D.; Tao, Y.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J. A new class of transcription factors mediates brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis. Cell 2005, 120, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xie, T.; Chen, C.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; He, Y. Genome-wide investigation of WRKY gene family in pineapple: Evolution and expression profiles during development and stress. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, J.; He, Y.; Wu, C.; Liu, H.; Hu, Z.; Sun, G. Cloning and Molecular Characterization of a SERK Gene Transcriptionally Induced During Somatic Embryogenesis in Ananas comosus cv. Shenwan. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 30, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wongs-Aree, C.; Noichinda, S. Sugar apple (Annona squamosa L.) and atemoya (A. cherimola Mill. × A. squamosa L.)—ScienceDirect. In Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 399–426. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Unrooted phylogenetic tree representing relationships among BAM amino acids of Arabidopsis, Glycine max, Citrus trifoliata, and Oryza sativa. The different-colored arcs indicate different groups (or subgroups) of BAM genes. I represents the subfamily of Group I; II represents the subfamily of Group II; III represents the subfamily of Group III; IV represents the subfamily of Group IV.
Figure 1. Unrooted phylogenetic tree representing relationships among BAM amino acids of Arabidopsis, Glycine max, Citrus trifoliata, and Oryza sativa. The different-colored arcs indicate different groups (or subgroups) of BAM genes. I represents the subfamily of Group I; II represents the subfamily of Group II; III represents the subfamily of Group III; IV represents the subfamily of Group IV.
Ijms 24 10516 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, gene structure and architecture of conserved protein motifs in AaBAM genes. (A) The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the full-length sequences of Annona atemoya proteins using MEGA 7 software. (B) The motif composition of AaBAM proteins. The motifs, numbers 1–20, are displayed in different-colored boxes. The sequence information for each motif is provided in Supplementary Table S3. (C) Exon–intron structure of AaBAM genes. Yellow boxes indicate CDS; black lines indicate introns; green boxes indicate UTR. The length of protein and genes can be estimated using the scale at the bottom.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, gene structure and architecture of conserved protein motifs in AaBAM genes. (A) The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the full-length sequences of Annona atemoya proteins using MEGA 7 software. (B) The motif composition of AaBAM proteins. The motifs, numbers 1–20, are displayed in different-colored boxes. The sequence information for each motif is provided in Supplementary Table S3. (C) Exon–intron structure of AaBAM genes. Yellow boxes indicate CDS; black lines indicate introns; green boxes indicate UTR. The length of protein and genes can be estimated using the scale at the bottom.
Ijms 24 10516 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of AaBAM genes in chromosome (Chrs).
Figure 3. Distribution of AaBAM genes in chromosome (Chrs).
Ijms 24 10516 g003
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the AaBAM genes. (A) Clustering of expression profiles of AaBAM genes in six samples including different tissues. (B) Expression analysis of 4 AaBAM genes in 2 representative samples by qRT-PCR. The expression value of AaBAM1.1 in young fruit was taken as 1. * p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the AaBAM genes. (A) Clustering of expression profiles of AaBAM genes in six samples including different tissues. (B) Expression analysis of 4 AaBAM genes in 2 representative samples by qRT-PCR. The expression value of AaBAM1.1 in young fruit was taken as 1. * p ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 24 10516 g004
Figure 5. Expression analysis of 6 AaBAM genes at three representative temperature by qRT-PCR. Data were normalized to actin gene and vertical bars indicate standard deviation. The expression value of AaBAM1.1 in 0 day fruits (not treated) was takeen as 1. (A) The expression of AaBAM1.1 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (B) The expression of AaBAM1.2 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (C) The expression of AaBAM3 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (D) The expression of AaBAM7 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (E) The expression of AaBAM9 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (F) The expression of AaBAM8 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C.
Figure 5. Expression analysis of 6 AaBAM genes at three representative temperature by qRT-PCR. Data were normalized to actin gene and vertical bars indicate standard deviation. The expression value of AaBAM1.1 in 0 day fruits (not treated) was takeen as 1. (A) The expression of AaBAM1.1 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (B) The expression of AaBAM1.2 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (C) The expression of AaBAM3 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (D) The expression of AaBAM7 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (E) The expression of AaBAM9 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C. (F) The expression of AaBAM8 under temperature of 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C.
Ijms 24 10516 g005
Figure 6. Expression analysis of 6 AaBAM genes in three representative phytohormone treamentby qRT-PCR. Data were normalized to actin gene and vertical bars indicate standard deviation. The expression value of AaBAM1.1 in 0 h fruits (not treated) was taken as 1. CK, cytokinin; IAA, auxin; ETH, ethylene. (A) The expression of AaBAM1.1 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (B) The expression of AaBAM1.2 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (C) The expression of AaBAM3 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (D) The expression of AaBAM7 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (E) The expression of AaBAM9 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (F) The expression of AaBAM8 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH.
Figure 6. Expression analysis of 6 AaBAM genes in three representative phytohormone treamentby qRT-PCR. Data were normalized to actin gene and vertical bars indicate standard deviation. The expression value of AaBAM1.1 in 0 h fruits (not treated) was taken as 1. CK, cytokinin; IAA, auxin; ETH, ethylene. (A) The expression of AaBAM1.1 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (B) The expression of AaBAM1.2 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (C) The expression of AaBAM3 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (D) The expression of AaBAM7 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (E) The expression of AaBAM9 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH. (F) The expression of AaBAM8 under phytohormone treatment of CK, IAA, ETH.
Ijms 24 10516 g006
Figure 7. Subcellular localization of the full-length 3 AaBAM protein. (A) Fluorescence channel; (B) chloroplast channel; (C) bright channel; (D) merge channel. The constructed vector was transferred into tobacco leaves.
Figure 7. Subcellular localization of the full-length 3 AaBAM protein. (A) Fluorescence channel; (B) chloroplast channel; (C) bright channel; (D) merge channel. The constructed vector was transferred into tobacco leaves.
Ijms 24 10516 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Jing, M.; Gu, S.; Li, D.; Dai, X.; Chen, Z.; Chen, J. Genome-Wide Investigation of BAM Gene Family in Annona atemoya: Evolution and Expression Network Profiles during Fruit Ripening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10516. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310516

AMA Style

Wang L, Jing M, Gu S, Li D, Dai X, Chen Z, Chen J. Genome-Wide Investigation of BAM Gene Family in Annona atemoya: Evolution and Expression Network Profiles during Fruit Ripening. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):10516. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310516

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Luli, Minmin Jing, Shuailei Gu, Dongliang Li, Xiaohong Dai, Zhihui Chen, and Jingjing Chen. 2023. "Genome-Wide Investigation of BAM Gene Family in Annona atemoya: Evolution and Expression Network Profiles during Fruit Ripening" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 10516. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310516

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop