Next Article in Journal
CC Chemokine 2 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Progression through the MEK/ERK/MAP3K19 Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Targeting of the GSK3β-CUGBP1 Pathway in Myotonic Dystrophy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ursolic and Oleanolic Acids: Plant Metabolites with Neuroprotective Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Pharmacological Studies on Neuromodulatory Effects of Plant Extracts

Department of Pharmacy, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10653; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310653
Submission received: 3 May 2023 / Accepted: 20 June 2023 / Published: 26 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacological Study on Neuromodulatory Effects of Plant Extract)
Central nervous system (CNS) disorders represent a public health priority and demand significant scientific efforts for the development and study of new drugs and their possible beneficial effects. It has been estimated that CNS disorders result in death in one of every nine patients; these disorders include ictus, Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Alzheimer’s (AD) disease [1]. There is a large amount of interest in natural compounds as, particularly in CNS disorders. In particular, various studies suggested that natural products can improve mood states, neuroinflammation, and neurodegenerative diseases [2,3]. This Special Issue contains six papers and several reviews which explore the neuroprotective effects of potential new drugs from plant sources. The contributions covered a variety of CNS disorders, exploiting different experimental approaches.
Yokubaitis and collaborators [4] studied the protective effects of beta-caryophyllene (BCP), a sesquiterpene found in Cannabis sativa, black pepper, clove, and rosemary, and of phytocannabinoid cannabidiol (CBP) on a model of permanent cerebral ischemia. In particular, the authors focused their attention on the potential interactive effects between BCP and CBP. The potential neuroprotective effects induced by the combination of CBD and BCP was attributed to their selective binding to cannabinoid receptor (CB)1 and CB2, respectively [5,6,7,8]. This would entail an improvement in therapeutic index and allow the use of lower doses of one or both of the combination constituents. Consistently, a synergistic analgesic effect of a CBD and CBP combination has also been reported by Blanton and collaborators [9]. Although further studies are needed to determine the real benefits of this association, the same authors provided potential mechanisms. The capacity of cannabinoids and terpenes to work synergistically is fascinating and this combination could offer a valid therapeutic approach in neurodegenerative diseases. These results set the stage for future studies that could evaluate the potential effects exerted by the combination of other terpenes and cannabinoids, including cannabigerol (CBG). CBG, a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid, showed beneficial effects on different CNS disorders [6,7,8]. In addition, preclinical studies demonstrated that CBG represents a valid neuroprotective agent [10,11,12].
In this context, various comparative in vitro studies of CBD and CBG were reported [13,14]. However, di Giacomo and collaborators reported that CBG was effective at lower concentrations compared to CBD, particularly for astrocytes and isolated prefrontal cortices from rats exposed to hydrogen peroxide. Using bioinformatic and docking analyses, the same authors hypothesized for the first time a possible involvement of neurokinin B receptor (NK3R) in the neuroprotection induced by CBG [14]. Based on these results, CBG could be a treatment for mood disorders since NK3R represents a possible target in psychiatric diseases, including schizophrenia and affective disorders [15].
Typically, treatment of emotional disorders includes a combination of drugs, as well as psychotherapy and family support. Dietary supplements, including herbal or plant-based extracts, micronutrients, and food-based nutraceuticals are widely used in different neurological diseases, such as mood and cognitive function disorders [16]. An important opportunity in this field is the possibility of combining natural products, as demonstrated by Ano and collaborators. Recently, these authors showed that supplementation with hop bitter acids such as iso-α-acids (IAA) and mature hop bitter acids (MHBA) improved mood in adults [17]. This effect could be related to increased dopaminergic activity in cerebral areas, such as the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus [17]. Furthermore, Kung and Li [18] reviewed the therapeutic role of alpha-eleostearic acid (α-ESA), an isomer of conjugated linolenic acids derived from wild bitter melon (Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser.), and curcumin in CNS diseases. The authors also discussed the potential involvement of glia-mediated neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction along with CDGSH iron-sulfur domain 2 (CISD2) decline and NFκB activation in CNS injuries and diseases. Their review improves our understanding of the CNS pathology–CISD2–NFκB axis and clarify perspectives on the potential role of these natural compounds as therapeutic agents [18].
In another review, Kim explored the neuroprotective effects of sulforaphane (SFN) on cognitive disorders, including AD, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, autism spectrum disorder, and schizophrenia. Kim discussed the anti-AD-like activity of sulforaphane and how it decreased levels of AD biomarkers, such as amyloid-β, tau, inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration in AD-like animal and cell models. In addition, the author focused on potential mechanisms involved in the neuroprotective effects induced by SFN. This review demonstrates that SFN has a multifaceted neuroprotective effect on AD pathophysiology, indicating the need to pursue SFN research [19].
Among natural products, triterpenoid acids also play a crucial role in CNS disorders, through their capacity to modulate several signaling pathways involved in neuro-inflammation and apoptotic processes. In their review, Gudoityte and collaborators focus on ursolic (UA) and oleanolic acids (OA). The neuroprotective activity of UA/OA and their derivatives could be related to stimulation of cellular antioxidant defenses [20]. In summary, all the research articles and reviews in this Special Issue provide new insights to allow us to further investigate the role of novel natural compounds in CNS diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bergen, D.C.; Silberberg, D. Nervous system disorders: A global epidemic. Arch. Neurol. 2002, 59, 1194–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rahman, M.H.; Bajgai, J.; Fadriquela, A.; Sharma, S.; Trinh, T.T.; Akter, R.; Jeong, Y.J.; Goh, S.H.; Kim, C.S.; Lee, K.J. Therapeutic Potential of Natural Products in Treating Neurodegenerative Disorders and Their Future Prospects and Challenges. Molecules 2021, 26, 5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Atanasov, A.G.; Zotchev, S.B.; Dirsch, V.M.; International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce; Supuran, C.T. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 200–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yokubaitis, C.G.; Jessani, H.N.; Li, H.; Amodea, A.K.; Ward, S.J. Effects of Cannabidiol and Beta-Caryophyllene Alone or in Combination in a Mouse Model of Permanent Ischemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gertsch, J.; Leonti, M.; Raduner, S.; Racz, I.; Chen, J.Z.; Xie, X.Q.; Altmann, K.H.; Karsak, M.; Zimmer, A. Beta-caryophyllene is a dietary cannabinoid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9099–9104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Rodríguez-Cueto, C.; Santos-García, I.; García-Toscano, L.; Espejo-Porras, F.; Bellido, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, J.; Muñoz, E.; de Lago, E. Neuroprotective effects of the cannabigerol quinone derivative VCE-003.2 in SOD1(G93A) transgenic mice, an experimental model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 157, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Granja, A.G.; Carrillo-Salinas, F.; Pagani, A.; Gómez-Cañas, M.; Negri, R.; Navarrete, C.; Mecha, M.; Mestre, L.; Fiebich, B.L.; Cantarero, I.; et al. A cannabigerol quinone alleviates neuroinflammation in a chronic model of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012, 7, 1002–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Valdeolivas, S.; Navarrete, C.; Cantarero, I.; Bellido, M.L.; Muñoz, E.; Sagredo, O. Neuroprotective properties of cannabigerol in Huntington’s disease: Studies in R6/2 mice and 3-nitropropionate-lesioned mice. Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Blanton, H.; Yin, L.; Duong, J.; Benamar, K. Cannabidiol and Beta-Caryophyllene in Combination: A Therapeutic Functional Interaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lah, T.T.; Novak, M.; Pena Almidon, M.A.; Marinelli, O.; Žvar Baškovič, B.; Majc, B.; Mlinar, M.; Bošnjak, R.; Breznik, B.; Zomer, R.; et al. Cannabigerol Is a Potential Therapeutic Agent in a Novel Combined Therapy for Glioblastoma. Cells 2021, 10, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stone, N.L.; England, T.J.; O’Sullivan, S.E. Protective Effects of Cannabidivarin and Cannabigerol on Cells of the Blood-Brain Barrier Under Ischemic Conditions. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021, 6, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gugliandolo, A.; Pollastro, F.; Grassi, G.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. In Vitro Model of Neuroinflammation: Efficacy of Cannabigerol, a Non-Psychoactive Cannabinoid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Echeverry, C.; Prunell, G.; Narbondo, C.; de Medina, V.S.; Nadal, X.; Reyes-Parada, M.; Scorza, C. A Comparative In Vitro Study of the Neuroprotective Effect Induced by Cannabidiol, Cannabigerol, and Their Respective Acid Forms: Relevance of the 5-HT1A Receptors. Neurotox. Res. 2021, 39, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Di Giacomo, V.; Chiavaroli, A.; Recinella, L.; Orlando, G.; Cataldi, A.; Rapino, M.; Di Valerio, V.; Ronci, M.; Leone, S.; Brunetti, L.; et al. Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Effects Induced by Cannabidiol and Cannabigerol in Rat CTX-TNA2 Astrocytes and Isolated Cortexes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Smith, P.W.; Dawson, L.A. Neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor modulators for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Recent Pat. CNS Drug Discov. 2008, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Clements, N.D.; Connolly, B.R.; Dicks, M.A.; Mullur, R.S. The Use of Vitamins, Supplements, Herbs, and Essential Oils in Rehabilitation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 31, 685–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ano, Y.; Kitaoka, S.; Ohya, R.; Kondo, K.; Furuyashiki, T. Hop Bitter Acids Increase Hippocampal Dopaminergic Activity in a Mouse Model of Social Defeat Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kung, W.M.; Lin, M.S. Beneficial Impacts of Alpha-Eleostearic Acid from Wild Bitter Melon and Curcumin on Promotion of CDGSH Iron-Sulfur Domain 2: Therapeutic Roles in CNS Injuries and Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kim, J. Pre-Clinical Neuroprotective Evidences and Plausible Mechanisms of Sulforaphane in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gudoityte, E.; Arandarcikaite, O.; Mazeikiene, I.; Bendokas, V.; Liobikas, J. Ursolic and Oleanolic Acids: Plant Metabolites with Neuroprotective Potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brunetti, L. Pharmacological Studies on Neuromodulatory Effects of Plant Extracts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310653

AMA Style

Brunetti L. Pharmacological Studies on Neuromodulatory Effects of Plant Extracts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):10653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310653

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brunetti, Luigi. 2023. "Pharmacological Studies on Neuromodulatory Effects of Plant Extracts" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 10653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310653

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop