Next Article in Journal
Domatinostat Targets the FOXM1–Survivin Axis to Reduce the Viability of Ovarian Cancer Cells Alone and in Combination with Chemotherapeutic Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Electron Scattering from 1-Methyl-5-Nitroimidazole: Cross-Sections for Modeling Electron Transport through Potential Radiosensitizers
Previous Article in Journal
Oxytocin Modulates Osteogenic Commitment in Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
TRAX-CHEMxt: Towards the Homogeneous Chemical Stage of Radiation Damage
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dependence of Induced Biological Damage on the Energy Distribution and Intensity of Clinical Intra-Operative Radiotherapy Electron Beams

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310816
by Rafael Colmenares 1,*, Rebeca Carrión-Marchante 2, M. Elena Martín 2, Laura Salinas Muñoz 3, María Laura García-Bermejo 3, Juan C. Oller 4, Antonio Muñoz 4, Francisco Blanco 5, Jaime Rosado 5, Ana I. Lozano 6, Sofía Álvarez 6, Feliciano García-Vicente 1 and Gustavo García 6,7
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310816
Submission received: 1 June 2023 / Revised: 21 June 2023 / Accepted: 23 June 2023 / Published: 28 June 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has well-designed research methods, appropriate statistical analysis and a relatively good interpretation of the results.

 

The quality of the language in the context of grammar, syntax and spelling is solid, however, when reading the paper I occasionally get a certain impression of confusion.

 

About the Title of the article, I suggest you to modify it and add the type of article.

Please be sure to use only keywords accordingly to medical subject headings (Mesh word) for a better indexing.

The introduction section is very short and is needed to add other references to increase the quality of the manuscript [10.3390/medicina59020410];[10.1111/joor.13472]

 

-I suggest you add a table with the list of abbreviations used in the text.

- The materials and methods section is well structured and in line with the results.

- The Conclusion briefly exposes the main findings of the study, underlying the clinical relevance of this study

Punctuation errors are present, I suggest editing them

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

 

The paper is well-written and the topic is interesting. The authors have put lots of effort into drafting this manuscript. My only concern is regarding the introduction section, which is quite lengthy.

 

The paper could go for publication

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

1.  Radiation field and protection requirements?

2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques?

3. Dose distributions for the first draft of a foils-collimator-applicator system?  

1.  Radiation field and protection requirements?

2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques?

3. Dose distributions for the first draft of a foils-collimator-applicator system?  

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop