Next Article in Journal
Development of a Polygenic Risk Score for BMI to Assess the Genetic Susceptibility to Obesity and Related Diseases in the Korean Population
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens AK-12 Helps Rapeseed Establish a Protection against Brevicoryne brassicae
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Diastolic and Microvascular Function in Heart Transplantation with Donation after Circulatory Death
Previous Article in Special Issue
Entomopathogenic Potential of Bacillus velezensis CE 100 for the Biological Control of Termite Damage in Wooden Architectural Buildings of Korean Cultural Heritage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in the Biosynthesis of Terpenoids and Their Ecological Functions in Plant Resistance

1
Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Crop Germplasm and Genetic Improvement, Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430064, China
2
College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
4
Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(14), 11561; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411561
Submission received: 4 July 2023 / Revised: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 14 July 2023 / Published: 17 July 2023

Abstract

:
Secondary metabolism plays an important role in the adaptation of plants to their environments, particularly by mediating bio-interactions and protecting plants from herbivores, insects, and pathogens. Terpenoids form the largest group of plant secondary metabolites, and their biosynthesis and regulation are extremely complicated. Terpenoids are key players in the interactions and defense reactions between plants, microorganisms, and animals. Terpene compounds are of great significance both to plants themselves and the ecological environment. On the one hand, while protecting plants themselves, they can also have an impact on the environment, thereby affecting the evolution of plant communities and even ecosystems. On the other hand, their economic value is gradually becoming clear in various aspects of human life; their potential is enormous, and they have broad application prospects. Therefore, research on terpenoids is crucial for plants, especially crops. This review paper is mainly focused on the following six aspects: plant terpenes (especially terpene volatiles and plant defense); their ecological functions; their biosynthesis and transport; related synthesis genes and their regulation; terpene homologues; and research and application prospects. We will provide readers with a systematic introduction to terpenoids covering the above aspects.

1. Introduction

Crops are one of the most important energy sources for humans. With the continuous growth of the world’s population, there is an urgent need to improve the output and quality of food through various means to meet societal needs. Insect pests reduce crop production by approximately 10% per year [1]. At present, we mainly rely on chemical pesticides to control pests in grain production; however, the use of a large number of pesticides is bound to have many adverse effects on our lives, including greater pollution, poorer food quality, and increasingly resistant pests.
With advances in science and technology, the introduction of exogenous resistance genes into crops through plant genetic engineering has shown good potential for agricultural pest control [1]. For example, in the most widely used Bt transgenic crops, the Bt protein has the ability to specifically kill target pests. Hence, introducing this gene into crops through plant transgenic technology can provide them with some resistance against pests [2,3,4,5,6]. However, given the increasing prevalence of insect pests resistant to the Bt protein in recent years, other methods need to be developed as candidates for pest control.
Terpenoids are the most abundant secondary metabolites in plants, comprising approximately 25,000 kinds of compounds. Structurally, terpenes are composed of single or multiple five-carbon units which can be divided into sesquiterpenes, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenes, tetraterpenes, and high polyterpenes, according to the number of five-carbon units. Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes are important components of the volatile compounds produced by plants, and they play an important role in the interactions and defense reactions between plants, microorganisms, and animals. Thirty years ago, researchers discovered that plants have unique defense mechanisms against pests. Plants can release volatiles after being eaten by pests, and these volatiles attract the natural enemies of the pests to achieve pest control [7,8]. Following the discovery of this unique defense mode in plants, the “regulation” strategy of using the tritrophic interaction of “crop–pest–natural enemy” to control pests came into being in the process of crop production. According to this concept, pesticides were first used to “kill” pests in a large area; subsequently, small amounts of pesticides were used to “kill” pests in combination with the corresponding “regulation” strategies for controlling pests. In theory, pests will not overcome the indirect defense strategy of attracting natural enemies, and this is a sustainable anti-insect strategy.

2. Plant Defense and Terpene Volatiles

There are millions of insects on earth, most of which feed on plants, and plants in turn have evolved efficient and sophisticated defense mechanisms to reduce the harm caused by herbivorous insects [9,10]. There are four main mechanisms of defense, and these are summarized as follows.
Constitutive defense: Constitutive defense refers to the resistance inherent in plants and it is accompanied by a lifetime of resistance. The advantage of this method is that plants accumulate the corresponding defense substances or form the corresponding defensive morphological structures (such as wax, leaf color, or surface hair) before they are damaged by pests. However, a disadvantage of this defense is that it may waste nutrients and energy that could otherwise be used for growth, development, and reproduction.
Induced defense: Induced defense is a mechanism according to which a defensive response is induced in plants by adverse external factors, such as a pest invasion or mechanical damage, which can minimize the energy and substances consumed in plant defense [11]. Induced defenses can be divided into direct and indirect defenses according to the different chemical substances produced by the plants.
Direct defense: Direct defense refers to the production of chemical substances that impose nutritional restrictions or toxic effects on pests after they have attacked a plant, thereby affecting the feeding, growth, development, or reproduction of herbivorous insects. During the direct defense process, plants produce substances to repel pests, such as (E)-β-farnesene (which affects cotton aphids (Aphis gossypii)), protease inhibitors, and other substances that affect the pests’ digestion and absorption. Toxic compounds such as alkaloids directly kill pests [12,13,14].
Indirect defense: Indirect defense is a supplement to direct defense. In this process, when plants are damaged by herbivorous insects, they emit terpene-based volatile organic compounds to attract the enemies of natural pest [15]. For example, linalool and caryophyllene can attract rice lice wasps (Anagrus nilaparvatae) to prevent damage from brown planthoppers (Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)) [16], and caryophyllene can also attract the parasitic wasp Cotesia sesamiae, the natural enemy of corn borer (Chilo partellus) larvae, to defend against corn borers [17].
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play an important role in plant defense responses. Tens of thousands of VOCs have been identified in plant species, most of which can be divided into three categories: fatty acid derivatives, benzene ring/phenylpropane compounds, and terpenoids [18].

2.1. Fatty Acid Derivatives

Plants produce fatty acid derivatives via the lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway. This pathway uses linoleic or linolenic acid as the starting point through the action of lipoxygenase [18,19]. First, a series of 9-hydroperoxidation or 13-hydroperoxidation intermediates are synthesized; these intermediates are then catalyzed by oxidative decarboxylation to produce 6-carbon or 9-carbon alcohols, aldehydes, and their esters (such as (E)-2-hexenal and (Z)-3-hexenol) [20]. Because of their typical green leaf odor, they are also called green leaf volatiles [21]. Intermediate 13-hydroperoxidation can produce jasmonic acid (JA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA). Green leaf volatiles can be released within minutes of plants being subjected to biotic or abiotic stresses, such as diseases and attacks by insect pests. Fatty acid derivatives may be transmitted to other plants as signals to warn them to take precautions in advance [21,22]. For example, after injury, plants release MeJA into the air and spread it to nearby undamaged plants as a warning of imminent harm [23].

2.2. Benzene Ring/Phenylpropane Compounds

Benzene ring/phenylpropane compounds are mainly synthesized via the shikimic acid pathway [24]. Methyl salicylate is one of the most widely studied VOCs among benzene-ring/phenylpropane compounds. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the involvement of signal transmission in healthy and diseased plants. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) can release methyl salicylate and thereby affect the expression of defense genes in neighboring healthy plants when infected with the tobacco mosaic virus [25]. Many other benzene ring/phenylpropane volatiles are also the main components of flower volatiles, and these compounds may be involved in attracting pollinating insects, such as when snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) plants, which are pollinated by honeybees, emit methyl benzoate during the day when bees are most active, thus attracting bees and encouraging pollination [26].

2.3. Terpenoids

Terpenoids are the most abundant VOCs in plants, and more than 80,000 species have been found to date [27]. They are mainly produced via isoprene-like pathways, and isoprene (C5) is the basic unit of which are composed. There are two main pathways for isoprene synthesis in plants: the methyl erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway located in plastids, which produces monoterpenes (linalool, myrcene, and limonene), diterpenes (geranyl linalool), and their derivatives (TMTT and-ionone), and the mevaleric acid (MVA) pathway, which produces sesquiterpenes (such as (E)-β-farnesene, α-humulene, caryophyllene, and nerolidol) and their derivatives (such as DMNT). Terpenoids are the most diverse functional substances among plant secondary metabolites, and functional studies of terpenoids and their metabolic pathways have become new research hotspots.

3. Ecological Functions of Terpenoids

Terpenoids play an important role in plant photosynthesis by regulating plant growth and development, pollination, and resistance to external biotic or abiotic stresses [28]. For instance, the tetraterpene carotene can absorb and transmit light energy, and some important hormones in plants (abscisic acid, brassinolide, and gibberellin) are terpene derivatives that can affect plant growth and development. The linalool and nerol produced by tea plants under low temperatures can improve the cold tolerance of neighboring plants [29]. Linalool, (S)-limonene, (E)-nerolidol, and terpinene inhibit Xanthomonas oryzae activity [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Limonene and elemene perform antibacterial activities against Magnaporthe grisea, and some terpenoids can attract insects for pollination because of their fragrance [35,36]. Terpenoids can also participate in the induced defense responses of plants. For example, (E)-β-farnesene repels aphids, and caryophyllene and linalool attract rice lice wasps [37,38,39,40] (Figure 1).
In addition, terpenoids affect human life in a number of ways, and they are widely used in food processing, perfumes, medicine, biofuels, and other fields. Many volatile terpenoids are fragrant compounds. Limonene, linalool, and nerolidol have unique fragrances and can be used as food additives and perfumes [41,42]. In recent years, several studies have found that all kinds of terpenoids and their glycoside derivatives play various roles in anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-aggregation, anticoagulant, anti-tumor, sedative, and analgesic activities [43,44]. For example, the diterpenoid taxol has anticancer properties, and the sesquiterpene lactone artemisinin has antimalarial functions [45]. Because of their low hygroscopicity, high energy density, and good fluidity at low temperatures, some terpenes have great potential as renewable biofuels [46]. For example, monoterpenes can be used as biogas analogs, while sesquiterpenes and diterpenes can be used as biodiesels [47] (Figure 1).

4. Biosynthesis of Terpenoids

Although many types of terpenoids exist, they have similar synthetic pathways. The terpenoid biosynthesis pathway is divided into three steps.

4.1. C5 Precursor IPP and DMAPP Formation Phase

The C5 precursor consists of two isomers, IPP and DMAPP, which are mainly synthesized from MVA and MEP. The MVA pathway includes six steps of enzymatic reactions, providing precursors for sesquiterpenes, phytosterols, and triterpenoids such as brassinolide and ubiquinones in the mitochondria. The MEP pathway consists of seven enzymatic steps that mainly act as substrate sources for monoterpenes, diterpenes, carotenoids, and their decomposition products (cytokinins, gibberellins, chlorophyll, tocopherols, and plastids) [48] (Figure 2).

4.2. Direct Precursor Formation Stage

Geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP, C10), farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP, C15), and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP, C20) are the main direct precursors of most terpenoids. GPP is synthesized by the action of GPP synthase (GPS), which is a precursor in monoterpene synthesis [49]. GPS exists in two forms: a homodimer composed of two identical subunits, and a heterodimer composed of a small and a large subunit. FPP is a precursor for the synthesis of sesquiterpenes, triterpenes, and sterols, which are formed by the condensation of one DMAPP molecule and two IPP molecules. GGPP is a precursor of many important substances in plants, including chlorophyll, carotenoids, gibberellins, and tocopherols. It is produced from three IPP molecules and one DMAPP molecule under the action of bovine pyrophosphate synthase (GGPS). Interestingly, GGPS can also act as a large subunit of the GPS heterodimer [49,50].

4.3. Terpene Formation and Modification Stage

There have been many studies on the formation stages of IPP, DMAPP, and their direct precursors, and all terpenoids must undergo these two stages. There are few studies on the third stage, especially on the modification processes of terpenoids, yet this stage is the main factor in the enrichment of terpenoid diversity. Most terpenes are catalyzed by terpene synthase (TPS), which removes the bisphosphate groups of the direct precursors GPP, FPP, and GGPP to form monoterpenes (C10), sesquiterpenes (C15), diterpenes (C20), and polyterpene skeletons. Squalene synthase (SQS/farnesyl diphosphate farnesyltransferase) and phytene synthetase (PSY/geranylgeranyl diphosphate gerany ltransferase) can also directly condense two FPP or GGPP molecules to form the sterol precursor squalene (C30) and the carotenoid precursor octahydrolycopene (C40) [51].
After terpenoid carbon skeleton synthesis, terpenoids can be further modified by redox reactions, methylation, acylation, and glycosylation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) and other modifying enzymes, thus providing terpenoids with various structures, complex chemical properties, and unique functional characteristics [52]. The main function of CYP is to oxidize terpenes. For example, in plants, (E,E)-geranyllinalool and (E)-nerolidol can produce the terpene homologues TMTT and DMNT, respectively, under the action of P450 enzymes encoded by AtCYP82G1, and these two substances produce important anti-insect effects in many plants. The specific metabolic responses of terpenes in plants are shown in Figure 2.

4.4. Transport of Terpenoids

Few studies have been conducted on the transport and emission of terpenoids in plants after their synthesis. In recent years, following in-depth studies of terpenoid metabolic pathways, an increasing number of researchers have begun to study terpenoid transport. They have found that terpenoid transport is related to ABC transporters. For example, in the leaves of Vinca minor, VmABCG1, a member of the superfamily of ABC transporters, is involved in the emission of the nonvolatile monoterpene indole alkaloid vinblastine [53]. In addition, in the hairs of Artemisia annua, sesquiterpene (E)-caryophyllene transport is completed under the action of AaPDR3, a member of the ABC transporter superfamily [54]. Capsidiol emissions from Nicotiana benthamiana are related to NbABCG1 and NbABCG2 [55]. However, the substrate specificity of these transporters and the reversibility of their transport directions are unclear and require further study.

5. Synthetic Genes Related to Terpenoids and Their Transcriptional Regulation

5.1. Terpene Synthase (TPS)

Terpene synthase catalyzes the formation of terpenoids, and the abundance of its species is closely related to the presence of a large number of terpene synthase genes in plants [56]. The TPS gene family is a medium-sized family in plants. Except for the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens, which contains only one functional TPS gene, plant genomes contain approximately 20–152 TPS genes, some of which have lost their functions during evolution [57].
Based on differences in amino acid sequences, the TPS gene family can be divided into seven subfamilies: TPS-a, TPS-b, TPS-c, TPS-d, TPS-e/f, TPS-g, and TPS-h [58,59]. TPS-a, TPS-b, and TPS-d are mainly involved in plant secondary metabolism. TPS-a is divided into TPS-a1 and TPS-a2, which are involved in sesquiterpene synthesis in dicotyledons and monocotyledons, respectively. TPS-b mainly synthesizes monoterpenes in angiosperms, but almost all of the genes in this subfamily come from dicotyledons (except sorghum). The TPS-c and TPS-e branches contain all the enzymes involved in gibberellin biosynthesis in gymnosperms and angiosperms, as well as an unknown functional terpene synthase containing the DDXXD domain found in Moellendorf’s spikemoss. The TPS-f branches are primarily involved in monoterpene synthesis in dicotyledons. Because the TPS-e branch is believed to be derived from the TPS-f subfamily, they are collectively referred to as the TPS-e/f subfamily. The TPS-g subfamily is closely related to the TPS-b subfamily and participates in the synthesis of acyclic monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes, while the TPS-h subfamily exists only in gymnosperms and has not been found to synthesize bifunctional diterpenes in angiosperms [57,60].
Based on their structures and catalytic mechanisms, terpene synthases can be divided into two categories (Class I and Class II). Class I consists of ionization-dependent terpene synthases, and the loss of pyrophosphate groups on the substrate depends on the synergism of metal ions such as Mg2+ and Mn2+. Most monoterpene, sesquiterpene, and diterpene synthases belong to Class I. There are two main conserved domains in the Class I structure: one is the aspartic acid residue-rich domain DDxxD, located at the C-terminus, and the other is the (L, V) (V, L, A) − (N, D) D(L, I, V) × (S, T) xxxE domain, which is known as the NSE/DTE domain. The primary role of these two conserved domains is to coordinate the binding of metal ions and substrate phosphate groups to promote the formation of carbon-positive ion intermediates. Due to the random rearrangement of bonds after the formation of carbon-positive ion intermediates, this type of terpene synthase reacts with a single substrate to produce a variety of products [56]. Class II enzymes are proton-dependent terpene synthases. The substrate produces carbocation intermediates through protonation and catalyzes skeleton rearrangement, which mainly involves diterpene synthase and triterpene synthase [27,61]. A DxDD-conserved domain exists in the Class II structure. The DDxxD domain is ubiquitous in terpene synthases, but some copalyl diphosphates have only the DxxD domain and the natural DDxxD variation sequence NDxxD [62]. Interestingly, a few terpene synthases have both the DDxxD and DxxD domains.
In general, terpene synthase has the following characteristics: (1) It reacts with the same substrate to produce different products, such as OsTPS31 (LOC_Os08g07100), which can react with FPP to produce 14 sesquiterpenes, mainly gingerene and β-sesquiphellandrene [63]. (2) It has the characteristics of a multi-functional enzyme; that is, it can catalyze different substrates (GPP, FPP, and GGPP) to produce different terpenoids, such as OsTPS3 in rice, PlTPS3 in lima beans, and CsLIS/NES in tea plants, all of which have the bifunctional enzyme linalool/nerolidol [63,64,65]. There are even linalool/nerolidol/geranyllinalool synthases in some plants, such as ZmTPS2 in corn, and PlTPS2 and PlTPS4 in lima beans [64,66,67]. (3) The expression of terpene synthase is specific to different tissues and times and can be further induced by biotic or abiotic stresses. For example, some terpene synthase genes are expressed only in specific plant tissues during a specific growth period or are induced after stress [68,69].

5.2. Transcriptional Regulation of Terpenoids

Terpenoids play vital roles in plants and are mostly secondary metabolites. These terpenoids have no effect on the growth and development of plants, and their functions are mainly reflected in their ability to protect against various biological and abiotic stresses. Plants are not always in a state of stress; therefore, the synthesis of too many secondary terpenoids may cause waste or even harm to the plant. The synthesis of chemicals in plants involves an investment of energy and resources. If the synthesis of a substance benefits the plant, the plant may maintain the ability; however, if the benefit is not worth the energy cost, the synthesis of a substance will be gradually eliminated [70]. Therefore, during plant evolution, a series of fine regulatory processes have developed around the biosynthesis and metabolism of specific terpenoids that enable the inducement of their synthesis in specific tissues or developmental periods, as well as under various biotic and abiotic stresses. In this way, while plants are kept resistant to external adverse environmental stresses, energy consumption is also reduced, resulting in a “win-win” situation. This process is mainly regulated by transcription factors at the gene transcriptional level.
Transcription factors are DNA-binding proteins that recognize and bind to specific cis-elements in target gene promoters [71]. Transcription factors can be divided into different families based on differences in their DNA-binding domains. There are at least 64 transcription factor families in the vascular plant genome [72]. Previous studies have shown that transcription factor families such as WRKY, MYB, bHLH, AP2/ERF, NAC, bZIP, SPL, and YABBY are involved in the metabolic pathways of specific terpenoids in plants (Table 1).
The WRKY transcription factor is involved in the synthesis of triterpene in cotton, sesquiterpene artemisinin in Artemisia annua, diterpene antitoxin in rice, taxol in Taxus chinensis, tanshinone in Salvia miltiorrhiza, and the triterpenoid compound ginsenoside in North American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) by binding to the W-box element [75,80,84,87,89,90,94]. MYB transcription factors promote or inhibit terpenoid synthesis. For example, in spearmint (Mentha spicata), MsMYB reduces the downstream terpene content by inhibiting the expression of geranyl diphosphate synthase, whereas in Salvia miltiorrhiza, SmMYB36 promotes tanshinone biosynthesis [82,91]. BHLH transcription factors regulate monoterpene, sesquiterpene, and triterpene derivatives. For example, in butterfly orchids (Phalaenopsis), bHLH4 and bHLH6 promote the accumulation of monoterpenes and enhance their aroma [88]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, MYC2 (bHLH) can promote the production of sesquiterpene (E)-β-caryophyllene, and the TSAR1/2 (bHLH) transcription factor in alfalfa (Medicago truncatula) can regulate the synthesis of triterpenoid saponins [74,81]. The AP2/ERF transcription factors are involved in the biosynthesis of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpene derivatives. For example, the CitERF71 in citrus plants regulates geraniol production by controlling the expression of CitTPS16. The AaERF1 and AaERF2 in Artemisia annua and the ZmEREB58 in maize regulate sesquiterpene synthesis, whereas the SmERF128 in Salvia miltiorrhiza regulates tanshinone synthesis [76,79,92,95]. Few studies have examined the regulation of terpenoids by NAC transcription factors, which may be involved in the synthesis of monoterpenes and carotenoids [73,93]. bZIP transcription factors involved in the synthesis of diterpene derivatives and artemisinin, such as rice OsTGAP1, promote plant protegrin synthesis [85]. The inhibition of the rice OsTGAP1 interaction protein OsbZIP79 inhibits its synthesis, and the bZIP1 in Artemisia annua can bind to the ABRE element (ABA-responsive element) on the ADS and CYP71AV1 gene promoters to promote artemisinin synthesis [77,86]. SPL transcription factors regulate the biosynthesis of sesquiterpenes and artemisinin. For example, the AaSPL2 in Artemisia annua promotes artemisinin accumulation [78]. The YABBY transcription factor MsYABBY5 can regulate the production of monoterpenes in spearmint [83].
To date, few studies have been conducted on the transcriptional regulation of terpenoid metabolic pathways, and those that have been carried out have mainly focused on only a few terpenoids. A further understanding of the regulation of terpenoids is needed to provide a strong guarantee for increasing the yields of target terpenoids in plants [96].

6. Progress of Terpene Homologue Research

6.1. Discovery and Ecological Function of Terpene Homologues DMNT and TMTT

These two substances were first identified as new chemicals when they were isolated from the essential oil of cardamom (Eletteria cardamomum) [97] which, because of its flavor-enhancing properties, it is used as an additive in perfumes and food.
The ecological functions of DMNT and TMTT were first discovered in 1990. Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) plants can emit DMNT and TMTT after being attacked by mites and can strongly attract the natural enemies of female phytoseiid mites (Phytoseiulus persimilis), which are from Chile [7]. DMNT and TMTT were also detected in maize seedling metabolites in the same year; they can effectively lure female Cotesia marginiventris parasitoids to their natural prey, the pest Parasa consocia (Latoia consocia) [7]. Consequently, researchers have conducted a series of ecological studies on these two substances.

6.1.1. Attracting Pollination Insects

Terpene homologues are also found in the aromatic components released by some plants, and they can help plants to attract pollinating insects [98]. For example, the TMTT released by African orchids (Aeranis friesiorum) can attract moths for pollination [99]. Among the flower aroma components of some yucca (Yucca smalliana) varieties, DMNT is the most abundant substance, and it plays a role in attracting moths for pollination [100,101]. DMNT and TMTT play important roles in attracting insect pollinators; however, the attraction mechanism remains unclear.

6.1.2. Attracting the Natural Enemies of Insects

Since the discovery of terpene homologues, a large number of studies have found that the release of DMNT and TMTT from most plants is very low under normal conditions, and that their release increases significantly only when such an increase is induced by biotic or abiotic stress (especially by pests). DMNT and TMTT can attract the natural enemies of insect pests and thereby reduce the damage caused by these pests. For instance, cotton (Gossypium spp.), when attacked by chewing caterpillars or sucking worms, can release DMNT and TMTT and strongly attract natural enemies such as female parasitoids [102]. Terpene homologues commonly attract the natural enemies of insect pests in higher plants. In some cases, this may be due to the combined action of many substances (Figure 2).

6.1.3. Pest Avoidance

Terpene homologues tend to keep away some pests. For example, cotton treated with JA can induce the production of TMTT and have a repellent effect on the cotton aphid [103].

6.1.4. Inducing Defense Responses in Neighboring Plants

Terpene homologues can also induce defense responses in adjacent healthy plants. This phenomenon was first reported in lima bean plants. Feeding Tetranychus urticae with lima bean plants induced not only the production of terpene homologues, but also the expression of resistance genes such as PR-2 and lipoxygenase LOX in uninjured neighboring plants, improving their resistance to Tetranychus urticae [104,105]. A similar phenomenon was observed in tea plants. When pests feed on tea plants, DMNT can induce the upregulation of the LOX1 and LOX3 genes in healthy adjacent tea plants, thus increasing their JA content and improving their resistance to pests [106]. However, the specific mechanism by which volatiles induce resistance in neighboring plants remains unclear.
Many studies have been conducted on the use of DMNT and TMTT to attract the natural enemies of insect pests, but there is an urgent need to strengthen the research on the relationship between DMNT and pollinating insects, adjacent plants, and corresponding pests to further explore the ecological functions of DMNT and TMTT.

6.2. Biosynthesis of DMNT and TMTT

Since the discovery of DMNT and TMTT, scientists have explored their metabolic pathways in plants. Isotope signals were detected in DMNT and TMTT when deuterium-labeled nerolidol and geranyl linalool were added to lima bean leaves, indicating that the biosynthesis of DMNT and TMTT may be triggered by the oxidative degradation of nerolidol and geranyllinalool [107,108]. Subsequent studies have found that the synthesis of DMNT and TMTT in plant leaves is divided into two steps: first, the formation of the tertiary alcohol precursors nerolidol and geranyllinalool under the action of terpenoid synthase, and second, the oxidation of the nerolidol and geranyllinalool CYP genes to produce DMNT and TMTT [109] (Figure 2). Specifically, the ethylene groups on geranyllinalool and nerolidol are epoxidized to remove C2 and form the intermediate geranyl acetone (C13) or farnesyl acetone, which is then deacetylated to form DMNT (C11) or TMTT (C16).
For a long time after it was discovered in 1989 that the precursors of the terpene homologues DMNT and TMTT were nerol and geranyl linalool, many researchers explored the conversion of nerol and geranyllinalool into terpene homologues in plants. TMTT was detected in Arabidopsis thaliana after JA treatment. After Arabidopsis thaliana was treated with alamethicin (ALA, an elicitor), AtCYP82G1 expression was upregulated and co-expressed with the geranyllinalool synthase GES gene [109]. The protein expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can react with nerolidol and geranyllinalool to form DMNT and TMTT, and it can compensate for the phenotype in which the mutant version of the gene cannot produce TMTT. It is therefore considered the key enzyme for the synthesis of terpene homologues. This gene belongs to the CYP82 family and exists only in the dicotyledons. DMNT and TMTT are synthesized by co-eliminating the polar head of the substrate and the C5 hydrogen atom of the allyl group. The encoded enzyme has low substrate specificity and can use nerol or geranyllinalool as a substrate. It can also use the (E)-nerolidol 3s isomer as a substrate, but it cannot use linalool, (Z)-nerolidol, (E,E,E)-geranyllinalool, (E,E)-farnesol, (E)-geranyl alcohol, or fully saturated analogs of the two substrates [109]. The oxidative cracking of (E)-nerolidol and (E,E)-geranyllinalool depends on the elimination of β-carbon atoms [58].

7. Research and Application Prospects

At present, chemical pesticides are mainly used to control pests in agricultural production. However, their extensive use results in a series of negative effects, such as environmental destruction, poorer crop quality, and pesticide residues. They also cause pests to develop resistance to pesticides, reducing their effectiveness over time. Terpenoids exist widely in all kinds of plants, and when plants are damaged, the released of these terpenoids can be induced, thereby attracting the natural enemies of pests to achieve indirect defense. The natural enemies of pests will evolve with the evolution of the pests themselves; therefore, in theory, the indirect defense strategy by which the natural enemies of pests are attracted cannot be overcome by pests and should persist over time. In recent years, this feature has also been used in the “push–pull” pest control strategy, which aims to make use of the sensory systems of insects, such as their senses of smell, vision, and taste, along with a series of behaviors such as feeding, courtship, and avoidance, to avoid or trap pests through corresponding plant resources, artificial simulation materials, or chemical synthetic substances [110,111]. This strategy has been used both domestically and internationally. Small-scale farmers in sub-Saharan Africa have adopted this strategy to manage pests. For example, the intercropping of cattle forage grass and corn provides the power of a “push” to expel corn borer-stemmed Noctuidae (Helotrophaleu costigma) and maize stem borers (Chilo partellus) from the corn fields [112]. (E)-β-farnesene (EβF) has also been applied to rice in China. It was found that EβF could control the population growth of rice pests by attracting their natural enemies, such as ladybugs [37]. By causing a reaction between a pseudo-substrate resembling the natural substrate and geraniene D synthase, a target product with a similar structure and similar properties, but with a more efficient biological function, can be produced [113]. Modifications of nerolidol and geranyllinalool are underway [114]. For example, researchers have begun replacing their methyl groups R′, R″ and R‴, or forming cyclization between their C6 and C11 or C15 positions, resulting in pseudo-substrates with similar structures. The natural cytochrome monooxygenase P450 in plants can react with pseudo-substrates to produce stable functional analogs of DMNT and TMTT, and these can be used in the field. In contrast, transgenic technology can also be used to improve crops so that they can release more resistance-related terpenoids and “pull” the natural enemies of pests, such as the natural enemy of the striped stemborer (Chilo suppressalis, Cotesia chilonis). Many studies have proven the feasibility of this strategy. For example, transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana can produce large amounts of nerol and DMNT and attract more predatory mites by transferring nerol synthase from strawberries into the mitochondria of Arabidopsis [115]. DMNT and TMTT transgenic rice plants are significantly more attractive to C. chilonis female wasps than wild type ZH11 plants [116]. To avoid energy waste in genetically modified crops, growers can consider using pest-feeding inducible promoters to drive these genes, making this strategy more efficient and feasible. Therefore, the use of terpene plant volatiles to encourage crop–pest–natural enemy tritrophic interactions in the field is an effective and sustainable method of pest control.
Many studies have shown that when pests damage plants, the expression of the terpene synthase genes in these plants will sharply increase [64,66,102,109], though so far there is very little research on the ways in which plants can induce the synthesis of terpene synthase. It is possible to excavate the relevant regulatory transcription factors to improve the synthesis regulatory networks of terpene homologues, thereby regulating the release of terpene homologues by controlling the expression levels of these upstream transcription factors, and thereby improving the ability of plants to resist pests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Y. and C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L., W.Z., W.L. and J.W.; writing—review and editing, A.Y. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31701399), the Science and Technology Major Program of Hubei Province (Grant Nos. 2022ABA001 and 2021ABA011), and the Wuhan Science and Technology Major Project for Biological Breeding (Grant No. 2022021302024850).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, H.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Q. Review and prospect of transgenic rice research. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 4049–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Ling, F.; You, A. Application and Development of Bt Insect Resistance Genes in Rice Breeding. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, W.; Chen, H.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Q. Development of insect-resistant transgenic indica rice with a synthetic cry1C* gene. Mol. Breed. 2006, 18, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ye, R.; Huang, H.; Yang, Z.; Chen, T.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y. Development of insect-resistant transgenic rice with Cry1C*-free endosperm. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 1015–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, Z.; Chen, H.; Tang, W.; Hua, H.; Lin, Y. Development and characterisation of transgenic rice expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis genes. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ling, F.; Zhou, F.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y. Development of marker-free insect-resistant indica rice by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated co-transformation. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, G.; Jing, S.; Song, X.; Zhu, L.; Zheng, F.; Sun, B. Reconstitution of the Flavor Signature of Laobaigan-Type Baijiu Based on the Natural Concentrations of Its Odor-Active Compounds and Nonvolatile Organic Acids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Turlings, T.C.J.; Tumlinson, J.H.; Lewis, W.J. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 1990, 250, 1251–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Baldwin, I.T.; Preston, C.A. The eco-physiological complexity of plant responses to insect herbivores. Planta 1990, 208, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sabelis, M.W.; Janssen, A.; Kant, M.R. The enemy of my enemy is my ally. Science 2001, 291, 2104–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, M.S. Inducible direct plant defense against insect herbivores: A review. Insect Sci. 2008, 15, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Ge, F. Effect of synthetic aphid alarm pheromone (E)-β-farnesene on development and reproduction of Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99, 1636–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Felton, G.W. Indigestion is a plant’s best defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18771–18772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bermúdez-Torres, K.; Herrera, J.M.; Brito, R.F.; Wink, M.; Legal, L. Activity of quinolizidine alkaloids from three Mexican Lupinus against the lepidopteran crop pest Spodoptera frugiperda. BioControl 2009, 54, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McCormick, A.C.; Unsicker, S.B.; Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lou, Y.; Hua, X.; Turlings, T.C.; Cheng, J.; Chen, X.; Ye, G. Differences in induced volatile emissions among rice varieties result in differential attraction and parasitism of Nilaparvata lugens eggs by the parasitoid Anagrus nilaparvatae in the field. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tamiru, A.; Bruce, T.J.A.; Richter, A.; Woodcock, C.M.; Midega, C.A.O.; Degenhardt, J.; Kelemu, S.; Pickett, J.A.; Khan, Z.R. A maize landrace that emits defense volatiles in response to herbivore eggs possesses a strongly inducible terpene synthase gene. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 2835–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McMullen, M.D.; Kresovich, S.; Villeda, H.S.; Bradbury, P.; Li, H.; Sun, Q.; Flint-Garcia, S.; Thornsberry, J.; Acharya, C.; Bottoms, C.; et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 2009, 325, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nagegowda, D.; Gupta, P. Advances in biosynthesis, regulation, and metabolic engineering of plant specialized terpenoids. Plant Sci. 2020, 294, 110457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feussner, I.; Wasternack, C. The lipoxygenase pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 53, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Engelberth, J. Green Leaf Volatiles: Airborne Signals That Protect against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2020, 11, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pierik, R.; Ballaré, C.; Dicke, M. Ecology of plant volatiles: Taking a plant community perspective. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1845–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tzin, V.; Galili, G. New Insights into the Shikimate and Aromatic Amino Acids Biosynthesis Pathways in Plants. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 956–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shulaev, V.; Silverman, P.; Raskin, I. Airborne signalling by methyl salicylate in plant pathogen resistance. Nature 1997, 385, 718–721, Correction at Nature 1997, 385, 718–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kolosova, N.; Gorenstein, N.; Kish, C.M.; Dudareva, N. Regulation of circadian methyl benzoate emission in diurnally and nocturnally emitting plants. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2333–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Christianson, D.W. Structural and Chemical Biology of Terpenoid Cyclases. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11570–11648, Correction at Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Loreto, F.; Dicke, M.; Schnitzler, J.; Turlings, T. Plant volatiles and the environment. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1905–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Jin, J.; Zhang, N.; Lei, L.; Gao, T.; Jing, T.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Y.; et al. Induction of priming by cold stress via inducible volatile cues in neighboring tea plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 1461–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Taniguchi, S.; Hosokawa-Shinonaga, Y.; Tamaoki, D.; Yamada, S.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Jasmonate induction of the monoterpene linalool confers resistance to rice bacterial blight and its biosynthesis is regulated by JAZ protein in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Jiang, Q.; Shi, Q. Revealing the mechanisms for linalool antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum and its efficient control of Fusarium Wilt in tomato plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, G.W.; Chung, M.-S.; Kang, M.; Chung, B.Y.; Lee, S. Direct suppression of a rice bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) by monoterpene (S)-limonene. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kiryu, M.; Hamanaka, M.; Yoshitomi, K.; Mochizuki, S.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Rice terpene synthase 18 (OsTPS18) encodes a sesquiterpene synthase that produces an antibacterial (E)-nerolidol against a bacterial pathogen of rice. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2018, 84, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yoshitomi, K.; Taniguchi, S.; Tanaka, K.; Uji, Y.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Rice terpene synthase 24 (OsTPS24) encodes a jasmonate-responsive monoterpene synthase that produces an antibacterial γ-terpinene against rice pathogen. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 191, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, X.; Chen, H.; Yuan, J.S.; Köllner, T.G.; Chen, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Fu, J.; et al. The rice terpene synthase gene OsTPS19 functions as an (S)-limonene synthase in planta, and its overexpression leads to enhanced resistance to the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1778–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Taniguchi, S.; Miyoshi, S.; Tamaoki, D.; Yamada, S.; Tanaka, K.; Uji, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Isolation of jasmonate-induced sesquiterpene synthase of rice: Product of which has an antifungal activity against Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gao, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, F.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y. Expression of a Peppermint (E)-β-Farnesene Synthase Gene in Rice Has Significant Repelling Effect on Bird Cherry-Oat Aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1967–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, B.; Tao, S.-M.; Dai, H.-Y.; Xu, X.-T.; Sun, Y.-X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.-J. The main component of the aphid alarm pheromone (E)-β-farnesene affects the growth and development of Spodoptera exigua by mediating juvenile hormone-related genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 863626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, X.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Cao, J.; Cui, M.; Ban, L. (E)-β-farnesene synthase gene affects aphid behavior in transgenic Medicago sativa. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aartsma, Y.; Pappagallo, S.; Van Der Werf, W.; Dicke, M.; Bianchi, F.J.J.A.; Poelman, E.H. Spatial scale, neighbouring plants and variation in plant volatiles interactively determine the strength of host-parasitoid relationships. Oikos 2020, 129, 1429–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hausch, B.J.; Lorjaroenphon, Y.; Cadwallader, K.R. Flavor chemistry of lemon-lime carbonated beverages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Pragadheesh, V.S.; Chanotiya, C.S.; Rastogi, S.; Shasany, A.K. Scent from Jasminum grandiflorum flowers: Investigation of the change in linalool enantiomers at various developmental stages using chemical and molecular methods. Hytochemistry 2017, 140, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kokkiripati, P.K.; Bhakshu, L.M.; Marri, S.; Padmasree, K.; Row, A.T.; Raghavendra, A.S.; Tetali, S.D. Gum resin of Boswellia serrata inhibited human monocytic (THP-1) cell activation and platelet aggregation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, D.-D.; Jiang, L.-L.; Li, H.-Y.; Yan, P.-F.; Zhang, Y.-L. Chemical Components and Pharmacological Activities of Terpene Natural Products from the Genus Paeonia. Molecules 2016, 21, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, G.; Tang, W.; Bidigare, R.R. Terpenoids as therapeutic drugs and pharmaceutical agents. In Natural Products; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 197–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Phulara, S.; Chaturvedi, P.; Gupta, P. Isoprenoid-Based Biofuels: Homologous Expression and Heterologous Expression in Prokaryotes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 5730–5740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, J. Recent advances in the biosynthesis of isoprenoids in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 114, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tholl, D. Biosynthesis and biological functions of terpenoids in plants. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biot. 2015, 148, 63–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nagegowda, D.A. Plant volatile terpenoid metabolism: Biosynthetic genes, transcriptional regulation and subcellular compartmentation. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 2965–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Rai, A.; Smita, S.S.; Singh, A.K.; Shanker, K.; Nagegowda, D.A. Heteromeric and Homomeric Geranyl Diphosphate Synthases from Catharanthus roseus and Their Role in Monoterpene Indole Alkaloid Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1531–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Vranová, E.; Coman, D.; Gruissem, W. Network Analysis of the MVA and MEP Pathways for Isoprenoid Synthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 665–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Boutanaev, A.M.; Moses, T.; Zi, J.; Nelson, D.R.; Mugford, S.T.; Peters, R.J.; Osbourn, A. Investigation of terpene diversification across multiple sequenced plant genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 122, E81–E88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Demissie, Z.; Woolfson, K.; Fang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Vincenzo, D. The ATP binding cassette transporter, VmTPT2/VmABCG1, is involved in export of the monoterpenoid indole alkaloid, vincamine in Vinca minor leaves. Phytochemistry 2019, 140, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fu, X.; Shi, P.; He, Q.; Shen, Q.; Tang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Ma, Y.; Yan, T.; Chen, M.; Hao, X.; et al. AaPDR3, a PDR Transporter 3, Is Involved in Sesquiterpene beta-Caryophyllene Transport in Artemisia annua. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shibata, Y.; Ojika, M.; Sugiyama, A.; Yazaki, K.; Jones, D.A.; Kawakita, K.; Takemoto, D. The Full-Size ABCG Transporters Nb-ABCG1 and Nb-ABCG2 Function in Pre- and Postinvasion Defense against Phytophthora infestans in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 1163–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Degenhardt, J.; Köllner, T.G.; Gershenzon, J. Monoterpene and sesquiterpene synthases and the origin of terpene skeletal diversity in plants. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1621–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, F.; Tholl, D.; Bohlmann, J.; Pichersky, E. The family of terpene synthases in plants: A mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J. 2011, 66, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bohlmann, J.; Meyer-Gauen, G.; Croteau, R. Plant terpenoid synthases: Molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 4126–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xiong, W.; Wu, P.; Jia, Y.; Wei, X.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Jiang, H.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of the terpene synthase gene family in physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.) and functional identification of six terpene synthases. Tree Genet. Genomes 2016, 12, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alicandri, E.; Paolacci, A.R.; Osadolor, S.; Sorgonà, A.; Badiani, M.; Ciaffi, M. On the Evolution and Functional Diversity of Terpene Synthases in the Pinus Species: A Review. J. Mol. Evol. 2020, 88, 253–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Christianson, D. Structural biology and chemistry of the terpenoid cyclases. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3412–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Prosser, I.; Altug, I.G.; Phillips, A.L.; König, W.A.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; Beale, M.H. Enantiospecific (+)- and (−)-germacrene D synthases, cloned from goldenrod, reveal a functionally active variant of the universal isoprenoid-biosynthesis aspartate-rich motif. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 432, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yuan, J.S.; Köllner, T.G.; Wiggins, G.; Grant, J.; Degenhardt, J.; Chen, F. Molecular and genomic basis of volatile-mediated indirect defense against insects in rice. Plant J. 2008, 55, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, F.; Li, W.; Lin, Y.-J.; Pickett, J.A.; Birkett, M.A.; Wu, K.; Wang, G.; Zhou, J.-J. Expression of lima bean terpene synthases in rice enhances recruitment of a beneficial enemy of a major rice pest. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Liu, G.-F.; Liu, J.-J.; He, Z.-R.; Wang, F.-M.; Yang, H.; Yan, Y.-F.; Gao, M.-J.; Gruber, M.Y.; Wan, X.-C.; Wei, S. Implementation of CsLIS/NES in linalool biosynthesis involves transcript splicing regulation in Camellia sinensis. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Richter, A.; Schaff, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lipka, A.E.; Tian, F.; Köllner, T.G.; Schnee, C.; Preiß, S.; Irmisch, S.; Jander, G.; et al. Characterization of Biosynthetic Pathways for the Production of the Volatile Homoterpenes DMNT and TMTT in Zea mays. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 2651–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Brillada, C.; Nishihara, M.; Shimoda, T.; Garms, S.; Boland, W.; Maffei, M.E.; Arimura, G. Metabolic engineering of the C16 homoterpene TMTT in Lotus japonicus through overexpression of (E,E)-geranyllinalool synthase attracts generalist and specialist predators in different manners. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 1200–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Guitton, Y.; Nicolè, F.; Moja, S.; Valot, N.; Legrand, S.; Jullien, F.; Legendre, L. Differential accumulation of volatile terpene and terpene synthase mRNAs during lavender (Lavandula angustifolia and L. x intermedia) inflorescence development. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 138, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Irmisch, S.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, F.; Gershenzon, J.; Köllner, T.G. Terpene synthases and their contribution to herbivore-induced volatile emission in western balsam poplar (Populus trichocarpa). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Macías, F.A.; Molinillo, J.M.G.; Varela, R.M.; Galindo, J.C.G. Allelopathy—A natural alternative for weed control. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wray, G.A.; Hahn, M.W.; Abouheif, E.; Balhoff, J.P.; Pizer, M.; Rockman, M.V.; Romano, L.A. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20, 1377–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rushton, P.J.; Bokowiec, M.T.; Han, S.; Zhang, H.; Brannock, J.F.; Chen, X.; Laudeman, T.W.; Timko, M.P. Tobacco Transcription Factors: Novel Insights into Transcriptional Regulation in the Solanaceae. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Chen, X.; Wang, M.Y.; Matich, A.J.; Perez, R.L.; Allan, A.C.; Green, S.A.; Atkinson, R.G. Natural variation in monoterpene synthesis in kiwifruit: Transcriptional regulation of terpene synthases by NAC and ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3-like transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1243–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hong, G.-J.; Xue, X.-Y.; Mao, Y.-B.; Wang, L.-J.; Chen, X.-Y. Arabidopsis MYC2 interacts with DELLA proteins in regulating sesquiterpene synthase gene expression. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2635–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Chen, M.; Yan, T.; Shen, Q.; Lu, X.; Pan, Q.; Huang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Fu, X.; Liu, M.; Jiang, W.; et al. Glandular trichome-specific WRKY 1 promotes artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yu, Z.-X.; Li, J.-X.; Yang, C.-Q.; Hu, W.-L.; Wang, L.-J.; Chen, X.-Y. The jasmonate-responsive AP2/ERF transcription factors AaERF1 and AaERF2 positively regulate artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Zhang, F.; Fu, X.; Lv, Z.; Lu, X.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, M.; Wang, G.; Sun, X.; Liao, Z.; et al. A basic leucine zipper transcription factor, AabZIP1, connects abscisic acid signaling with artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Lv, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Peng, B.; Zhang, L.; Tang, K.; Chen, W. The SPB-Box Transcription Factor AaSPL2 Positively Regulates Artemisinin Biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Li, X.; Xu, Y.; Shen, S.; Yin, X.; Klee, H.; Zhang, B.; Chen, K. Transcription factor CitERF71 activates the terpene synthase gene CitTPS16 involved in the synthesis of E-geraniol in sweet orange fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4929–4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Xu, Y.-H.; Wang, J.-W.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.-Y.; Chen, X.-Y. Characterization of GaWRKY1, a cotton transcription factor that regulates the sesquiterpene synthase gene (+)-δ-cadinene synthase-A. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Mertens, J.; Pollier, J.; Bossche, R.V.; Lopez-Vidriero, I.; Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Goossens, A. The bHLH Transcription Factors TSAR1 and TSAR2 Regulate Triterpene Saponin Biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 194–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Reddy, V.A.; Wang, Q.; Dhar, N.; Kumar, N.; Venkatesh, P.N.; Rajan, C.; Panicker, D.; Sridhar, V.; Mao, H.-Z.; Sarojam, R. Spearmint R2R3-MYB transcription factor MsMYB negatively regulates monoterpene production and suppresses the expression of geranyl diphosphate synthase large subunit (MsGPPS.LSU). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1105–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Wang, Q.; Reddy, V.A.; Panicker, D.; Mao, H.-Z.; Kumar, N.; Rajan, C.; Venkatesh, P.N.; Chua, N.-H.; Sarojam, R. Metabolic engineering of terpene biosynthesis in plants using a trichome-specific transcription factor MsYABBY5 from spearmint (Mentha spicata). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 1619–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Akagi, A.; Fukushima, S.; Okada, K.; Jiang, C.-J.; Yoshida, R.; Nakayama, A.; Shimono, M.; Sugano, S.; Yamane, H.; Takatsuji, H. WRKY45-dependent priming of diterpenoid phytoalexin biosynthesis in rice and the role of cytokinin in triggering the reaction. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 86, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Miyamoto, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Okada, A.; Komiyama, K.; Chujo, T.; Yoshikawa, H.; Nojiri, H.; Yamane, H.; Okada, K. Identification of target genes of the bZIP transcription factor OsTGAP1, whose overexpression causes elicitor-induced hyperaccumulation of diterpenoid phytoalexins in rice cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Miyamoto, K.; Nishizawa, Y.; Minami, E.; Nojiri, H.; Yamane, H.; Okada, K. Overexpression of the bZIP transcription factor OsbZIP79 suppresses the production of diterpenoid phytoalexin in rice cells. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 173, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sun, Y.; Niu, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Luo, H.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, M.; Wu, Q.; Song, J.; Sun, C.; et al. Discovery of WRKY transcription factors through transcriptome analysis and characterization of a novel methyl jasmonate-inducible PqWRKY1 gene from Panax quinquefolius. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2013, 114, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chuang, Y.-C.; Hung, Y.-C.; Tsai, W.-C.; Chen, W.-H.; Chen, H.-H. PbbHLH4 regulates floral monoterpene biosynthesis in Phalaenopsis orchids. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4363–4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Cao, W.; Wang, Y.; Shi, M.; Hao, X.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Y.; Ren, J.; Kai, G. Transcription Factor SmWRKY1 Positively Promotes the Biosynthesis of Tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Deng, C.; Hao, X.; Shi, M.; Fu, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Feng, Y.; Makunga, N.P.; Kai, G. Tanshinone production could be increased by the expression of SmWRKY2 in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Sci. 2019, 284, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ding, K.; Pei, T.; Bai, Z.; Jia, Y.; Ma, P.; Liang, Z. SmMYB36, a Novel R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor, Enhances Tanshinone Accumulation and Decreases Phenolic Acid Content in Salvia miltiorrhiza Hairy Roots. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Zhang, Y.; Ji, A.; Xu, Z.; Luo, H.; Song, J. The AP2/ERF transcription factor SmERF128 positively regulates diterpenoid biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhu, M.; Chen, G.; Zhou, S.; Tu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Dong, T.; Hu, Z. A new tomato NAC (NAM/ATAF1/2/CUC2) transcription factor, SlNAC4, functions as a positive regulator of fruit ripening and carotenoid accumulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Li, S.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, M.; Fu, C.; Yu, L. Functional analysis of a WRKY transcription factor involved in transcriptional activation of the DBAT gene in Taxus chinensis. Plant Biol. 2013, 15, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Li, S.; Wang, H.; Li, F.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Zhu, L.; Wang, G.; Yu, J.; Huang, D.; Lang, Z. The maize transcription factor EREB58 mediates the jasmonate-induced production of sesquiterpene volatiles. Plant J. 2015, 84, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Grotewold, E. Transcription factors for predictive plant metabolic engineering: Are we there yet? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Maurer, B.; Hauser, A.; Froidevaux, J.-C. (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene and (E,E)-4,8,12-trimethyl-1,3,7,11-tridecatetraene, two unusual hydrocarbons from cardamom oil. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 2111–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Azuma, H.; Toyota, M.; Asakawa, Y. Intraspecific Variation of Floral Scent Chemistry in Magnolia kobus DC (Magnoliaceae). J. Plant Res. 2001, 114, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kaiser, R. Trapping, Investigation and Reconstitution of Flower Scents. In Perfumes; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 213–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Svensson, G.P.; Hickman, M.O., Jr.; Bartram, S.; Boland, W.; Pellmyr, O.; Raguso, R.A. Chemistry and geographic variation of floral scent in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2005, 92, 1624–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Svensson, G.P.; Pellmyr, O.; Raguso, R.A. Strong Conservation of Floral Scent Composition in Two Allopatric Yuccas. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32, 2657–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, D.; Huang, X.; Jing, W.; An, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y. Identification and functional analysis of two P450 enzymes of Gossypium hirsutum involved in DMNT and TMTT biosynthesis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 16, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Bruce, T.J.A.; Matthes, M.C.; Chamberlain, K.; Woodcock, C.M.; Mohib, A.; Webster, B.; Smart, L.E.; Birkett, M.A.; Pickett, J.A.; Napier, J.A. cis-Jasmone induces Arabidopsis genes that affect the chemical ecology of multitrophic interactions with aphids and their parasitoids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4553–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Arimura, G.-I.; Ozawa, R.; Shimoda, T.; Nishioka, T.; Boland, W.; Takabayashi, J. Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves. Nature 2000, 406, 512–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Arimura, G.-I.; Ozawa, R.; Horiuchi, J.-I.; Nishioka, T.; Takabayashi, J. Plant–plant interactions mediated by volatiles emitted from plants infested by spider mites. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2001, 29, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jing, T.; Du, W.; Gao, T.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, M.; Jin, J.; Wang, J.; Schwab, W.; Wan, X.; et al. Herbivore-induced DMNT catalyzed by CYP82D47 plays an important role in the induction of JA-dependent herbivore resistance of neighboring tea plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 44, 1178–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Adams, S.; Che, D.; Qin, G.; Farouk, M.H.; Hailong, J.; Rui, H. Novel Biosynthesis, Metabolism and Physiological Functions of L-Homoarginine. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2019, 20, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Shuo, X.; Lu, W. Progress of Heterologous Biosynthesis of Terpenoids in Engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. China Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lee, S.; Badieyan, S.; Bevan, D.R.; Herde, M.; Gatz, C.; Tholl, D. Herbivore-induced and floral homoterpene volatiles are biosynthesized by a single P450 enzyme (CYP82G1) in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21205–21210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kfir, R.; Overholt, W.A.; Khan, Z.R.; Polaszek, A. Biology and management of economically important lepidopteran cereal stem borers in Africa. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2022, 47, 701–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cook, S.M.; Khan, Z.R.; Pickett, J.A. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 375–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Khan, Z.R.; Midega, C.A.O.; Pittchar, J.O.; Murage, A.W.; Birkett, M.; Bruce, T.; Pickett, J.A. Achieving food security for one million sub-Saharan African poor through push-pull innovation by 2020. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20120284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Touchet, S.; Chamberlain, K.; Woodcock, C.M.; Miller, D.J.; Birkett, M.A.; Pickett, J.A.; Allemann, R.K. Novel olfactory ligands via terpene synthases. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7550–7553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Pickett, J.A.; Khan, Z.R. Plant volatile-mediated signalling and its application in agriculture: Successes and challenges. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 856–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Kappers, I.F.; Hoogerbrugge, H.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; Dicke, M. Variation in Herbivory-induced Volatiles Among Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Varieties has Consequences for the Attraction of Carnivorous Natural Enemies. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Li, W.; Wang, L.; Zhou, F.; Li, C.; Ma, W.; Chen, H.; Wang, G.; Pickett, J.A.; Zhou, J.; Lin, Y. Overexpression of the homoterpene synthase gene, oscyp92c21, increases emissions of volatiles mediating tritrophic interactions in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 44, 948–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The functions of plant terpenoids and terpene homologues. Terpenoids and terpene homologues play important roles in plants by regulating resistance to biotic stress (including insect and disease resistance). Terpenoids also have many significant impacts on human life, and they can play a role in anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-aggregation, anticoagulant, anti-tumor, sedative, and analgesic activities. Artemisinin is one such example.
Figure 1. The functions of plant terpenoids and terpene homologues. Terpenoids and terpene homologues play important roles in plants by regulating resistance to biotic stress (including insect and disease resistance). Terpenoids also have many significant impacts on human life, and they can play a role in anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-aggregation, anticoagulant, anti-tumor, sedative, and analgesic activities. Artemisinin is one such example.
Ijms 24 11561 g001
Figure 2. Sketch map of biosynthesis of terpenoids and terpene homologues in plants: the MVA pathway in the cytoplasm and the MEP pathway in plastids. Abbreviations: AACT, acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; AcAc-CoA, acetoacetyl-CoA; HMGS, HMG-CoA synthase; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A; HMGR, HMG-CoA reductase; MVA, mevalonic acid; MK, mevalonate kinase; MVAP, mevalonate 5-phosphate; PMK, phosphomevalonate kinase; MVAPP, mevalonate 5-diphosphate; MDD, mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; IPPI, IPP isomerase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; DXR, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase; MEP, 2-C-methylerythritol 4-phosphate; MCT, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; CDP-ME, 4-(cytidine 5’-diphospho)-2-C-methylD-erythritol; CMK, CDP-ME kinase; CDP-ME2P, 4-(cytidine 5’-diphospho)-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol phosphate; MDS, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase; MEcPP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate; HDS, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate synthase; HMBPP, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate; HDR, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase; GGPPS, geranyl Mapp diphosphate synthase; FPPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; GPS, GPP synthase; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate; GPP, geranylvdiphosphate; mTPS, monoterpenoid synthase; sTPS, sesquiterpene synthase; dTPS, diterpene synthases; NES, nerolidol synthase; GLS, geranyllinalool synthase; SQS, squalene synthase; PSY, Phytoene synthase; DMNT, 4,8-dimethylnona-1,3,7-triene; TMTT, 4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-1,3,7,11-tetraene.
Figure 2. Sketch map of biosynthesis of terpenoids and terpene homologues in plants: the MVA pathway in the cytoplasm and the MEP pathway in plastids. Abbreviations: AACT, acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; AcAc-CoA, acetoacetyl-CoA; HMGS, HMG-CoA synthase; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A; HMGR, HMG-CoA reductase; MVA, mevalonic acid; MK, mevalonate kinase; MVAP, mevalonate 5-phosphate; PMK, phosphomevalonate kinase; MVAPP, mevalonate 5-diphosphate; MDD, mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; IPPI, IPP isomerase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; DXR, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase; MEP, 2-C-methylerythritol 4-phosphate; MCT, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; CDP-ME, 4-(cytidine 5’-diphospho)-2-C-methylD-erythritol; CMK, CDP-ME kinase; CDP-ME2P, 4-(cytidine 5’-diphospho)-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol phosphate; MDS, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase; MEcPP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate; HDS, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate synthase; HMBPP, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate; HDR, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase; GGPPS, geranyl Mapp diphosphate synthase; FPPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; GPS, GPP synthase; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate; GPP, geranylvdiphosphate; mTPS, monoterpenoid synthase; sTPS, sesquiterpene synthase; dTPS, diterpene synthases; NES, nerolidol synthase; GLS, geranyllinalool synthase; SQS, squalene synthase; PSY, Phytoene synthase; DMNT, 4,8-dimethylnona-1,3,7-triene; TMTT, 4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-1,3,7,11-tetraene.
Ijms 24 11561 g002
Table 1. Correspondence between terpenoid synthesis genes and transcription factors in different species.
Table 1. Correspondence between terpenoid synthesis genes and transcription factors in different species.
SpeciesTerpeneGenesTFReference
Actinidia argutaTerpinoleneAaTPS1AaNAC[73]
Arabidopsis thaliana(E)-β-caryophylleneAtTPS11; AtTPS21AtMYC2[74]
Artemisia annuaArtemisininAaGSW1;AaWRKY1; AaERF1; AaERF2; AabZIP1; AaSPL2[75,76,77,78]
Citrus sinensis(E)-geraniolCitTPS16CitERF71[79]
Gossypium arboreumGossypolCAD1-AGaWRKY 1[80]
Medicago truncatulaSaponinTSAR1; TSAR2TSAR1; TSAR2[81]
Mentha spicataα-Pinene; β-Pinene; eucalyptol; linalyl acetate; α-bergamotene; germacrene D; γ-muurolene; β-copaene; LimoneneMsGPPS;
MsNTT
MsMYB;
MsYABBY5
[82,83]
Oryza sativaPhytoalexinsOsDXS3OsWRKY45; OsTGAP1; OsbZIP79[84,85,86]
Panax quinquefolius
(Arabidopsis thaliana)
GinsenosideAtHMGR; AtFPS2; AtSQS1; AtSQE2PqWRKY1[87]
Phalaenopsis bellinaGeraniol; linanolPbGDPS; PbGDPS2; PbTPS5&7&9&10PbbHLH4; PbbHLH6[88]
Salvia miltiorrhizaTanshinonesSmCPS1; SmKSL1; SmCYP76AH1SmWRKY1; SmWRKY2; SmMYB36; SmERF128[89,90,91,92]
Solanum lycopersicumCarotenoidSlACS2; SIACS4SINAC4[93]
Taxus chinensisTaxolTcDBATTcWRKY1[94]
Zea mays(E)-β-farneseneZmTPS10ZmEREB58[95]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Zha, W.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; You, A. Advances in the Biosynthesis of Terpenoids and Their Ecological Functions in Plant Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411561

AMA Style

Li C, Zha W, Li W, Wang J, You A. Advances in the Biosynthesis of Terpenoids and Their Ecological Functions in Plant Resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(14):11561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411561

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Changyan, Wenjun Zha, Wei Li, Jianyu Wang, and Aiqing You. 2023. "Advances in the Biosynthesis of Terpenoids and Their Ecological Functions in Plant Resistance" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 14: 11561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411561

APA Style

Li, C., Zha, W., Li, W., Wang, J., & You, A. (2023). Advances in the Biosynthesis of Terpenoids and Their Ecological Functions in Plant Resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(14), 11561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411561

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop