Next Article in Journal
Fine Tuning of ROS, Redox and Energy Regulatory Systems Associated with the Functions of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Plants under Heat Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
1α,25(OH)2D3 Promotes the Autophagy of Porcine Ovarian Granulosa Cells as a Protective Mechanism against ROS through the BNIP3/PINK1 Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
The Phospholipase A2 Superfamily: Structure, Isozymes, Catalysis, Physiologic and Pathologic Roles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Asprosin Exerts Pro-Inflammatory Effects in THP-1 Macrophages Mediated via the Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4) Pathway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms24021345
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regulation of Oocyte Apoptosis: A View from Gene Knockout Mice

by
Sandeep Kaur
and
Manabu Kurokawa
*
Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Room 108, Kent, OH 44242, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1345; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021345
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stress Signaling and Programmed Cell Death)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death that plays a critical role in cellular homeostasis and development, including in the ovarian reserve. In humans, hundreds of thousands of oocytes are produced in the fetal ovary. However, the majority die by apoptosis before birth. After puberty, primordial follicles develop into mature follicles. While only a large dominant follicle is selected to ovulate, smaller ones undergo apoptosis. Despite numerous studies, the mechanism of oocyte death at the molecular level remains elusive. Over the last two and a half decades, many knockout mouse models disrupting key genes in the apoptosis pathway have been generated. In this review, we highlight some of the phenotypes and discuss distinct and overlapping roles of the apoptosis regulators in oocyte death and survival. We also review how the transcription factor p63 and its family members may trigger oocyte apoptosis in response to DNA damage.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the fetal stage, mammalian ovaries contain millions of primordial germ cells. However, more than two-thirds of them are lost prior to birth in humans (or within the first days after birth in mice) [1,2,3]. This number gradually drops as oogonia enter their first meiotic division and become primary oocytes during the period after birth and before puberty (Figure 1). The primary oocytes are maintained in this dormant, meiotically arrested stage (the diplotene stage of the first meiotic prophase, also commonly referred to as the germinal vesicle (GV)) until the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge takes place during puberty. Each oocyte is enclosed by a single layer of epithelial granulosa cells as a primary oocyte (primordial follicle). During an estrus cycle, a group of primordial follicles grows to their maximum size, while the follicle continues to increase the number of granulosa cells surrounding an oocyte. Depending on the number of granulosa cell layers and the size, follicles are categorized as either primary, secondary, pre-antral, or antral. An antral follicle is fully developed and consists of a large oocyte surrounded by several layers of granulosa cells. In response to the LH surge, the oocyte resumes meiosis. The nuclear membrane of the GV breaks down (germinal vesicle breakdown, GVBD) and the first metaphase of meiosis (MI) is completed. Afterwards, the oocyte is arrested again at the second metaphase of meiosis (MII), which is released into the oviduct (ovulation). Importantly, at each estrus cycle, the majority of the “recruited” oocytes die by apoptosis (follicular atresia), while only select oocytes ovulate. Over time, the number of available oocytes per ovary (the ovarian reserve) continues to decline after each estrus cycle until it depletes, which is called reproductive senescence or menopause (Figure 1). Here, we oversee various gene knockout mice generated to date that characterize how each apoptotic player might contribute to the loss of female germ cells in vivo.

2. Apoptosis Pathways

Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death defined by the activation of a group of cysteine proteases called caspases (see [4,5,6] for review). While caspases are kept in a zymogenic form under non-stressed conditions, they are activated in response to various genotoxic or cytotoxic signals. Once active, caspases cleave their specific cellular substrates, leading to the ultimate dismantling of the cell. There are two main pathways to initiate downstream caspase activation: the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways (Figure 2). The extrinsic pathway is characterized by the activation of a cell death receptor (e.g., Fas and TNFR) by its ligand (e.g., FasL and TNFα), which results in the activation of caspase-8 or -10 through the formation of the DISC (death-inducing signaling complex). On the other hand, the intrinsic pathway involves mitochondrial cytochrome c release, which is regulated by the BH domain-containing BCL-2 protein family. This broad family consists of both pro-apoptotic (see below) and pro-survival (anti-apoptotic) members (BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-W, MCL-1 and A1/BFL-1). The pro-apoptotic members are further divided into two categories based on their structures: the BH3-only proteins and the multi-BH domain proteins. BAX, BAK, and BOK are among the multi-BH domain proteins that contain the BH1, BH2, and BH3 domains. The BH3-only proteins (BAD, BIK, BID, PUMA, BIM, BMF, NOXA, and HRK) only contain a single BH3 domain. Following a cell death stimulus, the expression of one or more BH3-only proteins is induced, which directly or indirectly activates multi-BH domain pro-apoptotic species. This process is counteracted by pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins. Thus, the activation of the multi-BH domain proteins is determined by the balance between the pro-survival BCL-2 family members and the BH3-only proteins (Figure 2). Once activated, the multi-BH domain proteins form a homo-oligomer on the outer mitochondrial membrane which triggers the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial intermembrane space. In the cytoplasm, cytochrome c activates the adaptor protein Apaf-1 by facilitating its heptamerization, thereby forming a signaling complex called the apoptosome. The apoptosome then recruits and activates caspase-9. There are two classes of caspases that lead to the dismantling of cellular components in both pathways: initiator caspases and effector (executioner) caspases. Caspases-8, -9, and -10 serve as the initiator caspases, as they are activated first in response to a pro-apoptotic stimulus through the DISC or the apoptosome (Figure 2). The initiator caspases then gain the ability to cleave and functionally activate downstream effector caspases, such as caspases-3 and -7. These activated effectors then cleave an array of cellular protein substrates, which leads to apoptotic death. Importantly, caspases-8 and -10 can cleave the BH3-only protein BID to generate its active form, tBID, which in turn promotes mitochondrial cytochrome c release. Therefore, BID can play a role in both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. In contrast to caspases-8, -9, and -10, caspase-2 is an initiator caspase whose mechanisms and functions remain less understood even though it is the most evolutionally conserved, with structural similarities to C. elegans and Drosophila caspases, CED-3 and DRONC, respectively. Caspase-2 is activated by another death signaling complex called the PIDDosome, which consists of the adaptor proteins PIDD and RAIDD. The formation of the PIDDosome itself is fully independent of cell death receptors or cytochrome c. Although it is known that the PIDDosome can be induced in response to DNA damage (see [7] for caspase-2 review), the mechanism of its formation and caspase-2 activation remains elusive. The substrates of caspase-2 have also been a subject of much debate. Except for BID, very few proteins are known to be cleaved by caspase-2 [7].

3. Knocking Out Pro-Survival Bcl-2 Family Genes

The first clue of the involvement of the BCL-2 family proteins in female germ cell death came from the early studies of pro-survival Bcl-2 gene knockout mice, where it was shown that whole-body knockout resulted in the loss of primordial follicles [8]. Subsequently, two groups independently generated transgenic mouse lines and demonstrated that overexpression of Bcl-2 in oocytes could lead to an increase in the primordial follicle pool or the resistance of oocytes to apoptosis [9,10]. Interestingly, however, a more recent study did not observe a significant difference in the primordial follicle pool of the neonatal mouse ovary upon oocyte-specific knockout or overexpression of Bcl-2 [11]. This discrepancy suggests that BCL-2 may play a role in the prevention of follicle atresia after puberty, but not in the survival of oocytes in the fetal or neonatal stage. Alternatively, it may be ascribed to the presence of multiple BCL-2 family proteins with redundant functions in mouse oocytes as we discuss below. (See Table 1).
Unlike Bcl-2, Bcl-XL null embryos die at 13 d.p.c. (days post coitum) [43]. However, a conditional depletion study where the expression of both Bcl-XL and Bcl-XS isoforms was significantly diminished by targeting the Bcl-X promoter has shown that the loss of Bcl-X leads to a marked reduction in germ cell numbers in fetal ovaries, from 13.5 to 15.5 d.p.c. [12] (note: BCL-XS is a short isoform and pro-apoptotic). Interestingly, using this mouse model, the same group later showed that there were no differences in the number of primordial, primary, and antral follicles in the ovary of Bcl-X-depleted adult mice [13]. Moreover, Bcl-X-depleted female mice were fertile despite a smaller litter size compared to wild-type females [13]. These results suggest that while BCL-XL plays a role in the protection of embryonic germ cells, it is dispensable for follicular development and female fertility.
The pro-survival MCL-1 is structurally somewhat distinct from BCL-2 and BCL-XL, although it contains BH domains 1–4 and a C-terminal transmembrane domain like the other pro-survival BCL-2 family members [4]. Thus, unlike BCL-2 and BCL-XL, MCL-1 does not interact with the BH3-only protein BAD, but it is capable of binding to NOXA. Mcl-1 knockout is embryonically lethal, where Mcl-1 null embryos die at the peri-implantation stage [44]. However, various tissue-specific conditional Mcl-1 knockout mice have been generated and are viable. Interestingly, oocyte-specific Mcl-1 gene knockout results in a significant reduction in the number of ovarian follicles, including primordial follicles [14]. Consequently, the mice experienced poor ovulation rates at 3 months and older, although oocyte-specific Mcl-1 knockout did not completely abolish ovulatory capacity [14]. These results suggest that MCL-1 is required for postnatal maintenance of the follicular pool.
BCL-w (also known as Bcl2l2 or Kiaa0271), Diva (also known as Bcl2l10, Boo, or BCL-b), and A-1 (also known as Bcl2a1a or BFL-1) are additional pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins whose functional significance in development and human disease is less characterized. Bcl-w gene knockout mice were viable and showed no phenotypes except for failed spermatogenesis [15]. Likewise, Diva null-mice exhibited normal ovarian histology [16], and its depletion did not affect the sensitivity to radiation-induced apoptosis in the ovary compared to wild-type mice [16]. Moreover, a transgenic mouse line that lacks all A-1 isoforms appeared outwardly normal and showed only minor defects in immune cells [17]. These results suggest that BCL-w, Diva, and A-1 are either dispensable for ovarian functions and oocyte development, or their loss can be compensated for by other pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins.

4. Knocking Out Pro-Apoptotic Bcl-2 Family Genes

Knockout mice targeting one or more genes encoding BH3-only proteins (BAD, BIK, BID, PUMA, BIM, BMF, NOXA, and HRK) have been generated, but none of them displayed any differences in ovarian functions or female fertility except for Bmf-deficient mice [27] (see Table 1). Given their overlapping role in activating the multi-BH domain proteins, it is not surprising that single knockout does not lead to a prominent phenotype, especially under non-stressed conditions. However, the deletion of the multi-BH domain proteins provides interesting insights into the distinct and overlapping roles of these proteins in the regulation of oocyte apoptosis. For example, Bak knockout mice are healthy and fertile [30], whereas Bax knockout mice exhibit lymphoid hyperplasia [45]. Moreover, Bax-null male mice are infertile due to defective spermatogenesis [45]. Importantly, Bax knockout mice display a three-fold increase in the number of primordial follicles at 42 days old compared to that in aged-matched wild-type controls, and this follicle surplus appears to contribute to the extended ovarian lifespan in Bax deficient females [32]. Bax/Bak double knockout mice display severe developmental abnormalities which were not observed in Bax or Bak single knockout mice, including frequent death in the pre- and perinatal periods, as well as the presence of interdigital webs and imperforate vagina in live offspring [30]. Bax/Bak double knockout also confers marked resistance in many cell types to various intrinsic apoptotic stimuli which activate the intrinsic pathway [30,46]. Bax/Bak double knockout males, however, remain infertile due to failed spermatogenesis as seen in Bax single knockout mice [30]. Whether co-depletion of Bax and Bak would further increase the ovarian reserve compared to Bax single knockout, remains to be determined. In this regard, it is noteworthy that the reduction in the ovarian reserve in Mcl-1 [14] and Bcl-X [12] knockout mice can be rescued by concomitant deletion of the Bax gene. Concurrent deletion of Bax also restores normal ovulation rates and improves the breeding performance of oocyte-specific Mcl-1 knockout mice [14]. These results suggest that it may be BAX, not BAK, that plays a major role in the regulation of oocyte apoptosis, at least in mice.
While BAX and BAK are often essential for the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in human disease and development, the role of BOK remains less studied. Bok was initially discovered through a yeast-two-hybrid screening with a rat ovarian cDNA library using Mcl-1 as bait [47]. As expected, BOK is highly expressed in the ovary, especially in oocytes and granulosa cells [47,48]. However, whole body knockout did not result in any prominent phenotypes in mice [33]. Interestingly, Bok/Bax, but not Bok/Bak, double knockout females displayed an increase in the number of ovarian follicles at one year of age, exacerbating the phenotype caused by loss of Bax [31]. Since this abundance of ovarian follicles was not seen at 14 weeks of age [31], it is unlikely that the double knockout females were supplied with excess primordial follicles at birth. Interestingly, except for the ovarian phenotype, the deletion of Bok did not significantly worsen the phenotypes of Bax or Bak single knockout mice, respectively [31], suggesting that BAX and BOK have an overlapping role in oocyte survival and the maintenance of the ovarian pool in adults.

5. Caspase Knockout Mice

Caspases are the ultimate executioners of apoptosis. However, it remains unclear which one(s), especially effector caspases, carry out this process in oocytes, which may be challenging to uncover. This can be attributed to potential compensatory mechanisms to offset the loss of a caspase gene by the upregulation of another [49], along with their overlapping roles. In general, caspase-3 is the most abundant effector caspase and plays a critical role in the induction of apoptosis in many settings. However, caspase-3 gene inactivation had no effect on the number of ovarian follicles [34]. It is possible that another major executioner, such as caspase-7, can compensate for its absence. Likewise, caspase-7 knockout mice display a healthy appearance and normal tissue morphology [35]. Although the fetuses at 20 d.p.c. appear normal, mice lacking both caspases-3 and -7 die soon after birth [35]. Unfortunately, to our best knowledge, the analysis of the ovarian reserve in caspases-3/7 double knockout mice has not been reported.
The role of caspase-2 is somewhat mysterious because its activation mechanism and substrates remain elusive. As mentioned earlier, the formation of the PIDDosome, the caspase-2-activating platform, can be promoted upon DNA damage. In fact, oocytes collected from caspase-2 knockout mice display significant resistance to the DNA-damaging agent doxorubicin, compared to oocytes from wild-type mice [36]. Although it is an in vitro study with isolated oocytes, this result suggests that caspase-2 may be involved in oocyte apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic drugs. Interestingly, female mice lacking caspase-2 also have a much larger pool of primordial follicles at postnatal day (PND) 4 [36], suggesting that caspase-2 may play a key role in the death of female germ cells that occurs at the perinatal period through PND 3. In contrast, caspase-11 (= caspase-4) knockout leads to the marked reduction of primordial follicles at PND 4, which is likely secondary to impaired cytokine production [37]. Interestingly, the death of oocytes caused by caspase-11 deficiency can be rescued by the co-deletion of caspase-2 [37].

6. The Extrinsic Pathway

Since an early study demonstrated that the injection of an agonistic anti-Fas antibody triggered follicular atresia in mice [39], it has been known that the extrinsic pathway plays a role in oocyte development and maintenance. Adult lpr/lpr mice, which carry a mutation in the Fas gene (resulting in reduced Fas expression), display an increase in ovarian follicles, particularly secondary follicles, compared to wild-type mice [39]. Later, another study using Fas knockout mice also showed that Fas-deficient mice had more ovarian follicles, compared to wild-type mice at PNDs 2 and 14 [40]. It should be noted, however, that the cell death receptor Fas is expressed in granulosa cells of secondary and antral follicles, but not in oocytes [39]. Thus, these results suggest that the Fas-mediated extrinsic apoptosis pathway regulates follicular development by controlling granulosa cell death.
TNFα is a cytokine with a wide variety of roles, ranging from serving as a cell survival ligand to being an activator of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway. Unlike Fas, TNFα is expressed in both oocytes and granulosa cells [50,51]. At PND 4, TNFα knockout females displayed a two-fold increase in primordial follicles compared to wild-type females [41]. Moreover, at one year of age, Tnfα knockout females maintained a larger follicular pool than wild-type females, and their litter size was significantly, and consistently, larger than that of wild-type females during a 12-month breeding period [41]. Whether the Tnfα knockout phenotype can be ascribed to the loss of the extrinsic pathway in oocytes, granulosa cells, or both, remains to be determined. TNFR1 and TNFR2, the two receptors shared by TNFα, are expressed in oocytes [42]. The analysis of Tnfr1 and Tnfr2 single knockout mice showed that the ovary in Tnfr2 knockout females at PND 7 had more growing follicles compared to the ovary in wild-type mice [42]. Moreover, when analyzed at PND 80, the number of primordial follicles was significantly greater in the ovary in Tnfr2 knockout females compared with the ovary in wild-type females [42]. Interestingly, Tnfr1 knockout females did not show such a phenotype [42].
Importantly, it is not known which caspase(s) is responsible for the induction of the extrinsic pathway in the ovary. In this regard, multiple studies have reported that caspase-2 can be activated in a PIDDosome-independent manner, in particular, through the DISC, including the TNFR complex [7]. Given the similarity between the ovarian phenotypes observed in caspase-2 knockout mice and Tnfα (Fas or Tnfr2) knockout mice, it is tempting to speculate that the induction of the extrinsic pathway may lead to the activation of caspase-2 in the ovary.
The oocyte phenotypes of transgenic mouse models related to the apoptosis pathways are summarized in Table 1.

7. p53 Family Proteins

In mammalian cells, the p53 family of transcription factors plays a key role in the regulation of many cellular functions including cell death, cell-cycle arrest, and DNA repair. This family largely consists of p53, p63, and p73 which all share a structurally homologous DNA binding domain, transactivation domain, and tetramerization domain [52]. In addition, the p53 family proteins share some of the same target genes, such as pro-apoptotic Puma and Noxa (see below) [53,54].
Among the p53 family proteins, p53 is the most studied family member since it is frequently inactivated in human cancer, and because its genetic inactivation promotes spontaneous carcinogenesis in mice [55]. Following cytotoxic or genotoxic stress, such as DNA damage, p53 is activated and induces an array of genes that arrest the cell cycle. However, if the damage persists or is irreparable, it promotes apoptosis by inducing genes such as Bax, Puma, Noxa, and Apaf-1 [56]. Moreover, p53 is regulated at multiple levels. While post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation) play an important role in p53 activation, p53 protein levels are also tightly regulated by multiple ubiquitin E3 ligases, including MDM2 and MDMX [52]. Conditional deletion of Mdm2, but not Mdmx, in mouse oocytes leads to female infertility due to a reduction in the number of healthy follicles and increased follicular atresia [57]. Importantly, co-deletion of p53 can restore female fertility [57], indicating that the induction of p53-target genes is sufficient to cause oocyte apoptosis. HUWE1 (also known as ARF-BP1 or MULE) is another ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets p53 for proteasomal degradation [58]. Recently, we demonstrated in mice that oocyte-specific Huwe1 knockout kills oocytes at the GV stage, resulting in complete infertility [59]. Interestingly, unlike Mdm2 knockout [57], concomitant p53 deletion does not rescue this phenotype [59]. The specific substrate(s) of HUWE1 that regulates oocyte death remains to be identified (Figure 3).
p63 was first discovered as a p53 homolog, nearly two decades after the discovery of p53 [60,61,62]. In the context of cancer, p53 is one of the essential tumor suppressors and is often mutated or deleted in cancer cells, but p63 mutation or deletion is rare [63]. Accumulating evidence suggests that p63 has roles in development. Unlike p53 knockout mice, p63 knockout mice die during embryogenesis due to abnormal limb and epithelium formation [64,65]. In addition to these roles, p63 also functions in oocytes as a “guardian of the genome”. While p63 maintains genomic integrity under non-stressed conditions, it also triggers oocyte apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress [66,67]. Moreover, p63 has an alternative promoter and undergoes alternative splicing, resulting in at least six isoforms. The predominant form in mammalian primordial follicle oocytes is TAp63α [66]. Importantly, TAp63α-null oocytes are resistant to apoptosis induced by γ-irradiation, while p53-null oocytes die within 2 days [66], indicating that TAp63α, but not p53, is the main player in oocytes for inducing apoptosis in response to DNA damage. It should be noted, however, that although TAp63α-null oocytes show marked resistance to γ-irradiation initially, they eventually die [68]. Moreover, p53/TAp63α double knockout oocytes display resistance to γ-irradiation for an extended period of time [68], suggesting that both p53 and p63 may contribute to the DNA damage response where p63 plays a more prominent role. What downstream effector(s) causes apoptosis in a p63-dependent manner following DNA damage? It was demonstrated that primordial follicle oocytes from mice deficient for the BH3-only protein PUMA are strikingly resistant to γ-irradiation [22]. Moreover, although oocytes from mice deficient in NOXA, another BH3-only protein, do not display any phenotypes by themselves, the depletion of Noxa further augments the irradiation-resistant phenotype of Puma-null oocytes [22], indicating that both Puma and Noxa, common target genes of p53 and p63, are responsible for DNA damage-induced oocyte apoptosis (Figure 3). Importantly, while oocytes from p53 deficient mice still express PUMA and NOXA, oocytes from TAp63 deficient mice do not [22]. This supports the idea that p63 may play a more dominant role in inducing these two BH3-only proteins in oocytes. The essential role of PUMA and NOXA in DNA damage-induced oocyte apoptosis was also shown by a more recent study in which oocytes with defective recombination repair (Dmc1−/− and Msh5−/−) were employed [23]. Oocytes in Dmc1−/− and Msh5−/− mice experience persistent DNA damage due to impaired meiotic recombination, resulting in death at/before the primordial follicle stage. Interestingly, co-deletion of Puma and Noxa could rescue oocyte loss in Dmc1−/− and Msh5−/− mice [23]. More importantly, the same study also demonstrated that much like Puma/Noxa double knockout, Bax single knockout alone can also protect oocytes from death in Dmc1−/− and Msh5−/− mice, as well as from irradiation-induced apoptosis [23]. Therefore, it is strongly suggested that DNA damage-induced oocyte apoptosis is mediated by the induction of PUMA and NOXA, followed by BAX activation (Figure 3 and Table 2).
DNA damage leads to the activation of ATR and ATM kinases, which activate Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1, CHEK1) and Checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2, CHEK2), respectively (Figure 3). The global knockout of Atr leads to embryonic lethality before 7.5 d.p.c. due to chromosomal fragmentation [72], whereas Atm deficiency results in genome instability and enhanced radiosensitivity [70,71,78]. Moreover, Atm deficiency also causes significant apoptosis in germ cells due to meiotic defects, which leads to infertility in both male and female mice [70,71]. Interestingly, oocyte apoptosis in Atm knockout mice was not rescued by concomitant deletion of caspase-2 or Bax [37], suggesting that there may be a yet-to-be-identified apoptosis pathway that operates under severe meiotic defects in the fetal ovary. Chk1 deficiency causes p53-independent apoptosis at the blastocyst stage due to DNA replication defects [79]. Interestingly, a transgenic mouse line that expresses an extra copy of Chk1 (SuperChk1 or sChk1) displays an increase in the ovarian reserve at birth and long-term maintenance of the follicular pool [69]. This suggests that even under non-stressed conditions, chronic DNA damage constantly occurs in oocytes before and after birth, leading to the depletion of the ovarian reserve that may be protected by the upregulation of the DNA repair pathway [69]. In contrast to Chk1 deficiency, Chk2 knockout mice develop normally and are viable. Interestingly, aged Chk2 knockout female mice show a larger follicular pool at an older age (13.5 months) compared to wild-type controls, which results in delayed reproductive senescence [69]. However, there were no differences in the ovarian reserve in young mice (1.5 months) [69], suggesting that CHK2 only plays a role in the depletion of the ovarian reserve after puberty. More importantly, the gene knockout of CHK2, which can phosphorylate and activate both p53 and p63 (Figure 3), recapitulates the phenotype of p53/TAp63α double knockout oocytes that display marked resistance to DNA damage [68] (Table 2). This strongly suggests that oocyte apoptosis induced by irradiation is mediated by CHK2 phosphorylation of p53 and TAp63α.
Compared to p53 and p63, the role of p73 in oocyte apoptosis remains poorly understood. The most predominant isoform of p73 in oocytes is TAp73α [73]. Trp73 knockout females (in which all p73 isoforms were removed) [76] and TAp73 knockout females (in which only TAp73 isoforms were deleted) [75] showed that they are infertile partially because ovulated oocytes are trapped under the ovarian bursa, thus not being released into the fallopian tubes. Nevertheless, TAp73-deficient ovaries contain fewer primordial and primary follicles compared to wild-type ovaries [75]. Moreover, TAp73-deficient oocytes display severe abnormalities in spindle assembly, resulting in embryonic death at the blastocyst stage following in vitro fertilization with wild-type sperm [75]. These results suggest that, unlike p53 and p63, p73 plays a role in the formation of spindle assembly rather than the induction of apoptosis. Nevertheless, a recent ex vivo study in ovarian culture demonstrated that oocyte-specific Trp73 deficiency partially protects oocytes from cisplatin-induced apoptosis, but not from X-ray-induced apoptosis [77]. As p73 can induce apoptosis in cancer cells by inducing Puma [80], how p73 plays its role in oocyte quality control awaits further investigation (Figure 3).

8. Conclusions

Females are born with a finite number of oocytes. However, the vast majority of them die by apoptosis before leaving the ovary. Because oocytes are single cells, the apoptotic machinery must carefully decide cell fate. Yet, the mechanism that governs this decision in vivo remains elusive. Oocytes are a difficult cell type to study since unlike cell lines, oocytes only function within the ovary. Over the last twenty-five years, a number of gene knockout mice have been generated, providing us with a window of opportunity to genetically dissect the signaling pathway. Ultimately, this collection of in vivo evidence should help us to understand how oocyte apoptosis might be regulated in human ovaries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, M.K.; supervision, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH R15 CA256838, NIH R03 CA230828, and NIH R03 CA208384 (to M.K.).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Eric Takacs, Peighton Neuman, Hannah Zuppe, Andrew Whitfield, and Dara Almufarrej for critical reading of the manuscript. The figures were created with BioRender.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Forabosco, A.; Sforza, C.; Pol, A.D.; Vizzotto, L.; Marzona, L.; Ferrario, V.F. Morphometric Study of the Human Neonatal Ovary. Anat. Rec. 1991, 231, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baker, T.G. A Quantitative and Cytological Study of Germ Cells in Human Ovaries. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1963, 158, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pepling, M.E.; Spradling, A.C. Mouse Ovarian Germ Cell Cysts Undergo Programmed Breakdown to Form Primordial Follicles. Dev. Biol. 2001, 234, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Youle, R.J.; Strasser, A. The BCL-2 Protein Family: Opposing Activities That Mediate Cell Death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kurokawa, M.; Kornbluth, S. Caspases and Kinases in a Death Grip. Cell 2009, 138, 838–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bao, Q.; Shi, Y. Apoptosome: A Platform for the Activation of Initiator Caspases. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brown-Suedel, A.N.; Bouchier-Hayes, L. Caspase-2 Substrates: To Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Control, and Beyond. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 610022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ratts, V.S.; Flaws, J.A.; Kolp, R.; Sorenson, C.M.; Tilly, J.L. Ablation of Bcl-2 Gene Expression Decreases the Numbers of Oocytes and Primordial Follicles Established in the Post-Natal Female Mouse Gonad. Endocrinology 1995, 136, 3665–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Flaws, J.A.; Hirshfield, A.N.; Hewitt, J.A.; Babus, J.K.; Furth, P.A. Effect of Bcl-2 on the Primordial Follicle Endowment in the Mouse Ovary. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 64, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Morita, Y.; Perez, G.I.; Maravei, D.V.; Tilly, K.I.; Tilly, J.L. Targeted Expression of Bcl-2 in Mouse Oocytes Inhibits Ovarian Follicle Atresia and Prevents Spontaneous and Chemotherapy-Induced Oocyte Apoptosis In Vitro. Mol. Endocrinol. Baltim. Md. 1999, 13, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jones, R.L.; Pepling, M.E. Role of the Antiapoptotic Proteins BCL2 and MCL1 in the Neonatal Mouse Ovary. Biol. Reprod. 2013, 88, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rucker, E.B.; Dierisseau, P.; Wagner, K.-U.; Garrett, L.; Wynshaw-Boris, A.; Flaws, J.A.; Hennighausen, L. Bcl-x and Bax Regulate Mouse Primordial Germ Cell Survival and Apoptosis during Embryogenesis. Mol. Endocrinol. 2000, 14, 1038–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Riedlinger, G.; Okagaki, R.; Wagner, K.-U.; Rucker, E.B.; Oka, T.; Miyoshi, K.; Flaws, J.A.; Hennighausen, L. Bcl-x Is Not Required for Maintenance of Follicles and Corpus Luteum in the Postnatal Mouse Ovary. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 66, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Omari, S.; Waters, M.; Naranian, T.; Kim, K.; Perumalsamy, A.L.; Chi, M.; Greenblatt, E.; Moley, K.H.; Opferman, J.T.; Jurisicova, A. Mcl-1 Is a Key Regulator of the Ovarian Reserve. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Print, C.G.; Loveland, K.L.; Gibson, L.; Meehan, T.; Stylianou, A.; Wreford, N.; de Kretser, D.; Metcalf, D.; Köntgen, F.; Adams, J.M.; et al. Apoptosis Regulator Bcl-w Is Essential for Spermatogenesis but Appears Otherwise Redundant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 12424–12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Russell, H.R.; Lee, Y.; Miller, H.L.; Zhao, J.; McKinnon, P.J. Murine Ovarian Development Is Not Affected by Inactivation of the Bcl-2 Family Member Diva. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 6866–6870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Schenk, R.L.; Tuzlak, S.; Carrington, E.M.; Zhan, Y.; Heinzel, S.; Teh, C.E.; Gray, D.H.; Tai, L.; Lew, A.M.; Villunger, A.; et al. Characterisation of Mice Lacking All Functional Isoforms of the Pro-Survival BCL-2 Family Member A1 Reveals Minor Defects in the Haematopoietic Compartment. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ranger, A.M.; Zha, J.; Harada, H.; Datta, S.R.; Danial, N.N.; Gilmore, A.P.; Kutok, J.L.; Beau, M.M.L.; Greenberg, M.E.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Bad-Deficient Mice Develop Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9324–9329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Coultas, L.; Bouillet, P.; Stanley, E.G.; Brodnicki, T.C.; Adams, J.M.; Strasser, A. Proapoptotic BH3-Only Bcl-2 Family Member Bik/Blk/Nbk Is Expressed in Hemopoietic and Endothelial Cells but Is Redundant for Their Programmed Death. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 24, 1570–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kaufmann, T.; Tai, L.; Ekert, P.G.; Huang, D.C.S.; Norris, F.; Lindemann, R.K.; Johnstone, R.W.; Dixit, V.M.; Strasser, A. The BH3-Only Protein Bid Is Dispensable for DNA Damage- and Replicative Stress-Induced Apoptosis or Cell-Cycle Arrest. Cell 2007, 129, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yin, X.-M.; Wang, K.; Gross, A.; Zhao, Y.; Zinkel, S.; Klocke, B.; Roth, K.A.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Bid-Deficient Mice Are Resistant to Fas-Induced Hepatocellular Apoptosis. Nature 1999, 400, 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kerr, J.B.; Hutt, K.J.; Michalak, E.M.; Cook, M.; Vandenberg, C.J.; Liew, S.H.; Bouillet, P.; Mills, A.; Scott, C.L.; Findlay, J.K.; et al. DNA Damage-Induced Primordial Follicle Oocyte Apoptosis and Loss of Fertility Require TAp63-Mediated Induction of Puma and Noxa. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. ElInati, E.; Zielinska, A.P.; McCarthy, A.; Kubikova, N.; Maciulyte, V.; Mahadevaiah, S.; Sangrithi, M.N.; Ojarikre, O.; Wells, D.; Niakan, K.K.; et al. The BCL-2 Pathway Preserves Mammalian Genome Integrity by Eliminating Recombination-Defective Oocytes. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Coultas, L.; Bouillet, P.; Loveland, K.L.; Meachem, S.; Perlman, H.; Adams, J.M.; Strasser, A. Concomitant Loss of Proapoptotic BH3-only Bcl-2 Antagonists Bik and Bim Arrests Spermatogenesis. Embo J. 2005, 24, 3963–3973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kelly, P.N.; White, M.J.; Goschnick, M.W.; Fairfax, K.A.; Tarlinton, D.M.; Kinkel, S.A.; Bouillet, P.; Adams, J.M.; Kile, B.T.; Strasser, A. Individual and Overlapping Roles of BH3-Only Proteins Bim and Bad in Apoptosis of Lymphocytes and Platelets and in Suppression of Thymic Lymphoma Development. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ren, D.; Tu, H.-C.; Kim, H.; Wang, G.X.; Bean, G.R.; Takeuchi, O.; Jeffers, J.R.; Zambetti, G.P.; Hsieh, J.J.-D.; Cheng, E.H.-Y. BID, BIM, and PUMA Are Essential for Activation of the BAX- and BAK-Dependent Cell Death Program. Science 2010, 330, 1390–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Liew, S.H.; Vaithiyanathan, K.; Cook, M.; Bouillet, P.; Scott, C.L.; Kerr, J.B.; Strasser, A.; Findlay, J.K.; Hutt, K.J. Loss of the Proapoptotic BH3-Only Protein BCL-2 Modifying Factor Prolongs the Fertile Life Span in Female Mice. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 90, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Labi, V.; Erlacher, M.; Kiessling, S.; Manzl, C.; Frenzel, A.; O’Reilly, L.; Strasser, A.; Villunger, A. Loss of the BH3-Only Protein Bmf Impairs B Cell Homeostasis and Accelerates γ Irradiation–Induced Thymic Lymphoma Development. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 641–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Coultas, L.; Terzano, S.; Thomas, T.; Voss, A.; Reid, K.; Stanley, E.G.; Scott, C.L.; Bouillet, P.; Bartlett, P.; Ham, J.; et al. Hrk/DP5 Contributes to the Apoptosis of Select Neuronal Populations but Is Dispensable for Haematopoietic Cell Apoptosis. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 2044–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lindsten, T.; Ross, A.J.; King, A.; Zong, W.-X.; Rathmell, J.C.; Shiels, H.A.; Ulrich, E.; Waymire, K.G.; Mahar, P.; Frauwirth, K.; et al. The Combined Functions of Proapoptotic Bcl-2 Family Members Bak and Bax Are Essential for Normal Development of Multiple Tissues. Mol. Cell. 2000, 6, 1389–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ke, F.; Bouillet, P.; Kaufmann, T.; Strasser, A.; Kerr, J.; Voss, A.K. Consequences of the Combined Loss of BOK and BAK or BOK and BAX. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Perez, G.I.; Robles, R.; Knudson, C.M.; Flaws, J.A.; Korsmeyer, S.J.; Tilly, J.L. Prolongation of Ovarian Lifespan into Advanced Chronological Age by Bax-Deficiency. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ke, F.; Voss, A.; Kerr, J.B.; O’Reilly, L.A.; Tai, L.; Echeverry, N.; Bouillet, P.; Strasser, A.; Kaufmann, T. BCL-2 Family Member BOK Is Widely Expressed but Its Loss Has Only Minimal Impact in Mice. Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Matikainen, T.; Perez, G.I.; Zheng, T.S.; Kluzak, T.R.; Rueda, B.R.; Flavell, R.A.; Tilly, J.L. Caspase-3 Gene Knockout Defines Cell Lineage Specificity for Programmed Cell Death Signaling in the Ovary. Endocrinology 2001, 142, 2468–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lakhani, S.A.; Masud, A.; Kuida, K.; Porter, G.A.; Booth, C.J.; Mehal, W.Z.; Inayat, I.; Flavell, R.A. Caspases 3 and 7: Key Mediators of Mitochondrial Events of Apoptosis. Science 2006, 311, 847–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bergeron, L.; Perez, G.I.; Macdonald, G.; Shi, L.; Sun, Y.; Jurisicova, A.; Varmuza, S.; Latham, K.E.; Flaws, J.A.; Salter, J.C.M.; et al. Defects in Regulation of Apoptosis in Caspase-2-Deficient Mice. Gene Dev. 1998, 12, 1304–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Morita, Y.; Maravei, D.V.; Bergeron, L.; Wang, S.; Perez, G.I.; Tsutsumi, O.; Taketani, Y.; Asano, M.; Horai, R.; Korsmeyer, S.J.; et al. Caspase-2 Deficiency Prevents Programmed Germ Cell Death Resulting from Cytokine Insufficiency but Not Meiotic Defects Caused by Loss of Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated (Atm) Gene Function. Cell Death Differ. 2001, 8, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ene, A.C.; Park, S.; Edelmann, W.; Taketo, T. Caspase 9 Is Constitutively Activated in Mouse Oocytes and Plays a Key Role in Oocyte Elimination during Meiotic Prophase Progression. Dev. Biol. 2013, 377, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Sakamaki, K.; Yoshida, H.; Nishimura, Y.; Nishikawa, S.; Manabe, N.; Yonehara, S. Involvement of Fas Antigen in Ovarian Follicular Atresia and Luteolysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1997, 47, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moniruzzaman, M.; Sakamaki, K.; Akazawa, Y.; Miyano, T. Oocyte Growth and Follicular Development in KIT-Deficient Fas-Knockout Mice. Reproduction 2007, 133, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cui, L.; Yang, G.; Pan, J.; Zhang, C. Tumor Necrosis Factor α Knockout Increases Fertility of Mice. Theriogenology 2010, 75, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Greenfeld, C.R.; Roby, K.F.; Pepling, M.E.; Babus, J.K.; Terranova, P.F.; Flaws, J.A. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Receptor Type 2 Is an Important Mediator of TNF Alpha Function in the Mouse Ovary. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 76, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Motoyama, N.; Wang, F.; Roth, K.A.; Sawa, H.; Nakayama, K.; Nakayama, K.; Negishi, I.; Senju, S.; Zhang, Q.; Fujii, S.; et al. Massive Cell Death of Immature Hematopoietic Cells and Neurons in Bcl-x-Deficient Mice. Science 1995, 267, 1506–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rinkenberger, J.L.; Horning, S.; Klocke, B.; Roth, K.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Mcl-1 Deficiency Results in Peri-Implantation Embryonic Lethality. Gene Dev. 2000, 14, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Knudson, C.M.; Tung, K.S.K.; Tourtellotte, W.G.; Brown, G.A.J.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Bax-Deficient Mice with Lymphoid Hyperplasia and Male Germ Cell Death. Science 1995, 270, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rathmell, J.C.; Lindsten, T.; Zong, W.-X.; Cinalli, R.M.; Thompson, C.B. Deficiency in Bak and Bax Perturbs Thymic Selection and Lymphoid Homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 932–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hsu, S.Y.; Kaipia, A.; McGee, E.; Lomeli, M.; Hsueh, A.J.W. Bok Is a Pro-Apoptotic Bcl-2 Protein with Restricted Expression in Reproductive Tissues and Heterodimerizes with Selective Anti-Apoptotic Bcl-2 Family Members. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12401–12406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Jääskeläinen, M.; Nieminen, A.; Pökkylä, R.-M.; Kauppinen, M.; Liakka, A.; Heikinheimo, M.; Vaskivuo, T.E.; Klefström, J.; Tapanainen, J.S. Regulation of Cell Death in Human Fetal and Adult Ovaries—Role of Bok and Bcl-XL. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2010, 330, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Takai, Y.; Matikainen, T.; Jurisicova, A.; Kim, M.R.; Trbovich, A.M.; Fujita, E.; Nakagawa, T.; Lemmers, B.; Flavell, R.A.; Hakem, R.; et al. Caspase-12 Compensates for Lack of Caspase-2 and Caspase-3 in Female Germ Cells. Apoptosis 2007, 12, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Naz, R.; Zhu, X.; Menge, A. Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor-a and Its Receptors Type I and Type II in Human Oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1997, 47, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Terranova, P.F. Potential Roles of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Follicular Development, Ovulation, and the Life Span of the Corpus Luteum. Domest. Anim. Endocrin. 1997, 14, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bang, S.; Kaur, S.; Kurokawa, M. Regulation of the p53 Family Proteins by the Ubiquitin Proteasomal Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Viganò, M.A.; Mantovani, R. Hitting the Numbers: The Emerging Network of p63 Targets. Cell Cycle 2007, 6, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pyati, U.J.; Gjini, E.; Carbonneau, S.; Lee, J.-S.; Guo, F.; Jette, C.A.; Kelsell, D.P.; Look, A.T. p63 Mediates an Apoptotic Response to Pharmacological and Disease-Related ER Stress in the Developing Epidermis. Dev. Cell 2010, 21, 492–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Kruse, J.-P.P.; Gu, W. Modes of p53 Regulation. Cell 2009, 137, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Meek, D.W. Tumour Suppression by p53: A Role for the DNA Damage Response? Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Livera, G.; Uzbekov, R.; Jarrier, P.; Fouchécourt, S.; Duquenne, C.; Parent, A.; Marine, J.; Monget, P. Loss of Oocytes Due to Conditional Ablation of Murine Double Minute 2 (Mdm2) Gene Is p53-dependent and Results in Female Sterility. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 2566–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Chen, D.; Kon, N.; Li, M.; Zhang, W.; Qin, J.; Gu, W. ARF-BP1/Mule Is a Critical Mediator of the ARF Tumor Suppressor. Cell 2005, 121, 1071–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Eisa, A.A.; Bang, S.; Crawford, K.J.; Murphy, E.M.; Feng, W.W.; Dey, S.; Wells, W.; Kon, N.; Gu, W.; Mehlmann, L.M.; et al. X-Linked Huwe1 Is Essential for Oocyte Maturation and Preimplantation Embryo Development. Iscience 2020, 23, 101523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, A.; Kaghad, M.; Wang, Y.; Gillett, E.; Fleming, M.D.; Dötsch, V.; Andrews, N.C.; Caput, D.; McKeon, F. p63, a p53 Homolog at 3q27–29, Encodes Multiple Products with Transactivating, Death-Inducing, and Dominant-Negative Activities. Mol. Cell 1998, 2, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Trink, B.; Okami, K.; Wu, L.; Sriuranpong, V.; Jen, J.; Sidransky, D. A New Human p53 Homologue. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 747–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Osada, M.; Ohba, M.; Kawahara, C.; Ishioka, C.; Kanamaru, R.; Katoh, I.; Ikawa, Y.; Nimura, Y.; Nakagawara, A.; Obinata, M.; et al. Cloning and Functional Analysis of Human P51, Which Structurally and Functionally Resembles p53. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Irwin, M.S.; Kaelin, W.G. P53 Family Update: p73 and p63 Develop Their Own Identities. Cell Growth Differ. Mol. Biol. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2001, 12, 337–349. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang, A.; Schweitzer, R.; Sun, D.; Kaghad, M.; Walker, N.; Bronson, R.T.; Tabin, C.; Sharpe, A.; Caput, D.; Crum, C.; et al. p63 Is Essential for Regenerative Proliferation in Limb, Craniofacial and Epithelial Development. Nature 1999, 398, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mills, A.A.; Zheng, B.; Wang, X.-J.; Vogel, H.; Roop, D.R.; Bradley, A. p63 Is a p53 Homologue Required for Limb and Epidermal Morphogenesis. Nature 1999, 398, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Suh, E.-K.; Yang, A.; Kettenbach, A.; Bamberger, C.; Michaelis, A.H.; Zhu, Z.; Elvin, J.A.; Bronson, R.T.; Crum, C.P.; McKeon, F. p63 Protects the Female Germ Line during Meiotic Arrest. Nature 2006, 444, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gonfloni, S.; Tella, L.D.; Caldarola, S.; Cannata, S.M.; Klinger, F.G.; Bartolomeo, C.D.; Mattei, M.; Candi, E.; Felici, M.D.; Melino, G.; et al. Inhibition of the C-Abl–TAp63 Pathway Protects Mouse Oocytes from Chemotherapy-Induced Death. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bolcun-Filas, E.; Rinaldi, V.D.; White, M.E.; Schimenti, J.C. Reversal of Female Infertility by Chk2 Ablation Reveals the Oocyte DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathway. Science 2014, 343, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ruth, K.S.; Day, F.R.; Hussain, J.; Martínez-Marchal, A.; Aiken, C.E.; Azad, A.; Thompson, D.J.; Knoblochova, L.; Abe, H.; Tarry-Adkins, J.L.; et al. Genetic Insights into Biological Mechanisms Governing Human Ovarian Ageing. Nature 2021, 596, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, Y.; Ashley, T.; Brainerd, E.E.; Bronson, R.T.; Meyn, M.S.; Baltimore, D. Targeted Disruption of ATM Leads to Growth Retardation, Chromosomal Fragmentation during Meiosis, Immune Defects, and Thymic Lymphoma. Gene Dev. 1996, 10, 2411–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Barlow, C.; Hirotsune, S.; Paylor, R.; Liyanage, M.; Eckhaus, M.; Collins, F.; Shiloh, Y.; Crawley, J.N.; Ried, T.; Tagle, D.; et al. Atm-Deficient Mice: A Paradigm of Ataxia Telangiectasia. Cell 1996, 86, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Brown, E.J.; Baltimore, D. ATR Disruption Leads to Chromosomal Fragmentation and Early Embryonic Lethality. Gene Dev. 2000, 14, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, S.-Y.; Cordeiro, M.H.; Serna, V.A.; Ebbert, K.; Butler, L.M.; Sinha, S.; Mills, A.A.; Woodruff, T.K.; Kurita, T. Rescue of Platinum-Damaged Oocytes from Programmed Cell Death through Inactivation of the P53 Family Signaling Network. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Livera, G.; Petre-Lazar, B.; Guerquin, M.-J.; Trautmann, E.; Coffigny, H.; Habert, R. p63 Null Mutation Protects Mouse Oocytes from Radio-Induced Apoptosis. Reproduction 2008, 135, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Tomasini, R.; Tsuchihara, K.; Wilhelm, M.; Fujitani, M.; Rufini, A.; Cheung, C.C.; Khan, F.; Itie-Youten, A.; Wakeham, A.; Tsao, M.; et al. TAp73 Knockout Shows Genomic Instability with Infertility and Tumor Suppressor Functions. Gene Dev. 2008, 22, 2677–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Yang, A.; Walker, N.; Bronson, R.; Kaghad, M.; Oosterwegel, M.; Bonnin, J.; Vagner, C.; Bonnet, H.; Dikkes, P.; Sharpe, A.; et al. p73-Deficient Mice Have Neurological, Pheromonal and Inflammatory Defects but Lack Spontaneous Tumours. Nature 2000, 404, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kim, S.-Y.; Nair, D.M.; Romero, M.; Serna, V.A.; Koleske, A.J.; Woodruff, T.K.; Kurita, T. Transient Inhibition of p53 Homologs Protects Ovarian Function from Two Distinct Apoptotic Pathways Triggered by Anticancer Therapies. Cell Death Differ. 2019, 26, 502–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Elson, A.; Wang, Y.; Daugherty, C.J.; Morton, C.C.; Zhou, F.; Campos-Torres, J.; Leder, P. Pleiotropic Defects in Ataxia-Telangiectasia Protein-Deficient Mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 13084–13089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Liu, Q.; Guntuku, S.; Cui, X.-S.; Matsuoka, S.; Cortez, D.; Tamai, K.; Luo, G.; Carattini-Rivera, S.; DeMayo, F.; Bradley, A.; et al. Chk1 Is an Essential Kinase That Is Regulated by Atr and Required for the G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint. Gene Dev. 2000, 14, 1448–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Melino, G.; Bernassola, F.; Ranalli, M.; Yee, K.; Zong, W.X.; Corazzari, M.; Knight, R.A.; Green, D.R.; Thompson, C.; Vousden, K.H. p73 Induces Apoptosis via PUMA Transactivation and Bax Mitochondrial Translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 8076–8083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 01345 g001 550
Figure 1. Graphical representation of germ cell quantities in mouse and human ovaries at various stages of the reproductive lifespan. Germ cells are most abundant during the fetal stage. In mice, the greatest loss is seen within the first few days following birth, whereas in humans, substantial germ cell death takes place before birth. Between birth and puberty, there is a second wave of significant decline in the number of oocytes. Once the oocytes are exhausted, the ovaries enter reproductive senescence. PND: Postnatal day.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of germ cell quantities in mouse and human ovaries at various stages of the reproductive lifespan. Germ cells are most abundant during the fetal stage. In mice, the greatest loss is seen within the first few days following birth, whereas in humans, substantial germ cell death takes place before birth. Between birth and puberty, there is a second wave of significant decline in the number of oocytes. Once the oocytes are exhausted, the ovaries enter reproductive senescence. PND: Postnatal day.
Ijms 24 01345 g001
Ijms 24 01345 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the major players in the apoptotic pathways. Three signaling pathways in cells can result in apoptosis. Extracellular stress signals activate the death receptors, which leads to the formation of the DISC complex. Caspases-8 and -10 are then activated by the DISC through dimerization. The second pathway is triggered by an intracellular stress stimulus leading to mitochondrial cytochrome c release which is governed by the BCL-2 family proteins. In the cytoplasm, cytochrome c binds to the adaptor protein Apaf-1, which triggers the formation of the caspase-9 activating complex apoptosome. The executioner caspase-3 and -7 are subsequently activated via the proteolytic cleavage by caspase-8 (-10) or caspase-9. The third pathway, which is also triggered by an intracellular signal, results in PIDDosome formation and subsequent activation of the initiator caspase-2. The activation of BID by caspase-2 or caspase-8 (-10) feeds into the BCL-2 family-mediated cytochrome c release.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the major players in the apoptotic pathways. Three signaling pathways in cells can result in apoptosis. Extracellular stress signals activate the death receptors, which leads to the formation of the DISC complex. Caspases-8 and -10 are then activated by the DISC through dimerization. The second pathway is triggered by an intracellular stress stimulus leading to mitochondrial cytochrome c release which is governed by the BCL-2 family proteins. In the cytoplasm, cytochrome c binds to the adaptor protein Apaf-1, which triggers the formation of the caspase-9 activating complex apoptosome. The executioner caspase-3 and -7 are subsequently activated via the proteolytic cleavage by caspase-8 (-10) or caspase-9. The third pathway, which is also triggered by an intracellular signal, results in PIDDosome formation and subsequent activation of the initiator caspase-2. The activation of BID by caspase-2 or caspase-8 (-10) feeds into the BCL-2 family-mediated cytochrome c release.
Ijms 24 01345 g002
Ijms 24 01345 g003 550
Figure 3. The DNA damage response pathway. In mouse oocytes, DNA single-strand and double-strand breaks trigger the activation of ATR or ATM, respectively. Once activated, ATR and ATM phosphorylate and activate their downstream kinases CHK1 and CHK2, respectively. Please see the text for more detail.
Figure 3. The DNA damage response pathway. In mouse oocytes, DNA single-strand and double-strand breaks trigger the activation of ATR or ATM, respectively. Once activated, ATR and ATM phosphorylate and activate their downstream kinases CHK1 and CHK2, respectively. Please see the text for more detail.
Ijms 24 01345 g003
Table
Table 1. Gene knockout mice related to the apoptosis pathway.
Table 1. Gene knockout mice related to the apoptosis pathway.
GenesType of Knockout PhenotypesReferences
Bcl-2Global KOPro-survival BCL-2 family member Decrease in the number of primordial follicles in ovaries at PND 42[8]
Global transgenic overexpressionIncrease in the number of primordial follicles at PND 8 but not retained in adulthood[9]
Oocyte-specific overexpression Decrease in follicular atresia at PND 42 but no significant phenotypic differences in neonatal ovaries between PNDs 1 and 7[10,11]
Bcl-X (Bcl2l1)Reduction in Bcl-X (both isoforms: Bcl-XL and Bcl-Xs) gene expressionPro-survival BCL-2 family memberDrastic decrease in primordial follicle numbers at PND 19 but no significant phenotypic differences in ovaries in later study using conditional knockout[12,13]
Mcl-1Oocyte-specific KOPro-survival BCL-2 family memberDecrease in primordial oocyte reserve at PND 7[14]
Decrease in the numbers of primordial follicles, primary follicles and secondary follicles at 3 months which can be rescued by co-deletion of Bax
Bcl-w (Bcl2l2, Kiaa0271)Global KOPro-survival BCL-2 family memberFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[15]
Diva (Bcl2l10, Bcl-b, Boo)Global KOPro-survival BCL-2 family memberFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[16]
A-1 (Bcl2a1a, Bfl-1)Global KOPro-survival BCL-2 family memberFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[17]
Bad (Bbc6)Global KOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinOvarian phenotypes not reported[18]
Bik (Biklk, Blk, Nbk)Global KOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[19]
BidGlobal KOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinOvarian phenotypes not reported[20,21]
Puma (Bbc3)Global KOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinNo ovarian phenotype under non-stressed conditions[22]
Primordial follicle oocytes are resistant to irradiation-induced apoptosis at PND 5
Noxa (Pmaip1)Global KOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinNo significant differences in ovarian morphology[22]
Puma/NoxaGlobal DKOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinsPuma/Noxa DKO oocytes are more resistant to DNA damage-induced death than Puma single KO oocytes[22]
Protected oocyte death in Dmc1 and Msh5-nulls (oocytes with defective recombination repair) [23]
Bim (Bcl2l11)Global KOPro-apoptotic
BH3-only protein		Fertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[24]
Bim/BadGlobal DKOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinsFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[25]
Bim/BikGlobal DKOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinsFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[24]
Bim/BidGlobal DKOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinsOvarian phenotypes not reported[26]
Bid/Bim/PumaGlobal TKOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinsOvarian phenotypes not reported[26]
BmfGlobal KOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinIncrease in follicles at PNDs 100, 200, 300, and 400[27]
Fertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[28]
Hrk (Bid3, Dp5)Global KOPro-apoptotic BH3-only proteinFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[29]
Bak (Bak1)Global KOPro-apoptotic BCL2 family memberFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[30,31]
BaxGlobal KOPro-apoptotic BCL2 family memberThree times as many primordial follicles at PND 42 and reduced follicular atresia (granulosa cell death) induced by apoptosis. No increase observed in primordial follicles in neonatal ovaries[32]
Global KOFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[31]
Global KOProtected oocytes from irradiation-induced death and the lack of Dmc1 and Msh5-nulls (oocytes with defective recombination repair)[23]
Bok (Mtd)Global KOPro-apoptotic BCL2 family memberFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[31,33]
Bok/BakGlobal DKOPro-apoptotic BCL2 family membersFertile and no abnormalities reported in the ovary[31]
Bok/BaxGlobal DKOPro-apoptotic BCL2 family membersAged (1-year-old) Bok/Bax DKO females had excess follicles at almost all developmental stages, exacerbating the phenotype caused by Bax single KO[31]
Caspase-3 (Casp3, Cpp32)Global KOProteaseNo significant differences in ovarian morphology[34]
Caspase-7 (Casp7, Lice2, Mch3)Global KOProteaseNo significant differences in ovarian morphology[35]
Caspase-2 (Casp2, Ich1, Nedd2)Global KOProteaseIncrease in the number of primordial follicles at PND 4 [36]
Resistance to apoptosis induced by doxorubicin in young adult mice
Caspase-11 (Casp4, Casp11, Caspl, Ich3)Global KOProteaseSeverely diminished primordial follicle pool at PND 4 which can be rescued by Caspase-2 KO[37]
Caspase-9 (Casp9, Mch6)Global KOProteaseAt 19.5 d.p.c., when the majority of oocytes complete homologous recombination, the total number of germ cells was noticeably larger in Caspase-9 KO embryos.[38]
Fas (Apt1, Tnfrsf6)Global KOCell death receptorIncrease in secondary follicles [39]
Increase in germ cells/oocytes in prenatal and PND 2 to 14 ovaries [40]
Tnfa (Tnf, Tnfsf2)Global KOCell death ligandIncrease in the number of total follicles from PND 4 to 90[41]
Tnfr1 (Tnfrsf1a)Global KOCell death receptorNo significant differences in ovarian morphology[42]
Tnfr2 (Tnfrsf1b)Global KOCell death receptorIncrease in the number of primary follicles at PND 7 and primordial, primary and preantral follicles at PND 80[42]
DKO = double knockout; TKO = triple knockout; PND = postnatal day; d.p.c. = days post coitum.
Table
Table 2. Gene knockout mice related to the DNA damage pathway.
Table 2. Gene knockout mice related to the DNA damage pathway.
GenesType of Mouse ModelsProtein FunctionsOocyte PhenotypesReferences
Chk1 (Chek1)Conditional aneuploid mutant with 3 copies of Chk1KinaseIncrease in primordial, primary and antral follicles in 1.5 months old mice as well as primordial and antral follicles in aged mice[69]
Chk2 (Chek2)Oocyte-specific KO KinaseNo difference in 1.5 month old mice and increase in primordial, primary, secondary and antral follicles in aged mice[69]
Global KORescued the infertility of Trip13Gt/Gt (DNA repair deficient) and irradiated females[68]
AtmGlobal KOKinaseInfertile and decrease in oocyte reserve in adult females[70,71]
Atr (Kiaa4069)Global KOKinaseEmbryonic lethality due to DNA fragmentation between blastocyst stage and 7.5 d.p.c[72]
Trp53 (Tp53, P53)Global KOTranscription factorPartially rescued the Trip13Gt/Gt (DNA repair deficient) oocytes [68]
Trp63 (Tp63, P63)Oocyte-specific KOTranscription factorRescued from cisplatin-induced cell death of primordial follicles in ovary (PND 5) after 4 days of culture[73]
Global KORescued from irradiation-induced cell death of primordial follicles in ovary (18.5 d.p.c) [74]
TAp63Global KOTranscription factorPrimordial follicles protected from irradiation induced apoptosis at PND 5 in TAp63 KO [66]
TAp73Global KOTranscription factorDecrease in oocyte reserve and infertility[75]
Trp73Global KOTranscription factorInfertile but no abnormality in oocytes [76]
Oocyte-specific KOTranscription factorPartially rescued from cisplatin-induced cell death of primordial follicles in ovary (PND 5), but not from X-ray induced apoptosis[77]
Mdm2Oocyte-specific KOUbiquitin E3 LigaseInfertile and decrease in healthy secondary and tertiary follicles and increase in atretic primary, secondary follicle population at 5–6 weeks of age. Fertility was restored in Mdm2/p53 DKO[57]
Huwe1 (Kiaa0312, Ureb1)Oocyte-specific KOUbiquitin E3 LigaseInfertile and less follicles present at 4 weeks of age. Fertility was not restored in Huwe1/p53 DKO[59]
DKO = double knockout; PND = postnatal day; d.p.c. = days post coitum.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaur, S.; Kurokawa, M. Regulation of Oocyte Apoptosis: A View from Gene Knockout Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021345

AMA Style

Kaur S, Kurokawa M. Regulation of Oocyte Apoptosis: A View from Gene Knockout Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(2):1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaur, Sandeep, and Manabu Kurokawa. 2023. "Regulation of Oocyte Apoptosis: A View from Gene Knockout Mice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021345

APA Style

Kaur, S., & Kurokawa, M. (2023). Regulation of Oocyte Apoptosis: A View from Gene Knockout Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(2), 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop