Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Two Simultaneous Metabolomic and Proteomic Extraction Protocols Assessed by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Changes in the Endophytic Bacterial Community of Brassica rapa after Application of Systemic Insecticides
Previous Article in Journal
Regulation of Oocyte Apoptosis: A View from Gene Knockout Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Light Quality on Metabolomic, Ionomic, and Transcriptomic Profiles in Tomato Fruit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fine Tuning of ROS, Redox and Energy Regulatory Systems Associated with the Functions of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Plants under Heat Stress

Department of Materials and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sophia University, 7-1 Kioi-cho, Chiyoda, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1356; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021356
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Molecular Plant Sciences in Japan)

Abstract

:
Heat stress severely affects plant growth and crop production. It is therefore urgent to uncover the mechanisms underlying heat stress responses of plants and establish the strategies to enhance heat tolerance of crops. The chloroplasts and mitochondria are known to be highly sensitive to heat stress. Heat stress negatively impacts on the electron transport chains, leading to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can cause damages on the chloroplasts and mitochondria. Disruptions of photosynthetic and respiratory metabolisms under heat stress also trigger increase in ROS and alterations in redox status in the chloroplasts and mitochondria. However, ROS and altered redox status in these organelles also activate important mechanisms that maintain functions of these organelles under heat stress, which include HSP-dependent pathways, ROS scavenging systems and retrograde signaling. To discuss heat responses associated with energy regulating organelles, we should not neglect the energy regulatory hub involving TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN (TOR) and SNF-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE 1 (SnRK1). Although roles of TOR and SnRK1 in the regulation of heat responses are still unknown, contributions of these proteins to the regulation of the functions of energy producing organelles implicate the possible involvement of this energy regulatory hub in heat acclimation of plants.

1. Introduction

Heat stress caused by unusual temperature increase severely affects plant growth and crop production. It has been also estimated that global temperature will increase 2.0–4.9 °C by the end of 21st century [1]. It is therefore urgent to elucidate the mechanisms underlying responses of plants to heat stress and establish the strategies to enhance heat tolerance of crops.
Heat stress can cause detrimental effects on growth and development via disturbing various physiological traits in plants and crops [2]. Especially, the chloroplasts and mitochondria as well as the plasma membrane are known to be highly sensitive to heat stress [3,4]. Many studies reported the negative impacts of heat stress on activities of the key enzymes involved in the metabolisms associated with photosynthesis and respiration [3,4]. It was also demonstrated that disruptions of the electron transport chains in the chloroplasts and mitochondria resulted in the excess accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as 1O2, O2 and H2O2 which can cause damages on cells under heat stress [3,4]. Despite their toxic potential, however, ROS are also known to play important roles as signaling molecules required for acclimatory responses of plants to heat stress [5,6,7]. ROS accumulating in different cellular compartments at various concentrations might be required for the creation of specific signals suitable for acclimation to different types of stresses [8,9]. A recent study demonstrated that ROS accumulation increased in the cytosol and nucleus in response to heat stress [10]. Such a pattern of ROS accumulation in cells might be associated with reprograming of the transcriptome to tailor heat stress responses [10]. ROS required for signaling can be also produced via NADPH oxidases (RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGUEs; RBOHs) localized in the plasma membrane [11,12,13]. ROS produced by RBOHs might activate various heat acclimatory pathways involving several heat response transcription factors [5]. For example, ROS affect the translocation of redox regulated transcription factors such as HEAT SHOCK TRANSCRIPTION FACTORs (HSFs) and MULTIPROTEIN BRIDGING FACTOR 1c (MBF1c) which are known to be heat responsive to the nucleus [14,15]. A previous study demonstrated that HSFA2 might regulate a key regulator of unfolded protein response in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER-UPR) via modulation of ROS signaling during heat stress [16]. In addition, ROS generated in the chloroplasts and mitochondria are known to activate several stress acclimatory mechanisms via retrograde signaling, the regulatory systems of nuclear gene expression [17,18]. These findings suggest that the balance of ROS level among different organelles including the chloroplasts and mitochondria needs to be strictly controlled via producing and scavenging systems under heat stress.
Previous studies uncovered several mechanisms that protect the chloroplasts and mitochondria against heat stress. HEAT SHOCK PROTEINs (HSPs) were shown to be involved in the maintenance of various biological processes including regulation of ROS level and electron transport in the chloroplasts and mitochondria [19,20,21]. Indeed, these organelles are well known as major sources of ROS production [22,23]. It might be therefore reasonable to speculate that the mechanisms to prevent excess ROS accumulation in the chloroplasts and mitochondria have been evolved in plant cells. Retrograde signaling might also play key roles to maintain functions of these organelles under heat stress via activation of pathways involving HSPs [24,25]. ALTERNATIVE OXIDASE (AOX), a marker of the retrograde signaling activity which can prevent over-reduction of the electron transport chain was also implicated in heat responses in the mitochondria [26,27].
As regulation of some of these pathways are energy-consuming processes, heat response in plant cells might rely on the balance of the activities between the chloroplasts and mitochondria [4,28]. Heat stress negatively affects photosynthesis, leading to depletions of sugars and starches. Depletions of these substrates for the respiratory metabolisms impacts on the efficiency of energy production which is required for the activity of heat response pathways [4,29]. Thus, control of respiration/photosynthesis ratio by improving rate of the photosynthetic CO2 fixation and reducing energy costs might be important to enhance the ability of plants to acclimate to heat stress [29].
TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN (TOR) and SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE 1 (SnRK1) are known to play key roles to switch signals underlying growth, development and stress responses depending on energy status [30,31,32,33]. Under the conditions in which plants can effectively produce energy via photosynthesis and respiration, TOR activates energy consuming mechanisms to boost growth and development [31]. In contrast, under the stressed conditions that can cause energy depletion, SnRK1 inhibits the energy-consuming growth mechanisms regulated by TOR while activating stress responses as well as mechanisms to obtain energy from alternative sources [30,32]. TOR and SnRK1 were shown to target many proteins involved in a broad range of biological processes including the maintenance of metabolisms associated with photosynthesis and respiration as well as retrograde signaling [30,31,32,34,35]. However, integrations of TOR- and SnRK1-dependent mechanisms with functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria are still not understood and the roles of TOR and SnRK1 in the regulation of heat stress responses need to be elucidated.
In this review, the author will discuss effects of heat stress on the functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria and the mechanisms underlying acclimatory responses of these energy regulating organelles to heat stress, including retrograde signaling. The author will also suggest possible integration of mechanisms underlying heat stress responses of the chloroplasts and mitochondria with the energy regulatory system involving TOR and SnRK1.

2. Effects of Heat Stress on the Chloroplasts and Mechanisms to Counteract Them

The chloroplast is well known as one of the most sensitive organelles to heat stress [36]. It has been reported that heat stress caused enlargement of the chloroplasts as well as increase in the number of plastid vesicles [37]. Such alterations might occur due to the disruption of the thylakoid membrane caused by the changes in redox status of the chloroplasts [3,29]. Photosystem II (PSII), which is embedded in the thylakoid membrane, is also known as a sensitive target of heat stress in the chloroplasts [36]. Heat stress can perturb PSII function via increasing fluidity of the thylakoid membranes, leading to falling off of the PSII light-harvesting complex from the thylakoid membrane, as well as dissociation of the oxygen evolving complexes [38,39,40,41,42]. These effects on PSII induced by heat stress result in inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport in PSII and decrease in ATP synthesis, leading to acceleration of ROS production [17].
Under unfavorable conditions, ROS including superoxide anion (•O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (•OH) and singlet oxygen (1O2) can be generated mainly in the reaction centers of PSI and PSII in the thylakoid membrane [18,22]. 1O2, which is produced as a byproduct of photosynthesis via excitation of ground-state triplet oxygen [22,36], can severely damage D1 and D2 proteins, the reaction center proteins in PSII [43]. Particularly, D1 protein is susceptible to 1O2 due to its localization to the proximity of 1O2 production site [44]. It has been also reported that a large amount of chlorophyllide-a, a precursor of chlorophyll synthesis, dramatically increased 1O2 production in Arabidopsis mutant deficient in CHLOROPHYLL SYNTHASE (CHLG) under heat stress [45]. This finding suggests a key role of CHLG in the maintenance of cellular ROS level [45]. Significance of the maintenance of chlorophyll synthesis in heat tolerance can be further supported by the finding that mutants with delayed senescence phenotypes showed enhanced tolerance to heat stress in various plant species [46,47]. Disruptions of the mechanisms responsible for the regulation of H2O2 and O2- also cause negative impacts on plant cells [48,49]. Downregulation of thylakoid ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE (APX) or Cu/Zn SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE (Cu/ZnSOD), enzymes responsible for scavenging H2O2 or O2, respectively, in the chloroplasts resulted in retardation of growth [48]. In addition, heat stress triggered degradation of Cu/ZnSOD, while inducing activity of CATALASE (CAT) [50], suggesting that heat stress can alter the balance between H2O2 and O2. Alterations in the activities of antioxidant enzymes and the balance of ROS production can be critical for the function of PSII under heat stress [17].
Heat sensitivity of the Calvin–Benson cycle has been also reported in previous studies [17,51]. In this cycle, activity of RIBULOSE-1,5-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE/OXYGENASE (RUBISCO), an enzyme responsible for the fixation of CO2 is known to be inhibited by heat stress [17]. Inhibition of RUBISCO activity occurs due to inhibition of another enzyme, RUBISCO ACTIVASE (RCA) that uses the energy from ATP hydrolysis to restore RUBISCO [17]. Thus, inhibition of electron flow leading to decrease in ATP synthesis in the thylakoid membrane might be one of the major limiting factors of the Calvin–Benson cycle during heat stress. Affinity of RUBISCO for CO2 also decreases under heat stress, which tends to accelerate the oxygenase reaction of this enzyme. The process enhanced by the oxygenase activity of RUBISCO is known as photorespiration, which reduces efficiency of photosynthesis [51]. Stability of a chaperone required for the maintenance of the RUBISCO structure might be a key for the activity of CO2 fixation in the stroma. A recent study demonstrated that DnaJ protein in tomato (SlCDJ2) plays important roles to maintain the activity of CO2 fixation via RUBISCO under heat stress [52]. In addition, several other enzymes involved in the Calvin–Benson cycle were shown to be regulated by the thioredoxin (TRX)-dependent mechanisms that perceive electrons derived from the electron transport chain in the thylakoid membrane [22]. Thus, inhibition of electron transport caused by heat stress might negatively affect activities of these enzymes.
Plants possess mechanisms to attenuate damages on the chloroplasts caused by heat stress. Heat priming, pre-exposure to mild heat treatment that enhances heat tolerance of plants, contributes to the maintenance of redox regulation by activating ROS scavenging enzymes such as SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE (SOD) and GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE (GR) in the chloroplasts as well as mitochondria [53]. THIOREDOXIN-LIKE 1 (TRXL1) in the chloroplasts also activates NADP-DEPENDENT MALATE DEHYDROGENASE and attenuates production of O2, leading to enhancement of heat tolerance as well as disease resistance [54]. SEROTONIN N-ACETYLTRANSFERASE in tomato (SlSNAT), an enzyme required for melatonin synthesis was shown to be involved in ROS scavenging [55]. SlSNAT localized in the chloroplasts interacts with HSP40 [55]. Overexpression of SlSNAT resulted in enhanced heat tolerance of the transgenic plants accompanied by enhanced melatonin accumulation, higher capacity of ROS scavenging and upregulation of heat response transcripts. Significance of melatonin in heat acclimation has been also proposed by the recent findings that melatonin plays important roles in the protection of PSII by attenuating production of excess excitation energy and controlling ROS regulatory systems via the MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASEs (MAPKs) cascade involving MAPK3 and 6 [56,57].
HSPs are also known to be essential for the protection of PSII against heat stress [36,58]. Of these, HSP21 might play pivotal roles. It was revealed that HSP21 in Arabidopsis binds to a chloroplast nucleoid protein, PLASTID TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVE 5 (PTAC5), to maintain the chloroplast-encoded RNA polymerase [19]. HSP21 was also shown to directly bind to D1 and D2 proteins to protect PSII against heat stress as well as oxidative and photo-inhibitory stresses [59]. FILAMENTATION TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE H6 (FTSH6), a plastid-localized metalloprotease, functions as a negative regulator of HSP21 protein accumulation [56]. Deficiency in FTSH6 protein resulted in enhanced accumulation of HSP21 during heat stress, but an increase in FTSH6 protein oppositely affected accumulation of HSP21 during the recovery phase following heat treatment [60]. A more recent study demonstrated that HSFA2 acts as a regulator of both HSP21 and FTSH6 to modulate heat memory, an ability of plants to maintain high activity of heat response to better prepare for future heat stress even after the recovery from heat stress [61]. In tall fescue, FaHSP17.8-CII was shown to regulate heat tolerance of plants by modulating electron transport of PSII and ROS signaling [62]. The function of FaHSP17.8-CII is also associated with heat memory. Following the exposure to sublethal heat stress, heat memory of FaHSP17.8-CII was kept at high level for more than 4 days. During this heat memory phase, ROS accumulation increased and PSII electron transport was maintained [62]. In addition, heat stress causes the aggregation of LIGHT-HARVESTIG COMPLEX II (LHCII) proteins. During this LHCII aggregation, excess monogalacosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), a main thylakoid membrane lipid associated with LHCII can be extruded [63]. Then, extruded MGDG forms inverted hexagonal phase (HP) [64,65], which is involved in the regulation of HSPs [66]. HP produced under heat stress activates VIOLAXANTHIN DEEPOXIDASE (VDE) involved in the xanthophyll cycle [67]. VDE synthesizes zeaxanthin that quenches excess excitation energy and stabilize the thylakoid membrane. These findings suggest that the integration of HSPs-dependent mechanisms with ROS regulatory systems is essential for the protection of photosynthetic reactions in the thylakoid against heat stress and oxidative stress.
Effects of heat stress on plant cells and acclimatory mechanisms to heat stress might be differently modulated depending on intensity of stress [68,69]. For example, in Paspalum wettsteinii, mild heat stress (40 °C or less) promoted growth, although severe heat stress (45 °C) resulted in excess accumulation of ROS accompanied by damages on photosynthetic machineries [69]. A recent study demonstrated that effects of heat stress on the chloroplasts in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii were different depending on the temperatures [68]. Moderate heat stress (35 °C) resulted in upregulation of the transcripts and proteins involved in carbon metabolisms as well as enhanced growth. In contrast, more severe heat stress (40 °C) resulted in defects in cell division and growth accompanied by disruption in thylakoid ultrastructure and decreased photosynthetic activity. During recovery following both mild and severe heat treatments, accumulation of the transcripts and proteins involved in DNA synthesis increased, although those involved in photosynthetic light reactions declined. Such effects on the mechanisms of DNA synthesis were more obviously observed following the exposure of plants to severe heat stress. Based on these findings, it was proposed that downregulation of photosynthetic light reactions during DNA replication might benefit recovery of the cell cycle by reducing ROS production [68].
Taken together, these findings suggest that damages on PSII leading to the inhibition of electron transport and ATP synthesis negatively impacts the activities of the CO2 fixation under heat stress. Thus, it is essential to protect functions of PSII against heat stress via the integration among multiple pathways involving HSPs and ROS regulatory systems. It should be interesting to investigate how these multiple pathways are flexibly coordinated depending on intensity of heat stress or growth stages. Effects of heat stress on the chloroplasts can also impact on functions of the mitochondria and energy homeostasis. Effects of heat stress on the mitochondria and the integrations between the chloroplasts and mitochondria will be discussed in the sections below.

3. Effects of Heat Stress on the Mitochondria and Mechanisms to Counteract Them

In contrast to photosynthesis that can be dramatically inhibited by heat stress, rate of respiration increases as temperature increases [4]. Like other biochemical processes, respiration rate increases about twofold for every 10 °C of the temperature increase. It occurs at highly variable temperatures of 40–60 °C, depending on the plant species and growth habitat [70,71]. Such an increase in respiration could be beneficial for cells to fulfill energy demand for the maintenance of cellular metabolisms under heat stress. However, due to the inhibition of photosynthesis, substrates (i.e., sugars produced by photosynthesis) for the metabolisms associated with respiration can be depleted and plants are required to strictly modulate energy usage. Thus, inhibition of respiration by heat stress can be also occurred because of the detrimental damages on the chloroplasts [17,25]. It has been also demonstrated that excess ROS production in seeds caused disruptions in mitochondrial functions under heat stress [72]. In addition, heat stress reduces not only the fixation of CO2 via suppression of photosynthesis but also activities of sucrose synthesizing enzymes [73]. In this case, the decline of the sugar supply required for respiration might be supported by the degradation of alternative sources such as starches and proteins to maintain ATP production [74,75,76].
Under the situations in which sugar supply is depleted, reduction of ATP demand might be essential to decrease energy costs during heat stress. Such an “energy-saving mode” can be achieved at least partially by decrease in photosynthetic rate, transport and synthesis of sucrose, and growth inhibition [4]. However, ATP costs for protein synthesis and maintenance can increase during heat stress because the stress causes denaturation of proteins. Probably, stabilization of proteins requires less energy compared to synthesis of proteins [4]. The HSPs-dependent maintenance of protein conformation could therefore contribute to stabilization of proteins under heat stress, resulting in a decrease of energy costs. However, this hypothesis is still controversial because HSPs also utilize ATP for their functions [7,28]. Another possible strategy to efficiently acclimate to heat stress with reducing energy costs is the formation of heat-stable isoforms of mitochondrial proteins. For example, mitochondrial MALATE DEHYDROGENASE adaptable to higher temperature with greater thermal stability was found in beach pea and Arabidopsis [4]. Thus, it is possible that reprograming of the proteome involving heat-stable isoforms of proteins might allow respiration to acclimate to higher temperature with lowered energy costs [4].
Increase in membrane fluidity caused by heat stress also affects respiratory energy demand of cells. Leakage of protons to the intermembrane space of the mitochondria inhibits ATP synthesis via excess consumption of substrates for the maintenance of the proton motive force required for ATP synthesis [77]. Decrease in the proton motive force for ATP synthesis results in inhibition of electron flow in the mitochondrial electron transport chain [78]. In addition, heat stress can inhibit the activity of CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE (COX) due to the membrane disruption. Inhibition of COX activity results in over-reduction of the ubiquinone pool in the electron transport chain, leading to transfer of excess electron to oxygen to produce excess ROS [79,80].
Mitochondrial damage caused by oxidative stress can trigger the release of metals from mitochondrial proteins [81]. The released metals directly affect activities of the electron transport chain in the mitochondria, leading to further ROS production [82,83]. Oxidation of target proteins is also catalyzed by the released metals [84,85], which triggers the mitochondrial dysfunction as well as excess ROS production [81]. Aggregation of proteins oxidized by the released metals is known to disturb mitochondrial functions [85]. The release of metals in the presence of high level of •O2 and H2O2 accelerates the reaction to produce hydroxyl radical (•OH) that causes damages on the membrane via lipid peroxidation [81,86]. •OH can produce reactive carboxyl species (RCS) that lead to the formation of reactive compounds [87]. One of these RCS, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) was shown to inhibit several enzymes involved in the TCA cycle and respiration, such as MALATE DEHYDROGENASE, α-KETOGLUTARATE DEHYDROGENASE and PYRUVATE DEHYDROGENASE [88,89]. HNE also negatively impacts on the function of AOX. However, effects of HNE to the activity of AOX is still controversial because inhibition of respiration caused by HNE can also enhance accumulation of the Aox transcript and AOX protein [89].
Plants possess mechanisms to acclimate to heat stress via modulation of mitochondrial functions. Purified mitochondrial HSP22 from pea was shown to be decomposed into monomers in response to heat stress, preventing heat aggregation of rhodanese that detoxifies cyanide ion [90]. Roles of mitochondrial HSPs in the regulation of cellular ROS level during heat stress have been also reported. HSP24.7 in cotton was shown to positively regulate seed germination via temperature-dependent ROS generation [91]. In Arabidopsis, mitochondrial HSP70 is required to reduce ROS level and maintain COX activity during heat stress [92]. Several small HSPs were also reported to play important roles in protecting the electron transport chain and limiting ROS level during heat stress in apple and tomato [93,94,95]. Roles of sHSP24.1 in the response of eggplant to severe heat stress has been revealed in a recent study [21]. Overexpression of sHSP24.1 resulted in enhanced tolerance to heat stress up to 52 °C accompanied by upregulation of the transcripts involved in ROS scavenging, mitochondrial electron transport chain, auxin biosynthesis, and cell wall remodeling. These results suggest that the HSP-dependent pathways required for the protection of the mitochondria against oxidative stress play pivotal roles in the regulation of heat tolerance of plants, and at least to some extent, these pathways are conserved among various plant species. AOX has been well known to dissipate excess reducing equivalent to prevent over-reduction of the ubiquinone (UQ) pool without producing ROS [96,97]. Significance of AOX in the protection of plant cells against heat stress has been also reported. For example, increase in AOX capacity might contribute to acquired heat tolerance in spring wheat [26]. In marine diatom (Phaeodactylum tricornutum), downregulation of AOX resulted in enhanced sensitivity to heat stress accompanied by higher accumulation of H2O2 compared to WT [27], suggesting the role of AOX in the regulation of cellular ROS level under heat stress. In addition, AOX could be one of the key mediators of integration between the chloroplasts and mitochondria via retrograde signaling. These key roles of AOX will be discussed in the sections below.
In plant cells, proline is a multifunctional amino acid involved in responses to multiple stresses [98,99]. PROLINE DEHYDROGENASE (ProDH), a proline-degrading enzyme was shown to provide electrons to the electron transport chain in the mitochondria [100]. Under stress conditions accompanied by over-reduction of the electron transport chain, FADH2 in ProDH can reduce oxygen resulting in production of •O2 and subsequently H2O2 [101]. The presence of proline and the activity of ProDH might be therefore associated with status of ROS production and signaling in the mitochondria [81]. It is still controversial how proline affects heat stress responses in plants. Toxicity of proline under heat stress was demonstrated in Arabidopsis [102]; however, positive roles of proline on heat tolerance of plants have been also reported (summarized in a book chapter [103]). Effects of proline on heat responses in plants could be different depending on the coordination with ROS level and status of other metabolisms that can be modulated depending on the intensity and duration of stresses.
A recent study demonstrated the involvement of the machineries regulating mitochondrial gene expression in heat response of plants. Suppression of TRANSCRIPTION TERMINATION FACTOR-RELATED 18/SUPPRESSOR of HOT1-4 1 (mTERF18/SHOT1) resulted in enhanced heat tolerance of Arabidopsis via attenuation of oxidative damage [104]. SHOT1 was found to bind DNA and localizes to the mitochondrial nucleoids. As SHOT1-interacting proteins, three homologues of animal ATPase family, AAA DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 3 (ATAD3) were identified. Importantly, ATAD3 was shown to be involved in mitochondrial nucleoid organization, and deficiency in the function of ATAD3 resulted in disruption of the nucleoids, reduction in accumulation of the complex I, and enhancement of heat tolerance. Thus, such alterations caused by the deficiency in SHOT1 might activate the mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial metabolisms, leading to activation of heat acclimatory responses [104].
Taken together, the findings above suggest that heat stress can highly impact on membrane feature and activity of the electron transport chain in the mitochondria, which results in further generation of ROS leading to damage on the enzymes involved in respiration and related metabolisms. Thus, ROS regulatory systems and the mechanisms responsible for protections of the membrane and the electron transport chain against oxidative stress should be essential to regulate heat stress responses of plant cells. In future studies, it is necessary to elucidate how these heat acclimatory mechanisms in the mitochondria link to the systems to decrease energy costs. In addition, it should be also important to investigate how these heat acclimatory mechanisms are associated with other mechanisms involving proline metabolism and mitochondrial gene expression.

4. Heat Responses of Plants Regulated by Retrograde Signaling

Retrograde signaling from the chloroplasts and mitochondria to the nucleus optimizes functions of these organelles under stress conditions [105]. Previous studies demonstrated the involvement of chloroplast retrograde signaling in the regulation of heat response pathways (Figure 1). Retrograde signaling regulated by GENOME UNCOUPLED 5 (GUN5), the H-subunit of Mg-chelatase was shown to activate expression of the nuclear transcript encoding HSP21 that moves to the chloroplasts and protects D1 and D2 proteins against heat stress [59]. GUN1 activated by Mg-ProtoIX, a precursor of chlorophyll synthesis, functions upstream of ABA INSENSITIVE 4 (ABI4) that negatively or positively regulates transcription of downstream transcripts depending on binding targets [106,107]. Although detailed mechanisms of GUN1- and ABI4-dependent heat response in plants are still unknown, significance of these proteins in heat tolerance of plants was previously reported [108].
Protein translation in the chloroplasts is known as a heat-sensitive process [36]. Translation elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), named RAB GTPASE HOMOLOG E1b (RABE1b), was shown to be important for the maintenance of translation in the chloroplasts under heat stress [109]. Downregulation of RABE1b in Arabidopsis and tomato resulted in enhanced sensitivity to heat stress as well as compromised expression of the transcript encoding HSFA2 [109]. Downregulation of RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S1 (RPS1) in the chloroplast also resulted in impaired expression of the HSFA2-dependent heat response transcripts in the nucleus [110]. These results suggest that translation in the chloroplasts is required for chloroplast retrograde signaling which activates heat response pathway regulated by HSFA2. More recently, Trosch and coworkers demonstrated that heat stress led to a specific translational repression of chlorophyll a-containing core antenna proteins in PSI and PSII in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [111]. Pattern of translocation of the ribosome nascent chain complexes to the thylakoid membranes was altered by heat stress, which is characterized by increased accumulation of the chloroplast SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE 54 (cpSRP54)-bound ribosomes [111]. cpSRPs are known to modulate chlorophyll antenna size to maximize photosynthetic productivity [112]. Thus, plastid translation might be modulated depending on light harvesting capacity of chlorophyll antenna that can be affected by heat stress.
1O2 generated by the damage of PSII in the chloroplast is also known as a key regulator of retrograde signaling [3,18]. The transcriptional responses mediated by 1O2 were first found by the analyses of the Arabidopsis flu mutant [113,114]. When flu mutant is moved from dark to light condition, the mutant accumulates high level of 1O2 produced by protochlorophyllide, a photosensitizing chlorophyll precursor [115]. The 1O2-dependent retrograde signaling requires EXECUTOR1 and 2 (EX1 and 2) proteins localized in the thylakoid membrane [114,115,116,117,118,119]. The plastid ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease, FTSH2 is also involved in the signal transduction regulated by EX1 and EX2 [43,120]. FTSH2 was shown to be integrated with an unfolded protein response-like mechanism that regulates quality control of proteins including HSPs and ROS detoxifiers [43]. These results indicate the possible links between 1O2-dependent retrograde signaling and pathways involving HSPs and ROS regulatory systems. In contrast to H2O2, 1O2 might not be moved to the nucleus because of its short half-life. Thus, more stable second messengers activated by 1O2 might enhance downstream pathways [121]. β-carotene oxidized by 1O2 might be one candidate of the second messenger. It was demonstrated that β-carotene oxidized by 1O2 can re-program the expression of stress response transcripts [121]. H2O2 was shown to inhibit a key regulator of retrograde signaling, 3′(2′),5′-BISPHOSPHOSPHATE NUCLEOTIDASE (SAL1), leading to accumulation of 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphate (PAP). PAP transported from the chloroplast to the nucleus is known to regulate the expression of the nuclear genes involved in responses to high light and drought as well as programmed cell death [122,123]. However, roles of SAL1-dependent retrograde signaling in heat response have not been reported.
Due to high sensitivity to heat stress, the chloroplast is considered as a sensor of heat stress [124]. Ca2+ concentration in the stroma was reported to be increased in response to heat stress without altering Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm, suggesting that sensors of heat stress in the chloroplasts might be regulated by Ca2+-sensing proteins [124]. Ca2+ channels in the plasma membrane were proposed as heat sensors [125], and their functions are tightly linked with ROS signaling during heat stress [5,7]. It is therefore interesting to investigate how Ca2+-dependent heat sensing in the chloroplasts can be integrated with ROS regulatory systems involved in heat responses in plant cells. In addition, it should be also necessary to address how heat sensing mechanisms in the chloroplasts are linked to the regulation of retrograde signaling.
Several key players involved in mitochondrial retrograde signaling have been identified (Figure 2), although its underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown. AOX is a key marker to monitor the activation of mitochondrial retrograde signaling. ROS are known as signaling molecules that induce expression of the transcript encoding AOX (Aox). Previous studies demonstrated that exogenous application of antioxidants attenuated AOX activity induced by an inhibitor of the complex III of the electron transport chain [126,127]. Other regulators of mitochondrial retrograde signaling which modulate Aox expression were also identified by forward genetic screening in Arabidopsis [25]. Of these, ANAC017 was identified as a master regulator of mitochondrial retrograde signaling [128]. Although expression of the transcript encoding ANAC017 is not obviously altered by abiotic stresses, its protein conformational response to mitochondrial dysfunction has been revealed [128]. In response to perturbations of mitochondrial functions, the ANAC017 protein is released from the ER-membrane by the functions of an unknown protease and moves to the nuclei. ANAC017 was shown to function upstream to ANAC013, another key regulator of mitochondrial retrograde signaling [128].
Redox-dependent post translational modifications of proteins were also involved in the activation of mitochondrial retrograde signaling. Glutathione exists in the reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSH) forms and is known as a key regulator of cellular redox status [129]. S-glutathionylation is a reversible post translational modification that prevents cysteine residues of target proteins from oxidation [130,131]. Two mitochondrial enzymes, GALACTONOLACTONE DEHYDROGENASE (GLDH), a key enzyme in ascorbate synthesis, and GLYCINE DECARBOXYLASE (GLDC) involved in photorespiration, are known to be inactivated by S-glutathionylation [132,133]. The S-glutathionylation-dependent inactivation of these enzymes results in metabolic changes, which in turn triggers mitochondrial retrograde signaling [134]. S-nitrosylation by nitric oxide (NO) is also known as an important post translational modification of proteins involved in the regulation of mitochondrial retrograde signaling. Indeed, NO was shown to activate Aox expression [135,136]. Mitochondrial proteins targeted by S-nitrosylation include components of the complex I in the electron transport chain and ACONITASE, an enzyme that functions in the TCA cycle [136,137]. Inactivation of these proteins can induce increase in ROS as well as citrate. In addition, induction of Aox expression by monofluoroacetate (MFA), an inhibitor of ACONITASE in tobacco and Arabidopsis was reported in previous studies [138,139,140]. Application of MFA led to an increase in citrate level, and exogenous application of citrate also resulted in an induction of Aox expression in tobacco cell culture [139,141]. However, the role of citrate in the regulation of Aox expression is still unclear because Aox expression was not highly responsive to exogenous citrate application in Arabidopsis and soybean [142,143]. Probably, the significance of citrate in the regulation of retrograde signaling is a species-dependent process.
ABI4 was also identified as a mediator between mitochondrial retrograde signaling and expression of Aox transcript. ABI4 is known to be a repressor of Aox expression, which directly binds to the promoter of Aox gene [106,144]. In contrast, application of exogenous ABA can de-repress the inhibition of Aox expression by ABI4 [106]. Involvement of ABI4 both in chloroplast and mitochondrial retrograde signaling indicates the existence of the mechanisms that link these signals. Such integration of signals between the chloroplasts and mitochondria will be discussed in the following chapter.
Although AOX was shown to be involved in the protection of plants against heat stress [26,27], roles of its upstream regulators in heat responses are still largely unknown. It is necessary to address how disruptions of mitochondrial functions caused by heat stress can trigger retrograde signaling. In addition, it should be also important to investigate heat response transcripts and proteins that can be regulated by retrograde signaling.

5. Integration between Signals in the Chloroplasts and Mitochondria via ROS and Redox Regulation

To adapt to stress conditions including heat stress, it is necessary for plant cells to properly balance amounts of ATP, reductants and carbon via modulating functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria (Figure 3) [145]. In the chloroplasts, conditions that accelerate the oxygenase activity of RUBISCO lead to high demand of ATP relative to NADPH [146,147,148]. In this case, a shortage of ATP relative to NADPH generation by the electron transport chain in the chloroplasts results in excess accumulation of stromal NADPH [145]. To shuttle excess reductants from the stroma of the chloroplasts, NADPH is consumed by the reduction of oxaloacetate to form malate. Then, malate transported from the chloroplasts to the cytosol is oxidized back to oxaloacetate (OAA) and returns to the chloroplasts [145]. This malate oxidation generates NADH, whose conversion to NAD+ might depend on the mitochondrial electron transport chain [145]. Thus, functions of the mitochondria to oxidize reductants excessively accumulated in the stroma of the chloroplasts might be essential to maintain redox status in cells. Such redox regulations might be important to maintain electron flow in the chloroplasts, leading to acceleration of the stromal ATP production. In addition, respiratory activity in the mitochondria might shift to AOX-dependent to oxidize excess reductants, when activity of photorespiration is enhanced. In Arabidopsis, the glycine to serine ratio increased under high temperature due to the enhanced photorespiration, and this trend was further accelerated in AOX1a-deficient plants [149]. These results suggest that mitochondrial GLYCINE DECARBOXYLASE (GDC), which converts glycine to serine during photorespiration, was inhibited by the deficiency in AOX1a at higher temperatures, probably by high matrix NADH [150,151]. It should be noted that photorespiratory activity of RUBISCO can be activated under high temperature [152]; thus, such redox regulations involving the chloroplasts and mitochondria should be essential for plants to adapt to heat stress.
Glutathione (GSH) is known to play important roles in the regulation of ROS and redox homeostasis as well as energy demand in the whole plant cell level [129,153,154]. Formation of disulfide bond between GSH and cysteine residues is an important post-translational modification of proteins [129,130] because it can prevent oxidation of protein thiols by ROS and alterations in protein conformation [130]. The redox regulatory proteins localized both in the chloroplasts and mitochondria such as thioredoxins (TRX) and peroxiredoxins (PRX) are the targets of the post-translational modification by GSH [155,156,157,158]. TRXs and PRXs have been also reported to regulate AOX and many target proteins involved in carbon assimilation and mitochondrial respiration [157,159]. Based on the localization both in the chloroplasts and mitochondria, it can be speculated that TRXs and PRXs might contribute to the cross talk between the mitochondria and chloroplasts [159]. Such cross talk between these energy-related organelles might be associated with the transport of metabolites including NAPDH, dihydroxyacetone phosphate, malate and glycolate, whose concentration can be altered depending on light and energy status. [159,160]. Ascorbate is present in the cytosol, chloroplasts and mitochondria and functions as a key antioxidant to detoxify ROS under stress conditions including heat stress [79,86]. Scavenging of H2O2 is depending on the functions of ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE (APX) that catalyzes oxidation of ascorbate to monodehydroascorbate. Reduction of monodehydroascorbate to ascorbate is carried out by the functions of MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASES and GSH-DEPENDENT DEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASES [86]. Mitochondria are active sites producing ascorbate and utilizing ascorbate-glutathione cycle to scavenge H2O2, which can affect functions of the electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation [80,161,162]. Ascorbate produced in the mitochondria is provided to other cellular compartments including the chloroplasts. Thus, provision of ascorbate might affect chloroplast-derived signals that are depending on H2O2 [122,123,163].
Links between the chloroplasts and mitochondria can be also supported by the findings associated with retrograde signaling. The chloroplasts and mitochondria share the same components of retrograde signaling, such as ROS, ANAC017, ABI4 and PAP. Both chloroplasts and mitochondria produce •O2 and H2O2. Of these, H2O2 with longer half-life compared to •O2 moves into the cytosol and functions as a signaling molecule. It was demonstrated that in Arabidopsis, H2O2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum and induces release of transcription factors such as ANAC013 and ANAC017, key regulators of mitochondrial retrograde signaling [128,142]. Of these, ANAC017 was shown to be involved in the regulation of both chloroplast and mitochondrial retrograde signaling, which might suppress programmed cell death [164]. ABI4 and WRKY40 transcription factors were also known to regulate both chloroplast and mitochondrial retrograde signaling [81]. ABI4 acts as a repressor of the expression of the transcripts encoding LIGHT-HARVESTING CHLOROPHYLL a/b BINDING PROTEIN (LHCb) and AOX in the chloroplasts and mitochondria, respectively [105]. In contrast, WRKY40 and 63 positively regulate the expression of Aox transcript [105]. These WRKY transcription factors can be upregulated by dysfunctions of both chloroplasts and mitochondria, but not by a dysfunction of chloroplast or mitochondrial alone [165], suggesting their involvement in the modulation of the balance between functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria. PAP, a common regulator of both chloroplast and mitochondrial retrograde signaling, might also contribute to the crosstalk between these organelles. Such a crosstalk can be supported by the fact that PAP- and ANAC017-dependent pathways shared by the chloroplasts and mitochondria are involved in the regulation of similar sets of transcripts [164]. In contrast to chloroplast retrograde signaling, detailed mechanisms of SAL1-dependent mitochondrial retrograde signaling are still largely unknown [81,105]. It is speculated that mitochondrial retrograde signaling might be modulated via the coordination between level of PAP accumulation, SAL1 activity and ROS homeostasis. However, export of PAP from the mitochondria to the cytosol has not been revealed [81]. To elucidate the crosstalk between chloroplast and mitochondrial retrograde signaling; therefore, it is necessary to further uncover the mechanisms underlying mitochondrial retrograde signaling.

6. Possible Involvement of Energy-Regulatory Hub in Heat Response of Plants

The functions of TOR and SnRK1 to modulate growth and stress response signals depending on energy status have been extensively studied [30,31,32]. However, majority of these research focused on the responses of plants to dark conditions or submergence. Unfortunately, it is still largely unknown how mechanisms involving TOR and SnRK1 function under heat stress. It can be however speculated that these mechanisms involving TOR and SnRK1 might also contribute to responses of plants to heat stress because functions of these proteins were shown to be linked to the heat-sensitive processes in the chloroplasts and mitochondria (Figure 4).
Glucose and sucrose derived from photosynthesis as well as light signals activate TOR signaling via promoting auxin signals, which enhance cell division in the shoot and root meristems [166,167,168,169]. Deficient plants in TOR showed severe defects in photosynthesis [18]. Overexpression of TOR also resulted in impaired chloroplast development [18]. These facts indicate that TOR might be involved in the maintenance of photosynthetic machineries. Under abiotic stresses responsible for energy deficit, in contrast to TOR accelerating energy consuming processes, SnRK1 restores the energy homeostasis by activating catabolic pathways to produce ATP, while inhibiting energy consuming pathways. Integration between functions of SnRK1 and regulation of photosynthesis has been demonstrated in several studies [170]. In Arabidopsis, AKIN10, a kinase subunit of SnRK1 was shown to be activated in response to the inhibition of electron transport at PSII [170]. Integration between ethylene signaling, photosynthesis and AKIN10 activity has been also reported in a previous study [171]. An Arabidopsis mutant deficient in ethylene response (etr1 mutants) showed impaired PSII efficiency, leading to energy depletion that can activate AKIN10. Taken together, these results indicate that TOR and SnRK1 might control energy usage via modulating activity of photosynthesis depending on the energy status in cells.
SnRK1 can be activated by hypoxia accompanied by suppression of mitochondrial aerobic respiration and ATP synthesis [172,173]. Under such situations, BASIC LEUCINE ZIPPER 63 (bZIP63), a target of SnRK1 is known to form heterodimers with other bZIP family proteins. These bZIP transcription factors play important roles in amino acid breakdown under low energy conditions, which is known to be an alternative process of energy production. Under the situations with limited ATP production and low level of carbohydrates, retrograde signaling from the mitochondria can be also activated to induce alternative pathways of energy production such as catabolism of amino acids and fatty acids [174,175]. Amino acids can be also directly used as substrates to maintain the functions of the electron transport chain in the mitochondria under stresses accompanied by energy depletion [23]. Alterations in ATP level might affect level of other metabolites, leading to activation of mitochondrial retrograde signaling. These metabolites that act as retrograde signals include acetyl-CoA, the TCA cycle intermediates and NADH [174,176].
Involvement of SnRK1 in the regulation of AOX was demonstrated in previous studies. SnRK1 reprograms stress acclimatory mechanisms by modulating expression of the stress response genes and phosphorylation of the key metabolic proteins involved in mitochondrial retrograde signaling and the TCA cycle [81]. CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE E1 (CDKE1) and MYELOBLASTOSIS DOMAIN PROTEIN 29 (MYB29) as well as several proteins involved in auxin signaling were identified as regulators of Aox expression [142,177,178]. CDKE1 was shown to interact with SnRK1 to activate AOX [142]. SnRK1-dependent activation of Aox expression is integrated with the primary energy/stress signaling pathways [34]. In contrast, inhibition of auxin signaling and MYB29 resulted in prolonged retrograde signaling, suggesting that they function as negative regulators of AOX. The role of auxin as a negative regulator of AOX can be also supported by research employing mutants deficient in auxin transporters [178].
Based on the links of TOR and SnRK1 with functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria, we can speculate that TOR- and SnRK1-dependent mechanisms might be also associated with ROS regulatory systems. It has been well known that ROS producing enzymes, RBOHs are involved in a broad range of processes underlying growth, development and stress responses in plants [13]. Thus, the TOR- and SnRK1-dependent mechanisms could be integrated with the regulatory systems of ROS signals relying on RBOHs. Indeed, several RBOHs were shown to be upregulated in response to hypoxia accompanied by energy depletion [179]. Links between ROS regulatory systems and response to energy depletion can be also supported by the findings that a ROS specific cis element in the promoter of stress response genes functions under starvation [180,181]. In addition, a recent study demonstrated the significance of ROS in the modulation of the balance between cell division and differentiation in the shoot apical meristem [182], processes which can be regulated by TOR [166,167,168,169]. Abscisic acid (ABA) was shown to inhibit ATP-ADP exchange between the mitochondria and the cytosol by inhibiting mitochondrial ADENINE NUCLEOTIDE TRANSLOCATORs (ANTs) under the conditions accompanied by energy depletion [81,183,184]. Decrease in ADP in the mitochondria leads to accumulation of excess electrons in the electron transport chain and ROS production [81]. This inhibition of ATP-ADP exchange by ABA can be sensed by SnRK1, leading to subsequent reprograming of the expression of stress response transcripts and the phosphorylation of stress response proteins [185].
Previous studies indicated the possible links between TOR-dependent mechanisms with heat response pathways. Glucose-dependent TOR signaling was shown to induce expression of HSPs through the modulation of TOR-E2Fa signaling accompanied by enhanced heat tolerance [169,186]. Glucose also epigenetically regulates transcription of genes involved in heat responses in a TOR-dependent manner in which TOR functions together with p300/CREB HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE 1 (HAC1). It has been demonstrated that HSP90 stabilizes auxin receptor TIR1 and promotes elongation of shoots and roots at warm temperature [187]. These results indicate the integration of the thermomorphogenesis involving auxin signals with the HSP-dependent pathway.
The findings above indicate that the TOR- and SnRK1-dependent mechanisms might play important roles in the regulation of heat responses in plants, because the processes in the chloroplasts and mitochondria which are linked with TOR- and SnRK1 are known to be heat-sensitive. In future studies, it is necessary to investigate how photosynthetic and respiratory processes damaged by heat stress can be modulated via functions of TOR and SnRK1.

7. Conclusions

Effects of heat stress on functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria are mainly associated with excess production of ROS and altered redox status. ROS produced via dysfunctions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria can accelerate the damage on these organelles. However, increase in ROS production and alteration in redox status in these organelles can also trigger the acclimatory mechanisms of plants to heat stress. Indeed, many researchers have already known that ROS production needs to be strictly modulated under stresses including heat stress. The heat response mechanism activated by ROS include HSFs- and HSPs-dependent pathways. The findings described above suggest that plants possess various ROS-dependent pathways associated with the chloroplastic and mitochondrial signals to activate HSFs and HSPs in response to heat stress. Activation of heat responses via multiple pathways might be essential to flexibly tailor heat responses depending on intensity and duration of heat stress as well as growth stages of plants. We can expect that effects of heat stress on the chloroplasts and mitochondria might be different depending on such diverse situations with different energy demand.
Another key player regulating the heat acclimation of cells might be AOX in the mitochondria. Previous studies revealed various mechanisms that activate expression of Aox transcript. Even only for mitochondrial retrograde signaling, several key components responsible for the regulation of AOX expression have been found. In contrast to photosynthesis, to some extent, respiration can be activated by heat stress to provide energy required for protection of cells, indicating the significance of the maintenance of mitochondrial functions for the heat acclimation of plants. Thus, the modulation of ROS level via AOX might be a key process to protect cells against heat stress.
ROS and redox regulation might be essential to integrate functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria via the exchange of metabolites and retrograde signaling, leading to the proper balance between ATP production and carbon level in cells. Significance of ROS in the regulation of carbon level and energy production could be also supported by the integrations of ROS regulatory systems with sugar metabolisms proposed in a previous review [188]. However, such integrations of mechanisms under heat stress still needs to be addressed in future studies. Despite the extensive studies focusing on effects heat stress on energy regulatory organelles (chloroplasts and mitochondria), roles of key energy regulatory mechanisms involving TOR and SnRK1 in heat response of plants are still not understood. The possible contributions of TOR and SnRK1 to heat responses of plants can be supported by the integration of TOR and SnRK1 with mechanisms involving HSPs, AOX and ROS production as well as functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria. In future studies, it is necessary to uncover how TOR and SnRK1 regulate energy metabolisms to activate heat stress responses in plants.

Funding

This research was funded by Sophia University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Raftery, A.E.; Zimmer, A.; Frierson, D.M.W.; Startz, R.; Liu, P. Less Than 2 °C Warming by 2100 Unlikely. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Prasad, P.V.V.; Bheemanahalli, R.; Jagadish, S.V.K. Field crops and the fear of heat stress—Opportunities, challenges and future directions. Field Crops Res. 2017, 200, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zeng, C.; Jia, T.; Gu, T.; Su, J.; Hu, X. Progress in Research on the Mechanisms Underlying Chloroplast-Involved Heat Tolerance in Plants. Genes 2021, 12, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Scafaro, A.P.; Fan, Y.; Bradley, C.; Posch, B.C.; Garcia, A.; Coast, O.; Atkin, O.K. Responses of leaf respiration to heatwaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 2090–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mittler, R.; Finka, A.; Goloubinoff, P. How do plants feel the heat? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Katano, K.; Honda, K.; Suzuki, N. Integration between ROS Regulatory Systems and Other Signals in the Regulation of Various Types of Heat Responses in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Guihur, A.; Rebeaud, M.E.; Goloubinoff, P. How do plants feel the heat and survive? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2022, 47, 824–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Medina, E.; Kim, S.H.; Yun, M.; Choi, W.G. Recapitulation of the Function and Role of ROS Generated in Response to Heat Stress in Plants. Plants 2021, 10, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Babbar, R.; Karpinska, B.; Grover, A.; Foyer, C.H. Heat-Induced Oxidation of the Nuclei and Cytosol. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 617779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Morales, J.; Shulaev, V.; Torres, M.A.; Mittler, R. Respiratory burst oxidases: The engines of ROS signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chapman, J.M.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Gayomba, S.R.; Muday, G.K. RBOH-Dependent ROS Synthesis and ROS Scavenging by Plant Specialized Metabolites To Modulate Plant Development and Stress Responses. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 370–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, C.H.; Wang, P.Q.; Zhang, P.P.; Nie, X.M.; Li, B.B.; Tai, L.; Liu, W.T.; Li, W.Q.; Chen, K.M. NADPH Oxidases: The Vital Performers and Center Hubs during Plant Growth and Signaling. Cells 2020, 9, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Salazar, C.; Mondal, H.A.; Shulaev, E.; Cortes, D.F.; Shuman, J.L.; Luo, X.; Shah, J.; Schlauch, K.; et al. Temporal-spatial interaction between reactive oxygen species and abscisic acid regulates rapid systemic acclimation in plants. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3553–3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Giesguth, M.; Sahm, A.; Simon, S.; Dietz, K.J. Redox-dependent translocation of the heat shock transcription factor AtHSFA8 from the cytosol to the nucleus in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kataoka, R.; Takahashi, M.; Suzuki, N. Coordination between bZIP28 and HSFA2 in the regulation of heat response signals in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2017, 12, e1376159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, Q.L.; Chen, J.H.; He, N.Y.; Guo, F.Q. Metabolic Reprogramming in Chloroplasts under Heat Stress in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Song, Y.; Feng, L.; Alyafei, M.A.M.; Jaleel, A.; Ren, M. Function of Chloroplasts in Plant Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhong, L.; Zhou, W.; Wang, H.; Ding, S.; Lu, Q.; Wen, X.; Peng, L.; Zhang, L.; Lu, C. Chloroplast small heat shock protein HSP21 interacts with plastid nucleoid protein pTAC5 and is essential for chloroplast development in Arabidopsis under heat stress. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2925–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chakraborty, K.; Bishi, S.K.; Singh, A.L.; Zala, P.V.; Mahatma, M.K.; Kalariya, K.A.; Jat, R.A. Rapid induction of small heat shock proteins improves physiological adaptation to high temperature stress in peanut. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2018, 204, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khatun, M.; Borphukan, B.; Alam, I.; Keya, C.A.; Panditi, V.; Khan, H.; Huq, S.; Reddy, M.K.; Salimullah, M. Mitochondria-Targeted SmsHSP24.1 Overexpression Stimulates Early Seedling Vigor and Stress Tolerance by Multi-Pathway Transcriptome-Reprogramming. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 741898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Foyer, C.H.; Hanke, G. ROS production and signalling in chloroplasts: Cornerstones and evolving concepts. Plant J. 2022, 111, 642–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Van Aken, O. Mitochondrial redox systems as central hubs in plant metabolism and signaling. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sun, A.Z.; Guo, F.Q. Chloroplast Retrograde Regulation of Heat Stress Responses in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, Y.; Berkowitz, O.; Selinski, J.; Xu, Y.; Hartmann, A.; Whelan, J. Stress responsive mitochondrial proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 122, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Borovik, O.A.; Grabelnych, O.I. Mitochondrial alternative cyanide-resistant oxidase is involved in an increase of heat stress tolerance in spring wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 231, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Murik, O.; Tirichine, L.; Prihoda, J.; Thomas, Y.; Araújo, W.L.; Allen, A.E. Downregulation of mitochondrial alternative oxidase affects chloroplast function, redox status and stress response in a marine diatom. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1303–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hartl, F.U. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996, 381, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Posch, B.C.; Kariyawasam, B.C.; Bramley, H.; Coast, O.; Richards, R.A.; Reynolds, M.P.; Trethowan, R.; Atkin, O.K. Exploring high temperature responses of photosynthesis and respiration to improve heat tolerance in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5051–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Broeckx, T.; Hulsmans, S.; Rolland, F. The plant energy sensor: Evolutionary conservation and divergence of SnRK1 structure, regulation, and function. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6215–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caldana, C.; Martins, M.C.M.; Mubeen, U.; Urrea-Castellanos, R. The magic ‘hammer’ of TOR: The multiple faces of a single pathway in the metabolic regulation of plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 2217–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Crepin, N.; Rolland, F. SnRK1 activation, signaling, and networking for energy homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 51, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suzuki, N.; Shigaki, S.; Yunose, M.; Putrawisesa, N.R.; Hogaki, S.; Di Piazza, M.C. Mechanisms Regulating Energy Homeostasis in Plant Cells and Their Potential to Inspire Electrical Microgrids Models. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Emanuelle, S.; Doblin, M.S.; Stapleton, D.I.; Bacic, A.; Gooley, P.R. Molecular Insights into the Enigmatic Metabolic Regulator, SnRK1. Trend Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Haq, S.I.U.; Shang, J.; Xie, H.; Qiu, Q.S. Roles of TOR signaling in nutrient deprivation and abiotic stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 274, 153716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, S.; Ding, Y.; Zhu, C. Sensitivity and Responses of Chloroplasts to Heat Stress in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, R.; Wise, R.R.; Struck, K.R.; Sharkey, T.D. Moderate heat stress of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves causes chloroplast swelling and plastoglobule formation. Photosynth. Res. 2010, 105, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Baker, N.R.; Rosenqvist, E. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: An examination of future possibilities. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1607–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Janka, E.; Körner, O.; Rosenqvist, E.; Ottosen, C.O. High temperature stress monitoring and detection using chlorophyll a fluorescence and infrared thermography in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 67, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mathur, S.; Agrawal, D.; Jajoo, A. Photosynthesis: Response to high temperature stress. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2014, 137, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wahid, A.; Gelani, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Kreslavski, V.D.; Klimov, V.V.; Los, D.A.; Carpentier, R.; Mohanty, P. Heat stress: An overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 98, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dogra, V.; Kim, C. Chloroplast protein homeostasis is coupled with retrograde signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1656037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ding, X.; Jimenez-Gongora, T.; Krenz, B.; Lozano-Duran, R. Chloroplast clustering around the nucleus is a general response to pathogen perception in Nicotiana benthamiana. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 1298–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lin, Y.P.; Lee, T.Y.; Tanaka, A.; Charng, Y.Y. Analysis of an Arabidopsis heat-sensitive mutant reveals that chlorophyll synthase is involved in reutilization of chlorophyllide during chlorophyll turnover. Plant J. 2014, 80, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rossi, S.; Burgess, P.; Jespersen, D.; Huang, B. Heat-Induced Leaf Senescence Associated with Chlorophyll Metabolism in Bentgrass Lines Differing in Heat Tolerance. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, S-169–S-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abdelrahman, M.; El-Sayed, M.; Jogaiah, S.; Burritt, D.J.; Tran, L.P. The “STAY-GREEN” trait and phytohormone signaling networks in plants under heat stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1009–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Asada, K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox signaling in plants. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 2087–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sainz, M.; Díaz, P.; Monza, J.; Borsani, O. Heat stress results in loss of chloroplast Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and increased damage to Photosystem II in combined drought-heat stressed Lotus japonicus. Physiol. Plant 2010, 140, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Busch, F.A. Photorespiration in the context of Rubisco biochemistry, CO2 diffusion and metabolism. Plant J. 2020, 101, 919–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Wang, G.; Kong, F.; Zhang, S.; Meng, X.; Wang, Y.; Meng, Q. A tomato chloroplast-targeted DnaJ protein protects Rubisco activity under heat stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3027–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wang, X.; Cai, J.; Liu, F.; Dai, T.; Cao, W.; Wollenweber, B.; Jiang, D. Multiple heat priming enhances thermo-tolerance to a later high temperature stress via improving subcellular antioxidant activities in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 74, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pant, B.D.; Oh, S.; Lee, H.K.; Nandety, R.S.; Mysore, K.S. Antagonistic Regulation by CPN60A and CLPC1 of TRXL1 that Regulates MDH Activity Leading to Plant Disease Resistance and Thermotolerance. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Xie, Q.; Liu, Y.; Lv, H.; Bai, R.; Ma, R.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.D.; et al. SlSNAT Interacts with HSP40, a Molecular Chaperone, to Regulate Melatonin Biosynthesis and Promote Thermotolerance in Tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 909–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, J.; Gao, T.; Hu, J.; Zhao, L.; Yu, C.; Ma, F. Research advances in function and regulation mechanisms of plant small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) under environmental stresses. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 154054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, H.Y.; Back, K. Melatonin Regulates Chloroplast Protein Quality Control via a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, J.Y.; Sun, Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Yi, S.Y.; Qin, J.; Li, M.H.; Liu, J. The involvement of chloroplast HSP100/ClpB in the acquired thermotolerance in tomato. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, S.T.; He, N.Y.; Chen, J.H.; Guo, F.Q. Identification of core subunits of photosystem II as action sites of HSP21, which is activated by the GUN5-mediated retrograde pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2017, 89, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sedaghatmehr, M.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Balazadeh, S. The plastid metalloprotease FtsH6 and small heat shock protein HSP21 jointly regulate thermomemory in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sedaghatmehr, M.; Stüwe, B.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Balazadeh, S. Heat shock factor HSFA2 fine-tunes resetting of thermomemory via plastidic metalloprotease FtsH6. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 6394–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bi, A.; Wang, T.; Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Wassie, M. Stress memory gene FaHSP17.8-CII controls thermotolerance via remodeling PSII and ROS signaling in tall fescue. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 1163–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hayes, S.; Schachtschabel, J. Hot topic: Thermosensing in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 2018–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Garab, G.; Ughy, B.; Waard, P.; Akhtar, P.; Javornik, U.; Kotakis, C.; Šket, P.; Karlický, V.; Materová, Z.; Špunda, V.; et al. Lipid polymorphism in chloroplast thylakoid membranes—As revealed by (31)P-NMR and time-resolved merocyanine fluorescence spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Krumova, S.B.; Dijkema, C.; de Waard, P.; Van As, H.; Garab, G.; van Amerongen, H. Phase behavior of phosphatidylglycerol in spinach thylakoid membranes as revealed by 31P-NMR. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1778, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Tsvetkova, N.M.; Horváth, I.; Török, Z.; Wolkers, W.F.; Balogi, Z.; Shigapova, N.; Crowe, L.M.; Tablin, F.; Vierling, E.; Crowe, J.H.; et al. Small heat-shock proteins regulate membrane lipid polymorphism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 13504–13509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Dlouhý, O.; Kurasová, I.; Karlický, V.; Javornik, U.; Šket, P.; Petrova, N.Z.; Krumova, S.B.; Plavec, J.; Ughy, B.; Špunda, V.; et al. Modulation of non-bilayer lipid phases and the structure and functions of thylakoid membranes: Effects on the water-soluble enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, N.; Mattoon, E.M.; McHargue, W. Systems-wide analysis revealed shared and unique responses to moderate and acute high temperatures in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, X.; Huang, L.J.; Sun, X.F.; Zhao, L.L.; Wang, P.C. Differential Physiological, Transcriptomic, and Metabolomic Responses of Paspalum wettsteinii Under High-Temperature Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 865608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Atkin, O.K.; Tjoelker, M.G. Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lal, M.K.; Tiwari, R.K.; Gahlaut, V.; Mangal, V.; Kumar, A.; Singh, M.P.; Paul, V.; Kumar, S.; Singh, B.; Zinta, G. Physiological and molecular insights on wheat responses to heat stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 501–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Reis, L.P.; de Lima, E.B.E.E.; Brito, D.S.; Bernardes, R.C.; Dos Santos Araújo, R. Heat stress-mediated effects on the morphophysiological, biochemical, and ultrastructural parameters of germinating Melanoxylon brauna Schott. seeds. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1773–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kaushal, N.; Awasthi, R.; Gupta, K.; Gaur, P.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Nayyar, H. Heat-stress-induced reproductive failures in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) are associated with impaired sucrose metabolism in leaves and anthers. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 1334–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hüve, K.; Bichele, I.; Ivanova, H.; Keerberg, O.; Pärnik, T.; Rasulov, B.; Tobias, M.; Niinemets, U. Temperature responses of dark respiration in relation to leaf sugar concentration. Physiol. Plant 2012, 144, 320–334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Rashid, F.A.A.; Crisp, P.A.; Zhang, Y.; Berkowit, O.; Pogson, B.J.; Day, A.D.; Masle, J.; Dewar, R.C.; Whelan, J.; Atkin, O.K.; et al. Molecular and physiological responses during thermal acclimation of leaf photosynthesis and respiration in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 594–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Araújo, W.L.; Tohge, T.; Ishizaki, K.; Leaver, C.J.; Fernie, A.R. Protein degradation—An alternative respiratory substrate for stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Brookes, P.S. Mitochondrial H(+) leak and ROS generation: An odd couple. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2005, 38, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. O’Leary, B.M.; Lee, C.P.; Atkin, O.K. Variation in Leaf Respiration Rates at Night Correlates with Carbohydrate and Amino Acid Supply. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 2261–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Suzuki, N.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species and temperature stresses: A delicate balance between signaling and destruction. Physiol. Plant 2006, 126, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Turrens, J.F. Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J. Physiol. 2003, 552 Pt 2, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dourmap, C.; Roque, S.; Morin, A.; Caubrière, D.; Kerdiles, M.; Béguin, K.; Perdoux, R.; Reynoud, N.; Bourdet, L.; Audebert, P.A.; et al. Stress signalling dynamics of the mitochondrial electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation system in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 2020, 125, 721–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Amirsadeghi, S.; Robson, C.A.; Vanlerberghe, G.C. The role of the mitochondrion in plant responses to biotic stress. Physiol. Plant 2007, 129, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tan, Y.F.; O’Toole, N.; Taylor, N.L.; Millar, A.H. Divalent metal ions in plant mitochondria and their role in interactions with proteins and oxidative stress-induced damage to respiratory function. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 747–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Møller, I.M.; Rogowska-Wrzesinska, A.; Rao, R.S. Protein carbonylation and metal-catalyzed protein oxidation in a cellular perspective. J. Proteom. 2011, 74, 2228–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jacoby, R.P.; Li, L.; Huang, S.; Pong Lee, C.; Millar, A.H.; Taylor, N.L. Mitochondrial composition, function and stress response in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54, 887–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mano, J. Reactive carbonyl species: Their production from lipid peroxides, action in environmental stress, and the detoxification mechanism. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 59, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Winger, A.M.; Millar, A.H.; Day, D.A. Sensitivity of plant mitochondrial terminal oxidases to the lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE). Biochem. J. 2005, 387 Pt 3, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Winger, A.M.; Taylor, N.L.; Heazlewood, J.L.; Day, D.A.; Millar, A.H. The Cytotoxic lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal covalently modifies a selective range of proteins linked to respiratory function in plant mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 37436–37447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Avelange-Macherel, M.H.; Rolland, A.; Hinault, M.P.; Tolleter, D.; Macherel, D. The Mitochondrial Small Heat Shock Protein HSP22 from Pea is a Thermosoluble Chaperone Prone to Co-Precipitate with Unfolding Client Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ma, W.; Guan, X.; Li, J.; Pan, R.; Wang, L.; Liu, F.; Ma, H.; Zhu, S.; Hu, J.; Ruan, Y.L.; et al. Mitochondrial small heat shock protein mediates seed germination via thermal sensing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 4716–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Wei, S.S.; Niu, W.T.; Zhai, X.T.; Liang, W.Q.; Xu, M.; Fan, X.; Lv, T.T.; Xu, W.Y.; Bai, J.T.; Jia, N.; et al. Arabidopsis mtHSC70-1 plays important roles in the establishment of COX-dependent respiration and redox homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5575–5590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Downs, C.A.; Heckathorn, S.A. The mitochondrial small heat-shock protein protects NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase of the electron transport chain during heat stress in plants. FEBS Lett. 1998, 430, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Banzet, N.; Richaud, C.; Deveaux, Y.; Kazmaier, M.; Gagnon, J.; Triantaphylidès, C. Accumulation of small heat shock proteins, including mitochondrial HSP22, induced by oxidative stress and adaptive response in tomato cells. Plant J. 1998, 13, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Lund, A.A.; Rhoads, D.M.; Lund, A.L.; Cerny, R.L.; Elthon, T.E. In vivo modifications of the maize mitochondrial small heat stress protein, HSP22. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 29924–29929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Millenaar, F.F.; Lambers, H. The Alternative Oxidase: In vivo Regulation and Function. Plant Biol. 2003, 5, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Saha, B.; Borovskii, G.; Panda, S.K. Alternative oxidase and plant stress tolerance. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1256530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hosseinifard, M.; Stefaniak, S.; Ghorbani Javid, M. Contribution of Exogenous Proline to Abiotic Stresses Tolerance in Plants: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 23, 5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kavi Kishor, P.B.; Suravajhala, P.; Rathnagiri, P.; Sreenivasulu, N. Intriguing Role of Proline in Redox Potential Conferring High Temperature Stress Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 867531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Schertl, P.; Braun, H.P. Respiratory electron transfer pathways in plant mitochondria. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liang, X.; Zhang, L.; Natarajan, S.K.; Becker, D.F. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 998–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Shuman, J.; Shulaev, V.; Davletova, S.; Mittler, R. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Iqbal, N.; Fatma, M.; Khan, N.A.; Umar, S. Chapter 28—Regulatory Role of Proline in Heat Stress Tolerance: Modulation by Salicylic Acid. In Plant Signaling Molecules; Khan, M.I.R., Reddy, P.S., Ferrante, A., Khan, N.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Southen, UK, 2019; pp. 437–448. [Google Scholar]
  104. Kim, M.; Schulz, V.; Brings, L.; Schoeller, T.; Kühn, K. mTERF18 and ATAD3 are required for mitochondrial nucleoid structure and their disruption confers heat tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 2026–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, Y.; Selinski, J.; Mao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Berkowitz, O.; Whelan, J. Linking mitochondrial and chloroplast retrograde signalling in plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 375, 20190410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Giraud, E.; Van Aken, O.; Ho, L.H.; Whelan, J. The transcription factor ABI4 is a regulator of mitochondrial retrograde expression of ALTERNATIVE OXIDASE1A. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1286–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Wind, J.J.; Peviani, A.; Snel, B.; Hanson, J.; Smeekens, S.C. ABI4: Versatile activator and repressor. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Miller, G.; Suzuki, N.; Rizhsky, L.; Hegie, A.; Koussevitzky, S.; Mittler, R. Double mutants deficient in cytosolic and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase reveal a complex mode of interaction between reactive oxygen species, plant development, and response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1777–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Li, X.; Cai, C.; Wang, Z.; Fan, B.; Zhu, C.; Chen, Z. Plastid Translation Elongation Factor Tu Is Prone to Heat-Induced Aggregation Despite Its Critical Role in Plant Heat Tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 3027–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Yu, H.D.; Yang, X.F.; Chen, S.T.; Wang, Y.T.; Li, J.K.; Shen, Q.; Liu, X.L.; Guo, F.Q. Downregulation of chloroplast RPS1 negatively modulates nuclear heat-responsive expression of HsfA2 and its target genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Trösch, R.; Ries, F.; Westrich, L.D.; Gao, Y.; Herkt, C.; Hoppstädter, J.; Heck-Roth, J.; Mustas, M.; Scheuring, D.; Choquet, Y.; et al. Fast and global reorganization of the chloroplast protein biogenesis network during heat acclimation. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 1075–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kirst, H.; Melis, A. The chloroplast signal recognition particle (CpSRP) pathway as a tool to minimize chlorophyll antenna size and maximize photosynthetic productivity. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Meskauskiene, R.; Nater, M.; Goslings, D.; Kessler, F.; op den Camp, R.; Apel, K. FLU: A negative regulator of chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 12826–12831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Wagner, D.; Przybyla, D.; Op den Camp, R.; Kim, C.; Landgraf, F.; Lee, K.P.; Würsch, M.; Laloi, C.; Nater, M.; Hideg, E.; et al. The genetic basis of singlet oxygen-induced stress responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 2004, 306, 1183–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Op den Camp, R.G.; Przybyla, D.; Ochsenbein, C.; Laloi, C.; Kim, C.; Danon, A.; Wagner, D.; Hideg, E.; Göbel, C.; Feussner, I.; et al. Rapid induction of distinct stress responses after the release of singlet oxygen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2320–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Lee, K.P.; Kim, C.; Landgraf, F.; Apel, K. EXECUTER1- and EXECUTER2-dependent transfer of stress-related signals from the plastid to the nucleus of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10270–10275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Kim, C.; Apel, K. Singlet oxygen-mediated signaling in plants: Moving from flu to wild type reveals an increasing complexity. Photosynth. Res. 2013, 116, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Uberegui, E.; Hall, M.; Lorenzo, Ó.; Schröder, W.P.; Balsera, M. An Arabidopsis soluble chloroplast proteomic analysis reveals the participation of the Executer pathway in response to increased light conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2067–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Carmody, M.; Crisp, P.A.; d’Alessandro, S.; Ganguly, D.; Gordon, M.; Havaux, M.; Albrecht-Bort, V.; Pogson, B.J. Uncoupling High Light Responses from Singlet Oxygen Retrograde Signaling and Spatial-Temporal Systemic Acquired Acclimation. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1734–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Wang, L.; Kim, C.; Xu, X.; Piskurewicz, U.; Dogra, V. Singlet oxygen- and EXECUTER1-mediated signaling is initiated in grana margins and depends on the protease FtsH2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E3792–E3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Petrov, V.D.; Van Breusegem, F. Hydrogen peroxide-a central hub for information flow in plant cells. AoB Plants 2012, 2012, pls014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chan, K.X.; Mabbitt, P.D.; Phua, S.Y.; Mueller, J.W.; Nisar, N.; Gigolashvili, T.; Stroeher, E.; Grassl, J.; Arlt, W.; Estavillo, G.M.; et al. Sensing and signaling of oxidative stress in chloroplasts by inactivation of the SAL1 phosphoadenosine phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E4567–E4576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Chan, K.X.; Phua, S.Y.; Crisp, P.; McQuinn, R.; Pogson, B.J. Learning the Languages of the Chloroplast: Retrograde Signaling and Beyond. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 25–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lenzoni, G.; Knight, M.R. Increases in Absolute Temperature Stimulate Free Calcium Concentration Elevations in the Chloroplast. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Finka, A.; Cuendet, A.F.; Maathuis, F.J.; Saidi, Y.; Goloubinoff, P. Plasma membrane cyclic nucleotide gated calcium channels control land plant thermal sensing and acquired thermotolerance. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3333–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Maxwell, D.P.; Wang, Y.; McIntosh, L. The alternative oxidase lowers mitochondrial reactive oxygen production in plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 8271–8276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Vanlerberghe, G.C.; Robson, C.A.; Yip, J.Y. Induction of mitochondrial alternative oxidase in response to a cell signal pathway down-regulating the cytochrome pathway prevents programmed cell death. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 1829–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. De Clercq, I.; Vermeirssen, V.; Van Aken, O.; Vandepoele, K.; Murcha, M.W.; Law, S.R.; Inzé, A.; Ng, S.; Ivanova, A.; Rombaut, D.; et al. The membrane-bound NAC transcription factor ANAC013 functions in mitochondrial retrograde regulation of the oxidative stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3472–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Noctor, G.; Mhamdi, A.; Chaouch, S.; Han, Y.; Neukermans, J.; Marquez-Garcia, B.; Queval, G.; Foyer, C.H. Glutathione in plants: An integrated overview. Plant, Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 454–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zaffagnini, M.; Bedhomme, M.; Marchand, C.H.; Morisse, S.; Trost, P.; Lemaire, S.D. Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: Focus on glutathionylation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 567–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Gallogly, M.M.; Mieyal, J.J. Mechanisms of reversible protein glutathionylation in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2007, 7, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Leferink, N.G.; van Duijn, E.; Barendregt, A.; Heck, A.J.; van Berkel, W.J. Galactonolactone dehydrogenase requires a redox-sensitive thiol for optimal production of vitamin C. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Palmieri, M.C.; Lindermayr, C.; Bauwe, H.; Steinhauser, C.; Durner, J. Regulation of plant glycine decarboxylase by s-nitrosylation and glutathionylation. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1514–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Hartl, M.; Finkemeier, I. Plant mitochondrial retrograde signaling: Post-translational modifications enter the stage. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Huang, X.; von Rad, U.; Durner, J. Nitric oxide induces transcriptional activation of the nitric oxide-tolerant alternative oxidase in Arabidopsis suspension cells. Planta 2002, 215, 914–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Gupta, K.J.; Shah, J.K.; Brotman, Y.; Jahnke, K.; Willmitzer, L.; Kaiser, W.M.; Bauwe, H.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Inhibition of aconitase by nitric oxide leads to induction of the alternative oxidase and to a shift of metabolism towards biosynthesis of amino acids. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1773–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Navarre, D.A.; Wendehenne, D.; Durner, J.; Noad, R.; Klessig, D.F. Nitric oxide modulates the activity of tobacco aconitase. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Zarkovic, J.; Anderson, S.L.; Rhoads, D.M. A reporter gene system used to study developmental expression of alternative oxidase and isolate mitochondrial retrograde regulation mutants in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 871–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Vanlerberghe, G.C.; McLntosh, L. Signals Regulating the Expression of the Nuclear Gene Encoding Alternative Oxidase of Plant Mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Dojcinovic, D.; Krosting, J.; Harris, A.J.; Wagner, D.J.; Rhoads, D.M. Identification of a region of the Arabidopsis AtAOX1a promoter necessary for mitochondrial retrograde regulation of expression. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 58, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Gray, G.R.; Maxwell, D.P.; Villarimo, A.R.; McIntosh, L. Mitochondria/nuclear signaling of alternative oxidase gene expression occurs through distinct pathways involving organic acids and reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 23, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ng, S.; Giraud, E.; Duncan, O.; Law, S.R.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Narsai, R.; Carrie, C.; Walker, H.; Day, D.A.; et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase E1 (CDKE1) provides a cellular switch in plants between growth and stress responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 3449–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Djajanegara, I.; Holtzapffel, R.; Finnegan, P.M.; Hoefnagel, M.H.; Berthold, D.A.; Wiskich, J.T.; Day, D.A. A single amino acid change in the plant alternative oxidase alters the specificity of organic acid activation. FEBS Lett. 1999, 454, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Clifton, R.; Lister, R.; Parker, K.L.; Sappl, P.G.; Elhafez, D.; Millar, A.H.; Day, D.A.; Whelan, J. Stress-induced co-expression of alternative respiratory chain components in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 58, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Chadee, A.; Alber, N.A.; Dahal, K.; Vanlerberghe, G.C. The Complementary Roles of Chloroplast Cyclic Electron Transport and Mitochondrial Alternative Oxidase to Ensure Photosynthetic Performance. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 748204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Backhausen, J.E.; Scheibe, R. Adaptation of tobacco plants to elevated CO2: Influence of leaf age on changes in physiology, redox states and NADP-malate dehydrogenase activity. J. Exp. Bot. 1999, 50, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Foyer, C.H.; Neukermans, J.; Queval, G.; Noctor, G.; Harbinson, J. Photosynthetic control of electron transport and the regulation of gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1637–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Walker, B.J.; VanLoocke, A.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Ort, D.R. The Costs of Photorespiration to Food Production Now and in the Future. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 107–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Li, Y.T.; Liu, M.J.; Li, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhao, S.J.; Gao, H.Y.; Zhang, Z.S. Photoprotection by mitochondrial alternative pathway is enhanced at heat but disabled at chilling. Plant J. 2020, 104, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Pascal, N.; Dumas, R.; Douce, R. Comparison of the Kinetic Behavior toward Pyridine Nucleotides of NAD-Linked Dehydrogenases from Plant Mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 1990, 94, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Bykova, N.V.; Møller, I.M.; Gardeström, P.; Igamberdiev, A.U. The function of glycine decarboxylase complex is optimized to maintain high photorespiratory flux via buffering of its reaction products. Mitochondrion 2014, 19 Pt B, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhang, W.; Huang, W.; Yang, Q.Y.; Zhang, S.B.; Hu, H. Effect of growth temperature on the electron flow for photorespiration in leaves of tobacco grown in the field. Physiol. Plant 2013, 149, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Schwarzländer, M.; Fricker, M.D.; Müller, C.; Marty, L.; Brach, T.; Novak, J.; Sweetlove, L.J.; Hell, R.; Meyer, A.J. Confocal imaging of glutathione redox potential in living plant cells. J. Microsc. 2008, 231, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Attacha, S.; Solbach, D.; Bela, K.; Moseler, A.; Wagner, S.; Schwarzländer, M. Glutathione peroxidase-like enzymes cover five distinct cell compartments and membrane surfaces in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 1281–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Rouhier, N.; Lemaire, S.D.; Jacquot, J.P. The role of glutathione in photosynthetic organisms: Emerging functions for glutaredoxins and glutathionylation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 143–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Martí, M.C.; Florez-Sarasa, I.; Camejo, D.; Ribas-Carbó, M.; Lázaro, J.J.; Sevilla, F.; Jiménez, A. Response of mitochondrial thioredoxin PsTrxo1, antioxidant enzymes, and respiration to salinity in pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3863–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Liebthal, M.; Maynard, D.; Dietz, K.J. Peroxiredoxins and Redox Signaling in Plants. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 28, 609–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Thormählen, I.; Naranjo, B.; Trujillo-Hernandez, J.A.; Reichheld, J.-P.; Cejudo, F.J.; Geigenberger, P. On the Elaborate Network of Thioredoxins in Higher Plants. In Progress in Botany Vol. 80; Cánovas, F.M., Lüttge, U., Matyssek, R., Pretzsch, H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 223–251. [Google Scholar]
  159. Geigenberger, P.; Thormählen, I.; Daloso, D.M.; Fernie, A.R. The Unprecedented Versatility of the Plant Thioredoxin System. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Balmer, Y.; Vensel, W.H.; Tanaka, C.K.; Hurkman, W.J.; Gelhaye, E.; Rouhier, N.; Jacquot, J.P.; Manieri, W.; Schürmann, P.; Droux, M.; et al. Thioredoxin links redox to the regulation of fundamental processes of plant mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2642–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Basu, U.; Good, A.G.; Taylor, G.J. Transgenic Brassica napus plants overexpressing aluminium-induced mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase cDNA are resistant to aluminium. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Dixit, V.; Pandey, V.; Shyam, R. Chromium ions inactivate electron transport and enhance superoxide generation in vivo in pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Azad) root mitochondria. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Estavillo, G.M.; Crisp, P.A.; Pornsiriwong, W.; Wirtz, M.; Collinge, D.; Carrie, C.; Giraud, E.; Whelan, J.; David, P.; Javot, H.; et al. Evidence for a SAL1-PAP chloroplast retrograde pathway that functions in drought and high light signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3992–4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Van Aken, O.; Pogson, B.J. Convergence of mitochondrial and chloroplastic ANAC017/PAP-dependent retrograde signalling pathways and suppression of programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Van Aken, O.; Zhang, B.; Law, S.; Narsai, R.; Whelan, J. AtWRKY40 and AtWRKY63 modulate the expression of stress-responsive nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial and chloroplast proteins. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 254–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Li, X.; Cai, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Fu, L.; Liu, Z.; Xu, L. Differential TOR activation and cell proliferation in Arabidopsis root and shoot apexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2765–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Pfeiffer, A.; Janocha, D.; Dong, Y.; Medzihradszky, A.; Schöne, S.; Daum, G.; Suzaki, T.; Forner, J.; Langenecker, T.; Rempel, E.; et al. Integration of light and metabolic signals for stem cell activation at the shoot apical meristem. Elife 2016, 5, e17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Dong, Y.; Silbermann, M.; Speiser, A.; Forieri, I.; Linster, E.; Poschet, G.; Allboje Samami, A.; Wanatabe, M.; Sticht, C.; Teleman, A.A.; et al. Sulfur availability regulates plant growth via glucose-TOR signaling. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Xiong, Y.; McCormack, M.; Li, L.; Hall, Q.; Xiang, C.; Sheen, J. Glucose-TOR signalling reprograms the transcriptome and activates meristems. Nature 2013, 496, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Baena-González, E.; Rolland, F.; Thevelein, J.M.; Sheen, J. A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature 2007, 448, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Kim, G.D.; Cho, Y.H.; Yoo, S.D. Phytohormone ethylene-responsive Arabidopsis organ growth under light is in the fine regulation of Photosystem II deficiency-inducible AKIN10 expression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Im, J.H.; Cho, Y.H.; Kim, G.D.; Kang, G.H.; Hong, J.W.; Yoo, S.D. Inverse modulation of the energy sensor Snf1-related protein kinase 1 on hypoxia adaptation and salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 2303–2312. [Google Scholar]
  173. Cho, H.Y.; Wen, T.N.; Wang, Y.T.; Shih, M.C. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of protein kinase SnRK1 regulated protein phosphorylation in Arabidopsis under submergence. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2745–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Schwarzländer, M.; Finkemeier, I. Mitochondrial energy and redox signaling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 18, 2122–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Hildebrandt, T.M.; Nunes Nesi, A.; Araújo, W.L.; Braun, H.P. Amino Acid Catabolism in Plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1563–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Wagner, S.; Van Aken, O.; Elsässer, M.; Schwarzländer, M. Mitochondrial Energy Signaling and Its Role in the Low-Oxygen Stress Response of Plants. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1156–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Zhang, X.; Ivanova, A. The Transcription Factor MYB29 Is a Regulator of ALTERNATIVE OXIDASE1a. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1824–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Ivanova, A.; Law, S.R.; Narsai, R.; Duncan, O.; Lee, J.H.; Zhang, B.; Van Aken, O.; Radomiljac, J.D.; van der Merwe, M.; Yi, K.; et al. A Functional Antagonistic Relationship between Auxin and Mitochondrial Retrograde Signaling Regulates Alternative Oxidase1a Expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 1233–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Yang, C.-Y.; Hong, C.-P. The NADPH oxidase Rboh D is involved in primary hypoxia signalling and modulates expression of hypoxia-inducible genes under hypoxic stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 115, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Gadjev, I.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gechev, T.S.; Laloi, C.; Minkov, I.N.; Shulaev, V.; Apel, K.; Inzé, D.; Mittler, R.; Van Breusegem, F. Transcriptomic footprints disclose specificity of reactive oxygen species signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Petrov, V.; Vermeirssen, V.; De Clercq, I.; Van Breusegem, F.; Minkov, I.; Vandepoele, K.; Gechev, T.S. Identification of cis-regulatory elements specific for different types of reactive oxygen species in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 2012, 499, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zeng, J.; Dong, Z.; Wu, H.; Tian, Z.; Zhao, Z. Redox regulation of plant stem cell fate. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 2844–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kharenko, O.A.; Boyd, J.; Nelson, K.M.; Abrams, S.R.; Loewen, M.C. Identification and characterization of interactions between abscisic acid and mitochondrial adenine nucleotide translocators. Biochem. J. 2011, 437, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Berkowitz, O.; De Clercq, I.; Van Breusegem, F.; Whelan, J. Interaction between hormonal and mitochondrial signalling during growth, development and in plant defence responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1127–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Pedrotti, L.; Weiste, C.; Nägele, T. Snf1-RELATED KINASE1-Controlled C/S(1)-bZIP Signaling Activates Alternative Mitochondrial Metabolic Pathways to Ensure Plant Survival in Extended Darkness. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Mishra, B.S.; Singh, M.; Aggrawal, P.; Laxmi, A. Glucose and auxin signaling interaction in controlling Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings root growth and development. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Kieffer, M.; Yu, H.; Kepinski, S.; Estelle, M. HSP90 regulates temperature-dependent seedling growth in Arabidopsis by stabilizing the auxin co-receptor F-box protein TIR1. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Kiyono, H.; Katano, K.; Suzuki, N. Links between Regulatory Systems of ROS and Carbohydrates in Reproductive Development. Plants 2021, 10, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Retrograde signaling from the chloroplast associated with heat response in plants. ROS (1O2 and H2O2) and the intermediates of chlorophyll synthesis function as key regulators of retrograde signaling that activates or inhibits several proteins. These proteins activated via ROS or the chlorophyll intermediates transfer the signals from the chloroplasts to the nuclei, leading to activation or inhibition of nuclear gene expression.
Figure 1. Retrograde signaling from the chloroplast associated with heat response in plants. ROS (1O2 and H2O2) and the intermediates of chlorophyll synthesis function as key regulators of retrograde signaling that activates or inhibits several proteins. These proteins activated via ROS or the chlorophyll intermediates transfer the signals from the chloroplasts to the nuclei, leading to activation or inhibition of nuclear gene expression.
Ijms 24 01356 g001
Figure 2. Retrograde signaling from the mitochondria that might be associated with heat response in plants. Damages on the electron transport chain or TCA cycle generate ROS. ROS can activate ANAC transcription factors that enhance expression of the transcript encoding AOX. In contrast, ABI4 activated by mitochondrial retrograde signaling inhibits AOX. Similar to the chloroplast, ROS can inhibit SAL1. Inhibition of mitochondrial enzymes (GLDH and GLDC) by S-glutathionylation might activate retrograde signaling. NO can also inhibit enzymes involved in the electron transport chain and TCA cycle via S-nitrosylation, leading to activation of retrograde signaling.
Figure 2. Retrograde signaling from the mitochondria that might be associated with heat response in plants. Damages on the electron transport chain or TCA cycle generate ROS. ROS can activate ANAC transcription factors that enhance expression of the transcript encoding AOX. In contrast, ABI4 activated by mitochondrial retrograde signaling inhibits AOX. Similar to the chloroplast, ROS can inhibit SAL1. Inhibition of mitochondrial enzymes (GLDH and GLDC) by S-glutathionylation might activate retrograde signaling. NO can also inhibit enzymes involved in the electron transport chain and TCA cycle via S-nitrosylation, leading to activation of retrograde signaling.
Ijms 24 01356 g002
Figure 3. Integrations between the chloroplast and mitochondrion. Malate-OAA shuttle plays essential roles to prevent excess accumulation of reductants in the chloroplast, when photorespiration is accelerated. In this case, respiratory activity in the mitochondrion might shift to AOX-dependent to oxidize excess reductants in the mitochondrion. TRX and PRX modified by GSH in post-translation regulate proteins involved in the modulation of carbon assimilation, respiration and AOX.
Figure 3. Integrations between the chloroplast and mitochondrion. Malate-OAA shuttle plays essential roles to prevent excess accumulation of reductants in the chloroplast, when photorespiration is accelerated. In this case, respiratory activity in the mitochondrion might shift to AOX-dependent to oxidize excess reductants in the mitochondrion. TRX and PRX modified by GSH in post-translation regulate proteins involved in the modulation of carbon assimilation, respiration and AOX.
Ijms 24 01356 g003
Figure 4. Putative links of TOR- and SnRK1-dependent energy regulation with functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria during heat stress. TOR activated by the auxin and sugar signaling is required for proper activity of the chloroplasts. Glucose might also regulate expression of HSPs via TOR-dependent manor. In response to environmental stresses, energy depletion caused by the dysfunctions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria activates SnRK1. Then, SnRK1 activates stress responses involving AOX and bZIPs as well as mechanisms to obtain ATP from alternative sources. RBOH proteins required for the production of signaling ROS are also known to be activated by energy depletion, indicating the possible integration between SnRK1-dependent stress responses and RBOHs.
Figure 4. Putative links of TOR- and SnRK1-dependent energy regulation with functions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria during heat stress. TOR activated by the auxin and sugar signaling is required for proper activity of the chloroplasts. Glucose might also regulate expression of HSPs via TOR-dependent manor. In response to environmental stresses, energy depletion caused by the dysfunctions of the chloroplasts and mitochondria activates SnRK1. Then, SnRK1 activates stress responses involving AOX and bZIPs as well as mechanisms to obtain ATP from alternative sources. RBOH proteins required for the production of signaling ROS are also known to be activated by energy depletion, indicating the possible integration between SnRK1-dependent stress responses and RBOHs.
Ijms 24 01356 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suzuki, N. Fine Tuning of ROS, Redox and Energy Regulatory Systems Associated with the Functions of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Plants under Heat Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021356

AMA Style

Suzuki N. Fine Tuning of ROS, Redox and Energy Regulatory Systems Associated with the Functions of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Plants under Heat Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(2):1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suzuki, Nobuhiro. 2023. "Fine Tuning of ROS, Redox and Energy Regulatory Systems Associated with the Functions of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Plants under Heat Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021356

APA Style

Suzuki, N. (2023). Fine Tuning of ROS, Redox and Energy Regulatory Systems Associated with the Functions of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Plants under Heat Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(2), 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop