Next Article in Journal
Preclinical Models and Technologies in Glioblastoma Research: Evolution, Current State, and Future Avenues
Next Article in Special Issue
Upregulation of Wheat Heat Shock Transcription Factor TaHsfC3-4 by ABA Contributes to Drought Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling Connective Tissue Growth Factor as a Therapeutic Target and Assessing Kahweol as a Potential Drug Candidate in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expression Patterns and Functional Analysis of Three SmTAT Genes Encoding Tyrosine Aminotransferases in Salvia miltiorrhiza
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gene Cloning and Characterization of Transcription Factor FtNAC10 in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.)

1
School of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
3
Department of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
4
Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology (Ministry of Education), College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(22), 16317; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216317
Submission received: 7 September 2023 / Revised: 2 November 2023 / Accepted: 4 November 2023 / Published: 14 November 2023

Abstract

:
NAC transcription factors play a significant role in plant stress responses. In this study, an NAC transcription factor, with a CDS of 792 bp encoding 263 amino acids, was cloned from Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. (F. tataricum), a minor cereal crop, which is rich in flavonoids and highly stress resistant. The transcription factor was named FtNAC10 (NCBI accession number: MK614506.1) and characterized as a member of the NAP subgroup of NAC transcriptions factors. The gene exhibited a highly conserved N-terminal, encoding about 150 amino acids, and a highly specific C-terminal. The resulting protein was revealed to be hydrophilic, with strong transcriptional activation activity. FtNAC10 expression occurred in various F. tataricum tissues, most noticeably in the root, and was regulated differently under various stress treatments. The over-expression of FtNAC10 in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana) seeds inhibited germination, and the presence of FtNAC10 enhanced root elongation under saline and drought stress. According to phylogenetic analysis and previous reports, our experiments indicate that FtNAC10 may regulate the stress response or development of F. tataricum through ABA-signaling pathway, although the mechanism is not yet known. This study provides a reference for further analysis of the regulatory function of FtNAC10 and the mechanism that underlies stress responses in Tartary buckwheat.

1. Introduction

NAC transcription factors (TFs) form the fourth largest TF family in plants and are involved in regulating plant growth and development, as well as their responses to external stimuli [1,2,3,4]. NAC TFs are named according to the NAM, ATAF1 and CUC1/CUC2 TF genes [5,6]. The NAM gene was first identified in Petunia plants without apical meristem, and CUC1/CUC2 was found to have a similar function in A. thaliana [7]. There are known to be 117 NAC TFs in A. thaliana, 151 in Oryza sativa, 152 in Nicotiana tabacum and 152 in soybean [8,9,10]. Most NAC proteins have a highly conserved DNA-binding domain at the N-terminal and transcription activation domains at the C-terminal [11].
A number of studies have shown that NAC TF genes are involved in plant adaptations to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, cold conditions and high temperatures during growth and development [12,13,14,15]. Two NAC genes, AtAF1 and AtAF2, are induced during the response to drought and wounding in A. thaliana [16,17,18]. Others, including AtNAC072 (RD26), AtNAC019 and AtNAC055, are involved in biological and abiotic stress responses and lignin biosynthesis [19,20,21]. Functional studies of NAC TFs have been reported in many plant species. It is indicated that overexpression of ONAC066 significantly enhanced tolerance to drought and oxidative stress in rice (Oryza sativa) [22]. OsNAC2 not only negatively regulates root growth, but also affects the height of rice [23,24]. OsNAC3 positively regulates ABA biosynthesis and enhances tolerance to salt stress [25]. LcNAC002 positively regulates chlorophyll degradation and anthocyanin synthesis by co-activating the expression of LcSGR and LcMYB1 in litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) [26], beside, LcSGR might promote ROS and ABA biosynthesis by accelerating chlorophyll degradation and chloroplast aging, and indirectly promote LcMYB1 expression and anthocyanin accumulation. Overexpression of PsnNAC090, which was isolated from Populus simonii × Populus nigra, in transgenic tobacco shows stronger tolerance to salt stress [27].
Tatary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) is an annual dicot that mainly cultivated in China, Russia and India and is grown as a cereal crop [28,29]. In China, F. tataricum is planted widely in alpine mountain regions and remote areas such as Yunnan, Sichuan and Guizhou due to its extreme resistance to drought [30]. This crop is grown as one of the eight major cereals, as it is rich in lipids, vitamins (B1, B2 and B6), dietary fiber and minerals, with a protein content of 20–25% and a well-balanced amino acid composition [31]. F. tataricum has, therefore, become increasingly recognized and consumed as a functional food with high nutritional value [32]. With respect to its tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress, transcriptome data analysis has indicated that the expression of MYB, NAC, WRKY, bZIP and bHLH TFs is likely to be involved in regulating the adaptations of F. tataricum to environmental pressures [30]. Some published data show that FtANC genes are involved in Tatary buckwheat biological stress, abiotic stress response mechanism, and regulate plant growth and development. Recently, there are two genes, FtNAC16 and FtNAC31, have been reported, they have shown the important role in response to abiotic stress [33,34]. In addition, FtNAC16 promotes the biosynthesis of lignin and root elongation [33]. In this research, an NAC transcription factor FtNAC10 was cloned from F. tataricum, the basic function of FtNAC10 was investigated in order to provides a theoretical basis for further analysis of the regulatory function of FtNACs and the mechanism that underlies stress responses in F. tataricum.

2. Results

2.1. Profile of FtNAC10 Expression in Different Tissues of F. tataricum

To study the expression pattern of FtNAC10 in different tissues of F. tataricum, we performed quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR and noted that the FtNAC10 was expressed at levels that were 50-fold greater than those seen in root than leaf tissues (Figure 1). Moreover, expression was about 11 times higher in pre-filling stage seeds (S1) than leaves. In fact, the lowest level of FtNAC10 expression was observed in leaves.

2.2. Expression of FtNAC10 under Different Stresses

To study the functional responses of FtNAC10 to different stresses, we applied abscisic acid (ABA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), salt (NaCl) and salicylic acid (SA) to F. tataricum plants to simulate stress conditions. The results (Figure 2) showed that the expression of FtNAC10 was up-regulated under ABA, MeJA and SA stress. In particular, the TF was expressed at 12.6-fold higher levels after 24 h of MeJA stress, compared with the control group. Under ABA stress, the expression of FtNAC10 initially increased and then decreased, and reached to the peak at 72 h of treatment, when levels were about 2.2 times higher than those seen in the control group. After 12, 24 and 48 h of salt stress, the expression of FtNAC10 was down-regulated; however, it was then up-regulated after 72 and 96 h of exposure to NaCl.

2.3. Cloning and Characterization of FtNAC10

FtNAC10 was isolated and cloned from F. tataricum and found to contain a complete open reading frame (ORF) of 792 bp. The sequence was submitted to NCBI with GenBank accession number MK614506. A BLASTX analysis indicated that FtNAC10 is highly homologous to AtNAC2 (AAM63330.1), with 68.42% identity, and AtNAP (NP_564966.1), with 67.98% identity. FtNAC10 was revealed to encode a protein containing 263 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 8.38 and a molecular weight of 30,286.21 kDa. Moreover, multiple sequences alignment analysis indicated that, similar to most NAC TFs, FtNAC10 contains relatively highly conserved domains at the N-terminus, which are divided into five sub-domains (A–E), and is highly specific at the C-terminus (Figure 3a).
Next, data about NAC proteins from other plants were used to construct a phylogenetic tree. The results from our analysis of the phylogenetic tree indicated that FtNAC10 belongs to the NAP subgroup of NAC TFs and is most closely related to FtNAC45, FtNAC32, AtNAP and SlNAP2, which are regulatory factors involved in leaf senescence (Figure 3b) [35,36].

2.4. Transcriptional Activity of FtNAC10 and Localization of the Protein

To analyze the subcellular localization of FtNAC10, PEGAD-FtNAC10-GFP and PEGAD-GFP were expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The images were observed and compared by confocal microscope with different mode. The fluorescence signal from epidermal cells transformed with PEGAD-GFP was seen in the cytoplasm and nucleus, while the signal from cells transformed with PEGAD-FtNAC10-GFP appeared only in the nucleus (Figure 4a). These results indicated that FtNAC10 is localized in the nucleus.
During the transcription activity assay, the negative control grew on a SD/-Trp plate, but not on a SD/-Trp/His plate. However, the positive control containing the FtNAC10 gene grew well on both the SD/-Trp and SD/-Trp/His plates. Furthermore, both the positive control and pBridge-FtNAC10 showed evident blue color, whereas the negative control showed no color change (Figure 4b,c). β-galactosidase activity assay showed that the active unit of β-galactosidase in positive control, pGAL4, was 63.06 U, and the FtNAC10 was 61.22U, with almost the same activity unit (Figure 4d). Overall, the results from the analysis of β-galactosidase activity indicated strong FtNAC10 transcriptional activity.

2.5. FtNAC10-Associated Inhibition of Transgenic A. thaliana Seed Germination

The relative gene expression of FtNAC10 in the T2 transgenic A. thaliana lines was detected by qRT-PCR (Figure 5). We then chose three lines with higher expression levels, FtNAC10-16 (L16), FtNAC-2 (L2) and FtNAC-10 (L10), for further study. Among them, L16 exhibited the highest level of FtNAC10 expression, while a lower level of expression was seen in L2 and the lowest in L10. The seed germination assay revealed that the rate of wild-type (WT) seed germination was close to that of L10, while seed germination in L16 was about in line with that of L2, which was lower than WT and L10. During germination, transgenic lines showed lower germination rate at 2 days under normal condition, saline, and drought stress, especially L2 and L16 showed much lower rate than WT (Supplementary Figure S1). Overall, the germination rates for the three transgenic lines were relatively lower than that of the WT. The germination rates of the WT and L2, L10 and L16 lines after 7 days were 96.6%, 85.2%, 95.9% and 85.4% under normal conditions, respectively. Under saline conditions, these rates were 98.7%, 49.8%, 43.9% and 65.0%, respectively, while under drought stress, they were 96.4%, 50.8%, 91.6% and 40.5%, respectively (Figure 6). Under ABA treatment, the seed germination exhibited a hypersensitive similar trend with other treatments.

2.6. Overexpression of FtNAC10 Enhances Salinity and Drought Tolerance in Transgenic A. thaliana

To investigate the effects of FtNAC10 in response to various stresses, 10-day-old transgenic A. thaliana seedlings were subjected to saline and drought stress treatments. Our analysis revealed that the primary roots of transgenic FtNAC10 lines were significantly longer than those of the WT plants under saline and drought stress (Figure 7). In addition, the phenotype of the transgenic lines manifested more lateral roots than the WT under saline stress, and these leaves shrinked less than those of the WT under saline and drought stress. In summary, over-expression of FtNAC10 enhanced the tolerance of transgenic A. thaliana in response to saline and drought stress.

3. Discussion

According to previously reports, several transcriptional factor family, including MYB, NAC, WRKY, and bZIP, are critically involved in the regulation of plant growth and stress response [37,38,39,40]. It has been reported that NAC transcription factors (TFs), being one of the largest TF families, are involved in fruits development and ripening, stress response, embryonic development, and phytohormone signaling [41]. In previous studies, over-expression of OsNAC5 could enlarge root significantly and enhance the tolerance to drought [42]. Over-expression of OsNAP could enhance the tolerance to abiotic stress and improve yield through the ABA pathway [43]. ANAC032 is involved in root elongation via MYB30 regulation network [44]. To date, research on NAC TFs has focused mainly on model plants such as A. thaliana, maize and rice, and the functions of these TFs in these species have been characterized and reported. However, only a few NAC TFs from F. tataricum have been described. According to reports, FtNAC45 has the higher expression level in root, leaf and flower, and may play a role in growth and development in F. tataricum [31]. A recent study suggested that FtNAC31 plays an indispensable role in the response to drought and salt stress in an ABA signaling-dependent way in F. tataricum [34]. Another study revealed that FtNAC16 promotes the biosynthesis of lignin and root elongation under salt stress, which could be of benefit in buckwheat [33].
In this study, we identified an NAC TF, FtNAC10, in F. tataricum. Analysis of genetic evolution using a phylogenetic tree indicated that FtNAC10 belongs to the NAP subgroup of NAC TFs and is most closely related to FtNAC45, FtNAC32, AtNAP and SlNAP2. Plant transcriptional factors in the same family usually have similar functions. NAP TFs are associated with regulating plant growth, development and leaf senescence [45]. It has been reported that FtNAC45 may have a role in the growth and development of F. tataricum [31]. AtNAP has been reported to bind to the promoter of ABA synthesis gene AOO3 to activate its expression to accelerate leaf senescence eventually [35], while SlNAP2 has been confirmed to be involved in regulating leaf senescence and fruit yield in tomato [36]. Therefore, we inferred that FtNAC10 may play similar roles with FtNAC45, FtNAC32, AtNAP, SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 in plant functional regulation, and FtNAC10 might be associated with fruit development and leaf senescence in F. tataricum. The molecular characterization analysis indicated that FtNAC10 has a highly conserved N-terminal and highly specific C-terminal. Subcellular localization showed FtNAC10 is localized in the nucleus and shows strong transcriptional activation activity. Moreover, the expression profile indicated that FtNAC10 is expressed most highly in root, less in pre-filling stage seeds and at the lowest level in leaves. Moreover, the expression level of FtNAC10 exhibited an initial increase, followed by a subsequent decrease, and ultimately another increase throughout fruit development, which displayed the similar expression trend with FtNAC45 and may play a role in fruit development and ripening [31]. Applying stressors such as ABA, MeJA, NaCl and SA to plants up-regulated FtNAC10 expression in F. tataricum. This indicated that FtNAC10 enables these plants to respond to harsh environmental conditions. The seed germination experiments revealed that over-expression of FtNAC10 in transgenic A. thaliana plants inhibited seed germination under normal or stressful conditions, including saline, drought and ABA pressures. And the transgenic L2 and L16 showed significant differences at 2 days or 4 days during generation (Supplementary Figure S1). we speculate that the expression of FtNAC10 in T3 generation seeds is inadequate, which leads to insufficient sensitivity to these exogenous treatments during Arabidopsis seed germination. The expression level of FtNAC10 in L16 was higher compared to L2 and L10 sequentially. Moreover, the seed germination rate of L16 was exactly opposite under normal conditions. We speculated that over-expression of FtNAC10 might directly regulate seed germination via some mechanisms. After 10 days of salinity stress, the root length of L2, L10 and L16 were 0.57 cm, 1.15 cm, 1.48 cm longer respectively, compared to the wild type (WT). Under drought stress, they exhibited an increase in length ranging from 0.08 to 1.3 cm compared to the WT. However, there was no significant difference in root length under normal condition. The seedling stress experiments showed that over-expression of FtNAC10 promoted root elongation under saline and drought stress in transgenic A. thaliana. It suggested that FtNAC10 might enhance saline and drought tolerance in transgenic A. thaliana.
Gibberellin acid (GA) signaling pathway and ABA signaling pathway have been extensively reported to regulate seed germination. The rice transcription repressor, OsWRKY50, plays a role in mediating ABA-dependent seed germination and seedling growth, as well as enhancing salt stress tolerance through an ABA-independent pathway [46]. Overexpression of TERF1 could promote seed germination through glucose signaling pathway, which is mediated by GA [47]. As an important plant hormone, ABA can not only induce resistance to stress in crops but also improve yield, quality, even seed dormancy and seed germination [46]. Numerous studies have found that ABA-signaling pathway plays a vital role in plant responses to stresses such as drought, high salt conditions, low temperatures and invasion by pests or pathogens [12,25,42,44,48,49]. Under stressful conditions, ABA synthesis is activated in plants, resulting in the abundant production of this hormone. This promotes stomatal closure, inhibits stomatal opening, promotes moisture absorption and reduces moisture loss. Previous studies have revealed that the synthesis of ABA is regulated by key enzyme genes such as ABI3, ABI4, RD29A, RD29B, AAO3 and NCED [50,51]. For example, in maize, ZmWRKY79 indirectly up-regulates the expression of ZmAAO3 to increase the amount of ABA synthesis and thus enhance drought resistance [52]. In F. tataricum, FtNAC16 may affect tolerance to salinity through a FtNAC16-ABI4-NECD3-ABA-FtNAC16 feedback mechanism [33]. Taken together, we inferred FtNAC10 might be involved with ABA response and positively regulate the synthesis of ABA to inhibit seed germination, like AtNAP, WRKY50, FtNAC16, etc. Whether it has a positive regulatory effect and how it works still need to verify further experiments. Overall, our findings suggest that FtNAC10 enhances saline and drought tolerance in F. tataricum. However, further studies are needed to reveal the specific stress-resistance mechanism mediated by FtNAC10 in order to improve breeding strategies for this crop in the future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

The variety used in this experiment was F. tataricum 9940, and the seeds were provided by Shanxi academy of agricultural sciences. Seeds were germinated and cultivated in greenhouse under 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 24 °C condition. And the relative humidity in this room is about 70%. To analyze the expression patterns in different tissues of Tatary Buckwheat, various tissues were collected such as leaves (TB-L), stems (TB-S), roots (TB-R), pre-filling stage seeds (TB-S1), filling stage seeds (TB-S2), fully mature seeds (TB-S3), flower buds (TB-F1), blooming flowers (TB-F2) and near withering flowers (TB-F3) growing in normal condition [53]. These samples were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction.

4.2. Abiotic Stresses Experiments

The seedlings, when growing to One-week-old, were treated with different solutions respectively, such as 1/2 MS containing 100 µM NaCl, 100 µM ABA, 100 µM MeJA, and 100 µM SA. And one pot seedlings were treated with equal 1/2MS containing nothing as wide type (WT). Then all the samples were collected at 0 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h, frozen in the liquid nitrogen at once, and stored at −80 °C for total RNA extraction and qPCR assays. The primer sequences for qRT-PCR were as followed: CCCTTCTACTATCATCCCT (Forward) and ATCAGTTCCTGTGGCTTT (Reverse). Actin was used as reference gene, and each sample was in triplicate. The total reaction system was 10 µL: 5 µL of 2XSYBrR-Gree, 2.5 µL of cDNA, 0.25 µL of each primer, and 2 µL of ddH2O. This reaction was performed as following conditions: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of amplification at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 32 s, melt at 60 °C for 1 min. Gene expression was calculated by 2−△△Ct method [54].

4.3. Sequence Analysis and Gene Cloning of FtNAC10

The full-length CDs fragment of FtNAC10 was screened from the transcriptome of F. tataricum under salinity stress, and the full-length gene was cloned using the primer designed according to the CDs. The phylogenetic tree analysis between FtNAC10 and some homologous NAC genes or characterized in other species was performed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) algorithm in MEGA 5.0 software [9]. The protein sequence of FtNAC10 was aligned with its homologous NAC genes from other species by Bioedit.

4.4. Subcellular Localization and Transcription Activity Assay of FtNAC10

To investigate its exact localization, the ORF of FtNAC10, without termination codon, was inserted into PEGAD-GFP vector to generate PEGAD-FtNAC10-GFP plasmid. Agrobacterium GV3101 containing PEGAD-GFP and PEGAD-FtNAC10-GFP were injected into the back of N. benthamiana leaves, which were about 4-weeks-old. After dark culture for 48 h, the fluorescence signal of GFP was observed by confocal microscope.
To detect the transcription activity of FtNAC10, the full CDS of FtNAC10 was amplified by PCR with the following primers: 5′-CGGAATTCATGGATCCAAACACAGCC-3′ and 5′-CCAAGCTTTCATGGAAATTTGTAAGC-3′. Then, it was inserted into pBridge vector to obtain the pBridge-FtNAC10 vector. The pBridge (negative control), PGAL4 (positive control) and pBridge-FtNAC10 were transformed into yeast strains AH109, and they were cultured on SD/-Trp-His mediums at 30 °C. Then, detect the transcription activity by β-galactosidase colony-lift filter assay according to Yeast Protocol Handbook (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) [55].

4.5. Transformation Arabiodopsis

The full CDS was inserted into expression vector PK7FWG2 by Gateway-BP and LR reaction systems to obtain PK7FWG2-FtNAC10. The plasmid PK7FWG2-FtNAC10 was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 and then transformation effected Arabiodopsis by dipping flowers method [56]. The transgenic seeds were screened on 1/2 MS medium with 25 µg/mL kanamycin. Positive T3 homozygous lines were confirmed through qRT-PCR and were used for subsequent analysis.

4.6. Seeds Germination Experiment

For the statistical analysis of seed germination of transgenic A. thaliana under salinity, drought and ABA stress treatments, more than 30 sterilized seeds were placed in 1/2 MS plate medium with 150 mM NaCl, 300 mM mannitol and 0.3 µM ABA, respectively. Seeds were cultured under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 22 °C. The number of seed germinations was counted for 7 days, and photos were taken after sowing 7 days [57].

4.7. Seedlings Stress Experiment of Transgenic A. thaliana

A. thaliana of each transgenic line was sowed on 1/2 MS medium, vernalized for 3 d at 4 °C, and cultured in an incubator for 10 days, and then transferred to 1/2 MS, 1/2 MS + 150 mM NaCl, 1/2 MS + 300 mM mannitol medium, respectively. Three seedlings of the same strain were transferred to each plate, and there were three plate replicates for each line. After 14 days of upright culture in the incubator, observe the phenotype and root length of A. thaliana.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The results all shown in the figures were mean values with standard deviations (±SD) from triplicates. And the data were analyzed by SPSS software (Version 22, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The significance differences were calculated by Duncan’s multiple-range test at a level of 0.05 (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

FtNAC10 was found to be an important transcription factor, which enhances the sensitivity of A. thaliana seeds to salt, drought and ABA stress during germination and inhibits seed germination. In addition, FtNAC10 was revealed to promote root elongation under saline and drought stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Taken together, the findings suggest that FtNAC10 may regulate the stress response or development of F. tataricum via ABA-signaling pathway. However, further research is required to investigate the mechanism that underlies the FtNAC10-associated regulation of ABA synthesis and stress responses in F. tataricum.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242216317/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; methodology, X.L. and J.L.; software, J.L.; validation, X.L., J.L. and C.J.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, X.L. and J.L.; resources, X.L.; data curation, X.L. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, X.L., C.J. and D.L.; visualization, J.L.; supervision, X.L.; project administration, X.L. and J.L.; funding acquisition, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Research Foundation of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, grant number 2023ZXB010, the National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China, grant number 2018FY100704, and the Yingzi Tech. & Huazhong Agricultural University Intelligent Research Institute of Food Health, grant number IRIFH202219.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diao, P.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, Q.; Lv, W.; Ma, N. The role of NAC transcription factor in plant cold response. Plant Signal Behav. 2020, 15, 1785668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mahmood, K.; Zeisler-Diehl, V.V.; Schreiber, L.; Bi, Y.-M.; Rothstein, S.J.; Ranathunge, K. Overexpression of ANAC046 Promotes Suberin Biosynthesis in Roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ooka, H.; Satoh, K.; Doi, K.; Nagata, T.; Otomo, Y.; Murakami, K.; Matsubara, K.; Osato, N.; Kawai, J.; Carninci, P.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of NAC family genes in Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res. 2003, 10, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Valoroso, M.C.; Lucibelli, F.; Aceto, S. Orchid NAC Transcription Factors: A Focused Analysis of CUPULIFORMIS Genes. Genes 2022, 13, 2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Puranik, S.; Sahu, P.P.; Mandal, S.N.; Suresh, B.V.; Parida, S.K.; Prasad, M. Comprehensive genome-wide survey, genomic constitution and expression profiling of the NAC transcription factor family in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Saga, H.; Ogawa, T.; Kai, K.; Suzuki, H.; Ogata, Y.; Sakurai, N.; Shibata, D.; Ohta, D. Identification and characterization of ANAC042, a transcription factor family gene involved in the regulation of camalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 684–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Aida, M.; Ishida, T.; Fukaki, H.; Fujisawa, H.; Tasaka, M. Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: An analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 841–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, J.; Lian, W.; Cao, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, G.; Qi, C.; Liu, L.; Qin, S.; Yuan, X.; Li, X.; et al. Overexpression of BoNAC019, a NAC transcription factor from Brassica oleracea, negatively regulates the dehydration response and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, W.; Wei, Y.; Xia, Z.; Yan, Y.; Hou, X.; Zou, M.; Lu, C.; Wang, W.; Peng, M. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the NAC Transcription Factor Family in Cassava. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rushton, P.J.; Bokowiec, M.T.; Han, S.; Zhang, H.; Brannock, J.F.; Chen, X.; Laudeman, T.W.; Timko, M.P. Tobacco transcription factors: Novel insights into transcriptional regulation in the Solanaceae. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ernst, H.A.; Olsen, A.N.; Larsen, S.; Lo Leggio, L. Structure of the conserved domain of ANAC, a member of the NAC family of transcription factors. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, P.; Zhou, H.; Shi, X.; Yu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Meyer, R.C.; Smeekens, S.C.; et al. The ABI4-induced Arabidopsis ANAC060 transcription factor attenuates ABA signaling and renders seedlings sugar insensitive when present in the nucleus. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, S.G.; Lee, A.K.; Yoon, H.K.; Park, C.M. A membrane-bound NAC transcription factor NTL8 regulates gibberellic acid-mediated salt signaling in Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J. 2008, 55, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhong, R.; Demura, T.; Ye, Z.H. SND1, a NAC domain transcription factor, is a key regulator of secondary wall synthesis in fibers of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3158–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lv, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Chen, L.; Hao, X.; Pan, Q.; Fu, X.; Li, L.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. Overexpression of a Novel NAC Domain-Containing Transcription Factor Gene (AaNAC1) Enhances the Content of Artemisinin and Increases Tolerance to Drought and Botrytis cinerea in Artemisia annua. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, H.; Dai, M.; Yao, J.; Xiao, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, L. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12987–12992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Garapati, P.; Feil, R.; Lunn, J.E.; Van Dijck, P.; Balazadeh, S.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Transcription Factor Arabidopsis Activating Factor1 Integrates Carbon Starvation Responses with Trehalose Metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Delessert, C.; Kazan, K.; Wilson, I.W.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Manners, J.; Dennis, E.S.; Dolferus, R. The transcription factor ATAF2 represses the expression of pathogenesis-related genes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005, 43, 745–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fujita, M.; Fujita, Y.; Maruyama, K.; Seki, M.; Hiratsu, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Tran, L.S.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. A dehydration-induced NAC protein, RD26, is involved in a novel ABA-dependent stress-signaling pathway. Plant J. 2004, 39, 863–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jensen, M.K.; Kjaersgaard, T.; Nielsen, M.M.; Galberg, P.; Petersen, K.; O’Shea, C.; Skriver, K. The Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factor family: Structure-function relationships and determinants of ANAC019 stress signalling. Biochem. J. 2010, 426, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, Y.; Ma, H.; Chen, S.; Gu, T.; Gong, J. Control of proline accumulation under drought via a novel pathway comprising the histone methylase CAU1 and the transcription factor ANAC055. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yuan, X.; Wang, H.; Cai, J.; Bi, Y.; Li, D.; Song, F. Rice NAC transcription factor ONAC066 functions as a positive regulator of drought and oxidative stress response. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, X.; Lu, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lv, B.; Luo, L.; Xi, D.; Shen, J.; Ma, H.; Ming, F. OsNAC2 encoding a NAC transcription factor that affects plant height through mediating the gibberellic acid pathway in rice. Plant J. 2015, 82, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mao, C.; He, J.; Liu, L.; Deng, Q.; Yao, X.; Liu, C.; Qiao, Y.; Li, P.; Ming, F. OsNAC2 integrates auxin and cytokinin pathways to modulate rice root development. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, X.; Long, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, B.; Xin, Y.; Li, L.; Cao, S.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z.; Huang, H.; et al. A NAC transcription factor OsNAC3 positively regulates ABA response and salt tolerance in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zou, S.C.; Zhuo, M.G.; Abbas, F.; Hu, G.B.; Wang, H.C.; Huang, X.M. Transcription factor LcNAC002 coregulates chlorophyll degradation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in litchi. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 1913–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, Y.; Zang, W.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, R.; Jiang, T.; Zhou, B.; Yao, W. Ectopic Expression of PsnNAC090 Enhances Salt and Osmotic Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, J.; Wang, T.; Liu, M.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z. Transcriptome analysis of filling stage seeds among three buckwheat species with emphasis on rutin accumulation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, J.; Kreft, I.; Chao, G.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, P.; Gao, X.; Feng, B. Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) starch, a side product in functional food production, as a potential source of retrograded starch. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Ma, B.; Gao, Q.; Du, H.; Han, Y.; Li, Y.; Cao, Y.; Qi, M.; Zhu, Y.; et al. The Tartary Buckwheat Genome Provides Insights into Rutin Biosynthesis and Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 1224–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, M.; Ma, Z.; Sun, W.; Huang, L.; Wu, Q.; Tang, Z.; Bu, T.; Li, C.; Chen, H. Genome-wide analysis of the NAC transcription factor family in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Aubert, L.; Quinet, M. Comparison of Heat and Drought Stress Responses among Twelve Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) Varieties. Plants 2022, 11, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Ma, Z.; Tang, B.; Yu, H.; Tang, Z.; Bu, T.; Wu, Q.; Chen, H. Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) NAC Transcription Factors FtNAC16 Negatively Regulates of Pod Cracking and Salinity Tolerant in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, J.L.; Wu, Q.; Wu, H.L.; Wang, A.H.; Wang, X.L.; Li, C.L.; Zhao, H.X.; Wu, Q. FtNAC31, a Tartary buckwheat NAC transcription factor, enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 191, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guo, Y.; Gan, S. AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. Plant J. 2006, 46, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tureckova, V.; Xue, G.P.; Fernie, A.R.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Balazadeh, S. The NAC Transcription Factor SlNAP2 Regulates Leaf Senescence and Fruit Yield in Tomato. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1286–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hrmova, M.; Hussain, S.S. Plant Transcription Factors Involved in Drought and Associated Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, H.; Fu, X.; Shao, J.; Tang, Y.; Yu, M.; Li, L.; Huang, L.; Tang, K. Transcriptional regulatory network of high-value ac-tive ingredients in medicinal plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 429–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiang, J.; Ma, S.; Ye, N.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Samad, A.F.A.; Sajad, M.; Nazaruddin, N.; Fauzi, I.A.; Murad, A.M.A.; Zainal, Z.; Ismail, I. MicroRNA and Transcription Factor: Key Players in Plant Regulatory Network. Front Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, H.; Chen, S.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Xu, C.; Huang, M.; Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Z. Identification of the NAC Transcription Factor Family during Early Seed Development in Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz. Plants 2023, 12, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jeong, J.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Redillas, M.C.; Jang, G.; Jung, H.; Bang, S.W.; Choi, Y.D.; Ha, S.H.; Reuzeau, C.; Kim, J.K. OsNAC5 overexpression enlarges root diameter in rice plants leading to enhanced drought tolerance and increased grain yield in the field. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Lv, B.; Li, J.; Luo, L.; Lu, S.; Zhang, X.; Ma, H.; Ming, F. The NAC family transcription factor OsNAP confers abiotic stress response through the ABA pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 604–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maki, H.; Sakaoka, S.; Itaya, T.; Suzuki, T.; Mabuchi, K.; Amabe, T.; Suzuki, N.; Higashiyama, T.; Tada, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; et al. ANAC032 regulates root growth through the MYB30 gene regulatory network. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, F.; Li, J.; Qian, M.; Han, M.; Cao, L.; Liu, H.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, C. Identification of Peach NAP Transcription Factor Genes and Characterization of their Expression in Vegetative and Reproductive Organs during Development and Senescence. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, S.; Hu, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, W.; Wu, T.; Du, X. Rice OsWRKY50 Mediates ABA-Dependent Seed Germination and Seedling Growth, and ABA-Independent Salt Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, H.; Yuan, L.; Guo, W.; Wu, W. Transcription factor TERF1 promotes seed germination under osmotic conditions by activating gibberellin acid signaling. Plant Sci. 2022, 322, 111350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, Q.; Yan, S.; Huang, W.; Yang, J.; Dong, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, J.; Yang, T.; Mao, X.; Zhu, X.; et al. NAC transcription factor ONAC066 positively regulates disease resistance by suppressing the ABA signaling pathway in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 98, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiao, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, A.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J. The response of tartary buckwheat and 19 bZIP genes to abscisic acid (ABA). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 4341–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Melhorn, V.; Matsumi, K.; Koiwai, H.; Ikegami, K.; Okamoto, M.; Nambara, E.; Bittner, F.; Koshiba, T. Transient expression of AtNCED3 and AAO3 genes in guard cells causes stomatal closure in Vicia faba. J. Plant Res. 2008, 121, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lu, M.; Sun, Q.-P.; Zhang, D.-f.; Wang, T.-Y.; Pan, J.-b. Identification of 7 stress-related NAC transcription factor members in maize (Zea mays L.) and characterization of the expression pattern of these genes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 462, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gulzar, F.; Fu, J.; Zhu, C.; Yan, J.; Li, X.; Meraj, T.A.; Shen, Q.; Hassan, B.; Wang, Q. Maize WRKY Transcription Factor ZmWRKY79 Positively Regulates Drought Tolerance through Elevating ABA Biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, J.; Dong, Q.; Yao, P.; Shi, G.; Xu, S.; Deng, R.; Li, C.; et al. FtMYB8 from Tartary buckwheat inhibits both anthocyanin/Proanthocyanidin accumulation and marginal Trichome initiation. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. He, L.; Bian, J.; Xu, J.; Yang, K. Novel Maize NAC Transcriptional Repressor ZmNAC071 Confers Enhanced Sensitivity to ABA and Osmotic Stress by Downregulating Stress-Responsive Genes in Transgenic Arabidopsis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 8905–8918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Huang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Gao, F.; Yao, P.; Deng, R.; Li, C.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q. A R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene, FtMYB13, from Tartary buckwheat improves salt/drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shi, H.; Ye, T.; Yang, F.; Chan, Z. Arabidopsis PED2 positively modulates plant drought stress resistance. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, D.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H.; Shi, H.; Su, M.; Shan, H.; Li, T.; Li, Q. The SlNAC8 gene of the halophyte Suaeda liaotungensis enhances drought and salt stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 2018, 662, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Gene expression analysis of FtNAC10 in different tissues of F. tataricum. These tissues are leaves (L), stems (S), roots (R), pre-filling stage seeds (S1), filling stage seeds (S2), fully mature seeds (S3), flower buds (F1), blooming flowers (F2) and near withering flowers (F3), respectively. There are three replicates per sample. Significant differences in gene expression between different tissues were analyzed at level of 0.05. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Gene expression analysis of FtNAC10 in different tissues of F. tataricum. These tissues are leaves (L), stems (S), roots (R), pre-filling stage seeds (S1), filling stage seeds (S2), fully mature seeds (S3), flower buds (F1), blooming flowers (F2) and near withering flowers (F3), respectively. There are three replicates per sample. Significant differences in gene expression between different tissues were analyzed at level of 0.05. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 16317 g001
Figure 2. Gene expression analysis of FtNAC10 under different stress treatments in F. tataricum seedling. The seedlings were collected at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after salt (100 µM NaCl), 100 µM abscisic acid (ABA), 100 µM methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and 100 µM salicylic acid (SA) treatment, respectively. Error bars indicate SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Gene expression analysis of FtNAC10 under different stress treatments in F. tataricum seedling. The seedlings were collected at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after salt (100 µM NaCl), 100 µM abscisic acid (ABA), 100 µM methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and 100 µM salicylic acid (SA) treatment, respectively. Error bars indicate SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 16317 g002
Figure 3. Characterization of the FtNAC10 protein sequences. (a) Alignment of FtNAC10 proteins with its homologous NAC proteins from other species: F. tataricum (FtNAC10, QJD55561.1, FtNAC32 and FtNAC45 [31], Manihot esculenta Crantz (MeNAC29, XP_021613232.1), Cannabis sativa L (CsNAC2, XP_030484994.1), Brassica napus L (BnNAC07, AIA57511.1), Morus notabilis C. K. Schneid (MnNAC29, XP_010108694.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (AtNAP, NP_564966.1), Solanum lycopersicum L (SlNAP2, NP_001352326.1; SlNAP1, NP_001316452.1). A, B, C, D and E represent the conserved domain of NAC gene respectively. A, B, C, D and E represent the conserved domain of NAC gene respectively. (b) Phylogenetic tree of FtNAC10 protein with other NAC proteins. AtNAC3 (NP_188169.1), RD26 (NP_567773.1), NAM (NP_175696.1), and ANAC019 (NP_175697.1), FtNAC12 (MW355482) and FtNAC60, were orginal from A. thaliana and F. tataricum, respectively. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA5.2 software. Protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW program in MEGA5.2. The bootstrap was set as 1000 and the phylogenetic tree was analyzed using neighbor-joining method.
Figure 3. Characterization of the FtNAC10 protein sequences. (a) Alignment of FtNAC10 proteins with its homologous NAC proteins from other species: F. tataricum (FtNAC10, QJD55561.1, FtNAC32 and FtNAC45 [31], Manihot esculenta Crantz (MeNAC29, XP_021613232.1), Cannabis sativa L (CsNAC2, XP_030484994.1), Brassica napus L (BnNAC07, AIA57511.1), Morus notabilis C. K. Schneid (MnNAC29, XP_010108694.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (AtNAP, NP_564966.1), Solanum lycopersicum L (SlNAP2, NP_001352326.1; SlNAP1, NP_001316452.1). A, B, C, D and E represent the conserved domain of NAC gene respectively. A, B, C, D and E represent the conserved domain of NAC gene respectively. (b) Phylogenetic tree of FtNAC10 protein with other NAC proteins. AtNAC3 (NP_188169.1), RD26 (NP_567773.1), NAM (NP_175696.1), and ANAC019 (NP_175697.1), FtNAC12 (MW355482) and FtNAC60, were orginal from A. thaliana and F. tataricum, respectively. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA5.2 software. Protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW program in MEGA5.2. The bootstrap was set as 1000 and the phylogenetic tree was analyzed using neighbor-joining method.
Ijms 24 16317 g003
Figure 4. Subcellular localization and transcription activation activity analysis of FtNAC10. 1, 2, and 3 represented pBridge, pBridge-PGAL4, and pBridge-FtNAC10, respectively. (a) Subcellular localization of FtNAC10 determined by transforming N. benthamiana leaves epidermal cells with PEGAD-GFP and PEGAD-FtNAC10-GFP; (b) yeast cultured on SD\-Trp-His; (c) The activity analysis results of filter paper. (d) Analysis of β-galactosidase activity (** p < 0.01). Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 4. Subcellular localization and transcription activation activity analysis of FtNAC10. 1, 2, and 3 represented pBridge, pBridge-PGAL4, and pBridge-FtNAC10, respectively. (a) Subcellular localization of FtNAC10 determined by transforming N. benthamiana leaves epidermal cells with PEGAD-GFP and PEGAD-FtNAC10-GFP; (b) yeast cultured on SD\-Trp-His; (c) The activity analysis results of filter paper. (d) Analysis of β-galactosidase activity (** p < 0.01). Scale bar = 50 µm.
Ijms 24 16317 g004
Figure 5. Gene expression analysis of FtNAC10 in transgenic A. thaliana. WT represents control group, 1–16 represent FtNAC10 A. thaliana transgenic lines.
Figure 5. Gene expression analysis of FtNAC10 in transgenic A. thaliana. WT represents control group, 1–16 represent FtNAC10 A. thaliana transgenic lines.
Ijms 24 16317 g005
Figure 6. Germination statistical analysis of FtNAC10 transgenic A. thaliana lines on stress plate. (a) FtNAC10 transgenic A. thaliana lines were germinated on plate. The treatments were 1/2 MS (control), 150 mM NaCl, 300 mM Mannitol and 0.3 µM abscisic acid (ABA), respectively. Above figures represent the germination rate of WT and transgenic A. thaliana seeds on the 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) plate and with 150 mM NaCl, 300 mM Mannitol and 0.3 µM abscisic acid (ABA), 1, 2, 3 and 4 represent wild type (WT), FtNAC10 transgenic lines L2, L10 and L16, respectively. (b) The germination rate of FtNAC10 transgenic lines on stress plate. Significant differences in germination rate between different transgenic lines were analyzed at level of 0.05. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3). Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 6. Germination statistical analysis of FtNAC10 transgenic A. thaliana lines on stress plate. (a) FtNAC10 transgenic A. thaliana lines were germinated on plate. The treatments were 1/2 MS (control), 150 mM NaCl, 300 mM Mannitol and 0.3 µM abscisic acid (ABA), respectively. Above figures represent the germination rate of WT and transgenic A. thaliana seeds on the 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) plate and with 150 mM NaCl, 300 mM Mannitol and 0.3 µM abscisic acid (ABA), 1, 2, 3 and 4 represent wild type (WT), FtNAC10 transgenic lines L2, L10 and L16, respectively. (b) The germination rate of FtNAC10 transgenic lines on stress plate. Significant differences in germination rate between different transgenic lines were analyzed at level of 0.05. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3). Scale bar = 1 cm.
Ijms 24 16317 g006
Figure 7. Primary root length analysis of FtNAC10 transgenic A. thaliana lines under salinity, and drought stress. The stress treatments were salinity (150 mM NaCl), drought (300 mM Mannitol), respectively. WT, L2, L10 and L16 represent wild type, FtNAC10 transgenic lines L2, L10 and L16. All treatments were repeated three times for each line and the data represent means ± SE. Significant differences in root length between different transgenic lines were analyzed at level of 0.05. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05). Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 7. Primary root length analysis of FtNAC10 transgenic A. thaliana lines under salinity, and drought stress. The stress treatments were salinity (150 mM NaCl), drought (300 mM Mannitol), respectively. WT, L2, L10 and L16 represent wild type, FtNAC10 transgenic lines L2, L10 and L16. All treatments were repeated three times for each line and the data represent means ± SE. Significant differences in root length between different transgenic lines were analyzed at level of 0.05. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (LSD test, p < 0.05). Scale bar = 1 cm.
Ijms 24 16317 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Li, X.; Jia, C.; Liu, D. Gene Cloning and Characterization of Transcription Factor FtNAC10 in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216317

AMA Style

Li J, Li X, Jia C, Liu D. Gene Cloning and Characterization of Transcription Factor FtNAC10 in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(22):16317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jinghuan, Xiaohua Li, Caihua Jia, and Dahui Liu. 2023. "Gene Cloning and Characterization of Transcription Factor FtNAC10 in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 22: 16317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216317

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop