Next Article in Journal
Toward Transgene-Free Transposon-Mediated Biological Mutagenesis for Plant Breeding
Previous Article in Journal
Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Study of Hybrid Films Based on Polypropylene and NiO or NiFe2O4 Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chemical Structure Diversity and Extensive Biological Functions of Specialized Metabolites in Rice

Research Center of Protection and Utilization of Plant Resources, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(23), 17053; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242317053
Submission received: 27 October 2023 / Revised: 25 November 2023 / Accepted: 29 November 2023 / Published: 2 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is thought to have been domesticated many times independently in China and India, and many modern cultivars are available. All rice tissues are rich in specialized metabolites (SPMs). To date, a total of 181 terpenoids, 199 phenolics, 41 alkaloids, and 26 other types of compounds have been detected in rice. Some volatile sesquiterpenoids released by rice are known to attract the natural enemies of rice herbivores, and play an indirect role in defense. Momilactone, phytocassane, and oryzalic acid are the most common diterpenoids found in rice, and are found at all growth stages. Indolamides, including serotonin, tryptamine, and N-benzoylserotonin, are the main rice alkaloids. The SPMs mainly exhibit defense functions with direct roles in resisting herbivory and pathogenic infections. In addition, phenolics are also important in indirect defense, and enhance wax deposition in leaves and promote the lignification of stems. Meanwhile, rice SPMs also have allelopathic effects and are crucial in the regulation of the relationships between different plants or between plants and microorganisms. In this study, we reviewed the various structures and functions of rice SPMs. This paper will provide useful information and methodological resources to inform the improvement of rice resistance and the promotion of the rice industry.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a crop plant in the Poaceae family, and originated from China and India. Indica rice and japonica rice are derived from different gene pools of the common wild ancestor O. rufipogon, and are believed to have undergone multiple domestications resulting in O. sativa, also known as Asian common wild rice [1]. O. rufipogon and O. sativa are widely distributed throughout Asia and there is no apparent reproductive barrier between them, which results in a continuous series of intermediate and mixed genotypes, guaranteeing the formation of diverse modern rice varieties [1]. Because of the easy transportation and storage of rice, together with the wide adaptability of the plant, rice is widespread and used not only as an important food crop but also as a raw material in the processing and brewing industries. At present, hybrid rice is widely distributed throughout the Asian monsoon areas and tropical rain forests.
Specialized metabolites (SPMs) enable plants to defend themselves against biological and abiotic stresses from their environment [2,3,4]. Rice contains abundant SPMs, which are able to prevent herbivory, resist infection from pathogens and plant oxidation, and regulate plant growth and development, with some also having allelopathic effects [4,5,6,7,8]. The SPMs in rice are mainly terpenoids, phenolics, and alkaloids. Different SPMs have different organ, tissue, and expression time specificities, and are specific to different biological processes.
Terpenoids can defend directly against biological stresses. Stress induces the accumulation of momilactones, oryzalexins, and phytocassanes, and initiates the defenses mediated by these chemicals against fungi and herbivores. The biosynthesis of oryzalexins and phytocassanes from ent-kaurene and ent-cassadiene is catalyzed by CYP701A6/8 [9,10]. High concentrations of momilactones and phytocassanes accumulate at the edges of necrotic diseased leaves, preventing the subsequent spread of fungi from the infected site [11,12]. Phenolics are mainly found in the bran and husks of rice, and have direct or indirect anti-insect and anti-bacterial defense functions in addition to their antioxidant effects. Meanwhile, the momilactones and ferulic acid secreted from the roots into the soil have significant allelopathic effects and are able to inhibit the growth of harmful weeds in paddy fields. Alkaloids are released into different tissues of the rice plant and have anti-insect and anti-bacterial functions, and are also able to inhibit the growth of nearby plants when the rice is subjected to biological stress.
In recent years, the chemical structures and biological function of SPMs from rice have been partially reviewed, revealing the special diterpenoid phytoalexins and their metabolic pathway [13], as well as the related factors and signal pathways involved in regulating the production of rice phytoalexin [14]. The endogenous function of momilactone was found to be allelopathy via analysis of the phytoalexin biosynthetic genes, as well as OsKSL4 and OsCPS2 [15]. The genetic mechanisms behind the natural variation observed in rice SPMs have also been investigated [16]. With advances in analytical methods and spectroscopy, the number and variety of SPMs isolated from rice has increased. In this study, we review the structural diversity of the 439 SPMs found from rice to date, and summarize the pivotal roles of these SPMs in the interactions between rice and herbivores, microorganisms, and other plants.

2. Chemical Structure Diversity of SPMs in Rice

2.1. Chemical Structure Diversity of Terpenoids in Rice

Terpenoids are the main rice components with induced defensive functions. Monoterpenoids, sesquiterpenoids, diterpenoids, triterpenoids, and steroids are all important in rice defenses, and include both volatile and non-volatile terpenoids. The volatile monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids are often found in rice leaves. The main types of rice diterpenoids are casbene, ent-cassadiene, stemarene, pimarane, ent-gibberellin, pimaradiene, and kauranes, all of which are often involved in induced defense functions [8,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Triterpenoids are usually found in rice bran and hulls [27].

2.1.1. Chemical Structure Diversity of Rice Monoterpenoids

Twenty-one monoterpenoids (121) have been found in rice to date. These volatile monoterpenoids largely comprise chain monoterpenoids (14) and cyclic monoterpenoids (521), which are found mainly in rice leaves, bran, seeds, and bran oil [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. These are the volatile components responsible for most of rice’s aroma. Many volatile monoterpenoids, including geraniol (4) and γ-terpinene (9), accumulated in four-leaf-stage rice following the addition of exogenous 100 μM jasmonic acid (JA) [34].

2.1.2. Chemical Structure Diversity of Rice Sesquiterpenoids

Twenty-eight sesquiterpenoids (2249) have been isolated from rice, and are also major volatile components of rice’s aroma [28,29,30,36,37,38,39]. Sesquiterpenoids are found in all parts of the rice plant, including the leaves, husks, bran, seeds, stems, coleoptiles, roots, and rhizosphere exudates. The chemical skeletons of these sesquiterpenoid SPMs include irregular acyclic carbon (2224), elemane (25 and 26), bisabolane (2831), caryophyllane (3235), undecane (36 and 44), eudesmane (37 and 38), muurolane (39 and 40), cadalenic (4143), aromadendrane (44 and 45), and guaiane (47) [28,30,36,37,38].

2.1.3. Chemical Structure Diversity of Rice Diterpenoids

Fifty-two diterpenoids (50101) have been reported from rice [8,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,37,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Seven kinds of diterpenoid skeleton have been found in these diterpenoids: casbene (5254), ent-cassadiene (5661), stemarene (6264), pimarane (6572), pimaradiene (7380), ent-gibberellin (8991), and kauranes (8187 and 91100) [8,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,37,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,49].
Compounds 5674 are mainly distributed in the leaves, stems, and roots, while compounds 56 and 57 are mainly found in the husks [18,19,20,21,22,23,43,44,45,47,48,49]. Momilactone B (77) is present in the shoots and roots of rice throughout the entire life cycle [50]. The concentrations of momilactone B (77) in the shoots and roots increases gradually with plant growth to the flowering stage, when it reaches its highest levels, about 245 and 64.1 nmol/g FW, respectively [51]. Oryzalic acids A–B (83 and 84) and oryzalides A–B (86 and 87) are found at the rice seedling, tillering, and mature stages. The total concentrations of these four compounds were the highest at the mature stage, with 37.9 μg/g FW [52]. The concentrations of compounds 86 and 87 (in 35.0 and 1.7 μg/g FW, respectively) in the leaves, stems, ears, and roots were significantly higher than those of compounds 8384 [52].
The plant hormones gibberellins (GAs) are common diterpenoids in rice, and rice GAs include gibberellins A1/A4/A19 (8991). Gibberellins A1/A4 (89 and 90) are found in the seed kernels of third-leaf-stage rice seedlings. Compound 91 is the main endogenous genetic factor in rice, and has low growth-promoting activity. The concentrations of compound 91 vary significantly throughout the plant life cycle, usually reaching the highest levels in third-leaf-stage seedlings. Moreover, the levels of compound 89, which is involved in the regulation of plant growth and development, may be controlled by the rates of biosynthesis and metabolic transformation of gibberellin A19 (91) [46].

2.1.4. Chemical Structure Diversity of Triterpenoids and Steroids from Rice

Thirty-five triterpenoids (102136) have been isolated and identified from rice, and are mainly found in rice bran [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. The major types include citrostadienol (104107), gramisterol (108110), cycloeucalenol (111113), cycloartanol (114 and 115), tetracyclic triterpene (118120), cycloartane (124128), orizalanosterolide (130131), and lupane (132133) [53,54,55,56,57,61,63,64,65,67,68]. Compounds 104113 and their derivatives are considered to be nortriterpenoids according to their biosynthetic pathways.
Forty-five steroids (137181) have been isolated from rice, and are also usually found in rice bran [6,53,54,55,56,63,68,69,70,71,72,73]. Both hydrophobic (138142) and ergostane (147168) skeletons have been found [55,70,74]. The γ-oryzanol isolated from rice bran is a mixture of triterpenols and phytosterol ferulates. Cycloartanyl ferulate (115), 24-methylene cycloartanyl trans-ferulate (119), 24-methylene cycloartanyl cis-ferulate (120), and cycloartenyl ferulate (128) were found to be the main ingredients of γ-oryzanol [75]. Isolated phytosterols include campestanol (139), stigmasterol (143), and sitosterol (154), which are important components of the rice membrane lipid bilayer. These chemicals are able to regulate the fluidity of the membrane, and accumulate as rice seedlings mature [76].

2.2. Chemical Structure Diversity of Rice Phenolics

2.2.1. Simple Rice Phenolics

Forty-nine simple phenolic acids (182230) have been identified from rice [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. The phenolics in rice exist mainly in soluble conjugated and insoluble forms, and were found covalently bound to sugar parts or cell wall structures such as cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectin, and rod-like structural proteins [88]. The distribution of phenolic acids throughout the rice plant varies, but most are found in the insoluble form and are bound, and have a strong antioxidant capacity. p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (183) is a major phenolic compound in rice hulls, and other important phenolic compounds in rice include p-hydroxybenzoic acid (184), vanillic acid (189), caffeic acid (190), trans-ferulic acid (194), cis-ferulic acid (197), sinapic acid (203), syringic acid (211), and protocatechuic acid (214) [84]. Compounds 217 and 194/197 accumulate in rice bran [7,80], and compounds 194/197 are the most enriched phenolic acids in insoluble binding sites [89]. More than 90% of the phenolic acid and antioxidant activity in the whole of the rice plant is seen in the bran and husk. The diversity of phenolic acids and their antioxidant capacities were generally higher in pigmented rice than in non-pigmented rice [90,91].

2.2.2. Rice Flavonoids

One hundred and twenty-six (231356) flavonoids have been identified from rice, with the observed skeletons including diphenylpropane (233), non-prenylated flavanone (235239), isoflavone (335 and 336), and anthocyanin (337354) [69,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. Compounds 334354 were anthocyanins, which are widely found in pigmented rice [106,107]. Compounds 335336 and 347 are commonly found in purple rice bran [87]. Naringenin (244) is considered to be the biosynthetic precursor of sakuranetin (246), and the conversion of naringenin (244) into sakuranetin (246) is catalyzed by naringenin 7-O-methyltransferase (OsNOMT), a key enzyme in the synthesis of sakuranetin (246), in rice leaves [95]. Compounds 275 and 276 have been identified from the whole rice leaves and phloem [108]. The variety O. sativa spp. japonica cv. Hwa-Young also has a high concentration of flavonoids in the seeds, especially in the endosperm tissues, and eight different flavonoids (292295, 257260) have been isolated [109,110]. Tricin (297) accumulates in rice leaves, stems, and roots [111,112].

2.2.3. Other Rice Phenolics

Seventeen other phenolic compounds (356372) have been identified from rice [64,82,92,113,114,115,116,117]. These include tocopherols (358361) and tocotrienols (362365). Tocotrienols are unsaturated forms of vitamin E with three double bonds on the terpenoid side chain [118].

2.3. Chemical Structure Diversity of Rice Alkaloids

Forty one alkaloids (373413) have been identified from rice, including indolamides (373380), amides (381399, 403), and nitrogen-containing heterocyclic rings, formed by the decarboxylation of dicarboxylic acid (401 and 404413) [82,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133]. 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (381), a nitrogen-containing aromatic compound, is present at high concentrations in brown rice, and gives it its unique “popcorn” flavor [124]. In fragrant rice cultivars, the synthesis of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (381) from proline is regulated by the pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid synthase (P5CS) gene [134].

2.4. Chemical Structure Diversity of Other Types of Compounds in Rice

Twenty-six other types of compounds (414439) have been identified from rice, including chain hydrocarbons (414429, 438), alicyclic hydrocarbons (430, 432437, 439), and aromatic hydrocarbons (431) [30,33,64,73,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143]. Compounds 419 and 435437 are found throughout the whole rice plant. Compounds 414418 are generally found in rice kernels. Compounds 423427 are generally found at higher concentrations in the seed shell than elsewhere in the rice plant.

3. Interactions between Rice SPMs and Herbivores

3.1. Rice SPMs Related to Herbivore Resistance

3.1.1. Anti-Insect Activity of Rice Terpenoids

The expression of genes involved in terpenoid synthesis is usually elevated following herbivory, and high concentrations of terpenoids are synthesized to resist biological stress. For example, when the rice phloem is subjected to herbivory by Sogatella furcifera, a mixture of volatile sesquiterpenoids is obtained from the damaged parts (Table 1) [144,145,146]. These volatile sesquiterpenoids include (E)-γ-bisabolene (28) and α-zingiberene (31), which are some of the products of the sesquiterpene synthases encoded by the Os08g07100 and Os08g04500 genes. Linalool (3) from rice leaves is the single product produced by linalool synthase (OsLIS), which is encoded by the Os02g02930 gene. Linalool (3) is released from the damaged parts of rice, and is the most abundant volatile emitted from S. furcifera-damaged rice plants (165.2 ng/plant/h) [39,145]. The concentration of momilactone A (76) in damaged leaves increases with the prolongation of infection time, and the amount of momilactone A (76) was more than 3 μg/g FW 7 days following S. furcifera herbivory [147]. Feeding by other herbivores also induced sesquiterpenoid emissions in rice. Following Nilaparvata lugens or Chilo suppressalis herbivory, the expression of the sesquiterpene synthase II gene (OsTPS2) in rice leaves increased to promote the concentrations of (E)-β-farnesene (22) and (E)-β-caryophyllene (35) [39].
Moreover, the diterpenoid biosynthetic pathway in rice is often activated following herbivore feeding. (E,E,E)-geranyl diphosphate (GGPP) is converted into syn-copalyl diphosphate (syn-CPP) in a reaction catalyzed by rice CPP synthase (OsCPS4) and syn-CPP synthase (OsCYC1). Syn-CPP can be further converted into 9βH-pimara-7,15-diene (73), in a reaction catalyzed by OsKSL4. Subsequently, the 9βH-pimara-7,15-diene (73) can be converted into 3β-hydroxy-9βH-pimara-7,15-dien-19,6β-olide (74) by either CYP99A2 or CYP99A3, and compound 74 can in turn be converted into the momilactones A (76) or B (77), catalyzed by the OsMAS protein. These diterpenoids enhance the ability of rice to resist biological stresses (Figure 1) [47].
In addition, certain volatile terpenoids are able to attract the natural enemies of herbivores and therefore play an indirect role in rice defenses against herbivory. Linalool (3) and zingiberene (31) are the most abundant volatile sesquiterpenoids released after S. furcifera feeding, and are able to attract female parasitic Cotesia marginiventris wasps, which are a natural enemy of S. furcifera [145]. Similarly, linalool (3), (E)-β-farnesene (22), and (E)-β-caryophyllene (34) are the major monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids released by rice 10 days after N. lugens infestation, and serve as important signals enabling the natural enemies of rice herbivores, for example, Anagrus nilaparvatae, an egg parasite of N. lugens, to locate the infested rice [39].
Herbivory also mediates the levels of certain hormones in rice that reduce plant defense. Jasmonic acid (JA) concentrations significantly decreased after N. lugens infestation in the rice cultivar Rathu Heenati [148]. In order to reduce the influence of herbivores, rice has developed a variety of countermeasures. The expression of the resistance gene Bph14 increases in the 24 h following initial N. lugens infestation, via interactions with the transcription factors WRKY46 and WRKY72. Bph14 activates the salicylic acid (SA) signal pathway and increases the deposition of callose into the phloem cells [149,150]. Meanwhile, some OsWRKYs (OsWRKY62/50/104) and OsNACs (Os05g0442700, Os12g0630800/0156100, Os01g0862800) showed significantly higher expression under S. furcifera infection [151]. Rice wound-inducible transcription factor RERJ1 also participates in the JA-mediated stress response by physically binding OsMYC2 and can protect against herbivory by activating JA signals (Figure 1) [152].

3.1.2. Anti-Insect Activity of Phenolic Substances in Rice

The biosynthetic pathways of various phenolic compounds in rice are related to resistance to herbivores. N. lugens herbivory on rice results in the conversation of 4-coumaroyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA into naringenin chalcone by chalcone synthase (CHS) in the rice tissues, and the naringenin chalcone can be further converted into naringenin (244) via the action of chalcone isomerase (CHI) [153]. Naringenin (244) is converted into apigenin (242) by CYP93G1 (OsFNSII), which is in turn used in the synthesis of luteolin (240) by CYP75B4. The reaction of luteolin (240) into tricin (297) is catalyzed by CYP75B4, and tricin is known to improve rice resistance to N. lugens [154]. Herbivory also increases the levels of JA in plants, resulting in enhanced activity of the OsNOMT promoter and therefore promoting the synthesis of phenolic compounds. After S. furcifera herbivory, OsMYC2-like proteins 1 and 2 (OsMYL1 and OsMYL2) act synergistically with OsMYC2 to further activate the OsNOMT promoter. JA signal transduction is reinforced by OsMYL1 and OsMYL2 via OsMYC2, resulting in the synthesis of sakuranetin (246) from naringenin (244) during the rice defense response (Figure 1) [155,156].
Herbivory is able to induce an increase in the levels of phenolic chemicals in rice. The concentration of sakuranetin (246) in rice leaves can reach 0.6 μg/g FW following herbivory [147]. Moreover, the concentrations of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HX) (184), ferulic acid (FER) (194/197), and p-coumaric (p-CM) (219) in the tissues of rice varieties resistant to Oryzophagus oryzae are significantly higher than those in the tissues of susceptible rice [157] (Table 1). After S. furcifera infected rice plants, the DEG expression of the OsF3H gene enhanced kaempferol (278), quercetin (282), cyanidin (334), and delphinidin (342) biosynthesis in response to the infestation [158,159]. The concentration of tricin (297) is markedly higher at the leaf stage than at the tiller or booting stages, with a significant negative correlation with rice injury severity [160].
These phenolic compounds are able to inhibit certain herbivorous behaviors and some have direct anti-insect effects. For example, rice plants treated with 0, 50, or 100 ppm of eriodictyol (237) show increased resistance to N. lugens. Schaftoside (275) and isoschaftoside (276) in rice also have antifeedant effects against N. lugens [161]. After feeding on rice leaves containing tricin (297) for 15 days, the weight of honeydew produced by N. lugens nymphs was found to be negatively correlated with the concentration of tricin (297). Furthermore, 500 μg/mL of tricin (297) can significantly inhibit the spawning and feeding behaviors of female N. lugens (Figure 1) [162]. Tricin (297) also acts as an inhibitor of N. lugens’s uptake of phloem sap and stimulates probing behavior to detect irritants. Tricin concentrations are negatively correlated with the duration of N. lugens phloem feeding and positively correlated with probing frequency [163]. Laodelphax striatellus adults fed on rice stems and leaves containing tricin 5-O-glucoside (299) and tricin 7-O-rutinoside (300) for 14 weeks displayed a marked increase in the frequency and duration of probing behavior [164] (Table 1). Thus, different phenolic chemicals in rice allow the plant to resist herbivores via several different mechanisms.

3.1.3. Anti-Insect Activity of Alkaloids in Rice

Herbivory can stimulate increases in alkaloid levels in rice. N. lugens and Mythimna loreyi feeding both increased the accumulation of isopentylamine (373) [119] (Table 1). Moreover, 48 hours of C. suppressalis larvae herbivory resulted in concentrations of serotonin (390) and tryptamine (391) in rice leaves that were 3.5 times higher than those in uninfected leaves, and the concentrations of N-feruloyltryptamine (395) and N-p-coumaroylserotonin (398) in leaves subjected to herbivory were 33 times and 140 times higher than those in control leaves, respectively [128].
Alkaloids function similarly to phenolics and some can also directly inhibit herbivores. N. lugens fed on rice seedlings that have been immersed in 50 mg/L isopentylamine (373) solution have a higher mortality than those fed on non-treated seedlings [119]. Similarly, bioassays demonstrate that N. lugens that ingest a 15% sugar solution containing N-p-coumaroylputrescine (CouPut) (377) or N-feruloylputrescine (378) have a higher mortality than those on a sugar-only diet [123]. The levels of 14 benzamides or hydroxycinnamic acid amides in rice increase following herbivory by S. furcifera. These chemicals include N-feruloyltyramine (376), N-feruloylputrescine (378), N-p-coumaroylagmatine (379), and N-feruloylagmatine (380), and demonstrate feeding and oviposition inhibition in S. furcifera adult females [122]. Serotonin (390) and tryptamine (391) are active substances that affect herbivores’ nervous system, and their accumulation can directly affect the behavior and physiological functions of herbivores [128]. For example, high concentrations of tryptamine (391) demonstrated anti-oviposition activity against Bemisia tabaci [165], and both growth inhibition and antifeedant effects against Malacosoma disstria and Manduca sexta [166].

3.2. Salivary Metabolites from Herbivores Induce Defense Responses in Rice

Proteins in the salivary glands of herbivores have multiple effects on rice, and can not only induce the production of SPMs, but can also activate rice hormone pathways to affect the rice growth index. The protein N1G14 is generated in follicle A of the main salivary gland in N. lugens. N1G14 is secreted into rice plants during feeding, inducing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, callose deposition, and the activation of the jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway [167]. Similarly, N. lugens-secreted mucin-like protein (NlMLP) is highly expressed in the salivate glands of N. lugens and is also secreted into rice during feeding. NlMLP induces rice genes encoding basic NbPR3 and NbPR4 proteins, which promote the JA signaling pathway, as well as the biosynthesis of callose in the cell wall [168]. Moreover, herbivore vitellogenin (VgN) is also able to induce the production of SPMs and a defense response in rice. VgN from S. furcifera or L. striatellus increases the levels of JA and induces the JA-Ile signaling pathway in rice [169]. N. lugens vitellogenin (NlVgN) from the salivary glands of N. lugens enters the damaged parts of the rice plant during feeding, inducing Ca2+ increases and H2O2 production in the rice cytoplasm. Meanwhile, NlVgN-induced JA-responsive genes, including OsJAZ8, OsJAZ11, OsPR10a, and the defense-related gene, OsWRKY26, were up-regulated, triggering the JA pathway and thus reducing the hatching rate of N. lugens eggs. NlVgN also induces the release of volatile substances such as α-thujene (13), linalool (3), (E)-β-caryophyllene (35), (E)-β-farnesene (22), and α-curcumene (29), which are attractive to the N. lugens egg parasite A. nilaparvatae (Figure 2) [169].

3.3. Adaptive Mechanisms of Herbivores to Rice Defense Response

The adaptation of herbivores to plant defense responses is key to their successful expansion. In susceptible wild-type rice, N. lugens feeding induces the rice cytochrome P450 gene CYP71A1 encoding tryptamine 5-hydroxylase, which catalyzes the conversion of tryptamine (391) into serotonin (390) [170]. However, in rice mutants with an inactivated CYP71A1 gene, serotonin (390) is not produced and instead high concentrations of SA are produced, making the plants more resistant to herbivory [171]. Herbivores are also able to adapt to the volatile terpenoids produced by rice. Indeed, both male and female rice leaf bugs (Trigonotylus caelestialium) are attracted to the volatile sesquiterpenoids released from flowering rice panicles, such as (E)-β-caryophyllene (34) and β-elemene (26) [172], suggesting that T. caelestialium is not disturbed by these volatile substances.
Certain herbivores are able to suppress the plant defense response via the substances released from their salivary glands. NlSEF1 protein, which has EF-hand Ca2+ binding activity, is highly expressed in the salivary glands of N. lugens, and is excreted into rice as N. lugens pierces the sieve tube. NlSEF1 inhibits H2O2 production and decreases the cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels in rice [173]. The salivary endo-β-1,4-glucanase (NlEG1), which has endoglucanase activity, is highly expressed in the salivary glands and midgut of N. lugens, and allows N. lugens to reach the phloem by degrading the cellulose in the rice cell wall, thus overcoming the cell wall defenses [174]. N. lugens salivary protein 7 (NlSP7) is highly sensitive to tricin (297) in rice, and can enter the phloem through the cell wall, where it interacts with tricin (297). This interaction of NlSP7 with tricin (297) decreases the expression of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway marker genes CHS and CHI [175]. Another example is that during the S. furcifera feeding process, the LsPDI1 produced in the salivary glands is secreted into the rice cells to induce cell death (Figure 3) [176].

4. Interactions between SPMs and Microorganisms in Rice

4.1. Antipathogen Activities of Rice SPMs

Infection with plant pathogens can seriously harm rice growth and can lead to substantial losses in crop yield. Devastating fungal diseases, such as the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae (anamorph Pyricularia oryzae), M. grisea (Hebert) Barr (anamorph Pyricularia grisea Sacc.), the rice brown spot fungus Cochliobolus miyabeanus, and a variant of Helminthosporium oryzae, also known as brown spot fungus (Bipolaris oryzae), can cause serious declines in rice production [177]. Meanwhile, bacterial damage to rice leaves can also be serious. For example, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) is one of the most devastating bacterial diseases of rice, and is a major obstacle to improving rice yields.

4.1.1. Antipathogen Activities of Rice Terpenoids

The levels of monoterpenes and diterpenes in rice tissues increase following bacterial infection. Xoo infection leads to the initiation of the (E,E,E)-geranyl diphosphate (GGPP) pathway via the activities of OSCPS4 and OSKSL8 and the subsequent synthesis of oryzalexin S (62) [45]. Various pimaranes (6572) and kauranes (8187 and 91100) have been isolated from the leaves of Xoo-resistant rice varieties [21,178,179,180], indicating that Xoo infection induces the accumulation of terpenoids [52]. X. campestris pv. oryzae (Xco) also induces terpenoid production in rice. Following infection with X. campestris pv. oryzae, the concentrations of oryzalic acid A (83), oryzalic acid B (84), oryzalide A (86), and oryzalide B (87) in rice leaves are significantly higher than in those of uninfected rice strains [181]. Some monoterpenes also show significant bacteriostatic activity; for example, at concentrations of 5 mM, the (S)-limonene (6) released from rice leaves is able to significantly inhibit the growth of the pathogen Xoo.
Following bacterial infection, the monoterpenoid and diterpenoid biosynthetic pathways in plants are often activated. For example, isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) is isomerized into dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) and IPP via the action of isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IDI). IDI is further converted into GPP, GGPP, and FPP, which are the precursors of monoterpenoids, diterpenes, and sesquiterpenes, in reactions catalyzed by GPP synthase (GPS), GGPP synthase (GGPS), and FPP synthase (FPS), respectively [182]. GPP can then be catalyzed by the terpene synthases (TPSs) OsTPS3/19/20/24, to synthesize linalool (3), geraniol (4), (S)-limonene (6), and γ-terpinene (9), respectively, which increases the resistance of rice to bacteria [32,34,36]. Meanwhile, (E)-β-farnesene (22) and (E)-nerolidol (23) are synthesized by FPP in the cytoplasm, in reactions catalyzed by the rice terpene synthase OsTPS18 (Figure 4) [36].
Numerous monoterpenes and diterpenes show good inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi. After infection of rice with M. oryzae, GGPP is cyclized by the copalyl diphosphate (CPP) synthases (CPS) OSCPS1 and OSCPS2 to form ent-CPP, and then further converted via the action of OSKSL7 into ent-cassa-12,15-diene, which is in turn converted into phytocassanes A–E (5661), in reactions catalyzed by CYP76M7 [183]. ent-CPP can be converted by OSKSL10 into ent-sandaraco-pimaradiene (71), which can then be hydroxylated by CYP701A8 at C-3α to form 3α-hydroxy-ent-sandaraco-pimaradiene (72), and then further cyclized by CYP76M8 at C-7β to form oryzalexin D (68) (Figure 4) [48,184,185]. At 230 ppm, oryzalexin D (68) has a 50% inhibitory effect on M. oryzae mycelial growth [186]. (S)-limonene (6) can inhibit spore germination in M. oryzae in vitro at 50, 80, and 100 mmol/L [187]. Momilactones A (76) and B (77) isolated from rice leaves infected with M. oryzae inhibit the elongation of 50% of M. oryzae embryo tubes at concentrations of 5 and 1 μg/mL, respectively [188]. Phytocassanes A–E (5661) also significantly inhibit the spore germination of M. oryzae [18]. Both phytocassanes A (56) and F (61) inhibit the mycelial growth of M. oryzae, and have similar inhibitory activities [20]. P. oryzae conidia germination and growth in complete medium are significantly inhibited in vitro at concentrations of bayogenin 3-O-β-D-cellobioside (135) of 5 nM/L–10 nM/L [66]. 3β,20β-epoxy-3α-hydroxy-5α-abieta-8,11,13-trien-7-one (55) and 6β,19β-epoxy-3β-hydroxy-5α,9β-pimara-7,15-diene (80) isolated from rice husks can inhibit 88.67% of M. grisea conidium germination at concentrations of 120 mg/mL [41].

4.1.2. Antipathogen Activities of Rice Phenolic Compounds

Rice flavonoids have antibacterial activity. Sakuranetin (246) shows a strong inhibitory effect on (Xoc) at 10 μg/mL. The inhibitory effect of sakuranetin (246) on Burkholderia glumae and Xoo also increases with increasing concentrations, but was not as obvious as that on Xoc [121].
Phenolic biosynthetic pathways play a key role in improving resistance against fungal infection. Rice OsF3H and OsF3′H induce naringenin (244), which in turn produces eriodictyol (237) and finally synthesizes quercetin (282). Kaempferol (278) can also be formed from naringenin (244), finally also resulting in the production of quercetin (282). Quercetin (282) significantly reduced the metabolic activity of Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis biofilms [189]. OsF3H and OsF3′H participated in the synthesis of dihydroquercetin (238), naringenin (244), and kaempferol (278), which contribute to the resistance of rice to M. oryzae (Figure 4) [161].
Different kinds of phenolics have different effects on fungal pathogens, but all phenolics show direct inhibition activity. The growth rates of M. oryzae decrease with increasing concentrations of eriodictyol (237) [161], and tricin (297) inhibits the spore germination of P. oryzae and R. solani at 100 μg/g [190]. The concentrations of sakuranetin (246) in rice seedlings increase following inoculation with M. oryzae spore suspension, and sakuranetin (246) concentrations of 0.1 mM and 0.3 mM result in the inhibition of M. oryzae’s mycelium growth rate by 40% and 55%, respectively [191].

4.1.3. Antipathogen Activities of Rice Alkaloids

Alkaloids have direct antibacterial activity. N-benzoyltryptamine (374) and N-trans-cinnamoyltyramine (375) show bacteriostatic activity against Xoo and Xoc at concentrations of 10 μg/mL, while N-trans-cinnamoyltryptamine (397) strongly inhibits the growth of Xoc between 5 μg/mL and 10 μg/mL [121]. In addition, N-feruloyltryptamine (395) and N-trans-cinnamoyltryptamine (397) show inhibitory activity on the growth of Xoo in a dose-dependent manner [120].
The concentrations of alkaloids in rice leaf tissue increases following fungal infection. For example, when rice leaves are infected with C. miyabeanus in vivo, the accumulation of indolamides (378 and 379) and amides (392394, 396, 398) increases [120]. The greatest accumulation following C. miyabeanus infection was seen in N-feruloylputrescine (378), followed by N-benzoylserotonin (392) [120]. M. oryzae infection also induced the accumulation of N-benzoyltyramine (374) and N-benzoyltryptamine (393) in rice leaves [17], and serotonin (390) accumulates in rice leaves in response to B. oryzae infection [192].
These alkaloids exhibit direct inhibitory effects on fungi. Serotonin (390), tryptamine (391), and N-benzoyltyramine (393) inhibit the germination of C. miyabeanus conidia at 300 μM, with an inhibition rate of about 25%. N-benzoyltryptamine (374) and N-trans-cinnamoyltryptamine (397) also inhibit M. grisea mycelium growth. 3-isopropyl-5-acetoxycyclohexene-2-one-1 (439) inhibits M. oryzae and R. solani spore germination at concentrations of 100 μg/g [190]. Moreover, alkaloids can repair functional losses of rice mutant synthesis because they have exogenous antifungal abilities. For example, the addition of serotonin (390) to rice mutants restores the inhibition of B. oryzae hyphal growth in leaves, indicating that serotonin (390) confers strong resistance against B. oryzae [193].
Alkaloids are also able to strengthen the plant cell wall, allowing it to resist fungal infection to a certain extent. The activities of aminobenzoate synthase genes (OASA2, OASB1, and OASB2) increased following infection of rice with B. oryzae [193]. Aminobenzoate synthase proteins regulate the tryptamine pathway and induce the accumulation of serotonin (390), tryptamine (391), N-feruloylserotonin (394), and N-p-coumaroylserotonin (398) in the cell wall after oxidative polymerization in the leaves, forming a physical barrier against fungal infection [192].

4.2. Main Bacterial Targets of Rice SPMs

Identifying the bacterial target of SPMs promotes understanding of the mechanisms underlying plant resistance to pathogens. Geraniol (4) inhibits the growth of Xoo by inhibiting the down-regulation of ZipA and ZapE, which are Xoo genes associated with cell division [32]. Another example is the protein Hpa1, which is secreted by Xoo via a type III secretion system (TTSS) and causes pathogenicity in rice, and which is encoded by the hrp gene [194]. Phenolic compounds such as o-coumaric acid (217) can inhibit at least 60% of Hpa1 activity, which reduces the pathogenicity of Xoo (Figure 4) [195]. Sixty-four μg /ml kaempferol (278) inhibited 80% of biofilm formation. Kaempferol (278) inhibits biofilm formation mainly by influencing the binding of the Staphylococcus aureus surface anchor protein to the host matrix protein, thus reducing the adhesion of S. aureus [196].

4.3. Adaptation of Fungus to Rice SPMs

Certain pathogenic fungi are able to adapt to and detoxify rice SPMs. Sakuranetin (246) has an inhibitory effect on plant pathogens, and shows antifungal activity significantly higher than that of naringenin (244) [97,98]. However, sakuranetin can be detoxified into naringenin (244) and sternbin (247) by M. oryzae [98]. Similarly, sakuranetin (246) can also be detoxified by Rhizoctonia solani, where it is converted into naringenin (244), sakuranetin 4′-O-β-D-xylopyranoside (248), and naringenin-7-O-β-D-xylopyranoside (249). The degradation products sakuranetin 4′-O-β-D-xylopyranoside (248) and naringenin-7-O-β-D-xylopyranoside (249) show no antifungal activity [99]. M. oryzae can convert serotonin (390) into 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5HIAA) (389) in culture medium, which may also be part of a detoxification process (Figure 3) [192]. Understanding the mechanisms by which fungi detoxify rice SPMs is of great importance in improving the control of fungal diseases in rice, and deserves further study.

4.4. Interactions between Rice SPMs and Rhizosphere Microbial Communities

Various plant hormones and SPMs can promote the proliferation and aggregation of microorganisms in the rice rhizosphere. Strigolactones are potential rhizosphere-signaling molecules, and are known to increase the abundance of Nitrosomonadaceae and Rhodanobacter [197]. The cinnamic acid (0.12 mM) (216) and ferulic acid (0.05–0.1 mM) (194/197) exuded from rice promote cell proliferation and chemotaxis aggregation of the rhizosphere microorganism Myxococcus xanthus. Exogenous ferulic acid (194/197) at 53.5 mM induces M. xanthus growth and up-regulates the expression of chemotactic-related genes including FrzA, B, CD, E, G, F, and Z [198]. The rhizosphere microbial community can be regulated by plant-synthesized SPMs. The size and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community is reduced following the inhibition of PAL gene expression, with only six microbial communities subsequently detected, including Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Spirochaetes, Tenericutes, Clostridium, and an unknown bacteria [199]. Moreover, inoculation with endophytic bacteria induces SPM aggregation, but also promotes plant growth. Colonization of Azospirillum sp. B510 in rice rhizomes results in increased levels of hydroxyl cinnamon derivatives [200]. Phenolics such as gallic acid (215), trans- or cis-ferulic acid (194/197), and cinnamic acid (216) accumulate in the rice roots and leaves following inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli or R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii. In addition, both strains of Rhizobium promote the growth and productivity of rice plants under greenhouse conditions [201]. In conclusion, plants can alter the colonization of the rhizosphere by endophytic microorganisms via the release of SPMs, and endophytic microbes also affect the release of SPMs.

5. Rice SPMs Regulate Plant-to-Plant Relationships

Rice terpenoids and phenolics exhibit obvious allelopathic effects. They can inhibit the growth of weeds surrounding the rice plants, but also have negative effects on the rice itself.

5.1. Allelopathy of Rice Terpenoids

Diterpenoids, including momilactones, have obvious allelopathic effects. The momilacontes A (76) and B (77) being released by rice plants into the surrounding soil at concentrations greater than 1 μM and 10 μM, respectively, inhibit the growth of the harmful weeds Echinochloa crus-galli and Echinochloa colonum [8]. Momilaconte B (77) is a major allelopathic chemical in rice, and exhibits stronger weed growth inhibition activity than momilactone A (76). Momilactone B (77) inhibits 50% of the root and hypocotyl growth in seedlings of cress (Lepidium sativum L.) at 36 and 41 μM, and 50% of theroot and hypocotyl growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings at 56 and 79 μM, respectively [202]. Momilactone synthesis is deficient in rice OsCPS4 knockdown mutants, and the levels of cps4-tos are reduced. When OsCPS4 rice mutants are grown allopathically with Lactuca sativa seedlings, the root and hypocotyl lengths of the adjacent L. sativa seedlings increase compared to those of the control, further demonstrating the allelopathic effect of momilactones on neighboring plants (Figure 5) [203]. Triterpenes and flavonoids from rice also have allelopathic effects on neighboring plants. For example, the lanast-7,9(11)-dien-3α,15α-diol-3α-D-glucofuranoside (116) extracted from rice husks inhibits the growth of the duckweed Lemna paucicostata by decreasing its chlorophyll content [58]. Moreover, when the concentrations of β-sitosterol-β-D-glucoside (164) in rice husk extract reach 100 μg/mL, 10 days following the addition of the husk extract to medium containing Microcystis aeruginosa, the cell growth is inhibited by more than 40% [6]. However, certain triterpenoids, including momilactones, also inhibit the growth of the rice plants themselves. Momilactones A (76) and B (77) inhibit the growth of the rice roots and buds at the seedling stage at concentrations greater than 100 μM and 300 μM, respectively. This indicates that the inhibitory effect of the momilactones on the growth of rice seedlings is much lower than their effects on the surrounding weeds [8].

5.2. Allelopathy of Rice Phenolic Compounds

The phenolic compounds exuded from rice can also have allelopathic effects [204]. When the rice seedlings are grown surrounded by Echinochloa crus-galli seedlings, the allelopathic rice seedlings release lignin-related phenolic acids (p-hydroxybenzoic (184), vanillic acid (189), caffeic acid (190), ferulic acid (194/197), syringic acid (211), and p-coumaric acid (219)) into the soil in response [205]. p-coumaric acid (219) inhibits E. crus-galli roots at concentrations higher than 5 mM and also the germination of Lactuca sativa seedlings at 1 mM [206]. Similarly, p-hydroxybenzoic acid (184), 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (186), 2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (187), vanillic acid (189), caffeic acid (190), trans-ferulic acid (194), syringic acid (211), cinnamic acid (216), p-coumaric acid (219), and salicylic acid (226) in rice root exudates inhibit the growth of Sagittaria montevidensis roots at 1000 μM [79]. The 5,4′-dihydroxy-3′,5′-dimethoxy-7-O-β-glucopyranosyl flavone (298) and 7,4′-dihydroxy-3′,5′-dimethoxy-5-O-β-glucopyranosyl flavone (299) secreted from rice roots into the rhizosphere, and converted into the aglycone form 5,7,4′-trihydroxy-3′,5′-dimethoxyflavone (297), show inhibitory effects on weeds such as E. crus-galli, as well as on microorganisms (Figure 5) [207]. Orizaanthracenol (367) is exuded from rice roots and can inhibit radish germination at 40 ppm, leading to reductions in total radish dry weight of 50.96%. Furthermore, the inhibitory effects of 1-hydroxy-7-((2S,3R,4R,5S)-2″,3″,4″-trihydroxy-5″-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-1-yloxy)anthracen- 2-yl 3′,7′,11′,15′,19′-pentamethyltricosanoate (371) on the germination and growth of radishes are 27% lower than those of 1-hydroxy-7-((2S,3R,4R,5S)-2″,3″,4″-trihydroxy-5″-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-1-yloxy)anthracen- 2-yl 3′,7′-dimethyloctanoate (369) [115]. In the future, the various allelopathic substances produced by different rice varieties could be used in intercropping, so as to reduce pesticide use and promote rice yields.

6. Endophytic Microorganisms Promote Rice Growth

Rice endophytic fungi in the rhizosphere can improve rice’s resistance to pathogens. The rice endophytic fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum EF5 has indirect antagonistic activity against the plant pathogens Sclerotium rolfsii and Macrophomina phaseolina because it releases mVOCs such as α-cuprenene (37) [38]. Some endophytic bacteria in rice also have dual functions, both promoting rice growth and improving resistance against pathogens. For example, the rice endophytic fungus Phomopsis liquidambaris B3 significantly up-regulates the expression levels of OsAOX, OsLOX, OsPAL, and OsPR10 in rice, improving the diversity of the microbial community in the rhizosphere and promoting rice root development. At the same time, the presence of P. liquidambaris B3 results in a 41.0% inhibition rate of rice spikelet disease being induced by Fusarium proliferatum [208]. The Pseudomonas strains Pf1, TDK1, and PY15 found in the rice rhizosphere promote the growth of rhizosphere microorganisms and improve the resistance of the rice plant to Sarocladium oryzae [209]. Similarly, rice plants treated with both Streptomyces shenzhenensis TKSC3 and Streptomyces sp. SS8S show increased activity of β-1,3-glucanase (GLU) and peroxidase (POX), which enhance the plant cell wall and promote the growth of the plant, which then demonstrates significant resistance to Xoc [210].

7. Prospect

Rice SPMs exhibit structural diversity and have extensive and varied biological activities. The diterpenoids, phenolics, and alkaloids present in rice tissues are able to reduce the growth or reproduction of certain herbivores. These chemicals can also be induced by pathogenic fungi, and not only play a direct role against pathogens but also regulate the allelopathic interactions between rice and other neighboring plants. The phenolic compounds in rice also enhance stem and leaf hardness by increasing wax deposition. Together, these SPMs play a significant role in improving rice yield and quality. In the future, rice SPMs could be used to synthesize biological herbicides and insecticides that are friendly both to humans and nature and are less dangerous than synthetic pesticides. These future herbicides and insecticides should be able to reduce harmful weeds and plant pathogens, regulate rice rhizosphere microorganisms, improve the soil and crop quality, and increase crop yields [211]. The use of the allelopathic properties of rice SPMs to manage weeds and pests would solve the problems of environmental pollution and food safety caused by traditional pesticides, and would contribute to the sustainable development of ecologically friendly agriculture [212].

8. Materials and Methods

Two databases, SciFinder and Web of Science, were used to investigate references from 1976 to 2023. The keywords were rice, rice-specialized metabolism, biological functions, including the biosynthetic pathway and biological functions of terpenes, phenolics, and alkaloids, as well as the targets of these specialized metabolites on herbivores, and the detoxification effects of herbivores and fungi on specialized metabolites. 212 references were cited.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242317053/s1. The chemical structures, names, and isolated parts of compounds 1439 are provided in the Supplementary Materials, Figures S1–S7 and Tables S1–S4 [6,8,10,12,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,90,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,131,132,133,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,146,170,178,179,180,184,185,204,205,212].

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, S.L. and J.H.; writing—review and editing, H.Z., J.Z., S.L. and J.H.; data curation, H.Z., J.L., L.B. and S.L.; supervision, S.L., J.Z., H.L., J.H. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Project of Liaoning (Grant no. LJKZ0656), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 32000273 and 32370416), and the Excellent Training Plan of Shenyang Agricultural University (Grant no. 2020170053).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The Supporting Information is available from the Online Library or from the author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kovach, M.J.; Sweeney, M.T.; McCouch, S.R. New insights into the history of rice domestication. Trends Genet. 2007, 23, 578–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, H.W.; Hua, J.; Li, H.D.; Song, X.Y.; Luo, S.H. Structurally diverse specialized metabolites of maize and their extensive biological functions. J. Cell. Physiol. 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, H.W.; Hua, J.; Zhang, J.M.; Luo, S.H. Negative interactions balance growth and defense in plants confronted with herbivores or pathogens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 12723–12732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Numan, M.; Lubna; Kim, K.-M. Plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 968. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim, E.-G.; Yun, S.; Park, J.-R.; Kim, K.-M. Identification of F3H, major secondary metabolite-related gene that confers resistance against whitebacked planthopper through qtl mapping in rice. Plants 2021, 10, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Park, M.-H.; Chung, I.-M.; Ahmad, A.; Kim, B.-H.; Hwang, S.-J. Growth inhibition of unicellular and colonial Microcystis strains (Cyanophyceae) by compounds isolated from rice (Oryza sativa) hulls. Aquat. Bot. 2009, 90, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pang, Y.H.; Ahmed, S.; Xu, Y.J.; Beta, T.; Zhu, Z.W.; Shao, Y.F.; Bao, J.S. Bound phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of whole grain and bran of white, red and black rice. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ota, K.; Ino, T. Release of momilactone A and B from rice plants into the rhizosphere and its bioactivities. Allelopathy J. 2008, 22, 321–328. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Q.; Hillwig, M.L.; Wu, Y.S.; Peters, R.J. CYP701A8: A rice ent-kaurene oxidase paralog diverted to more specialized diterpenoid metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 1418–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Q.; Xu, Q.L.; Xia, X.M.; Dong, L.M.; Luo, B.; Liu, W.B.; Tan, J.W. A new phenylpropane-pimarane heterodimer and a new ent-kaurene diterpene from the husks of Oryza sativa. Phytochem. Lett. 2018, 24, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Umemura, K.; Ogawa, N.; Shimura, M.; Koga, J.; Usami, H.; Kono, T. Possible role of phytocassane, rice phytoalexin, in disease resistance of rice against the blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 899–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mitsuaki, T.; Akihiro, O.; Nobuki, S.; Chizuko, K.; Tadahiro, K.; Yoshio, K.; Norindo, T. Momilactone-C, a minor constituent of growth inhibitors in rice husk. Chem. Lett. 1976, 5, 1157–1158. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, W.X.; Li, Y.Y.; Dang, P.Q.; Zhao, S.J.; Lai, D.W.; Zhou, L.G. Rice secondary metabolites: Structures, roles, biosynthesis, and metabolic regulation. Molecules 2018, 23, 3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miyamoto, K.; Shimizu, T.; Okada, K. Transcriptional regulation of the biosynthesis of phytoalexin: A lesson from specialized metabolites in rice. Plant Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Toyomasu, T.; Usui, M.; Sugawara, C.; Otomo, K.; Hirose, Y.; Miyao, A.; Hirochika, H.; Okada, K.; Shimizu, T.; Koga, J. Reverse-genetic approach to verify physiological roles of rice phytoalexins: Characterization of a knockdown mutant of OsCPS4 phytoalexin biosynthetic gene in rice. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 150, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matsuda, F.; Nakabayashi, R.; Yang, Z.G.; Okazaki, Y.; Yonemaru, J.i.; Ebana, K.; Yano, M.; Saito, K. Metabolome-genome-wide association study dissects genetic architecture for generating natural variation in rice secondary metabolism. Plant J. 2015, 81, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Horie, K.; Sakai, K.; Okugi, M.; Toshima, H.; Hasegawa, M. Ultraviolet-induced amides and casbene diterpenoids from rice leaves. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 15, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koga, J.; Shimura, M.; Oshima, K.; Ogawa, N.; Yamauchi, T.; Ogasawara, N. Phytocassanes A, B, C and D, novel diterpene phytoalexins from rice, Oryza sativa L. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7907–7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Koga, J.; Ogawa, N.; Yamauchi, T.; Kikuchi, M.; Ogasawara, N.; Shimura, M. Functional moiety for the antifungal activity of phytocassane E, a diterpene phytoalexin from rice. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Horie, K.; Inoue, Y.; Sakai, M.; Yao, Q.; Tanimoto, Y.; Koga, J.; Toshima, H.; Hasegawa, M. Identification of UV-induced diterpenes including a new diterpene phytoalexin, phytocassane F, from rice leaves by complementary GC/MS and LC/MS approaches. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4050–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kono, Y.; Kojima, A.; Nagai, R.; Watanabe, M.; Kawashima, T.; Onizawa, T.; Teraoka, T.; Watanab, M.; Koshino, H.; Uzawa, J.; et al. Antibacterial diterpenes and their fatty acid conjugates from rice leaves. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Akatsuka, T.; Kodama, O.; Sekido, H.; Kono, Y.; Takeuchi, S. Novel phytoalexins (oryzalexins A, B and C) isolated from rice blast leaves infected with Pyricularia oryzae. Part I: Isolation, characterization and biological activities of oryzalexins. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1985, 49, 1689–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cho, J.-G.; Cha, B.-J.; Min Lee, S.; Shrestha, S.; Jeong, R.-H.; Sung Lee, D.; Kim, Y.-C.; Lee, D.-G.; Kang, H.-C.; Kim, J.; et al. Diterpenes from the roots of Oryza sativa L. and their inhibition activity on NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cartwright, D.W.; Langcake, P.; Pryce, R.J.; Leworthy, D.P.; Ride, J.P. Isolation and characterization of two phytoalexins from rice as momilactones A and B. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 535–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kato, T.; Kabuto, C.; Sasaki, N.; Tsunagawa, M.; Aizawa, H.; Fujita, K.; Kato, Y.; Kitahara, Y.; Takahashi, N. Momilactones, growth inhibitors from rice, Oryza sativa L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 3861–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chung, I.M.; Kim, J.T.; Kim, S.-H. Evaluation of allelopathic potential and quantification of momilactone A,B from rice hull extracts and assessment of inhibitory bioactivity on paddy field weeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2527–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramazani, E.; Akaberi, M.; Emami, S.A.; Tayarani-Najaran, Z. Biological and pharmacological effects of γ-oryzanol: An updated review of the molecular mechanisms. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021, 27, 2299–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chumpolsri, W.; Wijit, N.; Boontakham, P.; Nimmanpipug, P.; Sookwong, P.; Luangkamin, S.; Wongpornchai, S. Variation of terpenoid flavor odorants in bran of some black and white rice varieties analyzed by GC×GC-MS. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2015, 3, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, G.W.; Chung, M.-S.; Kang, M.; Chung, B.Y.; Lee, S. Direct suppression of a rice bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) by monoterpene (S)-limonene. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Obara, N.; Hasegawa, M.; Kodama, O. Induced volatiles in elicitor-treated and rice blast fungus-inoculated rice leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 2549–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taniguchi, S.; Hosokawa-Shinonaga, Y.; Tamaoki, D.; Yamada, S.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Jasmonate induction of the monoterpene linalool confers resistance to rice bacterial blight and its biosynthesis is regulated by JAZ protein in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kiyama, H.; Matsunaga, A.; Suzuki, G.; Gomi, K. Monoterpene geraniol produced by rice terpene synthase 21 suppresses the expression of cell-division related genes in the rice bacterial pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 115, 101673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, H.; Lee, G.; Kim, Y.; Ahn, H.; Lee, K.-G. Analysis of volatile compounds and antioxidant activity in rice extracts (Oryza sativa L.) extracted by various conditions. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 5289–5296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yoshitomi, K.; Taniguchi, S.; Tanaka, K.; Uji, Y.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Rice terpene synthase 24 (OsTPS24) encodes a jasmonate-responsive monoterpene synthase that produces an antibacterial γ-terpinene against rice pathogen. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 191, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Concepcion, J.C.T.; Ouk, S.; Riedel, A.; Calingacion, M.; Zhao, D.; Ouk, M.; Garson, M.J.; Fitzgerald, M.A. Quality evaluation, fatty acid analysis and untargeted profiling of volatiles in Cambodian rice. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kiryu, M.; Hamanaka, M.; Yoshitomi, K.; Mochizuki, S.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Rice terpene synthase 18 (OsTPS18) encodes a sesquiterpene synthase that produces an antibacterial (E)-nerolidol against a bacterial pathogen of rice. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2018, 84, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chung, I.M.; Ali, M.; Hahn, S.J.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Lim, Y.H.; Ahmad, A. Chemical constituents from the hulls of Oryza sativa with cytotoxic activity. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2005, 41, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sridharan, A.; Thankappan, S.; Karthikeyan, G.; Uthandi, S. Comprehensive profiling of the VOCs of Trichoderma longibrachiatum EF5 while interacting with Sclerotium rolfsii and Macrophomina phaseolina. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 236, 126436. [Google Scholar]
  39. Xiao, Y.H.; Wang, Q.J.; Erb, M.; Turlings, T.C.; Ge, L.M.; Hu, L.F.; Li, J.; Han, X.; Zhang, T.; Lu, J. Specific herbivore-induced volatiles defend plants and determine insect community composition in the field. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 1130–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Inoue, Y.; Sakai, M.; Yao, Q.; Tanimoto, Y.; Toshima, H.; Hasegawa, M. Identification of a novel casbane-type diterpene phytoalexin, ent-10-oxodepressin, from rice leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013, 77, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, G.; Xu, Q.L.; He, C.M.; Zeng, L.; Wang, H.F. Two new anti-fungal diterpenoids from the husks of Oryza sativa. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 10, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gu, C.Z.; Xia, X.M.; Lv, J.; Tan, J.W.; Baerson, S.R.; Pan, Z.Q.; Song, Y.Y.; Zeng, R.S. Diterpenoids with herbicidal and antifungal activities from hulls of rice (Oryza sativa). Fitoterapia 2019, 136, 104183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kodama, O.; Li, W.X.; Tamogami, S.; Akatsuka, T. Oryzalexin S, a novel stemarane-type diterpene rice phytoalexin. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 56, 1002–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kato, H.; Kodama, O.; Akatsuka, T. Oryzalexin E, a diterpene phytoalexin from UV-irradiated rice leaves. Phytochemistry 1993, 33, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nemoto, T.; Cho, E.-M.; Okada, A.; Okada, K.; Otomo, K.; Kanno, Y.; Toyomasu, T.; Mitsuhashi, W.; Sassa, T.; Minami, E. Stemar-13-ene synthase, a diterpene cyclase involved in the biosynthesis of the phytoalexin oryzalexin S in rice. FEBS Lett. 2004, 571, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kurogochi, S.; Murofushi, N.; Ota, Y.; Takahashi, N. Identification of gibberellins in the rice plant and quantitative changes of gibberellin A19 throughout its life cycle. Planta 1979, 146, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shimura, K.; Okada, A.; Okada, K.; Jikumaru, Y.; Ko, K.-W.; Toyomasu, T.; Sassa, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Kodama, O.; Shibuya, N. Identification of a biosynthetic gene cluster in rice for momilactones. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 34013–34018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wu, Y.S.; Wang, Q.; Hillwig, M.L.; Peters, R.J. Picking sides: Distinct roles for CYP76M6 and CYP76M8 in rice oryzalexin biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 2013, 454, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kato, H.; Kodama, O.; Akatsuka, T. Oryzalexin F, a diterpene phytoalexin from UV-irradiated rice leaves. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 299–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ino, T. Concentration and release level of momilactone B in the seedlings of eight rice cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 965–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ino, T. Possible involvement of momilactone B in rice allelopathy. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 718–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Watanabe, M.; Kono, Y.; Esumi, Y.; Teraoka, T.; Hosokawa, D.; Suzuki, Y.; Sakurai, A.; Watanabe, M. Studies on a quantitative analysis of oryzalides and oryzalic acids in rice plants by GC-SIM. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 1460–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Verardo, V.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Marconi, E.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Garrido-Frenich, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. Determination of lipophilic and hydrophilic bioactive compounds in raw and parboiled rice bran. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 50786–50796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akihisa, T.; Yasukawa, K.; Yamaura, M.; Ukiya, M.; Kimura, Y.; Shimizu, N.; Arai, K. Triterpene alcohol and sterol ferulates from rice bran and their anti-inflammatory effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2313–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Suttiarporn, P.; Chumpolsri, W.; Mahatheeranont, S.; Luangkamin, S.; Teepsawang, S.; Leardkamolkarn, V. Structures of phytosterols and triterpenoids with potential anti-cancer activity in bran of black non-glutinous rice. Nutrients 2015, 7, 1672–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fang, N.B.; Yu, S.G.; Badger, T.M. Characterization of triterpene alcohol and sterol ferulates in rice bran using LC-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3260–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oka, T.; Fujimoto, M.; Nagasaka, R.; Ushio, H.; Hori, M.; Ozaki, H. Cycloartenyl ferulate, a component of rice bran oil-derived γ-oryzanol, attenuates mast cell degranulation. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chung, I.M.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, A.; Lim, J.D.; Yu, C.Y.; Kim, J.S. Chemical constituents of rice (Oryza sativa) hulls and their herbicidal activity against duckweed (Lemna paucicostata Hegelm 381). Phytochem. Analysis 2006, 17, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sabir, A.; Rafi, M.; Darusman, L.K. Discrimination of red and white rice bran from Indonesia using HPLC fingerprint analysis combined with chemometrics. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1717–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, C.; Xi, X.J.; Liu, Y.Y.; Lu, Y.Z.; Che, F.F.; Gu, Y.X.; Yu, Y.C.; Li, H.; Liu, J.G.; Wei, Y. Isolation of four major compounds of γ-oryzanol from rice bran oil by ionic liquids modified high-speed countercurrent chromatography and antimicrobial activity and neuroprotective effect of cycloartenyl ferulate in vitro. Chromatographia 2021, 84, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Luo, H.F.; Li, Q.L.; Yu, S.G.; Badger, T.M.; Fang, N.B. Cytotoxic hydroxylated triterpene alcohol ferulates from rice bran. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, W.H.; Zhong, H.M.; Che, C.T. Cycloartanes from the red alga Galaxaura sp. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2005, 7, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shu, X.L.; Frank, T.; Shu, Q.Y.; Engel, K.-H. Metabolite profiling of germinating rice seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 11612–11620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chung, I.M.; Kwon, C.; An, Y.; Ali, M.; Lee, H.; Lim, J.-D.; Kim, S.; Yang, Y.J.; Kim, S.-H.; Ahmad, A. Characterization of new polyphenolic glycosidic constituents and evaluation of cytotoxicity on a macrophage cell line and allelopathic activities of Oryza sativa. Molecules 2018, 23, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chung, I.M.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, A. A and B from rice hulls of Oryza sativa. Indian J. Chem. 2007, 3, 516–522. [Google Scholar]
  66. Norvienyeku, J.; Lin, L.L.; Waheed, A.; Chen, X.M.; Bao, J.D.; Aliyu, S.R.; Lin, L.Y.; Shabbir, A.; Batool, W.; Zhong, Z.H.; et al. Bayogenin 3-O-cellobioside confers non-cultivar-specific defence against the rice blast fungus Pyricularia oryzae. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Okahara, F.; Suzuki, J.; Hashizume, K.; Osaki, N.; Shimotoyodome, A. Triterpene alcohols and sterols from rice bran reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in rodents and humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 60, 1521–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sen, S.; Chakraborty, R.; Kalita, P. Rice-not just a staple food: A comprehensive review on its phytochemicals and therapeutic potential. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 265–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ali, M.; Ahmad, A.; Sultana, S.; Mir, S.R. Chemical constituents from the seed husks of Oryza sativa L. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 5530–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jung, Y.J.; Park, J.-H.; Shrestha, S.; Song, M.-C.; Cho, S.; Lee, C.-H.; Han, D.; Baek, N.-I. Phytosterols from the rice (Oryza sativa) bran. J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2014, 57, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ohnishi, M.; Fujino, Y. Novel glycolipids; cellobiosylsterol and cellotriosylsterol in rice bran. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1978, 42, 2423–2425. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ohnishi, M.; Fujino, Y. Structural study on new sterylglycosides in rice bran: Cellotetraosylsitosterol and cellopentaosylsitosterol. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1980, 44, 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  73. Chung, I.M.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, A.; Chun, S.-C.; Kim, J.-T.; Sultana, S.; Kim, J.-S.; Min, S.-K.; Seo, B.-R. Steroidal constituents of rice (Oryza sativa) hulls with algicidal and herbicidal activity against blue–green algae and duckweed. Phytochem. Anal. 2007, 18, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Luang-In, V.; Yotchaisarn, M.; Somboonwatthanakul, I.; Deeseenthum, S. Bioactivities of organic riceberry broken rice and crude riceberry rice oil. J. Pharm. Anal. 2018, 42. [Google Scholar]
  75. Xu, Z.M.; Godber, J.S. Purification and identification of components of γ-oryzanol in rice bran oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 2724–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kumar, M.S.; Ali, K.; Dahuja, A.; Tyagi, A. Role of phytosterols in drought stress tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ding, C.; Liu, Q.; Li, P.; Pei, Y.S.; Tao, T.T.; Wang, Y.; Yan, W.; Yang, G.F.; Shao, X.L. Distribution and quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds in fractions of Japonica and Indica rice. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, W.; Guo, J.; Zhang, J.N.; Peng, J.; Liu, T.X.; Xin, Z.H. Isolation, identification and antioxidant activity of bound phenolic compounds present in rice bran. Food Chem. 2015, 171, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Seal, A.N.; Haig, T.; Pratley, J.E. Evaluation of putative allelochemicals in rice root exudates for their role in the suppression of arrowhead root growth. J. Chem. Ecol. 2004, 30, 1663–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ti, H.H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, R.F.; Zhang, M.W.; Deng, Y.Y.; Wei, Z.C.; Chi, J.W.; Zhang, Y. Free and bound phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of milled fractions of different indica rice varieties cultivated in southern China. Food Chem. 2014, 159, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rosado, M.J.; Rencoret, J.; Marques, G.; Gutiérrez, A.; Del Río, J.C. Structural characteristics of the guaiacyl-rich lignins from rice (Oryza sativa L.) husks and straw. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 640475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Yang, Z.G.; Nakabayashi, R.; Okazaki, Y.; Mori, T.; Takamatsu, S.; Kitanaka, S.; Kikuchi, J.; Saito, K. Toward better annotation in plant metabolomics: Isolation and structure elucidation of 36 specialized metabolites from Oryza sativa (rice) by using MS/MS and NMR analyses. Metabolomics 2014, 10, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zeng, Z.C.; Hu, X.T.; McClements, D.J.; Luo, S.J.; Liu, C.M.; Gong, E.; Huang, K. Hydrothermal stability of phenolic extracts of brown rice. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zaupa, M.; Calani, L.; Del Rio, D.; Brighenti, F.; Pellegrini, N. Characterization of total antioxidant capacity and (poly) phenolic compounds of differently pigmented rice varieties and their changes during domestic cooking. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Han, S.J.; Ryu, S.N.; Kang, S.S. A new 2-arylbenzofuran with antioxidant activity from the black colored rice (Oryza sativa L.) bran. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 1365–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Himeno, N.; Saburi, W.; Wakuta, S.; Takeda, R.; Matsuura, H.; Nabeta, K.; Sansenya, S.; Cairns, J.R.K.; Mori, H.; Imai, R. Identification of rice β-glucosidase with high hydrolytic activity towards salicylic acid β-D-glucoside. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013, 77, 934–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tanaka, J.; Nakanishi, T.; Shimoda, H.; Nakamura, S.; Tsuruma, K.; Shimazawa, M.; Matsuda, H.; Yoshikawa, M.; Hara, H. Purple rice extract and its constituents suppress endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced retinal damage in vitro and in vivo. Life Sci. 2013, 92, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Acosta-Estrada, B.A.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O. Bound phenolics in foods, a review. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, H.C.; Shao, Y.F.; Bao, J.S.; Beta, T. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of breeding lines between the white and black rice. Food Chem. 2015, 172, 630–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Deng, G.F.; Xu, X.R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Gan, R.Y.; Li, H.B. Phenolic compounds and bioactivities of pigmented rice. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2013, 53, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Samyor, D.; Das, A.B.; Deka, S.C. Pigmented rice a potential source of bioactive compounds: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, F.; Yang, L.M.; Huang, W.X.; Luo, X.D.; Xie, J.K.; Hu, B.L.; Chen, Y.L. Flavonoid metabolic profiles and gene mapping of rice (Oryza sativa L.) purple gradient grain hulls. Rice 2022, 15, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Irakli, M.N.; Samanidou, V.F.; Biliaderis, C.G.; Papadoyannis, I.N. Simultaneous determination of phenolic acids and flavonoids in rice using solid-phase extraction and RP-HPLC with photodiode array detection. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yu, X.T.; Yang, T.; Qi, Q.Q.; Du, Y.M.; Shi, J.; Liu, X.M.; Liu, Y.H.; Zhang, H.B.; Zhang, Z.F.; Yan, N. Comparison of the contents of phenolic compounds including flavonoids and antioxidant activity of rice (Oryza sativa) and Chinese wild rice (Zizania latifolia). Food Chem. 2021, 344, 128600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Shimizu, T.; Lin, F.Q.; Hasegawa, M.; Okada, K.; Nojiri, H.; Yamane, H. Purification and identification of naringenin 7-O-methyltransferase, a key enzyme in biosynthesis of flavonoid phytoalexin sakuranetin in rice. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 19315–19325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chung, I.M.; Park, S.-K.; Ali, M.; Prabakaran, M.; Oh, Y.-T.; Kim, S.-H.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Ahmad, A. Flavonoid glycosides from leaves and straw of Oryza sativa and their effects of cytotoxicity on a macrophage cell line and allelopathic on weed germination. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kodama, O.; Miyakawa, J.; Akatsuka, T.; Kiyosawa, S. Sakuranetin, a flavanone phytoalexin from ultraviolet-irradiated rice leaves. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 3807–3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Katsumata, S.; Hamana, K.; Horie, K.; Toshima, H.; Hasegawa, M. Identification of sternbin and naringenin as detoxified metabolites from the rice flavanone phytoalexin sakuranetin by Pyricularia oryzae. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Katsumata, S.; Toshima, H.; Hasegawa, M. Xylosylated detoxification of the rice flavonoid phytoalexin sakuranetin by the rice sheath blight fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Molecules 2018, 23, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jan, R.; Khan, M.; Asaf, S.; Lubna; Asif, S.; Kim, K.-M. Bioactivity and therapeutic potential of kaempferol and quercetin: New insights for plant and human health. Plants 2022, 11, 2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kim, B.; Woo, S.; Kim, M.-J.; Kwon, S.-W.; Lee, J.; Sung, S.H.; Koh, H.-J. Identification and quantification of flavonoids in yellow grain mutant of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Food Chem. 2018, 241, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jeong, R.-H.; Lee, D.-Y.; Cho, J.-G.; Lee, S.-M.; Kang, H.-C.; Seo, W.-D.; Kang, H.-W.; Kim, J.-Y.; Baek, N.-I. A new flavonolignan from the aerial parts of Oryza sativa L. inhibits nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2011, 54, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kim, C.; Kikuchi, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, S.; Yoon, U.; Lee, G.; Choi, J.; Kim, Y.; Park, S. Computational identification of seed-specific transcription factors involved in anthocyanin production in black rice. Biochip J. 2010, 4, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hou, Z.H.; Qin, P.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, S.H.; Ren, G.X. Identification of anthocyanins isolated from black rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their degradation kinetics. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, X.Q.; Nagao, N.; Itani, T.; Irifune, K. Anti-oxidative analysis, and identification and quantification of anthocyanin pigments in different coloured rice. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2783–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hao, J.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Yang, S.L.; Li, H.R. Identification of anthocyanins in black rice (Oryza sativa L.) by UPLC/Q-TOF-MS and their in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities. J. Cereal Sci. 2015, 64, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tamura, S.; Yan, K.; Shimoda, H.; Murakami, N. Anthocyanins from Oryza sativa L. subsp. indica. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 438–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Besson, E.; Dellamonica, G.; Chopin, J.; Markham, K.R.; Kim, M.; Koh, H.-S.; Fukami, H. C-glycosylflavones from Oryza sativa. Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 1061–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cho, J.-G.; Song, N.Y.; Nam, T.-G.; Shrestha, S.; Park, H.-J.; Lyu, H.-N.; Kim, D.-O.; Lee, G.; Woo, Y.-M.; Jeong, T.-S.; et al. Flavonoids from the grains of C1/R-S transgenic rice, the transgenic Oryza sativa spp. japonica, and their radical scavenging activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10354–10359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yang, Z.G.; Nakabayashi, R.; Mori, T.; Takamatsu, S.; Kitanaka, S.; Saito, K. Metabolome analysis of Oryza sativa (rice) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for characterizing organ specificity of flavonoids with anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activity. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 64, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ajitha, M.J.; Mohanlal, S.; Suresh, C.H.; Jayalekshmy, A. DPPH radical scavenging activity of tricin and its conjugates isolated from “njavara” rice bran: A density functional theory study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3693–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mohanlal, S.; Parvathy, R.; Shalini, V.; Helen, A.; Jayalekshmy, A. Isolation, characterization and quantification of tricin and flavonolignans in the medicinal rice njavara (Oryza sativa L.), as compared to staple varieties. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2011, 66, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Qureshi, A.A.; Mo, H.; Packer, L.; Peterson, D.M. Isolation and identification of novel tocotrienols from rice bran with hypocholesterolemic, antioxidant, and antitumor properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3130–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sookwong, P.; Murata, K.; Nakagawa, K.; Shibata, A.; Kimura, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Kojima, Y.; Miyazawa, T. Cross-fertilization for enhancing tocotrienol biosynthesis in rice plants and QTL analysis of their F2 progenies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4620–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Jeong, I.-M.; Lim, Y.-H.; Ali, M.; Sultana, S.; Ahmad, A. Novel anthracene derivatives isolated from rice hulls of Oryza sativa and their growth inhibitory activity of radish seed. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2006, 27, 995–1000. [Google Scholar]
  116. Chung, I.M.; Park, H.Y.; Chun, S.C.; Kim, J.J.; Ahmad, A. New glycosidic and other constituents from hulls of Oryza sativa. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2007, 43, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, M.-H.; McClung, A.M.; Bergman, C.J. Phenolic content, anthocyanins and antiradical capacity of diverse purple bran rice genotypes as compared to other bran colors. J. Cereal Sci. 2017, 77, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kamal-Eldin, A.; Appelqvist, L.-Å. The chemistry and antioxidant properties of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Lipids 1996, 31, 671–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Aboshi, T.; Iitsuka, C.; Galis, I.; Teraishi, M.; Kamo, M.; Nishimura, A.; Ishihara, A.; Mori, N.; Murayama, T. Isopentylamine is a novel defence compound induced by insect feeding in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Morimoto, N.; Ueno, K.; Teraishi, M.; Okumoto, Y.; Mori, N.; Ishihara, A. Induced phenylamide accumulation in response to pathogen infection and hormone treatment in rice (Oryza sativa). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2018, 82, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Park, H.L.; Yoo, Y.; Hahn, T.-R.; Bhoo, S.H.; Lee, S.-W.; Cho, M.H. Antimicrobial activity of UV-induced phenylamides from rice leaves. Molecules 2014, 19, 18139–18151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, W.W.; Yu, Z.X.; Meng, J.P.; Zhou, P.Y.; Luo, T.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Lou, Y.G. Rice phenolamindes reduce the survival of female adults of the white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Alamgir, K.M.; Hojo, Y.; Christeller, J.T.; Fukumoto, K.; Isshiki, R.; Shinya, T.; Baldwin, I.T.; Galis, I. Systematic analysis of rice (Oryza sativa) metabolic responses to herbivory. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Buttery, R.G.; Ling, L.C.; Juliano, B.O.; Turnbaugh, J.G. Cooked rice aroma and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1983, 31, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kinashi, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Takeuchi, S.; Kawarada, A. Possible metabolic intermediates from IAA to β-acid in rice bran. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1976, 40, 2465–2470. [Google Scholar]
  126. Suzuki, Y.; Kinashi, H.; Takeuchi, S.; Kawarada, A. (+)-5-Hydroxy-dioxindole-3-acetic acid, a synergist from rice bran of auxin-induced ethylene production in plant tissue. Phytochemistry 1977, 16, 635–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Yamamoto, Y.; Kamiya, N.; Morinaka, Y.; Matsuoka, M.; Sazuka, T. Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA genes in rice. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1362–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ishihara, A.; Hashimoto, Y.; Miyagawa, H.; Wakasa, K. Induction of serotonin accumulation by feeding of rice striped stem borer in rice leaves. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 714–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Nakano, H.; Ono, H.; Kaji, R.; Sakai, M.; Doi, S.; Kosemura, S. Oryzadiamines A and B, alkaloids from Oryza sativa with yellow grain. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tadera, K.; Orite, K. Isolation and structure of a new vitamin B6 conjugate in rice bran. J. Food Sci. 1991, 56, 268–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nakano, H.; Kosemura, S.; Suzuki, T.; Hirose, K.; Kaji, R.; Sakai, M. Oryzamutaic acid A, a novel yellow pigment from an Oryza sativa mutant with yellow endosperm. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2003–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nakano, H.; Kosemura, S.; Yoshida, M.; Suzuki, T.; Iwaura, R.; Kaji, R.; Sakai, M.; Hirose, K. Oryzamutaic acids B–G, new alkaloids from an Oryza sativa mutant with yellow endosperm. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nakano, H.; Kosemura, S.; Yoshida, M.; Iwaura, R.; Suzuki, T.; Kaji, R.; Sakai, M. Oryzamutaic acids H–J, new alkaloids from an Oryza sativa mutant with yellow endosperm. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4953–4956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kaikavoosi, K.; Kad, T.D.; Zanan, R.L.; Nadaf, A.B. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline augmentation in scented indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties through Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) gene transformation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 177, 1466–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tanaka, K.; Taniguchi, S.; Tamaoki, D.; Yoshitomi, K.; Akimitsu, K.; Gomi, K. Multiple roles of plant volatiles in jasmonate-induced defense response in rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e29247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Fujino, Y.; Ohnishi, M. Constituents of ceramide and ceramide monohexoside in rice bran. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1976, 17, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chung, I.M.; Ali, M.; Chun, S.-C.; Jin, C.W.; Cho, D.H.; Hong, S.-B.; Ahmad, A. New aliphatic alcohol and ester constituents from rice hulls of Oryza sativa. Chin. J. Chem. 2007, 25, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ahmad, A.; Yoon, J.; Chung, I. Chemical constituents from the rice straw of Oryza sativa. Asian J. Chem. 2013, 25, 9872–9874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chung, I.M.; Ali, M.; Chun, S.-C.; Lee, O.-K.; Ahmad, A. Sativalanosteronyl glycoside and oryzatriacontolide constituents from the Hulls of Oryza sativa. Asian J. Chem. 2007, 19, 1535. [Google Scholar]
  140. Miyazawa, M.; Nagai, S.; Oshima, T. Volatile components of the straw of Oryza sativa L. J. Oleo Sci. 2008, 57, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chung, I.M.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, A. Dicyclohexanyl orizane constituent from the hulls of Oryza sativa and its inhibitory activity. Asian J. Chem. 2005, 17, 2616. [Google Scholar]
  142. Guo, H.M.; Li, H.C.; Zhou, S.R.; Xue, H.W.; Miao, X.X. cis-12-Oxo-phytodienoic acid stimulates rice defense response to a piercing-sucking insect. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1683–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Lee, T.K.; Lee, D.; Yu, J.S.; Jo, M.S.; Baek, S.C.; Shin, M.-S.; Ko, Y.-J.; Kang, K.S.; Kim, K.H. Biological evaluation of a new lignan from the roots of rice (Oryza sativa). Chem. Biodivers. 2018, 15, e1800333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Wang, Q.; Xin, Z.J.; Li, J.C.; Hu, L.F.; Lou, Y.G.; Lu, J. (E)-β-Caryophyllene functions as a host location signal for the rice white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 91, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yuan, J.S.; Köllner, T.G.; Wiggins, G.; Grant, J.; Degenhardt, J.; Chen, F. Molecular and genomic basis of volatile-mediated indirect defense against insects in rice. Plant J. 2008, 55, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zhan, Z.H.; Matsuo, A.; Oku, Y.; Tebayashi, S.-i.; Kim, C.-S. Studies on the probing stimulants for the white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in rice plant (Oryza sativa L.). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2016, 80, 2285–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Kanno, H.; Hasegawa, M.; Kodama, O. Accumulation of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and phytoalexins in rice, Oryza sativa, infested by the white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2012, 47, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Li, C.Y.; Luo, C.; Zhou, Z.H.; Wang, R.; Ling, F.; Xiao, L.T.; Lin, Y.J.; Chen, H. Gene expression and plant hormone levels in two contrasting rice genotypes responding to brown planthopper infestation. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Du, B.; Zhang, W.L.; Liu, B.F.; Hu, J.; Wei, Z.; Shi, Z.Y.; He, R.F.; Zhu, L.L.; Chen, R.Z.; Han, B. Identification and characterization of Bph14, a gene conferring resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 22163–22168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Hu, L.; Wu, Y.; Wu, D.; Rao, W.W.; Guo, J.P.; Ma, Y.H.; Wang, Z.Z.; Shangguan, X.X.; Wang, H.Y.; Xu, C.X. The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of BROWN PLANTHOPPER RESISTANCE14 function in signaling and resistance against planthopper in rice. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 3157–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Khan, I.; Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Bilal, S.; Kim, K.-M.; Al-Harrasi, A. Genome and transcriptome-wide analysis of OsWRKY and OsNAC gene families in Oryza sativa and their response to white-backed planthopper infestation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Valea, I.; Motegi, A.; Kawamura, N.; Kawamoto, K.; Miyao, A.; Ozawa, R.; Takabayashi, J.; Gomi, K.; Nemoto, K.; Nozawa, A. The rice wound-inducible transcription factor RERJ1 sharing same signal transduction pathway with OsMYC2 is necessary for defense response to herbivory and bacterial blight. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 109, 651–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Park, S.; Choi, M.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, J.K.; Ha, S.-H.; Lim, S.-H. Molecular and biochemical analysis of two rice flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase to evaluate their roles in flavonoid biosynthesis in rice grain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Lam, P.Y.; Liu, H.J.; Lo, C. Completion of tricin biosynthesis pathway in rice: Cytochrome P450 75B4 is a unique chrysoeriol 5′-hydroxylase. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 1527–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Yamane, H. Biosynthesis of phytoalexins and regulatory mechanisms of it in rice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013, 77, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Ogawa, S.; Miyamoto, K.; Nemoto, K.; Sawasaki, T.; Yamane, H.; Nojiri, H.; Okada, K. OsMYC2, an essential factor for JA-inductive sakuranetin production in rice, interacts with MYC2-like proteins that enhance its transactivation ability. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Pazini, J.D.; Martins, J.F.D.; Dorneles, K.D.; Crizel, R.L.; Da Silva, F.F.; Chaves, F.C.; Fernando, J.A.; Dallagnol, L.J.; Seidel, E.J.; Stout, M.J. Morphoanatomical and biochemical factors associated with rice resistance to the South American rice water weevil, Oryzophagus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 22480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Lubna; Asif, S.; Kim, E.-G.; Jang, Y.-H.; Kim, N.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Lee, G.-S.; Kim, K.-M. Enhancing the expression of the OsF3H gene in Oryza sativa leads to the regulation of multiple biosynthetic pathways and transcriptomic changes that influence insect resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Jan, R.; Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Lee, I.J.; Kim, K.M. Overexpression of OsF3H modulates WBPH stress by alteration of phenylpropanoid pathway at a transcriptomic and metabolomic level in Oryza sativa. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhang, Z.; Cui, B.; Yan, S.; Li, Y.; Xiao, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y. Evaluation of tricin, a stylet probing stimulant of brown planthopper, in infested and non-infested rice plants. J. Appl. Entomol. 2017, 141, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Chen, S.; Sun, B.; Shi, Z.Y.; Miao, X.X.; Li, H.C. Identification of the rice genes and metabolites involved in dual resistance against brown planthopper and rice blast fungus. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 1914–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bing, L.; Xia, D.H.; Xin, Z.M.; Di, X.; Shu, W.J. Potential resistance of tricin in rice against brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). Acta Ecol. Sin. 2007, 27, 1300–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhang, Z.F.; Cui, B.Y.; Zhang, Y. Electrical penetration graphs indicate that tricin is a key secondary metabolite of rice, inhibiting phloem feeding of brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2015, 156, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Adjei-Afriyie, F.; Kim, C.-S.; Takemura, M.; Ishikawa, M.; Tebayashi, S.-i.; Horiike, M. Probing stimulants from the rice plant towards the smaller brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Fallen)(Homoptera: Delphacidae). Z. Naturforsch. C 2000, 55, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Thomas, J.C.; Adams, D.G.; Nessler, C.L.; Brown, J.K.; Bohnert, H.J. Tryptophan decarboxylase, tryptamine, and reproduction of the whitefly. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Gill, R.I.; Ellis, B.E.; Isman, M.B. Tryptamine-induced resistance in tryptophan decarboxylase transgenic poplar and tobacco plants against their specific herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 779–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Gao, H.L.; Zou, J.Z.; Lin, X.M.; Zhang, H.H.; Yu, N.; Liu, Z.W. Nilaparvata lugens salivary protein NlG14 triggers defense response in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 7477–7487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Shangguan, X.X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B.F.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Wang, Z.Z.; Guo, J.P.; Rao, W.W.; Jing, S.L.; Guan, W.; et al. A mucin-like protein of planthopper is required for feeding and induces immunity response in plants. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 552–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Zeng, J.M.; Ye, W.F.; Hu, W.H.; Jin, X.C.; Kuai, P.; Xiao, W.H.; Jian, Y.K.; Turlings, T.C.; Lou, Y.G. The N-terminal subunit of vitellogenin in planthopper eggs and saliva acts as a reliable elicitor that induces defenses in rice. New Phytol. 2022, 238, 1230–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Takeda, Y.; Koshiba, T.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Murakami, S.; Yamamura, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Takano, T.; Hattori, T.; Sakamoto, M. Regulation of CONIFERALDEHYDE 5-HYDROXYLASE expression to modulate cell wall lignin structure in rice. Planta 2017, 246, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Lu, H.P.; Luo, T.; Fu, H.W.; Wang, L.; Tan, Y.Y.; Huang, J.Z.; Wang, Q.; Ye, G.Y.; Gatehouse, A.M.; Lou, Y.G. Resistance of rice to insect pests mediated by suppression of serotonin biosynthesis. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Hori, M.; Enya, S. Attractiveness of synthetic volatile blends of flowering rice panicles to Trigonotylus caelestialium (Kirkaldy)(Heteroptera: Miridae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ye, W.F.; Yu, H.X.; Jian, Y.K.; Zeng, J.M.; Ji, R.; Chen, H.D.; Lou, Y.G. A salivary EF-hand calcium-binding protein of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens functions as an effector for defense responses in rice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ji, R.; Ye, W.F.; Chen, H.D.; Zeng, J.M.; Li, H.; Yu, H.X.; Li, J.C.; Lou, Y.G. A salivary endo-β-1, 4-glucanase acts as an effector that enables the brown planthopper to feed on rice. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1920–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Gong, G.; Yuan, L.Y.; Li, Y.F.; Xiao, H.X.; Li, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, W.J.; Zhang, Z.F. Salivary protein 7 of the brown planthopper functions as an effector for mediating tricin metabolism in rice plants. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Fu, J.M.; Shi, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Fang, J.C.; Ji, R. Planthopper-secreted salivary disulfide isomerase activates immune responses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 622513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Bussaban, B.; Lumyong, S.; Lumyong, P.; Seelanan, T.; Park, D.; McKenzie, E.; Hyde, K. Molecular and morphological characterization of Pyricularia and allied genera. Mycologia 2005, 97, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Watanabe, M.; Kono, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Uzawa, J.; Teraoka, T.; Hosokawa, D.; Suzuki, Y.; Sakurai, A.; Teraguchi, M. Structures of oryzalic acid B and three related compounds, a group of novel antibacterial diterpenes, isolated from leaves of a bacterial leaf blight-resistant cultivar of rice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 56, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Watanabe, M.; Sakai, Y.; Teraoka, T.; Abe, H.; Kono, Y.; Uzawa, J.; Kobayashi, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Sakurai, A. Novel C19-kaurane type of diterpene (oryzalide A), a new antimicrobial compound isolated from healthy leaves of a bacterial leaf blight-resistant cultivar of rice plant. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1990, 54, 1103–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Kono, Y.; Uzawa, J.; Kobayashi, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Uramoto, M.; Sakurai, A.; Watanabe, M.; Teraoka, T.; Hosokawa, D.; Watanabe, M.; et al. Structures of oryzalides A and B, and oryzalic acid A, a group of novel antimicrobial diterpenes, isolated from healthy leaves of a bacterial leaf blight-resistant cultivar of rice plant. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1991, 55, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Lerma-García, M.; Herrero-Martínez, J.; Simó-Alfonso, E.; Mendonça, C.R.; Ramis-Ramos, G. Composition, industrial processing and applications of rice bran γ-oryzanol. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Wang, Q.; Quan, S.; Xiao, H. Towards efficient terpenoid biosynthesis: Manipulating IPP and DMAPP supply. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2019, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Swaminathan, S.; Morrone, D.; Wang, Q.; Fulton, D.B.; Peters, R. CYP76M7 is an ent-cassadiene C11α-hydroxylase defining a second multifunctional diterpenoid biosynthetic gene cluster in rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3315–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Kono, Y.; Takeuchi, S.; Kodama, O.; Sekido, H.; Akatsuka, T. Novel phytoalexins (oryzalexins A, B and C) isolated from rice blast leaves infected with Pyricularia oryzae. Part II: Structural studies of oryzalexins. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1985, 49, 1695–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Sekido, H.; Endo, T.; Suga, T.; Kodama, O.; Akatsuka, T.; Kono, Y.; Takeuchi, S. Oryzalexin D (3, 7-dihydroxy-(+)-sandaracopimaradiene), a new phytoalexin isolated from blast-infected rice leaves. J. Pestic. Sci. 1986, 11, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Sekido, H.; Akatsuka, T. Mode of action of oryzalexin D against Pyricularia oryzae. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1987, 51, 1967–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chen, X.J.; Chen, H.; Yuan, J.S.; Köllner, T.G.; Chen, Y.Y.; Guo, Y.F.; Zhuang, X.F.; Chen, X.L.; Zhang, Y.J.; Fu, J.Y. The rice terpene synthase gene OsTPS19 functions as an (S)-limonene synthase in planta, and its overexpression leads to enhanced resistance to the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1778–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Cartwright, D.; Langcake, P.; Pryce, R.J.; Leworthy, D.P.; Ride, J.P. Chemical activation of host defence mechanisms as a basis for crop protection. Nature 1977, 267, 511–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Rocha, M.F.G.; Sales, J.A.; da Rocha, M.G.; Galdino, L.M.; de Aguiar, L.; Pereira-Neto, W.D.; Cordeiro, R.D.; Castelo-Branco, D.; Sidrim, J.J.C.; Brilhante, R.S.N. Antifungal effects of the flavonoids kaempferol and quercetin: A possible alternative for the control of fungal biofilms. Biofouling 2019, 35, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kong, C.H.; Xu, X.H.; Zhou, B.; Hu, F.; Zhang, C.X.; Zhang, M.X. Two compounds from allelopathic rice accession and their inhibitory activity on weeds and fungal pathogens. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Hasegawa, M.; Mitsuhara, I.; Seo, S.; Okada, K.; Yamane, H.; Iwai, T.; Ohashi, Y. Analysis on blast fungus-responsive characters of a flavonoid phytoalexin sakuranetin; accumulation in infected rice leaves, antifungal activity and detoxification by fungus. Molecules 2014, 19, 11404–11418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Ishihara, A.; Fukami, A.; Matsuda, Y.; Nakajima, H.; Miyagawa, H. Accumulation of indole-3-acetic acid in rice sl mutant leaves infected with Bipolaris oryzae. J. Phytopathol. 2016, 164, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ishihara, A.; Hashimoto, Y.; Tanaka, C.; Dubouzet, J.G.; Nakao, T.; Matsuda, F.; Nishioka, T.; Miyagawa, H.; Wakasa, K. The tryptophan pathway is involved in the defense responses of rice against pathogenic infection via serotonin production. Plant J. 2008, 54, 481–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Furutani, A.; Tsuge, S.; Oku, T.; Tsuno, K.; Inoue, Y.; Ochiai, H.; Kaku, H.; Kubo, Y. Hpa1 secretion via type III secretion system in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2003, 69, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Fan, S.S.; Tian, F.; Li, J.Y.; Hutchins, W.; Chen, H.M.; Yang, F.H.; Yuan, X.C.; Cui, Z.N.; Yang, C.H.; He, C.Y. Identification of phenolic compounds that suppress the virulence of Xanthomonas oryzae on rice via the type III secretion system. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Ming, D.; Wang, D.C.; Cao, F.J.; Xiang, H.; Mu, D.; Cao, J.J.; Li, B.B.; Zhong, L.; Dong, X.Y.; Zhong, X.B.; et al. Kaempferol inhibits the primary attachment phase of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Nasir, F.; Shi, S.H.; Tian, L.; Chang, C.L.; Ma, L.; Li, X.J.; Gao, Y.Z.; Tian, C.J. Strigolactones shape the rhizomicrobiome in rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Sci. 2019, 286, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Li, Y.Z.; Jian, X.; Li, Y.; Zeng, X.M.; Xu, L.N.; Khan, M.U.; Lin, W.X. OsPAL2-1 mediates allelopathic interactions between rice and specific microorganisms in the rhizosphere ecosystem. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Fang, C.X.; Zhuang, Y.E.; Xu, T.C.; Li, Y.Z.; Li, Y.; Lin, W.X. Changes in rice allelopathy and rhizosphere microflora by inhibiting rice phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene expression. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Chamam, A.; Sanguin, H.; Bellvert, F.; Meiffren, G.; Comte, G.; Wisniewski-Dyé, F.; Bertrand, C.; Prigent-Combaret, C. Plant secondary metabolite profiling evidences strain-dependent effect in the AzospirillumOryza sativa association. Phytochemistry 2013, 87, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Mishra, R.P.N.; Singh, R.K.; Jaiswal, H.K.; Kumar, V.; Maurya, S. Rhizobium-mediated induction of phenolics and plant growth promotion in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ino, T. Rice seedlings release momilactone B into the environment. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Xu, M.M.; Galhano, R.; Wiemann, P.; Bueno, E.; Tiernan, M.; Wu, W.; Chung, I.M.; Gershenzon, J.; Tudzynski, B.; Sesma, A. Genetic evidence for natural product-mediated plant-plant allelopathy in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2012, 193, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Thi, H.L.; Lin, C.H.; Smeda, R.J.; Leigh, N.D.; Wycoff, W.G.; Fritschi, F.B. Isolation and identification of an allelopathic phenylethylamine in rice. Phytochemistry 2014, 108, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Kong, C.H.; Li, H.B.; Hu, F.; Xu, X.H.; Wang, P. Allelochemicals released by rice roots and residues in soil. Plant Soil 2006, 288, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Rimando, A.M.; Olofsdotter, M.; Dayan, F.E.; Duke, S.O. Searching for rice allelochemicals: An example of bioassay-guided isolation. Agron. J. 2001, 93, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Kong, C.H.; Zhao, H.; Xu, X.H.; Wang, P.; Gu, Y. Activity and allelopathy of soil of flavone O-glycosides from rice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 6007–6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Zhu, Q.; Tang, M.J.; Yang, Y.; Sun, K.; Tian, L.S.; Lu, F.; Hao, A.Y.; Dai, C.C. Endophytic fungus Phomopsis liquidambaris B3 induces rice resistance to RSRD caused by Fusarium proliferatum and promotes plant growth. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 4059–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Saravanakumar, D.; Lavanya, N.; Muthumeena, K.; Raguchander, T.; Samiyappan, R. Fluorescent pseudomonad mixtures mediate disease resistance in rice plants against sheath rot (Sarocladium oryzae) disease. Biocontrol 2009, 54, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Hata, E.M.; Yusof, M.T.; Zulperi, D. Induction of systemic resistance against bacterial leaf streak disease and growth promotion in rice plant by Streptomyces shenzhenesis TKSC3 and Streptomyces sp. SS8. Plant Pathol. 2021, 37, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Khanh, T.; Chung, M.; Xuan, T.; Tawata, S. The exploitation of crop allelopathy in sustainable agricultural production. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2005, 191, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Kong, C.H.; Liang, W.J.; Xu, X.H.; Hu, F.; Wang, P.; Jiang, Y. Release and activity of allelochemicals from allelopathic rice seedlings. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2861–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Rice SPMs with functions in plant defenses against herbivores and their biosynthesis. Blue arrows: rice priming responds to herbivore defense genes and biosynthetic pathways of rice SPMs; Red arrows: SPMs involved in herbivore inhibition.
Figure 1. Rice SPMs with functions in plant defenses against herbivores and their biosynthesis. Blue arrows: rice priming responds to herbivore defense genes and biosynthetic pathways of rice SPMs; Red arrows: SPMs involved in herbivore inhibition.
Ijms 24 17053 g001
Figure 2. Salivary metabolites from herbivores that are known to induce defense responses in rice. Blue arrows: effects of herbivore salivary gland proteins on rice defenses; red arrows: inhibitory effects of the rice defense response on herbivores; yellow arrows: proteins produced by herbivore salivary glands; green arrow: the attraction of herbivore parasites by SPMs.
Figure 2. Salivary metabolites from herbivores that are known to induce defense responses in rice. Blue arrows: effects of herbivore salivary gland proteins on rice defenses; red arrows: inhibitory effects of the rice defense response on herbivores; yellow arrows: proteins produced by herbivore salivary glands; green arrow: the attraction of herbivore parasites by SPMs.
Ijms 24 17053 g002
Figure 3. Adaptation of herbivores and fungi to rice SPMs. Blue arrows: biosynthetic pathways of rice SPMs; red arrows: herbivore reactions to rice defenses and fungal detoxification of SPMs; yellow arrows: salivary gland proteins from herbivores; green arrow: the attraction of herbivores by SPMs.
Figure 3. Adaptation of herbivores and fungi to rice SPMs. Blue arrows: biosynthetic pathways of rice SPMs; red arrows: herbivore reactions to rice defenses and fungal detoxification of SPMs; yellow arrows: salivary gland proteins from herbivores; green arrow: the attraction of herbivores by SPMs.
Ijms 24 17053 g003
Figure 4. Pathogen targets of rice SPMs and the SPMs biosynthetic pathways. Blue arrows: biosynthetic pathways of rice SPMs; red arrows: target of SPMs inhibition of pathogens.
Figure 4. Pathogen targets of rice SPMs and the SPMs biosynthetic pathways. Blue arrows: biosynthetic pathways of rice SPMs; red arrows: target of SPMs inhibition of pathogens.
Ijms 24 17053 g004
Figure 5. Allelopathic effects of SPMs from rice on other plants. Blue arrows: rice SPMs with allelopathic effects; red arrows: allelopathic effects of rice SPMs on rice itself or on other plants.
Figure 5. Allelopathic effects of SPMs from rice on other plants. Blue arrows: rice SPMs with allelopathic effects; red arrows: allelopathic effects of rice SPMs on rice itself or on other plants.
Ijms 24 17053 g005
Table 1. Pathogens and herbivores of rice.
Table 1. Pathogens and herbivores of rice.
CategoryNo.FamilyNameSite of Infection/HerbivoryDegree of Harm *
Herbivores1DelphacidaeNilaparvata lugensXylem, phloem tissues+++
2Sogatella furciferaXylem, phloem tissues+++
3Laodelphax striatellusLeaves, stem+
4MiridaeTrigonotylus caelestialiumShoots++
5PyralidaeChilo suppressalisLeaves++
6AleyrodidaeBemisia tabaciLeaves++
7LasiocampidaeMalacosoma disstriaLeaves+
8SphingidaeManduca sextaLeaves, stem+
9 Mythimna loreyiLeaves++
10CurculionidaeOryzophagus oryzaeLeaves, stem++
Pathogens1AgonomycetaceaeRhizoctonia solaniCulms, sheath+++
2PyriculariaceaeMagnaporthe grisea/Pyricularia griseaLeaves, nodes, stems, panicles, roots +++
3Magnaporthe oryzae/Pyricularia oryzaeLeaves, nodes, stems, panicles, roots+++
4PleosporaceaeCochliobolus miyabeanus/Bipolaris oryzaeLeaves+++
5DematiaceaeHelminthosporium oryzaeGrain+++
6AgonomycetaceaeSclerotium rolfsiiStem+
7TuberculariaceaeFusarium proliferatumSpikelet+++
8HypocrealesSarocladium oryzaeLeaf sheath++
9BotryosphaeriaceaeMacrophomina phaseolinaStem++
10BurkholderiaceaeBurkholderia glumaeHusk++
11PseudomonadaceaeXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo)Leaves+++
12X. oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xoc)Leaves++
13X. campestris pv. oryzaeLeaves+++
* +++: very serious; ++: moderately serious; +: serious.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, H.; Zhang, J.; Bai, L.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Hua, J.; Luo, S. Chemical Structure Diversity and Extensive Biological Functions of Specialized Metabolites in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242317053

AMA Style

Zhou H, Zhang J, Bai L, Liu J, Li H, Hua J, Luo S. Chemical Structure Diversity and Extensive Biological Functions of Specialized Metabolites in Rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(23):17053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242317053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Huiwen, Jinjin Zhang, Liping Bai, Jiayi Liu, Hongdi Li, Juan Hua, and Shihong Luo. 2023. "Chemical Structure Diversity and Extensive Biological Functions of Specialized Metabolites in Rice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 23: 17053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242317053

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop