Next Article in Journal
N-Doped Carbon/CeO2 Composite as a Biomimetic Catalyst for Antibacterial Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of a Novel N4-Methylcytosine Restriction-Modification System in Deinococcus radiodurans
Previous Article in Journal
Stress-Related Immune Response and Selenium Status in Autoimmune Thyroid Disease Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acquisition of Streptomycin Resistance by Oxidative Stress Induced by Hydrogen Peroxide in Radiation-Resistant Bacterium Deinococcus geothermalis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MoaE Is Involved in Response to Oxidative Stress in Deinococcus radiodurans

MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection, Institute of Biophysics, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2441; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032441
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 22 January 2023 / Published: 26 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanism of Radiation Resistant Microorganisms)

Abstract

:
Molybdenum ions are covalently bound to molybdenum pterin (MPT) to produce molybdenum cofactor (Moco), a compound essential for the catalytic activity of molybdenum enzymes, which is involved in a variety of biological functions. MoaE is the large subunit of MPT synthase and plays a key role in Moco synthesis. Here, we investigated the function of MoaE in Deinococcus radiodurans (DrMoaE) in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating that the protein contributed to the extreme resistance of D. radiodurans. The crystal structure of DrMoaE was determined by 1.9 Å resolution. DrMoaE was shown to be a dimer and the dimerization disappeared after Arg110 had been mutated. The deletion of drmoaE resulted in sensitivity to DNA damage stress and a slower growth rate in D. radiodurans. The increase in drmoaE transcript levels the and accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species levels under oxidative stress suggested that it was involved in the antioxidant process in D. radiodurans. In addition, treatment with the base analog 6-hydroxyaminopurine decreased survival and increased intracellular mutation rates in drmoaE deletion mutant strains. Our results reveal that MoaE plays a role in response to external stress mainly through oxidative stress resistance mechanisms in D. radiodurans.

1. Introduction

The trace element molybdenum is a key component of several enzymes involved in nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon metabolism [1]. Molybdenum usually binds to molybdenum pterin (MPT) to form molybdenum cofactor (Moco) as the catalytic site of molybdoenzymes, such as DMSO reductase family, xanthine oxidase family, and sulfite oxidase family [2]. In all prokaryotes, the biosynthesis of Moco can be divided into four steps: (1) conversion of 5′-GTP into cyclic pyropterin monophosphate (cPMP) [3]; (2) insertion of two sulfur atoms into cPMP to form MPT [4]; (3) intercalation of molybdenum into the disulfide sulfur of MPT, which catalyzes the formation of Mo-MPT [5]; and (4) covalent binding of CMP or GMP to MPT. Finally, Moco is processed by the molybdenum enzyme and catalyzes the redox reaction in which the molybdenum enzyme participates [6].
The conversion of cPMP into MPT in the Moco biosynthetic pathway is responsible for MPT synthase [4]. MPT synthase is a heterotetrameric enzyme composed of two small and two large subunits encoded by moaD and moaE [7]. Structural analysis of MPT synthases from Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus have shown that the central dimer is formed by two MoaE subunits, each containing MoaD [4,8], and the small subunit of MPT synthase is thiolated at the C -terminus of MoaD in the form of the carboxylic acid group carrying a sulfur atom [3]. The two MoaE–MoaD dimers function independently during the reaction, with each MoaE subunit bound to one cPMP molecule [9].
In E. coli and most organisms, MPT synthase is encoded by the moaD and moaE genes. In addition to two moaD genes (moaD1 and moaD2) and two moaE genes (moaE1 and moaE2), Mycobacterium tuberculosis also contains an moaX gene encoding linearly fused MoaD and MoaE proteins. It has been confirmed that cleavage is required to activate the function of MoaX, the cleavage position is between Gly82 and Ser83 residues, and the Gly81-Gly82 motif is necessary for catalysis [10]. MoaE is essential for Moco synthesis. In M. tuberculosis, Moco biosynthesis is also associated with its pathogenicity [11], and the deletion of moaE results in the disruption of the Moco biosynthetic pathway [10]. In Pseudomonas putida, moaE is essential for the generation of the molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide (Mo-MCD) required for molybdenum enzymes, and its deletion inhibits the growth of the strain in cultures with nicotine as the sole carbon and nitrogen source [12].
Deinococcus radiodurans R1 was first isolated from γ-irradiated meat cans in 1956 [13]. In addition to γ irradiation, this robust organism also has high levels of resistance to UV radiation, desiccation, oxidizing agents, and other DNA-damaging agents [14]. D. radiodurans possesses strong abilities in preventing the formation of endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) [15,16], activating antioxidant defense systems [17,18], as well as removing and degrading damaged bases [19,20]. In D. radiodurans, the DrMoaD–MoaE fusion protein is encoded by the dr_2607 gene, and the JAMM protein encoded by dr_0402 activates DrMoaD and DrMoaE [21,22]. However, the contribution of the Moco biosynthetic pathway to the extreme resistance of D. radiodurans remains unknown.
In the present study, the crystal structure of DrMaoE, an important protein in Moco biosynthesis, was determined, and Arg110 was found to be the key residue for its dimerization. The deletion of drmoaE led to an increased susceptibility to stress-induced oxidative damage, a loss of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) reductase activity, and an elevated rate of mutations caused by base analogs. The data above indicate that DrMoaE plays an important role in response to oxidative stress in D. radiodurans.

2. Results

2.1. Overall Structure of DrMoaE

We compared the amino acid sequences of DrMoaE and the homologous proteins from M. tuberculosis (MtMoaE), E. coli (EcMoaE), and S. aureus (SaMoaE), and found that the similarity was high at about 32%, 29.73%, and 37.41%, respectively (Figure 1A).
DrMoaE structural data with a resolution of 1.9 Å were obtained (Supplementary Table S1), revealing that each monomeric protein consisted of three α helices and six β sheets. The α/β structure exhibited a hammerhead fold containing an additional four-stranded antiparallel β-sheet domain (Figure 1B,C). To explore the structural similarities and differences between DrMoaE and its homologous proteins, we selected the resolved EcMoaE (PDB: 1NVJ, red) and MtMoaE (PDB: 2WP4, blue) for comparison. The r.m.s.d. values of 1.19 Å and 0.981 Å were comparable with the Cα atoms of EcMoaE and MtMoaE, respectively, suggesting that DrMoaE was similar to its homologous proteins, with a high degree of overlap of the four-stranded antiparallel β sheet, but a displacement of the α1 and α2 helices located around it (Figure 1D). Compared with EcMoaE and MtMoaE, the loop between the β2 and β3 sheets were predominantly disordered, resulting in their apparent deflection (Figure 1D).

2.2. Arg110 Is a Key Residue for DrMoaE Dimerization

MoaE can interact with MoaD to complete cPMP processing. The anion pocket of substrate precursor Z (cPMP) bound to EcMoaE was found to consist of His103, Arg104, and Arg39, which corresponded to His109, Arg110, and Arg45 of DrMoaE, respectively. Sequence comparison revealed that these three residues were highly conserved in D. radiodurans, M. tuberculosis, and E. coli (Figure 2A). The His109 and Arg110 amino acid pair of DrMoaE located in the α3 helix was equally capable of forming an anion-binding pocket with the Arg45 of β2 sheet located in another monomer, which matched well with the MtMoaE protein, but exhibited a significant angular shift in E. coli (Figure 2B).
In the dimer interaction interface, the two anionic binding pockets in the dotted frames were symmetrical to each other (Figure 2C). In E. coli, Arg39 and His103 underwent significant conformational changes before and after substrate binding, while Arg104 remained largely unchanged [23]. It was speculated that EcMoaE Arg104 may function in the dimerization of MoaE in addition to their important role in substrate binding [23]. When the corresponding Arg110 in D. radiodurans was mutated to alanine, the gel filtration result of DrMoaE shifted from a single peak of 34 kDa to a single peak of 17 kDa (Figure 2D and Supplementary Figure S1). The DrMoaE dimer disappeared, suggesting that Arg110 had an irreplaceable role in the stable dimerization formation of DrMoaE.

2.3. ΔdrmoaE Mutant Strain Is Sensitive to Damage Stress

To investigate the biological function of drmoaE, we analyzed the effects of several DNA-damaging agents on the ΔdrmoaE mutant strain. Under H2O2 treatment, the resistance of the mutant strain significantly decreased by about one or two orders of magnitude compared with the wild-type strain R1, and the complement of ΔdrmoaE_R110A could restore some of the growth activity of the ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, but it was still about half an order of magnitude lower than that of the R1, whereas the resistance of the ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain was able to fully compensate for the decrease (Figure 3A). When treated with γ-ray or low doses of UV (150 J/m2), the mutant did not exhibit a decrease in resistance compared with the wild-type strain (Figure 3B, C). However, the ΔdrmoaE mutant exhibited an order of magnitude decrease in survival rate when treated with higher doses of UV (Figure 3B). The deletion of drmoaE significantly inhibited the growth of D. radiodurans, but the ΔdrmoaE_R110A complementary strain could grow at a rate similar to that of wild-type R1 (Figure 3D). These results suggest that drmoaE plays an important role in oxidative stress resistance in D. radiodurans, while Arg110 is vital in the process.

2.4. DrmoaE Contributes to the Antioxidant Process

To establish the role of drmoaE in the antioxidant process of D. radiodurans, the effect of drmoaE deficiency on intracellular ROS scavenging was determined. We compared the accumulation of ROS in the wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain and found that the accumulation of ROS in the mutant strain increased significantly compared with the wild-type strain after treatment with H2O2. Intracellular ROS accumulation in the ΔdrmoaE mutant strain was dose-dependent, as the mutant level was about 1.5-fold higher than in the wild-type strain after treatment with 80 mM H2O2 (Figure 4A). These results indicate that drmoaE is involved in the antioxidant process of D. radiodurans by affecting intracellular ROS accumulation.
The transcript levels of drmoaE under oxidative stress were further analyzed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The wild-type strain was treated with 40 mM H2O2 for 0, 15, 30, and 60 min, and the transcript levels of drmoaE increased with longer treatment time, reaching the highest level at 30 min (Figure 4B). This indicates that drmoaE participates in the antioxidant process of D. radiodurans by increasing its transcript levels.

2.5. DMSO Reductase Activity Is Decreased in the ΔdrmoaE Mutant Strain

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) are important components of the antioxidant system. Under normal physiological conditions, the activity of SOD and CAT in D. radiodurans is approximately 6- and 20-fold higher, respectively, than that of E. coli. We compared the intracellular SOD and CAT activities of the wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain, and found that the deletion of drmoaE did not significantly decrease the activities of SOD and CAT in vivo (Figure 5A,B), indicating that drmoaE does not respond to oxidative stress by affecting SOD and CAT activities.
It has been shown that the activities of some Moco-dependent oxidoreductases, such as DMSO reductase, depend on Moco biosynthesis [24]. The DMSO reductase family found in bacteria and archaea catalyzes oxygen atom transfer and simple redox reactions. The intracellular DMSO reductase activity of the wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain was analyzed, and intracellular DMSO reductase activity was found to decrease significantly when drmoaE was absent, until it was undetectable (Figure 5C). This suggests that DrMoaE responds to antioxidant processes by affecting DMSO reductase activity.

2.6. DrMoaE Responds to Base Analog Damage

Our above results show that the ΔdrmoaE mutant strain was sensitive to H2O2 and high-dose UV, implying that drmoaE plays a role in the cellular defense mechanism against oxidative damage to DNA. In E. coli, the deletion of Moco-related genes, such as moeA results in DNA mutation, were induced by base analog 6-hydroxyaminopurine (HAP) [25]. In Salmonella, mutations caused by the deletion of Moco-related genes in addition to HAP were also affected by other base analogs other than HAP, such as hydroxylamine aminopurine [26]. The survival rate of the ΔdrmoaE mutant strain in the presence of HAP was decreased to about 50% relative to the wild-type and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strains (Figure 6A). Screening using TGY solid medium containing 50 μg/mL rifampicin revealed that the deletion of drmoaE resulted in a rapid increase in mutation frequency eight-fold that of the wild-type strain, whereas the mutation rate of the wild-type and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strains did not change significantly (Figure 6B). High doses of UV and γ rays also broke down water molecules, causing some oxidative damage and producing base analogs. Therefore, one of the main functions of drmoaE in the antioxidant process may be to metabolize the base analogs produced by oxidative stress and reduce protein and DNA damage under oxidative damage conditions, thus accelerating the recovery of the strains from various external stresses.

3. Discussion

MPT synthase catalyzes the conversion of precursor Z (cPMP) into MPT via sulfur transfer of MoaD thiocarboxylate [11]. The mechanism of MPT synthase relies heavily on the precise interaction between the active form of MoaD carrying the thiocarboxylate and the MoaE protein. In the present study, we solved the crystal structure of DrMoaE by 1.9 Å resolution. Compared with previously reported structures of homologous proteins from E. coli and M. tuberculosis, DrMoaE had a high similarity but exhibited a significant angular deflection of the loop sequence between its β2 and β3 sheets. The positively charged residues His109, Arg110, and Arg45, which can form an anion-binding pocket in D. radiodurans, were the most conserved in different organisms. However, a significant angular shift in the positively charged residues of the substrate-binding pocket of EcMoaE compared to DrMoaE was found in the structural comparison, suggesting that there may be variability in the substrate-binding mode in different species. Meanwhile, the structural analysis revealed that Arg110 is essential for the dimerization of DrMoaE, and the stable dimerization state of DrMoaE disappeared after mutation of this site, indicating that Arg110 is important in the dimerization of DrMoaE.
The ΔdrmoaE mutant strain was sensitive to various DNA-damaging agents, especially to oxidative stress caused by H2O2. The deletion of drmoaE resulted in growth restriction of D. radiodurans. Intracellular ROS accumulation confirmed that drmoaE deficiency led to ROS accumulation under oxidative stress in D. radiodurans, while the transcript levels of drmoaE in the wild-type strain were elevated under oxidative stress. The above results suggest that drmoaE plays an important role in oxidative stress resistance in D. radiodurans.
CAT and SOD are important ROS scavengers in D. radiodurans, and the absence of drmoaE has little effect on their activities, suggesting that an additional effective ROS scavenging mechanism is required for DrMoaE to perform its function. It was shown that the ratio of MoO42− affected the capacity of redox metabolic in Agave [27]. The transport pathway of MoO42− is mainly converted into Moco through the Moco biosynthesis pathway to complete the function of a series of molybdenum enzymes such as DMSO reductase. The loss of DMSO reductase activity in the ΔdrmoaE mutant suggests that the function of molybdenum enzymes is hindered by the absence of drmoaE, thereby affecting the antioxidant process in which molybdenum enzymes are involved in D. radiodurans.
Modified nucleobases that can participate in cellular processes together with natural substrates which are toxic and/or mutagenic are traditionally referred to as base analogs [26]. In organisms, base analogs can act as products of oxidative stress damage, such as 5-hydroxy-dCTP [28], 2-hydroxy-dATP [29], and 8-oxo-dGTP [30]. Base analogs are potent mutagens, such as HAP for adenine analogs, which are inserted into the DNA strand by DNA polymerase, leading to incorrect DNA replication and mutations, and are therefore commonly used to test the metabolism of nucleotide precursors or the mechanisms of DNA replication and repair [31]. Our study showed that DNA and DNA bases were exposed to peroxyl radicals (ROO), a major intracellular oxidant and oxidative stress product, with HAP being the major product [32]. The ΔdrmoaE mutant strain exhibited a significant decrease in survival rate and a significant increase in mutation rate in vivo after treatment with HAP, suggesting that the deletion of drmoaE leads to the accumulation of base analogs in vivo and an increase in DNA mutations. In E. coli, the DMSO reductase-dependent deletion of the bisC Moco pathway is insensitive to HAP [33]. In vitro studies have found that mammalian xanthine oxidase is able to reduce HAP to adenine [34]. The treatment of wild-type strains with febuxostat, a specific inhibitor of xanthine dehydrogenase and xanthine oxidase, was to found to have no effect on the mutation rate in D. radiodurans, nor did hypoxanthine-specific inhibition of xanthine dehydrogenase and xanthine oxidase in E. coli. However, cell lysates from E. coli moaE deletion mutant strains resulted in a decrease in the conversion of HAP to adenine with reduced efficiency [35], suggesting that moaE mediates a specific molybdenum enzyme pathway involved in the metabolism of base analogs in bacteria, other than the common molybdenum enzyme pathway reported to date.
In conclusion, our results support that DrMoaE possesses a conserved MoaE protein structure, with a more disordered loop between the β2 and β3 sheets, while the cPMP-binding pocket Arg110 residue is a key site for its dimerization, which responds to the oxidative damage process in D. radiodurans, and is thus able to reduce base damage and genomic DNA mutations to defend against various external stresses.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains and Growth Conditions

All strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. E. coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% sodium chloride) or on agar (1.5% Bacto-agar) plates supplemented with appropriate antibiotics at 37 °C. All D. radiodurans strains were grown at 30 °C in tryptone glucose yeast extract (TGY) liquid media or on agar plates (0.5% tryptone, 0.1% glucose, and 0.3% yeast extract) supplemented with appropriate antibiotics.

4.2. Expression and Purification of Proteins

The drmoaE gene was amplified, digested using NdeI (upstream) and BamHI (downstream), and ligated to the pET28a expression vector which has been digested using NdeI and BamHI. The targeted mutant fragments were obtained by PCR amplification of selected mutant sites. Primers were shown in Supplementary Table S2. The successfully constructed plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) and induced in LB liquid medium containing 40 μg/mL kanamycin and 0.4 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 5 h at 30 °C. Cells were harvested and resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 200 mM NaCl; 5% (w/v) glycerol; 3 mM β-mercaptoethanol) followed by sonication. The bacterial lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was filtered through a membrane and purified using a Ni-NTA column (1 mL, GE Healthcare Biosciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0; 200 mM NaCl; 5% (w/v) glycerol), and washed with buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0; 200 mM NaCl; 5% (w/v) glycerol; 300 mM imidazole) to separate impurities from target proteins. Next, protein samples were purified using a HiTrap Q ion exchange column (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) equilibrated with buffer A and washed with buffer C (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0; 1 M NaCl; 5% (w/v) glycerol). Finally, protein purification was performed using a Superdex75 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) equilibrated with buffer D (20 mM Tris-HCl; pH 8.0; 200 mM KCl; 1 mM DTT), followed by protein concentration using a concentration centrifuge tube.

4.3. Crystallization, Data Collection, and Structure Determination

Purified fresh DrMoaE protein (N-terminal with 6×His) was concentrated to 2.8 mg/mL and screened for DrMoaE crystallization conditions using a protein crystallization kit (HR-114) incubated at 293 K. About 1 week later, DrMoaE crystals were obtained at a reservoir condition containing 0.2 M lithium sulfate, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, and 22% PEG3350. To the microwells with DrMoaE protein crystals, 20% cryoprotectant (0.2 M lithium sulfate, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 22% PEG3350, and 20% (w/v) glycerol) were added and left for 3 min, and the retrieved protein crystals were stored in liquid nitrogen. DrMoaE protein crystals were subjected to X-ray diffraction at the beamline BL17U of the Shanghai Light Source (SSRF) and were integrated and scaled using the XDS suite suit [36]. The structure of DrMoaE was solved by molecular replacement using E. coli homolog (PDB:1NVJ; [23]) as the search model. The refinement of the structure was performed using PHENIX [37], and manual modeling was performed using COOT [38]. The refined structure included 139 amino acids of DrMoaE (residues 9–145 of each monomer), and the structure of DrMoaE was mainly presented using PyMOL.

4.4. Construction of Mutant and Complementary Strains

The deletion mutant strains were constructed using the previously described triple ligation method [39]. Briefly, the amplified upstream and downstream fragments of the target gene were digested using HindIII and BamHI, respectively, and ligated to the streptavidin gene that had been digested using HindIII and BamHI. The ligation product was transformed into D. radiodurans. Then, the deletion mutant strain was screened using a TGY medium containing 10 μg/mL streptomycin. The drmoaE and drmoaER110A were cloned into the pRADK vector with the groEL promoter of D. radiodurans for complementary strain construction. The constructed plasmid was transformed into the ΔdrmoaE mutant strain to obtain the ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain and ΔdrmoaE_R110A complementary strain.

4.5. Phenotypic and Growth Curve Analysis

Both the phenotypic analysis and the growth curve were determined as previously described [40]. The wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain were cultured to OD600 = 1.0. For H2O2 treatment, strains were treated with 20–60 mM H2O2 for 30 min and diluted 10−4 times using sterile PBS solution, and 100 μL of the diluted bacterial solution was applied to the TGY plates for 2–3 days at 30 °C for counting. For UV treatment, strains were diluted 10−4 times using sterile PBS solution, and 100 μL of the diluted bacterial solution was applied to TGY solid medium and then treated with 0–600 J/m2 UV and incubated at 30 °C for 2–3 days. For γ-ray treatment, the strains were irradiated with 0–8 kGy γ-rays (60Co, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China) and diluted 10−4 times using sterile PBS solution, and 100 μL of the diluted bacterial solution was applied to the in TGY plates for 2–3 days at 30 °C for counting. For the growth curve, the wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain were grown to OD600 = 1.0 and 100 μL was transferred to 5 mL of TGY medium without antibiotics, and the OD600 value of each strain was detected every 2 h.

4.6. Detection of Intracellular ROS Content

Intracellular ROS levels were detected by a molecular probe, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), as previously described [41]. Briefly, wild-type strains, ΔdrmoaE mutant strains, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strains were grown to OD600 = 1.0, the supernatant was removed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 3 min and washed 3 times with PBS buffer. The organisms were incubated with DCFH-DA for 30 min at 37 °C. After incubation, the cells were washed 3 times with PBS buffer and resuspended in 2 mL of PBS buffer. Then, 1 mL of the sample was treated with 0, 40, and 80 mM H2O2 for 30 min, respectively. The fluorescence intensity (excitation wavelength 488 nm, detection wavelength 525 nm) was measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, California, USA).

4.7. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

The expression of drmoaE under oxidative stress was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) as described previously [42]. Wild-type strains were incubated to OD600 = 1.0, treated with 40 mM H2O2 for 30 min, and the reaction was terminated using catalase. Total RNA was extracted using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and RT-qPCR analysis was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan) to collect data. Primers are shown in Supplementary Table S2. Data were collected and differences in relative transcript abundance levels were calculated. The internal control was the dr_1343 gene encoding glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH).

4.8. Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activity

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined using the nitrogen blue tetrazolium (NBT) method. The wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain were grown to OD600 = 1.0, and 1 mL of bacterial solution was centrifuged at room temperature for 3 min at 5000 rpm to remove the supernatant. After that, an equal volume of extract was added to resuspend the bacteria, and the bacteria were completely crushed in an ice bath using an ultrasonic crusher. The absorbance value at 560 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer, following which cell lysates were incubated with the reaction reagent of Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity detection kit (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology, Beijing, China) in a water bath at 37 °C for 30 min. Superoxide anion (O2) that was produced by the reaction of xanthine and xanthine oxidase in the kit reduced nitro-blue tetrazolium to blue formazan. After the addition of SOD, O2 was cleared so as to inhibit the formation of formazan. It was considered an enzyme activity unit (U) when the percentage of SOD enzyme inhibition of the xanthine oxidase coupling reaction system described above was 50% at 37 °C.

4.9. Analysis of Catalase Activity

Under sufficient hydrogen peroxide conditions, catalase can catalyze H2O2 to produce water and oxygen completely, and the residual H2O2 can be oxidized by extra catalase to produce the red product (N-(4-antipyrine)-3-chloro-5-sulfonate-p-benzoquinonemonoimine), which can be detected at the wavelength of 520 nm. The wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain were grown to OD600 = 1.0, and the supernatant was removed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 3 min at room temperature, and the bacteria were resuspended using lysate and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min for lysis. The cell lysis supernatant, hydrogen peroxide assay buffer, and 250 mM hydrogen peroxide solution were added in a total reaction volume of 50 μL at 25 °C for 5 min, and the reaction was terminated using 450 μL of peroxidase reaction termination solution. The absorbance value at 520 nm was measured after incubation with the color development solution at 25 °C for 15 min. Catalase activity was measured using the Catalase Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). The unit (U) indicated that one enzyme activity unit (1 unit) catalyzes the breakdown of 1 μmol H2O2 in 1 min at 25 °C, pH 7.0.

4.10. Analysis of DMSO Reductase Activity

DMSO reductase activity was assayed as described previously [43]. Briefly, wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain were cultured to OD600 = 1.0, harvested by centrifugation, washed using buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 2 M NaCl), and resuspended in 20 mL of buffer A. Cells were lysed using a high-pressure disruptor, and supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 4 °C, 15,000 rpm for 30 min, and assayed for total protein concentration using the Bradford Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Cell lysates (1–1.5 mg protein), buffer A, and 0.3 mM methyl violet crystal were mixed and reacted in an anaerobic environment. The system was adjusted to 1–1.2 at OD600 absorbance value with fresh Na2S2O4 (20 mM) and NaHCO3 (20 mM), followed by the addition of DMSO (10 mM) for the assay. The reaction was assayed for a total of 3.5 min at 15 s intervals. Each DMSO reductase activity unit (U) was defined as 1 μmol of substrate consumed per minute at room temperature. The extinction coefficient of methyl viologen A600 nm was 13.6 (mM−1·cm−1).

4.11. 6-Hydroxyaminopurine (HAP)-Mediated Growth Inhibition

The wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain cultured to OD600 = 1.0 were divided into 1 mL aliquots into 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes, centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 3 min to remove the supernatant, and resuspended using 1 mL sterile PBS buffer. After that, an appropriate amount of 6-hydroxyaminopurine (HAP) solution (mother liquor concentration 0.1 mg/mL) was added to the resuspension solution and incubated at 30 °C for 2 h, and then kept on ice. The bacterial solution was diluted 104 times using sterile PBS buffer, and 100 μL of the dilution was applied to the plate on TGY solid medium and incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. We counted the number of surviving cells in media additives with HAP or not and calculated the percentage of surviving cells [35].

4.12. Mutant Frequency Determinations

The wild-type strain, ΔdrmoaE mutant strain, and ΔdrmoaE_Cwt complementary strain cultured to OD600 = 0.4 were divided into 1 mL aliquots and into 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes with appropriate amounts of HAP solution and incubated overnight at 30 °C. A total of 100 μL of the bacterial solution was applied to the plate on a TGY solid medium containing 50 μg/mL of rifampicin in order to obtain the number of Rifr cells per strain. The bacterial solution was diluted using sterile PBS buffer and 100 μL of the bacterial solution dilution was applied to the plates without rifampicin to obtain the total number of cells per strain. The number of Rifr cells divided by the total number of cells was used to determine the mutation frequency [35].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24032441/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H., L.W. and J.C.; methodology, J.C. and Y.H.; software, J.C. and Y.Z.; data curation, J.C., M.Z. and Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.H., L.W. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.H., L.W., H.X., B.T. and J.C.; funding acquisition, Y.H. and L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870051) and the Public Project of Zhejiang Province (LGN22C010002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The coordinates and structure factors have been deposited to Protein Data Bank with accession codes 8HLG.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF in China) for assistance in the data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Gladyshev, V.N. Molybdoproteomes and evolution of molybdenum utilization. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 379, 881–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Leimkuhler, S. The biosynthesis of the molybdenum cofactors in Escherichia coli. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 2007–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gutzke, G.; Fischer, B.; Mendel, R.R.; Schwarz, G. Thiocarboxylation of molybdopterin synthase provides evidence for the mechanism of dithiolene formation in metal-binding pterins. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 36268–36274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Daniels, J.N.; Wuebbens, M.M.; Rajagopalan, K.V.; Schindelin, H. Crystal structure of a molybdopterin synthase-precursor Z complex: Insight into its sulfur transfer mechanism and its role in molybdenum cofactor deficiency. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hasona, A.; Self, W.T.; Ray, R.M.; Shanmugam, K.T. Molybdate-dependent transcription of hyc and nar operons of Escherichia coli requires MoeA protein and ModE-molybdate. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 169, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Neumann, M.; Mittelstadt, G.; Seduk, F.; Iobbi-Nivol, C.; Leimkuhler, S. MocA Is a Specific Cytidylyltransferase Involved in Molybdopterin Cytosine Dinucleotide Biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21891–21898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pitterle, D.M.; Rajagopalan, K.V. The biosynthesis of molybdopterin in Escherichia coli. Purification and characterization of the converting factor. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 13499–13505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wuebbens, M.M.; Rajagopalan, K.V. Investigation of the early steps of molybdopterin biosynthesis in Escherichia coli through the use of in vivo labeling studies. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 1082–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wuebbens, M.M.; Rajagopalan, K.V. Mechanistic and mutational studies of Escherichia coli molybdopterin synthase clarify the final step of molybdopterin biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 14523–14532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Narrandes, N.C.; Machowski, E.E.; Mizrahi, V.; Kana, B.D. Cleavage of the moaX-encoded fused molybdopterin synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis is necessary for activity. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Williams, M.; Mizrahi, V.; Kana, B.D. Molybdenum cofactor: A key component of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis? Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 40, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jiang, Y.; Tang, H.; Wu, G.; Xu, P. Functional Identification of a Novel Gene, moaE, for 3-Succinoylpyridine Degradation in Pseudomonas putida S16. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Anderson, A.W.; Nordan, H.C.; Cain, R.F.; Parrish, G.; Duggan, D. Studies on a Radio-Resistant Micrococcus. 1. Isolation, Morphology, Cultural Characteristics, and Resistance to Gamma Radiation. Food Technol.-Chic. 1956, 10, 575–578. [Google Scholar]
  14. Slade, D.; Radman, M. Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75, 133–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Julie, M.; Zimmerman, J.R.B. A ring-like nucleoid is not necessary for radioresistance in the Deinococcaceae. BMC Microbiol. 2005, 5, 17. [Google Scholar]
  16. Daly, M.J.; Gaidamakova, E.K.; Matrosova, V.Y.; Kiang, J.G.; Fukumoto, R.; Lee, D.Y.; Wehr, N.B.; Viteri, G.A.; Berlett, B.S.; Levine, R.L. Small-molecule antioxidant proteome-shields in Deinococcus radiodurans. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anjem, A.; Varghese, S.; Imlay, J.A. Manganese import is a key element of the OxyR response to hydrogen peroxide in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 72, 844–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tanaka, A.; Hirano, H.H.; Kikuchi, M.; Kitayama, S.; Watanabe, H. Changes in cellular proteins of Deinococcus radiodurans following gamma-irradiation. Radiat. Environ. Bioph. 1996, 35, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. White, O. Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Science 1999, 286, 1571–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Omelchenko, M.V.; Beliaev, A.S.; Venkateswaran, A.; Stair, J.; Wu, L.; Thompson, D.K.; Xu, D.; Rogozin, I.B.; et al. Transcriptome dynamics of Deinococcus radiodurans recovering from ionizing radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4191–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yang, Y.M.; Won, Y.B.; Ji, C.J.; Kim, J.H.; Ryu, S.H.; Ok, Y.H.; Lee, J.W. Cleavage of molybdopterin synthase MoaD-MoaE linear fusion by JAMM/MPN(+) domain containing metalloprotease DR0402 from Deinococcus radiodurans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 502, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cai, J.L.; Pan, C.M.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, H.; Tian, B.; Wang, L.Y.; Hua, Y.J. DRJAMM Is Involved in the Oxidative Resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 756867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rudolph, M.J.; Wuebbens, M.M.; Turque, O.; Rajagopalan, K.V.; Schindelin, H. Structural studies of molybdopterin synthase provide insights into its catalytic mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 14514–14522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Miralles-Robledillo, J.M.; Torregrosa-Crespo, J.; Martinez-Espinosa, R.M.; Pire, C. DMSO Reductase Family: Phylogenetics and Applications of Extremophiles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kozmin, S.G.; Pavlov, Y.I.; Dunn, R.L.; Schaaper, R.M. Hypersensitivity of Escherichia coli Delta(uvrB-bio) mutants to 6-hydroxylaminopurine and other base analogs is due to a defect in molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 3361–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Swartz, C.D.; Parks, N.; Umbach, D.M.; Ward, W.O.; Schaaper, R.M.; DeMarini, D.M. Enhanced mutagenesis of Salmonella tester strains due to deletion of genes other than uvrB. Environ. Mol. Mutagen 2007, 48, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Barros, M.P.; Hollnagel, H.C.; Glavina, A.B.; Soares, C.O.; Ganini, D.; Dagenais-Bellefeuille, S.; Morse, D.; Colepicolo, P. Molybdate:sulfate ratio affects redox metabolism and viability of the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 142, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feig, D.I.; Sowers, L.C.; Loeb, L.A. Reverse Chemical Mutagenesis—Identification of the Mutagenic Lesions Resulting from Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Damage to DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 6609–6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fujikawa, K.; Kamiya, H.; Yakushiji, H.; Fujii, Y.; Nakabeppu, Y.; Kasai, H. The oxidized forms of dATP are substrates for the human MutT homologue, the hMTH1 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 18201–18205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Michaels, M.L.; Miller, J.H. The GO system protects organisms from the mutagenic effect of the spontaneous lesion 8-hydroxyguanine (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine). J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 6321–6325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kozmin, S.G.; Schaaper, R.M.; Shcherbakova, P.V.; Kulikov, V.N.; Noskov, V.N.; Guetsova, M.L.; Alenin, V.V.; Rogozin, I.B.; Makarova, K.S.; Pavlov, Y.I. Multiple antimutagenesis mechanisms affect mutagenic activity and specificity of the base analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine in bacteria and yeast. Mutat. Res. 1998, 402, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Simandan, T.; Sun, J.; Dix, T.A. Oxidation of DNA bases, deoxyribonucleosides and homopolymers by peroxyl radicals. Biochem. J. 1998, 335 Pt 2, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kozmin, S.G.; Schaaper, R.M. Molybdenum cofactor-dependent resistance to N-hydroxylated base analogs in Escherichia coli is independent of MobA function. Mutat. Res. 2007, 619, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Clement, B.; Kunze, T. The Reduction of 6-N-Hydroxylaminopurine to Adenine by Xanthine-Oxidase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992, 44, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kozmin, S.G.; Leroy, P.; Pavlov, Y.I.; Schaaper, R.M. YcbX and yiiM, two novel determinants for resistance of Escherichia coli to N-hydroxylated base analogues. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Adams, P.D.; Afonine, P.V.; Bunkoczi, G.; Chen, V.B.; Davis, I.W.; Echols, N.; Headd, J.J.; Hung, L.W.; Kapral, G.J.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; et al. PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Emsley, P.; Lohkamp, B.; Scott, W.G.; Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, S.; Cai, J.; Lu, H.; Mao, S.; Dai, S.; Hu, J.; Wang, L.; Hua, X.; Xu, H.; Tian, B.; et al. N (4)-Cytosine DNA Methylation Is Involved in the Maintenance of Genomic Stability in Deinococcus radiodurans. Front Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dai, J.; Gao, K.; Yao, T.; Lu, H.; Zhou, C.; Guo, M.; Dai, S.; Wang, L.; Xu, H.; Tian, B.; et al. Late embryogenesis abundant group3 protein (DrLEA3) is involved in antioxidation in the extremophilic bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 240, 126559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dai, S.; Jin, Y.; Li, T.; Weng, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, G.; Li, J.; Pang, R.; Tian, B.; Hua, Y. DR1440 is a potential iron efflux protein involved in maintenance of iron homeostasis and resistance of Deinococcus radiodurans to oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Dai, J.; Chen, Z.; Hou, J.; Wang, Y.; Guo, M.; Cao, J.; Wang, L.; Xu, H.; Tian, B.; Zhao, Y. MazEF Toxin-Antitoxin System-Mediated DNA Damage Stress Response in Deinococcus radiodurans. Front Genet. 2021, 12, 632423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Miranda, H.V.; Nembhard, N.; Su, D.; Hepowit, N.; Krause, D.J.; Pritz, J.R.; Phillips, C.; Soll, D.; Maupin-Furlow, J.A. E1-and ubiquitin-like proteins provide a direct link between protein conjugation and sulfur transfer in archaea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4417–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overall structure of DrMoaE. (A) Sequence alignment of DrMoaE with homologous proteins of M. tuberculosis (MtMoaE), E. coli (EcMoaE), and S. aureus (SaMoaE). (B) The dimer of DrMoaE is shown as a cartoon and the two protomers are represented in yellow and blue, respectively. Each protomer’s α-helices, β-sheet, N-terminal (NTD), and C-terminal (CTD) are labeled. (C) Topology diagram of DrMoaE. The color is the same as in panel B. The N-terminal (N) and C-terminal (C) of each protomer are labeled. (D) Structural alignment of MoaE. D. radiodurans (green), E. coli (red), M. tuberculosis (blue). The dotted box indicates the loop between β2 and β3 sheets.
Figure 1. Overall structure of DrMoaE. (A) Sequence alignment of DrMoaE with homologous proteins of M. tuberculosis (MtMoaE), E. coli (EcMoaE), and S. aureus (SaMoaE). (B) The dimer of DrMoaE is shown as a cartoon and the two protomers are represented in yellow and blue, respectively. Each protomer’s α-helices, β-sheet, N-terminal (NTD), and C-terminal (CTD) are labeled. (C) Topology diagram of DrMoaE. The color is the same as in panel B. The N-terminal (N) and C-terminal (C) of each protomer are labeled. (D) Structural alignment of MoaE. D. radiodurans (green), E. coli (red), M. tuberculosis (blue). The dotted box indicates the loop between β2 and β3 sheets.
Ijms 24 02441 g001
Figure 2. Roles of key amino acid residues in DrMoaE. (A) Sequence alignment of DrMoaE, MtMoaE, and EcMoaE. (B) Structure alignment of His109, Arg110, and Arg45 of DrMoaE with the corresponding sites of EcMoaE and MtMoaE. D. radiodurans (green), E. coli (purple), M. tuberculosis (blue). (C) The structure of DrMoaE; the dotted box represents the anion binding pocket. (D) Gel filtration profiles of DrMoaE and DrMoaER110A. Blue represents DrMoaE and orange represents DrMoaER110A. The protein standard curve was generated using a mixture of aprotinin (6.512 kDa), RNaseA (13.7 kDa), chymotrypsinogen A (24 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), and BSA (67 kDa).
Figure 2. Roles of key amino acid residues in DrMoaE. (A) Sequence alignment of DrMoaE, MtMoaE, and EcMoaE. (B) Structure alignment of His109, Arg110, and Arg45 of DrMoaE with the corresponding sites of EcMoaE and MtMoaE. D. radiodurans (green), E. coli (purple), M. tuberculosis (blue). (C) The structure of DrMoaE; the dotted box represents the anion binding pocket. (D) Gel filtration profiles of DrMoaE and DrMoaER110A. Blue represents DrMoaE and orange represents DrMoaER110A. The protein standard curve was generated using a mixture of aprotinin (6.512 kDa), RNaseA (13.7 kDa), chymotrypsinogen A (24 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), and BSA (67 kDa).
Ijms 24 02441 g002
Figure 3. Phenotype and growth analysis of drmoaE. (A) Survival curves of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A) under H2O2 (0–60 mM), respectively. (B) Survival curves of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A) under UV (0–600 J/m2), respectively. (C) Survival curves of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A) under γ-ray (0–8 kGy), respectively. (D) Growth curve of the wild-type strain (R1), mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A). Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD).
Figure 3. Phenotype and growth analysis of drmoaE. (A) Survival curves of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A) under H2O2 (0–60 mM), respectively. (B) Survival curves of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A) under UV (0–600 J/m2), respectively. (C) Survival curves of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A) under γ-ray (0–8 kGy), respectively. (D) Growth curve of the wild-type strain (R1), mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt and ΔdrmoaE_R110A). Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD).
Ijms 24 02441 g003
Figure 4. Antioxidant function of DrMoaE. (A) The level of ROS accumulation in cells after 0, 40, and 80 mM H2O2 treatment, respectively. “Untreated” represents a concentration of 0 mM H2O2. RFU means relative fluorescence units. Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD). “ns” means not significant. ** p < 0.01. (B) The mRNA levels of drmoaE after exposure to 40 mM H2O2 for 0, 15, 30, and 60 min. Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD).
Figure 4. Antioxidant function of DrMoaE. (A) The level of ROS accumulation in cells after 0, 40, and 80 mM H2O2 treatment, respectively. “Untreated” represents a concentration of 0 mM H2O2. RFU means relative fluorescence units. Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD). “ns” means not significant. ** p < 0.01. (B) The mRNA levels of drmoaE after exposure to 40 mM H2O2 for 0, 15, 30, and 60 min. Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD).
Ijms 24 02441 g004
Figure 5. Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), and DMSO reductase (C) in the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt). Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD). “ns” means not significant. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), and DMSO reductase (C) in the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt). Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD). “ns” means not significant. *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 02441 g005
Figure 6. Survival rate (A) and mutation rate (B) of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt) exposed to HAP. The survival rate was determined after a 2 h exposure to HAP in the TGY medium. The mutation rate was measured after overnight exposure to HAP in the TGY medium. Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD). “ns” means not significant. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6. Survival rate (A) and mutation rate (B) of the wild-type strain (R1), the mutant strain (ΔdrmoaE), and the complementary strain (ΔdrmoaE_Cwt) exposed to HAP. The survival rate was determined after a 2 h exposure to HAP in the TGY medium. The mutation rate was measured after overnight exposure to HAP in the TGY medium. Each value represents the mean of three assays (mean ± SD). “ns” means not significant. *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 02441 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, J.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, H.; Tian, B.; Wang, L.; Hua, Y. MoaE Is Involved in Response to Oxidative Stress in Deinococcus radiodurans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032441

AMA Style

Cai J, Zhang M, Chen Z, Zhao Y, Xu H, Tian B, Wang L, Hua Y. MoaE Is Involved in Response to Oxidative Stress in Deinococcus radiodurans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032441

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Jianling, Maoxu Zhang, Zijing Chen, Ye Zhao, Hong Xu, Bing Tian, Liangyan Wang, and Yuejin Hua. 2023. "MoaE Is Involved in Response to Oxidative Stress in Deinococcus radiodurans" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032441

APA Style

Cai, J., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., Xu, H., Tian, B., Wang, L., & Hua, Y. (2023). MoaE Is Involved in Response to Oxidative Stress in Deinococcus radiodurans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(3), 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032441

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop