Next Article in Journal
Identification and Functional Analysis of Two Mitoferrins, CsMIT1 and CsMIT2, Participating in Iron Homeostasis in Cucumber
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome and Metabolome Profiling Unveil Pigment Formation Variations in Brown Cotton Lines (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Wall-Associated Kinase TaWAK-5D600 Positively Participates in Defense against Sharp Eyespot and Fusarium Crown Rot in Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization and Experimental Expression Analysis of CNGC Gene Family in Gossypium
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms24055057
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The CCCH-Type Zinc-Finger Protein GhC3H20 Enhances Salt Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Cotton through ABA Signal Transduction Pathway

by
Qi Zhang
,
Jingjing Zhang
,
Fei Wei
,
Xiaokang Fu
,
Hengling Wei
,
Jianhua Lu
,
Liang Ma
* and
Hantao Wang
*
State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(5), 5057; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24055057
Submission received: 14 January 2023 / Revised: 26 February 2023 / Accepted: 3 March 2023 / Published: 6 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genes Function and Mechanism Identification in Plant Stress Resistance)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The CCCH zinc-finger protein contains a typical C3H-type motif widely existing in plants, and it plays an important role in plant growth, development, and stress responses. In this study, a CCCH zinc-finger gene, GhC3H20, was isolated and thoroughly characterized to regulate salt stress in cotton and Arabidopsis. The expression of GhC3H20 was up-regulated under salt, drought, and ABA treatments. GUS activity was detected in the root, stem, leaves, and flowers of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis. Compared with the control, the GUS activity of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings under NaCl treatment was stronger. Through the genetic transformation of Arabidopsis, three transgenic lines of 35S-GhC3H20 were obtained. Under NaCl and mannitol treatments, the roots of the transgenic lines were significantly longer than those of the wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis. The leaves of the WT turned yellow and wilted under high-concentration salt treatment at the seedling stage, while the leaves of the transgenic Arabidopsis lines did not. Further investigation showed that compared with the WT, the content of catalase (CAT) in the leaves of the transgenic lines was significantly higher. Therefore, compared with the WT, overexpression of GhC3H20 enhanced the salt stress tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis. A virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) experiment showed that compared with the control, the leaves of pYL156-GhC3H20 plants were wilted and dehydrated. The content of chlorophyll in pYL156-GhC3H20 leaves was significantly lower than those of the control. Therefore, silencing of GhC3H20 reduced salt stress tolerance in cotton. Two interacting proteins (GhPP2CA and GhHAB1) of GhC3H20 have been identified through a yeast two-hybrid assay. The expression levels of PP2CA and HAB1 in transgenic Arabidopsis were higher than those in the WT, and pYL156-GhC3H20 had expression levels lower than those in the control. GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 are the key genes involved in the ABA signaling pathway. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that GhC3H20 may interact with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 to participate in the ABA signaling pathway to enhance salt stress tolerance in cotton.

1. Introduction

Cotton is an important oil crop and fiber crop in China, which plays an important role in the national economy [1]. Soil salinization affects not only cotton yield but also cotton quality. It is essential to study the mechanism of upland cotton in response to salt stress, which is closely linked to cotton production and the agricultural economy in China [2]. Transcription factors can activate the expression of downstream genes and form a transcriptional regulatory network in response to stress [3,4]. Transcription factors such as the AP2/ERF family members related to plant stress can regulate the expression of multiple functional genes related to plant stress. It is more effective to use transcription factors to study the stress resistance of crops and cultivate good stress-resistant varieties than to use single genes for the genetic improvement of crops [5].
The zinc-finger transcription factor family, as one of the largest transcription factor families in plants, plays an important role in multiple biological processes, such as morphogenesis, signal transduction, and environmental stress responses [6,7]. Zinc-finger transcription factors contain zinc-finger motifs in which cysteines and/or histidines coordinate with a few zinc atoms to form the local peptide structures that are essential for their specific functions [8]. Several plant zinc-finger families, such as the RING-finger, ERF, WRKY, DOF, and LIM families, regulate gene expression with the aid of DNA-binding, protein-binding proteins, or RNA-binding proteins [9,10,11,12,13]. According to their structural diversities, the zinc-finger transcription factor family has been classified into nine types: C2H2, C8, C6, C3HC4, C2HC, C2HC5, C4, C4HC3, and CCCH [6,8,14,15,16]. The CCCH family contains a typical C3H-type motif, and members of this family have already been identified in organisms from yeast to humans [8,9,10]. In plants, multiple CCCH zinc-finger proteins were found to be involved in abiotic and biotic stresses. For example, as a nuclear CCCH zinc-finger protein, overexpressed GhZFP1 enhanced salt stress and fungal disease tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants by interacting with GZIRD21A and GZIPR5 [17]. The CCCH zinc-finger members participated in salt stress via the ABA signaling pathway. Overexpressed AtOZF2 Arabidopsis plants were insensitive to salt stress, and the mutant atozf2 Arabidopsis plant significantly reduced salt stress tolerance. Further study showed that AtOZF2 regulated salt stress via the ABA signaling pathway mediated by ABI2 [18]. Under salt stress, the expression of three salt stress-responsive genes (RAB18, COR15A, and RD22) in the ABA-dependent pathway was significantly higher in AtC3H17 OXs than in the WT. The results indicated that the CCCH zinc-finger gene AtC3H17 may be involved in salt stress by the ABA-dependent pathway [19]. As a nuclear transcriptional activator, IbC3H18 interacted with IbPR5 and enhanced salt and drought stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants by regulating the expression of a range of abiotic stress-responsive genes involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, ABA signaling, photosynthesis, and ion transport pathways [20]. Pieces of evidence show that CCCH zinc-finger genes are involved in response to salt stress through the ABA-dependent pathway.
In this study, based on the transcriptome data related to salt stress [21], an up-regulated CCCH zinc-finger gene GhC3H20 was identified. qRT-PCR results showed that GhC3H20 was up-regulated under NaCl, PEG, and ABA treatments. Compared with the control, the GUS activity of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings under NaCl treatment was stronger. Overexpression of GhC3H20 in Arabidopsis could promote salt stress tolerance, and silencing of GhC3H20 in cotton could decrease salt stress tolerance. In addition, GhC3H20 could interact with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 to regulate salt stress by the ABA signaling pathway. This study lays the foundation for future studies of GhC3H20 in the improvement of salt stress tolerance in cotton.

2. Results

2.1. Gene Structure, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Protein Sequence Alignment Analysis of GhC3H20

The coding sequences of the GhC3H20 (GH_D08G2771) gene were cloned from the upland cotton material TM-1. The open reading frame of GhC3H20 was 1062 bp and encoded 353 amino acid residues. The estimated molecular mass (Mw) of the GhC3H20 protein was 39.3 kDa, and the isoelectric point (pI) was 6.23. Subcellular prediction analysis results showed that GhC3H20 might be located in the nucleus of the cell. The result of gene structure analysis showed that GhC3H20 contained an exon (Figure 1A). The cotton GhC3H20 gene is homologous to the Arabidopsis AtC3H20 (AT2G19810) gene, and the protein sequence similarity is 56%. In a previous study, phylogenetic analysis result revealed that AtC3H20 belonged to the CCCH zinc-finger family group IX [22]. The neighbor-joining tree result of GhC3H20 and CCCH family group IX members in Arabidopsis showed GhC3H20, AT4G29190, AT2G19810, and AT2G25900 divided into one branch (Figure 1B). The protein sequence alignments of GhC3H20, AT4G29190, AT2G19810, and AT2G25900 showed that all four proteins contained two CCCH motifs and most amino acid residues were conserved (Figure 1C).

2.2. Expression Pattern Analysis of the GhC3H20 Gene under NaCl and PEG Treatments and in Eight Cotton Tissues

The transcriptome data of salt treatment showed that the GhC3H20 gene responded to salt stress [21]. Therefore, the GhC3H20 gene was selected to do qRT-PCR under salt and PEG treatments. qRT-PCR results revealed that the expression levels of GhC3H20 were the highest at 48 h and 24 h of NaCl and PEG treatments (Figure 2A,B). The results showed that the GhC3H20 gene was up-regulated under salt and drought stresses. The expression levels of the GhC3H20 gene in eight tissue samples (vegetative organs: roots, stems, leaves, and buds; reproductive organs: petals, stamens, pistils, and fibers) of upland cotton were determined by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 2C, in reproductive organs, the expression levels of the GhC3H20 gene were highest in stamens, and, among vegetative organs, the expression levels of the GhC3H20 gene were highest in stems.

2.3. Promoter Analysis of GhC3H20

The PlantCare website was employed to analyze cis-acting elements in the 2000 bp promoter of GhC3H20. The result revealed that this region included stress-response, light-response, and hormone-response elements. Among hormone-response elements, ABA-response elements occur in the largest number as six elements (Supplementary Table S1). ABA (100 μM) was sprayed on the leaves of upland TM-1 cotton seedlings and the expression levels of GhC3H20 were measured by qRT-PCR. The results showed that after ABA treatment, the expression levels of GhC3H20 were increased significantly from 0 h to 6 h and decreased from 6 h to 12 h (Figure 3A). The results indicated that the GhC3H20 gene had responded to ABA.
To understand the tissue expression specificity of GhC3H20, the ProGhC3H20:: GUS vector was constructed and genetically transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana. The roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and fruit pods of T1 generation transgenic Arabidopsis plants were taken for GUS staining, respectively. The results showed GUS staining was found in all tissues of transgenic Arabidopsis plants, except fruit pods (Figure 3B).
To further understand the promoter of GhC3H20 in response to salt stress, the GUS staining of transgenic seedlings was detected under NaCl (150 mM) treatment. GUS activity was more strongly expressed in the leaves and stems of NaCl-treated transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings than in the control. (Figure 3C,D).

2.4. Overexpression of GhC3H20 Enhances Salt and osmotic Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis Seedlings

To further understand the relationship of GhC3H20 in response to salt stress, the 35S-GhC3H20 vector was constructed and transformed into Arabidopsis. The transgenic Arabidopsis were detected by 1/2 MS (+kana) and PCR. The T3 generation of transgenic Arabidopsis was used for further analysis under salt stress. qRT-PCR results indicated that three transgenic Arabidopsis lines were significantly overexpressed relative to the WT (Figure 4A). To further understand the function of the GhC3H20 gene in response to salt and osmotic stresses during seedling stages, the root length of ten Arabidopsis seedlings were measured under 0, 150 mM NaCl, and 200 mM mannitol treatments (Figure 4B). Under NaCl and mannitol treatments, the roots of the transgenic lines were significantly longer than those of the WT (Figure 4C). The results indicated that overexpression of GhC3H20 could enhance the root growth of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings under salt and osmotic stresses.

2.5. Overexpression of GhC3H20 Enhanced the Salt Stress Tolerance of Transgenic Arabidopsis at the Seedling Stage

To analyze the function of the GhC3H20 gene in response to salt stress at the seedling stage, WT and transgenic Arabidopsis were planted in nutrient soil and treated with 400 mM NaCl to observe the phenotype. After salt treatment for 5 days, the leaves of the WT wilted and turned yellow. While the transgenic lines still had green rosette leaves (Figure 5A). To better understand the physiological changes in plants, after salt treatment, the leaves of WT and transgenic Arabidopsis were taken, and the activities of CAT were measured. The activities of CAT in the transgenic Arabidopsis lines were significantly higher than those in the WT (Figure 5B). All results indicated that overexpression of GhC3H20 could enhance the salt stress tolerance of Arabidopsis plants.

2.6. Silencing of GhC3H20 in Cotton Decreased Salt Stress Tolerance

To further analyze the putative function of the GhC3H20 gene, a VIGS strategy was used to knock down the expression levels of the GhC3H20 gene in cotton. Cotton standard line TM-1 plants were grown until the third true leaf expanded and was treated with 400 mM NaCl for five days. Figure 6A shows that PYL156-GhPDS plants (positive control) had an obvious leaf-whitening phenotype. The leaves of the PYL156-GhC3H20 (silenced plants) plants wilted and turned yellow, while the leaves of the PYL156 (control plants) plants only slightly shrank due to water loss (Figure 6A). The expression levels of GhC3H20 determined by qRT-PCR indicated that the gene was effectively silenced (Figure 6B). To understand the physiological changes in plants, after salt treatment, the leaves of the control and the silenced plants were taken, and the content of chlorophyll was measured. The content of chlorophyll in the leaves of the control plants was significantly higher than that of the leaves of the silenced plants (Figure 6C). These results indicated that silencing of the GhC3H20 gene reduced salt stress tolerance in cotton.

2.7. GhC3H20 Interacts with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1

A transcriptional activation assay was performed in the yeast cells. The yeast cells containing pGADT7+pGBKT7-GhC3H20 (experimental group), pGADT7-large T+pGBKT7-lamin C (negative control), and pGADT7-large T+pGBKT7-p53 (positive control) were transformed into the yeast cells and cultured on SD/−Trp/−Leu and SD/−Trp/−Leu/−His/−Ade medium. The positive control and the experimental group grew well on SD/−Trp/−Leu and SD/−Trp/−Leu/−His/−Ade medium, while the negative control could not, demonstrating that GhC3H20 could autonomously activate the reporter genes in the absence of a prey protein (Figure 7A).
Previous studies have reported that CCCH zinc-finger genes participate in salt stress through the ABA signaling pathway [18,19,20]. Therefore, four key genes (GhPP2CA, GhHAB1, GhABF3, and GhABI1) of ABA signal transduction were selected to do the Y2H assay. The coding sequences of GhPP2CA, GhHAB1, GhABF3, and GhABI1 were cloned into the pGADT7 vector. The constructive vectors with pGBKT7-GhC3H20 were co-transformed into the yeast strain Y2HGold. The results showed that the yeast cells containing the positive control pGBKT7-p53+pGADT7-largeT and the experimental group pGBKT7-GhC3H20 +pGADT7-GhPP2CA and pGBKT7-GhC3H20 +pGADT7-GhHAB1 could grow well on SD/−Trp/−Leu/-His/−Ade+40 mM 3AT medium and turned blue on SD/−Trp/−Leu/−His/−Ade/X-a-Gal/AbA+40 mM 3AT medium. Yeast containing the negative control, the control group pGADT7+pGBKT7-GhC3H20, and the experimental group pGBKT7-GhC3H20+ pGADT7-GhABF3 and pGBKT7-GhC3H20+ pGADT7-GhABI1 could not grow on SD-TLHA+40 mM 3AT medium and turned blue on SD-TLHA+X-α-Gal +40 mM 3AT medium. The results showed that GhC3H20 could interact with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 but did not interact with GhABF3 and GhABI1 (Figure 7B).

2.8. GhC3H20 Increased the Expression Levels of ABA Signaling and Osmotic Stress-Related Genes in Arabidopsis and Cotton

qRT-PCR results indicated that the expression of GhC3H20 was up-regulated under ABA and PEG treatments. Overexpression of GhC3H20 enhanced the osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings. Therefore, two interaction genes (PP2CA and HAB1) of GhC3H20 and two osmotic stress-related genes (AtNHX1 and GhNHX2) were used to do qRT-PCR in Arabidopsis and cotton, respectively. Under salt stress, the expression levels of AtPP2CA, AtHAB1, and AtNHX1 in transgenic Arabidopsis were higher than those in the WT, except GhHAB1 in Line 3 (Figure 8A,B), and the expression levels of GhPP2CA, GhHAB1, and GhNHX2 in the silenced plants were lower than those in the control plants (Figure 8C,D). The expression of GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 were the highest at 6 h of NaCl treatment (Figure 8E). PP2CA and HAB1 are key genes in ABA signaling transduction. NHX protein is a Na+/H+ antiporter, which regulates osmotic stress by transporting intracellular Na+ to be extracellular under high salt concentrations. It is most likely that GhC3H20 could enhance salt stress tolerance through the ABA signal transduction pathway and osmotic stress pathway.

3. Discussion

Having been cloned in various plants such as Arabidopsis [23], rice [24], and sweet potato [20], zinc-finger transcription factors play an important role in the regulation of plant abiotic stress responses. However, the regulatory mechanism of the zinc-finger gene in response to salt stress in cotton remains poorly understood. In our study, a salt-induced gene (GhC3H20) from the zinc-finger family was identified by transcriptome data of salt stress [21]. The gene encodes 353 amino acids, with two C3H-type motifs and no intron, which indicated that the C3H20 gene belongs to the CCCH zinc-finger subfamily [22]. Phylogenetic analysis also revealed that the cotton GhC3H20 gene belongs to a novel CCCH-type zinc-finger protein subfamily. All members of CCCH zinc-finger group IX in Arabidopsis have some characteristics in common, consisting of two CCCH-type motifs. In addition, gene structure analysis indicated that they are all intronless genes [22]. The CCCH zinc-finger family has been reported to be involved in salt stress [25]. More recently, the rice TZF1 gene has been reported to regulate the expression of many abiotic stress tolerance genes to enhance salt stress tolerance in transgenic Oryza sativa L. plants [26]. The first CCCH zinc-finger protein GhZFP1 in cotton has been identified and functionally characterized. Further research showed that GhZFP1 interacted with GZIRD21A and GZIPR5 to regulate salt stress in cotton [17]. Our study lays the foundation for future studies of the CCCH zinc-finger members in the improvement of salt stress tolerance in cotton.
In the present study, the GhC3H20 gene was induced by salt, drought, and ABA treatments. The homologous genes of GhC3H20 in Arabidopsis, AtOZF1, and AtOZF2 were also induced by salinity and ABA [18]. The cotton GhZFP1 gene was induced by salt and drought stresses [17]. The result indicated that GhC3H20 is likely to be involved in salt stress. To understand the relationship between the GhC3H20 gene and salt stress, we obtained three transgenic Arabidopsis lines through genetic transformation. Overexpressed GhC3H20 enhanced salt stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings. Silencing of GhC3H20 decreased the salt stress tolerance in cotton. Plants produce some reactive oxygen species (ROS) under salt stress, such as O2, H2O2, O2−, and HO, which are highly active molecules and can cause oxidative damage to proteins, DNA, and lipids [27,28]. CAT is the most important antioxidant enzyme to help remove excess ROS in plants, maintain a low level of ROS, and improve the tolerance of plants under stress [29,30]. In this work, we found that under salt treatment, transgenic Arabidopsis had higher CAT activity compared with the WT, suggesting that the GhC3H20 gene can increase the relevant antioxidant enzymes in transgenic Arabidopsis in response to salt stress. Chlorophyll is an important material for the photosynthesis of plants. Under stress, the content of chlorophyll decreases and photosynthesis decreases, thus causing damage to plants. Under salt stress, the control cotton plants had a higher content of chlorophyll compared with silent plants. The expression of genes (AtNHX1 and GhNHX2) related to osmotic stress was higher in transgenic Arabidopsis than in the WT and was lower in the silenced plants than in the control plants. It is likely that stress-inducible genes were induced by the expression of GhC3H20. The increased abundance of GhC3H20 transcripts probably up-regulated the transcription of several stress-inducible genes, which in turn contributed to increased endurance under the stress conditions. It has been reported that overexpression of the CCCH-tandem zinc-finger protein OsTZF1 promotes salt stress tolerance by inducing the expression of some stress-related genes in Ubi:OsTZF1 OX plants [31]. These results demonstrated that GhC3H20 might participate as a positive transcript factor in the regulation of salt stress.
As an important signaling molecule, ABA plays a key role in abiotic stresses such as salt stress [32,33,34]. Under stress, ABA can improve plant tolerance by altering stomatal closure, modulating root architecture, and osmolyte biosynthesis [35,36]. Some genes enhance plant tolerance through the ABA signaling pathway or the ABA biosynthesis pathway [37,38]. What is more, the expression levels of the stress-related genes were decreased in mutants associated with defects in ABA biosynthesis or response. For example, under salt stress, the expression levels of the RD29B gene in ABA1 and ABI1 mutants are extremely low or do not expressed [39]. All evidence suggests that ABA is a key hormone in response to stress. Multiple studies have reported that CCCH zinc-finger proteins participate in salt stress via the ABA signaling pathway [18,19,20]. In our study, the cotton GhC3H20 gene was up-regulated under ABA treatment. To elucidate the precise molecular mechanism of GhC3H20 increasing salt stress tolerance in transgenic plants and cotton, two proteins–GhPP2CA and GhHAB1–that interact with GhC3H20 were isolated and identified by Y2H assay. The expression of GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 was induced by salt stress. Under salt stress, the expression levels of AtPP2CA and AtHAB1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants were higher than those in WT Arabidopsis, except AtHAB1 in Line 3, and the expression levels of GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 in silenced plants were lower than that in control plants. GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 genes were likely induced by the expression of GhC3H20. The increased abundance of GhC3H20 transcripts probably up-regulated the transcription of GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 genes, which in turn contributed to increased endurance under salt stress. AtOZF2 was reported to enhance salt stress tolerance by increasing and decreasing the expression of the AtABI2 gene in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Further research found AtOZF2 participated in the ABA and salt stress responses through the ABI2-mediated signaling pathway [18]. Those pieces of evidence indicated that the GhC3H20 might interact with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 to regulate salt stress by the ABA signaling pathway. As negative regulators participated in the ABA signaling pathway, PP2CA and HAB1 were also involved in the regulation of stresses. PP2CA together with ABI1 and SnRK2.4 regulate root length under salt stress [40]. Located close to PP2CA, Type 2C Protein Phosphatases SlPP2C1 gene RNAi plants displayed delayed root growth [41]. In this research, overexpression of GhC3H20 enhanced root length in Arabidopsis seedlings under salt stress. Therefore, we speculated that GhC3H20 was involved in ABA signaling to regulate root growth by binding to GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 under salt stress.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Treatments

G. hirsutum standard line TM-1 was used in this study. Cotton seeds were planted in the sand and grown in a plant growth chamber at 25 °C with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod condition. Until the third true leaf expanded for salt or drought treatment, seedlings were soaked in 200 mM sodium chloride (NaCl) or 20% polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG6000) solution, respectively. Simultaneously, seedlings watered with the deionized water was used as a control. The three roots of the control and salt-treated seedlings were collected for qRT-PCR assay at each time point of 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The three leaves of the control and drought-treated seedlings were harvested for qRT-PCR assay at each time point of 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. For ABA treatment, the 100 μM abscisic acid (ABA) solution was sprayed onto leaves. Samples from three leaves were collected at each time point of 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 h. For the tissue-specific test, G. hirsutum standard line TM-1 was planted in the field. The root, stem, leaves, and buds were taken during the third leaf time. The petals, stamens, and pistils were taken during flowering. A total of 15 days of fiber were used to do this study. Then, samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C in a refrigerator for subsequent experiments.

4.2. DNA Extraction, RNA Isolation, and the qRT-PCR Analysis

The cetyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method was used to extract genomic DNA as in the previous study [42]. The total RNA of leaves and roots was extracted and purified using an EASY Spin plus plant Total RNA Extraction kit (SunYa, Henan, China) or an RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand synthesis of cDNA was performed by the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Japan) or the HiScriptII Q RT SuperMix Vazyme for the qPCR (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A cotton actin gene (GhActin) and an Arabidopsis thaliana polyubiquitin gene (AtUBQ10) were used as standard controls. All the primers used for qRT-PCR were designed using a primer database (http://biodb.swu.edu.cn/qprimerdb, last accessed on 26 February 2023) and are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The expression of genes was analyzed using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with the UltraSYBR Mixture (Low ROX) Kit. The 10 μL reaction volume contained the following components: 0.4 μL of the PCR forward primer (10 μM), 0.4 μL of the PCR reverse primer (10 μM), 1 μL of cDNA, 5 μL of SYBR Premix Ex Taq (2×), and 3.6 μL of ddH2O. The amplification parameters were as follows: 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 32 s. The 2−ΔΔCt method was applied to calculate the relative expression levels with three technical replicates [43].

4.3. Gene Clone and Sequence Analysis

The full-length coding sequences (CDS) and the 2000 bp upstream sequences of the GhC3H20 (GH_D08G2771) gene from G.hirsutum TM-1 were cloned by specific primers (Supplementary Table S3). For the GUS assay, the GhC3H20 promoter sequences were inserted into the PBI121 binary vector with HindIII and XbaI restriction sites to generate the ProGhC3H20::GUS vector. For overexpression studies, the GhC3H20 CDS was inserted into the pBI121 binary vector with XbaI and SacI restriction sites to generate the 35S-GhC3H20 vector. The vectors were transferred into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by the freezing and thawing method [44]. Multiple sequence alignments were performed using DNAMAN software, and a phylogenetic tree was conducted by MEGA 7.0 software using a neighbor-joining method. The GhC3H20 gene structure was predicted by the online website Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS 2.0) (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). The molecular weight (Mw) and isoelectric point (pI) of the GhC3H20 protein were predicted by the online website ExPASy (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/). The online website ProtComp 9.0 (http://linux1.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=protcompan&group=programs&subgroup=proloc) was used to predict the subcellular localization of the GhC3H20 protein. The online website PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) was employed to predict the cis-elements.

4.4. Arabidopsis Transformation

The Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia ecotype was used for this study. The floral dip method was used to generate transgenic Arabidopsis plants [45]. Positive transformants were selected on 1/2 MS medium containing kanamycin (50 mg/l) and grew until maturation. Genomic DNA was extracted via the TPS method for PCR to test positive plants. The homozygous overexpressed transgenic lines of T3 generations were used for phenotypic analysis.

4.5. β-Glucuronidase (GUS) Histochemical Staining

The GUS staining kit (HuaYueYang, Bejing, China) was used for this experiment. For salt treatment, seeds of transgenic plants were placed on the 1/2 MS medium containing 150 mM NaCl. Samples from the roots, stems, leaves, inflorescences, and fruit pods of the T1 generation transgenic Arabidopsis were placed in the 5 mL tube to which the GUS staining solution was added. After 24 h at 37 °C in the dark, 75% alcohol was added to the tubes for decolorization.

4.6. Phenotypic Observation of Transgenic Arabidopsis

For length experiments, seeds of transgenic and WT Arabidopsis were germinated and grown on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 0 (control), 150 mM NaCl, and 200 mM mannitol. After dark treatment at 4 °C for 2 days, the 1/2 MS medium plates with the seeds were placed in an incubator with a photoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark at 22 °C. Ten seedlings were grown for two weeks. The root length in WT and transgenic lines were measured. Seedlings were transplanted in the nutrition soil and grown in a plant growth chamber at 25 °C with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod condition. One-month-old plants were subjected to salt treatment. For salt treatment, the transgenic and WT plants were watered with 400 mM NaCl and then kept in the NaCl-contained soil for 5 days. The growth status of the transgenic and WT plants under high salinity (NaCl) was observed.

4.7. VIGS Assay

For the VIGS assay, the online website SGN VIGS Tool (https://vigs.solgenomics.net/?tdsourcetag=s_pcqq_aiomsg) was applied to obtain the silenced fragments of GhC3H20. The gene-specific primers were designed by the NCBI Primer-BLAST tool and are listed in Supplementary Table S3. The silenced fragments were cloned by PCR and integrated into the PYL156 binary vector to construct the PYL156-GhC3H20 vector. The constructed vector and the PYL156 (negative control), PYL-GhPDS (positive control), and PLY192 (helper vector) vectors were then introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404. The LBA4404 cells harboring the vectors were collected and resuspended in filtration buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, and 200 μM acetosyringone). The LBA4404 cells harboring PYL156 or PYL156-GhC3H20 were equally mixed with PYL192 and co-injected into two fully expanded cotyledons of TM-1 plants. Until the third true leaves expanded, twenty seedlings were treated with 400 mM NaCl solution. The growth status of the PYL156 and PYL156 derivative plants under high salinity (NaCl) was observed.

4.8. Measurement of CAT and Chlorophyll Content

After salt treatment, approximately 0.1 g of samples from leaves were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The CAT content detection kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was used to measure the content of CAT. Samples were placed in the 15 mL tube to which 15 mL of mixed liquid (acetone: absolute ethanol = 1:1) was added and treated for 24 h at room temperature in the dark. When the leaves turned white, the absorbance was measured at 645 nm and 663 nm.
Chlorophyll Content (mg/g) = (20.31A645 + 8.03A663) × 0.15

4.9. Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) Assays

The CDS sequences of GhC3H20, GhPP2CA, GhHAB1, GhABF3, and GhABI1 were cloned and amplified by PCR. The fragments of CDS sequences were inserted into the pGBKT7 binary vector with EcoRI and BamHI sites to create pGBKT7-GhC3H20, pGBKT7-GhPP2CA, pGBKT7-GhHAB1, pGBKT7-GhABF3, and pGBKT7-GhABI1 plasmids. The pGBKT7-GhC3H20 with pGADT7, pGBKT7-GhPP2CA, pGBKT7-GhHAB1, pGBKT7-GhABF3, or pGBKT7-GhABI1 plasmids were co-transformed into Y2HGold cells. The yeast cells containing transformed products, pGBKT7-p53+pGADT7-largeT (positive control), and pGBKT7-laminC+pGADT7-largeT (negative control) were cultured and detected on SD-Trp-Leu, SD-Trp-Leu-His-Ade containing 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 mM 3AT, and SD-Trp-Leu-His-Ade+X-a-Gal+40 mM 3AT medium at 30 °C for 3–5 days.

5. Conclusions

As one of the transcription factors widely existing in plants, the CCCH zinc-finger protein not only plays pivotal roles in plant growth and development but also participates in stress response. In this study, a CCCH zinc-finger protein, the GhC3H20 gene, was identified. qRT-PCR results showed that GhC3H20 was up-regulated under NaCl, PEG, and ABA treatments. GUS activity was detected in the root, stem, leaves, and flowers of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis. Compared with the control, the GUS activity of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings under NaCl treatment was stronger. Overexpressed GhC3H20 enhanced the salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis, and silencing of GhC3H20 decreased the salt stress tolerance in cotton. In the Y2H assay, two interact genes (GhPP2CA and GhHAB1) of GhC3H20 were identified. GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 are the key genes involved in the ABA signaling pathway. The expression levels of PP2CA and HAB1 in transgenic Arabidopsis were higher than those in the WT, and pYL156-GhC3H20 plants were lower than those in the control. GhC3H20 is likely to participate in the ABA signaling pathway to regulate salt stress by interacting with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1. This study lays the foundation for future studies of GhC3H20 in the improvement of salt stress tolerance in cotton. For further study, transgenic cotton of GhC3H20 will be constructed to investigate the biological function in response to salt stress. What is more, the downstream and upstream genes of GhC3H20 will be further studied to form a regulatory network in response to salt stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24055057/s1.

Author Contributions

H.W. (Hantao Wang), L.M. and Q.Z. conceived and designed the study. Q.Z. drafted the manuscript. J.Z., F.W., H.W. (Hengling Wei) and X.F. analyzed the data. J.L., H.W. (Hantao Wang) and L.M. revised the language. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-15-06), Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Shang, H.; Shi, Y.; Huang, L.; Li, J.; Ge, Q.; Gong, J.; Liu, A.; Chen, T.; Wang, D.; et al. Construction of a high-density genetic map by specific locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) and its application to Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) analysis for boll weight in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum.). BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Mu, C.; Zhou, L. Phosphatase GhDsPTP3a interacts with annexin protein GhANN8b to reversely regulate salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium spp.). New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1856–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hoang, X.L.T.; Nhi, D.N.H.; Thu, N.B.A.; Thao, N.P.; Tran, L.P. Transcription Factors and Their Roles in Signal Transduction in Plants under Abiotic Stresses. Curr. Genom. 2017, 18, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Shao, H.; Tang, X. Recent Advances in Utilizing Transcription Factors to Improve Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance by Transgenic Technology. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Magnani, E.; Sjolander, K.; Hake, S. From endonucleases to transcription factors: Evolution of the AP2 DNA binding domain in plants. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2265–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Takatsuji, H. Zinc-finger transcription factors in plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 1998, 54, 582–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stege, J.T.; Guan, X.; Ho, T.; Beachy, R.N.; Barbas, C.F., III. Controlling gene expression in plants using synthetic zinc finger transcription factors. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 1077–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Moore, M.; Ullman, C. Recent developments in the engineering of zinc finger proteins. Brief. Funct. Genom. Proteom. 2003, 1, 342–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kosarev, P.; Mayer, K.F.; Hardtke, C.S. Evaluation and classification of RING-finger domains encoded by the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, research0016.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nakano, T.; Suzuki, K.; Fujimura, T.; Shinshi, H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lijavetzky, D.; Carbonero, P.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J. Genome-wide comparative phylogenetic analysis of the rice and Arabidopsis Dof gene families. BMC Evol. Biol. 2003, 3, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Arnaud, D.; Déjardin, A.; Leplé, J.C.; Lesage-Descauses, M.C.; Pilate, G. Genome-wide analysis of LIM gene family in Populus trichocarpa, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa. DNA Res. 2007, 14, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jenkins, T.H.; Li, J.; Scutt, C.P.; Gilmartin, P.M. Analysis of members of the Silene latifolia Cys2/His2 zinc-finger transcription factor family during dioecious flower development and in a novel stamen-defective mutant ssf1. Planta 2005, 220, 559–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schumann, U.; Prestele, J.; O’Geen, H.; Brueggeman, R.; Wanner, G.; Gietl, C. Requirement of the C3HC4 zinc RING finger of the Arabidopsis PEX10 for photorespiration and leaf peroxisome contact with chloroplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1069–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Berg, J.M.; Shi, Y. The galvanization of biology: A growing appreciation for the roles of zinc. Science 1996, 271, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, Y.H.; Yu, Y.P.; Wang, D.; Wu, C.A.; Yang, G.D.; Huang, J.G.; Zheng, C.C. GhZFP1, a novel CCCH-type zinc finger protein from cotton, enhances salt stress tolerance and fungal disease resistance in transgenic tobacco by interacting with GZIRD21A and GZIPR5. New Phytol. 2009, 183, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, P.; Ju, H.W.; Min, J.H.; Zhang, X.; Chung, J.S.; Cheong, H.S.; Kim, C.S. Molecular and physiological characterization of the Arabidopsis thaliana Oxidation-related Zinc Finger 2, a plasma membrane protein involved in ABA and salt stress response through the ABI2-mediated signaling pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Seok, H.Y.; Nguyen, L.V.; Park, H.Y.; Tarte, V.N.; Ha, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Moon, Y.H. Arabidopsis non-TZF gene AtC3H17 functions as a positive regulator in salt stress response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 498, 954–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, H.; Gao, X.; Zhi, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Niu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhai, H.; Zhao, N.; Li, J.; et al. A non-tandem CCCH-type zinc-finger protein, IbC3H18, functions as a nuclear transcriptional activator and enhances abiotic stress tolerance in sweet potato. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1918–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Long, L.; Yang, W.W.; Liao, P.; Guo, Y.W.; Kumar, A.; Gao, W. Transcriptome analysis reveals differentially expressed ERF transcription factors associated with salt response in cotton. Plant Sci. 2019, 281, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, D.; Guo, Y.; Wu, C.; Yang, G.; Li, Y.; Zheng, C. Genome-wide analysis of CCCH zinc finger family in Arabidopsis and rice. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Li, Z.; Thomas, T.L. PEI1, an embryo-specific zinc finger protein gene required for heart-stage embryo formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 383–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kong, Z.; Li, M.; Yang, W.; Xu, W.; Xue, Y. A novel nuclear-localized CCCH-type zinc finger protein, OsDOS, is involved in delaying leaf senescence in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Han, G.; Qiao, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, B. The Roles of CCCH Zinc-Finger Proteins in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ilyas, M.; Hussain Shah, S.; Fujita, Y.; Maruyama, K.; Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Jan, A. OsTZF1, a CCCH-tandem zinc finger protein gene, driven under own promoter produces no pleiotropic effects and confers salt and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, 2142725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Miller, G.; Suzuki, N.; Ciftci-Yilmaz, S.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.; Song, L.; Dai, J.; Gan, N.; Liu, Z. Effects of microcystins on the growth and the activity of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase of rape (Brassica napus L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). Toxicon 2004, 43, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jan, A.; Maruyama, K.; Todaka, D.; Kidokoro, S.; Abo, M.; Yoshimura, E.; Shinozaki, K.; Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. OsTZF1, a CCCH-tandem zinc finger protein, confers delayed senescence and stress tolerance in rice by regulating stress-related genes. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1202–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, C.; Zhang, L.J.; Huang, R.D. Cytoskeleton and plant salt stress tolerance. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. León, J.; Castillo, M.C.; Coego, A.; Lozano-Juste, J.; Mir, R. Diverse functional interactions between nitric oxide and abscisic acid in plant development and responses to stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 907–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saxena, I.; Srikanth, S.; Chen, Z. Cross Talk between H2O2 and Interacting Signal Molecules under Plant Stress Response. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, F.; Jensen, C.R.; Shahanzari, A.; Andersen, M.N.; Jacobsen, S.-E. ABA regulated stomatal control and photosynthetic water use efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during progressive soil drying. Plant Sci. 2005, 168, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tuteja, N. Abscisic Acid and abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Ran, Q.; Zhang, J. The bHLH family member ZmPTF1 regulates drought tolerance in maize by promoting root development and abscisic acid synthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5471–5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Uno, Y.; Furihata, T.; Abe, H.; Yoshida, R.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper transcription factors involved in an abscisic acid-dependent signal transduction pathway under drought and high-salinity conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 11632–11637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Krzywińska, E.; Kulik, A.; Bucholc, M.; Fernandez, M.A.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Dobrowolska, G. Protein phosphatase type 2C PP2CA together with ABI1 inhibits SnRK2.4 activity and regulates plant responses to salinity. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1253647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Jiang, L.; Kai, W.; Liang, B.; Wang, J.; Du, Y.; Zhai, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Suppressing Type 2C Protein Phosphatases Alters Fruit Ripening and the Stress Response in Tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Porebski, S.; Bailey, L.G.; Baum, B.R. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1997, 15, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Holsters, M.; de Waele, D.; Depicker, A.; Messens, E.; van Montagu, M.; Schell, J. Transfection and transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol. Gen. Genet. MGG 1978, 163, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 05057 g001 550
Figure 1. GhC3H20 gene structure, sequence alignment, and phylogenetic analysis. (A) Gene structure of GhC3H20. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of GhC3H20 and CCCH zinc-finger family group IX members in Arabidopsis thaliana. (C) Protein sequence alignments of GhC3H20 with AT2G19810, AT4G29190, and AT2G25900. Note: CCCH represents the C3H-type motif. The colored regions represent conserved amino acid sequences. The red star represents GhC3H20 gene.
Figure 1. GhC3H20 gene structure, sequence alignment, and phylogenetic analysis. (A) Gene structure of GhC3H20. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of GhC3H20 and CCCH zinc-finger family group IX members in Arabidopsis thaliana. (C) Protein sequence alignments of GhC3H20 with AT2G19810, AT4G29190, and AT2G25900. Note: CCCH represents the C3H-type motif. The colored regions represent conserved amino acid sequences. The red star represents GhC3H20 gene.
Ijms 24 05057 g001
Ijms 24 05057 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 under 200 mM NaCl and 20% PEG treatment and in eight cotton tissues (root, stem, leaf, bud, petal, stamen, pistil, and fiber) in cotton. (A) Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 gene in roots under ddH2O (CK) and 200 mM NaCl treatments. (B) Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 gene in leaves under ddH2O (CK) and 20% PEG treatments. (C) Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 gene in eight tissues. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 2. Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 under 200 mM NaCl and 20% PEG treatment and in eight cotton tissues (root, stem, leaf, bud, petal, stamen, pistil, and fiber) in cotton. (A) Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 gene in roots under ddH2O (CK) and 200 mM NaCl treatments. (B) Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 gene in leaves under ddH2O (CK) and 20% PEG treatments. (C) Expression pattern analysis of GhC3H20 gene in eight tissues. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Ijms 24 05057 g002
Ijms 24 05057 g003 550
Figure 3. The expression level analysis of the GhC3H20 gene under 100 μM ABA treatment. GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis in five tissues (root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit pod), and GUS activity analysis of Pro GhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings under control and salt treatment. (A) The expression level analysis of the GhC3H20 gene under 100 μM ABA treatment. (B) GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis in five tissues (root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit pod). (C) GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings on 1/2 MS medium. (D) GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings on 1/2 MS medium containing 150 mM NaCl. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 3. The expression level analysis of the GhC3H20 gene under 100 μM ABA treatment. GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis in five tissues (root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit pod), and GUS activity analysis of Pro GhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings under control and salt treatment. (A) The expression level analysis of the GhC3H20 gene under 100 μM ABA treatment. (B) GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis in five tissues (root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit pod). (C) GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings on 1/2 MS medium. (D) GUS activity analysis of ProGhC3H20::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings on 1/2 MS medium containing 150 mM NaCl. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Ijms 24 05057 g003
Ijms 24 05057 g004 550
Figure 4. Overexpression of GhC3H20 enhanced salt and osmotic stresses tolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings. (A) The expression levels of GhC3H20 in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines. (B) Root length phenotype of WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 1/2 MS medium, 150 mM NaCl, and 200 mM mannitol treatments. (C) Statistics of root lengths of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings under salt and osmotic stresses. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates or standard deviations of the root length among Arabidopsis seedlings (** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test). Note: WT represents wild-type Arabidopsis. Line 1, Line 2, and Line 3 represents three transgenic Arabidopsis lines.
Figure 4. Overexpression of GhC3H20 enhanced salt and osmotic stresses tolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings. (A) The expression levels of GhC3H20 in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines. (B) Root length phenotype of WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 1/2 MS medium, 150 mM NaCl, and 200 mM mannitol treatments. (C) Statistics of root lengths of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings under salt and osmotic stresses. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates or standard deviations of the root length among Arabidopsis seedlings (** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test). Note: WT represents wild-type Arabidopsis. Line 1, Line 2, and Line 3 represents three transgenic Arabidopsis lines.
Ijms 24 05057 g004
Ijms 24 05057 g005 550
Figure 5. Phenotype and the content of CAT in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (A) The phenotype of WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (B) The content of CAT in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 400 mM NaCl treatment. The error bars represent standard deviations of three biological replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 5. Phenotype and the content of CAT in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (A) The phenotype of WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (B) The content of CAT in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines under 400 mM NaCl treatment. The error bars represent standard deviations of three biological replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Ijms 24 05057 g005
Ijms 24 05057 g006 550
Figure 6. Silencing of GhC3H20 decreased salt stress tolerance in cotton. (A) Leaf whitening of positive control plants (plants injected with pYL156-GhPDS vector), and phenotype analysis of control plants and silent plants under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (B) The relative expression levels of control plants and silenced plants in cotton leaves. (C) The content of chlorophyll in leaves of control plants and silenced plants under 400 mM NaCl treatment. The error bars represent standard deviations of three biological replicates (** p <0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 6. Silencing of GhC3H20 decreased salt stress tolerance in cotton. (A) Leaf whitening of positive control plants (plants injected with pYL156-GhPDS vector), and phenotype analysis of control plants and silent plants under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (B) The relative expression levels of control plants and silenced plants in cotton leaves. (C) The content of chlorophyll in leaves of control plants and silenced plants under 400 mM NaCl treatment. The error bars represent standard deviations of three biological replicates (** p <0.01, Student’s t-test).
Ijms 24 05057 g006
Ijms 24 05057 g007 550
Figure 7. GhC3H20 interacted with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 in vivo. (A) GhC3H20 transcriptional activation assay. (B) GhC3H20 interacted with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 in yeast cells.
Figure 7. GhC3H20 interacted with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 in vivo. (A) GhC3H20 transcriptional activation assay. (B) GhC3H20 interacted with GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 in yeast cells.
Ijms 24 05057 g007
Ijms 24 05057 g008 550
Figure 8. The expression levels of genes related to ABA and osmotic stress in cotton and Arabidopsis under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (A) The expression levels of ABA marker genes (AtPP2CA and AtHAB1) in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (B) The relative expression of the osmotic stress marker gene (AtNHX1) in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (C) The relative expression of ABA marker genes (GhPP2CA and GhHAB1) in control plants (plants injected with pYL156 empty vector) and silenced plants (plants injected with pYL156-GhC3H20 vector) in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (D) The relative expression of the osmotic stress marker gene (GhNHX2) in control plants (plants injected with pYL156 empty vector) and silenced plants (plants injected with pYL156-GhC3H20 vector) in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (E) The expression levels of GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 in roots under 200 mM NaCl treatment. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 8. The expression levels of genes related to ABA and osmotic stress in cotton and Arabidopsis under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (A) The expression levels of ABA marker genes (AtPP2CA and AtHAB1) in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (B) The relative expression of the osmotic stress marker gene (AtNHX1) in WT Arabidopsis and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (C) The relative expression of ABA marker genes (GhPP2CA and GhHAB1) in control plants (plants injected with pYL156 empty vector) and silenced plants (plants injected with pYL156-GhC3H20 vector) in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (D) The relative expression of the osmotic stress marker gene (GhNHX2) in control plants (plants injected with pYL156 empty vector) and silenced plants (plants injected with pYL156-GhC3H20 vector) in leaves under 400 mM NaCl treatment. (E) The expression levels of GhPP2CA and GhHAB1 in roots under 200 mM NaCl treatment. The error bars represent standard deviations of three technical replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Ijms 24 05057 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wei, F.; Fu, X.; Wei, H.; Lu, J.; Ma, L.; Wang, H. The CCCH-Type Zinc-Finger Protein GhC3H20 Enhances Salt Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Cotton through ABA Signal Transduction Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24055057

AMA Style

Zhang Q, Zhang J, Wei F, Fu X, Wei H, Lu J, Ma L, Wang H. The CCCH-Type Zinc-Finger Protein GhC3H20 Enhances Salt Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Cotton through ABA Signal Transduction Pathway. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(5):5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24055057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Qi, Jingjing Zhang, Fei Wei, Xiaokang Fu, Hengling Wei, Jianhua Lu, Liang Ma, and Hantao Wang. 2023. "The CCCH-Type Zinc-Finger Protein GhC3H20 Enhances Salt Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Cotton through ABA Signal Transduction Pathway" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 5: 5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24055057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop