Next Article in Journal
Polystyrene Microplastics Induce Oxidative Stress in Mouse Hepatocytes in Relation to Their Size
Previous Article in Journal
TcbHLH14 a Jasmonate Associated MYC2-like Transcription Factor Positively Regulates Pyrethrin Biosynthesis in Tanacetum cinerariifolium
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms24087381
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of the Feeding System on Fat Deposition in Yak Subcutaneous Fat

by
Lin Xiong
1,2,3,
Jie Pei
1,2,3,
Pengjia Bao
1,2,3,
Xingdong Wang
1,2,3,
Shaoke Guo
1,2,3,
Mengli Cao
1,2,3,
Yandong Kang
1,2,3,
Ping Yan
1,2,3,* and
Xian Guo
1,2,3,*
1
Animal Science Department, Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730050, China
2
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding on Tibetan Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Lanzhou 730050, China
3
Key Laboratory for Yak Genetics, Breeding, and Reproduction Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7381; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087381
Submission received: 23 February 2023 / Revised: 6 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fat deposition is very important to the growth and reproduction of yaks. In this study, the effect of the feeding system on fat deposition in yaks was explored by transcriptomics and lipidomics. The thickness of the subcutaneous fat in yaks under stall (SF) and graze feeding (GF) was evaluated. The transcriptomes and lipidomes of the subcutaneous fat in yaks under different feeding systems were detected by RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) and non-targeted lipidomics based on ultrahigh-phase liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS), respectively. The differences in lipid metabolism were explored, and the function of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was evaluated by gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genome (KEGG) analysis. Compared with GF yaks, SF yaks possessed stronger fat deposition capacity. The abundance of 12 triglycerides (TGs), 3 phosphatidylethanolamines (PEs), 3 diglycerides (DGs), 2 sphingomyelins (SMs) and 1 phosphatidylcholine (PC) in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks was significantly different. Under the mediation of the cGMP–PKG signaling pathway, the blood volume of SF and GF yaks may be different, which resulted in the different concentrations of precursors for fat deposition, including non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA), glucose (GLU), TG and cholesterol (CH). The metabolism of C16:0, C16:1, C17:0, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2 and C18:3 in yak subcutaneous fat was mainly realized under the regulation of the INSIG1, ACACA, FASN, ELOVL6 and SCD genes, and TG synthesis was regulated by the AGPAT2 and DGAT2 genes. This study will provide a theoretical basis for yak genetic breeding and healthy feeding.

1. Introduction

Yak (Bos grunniens) is a kind of classic grazing livestock in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and adjacent areas [1,2] that plays an essential role in the lives of local residents, providing resources such as animal-derived food, animal power and fuel [3]. After long-term natural selection, yaks have adapted to special living environments such as low temperatures and oxygen levels and possesses some unique physiological characteristics. Fat plays an important role in the life activities of yaks [4], such as survival under starvation, lactation and childbirth [5,6]. Yaks live through a cold season for more than six months of the year; grass is bad quality and scarce during this time. Moreover, the pregnancy and parturition of yaks mainly occurs in the cold season and female yaks suffer from long-term grass shortage and low temperature during pregnancy. Adequate fat deposition in female yaks can ensure a higher calving rate. After the calf is born, the fat deposition in female yaks is also one of the key factors for calf lactation. On the other hand, fat plays an important role in meat processing. If there is not enough fat in meat products, the overall meat quality will be reduced, leading to dryness and poor taste. Therefore, some subcutaneous or visceral fat is artificially added in order to develop tenderness and improve taste in the process of producing meat products.
The factors affecting the fat deposition in livestock are very complex and include genetics [7], diet [8,9], the feeding system [10,11] and gender [12,13]. In recent years, overgrazing has led to serious rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the survival and stocking rate of yaks has been seriously reduced [14]. Therefore, the nutrition management of yaks, especially the change in the traditional graze feeding (GF) method, is particularly important to the development of yak production. Stall feeding (SF) can significantly improve the growth performance and economic benefit of yaks; however, there are few reports on the effect of the feeding system on fat deposition in yaks.
Fat deposition in livestock is a dynamic equilibrium process that is regulated by fat synthesis, transport and decomposition. From the perspective of molecular biology, fat deposition is regulated by the expression of specific genes in time and space. Transcriptome analysis based on high-throughput sequencing technology possesses the advantages of higher resolution and sensitivity [15] and is being widely applied to studying the regulation of fat metabolism in beef cattle [16,17], dairy cows [18], chickens [19] and pigs [20]. Metabolites are the end product of gene expression, and the main metabolites in adipose tissue belong to lipids. Lipidomics can systematically analyze the changes in lipid composition in organisms [21] and has been successfully applied to exploring the fat characterization in cattle [22,23], dairy cattle [24], goats [25] and pigs [26]. The differential lipids in yak shanks and flanks have also been revealed by lipidomics approaches [27]. Plenty of lipid molecules with biological activity in specific substrates were found, and some new lipid functions in terms of livestock growth and development were clarified. The combination of lipidomics and transcriptomics can comprehensively and systematically reveal the physiological process of the fat metabolism in cattle [28,29], and RNA-Seq and lipidomics was used to reveal the different adipogenic processes between bovine perirenal and intramuscular adipocytes [28]. The regulatory mechanism of the feeding system to fat deposition in yak can also be revealed by the change in the lipidome and transcriptome in yak adipose tissue.
In this study, the deposition quantity of the subcutaneous fat in yaks under GF and SF was measured. The biochemical markers related to fat metabolism in yak serum under two feeding systems were detected. Furthermore, the transcriptomes and lipidomes in the subcutaneous fat of GF and SF yaks were detected by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and non-targeted lipidomics based on ultrahigh-phase liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (UHPLC-MS), respectively. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differential lipids (DLs) in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks were screened and annotated by gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genome (KEGG) analysis. The correlation analysis of crucial DEGs and DLs was also carried out. Then, the regulatory mechanism of the feeding system on subcutaneous fat deposition in yaks was clarified from the angle of molecular biology. This study can provide a theoretical basis for yak genetics and breeding and efficient feeding.

2. Results

2.1. Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat in Yaks under Graze (GF) and Stall Feeding (SF)

The thickness of the subcutaneous fat in the backs of SF yaks was significantly greater than the value in the backs of GF yaks (7.28 ± 0.55 vs. 5.22 ± 0.78 mm, p < 0.01). Additionally, the thickness of the subcutaneous fat in the waist of SF yaks was significantly greater than the value in the waist of GF yaks (9.43 ± 1.13 vs. 6.08 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.01).

2.2. Level of Biochemical Markers in the Sera of GF and SF Yaks

The concentrations of glucose (GLU) (4.53 ± 0.28 vs. 4.06 ± 0.23 mmol/L), triglyceride (TG) (0.25 ± 0.05 vs. 0.18 ± 0.02 mmol/L), total cholesterol (TCH) (2.75 ± 0.14 vs. 2.14 ± 0.35 mmol/L), high density lipoprotein (HDL) (1.57 ± 0.20 vs. 1.24 ± 0.18 mmol/L), low density lipoprotein (LDL) (0.61 ± 0.09 vs. 0.44 ± 0.04 mmol/L), non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) (0.22 ± 0.03 vs. 0.17 ± 0.01 mmol/L) and insulin (INS) (12.30 ± 1.45 vs. 10.02 ± 0.93 μIU/mL) in the sera of SF yaks were all higher than the respective values in the sera of GF yaks (p < 0.05).

2.3. Untargeted Metabolome Analyses for Subcutaneous Fat in GF and SF Yaks

The score plot of principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) for lipids in the subcutaneous fat of GF and SF yaks are shown in Figure 1a,b, respectively. The splot diagram of OPLS-DA is shown in Figure 1c. In order to prevent the overfitting of model, seven-fold cross validation and 200 response permutation testing were used to investigate the quality of the OPLS-DA model (Figure 1d). The values of R2Y and Q2Y were (0.0, 0.852) and (0.0, −0.636), respectively, and it can be found that the value of Q2Y was less than 0. Therefore, the OPLS-DA model was effective, stable and reliable. The lipids in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks were divided into two entirely different areas. It can be found there was a distinct difference in the lipids in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks, and the feeding system can lead to marked lipid perturbation in the subcutaneous fat of yaks.
A total of 408 lipid molecules in 13 classes were detected in the yak subcutaneous fat under the two feeding systems, including 14 ceramides (Cers), 1 cholesteryl ester (ChE), 52 diglycerides (DGs), 1 dimethylphosphatidylethanolamine (dMePE), 8 lysophosphatidylcholines (LPCs), 7 monoglycerides (MGs), 90 phosphatidylcholines (PCs), 32 phosphatidylethanolamines (PEs), 2 phosphatidylinositols (PIs), 2 phosphatidylserines (PSs), 27 sphingomyelins (SMs), 2 sphingoshines (SOs) and 171 triglycerides (TGs). The detailed information on lipid molecules is shown in Supplementary Table S1. The composition of lipid classes in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks is shown in Table 1. The predominant lipid classes in the subcutaneous fat of both SF and GF yaks were DGs, LPCs, PCs, PEs, SMs and TGs, whereas the abundance of DGs, PEs, SMs and TGs in yak subcutaneous fat was different between the SF and GF groups. Compared with the GF group, the percentage of PEs, SMs and TGs in the SF group was higher, whereas the percentage of DGs was lower. The volcano plot of lipid abundance in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks is shown in Figure 2a. A total of 21 DLs were screened out, including 12 TGs, 3 PEs, 3 DGs, 2 SMs and 1 PC. The abundance of 15 DLs was downregulated in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks, whereas 6 DLs were upregulated (Table 2). The heat map of DLs is shown in Figure 2b. Furthermore, TG(16:1/16:1/18:2), TG(18:0/18:1/20:4) and TG(18:1/18:2/20:4) were enriched in 7 KEGG pathways (Figure 2c), and the KEGG pathway involved in fat deposition included cholesterol metabolism (bom04979), fat digestion and absorption (bom04975), regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes (bom04923), insulin resistance (bom04931) and glycerolipid metabolism (bom00561).

2.4. Transcriptome Analysis for Subcutaneous Fat in GF and SF Yaks

A total of 17,269 genes were detected in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under the two feeding systems. A volcano plot of gene expression in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks is shown in Figure 3a. A total of 677 DEGs were screened out, and their information is shown in Supplementary Table S2. Of them, the expression of 383 DEGs in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks was downregulated, whereas the expression of 294 DEGs was upregulated. The DEGs involved in the regulation of fat metabolism included the ELOVL6, GPD1, FASN, PCK1, INSIG1, GK2, ACACA, ME1, HK3, MOGAT1, LIPA, PGK2, SCD and ACOX2 genes, and their information is shown in Table 3. Because of the importance of the DGAT2 (FC = 1.89) and AGPAT2 (FC = 1.92) genes in regulating TG synthesis, these two genes were also discussed in this study. After GO enrichment, the biological processes for DEGs were focused on biological adhesion, biological regulation, growth and metabolic process (Figure 3b). Furthermore, these DEGs were enriched in 31 KEGG pathways (Supplementary Table S3), and the top 20 KEGG pathways are shown in Figure 3c. The KEGG pathways involved in the fat metabolism of adipose tissue included growth hormone synthesis, secretion and action (ko04935), the cAMP signaling pathway (ko04024), the PPAR signaling pathway (ko03320), cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction (ko04060), the cGMP–PKG signaling pathway (ko04022), insulin secretion (ko04911) and the adipocytokine signaling pathway (ko04920).

2.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) Validation of Sequencing Data

The comparison results of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and mRNA-Seq for the ELOVL6, FASN, SCD and ACACA genes in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. The expressions of the ELOVL6, FASN, SCD and ACACA genes in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks were upregulated compared with in GF yaks. All four DEGs in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks possessed similar expression patterns for qPCR and mRNA-Seq data, which indicated the reliability of the mRNA-Seq data for the subcutaneous fat of yaks under different feeding systems in this study.

2.6. Results of Correlation Analysis for Transcriptome and Lipidomics

The results of Pearson analysis for crucial DEGs and DLs in the regulation of fat deposition in yak subcutaneous fat are shown in Figure 4. The expression of the ELOVL6, GPD1, FASN, INSIG1, ACACA, SCD, DGAT2 and AGPAT2 genes was negatively correlated with the abundance of DG(53:1)+K, TG(18:1/18:2/18:3), TG(18:1/18:2/20:4) and TG(16:0/-18:1/22:5); the expression of the ELOVL6, ACACA, ME1 and SCD genes was positively correlated with the abundance of PE(18:0p/20:4); the expression of the HK3 gene was positively correlated with the abundance of TG(16:1/16:1/18:2), TG(18:1/18:2/18:3), TG(18:1/18:2/20:4), DG(34:3p), DG(34:0p), TG(18:0/18:1/22:5), TG(16:1/18:2/18:3) and TG(18:3/18:2/18:2); the expression of the LIPK gene was positively correlated with the abundance of TG(18:0/18:1/22:5), DG(34:0p) and TG(16:1/14:1/18:2); the expression of the MOGAT1 and PGK2 genes was negatively correlated with the abundance of SM(d41:1) and SM(d22:0/18:1); the expression of the ME1 gene was negatively correlated with the abundance of TG(18:1/18:2/20:4) and TG(16:0/18:1/22:5); the expression of the INSIG1 gene was positively correlated with the abundance of TG(18:1/18:2/18:3), TG(18:1/18:2/20:4), TG(16:0/18:1/22:5) and TG(18:0/18:1/22:5).

3. Discussion

Changing the feeding system can lead to many effects in yaks from the macroscopic angle, such as dry matter intake, protein and energy levels, feeding behavior, digestive absorption and so on. Therefore, it was very difficult to explore the effect of the feeding system on fat deposition in yak subcutaneous fat from one of the above macro factors. However, all the above macro factors finally caused the changes in gene expression involved in the fat deposition in yaks, so it was feasible, reliable and accurate to explore the effect of the feeding system on the fat deposition in yak subcutaneous fat from the molecular level.
It was found that the capacity for fat deposition in SF yaks was stronger than that in GF yaks from the angle of subcutaneous fat thickness. Hormone [30] and adipocytokine [31,32] secretion play a crucial role in the regulation of fat deposition in cattle. In this study, many KEGG pathways for DEG enrichment were involved in hormone and adipocytokine secretion, such as insulin secretion (ko04911), the adipocytokine signaling pathway (04920), parathyroid hormone synthesis, secretion and action (ko04928), growth hormone synthesis and secretion and action (ko04935). Therefore, it was inferred the fat deposition in yaks under different feeding systems was also regulated by the hormone and adipocytokines from a macroscopic perspective. On the other hand, the KEGG pathways for DL enrichment involved in fat metabolism focused on cholesterol metabolism (bom04979), glycerolipid metabolism (bom00561), regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes (bom04923) and insulin resistance (bom04931). Therefore, the differences in fat deposition in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under different feeding systems was mainly caused by GLU, glycerolipid and CH metabolism under the regulation of hormone and adipocytokines. GLU, TG, TCH, HDL, LDL and NEFA are all the raw materials for lipid synthesis, and their levels in the sera of SF yaks were higher than the values in the sera of GF yaks. Apolipoprotein C3 mainly regulates the content of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) [33]. The APOC3 gene positively acts in the transport of CH, TG and NEFA and is involved in the regulation of bovine subcutaneous fat deposition [34]. It can be inferred that the subcutaneous fatty tissue of SF yaks can obtain more GLU, CH, TG and NEFA in comparison with that inGF yaks, and the final result was that the capacity of fat deposition in SF yaks was stronger than that in GF yaks. The glycerolipid is the main ingredient of lipids in cattle [35], and the majority of DLs (except for two SMs) in yak subcutaneous fat belonged to the glycerolipid class. INS is related to blood glucose transport and utilization. The concentration of INS is increased with fattening phases and is positively correlated with the cattle marbling in late fattening phases [36]. The level of INS in the sera of SF yaks was higher than the value in the sera of GF yaks. CH has a role in fatty acid and lipid transport and is the precursor for hormone synthesis in cattle [37]. The primacy of glycerolipid metabolism and the functions of insulin and cholesterol in the regulation of yak fat deposition were also proved in this study.
Studies show that the cGMP–PKG signaling pathway (ko04022) mediates the regulation of relaxation and contraction of vascular smooth muscle cells [38,39]. The relaxation and contraction of the vascular smooth muscle cells in yaks under different feeding systems may be different, which led to different blood volumes and then the quantity of GLU, TG and NEFA arriving at the adipocytes in yak subcutaneous fat was different. The GLU from diet can be stored in adipose tissue in the form of TG by the glycolytic pathway and citric acid cycle [40]. The ME1 gene acts in the release of NADPH and acetyl-CoA that are used in fatty acid biosynthesis [41]. The INSIG1 gene is associated with fat metabolism and adipocyte differentiation in bovines [42], and INS can induce the expression of the INSIG1 gene by regulating fatty acid synthesis [43]. The expression of the ME1 gene was significantly correlated with the abundance of PE(18:0p/20:4), TG(18:1/18:2/20:4) and TG(16:0/18:1/22:5) and the expression of the INSIG1 gene was positively correlated with the abundance of TG(18:1/18:2/18:3), TG(18:1/18:2/20:4), TG(16:0/18:1/22:5) and TG(18:0/18:1/22:5). Therefore, the fat deposition in yak subcutaneous fat due to the citric acid cycle was mainly realized under the regulation of the INSIG1 and ME1 genes.
The lipids in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks were mainly composed of LPCs, PCs, Pes and TGs, and the DLs were mainly formed by these fatty acids including C16:0, C16:1, C17:0, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2, C18:3, C20:4 and C22:5. Previous reports show that C16:0, C16:1, C18:1, C18:2, C18:3 are the major components of yak fat [44]. The level of fat deposition in cattle depends on the balance between lipid synthesis and decomposition, and the ACACA, SCD, FASN and ACOX1 genes were screened out as the candidate genes for subcutaneous fat deposition in beef cattle [45]. The ACACA and FASN genes play an important role in the de novo synthesis of fatty acids in bovines [46]. The ACACA gene regulates the conversion of acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA; FASN regulates the conversion of malonyl-CoA to C16:0, then C16:0 translates into other fatty acids by elongation and desaturation reactions. The expression of the FASN and ACACA genes was significant correlation with the abundance of DG(53:1)+K, TG(18:1/18:2/18:3), TG(18:1/1-8:2/20:4) and TG(16:0/18:1/22:5) in yak subcutaneous fat. Therefore, the de novo synthesis of fatty acids in yak subcutaneous fat was mainly regulated by ACACA and FASN. SCD regulates the desaturation of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) in cattle [47], such as C16:0 to C16:1 and C18:0 to C18:1. The main function of the ELOVL6 gene is to regulate the synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs). Overexpression of the ELOVL6 gene decreases the proportions of C14:0 and C16:0, whereas it increases the proportions of C18:0 and C20:4n6 in bovines [48]. The expression of ELOVL6 and SCD was significantly correlated with the abundance of DG(53:1)+K, TG(18:1/18:2/18:3), TG(18:1/18:2/20:4), TG(16:0/18:1/22:5) and PE(18:0p/20:4) in yak subcutaneous fat. Therefore, the ACACA, FASN, ELOVL6 and SCD genes were crucial in the regulation of fatty acid synthesis in yak subcutaneous fat.
The lipid composition in the adipose tissue of cattle is very complicated; the major component is TGs and lipidomic analyses showed that TGs comprised at least 50% of total lipids in bovine milk fat globule membranes [49]. In this study, it was found that TGs were also the major lipid component of yak subcutaneous fat. TG synthesis can be realized through two main pathways including the monoacylglycerol and glycerol 3 phosphate pathways [50]. MOGAT1 regulates DG and TG synthesis and plays a key role in the route of TG synthesis in cattle [51]. The acylglycerophosphate acyltransferase (AGPAT) family plays a bridging role in TG synthesis [52], and the AGPAT2 gene regulates the conversion of lysophosphatidic acid to phosphatidic acid. Diacylgycerol acyltransferases (DGATs) are the only rate-limiting enzyme in TG synthesis, and the DGAT2 gene acts in the saturated fat deposition in the adipose tissue of Nellore cattle [53]. The thickness of the subcutaneous fat in SF yaks was significantly higher than the value for GF yaks, and the expression of the DGAT2 and AGPAT2 genes was significantly correlated with the abundance of DG(53:1)+K, TG(18:1/18:2/18:3), TG(18:1/18:2/20:4) and TG(16:0/18:1/22:5) in yak subcutaneous fat. Therefore, the AGPAT2 and DGAT2 genes were the key controlling genes for TG synthesis in yak subcutaneous fat.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Sample Collection

Twelve two-year-old healthy male yaks with the same genetic background were selected in Qinghai province, China, and divided in GF and SF groups. Each group contained six yaks. The yaks in GF group were only grazed on natural pasture with no supplements; the yaks in SF group were fed with total mixed ration (TMR) in the colony house. The nutritional aspects of the grass and TMR are shown in Supplementary Table S4. The GF yaks were grazed from 07:00 to 19:00 every day and could eat and drink freely during the grazing period. The SF yaks were fed twice a day and could also freely eat and drink. After being fed for six months, all twelve yaks were fasted for 24 h and cut off from water for 8 h. Twenty mL of blood was collected from the jugular vein of yaks in the morning of the slaughter day and centrifugated at 3000 r/min for 15 min at 4 °C using a KL05R refrigerated centrifuge (Kaida Inc., Changsha, China). Then, the serum samples were obtained and stored at −20 °C for analyzing the biochemistry index. Next, all yaks were humanely harvested at a commercial abattoir (Xiahua Meat Food Co., Ltd., Xining, China). The subcutaneous fat samples (12–13th rib level) were collected and placed in enzyme-free cryopreservation tubes and stored in liquid nitrogen.

4.2. Measure of Subcutaneous Fat Thickness in Yaks

The thickness of subcutaneous fat in yaks was measured with a Vernier caliper (Hengliang Inc., Shanghai, China) within 10 min after slaughter. In this study, the yak subcutaneous fat at two sites was chosen and measured, including the thickness of subcutaneous fat on the back (on both sides of midline of the dorsal at the 5–6th thoracic vertebra) and the thickness of subcutaneous fat on the waist (on both sides of midline at the cruciate region). The measure for the thickness of subcutaneous fat on each side of sites was carried out three times, and the average value was obtained.

4.3. Determination of Biochemical Markers in Yak Serum

The concentrations of GLU, TCH, TG, HDL, LDL and NEFA in yak serum was determined by the colorimetric method with a Mindray BS–420 automatic biochemical analyzer. The concentration of INS in yak serum was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

4.4. Lipid Extraction, Mass Spectrometry (Ms) Data and Bioinformatics

An amount of 20 mg of subcutaneous fatty tissue, 20 μL internal standard (the solution of Lyso PC17:0 in methanol, 0.1 mg/mL) and 300 μL of a solution of methanol–water (v:v, 1:1) were added into a tube, followed by adding two small steel balls. The tube was precooled at –20 °C for 2 min, then the sample was grinded at 60 Hz for 2 min using a Tissuelyser–48 grinding miller (Jingxing limited company, Shanghai, China). A total of 300 μL chloroform was transferred into the tube, then the fat sample was vortexed for 30 s with a TYXH–I vortex oscillator (hannuo company, shanghai, China) and extracted for 10 min with a F-060SD ultrasonic cleaner (Fuyang Technology Group Co. LTD, Shengzhen, China). The mixture was allowed to stand for 20 min at −20 °C and the residual mixture was treated once again according to the above steps. Another 200 μL of lower chloroform was combined with the previous solution, and a total of 400 μL chloroform solution was obtained. One hundred and fifty μL chloroform solution was transferred into a vial and dried, then the residue was redissolved in 500 μL of a solution of isopropanol and methanol (v:v, 1:1). The mixture was vortexed for 30 s and extracted with ultrasound for 3 min. The solution was transferred into a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and allowed to for 2 h at −20 °C, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 r/min for 10 min. One hundred and fifty μL of supernatant was transferred into a vial for LC–MS analysis. Quality control (QC) samples were prepared by mixing the extract of all samples in equal volume.
The prepared samples were separated with an AB ExionLC HPLC coupled with an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 um) (Waters, Milford, CT, USA). The column temperature, flow rate, and sample size were 45 °C, 0.35 mL/min, and 2 μL, respectively. Mobile phase A was the solution of acetonitrile and water (v:v, 6:4) (containing 10 mmol/L ammonium formate); mobile phase B was the solution of isopropyl alcohol and acetonitrile (v:v, 9:1) (containing 10 mmol/L ammonium formate). The elution gradient was as follows: mobile phase B was held at 30% in 0.0–3.0 min, risen to 62% in 3.0–5.0 min, risen to 82% in 5.0–15.0 min, risen to 99% in 15.0–16.5 min, held at 99% in 16.5–18.0 min, reduced to 30% in 18.0–18.1 min, and held at 30% in 18.1–22.0 min. MS data was collected with an Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a heated electrospray ionization (ESI) source in positive and negative ion modes. The MS conditions were as follows: heater temp 300 °C, sheath gas flow rate 45 arb, aux gas flow rate 15 arb, sweep gas flow rate 1 arb, spray voltage 3.5 KV, capillary temp 320 °C, S-Lens RF level 50% and MS1 scan ranges 120–1800. The raw MS data was processed by software Lipid Search for MSn and the exact mass–to–charge ratio (m/z) of parent ions. The molecular structures of lipids in positive and negative mode were identified according to the parent ions and multi-stage mass spectrometry data of each individual sample. The results were aligned according to a certain retention time range and combined into a single report to sort out the original data matrix. In each sample, all peak signals were normalized. The extracted data was further processed by removing any peaks with a missing value (ion intensity = 0) in more than 50% of groups and by replacing the zero value by half of the minimum value. A data matrix was combined from the positive and negative ion data. The matrix was imported into R to carry out PCA in order to observe the overall distribution among the samples and the stability of the whole analysis process. OPLS–DA was utilized to distinguish the metabolites that differed between groups. To prevent overfitting, 7–fold cross-validation and 200 response permutation testing were used to evaluate the quality of the model. The variable importance of projection (VIP) values obtained from the OPLS–DA model were used to rank the overall contribution of each variable to the group discrimination. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was further used to verify whether the lipid differences between the SF and GF groups was significant. DLs were selected with VIP > 1.0 and p < 0.05.

4.5. RNA Extraction, Sequencing and Bioinformatics

The total RNA in yak subcutaneous fat was extracted using mirVana™ miRNA ISOlation Kit. Six hundred μL lysis/binding buffer was added into the subcutaneous fat sample and the mixture was homogenized, followed by adding 30 μL miRNA homogenate additive and standing in an ice bath for 10 min. The solution of acid phenol and chloroform (v:v, 1:1) was added into the tube and the mixture centrifuged at room temperature for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred out and 1.25 times the volume of 100% ethanol was added. The mixture was added into the column at room temperature and centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 30 s; the supernatant was then discarded. Three hundred and fifty μL miRNA wash solution 1 was added into the column and the column centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 30 s; the supernatant was then discarded. The solution of 10 μL DNase I and 70 μL buffer RDD QIAGEN was added on the column membrane, and the mixture was placed at room temperature for 15 min. Three hundred and fifty μL miRNA wash solution 1 was added to the centrifugal column, and the solution was centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 30 s. The supernatant was discarded. The centrifugal column was put in the collection tube once again. Five hundred μL wash solution 2/3 was added in the column twice, and the solution was centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 30 s. The supernatant was discarded. The centrifugal column was put in the collection tube once again. The empty column was centrifuged for 1 min. The centrifugal column was put into the collection tube and 100 μL of elution solution preheated at 95 °C was added to the center of the column. The column was allowed to stand for 2 min and then centrifuged at room temperature for 30 s. The liquid in the collection tube was the extracted total RNA. RNA integrity was evaluated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The samples with an RNA integrity number > 7 were subjected to the subsequent analysis. The libraries were constructed using TruSeq Stranded Total RNA with Ribo–Zero Gold. Then, these libraries were sequenced on the HiSeqTM 2500 sequencing platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and 150 bp paired-end reads were generated.
The raw reads were filtered with SortMeRNA and Trimmomatic software. The low-quality bases and N–bases or low-quality reads were removed. The quality of the processed data was detected with the software fastp, then the clean reads were obtained. Clean reads were mapped to the reference genome of yaks with hisat2 software. The read numbers in RNA-Seq analysis were normalized against reads per kilo base of transcripts per million (RPKM) to calculate the level of gene expression. The FPKM value of each gene was calculated using cufflinks, and the read counts of each gene were obtained by htseq-count. The counts were normalized using the estimateSizeFactors function of the DESeq (2012) R package. DEGs were screened using the nbinomTest function by calculated p and fold change (FC) for difference comparison. p < 0.05 and FC > 2 or <0.5 were set as the threshold for DEGs. GO and KEGG enrichment for DEGs was carried out using the hypergeometric distribution test.

4.6. Determination of qPCR for Candidate Genes Regulating Fat Deposition in Yaks

The qPCR method was used to detect the relative expression levels of four DEGs (ELOVL6, FASN, SCD and ACACA). The reference gene for qPCR was the β-actin gene. Quantification was performed with a two-step reaction process: reverse transcription (RT) and PCR. The RT reaction volume was 10 µL, which contained total RNA (0.5 μg), 5× TransScript All-in-one SuperMix for qPCR (5 μL) and gDNA Remover (0.5 μL). The reactions were carried out on a GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) for 15 min at 42 °C and 5 s at 85 °C. Real–time PCR was performed using a LightCycler® 480 Real–Time PCR Instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with a 10 µL PCR mixture that included 0.2 µL cDNA, 5 µL 2 × PerfectStartTM Green qPCR SuperMix, 0.2 µL (10 µmol/L) primer and 3.6 µL nuclease-free water. Reactions were incubated in a 384-well optical plate (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) at 94 °C for 30 s, followed by 45 cycles of 94 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Each sample was run in triplicate for analysis. At the end of the PCR cycles, melting curve analysis was performed to validate the specific generation of the expected PCR product. Relative gene expression levels were determined using the 2−∆∆Ct method.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

The thickness of subcutaneous fat in yaks and biochemical markers in yak serum were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test in SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) software, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlations between crucial DLs and DEGs were carried on by Pearson correlation analysis also using SPSS 16.0. Significant differences were considered as p < 0.05, and a correlation coefficient > 0.8 was considered as a high correlation.

5. Conclusions

The capacity for fat deposition in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under SF was stronger than the yaks under GF, and there were also differences in the abundances of 12 TGs, 3 PEs, 3 DGs, 2 SMs and 1 PC in the subcutaneous fat between SF and GF yaks. These differences were mainly caused by cholesterol and glycerolipid metabolism and insulin action in yak adipose tissue. The blood volume of yaks under the two feeding systems may be different because of the mediation of the cGMP–PKG signaling pathway, which resulted in the concentration differences of the precursors for fat deposition in yaks, including NEFA, GLU and TG. The INSIG1, ACACA, FASN, ELOVL6 and SCD genes play a crucial role in regulating fatty acid synthesis in the subcutaneous fat of yaks, and these fatty acids mainly include C16:0, C16:1, C17:0, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2, C18:3, C20:4 and C22:5. Furthermore, the TG synthesis in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of yaks was mainly realized under the regulation of the AGPAT2 and DGAT2 genes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24087381/s1.

Author Contributions

L.X.: Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing–original draft, Writing—review and editing; J.P.: Methodology, Resources, Data curation; P.B.: Validation, Writing—review and editing; X.W.: Writing—review and editing; S.G.: Validation; M.C.: Resources; Y.K.: Writing—original draft; P.Y.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition; X.G.: Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project received financial support from National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1600205), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-37) and Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (25-LZIHPS-01). These funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Permit No. SYXK-2020-0166). The methods used in this study were carried out in accordance with the Laboratory Animal Management Principles of China. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all people who were involved in the experiments. The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China for financial support. The authors also thank the coworkers of the Key Laboratory for Yak Genetics, Breeding, and Reproduction Engineering of Gansu Province, China, for performing the experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, L.L.; Han, L.; Ma, X.L.; Yu, Q.L.; Zhao, S.N. Effect of mitochondrial apoptotic activation through the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition pore on yak meat tenderness during postmortem aging. Food Chem. 2017, 234, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wen, W.T.; Luo, X.L.; Xia, B.X.; Guan, J.Q.; Nie, Y.Y.; Li, L.; Duan, J.Y.; Suman, S.P.; Sun, Q. Post-mortemoxidative stability of three yak (Bos grunniens) muscles as influenced by animal age. Meat Sci. 2015, 105, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Luo, J.; Huang, Z.Y.; Liu, H.N.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, F.Z. Yak milk fat globules from the Qinghai- Tibetan Plateau: Membrane lipid composition and morphological properties. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Albuquerque, A.; Óvilo, C.; Núñez, Y.; Benítez, R.; López-Garcia, A.; García, F.; Félix, M.D.R.; Laranjo, M.; Charneca, R.; Martins, J.M. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of subcutaneous adipose tissue from local big breeds. Genes 2020, 11, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. SILVA-Vignato, B.; Coutinho, L.L.; Poleti, M.D.; Cesar, A.S.M.; Moncau, C.T.; Regitano, L.C.A.; Balieiro, J.C.C. Gene co-expression networks associated with carcass traits reveal new pathways for muscle and fat deposition in Nelore cattle. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mason, A.E.; Saslow, L.R.; Moran, P.J.; Kim, S.; Wali, P.K.; Abousleiman, H.; Richler, R.; Schleicher, S.; Goldman, V.M.; Hartman, A.; et al. Lipid findings from the diabetes education to lower insulin, sugars, and hunger (DELISH) study. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 16, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ibáñez-escriche, N.; Magallón, E.; Gonzalez, E.; Tejeda, J.F.; Noguera, J.L. Genetic parameters and crossbreeding effects of fat deposition and fatty acid profiles in Iberian pig lines. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brzozowska, A.M.; Lukaszewicz, M.; Oprzadek, J.M. Energy-protein supplementation and lactation affect fatty acid profile of liver and adipose tissue of dairy cows. Molecules 2018, 23, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rodríguez, R.; Alomar, D.; Morales, R. Milk and meat fatty acids from sheep fed a plantain– chicory mixture or a grass-based permanent sward. Animal 2020, 14, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oliveira, P.P.A.; Corte, R.R.S.; Silva, S.L.; Rodriguez, P.H.M.; Sakamoto, L.S. The effect of grazing system intensification on the growth and meat quality of beef cattle in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. Meat Sci. 2018, 139, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bergamaschi, M.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Cecchinato, A.; Schiavon, S.; Bittante, G. Chemometric authentication of farming systems of origin of food (milk andripened cheese) using infrared spectra, fatty acid profiles, flavor, fingerprints, and sensory descriptions. Food Chem. 2020, 305, 125480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Stergiadis, S.; Berlitza, C.B.; Hunt, B.; Garg, S.; Givens, D.I.; Kliem, K.E. An update to the fatty acid profiles of bovine retail milk in the United Kingdom: Implications for nutrition in different age and gender groups. Food Chem. 2019, 276, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, M.K.; Kim, D.G.; Bong, Y.H.; Jang, J.H.; Son, S.W. Concentrations of PCDD/Fs, dioxin-like PCBs, PBDEs, and hexachlorobenzene in fat samples from cattle of different ages and gender in Korea. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 1786–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miao, F.H.; Guo, Z.G.; Xue, R.; Wang, X.Z.; Shen, Y.Y. Effects of grazing and precipitation on herbage biomass, herbage nutritive value, and yak performance in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wilhelm, B.T.; Marguerat, S.; Watt, S. Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature 2008, 453, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, R.; Li, H.; Huang, Y.Z.; Lan, X.Y.; Lei, C.Z.; Chen, H. Transcriptome profiling of lncrna related to fat tissues of qinchuan cattle. Gene 2019, 742, 144587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, D.C.; Jin, G.; Li, B.; Xu, F.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, F.; Wu, S.J.; et al. The comprehensive liver transcriptome of two cattle breeds with different intramuscular fat content. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 490, 1018–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mcfadden, J.W. Review: Lipid biology in the periparturient dairy cow: Contemporary perspectives. Animal 2020, 14, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Na, W.; Wu, Y.Y.; Gong, P.F.; Wu, C.Y.; Cheng, B.H.; Wang, Y.X.; Wang, N.; Du, Z.Q.; Li, H. Embryonic transcriptome and proteome analyses on hepatic lipid metabolism in chickens divergently selected for abdominal fat content. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Piórkowska, K.; Zukowski, K.; Ropka-Molik, K. A comprehensive transcriptome analysis of skeletal muscles in two Polish pig breeds differing in fat and meat quality traits. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2018, 41, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Han, X.; Gross, R.W. The foundations and development of lipidomics. J. Lipid Res. 2022, 63, 100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ueda, S.; Sasaki, R.; Nakabayashi, R.; Yamanoue, M.; Sirai, Y.; Iwamoto, E. Exploring the Lipids Involved in the Formation of Characteristic Lactones in Japanese Black Cattle. Metabolites 2021, 11, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Belaz, K.R.A.; Tata, A.; França, M.R.; Silva, M.I.S.D.; Vendramini, P.H.; Fernandes, A.M.A.P.; Alexandri, F.L.D.; Eberlin, M.N.; Binelli, M. Phospholipid Profile and Distribution in the Receptive Oviduct and Uterus During Early Diestrus in Cattle. Biol. Reprod. 2016, 95, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, L.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, H.D.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, Y.H.; Zhu, Q.P. Comparative lipidomics analysis of human, bovine and caprine milk by UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS. Food Chem. 2020, 310, 125865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jia, W.; Di, C.; Shi, L. Applications of lipidomics in goat meat products: Biomarkers, structure, nutrition interface and future perspectives. J. Proteom. 2023, 270, 104753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, J.W.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.J.; Qiao, M.; Xu, Z.; Peng, X.W.; Mei, S.Q. Proteomic and lipidomic analyses reveal saturated fatty acids, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylserine, and associated proteins contributing to intramuscular fat deposition. J. Proteomics 2021, 241, 104235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, N.; Zhang, C.; Chen, W.; Wu, T. Using an integrated feature-based molecular network and lipidomics approach to reveal the differential lipids in yak shanks and flanks. Food Chem. 2023, 403, 134352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, X.; Liang, C.; Li, A.; Cheng, G.; Long, F.; Khan, R.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S.; Wang, Y.; et al. RNA-Seq and lipidomics reveal different adipogenic processes between bovine perirenal and intramuscular adipocytes. Adipocyte 2022, 11, 448–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.; Ma, H.; Duan, Y.; Ma, X.; Tan, L.; Dong, J.; Jin, C.; Wei, R. Mycobacterium tuberculosis/Mycobacterium bovis triggered different variations in lipid composition of Bovine Alveolar Macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hayden, J.M.; Williams, J.E.; Collier, R.J. Plasma growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor, insulin, and thyroid hormone association with body protein and fat accretion in steers undergoing compensatory gain after dietary energy restriction. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71, 3327–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Daix, M.; Pirotte, C.; Bister, J.L.; Wergifosse, F.; Cuvelier, C.; Cabaraux, J.F.; Kirschvink, N.; Istasse, L.; Paquay, R. Relationship between leptin content, metabolic hormones and fat deposition in three beef cattle breeds. Vet. J. 2008, 177, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fu, Y.Y.; Chen, K.L.; Li, H.X.; Zhou, G.H. The adipokine Chemerin induces lipolysis and adipogenesis in bovine intramuscular adipocytes. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2016, 418, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Meyers, N.L.; Larsson, M.; Vorrsjo, E. Aromatic residues in the C-terminus of apolipoprotein C-III mediate lipid binding and LPL inhibition. J. Lipid Res. 2017, 58, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Romao, J.M.; He, M.L.; McAllister, T.A.; Guan, L.L. Effect of age on bovine subcutaneous fat proteome: Molecular mechanisms of physiological variations during beef cattle growth. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 3316–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, H.; Oh, D.Y.; Lee, Y. Determination of the effect of functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with glycerolipid synthesis on intramuscular fat deposition in Korean cattle steer. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2021, 64, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, M.; Masaki, T.; Ikuta, K.; Eiji, I.; Uemoto, Y.; Terada, F.; Roh, S. Changes in the liver transcriptome and physiological parameters of Japanese Black steers during the fattening period. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Daniels, T.F.; Wu, X.L.; Pan, Z.X.; Michal, J.J.; Jr, R.W.W.; Killinger, K.M.; MacNeil, M.D.; Jiang, Z.H. The reverse cholesterol transport pathway improves understanding of genetic networks for fat deposition and muscle growth in beef cattle. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qiao, Y.N.; He, W.Q.; Chen, C.P.; Zhang, C.H.; Zhao, W.; Wang, P.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.Z.; Yang, X.; Peng, Y.J.; et al. Myosin phosphatase target subunit 1 (MYPT1) regulates the contraction and relaxation of vascular smooth muscle and maintains blood pressure. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 22512–22523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Silberbach, M.; Jr, C.T.R. Natriuretic peptide signalling: Molecular and cellular pathways to growth regulation. Cell Signal. 2001, 13, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chang, G.G.; Tong, L. Structure and function of malic enzymes, a new class of oxidative decarboxylases. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 12721–12733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vidal, O.; Varona, L.; Oliver, M.A.; Noguera, J.L.; Sanchez, A.; Amills, M. Malic enzyme 1 genotype is associated with backfat thickness and meat quality traits in pigs. Anim. Genet. 2006, 37, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bionaz, M.; Loor, J.J. Gene networks driving bovine milk fat synthesis during the lactation cycle. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Diamond, R.H.; Du, K.; Lee, V.M. Novel delayed early and highly insulin—Induced growth response genes. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 15185–15192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xiong, L.; Pei, J.; Wang, X.D.; Guo, S.G.; Guo, X.; Yan, P. Lipidomics and Transcriptome Reveal the Effects of Feeding Systems on Fatty Acids in Yak’s Meat. Foods 2022, 11, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Du, L.L.; Li, K.; Chang, T.P.; An, B.X.; Liang, M.; Deng, T.Y.; Cao, S.; Du, Y.Y.; Cai, W.T.; Gao, X.; et al. Integrating genomics and transcriptomics to identify candidate genes for subcutaneous fat deposition in beef cattle. Genomics 2022, 114, 110406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hiller, B.; Hocquette, J.F.; Cassar-Malek, I.; Nuernberg, G.; Nuernberg, K. Dietary n-3 PUFA affect lipid metabolism and tissue function-related genes in bovine muscle. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Milanesi, E.; Nicoloso, L.; Crepaldi, P. Stearoyl CoA desaturase (SCD) gene polymorphisms in Italian cattle breeds. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2008, 125, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Junjvlieke, Z.; Khan, R.; Mei, C.G.; Cheng, G.; Wang, S.H.; Raza, S.H.A.; Hong, J.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Yang, W.C.; Han, W. Effect of ELOVL6 on the lipid metabolism of bovine adipocytes. Genomics 2020, 112, 2282–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brink, L.R.; Herren, A.W.; McMillen, S.; Fraser, K.; Agnew, M.; Roy, N.; Lönnerdal, B. Omics analysis reveals variations among commercial sources of bovine milk fat globule membrane. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 3002–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stone, S.J. Mechanisms of intestinal triacylglycerol synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2022, 1867, 159151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lyu, S.J.; Yang, P.; Liu, Y.Y.; Song, T.; Zhang, Z.J.; Shi, Q.T.; Chen, F.Y.; Liu, X. Genetic effects of MOGAT1 gene SNP in growth traits of Chinese cattle. Gene 2021, 769, 145201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mak, H.Y.; Ouyang, Q.; Tumanov, S.; Xu, J.S.; Rong, P.; Dong, F.T.; Lam, S.M.; Wang, X.W. AGPAT2 interaction with CDP- diacylglycerol synthases promotes the flux of fatty acids through the CDP-diacylglycerol pathway. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Berton, M.P.; Fonseca, L.F.S.; Gimenez, D.F.J.; Utembergue, B.L.; Cesar, A.S.M.; Coutinho, L.L.; Lemos, M.V.A.D. Gene expression profile of intramuscular muscle in Nellore cattle with extreme values of fatty acid. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 24 07381 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) The score plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of lipids in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under stall (SF) and graze feeding (GF). Red and blue represented the SF and GF groups, respectively. (b) The score plots of orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of lipids in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under SF and GF. (c) The splot diagram of OPLS-DA. (d) Permutation test of OPLS-DA model.
Figure 1. (a) The score plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of lipids in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under stall (SF) and graze feeding (GF). Red and blue represented the SF and GF groups, respectively. (b) The score plots of orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of lipids in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under SF and GF. (c) The splot diagram of OPLS-DA. (d) Permutation test of OPLS-DA model.
Ijms 24 07381 g001
Ijms 24 07381 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) The volcano plot of lipid abundance in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks. The abscissa represents the value of log2 fold change (FC), and the ordinate represents the value of −log10 P. A point represents a gene. The points with FC > 2.0 and p < 0.05 or FC < 0.5 and p < 0.05 are shown in red or blue, respectively; non-different lipids (DLs) are shown in black. (b) The heat map of all DLs in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks. Each row represents a DL, and each column represents a sample. The color blocks at different positions represent the abundance of lipid molecules. Red represents high abundance in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks, and blue represents low abundance in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks. (c) The bar diagram of Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathways for enrichment of DLs in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks.
Figure 2. (a) The volcano plot of lipid abundance in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks. The abscissa represents the value of log2 fold change (FC), and the ordinate represents the value of −log10 P. A point represents a gene. The points with FC > 2.0 and p < 0.05 or FC < 0.5 and p < 0.05 are shown in red or blue, respectively; non-different lipids (DLs) are shown in black. (b) The heat map of all DLs in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks. Each row represents a DL, and each column represents a sample. The color blocks at different positions represent the abundance of lipid molecules. Red represents high abundance in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks, and blue represents low abundance in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks. (c) The bar diagram of Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathways for enrichment of DLs in the subcutaneous fat of SF and GF yaks.
Ijms 24 07381 g002
Ijms 24 07381 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Volcano plot of gene expression in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks. The abscissa represents the value of log2 FC, and the ordinate represents the value of −log10 P. A point represents a gene. The points with FC > 2.0 and p < 0.05 or FC < 0.5 and p < 0.05 are shown in red or blue, respectively; non-differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are shown in black. (b) The top 30 terms for gene ontology (GO) enrichment for DEGs in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks. (c) The top 20 terms for KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for DEGs in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks.
Figure 3. (a) Volcano plot of gene expression in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks. The abscissa represents the value of log2 FC, and the ordinate represents the value of −log10 P. A point represents a gene. The points with FC > 2.0 and p < 0.05 or FC < 0.5 and p < 0.05 are shown in red or blue, respectively; non-differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are shown in black. (b) The top 30 terms for gene ontology (GO) enrichment for DEGs in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks. (c) The top 20 terms for KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for DEGs in the subcutaneous fat of SF yaks in contrast to GF yaks.
Ijms 24 07381 g003
Ijms 24 07381 g004 550
Figure 4. The correlation of crucial DLs and DEGs involved in regulating the fat deposition in yak subcutaneous fat. * represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01. Circles with no * or ** represent p > 0.05. Red or blue represent positive or negative correlation, respectively. Deeper colors represent stronger correlations.
Figure 4. The correlation of crucial DLs and DEGs involved in regulating the fat deposition in yak subcutaneous fat. * represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01. Circles with no * or ** represent p > 0.05. Red or blue represent positive or negative correlation, respectively. Deeper colors represent stronger correlations.
Ijms 24 07381 g004
Table
Table 1. The composition of lipid classes in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under stall (SF) and graze feeding (GF).
Table 1. The composition of lipid classes in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under stall (SF) and graze feeding (GF).
Lipid ClassSF Group
(Mean ± SD, %)		GF Group
(Mean ± SD, %)		p Value
Cers0.027 ± 0.0150.029 ± 0.0130.768
ChEs0.002 ± 0.0010.001 ± 0.00050.257
DGs6.382 ± 2.29213.548 ± 2.1340.000
dMePEs0.387 ± 0.1780.406 ± 0.2300.889
LPCs13.368 ± 1.51513.061 ± 3.0380.844
MGs0.067 ± 0.0470.036 ± 0.0050.176
PCs20.205 ± 0.65420.192 ± 1.5420.986
PEs10.953 ± 0.5069.560 ± 0.8790.012
PIs0.379 ± 0.1210.381 ± 0.1250.975
PSs0.0009 ± 0.00060.0012 ± 0.00070.514
SMs8.506 ± 1.2916.470 ± 1.2190.028
SOs0.007 ± 0.0040.007 ± 0.0030.984
TGs39.72 ± 1.59936.307 ± 1.5360.006
SF: stall feeding; GF: graze feeding. SD: standard deviation. Cers: ceramides, ChEs: cholesteryl esters; DGs: diglycerides, dMePEs: dimethylphosphatidylethanolamines, LPCs: lysophosphatid-ylcholines, MGs: monoglycerides, PCs: phosphatidylcholines, PEs: phosphatidylethanolamines, PIs: phosphatidylinositols, PSs: phosphatidylserines, SMs: sphingomyelins, SOs: sphingoshines; TGs: triglycerides.
Table
Table 2. The information for different lipids (DLs) in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under different feeding systems.
Table 2. The information for different lipids (DLs) in the subcutaneous fat of yaks under different feeding systems.
Lipid MoleculeFormulaVIPp ValueFC
PE(18:0p/20:4)C43H76O7N1P17.121.10 × 10−21.39
SM(d41:1)C46H93O6N2P17.042.09 × 10−41.94
PC(16:0/18:1)C42H82O8N1P15.933.15 × 10−20.85
SM(d22:0/18:1)C45H91O6N2P14.207.85 × 10−21.33
TG(17:0/18:1/18:1)C56H104O6N3.822.79 × 10−21.30
TG(16:1/14:1/18:1)C51H92O6N2.874.12 × 10−20.66
TG(16:1/16:1/18:2)C53H94O6N2.544.65 × 10−20.66
TG(18:0/17:0/18:1)C56H106O6N2.183.86 × 10−21.20
PE(16:0p/22:6)C43H72O7NP2.133.17 × 10−20.32
PE(18:0p/22:6)C45H76O7NP2.023.91 × 10−50.40
DG(53:1)+KC56H108O5K2.024.53 × 10−20.64
TG(18:1/18:2/18:3)C57H98 O6N1.886.11 × 10−50.58
TG(18:1/18:2/20:4)C59H100O6N1.724.24 × 10−40.43
TG(16:0/18:1/22:5)C59H102O6N1.581.73 × 10−20.63
DG(34:3p)C37H66 O41.574.33 × 10−30.31
TG(18:0/18:1/22:5)C61H106O6N1.503.15 × 10−50.16
DG(34:0p)C37H72O4 Na1.406.85 × 10−30.37
TG(16:1/14:1/18:2)C51H90O6N1.331.16 × 10−20.39
TG(18:0/18:1/20:4)C59H104O6N1.281.09 × 10−20.60
TG(16:1/18:2/18:3)C55H94O6N1.254.05 × 10−30.44
TG(18:3/18:2/18:2)C57H96O6N1.103.74 × 10−50.40
FC: fold change. SM: sphingomyelin; VIP: variable importance of projection; PC: phosphatidylcholine; TG: triglyceride; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; DG: diglyceride.
Table
Table 3. The information of crucial differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the regulation of fat metabolism in yak subcutaneous fat.
Table 3. The information of crucial differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the regulation of fat metabolism in yak subcutaneous fat.
SymbolDescriptionFCp Value
ELOVL6ELOVL fatty acid elongase 65.561.40 × 10−14
GPD1Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 12.082.27 × 10−4
APOC3Apolipoprotein c33.66 × 1062.45 × 10−8
FASNFatty acid synthase10.006.51 × 10−5
PCK1Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 13.571.78 × 10−15
INSIG1Insulin induced gene 12.048.63 × 10−7
GK2Glycerol kinase 20.019.85 × 10−4
ACACAAcetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha7.145.69 × 10−23
ME1Malic enzyme 12.131.69 × 10−5
INSInsulin2.869.70 × 10−10
HK3Hexokinase 30.241.23 × 10−7
LIPKLipase family member k0.191.26 × 10−10
MOGAT1Monoacylglycerol o-acyltransferase 10.023.13 × 10−3
LIPALipase0.341.22 × 10−5
SLC2A4Solute carrier family 2 member 42.081.19 × 10−3
PGK2Phosphoglycerate kinase 20.035.78 × 10−4
SCDStearoyl-CoA desaturase6.673.72 × 10−6
ACOX2Acyl-CoA oxidase 22.229.60 × 10−9
DGAT2Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 21.893.23 × 10−9
AGPAT21-Acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 21.921.59 × 10−4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiong, L.; Pei, J.; Bao, P.; Wang, X.; Guo, S.; Cao, M.; Kang, Y.; Yan, P.; Guo, X. The Effect of the Feeding System on Fat Deposition in Yak Subcutaneous Fat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087381

AMA Style

Xiong L, Pei J, Bao P, Wang X, Guo S, Cao M, Kang Y, Yan P, Guo X. The Effect of the Feeding System on Fat Deposition in Yak Subcutaneous Fat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiong, Lin, Jie Pei, Pengjia Bao, Xingdong Wang, Shaoke Guo, Mengli Cao, Yandong Kang, Ping Yan, and Xian Guo. 2023. "The Effect of the Feeding System on Fat Deposition in Yak Subcutaneous Fat" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087381

APA Style

Xiong, L., Pei, J., Bao, P., Wang, X., Guo, S., Cao, M., Kang, Y., Yan, P., & Guo, X. (2023). The Effect of the Feeding System on Fat Deposition in Yak Subcutaneous Fat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop