Next Article in Journal
Clinical Applications of Adipose-Derived Stem Cell (ADSC) Exosomes in Tissue Regeneration
Previous Article in Journal
GNN Codon Adjacency Tunes Protein Translation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A View on the Chemical and Biological Attributes of Five Edible Fruits after Finishing Their Shelf Life: Studies on Caco-2 Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Antioxidant Activity of N-Benzyl-2-[4-(aryl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine Oxides

by
Dimitra Hadjipavlou-Litina
1,*,
Iwona E. Głowacka
2,
José Marco-Contelles
3,4 and
Dorota G. Piotrowska
2,*
1
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Bioorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, Muszyńskiego 1, 90-151 Lodz, Poland
3
Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, Institute of General Organic Chemistry (CSIC), Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain
4
Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), CIBER, ISCIII, 46010 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(11), 5908; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115908
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 21 May 2024 / Accepted: 27 May 2024 / Published: 29 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Bioactives and Nutraceuticals)

Abstract

:
The synthesis, antioxidant capacity, and anti-inflammatory activity of four novel N-benzyl-2-[4-(aryl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine oxides 10ad are reported herein. The nitrones 10ad were tested for their antioxidant properties and their ability to inhibit soybean lipoxygenase (LOX). Four diverse antioxidant tests were used for in vitro antioxidant assays, namely, interaction with the stable free radical DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical) as well as with the water-soluble azo compound AAPH (2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride), competition with DMSO for hydroxyl radicals, and the scavenging of cationic radical ABTS•+ (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) radical cation). Nitrones 10b, 10c, and 10d, having the 4-fluorophenyl, 2,4-difluorophenyl, and 4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl motif, respectively, exhibited high interaction with DPPH (64.5–81% after 20 min; 79–96% after 60 min), whereas nitrone 10a with unfunctionalized phenyl group showed the lowest inhibitory potency (57% after 20 min, 78% after 60 min). Nitrones 10a and 10d, decorated with phenyl and 4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl motif, respectively, appeared the most potent inhibitors of lipid peroxidation. The results obtained from radical cation ABTS•+ were not significant, since all tested compounds 10ad showed negligible activity (8–46%), much lower than Trolox (91%). Nitrone 10c, bearing the 2,4-difluorophenyl motif, was found to be the most potent LOX inhibitor (IC50 = 10 μM).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress (OS) is a state of imbalance between the production and accumulation of free oxygen radicals in cells and tissues and the ability of the antioxidant system to remove them [1]. Antioxidants are chemical compounds that effectively neutralize the formation of free radicals. Their task is primarily to protect the body against free radicals, the excess of which may increase the risk of inflammation, arteriosclerosis, heart attacks, stroke, as well as neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s), among others [2,3,4]. The action of antioxidants is multidirectional, however, and the individual antioxidants differ in their mode of action. They may act either by multiple mechanisms or by a predominant mechanism [5,6,7]. Moreover, the biological importance of antioxidants is closely related to understanding the mechanisms of their action, which in turn determines the possibility of their practical use.
A vast number of natural and synthetic compounds have been tested for their antioxidant properties over decades. Among them, nitrogen-containing five-membered heterocyclic compounds, including 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-triazoles [8,9], are of special importance due to the relatively simple method for their preparation and the possibility to modify their structure by incorporation into the more complex molecules (Figure 1). For example, the hybrids of functionalized 1,2,4-triazoles and phenothiazone 1 (Figure 1) appeared to be good antioxidants [10]. Furthermore, 1,2,4-triazoles 2 (Figure 1) conjugated with two other heterocyclic systems, namely benzimidazole and thiophene, have been recognized to exhibit very good (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) (ABTS) scavenging activity [11]. Compound 3 (Figure 1) showed high 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) scavenging activity with the percent inhibition of 93.751 ± 0.47 at a concentration of 100 µg/mL, and with IC50 value 7.12 ± 2.32 µg/mL was found to be more active than the standard antioxidant BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) [12]. 4H-Chromene-containing 1,2,3-triazoles 4 (Figure 1) showed good antioxidant activity by DPPH and hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging methods [13]. Moreover, 1,2,3-triazoles containing both pyrazole and thiazole moieties 5 (Figure 1) have also been recognized as potent DPPH scavenging agents [14]. Ferrocene-1H-1,2,3-triazole hybrids 6 and 7 (Figure 1) exhibit antioxidant effects on mitochondrial free radicals and anti-inflammatory effects on rat mesangial cells (RMCs) [15].
Recently, we have investigated the antioxidant capacity of N-[2-(4-aryl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethylidene]methanamine oxides 8 and N-[2-(4-aryl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethylidene]-2-methylpropan-2-amine oxides 9 (Figure 2) [16]. Among all the tested nitrones, N-tert-butyl derivatives 9 (Figure 2) having the 4-fluorophenyl, 2,4-difluorophenyl, and 4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl substituents at C4 in 1,2,3-triazole moiety appeared the most potent hydroxyl radical scavengers (~100%), more potent than Trolox (88%), used as a reference compound. Moreover, N-{2-[4-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethylidene}-2-methylpropan-2-amine oxide 9 (R = t-Bu, Ar = 3-Me-4-F-C6H3) (Figure 2) was identified as the most balanced and potent antioxidant agent, since it was an extremely efficient and potent hydroxyl radical scavenger, the most potent 5-lipoxygenase (LOX) inhibitor, and one of the most potent lipid peroxidation inhibitors (LPis) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) radical cation (ABTS•+) scavenger of the whole series of the tested nitrones.
In continuation to our studies to identify new nitrones for the therapy for pathological inflammation and oxidative stress (OS), the nitrones 10ad (Figure 3), N-benzyl analogs of the previously reported compounds 8 and 9 [16] (Figure 2), have been synthesized with the intention of testing their antioxidant potency. The newly prepared series of compounds contains unfunctionalized nitrone 10a as well as derivatives substituted at the C4 of 1,2,3-triazole moiety with 4-fluorophenyl (10b), 2,4-difluorophenyl (10c), and 4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl (10d), which were selected from the previously synthesized nitrones of series 8 and 9 [16] based on their observed antioxidant activity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

Nitrones 10ad were prepared following the reactions shown in Scheme 1 as previously described [16], by reacting aldehydes 11ab with N-benzylhydroxylamine. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC and the full conversion of the aldehydes 11ab into respective nitrones 10 was achieved within 15 min, at room temperature (rt). All final products were purified by crystallization and their structure and purities were established by 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR (Supplementary Materials, Figures S1–S11), and IR techniques and by elemental analysis (Section 3). In particular, nitrones 10ad were isolated as pure Z-stereoisomers at the double bond (CH=N), as determined and confirmed by the presence of the single sets of the diagnostic signals of the respective protons CH=N (δ = 7.12–7.15 ppm) and CH2Ph (δ = 4.97–5.00 ppm) in the 1H NMR spectra of 10ad. Based on a comparison of the literature data for other acyclic nitrones [17], Z-configuration was assigned for (Z)-10ad; however, the corresponding signals for the E-isomeric nitrones necessary to provide full correlation were not observed.

2.2. In Vitro Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Herein, we have investigated in vitro the antioxidant evaluation of nitrones 10ad with regard to their antioxidant ability as well as to their ability to inhibit soybean LOX on several diverse antioxidant tests and in comparison to nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) and Trolox as standards. All aerobic organisms produce free radicals that can attack and damage lipids and DNA, inducing neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and stroke. Since OS and inflammation present a complex character, we decided to evaluate the in vitro antioxidant activity of the synthesized molecules using four different antioxidant assays:
(a)
Interaction with the stable free radical DPPH;
(b)
Interaction with the water-soluble azo compound 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH);
(c)
Competition with DMSO for hydroxyl radicals;
(d)
The scavenging of cationic radical ABTS•+.
All are spectrophotometric measurements which are simple, rapid, and convenient.
DPPH is a stable free radical, advantageous for testing compounds in an ethanolic solution, which in its oxidized form presents a maximum absorbance at about 517 nm. The DPPH method is independent of the molecule’s polarity. The reducing activity (RA) of the examined compounds with the stable free radical DPPH is given in Table 1. This interaction shows their radical scavenging ability in an iron-free system. Nitrones 10b, 10c, and 10d highly interact with DPPH (64.5–81%) after 20 min, whereas 10a presents a lower value. In general, the insertion of a substituent increases the reducing activity (RA). Thus, starting from 10a, all the other compounds in which one or two fluorine atoms or a fluorine atom and a methyl group are present, exhibit higher activities. It seems that an acceptor, such as a fluorine atom, with small molar refractivity (MR) in the para position offers antioxidant ability. The presence of a second fluorine atom as a substituent, 10c does not influence the interaction values, whereas a methyl group in meta position acting as a donor lowers activity (10b > 10d). RA is not influenced by lipophilicity within this nitrones group. The interaction values are increased for all after 60 min (78–81%), showing time dependency. For the sake of comparison, NDGA was used as a standard reference compound.
In our studies, the water-soluble azo AAPH was used as a thermal free radical initiator to induce the oxidative changes of linoleic acid to conjugated diene hydroperoxide. All nitrones except for 10c presented inhibition values (75–87%) lower than the common standard Trolox (93%) (Table 1). The compounds 10a and 10d are the most potent. Lipophilicity seems to play a significant role related to a positive result since the inserted methyl group in compound 10b (75%) increases the lipophilicity of compound 10d driving it to higher inhibition (87%). Nitrone 10c having two fluorine atoms and a clogP value of 2.24 exhibits the lowest anti-lipid peroxidation activity.
Hydroxyl (OH) free radical is counted as the most toxic. As a result, it reacts with important biological molecules such as DNA, lipids, or carbohydrates. We found it interesting to test the scavenging activity of the compounds in competition with DMSO. As shown in Table 1, all the compounds do not exhibit any activity compared to the standard compound Trolox.
In the ABTS•+ decolorization assay, the tested nitrones showed very low activity, except for nitrone 10b which is a mono-substituted fluor derivative. The compounds 10c and 10d exhibit equipotent results, lower activity than 10b (almost the half), and higher lipophilicity values.
We evaluated the synthesized nitrones for their ability to inhibit soybean LOX by the UV absorbance-based enzyme protocol, as shown in Table 1 [18]. The appropriate stimulation of neutrophils cleaves arachidonic acid (AA) from membrane phospholipids, producing leukotrienes through lipoxygenase. Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a potent mediator of inflammation, considered to be important in the pathogenesis of neutrophil-mediated inflammatory diseases with a marked relation to the severity of cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and cancer [19]. The enzyme lipoxygenase catalyzes the first two steps in the metabolism of AA, which is cleaved from membrane phospholipids to leukotrienes (LTB4). LTB4 generation is important in the pathogenesis of neutrophil-mediated inflammatory diseases. NDGA, a known inhibitor of soybean LOX, has been used as a reference compound with IC50 0.45 µM. A perusal of the IC50′s inhibition values (Table 1) shows that the most potent inhibitors are the compounds 10c (IC50 10 μM), 10b (IC50 62.5 μM), and 10a (IC50 85 μM). Compound 10d presents a lower activity of 45% at 100 μM. The structural moiety that significantly influences the inhibition in compounds 10b and 10c is the fluorine atom. In both compounds, this electronegative substituent is present. The most potent nitrone 10c possesses two fluorine atoms whereas 10b has one. The loss of the second fluorine atom (10b) lowers the activity as well as the absence of nitrone 10a. Substituents with low bulk, such as fluorine, and lipophilic contribution as π values increase the inhibitory activity. The strong inhibition of 10c could be therapeutically useful in stroke or neurodegeneration in combination with the high RA (%). It is worth mentioning that the high efficacy of the fluorinated derivatives of PBN (α-phenyl-N-tert-butyl nitrone), namely 4-F-PBN and 4-CF3-PBN, for spin-trapping experiments when compared to PBN has been recently described by Durand and co-workers [20].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

General information—The 1H, 13C, and NMR spectra were taken in CDCl3 on the Bruker Avance III spectrometers (600 MHz, Bruker Instruments, Karlsruhe, Germany) with TMS as the internal standard at 600 and 151 MHz, respectively. The 19F NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on the Bruker AvanceNEO (Bruker Instruments, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 565 MHz. The IR spectra were measured on an Infinity MI-60 FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany). The melting points were determined on a Boetius apparatus and are uncorrected. The elemental analyses were performed by the Microanalytical Laboratory of this Faculty on the Perkin-Elmer PE 2400 CHNS analyzer (Perkin Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT, USA). The following adsorbents were used: column chromatography, Merck silica gel 60 (70–230 mesh); analytical TLC, Merck TLC plastic sheets silica gel 60 F254 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
The 1H-, 13C-, and 19F-NMR spectra of all the newly synthesized compounds are provided in Supplementary Materials.

3.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of Nitrones 10ad

The respective aldehydes 11ad, obtained directly from corresponding diethyl acetal according to the previously described procedure [13], were dissolved in ethanol (2 mL), and CH3CO2Na (1.3 mmol) was added followed by N-benzylhydoxylamine hydrochloride (1.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred until the disappearance of the starting aldehyde was noticed on TLC. After that, 10% NaHCO3 was added (5 mL) and the product was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 5 mL). The organic extracts were combined, dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and crystallized from diethyl ether to give the pure nitrone 10ad.

3.2.1. N-Benzyl-2-(4-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethan-1-imine Oxide (10a)

Yield 79%; white amorphous solid; m.p. 134–136 °C (recrystallized from diethyl ether); IR (KBr, cm–1) νmax: 3398, 3347, 3130, 3033, 2948, 764, and 696. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.95 (s, 1H, HC5′), 7.84 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, Haromat.), 7.46–7.43 (m, 7H, Haromat.), 7.37 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Haromat.), 7.14 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, =CHCH2), 5.36 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H, =CHCH2), and 4.97 (s, 2H, CH2Ph); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.12, 131.66, 130.93, 130.29, 129.56, 129.21, 128.86, 128.31, 125.78, 120.95, 69.80, and 45.78. Anal. calcd. for C17H16N4O × 0.5H2O: C, 67.76; H, 5.69; N, 18.59. Found: C, 67.55; H, 5.60; N, 18.34.

3.2.2. N-Benzyl-2-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine Oxide (10b)

Yield 93%; white amorphous solid; m.p. 129–131 °C (recrystallized from diethyl ether); IR (KBr, cm–1) νmax: 3321, 3094, 3074, 2956, and 835. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.95 (s, 1H, HC5′), 7.82–7.79 (m, 2H, Haromat.), 7.45–7.43 (m, 5H, Haromat.), 7.15–7.13 (m, 3H, 2 × Haromat., =CHCH2), 5.38 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, =CHCH2), and 4.99 (s, 2H, CH2Ph); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 162.78 (d, J = 246.6 Hz), 147.23, 131.63, 130.69, 129.56, 129.21, 127.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz), 126.52 (d, J = 3.5 Hz), 120.75, 115.86 (d, J = 21.8 Hz), 69.85, and 45.69; 19F NMR (565 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −113.30–−113.35 (m). Anal. calcd. for C17H15FN4O × 0.5H2O: C, 63.94; H, 5.05; N, 17.54. Found: C, 63.80; H, 4.91; N, 17.44.

3.2.3. N-Benzyl-2-[4-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine Oxide (10c)

Yield 78%; white amorphous solid; m.p. 112–113 °C (recrystallized from diethyl ether); IR (KBr, cm–1) νmax: 3321, 3158, 3030, 2939, 2904, and 736. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.27 (dt, J = 8.4 Hz, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (s, 5H), 7.12 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 7.05–7.00 (m, 1H), 6.93 (ddd, J = 10.7 Hz, J = 8.4 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H), and 5.00 (s, 2H, CH2Ph); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 162.64 (dd, J = 250.4 Hz, J = 11.9 Hz), 159.28 (dd, J = 250.7 Hz, J = 11.9 Hz), 140.89 (d, J = 2.0 Hz), 131.62, 130.79, 129.59, 129.22, 128.80 (dd, J = 9.5 Hz, J = 4.7 Hz), 123.46 (d, J = 12.1 Hz), 112.04 (dd, J = 21.7 Hz, J = 4.1 Hz), 104.16 (dd, J = 25.9 Hz, J = 25.2 Hz), 69.79, and 46.03; 19F NMR (565 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −109.93–−110.01 (m), −110.70–−110.76 (m). Anal. calcd. for C17H14F2N4O × 2H2O: C, 56.04; H, 4.98; N, 15.38. Found: C, 56.18; H, 5.01; N, 15.41.

3.2.4. N-Benzyl-2-[4-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine Oxide (10d)

Yield 85%; white amorphous solid; m.p. 131–133 °C (recrystallized from diethyl ether); IR (KBr, cm–1) νmax: 3320, 3136, 3036, 2935, 820, and 736. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.68 (dd, J = 7.3 Hz, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.46–7.41 (m, 5H.), 7.13 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 4.99 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), and 2.35 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.35 (d, J = 246.6 Hz), 147.43, 131.61, 130.82, 129.59, 129.22, 128.94 (d, J = 5.4 Hz), 126.12 (d, J = 4.1 Hz), 125.43 (d, J = 18.4 Hz), 124.44 (d, J = 8.0 Hz), 120.68, 115.46 (d, J = 22.7 Hz), 69.83, 45.70, and 14.56 (d, J = 3.3 Hz); 19F NMR (565 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −117.65–−117.89 (br m). Anal. calcd. for C18H17FN4O × H2O: C, 63.15; H, 5.59; N, 16.36. Found: C, 63.18; H, 5.46; N, 16.32.

3.3. In Vitro Assays

General biological assays: NDGA, Trolox, AAPH, and DPPH soybean LOX linoleic acid sodium salt were purchased from the Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI, USA. The phosphate buffer (0.1 M and pH 7.4) was prepared by mixing an aqueous KH2PO4 solution (50 mL, 0.2 M), and an aqueous NaOH solution (78 mL, 0.1 M); the pH (7.4) was adjusted by adding a solution of KH2PO4 or NaOH. For the in vitro tests, a Lambda 20 (Perkin–Elmer-PharmaSpec 1700, Perkin-Elmer Corporation Ltd., Lan Beaconsfield, Bucks, UK) UV–Vis double beam spectrophotometer was used. Each in vitro experiment was performed at least in triplicate and the standard deviation of absorbance was less than 10% of the mean.

3.3.1. Determination of the RA of the Stable Radical DPPH [21]

To an ethanolic solution of DPPH (0.05 mM) in absolute ethanol, 10 µL from a stock solution (10 mM) in the DMSO of the compounds was added. The mixture was shaken vigorously and allowed to stand for 20 min or 60 min; absorbance at 517 nm was determined spectrophotometrically and the percentage of activity was calculated. All tests were undertaken on three or four replicates and the results were averaged (Table 1). NDGA was used as a reference compound.

3.3.2. Soybean LOX Inhibition Study In Vitro [22]

The tested compounds dissolved in DMSO were incubated at rt with sodium linoleate (0.1 mL) and 0.2 mL of the enzyme solution (1/9 × 10−4 w/v in saline) in buffer Tris pH 9. The conversion of sodium linoleate to 13-hydroperoxylinoleic acid at 234 nm was recorded and compared with NDGA, the appropriate standard inhibitor (Table 1).

3.3.3. Inhibition of Linoleic Acid Lipid Peroxidation [16]

Ten microliters of the 16 mM linoleic acid sodium salt solution were added to the UV cuvette containing 0.93 mL of the 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 prethermostated at 37 °C. The oxidation reaction was initiated at 37 °C under air by the addition of 50 μL of the 40 mM AAPH solution. Oxidation was carried out in the presence of 10 μL of the compounds’ stock 10 mM solution in DMSO, in the assay. Lipid oxidation was measured in the presence of the same level of DMSO. The rate of oxidation at 37 °C was recorded as the absorption values at 234 nm and compared to Trolox (Table 1).

3.3.4. Competition of the Tested Compounds with DMSO for Hydroxyl Radicals [23]

The hydroxyl radicals were produced by the Fe3+/ascorbic acid system and detected by the determination of the formaldehyde produced from the oxidation of DMSO. EDTA (0.1 mM), Fe3+ (167 μM), DMSO (33 mM) in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4), the tested compounds (100 µM) and ascorbic acid (10 mM) were inserted, mixed, and incubated in test tubes at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by CCl3COOH (17% w/v) and the % scavenging activity of the nitrones for hydroxyl radicals was recorded. Trolox was used as a positive control (Table 1).

3.3.5. ABTS•+–Decolorization Assay in Ethanolic Solution for Antioxidant Activity [23]

ABTS•+ was produced according to the described procedure as follows. An ABTS stock solution in water (7 mM) was mixed with potassium persulfate (2.45 mM) and left in a dark at room temperature for 12–16 h before use. A total of 10 µL of the investigated compounds were added to ethanol together with the cationic radical. The results were taken at 734 nm, after 1 min of the mixing procedure. Trolox was used as a positive standard (Table 1).

3.3.6. Estimation of Lipophilicity as Clog P

Bioloom of Biobyte Corp was used for the theoretical calculation of lipophilicity as Clog P values (BioByte Home Page. Available online: http://www.biobyte.com, accessed on 1 April 2024). We followed this procedure because lipophilicity is an important physicochemical property related to the biological activity and Absorbance–Distribution–Metabolism–Toxicity (ADMET) properties.

4. Conclusions

The synthesized nitrones 10ad were evaluated for their antioxidant activity using different in vitro techniques. Their anti-inflammatory activity was also tested. Thus, the inhibition of soybean LOX was developed as an indication of their anti-inflammatory effect. The in vitro results revealed that compound 10c is the most promising LOX inhibitor (IC50 = 10 μM) combining a significant anti-lipid peroxidation activity (79%). It seems that 10c could be a promising lead compound to confront inflammatory diseases where OS has been identified to be crucial. Further research is now in progress in our laboratory and will be reported elsewhere.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25115908/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.H.-L., J.M.-C. and D.G.P.; methodology and investigation, D.H.-L., I.E.G., D.G.P.; I.E.G. and D.G.P. designed and carried out the synthesis of the nitrones, interpreted the results, and characterized all the obtained compounds; D.H.-L. conducted the antioxidant tests and interpreted the results; writing—original draft preparation, D.H.-L. and D.G.P.; writing—review and editing, D.H.-L., I.E.G., J.M.-C. and D.G.P.; project administration, D.G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The synthetic part of the project was supported by the Medical University of Lodz internal funds (503/3-014-01/503-31-001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

D. Hadjipavlou-Litina gratefully acknowledges Biobyte Corp. 201West 4th Street, Suite 204, Claremont, CA 91711, USA for free access to the C-QSAR program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AAPH, 2,2′-Azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride; ABTS: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); ABTS•+, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) radical cation; ADMET, Absorbance–Distribution–Metabolism–Toxicity; BHA, butylated hydroxyanisole; DMSO, Dimethyl sulfoxide; DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical; EDTA, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; ILP, inhibition of lipid peroxydation; LOX, lipoxygenase; LPis, lipid peroxidation inhibitors; LTB4, leukotriene B4; MR, molar refractivity; NDGA, Nordihydroguaretic acid; OS, oxidative stress; PBN, α-phenyl-N-tert-butyl nitrone; RA, reducing activity; RMCs, rat mesangial cells.

References

  1. Lutskii, M.A.; Zemskov, A.M.; Razuvaeva, V.V.; Lushnikova, Y.P.; Karpova, O.Y. Oxidative stress as an indicator of metabolic impairments in the pathogenesis of cerebral stroke. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 2018, 48, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kontoghiorghes, G.J.; Kontoghiorghe, C.N. Prospects for the introduction of targeted antioxidant drugs for the prevention and treatment of diseases related to free radical pathology. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2019, 28, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ma, A.; Qi, S.; Chen, H. Antioxidant therapy for prevention of inflammation, ischemic reperfusion injuries and allograft rejection. Cardiovasc. Hematol. Agents Med. Chem. 2008, 6, 20–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Maxwell, S.R. Prospects for the use of antioxidant therapies. Drugs 1995, 49, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Halliwell, B. Understanding mechanisms of antioxidant action in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2024, 25, 13–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hunyadi, A. The mechanism(s) of action of antioxidants: From scavenging reactive oxygen/nitrogen species to redox signaling and the generation of bioactive secondary metabolites. Med. Res. Rev. 2019, 39, 2505–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lu, J.-M.; Lin, P.H.; Yao, Q.; Chen, C. Chemical and molecular mechanisms of antioxidants: Experimental approaches and model systems. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2010, 14, 840–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mohammed, J.H.; Kadhim, H.Y.; Makki, K.A.; Ali, B.A. Review on antioxidant evaluation ofn1,2,3-triazole derivatives synthesized by click chemistry. Ann. Rom. Soc. Cell Biol. 2021, 25, 2765–2796. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pachut-Stec, A. Antioxidant activity of 1,2,4-triazole and its derivatives: A mini-review. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maddila, S.; Momin, M.; Gorle, S.; Palakondu, L.; Jonnalagadda, S.B. Synthesis and antioxidant evaluation of novel phenothiazine linked substituted benzylideamino-1,2,4-triazole derivatives. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2015, 60, 2919–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mentese, E.; Yilmaz, F.; Baltas, N.; Bekircan, O.; Kahveci, B. Synthesis and antioxidant activities of some new triheterocyclic compounds containing benzimidazole, thiophene, and 1,2,4-triazole ring. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2015, 30, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cetin, A.; Gecibesler, I.H. Evaluation as antioxidant agents of 1,2,4-triazole derivatives: Effects of essential functional groups. J. App. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 5, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aitha, S.; Thumma, V.; Matta, R.; Ambala, S.; Jyothi, K.; Manda, S.; Pochampally, J. Antioxidant activity of novel 4H-chromene tethered 1,2,3-triazole analogues: Synthesis and molecular docking studies. Results Chem. 2023, 5, 100987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matta, R.; Pochampally, J.; Dhoddi, B.N.; Bhookya, S.; Bitla, S.; Akkiraju, A.G. Synthesis, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of triazole, pyrazole containing thiazole derivatives and molecular docking studies. BMC Chem. 2023, 17, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cheng, C.-Y.; Haque, A.; Hsieh, M.F.; Hassan, S.I.; Fazi, M.S.H.; Dege, N.; Khan, M.S. 1,4-Disubstituted 1H-1,2,3-triazoles for renal diseases: Studies of viability, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hadjipavlou-Latina, D.; Głowacka, I.E.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Piotrowska, D.G. Synthesis and antioxidant properties of novel 1,2,3-triazole-containing nitrones. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Piotrowska, D.G. N-Substituted C-diethoxyphosphorylated nitrones as useful synthons for the synthesis of α-aminophosphonates. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5363–5366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; Bariamis, S.E.; Militsopoulou, M.; Athanassopoulos, C.M.; Papaioannou, D. Trioxsalen derivatives with lipoxygenase inhibitory activity. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2009, 24, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Muller, K. 5-Lipoxygenase and 12-lipoxygenase: Attractive targets for the development of novel antipsoriatic drugs. Arch. Pharm. 1994, 327, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deletraz, A.; Tuccio, B.; Roussel, J.; Combes, M.; Cohen-Solal, C.; Farbe, P.-L.; Trouillas, P.; Vignes, M.; Callizot, N.; Durand, G. Para-Substituted α-Phenyl-N-tert-butyl Nitrones: Spin-Trapping, Redox and Neuroprotective Properties. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 30989–30999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koleva, I.I.; van Beek, T.A.; Linssen, J.P.H.; de Groot, A.; Evstatieva, L.N. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: A comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem. Anal. 2002, 13, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liegois, C.; Lermusieau, G.; Colin, S. Measuring antioxidant efficiency of wort, malt, and hops against the 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride-induced oxidation of an aqueous dispersion of linoleic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chamorro, B.; Diez-Iriepa, D.; Merás-Sáiz, B.; Chioua, M.; García-Vieira, D.; Iriepa, I.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; López-Muñoz, F.; Martínez-Murillo, R.; González-Nieto, D.; et al. Synthesis, antioxidant properties and neuroprotection of alpha-phenyl-tertbutylnitrone derived homobisnitrones in in vitro and in vivo ischemia models. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of selected 1,2,4- and 1,2,3-triazole-containing compounds 17 with antioxidant activity.
Figure 1. Structures of selected 1,2,4- and 1,2,3-triazole-containing compounds 17 with antioxidant activity.
Ijms 25 05908 g001
Figure 2. Structures of the compounds 8 and 9 encountered in the previous work [16].
Figure 2. Structures of the compounds 8 and 9 encountered in the previous work [16].
Ijms 25 05908 g002
Figure 3. Structures of the nitrones 10ad reported in the present work.
Figure 3. Structures of the nitrones 10ad reported in the present work.
Ijms 25 05908 g003
Scheme 1. Synthesis of nitrones 10ad. Reagents and conditions: a. details for preparation of aldehydes 11ad given in [16]; b. BnNHOH × HCl, CH3CO2Na, rt, 15 min.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of nitrones 10ad. Reagents and conditions: a. details for preparation of aldehydes 11ad given in [16]; b. BnNHOH × HCl, CH3CO2Na, rt, 15 min.
Ijms 25 05908 sch001
Table 1. Antioxidant activity of nitrones 10ad a, and standards Trolox and NDGA.
Table 1. Antioxidant activity of nitrones 10ad a, and standards Trolox and NDGA.
Ijms 25 05908 i001
Nitrones/
Standards
Clog P bILP
(%)
RA (%)
20 min/60 min
LOX Inhibition
(% or IC50 [µM])
Scavenging Activity for HO (%) aABTS•+
(%) a
10a1.918157/7885 μMno8
10b2.097581/8162.5 μMno46
10c2.243279/7910 μMno23
10d2.598764.4/79.545%no23
NDGA3.92nt88/960.45 μMnd-
Trolox3.0993ndnd7391
a nitrones tested at 100 µM. Values are the means of three or four different determinations. no = no activity under the experimental conditions. Means within each column differ significantly (p < 0.05). b BioByte Corporation, C-QSAR database, 201 W Fourth Str., Suite # 204, Claremont CA 91711-4707, USA. nd, not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; Głowacka, I.E.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Piotrowska, D.G. Synthesis and Antioxidant Activity of N-Benzyl-2-[4-(aryl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine Oxides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5908. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115908

AMA Style

Hadjipavlou-Litina D, Głowacka IE, Marco-Contelles J, Piotrowska DG. Synthesis and Antioxidant Activity of N-Benzyl-2-[4-(aryl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine Oxides. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(11):5908. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115908

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hadjipavlou-Litina, Dimitra, Iwona E. Głowacka, José Marco-Contelles, and Dorota G. Piotrowska. 2024. "Synthesis and Antioxidant Activity of N-Benzyl-2-[4-(aryl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]ethan-1-imine Oxides" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 11: 5908. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115908

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop