Next Article in Journal
Meta-QTL and Candidate Gene Analyses of Agronomic Salt Tolerance and Related Traits in an RIL Population Derived from Solanum pimpinellifolium
Previous Article in Journal
Breast Cancer Plasticity after Chemotherapy Highlights the Need for Re-Evaluation of Subtyping in Residual Cancer and Metastatic Tissues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unveiling the Role of RNA Recognition Motif Proteins in Orchestrating Nucleotide-Binding Site and Leucine-Rich Repeat Protein Gene Pairs and Chloroplast Immunity Pathways: Insights into Plant Defense Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Endophytic Fungi from the Four Staple Crops and Their Secondary Metabolites

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(11), 6057; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25116057
Submission received: 19 April 2024 / Revised: 28 May 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 31 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Plant-Fungi Interactions)

Abstract

:
Endophytic fungi are present in every plant, and crops are no exception. There are more than 50,000 edible plant species on the planet, but only 15 crops provide 90 percent of the global energy intake, and “the big four”—wheat, rice, maize and potato—are staples for about 5 billion people. Not only do the four staple crops contribute to global food security, but the endophytic fungi within their plant tissues are complex ecosystems that have been under scrutiny. This review presents an outline of the endophytic fungi and their secondary metabolites in four staple crops: wheat, rice, maize and potato. A total of 292 endophytic fungi were identified from the four major crops, with wheat having the highest number of 157 endophytic fungi. Potato endophytic fungi had the highest number of secondary metabolites, totaling 204 compounds, compared with only 23 secondary metabolites from the other three crops containing endophytic fungi. Some of the compounds are those with specific structural and pharmacological activities, which may be beneficial to agrochemistry and medicinal chemistry.

1. Introduction

There are more than 50,000 edible plant species on the planet, but only a few hundred contribute meaningfully to our diet [1]. In fact, just 15 crops provide 90 percent of the global energy intake and “the big four”—wheat, rice, maize and potato—are staples for about 5 billion people [2,3]. The most productive staple crop in the world is maize, which yielded 1.16 billion tons in 2022 alone, followed by wheat, rice and potatoes at 808, 776 and 375 million tons, respectively [4]. Such reliable, widespread crops are the basis of food systems and human subsistence.
Endophytic fungi are defined as fungi that spend the whole or part of their life cycle colonizing inter- and/or intracellularly inside the tissues of the host plants, typically including non-vascular plants, ferns and allies, conifers and angiosperms [5,6]. Considering crop–microbe interactions, endophytic fungi are also extremely important for agricultural sustainability. The presence of these endophytic fungi provides benefits to host plants, including enhanced resistance to herbivores and pests, increased competitiveness and improved tolerance to abiotic stresses such as the occurrence of heavy metals and high salinity, and may affect the yield and quality of the crop [6]. In a recent study, twelve strains of isolated endophytic fungi from the tissues of Cotoneaster multiflorus were shown to promote plant growth and performance, and enhance the fitness of their host plants’ resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [7]. Grasses are colonized by Acremonium endophytes, which are known to protect their hosts from insect attacks, nematodes and plant diseases [6]. In addition, endophytes have been recognized as important sources of a variety of new biologically active secondary metabolites potentially useful for human medicine, with anticancer, antimicrobial and other activities, and also could be potential sources of novel natural products with industrial and agrochemical potential [8,9,10].
It is estimated that there are over one million fungal endophytes existing in nature [11]. Up to now, just over 0.1 million fungi associated with higher organisms have been described [12]. Thus, the global diversity of most endophytic fungi is unknown, and still a large number of species and ecosystems need to be explored. This review brings insight into the diversity and bioactive potential of these endophytic fungi in four staple crops, which will contribute to their effective utilization.

2. Cultivation History and Pests and Diseases of the Four Staple Crops

2.1. Wheat

Wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. Aestivum) is a high-yielding crop that first originated in the Fertile Crescent region of the Middle East about 10,000 years ago and began to spread around the world [13]. Before 7000 B.C., Mesopotamia began to grow wheat and barley and raise goats [14]. Wheat was later utilized as a burial item for the Egyptian King Tutankhamun in 1325 B.C. [15]. It was not until the 16th century that the Spanish brought wheat to the New World [16]. Today, wheat is the staple food for more than 35% of the world’s population and is one of the major commodity grains, accounting for a large share of the international food trade [17].

2.2. Rice

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a cereal crop that produces edible grain seeds. The seeds can be eaten in their natural form, but rice may be more productive and reliable as its main crop. Rice is native to China, and spread westward through India to Europe and eastward to Korea and Japan [18]. Rice was first cultivated in China in 6000 B.C. until 2800 B.C., when it became one of the five grains grown in China [19]. After that, until 330 B.C., Alexander the Great brought back rice wine from India. Later, in 1519–1522, the Magellanic fleet saw rice in the Malay Archipelago [20,21]. In 1690, “Carolina Gold Rice” became an important industry in the New World [22]. Over the past 70 years, increases in rice yields have resulted from increases in grain yields per hectare; from 1950 to 1980, increases in yields were due to the introduction of dwarfing genes; and from 1980 to the present, increases in yields have been attributed to the development of high-yielding varieties, including hybrids, and to improvements in crop management practices, such as nitrogen fertilization [23,24,25]. Today, rice is the staple food for half of the world’s population. Rice is an important commodity, both in rice-growing regions and around the world.

2.3. Maize

Maize (Zea mays L.) is known as the “Queen of Cereals” and is one of the most extensively planted cereal crops in the world, ranking first in terms of production [26]. Beginning in 5000 B.C., maize was cultivated in Mesoamerica [27]. In 1492, Columbus discovered that the native peoples of the New World were growing corn and introduced it to the Old World, where it spread rapidly over the next two centuries [28,29]. In order to increase the yield of corn, it has been cross-pollinated with remarkable results [30]. Later, technological advances were achieved to extract corn oil from maize, which is appreciated for its high energy content, and there are indications that corn oil has uses for boosting biocontrol agent fungal efficiency [31]. In the 1960s, high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was developed for use in the manufacture of food and beverages. By the mid-1980s, it had completely replaced sucrose in most beverages in the United States and was consumed as a safe and reliable sweetener [32]. Approximately two-thirds of today’s maize is utilized largely for animal feed, but maize may also be used as a prime extract for motor fuel ethanol, opening up a new avenue for the development of sustainable biofuels [33].

2.4. Potato

Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) are an essential staple crop, ranking second only to wheat, rice and maize. At the moment, 1.3 billion people worldwide use potatoes, and this type of root “food” is becoming increasingly popular in developing nations; nevertheless, potato whole flour preservation time can be up to 15 years, and some governments have even recognized potato as a strategic reserve food. Archaeological evidence suggests that the earliest humans to encounter and potentially consume the potato lived on the western coast of South America around 13,000 years ago during the Last Ice Age. During the Last Ice Age, when glaciers receded from the Altiplano, prototypes of farmed potatoes arose in the mountains of modern-day Peru and Bolivia [34,35,36]. The oldest potato samples date back some 8000 years, and the domestication of the potato probably took place around Lake Titicaca, on the present-day border between Peru and Bolivia, and then gradually spread to the surrounding area [34,37]. The first step in domesticating potatoes is to select bitter-free tubers. Following that, the selection of non-bitter potato varieties and their cultivation and dissemination led to the potato’s domestication, allowing it to spread far over the world. China is by far the largest potato producer, accounting for 32% of the global planted area and 27% of global potato production [38].

3. Endophytic Fungi

Endophytic fungi (EFs) are a fascinating host-associated fungal community that colonizes the intercellular or intracellular regions of host tissues, benefiting their hosts while obtaining an advantage [39]. EFs play an important role in agricultural growth and development by controlling pests and diseases, producing growth regulators and boosting crop adaptation to harsh circumstances [40,41].

3.1. Wheat Endophytic Fungi

The present research identified fungi of the genera Alternaria, Acremonium, Cladosporium, Chaetomium, Epicoccum, Fusarium and Phoma, which have been described as wheat endophytes in the literature [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. The species Aureobasidium pullulans were identified in almost all the studied wheat cultivars [42]. Table 1 shows the comparison between the reviewed wheat endophytic fungi and the plant organs from which they originate. The vast majority of the wheat endophytic fungi reviewed belong to the genera Alternaria, Bipolaris, Cladosporium, Epicoccum, Fusarium, Penicillium and Sarocladium. Only nine endophytic fungi—Alternaria sp., Cladosporium sp., Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium sp., Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium olsonii, Penicillium sp., Sarocladium sp. and Sarocladium strictum—can be isolated from the roots, leaves, stems and fruits of the plant. In addition, the root endophytic fungi were the most diverse. Some representatives of the Trichoderma genus, isolated from wheat, can reduce the severity of diseases caused by P. triticis, Mycosphaerella graminicola, and B. sorokiniana and A. alternata in wheat [42]. Furthermore, the genera Alternaria and Cladosporium are capable of spreading vertically through the seed and thus infecting wheat [49].

3.2. Rice Endophytic Fungi

The vast majority of reported rice endophytic fungi belong to the genera Acremonium, Aspergillus, Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Penicillium, Sarocladium, Talaromyces and Trichoderma (Table 2). The dominant fungal genera Penicillium and Aspergillus coexisted in the stems and roots (Table 2) [50]. Aspergillus flavus, Eupenicillium javanicum, Microsphaeropsis arundinis, Penicillium rubens, Talaromyces pinophilus and Trichoderma zelobreve were simultaneously detected in the roots, shoots and stems of the rice plants (Table 2). Only two strains of the endophytic fungi Acremonium sp. and Arthrobotrys sp. were able to coexist in the roots, leaves, stems and fruits of the plant, and Aspergillus ustus and Sarocladium oryzae DX-THL3 colonized just the leaves (Table 2). Furthermore, practically all rice endophytic fungi were discovered from the roots (Table 2). Several studies have shown that rice endophytic fungi promote rice growth; for example, Cladosporium sphaerospermum produces gibberellins (GA7 and GA4), which increase rice biomass [51,52]. In addition, Talaromyces pinophilus, Aspergillus flavus and Trichoderma sp. were able to increase several plant growth parameters such as plant height, the number of tillers, total chlorophyll, photosynthesis rate, etc., as well as the accumulation of phytochemicals (total phenolic compounds and anthocyanins) and antioxidant capacity in rice seeds [53].

3.3. Maize Endophytic Fungi

The most active maize endophytic fungi were Acremonium, Aspergillus, Chaetomium, Didymella, Fusarium, Gibberella, Penicillium, Talaromyces and Trichoderma (Table 3). Several fungal strains of these genera have been reported in plant mutualistic interactions. The genus Penicillium is considered ubiquitous, living in debris, water, soil and forests [54,55], as well as the endophytes of wheat and rice (Table 1 and Table 2), and Didymella is a genus with saprophytic and parasitic species [54]. The Trichoderma and Cladosporium species are known to be associated with the rhizosphere and endosphere of plants, with antagonistic properties [56]. Most of the maize endophytic fungi were found in the roots of the plant, of which Pyrenochaeta terrestris was a major part, followed by Fusarium oxysporum and Periconia macrospinosa (Table 3) [57]. In addition, endophytic fungi endemic to maize roots include Diaporthe longicolla and Drechslera sp. [57]. Acremonium sp., Chaetomium sp., Didymella americana, Didymella heteroderae, Didymella pomorum, Eupenicillium javanicum, Eutypella scoparia, Monocillium mucidum, Penicillium subrubescens, Pleosporales sp., Rhizomucor sp., Sarocladium zae and Sordariomycetes sp. were isolated only from maize leaves (Table 3). Acremonium strictum, Aspergillus carneus, Fusarium andiyazi, Fusarium concentricum, Gibberella circinata, Trichoderma koningiopsis and Ustilago sp. were isolated only from maize stems (Table 3). Furthermore, only Fusarium proliferatum could be isolated from the roots, leaves, stems and fruits of maize (Table 3).

3.4. Potato Endophytic Fungi

There have been less studies on potato endophytic fungi than on wheat, rice and maize endophytic fungi. Almost all endophytic fungi originated in potato roots, while no endophytic fungi originated in potato fruits. Aspergillus carneus, Bipolaris eleusines, Boeremia exigua, Cephalotrichum gorgonifer, Chaetomium subaffine, Trichothecium crotocinigenum, Xylaria curta E10 and Xylaria cf. curta are all endophytic fungi originating from potato roots, leaves and stems (Table 4). Among other things, it was shown that Boeremia exigua showed good inhibitory activities on the growth of Phytophthora infestans, which causes late blight to the potato plant as well as to other plants [58]. Chaetomium globosum is currently isolated only from potato stems (Table 4). In addition, Colletotrichum coccodes and Cylindrocarpon destructans are common endophytic fungi in potato roots and both are weak plant pathogens (Table 4) [59].
Table 1. Endophytic fungi isolated from wheat plants.
Table 1. Endophytic fungi isolated from wheat plants.
Fungal EndophytesOrgansFungal EndophytesOrgans
RootsLeavesStemsFruitsRootsLeavesStemsFruits
Achroiostachys sp. [42] Gibellulopsis sp. [42]
Acremonium sclerotigenum [42] Gloeotinia sp. [42]
Acremonium sp. [42] Helicocephalum sp. [46]
Akanthomyces sp. [42] Isaria farinose [42]
Alternaria alternata [42,60] Leptobacillium leptobactrum [42]
Alternaria chalastospora [49] Marasmius sp. [42]
Alternaria conjuncta [42] Meyerozyma sp. [42]
Alternaria hordeicola [42] Microdochium bolleyi [42,61,62]
Alternaria infectoria [42,46] Microdochium nivale [61]
Alternaria rosae [42] Microdochium sp. [42]
Alternaria sp. [42]Moesziomyces bullatus [42]
Alternaria tenuissima [42,61] Moesziomyces sp. [42]
Anthracocystis sp. [42] Neonectria sp. [42]
Arthrinium sp. [42] Neosetophoma samarorum [62]
Aureobasidium pullulans [42] Nigrospora gorlenkoana [42]
Backusella sp. [42] Nigrospora sp. [46]
Bipolaris cynodontis [60] Penicilium amphipolaria [42]
Bipolaris sorokiniana [42,60,62] Penicillium chrysogenum [42]
Bipolaris sp. [60] Penicillium crustosum [42]
Cadophora sp. [42] Penicillium digitatum [42]
Candida albicans [46] Penicillium expansum [42]
Candida sake [63] Penicillium olsonii [42]
Cephalosporium sp. [46] Penicillium sp. [42]
Chaetomium globosum [60] Periconia macrospinosa [42,62]
Chaetomium sp. [42,49] Periconia sp. [42]
Chrysosporium pseudomerdarium [42] Phaeosphaeria nodorum [62]
Cladorrhinum flexuosum [62] Phlebia sp. [42]
Cladosporium allicinum [42] Phoma eupyrena [42]
Cladosporium cladosporioides [42] Phoma sp. [42]
Cladosporium delicatulum [63] Phomopsis sp. [60]
Cladosporium herbarum [60] Plectosphaerella cucumerina [42]
Cladosporium oxysporum [61] Pleospora herbarum [60]
Cladosporium sp. [42] Pseudogymnoascus pannorum [46]
Clonostachys candelabrum [42] Pseudozyma flocculosa [42]
Cochliobolus spicifer [46]Pyrenochaeta sp. [62]
Cryptococcus sp. [60] Rhizoctonia solani [42]
Curvularia lunata [46] Rhodotorula rubra [60]
Curvularia spicifera [46] Sarocladium sp. [42]
Didymella exitialis [61] Sarocladium strictum [42]
Didymella pomorum [42] Septoria tritici [46]
Didymella sp. [42] Setophoma terrestris [42]
Engyodontium album [42] Setosphaeria pedicellata [42]
Epicoccum nigrum [60,61,62] Simplicillium lamellicola [62]
Epicoccum sp. [42] Stachybotrys sp. [46]
Filobasidium chernovii [63] Stagonospora nodorum [61]
Fusarium avenaceum [42] Stemphylium botryosum [46]
Fusarium culmorum [61] Stemphylium vesicarium [42,63]
Fusarium equiseti [62] Stemphylium sp. [60]
Fusarium graminearum [61] Talaromyces aculeatus [42]
Fusarium incarnatum [62] Trichoderma hamatum [42]
Fusarium oxysporum [42,46,62]Trichoderma koningii [42]
Fusarium poae [42] Trichoderma viride [42]
Fusarium proliferatum [42] Trichoderma sp. [42]
Fusarium redolens [42] Ulocladium sp. [46]
Fusarium solani [42] Umbelopsis sp. [42]
Fusarium sp. [42]Valsa friesii [62]
Fusarium temperatum [42] Waitea circinata [42]
√ Present in plant organs.
Table 2. Endophytic fungi isolated from rice plants.
Table 2. Endophytic fungi isolated from rice plants.
Fungal EndophytesOrgansFungal EndophytesOrgans
RootsLeavesStemsFruitsRootsLeavesStemsFruits
Absidia sp. [64] Penicillium chrysogenum [50]
Acremonium cellulolyticus [65] Penicillium citrinum [65]
Acremonium sp. [64]Penicillium decumbens [50]
Arthrobotrys sp. [64]Penicillium griseofulvum [65]
Aspergillus aureolus [65] Penicillium limosum [65]
Aspergillus flavus [66] Penicillium pinophilum [65]
Aspergillus ochraceous [50] Penicillium rubens [67]
Aspergillus udagawae [65] Penicillium simplicissimum [68]
Aspergillus ustus [69] Penicillium sp. [65]
Aspergillus welwitschiae Ocstreb1 [70] Pestalotiopsis disseminata [65]
Aspergillus sp. [64] Phialophora verrucosa [50]
Candida tropicalis [51] Phoma sp. [68]
Ceriporia lacerata [65] Piriformospora indica [71]
Chaetomium brasiliense [69] Pseudophialophora oryzae sp. Nov [72]
Chaetomium globosum [50] Pyricularia sacc [64]
Chaetomium pilosum [65] Rhizoctonia solani [50]
Cladosporium cladosporioides [50] Sarocladium oryzae [65]
Cladosporium sphaerospermum [51] Sarocladium oryzae DX-THL3 [73]
Coniothyrium fuckelli [50] Speiropsis pedatospora [50]
Cylindrocladium sp. [64] Stemphylium botryosum [50]
Emmia lacerata [65] Talaromyces adpressus [70]
Eupenicillium javanicum [67] Talaromyces argentinensis [70]
Fusarium oxysporum [50] Talaromyces cellulolyticus [65]
Fusarium solani [65] Talaromyces funiculosus [65]
Fusarium sp. [64] Talaromyces pinophilus [66]
Galactomyces geotrichum [68] Talaromyces purpureogenus [65]
Humicola fuscoatra [50] Talaromyces sp. [65]
Marasmius nigrobrunneus [65] Thielavia sp. [65]
Microsphaeropsis arundinis [67] Thielavia terricola [65]
Mucor irregularis [65] Trichocomaceae sp. [65]
Neocosmospora rubicola [65] Trichoderma hamatum [65]
Neosartorya fischeri [65] Trichoderma paraviridescens [65]
Neosartorya sp. [65] Trichoderma sp. [65]
Nigrospora oryzae [60] Trichoderma viridae [50]
Paecilomyces varioti [50] Trichoderma zelobreve [66]
√ Present in plant organs.
Table 3. Endophytic fungi isolated from maize plants.
Table 3. Endophytic fungi isolated from maize plants.
Fungal EndophytesOrgansFungal EndophytesOrgans
RootsLeavesStemsFruitsRootsLeavesStemsFruits
Acremonium sp. [68] Fusarium ventricosum [74]
Acremonium strictum [75] Fusarium verticillioides [75,76]
Alternaria alternata [74,77] Gibberella circinata [68]
Aspergillus carneus [68] Gibberella fujikuroi [68]
Aspergillus flavus [75] Gibberella intermedia [68]
Aspergillus fumigatus [75] Gibberella moniliformis [68]
Aspergillus insuetu80s [54] Microsphaeropsis arundinis [54]
Aspergillus niger [75] Monocillium mucidum [54]
Aspergillus terreus [77] Mucor circinelloides [77]
Aspergillus tubingensis [68] Penicillium aurantiogriseum [75]
Bipolaris tetramera [77] Penicillium citrinum [74,76]
Bipolaris zeicola [75] Penicillium glaucoroseum [54]
Chaetomium cochliodes [74] Penicillium griseofulvum [54]
Chaetomium murorum [75] Penicillium janthinellum [54]
Chaetomium sp. [75] Penicillium ludwigii [54]
Chaetomium subaffine [74] Penicillium ochrochloron [68]
Cladosporium cladosporioides [74] Penicillium oxalicum [75]
Cladosporium sphaerospermum [75] Penicillium polonicum [75]
Clonostachys rosea [54] Penicillium pulvillorum [54]
Diaporthe longicolla [57] Penicillium subrubescens [54]
Didymella americana [54] Periconia macrospinosa [57]
Didymella heteroderae [54] Pleosporales sp. [68]
Didymella pomorum [54] Pyrenochaetopsis microspora [54]
Drechslera sp. [57] Rhizomucor pusillus [75]
Epicoccum purpurascens [74] Rhizomucor sp. [68]
Epicoccum sorghi [68] Rhizopus oryzae [74]
Eupenicillium javanicum [68] Sarocladium zae [54]
Eutypella scoparia [68] Sarocladium zeae [75,78]
Fusarium andiyazi [68] Setophoma terrestris [57]
Fusarium concentricum [68] Sordariomycetes sp. [68]
Fusarium denticulatum [68] Talaromyces calidicanicus [54]
Fusarium equiseti [68] Talaromyces pinophilus [68]
Fusarium graminearum [77] Talaromyces verroculosus [54]
Fusarium incarnatum [68] Thermomyces dupontii [75]
Fusarium lateritium [54] Trichoderma asperellum [74]
Fusarium moniliformis [54] Trichoderma gamsii [75]
Fusarium oxysporum [54,57,74] Trichoderma harzianum [75]
Fusarium proliferatum [74,75,77]Trichoderma koningiopsis [68]
Fusarium sacchari [76] Ustilago sp. [75]
Fusarium sp. [68] Verticillium lecanii [74]
Fusarium succisae [68]
√ Present in plant organs.
Table 4. Endophytic fungi isolated from potato plants.
Table 4. Endophytic fungi isolated from potato plants.
Fungal EndophytesOrgansFungal EndophytesOrgans
RootsLeavesStemsFruitsRootsLeavesStemsFruits
Acremonium sp. [59] Fusarium sp. [59]
Aspergillus carneus [79] Microdochium sp. [59]
Bipolaris eleusines [80] Mycelium sterile [59]
Boeremia exigua [58] Plectosporium tabacinum [59]
Cephalotrichum asperulum [81] Trichosporon sp. [59]
Cephalotrichum gorgonifer [81] Trichothecium crotocinigenum [82]
Cephalotrichum tenuissimum [81] Ulocladium sp. [59]
Chaetomium globosum [83] Verticillium dahliae [59]
Chaetomium subaffine [81] Xylaria curta E10 [84,85]
Colletotrichum coccodes [59] Xylaria cf. curta [86,87]
Cylindrocarpon destructans [59]
√ Present in plant organs.

4. Secondary Metabolites

Endophytic fungi have accumulated a wide repertoire of chemicals containing at least several hundred thousand secondary metabolites [88,89]. Secondary metabolites play important roles in defense, stress tolerance, reproduction, plant growth regulation and crop yield and are recognized as a novel basis for potential bio-pesticides [90,91]. In addition, secondary metabolites derived from endophytic fungi are also an important source for human drug discovery due to their complex structures and wide range of pharmacological activities. Based on their structural skeleton, secondary metabolites derived from four staple crops can be classified as ketones, terpenoids and alkaloids.

4.1. Ketone Compounds

4.1.1. Chromones

Chromones are oxygen-containing heterocyclic compounds with a benzoannelated γ-pyrone ring being chromone (4H-chromen-4-one, 4H-1-benzopyran-4-one), the parent compound [92]. Eleven dimeric chromanones, paecilins F-P (212) and compounds 1, 1315 were isolated from the potato endophyte fungus Xylaria curta E10 (Figure 1). Compound 1 showed antifungal activity against the human pathogenic fungus, Candida albicans, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 μg/mL, while compounds 8 and 10 showed antimicrobial activity against gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli with the same minimum inhibitory concentration of 16 μg/mL [93]. Eighteen chromones (1633) were isolated from the potato endophytic fungus Bipolaris eleusines, of which 16, 18 and 23 contained chlorine in their structures (Figure 1), and both compounds 16 and 31 inhibited the cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 with IC50 values of 14.48 μM and 17.99 μM, respectively [94]. Compounds 21 and 22 showed weak inhibitory activities against Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus with the inhibition rates of 56.3 and 32.0%, respectively, at the concentration of 128 μg/mL [95].

4.1.2. Other Ketones

Five polyketides (3438) were isolated from the potato endophytic fungus Aspergillus carneus, all of which showed moderate antifungal activity against plant pathogens (Figure 2). Compounds 3436 and 38 inhibited the production of nitric oxide in the lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cancer cell line RAW264.7, with half-maximum inhibitory concentration values of 13.36, 30.16, 30.16 and 51.47 μM, respectively. Compound 38 showed potent antioxidant activity [96]. Nine depsidones boremexins (4149) were isolated from the potato endophytic fungus Boeremia exigua, among which compounds 4143, 4647 and 49 inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide production in RAW264.7 macrophages with IC50 values ranging from 19.4 to 34.4 μM, and compounds 42 and 48 were cytotoxic to the human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) with IC50 values of 33.1 and 4.0 μM, respectively [58]. In addition, two sesquiterpene–xanthenone adducts, bisphenols I and J (39 and 40) (Figure 2), resistant to phytopathogenic fungi (Alternaria solani) were isolated from cultures of the potato endophyte fungus B. eleusines, and they showed potent inhibitory activity against A. solani with MIC values of 8 and 16 μg mL−1, respectively [97]. The compounds leptosphaeric acid (50) and cillifuranone (51) (Figure 2) were isolated from the wheat endophytic fungus Microdochium majus 99049, which showed activity against the HUH-7 human hepatoma cell with IC50 values at 80 μg/mL [96]. The compounds (+)-dehydrovomifoliol (52) and macrolactin A (53) (Figure 2) were isolated from the maize endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. and 53 showed significant antifungal activities against the plant pathogen Alternaria alternata with an MIC of 1 μg/mL [98].

4.2. Terpenoid Compounds

Terpenoids are a type of natural product made up of basic “C5” units known as isoprene. Thus, terpenoids are classified according to the number of isoprene units, with sesquiterpenoids (C15), diterpenoids (C20), sesterterpenoids (C25) and others [99].

4.2.1. Sesquiterpenoids

Sixteen sativene-type sesquiterpenoids (5469) (Figure 3) as well as three seco-longifolene sesquiterpenoids (7072) and one sesquiterpene dimer (73) were obtained from cultures of the potato endophytic fungus B. eleusines. Among them, compounds 61 and 63 inhibited LPS-induced nitric oxide production in RAW264.7 macrophages with IC50 values of 23.8 and 17.5 μM, respectively, while none of the other compounds showed significant biological activity [100,101,102]. Eighteen trichothecene sesquiterpenoids, trichothecrotocins A–B (7475) (Figure 3), trichothecrotocins K–S (8889, 7682) and compounds 8387, 9091 were obtained from the liquid ferment of the potato endophyte fungus Trichothecium crotocinigenum [103]. Trichothecrotocins A and M have a rare 6,11-epoxy moiety in the trichothecene family. Additionally, the trichothecrotocins A and B possessed antiplantopathogenic activity with an MIC value of 8–128 μg/mL [103]. The trichothecrotocins Q and R as well as compound 87 showed strong inhibitory activity against the human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) with IC50 values of 7.56, 2.34 and 3.32 μM, respectively, and compound 85 showed strong cytotoxicity to the cancer cell line Hela with an IC50 value of 0.52 μM [103]. Constitutive relationship analysis indicated that 11,12-epoxide and the 8,9-double bond should be responsible for the cytotoxicity and it has been demonstrated that trichothecrotocin R induces apoptosis by arresting the G2/M phase intrinsic pathway [103,104,105]. And two merosesquiterpenoid racemates with a novel 6/6-5/5/5 fused ring system (92, 93) (Figure 3) were obtained from T. crotocinigenum, which exhibited antiplant pathogenic activity with MIC values of 8–128 μg/mL [103]. Eleven merosesquiterpenoids, trichothecrotocins D–J (9497, 99, 101102) and compounds 98, 100, 103104 (Figure 3) were also isolated from T. crotocinigenum and compounds 9498 and 100 showed antifungal activity against four plant pathogens (P. infestans, A. solani, R. solan and F. oxysporum) with MIC values of 8–128 μg/mL [105]. Eleven sesquiterpenes fusarchlamols A–F (105106, 111114) and compounds 107110 and 115 (Figure 3) were isolated from the maize endophytic fungus Fusarium sp., of which compounds 105107 and 113114 effectively inhibited A. alternata, a phytopathogen found in Coffea arabica, with MIC values of 1–2 μg/mL [98].

4.2.2. Diterpenoids

Two diterpenoids (116117) (Figure 4) were isolated from the coffee medium of the maize endophyte fungus Fusarium sp. Among them, 117 showed significant antifungal activity against the phytopathogen A. alternata from Coffee arabica with an MIC value of 2 μg/mL [98]. A casbane-type diterpene (118) (Figure 4) was obtained from UV-irradiated rice leaves, which inhibited the spore germination (IC50 30 ppm) and germ tube growth (IC50 10 ppm) of the rice blast fungus [106]. Eight diterpenoids (119126) (Figure 4) were obtained from rice husks, of which 122123 and 125126 exhibited moderate α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with IC50 values ranging from 21.33 to 81.39 μg/mL, respectively [107]. One diterpenoid, oryzalactone (127), also containing a lactone ring, was obtained from rice leaves, which inhibited conidial germination and germ tube elongation, suggesting that they have antifungal activity against P. oryzae [108]. Ten diterpenes and diterpene derivatives (128137) (Figure 4) were isolated from UV-irradiated rice leaves. Compounds 128 and 130 exhibited weak antifungal activity and may be biosynthetic intermediates of the rice phytotoxins momilactones and oryzalexin S, respectively [109]. Compounds 132 and 133 showed the same and relatively high inhibitory activity against the mycelial growth of M. oryzae [109]. The treatment of suspension-cultured rice cells with mycelial extracts of the potato pathogenic fungus Phytophthora infestans produced large amounts of diterpenoids (138142). The ED50 values of these compounds (138142) in preventing the spore germination of the rice pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea were 6, 20, 4, 7 and 25 μg/mL, respectively, and indicated that the hydroxyl group at the C-1 position was the main functional moiety for the high antifungal activity of these compounds [110,111]. The benzene ring-containing diterpenoids abietoryzins A–E (143147) (Figure 4) were detected in rice leaves infected with the pathogen, and both of them inhibited the germ tube elongation of both phytopathogenic fungi, Pyricularia oryzae and Bipolaris oryzae, and their effective concentrations were lower than those found in the conidial germination assay; the IC50 values for germ tube elongation were more than 10 times smaller than those for conidial germination [112]. Moreover, 143, 146 and 147 had relatively strong activities on the elongation of P. oryzae with IC50 values of 6.6, 7.8 and 8.1 μM, respectively, and 144 and 145 had relatively strong activities on the elongation of B. oryzae with IC50 values of 9.8 μM [112]. In addition, a series of diterpenoids (148156) (Figure 4) have also been identified from rice blast leaves infected with P. oryzae [113,114,115].

4.2.3. Sesterterpenoids

Four sesterterpenoids (157160) (Figure 5) were isolated from the wheat solid ferment of the potato endophyte fungus B. eleusines, of which compound 157 showed moderate antifungal activity against Epidermophyton floccosum with 99.81% inhibition at a concentration of 100 μM [111].

4.2.4. Other Terpenoids

Six 6/6/6/6-fused hexaketide−terpenoid hybrids bipolariterpenes A–C (161163) (Figure 6) and compounds 164166 were isolated from the potato endophytic fungus B. eleusines, and compound 161 exhibited weak antifungal activity against E. floccosum, inhibiting it by 65.06% at 100 μM [111]. Two steroidal compounds (167168) (Figure 6) were isolated from the wheat pathogenic fungus M. majus 99049 [96]. Compound 167 was active against HeLa cells with an IC50 value of 51.9 μg/mL. In addition, 167 also showed weak anti-mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) with an MIC value at 80 μg/mL. And 167 showed moderate anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity with an MIC value of 25 μg/mL, while 168 showed weak anti-MRSA activity (MIC = 100 μg/mL) [96]. Eight steroidal compounds (169176) (Figure 6) were isolated from the endophytic fungus Sarocladium oryzae DX-THL3 from the leaf of Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.), and compounds 169170 and 172175 exhibited antibacterial activity against S. aureus with MIC values of 64, 4, 8, 1, 4 and 16 μg/mL, 173 also showed antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis with an MIC value of 64 μg/mL, compounds 170, 173 and 175 showed some potent antibacterial activity against E. coli with MIC 64 μg/mL, and all of these compounds were inactive against Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzicola at 128 μg/mL [73].

4.3. Alkaloid Compounds

Alkaloids were originally defined as alkaline substances extracted from a plant with a biological activity, and later extended to nitrogen-containing compounds derived from secondary or specialized metabolism [116].

4.3.1. Cytochalasins

Fourteen pyrrolidine/perhydroanthracene (5/6/6/6 tetracyclic skeleton)-fused ring systems of cytochalasins (177190) (Figure 7) were isolated from the potato endophytic fungus X. curta E10. Compounds 177 and 181 exhibited potent inhibitory activity against the MCF-7 cell line with IC50 values of 2.03 and 0.85 μM, and compound 179 exhibited moderate inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 13.9 μM, and it was hypothesized that the hydroxyl group at the C-7 position and the acetylation of OH-21 might be the key factors for the cytotoxic activity [84,85]. Compounds 191195 (Figure 7) were similarly isolated from the potato endophyte fungus Xylaria cf. curta, in which compound 191 showed a significant and selective inhibitory effect on LPS-induced B lymphocyte cell proliferation (IC50 value of 2.42 μM), which was 29 times more than against T-cell [117]. In view of the structure/activity relationship, polar substitutions at positions 5 and 6 may be important for the inhibitory effects on B-cell proliferation. The oxygen substitution at position 7 could be a key pharmacophore for immunosuppressive activities, and the compounds with 7β-OH or 7-oxo have better activity than that of compounds with 7α-OH. Moreover, the substitution of 21-OAc could increase the immunosuppressive activity as well [117]. Cytochalasins D1 and C1 (196, 197), which possess a unique eleven-membered macrocycle with an oxygen bridge, were also obtained from this fungus, and they showed moderate cytotoxicity against the HL-60 cell line with IC50 values of 12.7 and 22.3 μM, respectively [118]. An unprecedented 6/7/5/6/6/6 fused ring system with two chlorine substitutions, xylarichalasin A (198), was also obtained from this fungus, which showed significant cytotoxicity against the SMMC-7721 and MCF-7 cell lines (IC50 values of 8.6, 6.3 μM), superior to the positive drug cisplatin [86]. Three cytochalasins (curtachalasins C-E, 199201) with an unprecedented bicyclic [3.3.1] lactam core structure and thirteen 19,20-epoxycytochalasans (201214) were isolated from extracts of the liquid fermentation of X. cf. curta [87,119]. Compound 199 showed significant resistance reversal activity against fluconazole-resistant C. albicans, compound 208 showed significant specific cytotoxicity against the HL-60 cell line with an IC50 value of 1.11 μM, and compounds 202 and 213 were moderately cytotoxic against the cancer cell line HL-60 (IC50 values of 13.31 and 10.04 μM, respectively) [87,119]. Eight cytochalasins boerechalasins A-G (215221) and compound 222 were isolated from the potato endophytic fungus B. exigua, and compound 220 exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against the MCF-7 cell line, with an IC50 value of 22.8 μM [120].

4.3.2. Other Alkaloids

Three alkaloid derivatives (223225) (Figure 8) were isolated from the wheat endophytic fungus M. majus 99049, and they showed weak inhibitory activity against the HUH-7 human hepatoma cell with IC50 values at 80 μg/mL [96]. The compound caffeine (226) was isolated from the maize endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. and it showed significant antifungal activities against the plant pathogen A. alternata with MICs of 1 μg/mL [98]. Pipecolisporin (227), a new pipecolic acid containing hexapeptide, was isolated from cultures of the wheat endophytic fungus Nigrospora oryzae. The compound (227) displayed remarkable antiparasitic activity against Plasmodium Falciparum and Trypanosoma cruzi, with an IC50 value comparable to that of benznidazole, currently used in the treatment of Chagas disease, and no toxicity against a panel of five human carcinoma cell lines [121].

5. Conclusions

This review evaluates the endophytic fungi and secondary metabolites of four major crops: wheat, rice, maize and potato. Wheat had the highest number of endophytic fungi, followed by maize, rice and potato. Although potato endophytic fungi were the least abundant, they had the highest number of metabolites. In addition, 12 secondary metabolites were derived from wheat endophytic fungi, 8 compounds from rice endophytic fungi and only 3 compounds from maize endophytic fungi. Secondary metabolites derived from potato endophytic fungi play important roles in antimicrobial, plant growth regulation and human drug discovery. Although the chemical composition of endophytic fungi has been the focus of natural product research, only a small fraction of the chemical composition of endophytic fungi from the other three staple food crops (wheat, rice and maize) has been explored. Therefore, the diversity of endophytic fungi related to the four staple foods as well as their chemical composition still needs to be explored.

Author Contributions

Y.F. and B.S. conceptualized the review; Y.F. wrote the review with the help of B.S.; B.S. reviewed the text and structured the review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2022CFB920), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, South-Central MinZu University (CZQ23047).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Olmos, E.; Roman-Garcia, I.; Reguera, M.; Mestanza, C.; Fernandez-Garcia, N. An update on the nutritional profiles of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), and chia (Salvia hispanica L.), three key species with the potential to contribute to food security worldwide. JSFA Rep. 2022, 2, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gruber, K. Agrobiodiversity: The living library. Nature 2017, 544, S8–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, H.; Xu, F.; Wu, Y.; Hu, H.H.; Dai, X.F. Progress of potato staple food research and industry development in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 2924–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Our World in Data. 2024. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=table&time=latest&facet=none&Food=Potatoes&Metric=Production&Per+Capita=false&country=ZAF%3BhideControls~OWID_WRL (accessed on 17 April 2024).
  5. Li, J.; Zhao, J.L.; Xu, L.J.; Zhou, L.G.; Li, X.L.; Wang, J.G. Endophytic fungi from rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 733–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gouda, S.; Das, G.; Sen, S.K.; Shin, H.-S.; Patra, J.K. Endophytes: A Treasure House of Bioactive Compounds of Medicinal Importance. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lü, Z.W.; Liu, H.Y.; Wang, C.L.; Chen, X.; Huang, Y.X.; Zhang, M.M.; Huang, Q.L.; Zhang, G.F. Isolation of endophytic fungi from Cotoneaster multiflorus and screening of drought-tolerant fungi and evaluation of their growth-promoting effects. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1267404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ribeiro, B.A.; da Mata, T.B.; Canuto, G.A.B.; Silva, E.O. Chemical Diversity of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Brazilian Endophytic Fungi. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gunatilaka, A.A.L. Natural products from plant-associated microorganisms: Distribution, structural diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 509–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fadiji, A.E.; Babalola, O.O. Elucidating Mechanisms of Endophytes Used in Plant Protection and Other Bioactivities with Multifunctional Prospects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhunjun, C.S.; Phukhamsakda, C.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Saxena, R.K.; Li, Q.R. Do all fungi have ancestors with endophytic lifestyles? Fungal Divers. 2023, 125, 73–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ratnaweera, P.B.; de Silva, E.D. Endophytic Fungi: A Remarkable Source of Biologically Active Secondary Metabolites. In Endophytes: Crop Productivity and Protection. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity; Maheshwari, D., Annapurna, K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
  13. de Sousa, T.; Ribeiro, M.; Sabença, C.; Igrejas, G. The 10,000-Year Success Story of Wheat! Foods 2021, 10, 2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hatziminaoglou, Y.; Boyazoglu, J. The goat in ancient civilisations: From the Fertile Crescent to the Aegean Sea. Small Rumin. Res. 2004, 51, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saffirio, L. Food and dietary habits in ancient Egypt. J. Hum. Evol. 1972, 1, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Capparelli, A.; Lema, V.; Giovannetti, M.; Raffino, R. The introduction of Old World crops (wheat, barley and peach) in Andean Argentina during the 16th century a.d.: Archaeobotanical and ethnohistorical evidence. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2005, 14, 472–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shiferaw, B.; Smale, M.; Braun, H.J.; Duveiller, E.; Reynolds, M.; Muricho, G. Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security. Food Sec. 2013, 5, 291–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gutaker, R.M.; Groen, S.C.; Bellis, E.S.; Choi, J.Y.; Pires, I.S.; Bocinsky, R.K.; Slayton, E.R.; Wilkins, O.; Castillo, C.C.; Negrão, S.; et al. Genomic history and ecology of the geographic spread of rice. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, W.M.; Ding, J.L.; Shu, J.W.; Chen, W. Exploration of early rice farming in China. Quat. Int. 2010, 227, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taylor, E. A Log-Book of Magellan’s Voyage, 1519–1522. J. Navig. 1964, 17, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bellwood, P. The Checkered Prehistory of Rice Movement Southwards as a Domesticated Cereal—From the Yangzi to the Equator. Rice 2011, 4, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carney, J. The African origins of Carolina rice culture. Ecumene 2000, 7, 125–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W. Changes in rice yields in China since 1980 associated with cultivar improvement, climate and crop management. Field. Crop. Res. 2012, 136, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, S.; Khush, G.S.; Virk, P.; Tang, Q.; Zou, Y. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crop. Res. 2008, 108, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peng, S.; Tang, Q.; Zou, Y. Current Status and Challenges of Rice Production in China. Plant. Prod. Sci. 2009, 12, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Salakinkop, S.R.; Talekar, S.C.; Patil, C.R.; Patil, S.B.; Jat, S.L.; Iliger, K.S.; Manjulatha, G.; Harlapur, S.I.; Kachapur, R.M. Sustainable intensification of climate-resilient maize–chickpea system in semi-arid tropics through assessing factor productivity. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. García-Lara, S.; Serna-Saldivar, S.O. Chapter 1-Corn History and Culture. In Corn, 3rd ed.; Serna-Saldivar, S.O., Ed.; AACC International Press: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cherniwchan, J.; Moreno-Cruz, J. Maize and precolonial Africa. J. Dev. Econ. 2019, 136, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, S.; Kung, J.K. Of maize and men: The effect of a New World crop on population and economic growth in China. J. Econ. Growth. 2016, 21, 71–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bannert, M.; Stamp, P. Cross-pollination of maize at long distance. Eur. J. Agron. 2007, 27, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, N.; Vasudev, S.; Yadava, D.K.; Chaudhary, D.P.; Prabhu, K.V. Oil Improvement in Maize: Potential and Prospects. In Maize: Nutrition Dynamics and Novel Uses; Chaudhary, D.P., Kumar, S., Langyan, S., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  32. White, J.S.; Nicklas, T.A. High-Fructose Corn Syrup Use in Beverages: Composition, Manufacturing, Properties, Consumption, and Health Effects. In Beverage Impacts on Health and Nutrition, 2nd ed.; Wilson, T., Temple, N.J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Han, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X. Impacts of China’s bioethanol policy on the global maize market: A partial equilibrium analysis to 2030. Food. Secur. 2022, 14, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. De Jong, H. Impact of the Potato on Society. Am. J. Potato Res. 2016, 93, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ugent, D.; Dillehay, T.; Ramirez, C. Potato remains from a late pleistocene settlement in southcentral Chile. Econ. Bot. 1987, 41, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ugent, D.; Peterson, L.W. Archeologial remains of potato and sweet potato in Peru. CIP Circular. 1988, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  37. Garzón, F. Sociedades precolombinas asociadas a la domesticación y cultivo de la papa (Solanum tuberosum) en Sudamérica. Rev. Latinoam. Papa 2016, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Z.J.; Liu, H.; Zeng, F.K.; Yang, Y.C.; Xu, D.; Zhao, Y.C.; Liu, X.F.; Kaur, L.; Liu, G.; Singh, J. Potato Processing Industry in China: Current Scenario, Future Trends and Global Impact. Potato Res. 2023, 66, 543–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Alam, B.; Lǐ, J.; Gě, Q.; Khan, M.A.; Gōng, J.; Mehmood, S.; Yuán, Y.; Gǒng, W. Endophytic Fungi: From Symbiosis to Secondary Metabolite Communications or Vice Versa? Front. Plant. Sci. 2021, 12, 791033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Buddhika, U.V.A.; Abeysinghe, S. Chapter 5-Plant endophytic microorganisms enhancing crop productivity and yield. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Verma, J.P., Macdonald, C., Gupta, V.K., Podile, A.R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  41. Burragoni, S.G.; Jeon, J. Applications of endophytic microbes in agriculture, biotechnology, medicine, and beyond. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 245, 126691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salamon, S.; Mikołajczak, K.; Błaszczyk, L. Constellation of the endophytic mycobiome in spring and winter wheat cultivars grown under various conditions. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Latz, M.A.C.; Kerrn, M.H.; Sørensen, H.; Collinge, D.B.; Jensen, B.; Brown, J.K.M.; Madsen, A.M.; Jørgensen, H.J.L. Succession of the fungal endophytic microbiome of wheat is dependent on tissue-specific interactions between host genotype and environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lenc, L.; Kwaśna, H.; Sadowski, C.; Grabowski, A. Microbiota in wheat roots, rhizosphere and soil in crops grown in organic and other production systems. J. Phytopathol. 2015, 163, 245–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rojas, E.C.; Jensen, B.; Jørgensen, H.J.L.; Latz, M.A.C.; Esteban, P.; Ding, Y.; Collinge, D.B. Selection of fungal endophytes with biocontrol potential against Fusarium head blight in wheat. Biol. Control 2020, 144, 104222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Larran, S.; Perelló, A.; Simón, M.R.; Moreno, V. The endophytic fungi from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 23, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vujanovic, V.; Mavragani, D.; Hamel, C. Fungal communities associated with durum wheat production system: A characterization by growth stage, plant organ and preceding crop. Crop Prot. 2012, 37, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nicolaisen, M.; Justesen, A.F.; Knorr, K.; Wang, J.; Pinnschmidt, H.O. Fungal communities in wheat grain show significant co-existence patterns among species. Fungal Ecol. 2014, 11, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ofek-Lalzar, M.; Gur, Y.; Ben-Moshe, S.; Sharon, O.; Kosman, E.; Mochli, E.; Sharon, A. Diversity of fungal endophytes in recent and ancient wheat ancestors Triticum dicoccoides and Aegilops sharonensis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, W.F.; Zhai, Y.Y.; Cao, L.X.; Tan, H.M.; Zhang, R.D. Endophytic bacterial and fungal microbiota in sprouts, roots and stems of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mcrobiol. Res. 2016, 188–189, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ganie, S.A.; Bhat, J.A.; Devoto, A. The influence of endophytes on rice fitness under environmental stresses. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2022, 109, 447–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hamayun, M.; Khan, S.A.; Ahmad, N.; Tang, D.S.; Kang, S.M.; Na, C.I.; Sohn, E.Y.; Hwang, Y.H.; Shin, D.H.; Lee, B.H.; et al. Cladosporium sphaerospermum as a new plant growth-promoting endophyte from the roots of Glycine max (L.) Merr. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Y.; Gao, B.L.; Li, X.X.; Zhang, Z.B.; Yan, R.M.; Yang, H.L.; Zhu, D. Phylogenetic diversity of culturable endophytic fungi in Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff), detection of polyketide synthase gene and their antagonistic activity analysis. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 1032–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zelaya-Molina, L.X.; Sanchez-Lima, A.D.; Arteaga-Garibay, R.I.; Bustamante-Brito, R.; Vásquez-Murrieta, M.S.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Ramos-Garza, J. Functional characterization of culturable fungi from microbiomes of the “conical cobs” Mexican maize (Zea mays L.) landrace. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 204, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yadav, A.N.; Verma, P.; Kumar, V.; Sangwan, P.; Mishra, S.; Panjiar, N.; Saxena, A.K. Biodiversity of the genus Penicillium in different habitats. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Gupta, V., Rodriguez-Couto, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  56. Park, Y.H.; Mishra, R.C.; Yoon, S.; Kim, H.; Park, C.; Seo, S.T.; Bae, H. Endophytic Trichoderma citrinoviride isolated from mountain-cultivated ginseng (Panax ginseng) has great potential as a biocontrol agent against ginseng pathogens. J. Ginseng. Res. 2019, 43, 408–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Strom, N.; Hu, W.; Haarith, D.; Chen, S.; Bushley, K. Corn and Soybean Host Root Endophytic Fungi with Toxicity Toward the Soybean Cyst Nematode. Phytopathology® 2019, 110, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, Y.; Sun, L.T.; Yang, H.X.; Li, Z.H.; Liu, J.K.; Ai, H.L.; Wang, G.K.; Feng, T. Depsidones and diaryl ethers from potato endophytic fungus Boeremia exigua. Fitoterapia 2020, 141, 104483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Götz, M.; Nirenberg, H.; Krause, S.; Wolters, H.; Draeger, S.; Buchner, A.; Lottmann, J.; Berg, G.; Smalla, K. Fungal endophytes in potato roots studied by traditional isolation and cultivation-independent DNA-based methods. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 58, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Larran, S.; Perelló, A.; Simón, M.R.; Moreno, V. Isolation and analysis of endophytic microorganisms in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaves. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 18, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sieber, T.; Riesen, T.K.; Müller, E.; Fried, P.M. Endophytic fungi in four winter wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in resistance against Stagonospora nodorum (Berk.) Cast. & Germ. = Septoria nodorum (Berk.) Berk. J. Phytopathol. 1988, 122, 289–306. [Google Scholar]
  62. Abaya, A.; Xue, A.; Hsiang, T. Selection and screening of fungal endophytes against wheat pathogens. Biol. Control 2021, 154, 104511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, X.; Kosman, E.; Sharon, A. Stem endophytic mycobiota in wild and domesticated wheat: Structural differences and hidden resources for wheat improvement. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jana, S.K.; Islam, M.M.; Mandal, S. Endophytic Microbiota of Rice and Their Collective Impact on Host Fitness. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 79, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pang, Z.Q.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, P.; Yu, D.Q. Microbial Diversity of Upland Rice Roots and Their Influence on Rice Growth and Drought Tolerance. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gateta, T.; Nacoon, S.; Seemakram, W.; Ekprasert, J.; Theerakulpisut, P.; Sanitchon, J.; Suwannarach, N.; Boonlue, S. The Potential of Endophytic Fungi for Enhancing the Growth and Accumulation of Phenolic Compounds and Anthocyanin in Maled Phai Rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Fungi 2023, 9, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, W.; Gao, B.; Wang, Y.; Chang, J.; Zhu, D. Endophytic fungi from Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) show diverse catalytic potential for converting glycyrrhizin. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Potshangbam, M.; Devi, S.I.; Sahoo, D.; Strobel, G.A. Functional Characterization of Endophytic Fungal Community Associated with Oryza sativa L. and Zea mays L. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Promgool, T.; Kanokmedhakul, K.; Leewijit, T.; Song, J.; Soytong, K.; Yahuafai, J.; Kudera, T.; Kokoska, L.; Kanokmedhakul, S. Cytotoxic and antibacterial depsidones from the endophytic fungus Chaetomium brasiliense isolated from Thai rice. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 4605–4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Airin, A.A.; Arafat, M.I.; Begum, R.A.; Islam, M.R.; Seraj, Z.I. Plant growth-promoting endophytic fungi of the wild halophytic rice Oryza coarctata. Ann. Microbiol. 2023, 73, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tsai, H.J.; Shao, K.H.; Chan, M.T.; Cheng, C.P.; Yeh, K.W.; Oelmüller, R.; Wang, S.J. Piriformospora indica symbiosis improves water stress tolerance of rice through regulating stomata behavior and ROS scavenging systems. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1722447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhu, J.N.; Yu, Y.J.; Dai, M.D.; Zeng, Y.L.; Lu, X.J.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.H.; Su, Z.Z.; Lin, F.C. A New Species in Pseudophialophora from Wild Rice and Beneficial Potential. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 845104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhang, Z.B.; Du, S.Y.; Ji, B.; Ji, C.J.; Xiao, Y.W.; Yan, R.M.; Zhu, D. New Helvolic Acid Derivatives with Antibacterial Activities from Sarocladium oryzae DX-THL3, an Endophytic Fungus from Dongxiang Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Molecules 2021, 26, 1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wallace, J.G. Maize seed endophytes. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2023, 24, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Singh, R.; Goodwin, S.B. Exploring the Corn Microbiome: A Detailed Review on Current Knowledge, Techniques, and Future Directions. PhytoFrontiers™ 2022, 2, 158–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Terna, T.P.; Mohamed Nor, N.M.I.; Zakaria, L. Histopathology of Corn Plants Infected by Endophytic Fungi. Biology 2022, 11, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Russo, M.L.; Pelizza, S.A.; Cabello, M.N.; Stenglein, S.A.; Vianna, M.F.; Scorsetti, A.C. Endophytic fungi from selected varieties of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and corn (Zea mays L.) grown in an agricultural area of Argentina. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2016, 48, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. de Almeida, M.N.; Guimarães, V.M.; Falkoski, D.L.; Visser, E.M.; Siqueira, G.A.; Milagres, A.M.; de Rezende, S.T. Direct ethanol production from glucose, xylose and sugarcane bagasse by the corn endophytic fungi Fusarium verticillioides and Acremonium zeae. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 168, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, X.; Zhang, F.L.; Wu, X.; Ye, K.; Lv, X.; Ai, H.L.; Liu, J.K. Bioactive Polyketides From the Potato Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus carneus. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X2098522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ai, H.L.; Shi, B.B.; Li, W.; He, J.; Li, Z.H.; Feng, T.; Liu, J.K. Bipolarithizole A, an antifungal phenylthiazole-sativene meroses-quiterpenoid from the potato endophytic fungus Bipolaris eleusines. Org. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 1814–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Alijanimamaghani, N.; Saremi, H.; Javan-Nikkhah, M.; Sophie, D.R.; Pianta, E.; Tonolla, M. Endophytic Cephalotrichum spp. from Solanum tuberosum (potato) in Iran—A polyphasic analysis. Sydowia 2022, 74, 287–301. [Google Scholar]
  82. Devaux, A.; Goffart, J.P.; Kromann, P.; Andrade-Piedra, J.; Polar, V.; Hareau, G. The Potato of the Future: Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainable Agri-food Systems. Potato Res. 2021, 64, 681–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, J.; Islam, M.S.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, W. Isolation of Potato Endophytes and Screening of Chaetomium globosum Antimicrobial Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, X.; Fan, Y.Z.; Ye, K.; Pan, X.Y.; Ma, X.J.; Ai, H.L.; Shi, B.B.; Liu, J.K. Six Unprecedented Cytochalasin Derivatives from the Potato Endophytic Fungus Xylaria curta E10 and Their Cytotoxicity. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, W.X.; Li, Z.H.; Feng, T.; Li, J.; Sun, H.; Huang, R.; Yuan, Q.X.; Ai, H.L.; Liu, J.K. Curtachalasins A and B, Two Cyto-chalasans with a Tetracyclic Skeleton from the Endophytic Fungus Xylaria curta E10. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 7758–7761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, W.X.; Lei, X.; Yang, Y.L.; Li, Z.H.; Ai, H.L.; Li, J.; Feng, T.; Liu, J.K. Xylarichalasin A, a Halogenated Hexacyclic Cyto-chalasan from the Fungus Xylaria cf. curta. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 6957–6960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, W.X.; Li, Z.H.; Ai, H.L.; Li, J.; He, J.; Zheng, Y.S.; Feng, T.; Liu, J.K. Cytotoxic 19,20-epoxycytochalasans from endophyt-ic fungus Xylaria cf. curta. Fitoterapia 2019, 137, 104253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kliebenstein, D.J. Use of Secondary Metabolite Variation in Crop Improvement. In Plant-Derived Natural Products; Osbourn, A., Lanzotti, V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  89. Wink, M. Plant Breeding: Importance of plant secondary metabolites for protection against pathogens and herbivores. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1988, 75, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chakraborty, R. Role of Secondary Metabolites and Prospects of Engineering Secondary Metabolite Production for Crop Im-provement. In Plant Stress: Challenges and Management in the New Decade. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation; Roy, S., Mathur, P., Chakraborty, A.P., Saha, S.P., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  91. Anjali; Kumar, S.; Korra, T.; Thakur, R.; Arutselvan, R.; Kashyap, A.S.; Nehela, Y.; Chaplygin, V.; Minkina, T.; Keswani, C. Role of plant secondary metabolites in defence and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic stress. Plant Stress 2023, 8, 100154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gaspar, A.; Matos, J.M.; Garrido, J.; Uriarte, E.; Borges, F. Chromone: A Valid Scaffold in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4960–4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wei, P.P.; Ai, H.L.; Shi, B.B.; Ye, K.; Lv, X.; Pan, X.Y.; Ma, X.J.; Xiao, D.; Li, Z.H.; Lei, X.X. Paecilins F–P, new dimeric chroma-nones isolated from the endophytic fungus Xylaria curta E10, and structural revision of paecilin A. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 922444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fan, Y.Z.; Tian, C.; Tong, S.Y.; Liu, Q.; Xu, F.; Shi, B.B.; Ai, H.L.; Liu, J.K. Chromones from the endophytic fungus Bipolaris eleu-sines. Phytochemistry 2024, 221, 114046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. He, J.; Li, Z.H.; Ai, H.L.; Feng, T.; Liu, J.K. Anti-bacterial chromones from cultures of the endophytic fungus Bipolaris eleusines. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 3515–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zhang, J.Y.; Wang, Z.Z.; Song, Z.J.; Karthik, L.; Hou, C.J.; Zhu, G.L.; Jiang, L.; Han, J.Y.; Ma, R.; Li, L.; et al. Brocaeloid D, a novel compound isolated from a wheat pathogenic fungus, Microdochium majus 99049. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2019, 4, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. He, J.; Yang, M.S.; Wang, W.X.; Li, Z.H.; Elkhateeb, W.A.M.; Wen, T.C.; Ai, H.L.; Feng, T. Anti-phytopathogenic sesquiterpe-noid-xanthone adducts from potato endophytic fungus Bipolaris eleusines. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sun, J.; Yang, X.Q.; Wan, J.L.; Han, H.L.; Zhao, Y.D.; Cai, L.; Yang, Y.B.; Ding, Z.T. The antifungal metabolites isolated from maize endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. induced by OSMAC strategy. Fitoterapia 2023, 171, 105710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, X.T.; Zheng, M.J.; Fu, A.M.; Li, Q.; Chen, C.M.; Zhu, H.C.; Zhang, Y.H. Natural Sesquiterpenoids, Diterpenoids, Ses-terterpenoids, and Triterpenoids with Intriguing Structures from 2017 to 2022. Chin. J. Chem. 2023, 41, 3115–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, Z.H.; Ai, H.L.; Yang, M.S.; He, J.; Feng, T. Bioactive sativene sesquiterpenoids from cultures of the endophytic fungus Bipolaris eleusines. Phytochem. Lett. 2018, 27, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fan, Y.Z.; Tian, C.; Tong, S.Y.; Liu, Q.; Xu, F.; Shi, B.B.; Ai, H.L.; Liu, J.K. The antifungal properties of terpenoids from the en-dophytic fungus Bipolaris eleusines. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2023, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yang, M.S.; Cai, X.Y.; He, Y.Y.; Lu, M.Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, W.X.; Li, Z.H.; Ai, H.L.; Feng, T. Seco-sativene and Seco-longifolene Sesquiterpenoids from Cultures of Endophytic Fungus Bipolaris eleusines. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2017, 7, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Yang, H.X.; Ai, H.L.; Feng, T.; Wang, W.X.; Wu, B.; Zheng, Y.S.; Sun, H.; He, J.; Li, Z.H.; Liu, J.K. Trichothecrotocins A–C, An-tiphytopathogenic Agents from Potato Endophytic Fungus Trichothecium crotocinigenum. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 8069–8072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yang, H.X.; Wu, X.; Chi, M.J.; Li, Z.H.; Feng, T.; Ai, H.L.; Liu, J.K. Structure and cytotoxicity of trichothecenes produced by the potato-associated fungus Trichothecium crotocinigenum. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 111, 104874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Yang, H.X.; He, J.; Zhang, F.L.; Zhang, X.D.; Li, Z.H.; Feng, T.; Ai, H.L.; Liu, J.K. Trichothecrotocins D–L, Antifungal Agents from a Potato-Associated Trichothecium crotocinigenum. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 2756–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Inoue, Y.; Sakai, M.; Yao, Q.; Tanimoto, Y.; Toshima, H. Identification of a novel casbene-type diterpene phytoalexin, ent-10-oxodepressin, from rice leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013, 77, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, W.L.; Zhang, K.Y.; Yuan, M.Q.; Yang, M.; Wang, A.D.; Huang, L.; Li, J.L. α-Glucosidase inhibitors from the husks of rice Oryza sativa L. Fitoterapia 2023, 171, 105688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kariya, K.; Ube, N.; Ueno, M.; Teraishi, M.; Okumoto, Y.; Mori, N.; Ueno, K.; Ishihara, A. Natural variation of diterpenoid phytoalexins in cultivated and wild rice species. Phytochemistry 2020, 180, 112518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Horie, K.; Inoue, Y.; Sakaki, M.; Yao, Q.; Tanimoto, Y.; Koga, J.; Toshima, H.; Hasegawa, M. Identification of UV-Induced diterpenes including a new diterpene phytoalexin, phytocassane F, from rice leaves by complementary GC/MS and LC/MS approaches. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015, 63, 4050–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Koga, J.; Shimura, M.; Oshima, K.; Ogawa, N.; Yamauchi, T.; Ogasawara, N. Phytocassanes A, B, C and D, novel diterpene phytoalexins from rice, Oryza sativa L. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7907–7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Koga, J.; Ogawa, N.; Yamauchi, T.; Kikuchi, M.; Ogasawara, N.; Shimura, N. Functional moiety for the antifungal activity of phytocassane E, a diterpene phytoalexin from rice. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kariya, K.; Fujita, A.; Ueno, M.; Yoshikawa, T.; Teraishi, M.; Taniguchi, Y.; Ueno, K.; Ishihara, A. Natural variation of diterpe-noid phytoalexins in rice: Aromatic diterpenoid phytoalexins in specific cultivars. Phytochemistry 2023, 211, 113708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Akatsuka, T.; Kodama, O.; Kato, H.; Kono, Y.; Takeuchi, S. 3-Hydroxy-7-oxo- sandaraco-pimaradiene (oryzalexin A), a new phytoalexin isolated from rice blast leaves. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1983, 47, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kono, Y.; Takeuchi, S.; Kodama, O.; Akatsuka, T. Absolute configuration of oryzalexin A and structures of its related phytoa-lexins isolated from rice blast leaves infected with Pyricularia oryzae. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1984, 48, 253–255. [Google Scholar]
  115. Sekido, H.; Endo, T.; Suga, R.; Kodama, O.; Akatsuka, T.; Kono, Y.; Takeuchi, S. Oryzalexin D (3,7-dihydroxy-(+)-sandaracopimaradiene), a new phytoalexin isolated from blast-infected rice leaves. J. Pestic. Sci. 1986, 11, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lichman, B.R. The scaffold-forming steps of plant alkaloid biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 103–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wang, W.X.; Cheng, G.G.; Li, Z.H.; Ai, H.L.; He, J.; Li, J.; Feng, T.; Liu, J.K. Curtachalasins, immunosuppressive agents from the endophytic fungus Xylaria cf. curta. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 7985–7994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Wang, W.X.; Feng, T.; Li, Z.H.; Li, J.; Ai, H.L.; Liu, J.K. Cytochalasins D1 and C1, unique cytochalasans from endophytic fungus Xylaria cf. curta. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2019, 60, 150952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, W.X.; Lei, X.; Ai, H.L.; Bai, X.; Li, J.; He, J.; Li, Z.H.; Zheng, Y.S.; Feng, T.; Liu, J.K. Cytochalasans from the Endophytic Fungus Xylaria cf. curta with Resistance Reversal Activity against Fluconazole-Resistant Candida albicans. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1108–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Teng, S.Q.; Zhang, X.F.; Li, H.F.; Luo, X.W.; Zhou, Y.S.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.K.; Feng, T. Boerechalasins A–G, cytochalasans from the fungus Boeremia exigua with anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities. Phytochemistry 2023, 215, 113861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Fernández-Pastor, I.; González-Menéndez, V.; Annang, F.; Toro, C.; Mackenzie, T.A.; Bosch-Navarrete, C.; Genilloud, O.; Reyes, F. Pipecolisporin, a Novel Cyclic Peptide with Antimalarial and Antitrypanosome Activities from a Wheat Endophytic Nigrospora oryzae. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of chromones.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of chromones.
Ijms 25 06057 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of other ketones.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of other ketones.
Ijms 25 06057 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of sesquiterpenoids.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of sesquiterpenoids.
Ijms 25 06057 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structures of diterpenoids.
Figure 4. Chemical structures of diterpenoids.
Ijms 25 06057 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structures of sesterterpenoids.
Figure 5. Chemical structures of sesterterpenoids.
Ijms 25 06057 g005
Figure 6. Chemical structures of other terpenoids.
Figure 6. Chemical structures of other terpenoids.
Ijms 25 06057 g006
Figure 7. Chemical structures of cytochalasans.
Figure 7. Chemical structures of cytochalasans.
Ijms 25 06057 g007
Figure 8. Chemical structures of other alkaloids.
Figure 8. Chemical structures of other alkaloids.
Ijms 25 06057 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, Y.; Shi, B. Endophytic Fungi from the Four Staple Crops and Their Secondary Metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25116057

AMA Style

Fan Y, Shi B. Endophytic Fungi from the Four Staple Crops and Their Secondary Metabolites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(11):6057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25116057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Yinzhong, and Baobao Shi. 2024. "Endophytic Fungi from the Four Staple Crops and Their Secondary Metabolites" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 11: 6057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25116057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop