Next Article in Journal
STAT4 Mediates IL-6 Trans-Signaling Arrhythmias in High Fat Diet Guinea Pig Heart
Previous Article in Journal
Concussion-Related Biomarker Variations in Retired Rugby Players and Implications for Neurodegenerative Disease Risk: The UK Rugby Health Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plant Hormone Pathway Is Involved in Regulating the Embryo Development Mechanism of the Hydrangea macrophylla Hybrid

College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(14), 7812; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147812
Submission received: 11 June 2024 / Revised: 7 July 2024 / Accepted: 13 July 2024 / Published: 17 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
The research is aimed to elucidate the role of plant hormones in regulating the development of hybrid embryos in Hydrangea macrophylla. Fruits from the intraspecific cross of H. macrophylla ‘Otaksa’ × ‘Coerulea’ were selected at the globular, heart, and torpedo stages of embryo development. Transcriptome sequencing and differential gene expression analysis were conducted. The results showed that fruit growth followed a single “S-shaped growth curve, with globular, heart, and torpedo embryos appearing at 30, 40, and 50 d post-pollination, respectively, and the embryo maintaining the torpedo shape from 60 to 90 d. A total of 12,933 genes was quantified across the three developmental stages, with 3359, 3803, and 3106 DEGs in the S1_vs_S2, S1_vs_S3, and S2_vs_S3 comparisons, respectively. Among these, 133 genes related to plant hormone biosynthesis and metabolism were differentially expressed, regulating the synthesis and metabolism of eight types of plant hormones, including cytokinin, auxin, gibberellin, abscisic acid, and jasmonic acid. The pathways with the most differentially expressed genes were cytokinin, auxin, and gibberellin, suggesting these hormones may play crucial roles in embryo development. In the cytokinin pathway, CKX (Hma1.2p1_0579F.1_g182670.gene, Hma1.2p1_1194F.1_g265700.gene, and NewGene_12164) genes were highly expressed during the globular embryo stage, promoting rapid cell division in the embryo. In the auxin pathway, YUC (Hma1.2p1_0271F.1_g109005.gene and Hma1.2p1_0271F.1_g109020.gene) genes were progressively up-regulated during embryo growth; the early response factor AUX/IAA (Hma1.2p1_0760F.1_g214260.gene) was down-regulated, while the later transcriptional activator ARF (NewGene_21460, NewGene_21461, and Hma1.2p1_0209F.1_g089090.gene) was up-regulated, sustaining auxin synthesis and possibly preventing the embryo from transitioning to maturity. In the gibberellin pathway, GA3ox (Hma1.2p1_0129F.1_g060100.gene) expression peaked during the heart embryo stage and then declined, while the negative regulator GA2ox (Hma1.2p1_0020F.1_g013915.gene) showed the opposite trend; and the gibberellin signaling repressor DELLA (Hma1.2p1_1054F.1_g252590.gene) increased over time, potentially inhibiting embryo development and maintaining the torpedo shape until fruit maturity. These findings preliminarily uncover the factors affecting the development of hybrid H. macrophylla embryos, laying a foundation for further research into the regulatory mechanisms of H. macrophylla hybrid embryo development.

1. Introduction

Hydrangea macrophylla is an important species of Hydrangea Linn. in the Hydrangeaceae family. China has an abundant germplasm resource of Hydrangea, with 47 species and 11 varieties. In recent years, a series of new varieties has been produced through interspecific or intraspecific hybridization [1]. However, hybridization followed by embryo developmental arrest or even abortion has severely hindered the breeding process of Hydrangea species [2]. The abnormal development of young embryos is mainly because the young embryos may stop developing or die in proembryonic stage, globular embryo, heart embryo, torpedo embryo, cotyledone embryo and other stages [3]. Embryo abortion is mainly caused by abnormal endosperm or disharmony between embryo and endosperm, resulting in endosperm deformity, disintegration, embryo sac deformity, cavity and other phenomena [4]. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the fruit development of H. macrophylla hybrids.
Fruit development and seed formation are complex processes, which are not only affected by genetic factors, but also related to environmental conditions and the regulation of plant growth and development, and many genes and transcription factors are involved in the regulation of the processes [5,6]. Plant hormones and transcription factors work together to construct a complex regulatory network that promotes the normal growth and development of fruits and seeds. Studies have shown that plant hormones that play a key role in seed development mainly include auxin (IAA), cytokinin (CK), abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellic acid (GA), ethylene (ETH), brassinolide (BR), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA) [7].
For instance, IAA produced by the central cell/endosperm of Arabidopsis mutants after fertilization will promote the development of seed coat [8]. The content of IAA in maize was low at the early stage of endosperm development, but increased gradually with endosperm maturation [9].
Literature results indicate that ABA has dual effects on seed embryo development. In the early embryo development of Arabidopsis thaliana, the increase of ABA expression promoted embryo growth [10]. The decrease or insufficiency of ABA expression in tobacco seed development can lead to seed sterility and inhibit embryo growth [11].
Findings from the literature propose GA can promote seed germination, endosperm nutrition reserve and fruit development. At the late stage of GA biosynthesis, GA20ox and GA3ox catalyzed the formation of bioactive gibberellin from the interspecific products, while GA2ox inhibited the synthesis of GA [12]. In barley endosperm, the downregulation of HvGA3ox2 and upregulation of HvGA2oxs lead to a decrease in GA expression levels [13]. The increased expression of PsGA2ox2 in Arabidopsis thaliana resulted in decreased ovule number and seed abortion [14]. Bitter melon GA promoted seed germination by increasing protease degradation of RGL2 [15]. GA positively regulated rice can promote α-amylase expression and decrease endosperm starch reserve [16].
Studies suggest CK acts on the primary stage of seed development. At the same time, it promoted cell division to form more ovule, and the high expression of genes related to CK synthesis in the early stage of development increased the number of seeds [17]. CK content in spring wheat seed development decreased with seed maturity, and the content in the first two developmental stages was significantly higher than that in the last three developmental stages [18].
Data from literature implies BR can regulate embryonic development and control seed shape. Arabidopsis thaliana regulates embryo and endosperm development and seed formation by directly or indirectly regulating BR gene expression through BZR1 [19]. The content of BR in wheat tad11-2a-1 mutant decreased, which made the seed volume smaller [20].
Historical documents support JA is mainly involved in embryo development and seed production during seed development. The decrease of JA-lle expression in rice seed would lead to the decrease of seed yield [21]. The increased expression of JA-lle during early development of barley can promote the reserve of nutrients during embryonic development [22].
Academic findings infer SA regulates seed germination and fruit ripening, and plays a role in plant growth and development by regulating cell division and expansion. The decrease and deletion of SA expression during the development of Arabidopsis sid2 mutant led to an increase in seed number [22]. The significant expression of SA in early and late development of barley seeds promoted the division and expansion of embryo and endosperm cells [13].
During fruit and seed development, transcription factors regulate organ formation, cell division and differentiation, and fruit and seed maturation [23]. The overexpression of the FtMYB15 gene extracted from Tartary buckwheat in Arabidopsis resulted in increased pigment and anthocyanin content in the seed coat [24]. The overexpression of the AP2/EREBP family LaAP2L gene in Larch can enhance cell proliferation and increase seed yield [25]. The bHLH transcription factor gene SlPRE2 in tomato was highly expressed in immature fruit, and the seeds in SLPRE2-silenced strains were smaller. In addition, the down-expression of SlPRE2 led to the down-expression of genes related to gibberellin metabolism in immature fruit [26]. The expression levels of AdbZIP24, AdbZIP36, AdbZIP37, and AibZIP30 decreased gradually during the growth and development of peanut seeds [27]. RIN of the MADS-box transcription factor in tomato can directly activate the bHLH95 transcription factor to regulate fruit ripening [28]. In a watermelon study, the NAC transcription factor CLNAC68 positively regulated seed development by inhibiting ClGH3.6 [29].
Transcriptomics is a scientific method to systematically study gene transcription profiles at the transcriptional level. Transcriptomic analysis during embryo development is a widely used strategy to identify functional genes in embryo development. In recent years, this technology has been used to study the seed development mechanism of many plants, such as Arabidopsis [29], tomato [30], and peony [31]. However, transcriptomic analysis technology has not been applied to the study of the seed development of H. macrophylla, and genes related to seed embryo development and fruit formation have not been reported. In this study, the dynamic changes in fruit growth and development 0–100 days after pollination were observed using ‘Otaksa’ × ‘Coerulea’ in specific hybrid fruits as materials. Fruits at the large globular embryo stage (30 d after pollination), heart embryo stage (40 d after pollination), and torpedo embryo stage (50 d after pollination) were selected for transcriptomic analysis to screen the differentially expressed genes related to plant hormone bio-anabolism in order to elucidate the molecular mechanism of hormone biosynthesis in the development of H. macrophylla hybrid fruits, and lay a foundation for revealing abnormal embryo development after the pollination of H. macrophylla.

2. Results

2.1. Fruit Morphological Development

H. macrophylla fruit is a capsule, composed of an outer pericarp, flesh, inner pericarp, and seeds. After pollination, the fruit’s morphology and color change with the growth process (Figure 1a). The fruit’s skin color is bluish purple at 0–20 Dap, light green at 30–40 Dap, dark green at 50–70 Dap, yellow-green at 80–90 Dap, and yellowish brown and dry at 100 Dap. The color of the stigma gradually changes from bluish -purple to pink, light green, and dark green, until it becomes withered and yellow. The growth curves of the longitudinal and transverse diameters of the fruit were consistent, showing a single S shape (Figure 1b). Fruit growth was divided into three stages. In the 0–10 Dap stage, the break line slope was small, and the longitudinal and transverse diameter growths were slow. During the stage of 10–55 Dap, the longitudinal and transverse diameters increased rapidly, ovary enlargement was oblong, and the fruit shape index was 1.29. During the 55–100 Dap stage, the transverse and longitudinal diameters reached about 90% for the ripe fruit, while the fruit shape index remained in the range of 1.11–1.29, and the fruit’s shape was oblong. The fruit’s vertical and horizontal diameter growth showed a “slow–fast–slow” trend.

2.2. Embryo Development at Different Embryo Ages

In order to further explore the growth and development of hybrid embryos at different developmental stages, fruits at 10–90 Dap were selected for paraffin section observation. Embryos were not formed at 10–20 Dap (Figure 2a,b). At 30 Dap, the cotyledon and embryonal axis did not begin to differentiate, and the embryo body was spherical (Figure 2c); at 40 Dap, the cotyledon and embryonal axis began to differentiate, and the embryo body was bilateral symmetrical and heart-shaped (Figure 2d); at 50 Dap, the cotyledon and embryonal axis began to differentiate, and the embryo body was elongated and torpedo-shaped (Figure 2e–i). The 60 Dap–90 Dap embryo remains a torpedo shape.

2.3. Analysis of Sequencing Data

A total of nine fruit samples were selected for transcriptome sequencing at the three stages of hybrid embryo development: globular stage (S1), heart stage (S2), and torpedo stage (S3). A total of 57.08 Gb of clean data was obtained, and the clean datum for each sample was 5.77 Gb. The percentage of Q30 bases is 93.73% or above (Table S1). For each sample, the clean reads and hydrangeas reference genome HMA_r1.2_1 database (https://plantgarden.jp/en/list/t23110, accessed on 18 August 2023) were used to perform a sequence comparison, comparing efficiency between 86.77% and 88.93% (Table S2). Principal component analysis and correlation test were conducted on nine samples, and the results show that the three biological samples in the three periods have high repeatability and a strong correlation (Figure 3a). The distance between the samples in each group was very close, and the three groups of samples were separated from each other, indicating good repeatability within the sample group and high inter-group classification (Figure 3b). Therefore, the sequencing data were reliable and could be used for subsequent analysis.

2.3.1. Differential Genes Expression Analysis

p ≤ 0.05 and |log2FC| ≥ 1 were used as the screening criteria for differential gene expression at the three developmental stages. In groups S1_vs_S2, S1_vs_S3, and S2_vs_S3, there are 3359, 3803, and 3106 DEGs, respectively (Figure 4a). A Venn map was drawn for the differential genes of the three comparison groups, among which 332 were common differential genes, and 957, 918, and 695 differential genes were specifically expressed in the S1_vs_S2, S1_vs_S3, and S2_vs_S3 groups, respectively (Figure 4b). Therefore, it is speculated that large numbers of gene transcriptions and translations are activated during the heart embryo stage of seed embryo development.

2.3.2. Functional Analysis of Differential Genes with GO Enrichment Analysis

To further understand the functional categories of these DEGs, we conducted a GO enrichment analysis of the 6253 DEGs identified. We selected the top 20 functions with the most significant enrichment levels that were present in all pairwise comparison groups from each of the three categories: biological processes (BPs), cellular components (CCs), and molecular functions (MFs) (Figure 5). In biological processes, DEGs are enriched in cellular processes, metabolic processes, and biological regulation. In cellular components, DEGs are enriched in cells and intracellular components. In molecular functions, DEGs are enriched in catalytic activity, binding activity, and transcriptional regulation activity.

2.3.3. Differentially Expressed Genes Participate in Pathway Analysis

To further analyze the role of differentially expressed genes in germ development, the top 20 KEGG pathways with the most significant differentially enriched genes were identified. These pathways were analyzed separately for each of the three comparison groups: S1_vs_S2, S2_vs_S3, and S1_vs_S3. Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, the MAPK signaling pathway – plant pathway, and starch and sucrose metabolism were significantly enriched in the three comparison groups (Figure 6, Table S3). A total of 58, 60, and 55 differential genes was up-regulated in the plant hormone signal transduction pathway. There were 57, 59, and 43 differential genes up-regulated in the MAPK signaling pathway – plant pathway. Therefore, it can be inferred that a large number of genes related to cell proliferation and differentiation and hormone signal transduction are activated during the heart embryo stage during germ development.

2.4. DEG Analysis of Biosynthetic Pathways and Signal Transduction Pathways of Plant Hormones

2.4.1. Auxin Synthesis Pathway and Signal Transduction Pathway

Plants synthesize tryptophan to auxin through four pathways: the indole acetamide pathway (IAM), the indole pyruvate pathway (IPA), the tryptamine pathway (TAM), and the indole acetaldoxime pathway (IAOx) [32]. There are three core components mediating auxin signaling, namely auxin receptors (TIR1/AFBs), auxin blocking proteins (AUX/IAAs), and growth response factors (ARFs) [33]. DEGs involved in IAA biosynthesis were screened from transcriptome data, belonging to ALDH, TDC, UGT74B1, YUC, and DAO gene families (Figure 7a, Table S4). The expression levels of two YUC genes (Hma1.2p1_0271F.1_g109005.gene and Hma1.2p1_0271F.1_g109020.gene) increased with embryo development. The expression levels of two ALDH genes decreased gradually (Hma1.2p1_0802F.1_g220550.gene and Hma1.2p1_0967F.1_g242275.gene). Differential genes related to IAA signaling belong to the AUXI, AUX/IAA, ARF, GH3, and SAUR gene families (Figure 8a,b, Table S5), where AUXI/IAA, GH3, and SAUR are early response factors. One AUX/IAA (Hma1.2p1_0760F.1_g214260.gene), two GH3 (Hma1.2p1_0905F.1_g235370.gene and Hma1.2p1_1023F.1_g248970.gene), and one SAUR (Hma1.2p1_0032F.1_g019970.gene) decreased with embryo development. As a transcriptional activator, the auxin response factor (ARF) mainly regulates the expression of downstream genes, and the expression of the three ARFs is up-regulated during the embryonic development of the H. macrophylla hybrid. They are ARFs (NewGene_21460, NewGene_21461, and Hma1.2p1_0209F.1_g089090.gene.).

2.4.2. Cytokinin Synthesis Pathway and Signal Transduction Pathway

Isopentenyltransferase (ITP) converts AMP, ADP, or ATP and dimethylallyldiphosphate (DMAPP) to IP-nucleotides, which is the main synthetic pathway for the generation of cytokinin in plants, mainly derived tZ and iP and their carbohydrate-bound cytokinins [34]. Its signal transduction is mediated by continuous phosphoric acid transfer. During seed development, low concentrations of CK promote the enlargement of embryonic or cotyledon cells [35]. During Hydrangea hybrid embryo development, CKX expression decreased first and then increased (Figure 7b, Table S4). CKX is a key enzyme in the degradation branch of the cytokinin synthesis pathway and regulates endogenous cytokinin levels by degrading cytokinin [36]. Therefore, it is believed that cytokinin activity is strong in the heart embryo stage. Four AHPs, three B-ARRs, and one A-ARR participate in cytokinin signal transduction (Figure 8a,b, Table S5), among which the expression of one AHP (Hma1.2p1_0012F.1_g007340.gene) decreases with embryo development, and AHP is a negative regulatory factor in the CK signal transduction pathway.

2.4.3. Abscisic Acid Synthetic Pathway and Signal Transduction Pathway

Active abscisic acid is synthesized in plant cells mainly through the carotenoid pathway, and ZEP, NCED, ABA2, and AAO3 are the key catalytic enzymes in the successive steps of synthesis [37]. In ABA core signal transduction, PYR/PYL/RCAR proteins bind to ABA and PP2C proteins to inhibit the phosphatase activity of PP2C, thereby activating the function of SnRK2 [38]. SnRK2 regulates seed development and promotes the accumulation of stored products in ABA signal transduction [39]. During the embryo development of the H. macrophylla hybrid, the expression of three AAOs and one CYP707As is up-regulated (Figure 7c, Table S4), which promotes ABA synthesis by increasing the catalytic activity, while the expression of ABA1/ZEP is decreased. One PYR/PYL, six PP2C, two SnRK2, and one ABF were involved in ABA signal transduction (Figure 8a,b, Table S5). Among them, the expression of PP2C (Hma1.2p1_0571F.1_g180710.gene) decreased and that of SnRK2 (Hma1.2p1_0873F.1_g231230.gene) increased.

2.4.4. Gibberellin Synthesis Pathway and Signal Transduction Pathway

GA is a plant hormone of diterpenoids, which can promote cells division and elongation, fruit development, seed germination, and flowering [40]. Seven differential genes involved in GA biosynthesis were screened from the transcriptomic data, among which CPS, KO, and KAO were involved in GA synthesis, while GA20ox and GA3ox were involved in the conversion of GA, which were also two dioxygenases that catalyzed GA metabolism at a later stage (Figure 7d, Table S4). The expression of GA3ox was inhibited by GA feedback, while the expression of GA20ox, which caused GA inactivation, was activated by GA feedback [41]. The expression of GA3ox (Hma1.2p1_0129F.1_g060100.gene), which was the highest in the heart embryo stage and the lowest in the torpedo embryo stage. GA20ox (Hma1.2p1_0020F.1_g013915.gene), showed the opposite expression characteristics. In the gibberellin signal transduction pathway, the DELLA protein acts as a negative regulator to inhibit plant growth and development [42]. After the binding of active GA and GID1, the protein complex with DELLA is formed, and then the repression of the DELLA protein is no longer occurs [43]. During H. macrophylla hybrid embryo development, the expression of GID1 (Hma1.2p1_0209F.1_g089280.gene) decreased, while the expression of DELLA (Hma1.2p1_1054F.1_g252590.gene) increased (Figure 8a,b, Table S5).

2.4.5. Jasmonic Acid Synthetic Pathway and Signal Transduction Pathway

Jasmonic acid is a kind of lipid hormone in plants, which not only plays an important role in regulating plant growth and development, but also plays an important role in resisting stress [44,45]. JA can directly regulate gene expression, and can also be catalyzed to form MeJA and other metabolites [46]. During H. macrophylla hybrid embryo development, 11 genes in the JA synthesis pathway were differentially expressed, including one PLA2, one DAD1, three LOXs, three AOCs, one OPR3, one OPCL1, and one JMT. Among them, two LOXs (Hma1.2p1_0686F.1_g203361.gene, NewGene_8992) and two AOCs (Hma1.2p1_1162F.1_g262740.gene, NewGene_13810) showed an upward trend during germ development (Figure 7e, Table S4). JAs are important signaling molecules within and between plant cells. Under normal growth conditions, JAZ proteins bind to the MYC2 transcription factor, collaboratively suppressing the expression of early JA-responsive genes, thus controlling the level of JA expression within the body [47]. With the development of seed embryos, the expression of five JAZ and two MYC2 components is up-regulated (Figure 8a,b, Table S5).

2.4.6. Ethylene Synthesis Pathway and Signal Transduction Pathway

Ethylene is a bioactive gaseous plant hormone that regulates many physiological processes, such as seed germination, flowering, organ aging, and fruit ripening [48,49,50]. In the biosynthesis of ethylene, ACC is the most critical intermediate product, which is directly oxidized to ethylene [51]. Two SAM and three ACO differential genes participated in the synthesis of ETH, and the expression of SAM (Hma1.2p1_0052F.1_g030460.gene) showed a downward trend, while that of ACO (Hma1.2p1_0445F.1_g154290.gene) increased first and then decreased. It was highly expressed in the heart embryo stage (Figure 7f, Table S4). The ethylene signaling pathway begins with mutual recognition, binding, and interaction between receptor proteins. The receptor is a negative regulator of ethylene signaling. During H. macrophylla hybrid embryo development, ETR (Hma1.2p1_0494F.1_g165480.gene) increased first and then decreased, with the highest expression in the heart embryo stage (Figure 8a,b, Table S5).

2.4.7. Salicylic Acid Synthesis Pathway and Signal Transduction Pathway

Salicylic acid is a plant hormone of small molecular phenolic compounds, which can regulate seed germination, fruit setting, and fruit ripening [52]. The phenylalanine ammoniase (PAL) pathway is the main pathway of SA biosynthesis [53]. Eight DEGs involved in the SA biosynthesis pathway were screened from the transcriptome data, and all of the eight PAL genes showed an upward trend during the development of the Hydrangea hybrid embryo (Figure 7g, Table S4). The binding of class II TGA to the co-activator complex activates downstream gene transcription. During the development of the Hydrangea hybrid embryo, the expression levels of four TAG increased (Figure 8a,b, Table S5).

2.4.8. Brassinolide Synthesis and Signal Transduction Pathway

BR is an important phytosterol hormone that regulates many physiological activities, such as seed germination, cell elongation, and flowering time. Brassterol is synthesized in eight steps during the synthesis of brassinolide [54]. BRI1 protein is an important part of the BR signal transduction pathway, and the binding of BAK1 and BRI1 proteins can ensure the effective reception of the BR signal [55]. Two differentially expressed genes of BRI1 (Hma1.2p1_0767F.1_g215530.gene and Hma1.2p1_2431F.1_g322035.gene) and BAK1 (Hma1.2p1_0653F.1_g196100.gene) were selected from the transcriptomic data to perform in BR synthesis. The embryonic development of the Hydrangea hybrid showed an upward trend (Figure 8a,b, Table S5). The expression of DWF4 (NewGene_5077) was the highest in the heart embryo stage and significantly decreased in torpedo embryo stage. The expression of CYP92A6 (Hma1.2p1_0291F.1_g114980.gene) was the highest in the globular embryo stage and decreased in the heart embryo stage (Figure 7h, Table S4).

2.5. TFs Involved in the Growth and Development of Hybrid Fruits

During the development of hybrid fruit, many differentially expressed transcription factors are involved. The top 10, in terms of number, include 108 MYB, 106 bHLH, 99 AP2/ERF-ERF, 96 C2H2, 91 NAC, 79 WRKY, 78 MYB-related, 77 bZIP, 61 C3H, and 54 FAR1 (Figure 9a, Table S6). From a pairwise comparison of samples from three different periods, it was found that there were 236 TFs in the S1_vs_S2 comparison group (147 up-regulated and 89 down-regulated), 264 TFs in the S1_vs_S3 comparison group (191 up-regulated and 73 down-regulated), and 251 TFs in the S2_vs_S3 comparison group (154 up-regulated and 97 down-regulated) (Figure 9c, Table S7). Through K-means cluster analysis of differentially expressed transcription factors, six different expression trends were found (Figure 9b, Table S8), among which category 6 (344 TFs) showed an upward trend, which may play a role in promoting the growth and development of Hydrangea hybrid fruits. Class 2 (276 TFs) and class 5 (215 TFs) showed a downward trend, which may inhibit the growth and development of H. macrophylla hybrid fruits. The specific role of these TFs in different stages of H. macrophylla fruit development needs to be further explored.

2.6. RT-qPCR Verification

In order to verify the accuracy of the results of RNA-Seq, 12 DEGs related to plant hormone biosynthesis, signal transduction, and transcription factors were randomly selected for RT-qPCR analysis (Figure 10, Table S9). The results show that the RT-qPCR results of these 12 DEGs and the abundance expression of RNA-Seq data are consistent, indicating the reliability and accuracy of the RNA-Seq data in this study.

3. Discussion

Seed formation mainly goes through two processes: embryo/endosperm development and seed maturation [56]. The development of a dicotyledonous embryo starts from the first division of the fertilized egg and goes through the pro-embryo stage, globular embryo stage, heart embryo stage, torpedo embryo stage, and mature embryo stage [57]. The embryo development of the H. macrophylla hybrid only experiences the pro-embryo, globular, heart, and torpedo stages. From 50 days after pollination until the fruit is yellow, the embryo body remains torpedo-shaped, which is inconsistent with the development process of other dicotyledonous plant embryos. This may also be one of the reasons for the low hybrid seed germination rate in Hydrangea species. The reason may be that endosperm cannot provide sufficient nutritional support for the embryo’s morphological transformation [11].
Seed formation is also regulated by a variety of hormones. Plant hormone signal transduction ensures normal seed development by regulating the synthesis and catabolism of a series of proteins during embryonic development [58]. From fertilization to embryonic morphogenesis, cytokinin plays a dominant role. During seed development, the decrease of cytokinin concentration and the decrease of signal transduction pathway activity promote the enlargement of embryonic or cotyledon cells [13]. CKX irreversibly lyses free CK, thereby reducing the level of active CK. In maize, overexpression of CKX has been shown to decrease endogenous cytokinin levels [59]. In this study, the expression of CKX (Hma1.2p1_0579F.1_g182670.gene, Hma1.2p1_1194F.1_g265700.gene, and NewGene_12164) genes decreased first and then increased. These results indicate that the rapid cell division of the hybrid hydrangea embryo is mainly in the heart embryo stage.
Auxin is a key component of seed development, and IAA plays an important regulatory role in early seed development and the endosperm [8]. Previous studies have shown that the protein encoded by the YUC gene family can catalyze the direct conversion of indole pyruvate into IAA [33]. Excessive expression of YUC can lead to the excessive accumulation of auxin in plants and lead to defects in plant embryo development [60]. In this study, the expression of YUC (Hma1.2p1_0271F.1_g109005.gene and Hma1.2p1_0271F.1_g109020.gene) genes was up-regulated gradually during the growth of the embryo, and the torpedo stage exhibited the highest level, which may be one of the reasons for the torpedo shape of the hybrid embryo. AUX/IAA is a negative regulator of early response in the IAA signaling pathway, which can negatively regulate the abundance of the auxin response factor (ARF), thereby mediating various plant development processes [61]. ARF affects the formation of embryonic morphology by regulating cortical cell initiation and asymmetric division [62]. AUX/IAA (Hma1.2p1_0760F.1_g214260.gene) gene expression was down-regulated during the embryo development of the Hydrangea hybrid. The up-regulated expression of ARF (NewGene_21460, NewGene_21461 and Hma1.2p1_0209F.1_g089090.gene) promoted the endosperm accumulation of auxin to some extent, which may affect the transition of the embryo to maturity.
GA can regulate the physiological state of and biochemical changes in seeds, and the seeds themselves have the ability to synthesize GA. The DELLA protein is a major negative regulator of the GA signaling pathway, which restricts the process of the cell division cycle through the activities of TCP14 and TCP15 and stops embryonic development [63]. The overexpression of GID1 in Arabidopsis thaliana can relieve the inhibitory effect of DELLA protein on plant growth and promote seed development [64]. During the embryo development process of Hydrangea hybrids, the expression level of the DELLA gene (Hma1.2p1_1054F.1_g252590.gene) gradually increased, while the expression level of the GID1 gene (Hma1.2p1_0209F.1_g089280.gene) decreased. This suggests that the hybrid embryo’s development potentially halted at the torpedo stage, causing it to retain the characteristic torpedo shape throughout fruit maturation. Consequently, when mature seeds are sown, they exhibit a low germination rate. GA2-oxidase (GA2ox) is a key enzyme in the later stages of gibberellin biosynthesis, functioning as a negative regulator. It can convert active GA1 and GA4 in plants into inactive GA8 and GA34; GA3-oxidase (GA3ox) is the key enzyme regulating the synthesis of active gibberellins in the final step of the gibberellin metabolic pathway, responsible for catalyzing the inactive GA9 and GA20 into biologically active GA1 and GA4 [65]. In this study, the expression trends of GA2ox (Hma1.2p1_0020F.1_g013915.gene) and GA3ox (Hma1.2p1_0129F.1_g060100.gene) were also completely opposite, indicating that, during the embryo development process of Hydrangea, these two gibberellin oxidase genes work in coordination to control the content of active gibberellins in the body. ABA plays an important role in regulating storage proteins in seeds [13]. In a previous study by [66], AAOs were identified as essential genes for ABA biosynthesis, and upregulated expression of AAOs was observed during the seed development process in buckwheat. In this study, the gradual increase in the expression of AAOs (Hma1.2p1_1413F.1_g281850.gene, Hma1.2p1_1413F.1_g281850.gene, and NewGene_17841) indicates the promotion of normal embryo development in Hydrangea. In conclusion, the different expression patterns of differential genes in plant hormone biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways, as well as the regulatory imbalance of various hormone signaling pathways, may be the reasons for the formation of globular embryo, heart embryo and torpedo embryo, and the development of the hybrid embryo in the torpedo stage.
In addition to structural genes, which play an important role in fruit and seed growth and development, transcription factors also play a significant role in these processes [67]. The results of this study show that the MYB and bHLH families had the largest number of transcription factors, followed by AP2/ERF-ERF, C2H2, NAC, WRKY, MYB-related, bZIP, C3H, and FAR1. MYB plays a key role in plant morphogenesis, growth and development, and the synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites. Xie et al. [68] found in their research on dragon fruit that R2R3-MYB plays a key regulatory role in the fruit ripening process, and the inhibitory factor Hu MYB1 is involved in regulating fruit ripening by inhibiting genes related to betaine biosynthesis. RGE1 is a member of the bHLH gene family, and a functionally disabled RGE1 mutant will lead to embryo growth retardation, eventually resulting in the formation of small and wizened seeds [69]. Therefore, transcription factors also play a key role in the development of hydrangea hybrid fruit. It is speculated that fruit growth and development affect the expression of transcription factors and thus regulate the morphological changes in embryos. The specific regulation needs to be explored.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Material

The materials used in the experiment were collected from the Hydrangea germplasm resource garden at Hunan Agricultural University, using H. macrophylla ‘Otaksa’, with a round flower type as the female parent, and H. macrophylla ‘Coerulea’, with a flat-top flower type as the male parent for intraspecific hybridization. Using conventional water and fertilizer cultivation and maintenance management, the greenhouse’s temperature was maintained at 15–35 °C, humidity was maintained at 50–80%, and sufficient light was guaranteed.

4.2. Growth Index of Hybrid Fruits

Fruit shape and color changes were observed from the pollination day to 100 d (100 Dap) after pollination. 15 hybrid fruits were randomly selected every 5 days to measure the transverse and longitudinal diameters with vernier calipers, and 21 groups could be divided according to the measurement time. The measurement was repeated three times for each group, and then the fruit shape index was calculated [70] and the fruit growth curve was drawn.

4.3. Hybrid Embryo Growth and Development Morphology

Every 10 d after pollination, 10 hybrid fruits were placed in FAA fixation solution for 24 h, and the fixed materials were placed in 75%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%, and 100% ethanol for 4 h, 2 h, 1.5 h, 1.5 h, 1 h, and 1 h, respectively, and then dehydrated step by step. Then, add an alcohol benzene mixture for 20 min, xylene for 20 min, xylene for 20 min, paraffin for 2 h, paraffin for 2 h, and paraffin for 2 h for step-by-step transparency, wax dipping, embedding, slicing, sticking, dewaxing, and rehydrating, an HE dye solution (Safranine O-Fast Green Stain Kit) for staining, and then seal the slice. The slice thickness was 4 mm. The slices were flattened in 40 °C warm water in a KD-P tissue spreading machine (Jinhua Kedi Equipment Co., Ltd., Jinhua, China) and baked in a 60 °C oven. Finally, the slices were placed under an Olympus BX43F optical microscope (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) to observe the seed embryo structure.

4.4. RNA Extraction, Library Construction, and RNA Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted with a FastPure® Universal Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit, and the purity and concentration of RNA were detected with Nano-Drop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The integrity of RNA was evaluated by agarose-gel electrophoresis. The qualified samples were sent to Biomarker Technologies for library construction, quantified by a Qubit 3.0 fluorescence quantifier and Qsep400 high-throughput analysis system. After the library was qualified, RNA-Seq was sequenced by the Illumina NovaSeq6000 sequencing platform using the PE150 mode.

4.5. Transcriptome Analysis

Raw reads were obtained by removing connectors and low-quality sequences from the original sequence data to obtain high-quality clean reads. The resulting high-quality Clean Reads were compared to the hydrangea reference genome, The version information for reference genome Hydrangea_macrophylla. HMA_r1.2_1. Genome (https://plantgarden.jp/en/list/t23110, accessed on 18 August 2023). According to the quantitative results of FPKM, differential genes (DEGs) were analyzed by gene ontology (GO) function analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. In this experiment, Fold Change ≥ 2 and FDR < 0.01 were taken as the significant conditions for gene expression difference, and at least two of the three repeats in one treatment could be used for expression analysis. With P < 0.05 as the screening condition, hypergeometric test was used to compare KEGG database to find the significant enrichment pathway of differentially expressed transcripts and identify the main signal transduction pathways involved in differentially expressed genes.Log-normalized transcriptome data (Log2FPKM) were utilized for principal component analysis (PCA), correlation analysis, and heat map generation. GraphPad Prism 8.0 was employed to create a differential gene histogram for comparison groups. The online tool jvenn was used to generate area-scale Venn diagrams. Log2FC values from nine groups were applied in TBtools for data mapping. All genes annotated in regulatory pathways were marked, and their relative expression heat maps primarily demonstrated the responses of specific metabolic pathways during fruit development. TBtools was also used for heat mapping of DEGs within each module. Adobe Illustrator (version 2021) was used for typesetting differential gene heat maps and creating metabolic flowcharts.

4.6. RT-qPCR Assay

RT-qPCR assay was performed using the Cham Q Vniversal qPCR Master Mix assay kit with three replicates per sample. β-TUB was used as the reference gene of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We used (http://www.oligoarchitect.com/ShowToolServlet, accessed on 21 December 2023) the website to design the RT-qPCR primers. The relative expression data of DEGs were normalized by the 2−ΔΔCT method.

5. Conclusions

The growth of fruit from the intraspecific hybridization of Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Otaksa’ × ‘Coerulea’ exhibits a single sigmoid growth curve. At 30 Dap, 40 Dap, and 50 Dap, globular embryos, heart embryos, and torpedo embryos were formed, respectively, and the torpedo embryo was maintained at 50–90 Dap. In this study, a total of 12,933 differential genes was quantified during globular, heart-shaped, and torpedo-shaped embryo stages. Four pathways were significantly enriched: Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, MAPK signaling pathway–plant pathway, and starch and sucrose metabolism. Genes related to germ development include: in the cytokinin pathway, CKX; in the auxin pathway, YUC, AUX/IAA, and ARF; in the gibberellin pathway, DELLA, GID1, GA2ox, and GA3ox; and in the ABA biosynthetic pathway, AAOs. The MYB transfactor family and bHLH transcription factor have the largest number. This study enriches the research of Hydrangea hybrid fruit and is conducive to further understanding the molecular mechanism of the development of Hydrangea macrophylla hybrid fruit, and provides a biological basis for improving the excellent breeding standards of Hydrangea macrophylla.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25147812/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.Z.: Formal analysis, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—original draft preparation, Validation, and Visualization. X.Z.: Conceptualization and Writing—review and editing. T.Z.: Investigation and Writing—review and editing. H.J.: Analysis, Investigation, and Validation. P.L.: Analysis and Validation. H.Z.: Analysis and Validation. H.C.: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing—review and editing, Visualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, and Resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key project of the Hunan Provincial Department of Education in 2022 (22A0142) and supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2021JJ30313).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Transcriptome data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under the accession number PRJNA1085229 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA1085229, accessed on 7 June 2024).

Acknowledgments

We thank BioMarker for providing RNA-Seq services and Wuhan Metware for providing metabolome sequencing services.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, T.-Y.; Chen, C.-M. Early-Flowering Interspecific Hydrangea Progenies from Crossing H. chinensis with H. macrophylla. HortScience 2022, 57, 1487–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Suyama, T.; Tanigawa, T.; Yamada, A.; Matsuno, T.; Kunitake, T. Cross Compatibility between Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. and Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser., and Efficiency Improvement of Hybrid Acquisition with Ovule Culture. Hortic. Res. 2008, 7, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Deng, Y.; Teng, N.; Chen, S.; Chen, F.; Guan, Z.; Song, A.; Chang, Q. Reproductive Barriers in the Intergeneric Hybridization between Chrysanthemum grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitam. and Ajania przewalskii Poljak. (Asteraceae). Euphytica 2010, 174, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yabuya, T.; Yamagata, H. Embryological and Cytological Studies on Seed Development after Reciprocal Crosses between Iris sanguinea Hornem and I. iaevigata Fisch. Jpn. J. Breed. 1978, 28, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tang, D.; Gallusci, P.; Lang, Z. Fruit Development and Epigenetic Modifications. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Su, L.; Wan, S.; Zhou, J.; Shao, Q.S.; Xing, B. Transcriptional Regulation of Plant Seed Development. Physiol. Plant 2021, 173, 2013–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Savadi, S. Molecular Regulation of Seed Development and Strategies for Engineering Seed Size in Crop Plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 84, 401–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Figueiredo, D.D.; Batista, R.A.; Roszak, P.J.; Hennig, L.; Köhler, C. Auxin Production in the Endosperm Drives Seed Coat Development in Arabidopsis. eLife 2016, 5, e20542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, X.; Wu, J.; Yi, F.; Lai, J.; Chen, J. High Temporal-Resolution Transcriptome Landscapes of Maize Embryo Sac and Ovule during Early Seed Development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2023, 111, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cheng, W.-H.; Endo, A.; Zhou, L.; Penney, J.; Chen, H.-C.; Arroyo, A.; Leon, P.; Nambara, E.; Asami, T.; Seo, M.; et al. A Unique Short-Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase in Arabidopsis Glucose Signaling and Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis and Functions. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2723–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Frey, A.; Godin, B.; Bonnet, M.; Sotta, B.; Marion-Poll, A. Maternal Synthesis of Abscisic Acid Controls Seed Development and Yield in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia. Planta 2004, 218, 958–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. He, H.; Liang, G.; Lu, S.; Wang, P.; Liu, T.; Ma, Z.; Zuo, C.; Sun, X.; Chen, B.; Mao, J. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of GA2ox, GA3ox, and GA20ox Are Related to Gibberellin Oxidase Genes in Grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Genes 2019, 10, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tuan, P.A.; Nguyen, T.-N.; Toora, P.K.; Ayele, B.T. Temporal and Spatial Transcriptional Regulation of Phytohormone Metabolism during Seed Development in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1242913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Singh, D.P.; Filardo, F.F.; Storey, R.; Jermakow, A.M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Swain, S.M. Overexpression of a Gibberellin Inactivation Gene Alters Seed Development, KNOX Gene Expression, and Plant Development in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant 2010, 138, 74–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, S.-G.; Park, C.-M. Gibberellic Acid-Mediated Salt Signaling in Seed Germination. Plant Signal Behav. 2008, 3, 877–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Damaris, R.N.; Lin, Z.; Yang, P.; He, D. The Rice Alpha-Amylase, Conserved Regulator of Seed Maturation and Germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bencivenga, S.; Simonini, S.; Benková, E.; Colombo, L. The Transcription Factors BEL1 and SPL Are Required for Cytokinin and Auxin Signaling During Ovule Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2886–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nguyen, H.N.; Perry, L.; Kisiala, A.; Olechowski, H.; Emery, R.J.N. Cytokinin Activity during Early Kernel Development Corresponds Positively with Yield Potential and Later Stage ABA Accumulation in Field-Grown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta 2020, 252, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jiang, W.-B.; Lin, W.-H. Brassinosteroid Functions in Arabidopsis Seed Development. Plant Signal Behav. 2013, 8, e25928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xu, H.; Sun, H.; Dong, J.; Ma, C.; Li, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ji, J.; Hu, X.; Wu, M.; et al. The Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis Gene TaD11-2A Controls Grain Size and Its Elite Haplotype Improves Wheat Grain Yields. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022, 135, 2907–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, E.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, S.-H.; Koo, Y.J.; Choi, Y.D.; Chung, Y.-Y.; Lee, I.-J.; Kim, J.-K. Methyl Jasmonate Reduces Grain Yield by Mediating Stress Signals to Alter Spikelet Development in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1751–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abreu, M.E.; Munné-Bosch, S. Salicylic Acid Deficiency in NahG Transgenic Lines and Sid2 Mutants Increases Seed Yield in the Annual Plant Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Agarwal, P.; Kapoor, S.; Tyagi, A.K. Transcription Factors Regulating the Progression of Monocot and Dicot Seed Development. Bioessays 2011, 33, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Luo, X.; Zhao, H.; Yao, P.; Li, Q.; Huang, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q. An R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor FtMYB15 Involved in the Synthesis of Anthocyanin and Proanthocyanidins from Tartary Buckwheat. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, A.; Zhou, Y.; Jin, C.; Song, W.; Chen, C.; Wang, C. LaAP2L1, a Heterosis-Associated AP2/EREBP Transcription Factor of Larix, Increases Organ Size and Final Biomass by Affecting Cell Proliferation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 1822–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, Z.; Liang, H.; Chen, G.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Liao, C.; Hu, Z. The bHLH Transcription Factor SlPRE2 Regulates Tomato Fruit Development and Modulates Plant Response to Gibberellin. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, Z.; Yan, L.; Wan, L.; Huai, D.; Kang, Y.; Shi, L.; Jiang, H.; Lei, Y.; Liao, B. Genome-Wide Systematic Characterization of bZIP Transcription Factors and Their Expression Profiles during Seed Development and in Response to Salt Stress in Peanut. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Kang, J.; Xie, Q.; Gong, J.; Shen, H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, G.; Hu, Z. The Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor bHLH95 Affects Fruit Ripening and Multiple Metabolisms in Tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 6311–6327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Li, M.; Tian, S.; Yu, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Gong, G.; Zhang, H.; et al. The NAC Transcription Factor ClNAC68 Positively Regulates Sugar Content and Seed Development in Watermelon by Repressing ClINV and ClGH3.6. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, X.; He, Z.; Yin, Y.; Xu, X.; Wu, W.; Li, L. Transcriptome Sequencing and Analysis during Seed Growth and Development in Euryale Ferox Salisb. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Liang, H.; Guo, D.; Guo, L.; Duan, X.; Jia, Q.; Hou, X. Integrated Analysis of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Data from Tree Peony (P. ostii) Seeds Reveals Key Developmental Stages and Candidate Genes Related to Oil Biosynthesis and Fatty Acid Metabolism. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhao, Y. Auxin Biosynthesis and Its Role in Plant Development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mashiguchi, K.; Tanaka, K.; Sakai, T.; Sugawara, S.; Kawaide, H.; Natsume, M.; Hanada, A.; Yaeno, T.; Shirasu, K.; Yao, H.; et al. The Main Auxin Biosynthesis Pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18512–18517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Guan, C.; Wang, X.; Feng, J.; Hong, S.; Liang, Y.; Ren, B.; Zuo, J. Cytokinin Antagonizes Abscisic Acid-Mediated Inhibition of Cotyledon Greening by Promoting the Degradation of Abscisic Acid Insensitive5 Protein in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1515–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kong, L.; Guo, H.; Sun, M. Signal Transduction during Wheat Grain Development. Planta 2015, 241, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tuan, P.A.; Yamasaki, Y.; Kanno, Y.; Seo, M.; Ayele, B.T. Transcriptomics of Cytokinin and Auxin Metabolism and Signaling Genes during Seed Maturation in Dormant and Non-Dormant Wheat Genotypes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dejonghe, W.; Okamoto, M.; Cutler, S.R. Small Molecule Probes of ABA Biosynthesis and Signaling. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 1490–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhao, Y.; Chan, Z.; Xing, L.; Liu, X.; Hou, Y.-J.; Chinnusamy, V.; Wang, P.; Duan, C.; Zhu, J.-K. The Unique Mode of Action of a Divergent Member of the ABA-Receptor Protein Family in ABA and Stress Signaling. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 1380–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Finkelstein, R.; Reeves, W.; Ariizumi, T.; Steber, C. Molecular Aspects of Seed Dormancy. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 387–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Reinecke, D.M.; Wickramarathna, A.D.; Ozga, J.A.; Kurepin, L.V.; Jin, A.L.; Good, A.G.; Pharis, R.P. Gibberellin 3-Oxidase Gene Expression Patterns Influence Gibberellin Biosynthesis, Growth, and Development in Pea. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 929–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, Q.-F.; Wang, C.; Jiang, L.; Li, S.; Sun, S.S.M.; He, J.-X. An Interaction between BZR1 and DELLAs Mediates Direct Signaling Crosstalk between Brassinosteroids and Gibberellins in Arabidopsis. Sci. Signal 2012, 5, ra72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zentella, R.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Park, M.; Thomas, S.G.; Endo, A.; Murase, K.; Fleet, C.M.; Jikumaru, Y.; Nambara, E.; Kamiya, Y.; et al. Global Analysis of Della Direct Targets in Early Gibberellin Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3037–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sasaki, A.; Itoh, H.; Gomi, K.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Ishiyama, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Jeong, D.-H.; An, G.; Kitano, H.; Ashikari, M.; et al. Accumulation of Phosphorylated Repressor for Gibberellin Signaling in an F-Box Mutant. Science 2003, 299, 1896–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Acosta, I.F.; Laparra, H.; Romero, S.P.; Schmelz, E.; Hamberg, M.; Mottinger, J.P.; Moreno, M.A.; Dellaporta, S.L. Tasselseed1 Is a Lipoxygenase Affecting Jasmonic Acid Signaling in Sex Determination of Maize. Science 2009, 323, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yoshida, Y.; Sano, R.; Wada, T.; Takabayashi, J.; Okada, K. Jasmonic Acid Control of GLABRA3 Links Inducible Defense and Trichome Patterning in Arabidopsis. Development 2009, 136, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Creelman, R.A.; Mullet, J.E. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1997, 48, 355–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chini, A.; Fonseca, S.; Fernández, G.; Adie, B.; Chico, J.M.; Lorenzo, O.; García-Casado, G.; López-Vidriero, I.; Lozano, F.M.; Ponce, M.R.; et al. The JAZ Family of Repressors Is the Missing Link in Jasmonate Signalling. Nature 2007, 448, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Khan, N.A. The Ethylene: From Senescence Hormone to Key Player in Plant Metabolism. J. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lin, Z.; Zhong, S.; Grierson, D. Recent Advances in Ethylene Research. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3311–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Schaller, G.E. Ethylene and the Regulation of Plant Development. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Van de Poel, B.; Bulens, I.; Markoula, A.; Hertog, M.L.A.T.M.; Dreesen, R.; Wirtz, M.; Vandoninck, S.; Oppermann, Y.; Keulemans, J.; Hell, R.; et al. Targeted Systems Biology Profiling of Tomato Fruit Reveals Coordination of the Yang Cycle and a Distinct Regulation of Ethylene Biosynthesis during Postclimacteric Ripening. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 1498–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Morris, K.; MacKerness, S.A.-H.; Page, T.; John, C.F.; Murphy, A.M.; Carr, J.P.; Buchanan-Wollaston, V. Salicylic Acid Has a Role in Regulating Gene Expression during Leaf Senescence. Plant J. 2000, 23, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hartmann, M.; Zeier, J. N-Hydroxypipecolic Acid and Salicylic Acid: A Metabolic Duo for Systemic Acquired Resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 50, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ohnishi, T.; Godza, B.; Watanabe, B.; Fujioka, S.; Hategan, L.; Ide, K.; Shibata, K.; Yokota, T.; Szekeres, M.; Mizutani, M.c. CYP90A1/CPD, a brassinosteroid biosynthetic cytochrome P450 of Arabidopsis, catalyzes C-3 oxidation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 31551–31560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, X.; Kota, U.; He, K.; Blackburn, K.; Li, J.; Goshe, M.B.; Huber, S.C.; Clouse, S.D. Sequential Transphosphorylation of the BRI1/BAK1 Receptor Kinase Complex Impacts Early Events in Brassinosteroid Signaling. Dev. Cell 2008, 15, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gutierrez, L.; Van Wuytswinkel, O.; Castelain, M.; Bellini, C. Combined Networks Regulating Seed Maturation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yu, B.; Gao, P.; Song, J.; Yang, H.; Qin, L.; Yu, X.; Song, H.; Coulson, J.; Bekkaoui, Y.; Akhov, L.; et al. Spatiotemporal Transcriptomics and Metabolic Profiling Provide Insights into Gene Regulatory Networks during Lentil Seed Development. Plant J. 2023, 115, 253–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Miransari, M.; Smith, D.L. Plant Hormones and Seed Germination. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 99, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zalabák, D.; Galuszka, P.; Mrízová, K.; Podlešáková, K.; Gu, R.; Frébortová, J. Biochemical Characterization of the Maize Cytokinin Dehydrogenase Family and Cytokinin Profiling in Developing Maize Plantlets in Relation to the Expression of Cytokinin Dehydrogenase Genes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 74, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cheng, Y.; Dai, X.; Zhao, Y. Auxin Synthesized by the YUCCA Flavin Monooxygenases Is Essential for Embryogenesis and Leaf Formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2430–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Luo, J.; Zhou, J.-J.; Zhang, J.-Z. Aux/IAA Gene Family in Plants: Molecular Structure, Regulation, and Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Möller, B.K.; Ten Hove, C.A.; Xiang, D.; Williams, N.; López, L.G.; Yoshida, S.; Smit, M.; Datla, R.; Weijers, D. Auxin Response Cell-Autonomously Controls Ground Tissue Initiation in the Early Arabidopsis Embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E2533–E2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ito, T.; Okada, K.; Fukazawa, J.; Takahashi, Y. DELLA-Dependent and -Independent Gibberellin Signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2018, 13, e1445933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gallego-Giraldo, C.; Hu, J.; Urbez, C.; Gomez, M.D.; Sun, T.-P.; Perez-Amador, M.A. Role of the Gibberellin Receptors GID1 during Fruit-Set in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2014, 79, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yan, G.; Hai, J.; Dong, G.; Hui, L.; Qing, Y.; Min, X.; Li, X. Identification and Expression Analysis of Gibberellin Oxidase Gene Fam ily in Flax. Mol. Plant Breed. 2023, 21, 7706–7714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huang, J.; Deng, J.; Shi, T.; Chen, Q.; Liang, C.; Meng, Z.; Zhu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Yu, S.; et al. Global Transcriptome Analysis and Identification of Genes Involved in Nutrients Accumulation during Seed Development of Rice Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tararicum). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Benech-Arnold, R.L.; Giallorenzi, M.C.; Frank, J.; Rodriguez, V. Termination of Hull-Imposed Dormancy in Developing Barley Grains Is Correlated with Changes in Embryonic ABA Levels and Sensitivity. Seed Sci. Res. 1999, 9, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xie, F.; Hua, Q.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, J.; Hu, G.; Chen, J.; Qin, Y. Genome-Wide Characterization of R2R3-MYB Transcription Factors in Pitaya Reveals a R2R3-MYB Repressor HuMYB1 Involved in Fruit Ripening through Regulation of Betalain Biosynthesis by Repressing Betalain Biosynthesis-Related Genes. Cells 2021, 10, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kondou, Y.; Nakazawa, M.; Kawashima, M.; Ichikawa, T.; Yoshizumi, T.; Suzuki, K.; Ishikawa, A.; Koshi, T.; Matsui, R.; Muto, S.; et al. RETARDED GROWTH OF EMBRYO1, a New Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Protein, Expresses in Endosperm to Control Embryo Growth. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1924–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xue, Z.; Yang, R.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Lin, Y.; Li, Z.; Song, Y.; Feng, X.; Li, L. Candidate Gene Mining of GA-Mediated Regulation of Pear Fruit Shape. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2024, 65, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological changes during the growth and development of H. macrophylla hybrid fruits. (a) Fruit shape changes; (b) fruit growth dynamic curve.
Figure 1. Morphological changes during the growth and development of H. macrophylla hybrid fruits. (a) Fruit shape changes; (b) fruit growth dynamic curve.
Ijms 25 07812 g001
Figure 2. Morphological development of Hydrangea hybrid embryos: (a) 10 Dap, pro-embryo; (b) 20 Dap, pro-embryo; (c) 30 Dap, globular embryo; (d) 40 Dap, heart embryo; (e) 50 Dap, torpedo embryo; (f) 60 Dap, torpedo embryo; (g) 70 Dap, torpedo embryo; (h) 80 Dap, torpedo embryo; (i) 90 Dap, torpedo embryo. (Note: co: cotyledon; em: embryonal axis).
Figure 2. Morphological development of Hydrangea hybrid embryos: (a) 10 Dap, pro-embryo; (b) 20 Dap, pro-embryo; (c) 30 Dap, globular embryo; (d) 40 Dap, heart embryo; (e) 50 Dap, torpedo embryo; (f) 60 Dap, torpedo embryo; (g) 70 Dap, torpedo embryo; (h) 80 Dap, torpedo embryo; (i) 90 Dap, torpedo embryo. (Note: co: cotyledon; em: embryonal axis).
Ijms 25 07812 g002
Figure 3. Biological repeated parallelism test. (a) Sample correlation analysis diagram; (b) PCA principal component analysis diagram.
Figure 3. Biological repeated parallelism test. (a) Sample correlation analysis diagram; (b) PCA principal component analysis diagram.
Ijms 25 07812 g003
Figure 4. Differentially expressed genes at different stages of embryo development. (a) Differential gene expression statistics; (b) Venn diagram.
Figure 4. Differentially expressed genes at different stages of embryo development. (a) Differential gene expression statistics; (b) Venn diagram.
Ijms 25 07812 g004
Figure 5. GO enrichment analysis of different genes in different developmental stages of hybrid fruits.
Figure 5. GO enrichment analysis of different genes in different developmental stages of hybrid fruits.
Ijms 25 07812 g005
Figure 6. KEGG for full analysis of differential genes at different stages of embryo development.
Figure 6. KEGG for full analysis of differential genes at different stages of embryo development.
Ijms 25 07812 g006
Figure 7. Gene expression of plant hormone biosynthesis pathway in the intraspecific hybrid fruit of H. macrophylla. (a) IAA biosynthesis pathway; (b) CK biosynthesis pathway; (c) ABA biosynthetic pathway; (d) GA biosynthetic pathway; (e) JA biosynthetic pathway; (f) ethylene biosynthetic pathway; (g) SA biosynthetic pathway; (h) BR biosynthetic pathway.
Figure 7. Gene expression of plant hormone biosynthesis pathway in the intraspecific hybrid fruit of H. macrophylla. (a) IAA biosynthesis pathway; (b) CK biosynthesis pathway; (c) ABA biosynthetic pathway; (d) GA biosynthetic pathway; (e) JA biosynthetic pathway; (f) ethylene biosynthetic pathway; (g) SA biosynthetic pathway; (h) BR biosynthetic pathway.
Ijms 25 07812 g007
Figure 8. Gene expression of plant hormone signaling pathway in the seeds of intraspecific hybrids of H. macrophylla. (a) Schematic diagram of plant hormone signaling pathways; (b) heat map analysis of Z-score.
Figure 8. Gene expression of plant hormone signaling pathway in the seeds of intraspecific hybrids of H. macrophylla. (a) Schematic diagram of plant hormone signaling pathways; (b) heat map analysis of Z-score.
Ijms 25 07812 g008
Figure 9. Characterization of transcription factors (TFs) expressed during the development of Hydrangea intraspecific hybrid fruits. (a) TF identification results at different developmental stages of Hydrangea intraspecific hybrid fruits; (b) K-means clustering analysis of 1592 TFs; (c) number of TFs differentially expressed at any two developmental stages of H. macrophylla hybrid fruits.
Figure 9. Characterization of transcription factors (TFs) expressed during the development of Hydrangea intraspecific hybrid fruits. (a) TF identification results at different developmental stages of Hydrangea intraspecific hybrid fruits; (b) K-means clustering analysis of 1592 TFs; (c) number of TFs differentially expressed at any two developmental stages of H. macrophylla hybrid fruits.
Ijms 25 07812 g009
Figure 10. RT-qPCR was used to verify the selected genes in the RNA-Seq data. (Error lines identify three biological replicates).
Figure 10. RT-qPCR was used to verify the selected genes in the RNA-Seq data. (Error lines identify three biological replicates).
Ijms 25 07812 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, Y.; Zeng, X.; Zhu, T.; Jiang, H.; Lei, P.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H. Plant Hormone Pathway Is Involved in Regulating the Embryo Development Mechanism of the Hydrangea macrophylla Hybrid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147812

AMA Style

Zhu Y, Zeng X, Zhu T, Jiang H, Lei P, Zhang H, Chen H. Plant Hormone Pathway Is Involved in Regulating the Embryo Development Mechanism of the Hydrangea macrophylla Hybrid. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(14):7812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Yali, Xiaoman Zeng, Tingting Zhu, Hui Jiang, Penghu Lei, Huijun Zhang, and Haixia Chen. 2024. "Plant Hormone Pathway Is Involved in Regulating the Embryo Development Mechanism of the Hydrangea macrophylla Hybrid" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 14: 7812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147812

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop