Next Article in Journal
Obesity Arrhythmias: Role of IL-6 Trans-Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
The Glycocalyx: The Importance of Sugar Coating the Blood-Brain Barrier
Previous Article in Special Issue
G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Cell Signaling Transduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Neubert et al. Effects of Normobaric Hypoxia and Adrenergic Blockade over 72 h on Cardiac Function in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11417

1
Carl-Ludwig-Institute of Physiology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
2
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Heart Centre, University of Leipzig, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(15), 8408; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158408
Submission received: 7 May 2024 / Accepted: 10 May 2024 / Published: 1 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Cell Signaling Transduction)
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. The table contained some identical values in several groups in some lines of Table 3. The corrected Table 3 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor.

Reference

  1. Neubert, E.; Rassler, B.; Hoschke, A.; Raffort, C.; Salameh, A. Effects of Normobaric Hypoxia and Adrenergic Blockade over 72 h on Cardiac Function in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 3. Hemodynamic results.
Table 3. Hemodynamic results.
CohortNormoxic Cohort:Hypoxic Cohort:
Group
(n)
N-Ctrl
(9–14)
N-PZ
(6–7)
N-PR
(6–8)
N-PZ + PR
(6–8)
H-Ctrl
(14–16)
H-PZ
(9–13)
H-PR
(7–12)
H-PZ + PR
(9)
EF [%]56.9 ± 1.848.8 ± 1.7 ##
61.8 ± 1.262.6 ± 1.549.5 ± 5.6 *50.7 ± 4.3 *54.1 ± 2.9 #45.9 ± 2.5 ## *42.7 ± 4.2 *48.4 ± 3.4
SW
[mmHg µL]
15,001 ± 114610,954 ± 664 ##
18512 ± 217416857 ± 110412476 ± 1560 *10467 ± 1532 ***12852 ± 1513 ##9577 ± 939 ##9151 ± 116411830 ± 1095
HR [min−1]426.0 ± 7.7390.0 ± 6.2 ###
441.8 ± 8.1458.1 ± 11.2423.9 ± 9.3374.5 ± 21.1 ***410.4 ± 8.3 #407.4 ± 11.1 ##359.6 ± 11.9 ### ***367.7 ± 13.9 **
LV esE
[mmHg/µL]
0.33 (0.26; 0.50)0.36 (0.24; 0.71)
0.36
(0.24; 0.53)
0.28
(0.26; 0.34)
0.44
(0.37; 0.55)
0.24
(0.17; 0.50)
0.34
(0.26; 0.66)
0.57
(0.28; 0.76)
0.33
(0.25; 0.58)
0.25
(0.18; 0.72)
RV dP/dtmax
[mmHg/s]
2053 (1602; 2488)1919 (1530; 2687)
2154
(2072; 2448)
2441
(2001; 3233)
1888
(1609; 3348)
1473
(1390; 1719)
2511
(1823; 3118)
2238
(1799; 3049)
1568
(1503; 1919)
1402
(1158; 1631) *
RV dP/dtmin
[mmHg/s]
−1711 (−2145; −1215)−1618 (−2138; −1274)
−1896
(−2501; −1727)
−1863
(−2164; −1166)
−1409
(−1774; −1228)
−1208
(−1454; −1053)
−2088
(−2384; −1487)
−1856
(−2291; −1236)
−1379
(−1681; −1077)
−1333
(−1778; −1098)
MAP [mmHg]96.4 ± 3.591.0 ± 2.4
109.6 ± 3.591.0 ± 5.792.7 ± 11.684.7 ± 5.091.4 ± 3.691.2 ± 4.887.1 ± 5.995.2 ± 5.7
TPR [mmHg min kg s−1]0.28 (0.25; 0.33)0.31 (0.29; 0.41) #
0.28
(0.25; 0.32)
0.25
(0.24; 0.28)
0.28
(0.23; 0.46)
0.31
(0.26; 0.38)
0.30
(0.25; 0.33)
0.30
(0.27; 0.46)
0.33
(0.30; 0.43)
0.40
(0.30; 0.51)
Normally distributed data are given as means ± SEM; if data were not normally distributed, the medians (25th; 75th percentiles) are presented (n = number of values per group). Cohort means (± SEM) and medians (25th; 75th percentiles) are presented in bold characters. Cohort/group labels: N = normoxia; H = hypoxia; Ctrl = control group (0.9% saline infusion); PZ = prazosin; PR = propranolol. LV, RV = left/right ventricle; EF = ejection fraction; esE = end-systolic elastance; SW = stroke work; dP/dt max = maximal velocity of contraction; dP/dt min = maximal velocity of relaxation; HR = heart rate; MAP = mean aortic pressure; TPR = total peripheral resistance. Significant differences from the hypoxic cohort or groups to the normoxic cohort or to the corresponding normoxic group: # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001; significant differences between blocker groups and the related control (N-Ctrl or H-Ctrl) are marked with asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neubert, E.; Rassler, B.; Hoschke, A.; Raffort, C.; Salameh, A. Correction: Neubert et al. Effects of Normobaric Hypoxia and Adrenergic Blockade over 72 h on Cardiac Function in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11417. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158408

AMA Style

Neubert E, Rassler B, Hoschke A, Raffort C, Salameh A. Correction: Neubert et al. Effects of Normobaric Hypoxia and Adrenergic Blockade over 72 h on Cardiac Function in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11417. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(15):8408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158408

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neubert, Elias, Beate Rassler, Annekathrin Hoschke, Coralie Raffort, and Aida Salameh. 2024. "Correction: Neubert et al. Effects of Normobaric Hypoxia and Adrenergic Blockade over 72 h on Cardiac Function in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11417" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 15: 8408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158408

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop