Next Article in Journal
Human Beta Defensin-2 mRNA and Proteasome Subunit β Type 8 mRNA Analysis, Useful in Differentiating Skin Biopsies from Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis Vulgaris Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Transcriptomes Reveals Pathways and Verifies Candidate Genes for Clubroot Resistance in Brassica oleracea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms25179190
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anti-CD44 Variant 10 Monoclonal Antibody Exerts Antitumor Activity in Mouse Xenograft Models of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas

by
Kenichiro Ishikawa
1,2,
Hiroyuki Suzuki
1,*,
Tomokazu Ohishi
3,4,
Guanjie Li
1,
Tomohiro Tanaka
1,
Manabu Kawada
4,
Akira Ohkoshi
2,
Mika K. Kaneko
1,
Yukio Katori
2 and
Yukinari Kato
1,*
1
Department of Antibody Drug Development, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
2
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
3
Institute of Microbial Chemistry (BIKAKEN), Numazu, Microbial Chemistry Research Foundation, 18-24 Miyamoto, Numazu-shi 410-0301, Shizuoka, Japan
4
Institute of Microbial Chemistry (BIKAKEN), Laboratory of Oncology, Microbial Chemistry Research Foundation, 3-14-23 Kamiosaki, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-0021, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9190; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179190 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 August 2024 / Revised: 20 August 2024 / Accepted: 22 August 2024 / Published: 24 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Cancer: Update on Molecular Pathology, Mechanisms and Treatments)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
CD44 regulates cell adhesion, proliferation, survival, and stemness and has been considered a tumor therapy target. CD44 possesses the shortest CD44 standard (CD44s) and a variety of CD44 variant (CD44v) isoforms. Since the expression of CD44v is restricted in epithelial cells and carcinomas compared to CD44s, CD44v has been considered a promising target for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy. We previously developed an anti-CD44v10 mAb, C44Mab-18 (IgM, kappa), to recognize the variant exon 10-encoded region. In the present study, a mouse IgG2a version of C44Mab-18 (C44Mab-18-mG2a) was generated to evaluate the antitumor activities against CD44-positive cells compared with the previously established anti-pan CD44 mAb, C44Mab-46-mG2a. C44Mab-18-mG2a exhibited higher reactivity compared with C44Mab-46-mG2a to CD44v3–10-overexpressed CHO-K1 (CHO/CD44v3–10) and oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (HSC-2 and SAS) in flow cytometry. C44Mab-18-mG2a exerted a superior antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against CHO/CD44v3–10. In contrast, C44Mab-46-mG2a showed a superior complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) against CHO/CD44v3–10. A similar tendency was observed in ADCC and CDC against HSC-2 and SAS. Furthermore, administering C44Mab-18-mG2a or C44Mab-46-mG2a significantly suppressed CHO/CD44v3–10, HSC-2, and SAS xenograft tumor growth compared with the control mouse IgG2a. These results indicate that C44Mab-18-mG2a could be a promising therapeutic regimen for CD44v10-positive tumors.

1. Introduction

CD44 is involved in tumor malignant progression through the promotion of tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasiveness, and stemness [1,2]. The variety of CD44 function is mediated by the alternative splicing of 20 exons [3,4,5]. CD44 standard (CD44s), the shortest isoform of CD44, is generated by the first five (1–5) and the last five (16–20) exons and expressed in a broad range of tissues [6,7,8]. The central (6–15) exons are alternatively spliced and inserted between the first and last five exons of CD44s. The variant exon-containing CD44 is designated as the CD44 variant (CD44v) isoform [9,10,11,12].
The CD44 ectodomain includes a hyaluronic acid (HA)-binding domain (HABD) [13,14,15]. The HABD is present in both CD44s and CD44v isoforms. Upon HA binding, CD44s and CD44v transduce the intracellular signaling through the cytoplasmic domain, which promotes cell migration and proliferation [16]. The variant exon-encoding regions possess a variety of functions. The v3-encoded region can be attached to a heparan sulfate side chain, which recruits heparin-binding growth factors and stimulates the signal transduction through activation of the receptors [4,17,18]. The v6-encoded region potentiates the MET signaling pathway through the formation of a ternary complex with its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor [19,20,21,22]. Moreover, the v8–10-encoded region regulates the intracellular reduced glutathione levels through the promotion of a cystine–glutamate transporter function [23]. These functions are essential for tumor cell proliferation, invasiveness, and survival to oxidative stress and chemotherapeutic drugs [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Therefore, CD44 has been considered as an essential target for tumor therapy [14,30].
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD44 have been evaluated in clinical trials [31,32]. RG7356, a humanized anti-pan-CD44 mAb, exhibited the antitumor effect for B cell leukemia but no cytotoxicity on normal B cells [33]. In a human chronic lymphocytic leukemia-engrafted mouse model, RG7356 administration resulted in complete clearance of engrafted leukemia cells [33]. In acute myeloid leukemia [34] and advanced CD44-positive solid tumors [35], phase I clinical trials were conducted. Although RG7356 exhibited an acceptable safety profile, the studies were terminated due to the lack of dose–response relationship with RG7356 in both clinical and pharmacodynamic aspects [35].
Since CD44v expression is restricted in epithelial tissue and carcinomas, anti-CD44v mAbs were developed and evaluated in clinical studies. Humanized anti-CD44v6 mAbs (BIWA-4 and BIWA-8) labeled with 186Re showed antitumor efficacy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) xenograft-bearing mice [36]. Moreover, the antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) of BIWA-4, bivatuzumab–mertansine was developed and evaluated in clinical trials [32]. However, the clinical trials were terminated due to severe toxicity in the skin, probably due to the efficient accumulation of mertansine in the skin [32,37]. Therefore, anti-CD44 mAbs with more potent efficacy and lower toxicity to normal cells are desired.
The Fc region of therapeutic mAb binds to FcγRs on dendritic cells, macrophages, and neutrophils, which influences the adaptive immune responses through antigen presentation and cytokine production [38]. Moreover, the FcγR binding results in the activation of natural killer (NK) cells [39] and macrophages [40], which mediates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). The complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (CDC) is also considered as an essential effector function in tumor immunotherapy [41]. The Fc region of therapeutic mAbs binds to complement C1q, facilitating the assembly of active C1 complex (C1q, C1r, and C1s). The reaction of the complement cascade finally promotes the assembly of the pore-forming membrane attack complex (MAC or C5b–C9) on the tumor cell membrane, which results in the terminal cell lysis [41]. The involvement of CDC in the antitumor effect was first recognized in the treatment of B cell lymphomas by an anti-CD20 mAb, rituximab [42,43]. Furthermore, the cytolytic capacity by complement has been shown in anti-CD38 and CD52 immunotherapies for multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, respectively [43,44,45]. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests that complement plays critical roles in not only tumor cell lysis but also in several immunologic functions in antitumor immunity [46,47]. In the immunotherapy against solid tumors, an anti-HER2 bispecific and biparatopic antibody zanidatamab exerted more potent CDC against HER2-positive breast cancers compared with clinically approved anti-HER2 mAb trastuzumab [48].
The Cell-Based Immunization and Screening method is a strategy to obtain mAbs against a membrane protein comprehensively. We immunized mice with the CD44v3–10-overexpressed cells or CD44v3–10 ectodomain and established various anti-CD44 mAbs and determined their epitopes. C44Mab-5 [49] and C44Mab-46 [50] are anti-pan-CD44 mAbs, which have the epitopes within the constant exon 2- and 5-encoded sequences, respectively [51,52]. We also established various CD44v-specific mAbs. C44Mab-6 recognizes variant exon 3-encoded sequences and is referred to as anti-CD44v3 mAb [53]. Furthermore, C44Mab-3 (an anti-CD44v5 mAb) [54], C44Mab-9 (an anti-CD44v6 mAb) [55], C44Mab-34 (an anti-CD44v7/8 mAb) [56], C44Mab-1 (an anti-CD44v9 mAb) [57], and C44Mab-18 (an anti-CD44v10 mAb) [58] were established. C44Mab-108 is an anti-CD44v4 mAb, established by peptide immunization [59]. These mAbs cover almost all variant exons and are applicable to flow cytometry, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry.
In this study, we produced an IgG2a-type C44Mab-18 (C44Mab-18-mG2a) and investigated the antitumor efficacy against CHO/CD44v3–10 and oral SCC (OSCC) xenografts by comparing anti-pan-CD44 mAb, C44Mab-46-mG2a.

2. Results

2.1. Flow Cytometric Analysis against CHO/CD44v3–10, HSC-2, and SAS Cells Using C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a

We previously established an anti-CD44v10 mAb (C44Mab-18, IgM, kappa) and showed the availability for flow cytometry, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry against OSCC tissues [58]. In the present study, we cloned the VH cDNA of C44Mab-18 and combined it with the CH cDNA of mouse IgG2a. We also cloned the VL cDNA of C44Mab-18 and combined it with the CL cDNA of the mouse kappa light chain. Finally, a class-switched C44Mab-18 (C44Mab-18-mG2a) was produced (Figure 1A). We also used mouse IgG2a-type C44Mab-46 (C44Mab-46-mG2a) as an anti-pan CD44 mAb [60]. In reduced conditions, we confirm the purity of original and recombinant mAbs by SDS-PAGE (Supplementary Figure S1). We next confirmed the reactivity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a using CHO/CD44v3–10 and CHO/CD44s cells. Both C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a detected CHO/CD44v3–10 cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 1B). The reactivity of C44Mab-18-mG2a to CHO/CD44v3–10 was superior to that of C44Mab-46-mG2a (Figure 1B). In contrast, C44Mab-18-mG2a did not react with CHO/CD44s cells compared to C44Mab-46-mG2a (Figure 1C). Both C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a did not respond with CHO-K1 cells (Supplementary Figure S2). These results confirmed that C44Mab-18-mG2a recognizes only CHO/CD44v3–10 and that C44Mab-46-mG2a recognizes both CHO/CD44v3–10 and CHO/CD44s.
We next investigated the reactivity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against endogenous CD44-expressing OSCC cell lines, HSC-2 and SAS. Both C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a reacted with HSC-2 (Figure 2A) and SAS (Figure 2B) cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The reactivity of C44Mab-18-mG2a to these cells was superior to that of C44Mab-46-mG2a (Figure 2). We also used PMab-231 as a control mouse IgG2a, which did not react with CHO/CD44v3–10, HSC-2, and SAS cells (Supplementary Figure S3).

2.2. Induction of ADCC and CDC by C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against CHO/CD44v3–10 Cells

Next, we performed in vitro ADCC and CDC assays to examine the cytotoxicity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells. As shown in Figure 3A, C44Mab-18-mG2a significantly exerted ADCC against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells in the presence of mouse splenocytes (30% cytotoxicity, p < 0.01) compared with control mouse IgG2a (PMab-231, 11% cytotoxicity). Although a tendency of increased ADCC compared with the control was observed by C44Mab-46-mG2a, the difference was not significant.
In contrast, C44Mab-46-mG2a significantly exerted CDC against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells in the presence of complements (27% cytotoxicity, p < 0.05) compared with the control (12% cytotoxicity). We did not observe a significant difference in CDC between C44Mab-18-mG2a and the control (Figure 3B)
These results indicated that C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a possess different properties for exerting ADCC and CDC against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells.

2.3. Antitumor Effects of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a in the Mouse Xenografts of CHO/CD44v3–10

We next evaluated the in vivo antitumor effect of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against CHO/CD44v3–10 xenograft tumors inoculated in nude mice. C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (100 µg/mouse) were intraperitoneally injected into mice on days 7, 14, and 21 following the inoculation. The tumor volume was measured on days 7, 14, 17, 21, 24, and 28. The C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a administration resulted in a significant reduction in tumor volume on days 17 (p < 0.05 in C44Mab-18-mG2a), 21 (p < 0.01), 24 (p < 0.01), and 28 (p < 0.01) compared with that of the control mouse IgG2a (Figure 4A). The C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a administration resulted in 56% and 50% reductions in tumor volume compared with the control mouse IgG2a on day 28, respectively.
The weight of CHO/CD44v3–10 tumors treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a was significantly lower than those treated with the control mouse IgG2a (Figure 4B,C, 62% reduction; p < 0.05). Although a 53% reduction in tumor weight was observed by C44Mab-46-mG2a treatment, it is not statistically different compared to the control (p = 0.0626). The loss of body weight was not observed in the CHO/CD44v3–10 tumor-implanted mice during the treatments (Figure 4D,E).

2.4. Induction of ADCC and CDC by C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against HSC-2 and SAS Cells

Next, we performed in vitro ADCC and CDC assays to examine the cytotoxicity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against HSC-2 and SAS cells. Both C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a significantly exerted ADCC against HSC-2 cells [Figure 5A, 17% (p < 0.01) and 13% (p < 0.05) cytotoxicity, respectively] and SAS cells [Figure 5C, 19% (p < 0.01) and 14% (p < 0.05) cytotoxicity, respectively] compared with the control.
Both C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a significantly exerted CDC against HSC-2 cells [Figure 5B, 27% (p < 0.05) and 40% (p < 0.01) cytotoxicity, respectively] compared with the control. In SAS cells, C44Mab-46-mG2a significantly exerted CDC [Figure 5D, 26% (p < 0.05) cytotoxicity] compared with the control. We could not observe the significant difference of CDC against SAS cells between C44Mab-18-mG2a and the control (Figure 5D).

2.5. Antitumor Effects of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a in the Mouse Xenografts of HSC-2 and SAS

In the HSC-2 and SAS xenograft models, C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (500 µg/mouse) were intraperitoneally administrated into mice on days 7 and 14, following the inoculation. The tumor volume was measured on days 7, 14, and 17. The C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a administration resulted in a significant reduction in both tumor volume on day 14 (p < 0.01) and day 17 (p < 0.01) compared with that of the control mouse IgG2a (Figure 6A,B). The C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a administration resulted in 43% and 36% reduction in HSC-2 tumor volume, respectively, compared with that treated with the control mouse IgG2a on day 17. The C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a administration also resulted in a 33% and 32% reduction in SAS tumor volume, respectively, compared with that treated with the control mouse IgG2a on day 17.
The weight of HSC-2 tumors treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a was significantly lower than that treated with the control mouse IgG2a [Figure 6C, 40% (p < 0.01) and 30% (p < 0.05) reduction, respectively]. The weight of SAS tumors treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a was significantly lower than that treated with the control mouse IgG2a [Figure 6D, 23% (p < 0.01) and 19% (p < 0.05) reduction, respectively]. The loss of body weight was not observed in the HSC-2 and SAS tumor-implanted mice during the treatments (Figure 6E,F).

3. Discussion

Among CD44v, v10-containing isoforms include the most abundant CD44v, such as CD44v3–10, CD44v6–10, and CD44v8–10 [2,61]. Therefore, anti-CD44v10 mAbs including C44Mab-18-mG2a can target the broad range of CD44v-expressing tumor cells. In this study, we evaluated the antitumor activities against CD44-positive cells compared with an anti-pan-CD44 mAb, C44Mab-46-mG2a. C44Mab-18-mG2a exhibited the higher reactivity to CHO/CD44v3–10 and OSCC cells compared with C44Mab-46-mG2a (Figure 1 and Figure 2). C44Mab-18-mG2a exhibited a superior ADCC against CHO/CD44v3–10 (Figure 3) and OSCC (Figure 5) cells. In contrast, C44Mab-46-mG2a showed a superior CDC against those cells. Furthermore, C44Mab-18-mG2a or C44Mab-46-mG2a similarly inhibited CHO/CD44v3–10 and OSCC xenograft growth compared with the control mouse IgG2a (Figure 4 and Figure 6). These results indicate that C44Mab-18-mG2a could be a promising therapeutic regimen for CD44v10-positive tumors.
OSCC arises from the oral cavity and is a type of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). HNSCC has been revealed to be associated with alcohol, smoking, and human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 infection [62]. In the Pan-Cancer Atlas, HNSCC has been shown as the second-highest CD44-expressing tumor type [63]. The overexpression of CD44 is associated with resistance to therapy and unfavorable outcomes [64,65,66]. Furthermore, CD44-high cancer stem cells (CSCs) from HNSCC exhibited increased migration, invasiveness, and stemness [67]. In immunodeficient mice, the CD44-high CSCs could form more lung metastatic foci than CD44-low cells [68]. Therefore, CD44 is considered an important target for mAb therapies. Since C44Mab-18 is available to immunohistochemistry [58], C44Mab-18 could be used for diagnosis and therapy of OSCC.
In CHO/CD44v3–10 cells, C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a recognized a common target but mainly exerted ADCC and CDC activity, respectively (Figure 3). The epitope of C44Mab-46 was previously determined as the 174-TDDDV-178 sequence in the constant exon 5-encoded region [51], which is relatively apart from transmembrane domain compared to variant exon 10-encoded region recognized by C44Mab-18 [58]. To activate the classical pathway of complement, an ordered hexamer formation of IgG mAb is required to bind to the hexavalent complement C1q [69,70]. The structure of the C44Mab-46-mG2a–CD44v3–10 complex may provide the appropriate space to form the hexameric structure of the mAb–C1q complex and recruit the pore-forming membrane attack complex to exert CDC. In contrast, C44Mab-18-mG2a showed a higher reactivity to CHO/CD44v3–10 compared with C44Mab-46-mG2a in flow cytometry (Figure 1). The difference in the reactivity and the epitope would influence the ADCC activity. Further studies are required to reveal the relationship among the affinity of mAb, epitope, and ADCC activity.
The limitation of this study is that both C44Mab-46-mG2a and C44Mab-18-mG2a are effective in human xenograft models of nude mice. To apply human tumor therapy, a class switch to human IgG1 is essential. We previously generated humanized IgG1 mAbs and evaluated the antitumor activity with injections of human NK cells [71,72]. We will produce humanized mAbs from C44Mab-46 and C44Mab-18 and evaluate the ADCC and CDC in the presence of human NK cells and complement, respectively. Furthermore, the antitumor effects should be investigated with injections of human NK cells.
Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) uses a targeted mAb conjugated with a photoactivatable dye such as IRDye700DX (IR700) [73,74,75,76]. When the mAb binds to the antigen-expressed target cells, IR700 induces plasma membrane rupture and immunogenic cell death by NIR-light exposure. Preclinical studies of anti-pan-CD44 mAb-based NIR-PIT (IM7-IR700) were conducted. In the syngeneic mouse model of OSCC, IM7-IR700 administration and the NIR light exposure to OSCC tumors resulted in a significant reduction but failed to induce durable antitumor responses [77]. Because IM7 is a pan-CD44 mAb, IM7 might target not only tumor cells but also CD44s-positive immune cells which are involved in the antitumor immunity. The expression of CD44v is low in hematopoietic cells compared with CD44s [2]. We previously showed that C44Mab-18 can distinguish tumor cells from stromal tissues in immunohistochemistry. In contrast, C44Mab-46 stained both tumor and stromal tissue including fibroblasts and leukocytes [58]. Therefore, anti-CD44v10 mAbs such as C44Mab-18 might be a promising mAb for NIR-PIT without affecting the host immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.
Since both CD44s and CD44v are expressed in normal cells, there is a concern about adverse effects due to the recognition of normal cells by mAbs. In fact, clinical trials of the anti-CD44v6 mAb–ADC to advanced solid tumors were discontinued because of the skin toxicities [32,37]. Therefore, cancer-specific antibodies are desired to reduce the adverse effects. A cancer-specific anti-CD44v6 mAb (clone 4C8) recognizes aberrantly O-glycosylated Tn (GalNAcα1-O-Ser/Thr) antigen in the variant exon 6-encoded region. The 4C8 mAb was further developed for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, which exhibited target-specific in vitro cytotoxicity and significant tumor regression in vivo [78]. We have developed cancer-specific mAbs (CasMabs) against various tumor antigens, including HER2 (clones H2Mab-214 [79] and H2Mab-250 [80]), and reported the antitumor effect in mouse xenograft models using recombinant mouse IgG2a or human IgG1 mAbs [71,72]. These anti-HER2 mAbs were screened by the reactivity to cancer and normal cells in flow cytometry. H2Mab-214 was revealed to recognize a locally misfolded structure in the Cys-rich HER2 extracellular domain 4, which usually forms a β-sheet [79]. H2Mab-250 also shows a specific reactivity against HER2-positive tumor cells, which has been developed as CAR-T-cell therapy. The phase I study has been conducted in the US (NCT06241456). We have developed CasMabs against CD44s or CD44v by comparing the reactivity against tumor and normal cells. The anti-CD44 CasMabs could contribute to developing novel modalities such as ADCs and CAR-T cells.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Lines and Cell Culture

CHO-K1 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). OSCC cell lines HSC-2 and SAS were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (Osaka, Japan). CHO/CD44s and CHO/CD44v3–10 were previously established by transfecting pCAG-Ble/PA16-CD44s and pCAG-Ble/PA16-CD44v3–10 into CHO-K1 cells using a Neon transfection system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) [50,58].
HSC-2 and SAS were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) containing 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), 100 U/mL of penicillin (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.), 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.), and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.).
CHO/CD44v3–10 was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, antibiotics as mentioned above, and 5 mg/mL Zeocin (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA). All cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

4.2. Antibodies

An anti-pan-CD44 mAb (C44Mab-46) and an anti-CD44v10 mAb (C44Mab-18) were previously established [50,58]. A recombinant mouse IgG2a-type mAb, C44Mab-46-mG2a, was generated previously [60]. To generate a recombinant mouse IgG2a-type mAb from C44Mab-18 (IgM, kappa), VH cDNAs of C44Mab-18 and CH of mouse IgG2a were cloned into the pCAG-Ble vector (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan). VL and mouse kappa light chain (CL) cDNA of C44Mab-18 was also cloned into the pCAG-Neo vector (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). Using the ExpiCHO Expression System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), the vectors were transfected into BINDS-09 cells (http://www.med-tohoku-antibody.com/topics/001_paper_cell.htm, accessed on 23 August 2024) and the supernatants were collected. C44Mab-18-mG2a were purified using Ab-Capcher (ProteNova Co., Ltd., Kagawa, Japan). PMab-231 (a control mouse IgG2a) was previously described [80].

4.3. Flow Cytometry

CHO/CD44v3–10, HSC-2, and SAS were obtained using 1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA; Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) and 0.25% trypsin treatment. The cells were treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, PMab-231, or blocking buffer [0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] (control) for 30 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the cells were incubated in Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) for 30 min at 4 °C. Fluorescence data were collected using the SA3800 Cell Analyzer (Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed using SA3800 software ver. 2.05 (Sony Corp.) [50].

4.4. ADCC

Animal studies for ADCC were approved by the Institutional Committee for Experiments of the Institute of Microbial Chemistry (permit no. 2024-038). The ADCC activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a was measured as follows. The target cells (CHO/CD44v3–10, HSC-2, and SAS) were labeled with 10 µg/mL Calcein AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and plated in 96-well plates (1 × 104 cells/well). The calcein-labeled target cells were mixed with the effector splenocyte (effector to target ratio, 50:1) from female BALB/c nude mice (Jackson Laboratory Japan, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) with 100 μg/mL of C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (PMab-231). After a 4 h incubation at 37 °C, the calcein release into the medium was measured using a microplate reader (Power Scan HT; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
The cytolyticity (% lysis) was determined: % lysis is calculated as (E − S)/(M − S) × 100, where “E” indicates the fluorescence in effector and target cell cultures, “S” means the spontaneous fluorescence of only target cells, and “M” indicates the maximum fluorescence after treatment with a lysis buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM EDTA, and 0.5% Triton X-100] [49].

4.5. CDC

The calcein-labeled target cells were mixed with rabbit complement (final concentration 15%, Low-Tox-M Rabbit Complement; Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby, ON, Canada) and 100 μg/mL of C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (PMab-231). After a 4 h incubation at 37 °C, the calcein release into the medium was measured as described previously [60].

4.6. Antitumor Activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a in Xenografts of CHO/CD44v3–10, HSC-2, and SAS

The animal study protocol was approved (approval nos. 2024-013) by the Institutional Committee for Experiments of the Institute of Microbial Chemistry (Numazu, Japan). The animal study was performed as described previously [49]. CHO/CD44v3–10, HSC-2, or SAS cells (5 × 106 cells) suspended with BD Matrigel Matrix Growth Factor Reduced (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were inoculated into the left flank of female BALB/c nude mice subcutaneously. On day 7 after the inoculation, 100 μg of C44Mab-18-mG2a (n = 8), C44Mab-46-mG2a (n = 8), or control mouse IgG2a (PMab-231) (n = 8) in 100 μL PBS was injected intraperitoneally. Additional antibody injections were performed on days 14 and 21. The tumor volume was measured on the indicated days.
In the HSC-2 or SAS xenograft experiment, 500 μg of C44Mab-18-mG2a (n = 8), C44Mab-46-mG2a (n = 8), or control mouse IgG2a (PMab-231) (n = 8) in 100 μL PBS was injected intraperitoneally on days 7 and 14 after the inoculation. The tumor volume was measured on the indicated days. The xenograft tumors were carefully removed from the sacrificed mice and weighed immediately.
The tumor volume was calculated using the following formula: Volume = W2 × L/2, where W is the short diameter and L is the long diameter. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). In tumor weight measurement, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was conducted. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was utilized for tumor volume and mice weight. GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all calculations. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25179190/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K., M.K.K. and Y.K. (Yukinari Kato); methodology, T.O.; formal analysis, T.T.; investigation, K.I., H.S., T.O., G.L. and T.T.; data curation, H.S. and Y.K. (Yukinari Kato); writing—original draft preparation, K.I. and H.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.K. (Yukinari Kato); supervision, A.O. and Y.K. (Yukio Katori); project administration, Y.K. (Yukinari Kato); funding acquisition, H.S., T.T., M.K.K. and Y.K. (Yukinari Kato). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Numbers 24am0521010 (to Y.K. (Yukinari Kato)), JP23ama121008 (to Y.K. (Yukinari Kato)), JP23am0401013 (to Y.K. (Yukinari Kato)), JP23bm1123027 (to Y.K. (Yukinari Kato)), and JP23ck0106730 (to Y.K. (Yukinari Kato)) and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) grant nos. 22K06995 (to H.S.), 21K20789 (to T.T.), 21K07168 (to M.K.K.), and 22K07224 (to Y.K. (Yukinari Kato)).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Committee for Experiments of the Institute of Microbial Chemistry approved animal experiments (approval nos. 2024-013 and 2024-038).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shun-ichi Ohba and Akiko Harakawa (Institute of Microbial Chemistry [BIKAKEN], Numazu, Microbial Chemistry Research Foundation) for technical assistance with the animal experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Zöller, M. CD44: Can a cancer-initiating cell profit from an abundantly expressed molecule? Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ponta, H.; Sherman, L.; Herrlich, P.A. CD44: From adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hassn Mesrati, M.; Syafruddin, S.E.; Mohtar, M.A.; Syahir, A. CD44: A Multifunctional Mediator of Cancer Progression. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jackson, D.G.; Bell, J.I.; Dickinson, R.; Timans, J.; Shields, J.; Whittle, N. Proteoglycan forms of the lymphocyte homing receptor CD44 are alternatively spliced variants containing the v3 exon. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 128, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Heider, K.H.; Mulder, J.W.; Ostermann, E.; Susani, S.; Patzelt, E.; Pals, S.T.; Adolf, G.R. Splice variants of the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 associated with metastatic tumour cells are expressed in normal tissues of humans and cynomolgus monkeys. Eur. J. Cancer 1995, 31, 2385–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Woerner, S.M.; Givehchian, M.; Dürst, M.; Schneider, A.; Costa, S.; Melsheimer, P.; Lacroix, J.; Zöller, M.; Doeberitz, M.K. Expression of CD44 splice variants in normal, dysplastic, and neoplastic cervical epithelium. Clin. Cancer Res. 1995, 1, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gansauge, F.; Gansauge, S.; Zobywalski, A.; Scharnweber, C.; Link, K.H.; Nussler, A.K.; Beger, H.G. Differential expression of CD44 splice variants in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and in normal pancreas. Cancer Res. 1995, 55, 5499–5503. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fox, S.B.; Fawcett, J.; Jackson, D.G.; Collins, I.; Gatter, K.C.; Harris, A.L.; Gearing, A.; Simmons, D.L. Normal human tissues, in addition to some tumors, express multiple different CD44 isoforms. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 4539–4546. [Google Scholar]
  9. Prochazka, L.; Tesarik, R.; Turanek, J. Regulation of alternative splicing of CD44 in cancer. Cell. Signal. 2014, 26, 2234–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heider, K.H.; Hofmann, M.; Hors, E.; van den Berg, F.; Ponta, H.; Herrlich, P.; Pals, S.T. A human homologue of the rat metastasis-associated variant of CD44 is expressed in colorectal carcinomas and adenomatous polyps. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 120, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heider, K.H.; Dämmrich, J.; Skroch-Angel, P.; Müller-Hermelink, H.K.; Vollmers, H.P.; Herrlich, P.; Ponta, H. Differential expression of CD44 splice variants in intestinal- and diffuse-type human gastric carcinomas and normal gastric mucosa. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 4197–4203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Günthert, U.; Hofmann, M.; Rudy, W.; Reber, S.; Zöller, M.; Haussmann, I.; Matzku, S.; Wenzel, A.; Ponta, H.; Herrlich, P. A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells. Cell 1991, 65, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cirillo, N. The Hyaluronan/CD44 Axis: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, Q.; Yang, C.; Gao, F. The state of CD44 activation in cancer progression and therapeutic targeting. FEBS J. 2021, 289, 7970–7986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mishra, M.N.; Chandavarkar, V.; Sharma, R.; Bhargava, D. Structure, function and role of CD44 in neoplasia. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2019, 23, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zöller, M. CD44, Hyaluronan, the Hematopoietic Stem Cell, and Leukemia-Initiating Cells. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zen, K.; Liu, D.Q.; Li, L.M.; Chen, C.X.; Guo, Y.L.; Ha, B.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C.Y.; Liu, Y. The heparan sulfate proteoglycan form of epithelial CD44v3 serves as a CD11b/CD18 counter-receptor during polymorphonuclear leukocyte transepithelial migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 3768–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bennett, K.L.; Jackson, D.G.; Simon, J.C.; Tanczos, E.; Peach, R.; Modrell, B.; Stamenkovic, I.; Plowman, G.; Aruffo, A. CD44 isoforms containing exon V3 are responsible for the presentation of heparin-binding growth factor. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 128, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Todaro, M.; Gaggianesi, M.; Catalano, V.; Benfante, A.; Iovino, F.; Biffoni, M.; Apuzzo, T.; Sperduti, I.; Volpe, S.; Cocorullo, G.; et al. CD44v6 is a marker of constitutive and reprogrammed cancer stem cells driving colon cancer metastasis. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14, 342–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orian-Rousseau, V.; Morrison, H.; Matzke, A.; Kastilan, T.; Pace, G.; Herrlich, P.; Ponta, H. Hepatocyte growth factor-induced Ras activation requires ERM proteins linked to both CD44v6 and F-actin. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matzke, A.; Sargsyan, V.; Holtmann, B.; Aramuni, G.; Asan, E.; Sendtner, M.; Pace, G.; Howells, N.; Zhang, W.; Ponta, H.; et al. Haploinsufficiency of c-Met in cd44-/- mice identifies a collaboration of CD44 and c-Met in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 8797–8806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Orian-Rousseau, V.; Chen, L.; Sleeman, J.P.; Herrlich, P.; Ponta, H. CD44 is required for two consecutive steps in HGF/c-Met signaling. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 3074–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ishimoto, T.; Nagano, O.; Yae, T.; Tamada, M.; Motohara, T.; Oshima, H.; Oshima, M.; Ikeda, T.; Asaba, R.; Yagi, H.; et al. CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc− and thereby promotes tumor growth. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thanee, M.; Padthaisong, S.; Suksawat, M.; Dokduang, H.; Phetcharaburanin, J.; Klanrit, P.; Titapun, A.; Namwat, N.; Wangwiwatsin, A.; Sa-Ngiamwibool, P.; et al. Sulfasalazine modifies metabolic profiles and enhances cisplatin chemosensitivity on cholangiocarcinoma cells in in vitro and in vivo models. Cancer Metab. 2021, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ogihara, K.; Kikuchi, E.; Okazaki, S.; Hagiwara, M.; Takeda, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Kosaka, T.; Mikami, S.; Saya, H.; Oya, M. Sulfasalazine could modulate the CD44v9-xCT system and enhance cisplatin-induced cytotoxic effects in metastatic bladder cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 1431–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wada, F.; Koga, H.; Akiba, J.; Niizeki, T.; Iwamoto, H.; Ikezono, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Abe, M.; Masuda, A.; Sakaue, T.; et al. High expression of CD44v9 and xCT in chemoresistant hepatocellular carcinoma: Potential targets by sulfasalazine. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 2801–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Miyoshi, S.; Tsugawa, H.; Matsuzaki, J.; Hirata, K.; Mori, H.; Saya, H.; Kanai, T.; Suzuki, H. Inhibiting xCT Improves 5-Fluorouracil Resistance of Gastric Cancer Induced by CD44 Variant 9 Expression. Anticancer. Res. 2018, 38, 6163–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hagiwara, M.; Kikuchi, E.; Tanaka, N.; Kosaka, T.; Mikami, S.; Saya, H.; Oya, M. Variant isoforms of CD44 involves acquisition of chemoresistance to cisplatin and has potential as a novel indicator for identifying a cisplatin-resistant population in urothelial cancer. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Takayama, T.; Kubo, T.; Morikawa, A.; Morita, T.; Nagano, O.; Saya, H. Potential of sulfasalazine as a therapeutic sensitizer for CD44 splice variant 9-positive urogenital cancer. Med. Oncol. 2016, 33, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, K.L.; Li, D.; Lu, T.X.; Chang, S.W. Structural Characterization of the CD44 Stem Region for Standard and Cancer-Associated Isoforms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Birzele, F.; Voss, E.; Nopora, A.; Honold, K.; Heil, F.; Lohmann, S.; Verheul, H.; Le Tourneau, C.; Delord, J.P.; van Herpen, C.; et al. CD44 Isoform Status Predicts Response to Treatment with Anti-CD44 Antibody in Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 2753–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tijink, B.M.; Buter, J.; de Bree, R.; Giaccone, G.; Lang, M.S.; Staab, A.; Leemans, C.R.; van Dongen, G.A. A phase I dose escalation study with anti-CD44v6 bivatuzumab mertansine in patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6064–6072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, S.; Wu, C.C.; Fecteau, J.F.; Cui, B.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Wu, R.; Rassenti, L.; Lao, F.; Weigand, S.; et al. Targeting chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells with a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for CD44. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6127–6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vey, N.; Delaunay, J.; Martinelli, G.; Fiedler, W.; Raffoux, E.; Prebet, T.; Gomez-Roca, C.; Papayannidis, C.; Kebenko, M.; Paschka, P.; et al. Phase I clinical study of RG7356, an anti-CD44 humanized antibody, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 32532–32542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C.W.; Gomez-Roca, C.; van Herpen, C.; Coveler, A.L.; Mahalingam, D.; Verheul, H.M.; van der Graaf, W.T.; Christen, R.; Rüttinger, D.; Weigand, S.; et al. First-in-human phase I clinical trial of RG7356, an anti-CD44 humanized antibody, in patients with advanced, CD44-expressing solid tumors. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 80046–80058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Verel, I.; Heider, K.H.; Siegmund, M.; Ostermann, E.; Patzelt, E.; Sproll, M.; Snow, G.B.; Adolf, G.R.; van Dongen, G.A. Tumor targeting properties of monoclonal antibodies with different affinity for target antigen CD44V6 in nude mice bearing head-and-neck cancer xenografts. Int. J. Cancer 2002, 99, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Riechelmann, H.; Sauter, A.; Golze, W.; Hanft, G.; Schroen, C.; Hoermann, K.; Erhardt, T.; Gronau, S. Phase I trial with the CD44v6-targeting immunoconjugate bivatuzumab mertansine in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tsao, L.C.; Force, J.; Hartman, Z.C. Mechanisms of Therapeutic Antitumor Monoclonal Antibodies. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 4641–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cantoni, C.; Falco, M.; Vitale, M.; Pietra, G.; Munari, E.; Pende, D.; Mingari, M.C.; Sivori, S.; Moretta, L. Human NK cells and cancer. Oncoimmunology 2024, 13, 2378520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Van Wagoner, C.M.; Rivera-Escalera, F.; Jaimes-Delgadillo, N.C.; Chu, C.C.; Zent, C.S.; Elliott, M.R. Antibody-mediated phagocytosis in cancer immunotherapy. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 319, 128–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reis, E.S.; Mastellos, D.C.; Ricklin, D.; Mantovani, A.; Lambris, J.D. Complement in cancer: Untangling an intricate relationship. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Taylor, R.P.; Lindorfer, M.A. Cytotoxic mechanisms of immunotherapy: Harnessing complement in the action of anti-tumor monoclonal antibodies. Semin. Immunol. 2016, 28, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Reff, M.E.; Carner, K.; Chambers, K.S.; Chinn, P.C.; Leonard, J.E.; Raab, R.; Newman, R.A.; Hanna, N.; Anderson, D.R. Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20. Blood 1994, 83, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. de Weers, M.; Tai, Y.T.; van der Veer, M.S.; Bakker, J.M.; Vink, T.; Jacobs, D.C.; Oomen, L.A.; Peipp, M.; Valerius, T.; Slootstra, J.W.; et al. Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 1840–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zent, C.S.; Secreto, C.R.; LaPlant, B.R.; Bone, N.D.; Call, T.G.; Shanafelt, T.D.; Jelinek, D.F.; Tschumper, R.C.; Kay, N.E. Direct and complement dependent cytotoxicity in CLL cells from patients with high-risk early-intermediate stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with alemtuzumab and rituximab. Leuk. Res. 2008, 32, 1849–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schmudde, I.; Laumonnier, Y.; Köhl, J. Anaphylatoxins coordinate innate and adaptive immune responses in allergic asthma. Semin. Immunol. 2013, 25, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carroll, M.C.; Isenman, D.E. Regulation of humoral immunity by complement. Immunity 2012, 37, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Weisser, N.E.; Sanches, M.; Escobar-Cabrera, E.; O’Toole, J.; Whalen, E.; Chan, P.W.Y.; Wickman, G.; Abraham, L.; Choi, K.; Harbourne, B.; et al. An anti-HER2 biparatopic antibody that induces unique HER2 clustering and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yamada, S.; Itai, S.; Nakamura, T.; Yanaka, M.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Detection of high CD44 expression in oral cancers using the novel monoclonal antibody, C(44)Mab-5. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2018, 14, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Goto, N.; Suzuki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Asano, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Monoclonal Antibody for Multiple Applications against Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Takei, J.; Asano, T.; Suzuki, H.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Epitope Mapping of the Anti-CD44 Monoclonal Antibody (C44Mab-46) Using Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis and Surface Plasmon Resonance. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2021, 40, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Asano, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Development of a Novel Epitope Mapping System: RIEDL Insertion for Epitope Mapping Method. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2021, 40, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Suzuki, H.; Kitamura, K.; Goto, N.; Ishikawa, K.; Ouchida, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. A Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 3 Monoclonal Antibody C(44)Mab-6 Was Established for Multiple Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kudo, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 variant 5 Monoclonal Antibody C44Mab-3 for Multiple Applications against Pancreatic Carcinomas. Antibodies 2023, 12, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ejima, R.; Suzuki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Asano, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 6 Monoclonal Antibody C(44)Mab-9 for Multiple Applications against Colorectal Carcinomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Suzuki, H.; Ozawa, K.; Tanaka, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 7/8 Monoclonal Antibody, C44Mab-34, for Multiple Applications against Oral Carcinomas. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tawara, M.; Suzuki, H.; Goto, N.; Tanaka, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. A Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 9 Monoclonal Antibody C44Mab-1 was Developed for Immunohistochemical Analyses Against Colorectal Cancers. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 3658–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ishikawa, K.; Suzuki, H.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Establishment of a Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 10 Monoclonal Antibody C(44)Mab-18 for Immunohistochemical Analysis against Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 5248–5262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Suzuki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Goto, N.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 4 Monoclonal Antibody C44Mab-108 for Immunohistochemistry. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 1875–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ishikawa, K.; Suzuki, H.; Ohishi, T.; Nakamura, T.; Yanaka, M.; Li, G.; Tanaka, T.; Ohkoshi, A.; Kawada, M.; Kaneko, M.K.; et al. Antitumor activities of anti-CD44 monoclonal antibodies in mouse xenograft models of esophageal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang, H.; Brown, R.L.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, P.; Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Deng, Y.; Hu, X.; Zhang, J.; Gao, X.D.; et al. CD44 splice isoform switching determines breast cancer stem cell state. Genes Dev. 2019, 33, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Johnson, D.E.; Burtness, B.; Leemans, C.R.; Lui, V.W.Y.; Bauman, J.E.; Grandis, J.R. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ludwig, N.; Szczepanski, M.J.; Gluszko, A.; Szafarowski, T.; Azambuja, J.H.; Dolg, L.; Gellrich, N.C.; Kampmann, A.; Whiteside, T.L.; Zimmerer, R.M. CD44(+) tumor cells promote early angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2019, 467, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Boxberg, M.; Götz, C.; Haidari, S.; Dorfner, C.; Jesinghaus, M.; Drecoll, E.; Boskov, M.; Wolff, K.D.; Weichert, W.; Haller, B.; et al. Immunohistochemical expression of CD44 in oral squamous cell carcinoma in relation to histomorphological parameters and clinicopathological factors. Histopathology 2018, 73, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, J.; Zhou, J.; Lu, J.; Xiong, H.; Shi, X.; Gong, L. Significance of CD44 expression in head and neck cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. de Jong, M.C.; Pramana, J.; van der Wal, J.E.; Lacko, M.; Peutz-Kootstra, C.J.; de Jong, J.M.; Takes, R.P.; Kaanders, J.H.; van der Laan, B.F.; Wachters, J.; et al. CD44 expression predicts local recurrence after radiotherapy in larynx cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 5329–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, Y.; Shin, J.H.; Longmire, M.; Wang, H.; Kohrt, H.E.; Chang, H.Y.; Sunwoo, J.B. CD44+ Cells in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Suppress T-Cell-Mediated Immunity by Selective Constitutive and Inducible Expression of PD-L1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3571–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Davis, S.J.; Divi, V.; Owen, J.H.; Bradford, C.R.; Carey, T.E.; Papagerakis, S.; Prince, M.E. Metastatic potential of cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2010, 136, 1260–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hiemstra, I.H.; Santegoets, K.C.M.; Janmaat, M.L.; De Goeij, B.; Ten Hagen, W.; van Dooremalen, S.; Boross, P.; van den Brakel, J.; Bosgra, S.; Andringa, G.; et al. Preclinical anti-tumour activity of HexaBody-CD38, a next-generation CD38 antibody with superior complement-dependent cytotoxic activity. EBioMedicine 2023, 93, 104663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. de Jong, R.N.; Beurskens, F.J.; Verploegen, S.; Strumane, K.; van Kampen, M.D.; Voorhorst, M.; Horstman, W.; Engelberts, P.J.; Oostindie, S.C.; Wang, G.; et al. A Novel Platform for the Potentiation of Therapeutic Antibodies Based on Antigen-Dependent Formation of IgG Hexamers at the Cell Surface. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e1002344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Maruoka, Y.; Wakiyama, H.; Choyke, P.L.; Kobayashi, H. Near infrared photoimmunotherapy for cancers: A translational perspective. EBioMedicine 2021, 70, 103501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kato, T.; Wakiyama, H.; Furusawa, A.; Choyke, P.L.; Kobayashi, H. Near Infrared Photoimmunotherapy; A Review of Targets for Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2021, 13, 2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ogawa, M.; Tomita, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Lee, M.J.; Lee, S.; Tomita, S.; Nagaya, T.; Sato, K.; Yamauchi, T.; Iwai, H.; et al. Immunogenic cancer cell death selectively induced by near infrared photoimmunotherapy initiates host tumor immunity. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 10425–10436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mitsunaga, M.; Ogawa, M.; Kosaka, N.; Rosenblum, L.T.; Choyke, P.L.; Kobayashi, H. Cancer cell-selective in vivo near infrared photoimmunotherapy targeting specific membrane molecules. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1685–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nagaya, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Okuyama, S.; Ogata, F.; Maruoka, Y.; Choyke, P.L.; Allen, C.; Kobayashi, H. Syngeneic Mouse Models of Oral Cancer Are Effectively Targeted by Anti-CD44-Based NIR-PIT. Mol. Cancer Res. 2017, 15, 1667–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Aasted, M.K.M.; Groen, A.C.; Keane, J.T.; Dabelsteen, S.; Tan, E.; Schnabel, J.; Liu, F.; Lewis, H.S.; Theodoropulos, C.; Posey, A.D.; et al. Targeting Solid Cancers with a Cancer-Specific Monoclonal Antibody to Surface Expressed Aberrantly O-glycosylated Proteins. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2023, 22, 1204–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Arimori, T.; Mihara, E.; Suzuki, H.; Ohishi, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Takagi, J.; Kato, Y. Locally misfolded HER2 expressed on cancer cells is a promising target for development of cancer-specific antibodies. Structure 2024, 32, 536–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kaneko, M.K.; Suzuki, H.; Kato, Y. Establishment of a Novel Cancer-Specific Anti-HER2 Monoclonal Antibody H2Mab-250/H2CasMab-2 for Breast Cancers. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2024, 43, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Suzuki, H.; Ohishi, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y. Anti-HER2 Cancer-Specific mAb, H2Mab-250-hG1, Possesses Higher Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity than Trastuzumab. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kaneko, M.K.; Suzuki, H.; Ohishi, T.; Nakamura, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kato, Y. A Cancer-Specific Monoclonal Antibody against HER2 Exerts Antitumor Activities in Human Breast Cancer Xenograft Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 25 09190 g001
Figure 1. Flow cytometry using C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a. (A) Class-switched mouse IgG2a mAbs, C44Mab-18-mG2a, and C44Mab-46-mG2a were generated from C44Mab-18 (mouse IgM) and C44Mab-46 (mouse IgG1), respectively. CHO/CD44v3–10 (B) and CHO/CD44s (C) cells were treated with buffer control (black) or 10–0.01 µg/mL of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a (red). The cells were further treated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. Fluorescence data were analyzed using the SA3800 Cell Analyzer.
Figure 1. Flow cytometry using C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a. (A) Class-switched mouse IgG2a mAbs, C44Mab-18-mG2a, and C44Mab-46-mG2a were generated from C44Mab-18 (mouse IgM) and C44Mab-46 (mouse IgG1), respectively. CHO/CD44v3–10 (B) and CHO/CD44s (C) cells were treated with buffer control (black) or 10–0.01 µg/mL of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a (red). The cells were further treated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. Fluorescence data were analyzed using the SA3800 Cell Analyzer.
Ijms 25 09190 g001
Ijms 25 09190 g002
Figure 2. Flow cytometry using C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines. HSC-2 (A) and SAS (B) cells were treated with buffer control (black) or 10–0.01 µg/mL of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a (red). The cells were further treated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. Fluorescence data were analyzed using the SA3800 Cell Analyzer.
Figure 2. Flow cytometry using C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines. HSC-2 (A) and SAS (B) cells were treated with buffer control (black) or 10–0.01 µg/mL of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a (red). The cells were further treated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. Fluorescence data were analyzed using the SA3800 Cell Analyzer.
Ijms 25 09190 g002
Ijms 25 09190 g003
Figure 3. Evaluation of ADCC and CDC activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells. The ADCC (A) and CDC (B) induced by C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells. Values are shown as mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).
Figure 3. Evaluation of ADCC and CDC activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells. The ADCC (A) and CDC (B) induced by C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) against CHO/CD44v3–10 cells. Values are shown as mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).
Ijms 25 09190 g003
Ijms 25 09190 g004
Figure 4. Antitumor activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against CHO/CD44v3–10 xenograft. (A) Tumor volume of CHO/CD44v3–10 xenograft. CHO/CD44v3–10 cells (5 × 106 cells) were injected into mice subcutaneously. On days 7, 14, and 21, 100 μg of C44Mab-18-mG2a (n = 8), C44Mab-46-mG2a (n = 8), or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) (n = 8) was injected into mice intraperitoneally (arrows). The tumor volume was measured on days 7, 14, 17, 21, 24, and 28 following the inoculation. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The weight (B) and appearance (C) of excised CHO/CD44v3–10 xenografts on day 28. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The body weight (D) and appearance (E) of CHO/CD44v3–10 xenograft-bearing mice treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mIgG2a. Scale bar, 1 cm.
Figure 4. Antitumor activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against CHO/CD44v3–10 xenograft. (A) Tumor volume of CHO/CD44v3–10 xenograft. CHO/CD44v3–10 cells (5 × 106 cells) were injected into mice subcutaneously. On days 7, 14, and 21, 100 μg of C44Mab-18-mG2a (n = 8), C44Mab-46-mG2a (n = 8), or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) (n = 8) was injected into mice intraperitoneally (arrows). The tumor volume was measured on days 7, 14, 17, 21, 24, and 28 following the inoculation. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The weight (B) and appearance (C) of excised CHO/CD44v3–10 xenografts on day 28. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The body weight (D) and appearance (E) of CHO/CD44v3–10 xenograft-bearing mice treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mIgG2a. Scale bar, 1 cm.
Ijms 25 09190 g004
Ijms 25 09190 g005
Figure 5. Evaluation of ADCC and CDC activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against HSC-2 and SAS cells. The ADCC (A,C) and CDC (B,D) induced by C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) against HSC-2 (A,B) and SAS (C,D) cells. Values are shown as mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).
Figure 5. Evaluation of ADCC and CDC activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against HSC-2 and SAS cells. The ADCC (A,C) and CDC (B,D) induced by C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) against HSC-2 (A,B) and SAS (C,D) cells. Values are shown as mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).
Ijms 25 09190 g005
Ijms 25 09190 g006
Figure 6. Antitumor activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against HSC-2 and SAS xenograft. (A,B) Tumor volume in HSC-2 (A) and SAS (B) xenograft. HSC-2 and SAS cells (5 × 106 cells) were injected into mice subcutaneously. On days 7 and 14, 500 μg of C44Mab-18-mG2a (n = 8), C44Mab-46-mG2a (n = 8), or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) (n = 8) was injected into mice intraperitoneally (arrows). The tumor volume was measured on days 7, 14, and 17 following the inoculation. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (C,D) The weight and appearance of the excised HSC-2 (C) and SAS (D) xenografts on day 17. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (E,F) The body weight of HSC-2 (E) and SAS (F) xenograft-bearing mice treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mIgG2a. Scale bar, 1 cm.
Figure 6. Antitumor activity of C44Mab-18-mG2a and C44Mab-46-mG2a against HSC-2 and SAS xenograft. (A,B) Tumor volume in HSC-2 (A) and SAS (B) xenograft. HSC-2 and SAS cells (5 × 106 cells) were injected into mice subcutaneously. On days 7 and 14, 500 μg of C44Mab-18-mG2a (n = 8), C44Mab-46-mG2a (n = 8), or control mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a, PMab-231) (n = 8) was injected into mice intraperitoneally (arrows). The tumor volume was measured on days 7, 14, and 17 following the inoculation. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (C,D) The weight and appearance of the excised HSC-2 (C) and SAS (D) xenografts on day 17. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (E,F) The body weight of HSC-2 (E) and SAS (F) xenograft-bearing mice treated with C44Mab-18-mG2a, C44Mab-46-mG2a, or control mIgG2a. Scale bar, 1 cm.
Ijms 25 09190 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ishikawa, K.; Suzuki, H.; Ohishi, T.; Li, G.; Tanaka, T.; Kawada, M.; Ohkoshi, A.; Kaneko, M.K.; Katori, Y.; Kato, Y. Anti-CD44 Variant 10 Monoclonal Antibody Exerts Antitumor Activity in Mouse Xenograft Models of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179190

AMA Style

Ishikawa K, Suzuki H, Ohishi T, Li G, Tanaka T, Kawada M, Ohkoshi A, Kaneko MK, Katori Y, Kato Y. Anti-CD44 Variant 10 Monoclonal Antibody Exerts Antitumor Activity in Mouse Xenograft Models of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(17):9190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ishikawa, Kenichiro, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Tomokazu Ohishi, Guanjie Li, Tomohiro Tanaka, Manabu Kawada, Akira Ohkoshi, Mika K. Kaneko, Yukio Katori, and Yukinari Kato. 2024. "Anti-CD44 Variant 10 Monoclonal Antibody Exerts Antitumor Activity in Mouse Xenograft Models of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 17: 9190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop