Next Article in Journal
Inflammation and Fibrosis in Progeria: Organ-Specific Responses in an HGPS Mouse Model
Previous Article in Journal
Lipodystrophic Laminopathies: From Dunnigan Disease to Progeroid Syndromes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preclinical Detection of Early Glomerular Injury in Children with Kidney Diseases—Independently of Usual Markers of Kidney Impairment and Inflammation

1
Jena University Hospital, Institute of Biochemistry I, Nonnenplan 2-4, 07743 Jena, Germany
2
Jena University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
3
Clinics for Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
4
Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Jena University Hospital, Clinics for Internal Medicine I, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Shared senior authorship.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9320; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179320
Submission received: 19 July 2024 / Revised: 23 August 2024 / Accepted: 24 August 2024 / Published: 28 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms and Regulation in Chronic Kidney Diseases)

Abstract

:
Glomerular kidney diseases typically begin insidiously and can progress to end stage kidney failure. Early onset of therapy can slow down disease progression. Early diagnosis is required to ensure such timely therapy. The goal of our study was to evaluate protein biomarkers (BMs) for common nephropathies that have been described for children with Alport syndrome. Nineteen candidate BMs were determined by commercial ELISA in children with congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urogenital tract, inflammatory kidney injury, or diabetes mellitus. It is particularly essential to search for kidney disease BMs in children because they are a crucial target group that likely exhibits early disease stages and in which misleading diseases unrelated to the kidney are rare. Only minor differences in blood between affected individuals and controls were found. However, in urine, several biomarker candidates alone or in combination seemed to be promising indicators of renal injury in early disease stages. The BMs of highest sensitivity and specificity were collagen type XIII, hyaluronan-binding protein 2, and complement C4-binding protein. These proteins are unrelated to inflammation markers or to risk factors for and signs of renal failure. In conclusion, our study evaluated several strong candidates for screening for early stages of kidney diseases and can help to establish early nephroprotective regimens.

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) global prevalence is ~13.4%, and global adult CKD is increasing [1]. CKD starts without clinical symptoms despite early renal damage. CKD often progresses to end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Thus, to optimally delay CKD progression, therapy is most beneficial to asymptomatic patients, i.e., before onset of proteinuria [2,3,4,5]. Therefore, most nephropathy patients would benefit from early diagnostic and prognostic BMs.
The most frequent renal disease is diabetic kidney disease (DKD). This disease is caused mainly by hyperglycemia induced glomerular alterations, including GBM thickening and podocyte injury [6,7]. For identifying DKD, current guidelines recommend tests for microalbuminuria. However, microalbuminuria already implies glomerular malfunction [8,9,10]. Novel BMs of DKD are most likely among the products of early disease processes (e.g., focal structure damage, focal immune reactions, and inflammation) [11]. Many proposed BMs for advanced CKD and DKD derive from immune reactions and are possibly related to disease progression [12]. These proposed BMs in the blood include acute phase reactants (APRs) [10], constituents from cells and the extracellular matrix [11,13,14,15,16], including tubular segments, metabolites [15,17], (exosomal) micro-RNAs [18,19,20,21,22], exosomes [23], and urinary extracellular vesicles (uEV) [24,25]. They also include typical chemical modifications [26], epigenetic imprinting [20,27], endothelial cell injury markers [26], products of acute kidney injury (e.g., cystatin C), and products of fibrosis, like TGF-β1 [28,29]. Several tubular BMs are associated with GFR decline in childhood-onset type 1 DM (T1DM) [30] and T2DM [31]. Moreover, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) [32], focally altered proteins [33], and urinary peptide signatures were used to specify the deviation of particular BM proteins [34]. Most of these BMs require specialized techniques that are often unavailable. Current tools to diagnose CKD before onset of albuminuria include initial hyperfiltration [35], metabolites [36], constituents of uEV [24,37], and proteins [38], including signs of early immune reactions. In addition, urinary vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A), angiotensinogen (AGT), transferrin [39,40], and α1-acid glycoprotein (a1AGP) [41] were higher in normoalbuminuric children with T1DM than in controls and correlated with the urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR).
Obesity-related glomerulopathy (ORG) is associated with CKD development [42,43]. Its pathophysiology includes hemodynamic changes, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system (RAAS), endocrine and metabolic alterations, inflammation, and oxidative stress [42]. There are several proposed new BMs of early kidney injury in ORG, e.g., tubular BMs of acute kidney injury as well as slit diaphragm constituents [42].
In children, CKD is commonly due to congenital disorders and glomerular diseases [44]. Delaying CKD progression requires early, pre-symptomatic diagnosis. Therefore, BMs of early, pre-symptomatic disease and monitoring disease progression need to be sensitive enough to distinguish between affected and unaffected children [45,46,47].
In our previous work, we took use of animal models for Alport syndrome (AS), an inherited type IV collagen glomerulonephropathy. Type IV collagen is preserved in all mammalian species. Therefore, it was possible to use Alport mammalian models to study pathogenesis and therapy [48], to study glomerular injury, and to search for early BMs [49].
Because most kidney alterations start at or affect the glomerulus, similar mechanisms are likely at early stages of most CKD. Thus, according to our hypothesis, BMs can be unspecific to disease but specific to the injured glomerulus. For that reason, our study evaluated early protein biomarkers for common nephropathies. The goal was to determine the ability of our BMs to distinguish healthy individuals from those with different nephropathies in a way suitable for point-of-care early screening.

2. Results

In our previous studies [49,50], mammalian models of Alport syndrome and children with Alport syndrome were screened initially to identify generic markers for glomerular disease. In our current study, these markers are now being tested in patients with various kidney diseases (including CAKUT, cystic disease, and diabetes) to see whether they represent useful BMs for other forms of kidney disease (Figure 1). In the interest of clarity, our multi-step program was divided into a discovery phase and a proof-of-concept phase. The discovery phase (see Figure 1) included a mass spectrometric search for pre-clinical BMs in two animal models and the verification of a panel of these BMs in children with AS and similar diseases [49,50]. These BMs occur in body fluids and originate from injured glomerular structures.
In the proof-of-concept phase, we analyzed the same panel of BMs to determine whether they indicated early kidney injury in renal disorders other than AS (Figure 2). Again, we performed this determination in samples from children because it is in children that renal alterations characteristic of early or even of a pre-clinical stage of CKD can be expected.

2.1. Biomarkers Previously Identified in Early AS Discriminated between Healthy Children and Those with Various Other Nephropathies

Figure 3 shows four individual BMs with the greatest discriminatory power, and Table 1 summarizes all the BMs that were considerably different between patients and healthy controls (visualization in Supplementary Figure S1). In serum, four BMs discriminated between people with nephropathies and healthy controls. These were procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP), TGF-β1, vitronectin (VTN), and CRP. VTN and CRP were indicative in patients at risk of pre-clinical DKD. Nevertheless, the median VTN was only slightly higher in children with nephropathies than in controls, and the group ranges overlapped. However, CRP of <1 mg/L, i.e., below commonly applied concentration ranges, distinguished between groups.
In contrast to the situation in serum, in urine, 17 BMs were significantly different, mostly more abundant in patients than in controls. These 17 BMs were able to identify more than 40 times when patients had significantly higher values than controls. Among these BMs, three identified most disease groups. These three were collagen type XIII (ColXIII), hyaluronan-binding protein 2 (HABP2), and complement C4-binding protein (C4BP). They were also able to identify children in groups A and B presumed to have pre-clinical stage KD. These individuals were those with obesity, metabolic syndrome, or T2DM and T1DM.
Because several urinary BMs correlated with each other (Supplementary Table S2), we checked 26 products of positively correlated urinary BMs for their ability to enhance discrimination between patients and controls.
Several combinations indeed discriminated superiorly between patients and controls than single marker concentrations (Figure 4, Table 2), as in AS [49]. Altogether, there were 70 instances of renal injury in which we identified significantly higher values than in controls. In practice, it was possible to detect all nephropathies using at least one of these combinations. For example, we were able, using several combined BMs, to detect early KD in children with obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and T2DM (group A). Ten combinations were significantly greater than controls in T1DM patients (group B), and 19 in ADPKD/ARPKD patients (group E).

2.2. Several Individual BMs and Combinations of BMs Showed Valuable Diagnostic Scores

The AUCs were above ~0.700 for ColXIII, HABP2, and C4BP, as well as combinations thereof (e.g., Table 3, Figure 5). These BMs also had reliable quality characteristics (sensitivity, false positive rate), either alone or in combination. This held true both for several sub-groups analyzed separately (Supplementary Tables S3–S7) and for all nephropathy patients grouped together (Supplementary Table S8). In post-infection GN, IgAN, and IgAV (group G), some APRs (CRP, AGT, fibrinogen, complement factors I and H (CFI, CFH)) also produced high accuracy (Supplementary Table S7).

2.3. Correlation of Our BMs with Clinical Parameters

In this part of our study, small sample sizes prevented complete analyses for some BMs. Nevertheless, in the control group, no BM candidate correlated with BMI-SDS (Supplementary Table S9). Only serum AGT and C1q correlated with age (Supplementary Table S10). The only BM that correlated (inversely) with diastolic blood pressure was serum ADP (Supplementary Table S11). There was no need for age- or BMI-related cutoffs for any of our urinary BMs. In group A (obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension and T2DM), UACR did not correlate with any of our BM candidates. There were, however, notable relationships of urinary AGT, gelsolin (GS), VTN, and complement C9 (C9) with concurrent blood glucose levels (Supplementary Table S12). There were no such relationships with HbA1c, BMI, and CRP, however (Supplementary Tables S13 and S14). Systolic blood pressure was consistently correlated with urinary ADP (Supplementary Table S15), and diastolic blood pressure with serum PICP, TGF-β1, and urine C9. There was also no correlation of albuminuria in group B (T1DM) with any BM candidates. The associations seemingly present for urinary a1AGP with PICP, serum CRP with UACR, and of a1AGP with blood glucose were all due to single data points. (Supplementary Table S16). There was also no relationship between any BM with HbA1c, BMI, blood pressure (Supplementary Tables S17 and S18), or with disease duration (Supplementary Table S19). Groups C to G all had few members. We therefore combined all pediatric patients diagnosed with nephropathies for correlation analysis. Combined, UACR and serum creatinine did not correlate with any of our BMs except urinary lumican (LUM), which was related to microalbuminuria (Supplementary Table S20). There was no correlation of any BM with eGFR or cGFR (Supplementary Table S21), and only a few samples produced a weak inverse correlation of cGFR with serum CFH. No BM was related to serum or urine CRP, i.e., to an inflammation degree, which is absent or subclinical, applying the current threshold (Supplementary Table S22). In nephropathies, no BM was associated with blood pressure (Supplementary Table S23).

2.4. Sex Differences

There were no gender-dependent differences in individual characteristics or main clinical data in our control group (Table 1). Moreover, in all groups of sufficient sample size, there were no consistent differences in BM concentrations (Supplementary Tables S24 and S25) between males and females. There were thus no sex-specific cutoffs.

3. Discussion

The most promising biomarker candidates in the urine with the highest sensitivity and specificity for early disease stages were collagen type XIII, hyaluronan-binding protein 2, and complement C4-binding protein. We verified these pre-clinical BMs in both pre-clinical and in early stages of the different nephropathy types, acquired and inherited, provoked by differing pathogenetic dysfunctions.
Urinary ColXIII, HABP2, and C4BP are BMs of glomerular origin. ColXIII is a glomerular endothelial membrane protein [51], HABP2 a GBM constituent, and C4BP a regulatory complement component. The last two are produced by podocytes [52]. Thus, these BMs are probably specific for early glomerular injury, independently of the renal impairment indicators usually applied.
In contrast, serum CRP was not greater in pre-clinical AS than in controls, supporting the lack of overt systemic inflammation pre-clinically [49]. In this study, most juvenile patients were also in pre-clinical nephropathy, although few were at a later stage. It is notable that, in both cases, CRP inflammation marker concentrations lay within the currently accepted normal range.
Children with obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and T2DM (group A) are at high risk of developing kidney impairment [53,54]. In our study, these children were still in the pre-clinical CKD stage, including a normal GFR (Table 1 and Table 4). Nevertheless, patients had significantly higher concentrations than healthy controls of CRP in serum and urine, of ColXIII, HABP2, and C4BP only in urine, and of VTN only in serum. In conclusion, these BMs were highly diagnostic either alone or in combination for children of group A.
Circulating, liver-derived AGT passes through damaged glomerular filtration barriers, but it is also released from the proximal tubules into the urine [57]. In mice, AGT is raised at high levels of advanced glycation end-products [58], and, matching our results, high glucose levels [57]. Urinary AGT is increased by hypertension, manifested CKD, IgAN, and DM [59]. We were unable to confirm that AGT indicates kidney injury in DKD before albuminuria [60]. Thus, urinary AGT is potentially a BM for intra-renal RAAS status and for kidney impairment of various origins. However, none of our BMs correlated with BMI, though there were some relationships with blood pressure. We were unable to verify in our pediatric patients the supposed association of high urinary ADP with HbA1c and UACR in T2DM [58,61].
The correlations of urinary AGT, GS, VTN, and C9 with concurrent blood glucose were determined by blood sugar values > 7.5 mM. In consequence, they are possibly related to High Glucose-Induced podocyte injury [62].
The group with T1DM (group B) had normal parameters (serum creatinine, UACR); however, UACR and blood pressure were slightly higher and cGFR was slightly lower than in controls (Table 4). We were unable to confirm the increasing relationship of a1AGP with UACR [41]. Nevertheless, serum a1AGP correlated with blood glucose, but this was due to just two hyperglycemic values. However, as in group A, there was no correlation of any of our urinary BMs with HbA1c or BMI. There was likewise no correlation with blood pressure or with the duration of disease. Surprisingly, no urinary BMs correlated with blood glucose, as in group A. The lack of a correlation was also true of AGT, although such a correlation has been reported [40]. In this group, combinations of urinary ADP, PICP, HABP2, and TGF-β1 had the highest diagnostic scores for pre-clinical renal alterations.
For all DKD, ORG, and metabolic-syndrome-associated KD, the complement system is crucial for CKD development and progression [43]. In contrast, in our study, most complement components were not indicative in pre-clinical pediatric patients. The only exceptions were urinary C4BP (in group A) and serum C9 (in group B).
Most pediatric CKD (nephropathies, groups C to G) are inherited and involve renal mass loss (C, E), vesico-urethral reflux (D), or inflammatory nephropathies (G). Elevated glomerular filtration-pressure, RAAS-activation, and inflammation affect the glomeruli and other parts of the nephrons. In consequence, affected children are at increased risk of glomerular injury and impaired kidney function. All CKD, derived from obstructive uropathy to glomerulonephritis, have overlapping pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pathways, whatever the primary disease [63]. These diseases are usually diagnosed from family history, genetics, ultrasound scans [64], and biopsy. Our novel and early BMs are potentially able, however, to help identify injury indicating signals earlier than by the means usually applied. Moreover, such BMs are also possible aids in the development of new therapies for delaying renal failure [65], as in AS [66]. We assume that raised BM levels indicate early renal impairment because most of our patients showed no or mild renal impairment and only slightly higher-than-normal blood pressure (Table 1). In group F (nephronophthisis, a primary tubulointestinal injury), our BMs appear, as expected, practically no different from controls.
Our promising BMs indicate renal (glomerular) injury. Their diagnostic scores are slightly different, however, in our sub-groups, and slightly lower than in AS [49]. In groups C and D, urinary HABP2 had the highest score. In group H, urinary HABP2 also had the highest score, but in combination with one of the other BMs (fibrinogen, C4BP, or ColXIII). We also found CFH and CFI to be moderately indicative in groups F and G. No one has yet analyzed plasma CFH as an early diagnostic BM, but an attempt was made to use it to differentiate between children with CAKUT CKD and those with non-CAKUT CKD [67].
Gelsolin (GS) is one of a family of actin-interacting proteins mainly implicated in cytoskeletal structure remodeling [68]. In the kidney, it is mainly expressed in the tubular system [69]. Plasma GS has actin clearing as well as numerous immune modulatory activities. Consequently, GS is affected by a wide variety of injuries, including CKD, and its abundance is then usually reduced. Additionally, its levels correlate with disease progress and mortality [68,70,71,72]. GS is thus probably a general prognostic health marker [71]. Even urinary GS is a rather non-specific marker of diverse serious disturbances [73]. Nevertheless, GS is a BM more abundant in AS-mice at the earliest stage [50], in AS-dogs, and in children with AS [49] than in controls. GS also has usable diagnostic scores in groups F and G, mainly in combination with other BMs.
Because IgAN and IgAV are inflammatory diseases, several APRs (including complement regulators) were, as expected, more abundant than in controls. All BMs identified in AS were clearly elevated in these patients with high diagnostic scores. This is a strong validation of our biomarkers. We confirmed that urinary AGT is more abundant in IgAN disease than in healthy controls [74].
The relationship of urinary lumican and UACR was determined by some microalbuminuric values. There was a weak and opposing correlation of CFH with eGFR and cGFR, and the correlation with serum CRP was determined by a single data point from an obese subject. There is no relation with BP. In children, there is also no correlation of C1q with GFR in blood nor in urine, despite one in adults [75].
In AS, we were unable to identify as BMs several proposed markers of glomerular injury [49,76]. Therefore, we did not examine their validity. These proposed markers include typical constituents of the slit diaphragm, the podocytes themselves, or filtrated plasma proteins combined with several tubular products [76].
Interestingly, our study found CRP in urine to be more than three orders of magnitude lower than in serum. In patients with nephropathies (group C to G), there was no correlation between urine and serum CRP concentrations and only a weak one in groups A and B. However, both urine and serum CRP had discriminatory power in our groups with inflammatory diseases (groups A and G). Nevertheless, we do not recommend CRP for screening because it is not specific to KD. This is particularly likely to be problematic in children because children frequently suffer from other subclinical and clinically overt infections.
As a limitation of our study, our sample sizes were low because there were few routine visits from patients during our work due to the coronavirus pandemic. Nevertheless, even with the limited sample sizes, there were strong significant differences between patients and controls. Several blood-serum parameters were able to discriminate between patients and controls. Due to its higher discriminatory power and non-invasiveness, however, urine is clinically preferable for practical reasons. This is particularly true for pediatric practice. Moreover, urine contains more BMs suitable as diagnostic tools.
The goal of our biomarker approach was to identify children at early stages of CKD, which might translate to a long-term clinical benefit: a further delay of progression of CKD by early diagnosis and therapy. The potential of early diagnosis of CKD in children to delay ESKD and improve life-expectancy has been recently discussed in Clinical Practice Guideline for Microhematuria in Children and Young Adults [77].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients

We measured BMs in samples from children with various CKDs diagnosed clinically, by family history, ultrasound, histology, genetic analysis, and established renal parameters. Patients with related diseases were grouped for statistical analysis:
(A)
obesity, metabolic syndrome, manifested T2DM, and arterial hypertension
(B)
T1DM
(C)
functional solitary kidney (renal agenesis, multicystic dysplastic kidney, and unilateral hypoplasia without renal function)
(D)
congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (ureteropelvic stenosis, duplex kidneys, vesico-ureteral reflux, and lower urinary tract obstruction)
(E)
autosomal dominant and recessive polycystic KDs (ADPKD, ARPKD)
(F)
hereditary ciliopathy (juvenile nephronophthisis)
(G)
glomerular diseases (IgAN, IgA-vasculitis (IgAV), post-infectious glomerulonephritis (GN)).

4.2. Samples

We used three sample sets from humans. These samples were transported and stored below −80 °C.
Set 1 came from pediatric patient groups (see above). We determined KD stages according to KDOQI-guidelines [78]. Most patients (131/147, 89.1%) were at a pre-clinical stage based on their GFR and albuminuria, i.e., stage G1A1. In group A, all children had eGFR > 90 mL/1.73 m2 and UACR < 20 mg/g creatinine. In group B, only one child (1/47, 2%) had eGFR < 60 mL/1.73 m2 (G3a/A1), and one other UACR > 300 mg/g (G1A3). All others were in stage G1A1. None of the people in the nephropathy groups (groups C to G) had eGFR < 100 mL/1.73 m2. However, twelve patients (12/80, 15%) had microalbuminuria (G1A2), and two children (2/80, 2.5%) with polycystic KDs had UACR > 300 mg/g (G1A3).
Set 2 came from children without diabetes or nephropathy as a control group at the Department of Pediatrics of the University Hospital in Jena.
Sample sets 1 and 2 were acquired applying standard procedures (09/2020 to 09/2021, ethical approval UHJ: 2020-1800) and included blood and spot urine.
Set 3, spot urines, came from an independent cohort of pediatric control samples from the Leipzig Medical Biobank (2014, Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, LIFE-child). This set is identical with set 3 in our AS research 49 and allowed tracking over 7 years (Table 4).

4.3. Evaluation by Immune Assays

All measurements were in duplicate. Before measuring the sample values, we determined the measurable range and dilutional linearity of each assay. (ELISA test kits applied in Supplementary Table S1). All concentrations of BMs in urine were normalized by the respective urinary creatinine concentration.

4.4. Statistical Analysis of ELISA Results

We analyzed the data using SPSS™ (v. 27). The data were non-normally distributed in all patient sub-groups (Shapiro Wilk Test). Therefore, we tested group similarity by Kruskal–Wallis tests and post hoc pairwise comparison by Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (95% confidence interval, CI). To study BMs in combination, we correlated the immune reactivity of BMs with each other and multiplied positively correlated proteins. We used correlations with several clinical measures and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses to assess the diagnostic values of single and combined BMs. The interpretation followed a published protocol [79] with moderate accuracy, defined as area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.7–0.9 and high accuracy as AUC > 0.9. We rate a specific BM as indicating disease when its mean concentration is significantly different from those of healthy controls. Its suitability for detecting a disease is also given when the lower bound of the 95% CI of its AUC is >0.500 and its misclassification rate is low.

5. Conclusions

We identified three BMs as valid for the heterogeneous nephropathies we studied. These three BMs (ColXIII, HABP2, C4BP), together with several others, reliably distinguish affected children from healthy controls. They are not related to commonly assessed risk factors for kidney injury such as BMI, BP, and long-term glycemic conditions (HbA1c). They are also not associated with usual renal failure indicators (e.g., GFR and serum creatinine) or correlated with established inflammation markers. Thus, these BMs indicate very early CKD by detecting non-specific processes of kidney injury. The origin of these BMs suggests these processes are particularly likely to be glomerular disturbances. Because their diagnostic score is slightly lower than under AS and nothing is currently known of their time courses, we strongly suggest using BM combinations for diagnostics. Our validation identifies combinations as superior to single parameters. Furthermore, besides the need for further studies using larger and more equal sample sizes per group, the time courses of all the BMs applied must be determined with enough patients to improve their applicability and diagnostic scores. Given such information and their diagnostic ability and specificity, our BMs are potentially very valuable screening parameters and require evaluation in clinical practice.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25179320/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.R., O.G., A.D. and U.J.-K.; Data curation: H.R., B.T., F.W., O.M., J.S., W.K. and U.J.-K.; Formal analysis: H.R.; Investigation: H.R.; Methodology: H.R., B.T. and J.B.; Project administration: H.R., O.G., A.D. and U.J.-K.; Software: H.R.; Supervision: H.R., O.G., A.D. and U.J.-K.; Validation: H.R.; Visualization: H.R.; Original draft: H.R., O.G., A.D. and U.J.-K.; Writing—Review & Editing: all. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant/Award Number: 01KG1104, by the DFG (GR1852/6-1) awarded to Dr. O. Gross, and by the Thuringia Ministry for Education, Science, and Culture, the EFRE-fund Grant/Award Number 2013 FE 9075, and XLifeSciences (X-Kidneys) 2020/21 DD 0290-20 awarded to Dr. H. Rhode.

Institutional Review Board Statement

In accordance with the German Medicines Act, this study was approved by the ethic commission of the UHJ (UHJ: 2020-1800).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all legal representatives and from all patients 6 years and older.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information. Detailed anonymized clinical data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request. For general comments or other requests, please contact H.R.

Acknowledgments

A. J. Davis edited versions of the manuscript during its preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have any competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lv, J.C.; Zhang, L.X. Prevalence and Disease Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1165, 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gross, O.; Licht, C.; Anders, H.J.; Hoppe, B.; Beck, B.; Tönshoff, B.; Höcker, B.; Wygoda, S.; Ehrich, J.H.; Pape, L.; et al. Early angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in Alport syndrome delays renal failure and improves life expectancy. Kidney Int. 2012, 81, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Persson, F.; Lindhardt, M.; Rossing, P.; Parving, H.H. Prevention of microalbuminuria using early intervention with ren-in-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. J. Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2016, 17, 1470320316652047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Van den Belt, S.M.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Gracchi, V.; de Zeeuw, D.; Wühl, E.; Schaefer, F.; ESCAPE Trial Group. Early Proteinuria Lowering by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme In-hibition Predicts Renal Survival in Children with CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018, 29, 2225–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Andeen, N.K.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Steegh, F.; Hudkins, K.L.; Najafian, B.; Alpers, C.E. The phenotypes of podocytes and parietal epithelial cells may overlap in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2015, 88, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marshall, C.B. Rethinking glomerular basement membrane thickening in diabetic nephropathy: Adaptive or pathogenic? Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2016, 311, F831–F843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kriz, W.; Löwen, J.; Gröne, H.-J. The complex pathology of diabetic nephropathy in humans. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2023, 38, 2109–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Neu, A.; Burger-Busing, J.; Danne, T.; Dost, A.; Holder, M.; Holl, R.W.; Ziegler, R. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Diabetes Mellitus in Children and Adolescents. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2019, 127, 341–352. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pugliese, G.; Penno, G.; Natali, A.; Barutta, F.; Di Paolo, S.; Reboldi, G.; Society, I.D. Diabetic kidney disease: New clinical and therapeutic issues. Joint position statement of the Italian Diabetes Society and the Italian Society of Nephrology on “The natural history of diabetic kidney disease and treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired renal function”. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 29, 1127–1150. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ceccarelli, D.C.; Paleari, R.; Solerte, B.; Mosca, A. Re-thinking diabetic nephropathy: Microalbuminuria is just a piece of the diagnostic puzzle. Clin. Chim. Acta 2022, 524, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pichler, R.; Afkarian, M.; Dieter, B.P.; Tuttle, K.R. Immunity and inflammation in diabetic kidney disease: Translating mecha-nisms to biomarkers and treatment targets. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2017, 312, F716–F731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Khan, N.U.; Lin, J.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Lu, W.; Zhong, Z.; Zhang, H.; Waqas, M.; Shen, L. Insights into predicting diabetic nephropathy using urinary biomarkers. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2020, 1868, 140475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zürbig, P.; Jerums, G.; Hovind, P.; MacIsaac, R.J.; Mischak, H.; Nielsen, S.E.; Panagiotopoulos, S.; Persson, F.; Rossing, P. Urinary proteomics for early diagnosis in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes 2012, 61, 3304–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schaefer, L.; Raslik, I.; Gröne, H.; Schönherr, E.; Macakova, K.; Ugorcakova, J.; Budny, S.; Schaefer, R.M.; Kresse, H. Small proteoglycans in human diabetic nephropathy: Discrepancy between glomerular expression and protein accumulation of decorin, biglycan, lumican, and fibromodulin. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 559–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barutta, F.; Bellini, S.; Canepa, S.; Durazzo, M.; Gruden, G. Novel biomarkers of diabetic kidney disease: Current status and potential clinical application. Acta Diabetol. 2021, 58, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chebotareva, N.; Bobkova, I.; Lysenko, L.; Moiseev, S. Urinary Markers of Podocyte Dysfunction in Chronic Glomerulone-phritis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1306, 81–99. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lodge, M.D.S.; Pullen, N.; Pereira, M.; Johnson, T.S. Urinary levels of pro-fibrotic transglutaminase 2 (TG2) may help predict progression of chronic kidney disease. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262104. [Google Scholar]
  18. Peters, L.J.F.; Floege, J.; Biessen, E.A.L.; Jankowski, J.; van der Vorst, E.P.C. MicroRNAs in Chronic Kidney Disease: Four Candidates for Clinical Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, X.; Kuang, G.; Wu, Y.; Ou, C. Emerging roles of exosomal miRNAs in diabetes mellitus. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021, 11, e468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kuo, F.C.; Chao, C.T.; Lin, S.H. The Dynamics and Plasticity of Epigenetics in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Therapeutic Applica-tions Vis-a-Vis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lanzaro, F.; Barlabà, A.; De Nigris, A.; Di Domenico, F.; Verde, V.; del Giudice, E.M.; Di Sessa, A. Pediatric Diabetic Nephropathy: Novel Insights from microRNAs. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smith, D.A.; Redman, J.E.; Fraser, D.J.; Bowen, T. Identification and detection of microRNA kidney disease biomarkers in liquid biopsies. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2023, 32, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, J.; Zheng, S.; Ma, C.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Wang, P.; Chen, P.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; et al. Research progress on exosomes in podocyte injury associated with diabetic kidney disease. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1129884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Saenz-Pipaon, G.; Echeverria, S.; Orbe, J.; Roncal, C. Urinary Extracellular Vesicles for Diabetic Kidney Disease Diagnosis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ugarte, F.; Santapau, D.; Gallardo, V.; Garfias, C.; Yizmeyián, A.; Villanueva, S.; Sepúlveda, C.; Rocco, J.; Pasten, C.; Urquidi, C.; et al. Urinary Extracellular Vesicles as a Source of NGAL for Diabetic Kidney Disease Evaluation in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 654269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Qin, X. Advances in early biomarkers of diabetic nephropathy. Front. Public Health 2018, 64, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zheng, W.; Guo, J.; Liu, Z.-S. Effects of metabolic memory on inflammation and fibrosis associated with diabetic kidney disease: An epigenetic perspective. Clin. Epigenet. 2021, 13, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thipsawat, S. Early detection of diabetic nephropathy in patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review of the literature. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2021, 18, 14791641211058856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mezher, M.; Al-Radeef, M.; Salih, K. Roles of interleukins (interleukin-18 and interleukin-17a) and transforming growth factor-beta markers in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney diseases. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2023, 14, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Suh, J.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Cho, K.S.; Jung, I.-A.; Cho, W.K.; Jeon, Y.J.; Jung, M.H.; Suh, B.K. Urinary markers in the early stage of nephropathy in patients with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2016, 31, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Satirapoj, B. Tubulointerstitial Biomarkers for Diabetic Nephropathy. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018, 2852398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, B.; Zhao, X.; Xie, W.; Hong, Z.; Zhang, Y. Integrative analyses of biomarkers and pathways for diabetic nephropathy. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1128136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, H.; Feng, J.; Tang, L. Early renal structural changes and potential biomarkers in diabetic nephropathy. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 1020443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chebotareva, N.; Vinogradov, A.; McDonnell, V.; Zakharova, N.V.; Indeykina, M.I.; Moiseev, S.; Nikolaev, E.N.; Kononikhin, A.S. Urinary Protein and Peptide Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tonneijck, L.; Muskiet, M.H.; Smits, M.M.; van Bommel, E.J.; Heerspink, H.J.; van Raalte, D.H.; Joles, J.A. Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Diabetes: Mechanisms, Clinical Significance, and Treatment. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 28, 1023–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Roointan, A.; Gheisari, Y.; Hudkins, K.L.; Gholaminejad, A. Non-invasive metabolic biomarkers for early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy: Meta-analysis of profiling metabolomics studies. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 2253–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, T.; Liu, T.C.; Liu, N.; Zhang, M. Changes in urinary exosomal protein CALM1 may serve as an early noninvasive biomarker for diagnosing diabetic kidney disease. Clin. Chim. Acta 2023, 547, 117466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, K.-S.; Lee, J.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, E.-Y.; Moon, J.-S.; Lee, S.-K.; Lee, J.-S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, H.-S. Identification of Novel Biomarker for Early Detection of Diabetic Nephropathy. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahmed, S.A.; Aziz, W.M.; Shaker, S.E.; Fayed, D.B.; Shawky, H. Urinary transferrin and proinflammatory markers predict the earliest diabetic nephropathy onset. Biomarkers 2022, 27, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dagdeviren Cakir, A.; Saygili, S.K.; Canpolat, N.; Konukoğlu, D.; Turan, H.; Çalışkan, S.; Evliyaoğlu, O. Elevated Urinary VEGF-A, Transferrin, and Angiotensinogen Levels in Normoalbuminuric Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Can They Be Early Markers of Diabetic Kidney Disease? Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2021, 94, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El-Beblawy, N.M.; Andrawes, N.G.; Ismail, E.A.; Enany, B.E.; El-Seoud, H.S.; Erfan, M.A. Serum and Urinary Orosomucoid in Young Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Link Between Inflammation, Microvascular Complications, and Subclinical Athero-sclerosis. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2016, 22, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Martínez-Montoro, J.I.; Morales, E.; Cornejo-Pareja, I.; Tinahones, F.J.; Fernández-García, J.C. Obesity-related glomerulopathy: Current approaches and future perspectives. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xu, Z.; Tao, L.; Su, H. The Complement System in Metabolic-Associated Kidney Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 902063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gupta, R.; Woo, K.; Yi, J.A. Epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2021, 34, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Magayr, T.A.; Song, X.; Streets, A.J.; Vergoz, L.; Chang, L.; Valluru, M.K.; Ong, A.C. Global microRNA profiling in human urinary exosomes reveals novel disease bi-omarkers and cellular pathways for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2020, 98, 420–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hastings, M.C.; Rizk, D.V.; Kiryluk, K.; Nelson, R.; Zahr, R.S.; Novak, J.; Wyatt, R.J. IgA vasculitis with nephritis: Update of pathogenesis with clinical implications. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2021, 37, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moran, S.M.; Cattran, D.C. Recent advances in risk prediction, therapeutics and pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Minerva Medica 2019, 110, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kashtan, C.E. Animal models of Alport syndrome. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2002, 17, 1359–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rhode, H.; Lüse, A.; Tautkus, B.; Nabity, M.; John-Kroegel, U.; Weigel, F.; Dost, A.; Schitke, J.; Metzing, O.; Böckhaus, J.; et al. Urinary Protein-Biomarkers Reliably Indicate Very Early Kidney Damage in Children with Alport Syndrome Independently of Albuminuria and Inflammation. Kidney Int. Rep. 2023, 8, 2778–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Muckova, P.; Wendler, S.; Rubel, D.; Büchler, R.; Alert, M.; Gross, O.; Rhode, H. Preclinical Alterations in the Serum of COL(IV)A3(-)/(-) Mice as Early Biomarkers of Alport Syndrome. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 5202–5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dennis, J.; Meehan, D.T.; Delimont, D.; Zallocchi, M.; Perry, G.A.; O’Brien, S.; Tu, H.; Pihlajaniemi, T.; Cosgrove, D. Collagen XIII induced in vascular endothelium mediates alpha1beta1 integ-rin-dependent transmigration of monocytes in renal fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 2527–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, X.; Ding, F.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Ding, J. The Expression Profile of Complement Components in Podocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lopez, L.N.; Wang, W.; Loomba, L.; Afkarian, M.; Butani, L. Diabetic kidney disease in children and adolescents: An update. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2022, 37, 2583–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tommerdahl, K.L.; Kendrick, J.; Nelson, R.G.; Bjornstad, P. Youth versus adult-onset type 2 diabetic kidney disease: Insights into currently known structural differences and the potential underlying mechanisms. Clin. Sci. 2022, 136, 1471–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kromeyer-Hauschild, K.; Wabitsch, M.; Kunze, D.; Geller, F.; Geiß, H.C.; Hesse, V.; von Hippel, A.; Jaeger, U.; Johnsen, D.; Korte, W.; et al. Perzentile für den Body-mass-Index für das Kindes- und Jugendalter unter Heranziehung verschiedener deutscher Stichproben. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2001, 149, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. U.S. Department of Health And Human Services. The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents; U.S. Department of Health And Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  57. Wang, J.; Shibayama, Y.; Kobori, H.; Liu, Y.; Kobara, H.; Masaki, T.; Wang, Z.; Nishiyama, A. High glucose augments angiotensinogen in human renal proximal tubular cells through hepatocyte nuclear factor-5. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Garagliano, J.M.; Katsurada, A.; Miyata, K.; Derbenev, A.V.; Zsombok, A.; Navar, L.G.; Satou, R. Advanced Glycation End Products Stimulate Angiotensinogen Production in Renal Proximal Tubular Cells. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 357, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Urushihara, M.; Nagai, T.; Kinoshita, Y.; Nishiyama, S.; Suga, K.; Ozaki, N.; Jamba, A.; Kondo, S.; Kobori, H.; Kagami, S. Changes in urinary angiotensinogen posttreatment in pediatric IgA nephropathy patients. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2015, 30, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nishiyama, A.; Kobori, H. Independent regulation of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in the kidney. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2018, 22, 1231–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kamel, M.F.; Nassar, M.; Elbendary, A.; Mohamed, A.G.A.; Abdullah, M.G.; Gomaa, H.R.A.; Awad, E.M.I.; Mahmoud, H.H.; Elfiki, M.A.; Abdalla, N.H.; et al. The potential use of urinary transferrin, urinary adiponectin, urinary Retinol Binding Protein, and serum zinc alpha 2 glycoprotein levels as novel biomarkers for early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy: A case-control study. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2022, 16, 102473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tung, C.; Hsu, Y.; Shih, Y.; Chang, P.; Lin, C. Glomerular mesangial cell and podocyte injuries in diabetic nephropathy. Nephrology 2018, 23 (Suppl. S4), 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Noone, D.; Licht, C. Chronic kidney disease: A new look at pathogenetic mechanisms and treatment options. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2014, 29, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. La Scola, C.; Ammenti, A.; Bertulli, C.; Bodria, M.; Brugnara, M.; Camilla, R.; Capone, V.; Casadio, L.; Chimenz, R.; Conte, M.L.; et al. Management of the congenital solitary kidney: Consensus recommendations of the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2022, 37, 2185–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nishi, K.; Uemura, O.; Harada, R.; Yamamoto, M.; Okuda, Y.; Miura, K.; Pediatric, C.K.D. Early predictive factors for progression to kidney failure in infants with severe con-genital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2022, 38, 1057–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gross, O.; Tonshoff, B.; Weber, L.T.; Pape, L.; Latta, K.; Fehrenbach, H.; Wilkening, F. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial with open-arm comparison indicates safety and efficacy of nephroprotective therapy with ramipril in children with Alport’s syn-drome. Kidney Int. 2020, 97, 1275–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liao, W.-T.; Chen, W.-L.; Tain, Y.-L.; Hsu, C.-N. Complement Factor H and Related Proteins as Markers of Cardiovascular Risk in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Feldt, J.; Schicht, M.; Garreis, F.; Welss, J.; Schneider, U.W.; Paulsen, F. Structure, regulation and related diseases of the ac-tin-binding protein gelsolin. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 2019, 20, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lueck, A.; Brown, D.; Kwiatkowski, D.J. The actin-binding proteins adseverin and gelsolin are both highly expressed but dif-ferentially localized in kidney and intestine. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111 Pt 24, 3633–3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Piktel, E.; Levental, I.; Durnaś, B.; Janmey, P.A.; Bucki, R. Plasma Gelsolin: Indicator of Inflammation and Its Potential as a Diagnostic Tool and Therapeutic Target. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Peddada, N.; Sagar, A.; Ashish; Garg, R. Plasma gelsolin: A general prognostic marker of health. Med. Hypotheses 2012, 78, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lin, Q.; Mao, J.-H. Early prediction of acute kidney injury in children: Known biomarkers but novel combination. World J. Pediatr. 2018, 14, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kustán, P.; Horváth-Szalai, Z.; Mühl, D. Nonconventional Markers of Sepsis. EJIFCC 2017, 28, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Williams, C.E.C.; Toner, A.; Wright, R.D.; Oni, L. A systematic review of urine biomarkers in children with IgA vasculitis nephritis. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2021, 36, 3033–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Higashisaka, K.; Takeya, S.; Kamada, H.; Obana, M.; Maeda, M.; Kabayama, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Ishida, N.; Isaka, R.; Tsujino, H.; et al. Identification of biomarkers of chronic kidney disease among kidney-derived proteins. Clin. Proteom. 2022, 19, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mizdrak, M.; Kumrić, M.; Kurir, T.T.; Božić, J. Emerging Biomarkers for Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Latta, K.; Boeckhaus, J.; Weinreich, I.; Borisch, A.; Müller, D.; Gross, O. Clinical Practice Guideline: Microhematuria in Children and Young Adults—Evaluation for the Early Detection of Kidney Disease. Dtsch. Aerzteblatt Online 2024, 121, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Inker, L.A.; Astor, B.C.; Fox, C.H.; Isakova, T.; Lash, J.P.; Peralta, C.A.; Feldman, H.I. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the eval-uation and management of CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2014, 63, 713–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Swets, J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240, 1285–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme of our overall workflow including, all earlier and current research. The focus of our current study is the proof-of-concept step IV in children (red frame) with different kinds of CKD. Steps I (mice), II (dogs) and—in parts—III (children) have been published in [49,50]. Abbreviations: ACI, angiotensinogen converting enzyme inhibition; TBMN, thin basement membrane nephropathy; BFH, benign familial hematuria; DM, diabetes mellitus; CAKUT, congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract; ADPKD and ARPKD, autosomal dominant and recessive polycystic KDs; IgAN, IgA-nephropathy; GN, glomerulonephritis.
Figure 1. Scheme of our overall workflow including, all earlier and current research. The focus of our current study is the proof-of-concept step IV in children (red frame) with different kinds of CKD. Steps I (mice), II (dogs) and—in parts—III (children) have been published in [49,50]. Abbreviations: ACI, angiotensinogen converting enzyme inhibition; TBMN, thin basement membrane nephropathy; BFH, benign familial hematuria; DM, diabetes mellitus; CAKUT, congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract; ADPKD and ARPKD, autosomal dominant and recessive polycystic KDs; IgAN, IgA-nephropathy; GN, glomerulonephritis.
Ijms 25 09320 g001
Figure 2. Visualization of patient categories and sample sizes. Patient groups: A: Obesity, metabolic syndrome, manifested T2DM, and arterial hypertension; B: T1DM; C: functional solitary kidney (renal agenesis, multicystic dysplastic kidney, and unilateral hypoplasia without renal function); D: congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (including ureteropelvic stenosis, duplex kidneys, vesico-ureteral reflux, and lower urinary tract obstruction); E: autosomal dominant and recessive polycystic KDs (ADPKD, ARPKD); F: hereditary ciliopathy (juvenile nephronophthisis); G: glomerular diseases (IgA-nephropathy, IgA-vasculitis (IgAV), post-infectious glomerulonephritis (GN)). Outer ring: Orange: primary glomerulopathies; green: congenital nephropathies; blue: primary tubulointerstitial nephropathy. “()” indicate number of patients.
Figure 2. Visualization of patient categories and sample sizes. Patient groups: A: Obesity, metabolic syndrome, manifested T2DM, and arterial hypertension; B: T1DM; C: functional solitary kidney (renal agenesis, multicystic dysplastic kidney, and unilateral hypoplasia without renal function); D: congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (including ureteropelvic stenosis, duplex kidneys, vesico-ureteral reflux, and lower urinary tract obstruction); E: autosomal dominant and recessive polycystic KDs (ADPKD, ARPKD); F: hereditary ciliopathy (juvenile nephronophthisis); G: glomerular diseases (IgA-nephropathy, IgA-vasculitis (IgAV), post-infectious glomerulonephritis (GN)). Outer ring: Orange: primary glomerulopathies; green: congenital nephropathies; blue: primary tubulointerstitial nephropathy. “()” indicate number of patients.
Ijms 25 09320 g002
Figure 3. Examples of concentrations of individual BMs in serum and urine from patients with various nephropathies in comparison to healthy controls. Median, SD, and single data points are shown. Patient groups are identical in all charts, as given at the bottom. Significances: p < 0.05 (*); p > 0.01 (**); all other not significant. B to D: Values below the detection limit (=zero) are arranged close to the abscissa for visualization. All other significant differences are summarized in Table 2. (a): Vitronectin (VTN) in serum. (b): Collagen type XIII (ColXIII) in urine. (c): Hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2) in urine. (d): Complement C4 binding protein (C4BP) in urine.
Figure 3. Examples of concentrations of individual BMs in serum and urine from patients with various nephropathies in comparison to healthy controls. Median, SD, and single data points are shown. Patient groups are identical in all charts, as given at the bottom. Significances: p < 0.05 (*); p > 0.01 (**); all other not significant. B to D: Values below the detection limit (=zero) are arranged close to the abscissa for visualization. All other significant differences are summarized in Table 2. (a): Vitronectin (VTN) in serum. (b): Collagen type XIII (ColXIII) in urine. (c): Hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2) in urine. (d): Complement C4 binding protein (C4BP) in urine.
Ijms 25 09320 g003
Figure 4. Examples of products of concentrations of BMs in urine from patients with various nephropathies in comparison to healthy controls. Median, SD, and single data points are shown. Patient groups are identical in all charts, as given at the bottom. Significances: p < 0.05 (*); p > 0.01 (**); all other not significant. Values below the detection limit (=zero) are arranged close to the abscissa for visualization. All other significant differences are summarized in Table 3. Abbreviations: collagen type XIII (ColXIII), complement C4 binding protein (C4BP), hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2), formin 1 (FMN), adiponectin (ADP), fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG). All concentrations of BMs were normalized by urinary creatinine, like in Figure 3. These normalized values were multiplied as given on the y-axis.
Figure 4. Examples of products of concentrations of BMs in urine from patients with various nephropathies in comparison to healthy controls. Median, SD, and single data points are shown. Patient groups are identical in all charts, as given at the bottom. Significances: p < 0.05 (*); p > 0.01 (**); all other not significant. Values below the detection limit (=zero) are arranged close to the abscissa for visualization. All other significant differences are summarized in Table 3. Abbreviations: collagen type XIII (ColXIII), complement C4 binding protein (C4BP), hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2), formin 1 (FMN), adiponectin (ADP), fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG). All concentrations of BMs were normalized by urinary creatinine, like in Figure 3. These normalized values were multiplied as given on the y-axis.
Ijms 25 09320 g004
Figure 5. Examples of ROC curves of some BMs in patients with T1DM and post-infection glomerulonephritis, IgAN, and IgAV. All results, cutoffs, AUC, and sensitivity and specificity values are summarized in Supplementary Tables S3–S8. Abbreviations: collagen type XIII (ColXIII), complement C4 binding protein (C4BP), hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2), fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG), complement factor I (CFI), procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP). Products of BM concentrations were built as in Figure 4.
Figure 5. Examples of ROC curves of some BMs in patients with T1DM and post-infection glomerulonephritis, IgAN, and IgAV. All results, cutoffs, AUC, and sensitivity and specificity values are summarized in Supplementary Tables S3–S8. Abbreviations: collagen type XIII (ColXIII), complement C4 binding protein (C4BP), hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2), fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG), complement factor I (CFI), procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP). Products of BM concentrations were built as in Figure 4.
Ijms 25 09320 g005
Table 1. Significance levels (p-values, p) of individual BM concentrations in serum and urine different in patients compared with healthy controls. n: number of patient values are given as minimum and maximum because all parameters in each group were determined on different numbers of samples. p < 0.05 (light grey) is considered significant and p < 0.01 (dark grey) highly significant according to Mann–Whitney U test. All other comparisons gave non-significant differences. We also included p-values of 0.05 to 0.10 to illustrate tendencies. Bold: favored BMs. Urinary concentrations were normalized by creatinine (c). Healthy controls: n = 11–25 for serum; n = 86–101 for urine. Abbreviations: adiponectin (ADP); angiotensinogen (AGT); collagen type XIII (ColXIII); α1-acid glycoprotein (a1AGP); hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2); complement C4 binding protein (C4BP); complement factor H (CFH); complement factor I (CFI); fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG); gelsolin (GS); leucine rich glycoprotein 1 (LRGP1); vitronectin (VTN); complement component C1q (C1q); C-reactive protein (CRP); complement component C9 (C9); formin 1 (FMN); procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP); transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β); lumican (LUM).
Table 1. Significance levels (p-values, p) of individual BM concentrations in serum and urine different in patients compared with healthy controls. n: number of patient values are given as minimum and maximum because all parameters in each group were determined on different numbers of samples. p < 0.05 (light grey) is considered significant and p < 0.01 (dark grey) highly significant according to Mann–Whitney U test. All other comparisons gave non-significant differences. We also included p-values of 0.05 to 0.10 to illustrate tendencies. Bold: favored BMs. Urinary concentrations were normalized by creatinine (c). Healthy controls: n = 11–25 for serum; n = 86–101 for urine. Abbreviations: adiponectin (ADP); angiotensinogen (AGT); collagen type XIII (ColXIII); α1-acid glycoprotein (a1AGP); hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2); complement C4 binding protein (C4BP); complement factor H (CFH); complement factor I (CFI); fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG); gelsolin (GS); leucine rich glycoprotein 1 (LRGP1); vitronectin (VTN); complement component C1q (C1q); C-reactive protein (CRP); complement component C9 (C9); formin 1 (FMN); procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP); transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β); lumican (LUM).
ParameterConcentration rangeObesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Hypertension, T2DMT1DMRenal Agenesis, Multicystic Renal DysplasiaAnomalies of the Urinary Tract, Duplex KidneysADPKD, ARPKDNephronophthisisPost-Infectious GN, IgAN, IgAV
Serum
n of patients 7–1611–1911–3210–175–1533–8
ADPng/mL
a1AGPmg/mL
AGTng/mL
ColXIIIng/mL 0.066
GSµg/mL
LRGP1pg/mL
HABP2ng/mL 0.066
PICPng/mL <0.001 0.077
TGFβng/mL 0.049 0.047 0.068
VTNµg/mL0.003 0.0320.001
C9ng/mL 0.056
C4BPng/mL 0.044
CRPng/mL0.003 0.020
LUMng/mL
FMNpg/mL
CFHng/mL
CFIng/mL
FGGng/mL 0.074 0.067
C1qng/mL
Urine
n of patients 10–2040–4425–339–1810–1636–8
ADPng/mg c 0.013
a1AGPng/mg c 0.064 0.003
AGTng/mg c 0.050 0.042 <0.001
ColXIIIng/mg c0.0130.0310.0440.0040.005 <0.001
GSng/mg c 0.016 0.007
LRGP1ng/mg c 0.019
HABP2ng/mg c0.006<0.001<0.001<0.0010.012 0.020
PICPpg/mg c <0.001 0.003 0.002
TGFβpg/mg c 0.002
VTNng/mg c 0.046 0.003 0.029
C9pg/mg c 0.053
C4BPng/mg c0.009 0.0020.0150.028 <0.001
CRPpg/mg c<0.001 0.065 <0.001
CFHng/mg c 0.045 0.011 0.006
CFIng/mg c 0.020 <0.001
FMNpg/mg c 0.002
LUMng/mg c
FGGng/mg c 0.014 <0.001
C1qng/mg c 0.0290.035
Table 2. Significance levels (p-values, p) of combined BM concentrations in urine from patients compared with healthy controls. n: number of patient values are given as minimum and maximum because all parameters in each group were determined on different numbers of samples. p < 0.05 (light grey) is considered significant and p < 0.01 (dark grey) highly significant according to Mann–Whitney U test. All other comparisons gave non-significant differences. We also included p-values of 0.05 to 0.10 to illustrate tendencies. Bold: combinations with highest discriminatory power. Healthy controls: n = 84–99. Abbreviations: adiponectin (ADP); angiotensinogen (AGT); collagen type XIII (ColXIII); α1-acid glycoprotein (a1AGP); hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2); complement C4 binding protein (C4BP); complement factor H (CFH); complement factor I (CFI); fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG); gelsolin (GS); leucine rich glycoprotein 1 (LRGP1); vitronectin (VTN); complement component C1q (C1q); C-reactive protein (CRP); complement component C9 (C9); formin 1 (FMN); procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP); transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β). Products of BM concentrations were built as in Figure 4.
Table 2. Significance levels (p-values, p) of combined BM concentrations in urine from patients compared with healthy controls. n: number of patient values are given as minimum and maximum because all parameters in each group were determined on different numbers of samples. p < 0.05 (light grey) is considered significant and p < 0.01 (dark grey) highly significant according to Mann–Whitney U test. All other comparisons gave non-significant differences. We also included p-values of 0.05 to 0.10 to illustrate tendencies. Bold: combinations with highest discriminatory power. Healthy controls: n = 84–99. Abbreviations: adiponectin (ADP); angiotensinogen (AGT); collagen type XIII (ColXIII); α1-acid glycoprotein (a1AGP); hyaluronan binding protein 2 (HABP2); complement C4 binding protein (C4BP); complement factor H (CFH); complement factor I (CFI); fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG); gelsolin (GS); leucine rich glycoprotein 1 (LRGP1); vitronectin (VTN); complement component C1q (C1q); C-reactive protein (CRP); complement component C9 (C9); formin 1 (FMN); procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP); transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β). Products of BM concentrations were built as in Figure 4.
Product of BMs in UrineObesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Hypertension, T2DMT1DMRenal Agenesis, Multicystic Renal DysplasiaAnomalies of the Urinary Tract, Duplex KidneysADPKD, ARPKDNephronophthisisPost-Infectious GN, IgAN, IgAV
n of patients10–1341–4325–309–1710–1335–8
ADP × PICP <0.001 0.009 0.006
ADP × C9 0.011
ADP × C4BP0.030 0.0040.0440.0680.026<0.001
AGT × GS 0.007 0.001
AGT × C9 0.019 0.007
ColXIII × C4BP0.0020.005<0.0010.0100.002 <0.001
ColXIII × FMN0.0020.0050.0140.0210.021 <0.001
GS × CFH 0.056 0.006 0.002
GS × C9 0.007
GS × VTN 0.008 0.003
GS × CFI 0.001 0.001
LRGP1 × C1q 0.0250.059 0.033
HABP2 × TGFβ0.024<0.0010.0560.0020.005
HABP2 × FGG0.007<0.0010.0060.084<0.001 0.001
VTN × AGT 0.0500.012 0.035 0.003
VTN × C9 0.025
VTN × CFI 0.002 <0.001
C9 × CFH0.082 0.0990.024
CRP × C1q0.008 0.021 0.002
CFH × CFI 0.0680.003 <0.001
CFH × FGG 0.096 0.002 <0.001
CFI × FGG 0.003 <0.001
CFI × a1AGP 0.035 <0.001
CFI × GS 0.053 0.026
FMN × FGG 0.017 <0.001
ColXIII × C4BP × HABP2<0.0010.0060.0160.015<0.001 <0.001
Table 3. ROC analysis and comparison of urine BM values from patients with ADPKD and ARDKD (group E) with healthy controls. ROC analysis by SPSS (cf. Methods section). Only BMs with AUC >0.600 are shown. Misclassification rate = (false positives + false negatives)/total sample counts, determined at the cut-off given. For abbreviations, see Table 1 and Table 2. Concentration ranges of BMs: ng/mg creatinine: ADP, AGT, ColXIII, HABP2, C4BP, CFH, CFI, FGG, GS, LRGP1, VTN, C1q; pg/mg creatinine: CRP, C9, FMN, PICP, TGF-β. Products of BM concentrations were built as in Figure 4.
Table 3. ROC analysis and comparison of urine BM values from patients with ADPKD and ARDKD (group E) with healthy controls. ROC analysis by SPSS (cf. Methods section). Only BMs with AUC >0.600 are shown. Misclassification rate = (false positives + false negatives)/total sample counts, determined at the cut-off given. For abbreviations, see Table 1 and Table 2. Concentration ranges of BMs: ng/mg creatinine: ADP, AGT, ColXIII, HABP2, C4BP, CFH, CFI, FGG, GS, LRGP1, VTN, C1q; pg/mg creatinine: CRP, C9, FMN, PICP, TGF-β. Products of BM concentrations were built as in Figure 4.
BMCut-offSensitivity1-SpecificityAUC95%—Confidence IntervalMisclassification RateBM × BMCut-offSensitivity1-SpecificityAUC95%—Confidence IntervalMisclassification Rate
ColXIII0.070.8570.360.7170.624–0.8100.34ADP × PICP260.40.5000.0610.7270.536–0.9180.11
HABP20.290.6360.1940.7440.595–0.8940.21AGT × GS115.30.5000.1460.7540.592–0.9160.48
C4BP3.460.6920.2400.6930.512–0.8740.27AGT × C9245.80.6000.0730.7540.571–0.9380.10
CRP7.540.5290.1490.6560.495–0.8180.20C4BP × ColXIII0.530.6670.2350.7500.603–0.8970.27
CFH8.890.6670.3130.6970.542–0.8530.31GS × CFH624.00.7000.2530.7540.589–0.9180.26
CFI1.700.4620.1310.6690.496–0.8420.14GS × C9197280.6000.0910.7540.581–0.9260.12
GS × CFI184.10.7000.1110.7960.635–0.9580.13
HABP2 × TGFβ3.280.7000.1330.7550.569–0.9410.15
HABP2 × FGG365.40.7000.0920.8120.678–0.9470.11
VTN × CFI4.830.6670.1010.7650.576–0.9540.07
CFH × CFI27.30.6360.1520.7620.599–0.9250.17
CFI × FGG28830.5830.0400.7550.586–0.9240.08
CFH × FGG91800.7270.2320.7710.610–0.9310.14
C4BP × ColXIII × HABP20.110.7000.1560.7840.626–0.9420.17
Table 4. Basic and clinical characteristics in the study population and controls.Data are presented as mean, (SD), and range (age, BMI). a p < 0.05 is considered significant, b p < 0.01 highly significant, Mann-Whitney U-test. Unmarked values indicate where patients are not significantly different from healthy people or females are not significantly different from male controls. We compared BMI and blood pressure in patients with healthy cohorts of the same age, sex and height and SDS transformed BMI [55] and blood pressure [56] to a z-score (cf. Supplementary Methods). a and b indicate significant and highly significant differences between patients and controls. Healthy pediatric controls included 70 samples from the Leipzig Medical Biobank (Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases. LIFE-child (collection: 02/2014-11/2014)) as well as 34 pediatric controls acquired in Jena (09/2020-09/2021).
Table 4. Basic and clinical characteristics in the study population and controls.Data are presented as mean, (SD), and range (age, BMI). a p < 0.05 is considered significant, b p < 0.01 highly significant, Mann-Whitney U-test. Unmarked values indicate where patients are not significantly different from healthy people or females are not significantly different from male controls. We compared BMI and blood pressure in patients with healthy cohorts of the same age, sex and height and SDS transformed BMI [55] and blood pressure [56] to a z-score (cf. Supplementary Methods). a and b indicate significant and highly significant differences between patients and controls. Healthy pediatric controls included 70 samples from the Leipzig Medical Biobank (Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases. LIFE-child (collection: 02/2014-11/2014)) as well as 34 pediatric controls acquired in Jena (09/2020-09/2021).
GroupnGenderAge [y]BMI [SDS, z]eGFR [mL/min/1.73m2]Cystatin cGFR [mL/min/1.73m2]Cystatin C [serum] mg/LBlood Glucose [mmol/L]HBA1c [%]Blood Pressure Syst. [SDS, z]Blood Pressure Diast [SDS, z]Serum Creatinine [µmol/L]Urine Albumin [mg/g creatinine]
Total
controls
10448 m/56f10.3
(4.0,
3.1–17.1)
0.069
(1.264,
−3.44–3.68)
149.8
(28.2)
117.7
(23.0)
0.84
(0.12)
5.01
(1.44)
5.18
(0.28)
0.404
(0.999)
0.344
(0.943)
48.1
(14.4)
9.2
(9.9)
Female
controls
56f10.3
(4.0,
3.5–16.7
−0.064
(1.25,
−3.44–2.90)
153.4
(30.0)
121.5
(22.5)
0.81
(0.11)
5.00
(1.88)
5.17
(0.28)
0.325
(1.00)
0.409
(1.01)
45.5
(12.7)
11.1
(12.0)
Male
controls
48m10.3
(4.1,
3.1–17.1)
0.220
(1.28,
−2.50–3.68)
145.6
(25.6)
113.2
(23.1)
0.87
(0.12)
5.01
(0.60)
5.19
(0.29)
0.490
(0.997)
0.274
(0.866)
51.0
(15.8)
6.9
(5.9)
AMetabolic syndrome, hypertension, obesity, T2DM187 m/11 f14.6 b
(2.8)
2.55 b
(0.85,
0.58–4.34)
154.8
(34.7)
112.1
(20.1)
0.83
(0.13)
6.01 b
(1.29)
5.50 b
(0.39)
2.048 b
(1.27)
1.981 b
(1.31)
53.2
(10.2)
5.3
(4.8)
BT1DM
5227 m/25 f14.7 b
(4.1)
0.629 b
(1.16,
−2.96–3.23)
n. d.107.5 a
(19.3)
0.87 a
(0.14)
8.6 b
(3.8)
7.68 b (1.01)1.370 b
(1.10)
1.456 b
(0.932)
52.0
(19.0)
16.4
(49.5)
CRenal agenesis, hypoplasia, multicystic renal dysplasia3321 m/12 f11.4
(4.3)
0.268
(1.197,
−2.68–3.25)
138.9
(27.4)
101.3 a
(14.7)
0.94 b
(0.11)
5.44 b
(0.68)
5.27
(0.27)
1.452 b
(1.27)
0.556
(0.837)
54.4
(15.5)
23.6
(47.3)
DAnomalies of the urinary tract, duplex kidneys1911 m/8 f10.9
(3.8)
0.438
(1.212,
−2.68–3.25)
141.5
(27.9)
118.1
(28.7)
0.85
(0.16)
5.25b
(0.48)
5.23
(0.25)
1.647b
(0.856)
0.577
(0.815)
52.8
(14.1)
17.9
(24.5)
EADPKD, ARPKD179 m/8 f10.4
(4.5)
0.091
(0.930,
−1.58–1.92)
156.7
(29.0)
117.1
(19.0)
0.84
(0.12)
5.25 a
(0.27)
5.19
(0.25)
1.587 b
(1.14)
1.101
(0.975)
45.9
(11.1)
95.6 b
(205.5)
FNephron-ophthisis31 m/2 f8.5
(1.6)
−0.270
(0.488,
−0.96–0.10)
137.8
(32.8)
99.3
(12.7)
0.98 a
(0.11)
5.20
(0.43)
5.33
(0.25)
1.707 a
(0.684)
1.771 b
(0.441)
46.7
(12.5)
11.6
(5.7)
GPost-infectious GN, IgAN, IgAV93m/6 f13.7 b
(2.3)
0.083
(1.746,
−2.31–2.43)
146.8
(29.7)
100.8 b
(18.7)
0.93 b
(0.14)
5.87 a
(0.85)
5.34
(0.35)
1.001
(0.835)
0.054
(0.754)
55.0
(14.6)
57.6 a
(65.3)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rhode, H.; Tautkus, B.; Weigel, F.; Schitke, J.; Metzing, O.; Boeckhaus, J.; Kiess, W.; Gross, O.; Dost, A.; John-Kroegel, U. Preclinical Detection of Early Glomerular Injury in Children with Kidney Diseases—Independently of Usual Markers of Kidney Impairment and Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9320. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179320

AMA Style

Rhode H, Tautkus B, Weigel F, Schitke J, Metzing O, Boeckhaus J, Kiess W, Gross O, Dost A, John-Kroegel U. Preclinical Detection of Early Glomerular Injury in Children with Kidney Diseases—Independently of Usual Markers of Kidney Impairment and Inflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(17):9320. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179320

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rhode, Heidrun, Baerbel Tautkus, Friederike Weigel, Julia Schitke, Oliver Metzing, Jan Boeckhaus, Wieland Kiess, Oliver Gross, Axel Dost, and Ulrike John-Kroegel. 2024. "Preclinical Detection of Early Glomerular Injury in Children with Kidney Diseases—Independently of Usual Markers of Kidney Impairment and Inflammation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 17: 9320. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179320

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop