Next Article in Journal
Dimethyl Fumarate-Loaded Gellan Gum Hydrogels Can Reduce In Vitro Chemokine Expression in Oral Cells
Previous Article in Journal
X-ray Radiotherapy Impacts Cardiac Dysfunction by Modulating the Sympathetic Nervous System and Calcium Transients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

New Psychoactive Substances Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Acute and Chronic Psychiatric Effects

by
Beldisa Taflaj
1,†,
Nunzia La Maida
2,†,
Roberta Tittarelli
3,
Annagiulia Di Trana
2,* and
Ilaria D’Acquarica
4
1
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Via dell’Amba Aradam 8, 00184 Rome, Italy
2
National Centre on Addiction and Doping, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
3
Laboratory of Forensic Toxicology, Section of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Social Security and Forensic Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors equally contributed to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9484; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179484 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 August 2024 / Revised: 27 August 2024 / Accepted: 28 August 2024 / Published: 31 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on the Drug Toxicity)

Abstract

:
New psychoactive substances (NPSs) are a heterogenous group of psychotropic molecules and diverted pharmaceutical drugs sold worldwide as legal substitutes for controlled drugs. The psychiatric consequences of NPS use are relatively unknown, although evidence of related psychotic symptoms has been described in the literature. We sought to summarize the available evidence on NPS-related psychiatric disorders, to facilitate the interpretation of the molecular mechanism underlying their specific pathologies. A literature search of Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted including studies published between 2013 and 2024, in which a correlation between NPS consumption and psychiatric symptoms was reported. Furthermore, the short- and long-term psychopathological effects were included. The literature search resulted in 109 NPS-related intoxication cases in which acute or chronic psychiatric symptoms were reported, mostly related to synthetic cannabinoids, followed by synthetic cathinones, hallucinogens, natural NPSs and stimulants. The most common acute symptoms were hallucinations, aggressiveness, and psychotic and bizarre behavior, related to the molecular disbalance of neurotransmitters in the central nervous systems, with different mechanisms. The lack of clear diagnostic criteria and toxicological analyses has resulted in crucial complications in psychiatric diagnoses related to NPS intoxication. Hence, the implementation of toxicological screening procedures in emergency rooms, including the main NPS classes, should support the diagnosis of acute intoxication and its proper therapeutic treatment. Finally, proper follow-up should be implemented to assess the chronic sequelae.

1. Introduction

New psychoactive substances (NPS) are a heterogenous group of psychotropic molecules, sold worldwide as legal substitutes for controlled drugs. Moreover, diverted pharmaceutical drugs or unusual consumption settings of banned drugs of abuse are internationally monitored as NPSs, even though some substances are specifically outlawed in several countries, as in the case of ketamine and psilocybin. The rapid spread of NPSs is strongly related to their potency, relatively low production costs and ease of commercialization due to their ambiguous legal status [1,2]. Indeed, their distribution follows unusual preferred trade routes, such as via the Internet, where they are purchased under different names as products “not for human consumption” [1]. Although more than 1200 NPSs are currently known, a total number of 566 NPSs were reported to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes (UNODC) in 2022, belonging to different categories: (1) sedative/hypnotics (e.g., benzodiazepine-type NPSs), (2) dissociatives (e.g., deschloroketamine), (3) hallucinogens (e.g., phenylalkylamine-based and lysergamide-based molecules), (4) stimulants (e.g., phenethylamines, piperazines, synthetic cathinones, SCs and tryptamines), (5) synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) and (6) synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl analogs, nitazenes) [1,3]. At the end of 2023, the European illegal market was populated by about 400 NPSs, 26 of which were first reported in Europe, mostly SCRAs [4]. The constant evolution of the NPS market represents the most challenging feature of this phenomenon for health personnel, due to the unknown risks related to new substances when they are dropped into the illicit market for the first time [5].
Among the numerous adverse effects related to NPS intoxication, such as hepatotoxicity, respiratory depression, cardiotoxicity and fertility issues, psychiatric effects have recently been raising concerns [6,7]. Depending on their pharmacological classification, NPSs have highly variable mechanisms of action, some of which can potentially induce the onset of psychiatric conditions, producing a wide range of mental state changes, as well as transient psychotic states or even long-lasting psychiatric disorders [8,9]. Furthermore, subjects with psychiatric conditions, either diagnosed or not, appear more prone to NPS consumption than the general population, increasing the risk of severe mental illness or psychiatric disorder exacerbation [9,10]. According to the literature, NPS consumption may exert different acute psychiatric and neurological symptoms, such as anxiety, panic attacks, psychosis, agitated/excited delirium, paranoia and hallucinations confusion, agitation and aggression [8,11,12]. Recently, Schifano et al. investigated the mental health risk posed to the general population by NPS intoxication, focusing on the long-term effects due to NPSs’ interference with the central nervous system dopamine pathway. As a result, various complications were described in this study, such as psychosis [12]. Furthermore, psychotic events were often observed as a result of SCRA consumption by non-psychotic patients [13], or SC consumption [14,15,16]. In 2015, the psychopathological effects caused by different NPS classes were observed by Schifano and colleagues, who described the short- and long-term clinical effects of different NPSs [12].
Notably, NPS consumption often occurs as polydrug abuse, characterized by the concurrent consumption of different classes of NPSs, classic drugs of abuse and diverted pharmaceutical drugs, but also psychotropic prescription drugs such as antipsychotics or hypnotics, further complicating the psychiatric sequelae [17]. Especially in specific settings such as prisons, the concurrent misuse of such substances heavily impacts the conditions and rehabilitation of the subjects, further increasing the physical and mental health risks [18]. Therefore, the lack of analytical evidence of the consumed substance further complicates the elucidation of NPSs’ psychiatric toxicity due to the lack of important information [19].
In this scenario, we sought to systematically review the literature to identify and summarize the available evidence on the relationship between psychiatric disorders and NPS intake, to clarify the connection between NPS use and the development of specific psychopathology.

2. Materials and Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed by the authors to find all the relevant scientific articles reporting cases of NPS abuse in which acute and chronic psychiatric symptoms and/or disorders were sufficiently reported.
Three different electronic databases, Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar, were searched, considering all the items from 1 January 2013 to 6 April 2024.
The search terms consisted of the main NPS classes/substances and the psychological/psychopathological outcomes of their abuse. In particular, the following keywords, alone or in combination, were used: new psychoactive substances, designer drugs, novel psychoactive substances, synthetic cathinones, synthetic cannabinoids (SCRAs), synthetic opioids, benzimidazole opioids, fentanyl analogs, tryptamines, hallucinogens, plant-based NPS, natural NPS, phenethylamines, phencyclidines, piperazines, designer benzodiazepines.
Furthermore, Psychotic Disorders OR Psychiatric Symptoms OR Mental Disorders OR Substance-Related Disorders OR Substance Abuse OR Substance Use Disorders OR Psychotic Symptoms OR Hallucinations OR Delusions were the terms used in the query related to psychological/psychopathological outcomes, while we added Schizophrenia OR Bipolar Disorder OR Major Depressive Disorder OR Anxiety Disorders OR Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder descriptors for the major psychiatric diagnosis/outcomes.
Potentially relevant studies were retrieved manually from the reference lists of the screened/selected manuscripts.
The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was the methodology selected for the present review [20]. According to the guidelines of the 2020 PRISMA statement [20], the research team evaluated the following items: the definition of the research question, hypothesis and objectives; a bibliographic search; data collection; screening of the scientific papers selected; and finally, an analysis of the main findings and conclusions, including the strengths and weaknesses of these studies (Figure 1).
The eligibility criteria included only studies describing a correlation between the use of NPSs and psychiatric/psychopathological outcomes, studies with sufficient details on case history, and cases in which an NPS was detected by toxicological analyses or referred to by the patient or their family. Furthermore, studies in English, Italian, French and Spanish were taken into consideration. Case series with large populations with no NPS specified, narrative reviews, book chapters, books, symposiums, letters to the editor and studies not relevant to the topic were excluded.
One of the authors screened all titles and abstracts, assessing 3293 candidates according to the screening criteria. Among these, 233 duplicate records were removed, while 2662 articles were excluded based on title/inclusion/exclusion criteria, and 332 were excluded based on the abstract. Then, the full texts of the remaining articles (n = 66) were independently reviewed by the authors, who determined whether each study met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-six cross-references were identified from each included study, and of these, 6 duplicate items and 10 records marked as ineligible were excluded. The screened records (n = 40) were analyzed and 5 articles were excluded based on the abstract, and 8 based on the full text. There were 27 studies included from the cross-references. A detailed workflow of the review process is provided in the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1). There was no restriction on the setting (e.g., inpatient, forensic settings, high schools).
All the authors critically reviewed every study, and the relevant data are given in Table 1. This systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review with registration number XXX, available from XXX).

3. Results

The literature search resulted in 109 NPS-related intoxication cases in which acute or chronic psychiatric symptoms were reported (Table 1). However, a proper diagnosis of psychiatric disorder was provided in only a few cases, reporting Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD) [21] or substance-induced psychiatric disorders [22]. A total number of 36 different molecules (Figure 2) were analytically confirmed, although 37 cases reported the generic NPS class.
SCRA-related intoxications were the most reported (n = 57) in subjects with a mean age of 24.4 years (range: 14–59), involving the highest number of pediatric subjects [21,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. SCRAs were consumed either alone or in combination (n = 19) with other drugs, mostly illegal cannabinoids and NPSs [25,31,32,33,34,35,37,38]. Unfortunately, the declared molecules or the mixtures had not been verified by toxicological analysis in more than 50% of cases, correlating the psychiatric symptoms to the general class of NPS or reporting only the NPS’s commercial name [21,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Concerning SCRA-related cases, 6 molecules were analytically confirmed in 25 different intoxications, with AM-2201 being the most recurrent (n = 8) [24,27,32]. While acute symptoms were reported in all the cases, chronic sequelae of SCRA intoxication were reported in almost 8% of cases. The acute psychiatric symptoms were mostly hallucinations (n = 51) [21,23,24,28,31,32,33,38], aggressiveness (n = 24) [24,26,32,33,34,38], anxiety (n = 14) [23,24,28,33,35], paranoia (n = 11) [32,34] and psychosis (n = 11) [32,34]. Furthermore, subjects showed increased sexuality and disinhibited behavior, suggesting an empathogenic-like effect [38]. Interestingly, polydrug consumption with SCRAs increased suicidality and enhanced THC effects, with chronic episodes of hallucination and psychosis.
SCs were reported in 29 different cases, including older subjects than other NPS class users (mean age of 30.9 years, range: 17–40 years old) [16,19,22,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Similarly to SCRAs, the consumed drug was not analytically confirmed, but the medical personnel based the diagnosis on the patient declaration [39,48]. However, mephedrone (4-MMC) was the most reported among the SCs (28% cases) [16,22,42,43], followed by methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV, 21% cases) [16,19,40,41,49]. Interestingly, MDPV was prevalently consumed in combination with other drugs, while 4-MMC was indifferently consumed alone or in combination (50% vs. 50%). One-third of cases involved subjects with familial or personal psychiatric history, mostly bipolar disorder [16,19,41,45], or a substance use disorder related to classic drugs of abuse and NPSs [22,39,41,42,43,45,48]. The most frequent acute symptom was hallucination (n = 7) [16,19,39,40,41,42,43,46,47,48,49], followed by psychosis, paranoia and anxiety. Suicidal behavior was prevalently reported as related to MDPV consumption [16,49], while depressive mood was related to N-ethylcathinone [16].
Among hallucinogenic NPS intoxications, phenethylamines (n = 16) and phencyclidines (n = 1) were reported in a total of 17 cases. Subjects had a mean age of 25 years old (range: 17–53). The most representative hallucinogen was phenethylamine 25I-NBOMe (n = 9) [19,51,52], followed by 5-IT (n = 6) [53], while the only reported phencyclidine, 3-MeO-PCP, involved a subject with anxious–depressive symptoms [54]. In one case, a mix of NBOMe molecules was consumed [19], while association with other psychotropic substances was reported in 30% of cases [19,51]. Besides the expected hallucination, other psychiatric symptoms reported were aggressiveness and agitation (70% cases) [52,53]. Concerning the psychiatric history of subjects, schizophrenia was reported in one case [51]. Notably, two cases lacked acute symptoms, while mid-term symptoms were listed, like persistent memory impairment [19]. Generic psychiatric symptoms such as restlessness and pathological agitation were reported in 5-IT intoxications [53]. Otherwise, the methoxetamine-related acute symptoms were dissociation, hallucination and motivational anhedonia, resulting in a diagnosis of substance-induced psychosis after 3 months [55].
Only three cases concerned natural NPSs of different pharmacological classes, in particular, two hallucinogens and one stimulant [19,21]. Two out of three cases involved subjects with a previous diagnosis of schizophrenia (n = 1) or bipolar I disorder (n = 1) associated with regular substance abuse [19]. The psychiatric condition worsened in both cases after NPS consumption. Similarly, stimulant NPSs were reported in only three cases, in which subjects with diagnosed schizophrenia showed increased aggressiveness and bizarre behavior [19,24].
Table 1. Acute and/or chronic psychiatric symptoms in NPS-related intoxications reported in the literature between 1 January 2013 and 6 April 2024.
Table 1. Acute and/or chronic psychiatric symptoms in NPS-related intoxications reported in the literature between 1 January 2013 and 6 April 2024.
New Psychoactive SubstanceAge, Sex
Clinical History
Psychiatric ComorbiditiesOther DrugsPsychiatric SymptomsYearRef.
SCRAs = 57
5F-ADB17 yo, malenanrPsychomotor agitation, confusion, anxiety, psychosis, delirium/hallucinations,2017[23]
5F-ADB17 yo, malenanrPsychomotor agitation, confusion, anxiety psychosis, delirium/hallucination2017[23]
5F-ADB26 yo, malenanrBizarre behavior, changing moods, incessant oral fluency, nonsensical statements2019[25]
5F-ADB49 yo, malenaOpioids,
fentanyl
Substance-induced psychosis,
suicidal behavior
2019[25]
5F-ADB31 yo, malenanrPanic attacks2023[24]
5F-ADB
MMB-2201
“Cherry bomb formula 6A”
14 yo, femalenaTHCAltered consciousness, c, apparent seizures2017[23]
5F-ADBSpice21 yo, malenaTHCPsychomotor agitation, suicidality, altered language, bradypsychia2017[23]
JWH-12221 yo, malenaTHC,
6-APB
Agitation, paranoid behavior2018[32]
AB-CHMINACA
AB-FUBINACA
AM-2201
5F-AMB
5F-APINACA
EAM-2201
JWH-018
JWH-122
MAM-2201
25 yo, malenanaPsychosis, anxiety,
panic attacks, agitation
2023[24]
ADB-PINACA25 yo, malenanrRestless and aggressive behavior2015[26]
ADB-PINACA24 yo, malenanrConfusion and agitation2015[26]
ADB-PINACA30 yo, male
regular cocaine user
nanrSeverely combative and aggressive behavior2015[26]
ADB-PINACA16 yo, femalenanrMild agitation and anxiety2015[26]
AM-220126 yo, male
regular THC user
nanrSevere panic attacks, recurring visual disturbances, impairment in social and occupational functioning2015[27]
AM-220135 yo, maleparanoid schizophrenia diagnosis, antisocial personality disordernrManic, prominent behavioral changes2014[28]
AM-220121 yo, maleparanoid schizophrenianrSevere agitation, anxiety and presence of paranoid delusions2014[28]
AM-220127 yo, maleundifferentiated schizophrenianrHypomanic severe anxiety and agitation, behavioral changes, possible haptic hallucinations2014[28]
AM-220129 yo, maleundifferentiated schizophrenianrAgitation, severe formal thought
symptoms, moderate anxiety
2014[28]
AM-220118 yo, malenanaAggressive behavior2023[24]
AM-2201
JWH-073
JWH-018
23 yo, malenanrPsychotic episodes2013[29]
JWH-01817 yo, femalenaCannabisViolent behavior, hallucination2018[32]
JWH-018
JWH-122
17 yo, malenanrAltered state of mind2015[30]
JWH-12218 yo, malenaTHCAcute: hallucinations
Chronic: occasional visual disorders hallucinations, derealization and body lightness
2017[31]
JWH-12218 yo, malenanaHallucinations, perception disorder2023[24]
K219 yo, malenaTHCCombativeness2013[33]
K224 yo, malenanrAnxiety2013[33]
K222 yo, malenanrHallucinations, agitation, dream state2013[33]
K217 yo, malenanrHallucinations, catatonia, disorganized thoughts2018[32]
K236 yo, malenaEphedrine, pseudoephedrine,
promethazine,
DXM
Florid persecutory delusions, hallucinations2018[32]
K236 yo, male
THC addiction
schizophreniaTHCWorsening paranoia, illogical speech, hallucinations2018[32]
K2
Spice
18 yo, malenaTHCDelusions, disorganized behavior2018[32]
K2
(Bayou Blaster)
19 yo, femalenanrAgitation, altered mental status, drowsiness, depression,
suicidal ideations
2013[33]
SCRAs
(Mr. Nice Guy)
23 yo, malenaCannabinoidsPsychotic symptoms, persecutory delusions, agitation, aggression, paranoia, altered mental status and severe agitation2015[34]
SCRAs
(Humboldt Gold)
17 yo, malenaCannabinoidsAgitation, hallucinations2013[33]
SCRAs
(Space)
17 yo, malenanrSelf-perception disorder, anxiety2013[33]
SCRAs18 yo, malenaBDZsAnxiety, insomnia, ideas of reference hallucinations2013[35]
SCRAs20 yo, male
regular THC user
nanrAcute: disturbance in consciousness, change in cognition, delirium, psychomotor agitation, thought-blocking, disorganized behaviors and thoughts
Chronic: diagnosed with schizophreniform disorder
2013[36]
SCRAs18 yo, malenaIllicit stimulants, cannabinoidsAcute: mystical and grandiose delusions, substance-induced bipolar disorder
Chronic: mystical and grandiose delusions
2015[37]
SCRAs28 yo, maleparanoid schizophrenianrDelusional mood, persecutory delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts2018[38]
SCRAs32 yo, female
regular SCRA, THC, crack cocaine and heroin user
schizoaffective disorderAripiprazole, carbolithiumAggressive behavior, sexual disinhibition, delusional mood,
grandiose and persecutory delusions
2018[38]
SCRAs20 yo, malenaPolysubstance misuseBizarre behavior, substance-induced psychotic episodes, sexual disinhibition, arousal and aggressive behavior2018[38]
SCRAs39 yo, male
regular polysubstance user
bipolar disordernrAgitation, aggressive behavior, disordered with grandiose delusions2018[38]
SCRAs31 yo, male
occasional LSD user; ecstasy, cannabinoids and psychostimulants
nanrAcute: HPPD Type II
Chronic: perception disorders
2018[21]
SCRAs18 yo, malenanrSelf-talking and laughing, delusions, manic symptoms2018[32]
SCRAs18 yo, female
occasional THC user
nanrHallucinations, soliloquy2018[32]
SCRAs17 yo, male
regular THC, LSD and ecstasy user
nanrParanoia and disorganized thought, bizarre behavior2018[32]
SCRAs
(Black Diamond)
26 yo, malenanrParanoid delusions2018[32]
SCRAs
(bonsai)
17 yo, malenanrCapgras syndrome,
persecutory delusions, hallucination
2018[32]
SCRAs
(bonsai)
31 yo, malenanrAnger, insomnia, delusions2018[32]
SCRAs
(kush)
21 yo, malenaTHCCatatonia, self-talk,
inappropriate laughter
2018[32]
SCRAs
(Mr. Nice Guy)
23 yo, malenanrVisibly psychotic, persecutory delusions2018[32]
SCRAs
(spice)
17 yo, male
regular THC user
nanrCatatonia, delusions2018[32]
SCRAs
(spice)
17 yo, malenaLSD, psilocybin, SCs, oxycodoneDelusions, hallucinations2018[32]
Spice59 yo, male
previous regular heroin, cocaine and THC user
PTSDnrHallucinations, disorganized,
bizarre behavior
2018[32]
Spice20 yo, malenanrParanoia, hallucinations2018[32]
Spice23 yo, malenaCannabisNonsensical speech,
paranoia
2018[32]
Spice25 yo, malenanrSevere psychosis, paranoia2018[32]
SCs (n = 29)
Bath salts26 yo, female
regular SC user
nanaAfter 5 months: visual hallucinations
After 8 months: occasional hallucinations, reduced psychotic symptoms
2013[39]
Bath salts40 yo, male
regular THC user
nanrParanoid behavior, hallucinations, psychological delusions, psychosis, aggressive behavior, self-mutilation2017[48]
Bath salts29 yo, femalebipolar disorderPolysubstance abuseAltered mental state2016[19]
Bath salts23 yo, malenanrBizarre behavior, suicidality,
hallucinations
2016[19]
MDPV
4-MMC
18 yo, malenaCannabinoidsAcute: hallucinations, agitation, confusion, memory loss
After 1 week: memory and speech disorder
2014[40]
MDPV
Butylone
28 yo, malenanaAcute psychosis2016[19]
Eutylone32 yo, malebipolar affective
disorder
schizophrenia
EthanolAbnormal behavior, unconsciousness2023[16]
MDPHPnr, malenaEthanol,
BDZs
Aggressive behavior2023[16]
MDPV23 yo, malepsychiatric historyTHCBizarre behavior, suicidality, hallucinations, agitation2023[16]
MDPV40 yo, malebipolar disorder historyLidocaineAggressive behavior, delusional2023[16]
MDPV
4-MMC
33 yo, male
opiates and MAMP addiction
familial bipolar disordernrHallucinations (auditory and visual), anxiety, paranoia, withdrawal syndrome2013[41]
MDPV
4-MMC
butylone
α-PVP
46 yo, malenaZolpidemSuicidal behavior hallucinations, paranoia, anxiety persecutory delusions2014[49]
4-MMC40 yo, male
regular cocaine user
nanrAcute: persecution and reference delusions
Chronic: delusions
2016[42]
4-MMC26 yo, male
heavy ethanol userand
regular cocaine user
nanrHallucinations2016[42]
4-MMC25 yo, male
regular cocaine, KETA, GHB, MDMA,
MAMP and poppers user
antisocial behaviornrParanoid behavior, intense emotional and behavioral impact, hallucinations2016[43]
4-MMC36 yo, malenaCocaine
MDMA
BDZs
Aggressive and bizarre behavior2023[16]
4-MMC
α-PVP
26 yo, male
occasional ethanol, cannabinoid, AMP and 4-MMC user
nanrAcute: psychotic disorder
Chronic: craving, withdrawal syndrome, addiction syndrome,
drug tolerance, substance-induced schizophrenia-like psychosis diagnosis
2023[22]
Ethcathinonenr, malenaAMPDepressed mood2023[16]
Hex-en21 yo, malenaBDZs,
AMP, cannabinoids
Disorientation, aggressive behavior2023[16]
Ephylone32 yo, malenanrPsychomotor agitation, aggressive behavior2019[44]
Ephylone26 yo, femalenaMDMADisconnected speech,
episodes of visual hallucinations,
2019[44]
Ephylone26 yo, malehistory of mental disordersnrPsychosis, paranoia, inconsistent speech2019[44]
Ephylone18 yo, malenanrPsychomotor agitation2019[44]
Ephylone29 yo, male
regular MDMA and SCs user
history of bipolar disorderAMP, BDZs, cannabinoids, opiatesAgitation, aggressive behavior2017[45]
SCs45 yo, maleparanoid schizophrenia mood disordernrChronic: increasing agitation2016[19]
α-PHiP37 yo, malenanaAgitation and bizarre behavior2023[50]
α-PHP39 yo, malenanrHallucinations, delusions, aggressive behavior, anxiety, psychotic symptoms2018[46]
α-PVP17 yo, femalenanrAltered mental status, agitation, psychotic behaviors, auditory hallucinations2016[47]
α-PVP40 yo, malenanaPsychotic behavior2023[50]
Hallucinogens (n = 17)
25I-NBOMe29 yo, malenaAMP
MDMA, 2C-I
Agitation, aggressiveness, self-injury2013[51]
25I-NBOMe20 yo, malena2C-IAgitation, visual hallucinations2013[51]
25I-NBOMe19 yo, malena2C-IAgitation, auditory and
visual hallucinations
2013[51]
25I-NBOMe22 yo, malena2C-IAgitation, visual hallucinations, aggressiveness2013[51]
25I-NBOMe21 yo, male
history of 2C-B use
na2C-IAgitation, visual hallucinations, aggressiveness2013[51]
25I-NBOMe20 yo, male
regular AMP and MDMA user
naEthanol, 2C-IVisual hallucinations2013[51]
25I-NBOMe20 yo male
regular MDMA, cocaine, cannabis and LSD user
na2C-IVisual hallucinations2013[51]
25I-NBOMe18 yo, malenaCannabinoids (screening)Acute: severe agitation, hallucinations
Chronic: episodes of aggressiveness
2013[52]
25I-NBOMe
25C-NBOMe
25H-NBOMe
29 yo, nr,
regular THC and LSD user
schizophrenianrAfter 1 month: persistent memory impairment, significant abnormalities in executive functions2016[19]
3-MeO-PCP29 yo, maleanxious–depressive symptoms in adolescence
under pharmacological treatment
nrAfter 3 days: mania-like episode with psychotic features, visual and tactile hallucinations, paranoid delusions, severe dissociation, sense of impending doom, psychomotor agitation, aggressive behaviors, persistent psychotic symptoms and behavioral alterations, substance-induced psychosis2024[54]
5-IT24 yo, malenanrHallucinations, restlessness2014[53]
5-IT53 yo, malenaMXE, ethanolRestlessness2014[53]
5-IT21 yo, malenaMethylphenidate, ritalinic acid, KETAAgitation, restlessness2014[53]
5-IT27 yo, femalenaMDPV, ethylphenidate,
4-MEC, 5-APB, buprenorphine, ethanol
Hallucinations, restlessness2014[53]
5-IT23 yo, malenanaHallucinations, agitation, restlessness2014[53]
5-IT23 yo, malenanaAgitation2014[53]
MXE23 yo, male
occasional THC, KETA and LSD user
nanrAcute: usual visual and auditory hallucinosis, severe dissociative symptoms, detachment from reality and absorption in imaginative
thoughts, marked affective withdrawal, motivational anhedonia
After 3 months: diagnosis of substance-induced psychotic disorder
2019[55]
Natural NPS (n = 3)
Datura stramonium (tropane alkaloids)32 yo, male
regular hallucinogen user
paranoid schizophrenia with mental and behavioral disordersnaParanoid schizophrenia, mental and behavioral disorders2016[19]
Psilocybe spp. (psilocybin)23 yo, male
regular THC user
naEthanol,
THC
Acute: hallucinations
Chronic: HPPD Type I
2018[21]
Salvia divinorum (salvinorin A)24 yo, female
chronic salvinorin A user
bipolar I disorder, occasional psychotic symptomsnrPsychotic symptoms, auditory hallucinations, persecutory and religious delusions2016[19]
Stimulants (n = 3)
BZP48 yo, maleschizophrenianrAggressive behavior, incoherent speech2016[19]
6-APB21 yo, malenaTHCAcute psychosis, agitation,
paranoid behavior
2023[24]
Ethylphenidate30 yo, maleparanoid schizophreniaBenzocaineSevere thought disorder, chaotic and bizarre behavior pattern2016[19]
Abbreviations: yo, years-old; nr, not reported; na, not available; 5F-ADB, (S)-methyl 2-[[1-(5-fluoropentyl)indazole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate; MMB-2201, (S)-methyl 2-[[1-(5-fluoropentyl)indole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3-methylbutanoate; THC, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol; 6-APB, 6-(2-Aminopropyl)benzofuran; JWH-122, (4-methyl-1-naphthyl)-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone; AB-CHMINACA, N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide; AB-FUBINACA, N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide; AM-2201, [1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl](naphthalen-1-yl)methanone; 5F-AMB, (S)-methyl 2-({[1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indazol-3-yl]carbonyl}amino)-3-methylbutanoate; 5F-APINACA, N-(1-adamantyl)-1-(5-fluoropentyl)indazole-3-carboxamide; EAM-2201, [1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-(4-ethyl-naphthalen-1-yl)methanone; JWH-018, naphthalen-1-yl(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; MAM-2201, 1-(5-fluoropentyl)-3-(4-methyl-naphthoyl)indole; ADB-pinaca, N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide; JWH-073, (1-butyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(naphthalen-1-yl)methanone; DXM, dextromethorphan; LSD, d-Lysergic Acid Diethylamide; SCRAs, synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists; PTSD, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; HPPD, Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder; BDZs, benzodiazepines; MDPV, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone; 4-MMC, mephedrone; MAMP, methamphetamine; KETA, ketamine; GHB, γ-hydroxybutyric acid; MDMA, methylendioxymethamphetamine; MDPHP, 3,4-methylenedioxy-alpha-pyrrolidinohexanophenone; α-PVP, alpha-pyrrolidinovalerophenone; AMP, amphetamine; Hex-en, N-ethyl-hexedrone; SCs, synthetic cathinones; α-PHiP, α-pyrrolidinoisohexanophenone; α-PHP, α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone; 25I-NBOMe, 2-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)ethanamine; 2C-I, 2-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine; 2C-B, 2-(4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine; 25C-NBOMe, 2-(4-chloro-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)ethanamine; 25H-NBOMe, 2-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)ethanamine; 3-MeO-PCP, 1-[1-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine; 5-IT, 1-(1H-indol-5-yl)propan-2-amine; MXE, methoxetamine; 4-MEC, 4-methylethcathinone; 5-APB, 1-(1-benzofuran-5-yl)propan-2-amine; BZP, 1-benzylpiperazine.

4. Discussion

Every year, the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) monitors the introduction of new substances on the market with a concern for the health of consumers. Currently, over 950 NPS are under surveillance, with SCRAs being the most reported between 2022 and 2023 [4]. While NPS-related fatalities are identified through post-mortem toxicological analyses, acute intoxications are often under-reported due to misinterpretation of symptoms and lack of toxicological procedures when the subjects are admitted to emergency departments [5]. Indeed, similarly to classic drugs of abuse, NPS consumption may exert a wide range of adverse effects, such as psychopathological ones, as a result of neurotransmitter balance disruption through direct or indirect dysregulation. In particular, SCRAs showed higher affinity for the cannabinoid receptor subtypes (CB1 and CB2), with 2–200 times more potency than that shown by THC [56]. Some SCRAs, such as JWH series or K2, which share their indole structure with serotonin (5-HT) and have an inhibitory property against monoamine oxidase, have been suggested to enhance the activation of 5-HT receptors, leading to serotonin syndrome [57]. A recent study in an animal model revealed that the tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B activation in pyramidal neurons contributes to schizophrenia-like behavior, due to the activation of CB1 receptors, leading to aggressiveness and anxiety [58].
SCs typically have sympathomimetic effects similar to amphetamine, and can act as potent inhibitors of neurotransmitter transporters or releasing agents. The variation in substituents on the α-carbon, or on the amino group and phenyl ring of the cathinone scaffold, lead to different selectivity and/or ligand affinity for dopamine, norepinephrine and 5-HT transporters [59].
Hallucinogens, including natural compounds (psilocybin), phenethylamines (NMBOMe series, 5-IT), arylcyclohexylamines such as 3-methoxy-phencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP), and methoxetamine (MXE) act as partial or full agonists at 5-HT2A receptors with different binding affinities and hallucinogenic effects [60]. The N-benzyl substitution of phenethylamine hallucinogens strongly increases 5-HT2A binding affinity [61].
We investigated evidence reported in the last decade of acute and chronic psychiatric effects on individuals using NPSs. Despite the structural and pharmacological differences in the consumed substances, most individuals displayed the same symptoms, such as alterations in mental status and aggressive behavior involving psychotic symptoms. Other relevant symptoms ranged from paranoia and psychosis to hallucinations and agitation to suicidality. Indeed, suicidality has been frequently linked to SCs and SCRAs [17]. Medium-term effects lasting from one week to eight months were reported in three cases related to SCs and NBOMe nasal insufflation, with occasional visual hallucinations and memory and speech impairments [19,39,40]. Interestingly, only three cases were diagnosed with substance-induced psychotic disorder due to SCRA intake, intravenous injection of MXE and 3-MeO-PCP use [38,54,55]. The three substance-induced psychotic disorder diagnoses were supported by psychometric and neuropsychological rating scales [38], an 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography imaging technique investigating regional brain metabolism, and toxicological analyses [54,55]. These studies highlight the significance of considering multiple factors and utilizing multiple tests (interview, rated scales, diagnostic and screening laboratory tests).
Two HPPD (types I and II), one schizophrenia-like psychosis induced by novel substances and one substance-induced bipolar disorder diagnosis were determined in cases reporting the use of SCRAs, psilocybin, SCs and SCRAs, respectively [21,22,37].
In one of the two HPPD diagnoses, in a patient with declared use of cannabis since the age of 16 years and all types of psychoactive substances, including SCRAs, between 22 and 30 years, the authors reported an initial diagnosis of vegetative dysfunction and myopia peripheral vitreochorioretinal dystrophy after brain MRI and ophthalmologic tests, which resulted in an inconclusive therapy. When the therapeutic program was based on antidepressants, benzodiazepines and anticonvulsants, the patient showed mood improvement, but less improvement in visual disturbances and cenesthopathies, but the follow-up was still ongoing [21].
Beside the high interindividual differences in the reported cases, the present study highlighted that the establishment of a psychiatric diagnosis associated with NPS use is difficult due to several factors. The first limitation is the underestimation and misinterpretation of the symptoms. Indeed, NPS intoxications can lead to different clinical manifestations that are challenging to identify and categorize without the support of further clinical and toxicological investigations. NPSs showed a complex toxicological profile with acute, mid-term and chronic adverse effects. Typically, they are consumed together with other drugs of abuse, enhancing their effects and complicating the accurate association between the symptoms and the specific substance. Moreover, users are often unaware of the substance that they are consuming due to adulteration or counterfeiting of the purchased drug [62]. This misleading information, together with the lack of data on patient clinical history on drug use and/or family history of psychological disorders, can lead to a misdirected initial diagnosis. When toxicological analyses are inconclusive, information on the substances consumed can be obtained only from relatives, friends, police or patient self-reporting. Another consideration is the lack of appropriate toxicological analyses. Routine laboratory screening, such as immunoassays, are not able to identify NPSs: for this reason, further tests with different techniques, such as liquid/gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry or high-resolution mass spectrometry, need to be performed [5]. Whenever the toxicology laboratory is not prepared for NPS analyses, the hospital should commit NPS analyses to an external laboratory which is properly equipped. Furthermore, the counseling of national and international agencies prepared for NPSs, such as National Early Warning Systems, the European Drug Agency or the National Institute on Drug Abuse, could be required when NPS intoxication is suspected for further support after diagnosis. Moreover, periodical training on NPS-related issues should be organized for medical staff to prepare them to recognize and manage NPS intoxication cases and ensure the continuous updating of personnel.
Considering the included studies, the general preference for benzodiazepine as the first intervention to manage agitation or aggressive behaviors in clinical practice was confirmed by almost 90% of reported cases, followed by antipsychotics. An effective practice used to manage agitation and prevent face-to face conflicts with healthcare professionals is the program of nonviolent Crisis Intervention® through a verbal de-escalation program [63]. Some authors report that is important for advanced practice nurses to make sure that safety training programs like the Crisis Intervention Program are implemented to avoid the decision to use physical restraint [15]. Others suggest a safe Informed Clinical Management Plan including a mental state assessment through a psychometric rating scale, laboratory analyses with specific methods for the determination of NPSs, medication and physical health monitoring [38]. In many cases patients are discharged due to the resolution of symptoms after 2 to 24 h and further investigations like a follow-up are not performed. Notably, chronic symptoms may have been under-reported due to the lack of a proper follow-up in most cases. Hence, NPS use might have played a role in exacerbating the symptoms of a previous or latent disease or in triggering a new one, especially in cases of past psychiatric symptoms. Regarding this concern, different types of schizophrenia were reported as the main pre-existing psychiatric conditions in NPS consumers with psychiatric symptoms, followed by bipolar disorder. However, psychiatric comorbidities were rarely considered in the NPS intoxication cases due to the lack of proper psychiatric anamnesis and the under-reporting of family history. This consideration underlines the need for the scientific community to examine more thoroughly the clinical outcomes of each individual under the influence of NPSs on admission to hospital and monitor their manifestations over time. Nonetheless, it is undoubtedly challenging to diagnose a mental disorder due to NPS abuse without clear diagnostic criteria and with all the abovementioned difficulties.
It is important to point out that the present review has several limitations. First, our findings cannot be generalized due to the small sample size of the studies. The methodological strategy may be complicated by comorbidities associated with NPS use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.T., A.D.T. and I.D.; methodology, B.T.; formal analysis, B.T. and N.L.M.; investigation, B.T., N.L.M., R.T., A.D.T. and I.D.; resources, I.D.; data curation, B.T. and N.L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, B.T., N.L.M., R.T. and A.D.T.; writing—review and editing, R.T. and I.D.; supervision, I.D.; project administration, A.D.T.; funding acquisition, A.D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Simonetta Di Carlo, Antonella Bacosi, Michele Sciotti and Chiara Fraioli for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. UNODC World Drug Report 2024—Drug Market Patterns and Trends. Available online: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2024-drug-market-trends.html (accessed on 10 July 2024).
  2. EUDA Drug Supply, Production and Precursors—The Current Situation in Europe (European Drug Report 2024). 2024. Available online: https://www.euda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2024/drug-supply-production-and-precursors_en (accessed on 10 July 2024).
  3. Zapata, F.; Matey, J.M.; Montalvo, G.; García-Ruiz, C. Chemical Classification of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS). Microchem. J. 2021, 163, 105877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. EUDA New Psychoactive Substances—The Current Situation in Europe (European Drug Report 2024). 2024. Available online: https://www.euda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2024/drug-situation-in-europe-up-to-2024_en (accessed on 10 July 2024).
  5. Graziano, S.; Zaami, S.; Tittarelli, R.; Pichini, S.; Sciotti, M.; Berretta, P.; Busardò, F.P.; Marinelli, E.; Tini, A.; Scaravaggi, G.; et al. The Complex and Constantly Evolving Public Health Threat of New Psychoactive Substances in Italy: Addressing the Main Functions of a National Observatory of Drugs. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2021, 57, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pantano, F.; Tittarelli, R.; Mannocchi, G.; Zaami, S.; Ricci, S.; Giorgetti, R.; Terranova, D.; Busardò, F.P.; Marinelli, E. Hepatotoxicity Induced by “the 3Ks”: Kava, Kratom and Khat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schifano, N.; Chiappini, S.; Mosca, A.; Miuli, A.; Santovito, M.C.; Pettorruso, M.; Capogrosso, P.; Dehò, F.; Martinotti, G.; Schifano, F. Recreational Drug Misuse and Its Potential Contribution to Male Fertility Levels’ Decline: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Orsolini, L.; Chiappini, S.; Papanti, D.; De Berardis, D.; Corkery, J.M.; Schifano, F. The Bridge Between Classical and “Synthetic”/Chemical Psychoses: Towards a Clinical, Psychopathological, and Therapeutic Perspective. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bersani, G.; Prevete, E. Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) Use in Severe Mental Illness (SMI) Patients: Potential Changes in the Phenomenology of Psychiatric Diseases. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 32, e2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Stanley, J.L.; Mogford, D.V.; Lawrence, R.J.; Lawrie, S.M. Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances by Inpatients on General Adult Psychiatric Wards. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e009430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Shafi, A.; Berry, A.J.; Sumnall, H.; Wood, D.M.; Tracy, D.K. New Psychoactive Substances: A Review and Updates. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 10, 2045125320967197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schifano, F.; Orsolini, L.; Duccio Papanti, G.; Corkery, J.M. Novel Psychoactive Substances of Interest for Psychiatry. World Psychiatry 2015, 14, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peglow, S.; Buchner, J.; Briscoe, G. Synthetic Cannabinoid Induced Psychosis in a Previously Nonpsychotic Patient. Am. J. Addict. 2012, 21, 287–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Daswani, R.R.; Choles, C.M.; Kim, D.D.; Barr, A.M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Synthetic Cathinone Use and Psychosis. Psychopharmacology 2024, 241, 875–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stiles, B.M.; Fish, A.F.; Cook, C.A.; Silva, V. Bath Salt-Induced Psychosis: Nursing Assessment, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 2016, 52, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Daziani, G.; Lo Faro, A.F.; Montana, V.; Goteri, G.; Pesaresi, M.; Bambagiotti, G.; Montanari, E.; Giorgetti, R.; Montana, A. Synthetic Cathinones and Neurotoxicity Risks: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chiappini, S.; Mosca, A.; Miuli, A.; Santovito, M.C.; Orsolini, L.; Corkery, J.M.; Guirguis, A.; Pettorruso, M.; Martinotti, G.; Di Giannantonio, M.; et al. New Psychoactive Substances and Suicidality: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. Medicina 2021, 57, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chiappini, S.; Vaccaro, G.; Mosca, A.; Miuli, A.; Stigliano, G.; Stefanelli, G.; Giovannetti, G.; Carullo, R.; d’Andrea, G.; Di Carlo, F.; et al. New Trends of Drug Abuse in Custodial Settings: A Systematic Review on the Misuse of over-the-Counter Drugs, Prescription-Only-Medications, and New Psychoactive Substances. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2024, 162, 105691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gray, R.; Bressington, D.; Hughes, E.; Ivanecka, A. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Novel Psychoactive Substances “legal Highs” on People with Severe Mental Illness. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2016, 23, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Page, M.J.; Mckenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Skryabin, V.Y.; Vinnikova, M.; Nenastieva, A.; Alekseyuk, V. Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder: A Literature Review and Three Case Reports. J. Addict. Dis. 2018, 37, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Severtsev, V.; Budanova, A. Recurrent Psychotic Episodes Induced by Synthetic Cathinones in a Monozygotic Twin with Drug Addiction: A Case Report. Consort. Psychiatr. 2023, 4, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barceló, B.; Pichini, S.; López-Corominas, V.; Gomila, I.; Yates, C.; Busardò, F.P.; Pellegrini, M. Acute Intoxication Caused by Synthetic Cannabinoids 5F-ADB and MMB-2201: A Case Series. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 273, e10–e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Oliveira, M.C.; Vides, M.C.; Lassi, D.L.S.; Torales, J.; Ventriglio, A.; Bombana, H.S.; Leyton, V.; Périco, C.D.A.M.; Negrão, A.B.; Malbergier, A.; et al. Toxicity of Synthetic Cannabinoids in K2/Spice: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kraemer, M.; Fels, H.; Dame, T.; Musshoff, F.; Halter, S.; Mogler, L.; Hess, C.; Madea, B.; Maas, A. Mono-/Polyintoxication with 5F-ADB: A Case Series. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 301, e29–e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schwartz, M.D.; Trecki, J.; Edison, L.A.; Steck, A.R.; Arnold, J.K.; Gerona, R.R. A Common Source Outbreak of Severe Delirium Associated with Exposure to the Novel Synthetic Cannabinoid ADB-PINACA. J. Emerg. Med. 2015, 48, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Besli, G.E.; Ikiz, M.A.; Yildirim, S.; Saltik, S. Synthetic Cannabinoid Abuse in Adolescents: A Case Series. J. Emerg. Med. 2015, 49, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Celofiga, A.; Koprivsek, J.; Klavz, J. Use of Synthetic Cannabinoids in Patients with Psychotic Disorders: Case Series. J. Dual Diagn. 2014, 10, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Patton, A.L.; Chimalakonda, K.C.; Moran, C.L.; Mccain, K.R.; Radominska-Pandya, A.; James, L.P.; Kokes, C.; Moran, J.H. K2 Toxicity: Fatal Case of Psychiatric Complications Following AM2201 Exposure. J. Forensic Sci. 2013, 58, 1676–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Naviglio, S.; Papanti, D.; Moressa, V.; Ventura, A. An Adolescent with an Altered State of Mind. BMJ 2015, 350, h299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Coppola, M.; Mondola, R. JWH-122 Consumption Adverse Effects: A Case of Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder Five-Year Follow-Up. J. Psychoact. Drugs 2017, 49, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Deng, H.; Verrico, C.D.; Kosten, T.R.; Nielsen, D.A. Psychosis and Synthetic Cannabinoids. Psychiatry Res. 2018, 268, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Harris, C.R.; Brown, A. Synthetic Cannabinoid Intoxication: A Case Series and Review. J. Emerg. Med. 2013, 44, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Durand, D.; Delgado, L.; de la Parra-Pellot, D.M.; Nichols-Vinueza, D. Psychosis and Severe Rhabdomyolysis with Synthetic Cannabinoid Use: A Case Report. Clin. Schizophr. Relat. Psychoses 2015, 8, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Papanti, D.; Schifano, F.; Botteon, G.; Bertossi, F.; Mannix, J.; Vidoni, D.; Impagnatiello, M.; Pascolo-Fabrici, E.; Bonavigo, T. “spiceophrenia”: A Systematic Overview of “Spice”-Related Psychopathological Issues and a Case Report. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2013, 28, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Berry-Cabán, C.S.; Ee, J.; Ingram, V.; Berry, C.E.; Kim, E.H. Synthetic Cannabinoid Overdose in a 20-Year-Old Male US Soldier. Subst. Abus. 2013, 34, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ustundag, M.F.; Ozhan Ibis, E.; Yucel, A.; Ozcan, H. Synthetic Cannabis-Induced Mania. Case Rep. Psychiatry 2015, 2015, 310930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bonaccorso, S.; Metastasio, A.; Ricciardi, A.; Stewart, N.; Jamal, L.; Rujully, N.U.D.; Theleritis, C.; Ferracuti, S.; Ducci, G.; Schifano, F. Synthetic Cannabinoid Use in a Case Series of Patients with Psychosis Presenting to Acute Psychiatric Settings: Clinical Presentation and Management Issues. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Penders, T.M.; Lang, M.C.; Pagano, J.J.; Gooding, Z.S. Electroconvulsive Therapy Improves Persistent Psychosis after Repeated Use of Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (“bath Salts”). J. ECT 2013, 29, e59–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zamengo, L.; Frison, G.; Bettin, C.; Sciarrone, R. Understanding the Risks Associated with the Use of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS): High Variability of Active Ingredients Concentration, Mislabelled Preparations, Multiple Psychoactive Substances in Single Products. Toxicol. Lett. 2014, 229, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Winder, G.S.; Stern, N.; Hosanagar, A. Are “Bath Salts” the next Generation of Stimulant Abuse? J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2013, 44, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barrios, L.; Grison-Hernando, H.; Boels, D.; Bouquie, R.; Monteil-Ganiere, C.; Clement, R. Death Following Ingestion of Methylone. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2016, 130, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dolengevich-Segal, H.; Rodríguez-Salgado, B.; Gómez-Arnau, J.; Sánchez-Mateos, D. Severe Psychosis, Drug Dependence, and Hepatitis C Related to Slamming Mephedrone. Case Rep. Psychiatry 2016, 2016, 8379562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Costa, J.L.; Cunha, K.F.; Lanaro, R.; Cunha, R.L.; Walther, D.; Baumann, M.H. Analytical Quantification, Intoxication Case Series, and Pharmacological Mechanism of Action for N-Ethylnorpentylone (N-Ethylpentylone or Ephylone). Drug Test Anal. 2019, 11, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Thirakul, P.; Hair, L.S.; Bergen, K.L.; Pearson, J.M. Clinical Presentation, Autopsy Results and Toxicology Findings in an Acute N-Ethylpentylone Fatality. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2017, 41, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fujita, Y.; Mita, T.; Usui, K.; Kamijo, Y.; Kikuchi, S.; Onodera, M.; Fujino, Y.; Inoue, Y. Toxicokinetics of the Synthetic Cathinone α-Pyrrolidinohexanophenone. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2018, 42, e1–e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Crespi, C. Flakka-Induced Prolonged Psychosis. Case Rep. Psychiatry 2016, 2016, 3460849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. John, M.E.; Thomas-Rozea, C.; Hahn, D. Bath Salts Abuse Leading to New-Onset Psychosis and Potential for Violence. Clin. Schizophr. Relat. Psychoses 2017, 11, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dragogna, F.; Oldani, L.; Buoli, M.; Altamura, A.C. A Case of Severe Psychosis Induced by Novel Recreational Drugs. F1000Research 2014, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Albishri, S.; Alotaibi, A.; Alzoubaidi, F.; El-Serafy, O. Flakka: “The Zombie Drug” a Medicolegal Concern: An Updated Review of α-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone. Saudi J. Forensic Med. Sci. 2023, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hill, S.L.; Doris, T.; Gurung, S.; Katebe, S.; Lomas, A.; Dunn, M.; Blain, P.; Thomas, S.H.L. Severe Clinical Toxicity Associated with Analytically Confirmed Recreational Use of 25I-NBOMe: Case Series. Clin. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rose, S.R.; Poklis, J.L.; Poklis, A. A Case of 251-NBOMe (25-1) Intoxication: A New Potent 5-HT2A Agonist Designer Drug. Clin. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 174–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bäckberg, M.; Beck, O.; Hultén, P.; Rosengren-Holmberg, J.; Helander, A. Intoxications of the New Psychoactive Substance 5-(2-Aminopropyl)Indole (5-IT): A Case Series from the Swedish STRIDA Project. Clin. Toxicol. 2014, 52, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pepe, M.; Di Nicola, M.; Cocciolillo, F.; Chiappini, S.; Martinotti, G.; Calcagni, M.L.; Sani, G. 3-Methoxy-Phencyclidine Induced Psychotic Disorder: A Literature Review and an 18F-FDG PET/CT Case Report. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Moccia, L.; Tofani, A.; Mazza, M.; Covino, M.; Martinotti, G.; Schifano, F.; Janiri, L.; Di Nicola, M. Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Impairment in Methoxetamine-Induced Psychosis: An 18F-FDG PET/CT Case Study. J. Psychoact. Drugs 2019, 51, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Castaneto, M.S.; Gorelick, D.A.; Desrosiers, N.A.; Hartman, R.L.; Pirard, S.; Huestis, M.A. Synthetic Cannabinoids: Epidemiology, Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Implications. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014, 144, 12–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wells, D.L.; Ott, C.A. The “New” Marijuana. Ann. Pharmacother. 2011, 45, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Migliaro, M.; Ruiz-Contreras, A.E.; Herrera-Solís, A.; Méndez-Díaz, M.; Prospéro-García, O.E. Endocannabinoid System and Aggression across Animal Species. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2023, 153, 105375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. La Maida, N.; Di Trana, A.; Giorgetti, R.; Tagliabracci, A.; Busardò, F.P.; Huestis, M.A. A Review of Synthetic Cathinone-Related Fatalities From 2017 to 2020. Ther. Drug Monit. 2021, 43, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fantegrossi, W.E.; Murnane, K.S.; Reissig, C.J. The Behavioral Pharmacology of Hallucinogens. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 75, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Halberstadt, A.L. Pharmacology and Toxicology of N-Benzylphenethylamine (“NBOMe”) Hallucinogens. In Neuropharmacology of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS); Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 283–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Di Trana, A.; Berardinelli, D.; Montanari, E.; Berretta, P.; Basile, G.; Huestis, M.A.; Busardò, F.P. Molecular Insights and Clinical Outcomes of Drugs of Abuse Adulteration: New Trends and New Psychoactive Substances. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jonikas, J.A.; Cook, J.A.; Rosen, C.; Laris, A.; Kim, J.-B. Brief Reports: A Program to Reduce Use of Physical Restraint in Psychiatric Inpatient Facilities. Psychiatr. Serv. 2004, 55, 818–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Prisma 2020 flow diagram of the search sources and strategy.
Figure 1. Prisma 2020 flow diagram of the search sources and strategy.
Ijms 25 09484 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of NPSs involved in 109 related intoxications with acute or chronic psychiatric symptoms, categorized into classes. Abbreviations: MDPV, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone; MDPHP, 3,4-methylenedioxy-alpha-pyrrolidinohexanophenone; α-PVP, alpha-pyrrolidinovalerophenone; α-PHiP, α-pyrrolidinoisohexanophenone; α-PHP, α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone; Hex-en, N-ethyl-hexedrone; 4-MMC, mephedrone; 3-MeO-PCP, 1-[1-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine; MXE, methoxetamine; 5-IT, 1-(1H-indol-5-yl)propan-2-amine; BZP, 1-benzylpiperazine; 6-APB, 6-(2-Aminopropyl)benzofuran.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of NPSs involved in 109 related intoxications with acute or chronic psychiatric symptoms, categorized into classes. Abbreviations: MDPV, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone; MDPHP, 3,4-methylenedioxy-alpha-pyrrolidinohexanophenone; α-PVP, alpha-pyrrolidinovalerophenone; α-PHiP, α-pyrrolidinoisohexanophenone; α-PHP, α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone; Hex-en, N-ethyl-hexedrone; 4-MMC, mephedrone; 3-MeO-PCP, 1-[1-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine; MXE, methoxetamine; 5-IT, 1-(1H-indol-5-yl)propan-2-amine; BZP, 1-benzylpiperazine; 6-APB, 6-(2-Aminopropyl)benzofuran.
Ijms 25 09484 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taflaj, B.; La Maida, N.; Tittarelli, R.; Di Trana, A.; D’Acquarica, I. New Psychoactive Substances Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Acute and Chronic Psychiatric Effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179484

AMA Style

Taflaj B, La Maida N, Tittarelli R, Di Trana A, D’Acquarica I. New Psychoactive Substances Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Acute and Chronic Psychiatric Effects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(17):9484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taflaj, Beldisa, Nunzia La Maida, Roberta Tittarelli, Annagiulia Di Trana, and Ilaria D’Acquarica. 2024. "New Psychoactive Substances Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Acute and Chronic Psychiatric Effects" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 17: 9484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop