Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Detection of Collagen I Alpha II and Cytokeratin 19 mRNA by Multiplex qPCR in Liquid Biopsy in Diagnosis of Patients with Resectable Solid Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance of Circulating MicroRNAs in Colorectal Cancer Detection with a Focus on Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
MicroRNAs Participate in Morphological Acclimation of Sugar Beet Roots to Nitrogen Deficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitrate Starvation Induces Lateral Root Organogenesis in Triticum aestivum via Auxin Signaling

1
College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
2
Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9566; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179566
Submission received: 27 July 2024 / Revised: 31 August 2024 / Accepted: 1 September 2024 / Published: 3 September 2024

Abstract

:
The lateral root (LR) is an essential component of the plant root system, performing important functions for nutrient and water uptake in plants and playing a pivotal role in cereal crop productivity. Nitrate (NO3) is an essential nutrient for plants. In this study, wheat plants were grown in 1/2 strength Hoagland’s solution containing 5 mM NO3 (check; CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (low NO3; LN), or 0.1 mM NO3 plus 60 mg/L 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) (LNT). The results showed that LN increased the LR number significantly at 48 h after treatment compared with CK, while not increasing the root biomass, and LNT significantly decreased the LR number and root biomass. The transcriptomic analysis showed that LN induced the expression of genes related to root IAA synthesis and transport and cell wall remodeling, and it was suppressed in the LNT conditions. A physiological assay revealed that the LN conditions increased the activity of IAA biosynthesis-related enzymes, the concentrations of tryptophan and IAA, and the activity of cell wall remodeling enzymes in the roots, whereas the content of polysaccharides in the LRP cell wall was significantly decreased compared with the control. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and atomic microscopy revealed that the content of cell wall polysaccharides decreased and the cell wall elasticity of LR primordia (LRP) increased under the LN conditions. The effects of LN on IAA synthesis and polar transport, cell wall remodeling, and LR development were abolished when TIBA was applied. Our findings indicate that NO3 starvation may improve auxin homeostasis and the biological properties of the LRP cell wall and thus promote LR initiation, while TIBA addition dampens the effects of LN on auxin signaling, gene expression, physiological processes, and the root architecture.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient for plant growth and development and is involved in various metabolic processes [1,2]. Nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+) are the main mineral forms of N that plants utilize from the external environment [3]. In particular, besides NO3 being a macroelement, NO3 signaling can regulate numerous biological processes, root organogenesis, organ growth, and development in plants [4,5,6,7]. However, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that the irrational use of N fertilizers, especially one-off basal fertilization at planting, often causes soil acidification [8,9,10], environmental pollution, and plant growth inhibition and increases production costs, thus leading to low N use efficiency (NUE) [11].
Biotic and abiotic stress frequently occur during plant growth and development. To adapt to severely fluctuating environments, plants often evolve compensation mechanisms. In particular, the root system is the primary organ that senses and responds to environmental changes, besides anchoring the plant and absorbing water and nutrients [12]. Typically, the root systems of higher plants are mainly composed of primary and lateral roots (LRs) and show high plasticity when subjected to various ambient factors [13,14]. For instance, when exposed to a localized source of NO3, the root system exhibits high plasticity by proliferating LRs in higher plants [15,16]. Deficiencies in potassium and phosphorus (Pi) negatively impact root elongation [17,18,19]. However, it has also been observed that Pi starvation enhances LR development and root hair emergence and elongation [20,21]. In Arabidopsis, primary root and LR development were inhibited by manganese due to the disruption of auxin biosynthesis and transport [22]. Boron deficiency decreased root growth by disturbing IAA biosynthesis [23,24]. Therefore, studying the responses of the root system to interactions between nutrients and auxin is of great significance in understanding plant development.
LRs are major architectural determinants of the root system and display higher plasticity in response to external water and nutrient availability [12,25]. Plant hormones play crucial roles in regulating LR formation and growth. In Arabidopsis thaliana, gibberellins were shown to positively control root apical meristem growth and LR formation [26,27]. Ethylene, an important gaseous phytohormone, exerted an inhibitory effect on LR formation, showing an antagonistic function with auxin in this process [25]. Cytokinins disrupted the LR patterning process by targeting LR founder cells [28]. Auxin, the first hormone discovered in plants, is involved in all stages of plant growth and development [29], including the regulation of root meristem activity and vascular tissue differentiation [30,31] and LR initiation and elongation [32,33]. In addition, enhanced auxin transport through various types of transporters promotes LR growth in plants [14,33,34,35]. Fine-tuning between auxin production and transport as well as inactivation is a prerequisite for LR positioning and development [17,36]. During LR formation, auxin signaling is specifically involved in the regulation of the coordinated asymmetric cell division of xylem-pole pericycle cells, periclinal cell division, and LR primordium (LRP) building, as well as setting the pace to facilitate LRP emergence [37,38].
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop around the world and occupies an extremely important position in food security. However, the mechanisms underlying roots’ responses to N starvation are not fully understood in wheat. The objectives of this study were to investigate the underlying mechanisms through which low levels of NO3 regulate LR development and to propose regulatory networks for the interactions between low NO3 and auxin in regulating LR development. This study thus provides a better understanding of root morphogenesis and aids in exploring reasonable N applications for wheat production.

2. Results

2.1. Plant Growth

No significant difference in the net increase in the shoot dry weight of wheat seedlings was observed in 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), or 0.1 mM NO3 plus 60 mg/L 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) (LNT) at 12 and 24 h (Figure 1A). At 24 and 48 h after treatment, the net increase in the dry weight of LNT and CK roots was significantly lower than that of LN, and no significant difference in the net increase in the root dry weight was observed between CK, LN, and LNT at 12 h (Figure 1B). At 48 h after treatment, the net increase in the dry weight of LNT shoots was significantly lower than that of LN, and no significant difference in the net increase in the shoot dry weight was observed between the CK and LN treatments (Figure 1A).

2.2. Root System Architecture

The wheat seedlings grown in LN conditions showed substantial changes in root morphogenesis compared with the CK plants (Figure 1A). Namely, the total root tips, total root length, and total surface area (p < 0.05) of the LN seedlings increased by 44.81% (p < 0.05), 20.34% (p < 0.05), and 14.16% (p < 0.05), respectively. The addition of TIBA decreased these parameters by 58.78% (p < 0.05), 48.12% (p < 0.05), and 39.49% (p < 0.05), respectively, compared to the LN conditions (Table 1). These data indicate that LN significantly increases LR development and thus increases the total root length and root surface area; however, the positive effect of low NO3 on root morphology is mitigated after the addition of TIBA (Figure 2).

2.3. Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) under Different N Treatments

A total of 7519.96 million genes were obtained, with average GC content of approximately 55.00%, Q20 of 98.40%, and Q30 of 95.40% and an average base sequencing error rate of 0.01, yielding 35,741,272 (95.04%) clean sequences. Combining the GC content and Q30, we concluded that the data were highly accurate and reliable for further experiments and subsequent analysis.
A differential analysis was performed using the DESeq2 package and employing a screening criterion of |log2(FoldChange)| ≥ 1 and p < 0.05. In the comparison between LN and CK, 12,288 DEGs were identified, with 7650 DEGs upregulated and 4638 DEGs downregulated. In LNT vs. LN, 24,638 DEGs were identified, with 9512 DEGs upregulated and 15,126 DEGs downregulated (Figure 3). In contrast, of the 21,417 DEGs in the LNT vs. CK comparison, only 11,942 genes were downregulated and 9475 were upregulated. These data indicate that the roots strongly respond to LN conditions, and the responses are strongly inhibited upon the addition of TIBA.

2.4. GO and KEGG Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

Based on the functional annotations, the DEGs between the CK, LN, and LNT libraries were classified into three Gene Ontology (GO) categories: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). The GO cellular component analysis showed that, in the comparison between the two groups of LN and CK, the processes associated with the BP group mainly included the cell wall polysaccharide metabolic process, the fatty acid metabolic process, protein–DNA complex assembly, DNA replication, plant-type cell wall organization or biogenesis, the cellular polysaccharide metabolic process, and plant-type cell wall organization. The DEGs of the CC group were mainly associated with microtubules, the extracellular space, polymeric cytoskeletal fibers, cell walls, apoplasts, cell–cell junctions, symplasts, and the microtubule cytoskeleton. Finally, the DEGs of the MF group were divided into nitrate transmembrane transporter activity, hormone binding, auxin transmembrane transporter activity, cellulase activity, xylanase activity, and xylan 1,4-beta-xylosidase activity (Figure 4A). In LNT vs. LN, the main enriched DEGs in the BP group were associated with protein–DNA complex assembly, the hemicellulose metabolic process, the cell wall polysaccharide metabolic process, the cell wall macromolecule metabolic process, and cell wall biogenesis. The DEGs in the CC group were mainly classified as apoplasts, cell–cell junctions, cell walls, and the cytoskeleton. The main categories in the MF group included structural constituents of the cytoskeleton, xyloglucan–xyloglucosyl transferase activity, lipase activity, transferase activity, the transfer of nitrogenous groups, cellulase activity, and microtubule binding (Figure 4B). These results suggest that low NO3 conditions affect a variety of physiological processes in wheat roots.
The KEGG analysis revealed that, in the LN vs. CK comparison, the pathways were mainly clustered into DNA replication, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, ABC transporters, fatty acid metabolism, and phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis (Figure 5A). In LNT vs. LN, the significantly enriched pathways included the biosynthesis of various plant secondary metabolites, galactose metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, DNA replication, the MAPK signaling pathway in plants, and fatty acid metabolism (Figure 5B). These results indicate that a wide spectrum of physiological processes in wheat roots are affected by the LN and the presence of TIBA.

2.5. DEGs Related to IAA Synthesis, Oxidation, and Transport

Considering that the GO terms and KEGG pathways were mainly clustered into tryptophan metabolism and biosynthesis, hormone binding, cell wall polysaccharide metabolism, and the cytoskeleton, and considering the importance of auxin in LR development, we next examined the expression of DEGs involved in the tryptophan-dependent auxin synthesis pathway. The transcriptomic analysis showed that the expression of auxin synthesis-related genes, including AMO, AO, GH3, IGPS, ILL, TAM, TAR, TDC, TSA, TSB, and YUC, was upregulated in the LN roots compared with CK and downregulated after the application of TIBA. Meanwhile, DAO, a dioxygenase for auxin oxidation catalyzing IAA oxidation, was downregulated in the LN roots and upregulated after the application of TIBA (Figure 6A,B). These results indicate that LN conditions promote the expression of auxin synthesis-related genes and the addition of TIBA mitigates these stimulatory effects.
Furthermore, we also analyzed the transcript abundance of genes involved in IAA transport processes. The results showed that the expression of genes encoding LAX3, PIN2, PIN3, ABCB8, ABCB11, and ABCB19 was significantly upregulated under the LN conditions compared with the CK. After the addition of TIBA, the expression of these genes was significantly downregulated (Figure 7B). These data indicate that low NO3 promotes while TIBA addition inhibits IAA transport.

2.6. DEGs Involved in the Regulation of IAA Biosynthesis and Transport

Based on previous publications, we analyzed genes that were involved in the regulation of auxin synthesis and transport. These genes included the high-affinity nitrate transporter (NRT), auxin-responsive protein (SAUR71), PIN-LIKES (PILS), putative multidrug resistance protein (MDR), putative polyol transporter (PLT), ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1 (WRI1), agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL21 (AGL21), Fanconi anemia group J protein homolog (BRIP1), and transcription factor HY5. Among them, AGL21, BRIP1, MDR, NRT2.1, PILS, PLT, SAUR71, and WRI1 were significantly upregulated and HY5 was downregulated in LN vs. CK; conversely, HY5 was upregulated and the others were significantly downregulated under LNT conditions compared with LN (Table 2).
The three squares in the heatmap from left to right represent wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT), respectively.

2.7. DEGs Related to Cell Wall Biological Properties

A total of 84 genes involved in cell wall modification were found to be differentially expressed, including those coding for cellulase, pectin acetylesterase, pectinesterase, pectate lyase, polygalacturonase, xyloglucan glycosyltransferase, probable xyloglucan glycosyltransferase, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase, endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, beta-1,4-xylosyltransferase, and beta-1,2-xylosyltransferase. The expression of all of these genes was significantly upregulated, while genes encoding the xylanase inhibitor protein were downregulated in the roots exposed to LN conditions compared with CK (Table 3). In the presence of TIBA, the expression of these DEGs was reversed compared with LN (Table 3). These data suggest that LN conditions may alter the root cell wall properties and that the genes encoding cell wall remodeling enzymes are repressed upon the addition of TIBA.

2.8. Expression of Genes Mediated by Auxin and Potentially Involved in Cell Wall Remodeling and LR Development

To explore the molecular mechanism by which auxin regulates cell wall loosening and LR initiation, we analyzed the transcript abundance of genes involved in cell wall remodeling and LR development. The results showed that the expression of genes encoding subtilisin-like protease (AIR3), plasma membrane ATPase (H+-ATPase), the glycosyl hydrolase family (GLH), NAC domain-containing protein (NAC), the nodulation signaling pathway (NSP), aquaporin (PIPs), and domain-containing protein RIC1 were significantly upregulated. After the addition of TIBA, the expression of these genes was significantly downregulated (Table 4).

2.9. DEGs Related to Cell Division, Elongation, and the Cell Cycle

A total of 203 genes were identified in all samples that were involved in cell division, elongation, and cell cycle processes. Specifically, the expression of 50 DEGs was upregulated and only 5 DEGs were downregulated in LN vs. CK (Figure 8A). In LNT vs. LN, the expression of 5 DEGs was significantly upregulated and 177 DEGs were markedly downregulated (Figure 8B). A total of 216 genes related to cell wall expansion were identified. In the comparison between LN and CK, 111 DEGs were significantly upregulated and only 5 DEGs were downregulated (Figure 9A), and, in LN vs. LNT, 11 were upregulated and 107 were downregulated (Figure 9B).
The majority of the DEGs encoding cell division control protein (CDC), the control of cell elongation transcription factor (ILI), microtubule-associated protein (MAP) involved in the cell cycle, expansins, and leucine-rich repeat extensin-like protein (LRX) were significantly upregulated in LN roots compared with CK roots, while most of these DEGs were downregulated in LNT roots compared with LN roots.

2.10. Verification of Hub DEGs via qRT-PCR

qRT-PCR was performed to validate the transcriptome analysis. Fifteen key DEGs participating in auxin synthesis and transport, LR emergence, and cell wall relaxation were selected (Figure 10). The results showed that the expression levels of a total of 12 DEGs based on the RNA-seq analysis were upregulated in the roots of LN vs. CK (IAA-amino acid hydrolase, auxin efflux carrier, and xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase protein genes), and three DEGs were significantly upregulated (2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (DAO), xylanase inhibitor protein, and ethylene-responsive transcription factor). Meanwhile, in LNT vs. LN, these fifteen DEGs showed the reverse trend in their expression. Taken together, these results show that the differences in the expression levels of these candidate DGEs detected via RT-qPCR were in accordance with the RNA-seq data, which confirms the reliability of the RNA-seq results.

2.11. Root Tryptophan and IAA Content

To explore whether auxin is involved in LN-mediated LR formation, we determined the endogenous content of tryptophan and IAA. The results showed that LN stimulated increases in the content of root tryptophan of 34.26% and root IAA of 92.25% compared with the CK at 48 h after treatment (Figure 11A,B). The addition of TIBA reduced the IAA and tryptophan content by 57.21% (p < 0.05) and 51.42% (p < 0.05), respectively, compared with LN (Figure 11A,B). These data indicate that low NO3 may promote and the addition of TIBA may inhibit IAA accumulation in the roots.

2.12. Effects of Different N Treatments on the Activity of Cell Wall Remodeling Enzymes and Cell Wall Composition in Wheat Roots

As shown in Table 5, the activity of pectinase, β-1,3-glucanase, polygalacturonase, exo-β-1,4-glucanase, cellulase, neutral xylanase, pectinate lyases, and pectinesterase was significantly higher in LN roots than in CK; LN also significantly increased these enzymes’ activity compared with LNT. Compared with the CK, LN significantly increased the galacturonic acid content and significantly decreased the content of cellulose and the degree of pectin-methyl esterification, while the opposite was true after TIBA addition compared with LN.

2.13. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectra of Cell Wall Composition

To examine the effects of low NO3 and TIBA on cell wall composition, FTIR spectra analysis was carried out. All samples were scanned at a wavenumber of 400 to 4000 cm−1 using FTIR. In this region, many absorption and vibration bands were identified. However, the FTIR spectra from the LRP cell walls of roots under different treatments showed similar profiles and were difficult to distinguish (Figure 12A). To facilitate the comparison, difference spectra were obtained for the cell wall components from the LN roots minus those from the CK roots, as well as spectra from the LNT roots minus the LN roots. Based on the difference spectra (Figure 12B), negative peaks at 825 cm−1, 1100 cm−1, and 1347 cm−1 caused by the LN conditions and positive peaks at these wavenumbers were observed after the addition of TIBA. These peaks can be attributed to D-(+)-galactose, D-(+)-glucose, and pectin (poly-galacturonic acid) (C-H vibrations), respectively [67,68]. The results of ATR-FTIR spectroscopy indicate that the polysaccharide components of the LRP cell wall decreased under low NO3 conditions and increased after the addition of external TIBA (Figure 12B).

2.14. Cell Wall Plasticity

The cell wall property of LRP was determined using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Figure 13 represents the average of the cell wall elastic modulus under different treatments. The results showed that the elastic modulus of LRP was greatly decreased in the LN roots compared with the CK and was significantly increased after the addition of TIBA (Figure 13), suggesting that the epidermal cell wall of LRP is more elastic under LN conditions than in CK and the addition of TIBA decreases the cell wall elasticity of LRP.

3. Discussion

3.1. Low NO3 Promotes Lateral Root Occurrence and Increases Root Surface Area

Several studies have revealed that low NO3 promotes LR growth [69,70,71]; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we observed that LN increased the number of root tips and their surface areas (Figure 1B and Figure 2; Table 1). To examine whether the LN-induced changes in the root structure were related to auxin signaling, we applied TIBA, an auxin polar transport inhibitor, to evaluate LR development and root growth. The results showed that in the presence of TIBA, these parameters were significantly decreased. These results suggest that low NO3 may induce LR formation and auxin signaling may be involved in this process. This view is consistent with the findings of Wang et al. (2021) [21].

3.2. Low NO3 Promotes Root IAA Synthesis and Transport and Improves IAA Homeostasis

Tryptophan-dependent auxin synthesis is the canonical pathway [72,73]. In this pathway, IAA biosynthesis is initiated from tryptophan, which is produced from indole-3-glycerophosphate (IGP) in the presence of tryptophan synthase (TSA) [74]. Tryptophan aminotransferases catalyze the conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-pyruvate (IPA), which is converted to auxin by indole-3-pyruvate monooxygenases (YUCs) [75,76]. Alternatively, tryptophan decarboxylases (TDCs) catalyze tryptophan to trigger the N-hydroxylation of tryptamine (TAM). TAM is further converted to indole-3-acetaldehyde (IAAId), a process requiring the participation of amine oxidase [77]. IAAId is then catalyzed to generate auxin via indole-3-acetaldehyde oxidase (AO) [78]. In the current study, we observed that the expression of genes encoding auxin synthesis-related enzymes was significantly upregulated under LN conditions while being decreased in the presence of TIBA (Figure 6B). In addition, low NO3 improved auxin homeostasis by downregulating the expression of DAO, which oxidizes IAA into oxIAA [79], and by upregulating the expression of GH3 and ILL; both genes are responsible for IAA-amido conjugation and IAA-AA hydrolyzation [80,81,82]. Meanwhile, the addition of TIBA caused the inactivation of IAA to oxIAA via DAO and inhibited the activation of IAA from IAA-AA conjugates due to the decreased expression of ILL (Figure 6). Physiological determination also revealed increases in tryptophan and IAA content under LN conditions (Figure 11A,B) and decreases after the addition of TIBA. These results indicate that a low level of NO3 promotes auxin biosynthesis and improves IAA homeostasis in the roots of wheat seedlings, and, unexpectedly, TIBA may inhibit root auxin accumulation, partially due to a decrease in IAA biosynthesis and an increase in IAA degradation.
Polar transport plays a pivotal role in improving auxin homeostasis. Multidrug resistance (MDR), P-glycoprotein (PGP), ATP binding cassette B (ABCB) is a member of the ABC protein family [40] and plays crucial roles in the control of key developmental events in plants [83,84]. OsABCB8 is localized in the cortex of the epidermis of the root maturation zone [85] and is responsible for auxin transport. ABCB11 acts in concert with ABCB1 and ABCB19 (initially named AtPGP1 and AtMDR1) in long-distance transport [86] and is specifically associated with auxin transport [87]. The free IAA content is severely reduced in AtABCB1 and AtABCB19 mutant hypocotyls and roots and even more drastically reduced in the AtABCB1 AtABCB19 double mutant [88]. In addition, NRT2.1 plays a positive role in regulating LR development by affecting auxin polar transport under low NO3 conditions [35]. As shown in Figure 7B, all genes associated with auxin transport were upregulated under low NO3 conditions and downregulated after the addition of TIBA. Therefore, we can deduce that low NO3 may improve auxin polar transport, which plays a pivotal role in root auxin homeostasis and LR formation. Similarly, in maize, low NO3 positively affects LR formation depending on more auxin accumulation in LR primordia while high NO3 inhibits root growth due to reduced IAA levels in the roots [89]. In rice, low nitrogen significantly increases root length and LR count, largely by promoting the polar transport of auxin from the shoot to the root and by inhibiting the expression of genes that negatively regulate ethylene and jasmonic-acid-related pathways [90]. In cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a moderate level of nitrogen increased lateral root growth by significantly decreasing abscisic acid and salicylic acid contents compared with high nitrogen concentration [91]. Taken together, crosstalk among phytohormones may play an essential role in low nitrate-induced LR development.

3.3. DEGs Involved in the Regulation of IAA Biosynthesis, Transport, and Signaling

Finely balanced auxin homeostasis is dependent on numerous factors such as genes encoding PLT, WRI1, AGL21, BRIP1/2, BZR1, GRE6, IDD, WAG1, and HAT (Table 2). Auxin has been proposed as a long-range signal from shoots to roots in response to nitrate [92], and interactions between auxin and nitrate signaling cooperatively regulate LR development [4,93]. In this study, we found that the expression of genes encoding PLT, WRI1, AGL21, BRIP1/2, BZR1, GRE6, IDD, WAG1, and HAT was upregulated in the roots exposed to LN and downregulated in the presence of TIBA, while HY5 was downregulated under low NO3 conditions and upregulated after the addition of TIBA (Table 2). Hence, we conjecture that a large number of factors are involved in low-NO3-mediated auxin biosynthesis and transport.

3.4. Low NO3 Modulates Cell Wall Remodeling and Elasticity

The plant cell wall is a natural nanostructure composed of a variety of biological macromolecules, such as cellulose, pectin, hemicellulose, lignin, and a small amount of protein [94], and is differently modified in structure and composition by the activity of a wide range of enzymes [95]. The cell wall can also control plant cell expansion via a finely regulated balance between the flexibility and structural integrity of the cell [96,97]. The primary cell wall remodeling enzymes/proteins include POLYGALACTURONASE (PG), EXPANSIN (EXP), and GLH [41,57]. PG is involved in the degradation of demethylated pectin in the cell wall. EXP17 is another component of the plant cell wall that lacks enzymatic activity but can nevertheless relax the plant cell wall [62]. The role of auxin in cell expansion is linked directly to cell wall modification [98]
Pectin, a homogalacturonan, consists of α-1,4-linked galacturonic acids. Homogalacturonans are secreted in a highly methylesterified form and are selectively de-methylesterified by pectin methylesterases (PMEs) [99]. PMEs with the resulting low DPM can facilitate cell wall loosening and cell expansion and thus tissue elongation [100,101]. Polygalacturonase can hydrolyze pectin to produce galacturonic acid, facilitate root cell wall remodeling, promote LRP cell division and LR elongation, and ultimately promote LR formation [102]. Cellulose and hemicellulose are the main components of the cell wall and are degraded via the action of cellulases [103]. Xyloglucan, β-glucan, and arabinoxylan form a homogeneous architecture of hemicellulose. In the epidermal cells overlying the LRP, the cross-linking xyloglucan can be modified primarily via the action of xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH), polygalacturonase, and expansins and thereby facilitate the separation of microfibrils upon cell wall acidification [104].
Expansins (EXPs), a family of non-enzymatic proteins with cell wall loosening activity [105], can relieve the tension of the cell wall and loosen the cell wall by disrupting the hydrogen bonds between the cellulose microfibrils and the matrix polysaccharides [106]. EXP family genes, such as EXPANSIN A1 (EXPA1), EXP14, and EXP17, have also been reported to promote LR formation in response to auxin [107,108]. In this study, we found that the expression of most genes related to cell wall remolding enzymes/proteins, including cellulase, polygalacturonase, pectinesterase, XTHs, PMEs, and EXPs, were upregulated in the roots of wheat seedlings when exposed to LN (Figure 8B and Figure 9; Table 3) and downregulated by the addition of TIBA (Figure 9). Our physiological assays revealed that the activity of pectinase, polygalacturonase, β-1,3-glucanase, exo-β-1,4-glucanase, cellulase, neutral xylanase, and pectinate lyases was significantly increased under LN conditions, while the addition of TIBA led to significant decreases in the activity of these enzymes (Table 5). As a consequence, the content of cellulose and the degree of pectin-methyl esterification were significantly decreased and the galacturonic acid content was enhanced significantly in LN roots compared with CK, while the addition of TIBA reversed these changes (Table 5).
To further verify whether LN treatment could induce cell wall relaxation in the roots, we determined the cell wall properties of LRP using FTIR and AFM analysis, and the results showed that LN decreased the number of polysaccharide macromolecules (Figure 12B) and increased the cell wall elasticity of the LRP epidermis (Figure 13). Adding TIBA increased the number of polysaccharide macromolecules in the LRP and increased cell wall stiffness (Figure 12B and Figure 13).
Overall, these results indicate that low NO3 positively regulates the pathway of cell wall remodeling in the roots as indicated in Figure 4, which may result in higher cell wall extensibility and plasticity and promote cell expansion and elongation during LR formation. These processes are largely mediated by auxin signaling.

3.5. Regulation of Low-NO3-Induced Cell Wall Elasticity and LR Formation via Auxin Signaling

Plasma-membrane-bound ATPases transport protons from the protoplast into the apoplast and consequently acidify the extracellular matrix. This acidification, in turn, activates expansins and other cell wall remodeling enzymes, loosens the network of cellulose and additional cell wall components, and promotes cell expansion and shoot and root growth in plants [109,110]. These processes are mediated by auxin [29]. In the present study, a transcriptome-wide analysis showed that the expression of genes encoding plasma membrane ATPase 10 was upregulated under low NO3 conditions and downregulated after the addition of external TIBA.
Aquaporins (AQPs) are membrane channels that facilitate water movement across cell membranes [111,112]. It has been hypothesized that AQPs contribute to maintaining adequate cell turgor pressure by allowing water influx across the plasma membrane and the tonoplast [61,113,114]. Péret et al. (2012) [61] demonstrated that auxin promoted water transfer from the overlying cells into the primordium by regulating AQPs and thus improved tissue hydraulics and promoted LR emergence. In our study, the transcript expression of aquaporin genes was significantly upregulated under LN conditions compared with CK, while it was downregulated after the addition of TIBA.
PR1 homolog PRH1 regulates the expression of EXP genes and affects cell wall loosening during LR development [115,116]. The expression of PRH1 was induced upon auxin treatment, and mutants of PRH1 had fewer LRs [117]. In the present study, the expression of the PRH1 and EXP genes was upregulated under low NO3 conditions and downregulated after the addition of TIBA (Figure 9 and Table 3), further indicating that auxin signaling may be involved in low-NO3-induced LR formation.
NAC1, a new member of the NAC family, is induced by auxin, activates the expression of auxin-responsive gene AIR3, and mediates auxin signaling to promote LR development by weakening the connections among cells during root development in Arabidopsis thaliana [57,118]. In our study, the transcript expression of the NAC1 and AIR3 genes was significantly upregulated under LN conditions compared with CK, while it was downregulated after the addition of TIBA (Table 4), indicating that auxin, NAC1, and AIR3 are involved in LR formation. This view is supported by the finding that NAC1 functions as an intermediate between auxin and AIR3-mediated LR development [57,118].
The auxin influx carrier LAX3, which is specifically expressed near the LRP, modulates cell wall remodeling enzymes/proteins including PG, GLH, AIR3 (a subtilisin-like protease), and EXPs [57,62]. In this study, the DEGs coding for LAX3, PG, GLHs, AIR3, and EXPs were upregulated by low NO3 and downregulated after the addition of TIBA (Figure 7B and Figure 10; Table 2 and Table 3). The expression of small auxin-upregulated RNAs (SAURs) is rapidly activated by auxin [119]. The auxin-induced expression of SAUR71 in the steles of young roots and hypocotyls promotes cell growth and organ elongation and thus positively regulates seedling growth [120]. Receptor-like protein kinase FERONIA interacts with RIC1 and is involved in auxin signaling [64,121], probably affecting auxin polar transport and distribution [122,123]. The PUCHI gene, encoding an APETALA2-like transcription factor, was regulated by auxin in the definition of primordium boundaries during LR outgrowth [124]. In the present study, the transcriptome-wide analysis showed that the expression of genes encoding SAUR71, APETALA2-like protein, and RIC1 was upregulated under low NO3 conditions and downregulated after the addition of external TIBA (Figure 6B and Table 2).
Based on these results, we conclude that the LN conditions enhanced cell wall elasticity and LR formation by regulating the cell wall remodeling pathway, and a large set of transducers downstream of auxin signals may be involved in these processes.

3.6. Low NO3 Promotes Root Cell Division and Elongation

In addition to cell wall expansion and cell wall modification, root morphogenesis is also regulated by cell division and elongation [71,125,126,127]. It has been reported that auxin promotes LR initiation by enhancing cell cycle activity and pericycle activation at the G1-to-S transition [128,129]. In addition, during LR morphogenesis, these processes are mediated by microtubule remodeling, which is in turn modulated by auxin [130]. TETRATRICOPEPTIDE-REPEAT THIOREDOXIN-LIKE 1 (TTL1) is also related to the microtubule structure and is involved in regulating the cell wall elasticity of root rhizodermal cells in the elongation zone [59]. BRs induce the expression of cyclin D genes, which promote cell division and play important roles in LR initiation and elongation [58]. In this study, most DEGs involved in cell division, elongation, and the cell cycle, such as CYCD6, CDC, ILI, MAP, TTL1, and BZR1, were upregulated in response to low NO3 conditions compared with CK and downregulated with TIBA addition (Figure 8A). Therefore, we speculate that low NO3 conditions can promote root cell proliferation and cell elongation and thus boost LR formation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Plant Culture

Seeds of wheat (cultivar Jimai 22) were surface-sterilized using 70% ethanol for 40 s and washed 4 times with distilled H2O. The sterilized seeds were placed in Petri dishes, covered with moist filter paper above and below, and germinated in Petri dishes at 24 °C. After 3 days, 15 seedlings of the same size were selected and fixed in each plastic pot (10 cm × 8 cm × 5 cm in length, width, and height) containing 300 mL distilled H2O and then placed in a light growth chamber at 24 °C (light)/20 °C (dark) for 14 h/10 h. The light intensity was 450 μmolm−2 s−1, and the relative humidity was maintained at 70 ± 5%. The 3-day-old seedlings were grown in distilled water for 5 d to exhaust the seed reserves. After this, the 8-day-old wheat seedlings were treated with 1/2 × Hoagland’s nutrient solution. In our preliminary experiments, we found that the roots of the 8-day-old seedlings grown in 1/2 strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution containing 5 mM NO3 grew best and that 0.1 mM NO3 could significantly promote LR development. Therefore, the following experiments were conducted using 8-day-old seedlings that were hydroponically cultured in 1/2 strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK; applied as Ca(NO3)2 at 2.5 mM), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN; applied as Ca(NO3)2 at 0.05 mM), or 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT). The solution was renewed every day. Each treatment was repeated in triplicate. CaCl2 was supplemented with the LN and LNT nutrient solution to maintain the same concentration of Ca2+ as in the CK solution. The nutrient solution was renewed every day.

4.2. Biomass Determination

To determine the biomass, the wheat seedlings were collected at 0, 12, 24, and 48 h after treatment and dried with absorbent paper. The shoots and roots were separated and then oven-dried at 60 °C for 30 min and then at 105 °C to a constant weight. The dried samples were weighed with a four-digit balance. Three biologically independent experiments, each with three replicates and 15 plants per replicate, were performed to calculate the fresh weight. The net increase was calculated by subtracting the dry weight of shoots or roots collected at 0 h from that measured 12, 24, or 48 h after treatment.

4.3. Root Architecture Measurements

At 48 h after treatment, intact root systems were spread out in a Perspex tray (200 mm × 250 mm) containing distilled H2O to untangle the roots and minimize root overlap, scanned using a scanner (Epson 1680, Seiko Epson Corporation, Nagano, Japan) at a resolution of 300 dpi, and analyzed using a WinRHIZO root analyzer (WinRHIZO, Régent Instruments Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada) to obtain the total root length, the root surface area, and the number of root tips. Nine roots with a uniform size were selected for each treatment.

4.4. Transcriptome Sequencing

4.4.1. RNA Extraction and Detection

Wheat roots were harvested at 48 h after treatment and stored at −80 °C, and the total RNA was extracted and subjected to transcriptome sequencing. Total RNA was extracted from the roots using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Beverly, MA, USA) and treated with RNase-free DNase I to remove residual DNA. Absorbance ratios A260/A280 and A260/A230 were detected using a NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer to determine the RNA purity, and RNA integrity was accurately measured using an Agilent 2100 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) bioanalyzer. The RNA extracted from all samples was complete, with A260/A280 ratios between 1.8 and 2.1 and an A260/A230 ratio greater than 1.8. Lastly, library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system.

4.4.2. Library Construction and Quality Inspection

Total RNA was used as the input material for RNA sample preparation. Briefly, mRNA was purified from total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using a random hexamer primer and M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (RNase H-). Second-strand cDNA synthesis was subsequently performed using DNA Polymerase I and RNase H. The remaining overhangs were converted into blunt ends via exonuclease/polymerase activity. After the adenylation of the 3′ ends of the DNA fragments, adaptors with a hairpin loop structure were ligated to prepare for hybridization. In order to select cDNA fragments of preferentially 370–420 bp in length, the library fragments were purified with the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, CA, USA). Then, PCR was performed with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA), universal PCR primers, and the Index (X) Primer.
After the library was constructed, a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for preliminary quantification, diluting the library to 1.5 ng/μL, and then the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer was used to detect the insert size of the library. Once the insert size met the expectations, qRT-PCR was used to accurately quantify the effective concentration of the library (the effective concentration of the library was higher than 1.5 nM) to ensure its quality.

4.4.3. Sequencing

The sequencing platform was the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). After the library inspection was completed, different libraries were pooled according to the requirements for the effective concentration and target offline data volume for Illumina sequencing. Four fluorescently labeled dNTP, DNA polymerase, and adaptor primers were amplified to the sequenced flow cells. When each sequencing cluster extended the complementary strand, each fluorescently labeled dNTP was released. The sequencer captured the fluorescence signal and converted the light signal into the sequencing peak through computer software to obtain the sequence information of the fragments to be measured.

4.4.4. Data Quality Control

To ensure the quality and reliability of the data analysis, raw data (raw reads) in fastq format were first processed through fastp software v0.20.1. In this step, clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing reads containing adaptors, reads containing poly-N, and low-quality reads from the raw data. At the same time, the Q20, Q30, and GC content of the clean data were calculated. All downstream analyses were based on clean data of high quality.

4.4.5. Analysis of Total Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

After the quantification of gene expression, the gene expression data were statistically analyzed and genes with significantly different expression levels in different states were screened. The original read count was first standardized (normalization) and mainly corrected for the review sequencing depth. The statistical model was then used to calculate the hypothesis testing probability (Padj) and perform multiple hypothesis testing correction to obtain the FDR value (false discovery rate; Padj is its common form). Finally, the number of DEGs for each comparative combination was counted and screened to analyze the expression of the target genes. The screening criteria were |log2(Fold Change)| ≥ 1, p ≤ 0.05.

4.4.6. GO Term and KEGG Enrichment Analysis

Gene Ontology (GO; http://www.geneontology.org; accessed on 1 April 2024) is the international standard classification system for gene function. The R software’s (R Core Team, 2021, version 4.4) clusterProfiler package version 3.19 was used to analyze the GO enrichment of the DEGs and genes, and the corresponding GO number was obtained via the ID correspondence or sequence annotation method. Then, the GO distribution related to the DEGs was obtained across three levels: biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular component (CC). GO terms with corrected p-values less than 0.05 were considered significantly enriched by differentially expressed genes. KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg; accessed on 1 April 2024) is a database resource for the understanding of high-level functions and utilities of the biological system from molecular-level information. Blast2GO software version 6.0 was used to test the statistical enrichment of the differentially expressed genes in the KEGG pathways (corrected p-value < 0.05).

4.5. RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

The total RNA for qRT-PCR was isolated from wheat roots using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All qRT-PCR reactions were performed in 96-well PCR plates (ABgene, Portsmouth, NH, USA). The samples were processed using the same reagents and protocol described for wheat tissue. The quantitative qRT-PCR experiments were performed in a LightCycler® 480 thermocycler (Roche, Burlington, NJ, USA). The qRT-PCR conditions were as follows: denaturing at 94 °C for 30 s; 45 cycles of 94 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 10 s, with melting and cooling. The transcript levels were normalized by applying the 2−ΔΔCt method. Actin was used as an internal standard to normalize the differences in the template amounts. Three biological replicates were performed. Differences between the two samples were assessed using the Student’s t-test method, and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference in content.

4.6. 2,3,5-Triodobenzoic Acid (TIBA) Treatment

To confirm the role of auxin in regulating LR development under low NO3 conditions, TIBA, an inhibitor of auxin polar transport, was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the 0.1 mM NO3 solution at a final concentration of 60 mg/L (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to determine root phenotypic changes.

4.7. Determination of Tryptophan, IAA, and Cell Wall Components

To determine the content of tryptophan, free auxin, and cell wall components, the roots were collected at 48 h after treatment, washed five times with distilled water, and stored in liquid nitrogen immediately to prevent the enzymatic and thermal degradation of these compounds.
Roots (approximately 0.1 g) were collected at 48 h after treatment, ground immediately to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen, and transferred to a 1.5 mL tube, to which 20 µL of the solution of internal standards (hexyl hydride) was added. Subsequently, 400 µL of hexane was added to each sample and they were vortexed, filtered through 0.45 μm pore size filters, and stored. The tryptophan was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Rigol L3000, RIGOL, Beijing, China). HPLC was performed using a Sepax C18 column (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Sepax, Beijing, China) with a column temperature of 40 °C. The mobile phase comprised solvent A (0.76% [v/v] sodium acetate) and solvent B (80% [v/v] methyl cyanide), the flow rate was 1.0 mL min−1, and the injection volume was 10 µL.
IAA was quantified via HPLC (Rigol L3000, RIGOL, Beijing, China) with a UV detector (254 nm). Briefly, fresh roots (approximately 0.1 g) were homogenized, and the free IAA was extracted using an aqueous solution of methanol. The extracts were purified through a C18 column on a solid-phase extractor, and the eluate was collected. The IAA was eluted with 80% methanol, and the eluent was evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen. The operating conditions included a Sepax-C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) and a mobile phase of methanol–water (2:3; v/v); the excitation and emission wavelengths were 275 nm and 345 nm, with a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1, an injection volume of 10 µL, and a column temperature of 35 °C.
The cellulose content was determined using a cellulose content test kit (Suzhou Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). The samples were dried to a constant weight at 80 °C, pulverized, and passed through a 40-mesh sieve. Then, 0.01 g of sample was weighed, and the cell walls in the samples were extracted first with 80% ethanol and acetone, and then cellulose was extracted with concentrated sulfuric acid and distilled water, after which the supernatant was collected. The supernatant was mixed with the corresponding reagent in the assay kit and the experimental steps were carried out according to the instructions. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 620 nm using a NanoPhotometer P-Class USB ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2600, Tokyo, Japan). All assays were performed using three biological replicates.
The content of root galacturonic acid was detected with a galacturonic acid content kit (Suzhou Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). Fresh roots (approximately 0.1 g) were homogenized using a mortar and pestle with 1 mL of pre-chilled extraction solution (80% methanol v/v, 100 mM imidazole, pH 7.0) and then heated at 90 °C for 2 h. The homogenate was transferred into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 8000× g at 4 °C for 10 min, and then the supernatant was collected. Next, the supernatant was mixed with the corresponding reagent in the assay kit and the experimental steps were carried out according to the instructions. The spectrophotometric value of the solution was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-2600, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The solution was measured at 530 nm to obtain the absorbance values. The galacturonic acid content was calculated according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.8. Activity of Enzymes and Pectin Methylation Degree Involved in Cell Wall Remodeling

The pectin methylation degree of the samples was determined using a pectin methylation degree assay kit (Suzhou Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). Briefly, the roots (0.1 g) and 1 mL ethanol (95%) were ground to a powder in a pre-cooled mortar. After incubation in an ice bath for 20 min, the tubes were centrifuged at 4 °C and 10,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and distilled water was added; then, the sample was centrifuged at 10,000× g, 4 °C for 10 min, and the resulting supernatant was discarded again and 1 mL of phosphate buffer was added (2 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, 4% polyvinyl pyrrolidone, 1 M NaCl). The sample was then incubated in a water bath at 90 °C for 2 h and cooled to room temperature. The extract was centrifuged at 4 °C at 10,000× g for 10 min, and then the supernatant was collected. Next, the supernatant was mixed with the corresponding reagent in the assay kit and the experimental steps were carried out according to the instructions (Suzhou Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). Finally, after incubation at 25 °C for 20 min, the absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 550 nm and 530 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2600, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Pectin methylation degree (%) = methanol content/galacturonic acid content × 100%.
The pectinesterase, pectinate lyase, pectinase, neutral xylanase, ploygalacturonase, β-1,3-glucanase, β-1,4-glucanase, and cellulase activity was determined according to the instructions of the reagent kit (Suzhou Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). Briefly, root tissue (0.1 g) was homogenized at 4℃ in 1 mL of extraction buffer (1 mM ascorbic acid, 3 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride or phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2% polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and 1 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid; pH 7.8) and centrifuged at 8000× g, 4 °C for 15 min, respectively. The supernatant was collected via enzyme extraction. Then, the supernatant was mixed with the corresponding reagent in the assay kit and the experimental steps were carried out according to the instructions (Suzhou Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). The absorbance of each sample was measured at 235 nm (pectinate lyases), 540 nm (pectinase, neutral xylanase, polygalacturonase, β-1,4-glucanase), 550 nm (pectinesterase, β-1,3-glucanase), and 620 nm (cellulase) using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2600, Tokyo, Japan). Enzymatic activity was calculated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All assays were performed using three biological replicates.

4.9. Atomic Force Microscopy

For AFM imaging, root blocks were fixed onto a glass slide using nail polish and submerged under a drop of distilled H2O at room temperature during imaging. A silicon nitride cantilever (ScanAsyst-Fluid, Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) with a nominal spring constant of 0.7 N/m (frequency = 150 kHz) and a nominal tip radius of 20 nm was used. Cell wall elasticity was measured using an indentation depth of 150 to 250 nm and an indentation force of 30 nN, and at least three indentation positions were chosen for each LRP. The quantification of elasticity (elastic modulus) was achieved with a commercial AFM BioScope Resolve (Bruker) under PeakForce Quantitative Nanoscale Mechanical (QNM) mode at 64 × 64 pixels. The AFM data were processed and analyzed with the NanoScope Analysis software (Bruker, version 1.8). At least five LRPs from three seedlings of each treatment were collected to determine the elastic modulus.

4.10. FTIR Analysis

FTIR analysis was performed using attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) (Nicolet iS50, ThermoNicolet, Madison, WI, USA,). The LRPs were cut and dried. ATR-FTIR images were obtained with a mid-IR spectral device at a 4 cm−1 resolution using a Spotlight 400 FTIR (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). According to the manufacturer’s procedure, the LRP was pushed via pressure into direct contact with the tip of the plane diamond. A total of 64 scans per pixel were performed in order to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. The spectrum was then corrected using spectral image software (v.1.6.4) and the empty scan was used as the background. The ATR-FTIR spectra were obtained from nine root samples for each treatment.

4.11. Statistical Analysis

All data were statistically analyzed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS software package (SPSS 27.0.1; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Duncan’s multiple range test was performed at p ≤ 0.05 on each of the significant variables measured. All values were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD).

5. Conclusions

In summary, our results indicate that a low concentration of nitrate can promote the epidermal cell wall relaxation of lateral root primordia and thus lateral root development, during which root auxin signaling plays an essential role. This study provides useful information on the interactions between low nitrogen conditions and auxin signaling in improving the root architecture and a theoretical basis for reasonable nitrogen fertilization during wheat production. Considering that the promotion of lateral root development by low nitrogen concentration has also been observed in maize [89], rice [90], cotton [91], rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [95], and tea plant (Camellia sinensis) [131] and that larger root systems help the plant increase nitrogen uptake [33], we would strongly recommend a considerably lower rate of nitrogen fertilization at the seedling stage than conventional practices in crop productivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.T. and X.L.; methodology, Y.Z.; software, B.Z.; validation, J.S., and H.X.; data curation, L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, C.T. and L.K.; supervision and review and editing; S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020MC087) and the Shandong Modern Agricultural Technology and Industry System (SDAIT-01-07).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Center for Protein Sciences at Peking University in Beijing, China, for assistance with AFM operation and image analysis and Siying Qin for her technical help.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pascual, M.B.; El-Azaz, J.; De La Torre, F.N.; Cañas, R.A.; Avila, C.; Cánovas, F.M. Biosynthesis and Metabolic Fate of Phenylalanine in Conifers. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kuypers, M.M.M.; Marchant, H.K.; Kartal, B. The Microbial Nitrogen-Cycling Network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, B.; Wu, J.; Yang, S.; Schiefelbein, J.; Gan, Y. Nitrate Regulation of Lateral Root and Root Hair Development in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4405–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Krouk, G.; Crawford, N.M.; Coruzzi, G.M.; Tsay, Y.-F. Nitrate Signaling: Adaptation to Fluctuating Environments. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alvarez, J.M.; Vidal, E.A.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Integration of Local and Systemic Signaling Pathways for Plant N Responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Olas, J.J.; Van Dingenen, J.; Abel, C.; Działo, M.A.; Feil, R.; Krapp, A.; Schlereth, A.; Wahl, V. Nitrate Acts at the Arabidopsis Thaliana Shoot Apical Meristem to Regulate Flowering Time. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Asim, M.; Ullah, Z.; Oluwaseun, A.; Wang, Q.; Liu, H. Signalling Overlaps between Nitrate and Auxin in Regulation of The Root System Architecture: Insights from the Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, J.H.; Liu, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, J.L.; Han, W.X.; Zhang, W.F.; Christie, P.; Goulding, K.W.T.; Vitousek, P.M.; Zhang, F.S. Significant Acidification in Major Chinese Croplands. Science 2010, 327, 1008–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, W.; Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Ye, C.; Zheng, J.; Guo, C.; Hao, M.; He, X.; Zhu, S. Fertilizer N Application Rate Impacts Plant-Soil Feedback in a Sanqi Production System. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 796–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raza, S.; Miao, N.; Wang, P.; Ju, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, J.; Kuzyakov, Y. Dramatic Loss of Inorganic Carbon by Nitrogen-induced Soil Acidification in Chinese Croplands. Global Change Biol. 2020, 26, 3738–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gho, Y.S.; Song, M.Y.; Bae, D.Y.; Choi, H.; Jung, K.-H. Rice PIN Auxin Efflux Carriers Modulate the Nitrogen Response in a Changing Nitrogen Growth Environment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Du, Y.; Scheres, B. Lateral Root Formation and the Multiple Roles of Auxin. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Waidmann, S.; Sarkel, E.; Kleine-Vehn, J. Same Same, but Different: Growth Responses of Primary and Lateral Roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2397–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hu, Q.Q.; Shu, J.Q.; Li, W.M.; Wang, G.Z. Role of Auxin and Nitrate Signaling in the Development of Root System Architecture. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 690363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H. Regulation of Arabidopsis Root Development by Nitrate Availability. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, H.; Rong, H.; Pilbeam, D. Signalling Mechanisms Underlying the Morphological Responses of the Root System to Nitrogen in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2329–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, R.; Zheng, R.; He, J.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Xiong, Y.; Xu, T. Noncanonical Auxin Signaling Regulates Cell Division Pattern during Lateral Root Development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 21285–21290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nieves-Cordones, M.; Ródenas, R.; Lara, A.; Martínez, V.; Rubio, F. The Combination of K + Deficiency with Other Environmental Stresses: What Is the Outcome? Physiol. Plant. 2019, 165, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sustr, M.; Soukup, A.; Tylova, E. Potassium in Root Growth and Development. Plants 2019, 8, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, Z.; Bielenberg, D.G.; Brown, K.M.; Lynch, J.P. Regulation of Root Hair Density by Phosphorus Availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, W. Potassium and Phosphorus Transport and Signaling in Plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 34–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, J.; Wang, W.; Zhou, H.; Wang, R.; Zhang, P.; Wang, H.; Pan, X.; Xu, J. Manganese Toxicity Inhibited Root Growth by Disrupting Auxin Biosynthesis and Transport in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Pan, Z.; Xie, S.; Peng, S. Boron Deficiency Alters Root Growth and Development and Interacts with Auxin Metabolism by Influencing the Expression of Auxin Synthesis and Transport Genes. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2016, 30, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olatunji, D.; Geelen, D.; Verstraeten, I. Control of Endogenous Auxin Levels in Plant Root Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qin, H.; Huang, R. Auxin Controlled by Ethylene Steers Root Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fonouni-Farde, C.; Miassod, A.; Laffont, C.; Morin, H.; Bendahmane, A.; Diet, A.; Frugier, F. Gibberellins Negatively Regulate the Development of Medicago Truncatula Root System. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Placido, D.F.; Sandhu, J.; Sato, S.J.; Nersesian, N.; Quach, T.; Clemente, T.E.; Staswick, P.E.; Walia, H. The LATERAL ROOT DENSITY Gene Regulates Root Growth during Water Stress in Wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1955–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jing, H.; Strader, L.C. Interplay of Auxin and Cytokinin in Lateral Root Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Enders, T.A.; Strader, L.C. Auxin Activity: Past, Present, and Future. Am. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 180–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mattsson, J.; Ckurshumova, W.; Berleth, T. Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis Leaf Vascular Development. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanaka, H.; Dhonukshe, P.; Brewer, P.B.; Friml, J. Spatiotemporal Asymmetric Auxin Distribution: A Means to Coordinate Plant Development. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 2738–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kou, X.; Zhao, X.; Wu, B.; Wang, C.; Wu, C.; Yang, S.; Zhou, J.; Xue, Z. Auxin Response Factors Are Ubiquitous in Plant Growth and Development, and Involved in Crosstalk between Plant Hormones: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lv, X.M.; Zhang, Y.X.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Xia, H.Y.; Du, W.Y.; Fan, S.J.; Kong, L.A. Low-Nitrogen Stress Stimulates Lateral Root Initiation and Nitrogen Assimilation in Wheat: Roles of Phytohormone Signaling. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 436–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Krouk, G. Hormones and Nitrate: A Two-Way Connection. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 91, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, C.H.; Yu, J.Q.; Hu, D.G. Nitrate: A Crucial Signal during Lateral Roots Development. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Q.; De Gernier, H.; Duan, X.; Xie, Y.; Geelen, D.; Hayashi, K.; Xuan, W.; Geisler, M.; Ten Tusscher, K.; Beeckman, T.; et al. GH3-mediated Auxin Inactivation Attenuates Multiple Stages of Lateral Root Development. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 1900–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guseman, J.M.; Hellmuth, A.; Lanctot, A.; Feldman, T.P.; Moss, B.L.; Klavins, E.; Calderón Villalobos, L.I.A.; Nemhauser, J.L. Auxin-Induced Degradation Dynamics Set the Pace for Lateral Root Development. Development 2015, 142, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stoeckle, D.; Thellmann, M.; Vermeer, J.E. Breakout—Lateral Root Emergence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 41, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cowling, C.L.; Homayouni, A.L.; Callwood, J.B.; McReynolds, M.R.; Khor, J.; Ke, H.; Draves, M.A.; Dehesh, K.; Walley, J.W.; Strader, L.C.; et al. ZmPILS6 is an auxin efflux carrier required for maize root morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2313216121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, C.; Wang, D.; Zhang, C.; Ye, M.; Kong, N.; Ma, H.; Chen, Q. Comprehensive Analysis and Expression Profiling of PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB Auxin Transporter Gene Families in Solanum Tuberosum under Phytohormone Stimuli and Abiotic Stresses. Biology 2021, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, D.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, K.; Dong, J.; Zhang, H. Genetic Regulation of Lateral Root Development. Plant Signaling Behav. 2023, 18, 2081397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Aida, M.; Beis, D.; Heidstra, R.; Willemsen, V.; Blilou, I.; Galinha, C.; Nussaume, L.; Noh, Y.-S.; Amasino, R.; Scheres, B. The PLETHORA Genes Mediate Patterning of the Arabidopsis Root Stem Cell Niche. Cell 2004, 119, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pinon, V.; Prasad, K.; Grigg, S.P.; Sanchez-Perez, G.F.; Scheres, B. Local Auxin Biosynthesis Regulation by PLETHORA Transcription Factors Controls Phyllotaxis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gutierrez, L.; Mongelard, G.; Floková, K.; Păcurar, D.I.; Novák, O.; Staswick, P.; Kowalczyk, M.; Păcurar, M.; Demailly, H.; Geiss, G.; et al. Auxin Controls Arabidopsis Adventitious Root Initiation by Regulating Jasmonic Acid Homeostasis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2515–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kong, Q.; Ma, W.; Yang, H.; Ma, G.; Mantyla, J.J.; Benning, C. The Arabidopsis WRINKLED1 Transcription Factor Affects Auxin Homeostasis in Roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4627–4634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yu, L.-H.; Miao, Z.-Q.; Qi, G.-F.; Wu, J.; Cai, X.-T.; Mao, J.-L.; Xiang, C.-B. MADS-Box Transcription Factor AGL21 Regulates Lateral Root Development and Responds to Multiple External and Physiological Signals. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1653–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alvarez-Buylla, E.R.; García-Ponce, B.; Sánchez, M.D.L.P.; Espinosa-Soto, C.; García-Gómez, M.L.; Piñeyro-Nelson, A.; Garay-Arroyo, A. MADS-box Genes Underground Becoming Mainstream: Plant Root Developmental Mechanisms. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1143–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Song, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, C. BRIP1 and BRIP2 Maintain Root Meristem by Affecting Auxin-Mediated Regulation. Planta 2024, 259, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yun, F.; Liu, H.; Deng, Y.; Hou, X.; Liao, W. The Role of Light-Regulated Auxin Signaling in Root Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Q.F.; Lu, J.; Yu, J.W.; Zhang, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, Q.Q. The Brassinosteroid-Regulated Transcription Factors BZR1/BES1 Function as a Coordinator in Multisignal-Regulated Plant Growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2018, 1861, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, Z.; Giehl, R.F.H.; Von Wirén, N. Local Auxin Biosynthesis Acts Downstream of Brassinosteroids to Trigger Root Foraging for Nitrogen. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cui, D.Y.; Zhao, J.B.; Jing, Y.J.; Fan, M.Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.C.; Xin, W.; Hu, Y.X. The Arabidopsis IDD14, IDD15, and IDD16 cooperatively regulate lateral organ morphogenesis and gravitropism by promoting auxin biosynthesis and transport. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Semeradova, H.; Montesinos, J.C.; Benkova, E. All Roads Lead to Auxin: Post-Translational Regulation of Auxin Transport by Multiple Hormonal Pathways. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wakeel, A.; Ali, I.; Khan, A.R.; Wu, M.; Upreti, S.; Liu, D.; Liu, B.; Gan, Y. Involvement of Histone Acetylation and Deacetylation in Regulating Auxin Responses and Associated Phenotypic Changes in Plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Weiste, C.; Dröge-Laser, W. The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor bZIP11 Activates Auxin-Mediated Transcription by Recruiting the Histone Acetylation Machinery. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gao, F.; Wang, K.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, P.; Shi, Z.; Luo, J.; Jiang, D.; Fan, F.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Blocking miR396 Increases Rice Yield by Shaping Inflorescence Architecture. Nat. Plants 2015, 2, 15196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Neuteboom, L.W. A Novel Subtilisin-like Protease Gene from Arabidopsis Thaliana Is Expressed at Sites of Lateral Root Emergence. DNA Res. 1999, 6, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. De Rybel, B.; Milad, A.; Alice, S.B.; Jos, R.W.; Margot, E.S.; Ondřej, N.; Nobutoshi, Y.; Saiko, Y.; Van Isterdael, G.; Joakim, P. Integration of growth and patterning during vascular tissue formation in Arabidopsis. Science 2014, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cuadrado-Pedetti, M.B.; Rauschert, I.; Sainz, M.M.; Amorim-Silva, V.; Botella, M.A.; Borsani, O.; Sotelo-Silveira, M. The Arabidopsis TETRATRICOPEPTIDE THIOREDOXIN-LIKE 1 Gene Is Involved in Anisotropic Root Growth during Osmotic Stress Adaptation. Genes 2021, 12, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hager, B.A. Role of the Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase in Auxin-Induced Elongation Growth: Historical and New Aspects. J. Plant Res. 2003, 116, 483–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Péret, B.; Li, G.; Zhao, J.; Band, L.R.; Voß, U.; Postaire, O.; Luu, D.-T.; Da Ines, O.; Casimiro, I.; Lucas, M.; et al. Auxin Regulates Aquaporin Function to Facilitate Lateral Root Emergence. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vilches-Barro, A.; Maizel, A. Talking through Walls: Mechanisms of Lateral Root Emergence in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 23, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Matsunami, M.; Toyofuku, K.; Ishikawa–Sakurai, J.; Ogawa, A.; Matsunami, T.; Kokubun, M. Root Development and the Expression of Aquaporin Genes in Rice Seedlings under Osmotic Stress. Plant Prod. Sci. 2016, 19, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lin, D.; Nagawa, S.; Chen, J.; Cao, L.; Chen, X.; Xu, T.; Li, H.; Dhonukshe, P.; Yamamuro, C.; Friml, J.; et al. A ROP GTPase-Dependent Auxin Signaling Pathway Regulates the Subcellular Distribution of PIN2 in Arabidopsis Roots. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kirolinko, C.; Hobecker, K.; Cueva, M.; Botto, F.; Christ, A.; Niebel, A.; Ariel, F.; Blanco, F.A.; Crespi, M.; Zanetti, M.E. A Lateral Organ Boundaries Domain Transcription Factor Acts Downstream of the Auxin Response Factor 2 to Control Nodulation and Root Architecture in Medicago truncatula. New Phytol. 2024, 242, 2746–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Battaglia, M.; Rípodas, C.; Clúa, J.; Baudin, M.; Aguilar, O.M.; Niebel, A.; Zanetti, M.E.; Blanco, F.A. A Nuclear Factor Y Interacting Protein of the GRAS Family Is Required for Nodule Organogenesis, Infection Thread Progression, and Lateral Root Growth. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1430–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Liu, X.; Renard, C.M.G.C.; Bureau, S.; Le Bourvellec, C. Revisiting the Contribution of ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy to Characterize Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 262, 117935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Orazbekuly, Y.; Aitkaliyeva, G.; Yelubay, M. New Approaches to Sample Preparation and Integrated Spectroscopic Methods for The Identification of Polioxyethylene Triolate Sorbitane for Pharmaceutical Examination of Drugs. Indones. J. Pharm. 2020, 31, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, H.; Jennings, A.; Barlow, P.W.; Forde, B.G. Dual Pathways for Regulation of Root Branching by Nitrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 6529–6534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Saito, A.; Tanabata, S.; Tanabata, T.; Tajima, S.; Ueno, M.; Ishikawa, S.; Ohtake, N.; Sueyoshi, K.; Ohyama, T. Effect of Nitrate on Nodule and Root Growth of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 4464–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Qin, L.; Walk, T.C.; Han, P.; Chen, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Xie, L.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Adaption of Roots to Nitrogen Deficiency Revealed by 3D Quantification and Proteomic Analysis. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 329–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Y.B.; Song, J.P.; Wang, Z.B. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2-LIKE38, One Member of AS2/LOB Gene Family, Involves in Regulating Ab-Adaxial Patterning in Arabidopsis Lateral Organs. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Morffy, N.; Strader, L.C. Old Town Roads: Routes of Auxin Biosynthesis across Kingdoms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020, 55, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, Y.M.; Su, Y.; Dai, Z.; Lu, M.; Sun, W.; Yang, W.; Wu, S.S.; Wan, Z.T.; Wan, H.H.; Zhai, J. Integration of the Metabolome and Transcriptome Reveals Indigo Biosynthesis in Phaius flavus Flowers under Freezing Treatment. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dai, X.; Mashiguchi, K.; Chen, Q.; Kasahara, H.; Kamiya, Y.; Ojha, S.; DuBois, J.; Ballou, D.; Zhao, Y. The Biochemical Mechanism of Auxin Biosynthesis by an Arabidopsis YUCCA Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 1448–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Aoi, Y.; Oikawa, A.; Sasaki, R.; Huang, J.; Hayashi, K.; Kasahara, H. Arogenate Dehydratases Can Modulate the Levels of Phenylacetic Acid in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 524, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, J.; Kamanga, B.M.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Y.; Xu, L. Research Progress of Aldehyde Oxidases in Plants. Peer J 2022, 10, e13119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tivendale, N.D.; Ross, J.J.; Cohen, J.D. The Shifting Paradigms of Auxin Biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stepanova, A.N.; Alonso, J.M. Auxin Catabolism Unplugged: Role of IAA Oxidation in Auxin Homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 10742–10744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, J.; Peer, W.A. Auxin Homeostasis: The DAO of Catabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 3145–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hayashi, K.; Arai, K.; Aoi, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Hira, H.; Guo, R.; Hu, Y.; Ge, C.; Zhao, Y.; Kasahara, H.; et al. The Main Oxidative Inactivation Pathway of the Plant Hormone Auxin. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Fukui, K.; Arai, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Aoi, Y.; Kukshal, V.; Jez, J.M.; Kubes, M.F.; Napier, R.; Zhao, Y.; Kasahara, H.; et al. Chemical Inhibition of the Auxin Inactivation Pathway Uncovers the Roles of Metabolic Turnover in Auxin Homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2206869119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Que, F.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wei, Q.; Ramakrishnan, M. Genome-Wide Identification, Expansion, Evolution, and Expression Analysis Reveals ABCB Genes Important for Secondary Cell Wall Development in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Agronomy 2023, 13, 1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Devi, R.; Goyal, P.; Verma, B.; Hussain, S.; Chowdhary, F.; Arora, P.; Gupta, S. A Transcriptome-Wide Identification of ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters Revealed Participation of ABCB Subfamily in Abiotic Stress Management of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Xu, Y.X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.T.; Li, X.Q.; Xu, L.G.; Qi, Y.H.; Jiang, D.A.; Jin, S.H. The B Subfamily of Plant ATP Binding Cassette Transporters and Their Roles in Auxin Transport. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Reemmer, J.E. ABCB11 Functions with B1 and B19 to Regulate Rootward Auxin Transport. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  87. Yazaki, K.; Shitan, N.; Sugiyama, A.; Takanashi, K. Chapter 6 Cell and Molecular Biology of ATP-Binding Cassette Proteins in Plants. In International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 276, pp. 263–299. ISBN 978-0-12-374807-2. [Google Scholar]
  88. Geisler, M.; Blakeslee, J.J.; Bouchard, R.; Lee, O.R.; Vincenzetti, V.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Titapiwatanakun, B.; Peer, W.A.; Bailly, A.; Richards, E.L.; et al. Cellular Efflux of Auxin Catalyzed by the Arabidopsis MDR/PGP Transporter AtPGP1. Plant J. 2005, 44, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tian, Q.; Chen, F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, F.; Mi, G. Inhibition of Maize Root Growth by High Nitrate Supply Is Correlated with Reduced IAA Levels in Roots. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 942–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, W.; Xin, W.; Chen, N.; Yang, F.; Li, J.; Qu, G.; Jiang, X.; Xu, L.; Zhao, S.; Liu, H.; et al. Transcriptome and Co-Expression Network Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanism of Rice Root Systems in Response to Low-Nitrogen Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, S.; Ge, C.; Shen, Q.; Ma, H.; Zhang, X.; Dong, H.; Zhao, X.; Pang, C. Nitrogen Modulates Cotton Root Morphology by Affecting Abscisic Acid (ABA) and Salicylic Acid (SA) Content. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2021; 67, 1722–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Forde, B.; Lorenzo, H. The Nutritional Control of Root Development. In Interactions in the Root Environment: An Integrated Approach; Powlson, D.S., Bateman, G.L., Davies, K.G., Gaunt, J.L., Hirsch, P.R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 51–68. ISBN 978-94-010-3925-3. [Google Scholar]
  93. Mounier, E.; Pervent, M.; Ljung, K.; Gojon, A.; Nacry, P. Auxin-mediated Nitrate Signalling by NRT 1.1 Participates in the Adaptive Response of ARabidopsis Root Architecture to the Spatial Heterogeneity of Nitrate Availability. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Burton, R.A.; Gidley, M.J.; Fincher, G.B. Heterogeneity in the Chemistry, Structure and Function of Plant Cell Walls. Nat. Chem Biol. 2010, 6, 724–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tian, H.; Song, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Z. Responses of Cell Wall Components to Low Nitrogen in Rapeseed Roots. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Peaucelle, A.; Braybrook, S.; Höfte, H. Cell Wall Mechanics and Growth Control in Plants: The Role of Pectins Revisited. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wolf, S.; Hématy, K.; Höfte, H. Growth Control and Cell Wall Signaling in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 381–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Majda, M. The Role of Auxin in Cell Wall Expansion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Levesque-Tremblay, G.; Pelloux, J.; Braybrook, S.A.; Müller, K. Tuning of Pectin Methylesterification: Consequences for Cell Wall Biomechanics and Development. Planta 2015, 242, 791–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Peaucelle, A.; Braybrook, S.A.; Le Guillou, L.; Bron, E.; Kuhlemeier, C.; Höfte, H. Pectin-Induced Changes in Cell Wall Mechanics Underlie Organ Initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Braybrook, S.A.; Peaucelle, A. Mechano-Chemical Aspects of Organ Formation in Arabidopsis thaliana: The Relationship between Auxin and Pectin. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wen, F.; Laskowski, M.; Hawes, M. Cell separation in roots. In Plant Cell Separation and Adhesion; Roberts, J.A., Gonzalez-Carranza, Z., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2007; Volume 25, pp. 91–105. [Google Scholar]
  103. Barbosa, F.C.; Silvello, M.A.; Goldbeck, R. Cellulase and Oxidative Enzymes: New Approaches, Challenges and Perspectives on Cellulose Degradation for Bioethanol Production. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020, 42, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cosgrove, D.J. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 850–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Duman, Z.; Eliyahu, A.; Abu-Abied, M.; Sadot, E. The Contribution of Cell Wall Remodeling and Signaling to Lateral Organs Formation. Israel J. Plant Sci. 2020, 67, 110–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, Q.; Burgess, P.; Xu, J.; Meyer, W.; Huang, B. Osmotic Stress- and Salt Stress-Inhibition and Gibberellin-Mitigation of Leaf Elongation Associated with up-Regulation of Genes Controlling Cell Expansion. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 131, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lee, H.W.; Kim, J. EXPANSINA17 Up-Regulated by LBD18/ASL20 Promotes Lateral Root Formation During the Auxin Response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 1600–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ramakrishna, P.; Ruiz Duarte, P.; Rance, G.A.; Schubert, M.; Vordermaier, V.; Vu, L.D.; Murphy, E.; Vilches Barro, A.; Swarup, K.; Moirangthem, K.; et al. EXPANSIN A1-Mediated Radial Swelling of Pericycle Cells Positions Anticlinal Cell Divisions during Lateral Root Initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 8597–8602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Spartz, A.K.; Lor, V.S.; Ren, H.; Olszewski, N.E.; Miller, N.D.; Wu, G.; Spalding, E.P.; Gray, W.M. Constitutive Expression of Arabidopsis SMALL AUXIN UP RNA19 (SAUR19) in Tomato Confers Auxin-Independent Hypocotyl Elongation. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1453–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Du, M.; Spalding, E.P.; Gray, W.M. Rapid Auxin-Mediated Cell Expansion. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 379–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Verkman, A.S. Aquaporins. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, R52–R55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, C.; Li, H.; Xia, H.; Fan, S.; Kong, L. Bicarbonate-Dependent Detoxification by Mitigating Ammonium-Induced Hypoxic Stress in Triticum Aestivum Root. Biology 2024, 13, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Heinen, R.B.; Ye, Q.; Chaumont, F. Role of Aquaporins in Leaf Physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2971–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Reinhardt, H.; Hachez, C.; Bienert, M.D.; Beebo, A.; Swarup, K.; Voß, U.; Bouhidel, K.; Frigerio, L.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Bennett, M.J.; et al. Tonoplast Aquaporins Facilitate Lateral Root Emergence. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 1640–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hu, F.; Fang, D.; Zhang, W.; Dong, K.; Ye, Z.; Cao, J. Lateral Root Primordium: Formation, Influencing Factors and Regulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 207, 108429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Du, A.; Gao, H.; Liang, J.; Yu, W.; Yu, H.; Fan, S.; Chen, Q.; Guo, J.; et al. Transcription Factor LBD16 Targets Cell Wall Modification/Ion Transport Genes in Peach Lateral Root Formation. Plant Physiol. 2024, 194, 2472–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sharma, M.; Singh, D.; Saksena, H.B.; Sharma, M.; Tiwari, A.; Awasthi, P.; Botta, H.K.; Shukla, B.N.; Laxmi, A. Understanding the Intricate Web of Phytohormone Signalling in Modulating Root System Architecture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Xie, Q.; Frugis, G.; Colgan, D.; Chua, N.-H. Arabidopsis NAC1 Transduces Auxin Signal Downstream of TIR1 to Promote Lateral Root Development. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 3024–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Huang, X.; Lu, Z.; Zhai, L.; Li, N.; Yan, H. The Small Auxin-Up RNA SAUR10 Is Involved in the Promotion of Seedling Growth in Rice. Plants 2023, 12, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Qiu, T.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Kong, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Han, N.; Bian, H.; Zhu, M.; Wang, J. The Tissue-Specific and Developmentally Regulated Expression Patterns of the SAUR41 Subfamily of SMALL AUXIN UP RNA Genes: Potential Implications. Plant Signaling Behav. 2013, 8, e25283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chen, X.; Naramoto, S.; Robert, S.; Tejos, R.; Löfke, C.; Lin, D.; Yang, Z.; Friml, J. ABP1 and ROP6 GTPase Signaling Regulate Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Arabidopsis Roots. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1326–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Huang, J.; Liu, H.; Chen, M.; Li, X.; Wang, M.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Huang, J.; Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; et al. ROP3 GTPase Contributes to Polar Auxin Transport and Auxin Responses and Is Important for Embryogenesis and Seedling Growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3501–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Dong, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Tao, L.; Liu, H. FERONIA Regulates Auxin-mediated Lateral Root Development and Primary Root Gravitropism. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hirota, A.; Kato, T.; Fukaki, H.; Aida, M.; Tasaka, M. The Auxin-Regulated AP2/EREBP Gene PUCHI Is Required for Morphogenesis in the Early Lateral Root Primordium of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2156–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Takatsuka, H.; Umeda, M. Hormonal Control of Cell Division and Elongation along Differentiation Trajectories in Roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 2633–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Zou, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, J.; Kang, Z.; Li, X.; Yin, C.; Lin, Y. Nitrogen Deficiency-Induced Decrease in Cytokinins Content Promotes Rice Seminal Root Growth by Promoting Root Meristem Cell Proliferation and Cell Elongation. Cells 2020, 9, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Xin, W.; Zhang, L.; Gao, J.; Zhang, W.; Yi, J.; Zhen, X.; Bi, C.; He, D.; Liu, S.; Zhao, X. Adaptation Mechanism of Roots to Low and High Nitrogen Revealed by Proteomic Analysis. Rice 2021, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Stals, H.; Inzé, D. When Plant Cells Decide to Divide. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Himanen, K.; Boucheron, E.; Vanneste, S.; De Almeida Engler, J.; Inzé, D.; Beeckman, T. Auxin-Mediated Cell Cycle Activation during Early Lateral Root Initiation. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2339–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wasteneys, G.O.; Yang, Z. New Views on the Plant Cytoskeleton. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 3884–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hu, S.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Y.; Xuan, W.; Zou, Z.W.; Arkorful, E.; Chen, Y.; Ma, Q.P.; Jeyaraj, A.; Chen, X.; et al. A novel insight into nitrogen and auxin signaling in lateral root formation in tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Net increases in dry weight of shoots (A) and roots (B) of wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 12, 24, and 48 h after treatment. Values represent the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1. Net increases in dry weight of shoots (A) and roots (B) of wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 12, 24, and 48 h after treatment. Values represent the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 25 09566 g001
Figure 2. Representations of the root morphology of wheat seedlings at 48 h after treatment with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT). Bar = 2 cm.
Figure 2. Representations of the root morphology of wheat seedlings at 48 h after treatment with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT). Bar = 2 cm.
Ijms 25 09566 g002
Figure 3. Paired comparisons of DEGs between different N treatments. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment.
Figure 3. Paired comparisons of DEGs between different N treatments. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment.
Ijms 25 09566 g003
Figure 4. GO analysis of DEGs for the roots of wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. (A) LN vs. CK; (B) LNT vs. LN. The X-axis indicates the number of differential genes annotated for the GO count, and the Y-axis indicates the enriched GO terms. The color gradient from red to blue represents the significance level of the −Log10(p-value). The key functions of DEGs that were involved in auxin signaling, cell wall remodeling, nitrogen mentalism, and water transport have been highlighted using the red font.
Figure 4. GO analysis of DEGs for the roots of wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. (A) LN vs. CK; (B) LNT vs. LN. The X-axis indicates the number of differential genes annotated for the GO count, and the Y-axis indicates the enriched GO terms. The color gradient from red to blue represents the significance level of the −Log10(p-value). The key functions of DEGs that were involved in auxin signaling, cell wall remodeling, nitrogen mentalism, and water transport have been highlighted using the red font.
Ijms 25 09566 g004
Figure 5. KEGG analyses of DEGs for the roots of wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. (A) The KEGG enrichment analysis of LN compared with CK. (B) The KEGG enrichment analysis of LNT compared with LN. The X-axis in the figure is the GeneRatio; the Y-axis is the KEGG pathway. The size of the dots represents the number of genes annotated for the KEGG pathway, and the color gradient from red to green represents the significance level of the enrichment. The key enriched pathways for DEGs that were involved in auxin biosynthesis and transport and nitrogen metabolism were highlighted using the red font.
Figure 5. KEGG analyses of DEGs for the roots of wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. (A) The KEGG enrichment analysis of LN compared with CK. (B) The KEGG enrichment analysis of LNT compared with LN. The X-axis in the figure is the GeneRatio; the Y-axis is the KEGG pathway. The size of the dots represents the number of genes annotated for the KEGG pathway, and the color gradient from red to green represents the significance level of the enrichment. The key enriched pathways for DEGs that were involved in auxin biosynthesis and transport and nitrogen metabolism were highlighted using the red font.
Ijms 25 09566 g005
Figure 6. A schematic model of the Trp-dependent IAA biosynthetic pathway (A) and the expression of DEGs involved in the pathways (B). Wheat seedlings were treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. AO, indole-3-acetaldehyde oxidase; DAO, 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase; GH3, indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase; IAA-AA, indole-3-acetic acid–amino acid conjugate; IAAId, indole-3-acetaldehyde; IGP, indole-3-glycerophosphate; IGPS, indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase; ILL, IAA-amino acid hydrolase ILR1-like; IPA, indole-3-pyruvate; TAM, tryptamine; TAR, tryptophan aminotransferase-related protein; TDC1, tryptophan decarboxylase 1; Trp, tryptophan; TSA, tryptophan synthase alpha chain; YUCs, indole-3-pyruvate monooxygenase. Heatmap (B) showing the differential expression levels of the identified DEGs in the roots of wheat plants with different N treatments. The log2(FoldChange) values for individual genes are indicated by the color, as shown in the scale, with red indicating a high level of expression and blue indicating a low level of expression.
Figure 6. A schematic model of the Trp-dependent IAA biosynthetic pathway (A) and the expression of DEGs involved in the pathways (B). Wheat seedlings were treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. AO, indole-3-acetaldehyde oxidase; DAO, 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase; GH3, indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase; IAA-AA, indole-3-acetic acid–amino acid conjugate; IAAId, indole-3-acetaldehyde; IGP, indole-3-glycerophosphate; IGPS, indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase; ILL, IAA-amino acid hydrolase ILR1-like; IPA, indole-3-pyruvate; TAM, tryptamine; TAR, tryptophan aminotransferase-related protein; TDC1, tryptophan decarboxylase 1; Trp, tryptophan; TSA, tryptophan synthase alpha chain; YUCs, indole-3-pyruvate monooxygenase. Heatmap (B) showing the differential expression levels of the identified DEGs in the roots of wheat plants with different N treatments. The log2(FoldChange) values for individual genes are indicated by the color, as shown in the scale, with red indicating a high level of expression and blue indicating a low level of expression.
Ijms 25 09566 g006
Figure 7. Schematic representation of major auxin transport types (A) and a list of genes related to auxin transport in wheat roots (B). The arrows in (A) indicate auxin flow mediated by a particular transporter. A heatmap (B) showing the differential expression levels of the identified DEGs in the roots with three treatments from three replicates. The color blocks represent log2-transformed fold changes, with red indicating a high level of expression and blue indicating a low level of expression.
Figure 7. Schematic representation of major auxin transport types (A) and a list of genes related to auxin transport in wheat roots (B). The arrows in (A) indicate auxin flow mediated by a particular transporter. A heatmap (B) showing the differential expression levels of the identified DEGs in the roots with three treatments from three replicates. The color blocks represent log2-transformed fold changes, with red indicating a high level of expression and blue indicating a low level of expression.
Ijms 25 09566 g007
Figure 8. Volcano plots of DEGs involved in cell division, elongation, and the cell cycle. (A) LN vs. CK; (B) LNT vs. LN. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment. Red and blue dots indicate upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively, and gray dots indicate genes that were not differentially expressed.
Figure 8. Volcano plots of DEGs involved in cell division, elongation, and the cell cycle. (A) LN vs. CK; (B) LNT vs. LN. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment. Red and blue dots indicate upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively, and gray dots indicate genes that were not differentially expressed.
Ijms 25 09566 g008
Figure 9. Volcano plots of DEGs encoding cell wall expansins. (A) LN vs. CK; (B) LNT vs. LN. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment. Red and blue dots indicate upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively, and gray dots indicate genes that were not differentially expressed.
Figure 9. Volcano plots of DEGs encoding cell wall expansins. (A) LN vs. CK; (B) LNT vs. LN. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment. Red and blue dots indicate upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively, and gray dots indicate genes that were not differentially expressed.
Ijms 25 09566 g009
Figure 10. RNA-seq data accuracy verification. The column represents the 2−ΔΔCt value of qRT-PCR analysis and log2(FoldChange) value of RNA-Seq. The values represent the mean ± SD. Positive values on the Y-axis indicate the upregulation of hub genes. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment.
Figure 10. RNA-seq data accuracy verification. The column represents the 2−ΔΔCt value of qRT-PCR analysis and log2(FoldChange) value of RNA-Seq. The values represent the mean ± SD. Positive values on the Y-axis indicate the upregulation of hub genes. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment.
Ijms 25 09566 g010
Figure 11. Content of root tryptophan (A) and IAA (B) in wheat seedlings grown under different N treatments. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between treatments. The values represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment.
Figure 11. Content of root tryptophan (A) and IAA (B) in wheat seedlings grown under different N treatments. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between treatments. The values represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. Wheat seedlings grown in solution containing 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment.
Ijms 25 09566 g011
Figure 12. ATR-FTIR spectra obtained from the epidermal cell walls of LRP of wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. (A) Difference spectra generated via the digital subtraction of the spectrum of the LN (0.1 mM NO3) LRPs from that of the CK LRPs and the spectrum of the LNT (0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L) LRPs from that of the LN LRPs. (B) Graphs show the transmission (Y-axis) plotted against the wavenumber (X-axis).
Figure 12. ATR-FTIR spectra obtained from the epidermal cell walls of LRP of wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) for 48 h. (A) Difference spectra generated via the digital subtraction of the spectrum of the LN (0.1 mM NO3) LRPs from that of the CK LRPs and the spectrum of the LNT (0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L) LRPs from that of the LN LRPs. (B) Graphs show the transmission (Y-axis) plotted against the wavenumber (X-axis).
Ijms 25 09566 g012
Figure 13. Graphs representing the LRP elastic moduli of wheat seedlings grown in 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), or 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment. Data are the mean ± SD from three LRPs. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 13. Graphs representing the LRP elastic moduli of wheat seedlings grown in 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), or 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT) at 48 h after treatment. Data are the mean ± SD from three LRPs. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05.
Ijms 25 09566 g013
Table 1. Root morphological parameters of wheat seedlings at 48 h after treatment.
Table 1. Root morphological parameters of wheat seedlings at 48 h after treatment.
TreatmentRoot TipsTotal Root Length (cm)Root Surface (cm2)
5 mM NO3 (CK)103.60 ± 17.32 b123.85 ± 19.60 b12.28 ± 1.75 b
0.1 mM NO3 (LN)150.02 ± 25.49 a149.04 ± 15.61 a14.01 ± 1.53 a
0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT)61.84 ± 20.00 c77.32 ± 11.23 c8.48 ± 0.93 c
Values with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 among the treatments. Values represent the mean ± SD of nine replicates.
Table 2. List of genes regulating IAA biosynthesis and transport in the roots.
Table 2. List of genes regulating IAA biosynthesis and transport in the roots.
Gene IDGene Expression
Ijms 25 09566 i001
Gene DescriptionFunction
TraesCS3A02G341400 Protein PIN-LIKES 6Regulating the spatial redistribution of IAA in roots [39].
TraesCS2A02G430400 Auxin-responsive protein SAUR71Regulating cell expansion downstream of auxin transport and auxin signaling [40].
TraesCS6B02G044300 High-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1Polar auxin transport [35,36].
novel.9662 High-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1
TraesCS6D02G035900 High-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1
TraesCS2A02G323900 Putative multidrug resistance proteinPolar auxin transport [41].
TraesCS4A02G370600 Putative multidrug resistance protein
TraesCS2D02G198800 Putative polyol transporter 2Transcription factors of auxin biosynthesis and key molecular triggers for de novo organ patterning during LR formation [42,43].
TraesCS2A02G188900 Putative polyol transporter 2
TraesCS2D02G199100 Putative polyol transporter 5
TraesCS5A02G141700 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1Regulating primary root growth through alterations in auxin homeostasis [44,45].
novel.7503 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor WRI1
TraesCS5B02G002500 Agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL21Positive regulation of auxin accumulation [46,47].
novel.12069 Agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL21
TraesCS5D02G359700 Fanconi anemia group J protein homologRegulation of auxin output [48].
TraesCS5A02G352700 Fanconi anemia group J protein homolog
TraesCS5B02G354900 Fanconi anemia group J protein homolog
TraesCS7A02G373800 Transcription factor HY5Negatively affecting PIN3 and LAX3 levels [49].
Transcription factors of brassinosteroid [50]; upregulating the expression of TAA1 and YUC5/7/8 [51].
TraesCS2A02G187800 BES1/BZR1 plant transcription factor
TraesCS2D02G199900 BES1/BZR1 plant transcription factor
TraesCS3A02G123500 BES1/BZR1 plant transcription factor
TraesCS5A02G233700 Protein indeterminate-domain 14Binding to promoter regions of YUC5, TAA1, and PIN1 to activate their expression [52].
TraesCS5D02G240600 Protein indeterminate-domain 14
TraesCS4A02G082200 Serine/threonine-protein kinase WAG1Controlling the phosphorylation of PIN proteins [53].
TraesCS3A02G425700 Probable histone acetyltransferase HAC-like 1Targeting auxin influx carrier LAX2 and inducing auxin-responsive genes [54,55].
TraesCS5D02G193200 Histone acetyl transferase HAT1
TraesCS5B02G186000 Histone acetyl transferase HAT1
Table 3. DEGs coding for cell wall remodeling enzymes in the roots of wheat under different N treatments.
Table 3. DEGs coding for cell wall remodeling enzymes in the roots of wheat under different N treatments.
Gene IDGene DescriptionLog2 (FoldChange)
LN vs. CKLNT vs. LN
TraesCS5D02G145900Cellulase (glycosyl hydrolase family 5)1.34−3.08
TraesCS3A02G241000Cellulase (glycosyl hydrolase family 5)2.90−2.23
TraesCS5D02G500000Pectin acetylesterase 31.95−6.42
TraesCS3D02G538500Pectin acetylesterase 51.43−6.25
TraesCS3A02G533800Pectin acetylesterase 51.62−7.31
TraesCS2B02G117500Probable pectinesterase 532.76−5.11
TraesCS1A02G143600Probable pectate lyase 121.21−1.28
TraesCS7B02G230600Polygalacturonase2.15−3.45
TraesCS3B02G020300Probable polygalacturonase3.91−7.45
TraesCS3D02G010500Probable xyloglucan glycosyltransferase 31.44−3.15
TraesCSU02G175000Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase2.40−5.16
TraesCS2A02G498500Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase 151.64−5.56
TraesCS3B02G045700Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase 12.55−2.47
TraesCS4D02G227700Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase 41.20−2.45
TraesCS4B02G227000Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase 42.55−2.63
TraesCS3D02G039400Xylanase inhibitor C-terminal−2.133.56
TraesCS1D02G064500Probable beta-1,4-xylosyltransferase1.30−1.05
TraesCS7B02G311200Beta-1,2-xylosyltransferase1.83−5.36
TraesCS7D02G405200Beta-1,2-xylosyltransferase1.89−3.93
Table 4. Expression of DEGs involved in the regulation of cell wall remodeling and LR formation.
Table 4. Expression of DEGs involved in the regulation of cell wall remodeling and LR formation.
Gene IDGene Expression
Ijms 25 09566 i001
Gene DescriptionFunction
TraesCS4B02G060000 Growth-regulating factor 6Activating OsYUC1 and auxin biosynthesis [56].
TraesCS4D02G059600 Growth-regulating factor 6
TraesCS2A02G037100 Subtilisin-like protease SBT5.3Activated by NAC and mediating auxin signaling to promote LR development by weakening connections among cells during root development [57].
TraesCS3B02G286900 Subtilisin-like protease SBT5.3
TraesCS4B02G350600 NAC domain-containing protein 86Transcription activator of genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary cell walls, activating AIR3, and mediating auxin signaling to promote LR development [57].
andTraesCS3B02G439600 NAC domain-containing protein 48
TraesCS7A02G068000 NAC domain-containing protein 43
TraesCS4A02G421300 NAC domain-containing protein 43
TraesCS2D02G199900 Brassinosteroid (BR)-regulated growth responseInducing the expression of cyclin D genes in LR initiation and elongation [58].
TraesCS5A02G473800 APETALA2-like protein 3Defining the primordium boundary during LR outgrowth [12].
TraesCS2D02G515800 APETALA2-like protein 5
TraesCS3B02G251600 Tetratricopeptide repeat-containing thioredoxin TTL1Regulating microtubule structure and cell wall elasticity [59].
TraesCS3B02G162100 Tetratricopeptide repeat-containing thioredoxin TTL1
TraesCS6D02G305000 Glycosyl hydrolase family 17Exhibiting glucan 1,3-beta-D-glucoside activity and relaxing the plant cell wall [41].
TraesCS3A02G374000 Glycosyl hydrolase family 17
TraesCS4A02G005000 Plasma membrane ATPase 10Excreting H+ ions into the cell wall compartment, lowering the cell wall pH, and initiating cell wall loosening and extended growth [60].
TraesCS4B02G300000 Plasma membrane ATPase 10
TraesCS2D02G206300 Aquaporin PIP2-1Promoting water transport from overlying tissue to the primordium [61,62,63].
TraesCS6A02G082900 Aquaporin PIP2-5
TraesCS2B02G497800 CRIB domain-containing protein RIC10Propagation of ROP GTPase signals [64].
TraesCS6D02G126000 CRIB domain-containing protein RIC10
TraesCS4B02G113300 Protein NODULATION SIGNALING PATHWAY 2Transcriptional regulator essential for Nod-factor-induced gene expression [65,66].
TraesCS4D02G110800 Protein NODULATION SIGNALING PATHWAY 2
The three squares in the heatmap from left to right represent wheat seedlings treated with 5 mM NO3 (CK), 0.1 mM NO3 (LN), and 0.1 mM NO3 + 60 mg/L TIBA (LNT), respectively.
Table 5. Effect of LN on the activity of root cell wall remodeling enzymes and the content of the main cell wall components.
Table 5. Effect of LN on the activity of root cell wall remodeling enzymes and the content of the main cell wall components.
CKLNLNT
Activity of cell-wall-remodeling-associated enzymes (μg min−1 g−1 FW)
pectinase 25.78 ± 0.30 b34.97 ± 4.58 a26.12 ± 1.37 b
β-1,3-glucanase183.63 ± 7.95 b735.34 ± 39.37 a226.22 ± 11.30 b
Polygalacturonase0.81 ± 0.03 c3.32 ± 0.23 a1.97 ± 0.16 b
exo-β-1,4-glucanase19.85 ± 0.52 c22.59 ± 0.92 a21.16 ± 0.19 b
Cellulase507.43 ± 3.94 b576.20 ± 11.05 a505.95 ± 12.57 b
neutral xylanase96.84 ± 4.38 b235.52 ± 23.28 a117.03 ± 4.28 b
pectinate lyases112.50 ± 4.69 b152.71 ± 4.96 a85.31 ± 3.57 c
Pectinesterase43.19 ± 1.55 b47.54 ± 2.08 a44.65 ± 1.64 ab
Cell wall components
galacturonic acid (μmol g−1 FW)5.18 ± 0.16 b5.70 ± 0.24 a5.10 ± 0.23 b
cellulose (μmol g−1 FW)4077.76 ± 45.73 a2277.95 ± 76.69 c2857.38 ± 40.26 b
DPM (%)1.61 ± 0.06 a1.32 ± 0.05 b1.68 ± 0.06 a
The results represent the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Different lowercase letters in each row indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. FW, fresh weight; DPM, degree of pectin-methyl esterification.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, B.; Si, J.; Xia, H.; Fan, S.; Kong, L. Nitrate Starvation Induces Lateral Root Organogenesis in Triticum aestivum via Auxin Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179566

AMA Style

Tang C, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhang B, Si J, Xia H, Fan S, Kong L. Nitrate Starvation Induces Lateral Root Organogenesis in Triticum aestivum via Auxin Signaling. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(17):9566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Chengming, Yunxiu Zhang, Xiao Liu, Bin Zhang, Jisheng Si, Haiyong Xia, Shoujin Fan, and Lingan Kong. 2024. "Nitrate Starvation Induces Lateral Root Organogenesis in Triticum aestivum via Auxin Signaling" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 17: 9566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop