Next Article in Journal
Reduction of Mitochondrial Calcium Overload via MKT077-Induced Inhibition of Glucose-Regulated Protein 75 Alleviates Skeletal Muscle Pathology in Dystrophin-Deficient mdx Mice
Previous Article in Journal
DNA 5mC and RNA m6A Collaborate to Upregulate Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase 2 for Kupffer Cell Activation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Response of the Gut Physiological Function and Microbiome of a Wild Freshwater Fish (Megalobrama terminalis) to Alterations in Reproductive Behavior
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Chronic Toxicity of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical to Daphnia magna: A Transcriptome and Network Analysis of TNT Exposure

1
Institute of Environmental Medicine for Green Chemistry, Department of Life Science, Biomedi Campus, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si 10326, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Nano, Chemical & Biological Engineering, College of Natural Science and Engineering, Seokyeong University, Seoul 02173, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(18), 9895; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189895
Submission received: 1 August 2024 / Revised: 30 August 2024 / Accepted: 5 September 2024 / Published: 13 September 2024

Abstract

:
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) impair growth and development. While EDCs can occur naturally in aquatic ecosystems, they are continuously introduced through anthropogenic activities such as industrial effluents, pharmaceutical production, wastewater, and mining. To elucidate the chronic toxicological effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) on aquatic organisms, we collected experimental data from a standardized chronic exposure test using Daphnia magna (D. magna), individuals of which were exposed to a potential EDC, trinitrotoluene (TNT). The chronic toxicity effects of this compound were explored through differential gene expression, gene ontology, network construction, and putative adverse outcome pathway (AOP) proposition. Our findings suggest that TNT has detrimental effects on the upstream signaling of Tcf/Lef, potentially adversely impacting oocyte maturation and early development. This study employs diverse bioinformatics approaches to elucidate the gene-level toxicological effects of chronic TNT exposure on aquatic ecosystems. The results provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of the adverse impacts of TNT through network construction and putative AOP proposition.

1. Introduction

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are toxic compounds that impede the functions of the endocrine system, affecting not only the synthesis, secretion, and metabolism of hormones but also biological processes (BPs) related to growth, development, and cancer [1,2,3]. The use of EDCs has witnessed a notable surge in the industrial, agricultural, and pharmaceutical fields in recent decades, posing a substantial threat to animal life [4,5,6]. In aquatic environments, EDCs can occur naturally, but their concentrations can also increase due to human activities, including industrial activities, agricultural runoff, mining, and the discharge of domestic and municipal wastewater [7,8,9,10]. Diverse adverse effects of EDCs have been observed in numerous aquatic field and laboratory studies involving freshwater fauna [7].
2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) has been detected in water sources proximal to military installations [11]. This contamination is attributed to the effluent discharge from explosive-manufacturing facilities, which facilitates the introduction of TNT into aquatic ecosystems. TNT contamination was reported in Sweden, where a concentration of 3 mg/L of TNT was observed in ponds near to industrial facilities [12]. Numerous studies have been conducted on the removal of TNT from aquatic environments as well as on the toxicity resulting from TNT exposure [13,14,15,16]. TNT, a potent explosive, can form π complexes with estrone, a female sex hormone characterized by an electron-rich aromatic ring. Frontier molecular orbital analyses, including HOMO and LUMO, demonstrate the π complex’s remarkable resistance to oxidation, suggesting a potential interference of TNT with estrone’s biological functions [17]. Furthermore, animals such as Mus musculus, Rattus rattus, and Caenorhabditis elegans treated with TNT experience adverse effects on their reproductive systems [18,19,20,21]. This evidence points to the broader toxicological implications of TNT, particularly its impact on sexual health through the disruption of hormonal activities, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive studies on its biological effects [17].
The water flea, a kind of crustacean zooplankton, is ubiquitous in both lotic and lentic ecosystems [22]. Hence, the impact of toxicants on reproduction and population dynamics in the water flea could exacerbate disruptions to the overall health of freshwater ecosystems [23]. Daphnia magna (D. magna), a species of water flea, serves as a recommended model organism in the U.S. EPA guidance (OPPTS 850.1300) and OECD test guidelines (No. 211), presenting significant advantages for genetic research [24,25]. In controlled environmental conditions, it exhibits a parthenogenetic reproductive cycle, facilitating the generation of genetically homogeneous individuals [26]. Furthermore, D. magna is a suitable individual for reproductive research because it has a short life cycle, good reproductive ability, and a size that is easy to observe with the naked eye [22]. Considering its position in the ecological hierarchy, D. magna constitutes an essential genus that can be valuable in evaluating ecotoxicity, owing to its unique life cycle that offers numerous sensitive endpoints for measuring physiological activities [23,27].
Public databases, including the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), offer a wealth of detailed biological data, including gene expression profiles of numerous mRNAs at a particular moment in time, and changes in the mRNA levels can be used to detect the cellular response to specific conditions, including medications or toxic substances [28,29,30].
Diverse bioinformatics analyses, such as differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis, functional enrichment analysis, biological network analysis, and suggesting putative adverse outcome pathways (AOPs), have been used to understand the biological functions of gene expression profiles. Gene ontology (GO) categorizes genes based on their biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF) to elucidate biological events at the cellular and molecular levels. A biological network offers an effective approach for comprehensively identifying the adverse effects induced by TNT on cellular processes, potential phenotypes, and central genes. AOP is one of the biological mechanism explanation methods that elucidate a series of biological events stemming from exposure to substances, including EDCs, until an adverse outcome is reached.
In this study, we explore the toxic effects of TNT chronic exposure through diverse bioinformatic analyses such as differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis, functional enrichment analysis, and biological network analysis, and suggest putative adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) to understand the biological events at the cellular level, the adverse effects, and biological mechanisms. Finally, we present a comprehensive approach to understand these mechanisms in aquatic organisms, which helps grasp the broader environmental health impacts of EDCs.

2. Results

2.1. Fucntional Enrichment Analysis

From transcriptome data following chronic exposure to TNT, 1759 DEGs were identified, with 688 upregulated and 1071 downregulated. Functional enrichment analysis based on their expression patterns was performed, and the top 10 upregulated and downregulated BPs, CCs, and MFs were identified (Table 1). Metabolism-related GO terms predominated in both upregulated and downregulated BPs, with ‘Cellular process’ exhibiting the lowest FDR in both categories. Upregulated CCs showed a prevalence of GO terms related to cellular organelles and membrane-bounded organelles. Conversely, downregulated CCs were notably associated with myofibers. Upregulated MFs involved the binding of substances other than proteins, while downregulated MFs included oxidative stress-related GO terms like ‘Oxidoreductase activity’ and ‘Glutathione transferase activity’.

2.2. Comprehensively Functional Enrichment Analysis for DEGs

Irrespective of their expression patterns, DEGs were integrated for GO analysis, confirming associations with the endocrine system, development, and reproduction (Table 2). In the context of endocrine function, associations emerged between five BPs related to development and eight BPs related to reproductive functions. Two key ontological categories were highlighted: ‘Organic substance biosynthetic process’, linked to hormone synthesis, and ‘Organic substance transport’, associated with hormone transport.

2.3. Toxicity Mechanisms of Chronic TNT Exposure in D. magna

2.3.1. Biological Network Analyses

To elucidate the reproductive toxicity mechanisms of chronic TNT exposure, DEGs were screened through interactions of transcribed protein from each DEG (Figure 1a). A biological network shows that chronic TNT exposure could cause adverse effects on reproduction and development in D. magna (Figure 1b). The biological network demonstrates that abnormal phenotypes in development, including body size, fertility, and oxidative stress response, can result from dysfunction in various cellular processes, such as reproductive processes, female gamete generation, and germ cell development. In the biological network, LOC116919267 (SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9), LOC116919853 (eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-III), LOC116919548 (transformer-2 protein homolog α), and LOC116923253 (histone deacetylase 1) exhibited high degree and betweenness centrality and were selected as central genes. An endocrine-focused biological network was found based on these five key genes and the interaction between central genes, central genes–cellular processes, and central genes–phenotypes (Figure 1c). The central genes are related to specific cellular processes involved in reproductive and developmental functions. In the endocrine-focused biological network, reproductive- and development-related adverse effects were mainly observed, and female reproduction-related adverse effects were also detected.

2.3.2. Putative Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Development for TNT

A putative adverse outcome pathway (AOP) was proposed, hypothesizing that a putative molecular initiating event (MIE) occurs due to chronic TNT exposure, followed by changes in the expression of casein kinase 1, epsilon (CK1ε), and casein kinase II (CK2) (Figure 1d). The differential expression of CK1ε and CK2 leads to the formation of the segment polarity protein dishevelled (Dvl) complex. This complex interacts with and regulates the activity of the transcription factors T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer (Tcf/Lef). The formation of the Dv1 complex promotes Tcf/Lef to bind to DNA and the transcription of genes crucial for oocyte maturation and early development. The deregulation of these transcription factors results in the activation of genes that should otherwise be tightly controlled, leading to potential developmental and reproductive abnormalities in D. magna.

3. Discussion

The DEGs derived from the transcriptome of the whole body of D. magna, individuals of which were exposed to TNT for 21 days, were found. The biological function of DEGs were analyzed using functional enrichment analysis, biological network analysis, and putative AOP [31]. At the cellular level, chronic exposure to TNT results in unusual metabolism, abnormal cell anatomical structures, reduced offspring development, and altered binding processes (Table 1). Among the upregulated BPs, ‘Cellular process’, ‘Biological regulation’, and ‘Cellular component organization or biogenesis’ were featured. In contrast, downregulated BPs featured ‘Organonitrogen compound metabolic process’, ‘Response to stimulus’, ‘Regulation of biological quality’, and ‘Response to ethanol’. The chemical structure of TNT dictates that biological detoxification pathways predominantly follow the reductive transformation of the nitro groups, making TNT recalcitrant to environmental mineralization. In the context of CCs, GO terms like ‘Intracellular anatomical structure’, ‘Cellular anatomical entity’, and ‘Cytoplasm’ were recurrent. For MFs, ‘Binding’, ‘Protein binding’, and ‘Catalytic activity’ were consistent GO terms across both upregulated and downregulated categories. Upregulated MFs involved the binding of substances other than proteins, while downregulated MFs included oxidative stress-related GO terms like ‘Oxidoreductase activity’ and ‘Glutathione transferase activity’. Both oxidoreductase and reduced glutathione are major antioxidants and play a key role in maintaining redox homeostasis [32,33,34]. The GO term ‘Organic substance biosynthetic process’ was linked to hormone synthesis, and ‘Organic substance transport’ was associated with hormone transport.
To comprehend the cellular functions of DEGs, functional enrichment analysis was conducted regardless of their expression patterns. After validating the GO terms with significant relevance to reproduction (FDR < 0.05), a total of 14 GO terms were recognized within BPs, and 1 GO term was identified each in CCs and MFs (Table 2). Notably, the BPs were related to development, reproduction, and the metabolism of organic substances, while GO terms pertinent to cell division were discovered in CCs, and GO terms related to organic compound binding were found in MFs. Additionally, five BPs related to development were elucidated, along with eight BPs associated with reproductive processes. Notably, the GO terms ‘Developmental process involved in reproduction’ and ‘Germ cell development’ were both linked to reproduction. Two reproductive-related BPs involved the genesis of germ cells, and three were related to meiotic cell division. Observations of ‘Female gamete generation’ and ‘Female meiotic nuclear division’ in D. magna highlight the adverse effects of TNT on reproductive functions. Additionally, ‘Meiotic spindle’ and ‘Organic cyclic compound binding’ were identified in CCs and MFs, respectively, linking them to reproduction and hormone binding.
Through biological network analysis, we achieved a comprehensive understanding of the chronic toxicity of TNT (Figure 1b). It was possible to identify adverse effects on putative phenotypes associated with reproduction, development, and body size. In the endocrine-focused biological network (Figure 1c), adverse effects on reproduction-related phenotypes and muscle development were observed, indicating that genes LOC116919267 (SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9), LOC116919853 (eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-III), LOC116919548 (transformer-2 protein homolog α), and LOC116923253 (histone deacetylase 1) could play crucial roles in the chronic toxicity mechanism of TNT. The main functions of UBC9 include influencing protein localization within the cell, altering protein–DNA interactions, and modifying protein–protein interactions [35,36]. It is involved in key cellular processes, such as cell cycle regulation, stress response, and development, notably in oocytes and embryos, indicating its role in transcriptional activation and possibly chromatin remodeling [37]. Furthermore, it is concerned with muscle development: the knockdown of endogenous nhp2l1 in zebrafish disrupts skeletal muscle development [38]. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A III (EIF4A3) regulates post-transcriptional gene expression by aiding in precursor mRNA splicing and influencing nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. It also supports the expression of important selenoproteins, such as phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase 1 [39]. Transformer 2 α homolog (TRA2A) promotes growth, movement, and chemotherapy resistance by regulating specific splicing events independent of other splicing factors [40]. Additionally, cell proliferation is tightly regulated by cyclins, with RNA processing factors being the most abundant functional class of cyclin-associated proteins, including TRA2A in human cells [41,42]. TRA2A is overexpressed in glioma tissues, enhancing the proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT of glioma cells [43]. Histone deacetylase 1 is involved in RNA translation and protein synthesis [44].
For intuitive insights into the chronic toxic mechanism of TNT, we proposed a putative AOP based on the KEGG pathway database [45]. The putative AOP showed that TNT induces changes in the expression of Ck1ε and Ck2, potentially leading to the occurrence of abnormal transcription of target genes, such as those involved in oocyte maturation and early development (Figure 1d). This suggests that chronic exposure to TNT affects reproduction and reproductive hormone metabolism. The differential expression of Ck1ε and Ck2 leads to the formation of the Dvl complex. This complex interacts with and regulates the activity of Tcf/Lef transcription factors [46]. Dvl is activated when Wnt binds to its receptor Frizzled (Fz) and coreceptor Lrp5/6 on the cell surface [47]. This binding event is crucial for initiating the Wnt signaling cascade. When Wnt binds to its receptors, Dvl is phosphorylated by Ck1ε, which inhibits the Gsk-3β-mediated phosphorylation of β-catenin [48,49]. This prevents β-catenin degradation, allowing it to accumulate in the cytoplasm and translocate to the nucleus to activate gene transcription [50]. However, the formation of the Dvl complex due to altered kinase activity disrupts this inhibition, allowing Tcf/Lef to bind to DNA and promote the transcription of genes crucial for oocyte maturation and early development. The deregulation of these transcription factors results in the activation of genes that should otherwise be tightly controlled, leading to potential developmental and reproductive abnormalities in D. magna.
Understanding these mechanisms in D. magna provides valuable insights into potential risks and pathways of chronic exposure to TNT, which could adversely affect aquatic organisms’ health, especially for populations reliant on aquatic ecosystems for food and water resources. Research on specific genes and mechanisms through diverse bioinformatic analysis methods could provide a comprehensive understanding of these complex mechanisms and new insights into exploring the toxicity of chemicals in aquatic organisms. Since our analysis was conducted using only partial data, more public genomic data and experiments need to be integrated. The interaction between D. magna genes was explained using the interactions of orthologous genes in other species, and gene–phenotype associations were also substituted with phenotypes of orthologous genes in Drosophila melanogaster (D. melanogaster) due to a lack of research on gene–gene and gene–phenotype interaction on D. magna. However, our study utilized only a single dataset of chronic TNT exposure. To fully understand the chronic toxic effects of TNT, a broader range of datasets is necessary. Additionally, future research should focus on examining the recovery of gene expression patterns modulated by chronic exposure to provide more accurate information for TNT regulation. Such studies would offer valuable insights into the persistence of genetic alterations induced by chronic TNT exposure and the potential for recovery at the molecular level. This information would be crucial for developing more effective regulatory strategies and understanding the chronic ecological impacts of TNT contamination.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Data Collection and Differentially Expressed Gene Screening

TNT chronic exposure gene expression profile datasets were obtained from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accessed on 3 October 2023). The gene expression dataset (GSE43960) includes the whole body of D. magna chronically exposed to TNT. The dataset was generated through microarray analysis following exposure to TNT of D. magna at a concentration of 1.85 mg/L for 21 days, in accordance with the guidance outlined by the U.S. EPA (OPPTS 850.1300), as implemented by Stanley et al. [51]. The exposure concentration was selected based on the dose–response relationship observed in preliminary range-finding experiments, according to the U.S. EPA guidelines (OPPTS 850.4200) [52]. TNT exposure was renewed three times a week, with one D. magna added per test chamber across 10 test chambers per treatment level, while the control exposure used solvent. The DEGs were screened with |Fold Change| ≥ 1.5 and p-value < 0.05 using the limma package (ver. 3.58.1) in R software [53].

4.2. Functional Enrichment Analysis

Gene ontology enrichment analysis was conducted using STRING database (https://string-db.org/, accessed on 2 January 2024) and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

4.3. Network Analysis

4.3.1. Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis

The protein–protein interaction data were sourced from the STRING database for D. magna DEGs, with an interaction score threshold of 0.4 [54,55].

4.3.2. Gene–Phenotype Association Analysis

To find associations between genes and phenotypes, transcribed proteins of DEGs were translated into their D. melanogaster which are evolutionarily close to D. magna species using NCBI BLASTp [56,57]. The association between translated orthologous gene and phenotypes were found in FlayBase (https://flybase.org/, accessed on 30 June 2024).

4.3.3. Biological Network Analysis and Endocrine-Focused Biological Network Analysis

Biological networks were constructed incorporating protein–protein interaction information, cellular processes, and orthologous phenotypes correlations. Top genes in the endocrine-focused biological network were identified by considering their degree and betweenness centrality. The cellular processes and phenotypes in the endocrine-focused biological network are connected to the selected genes, showing high degree and betweenness centrality.

4.4. Putative Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Development

The putative AOP for chronic exposure to TNT in D. magna was analyzed based on the Wnt signaling pathway in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database.

5. Conclusions

EDCs present significant risks to both the environment and living organisms by disrupting hormone functions, which can affect growth and development. The increased use of EDCs in industrial, agricultural, and pharmaceutical sectors has led to their accumulation in aquatic environments due to wastewater discharge. Various studies have shown that TNT can cause harmful effects in freshwater organisms, potentially disrupting ecosystems. Daphnia magna, a species of water flea, is an important model organism for studying the impact of toxic substances due to its key role in aquatic food webs and its ease of study. Data from gene expression profiling, such as those available from the GEO, provide valuable information on how chronic exposure to EDCs affects gene expression in this organism. We focused on datasets related to the exposure of D. magna to TNT, revealing significant alterations in gene expression linked to metabolism, cellular processes, and reproductive functions. Exposure to TNT was shown to interfere with the Wnt signaling pathway, leading to reproductive and developmental abnormalities in D. magna. Central genes such as LOC116919267 (SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9) and LOC116919853 (eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-III) were identified as central to the toxic effects observed.
By using techniques such as functional enrichment analysis and constructing biological networks, we were able to identify AOPs that describe the sequence of biological events linking EDC exposure to negative health effects. Understanding these mechanisms in aquatic organisms helps grasp the broader environmental health impacts of EDCs, especially for communities that depend on aquatic ecosystems for food and water. The importance of transcriptomic and network analyses in elucidating the complex interactions between environmental pollutants and biological systems was shown. Further research is essential to fully understand the implications of EDCs and to develop strategies for mitigating their impact on aquatic ecosystems and human health.

Author Contributions

Y.R.S. and E.-M.C.; designed the research study. J.L.; performed the overall analysis procedure and wrote the manuscript. H.W.K. and J.P.H. wrote the manuscript with J.L., D.Y.S. and Y.J.; composed the figures with J.L., J.Y.P. and S.-G.Y.; investigated information. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Core Technology Development Project for Environmental Diseases Prevention and Management Program, funded by South Korea’s Ministry of Environment (MOE) (grant number 2022003310012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data.

References

  1. Tao, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Qu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Effects of Effects of Common Environmental Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Zebrafish Behavior. Water Res. 2022, 208, 117826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yan, Y.; Guo, F.; Liu, K.; Ding, R.; Wang, Y. The Effect of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Placental Development. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1059854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sharma, N.K.; Sarode, S.C. Various Forms of Silicon Electronic Waste and Predisposition to Cancer. J. Cancer Prev. 2023, 28, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jasrotia, R.; Langer, S.; Dhar, M. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Aquatic Ecosystem: An Emerging Threat to Wildlife and Human Health. In Proceedings of the Zoological Society; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2021; pp. 634–647. [Google Scholar]
  5. Caserta, D.; Mantovani, A.; Marci, R.; Fazi, A.; Ciardo, F.; La Rocca, C.; Maranghi, F.; Moscarini, M. Environment and Women’s Reproductive Health. Hum. Reprod. Update 2011, 17, 418–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yamindago, A.; Jo, Y.; Won, H.; Yum, S. Sublethal Effects of Acetaminophen Exposure on Benthic Aquatic Animal (Hydra magnipapillata). Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2023, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Muller, A.K.; Markert, N.; Leser, K.; Kampfer, D.; Crawford, S.E.; Schaffer, A.; Segner, H.; Hollert, H. Assessing Endocrine Disruption in Freshwater Fish Species from a “Hotspot” for Estrogenic Activity in Sediment. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 257, 113636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Tizaoui, C.; Yang, Y.; Ali, J.; Zhang, W. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Water and Recent Advances on Their Detection Using Electrochemical Biosensors. Sens. Diagn. 2023, 2, 46–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Das, S.; Mukherjee, D. Effect of Cadmium Chloride on Secretion of 17β-Estradiol by the Ovarian Follicles of Common Carp, Cyprinus Carpio. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2013, 181, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, Y.M.; Oleszkiewicz, J.A.; Cicek, N.; Londry, K. Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (Edc) in Municipal Wastewater Treatment: A Need for Mass Balance. Environ. Technol. 2004, 25, 635–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lima, D.R.; Bezerra, M.L.; Neves, E.B.; Moreira, F.R. Impact of Ammunition and Military Explosives on Human Health and the Environment. Rev. Environ. Health 2011, 26, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leffler, P.; Brannas, E.; Ragnvaldsson, D.; Wingfors, H.; Berglind, R. Toxicity and Accumulation of Trinitrotoluene (Tnt) and Its Metabolites in Atlantic Salmon Alevins Exposed to an Industrially Polluted Water. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2014, 77, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Letzel, S.; Goen, T.; Bader, M.; Angerer, J.; Kraus, T. Exposure to Nitroaromatic Explosives and Health Effects during Disposal of Military Waste. Occup. Environ. Med. 2003, 60, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alizadeh, T.; Zare, M.; Ganjali, M.R.; Norouzi, P.; Tavana, B. A New Molecularly Imprinted Polymer (Mip)-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Monitoring 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (Tnt) in Natural Waters and Soil Samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 1166–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Khromykh, N.; Marenkov, O.; Sharamok, T.; Anishchenko, A.; Yesipova, N.; Nesterenko, O.; Kurchenko, V.; Mylostyvyi, R. Simulating 2, 4, 6-Trinitrotoluene (Tnt) Elimination in a Pond Inhabited by Freshwater Algae of the Rhizoclonium Genus. Regul. Mech. Biosyst. 2023, 14, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ek, H.; Dave, G.; Nilsson, E.; Sturve, J.; Birgersson, G. Fate and Effects of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (Tnt) from Dumped Ammunition in a Field Study with Fish and Invertebrates. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2006, 51, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Türker, L.; Çelik Bayar, Ç. A Dft Study on Estrone–Tnt Interaction. Z. Für Anorg. Und Allg. Chem. 2013, 639, 1871–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, D.; Chen, Y.; Liang, L.; Huang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Cai, P.; Wang, W. Effects of Exposure to the Explosive and Environmental Pollutant 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene on Ovarian Follicle Development in Rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 96412–96423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ruqa, W.A.; Pennacchia, F.; Rusi, E.; Zoccali, F.; Bruno, G.; Talarico, G.; Barbato, C.; Minni, A. Smelling Tnt: Trends of the Terminal Nerve. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ni, S.; Zhang, H.; Sun, L.; Zhao, Y.; Pei, C.; Nie, Y.; Liu, X.; Wu, L.; Xu, A. Transgenerational Reproductive Toxicity of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (Tnt) and Its Metabolite 4-Adnt in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 92, 103865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adomako-Bonsu, A.G.; Jacobsen, J.; Maser, E. Metabolic Activation of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene; a Case for Ros-Induced Cell Damage. Redox Biol. 2024, 72, 103082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kovačević, G.; Tramontana Ljubičić, P.; Petrinec, D.; Sirovina, D.; Novosel, M.; Želježić, D. How Daphnia magna Defends Itself against Predators: Mechanisms and Adaptations in a Freshwater Microcosm. Water 2024, 16, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, J.; Yang, F.; Ding, N.; Mo, J.; Guo, J. Transcriptomic Responses to Cytotoxic Drug Cisplatin in Water Flea Daphnia magna. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 95, 103964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. EPA. Ecological Effects Test Guidelines. Gammarid Acute Toxic. Test OPPTS 1996, 850, 1300. [Google Scholar]
  25. OECD. Test No. 211: Daphnia magna Reproduction Test; OECD: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen, N.D.; Matsuura, T.; Kato, Y.; Watanabe, H. Dnmt3.1 Controls Trade-Offs between Growth, Reproduction, and Life Span under Starved Conditions in Daphnia magna. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pietropoli, E.; Pauletto, M.; Tolosi, R.; Iori, S.; Lopparelli, R.M.; Montanucci, L.; Giantin, M.; Dacasto, M.; De Liguoro, M. An in Vivo Whole-Transcriptomic Approach to Assess Developmental and Reproductive Impairments Caused by Flumequine in Daphnia magna. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kim, H.S.; Na, H.W.; Jang, Y.; Kim, S.J.; Kee, N.G.; Shin, D.Y.; Choi, H.; Kim, H.J.; Seo, Y.R. Integrative Analysis to Explore the Biological Association between Environmental Skin Diseases and Ambient Particulate Matter. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shin, D.Y.; Lee, S.M.; Jang, Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, C.M.; Cho, E.M.; Seo, Y.R. Adverse Human Health Effects of Chromium by Exposure Route: A Comprehensive Review Based on Toxicogenomic Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, X.; Chang, J.; Jiao, D.; Zhu, M.; Ma, Y. Slit3 Knockdown Inhibited Tgf-Β-Induced Hepatic Stellate Cells Activation by down-Regulating Yap Signal. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2024, 20, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, N.; Huang, C.; He, Y.; Li, S.; Yuan, J.; Zhong, G.; Chen, Y. A Novel Immune-Related Lncrna Prognostic Signature for Cutaneous Melanoma. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2024, 20, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lzaod, S.; Dutta, T. Recent Advances in the Development of Oxidoreductase-Based Biosensors for Detection of Phenolic Antioxidants in Food and Beverages. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 47434–47448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Several Lines of Antioxidant Defense against Oxidative Stress: Antioxidant Enzymes, Nanomaterials with Multiple Enzyme-Mimicking Activities, and Low-Molecular-Weight Antioxidants. Arch. Toxicol. 2024, 98, 1323–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, S.Y.; Surh, Y.J.; Lee, Y.S. Effects of Exhaustive Exercise on Inflammatory, Apoptotic, and Antioxidative Signaling Pathways in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. J. Cancer Prev. 2023, 28, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Feligioni, M.; Marcelli, S.; Knock, E.; Nadeem, U.; Arancio, O.; Fraser, P.E. Sumo Modulation of Protein Aggregation and Degradation. AIMS Mol. Sci. 2015, 2, 382–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wright, C.M.; Whitaker, R.H.; Onuiri, J.E.; Blackburn, T.; McGarity, S.; Bjornsti, M.A.; Placzek, W.J. Ubc9 Mutant Reveals the Impact of Protein Dynamics on Substrate Selectivity and Sumo Chain Linkages. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ihara, M.; Stein, P.; Schultz, R.M. Ube2i (Ubc9), a Sumo-Conjugating Enzyme, Localizes to Nuclear Speckles and Stimulates Transcription in Mouse Oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 2008, 79, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Johnson, A.N.; Mokalled, M.H.; Valera, J.M.; Poss, K.D.; Olson, E.N. Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Myotube Elongation and Myogenesis by Hoi Polloi. Development 2013, 140, 3645–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ye, J.; She, X.; Liu, Z.; He, Z.; Gao, X.; Lu, L.; Liang, R.; Lin, Y. Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4a-3: A Review of Its Physiological Role and Involvement in Oncogenesis. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 712045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, T.; Sun, H.; Zhu, D.; Dong, X.; Liu, F.; Liang, X.; Chen, C.; Shao, B.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; et al. Tra2a Promoted Paclitaxel Resistance and Tumor Progression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers via Regulating Alternative Splicing. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 1377–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yasmin, R.; Gogoi, S.; Bora, J.; Chakraborty, A.; Dey, S.; Ghaziri, G.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Singh, L.H. Novel Insight into the Cellular and Molecular Signalling Pathways on Cancer Preventing Effects of Hibiscus Sabdariffa: A Review. J. Cancer Prev. 2023, 28, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bartkowiak, B.; Greenleaf, A.L. Expression, Purification, and Identification of Associated Proteins of the Full-Length Hcdk12/Cyclink Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 1786–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tan, Y.; Hu, X.; Deng, Y.; Yuan, P.; Xie, Y.; Wang, J. Tra2a Promotes Proliferation, Migration, Invasion and Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition of Glioma Cells. Brain Res. Bull. 2018, 143, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Magni, S.; Della Torre, C.; Garrone, G.; D’amato, A.; Parenti, C.; Binelli, A. First Evidence of Protein Modulation by Polystyrene Microplastics in a Freshwater Biological Model. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 250, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. Kegg for Taxonomy-Based Analysis of Pathways and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D587–D592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, H.; Rong, X.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Lu, L.; Li, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, J. Vbp1 Modulates Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling by Mediating the Stability of the Transcription Factors Tcf/Lefs. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 16826–16839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khalid, M.; Hodjat, M.; Abdollahi, M. Environmental Exposure to Heavy Metals Contributes to Diseases via Deregulated Wnt Signaling Pathways. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2021, 20, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Del Valle-Perez, B.; Arques, O.; Vinyoles, M.; de Herreros, A.G.; Dunach, M. Coordinated Action of Ck1 Isoforms in Canonical Wnt Signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 31, 2877–2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kirsten, D.; Meister, W.; Strauss, B. Value of Bronchoscopy in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Obstructive Bronchitis and Bronchial Asthma. Z. Arztl. Fortbild. 1987, 81, 1117–1119. [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu, J.; Xiao, Q.; Xiao, J.; Niu, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Shu, G.; Yin, G. Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signalling: Function, Biological Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Opportunities. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2022, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stanley, J.K.; Perkins, E.J.; Habib, T.; Sims, J.G.; Chappell, P.; Escalon, B.L.; Wilbanks, M.; Garcia-Reyero, N. The Good, the Bad, and the Toxic: Approaching Hormesis in Daphnia magna Exposed to an Energetic Compound. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 9424–9433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. EPA. Ecological Effects Test Guidelines: Seed Germination/Root Elongation Toxicity Test. OPPTS 1996, 850, 4200. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. Limma Powers Differential Expression Analyses for Rna-Sequencing and Microarray Studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Szklarczyk, D.; Kirsch, R.; Koutrouli, M.; Nastou, K.; Mehryary, F.; Hachilif, R.; Gable, A.L.; Fang, T.; Doncheva, N.T.; Pyysalo, S.; et al. The String Database in 2023: Protein-Protein Association Networks and Functional Enrichment Analyses for Any Sequenced Genome of Interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D638–D646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lee, J.; Weerasinghe-Mudiyanselage, P.D.; Kim, B.; Kang, S.; Kim, J.-S.; Moon, C. Impact of Diesel Particulate Matter on the Olfactory Bulb of Mice: Insights from Behavioral, Histological, and Molecular Assessments. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2024, 20, 735–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ismail, N.I.B.; Kato, Y.; Matsuura, T.; Watanabe, H. Generation of White-Eyed Daphnia magna Mutants Lacking Scarlet Function. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. Blast+: Architecture and Applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biological networks and putative AOP for TNT chronic toxicity in D. magna. (a) Interactions between all DEGs; the interactions represent relationships between translated proteins of each DEG. (b) Biological network for DEGs associated with chronic exposure to TNT. This biological network shows that reproduction- and development-related adverse effect are strongly associated; (c) Endocrine-focused biological network for DEGs associated with chronic exposure to TNT. This endocrine-focused biological network demonstrates strong associations with reproduction, development, and adverse effects related to female reproduction. The red ovals represent upregulated genes of D. magna, while blue ovals indicate downregulated genes of D. magna. The yellow box and purple box indicate cellular process and phenotype respectively. The blue connecting lines indicate biological association between genes. The gray line and dashed gray line indicate gene–phenotype interaction and gene–cellular process interaction, respectively. (d) A putative AOP for chronic TNT exposure. This putative AOP demonstrates Ck1ε and Ck2 are differentially expressed after a putative molecular initiating event (pMIE), and the transcription of target genes which play roles in oocyte maturation and early development is regulated after Tcf/Lef regulation.
Figure 1. Biological networks and putative AOP for TNT chronic toxicity in D. magna. (a) Interactions between all DEGs; the interactions represent relationships between translated proteins of each DEG. (b) Biological network for DEGs associated with chronic exposure to TNT. This biological network shows that reproduction- and development-related adverse effect are strongly associated; (c) Endocrine-focused biological network for DEGs associated with chronic exposure to TNT. This endocrine-focused biological network demonstrates strong associations with reproduction, development, and adverse effects related to female reproduction. The red ovals represent upregulated genes of D. magna, while blue ovals indicate downregulated genes of D. magna. The yellow box and purple box indicate cellular process and phenotype respectively. The blue connecting lines indicate biological association between genes. The gray line and dashed gray line indicate gene–phenotype interaction and gene–cellular process interaction, respectively. (d) A putative AOP for chronic TNT exposure. This putative AOP demonstrates Ck1ε and Ck2 are differentially expressed after a putative molecular initiating event (pMIE), and the transcription of target genes which play roles in oocyte maturation and early development is regulated after Tcf/Lef regulation.
Ijms 25 09895 g001
Table 1. The top 10 gene ontology terms for upregulated DEGs and the top 10 GO terms for downregulated DEGs from D. magna chronically exposed to TNT.
Table 1. The top 10 gene ontology terms for upregulated DEGs and the top 10 GO terms for downregulated DEGs from D. magna chronically exposed to TNT.
GO Term
Category
GO Term for Upregulated DEGsGO Term for Downregulated DEGs
GO Term DescriptionFDRGO Term DescriptionFDR
Biological
process
Cellular process5.42 × 10−90Cellular process9.71 × 10−17
Organic substance metabolic process9.54 × 10−51Metabolic process4.73 × 10−11
Metabolic process9.54 × 10−51Organic substance metabolic process9.28 × 10−10
Nitrogen compound metabolicprocess2.1 × 10−49Organonitrogen compoundmetabolic process1.26 × 10−8
Primary metabolic process1.29 × 10−48Response to stimulus4.84 × 10−8
Macromolecule metabolic process1.37 × 10−46Primary metabolic process1.23 × 10−6
Cellular metabolic process1.15 × 10−44Nitrogen compound metabolic process1.40 × 10−5
Biological regulation3.36 × 10−43Regulation of biological quality3.83 × 10−5
Cellular component organization or biogenesis3.99 × 10−40Glutathione metabolic process6.61 × 10−5
Regulation of biological process6.02 × 10−38Response to ethanol1.10 × 10−4
Cellular
Component
Intracellular anatomical structure1.86 × 10−104Cellular anatomical entity3.54 × 10−23
Cellular anatomical entity1.15 × 10−99Cytoplasm6.45 × 10−8
Intracellular organelle1.63 × 10−69Sarcomere4.75 × 10−6
Organelle7.16 × 10−69Intracellular anatomical structure5.18 × 10−6
Intracellular membrane-boundedorganelle1.29 × 10−58Extracellular region6.61 × 10−6
Membrane-bounded organelle4.02 × 10−56Supramolecular fiber1.10 × 10−4
Protein-containing complex1.23 × 10−53Membrane1.10 × 10−4
Cytoplasm2.31 × 10−52Z disc2.30 × 10−3
Nucleus2.24 × 10−50Organelle2.90 × 10−3
Ribonucleoprotein complex6.20 × 10−34Intracellular organelle7.60 × 10−3
Molecular
function
Binding1.69 × 10−65Catalytic activity5.48 × 10−12
Organic cyclic compound binding2.30 × 10−46Ion binding1.93 × 10−7
Heterocyclic compound binding6.98 × 10−46Binding5.32 × 10−7
Protein binding1.77 × 10−27Cation binding5.22 × 10−5
Nucleic acid binding9.34 × 10−27Oxidoreductase activity2.10 × 10−4
RNA binding1.97 × 10−25Glutathione transferase activity2.50 × 10−4
Catalytic activity6.67 × 10−22Metal ion binding3.00 × 10−4
Ion binding7.46 × 10−22Transferase activity6.70 × 10−4
Carbohydrate derivative binding4.74 × 10−20Catalytic activity, acting on a protein2.50 × 10−3
Small molecule binding1.35 × 10−19Protein binding2.80 × 10−3
Table 2. The endocrine-related gene ontology terms for upregulated and downregulated DEGs from D. magna chronically exposed to TNT.
Table 2. The endocrine-related gene ontology terms for upregulated and downregulated DEGs from D. magna chronically exposed to TNT.
GO Term
Category
GO Term DescriptionFDR
Biological
process
Organic substance biosynthetic process5.44 × 10−9
Developmental process2.60 × 10−4
Cellular process involved in reproduction in multicellular organism4.60 × 10−4
Anatomical structure development5.10 × 10−4
Reproductive process5.60 × 10−4
Female gamete generation2.50 × 10−3
Organic substance transport7.50 × 10−3
Developmental process involved in reproduction9.40 × 10−3
Multicellular organism development1.63 × 10−2
Meiotic cell cycle process1.79 × 10−2
Germ cell development3.46 × 10−2
Meiotic nuclear division3.88 × 10−2
Female meiotic nuclear division4.15 × 10−2
Cellular
Component
Meiotic spindle1.05 × 10−2
Molecular
function
Organic cyclic compound binding1.41 × 10−43
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Kim, H.W.; Shin, D.Y.; Han, J.P.; Jang, Y.; Park, J.Y.; Yun, S.-G.; Cho, E.-M.; Seo, Y.R. The Chronic Toxicity of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical to Daphnia magna: A Transcriptome and Network Analysis of TNT Exposure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189895

AMA Style

Lee J, Kim HW, Shin DY, Han JP, Jang Y, Park JY, Yun S-G, Cho E-M, Seo YR. The Chronic Toxicity of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical to Daphnia magna: A Transcriptome and Network Analysis of TNT Exposure. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(18):9895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jun, Hyun Woo Kim, Dong Yeop Shin, Jun Pyo Han, Yujin Jang, Ju Yeon Park, Seok-Gyu Yun, Eun-Min Cho, and Young Rok Seo. 2024. "The Chronic Toxicity of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical to Daphnia magna: A Transcriptome and Network Analysis of TNT Exposure" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 18: 9895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop