Next Article in Journal
Toxicity Tolerance in the Carcinogenesis of Environmental Cadmium
Next Article in Special Issue
New Insights into Pediatric Kidney Transplant Rejection Biomarkers: Tissue, Plasma and Urine MicroRNAs Compared to Protocol Biopsy Histology
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK Signaling Pathways in Gastric Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Significantly Improved Cold Preservation of Rat Hind Limb Vascularized Composite Allografts Using the New PrC-210 Free Radical Scavenger
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Modification of Preservative Fluids with Antioxidants in Terms of Their Efficacy in Liver Protection before Transplantation

by
Aneta Ostróżka-Cieślik
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia, Kasztanowa 3, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(3), 1850; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031850
Submission received: 4 December 2023 / Revised: 26 January 2024 / Accepted: 1 February 2024 / Published: 3 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Molecular Biology of Transplantation)

Abstract

:
Transplantation is currently the only effective treatment for patients with end-stage liver failure. In recent years, many advanced studies have been conducted to improve the efficiency of organ preservation techniques. Modifying the composition of the preservation fluids currently used may improve graft function and increase the likelihood of transplantation success. The modified fluid is expected to extend the period of safe liver storage in the peri-transplantation period and to increase the pool of organs for transplantation with livers from marginal donors. This paper provides a literature review of the effects of antioxidants on the efficacy of liver preservation fluids. Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using a combination of MeSH terms: “liver preservation”, “transplantation”, “preservation solution”, “antioxidant”, “cold storage”, “mechanical perfusion”, “oxidative stress”, “ischemia-reperfusion injury”. Studies published up to December 2023 were included in the analysis, with a focus on publications from the last 30 years. A total of 45 studies met the inclusion criteria. The chemical compounds analyzed showed mostly bioprotective effects on hepatocytes, including but not limited to multifactorial antioxidant and free radical protective effects. It should be noted that most of the information cited is from reports of studies conducted in animal models, most of them in rodents.

1. Introduction

Liver injury due to ischemia and reperfusion is a significant problem in the peri-transplantation period. Warm ischemia results in damage to hepatocytes through the activation of Kupffer cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Cold IRI (ischemia–reperfusion injury) results in the dysfunction of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells and impaired microcirculation [1,2,3,4]. Endothelin-1 increase and nitric oxide decrease cause vasoconstriction [5]. Oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria is inhibited. ATP stores are depleted and, consequently, the activity of the cell’s active transport system and membrane potential decreases. The level of Ca2+ ions in the cell increases, which affects the activation of cell-damaging enzymes such as phospholipases, endonucleases, proteases, and ATP-ase. The rate of anaerobic glycolysis increases. Mitochondria become swollen and highly permeable channels are formed in their inner membrane. Cytochrome c is released into the cytoplasm, which can direct the cell into the apoptosis pathway. The cell membrane and elements of the cytoskeleton are damaged [3,6].
Oxidative stress generates the production of ATP metabolites, accompanied by a sharp increase in the production of superoxide anion radical (O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (-OH). These initiate circulatory disturbances and a cascade of inflammatory reactions. Mitochondrial membrane morphology and permeability are altered. Damage to the mitochondrial respiratory chain leads to inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and disruption of energy metabolism. Free oxygen radicals formed in mitochondria cause damage to DNA and organelle proteins and peroxidation of membrane lipids, consequently leading to cell death by apoptosis or necrosis [7,8].
Recent years have seen an increase in research into developing organ perfusion and preservation techniques to minimize ischemia-related graft damage and improve marginal donor utilization rates. The optimization of organ preservation techniques, i.e., static cold storage (SCS; 0–4 °C), hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP, 0–4 °C), subnormothermic machine perfusion (SNMP; 20–30 °C), normothermic machine perfusion (NMP; 32–37 °C), and the introduction of novel substances into preservation fluid compositions, can significantly improve organ function before transplantation. A relatively new generation of organ preservation technology is NMP, which allows blood flow in the organ to be reconstructed and its vital functions to be assessed outside the human body. Transplant rejection rates using this method are 50% lower compared to static cold storage [9].
Modifying the composition of the preservation fluids currently used may improve graft function and increase the likelihood of transplantation success. The modified fluid is expected to extend the period of safe liver storage in the peri-transplantation period and to increase the pool of organs for transplantation with livers from marginal donors. This paper provides a literature review of the effects of antioxidants on the efficacy of liver preservation fluids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Focused Questions

The research question was “Does modifying the composition of preservative fluids with antioxidants affect the efficacy of liver preservation before transplantation?”

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using a combination of MeSH terms: “liver preservation”, “transplantation”, “preservation solution”, “antioxidant”, “cold storage”, “mechanical perfusion”, “oxidative stress”, “ischemia-reperfusion injury”. In addition, reference lists of found publications and bibliographies of studies were searched. Articles containing keywords in the titles or abstracts were included. Articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included in the review after reading the full text. Studies published up to December 2023 were included in the analysis, with a focus on publications from the last 30 years. Inclusion criteria: original articles in English, containing data from basic, preclinical, and clinical studies. Various storage techniques and liver preservation times were included. Exclusion criteria: articles in which the antioxidant was applied in a form other than a component of organ perfusion and preservation fluid (e.g., antioxidant administered by intraperitoneal injection, intravenous injection, bolus through the tail vein, oral delivery, application directly to the organ, modification of blood and its derivatives by the addition of antioxidants). Review articles, letters to the editor, books, studies published on websites and newsletters were not considered. Papers that did not meet the set criteria were not included in the review, thus ensuring the due quality of the literature selected for the review.

3. Strategies Based on Modifications of Preservative Solutions with Antioxidants

Transplant fluids provide the environment in which organs are stored during the peri-transplantation period. They extend the ischemic period of the graft and prevent the development of damage during this time. Preserving the optimal vital functions of the organ improves its function in the subsequent postoperative period. The development of an optimal preservative fluid is an important element of transplant success. The substances contained in it should have a multidirectional effect, including anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects, which will increase the effectiveness of the transplants performed. Commercially available preservative fluids have been discussed in detail by me in previous publications [10,11,12,13]. Studies indicate that UW (University of Wisconsin), HTK (histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate), and IGL-1 (Institut Georges Lopez-1) are the most commonly used in liver transplantation [14]. Antioxidants are important components of organ perfusion and preservation fluids. An analysis of the available literature (Table 1 and Table 2) indicates that the challenge is to develop a preservative fluid formulation for effective liver preservation in which the antioxidant is compatibility with the other ingredients, demonstrates efficacy and safety of use, and does not complicate the manufacturing process.

3.1. Enzymatic Antioxidant

Manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) is an enzyme located in the mitochondria and has a protective function against oxidative damage. The anti-inflammatory effect of MnSOD is mainly due to its superoxide anion scavenging ability. Superoxide anions exhibit pro-inflammatory effects by causing DNA damage, peroxynitrite ion formation, lipid peroxidation, and oxidation, and recruitment of neutrophils to sites of inflammation [60]. MnSOD converts superoxide anion radicals to hydrogen peroxide and oxygen in mitochondria [61]. It has been suggested that this has therapeutic effects in liver diseases associated with increased oxidative stress. This is mainly due to the beneficial effects of MnSOD on hepatic endothelial function [62]. Taurine (TAU, 2-aminoethane sulfonic acid) is a sulfuramino acid and a natural antioxidant. It exhibits limited oxygen-free radical scavenging capacity. It is believed that by maintaining an optimal taurine concentration in the mitochondria, ROS production can be controlled. This compound has a stabilizing effect on cell membranes and inhibits enzymes that induce the production of oxygen-free radicals [63]. Its protective effect on liver ischemia is currently disputed [21,64,65,66]. Hide et al. [54] added a recombinant form of the antioxidant human manganese superoxide dismutase to Celsior fluid. rMnSOD prevented oxidative stress and reduced the expression of vWF (von Willebrand factor) and ICAM1 (intracellular adhesion molecule 1). Studies were performed in a model of primary cultured LSECs, rat livers, and human samples. The addition of rMnSOD to the Celsior solution protected rat and human liver tissues. Lauschke et al. [15] performed studies in a model of isolated Wistar murine livers (non-heart-beating donors). Livers were stored at the University of Wisconsin (UW) fluid modified with SOD (600 U/mL) or taurine (0.5 mg/mL) at 4 °C for 24 h. An analysis of the collected perfusates showed that the addition of the antioxidant reduced enzyme release (LDHSOD = 16.3 ± 4.7 U/L/g; LDHTAURINE = 19.5 ± 7.3 U/L/g; LDHCONTROL = 66.9 ± 17.4 U/L/g; GLDHSOD = 498 ± 114 U/L/g; GLDHTAURINE = 362 ± 108 U/L/g; GLDHCONTROL = 924 ± 373 U/L/g), lipid peroxidation, and portal vascular resistance. Increased bile production was also observed. Taurine and SOD showed similar protective effects. Minor et al. [16] stored Wistar rat livers in UW fluid with or without TAU, then washed them with Ringer’s fluid and perfused them with Krebs–Henseleit buffer. The authors found that the addition of the antioxidant improved transhepatic flow. This could be explained by less tissue edema, which suggests an osmoprotective effect of TAU. In addition, they observed greater liver viability after reperfusion, which may be due to the involvement of TAU in modulating cellular calcium homeostasis.

3.2. Non-Enzymatic Antioxidants

3.2.1. Low-Molecular-Weight Antioxidant

Glutathione is the most important endogenous, non-enzymatic systemic antioxidant that protects cells from oxidative stress. It is made up of three amino acids, L-glutamate, L-cysteine, and glycine, and is synthesized in the cytoplasm of cells. In biological cells, it is present in 99% of the reduced form (GSH) and 1% in the oxidized form (GSSG) and conjugates [67]. GSH is found in the cytoplasm, mitochondria, and cell nucleus, with concentrations ranging from 5 mM/L to 10 mM/L. In the endoplasmic reticulum, it is found at a concentration of 2 mM/L. Its antioxidant capacity is due to the presence of the thiol group -SH in the cysteine unit [68]. It participates in the repair of cell components damaged under oxidative stress, contributes to the restoration of reduced forms of thiol groups in proteins, reactivates lipid radicals, and reduces oxidized nitrogenous bases in DNA [69]. Studies conducted confirm its high efficacy as a component of the preservative fluid. Bardallo et al. [17], as expected, demonstrated a protective mechanism of action of glutathione in cells. GSH plays in the prevention of energy degradation in a model of isolated steatotic livers derived from homozygous Ob Zücker rats. Mitochondrial integrity was maintained. ATP production was maintained at optimal levels, succinate concentrations decreased, and expression of OXPHOS I and II (oxidative phosphorylation complexes), UCP2 (uncoupling protein 2), and PINK-1 (PTEN-induced kinase 1). Unfortunately, GSH is a critical component of preservative fluid. At pH = 7, it undergoes non-enzymatic autoxidation, which minimizes the antioxidant capacity of the solution and reduces its stability under storage conditions. Consequently, glutathione can act as an antioxidant or pro-oxidant, generating H2O2 [5,6,7]. Furthermore, the preparation of the GSH-containing liquid should be carried out under anaerobic conditions. Many authors have attempted to solve these problems by modifying fluid compositions with the addition of glutathione derivatives or its precursors. Of note is a series of studies by the team of Quintana et al. [18,19,20], who used S-Nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) to modify the composition of UW fluid. The authors used an isolated perfused rat liver model in their study. S-Nitrosoglutathione is a mediator of nitric oxide (NO) transmission. NO at low concentrations improves the hepatic microcirculatory status. GSNO at a concentration of 100 μM had an effect on maintaining the hepatic morphology and improved the flow rate of non-steatotic livers preserved during 48 h. Little vacuolation, fewer endothelial cells inside sinusoids, and good albumin distribution around central veins and middle zones were observed. Furthermore, the addition of GSNO reduced LDH activity, improved bile production, and reduced endothelial cell damage. The authors found no hepatoprotective effect of GSNO at concentrations of 50 µM, 250 µM, and 500 µM.
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a potent antioxidant that inhibits the activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC). In the body, it is biotransformed to cysteine, which is a precursor of glutathione. In addition, it protects hepatocytes from apoptosis by affecting the JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinases) signaling pathway and attenuates liver fibrosis [70,71]. NAC has been found to exert a renal vasodilatory effect by increasing nitric oxide production [72]. It improves liver function in patients with liver dysfunction and who are in septic shock [73]. Minor et al. [21] studied the effects of the University of Wisconsin fluid modified with the addition of superoxide dismutase (SOD) or N-acetylcysteine. In the study, they used livers from rats excised 60 min after cardiac arrest of the donor and stored under hypothermia (4 °C, 24 h). The authors confirmed that the addition of antioxidants prevented lipid peroxidation. NAC counteracted the phosphorylation of Iκb (an inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa). A similar trend was found by Srinivasan et al. [22] who conducted studies in an orthotopic liver transplantation model in rats. Storing livers in modified HTK fluid with 20 mM N-acetylcysteine increased antioxidant capacity, improved microcirculation, and reduced lipid peroxidation. The hepatoprotective effect of N-acetylcysteine in an animal model [5,6] was not confirmed in a subsequent human clinical trial. Aliakbarian et al. [55] added NAC to the UW fluid formulation and found that it had no effect on either reducing liver ischemia–reperfusion injury or short-term prognosis in transplant recipients (e.g., hospital stay, vascular complications, inotrope requirement, or in-hospital mortality). An interesting solution is the modification of UW fluid with the addition of S-Nitroso-N-Acetylcysteine (SNAC). SNAC is a synthetic compound that acts as a NO donor [8]. Scherer de Fraga et al. [23] conducted studies in an isolated rat liver model and found that SNAC solution presented a greater capacity to maintain hepatocyte integrity during cold preservation. The activity of the released AST enzyme was lower in the SNAC + UW group (823 U/L) vs. UW (959 U/L). SNAC (as an NO donor) could promote intrahepatic vasodilation and diminish the inflammatory process by decreasing the adhesion of platelets and leukocytes.
Deferoxamine (DFX) is a chelator that combines with iron in a ratio of 1:1. Iron ions catalyze reactions to form a hydroxyl radical with a very high oxidizing potential (Haber–Weiss reaction). Without the iron ions, the reaction rate would be too low for the reaction to be pathophysiologically relevant. The resulting hydroxyl radical promotes lipid peroxidation and reacts with proteins and mitochondrial DNA [74,75]. Kerkweg et al. [24] found that deferoxamine protects rat liver cells from lipid peroxidation and apoptosis. Increased concentrations of chelated iron reduce necrosis and apoptosis of hepatocytes during storage in modified UW + DFX fluid by simple hypothermia. Jain et al. [25] studied the efficacy of deferoxamine in a system with N-acetylcysteine and Trolox C using UW fluid. The proposed antioxidants had a protective effect on the structure of the liver stored in modified hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) fluid. Decreased release of LDH and ALT enzymes, increased bile production, and ATP recovery were observed. Cell swelling decreased, suggesting improved liver microcirculation and mitochondrial function. Other authors [26] noted that DFX (added to UW fluid) inhibited oxidative stress in isolated hepatocytes. However, no similar antioxidant effect was observed in the perfused liver. This is probably due to the difference in the distribution of DFX in hepatocytes compared to the whole liver or its limited diffusion into cells during low-temperature storage of the graft.
Few studies on the efficacy of antioxidants as a component of preservative fluid have been conducted with HTK (Custodiol), which is recommended for all organs. This is presumably due to the presence of buffering histidine in the fluid formulation, which is toxic via increased intracellular chelate iron [27]. Studies available in the literature indicate that the traditional hydrophilic iron chelator, i.e., deferoxamine (DFX), and the new lipophilic hydroxamic acid derivative LK-614, which is membrane permeable, can be added to HTK fluid [27,28]. Wu et al. [27] investigated the efficacy of LK-614 in an isolated perfused rat liver model. Grafts were stored in cold HTK, mHTK fluid (chloride ion content reduced in fluid composition: 0.04 mM/L), or mHTK+ LK-614, respectively, for 24 h, and then reperfused for 60 min at T = 37 °C with Krebs–Henseleit buffer. LDH activity was lower in perfusates of the modified fluid. The bile produced in livers perfused with mHTK+ LK-614 fluid was higher. Hepatic microcirculation was also improved in this group of livers. In another study, Stegemann et al. [28] used two iron chelators, i.e., deferoxamine and LK-614, to modify the HTK fluid. Isolated rat livers were stored using the hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) technique. The addition of DFX at a concentration of 25 µM and LK-614 at a concentration of 2.5 µM improved liver metabolic activity, significantly decreased cleavage of caspase 9, and abrogated positive signs of cellular apoptosis. The activity of released enzymes was significantly lower (ALTHTK = 27.3 U/L vs. ALTHTK+DFX+ LK-614 = 0.6 U/L; LDHHTK = 553 U/L vs. LDHHTK+DFX+ LK-614 = 139 U/L).

3.2.2. Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidants

SkQ1 is a synthetic antioxidant that neutralizes mtROS (mitochondrial reactive oxygen species). It also reduces TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha) induced endothelial damage and modulates angiogenesis [76]. Cherkashina et al. [29] studied the efficacy of this antioxidant in a hypothermic storage model of isolated rat liver. Grafts were placed for 24 h in fluid modified with the addition of 1 µM SkQ1, after which they were reperfused for 60 min (T = 37 °C). It was observed that the amount of ROS produced decreased. The activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase, GSH peroxidase, GSH reductase, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) decreased. The efficiency of hepatic energy processes was improved, increasing the respiratory control index of mitochondria and ATP levels. Increased bile flow during reperfusion was also found, confirming the improved secretory function of the organ. The authors highlighted that mitochondria-targeted antioxidants may exhibit cytoprotective effects.
Idebenone (QSA-10) is a short-chain benzoquinone, a synthetic analog of coenzyme Q-10, and has been found to be able to transfer electrons directly to complex III of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, restoring ATP production in the cell [77]. Wieland et al. [30] studied the efficacy of QSA-10 in a rat liver microsomal model incubated in a modified UW or HTK preservation solution. The antioxidant prevented reperfusion damage and showed hepatoprotective effects. Idebenone showed the ability to protect against liver lipid peroxidation and protein damage. A significant reduction in cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) levels was also observed. QSA-10 at a concentration of 20 µM/L provided a protective effect against protein damage as a component of both HTK and UW fluid. The addition of 0.1 µM/L QSA-10 to HTK fluid provided high liver protection against lipid peroxidation.
Phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) is involved in glycolysis, where it is converted to pyruvate by pyruvate kinase in its final step. One molecule of PEP yields one molecule of ATP. It has been suggested that PEP may improve hepatic energy metabolism during ischemia [78]. Kondo et al. [31] studied the effect of PEP on oxidative damage to the graft in an ex vivo mouse liver cold preservation model, using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and UW fluids. Their study confirmed that PEP as a component of the preservation fluid showed the potential to scavenge reactive oxygen species, inhibit the increase in aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase activity, and attenuate ATP depletion. Storing livers in PBS + 100 mM PEP influenced a significant decrease in ALT, AST, and LDH activity, which was not observed in the UW + 100 mM PEP group. Analyzing oxidative stress parameters, there were no differences between the UW and UW + 100 mM PEP groups, while the efficacy of PBS + 100 mM PEP fluid in inhibiting the decrease in GSH concentration in graphite was confirmed. In contrast, ATP content was significantly higher in the UW + 100 mM PEP group compared to the PBS group. The authors noted that PEP showed a synergistic effect with the other components of the UW fluid only with regard to energy replenishment during the cold storage period of the liver.
α-Lipoic acid (ALA) is a cofactor of pyruvate dehydrogenase and α-ketoglutarate complexes and is involved in mitochondrial bioenergetic reactions. It has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. It removes reactive oxygen species and has a positive effect on the state of the vascular endothelium. It shows the ability to regenerate other antioxidants: vitamins C and E, coenzyme Q10, and glutathione [79,80,81]. Aghdaie et al. [56] studied the efficacy of UW + α-lipoic acid and UW + ursodeoxycholic acid fluids in maintaining the vital functions of isolated human hepatocytes. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) belongs to the steroidal bile acids. It exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. According to many authors, it shows a hepatoprotective effect, while its toxic effects have also been demonstrated. This is probably due to the small difference between the recommended dose of UDCA (13 mg/kg/day) and the toxic dose (28 mg/kg/day). It can convert to lithocholic acid, which induces DNA strand breaks [82]. In a study [56], the authors found that both ALA and UDCA added to UW fluid did not increase the number of viable hepatocytes. The preservation of vital cell function was assessed by testing the ability of hepatocytes to synthesize urea. The mean number of viable hepatocytes stored in hypothermia (4 °C) in UW fluid was 66.3 ± 1.8% (urea concentration 9.21 ± 1.14 mg/dL), in UW fluid + α-lipoic acid it was 42.65 ± 2.19% (urea concentration 8.87 ± 0.62 mg/dL), and in UW fluid + ursodeoxycholic acid, it was 43.73 ± 2.55% (urea concentration 8.44 ± 0.91 mg/dL).
Horváth et al. [83] suggest that low temperature has a beneficial effect on mitochondrial metabolism, but that its optimal effect disappears above 12 h of SCS liver storage. The authors noted that the use of HMP and SNMP techniques ensures adequate mitochondrial function.

3.2.3. Polyphenols

Curcumin, also known as long oyster, is a perennial herb in the ginger family. The compound is a diferuloylmethane and belongs to the hydrophobic polyphenol group of curcuminoids. It has been suggested that turmeric exhibits pleiotropic effects. Its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, chemopreventive, anticancer, immunosuppressive, and hepatoprotective functions have been confirmed [84,85]. Studies in an animal model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have confirmed its anti-steatotic and anti-fibrotic properties [86,87]. It can prevent the expression of ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule 1) and E-selectin in the pro-inflammatory vascular fluid that accumulates in the liver during clinical transplantation [88]. Ischemia-induced stress causes an increase in the expression of Hsp proteins. Turmeric has been found to be a potent stimulator of the heat shock proteins Hsp27, Hsp70, and alpha B crystalline, which are among the so-called ‘chaperone proteins’ [89]. In addition, it shows the ability to induce HO-1 (heme oxygenase-1), which protects cells from oxidative stress [90]. Chen et al. [33] found that the use of turmeric at a concentration of 100 µM as a component of UW and Euro-Collins (EC) preservative fluid improved the biochemical parameters of Sprague-Dawley rat livers. Curcumin increased portal vein flow velocity and bile production (bile output: EC24h = 17 µLg min vs. EC + curcumin24h = 43 µL/g min; UW48h = 10.2 µL/g min vs. UW + curcumin48h = 17.1µL/g min). Liver enzyme release into the perfusate was lower in the EC + curcumin group (AST: EC24h = 11.4 g dry weight vs. EC + curcumin24h = 5.7 g dry weight; UW48h = 9.2 g dry weight vs. UW + curcumin48h = 10.8 g dry weight; ALT: EC24h = 13.2 g dry weight vs. EC + curcumin24h = 6.2 g dry weight; UW48h = 5.6 g dry weight vs. UW + curcumin48h = 6.5 g dry weight). The authors concluded that curcumin increased the efficacy of preservative fluids in maintaining the vital functions of the isolated rat liver. McNally et al. [34] confirmed that UW fluid supplementation with curcumin protects human hepatocytes during cold preservation and warm reperfusion. This confirms its cytoprotective effect resulting from the induction of heme oxygenase-1. The protective role of curcumin in an ex vivo model of liver preservation was also confirmed by Johnston’s team [32].
Quercetin (QE) occurs naturally in plants. It has ‘GRAS’ status, indicating its high safety. It exhibits antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-aggregative, anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, antiviral, anticancer, and liver-protective effects. It reduces oxidative stress and protects cells from damage. It inhibits the production of cytokines and inflammatory enzymes [91]. Kato et al. [35] studied the effect of quercetin added to UW fluid on the storage efficiency of isolated hepatocytes and the whole liver in rats. Grafts were stored in the fluid for 24 h at 4 °C. QE fluid supplementation at 0.33 µM/L and 33.1 µM/L improved cell viability to 28.3% and 23.7%, respectively. A decrease in ALT activity was observed in perfusate samples collected after liver lavage. ALT levels in UW fluid perfusates were 325 ± 110 IU/L, and in UW + QE fluid perfusates it was 80 ± 66 IU/L. In addition, sucrose (0.1 M/L) enhanced the effect of quercetin (ALTUW+QE+suc = 28 ± 25 IU/L). The authors concluded that QE at 33.1 μmol/L showed efficacy in a rat model of liver undergoing cold preservation and orthotopic liver transplantation. It should be emphasized that the study was conducted under in vitro conditions. Another study was performed at the same research center on the efficacy of QE [57], which was added to UW fluid at a dose of 33.1 μM (in the presence of sucrose 0.1 M) using an isolated pig liver model. There was a significant static decrease in ALT, AST, and LDH enzyme activities in the group of grafts washed with UW + QE + Suc fluid. This solution prevented tissue edema. Histopathological examination also showed better results in terms of sinusoidal congestion and hepatocyte cytoplasmic vacuolization. The authors speculate that QE has a protective effect by suppressing oxidative stress. Given that quercitin shows poor bioavailability under in vivo conditions, further research is necessary.
Silibinin (SB) is a natural polyphenol, the most active component of the silymarin found in the fruit of the spotted thistle. It increases the activity of the enzymes dismutase and peroxidase, as well as glutathione concentration and glutathione peroxidase activity, thereby protecting liver cells from the oxidative effects of free oxygen radicals. It also regulates aldehyde oxidase activity in mitochondria and prevents mitochondrial dysfunction. It stabilizes cell membranes and inhibits prostaglandin synthesis associated with lipid peroxidation. It has anticancer, cholagogic, cholepoietic, anti-inflammatory, and potent detoxifying effects [92,93,94]. In a study conducted in an isolated rat liver model, the Ligeret team confirmed that silibinin shows potential in protecting hepatocytes [36]. UW fluid was used to assess the efficacy of SB. Livers were preserved in the modified fluid for 24 h at T = 4 °C. This was followed by reperfusion for 1 h at T = 37 °C. Silibinin at a dose of 100 µM increased mitochondrial ATP and RCR (respiratory control ratio) by 39% and 16%, respectively. A decrease in oxidative stress to values corresponding to control grafts (not preserved and not perfused) was also observed.
Magnolol (MAG) is a biphenol isolated in magnolia bark. It exhibits antioxidant, anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, neuroprotective, and antidiabetic properties. It protects mitochondria in a rat heart model against lipid peroxidation. Its antioxidant activity is due to its ability to scavenge oxygen free radicals and increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes [95,96]. Chiu et al. [37] stored isolated rat livers in UW + MAG or Ringer’s lactate + MAG fluids (the dose of magnolol was 10−6 M/L i.e., 2.66 mg/mL). This study showed that MAG was, respectively, 470 times more effective vs. α-tocopherol (α-T) in inhibiting oxygen consumption and 340 times more effective vs. α-T in inhibiting the formation of MDA (malondialdehyde) in mitochondria. In contrast, it had no significant effect on AST and ALT activity, which were determined in perfusate samples taken after 48 h and 96 h of graft storage in Ringer’s lactate + MAG. The authors conclude that magnolol inhibits lipid peroxidation in rat liver mitochondria.

3.2.4. Bioactive Metabolites from Marine Algae

Phycocyanin (Pc) is a blue pigment found in spirulina, belonging to a class of compounds called phycobiliproteins. It has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancer, and anti-neurodegenerative properties. It shows the ability to scavenge oxygen-free radicals and protect cells from oxidative damage [97]. The protective effect of phycocyanins on the liver was assessed by Gdara et al. [38] using an ex vivo model of isolated perfused rat liver. Livers after collection were stored for 12 and 24 h in fluids, respectively: KH (Krebs–Henseleit) or KH + Pc, cooled to 4 °C. Phycocyanin had a normalizing effect on the activity of aminotransferase (ALT, AST), phosphatase (ALP), lipid peroxidation (MDA), and the activity of antioxidant enzymes (glutathione-S-transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx)). An increase in thiol groups in hepatic tissues was also observed. According to the authors, a Pc dose of 0.2 mg ml−1g−1 was optimal for renal protection. Phycocyanin at a concentration of 0.1 mg ml−1g−1 only decreased ALP and GST activity after 24 h of graft storage.
Fucoidan (FUC) is a sulfated polysaccharide extracted from brown algae. It has antioxidant, antiproliferative, and antiangiogenic properties. It also exhibits anticancer, immunostimulant, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antithrombotic, antimicrobial, and antiviral effects [98]. Studies have confirmed the protective effect of FUC on the liver during ischemia. It contributes to reducing the developing inflammation (lowering TNF-ɑ, IL-1β, and CRP levels) and cell infiltration in inflamed areas. It is involved in the inhibition of hepatic expression of IL-6 (Interleukin-6) and PNPLA3 (Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3) [99,100]. Slim et al. [39] assessed the effects of fucoidan on the vital functions of Wistar rat livers stored in a modified IGL-1 solution (graft preservation in cold fluid/4 °C for 24 h, reperfusion for 2 h at 37 °C, FUC dose: 100 mg/L). There was a decrease in the activity of aminotransferases (ALT, AST) and an increase in the phosphorylation of AMPK, AKT protein kinase, and GSK3-β. A reduction in cell apoptosis (caspase 3), an improvement in mitochondrial function, and a decrease in oxidative stress markers were observed.

3.2.5. Vitamins and Vitamin-like Substances

α-Tocopherol (α-TCP) is a form of vitamin E with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and metabolic effects. It protects against the action of lipid-superoxide radicals. It exhibits the ability to block lipoxygenase activity. It influences the maintenance of the normal structure of membrane lipids. α-TCP prevents oxidative stress induced by TNF-α. It inhibits the formation of pro-inflammatory molecules, including IL-β. It exhibits a non-oxidative renal effect by stimulating activity on diacylglycerol kinase [101]. Bae et al. [40] added α-tocopherol to Vasosol fluid and conducted analyses of its efficacy in a rat model after cardiac death. Livers were stored for 8 h at 4 °C in UW fluid, then perfused using the hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) technique with KPS-1, Vasosol, and Vasosol + α-TCP fluids. The authors confirmed that α-tocopherol reduced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity in the reperfusates. In addition, low levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1) were observed in the post-reperfusion biopsy, but the levels were not statistically significant. The levels of apoptosis markers (caspase 3 and 7) in the circulation also decreased, which was due to a reduction of the levels of Cytochrome C mRNA. α-Tocopherol enhances HMP efficacy with Vasosol.
Carnitine (CAR, β-hydroxy-γ-N-trimethylaminobutyric acid) is a vitamin-like substance. It belongs to naturally occurring hydrophilic amino acid derivatives. It is involved in the transport of activated long-chain fatty acids to β-oxidation sites in the mitochondria, resulting in the formation of ATP. It is involved in the regulation of acyl-CoA and the regeneration of free CoA in the mitochondrion and cytosol. In its role as an antioxidant, it prevents the accumulation of lipid peroxidation end products. It exhibits anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, stabilizing biological membranes, and anti-fibrotic effects. It also plays an important role in modulating ketogenesis and glucogenesis [102,103]. Coskun et al. [42] evaluated the protective effects of L-carnitine on the vital functions of non-fatty liver (derived from a Wistar Albino rat) stored in UW or UW + L-CAR fluid for 48 h. It was observed that L-carnitine influenced a decrease in ALT (p < 0.05) and ACP (not statistically significant) activities in the collected perfusates and the levels of lipid peroxidation products (not statistically significant) in the analyzed tissues (UW: ALT = 268 IU/L; ACP = 2 IU/L; MDA = 5.0 nM/mg vs. UW + L-CAR: ALT = 171 IU/L; ACP = 1.9 IU/L; MDA = 4.1 nM/mg). In contrast, it had no significant effect on liver central vein dilatation, portal vein dilatation, sinusoidal dilatation, inflammation, autolysis, congestion, and edema. According to the authors, L-CAR can be an effective component of preservative fluid for flushing both fatty liver and non-fatty liver. The prophylactic effect of L-carnitine was also observed by the Tolba team [41]. In their study, L-CAR as a component of HTK fluid had a significant effect on reducing enzyme leakage from the steatotic livers of Wistar rats. ALT activity determined in post-reperfusion samples decreased by 70%, while GLDH activity decreased by 92%. Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels determined in the perfusate also decreased by 50% in the HTK + L-CAR group. In addition, the antioxidant prevented a decrease in hepatic energy metabolism. Oxygen consumption at the end of reperfusion was 28% higher in the group of grafts flushed with modified HTK fluid. Ultrastructural analysis showed no significant changes in the endoplasmic reticulum or mitochondria. The authors suggest that carnitine may act as a metabolic component in the composition of the preservation fluid, increasing liver viability after transplantation.

3.2.6. Drugs

Carvedilol (CVD) belongs to the third generation of β-blockers. It is mainly used in the treatment of spontaneous hypertension and ischemic heart disease. It has been found to exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulation, antiproliferative, cardioprotective, and neuroprotective effects. It influences endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production and improves vascular endothelial function. It blocks (depending on the concentration used) the production of oxygen free radicals in aqueous and lipid environments. It inhibits lipid peroxidation in the vascular endothelium and lipoprotein oxidation. Its antioxidant activity is suggested to be 10 times more potent than vitamin E [104,105,106]. Ben et al. [43] studied the effect of UW + CVD fluid on the vital functions of steatotic and non-steatotic livers stored using the simple hypothermia technique (SCS, 24 h) in an isolated rat liver model. Ex vivo perfusion was conducted at T = 37 °C for 2 h. Carvedilol reduced ALT and AST activity in perfusates taken from non-steatotic and steatotic livers. Bile production and hepatic clearance of sulfobromophthalein (BSP) improved. The activity of the mitochondrial damage marker GLDH (glutamate dehydrogenase) decreased in both liver types. The authors conclude that CVD via AMPK (adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase) increases NO production. In addition, it influences the preservation of higher ATP and adenine nucleotide content and reduces oxidative stress, thereby protecting the grafts from ischemia–reperfusion damage.
Trimetazidine (TMZ) is an antianginal and cardioprotective drug. By reducing β-oxidation of fatty acids at the level of 3-ketoacyl-co-enzyme A (CoA) thiolase (3-KAT), it secondarily enhances glucose oxidation, leading to an increase in cellular energy reserves when ischemia occurs. Reduces the excessive release of ROS and improves mitochondrial function. It influences the proper functioning of the sodium–potassium pump and cell homeostasis [107]. Ben et al. [44] studied the efficacy of TMZ in an isolated Zücker rat liver model. Steatotic and non-steatotic livers were stored for 24 h in UW and UW + TMZ fluids. Trimetazidine reduced transaminase activity (ALT and AST) and improved hepatic morphology in both liver types. The concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA), an indicator of the lipid peroxidation process, also decreased. Better bile production was observed. In a later report, the same authors [45] completed the study by adding aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR). AICAR is an adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator, which induces NO synthesis and protects against ischemia–reperfusion changes. The authors found that the separate addition of TMZ at a concentration of 10−6 M/L and AICAR at a concentration of 20 µM/L and 40 µM/L, respectively, to UW fluid-protected non-steatotic and steatotic livers during the ischemic period, and their efficacy remained similar. Both substances showed a similar protective effect against mitochondrial damage and ATP depletion. In contrast, the combination of TMZ and AICAR in UW fluid produced results similar to those obtained for UW + TMZ and UW + AICAR. The authors explain this by TMZ’s ability to activate AMPK, which increases the level of NO produced mainly from cNOS (constitutive nitric oxide synthase). They do not recommend modifying UW fluid with the addition of TMZ and AICAR simultaneously.
A series of studies on the modification of preservative fluid with the addition of trimetazidine was also carried out by Zaouali’s team [46,47,48,49]. They used a model of isolated steatotic and non-fatty rat livers. Grafts were stored in IGL-1 or IGL-1 fluid with TMZ at a concentration of 10−6 M/L for a period of 24 h at T = 4 °C, then subjected to 2 h of normothermic reperfusion. They found that TMZ induced NO and eNOS activation and prevented HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1) degradation during reperfusion of grafts with the steatotic disease. ALT and AST release decreased after 2 h of reperfusion in both liver types. TMZ also had a beneficial effect on bile production and vascular resistance. HO-1 (heme oxygenase-1) expression increased, which conditioned better cytoprotection of grafts against ischemia–reperfusion injury [46]. The same authors in a subsequent study [47] evaluated the efficacy of melatonin and trimetazidine added to IGL-1 or UW fluid based on a previously developed experimental model. Melatonin is a hormone with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects. The authors found that the vital functions of steatotic livers were better preserved after preservation in the modified fluid. IGL-1 + TMZ + MEL influenced a significant decrease in GRP78 (glucose-regulated protein 78), pPERK (protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase), and CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein) levels. In addition, it enhanced AMPK-induced autophagy in the liver. A later study by Zaouali et al. [48] also confirmed that the inclusion of trimetazidine in the IGL-1 fluid formulation inhibited GSK3β (glycogen synthase kinase-3β) and VDAC (voltage-dependent anion channel), affecting the reduction of ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress and preventing cell death during orthotopic liver transplantation. The modified fluid increased SIRT1 (sirtuin 1) levels, induced HIF-1α, and reduced HMGB1 (High-mobility Group Box 1 protein), thereby promoting autophagy in steatotic livers and increasing graft tolerance to ischemia–reperfusion injury [49]. Increasing SIRT1 levels inhibited the activity of rapamycin (mTOR is involved in T-cell activation and proliferation) through activation of HSP70 (heat shock protein 70) and AMPK [50].
Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor. It is used in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. It improves the rheological properties of blood and minimizes the ability of erythrocytes to adhere and aggregate. It exhibits anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, anticoagulant, and antiproteinuric effects. There are data indicating its renoprotective effect in diabetic kidney disease [108]. Kozaki et al. [51] investigated the potential of PTX as a component of UW fluid in an isolated rat liver model. The organs were stored in UW fluid and UW + PTX for 4 or 24 h. Orthotopic graft transplantation was then performed. The authors showed that Kupffer cells produced significantly less TNF-α and O2−. Also, a study by Arnault et al. [52] in a 24 h fatty liver storage model gave satisfactory results. PTX counteracted the increase in vascular resistance. The activity of the released enzymes was comparable to that of a normal liver and lower compared to the control group of fatty livers (ASTUW = 42 IU/L/g of liver vs. ASTUW+PTX = 19 IU/L/g of the liver; ALTUW = 32 IU/L/g of liver vs. ALTUW+PTX = 11 IU/L/g of the liver; LDHUW = 1 207 IU/L/g of liver vs. LDHUW+PTX = 402 IU/L/g of the liver). The authors conclude that pentoxifylline improves microcirculation in the liver, which influences the preservation of parenchymal cell integrity. The addition of PTX to the preservation fluid extends the safe cold storage time limit of livers from 12 h to 16 h, as reported in a study by Qing et al. [58]. The authors investigated the efficacy of PTX in a simple porcine orthotopic liver transplantation model. Grafts were subjected to 20 min of warm ischemia, followed by 12 h, 16 h, and 20 h of preservation in UW and UW + PTX fluid. Fluid supplementation with pentoxifylline significantly reduced ALT and AST activities in recipients’ artery blood. The levels of MDA and TNF-alpha in grafted liver tissue, and resistance of portal vein and hepatic artery also decreased. According to the authors, the hepatic protective effect of PTX is due to its antioxidant activity, inhibition of lipid peroxidation, improvement of microcirculation, and energy metabolism of the graft.
M101 is an extracellular hemoglobin obtained from the Arenicola marina. It has been confirmed that one molecule of M101 can bind up to 156 oxygen molecules, while human hemoglobin can attach up to four molecules. Studies conducted in recent years confirm that it is an effective O2 carrier and exhibits antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities. It is non-immunogenic and shows no toxicity. It has been confirmed in preclinical studies to improve cardiac, liver, kidney, pancreas, and lung function during transplantation [109]. One clinical trial was performed in a renal model (Clinical Trial Registry No. NCT 02652520) in which M101 at a dose of 1 g/L was added to UW fluid. The use of the innovative oxygen carrier was shown to be safe. Its beneficial effect on ischemia–reperfusion injury was confirmed [110]. Studies on the protective effects of M101 on the liver in the peri-transplantation period have been conducted by two scientific teams [53,59]. Alix et al. [59] evaluated the effect of adding M101 to UW fluid on the quality of pig livers in an orthotopic allotransplantation (OLT) model. Livers were stored by simple hypothermia (SCS) using UW and UW + M101 fluids and by hypothermic oxygen perfusion (HOPE). It was found that the use of the HOPE technique and SCS + UW with M101 improved graft function parameters, i.e., mitochondrial function, ATP synthesis, architecture, and antioxidant capacity of hepatocytes. The ATP concentration after 9 h of preservation was UWscs + M101 = 2.4 µM/mg protein vs. HOPE = 6.4 µM/mg protein. The use of both preservation techniques resulted in a decrease in inflammatory mediators and oxygen-free radical production. M101 affected oxygenates of liver grafts during preservation. However, the authors emphasize that liver function was better preserved using the HOPE technique than SCS + UW with M101. The effective effect of M101 in the preservation of isolated steatotic rat liver was also confirmed by Asong-Fontem et al. [53]. Grafts were stored for 24 h in IGL-1 and IGL-1 + M101 fluids during SCS, and then subjected to 2 h of normothermic reperfusion. M101 decreased transaminase activity, GLDH (glutamate dehydrogenase), and lactate levels. A decrease in MDA levels, higher nitrite and nitrate production, and a decrease in the inflammatory mediator HMGB1 (High-mobility Group Box 1) were also observed. M101 attenuates damage induced by ischemia and reperfusion.
Analyzing the available literature, there is considerable scientific interest in optimizing preservation fluids with the addition of antioxidants. The results of the review confirm their therapeutic potential in protecting the liver before transplantation. Although most of the studies conducted support the hypothesis of hepatoprotective properties of antioxidants, it is uncertain whether the observed effects in vitro will be reflected in vivo. The vast majority of experimental studies have been carried out in rat, pig, or cell models in culture, using doses of antioxidants that have mostly not been optimized.
Only six preclinical and clinical studies were found in the available literature (Table 2). As mentioned for NAC [56], its hepatoprotective effect in an animal model has not been confirmed in humans. UW fluid modification did not affect the incidence of ischemia–reperfusion injury or short-term liver transplantation outcomes. The efficacy of α-Lipoic acid as a component of UW fluid was also not demonstrated [57]. This antioxidant did not improve the viability of human hepatocytes. Only the addition of rMnSOD to Celsior fluid protected human liver tissues collected from a deceased donor by counteracting oxidative stress [55].

4. Perfusion Methods Considerations

Despite the rapid development of transplantation medicine, including liver storage techniques, the availability of grafts for transplantation is still a major problem. To increase the organ pool, advanced research is being conducted to improve the quality of marginal grafts from steatotic livers and those harvested from extended criteria donors (ECD). By using normothermic machine perfusion, the percentage of grafts eligible for transplantation can be increased. This method allows real-time liver and bile duct function assessment and can predict short-term transplantation outcomes [111]. It has been suggested that using NMP after the initial SCS period facilitates the regeneration of impaired cellular metabolic processes [112]. Assessment of graft function is based on analysis of selected parameters, including hemodynamic stability, bile production, and perfusate lactate clearance [113]. However, to date, there has been no standardization of diagnostic biomarkers to enable clinical evaluation of grafts [114]. This technique reduces macrovascular hepatic steatosis and potentially offers the possibility of storing the liver for up to 7–10 days [115,116].
Some authors indicate that it is advantageous to combine two liver storage techniques, e.g., SCS (at the stage of transporting the organ to the transplant center that has qualified the recipient) and NMP (to safely extend the preservation time of marginal organs or to perform the necessary perioperative procedures for demanding recipients). This is mainly due to challenges in managing the logistics of transporting NMP equipment (not all machines available on the market are portable), the need for trained personnel at the donor/recipient site, and the higher cost of the procedure [117]. Studies conducted using NMP after a period of static cold storage (SCS) confirm the high efficacy of combining the two techniques in high-risk liver transplantation. Laing et al. [118], based on a study in the UK, showed that 71% of organs originally unsuitable for transplantation could be transplanted using this method with 100% 90-day recipient/liver survival. Liu et al. [119], on the other hand, investigated the efficacy of liver storage with hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOP) and normothermic machine perfusion techniques. They concluded that the use of HOP-NMP was safe and provided potential benefits in preserving the function of grafts harvested from expanded criteria donors. Boteon et al. [120] suggest that a combined protocol of HOP and NMP alleviates oxidative stress, minimizes the risk of tissue inflammation, and improves metabolic recovery of marginal livers.
Critical to minimizing the effects of ischemic graft injury, especially in terms of protecting marginal grafts, is the development of machine perfusion and optimizing the composition of organ storage fluids. Data from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) indicate that the most commonly used fluids for liver transplantation are HTK, UW, and IGL-1 [121,122]. The use of HTK fluid has recently been restricted due to the concerns of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) [12]. It was observed that an increase in PNF (primary nonfunction) correlated with an increase in the proportion of livers flushed with HTK solution. Preston et al. [123] suggest an increased risk of deceased donor liver transplant failure resulting from the use of HTK fluid. Several reports of the beneficial properties of HTK fluid have been published. The lower concentration of K+ ions in its composition protects against hyperkalemic cardiac arrest upon reperfusion. Some of the authors suggest that it is more cost effective to use HTK fluid, whose consumption for graft washing is lower compared to UW fluid (422 5 mL vs. 5500 mL, p = 0.04) [124]. The lower viscosity of HTK fluid results in better microvascular perfusion [123]. Karakoyun et al. [14] confirmed the comparable efficacy of UW and HTK fluids in patient and graft survival. They observed a lower incidence of post-transplant biliary stenosis for grafts flushed with HTK fluid compared to UW fluid (13.5% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.013). IGL-1 is a relatively new fluid that was developed based on the composition of UW fluid. It is an extracellular fluid with a high concentration of sodium (120 mM/L) and a low concentration of potassium (25 mM/L), which helps to minimize the risk of cardiovascular complications. The inclusion of polyethylene glycol (PEG 35) in place of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in the composition of IGL-1 fluid reduced its viscosity to 1.25 mm2/s [125]. Szilágyi et al. [126] found comparable efficacy of IGL-1 fluid with UW and HTK fluids in protecting deceased donor livers (DDL). They found no statistical difference in the incidence of PNF after the use of either fluid. More recently, experimental studies analyzing the efficacy of UW fluid as an alternative NMP perfusate in renal transplantation have been conducted [127].
Analyzing the data included in the review, it can be concluded that the function of the graft is influenced by the time and method of storage in the modified preservation fluid. The shorter the time, the better the function of the organ and, consequently, the more efficient the uptake of vital functions after transplantation. Work comparing the efficacy of SCS and MP techniques indicates that better organ preservation is achieved using dynamic liver preservation. The use of the HMP technique has a significant effect on lowering the activity/concentration of markers of liver function in grafts harvested from marginal donors. The addition of an antioxidant further improves the benefits of the HMP technique [26]. It is noteworthy that only 7% of the papers analyzed used extracorporeal mechanical perfusion in hypothermia to assess the efficacy of modified preservation fluid. Most of the information cited is from reports of studies conducted in animal models, most of them in rodents. None of the teams proposed to conduct parallel studies in a human and animal liver transplantation model. Only one study was conducted in a human clinical trial. Despite the promising results of antioxidant efficacy obtained in an animal model, the benefit of antioxidants in a clinical trial cannot be predicted.

5. Conclusions

An analysis of the literature indicates a beneficial effect of most antioxidants used in preservative fluid supplementation. However, it should be emphasized that most of the information cited comes from reports of studies carried out on animal models, most of them on rodents. With regard to the current state of knowledge, it is important to establish an effective and safe antioxidant dose (taking into account direct exposure to the organ). It is also crucial to develop the technology for the preparation of the fluid containing the readily oxidizable substance. Previous studies confirm that technological errors during fluid preparation may result in oxidation of the antioxidant and contamination of the preparation with reactive iron, which may consequently reduce the effectiveness and safety of the preservative fluid. Consideration should also be given to developing a carrier to facilitate the diffusion of the antioxidant into the cell (e.g., in the form of a liposome). In order to further our knowledge of the efficacy of antioxidants added to preservation fluids in protecting the liver prior to transplantation, studies should be continued with other animal models and other research protocols, taking into account, among other things, a dynamic organ preservation strategy. I also suggest modifying the composition of preservation fluids with the addition of antioxidants in combination with hormones with antioxidant properties (e.g., prolactin, melatonin), which could potentially intensify the hepatoprotective effect of the fluid.

Funding

This research was financed by the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice: No. BNW-1–030/K/3/F.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bilzer, M.; Gerbes, A.L. Preservation injury of the liver: Mechanisms and novel therapeutic strategies. J. Hepatol. 2000, 32, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhai, Y.; Petrowsky, H.; Hong, J.C.; Busuttil, R.W.; Kupiec-Weglinski, J.W. Ischaemia–reperfusion injury in liver transplantation—From bench to bedside. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhai, Y.; Busuttil, R.W.; Kupiec-Weglinski, J.W. Liver Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury: New Insights into Mechanisms of Innate-Adaptive Immune-Mediated Tissue Inflammation. Arab. Archaeol. Epigr. 2011, 11, 1563–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mao, X.-L.; Cai, Y.; Chen, Y.-H.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, X.-X.; Ye, L.-P.; Li, S.-W. Novel Targets and Therapeutic Strategies to Protect Against Hepatic Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Front. Med. 2022, 8, 757336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marzi, I.; Rucker, M.; Walcher, F.; Takei, Y. Endothelin-1 is involved in hepatic sinusoidal vasoconstriction after ischemia and reperfusion. Transpl. Int. 1994, 7 (Suppl. 1), S503–S506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Theruvath, T.P.; Snoddy, M.C.; Zhong, Z.; Lemasters, J.J. Mitochondrial permeability transition in liver ischemia and reperfusion: Role of c-Jun N-terminal kinase 2. Transplantation 2008, 85, 1500–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.; Lu, T.; Zhang, C.; Xu, J.; Xue, Z.; Busuttil, R.W.; Xu, N.; Xia, Q.; Kupiec-Weglinski, J.W.; Ji, H. Activation of YAP attenuates hepatic damage and fibrosis in liver ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, C.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, L. Melatonin and its protective role in attenuating warm or cold hepatic ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Cell. Prolif. 2021, 54, e13021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Del Turco, S.; Cappello, V.; Tapeinos, C.; Moscardini, A.; Sabatino, L.; Battaglini, M.; Melandro, F.; Torri, F.; Martinelli, C.; Babboni, S.; et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles administration during machine perfusion of discarded human livers: A pilot study. Liver Transpl. 2022, 28, 1173–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ostróżka-Cieślik, A.; Dolińska, B.; Ryszka, F. Tips for optimizing organ preservation solutions. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2018, 65, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ostróżka-Cieślik, A.; Dolińska, B. Pharmacological benefits and risk of using hormones in organ perfusion and preservation solutions in the aspect of minimizing hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury during storage. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6467134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ostróżka-Cieślik, A.; Dolińska, B. The Role of Hormones and Trophic Factors as Components of Preservation Solutions in Protection of Renal Function before Transplantation: A Review of the Literature. Molecules 2020, 25, 2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ostróżka-Cieślik, A. The Effect of Antioxidant Added to Preservation Solution on the Protection of Kidneys before Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mangus, A.E.; Kubal, C.A.; Ekser, B.; Mihaylov, P.; Lutz, A.J.; Fridell, J.A.; Mangus, R.S. Deceased Donor Flush Volume Similar for Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin at a Single US Organ Procurement Organization: Adult and Pediatric Data. Transplant. Proc. 2023, 55, 2016–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lauschke, H.; Kötting, M.; Akbar, S.; Minor, T. Use of Taurine as Antioxidant in Resuscitating Livers from Non-Heart-Beating Donors by Gaseous Oxygen Persufflation. J. Investig. Surg. 2003, 16, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Minor, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Isselhard, W. Effects of Taurine on Liver Preservation in UW Solution with Consecutive Ischemic Rewarming in the Isolated Perfused Rat Liver. Transpl. Int. 1995, 8, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bardallo, R.G.; Company-Marin, I.; Folch-Puy, E.; Roselló-Catafau, J.; Panisello-Rosello, A.; Carbonell, T. PEG35 and Glutathione Improve Mitochondrial Function and Reduce Oxidative Stress in Cold Fatty Liver Graft Preservation. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Quintana, A.; Rodriguez, J.; Scandizzi, A.; Guibert, E. Effect of S- nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) added to the University of Wisconsin solution (UW): I) Morphological alteration during cold preservation/reperfusion of rat liver. Int. J. Surg. Investig. 2001, 2, 401–411. [Google Scholar]
  19. Quintana, A.B.; Lenzi, H.L.; Almada, L.L.; Scandizzi, A.L.; Furno, G.; Rodriguez, J.V.; Guibert, E.E. Effect of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) added to the University of Wisconsin solution (UW): II) Functional response to cold preservation/reperfusion of rat liver. Ann. Hepatol. 2002, 1, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Quintana, A.B.; Rodriguez, J.V.; Lenzi, H.L.; Guibert, E.E. Effect of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) added to the University of Wisconsin Solution (UW): Mast cell degranulation during normothermic reperfusion. Ann. Hepatol. 2004, 3, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Minor, T.; Kötting, M. Gaseous oxygen for hypothermic preservation of predamaged liver grafts: Fuel to cellular homeostasis or radical tissue alteration? Cryobiology 2000, 40, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Srinivasan, P.K.; Yagi, S.; Nagai, K.; Afify, M.; Hata, K.; Uemoto, S.; Tolba, R.H. Impact of oxygen free radicals in rat partial liver transplantation. J. Surg. Res. 2014, 191, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Scherer de Fraga, R.; Camacho, V.R.; Souza, G.F.; Cerski, C.T.; de Oliveira, J.R.; de Oliveira, M.G.; Alvares-da-Silva, M.R. S-nitroso-n-acetylcysteine: A promising drug for early ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat liver. Transpl. Proc. 2010, 42, 4491–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kerkweg, U.; Li, T.; de Groot, H.; Rauen, U. Cold-induced apoptosis of rat liver cells in University of Wisconsin solution: The central role of chelatable iron. Hepatology 2002, 35, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jain, S.; Lee, S.H.; Korneszczuk, K.; Culberson, C.R.; Southard, J.H.; Berthiaume, F.; Zhang, J.X.; Clemens, M.G.; Lee, C.Y. Improved preservation of warm ischemic livers by hypothermic machine perfusion with supplemented University of Wisconsin solution. J. Investig. Surg. 2008, 21, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vreugdenhil, P.K.; Rankin, M.A.; Southard, J.H. Cold storage sensitizes hepatocytes to oxidative stress injury. Transpl. Int. 1997, 10, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, S.; Wohlschlaeger, J.; de Groot, H.; Rauen, U. Evaluation of a modified HTK solution containing the new iron chelator LK 614 in an isolated rat liver perfusion model. J. Investig. Surg. Off. J. Acad. Surg. Res. 2009, 22, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Stegemann, J.; Hirner, A.; Rauen, U.; Minor, T. Use of a new modified HTK solution for machine preservation of marginal liver grafts. J. Surg. Res. 2010, 160, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cherkashina, D.V.; Sosimchik, I.A.; Semenchenko, O.A.; Volina, V.V.; Petrenko, A.Y. Mitochondria-targeted plastoquinone derivative SkQ(1) decreases ischemia-reperfusion injury during liver hypothermic storage for transplantation. Biochemistry 2011, 76, 1022–1029. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wieland, E.; Schütz, E.; Armstrong, V.W.; Küthe, F.; Heller, C.; Oellerich, M. Idebenone protects hepatic microsomes against oxygen radical-mediated damage in organ preservation solutions. Transplantation 1995, 60, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kondo, Y.; Ishitsuka, Y.; Kadowaki, D.; Fukumoto, Y.; Miyamoto, Y.; Irikura, M.; Hirata, S.; Sato, K.; Maruyama, T.; Hamasaki, N.; et al. Phosphoenolpyruvate, a glycolytic intermediate, as a cytoprotectant and antioxidant in ex-vivo cold-preserved mouse liver: A potential application for organ preservation. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Johnston, T.D.; Reddy, K.S.; Wu, G.; Chien, C.; Nagabhusan, M.; Ranjan, D. Organ preservation by curcumin+Euro-Collins is equivalent to univ. of Wisconsin solution in both in-vivo and ex-vivo models. Transplantation 1999, 67, S652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, C.; Johnston, T.D.; Wu, G.; Ranjan, D. Curcumin has potent liver preservation properties in an isolated perfusion model. Transplantation 2006, 82, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McNally, S.J.; Harrison, E.M.; Ross, J.A.; Garden, O.J.; Wigmore, S.J. Curcumin induces heme oxygenase-1 in hepatocytes and is protective in simulated cold preservation and warm reperfusion injury. Transplantation 2006, 81, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kato, F.; Gochi, M.; Kawagoe, T.; Yotsuya, S.; Matsuno, N. The protective effects of quercetin and sucrose on cold preservation injury in vitro and in vivo. Organ Biol. 2020, 27, 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ligeret, H.; Brault, A.; Vallerand, D.; Haddad, Y.; Haddad, P.S. Antioxidant and mitochondrial protective effects of silibinin in cold preservation-warm reperfusion liver injury. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 115, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chiu, J.H.; Wang, J.C.; Lui, W.Y.; Wu, C.W.; Hong, C.Y. Effect of magnolol on in vitro mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and isolated cold-preserved warm-reperfused rat livers. J. Surg. Res. 1999, 82, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gdara, N.B.; Belgacem, A.; Khemiri, I.; Mannai, S.; Bitri, L. Protective Effects of Phycocyanin on Ischemia/Reperfusion Liver Injuries. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 102, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Slim, C.; Zaouali, M.A.; Nassrallah, H.; Ammar, H.H.; Majdoub, H.; Bouraoui, A.; Abdennebi, H.B. Protective potential effects of fucoidan in hepatic cold ischemia-rerfusion injury in rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bae, C.; Pichardo, E.M.; Huang, H.; Henry, S.D.; Guarrera, J.V. The benefits of hypothermic machine perfusion are enhanced with Vasosol and α-tocopherol in rodent donation after cardiac death livers. Transplant. Proc. 2014, 46, 1560–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tolba, R.H.; Pütz, U.; Decker, D.; Dombrowski, F.; Lauschke, H. L-carnitine ameliorates abnormal vulnerability of steatotic rat livers to cold ischemic preservation. Transplantation 2003, 76, 1681–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Coskun, A.; Gunal, O.; Sahin, I.; Aslaner, A.; Yildirim, U.; Yavuz, O. Does l-carnitine have any effect on cold preservation injury of non-fatty liver in the University of Wisconsin solution? Hepatol. Res. 2007, 37, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ben Mosbah, I.; Rosello-Catafau, J.; Alfany-Fernandez, I.; Rimola, A.; Parellada, P.P.; Mitjavila, M.T.; Lojek, A.; Ben Abdennebi, H.; Boillot, O.; Rodes, J.; et al. Addition of carvedilol to university wisconsin solution improves rat steatotic and nonsteatotic liver preservation. Liver Transplant. 2010, 16, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ben Mosbah, I.; Casillas-Ramirez, A.; Xaus, C.; Serafin, A.; Rosello-Catafau, J.; Peralta, C. Trimetazidine: Is it a promising drug for use in steatotic grafts? World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ben Mosbah, I.; Massip-Salcedo, M.; Fernandez-Monteiro, I.; Xaus, C.; Bartrons, R.; Boillot, O.; Rosello-Catafau, J.; Peralta, C. Addition of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activators to university of wisconsin solution: A way of protecting rat steatotic livers. Liver Transplant. 2007, 13, 410–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zaouali, M.A.; Ben Mosbah, I.; Boncompagni, E.; Ben Abdennebi, H.; Mitjavila, M.T.; Bartrons, R.; Freitas, I.; Rimola, A.; Rosello-Catafau, J. Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha accumulation in steatotic liver preservation: Role of nitric oxide. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 3499–3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zaouali, M.A.; Boncompagni, E.; Reiter, R.J.; Bejaoui, M.; Freitas, I.; Pantazi, E.; Folch-Puy, E.; Abdennebi, H.B.; Garcia-Gil, F.A.; Rosello-Catafau, J. AMPK involvement in endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy modulation after fatty liver graft preservation: A role for melatonin and trimetazidine cocktail. J. Pineal Res. 2013, 55, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zaouali, M.A.; Panisello, A.; Lopez, A.; Castro, C.; Folch, E.; Carbonell, T.; Rolo, A.; Palmeira, C.M.; Garcia-Gil, A.; Adam, R.; et al. GSK3β and VDAC Involvement in ER Stress and Apoptosis Modulation during Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zaouali, M.A.; Panisello, A.; Lopez, A.; Folch, E.; Castro-Benitez, C.; Adam, R.; Rosello-Catafau, J. Cross-talk between sirtuin 1 and high-mobility box 1 in steatotic liver graft preservation. Transplant. Proc. 2017, 49, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pantazi, E.; Zaouali, M.A.; Bejaoui, M.; Folch-Puy, E.; Ben Abdennebi, H.; Varela, A.T.; Rolo, A.P.; Palmeira, C.M.; Rosello-Catafau, J. Sirtuin 1 in rat orthotopic liver transplantation: An igl-1 preservation solution approach. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 1765–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kozaki, K.; Egawa, H.; Bermudez, L.; Keefe, E.B.; So, S.K.; Esquivel, C.O. Effects of pentoxifylline pretreatment on Kupffer cells in rat liver transplantation. Hepatology 1995, 21, 1079–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arnault, I.; Bao, Y.M.; Sebagh, M.; Anjo, A.; Dimicoli, J.L.; Lemoine, A.; Delvart, V.; Adam, R. Beneficial effect of pentoxifylline on microvesicular steatotic livers submitted to a prolonged cold ischemia. Transplantation 2003, 76, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Asong-Fontem, N.; Panisello-Rosello, A.; Lopez, A.; Imai, K.; Zal, F.; Delpy, E.; Rosello-Catafau, J.; Adam, R. A Novel Oxygen Carrier (M101) Attenuates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injuries during Static Cold Storage in Steatotic Livers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hide, D.; Ortega-Ribera, M.; Fernández-Iglesias, A.; Fondevila, C.; Salvadó, M.J.; Arola, L.; García-Pagán, J.C.; Mancini, A.; Bosch, J.; Gracia-Sancho, J. A novel form of the human manganese superoxide dismutase protects rat and human livers undergoing ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Clin. Sci. 2014, 127, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Aliakbarian, M.; Nikeghbalian, S.; Ghaffaripour, S.; Bahreini, A.; Shafiee, M.; Rashidi, M.; Rajabnejad, Y. Effects of N-Acetylcysteine Addition to University of Wisconsin Solution on the Rate of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Adult Orthotopic Liver Transplant. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2017, 15, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Aghdaie, H.M.; Azarpira, N.; Esfandiari, E.; Kaviani, M.; Golbabapour, S.; Shamsaeefar, A.; Kazemi, K.; Dehghani, M.; Bahador, A.; Salahi, H.; et al. The Effects of Cold Preservation Solutions Supplemented with UDCA and α-Lipoic Acid on the Viability and Function of Isolated Human Hepatocytes. Int. J. Organ Transplant. Med. 2019, 10, 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  57. Otani, M.; Ishii, D.; Iwata, H.; Satake, Y.; Okada, Y.; Toriumi, A.; Imamura, M.; Nishikawa, Y.; Matsuno, N. Preservation Efficacy of a Quercetin and Sucrose Solution for Warm Ischemically Damaged Porcine Liver Grafts. Transplant. Proc. 2023, 55, 2212–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Qing, D.K.; Dong, J.H.; Han, B.L.; Chen, X.R. Cold preservation of pig liver grafts with warm ischemia and pentoxifylline-UW solution. Arch. Med. Res. 2006, 37, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alix, P.; Val-Laillet, D.; Turlin, B.; Mosbah, I.B.; Burel, A.; Bobillier, E.; Bendavid, C.; Delpy, E.; Zal, F.; Corlu, A. Adding the Oxygen Carrier M101 to a Cold-Storage Solution could be an Alternative to HOPE for Liver Graft Preservation. JHEP Rep. 2020, 2, 100119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, C.; Zhou, H.M. The role of manganese superoxide dismutase in inflammation defense. Enzym. Res. 2011, 2011, 387176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, M.; Sun, X.; Chen, B.; Dai, R.; Xi, Z.; Xu, H. Insights into manganese superoxide dismutase and human diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Guillaume, M.; Rodriguez-Vilarrupla, A.; Gracia-Sancho, J.; Rosado, E.; Mancini, A.; Bosch, J.; Garcia-Pagán, J.C. Recombinant Human Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Reduces Liver Fibrosis and Portal Pressure in CCl4-Cirrhotic Rats. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Surai, P.F.; Earle-Payne, K.; Kidd, M.T. Taurine as a Natural Antioxidant: From Direct Antioxidant Effects to Protective Action in Various Toxicological Models. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wettstein, M. Cytoprotection by the osmolytes betaine and taurine in ischemia- reoxygenation injury in the perfused rat liver. Hepatology 1997, 26, 1560–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Redmond, H.P.; Wang, J.H.; Bouchier-Hayes, D. Taurine attenuates nitric oxide- and reactive oxygen intermediate-dependent hepatocyte injury. Arch. Surg. 1996, 131, 1280–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huxtable, R. Physiological action of taurine. Physiol. Rev. 1992, 72, 101–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Niki, E. Antioxidant Activity: Are We Measuring It Correctly? Nutrition 2002, 18, 524–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Meister, A. Selective modification of glutathione metabolism. Science 1983, 220, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zasadowski, A.; Wysocki, A.; Barski, D.; Spodniewska, A. Some aspects of reactive oxygen species [ROS] and antioxidative system agents action. Short review. Acta Toxicol. 2004, 12, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  70. Zois, C.D.; Baltayiannis, G.H.; Karayiannis, P.; Tsianos, E.V. Systematic review: Hepatic fibrosis-regression with therapy. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 28, 1175–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wang, C.; Chen, K.; Xia, Y.; Dai, W.; Wang, F.; Shen, M.; Cheng, P.; Wang, J.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. N-acetylcysteine attenuates ischemia-reperfusion-induced apoptosis and autophagy in mouse liver via regulation of the ROS/JNK/Bcl-2 pathway. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tepel, M.; van der Giet, M.; Schwarzfeld, C.; Laufer, U.; Liermann, D.; Zidek, W. Prevention of Radiographic-Contrast-Agent–Induced Reductions in Renal Function by Acetylcysteine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Devlin, J.; Ellis, A.E.; McPeake, J.; Heaton, N.; Wendon, J.A.; Williams, R. N-acetylcysteine improves indocyanine green extraction and oxygen transport during hepatic dysfunction. Crit. Care Med. 1997, 25, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Poyton, R.O.; Ball, K.A.; Castello, P.R. Mitochondrial generation of free radicals and hypoxic signaling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 20, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lipinski, B. Hydroxyl radical and its scavengers in health and disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2011, 2011, 809696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Weniger, M.; Reinelt, L.; Neumann, J.; Holdt, L.; Ilmer, M.; Renz, B.; Hartwig, W.; Werner, J.; Bazhin, A.V.; D’Haese, J.G. The Analgesic Effect of the Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidant SkQ1 in Pancreatic Inflammation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 4650489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jaber, S.M.; Ge, S.X.; Milstein, J.L.; VanRyzin, J.W.; Waddell, J.; Polster, B.M. Idebenone Has Distinct Effects on Mitochondrial Respiration in Cortical Astrocytes Compared to Cortical Neurons Due to Differential NQO1 Activity. J. Neurosci. 2020, 40, 4609–4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Saiki, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Chijiiwa, K.; Shimizu, S.; Hamasaki, N.; Tanaka, M. Phosphoenolpyruvate prevents the decline in hepatic ATP and energy charge after ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats. J. Surg. Res. 1997, 73, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Salehi, B.; Berkay Yılmaz, Y.; Antika, G.; Boyunegmez Tumer, T.; Fawzi Mahomoodally, M.; Lobine, D.; Akram, M.; Riaz, M.; Capanoglu, E.; Sharopov, F.; et al. Insights on the Use of α-Lipoic Acid for Therapeutic Purposes. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Solmonson, A.; DeBerardinis, R.J. Lipoic acid metabolism and mitochondrial redox regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 7522–7530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Khalifa, E.A.; Nabil Ahmed, A.; Hashem, K.S.; Allah, A.G. Therapeutic effects of the combination of alpha-lipoic acid (ala) and coenzyme q10 (coq10) on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Int. J. Inflam. 2020, 2020, 5369797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kotb, M.A. Molecular Mechanisms of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Toxicity & Side Effects: Ursodeoxycholic Acid Freezes Regeneration & Induces Hibernation Mode. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 8882–8914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Horváth, T.; Jász, D.K.; Baráth, B.; Poles, M.Z.; Boros, M.; Hartmann, P. Mitochondrial Consequences of Organ Preservation Techniques during Liver Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hatcher, H.; Planalp, R.; Cho, J.; Torti, F.M.; Torti, S.V. Curcumin: From ancient medicine to current clinical trials. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 1631–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bavarsad, K.; Riahi, M.M.; Saadat, S.; Barreto, G.; Atkin, S.L.; Sahebkar, A. Protective effects of curcumin against ischemia-reperfusion injury in the liver. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 141, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zabihi, N.A.; Pirro, M.; Johnston, T.P.; Sahebkar, A. Is there a role for curcumin supplementation in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? The data suggest yes. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Rahmani, S.; Asgary, S.; Askari, G.; Keshvari, M.; Hatamipour, M.; Feizi, A.; Sahebkar, A. Treatment of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with Curcumin: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Fuller, B.; Dijk, S.; Butler, P.; Hoang, V.; Davidson, B. Pro-inflammatory agents accumulate during donor liver cold preservation: A study on increased adhesion molecule expression and abrogation by curcumin in cultured endothelial cells. Cryobiology 2003, 46, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kato, K.; Ito, H.; Kamei, K.; Iwamoto, I. Stimulation of the stress-induced expression of stress proteins by curcumin in cultured cells and in rat tissues in vivo. Cell Stress Chaperones 1998, 3, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Scapagnini, G.; Foresti, R.; Calabrese, V.; Giuffrida Stella, A.M.; Green, C.J.; Motterlini, R. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester and curcumin: A novel class of heme oxygenase-1 inducers. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 61, 554–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Aghababaei, F.; Hadidi, M. Recent Advances in Potential Health Benefits of Quercetin. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Surai, P.F. Silymarin as a vitagene modulator: Effects on mitochondria integrity in stress conditions. In Molecular Nutrition and Mitochondria; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 535–559. [Google Scholar]
  93. Surai, P.F. Silymarin as a Natural Antioxidant: An Overview of the Current Evidence and Perspectives. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 204–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zheng, W.; Feng, Z.; Lou, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, C.; Tao, Z.; Li, H.; Cheng, L.; Ying, X. Silibinin protects against osteoarthritis through inhibiting the inflammatory response and cartilage matrix degradation in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 99649–99665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Szałabska-Rąpała, K.; Borymska, W.; Kaczmarczyk-Sedlak, I. Effectiveness of Magnolol, a Lignan from Magnolia Bark, in Diabetes, Its Complications and Comorbidities—A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lo, Y.C.; Teng, C.M.; Chen, C.F.; Chen, C.C.; Hong, C.Y. Magnolol and honokiol isolated from Magnolia officinalis protect rat heart mitochondria against lipid peroxidation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1994, 47, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fernandes, R.; Campos, J.; Serra, M.; Fidalgo, J.; Almeida, H.; Casas, A.; Toubarro, D.; Barros, A.I.R.N.A. Exploring the Benefits of Phycocyanin: From Spirulina Cultivation to Its Widespread Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, Y.; Xing, M.; Cao, Q.; Ji, A.; Liang, H.; Song, S. Biological Activities of Fucoidan and the Factors Mediating Its Therapeutic Effects: A Review of Recent Studies. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Tsai, M.-Y.; Yang, W.-C.; Lin, C.-F.; Wang, C.-M.; Liu, H.-Y.; Lin, C.-S.; Lin, J.-W.; Lin, W.-L.; Lin, T.-C.; Fan, P.-S.; et al. The Ameliorative Effects of Fucoidan in Thioacetaide-Induced Liver Injury in Mice. Molecules 2021, 26, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Li, X.J.; Ye, Q.F. Fucoidan reduces inflammatory response in a rat model of hepatic ischemia–reperfusion injury. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 93, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Di Vincenzo, A.; Tana, C.; El Hadi, H.; Pagano, C.; Vettor, R.; Rossato, M. Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Metabolic Properties of Tocopherols and Tocotrienols: Clinical Implications for Vitamin E Supplementation in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Hanai, T.; Shiraki, M.; Imai, K.; Suetugu, A.; Takai, K.; Shimizu, M. Usefulness of Carnitine Supplementation for the Complications of Liver Cirrhosis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Virmani, M.A.; Cirulli, M. The Role of l-Carnitine in Mitochondria, Prevention of Metabolic Inflexibility and Disease Initiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Di Lenarda, A.; Sabbadini, G.; Moretti, M.; Sinagra, G. Long-term oral carvedilol in chronic heart failure. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2004, 5, 1359–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Oliveira, P.J.; Gonçalves, L.; Monteiro, P.; Providencia, L.A.; Moreno, A.J. Are the antioxidant properties of carvedilol important for the protection of cardiac mitochondria? Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2005, 3, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Górska, D. Carvedilol—More than β-blocker. Farm Pol. 2009, 65, 780–787. [Google Scholar]
  107. Borowicz-Reutt, K.; Banach, M. Trimetazidine, an Anti-Ischemic Drug, Reduces the Antielectroshock Effects of Certain First-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Donate-Correa, J.; Tagua, V.G.; Ferri, C.; Martín-Núñez, E.; Hernández-Carballo, C.; Ureña-Torres, P.; Ruiz-Ortega, M.; Ortiz, A.; Mora-Fernández, C.; Navarro-González, J.F. Pentoxifylline for Renal Protection in Diabetic Kidney Disease. A Model of Old Drugs for New Horizons. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Batool, F.; Delpy, E.; Zal, F.; Leize-Zal, E.; Huck, O. Therapeutic Potential of Hemoglobin Derived from the Marine Worm Arenicola marina (M101): A Literature Review of a Breakthrough Innovation. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Le Meur, Y.; Badet, L.; Essig, M.; Thierry, A.; Büchler, M.; Drouin, S.; Deruelle, C.; Morelon, E.; Pesteil, F.; Delpech, P.; et al. First-in-human use of a marine oxygen carrier (M101) for organ preservation: A safety and proof-of-principle study. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1729–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Li, J.; Lu, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Q. Comprehensive Approach to Assessment of Liver Viability During Normothermic Machine Perfusion. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2023, 11, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Shi, J.H.; Cheng, N.; Zhang, W.; Jin, Q.; Guo, W.Z.; Ge, G.B.; Zhang, S.J.; Line, P.D.; Wang, Y. Air-ventilated normothermic machine perfusion alleviates hepatic injury from DCD rat through CYP1A2. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chullo, G.; Panisello-Rosello, A.; Marquez, N.; Colmenero, J.; Brunet, M.; Pera, M.; Rosello-Catafau, J.; Bataller, R.; García-Valdecasas, J.C.; Fundora, Y. Focusing on Ischemic Reperfusion Injury in the New Era of Dynamic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Malkawi, D.; Savsani, K.; Alfonso, A.; Lee, S.D.; James, N.; Sarkar, D.; Imai, D.; Khan, A.; Sharma, A.; Kumaran, V.; et al. The Role of Normothermic Machine Perfusion in Extended Criteria Donor Grafts: A New Direction in Liver Graft Assessment and Preservation. Livers 2023, 3, 709–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shen, C.; Cheng, H.; Zong, T.; Zhu, H. The role of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in the preservation of ex-vivo liver before transplantation: A review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1072937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Clavien, P.A.; Dutkowski, P.; Mueller, M.; Eshmuminov, D.; Bautista Borrego, L.; Weber, A.; Muellhaupt, B.; Sousa Da Silva, R.X.; Burg, B.R.; Rudolf von Rohr, P.; et al. Transplantation of a human liver following 3 days of ex situ normothermic preservation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1610–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hefler, J.; Leon-Izquierdo, D.; Marfil-Garza, B.A.; Meeberg, G.; Verhoeff, K.; Anderson, B.; Dajani, K.; Bigam, D.L.; Shapiro, A.M.J. Long-term outcomes after normothermic machine perfusion in liver transplantation-Experience at a single North American center. Am. J. Transplant. 2023, 23, 976–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Laing, R.W.; Mergental, H.; Yap, C.; Kirkham, A.; Whilku, M.; Barton, D.; Curbishley, S.; Boteon, Y.L.; Neil, D.A.; Hübscher, S.G.; et al. Viability testing and transplantation of marginal livers (VITTAL) using normothermic machine perfusion: Study protocol for an open-label, non-randomised, prospective, single-arm trial. BMJ Open. 2017, 7, e017733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Liu, Q.; Del Prete, L.; Ali, K.; Grady, P.; Bilancini, M.; Etterling, J.; D'Amico, G.; Diago Uso, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Aucejo, F.; et al. Sequential hypothermic and normothermic perfusion preservation and transplantation of expanded criteria donor livers. Surgery 2023, 173, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Boteon, Y.L.; Laing, R.W.; Schlegel, A.; Wallace, L.; Smith, A.; Attard, J.; Bhogal, R.H.; Neil, D.A.H.; Hübscher, S.; Perera, M.T.P.R.; et al. Combined Hypothermic and Normothermic Machine Perfusion Improves Functional Recovery of Extended Criteria Donor Livers. Liver Transpl. 2018, 24, 1699–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Adam, R.; Karam, V.; Cailliez, V.; Grady, J.G.O.; Mirza, D.; Cherqui, D.; Klempnauer, J.; Salizzoni, M.; Pratschke, J.; Jamieson, N.; et al. 2018 Annual Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR)-50-year evolution of liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2018, 31, 1293–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Asong-Fontem, N.; Panisello-Rosello, A.; Sebagh, M.; Gonin, M.; Rosello-Catafau, J.; Adam, R. The Role of IGL-2 Preservation Solution on Rat Livers during SCS and HOPE. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Preston, W.A.; Pace, D.J.; Altshuler, P.J.; Yi, M.; Kittle, H.D.; Vincent, S.A.; Andreoni, K.A.; Frank, A.M.; Glorioso, J.M.; Ramirez, C.G.; et al. A propensity score matched analysis of liver transplantation outcomes in the setting of preservation solution shortage. Am. J. Transplant. online ahead of print. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Karakoyun, R.; Romano, A.; Nordström, J.; Ericzon, B.G.; Nowak, G. Type of Preservation Solution, UW or HTK, Has an Impact on the Incidence of Biliary Stricture following Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study. J Transplant. 2019, 2019, 8150736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. García-Gil, F.A.; Fuentes-Broto, L.; Albendea, C.D.; Serrano, M.T.; Roselló-Catafau, J.; Lampreave, F.; López-Pingarrón, L.; Escartín, J.; Soria, J.; Garcia, J.J.; et al. Evaluation of Institut Georges Lopez-1 preservation solution in pig pancreas transplantation: A pilot study. Transplantation 2014, 97, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Szilágyi, Á.L.; Mátrai, P.; Hegyi, P.; Tuboly, E.; Pécz, D.; Garami, A.; Solymár, M.; Pétervári, E.; Balaskó, M.; Veres, G.; et al. Compared efficacy of preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantation: Meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 1812–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zarnitz, L.; Doorschodt, B.M.; Ernst, L.; Hosseinnejad, A.; Edgworth, E.; Fechter, T.; Theißen, A.; Djudjaj, S.; Boor, P.; Rossaint, R.; et al. Taurine as Antioxidant in a Novel Cell- and Oxygen Carrier-Free Perfusate for Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Porcine Kidneys. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Studies on the effectiveness of supplementing preservative fluids with antioxidants. Basic research.
Table 1. Studies on the effectiveness of supplementing preservative fluids with antioxidants. Basic research.
Author,
Year of Publication
AntioxidantSpeciesPreservation Solution Modification
/Cold Ischemia
Outcome Measures, (Intervention, I/Control, C)Antioxidant DoseEffects of Antioxidant
Enzymatic antioxidant
Lauschke et al., 2003 [15]Taurine
SOD
Isolated perfused rat liver modelUW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS with
VSOP
I1: UW + SOD
I2: UW + TAU
C: UW
SOD: 600 U/mL;
Taurine: 0.5 mg/mL
↓ lipid peroxidation;
↓ vascular resistance;
↓ LDH, GLDH;
↑ bile production
Minor et al., 1995 [16]TaurineWistar ratsUW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + TAU
C1: UW
1 mM/Limprove hepatic circulation;
enhance viability of the liver upon reperfusion
Non-enzymatic antioxidants
Low-molecular-weight antioxidant
Bardallo et al., 2022 [17]PEG35,
Glutathione
Zücker ratsIGL
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I1: IGL + GSH
I2: IGL + PEG35 + GSH
C: IGL
PEG35: 1 g/L, 5 g/L
GSH: 3 mM/L, 9 mM/L
IGL + PEG35 (5 g/L) + GSH (9 mM/L):
maintained ATP production;
↓ succinate accumulation;
↑ expression of the OXPHOS complexes, UCP2, PINK-1, Nrf2, and HO-1;
protected against lipid and protein oxidation;
increased the GSH/GSSG ratio;
↓ inflammasome NLRP3 expression;
protecting mitochondrial integrity
Quintana et al., 2001 [18]S-NitrosoglutathioneIsolated perfused rat liver modelUW
48 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + GSNO
C: UW
100 µMthe hepatic morphology was conserved showing little vacuolation;
avoiding hepatic injury post cold preservation/reperfusion
Quintana et al., 2002 [19]S-NitrosoglutathioneIsolated perfused rat liver modelUW
48 h; 0 °C; SCS
I: UW + GSNO
C: UW
50 µM, 100 µM, 250 µM, 500 µM100 µM: prevented the ischemia/reperfusion injuries;
↓ LDH;
improved bile production;
partially reduced endothelial cell damage
Quintana et al., 2004 [20]S-NitrosoglutathioneIsolated perfused rat liver modelUW
48 h; 0 °C; SCS
I: UW + GSNO
C: UW
500 μM
100 μM
500 μM: interstitial edema after
normothermic reperfusion;
100 μM: damages on mast cells were avoided
Minor et al., 2000 [21]N-Acetylcysteine,
SOD
Isolated perfused rat liver modelUW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
VSOP
I1: UW + SOD
I2: UW + NAC
C: UW
SOD: 600 U/mL;
NAC: 20 mM
prevented an increase in free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation;
NAC counteracted the phosphorylation of Iκb
Srinivasan et al., 2014 [22]N-AcetylcysteineLewis ratHTK
1 h, 3 h, 24 h, 168 h; 5 °C;
SCS
I: HTK + NAC
C: HTK
20 mM↓ PVP;
↓ ALT;
improved microcirculation;
diminished histologic graft damage;
↓ lipid peroxidation;
↑ total antioxidant capacity
Scherer de Fraga et al., 2010 [23]S-Nitroso-N-AcetylcysteineWistar ratsUW
2 h, 4 h, 6 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + SNAC
C: UW
200 nM↓ AST
↓ Liver injury
Kerkweg et al., 2002 [24]Deferoxamine
Hepatocytes from male Wistar rats,
rat liver endothelial cells
UW
24 h; 4 °C;
SCS
I: UW + DFX
C: UW
10 mM↓ lipid peroxidation;
↓ apoptosis
Jain et al.,
2008 [25]
N-Acetylcysteine,
Trolox C,
Deferoxamine
Isolated perfused rat liver modelUW
4 °C; HMP
I: UW + Gly + NAC + TRX-C + DFX
C: UW
NAC: 5 mM
TRX-C: 0.2 mM
DFX: 0.25 mM
↓ LDH, ALT;
↑ bile production;
improved mitochondrial function;
improved liver microcirculation;
intact hepatocytes
Vreugdenhil et al., 1997 [26]Deferoxamine,
Trolox C,
Dithiothreitol
Hepatocytes from Sprague-Dawley rats;
isolated perfused rat liver model
UW
24 h, 48 h; 4 °C;
SCS
I1: UW + DFX
I2: UW + TRX
I3: UW + DTT
C: UW
DFX: 2.5 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM
TRX: 3 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM
DTT: 5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM
poor distribution of antioxidants in isolated rat liver;
only DFX was effective when added to the UW:
suppressed oxidative stress only in isolated hepatocytes stored in cold storage;
↓ LDH
Wu et al.,
2009 [27]
LK 614Isolated perfused rat liver modelHTK
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: HTK + LK 614
C: HTK
20 μM↓ LDH during reperfusion;
increased bile secretion;
better preserved hepatic microcirculation
Stegemann et al., 2010 [28]Deferoxamine,
LK 614
Wistar ratsHTK
18 h; 4 °C; HMP
I: HTK-N + LK 614 + DFX
C1: HTK
C2:HTK-N
DFX: 25 μM
LK 614: 2.5 μM, 7.5 μM
↓ ALT, LDH;
DFX: 25μM and LK 614: 2.5μM improved metabolic activity, reduced cleavage of caspase 9 and apoptotic index
Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants
Cherkashina et al., 2011 [29]SkQ1RatSucrose–saline
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: Sucrose–saline
+ SkQ1
C: Sucrose–saline
1 μM↓ hepatic injury and oxidative stress;
↑ liver and mitochondrial function
Wieland et al., 1995 [30] Idebenone
(QSA-10)
Rat liver microsomal modelUW, HTK
4 °C; SCS
I1: UW + QSA-10
I2: UW + Q-10
I3: HTK + QSA-10
I4: HTK + Q-10
C1: UW
C2: HTK
QSA-10: 0.1 µM/L, 20 µM/L
Q-10: 20 µM/L, 100 µM/L
protection against lipid peroxidation (HTK + QSA-10: 0.1 µM/L);
prevented protein damage (HTK + QSA-10: 20 µM/L and UW + QSA-10: 20 µM/L);
Q-10: 20 µM/ partial protection in UW;
QSA-10 have the potential to increase the efficacy of organ preservation
Kondo et al., 2013 [31]Phosphoenolpyruvate
Mouse liver (ex vivo)UW, PBS
24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 4 °C; SCS
I1: UW + PEP
I2: PBS + PEP
C1: UW
C2: PBS
PEP: 1 mM, 10 mM, 100 mM (PBS)
PEP: 100 mM (UW)
↓ oxidative stress;
attenuate ATP depletion;
prevents increases in biochemical parameters
Polyphenols
Johnston et al., 1999 [32]CurcuminSprague-Dawley rat livers
(ex vivo)
UW, EC
24 h; 4 °C;
oxygenated perfusion
I1: EC+ CUR
C1: EC
C2: UW
100 μMcurcumin-enhanced EC solution was equivalent to the UW solution
Chen et al.,
2006 [33]
CurcuminSprague-Dawley rat liversUW, EC, PBS
24 h, 36 h, 48 h; 4 °C; SCS
I1: UW + CUR
I2: EC+ CUR
I3: PBS+ CUR
C1: UW
C2: EC
C3: PBS
25–200 μMcurcumin at 100 μM concentration had the optimal preservation characteristics;
↑ portal flow rates and bile production;
↓ ALT, AST, LDH;
improves the quality of organs
McNally et al., 2006 [34]CurcuminHuman hepatocytesUW
16 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + CUR
C: UW
10 μMinduces HO-1;
maximum protection cells between 16 and 24 h of CS
Kato et al.,
2020 [35]
QuercetinRat
(isolated hepatocytes and whole liver)
UW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + QE
C: UW
QE: 0.33; 33.1 µM/L
Suc: 0.1 M/L
optimal dose of QE: 33,1 µM/L
↓ ALT
mild vascular degradation;
improvement of histological changes
Ligeret et al., 2008 [36]SilibininIsolated perfused rat liver modelUW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + SB
C: UW
100 μM↑ ATP, RCR
↓ oxidative stress
Chiu et al.,
1999 [37]
MagnololRatUW, Ringer’s lactate
24 h, 48 h; 96 h, 4 °C; SCS
I1: UW + MAG
I2: Ringer’s lactate + MAG
C1: UW
C2: Ringer’s lactate
10–6 M/L↓ lipid peroxidation
Bioactive metabolites from marine algae
Gdara et al., 2018 [38]PhycocyaninRatKH
12 h, 24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: KH + Pc
C:KH
0.1; 0.2 mg ml−1 g−1 of liveroptimal dose of Pc: 0.1 mg ml−1 g−1;
↓ ALT, AST, ALP;
↓ MDA;
↓ GST, GPx
Slim et al.,
2020 [39]
FucoidanIsolated perfused rat liver modelIGL-1
24 h, 4 °C; SCS
I1: IGL-1 + FUC
C1: IGL-1
C2: Ringer’s lactate
10 mg/L,
50 mg/L,
100 mg/L,
250 mg/L
optimal dose of
FUC: 100 mg/L;
↓ ALT, AST;
↑ phosphorylation of AMPK, AKT protein kinase, and GSK-3β;
reduction in apoptosis (caspase 3);
reduction of mitochondrial damage;
reduction oxidative stress;
reduction of ER stress markers;
↓ ERK1/2 and p38 MAPKs phosphorylation
Vitamins and vitamin-like substances
Bae et al.,
2014 [40]
α-TocopherolWistar rats after cardiac deathVasosol
4 °C; HMP
I: Vasosol + α-TCP
C1: Vasosol
C2: KPS-1
5.4 × 10−2 mM↓ ALT;
↓ inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1);
↓ caspase 3/7 expression in the circulation
Tolba et al., 2003 [41]L-carnitineIsolated perfused rat liver modelHTK
24 h, 4 °C; SCS
I: HTK + L-CAR
C: HTK
5 mM↓ ALT, GLDH;
improved the hepatic energy metabolism;
preserved integrity of the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum
Coskun et al., 2007 [42]L-carnitineWistar Albino ratUW
2 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h;
4 °C; SCS
I: UW + L-CAR
C: UW
5 mM/L↓ ALT, ACP;
↓ MDA
Drugs
Ben et al.,
2010 [43]
CarvedilolIsolated Zücker rat liver
(steatotic and non-steatotic)
UW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + CVD
C: UW
10−5 M/Lreduced hepatic injury, and improved hepatic functionality in both liver types
Ben et al.,
2006 [44]
TrimetazidineZücker rats
(steatotic and non-steatotic)
UW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + TMZ
C: UW
10−6 M/Lprotects against mitochondrial damage;
preserves more ATP;
decreases oxidative stress
higher bile production
Ben et al.,
2007 [45]
Trimetazidine,
aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside
Zücker rats
(steatotic and non-steatotic)
UW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I1: UW + TMZ
I2: UW + AICAR
C: UW
TMZ: 10−8 M/L
10−6 M/L, 10−4 M/L
AICAR: 10 μM/L, 20 μM/L, 40 μM/L, 80 μM/L
TMZ + AICAR:
10−6 M/L + 20 μM/L; 10−6 M/L + 40 μM/L;
↓ AST (TMZ)
TMZ improved bile production;
increase in cNOS via increasing AMPK;
TMZ and AICAR protected, with a similar degree of effectiveness, against cold I/R injury in steatotic and non-steatotic livers;
not necessary to combine AICAR and TMZ
Zaouali et al., 2010 [46]TrimetazidineZücker ratsIGL-1
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: IGL-1 + TMZ
C: IGL-1
10−6 M/L↓ AST, ALT;
higher bile production;
increased NO production;
HIF-1α accumulation;
increased HO-1 expression
Zaouali et al., 2013 [47]Trimetazidine
melatonin
Zücker rats
(steatotic)
UW, IGL-1
24 h, 4 °C; SCS
I2: IGL-1 + TMZ +MEL
C1: IGL-1
C2: UW
TMZ: 10−3 µM MEL: 100 µM↑ liver autophagy;
↓ GRP78, pPERK, and CHOP after reperfusion;
improved steatotic liver preservation through AMPK activation;
synergism of action MEL and TMZ
Zaouali et al., 2017 [48]TrimetazidineSprague-Dawley ratsUW, IGL-1
8 h, 4 °C; SCS
I1: IGL-1 + TMZ
C: IGL-1
C: UW
10−6 M/L↓ ALT, GLDH, MDA;
protects the mitochondria;
inhibited of GSK3β and VDAC phosphorylation;
reduced apoptosis;
decreased ER stress
Zaouali et al., 2017 [49]TrimetazidineHomozygous obese and lean Zücker ratsIGL-1
24 h, 4 °C; SCS
I: IGL-1 + TMZ
C: IGL-1
10−5 M/L↓ ALT, AST (especially in steatotic livers);
↑ SIRT1 protein levels;
↓ HMGB1 protein level;
↓ TNF-α release;
increasing the tolerance of steatotic liver graft against cold IRI
Pantazi et al., 2015 [50]TrimetazidineRat orthotopic liver transplantationIGL-1
8 h, 4 °C; SCS
I: IGL-1 + TMZ
C: IGL-1
10−6 M/L↓ ALT, GLDH;
Reduction of oxidative stress;
reduction of mitochondrial damage;
enhanced SIRT1 protein expression
Kozaki et al., 1995 [51]PentoxifyllineIsolated perfused rat liver modelUW
4 h, 24 h; 0–4 °C; SCS
I: UW + PTX
C: UW
25 mg PTX/kg body weightthe Kupffer cells produced significantly less O2 and TNF-α
Arnault et al., 2003 [52]PentoxifyllineIsolated perfused Wistar rat liver modelUW
18 h, 24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + PTX
C: UW
30 mM (during cold storage)
3 mM (at reperfusion);
improve microcirculation in the liver;
decrease in vascular resistance at reperfusion of 18 h and 24 h;
decreased number of foci of peliosis after an 18 h preservation;
↓ LDH, AST, ALT after 24 h cold ischemia time
Asong-Fontem et al., 2021 [53]M101Zücker ratsIGL-1
24 h, 4 °C, SCS
2 h, 37 °C, NR
I: IGL-1 + M101
C: IGL-1
1 g/L↓ AST, ALT, Lactate, GLDH;
↓ MDA;
higher production of NO2-NO3;
less inflammation (HMGB1)
Table 2. Studies on the effectiveness of supplementing preservative fluids with antioxidants. Preclinical and clinical studies.
Table 2. Studies on the effectiveness of supplementing preservative fluids with antioxidants. Preclinical and clinical studies.
Author,
Year of Publication
AntioxidantSpeciesPreservation Solution Modification
/Cold Ischemia
Outcome Measures, (Intervention, I/Control, C)Antioxidant DoseEffects of Antioxidant
Enzymatic antioxidant
Hide et al.,
2014 [54]
rMnSOD human liver samples,
LSEC, liver grafts from healthy and steatotic rats
Celsior
16 h, 4 °C; SCS
I: Celsior + rMnSOD
C: no SCS
rMnSOD: 0,15 µM↓ oxidative stress;
↑ NO;
Non-enzymatic antioxidants
Low-molecular-weight antioxidant
Aliakbarian et al., 2017 [55]N-AcetylcysteineHumanUW
4 °C; SCS
I: UW + NAC
C: UW
2 gaddition of NAC does not decrease the rate of ischemia–reperfusion injury
Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants
Aghdaie et al., 2019 [56]α-Lipoic acid (ALA)
ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)
Isolated human hepatocytes derived from livers of deceased donorsUW
24 h; 4 °C; SCS
I1: UW + α-Lipoic acid
I2: UW + ursodeoxycholic acid
C: UW
ALA: 5 mM/L
UDCA: 5 mM/L
does not increase the number of viable hepatocytes
Polyphenols
Otani et al., 2023
[57]
QuercetinIsolated pig liversUW
6 h, 4 °C; SCS
I: UW+ QE
C:UW
QE: 33.1 µM/L
Suc: 0.1 M/L
↓ ALT, AST, LDH;
improvement of histological changes;
prevent tissue edema
Drugs
Qing et al.,
2006 [58]
PentoxifyllineSimple porcine orthotopic liver transplantationUW
12 h, 16 h, 20 h;
4 °C; SCS
I: UW + PTX
C: UW
1 g/L↓ TNF-α, MDA;
↓ ALT, AST;
↑ ATP;
100% 1-week survival;
improved microcirculation
Alix et al.,
2020 [59]
M101Pig
allogeneic liver orthotopic transplantation
UW
9 h, 4 °C; SCS
I: UW + M101
C: UW
1 g/Limproved liver graft oxygenation during SCS;
livers cold stored with UWSCS + M101 did not reach the oxygenation level achieved with machine perfusion
Abbreviations: ACP, acid phosphatase; AICAR, aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside; ALA, α-Lipoic acid; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AMI, amifostine; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; AraA, adenine9-b-D-arabinofuranoside; AST, aspartate transferase; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; CHOP, C/EBP homologous protein; cNOS, constitutive nitric oxide synthase; CUR, curcumin; CVD, carvedilol; DFX, Deferoxamine; DTT, Dithiothreitol; EC, Euro-Collins solution; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERK1/2, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase; FUC, Fucoidan; GLDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; Gly, glycine; GRP78, glucose-regulated protein 78; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSK-3β, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; GSNO, S-Nitrosoglutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; HMGB1, High-mobility Group Box 1; HMP, hypothermic machine perfusion; HO-1, heme oxygenase 1; HOPE, hypothermic oxygen perfusion; HTK, histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate; IL-6, interleukin 6; Iκb, inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa; KH, Krebs–Henseleit; KPS-1, kidney machine perfusion solution; L-CAR, L-carnitine; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LSEC, liver sinusoidal endothelial cell; M101, Hemo2Life®; MAG, magnolol; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1;MEL, melatonin; NAC, N-Acetylcysteine; NLRP3, pyrin domain-containing protein 3; NR, normothermic reperfusion; Nrf2, nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation complexes; p38 MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PBS, phosphate buffer saline; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PINK1, PTEN-induced kinase 1; pPERK, protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; PTX, Pentoxifylline; PVP, portal venous pressure; QE, quercetin; QSA-10, idebenone; RCR, respiratory control ratio; RL, Ringer Lactate; SB, silibinin; SCS, static cold storage; SIRT1, Sirtuin 1; p-p38, phosphor-p38; SkQ1, 10-(6′-plastoquinonyl)decyltriphenylphosphonium; SNAC, S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine; Suc, sucrose; TAU, taurine; TMZ; trimetazidine; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; TRX-C, Trolox-C; UCP2, uncoupling protein 2; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; UW, University of Wisconsin solution; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel; VSOP, venous systemic oxygen persufflation; α-TCP, α-Tocopherol; ↑ increase ↓ decrease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ostróżka-Cieślik, A. Modification of Preservative Fluids with Antioxidants in Terms of Their Efficacy in Liver Protection before Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031850

AMA Style

Ostróżka-Cieślik A. Modification of Preservative Fluids with Antioxidants in Terms of Their Efficacy in Liver Protection before Transplantation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(3):1850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031850

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ostróżka-Cieślik, Aneta. 2024. "Modification of Preservative Fluids with Antioxidants in Terms of Their Efficacy in Liver Protection before Transplantation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 3: 1850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031850

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop