Next Article in Journal
The Auditory Pathway in Congenitally Cytomegalovirus-Infected Human Fetuses
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Human Papillomavirus on microRNA-21 Expression in Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Validating Enteroid-Derived Monolayers from Murine Gut Organoids for Toxicological Testing of Inorganic Particles: Proof-of-Concept with Food-Grade Titanium Dioxide
Previous Article in Special Issue
PAICS/DYRK3 Multienzyme Interactions as Coregulators of Purinosome Formation and Metabolism on Radioresistance in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms25052634
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Salivary Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection: An Exploratory Systematic Review

by
Daniel Bastías
,
Alejandro Maturana
,
Constanza Marín
,
René Martínez
* and
Sven Eric Niklander
*
Unit of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(5), 2634; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052634
Submission received: 17 January 2024 / Revised: 20 February 2024 / Accepted: 22 February 2024 / Published: 23 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights into Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Different efforts have been made to find better and less invasive methods for the diagnosis and prediction of oral cancer, such as the study of saliva as a source of biomarkers. The aim of this study was to perform a scoping review about salivary molecules that have been assessed as possible biomarkers for the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A search was conducted using EBSCO, PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science. The research question was as follows: which molecules present in saliva have utility to be used as biomarkers for the early detection of oral cancer? Sixty-two studies were included. Over 100 molecules were assessed. Most of the markers were oriented towards the early diagnosis of OSCC and were classified based on their ability for detecting OSCC and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), OSCC outcome prediction, and the prediction of the malignant transformation of OPMDs. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 IL-8, LDH, and MMP-9 were the most studied, with almost all studies reporting high sensitivity and specificity values. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 IL-8, LDH, and MMP-9 are the most promising salivary biomarkers. However, more studies with larger cohorts are needed before translating the use of these biomarkers to clinical settings.

1. Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common form of head and neck cancer [1]. It can arise de novo or from oral precursor lesions, a group known as oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) [2]. OPMDs encompass different disorders, with oral leukoplakia (OL) being the most common [3], with an estimated annual malignant transformation rate of 10% [4]. Despite different technological advances in the medical sciences, is still not possible to predict which OPMD will progress into cancer [5,6], with clinicians and pathologists still relying on the same histopathological and clinical indicators used for the last 40 years. There are also significant challenges for diagnosing oral cancer in early stages. Despite the oral cavity being of “easy access”, OSCC is still being diagnosed mostly in stages III and IV of the disease, which is translated to significant morbidity and an estimated overall survival of ≈50% during the first 5 years [7].
Different efforts have been made to discover biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of OPMDs and OSCC in order to predict the malignant transformation of precursor lesions, treatment response, the development of regional and distant metastases, among others [8]. Biomarkers have been obtained from tissues, urine, serum, blood, and saliva, among others. Saliva is probably the most attractive secretion for the finding of biomarkers for OSCC and OPMDs, as its collection is easy, non-invasive, fast, and cost-effective. Thus, different studies have explored the possibility of using salivary factors as biomarkers for the development and progression of OSCC and OPMDs [9,10,11]. The aim of this study was to perform an exploratory systematic review about the different salivary molecules that have been assessed as possible biomarkers for the diagnosis of OSCC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and scoping review guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute [12]. The research question was as follows: which molecules present in saliva have utility to be used as biomarkers for the early detection of oral cancer?

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were as follows: full text articles in English published between January 2015 and July 2022; studies describing any salivary molecule used as biomarker for the detection of oral cancer or an oral potentially malignant disorder; and clinical trials and cohort and case–control studies involving humans.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: reviews, editorials, opinions, letters to the editor, case reports, animal studies, studies about salivary biomarkers of other cancers, in vitro cell line studies, and animal studies.

2.3. Information Sources and Search Strategy

A bibliographic search was conducted using EBSCO, PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science with a publication date ranging from January 2015 to July 2022.
The following MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) search terms were used: “Saliva”, “Biomarker”, “Diagnosis”, “Head and neck cancer”, “Mouth neoplasms”, “Oral Cancer”, and “Precancerous conditions”, which were combined using “AND” or “OR”. Additionally, a manual search was also performed (Supplementary Figure S1).

2.4. Selection Process

Following the literature search, the records from each database were exported into Mendeley refence manager (Elsevier, London, UK, 2024). Duplicates were removed at this stage. The selection of articles was conducted independently by two reviewers (A.M. and D.B.). In the first phase, both reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts for relevance. Any disagreements were resolved by S.N. In the second phase, both reviewers independently performed a full-text review (A.M. and D.B.). Disagreements at this stage were resolved by S.N.

2.5. Data Extraction

The following data were extracted into a spreadsheet (Office Excel 2016; Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA): author, year of publication, country, diagnosis, number of cases included, biomarker, technique, and statistical analysis employed.

3. Results

The systematic search initially retrieved 1123 records. After eliminating 343 duplicates, 780 articles were subjected to title and abstract review, resulting in 97 records for full-text evaluation. Of those, 35 were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria; thus, 62 articles were included for data analysis (Figure 1).

3.1. Characteristics of the Included Studies

The studies included the analysis of over 60 molecules present in the saliva of 5278 patients, of which 2546 were patients with OSCC, 1070 with an OPMD, and 1662 healthy controls. The range of patients included per study varied from 23 to 310, and the range of biomarkers ranged from 1 to 11 (Supplementary Table S1).
Most of the detected markers were oriented towards the early diagnosis of OSCC (n = 54 molecules) and were classified based on their ability for detecting OSCC and OPMDs, OSCC outcome prediction (n = 4 molecules), and predicting the malignant transformation of OPMDs (n = 6 molecules). A list of abbreviations of the different markers can be found at the end of the manuscript.

3.2. Biomarkers for the Detection of OSCC and OPMDs

3.2.1. Enzymes

Eight articles assessed salivary metalloproteinase (MMP) levels, with MMP-9 being the most frequently studied. One study reported statistically significant differences in salivary MMP-9 and MMP-2 concentrations between OPMD patients compared to controls (p = 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively) [13]. Another study reported significantly higher salivary MMP9 levels (p < 0.001) in OSCC patients compared to OPMD patients, with an AUC of 0.917 for OSCC and an AUC of 0.852 for OPMD [14]. Ghallab and Shaker assessed the ability of MMP9 salivary levels to differentiate between patients with OSCC and an OPMD, reporting a sensitivity and specificity of 100% [15]. Other MMPs have also been reported to be altered between healthy and OSCC patients [16,17]. (Supplementary Table S2).
Other enzymes, such as LDH, AKR1b10, l-fructose, cathepsin V, and kallikrein, have shown elevated salivary concentrations in OSCC patients when compared to control groups [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Among these six markers, LDH is the most studied enzyme.
A significant rise in LDH levels in OSCC and high-risk premalignant lesions compared to control groups was reported [18], with a 3.9-fold and 2.5-fold increase, respectively. Similar results have also been reported by others [22]. The average salivary levels of AKR1b10 were significantly higher in patients with OSCC (646.47 ± 402.43 pg/mL) compared to healthy controls (25.0.1 ± 32.96 pg/mL), and OSCC patients with salivary AKR1b10 values over 646 pg/mL had significantly lower survival rates compared to OSCC patients with lower AKR1b10 levels [21]. Other enzymes and proteases, including kallikrein 5, cathepsin V, and ADAM9, also showed a significant increase in the saliva of patients with OSCC, each presenting an AUC > 0.7. The combination of these three markers improved diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC > 0.9 [19] (Supplementary Table S2).

3.2.2. Glycoproteins

CEA and CD44 are both included in this category [24,25,26,27,28,29]. CEA was the subject of study in three studies, and in all of them, a significant increase in the saliva of patients with OSCC compared to control patients was reported (p < 0.005) [22–25.52]. CEA salivary levels were also analyzed in conjunction with another marker, Naa10p, resulting in a significant increase in sensitivity and specificity (92.5% and 85%) [27]. CD44 variants were also found to be increased in the saliva of OSCC compared to control patients. A statistical analysis suggested a probable role of CD44v6 in the early stages of malignancies and of both CD44v6 and CD44v10 in locoregional aggressiveness and histopathological conditions [26] (Supplementary Table S2).

3.2.3. Cytokines

Several studies analyzed the salivary expression of different cytokines, including IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-17A, IL-17F, IFN-γ, TNF-α, HGF, CRP and VEGF [30,31]. The most studied cytokine was IL-8. In all these studies, a significant increase in IL-8 in the saliva of OSCC patients compared to controls was reported (p < 0.05) [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The diagnostic capacity of IL-8 was also evaluated in combination with a panel of different markers, including DUSP1, H3F3A, and SAT. This combination resulted in an improvement in diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.77 [33]. Another study reported both IL-8 and IL-1β to be effective salivary diagnostic markers in all stages of OSCC, showing significant discrimination, especially in stages III and IV and postoperative phases of the disease (p < 0.05) [37]. Similar results were also reported for IL-17A and IL-17F, which were significantly overexpressed in the saliva of patients with more advanced stages of the disease (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), particularly in stage IV. Furthermore, patients with larger primary tumors (T4) and greater nodal involvement were also found to have higher levels of IL-17 [40]. TNF-α was also studied in a significant number of studies [32,33,35,40,41,42]. TNF-α concentrations in the saliva of OSCC [35] and OPMD patients [41] have been reported to be significantly higher than in control patients, with an AUC > 0.8 for both OSCC and OPMD [32,33]. Other cytokines such as HGF and VEGF have also been reported to be significantly higher in the saliva of OSCC patients [43] (Supplementary Table S2).

3.2.4. MicroRNAs

Several studies have investigated the concentrations of different MicroRNAs in patients with OSCC and OPMDs. miR-21, miR-184, miR-let-7-5p, miR-412-3p, miR-512-3p, miR-302-3p, miR-517-3p, miR-30c-5p, miR-SAT, miR-OAZ, miR-H3F3A, and miR-24-3p have all shown significant differences in patients with OSCC and/or an OPMD compared to control groups [44,45,46,47,48,49]. Care has to be taken when assessing salivary RNA levels as, according to one study, these might be affected by periodontal status [50] (Supplementary Table S2).

3.2.5. Metabolites

Five studies explored the use of metabolites as saliva biomarkers for the diagnosis of OSCC and OPMDs. One study selected three metabolites (ornithine, ohydroxyvenzonate, and R5P) to assess their ability to distinguish between patients with OSCC and oral dysplasia, obtaining an AUC of 0.871 [51] (Supplementary Table S2). Two other studies examined salivary concentrations of TSA and compared them among patients with OSCC with different grades of differentiation (mild, moderate, and severe). In both studies, a significant increase in TSA was observed in the saliva of patients with less differentiated tumors (p < 0.01) [50,52]. Glycine and proline were also reported to be significantly elevated in the saliva of patients with OSCC (p = 0.02) [53] (Supplementary Table S2).

3.2.6. Others

ANG, ANG2, NUS1, transgelin and RCN1, showed significant increases in patients with OSCC compared to healthy controls [43,54,55,56]. Cai et al. reported a 1.58-fold increase in ANG and a 13.56-fold increase in ANG2 in OSCC patients [43]. Regarding the utility of NUS1 and RCN1, Ueda et al. reported a sensitivity of 68% and 70%, respectively, which increased to 98% when combining both markers [54]. Another study analyzed the concentrations of FSA and PBSA in OSCC patients who use tobacco, non-cancer patients who chew tobacco, and healthy controls without tobacco use. Significant increases in the concentrations of both markers were recorded among patients with OSCC and tobacco users [57]. KPNA2 has been proposed as a marker for disease progression, as a study that analyzed its salivary levels in OSCC patients in different stages of the disease found a significant increase in advanced stages (III and IV) and a positive correlation with lymph node spread [58]. In a similar way, a recent study that analyzed salivary concentrations of LGALS3BP reported a discriminative concentration of that marker for OSCC in stages I and II and high-risk OPMDs, but a decrease in the late stages and postoperative recurrences [37]. Vitamin C, L-fructose, CYFRA21-1, β2-microglobulin, Cathepsin B and the expression of many genes coding for different proteins involved in different functions have also been reported to be altered in OSCC and OPMD patients [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67] (Supplementary Table S2).

3.3. Biomarkers for OSCC Outcome Prediction

Several markers have been proposed for this purpose, including IL-5, CYFRA-21, miR-139-5p, and EGFR [38,53,68,69,70]. Salivary miR-139-5p levels were able to discriminate between patients with OSCC before surgical treatment from healthy individuals (AUC = 0.805) and from patients with OSCC after surgery (AUC = 0.713). Furthermore, concentrations of this marker returned to normal in the postoperative period (4–6 weeks) in patients undergoing tumor excision [68]. Similarly, high CYFRA 21-1 salivary levels have been associated with OSCC recurrence (p = 0.0031) [69] and high salivary levels of EGFR with poor survival [70]. Another study found an increase in salivary IL-5 levels after the first surgery. This was followed by a decrease in IL-5 in patients where a second primary occurred, which was followed by an increase in IL-5 saliva concentrations after the tumor was removed [38].

3.4. Biomarkers for the Prediction of Malignant Transformation of OPMDs

Certain salivary biomarkers have been assessed to try to predict the malignant transformation of OPMDs. Zaharan et al. reported an increase in salivary miRNA-21 and miRNA-184 in OPMDs (with and without dysplasia) and OSCC when compared to healthy and other disease control subjects [48]. Similarly, Sabarathinam et al. reported that salivary GPx, MDA, TNF-α, and AFP gradually increased as progression occurred from OPMDs to OSCC [42]. Another study showed that miRNA-31 increased in OPMDs and OLP with dysplasia and when the malignant transformation of previous an OMPD happened [47].

4. Discussion

According to the World Health Organization, in the year 2018 alone, 177,384 deaths due to oral cancer were recorded worldwide [71]. Different efforts have been made to find better and less invasive methods for the diagnosis and prediction of oral cancer, such as the use of saliva as a biomarker source [58], resulting in over 100 markers with potential use in OSCC patients. Nevertheless, there is no worldwide consensus on a unique biomarker (or a combination of them) able to accurately diagnose and predict OSCC development [8].
Among the analyzed markers, some showed more promise than others. IL-5 [38], miRNA-31 [47], among some others, have reported good results and positioned themselves as good candidates. Nevertheless, these were analyzed by only one study (IL-5 and miRNA-31). A similar scenario is reiterative with various markers identified in this review, with fifty-five of them being assessed in only one study. Consequently, it becomes challenging to establish the potential of all these molecules, given that the evidence is very limited, which makes it impossible to draw any conclusions.
The study of miRNA holds promise. Different systematic reviews have also concluded that they are potential biomarkers for OSCC and OPMDs [11,72,73]. The main issue is, as with many of the other markers, is that apart from mir-21, which was assessed by two studies [47,48], the salivary expression of all other miRNAs, has been analyzed by single studies.
However, among all markers, there were six assessed by four or more studies, all reporting high sensitivity and specificity values for the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and/or OPMDs. These markers were IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, LDH, MMP-9, aTNF-α (Table 1).
Interleukin-8 can play different roles in the carcinogenesis process, including the promotion of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [38], angiogenesis [35], and tumor growth [34]. This is probably why it was the most frequently investigated biomarker in this review (seven studies). All studies that evaluated IL-8 in OSCC reported its usefulness for discriminating between healthy and oral cancer patients [34,35,37,38]. However, there were discrepancies regarding at which stage of the disease the detection of IL-8 was most relevant. Some studies suggested salivary IL-8 to be useful in early stages, while others associated its increase with late stages of the disease. Apparently, IL-8 is better at discriminating OSCC than OPMDs, as only 60% of the reviewed articles indicated a rise in IL-8 in OPMDs [32,35,37,38]. Nevertheless, care must be taken when interpreting these findings, as two reports pointed out that periodontal disease and tobacco consumption could have affected IL-8 concentrations [34,37]. In contrast, Lee et al. dismissed the idea that factors such as alcohol or tobacco could directly influence salivary concentrations of IL-8, as their results did not demonstrate significant differences between groups associated with these factors when compared to control groups [35].
LDH is a catalyzing enzyme found in most cells, participating in cellular metabolism, playing a key role in the final step of the anaerobic–glycolytic metabolic pathway [18,20,22]. According to this review, salivary concentrations of these enzymes could be related to tumor size and cancer stage. Additionally, there may be potential utility in distinguishing between malignant and potentially malignant conditions, such as leukoplakia or submucosal fibrosis [18,23,75]. These results agree with the role of LDH in the organism. Awasthi suggested that elevated levels of this enzyme could be explained by uncontrolled cell mass increase, leading to the release of free analytes into the saliva [18]. LDH is an enzyme associated with cell membrane damage, and therefore, the quantification of salivary LDH could be related to death or cellular damage [20,22]. Different factors could limit the use of this enzyme as a biomarker, so care must be taken. For example, some authors suggest that salivary LDH content could be affected by various local or systemic factors such as periodontitis or tobacco consumption [22,23]. Nevertheless, all studies that investigated salivary LDH expression propose it as a promising marker in the diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis of OSCC and/or OPMDs. However, they all agree that studies with a larger population, including patient follow-up, are needed [18,20,22,23,74].
IL-1β is constitutively overexpressed in OSCC [76] and is identified as a key node gene in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of OSCC in vivo [77]. The oncogenic properties of IL-1β have also been demonstrated using in vivo models. In a mouse oral cancer model, pIL-1β mRNA positively correlated with the presence of malignant change. IL-1β is also reported to have a role in the induction of EMT in OSCC, as in the same study, OSCC cells treated with IL-1β showed molecular signs of EMT induction [78], which has also been reported by others [79,80,81]. This is also supported by the fact that IL-1β silencing reduces OSCC tumor size in vivo [77] and that elevated IL-1β expression has been related with lymph node metastasis in OSCC [82]. IL-1β salivary levels are able to discriminate between OSCC subjects and controls [35,37,83], but not between OPMD patients and healthy subjects [37]. The reported AUC of salivary IL-1β to differentiate between OSCC and control individuals varies between 0.729 and 0.7724 [35,37], but increases significantly when considering only late-stage OSCC [37]. Importantly, it has been reported that the discriminatory power of salivary IL-1β increases when used with other markers, such as IL-8, SAT1, and DUSP1 [83]. In the study by Singh et al., salivary IL-1β failed to distinguish between post-treatment OSCC individuals and healthy subjects, suggesting the normalization of IL-1β salivary levels after tumor removal [37]. A study in which the authors analyzed the expression of IL-1β (among other 50 factors) in OSCC patients before and after surgical intervention showed a significant decrease in salivary IL-1β levels after tumor resection. No significant changes in other cytokine levels were reported [84]. Similar results were also reported elsewhere [38].
MMP9 has been described as having multiple functions, including its participation in protein and extracellular matrix degradation [15], promotion of angiogenesis [15,75] and regulation of the initial steps of carcinogenesis and invasion [14]. Only one out of the four studies that included this molecule in their analysis determined that the differences in salivary concentrations of MMP-9 between patients with OSCC and control subjects were of no significance [15]. Most of the studies agreed on the potential of this biomarker for the diagnosis of OSCC and OPMDs [13,14,15,75], with possible utility for predicting the malignant transformation of previous OPMDs and the treatment monitoring of OSCC [14,51,75]. These results make sense when considering the functions of this metalloproteinase in the organism. MMP-9 maintains the bioavailability of growth factors such as VEGF. Consequently, an increase in MMP-9 would indirectly promote angiogenesis and uncontrolled cell proliferation [13,51,75,85].
TNF-α has been reported to be an important molecule within the inflammatory process [33,35,41,42] also capable of stimulating the growth of fibroblasts and inducing cell death [20]. TNF-α was suggested to have possible utility in distinguishing between OPMDs, OSCC, and healthy individuals [33,35,41,42]. TNF-α induces the release of other cytokines, thus creating a tumor microenvironment that favors the proliferation and survival of malignant cells [41]. In this regard, some authors proposed salivary TNF-α to be related to the patient’s lymph node involvement [32,40].
IL-6 is considered and oncogenic cytokine, similar to IL-1 and IL-8, and is reported to cause EMT [86], induce angiogenesis and tumor growth [87,88], disrupt cell–cell communication, impede macrophage function, and promote epithelial and endothelial cell migration and invasion [89]. IL-6 overexpression in patients with HNSCC is associated with poor prognosis, probably by enabling an immunosuppressive TME by increasing the presence of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and PDL-1 expression, and is considered a significant predictor of treatment outcome [90]. In OSCC, the expressions of IL-6 and IL-8 are associated with a more invasive mode of growth [91]. Apart from the study from Khyani et al., all studies that assessed IL-6 salivary expression reported an increase in OSCC patients [32,33,35,38].

5. Conclusions

Salivary biomarkers have the potential to become a useful tool to aid in the detection, control, and prediction of the malignant transformation and metastasis of OPMDs and OSCC. All authors agree that is unlikely that one single molecule would meet the requirements to be used as a biomarker, so efforts should be focused on developing a panel of biomarkers. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 IL-8, LDH, and MMP-9 are the most promising markers with the strongest evidence. However, in all cases, more studies with larger cohorts and more robust study designs are needed before translating the use of these markers to clinical settings. It would be interesting for future studies to assess the sensitivity and specificity of these markers when combined.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25052634/s1.

Author Contributions

S.E.N.: conceptualization, article screening, writing, and editing. C.M. and R.M.: conceptualization, writing, and editing. A.M. and D.B.: literature search, article screening, and writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Fondo Núcleo DI-05-22/NUC, Universidad Andres Bello.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AbbreviationName
AFPAlpha-Fetoprotein
AKR1B10Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member B10
CD44Cluster of Differentiation 44
CEACarcinoembryonic Antigen
CRPC-Reactive Protein
CSTACystatin A
CYFRA 21-1Cytokeratin Fragment 21-1
EGFREpidermal Growth Factor Receptor
ErbB2Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 (HER2)
FSAFibrin Split Products A
GPxGlutathione Peroxidase
GROGrowth-Related Oncogene
HCC-1Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Associated Protein
HGFHepatocyte Growth Factor
IFN-yInterferon-gamma
ILInterleukin
KLK5Kallikrein 5
KPNA2Karyopherin Alpha 2
LGALS3BPGalectin-3-Binding Protein
LGALS 3bp0Galectin-3-Binding Protein (Alternative Name)
LDHLactate Dehydrogenase
MCP-1Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1
DUSP1Dual-Specificity Phosphatase 1
MAOBMonoamine Oxidase B
MDAMalondialdehyde
MMPMatrix Metalloproteinase
mRNA Messenger RNA
miRMicroRNA
Naa10pN-alpha-acetyltransferase 10
NUS1Nucleolar Complex Protein 1
PADI1Peptidyl Arginine Deiminase 1
PBSAPara-Benzenesulfonic Acid
PF-4Platelet Factor 4
PIGFPlacental Growth Factor
RCN1Reticulocalbin 1
RSPRibosomal Protein S
SAT Spermidine/Spermine N1-Acetyltransferase
SYNE1Spectrin Repeat Containing Nuclear Envelope Protein 1
S100S100 Calcium-Binding Protein
SLC3A2Solute Carrier Family 3 Member 2
TIMPTissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases
TNCTenascin C
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor Alpha
TSATumor-Specific Antigen
VEGFVascular Endothelial Growth Factor
8-OHdG8-Hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine

References

  1. Gualtero, D.F.; Suarez Castillo, A. Biomarkers in saliva for the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and their potential use for early diagnosis: A systematic review. In Acta Odontologica Scandinavica; Taylor and Francis Ltd.: Abingdon, UK, 2016; pp. 170–177. [Google Scholar]
  2. Warnakulasuriya, S.; Kujan, O.; Aguirre-Urizar, J.M.; Bagan, J.V.; González-Moles, M.; Kerr, A.R.; Lodi, G.; Mello, F.W.; Monteiro, L.; Ogden, G.R.; et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders: A consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer. Oral Dis. 2021, 27, 1862–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mello, F.W.; Miguel, A.F.P.; Dutra, K.L.; Porporatti, A.L.; Warnakulasuriya, S.; Guerra, E.N.S.; Rivero, E.R.C. Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2018, 47, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Iocca, O.; Sollecito, T.P.; Alawi, F.; Weinstein, G.S.; Newman, J.G.; De Virgilio, A.; Di Maio, P.; Spriano, G.; Pardiñas López, S.; Shanti, R.M. Potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity and oral dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of malignant transformation rate by subtype. Head Neck 2020, 42, 539–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Maweri, S.A.; Halboub, E.; Al-Qadhi, G.; Al-Wesabi, M.; Al-Sharani, H.M.; Parveen, S.; Alhashimi, N.; Almeslet, A.; Alhajj, M.N. Efficacy of lycopene for management of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2023, 135, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lodi, G.; Franchini, R.; Warnakulasuriya, S.; Varoni, E.M.; Sardella, A.; Kerr, A.R.; Carrassi, A.; MacDonald, L.C.; Worthington, H.V. Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia to prevent oral cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 2016, CD001829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Harada, H.; Kikuchi, M.; Asato, R.; Hamaguchi, K.; Tamaki, H.; Mizuta, M.; Hori, R.; Kojima, T.; Honda, K.; Tsujimura, T.; et al. Characteristics of oral squamous cell carcinoma focusing on cases unaffected by smoking and drinking: A multicenter retrospective study. Head Neck 2023, 45, 1812–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Niklander, S.E. Inflammatory Mediators in Oral Cancer: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Potential. Front. Oral Health 2021, 2, 642238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kalmatte, A.; Rekha, P.D.; Ratnacaram, C.K. Emerging cell cycle related non-coding RNA biomarkers from saliva and blood for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 9479–9496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Niklander, S.E.; Murdoch, C.; Hunter, K.D. IL-1/IL-1R Signaling in Head and Neck Cancer. Front. Oral Health 2021, 2, 722676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Niklander, S.; Guerra, D.; Contreras, F.; González-Arriagada, W.; Marín, C. MicroRNAs and their role in the malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia: A scoping review. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2022, 27, e77–e84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Peters, M.D.J.; Godfrey, C.M.; Khalil, H.; McInerney, P.; Parker, D.; Soares, C.B. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int. J. Evid.-Based Healthc. 2015, 13, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kochurova, E.V.; Nikolenko, V.N. Estimation of Expression of Oral Fluid Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Pretumor Diseases of Oral Mucosa. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 163, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Smriti, K.; Ray, M.; Chatterjee, T.; Shenoy, R.P.; Gadicherla, S.; Pentapati, K.C.; Rustaqi, N. Salivary MMP-9 as a biomarker for the diagnosis of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2020, 21, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ghallab, N.A.; Shaker, O.G. Serum and salivary levels of chemerin and MMP-9 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral premalignant lesions. Clin. Oral Investig. 2017, 21, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chi, L.M.; Hsiao, Y.C.; Chien, K.Y.; Chen, S.F.; Chuang, Y.N.; Lin, S.Y.; Wang, W.S.; Chang, I.Y.F.; Yang, C.; Chu, L.J.; et al. Assessment of candidate biomarkers in paired saliva and plasma samples from oral cancer patients by targeted mass spectrometry. J. Proteom. 2020, 211, 103571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tang, H.; Hu, F.; Li, X.; Song, H. Analysis of influencing factors and prognosis of early postoperative recurrence, secondary tumor and metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2021, 67, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Awasthi, N. Role of salivary biomarkers in early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2017, 60, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Feng, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, J.; Yi, P.; Xu, X.; Fan, Y.; Cui, B.; Yu, Y.; Li, X.; Du, Y.; et al. Salivary protease spectrum biomarkers of oral cancer. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2019, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kallalli, B.N.; Rawson, K.; Muzammil; Singh, A.; Awati, M.A.; Shivhare, P. Lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker in oral cancer and oral submucous fibrosis. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2016, 45, 687–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ko, H.H.; Peng, H.H.; Cheng, S.J.; Kuo, M.Y.P. Increased salivary AKR1B10 level: Association with progression and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2018, 40, 2642–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mantri, T.; Thete, S.G.; Male, V.; Yadav, R.; Grover, I.; Adsure, G.R.; Kulkarni, D. Study of the role of salivary lactate dehydrogenase in habitual tobacco chewers, oral submucous fibrosis and oral cancer as a biomarker. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2019, 20, 970–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Saluja, T.S.; Spadigam, A.; Dhupar, A.; Syed, S. Equating salivary lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) with LDH-5 expression in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: An insight into metabolic reprogramming of cancer cell as a predictor of aggressive phenotype. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 5609–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Honarmand, M.; Farhad-Mollashahi, L.; Nakhaee, A.; Nehi, M. Salivary levels of ErbB2 and CEA in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2016, 17, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, S.X.; Yang, Y.Q.; Jin, L.J.; Cai, Z.G.; Sun, Z. Detection of survivin, carcinoembryonic antigen and ErbB2 level in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Cancer Biomark. 2017, 17, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shah, K.; Patel, S.; Modi, B.; Shah, F.; Rawal, R. Uncovering the potential of CD44v/SYNE1/miR34a axis in salivary fluids of oral cancer patients. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2018, 47, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zheng, J.; Sun, L.; Yuan, W.; Xu, J.; Yu, X.; Wang, F.; Sun, L.; Zeng, Y. Clinical value of Naa10p and CEA levels in saliva and serum for diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2018, 47, 830–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Seyedmajidi, S.; Seyedmajidi, M.; Foroughi, R.; Zahedpasha, A.; Saravi, Z.Z.; Pourbagher, R.; Bijani, A.; Motallebnejad, M.; Shabestani, A.M.; Mostafazadeh, A. Comparison of salivary and serum soluble CD44 levels between patients with oral SCC and healthy controls. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2018, 19, 3059–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sivadasan, P.; Gupta, M.K.; Sathe, G.; Sudheendra, H.V.; Sunny, S.P.; Renu, D.; Hari, P.S.; Gowda, H.; Suresh, A.; Kuriakose, M.A.; et al. Salivary proteins from dysplastic leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma and their potential for early detection. J. Proteom. 2020, 212, 103574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Metgud, R.; Bajaj, S. Altered serum and salivary C-reactive protein levels in patients with oral premalignant lesions and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biotech. Histochem. 2016, 91, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shan, J.; Sun, Z.; Yang, J.; Xu, J.; Shi, W.; Wu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Li, H. Discovery and preclinical validation of proteomic biomarkers in saliva for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Dis. 2019, 25, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dikova, V.; Jantus-Lewintre, E.; Bagan, J. Potential non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Horváth, J.; Szabó, A.; Tar, I.; Dezső, B.; Kiss, C.; Márton, I.; Scholtz, B. Oral Health May Affect the Performance of mRNA-Based Saliva Biomarkers for Oral Squamous Cell Cancer. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2018, 24, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khyani, I.A.M.; Qureshi, M.A.; Mirza, T.; Farooq, M.U. Detection of interleukins-6 and 8 in saliva as potential biomarkers of oral pre-malignant lesion and oral carcinoma: A breakthrough in salivary diagnostics in Pakistan. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 30, 817–823. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, L.T.; Wong, Y.K.; Hsiao, H.Y.; Wang, Y.W.; Chan, M.Y.; Chang, K.W. Evaluation of saliva and plasma cytokine biomarkers in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 47, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Michailidou, E.; Tzimagiorgis, G.; Chatzopoulou, F.; Vahtsevanos, K.; Antoniadis, K.; Kouidou, S.; Markopoulos, A.; Antoniades, D. Salivary mRNA markers having the potential to detect oral squamous cell carcinoma segregated from oral leukoplakia with dysplasia. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016, 43, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singh, P.; Verma, J.K.; Singh, J.K. Validation of Salivary Markers, IL-1β, IL-8 and Lgals3bp for Detection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in an Indian Population. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Val, M.; Sidoti Pinto, G.A.; Manini, L.; Gandolfo, S.; Pentenero, M. Variations of salivary concentration of cytokines and chemokines in presence of oral squamous cell carcinoma. A case-crossover longitudinal prospective study. Cytokine 2019, 120, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aziz, S.; Ahmed, S.S.; Ali, A.; Khan, F.A.; Zulfiqar, G.; Iqbal, J.; Khan, A.A.; Shoaib, M. Salivary immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 and IL-13 are significantly elevated in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Cancer Investig. 2015, 33, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zielińska, K.; Karczmarek-Borowska, B.; Kwaśniak, K.; Czarnik-Kwaśniak, J.; Ludwin, A.; Lewandowski, B.; Tabarkiewicz, J. Salivary IL-17A, IL-17F, and TNF- α Are Associated with Disease Advancement in Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 3928504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Deepthi, G.; Nandan, S.R.K.; Kulkarni, P.G. Salivary tumour necrosis factor-α as a biomarker in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019, 20, 2087–2093. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sabarathinam, J.; Selvaraj, J.; Devi, S. Estimation of levels of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), malondialdehyde (MDA), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) and alpha Feto protein (AFP) in saliva of potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2019, 12, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cai, M.; Zheng, Z.; Bai, Z.; Ouyang, K.; Wu, Q.; Xu, S.; Huang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, L.; Gao, J.; et al. Overexpression of angiogenic factors and matrix metalloproteinases in the saliva of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: Potential non-invasive diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fadhil, R.S.; Wei, M.Q.; Nikolarakos, D.; Good, D.; Nair, R.G. Salivary microRNA miR-let-7a-5p and miR-3928 could be used as potential diagnostic bio-markers for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0221779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gai, C.; Camussi, F.; Broccoletti, R.; Gambino, A.; Cabras, M.; Molinaro, L.; Carossa, S.; Camussi, G.; Arduino, P.G. Salivary extracellular vesicle-associated miRNAs as potential biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, L.; Ping, F.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, C.; Deng, M.; Cheng, B.; Xia, J. Salivary exosomal miR-24-3p serves as a potential detective biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma screening. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 121, 109553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hung, K.F.; Liu, C.J.; Chiu, P.C.; Lin, J.S.; Chang, K.W.; Shih, W.Y.; Kao, S.Y.; Tu, H.F. MicroRNA-31 upregulation predicts increased risk of progression of oral potentially malignant disorder. Oral Oncol. 2016, 53, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zahran, F.; Ghalwash, D.; Shaker, O.; Al-Johani, K.; Scully, C. Salivary microRNAs in oral cancer. Oral Dis. 2015, 21, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mehterov, N.; Vladimirov, B.; Sacconi, A.; Pulito, C.; Rucinski, M.; Blandino, G.; Sarafian, V. Salivary miR-30c-5p as potential biomarker for detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rajaram, S.; Danasekaran, B.P.; Venkatachalapathy, R.; Prashad, K.V.; Rajaram, S. N-acetylneuraminic acid: A scrutinizing tool in oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis. Dent. Res. J. 2017, 14, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ishikawa, S.; Wong, D.T.W.; Sugimoto, M.; Gleber-Netto, F.O.; Li, F.; Tu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Akin, D.; Iino, M. Identification of salivary metabolites for oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral epithelial dysplasia screening from persistent suspicious oral mucosal lesions. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 3557–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jacob, T.; Ramesh, M.; Murali, S.; Ramesh, K.; Sanjay, P.; Abraham, P. A non-invasive study to estimate and compare salivary sialic acid level as tumor marker in patients with pre-cancer and oral cancer. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2016, 12, 634–639. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lohavanichbutr, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Gu, H.; Nagana Gowda, G.A.; Djukovic, D.; Buas, M.F.; Raftery, D.; Chen, C. Salivary metabolite profiling distinguishes patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma from normal controls. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0204249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ueda, S.E.I.; Hashimoto, K.; Miyabe, S.; Hasegawa, S.; Goto, M.; Shimizu, D.A.I.; Oh-Iwa, I.; Shimozato, K.; Nagao, T.; Nomoto, S. Salivary NUS1 and RCN1 levels as biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis. In Vivo 2020, 34, 2353–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bu, J.; Bu, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, F.; Chen, P. Increased expression of tissue/salivary transgelin mRNA predicts poor prognosis in patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) surgery. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015, 21, 2275–2281. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sinevici, N.; Mittermayr, S.; Davey, G.P.; Bones, J.; O’Sullivan, J. Salivary N-glycosylation as a biomarker of oral cancer: A pilot study. Glycobiology 2019, 29, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Azeem, M.; Yesupatham, S.; Mohiyuddin, S.; Sumanth, V.; Ravishankar, S. Usefulness of salivary sialic acid as a tumor marker in tobacco chewers with oral cancer. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2020, 16, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, Q.; Gao, P.; Wang, X.; Duan, Y. Investigation and identification of potential biomarkers in human saliva for the early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Chim. Acta 2014, 427, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bhat, S.; Babu, S.; Bhat, S.; Castelino, R.; Rao, K.; Madi, M. Status of serum and salivary ascorbic acid in oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer. Indian J. Med. Paediatr. Oncol. 2017, 38, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Oh, S.Y.; Kang, S.M.; Kang, S.H.; Lee, H.J.; Kwon, T.G.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, S.T.; Choi, S.Y.; Hong, S.H. Potential salivary mRNA biomarkers for early detection of oral cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, C.I.; Yu, C.J.; Huang, Y.; Yi, J.S.; Cheng, H.W.; Kao, H.K.; Lao, W.W.K.; Chang, K.P. Association of overexpressed karyopherin alpha 2 with poor survival and its contribution to interleukin-1β-induced matrix metalloproteinase expression in oral cancer. Head Neck 2018, 40, 1719–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sharma, M.; Sharma, E.; Prabhu, V.; Pai, V.; D’Souza, J.; Harish, S.; Jose, M. Salivary L-fucose as a biomarker for oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2020, 16, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rathore, A.; Katyal, S.; Jain, A.; Shetty, D. Biochemical analysis of cytokeratin fragment 21-1 concentration and expression of cytokeratin 19 in oral potentially malignant disorders. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2020, 16, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nosratzehi, F.; Nosratzehi, T.; Alijani, E.; Rad, S.S. Salivary β2-microglobulin levels in patients with erosive oral lichen planus and squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shabbir, A.; Waheed, H.; Ahmed, S.; Shaikh, S.S.; Farooqui, W.A. Association of salivary Cathepsin B in different histological grades among patients presenting with oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Oral Health 2022, 22, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nandakumar, A.; Nataraj, P.; James, A.; Krishnan, R.; Mahesh, K.M. Estimation of salivary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a potential biomarker in assessing progression towards malignancy: A case-control studyoxidative. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2020, 21, 2325–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Luo, M.; Chen, H.; Cui, B.; Wang, L.; Lv, D.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, P. Salivary KLK5 and uPA are potential biomarkers for malignant transformation of OLK and OLP. Cancer Biomark. 2021, 31, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Duz, M.B.; Karatas, O.F.; Guzel, E.; Turgut, N.F.; Yilmaz, M.; Creighton, C.J.; Ozen, M. Identification of miR-139-5p as a saliva biomarker for tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A pilot study. Cell. Oncol. 2016, 39, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Malhotra, R.; Urs, A.B.; Chakravarti, A.; Kumar, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Mahajan, B. Correlation of Cyfra 21-1 levels in saliva and serum with CK19 mRNA expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 9263–9271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zanotti, L.; Paderno, A.; Piazza, C.; Pagan, E.; Bignotti, E.; Romani, C.; Bandiera, E.; Calza, S.; Del Bon, F.; Nicolai, P.; et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor detection in serum and saliva as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in oral cancer. Laryngoscope 2017, 127, E408–E414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wu, Y.; Hong, Q.; Lu, F.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Nie, Z.; He, B. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of miR-155 in Cancers: An Updated Meta-analysis. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2023, 27, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jadhav, K.B.; Nagraj, S.K.; Arora, S. miRNA for the assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and metanalysis. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2021, 50, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gholizadeh, N.; Alipanahi Ramandi, M.; Motiee-Langroudi, M.; Jafari, M.; Sharouny, H.; Sheykhbahaei, N. Serum and salivary levels of lactate dehydrogenase in oral squamous cell carcinoma, oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reaction. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Peisker, A.; Raschke, G.F.; Fahmy, M.D.; Guentsch, A.; Roshanghias, K.; Hennings, J.; Schultze-Mosgau, S. Salivary MMP-9 in the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2017, 22, e270–e275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Niklander, S.E.; Crane, H.L.; Darda, L.; Lambert, D.W.; Hunter, K.D. The role of icIL-1RA in keratinocyte senescence and development of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. J. Cell Sci. 2021, 134, jcs252080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, T.; Hong, Y.; Jia, L.; Wu, J.; Xia, J.; Wang, J.; Hu, Q.; Cheng, B. Modulation of IL-1beta reprogrammes the tumor microenvironment to interrupt oral carcinogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, C.H.; Chang, J.S.; Syu, S.H.; Wong, T.S.; Chan, J.Y.; Tang, Y.C.; Yang, Z.P.; Yang, W.C.; Chen, C.T.; Lu, S.C.; et al. IL-1beta promotes malignant transformation and tumor aggressiveness in oral cancer. J. Cell Physiol. 2015, 230, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. St John, M.A.; Dohadwala, M.; Luo, J.; Wang, G.; Lee, G.; Shih, H.; Heinrich, E.; Krysan, K.; Walser, T.; Hazra, S.; et al. Proinflammatory mediators upregulate snail in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 6018–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Dong, G.W.; Do, N.Y.; Lim, S.C. Relation between proinflammatory mediators and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Exp. Ther. Med. 2010, 1, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. St John, M.A. Inflammatory mediators drive metastasis and drug resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2015, 125 (Suppl. 3), S1–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Lee, C.H.; Wong, T.S.; Chan, J.Y.; Lu, S.C.; Lin, P.; Cheng, A.J.; Chen, Y.J.; Chang, J.S.; Hsiao, S.H.; Leu, Y.W.; et al. Epigenetic regulation of the X-linked tumour suppressors BEX1 and LDOC1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Pathol. 2013, 230, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Brinkmann, O.; Kastratovic, D.A.; Dimitrijevic, M.V.; Konstantinovic, V.S.; Jelovac, D.B.; Antic, J.; Nesic, V.S.; Markovic, S.Z.; Martinovic, Z.R.; Akin, D.; et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma detection by salivary biomarkers in a Serbian population. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kamatani, T.; Shiogama, S.; Yoshihama, Y.; Kondo, S.; Shirota, T.; Shintani, S. Interleukin-1 beta in unstimulated whole saliva is a potential biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cytokine 2013, 64, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ishikawa, S.; Ishizawa, K.; Tanaka, A.; Kimura, H.; Kitabatake, K.; Sugano, A.; Edamatsu, K.; Ueda, S.; Iino, M. Identification of salivary proteomic biomarkers for oral cancer screening. In Vivo 2021, 35, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Coppe, J.P.; Patil, C.K.; Rodier, F.; Sun, Y.; Munoz, D.P.; Goldstein, J.; Nelson, P.S.; Desprez, P.Y.; Campisi, J. Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, 2853–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sparmann, A.; Bar-Sagi, D. Ras-induced interleukin-8 expression plays a critical role in tumor growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Cell 2004, 6, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ancrile, B.; Lim, K.H.; Counter, C.M. Oncogenic Ras-induced secretion of IL6 is required for tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1714–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Loaiza, N.; Demaria, M. Cellular senescence and tumor promotion: Is aging the key? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1865, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tsai, M.S.; Chen, W.C.; Lu, C.H.; Chen, M.F. The prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma related to immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment regulated by IL-6 signaling. Oral Oncol. 2019, 91, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Korostoff, A.; Reder, L.; Masood, R.; Sinha, U.K. The role of salivary cytokine biomarkers in tongue cancer invasion and mortality. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 25 02634 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of selected studies.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of selected studies.
Ijms 25 02634 g001
Table 1. Markers studied by 4 or more studies.
Table 1. Markers studied by 4 or more studies.
MarkerFunctionExpressionReferences
LDHDiagnosisIncreased[18,20,22,23,52,74]
TNF-αDiagnosis, prognosisIncreased[32,33,35,40,41,42]
MMP-9Diagnosis, transformationIncreased[13,14,15,75]
IL-8DiagnosisIncreased[32,33,34,35,36,37,38]
IL-1βDiagnosis, prognosisIncreased[33,35,36,37,38]
IL-6Diagnosis
Prognosis		Increased[32,33,34,35,38]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bastías, D.; Maturana, A.; Marín, C.; Martínez, R.; Niklander, S.E. Salivary Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection: An Exploratory Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052634

AMA Style

Bastías D, Maturana A, Marín C, Martínez R, Niklander SE. Salivary Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection: An Exploratory Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(5):2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bastías, Daniel, Alejandro Maturana, Constanza Marín, René Martínez, and Sven Eric Niklander. 2024. "Salivary Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection: An Exploratory Systematic Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 5: 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052634

APA Style

Bastías, D., Maturana, A., Marín, C., Martínez, R., & Niklander, S. E. (2024). Salivary Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection: An Exploratory Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(5), 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop