Integrated Discriminant Evaluation of Molecular Genetic Markers and Genetic Diversity Parameters of Endangered Balearic Dog Breeds
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Intra-Racial Genetic Diversity
2.1.1. Ca de Bestiar (CB)
2.1.2. Ca de Bou (CBOU)
2.1.3. Podenco Ibicenco or Ibicean Hound (PI)
2.1.4. Ca Rater (CR)
2.1.5. Ca Mè (CM)
2.1.6. Ca de Conills (CC)
2.2. Inter-Racial Genetic Diversity
2.3. Critical Factors in the Molecular Differentiation of Endangered Dog Breeds
2.3.1. Canonical Discriminant Analysis
Multicollinearity Evaluation
Model Reliability and Explanatory Potential
Analysis Efficiency
Discriminant Loadings and Spatial Representation
Discriminant Potential
Discriminant Analysis Crossvalidation
2.3.2. CHAID Tree Analysis
Methodology
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Sampling
4.2. Laboratorial Analyses
4.3. Intra-Racial Genetic Diversity
4.4. Inter-Racial Genetic Diversity
4.5. Statistical Analyses
4.5.1. Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA)
CDA Methodology
Canonical Relationship Plotting
Sample Size Consideration
Multicollinearity Analysis
Canonical Correlation Dimension
Discriminant Analysis Efficiency
Discriminant Model Reliability
Canonical Loading Interpretation
Discriminant Function Reliability: Validation and Crossvalidation
4.5.2. Data-Mining CHAID
Decision Tree
Decision Tree Methodology
Decision Tree Reliability: Validation and Crossvalidation
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Navas, F.J. Curso Formación de Jueces Ca de Conills Menorca. In Proceedings of the II Jornada Sobre el Ca de Conill de Menorca, Menorca, Spain, 30 April–1 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Martínez, A.; Vega, J.L.; Delgado, J.V. Caracterización genética de razas de caza: Casos aplicados a Mallorca. Recer. Gestió Dins L’àmbit Cinegèt. Mon. Soc. Hist. Nat. Balear. 2019, 28, 115–117. [Google Scholar]
- Parker, H.G.; Kim, L.V.; Sutter, N.B.; Carlson, S.; Lorentzen, T.D.; Malek, T.B.; Johnson, G.S.; DeFrance, H.B.; Ostrander, E.A.; Kruglyak, L. Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science 2004, 304, 1160–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aguilera, L.; Canales, A.; Pons, A.; Delgado, J.; Martínez, A. Caracterización genética del Ca Rater Mallorquí con microsatélites. Arch. Zootec. 2022, 71, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, N.; Villablanca, F.X.; Roderick, G.K. Determining the source of individuals: Multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Solano-Gallego, L.; Llull, J.; Ramos, G.; Riera, C.; Arboix, M.; Alberola, J.; Ferrer, L. The Ibizian hound presents a predominantly cellular immune response against natural Leishmania infection. Vet. Parasitol. 2000, 90, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daw, E.W.; Heath, S.C.; Lu, Y. Single-nucleotide polymorphism versus microsatellite markers in a combined linkage and segregation analysis of a quantitative trait. BMC Genet. 2005, 6, S32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iglesias Pastrana, C.; Navas González, F.J.; Ruiz Aguilera, M.J.; Dávila García, J.A.; Delgado Bermejo, J.V.; Abelló, M.T. White-naped mangabeys’ viable insurance population within European Zoo Network. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ling, C.; Lixia, W.; Rong, H.; Fujun, S.; Wenping, Z.; Yao, T.; Yaohua, Y.; Bo, Z.; Liang, Z. Comparative analysis of microsatellite and SNP markers for parentage testing in the golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2020, 12, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ball, A.D.; Stapley, J.; Dawson, D.A.; Birkhead, T.R.; Burke, T.; Slate, J. A comparison of SNPs and microsatellites as linkage mapping markers: Lessons from the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Méndez, S.; Dunner, S.; García, J.; de Argüello, S.; Crespo, M.; Chomón, N.; Calderón, L.; Sañudo, B.; Cañón, J. Caracterización del perro de agua del cantábrico. Arch. Zootec. 2011, 60, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaiman, D.; Mercier, D.; Moazami-Goudarzi, K.; Eggen, A.; Ciampolini, R.; Lépingle, A.; Velmala, R.; Kaukinen, J.; Varvio, S.-L.; Martin, P. A set of 99 cattle microsatellites: Characterization, synteny mapping, and polymorphism. Mamm. Genome 1994, 5, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez, M.A.M. Caracterización Genética del Cerdo Ibérico Mediante Marcadores Moleculares; Universidad de Córdoba: Córdoba, Spain, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Cunningham, M. What Is the Difference between Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) and Heterozygosity (H) in Parentage Testing? Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Cunningham-22 (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Dhanapal, A.P. What Is the Difference between Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) and Heterozygosity (H) in Parentage Testing? Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arun-Prabhu-Dhanapal (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Nei, M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 1978, 89, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Official Website of National Institute of Justice of the United States Government. Population Genetics and Statistics for Forensic Analysts. Available online: https://nij.ojp.gov/nij-hosted-online-training-courses/population-genetics-and-statistics-forensic-analysts/population-theory/population-genetics/heterozygosity (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Alvariño Martínez, P. Evaluación de la Diversidad Genética y de Parentesco en Poblaciones de Rubia Gallega (Bos taurus). Master’s Thesis, Universidad de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cañas-Álvarez, J.; González-Rodríguez, A.; Munilla, S.; Varona, L.; Díaz, C.; Baro, J.; Altarriba, J.; Molina, A.; Piedrafita, J. Genetic diversity and divergence among Spanish beef cattle breeds assessed by a bovine high-density SNP chip. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 5164–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perez, M. What Is the Difference between Effective Number of Alleles and Observed Number of Alleles? Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manolo-Perez-3/ (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Leroy, G. Re: What Is the Difference between Effective Number of Alleles and Observed Number of Alleles? Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gregoire-Leroy (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Chybicki, I. How can I Calculate Mean Number of Alleles per Locus (A) and Effective Number of Alleles per Locus (Ae) in Case of Genetic Diversity Analysis? Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/post/How-can-I-calculate-mean-number-of-alleles-per-locus-A-and-effective-number-of-alleles-per-locus-Ae-in-case-of-genetic-diversity-analysis/55ae62535e9d97d3898b463a/citation/download. (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Greenbaum, G.; Templeton, A.R.; Zarmi, Y.; Bar-David, S. Allelic richness following population founding events–a stochastic modeling framework incorporating gene flow and genetic drift. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schober, P.; Boer, C.; Schwarte, L.A. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 2018, 126, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Çiftci, Y.; Okumuş, İ. Fish population genetics and applications of molecular markers to fisheries and aquaculture: I-Basic principles of fish population genetics. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 2, 145–155. [Google Scholar]
- Garrido, J.; Capote, C.B.; Morera, L.; de Andrés Cara, D.F.; Barbancho, M. Detección de variabilidad genética por microsatélites en el alano español. Arch. Zootec. 1999, 48, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
- Abramovs, N.; Brass, A.; Tassabehji, M. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the large scale genomic sequencing era. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waples, R.S. Testing for Hardy–Weinberg Proportions: Have We Lost the Plot? J. Hered. 2014, 106, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San José, C.; Cárcel, M.J.; Tejedor, M.T.; Monteagudo, L.V. Microsatellite DNA markers applied to the classification of the Podenco Valenciano canine breed. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 17, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koskinen, M.; Bredbacka, P. Assessment of the population structure of five Finnish dog breeds with microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 2000, 31, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kardos, M.; Taylor, H.R.; Ellegren, H.; Luikart, G.; Allendorf, F.W. Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild. Evol. Appl. 2016, 9, 1205–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Czyż, K.; Filistowicz, A.; Przysiecki, P.; Vrtková, A.E. Genetic distance between three breeds of dogs based on selected microsatellite sequences. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2016, 34, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
- Dzitsiuk, V.; Kruhlyk, S.; Spyrydonov, V. Genetic Analysis German Shepherd Breed Dogs Using Microsatellite Dna Markers. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2016, 52, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, A.M.; DeGiorgio, M. An unbiased estimator of gene diversity with improved variance for samples containing related and inbred individuals of any ploidy. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2017, 7, 671–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tripp Valdez, M.A. Análisis de la Estructura Poblacional del Dorado en el Noroeste del Paciífico Mexicano. Ph.D. Thesis, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., La Paz, Mexico, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Walsh, P.S.; Metzger, D.A.; Higuchi, R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 1991, 10, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, S.D.E. Trypanotolerance in West African Cattle and the Population Genetic Effects of Selection. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Belkhir, K. GENETIX 4.05, Logiciel sous Windows TM pour la Génétique des Populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000; Université de Montpellier II: Montpellier, France, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeh, F. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg. J. Bot. 1997, 129, 157. [Google Scholar]
- Raymond, M. Population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 1995, 86, 248–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.W.; Thompson, E.A. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 1992, 48, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds, J.; Weir, B.S.; Cockerham, C.C. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: Basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 1983, 105, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langella, O. Populations 1.2. 28 (12/5/2002): A Population Genetic Software; CNRS UPR9034; Laboratoire Populations, Génétique et Évolution: Montpellier, France, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Earl, D.A.; VonHoldt, B.M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Cons. Gen. Res. 2012, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopelman, N.M.; Mayzel, J.; Jakobsson, M.; Rosenberg, N.A.; Mayrose, I. Clumpak: A program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2015, 15, 1179–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alanzor Puente, J.M.; Pons Barro, Á.L.; González Ariza, A.; Martínez Martínez, M.d.A.; Delgado Bermejo, J.V.; Navas González, F.J. Integrated Discriminant Evaluation of Molecular Genetic Markers and Genetic Diversity Parameters of Endangered Balearic Dog Breeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052706
Alanzor Puente JM, Pons Barro ÁL, González Ariza A, Martínez Martínez MdA, Delgado Bermejo JV, Navas González FJ. Integrated Discriminant Evaluation of Molecular Genetic Markers and Genetic Diversity Parameters of Endangered Balearic Dog Breeds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(5):2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052706
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlanzor Puente, José Manuel, Águeda Laura Pons Barro, Antonio González Ariza, María del Amparo Martínez Martínez, Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo, and Francisco Javier Navas González. 2024. "Integrated Discriminant Evaluation of Molecular Genetic Markers and Genetic Diversity Parameters of Endangered Balearic Dog Breeds" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 5: 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052706