Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Diesel Exhaust Particles on Adipose Tissue Mitochondrial Function and Inflammatory Status
Next Article in Special Issue
Liver Diseases: From Bench to Bedside
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of Strong 3-Nitro-2-Phenyl-2H-Chromene Analogues as Antitrypanosomal Agents and Inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi Glucokinase
Previous Article in Special Issue
Serological and Molecular Characterization of Hepatitis C Virus-Related Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis in Patients without Cryoprecipitate
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Exploring Advanced Therapies for Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Insights from the Gut Microbiota–Bile Acid–Immunity Network

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(8), 4321; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084321
by Ziqi Guo 1,†, Kun He 2,†, Ke Pang 1, Daiyu Yang 1, Chengzhen Lyu 2, Haifeng Xu 3,* and Dong Wu 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(8), 4321; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084321
Submission received: 13 March 2024 / Revised: 5 April 2024 / Accepted: 9 April 2024 / Published: 13 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Liver Diseases: From Bench to Bedside)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The review " Exploring Advanced Therapies for Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Insights from the Gut Microbiota-Bile Acid-Immunity Network" is a true trailblazer in the study of the microbiota and brings forth exceptionally important advancements. However, there are several recommendations that would help enhance the quality of the article:

1.       The introduction section should be expanded. Please provide more information regarding the microbiota.

2. The Discussion section needs to be added. It would greatly help to incorporate information regarding treatment - specifically, the potential benefits of microbiota transfer in microbiome regulation - for example: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11112930 - where you can also find information related to tumor pathology, but there are other sources to draw from as well. Additionally, you could discuss microRNAs in digestive tumor pathology and beyond. For example: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11072058. Today, microRNAs provide valuable insights, both through their interaction with specific genes and through the identification of patterns depending on the underlying pathology.

3.      The conclusions need to better incorporate the information from the study.

4.      You can add a section about the materials and methods related to the study selection process.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In their review, the authors provide an overview of the current literature on the latest advances in research into the gut microbiota and bile acids in primary biliary cholangitis. This article discusses potential therapeutic approaches focusing on the regulation of the gut microbiota, maintenance of bile acid homeostasis, their interactions and associated immune factors.

The review is interesting, well conceived and written, and relevant. The manuscript provides a clear rationale for recent advances in the study of the gut microbiota and bile acids in primary biliary cholangitis and explores for the first time the potential of associated immune factors as novel immunotherapy targets. The literature is relevant and up to date.

I have no objections to the main content of the review, it is really well done. My comments and suggestions for improvement are as follows:

1. The abstract is short and should be expanded. The authors should add a few lines on immune factors that could be considered as new immunotherapy targets, as this is a main topic of this article.

2. As this is a review article, authors should add a paragraph about the literature search, stating the keywords used for the analysis, the databases searched, the number of papers identified, the number of papers excluded, the exact date they conducted the literature search, and the initials of the authors involved in this process.

3. Tables – All abbreviations should be explained in the legend of a table. Please revise.

4. The authors indicate that this work was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation. It is unclear why the authors required support as this is a review article. There were no expenses for this study. Please clarify.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have successfully responded to each recommendation individually.

Back to TopTop