Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Tracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Protocol
4.2. Patients
4.3. Procedure Description
4.4. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Siegel, R.L.; Giaquinto, A.N.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 12–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Polish Cancer Registry. Available online: http://onkologia.org.pl (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- Frederick, P.J.; Straugh, J.N., Jr. The role of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with endometrial cancer. Cancer Control 2009, 16, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bodurtha Smith, A.J.; Fader, A.N.; Tanner, E.J. Sentinel lymph node assessment in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 459–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barlin, J.N.; Khoury-Collado, F.; Kim, C.H.; Leitao, M.M., Jr.; Chi, D.S.; Sonoda, Y.; Alektiar, K.; DeLair, D.F.; Barakat, R.R.; Abu-Rustum, N.R. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: Beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012, 125, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruscito, I.; Gasparri, M.L.; Braicu, E.I.; Bellati, F.; Raio, L.; Sehouli, J.; Mueller, M.D.; Panici, P.B.; Papadia, A. Sentinel lymph node mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer: Indocyanine green versus other conventional dyes-A meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 23, 3749–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, E.C.; Kowalski, L.D.; Scalici, J.; Cantrell, L.; Schuler, K.; Hanna, R.K.; Method, M.; Ade, M.; Ivanova, A.; Boggess, J.F. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): A multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buda, A.; Bui, B.; Di Martino, G.; Di Lorenzo, P.; Palazzi, S.; Grassi, T.; Milani, R. Sentinel lymph node mapping with near-infrared fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green: A new tool for laparoscopic platform in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016, 23, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abu-Rustum, N.R. Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: A modern approach to surgical staging. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2014, 12, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thill, M.; Kurylcio, A.; Welter, R.; van Haasteren, V.; Grosse, B.; Berclaz, G.; Polkowski, W.; Hauser, N. The Central-European SentiMag study: Sentinel lymph node biopsy with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) vs. radioisotope. Breast 2014, 23, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Douek, M.; Klaase, J.; Monypenny, I.; Kothari, A.; Zechmeister, K.; Brown, D.; Wyld, L.; Drew, P.; Garmo, H.; Agbaje, O.; et al. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: The SentiMAGMulticentre Trial. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 21, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gunasekera, U.A.; Pankhurst, Q.A.; Douek, M. Imaging applications of nanotechnology in cancer. Target. Oncol. 2009, 4, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, L.; Gunasekera, A.; Douek, M. Applications of nanotechnology in cancer. Discov. Med. 2010, 9, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Winter, A.; Kowald, T.; Paulo, T.S.; Goos, P.; Engels, S.; Gerullis, H.; Schiffmann, J.; Chavan, A.; Wawroschek, F. Magnetic resonance sentinel lymph node imaging and magnetometer-guided intraoperative detection in prostate cancer using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 6689–6698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shiozawa, M.; Lefor, A.T.; Hozumi, Y.; Kurihara, K.; Sata, N.; Yasuda, Y.; Kusakabe, M. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer using superparamagnetic iron oxide and a magnetometer. Breast Cancer 2013, 20, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rubio, I.T.; Diaz-Botero, S.; Esgueva, A.; Rodriguez, R.; Cortadellas, T.; Cordoba, O.; Espinosa-Bravo, M. The superparamagnetic iron oxide is equivalent to the Tc99 radiotracer method for identifying the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 41, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Piñero-Madrona, A.; Torró-Richart, J.A.; de León-Carrillo, J.M.; de Castro-Parga, G.; Navarro-Cecilia, J.; Domínguez-Cunchillos, F.; Román-Santamaría, J.M.; Fuster-Diana, C.; Pardo-García, R.; Grupo de EstudiosSenológicos de la Sociedad Española de PatologiaMamaria (SESPM). Superparamagnetic iron oxide as a tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: A comparative non-inferiority study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 41, 991–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Houpeau, J.L.; Chauvet, M.P.; Guillemin, F.; Bendavid-Athias, C.; Charitansky, H.; Kramar, A.; Giard, S. Sentinel lymph node identification using superparamagnetic iron oxide particles versus radioisotope: The French Sentimag feasibility trial. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 113, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Winter, A.; Engels, S.; Goos, P.; Süykers, M.C.; Gudenkauf, S.; Henke, R.P.; Wawroschek, F. Accuracy of Magnetometer-Guided Sentinel Lymphadenectomy after Intraprostatic Injection of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Prostate Cancer: The SentiMag Pro II Study. Cancers 2019, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Jedryka, M.A.; Klimczak, P.; Kryszpin, M.; Matkowski, R. Superparamagnetic iron oxide: A novel tracer for sentinel lymph node detection in vulvar cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 1280–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Del Valle, D.; Ruiz, R.; Lekuona, A.; Cobas, P.; Jaunarena, I.; Gorostidi, M.; Cespedes, J. Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) for sentinel lymph node detection in vulvar cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2024, 187, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ballester, M.; Dubernard, G.; Lécuru, F.; Heitz, D.; Mathevet, P.; Marret, H.; Querleu, D.; Golfier, F.; Leblanc, E.; Rouzier, R.; et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: A prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011, 12, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Papadia, A.; Gasparri, M.L.; Radan, A.P.; Stämpfli, C.A.L.; Rau, T.T.; Mueller, M.D. Retrospective validation of the laparoscopic ICG SLN mapping in patients with grade 3 endometrial cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 144, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Touhami, O.; Grégoire, J.; Renaud, M.C.; Sebastianelli, A.; Plante, M. Performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 147, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soliman, P.T.; Westin, S.N.; Dioun, S.; Sun, C.C.; Euscher, E.; Munsell, M.F.; Fleming, N.D.; Levenback, C.; Frumovitz, M.; Ramirez, P.T.; et al. A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node mapping for high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 146, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- How, J.; Lau, S.; Press, J.; Ferenczy, A.; Pelmus, M.; Stern, J.; Probst, S.; Brin, S.; Drummond, N.; Gotlieb, W. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node detection following intra-operative cervical injection for endometrial cancer: A prospective study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012, 127, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, E.C. Current state of sentinel lymph nodes for women with endometrial cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2019, 29, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, S.; Podratz, K.C.; Bakkum-Gamez, J.N.; Dowdy, S.C.; Weaver, A.L.; McGree, M.E.; Cliby, W.A.; Keeney, G.L.; Thomas, G.; Mariani, A. Prospective assessment of the prevalence of pelvic, paraaortic and high paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 132, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Multinu, F.; Ducie, J.A.; Eriksson, A.G.Z.; Schlappe, B.A.; Cliby, W.A.; Glaser, G.E.; Grassi, T.; Keeney, G.L.; Weaver, A.L.; Abu-Rustum, N.R.; et al. Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer with nonbulky lymph node metastasis: Comparison of comprehensive surgical staging and sentinel lymph node algorithm. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 55, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murakami, K.; Kotani, Y.; Suzuki, A.; Takaya, H.; Nakai, H.; Matsuki, M.; Sato, T.; Mandai, M.; Matsumura, N. Superparamagnetic iron oxide as a tracer for sentinel lymph node detection in uterine cancer: A pilot study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mueller, J.J.; Abu-Rustum, N.R. Sentinel lymph node biopsy of the endometrium. In Clinical Lymphatic Mapping in Gynecologic Cancers, 2nd ed.; Levenback, C.E., van der Zee, A.G.J., Coleman, R.L., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2022; pp. 99–109. [Google Scholar]
Statistical Analysis | SLN_ALL Count | SLN_PLN Count | SLN_PALN Count | LND Count |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 1634 | 1593 | 2082 | 26 |
Median | 1250 | 1655 | 1379 | 11 |
SD | 1634 | 1250 | 1925 | 25 |
25% centile | 680 | 660 | 860 | 20 |
75% centile | 2020 | 1746 | 3240 | 30 |
Interquartile range | 1340 | 1086 | 2380 | 10 |
Clinicopathological Features | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Metastatic SLN (n) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Metastasis type | MIC | MIC | MIC | MIC | |
Localization | internal iliac right | 1 and 2—common iliac, left; 3—external iliac, left | internal iliac, right | internal iliac, left | |
Metastatic LND (n) | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Metastasis type | 1—MIC; 2—MAC; 3—MIC | MIC | MIC | MIC | MAC |
Localization | 1—external iliac, right; 2—paracaval; 3—aortocaval | 1 and 2—common iliac, left; 3—paracaval | internal iliac, right | 1—internal iliac, left; 2—para-aortic | 1—paracaval; 2—aortocaval |
Tumor type | carcinosarcoma | endometrioid | carcinosarcoma | endometrioid | endometrioid |
Tumor size (mm) | 30 | 53 | 50 | 60 | 45 |
Grading | HG | HG | HG | LG | LG |
Myometrial invasion (superficial) (≤50%) | present | ||||
Myometrial invasion (deep) (>50%) | present | present | present | present | |
LVSI | positive | positive | positive | negative | positive |
Statistical Analysis | Value (%) | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
Sensitivity | 80.0 | 28.3% to 99.4% |
Specificity | 100.0 | 86.7% to 100.0% |
Positive Predictive Value | 100.0 | 39.7% to 100.0% |
Negative Predictive Value | 97.8 | 88.6% to 99.6% |
Accuracy | 98.0 | 85.2% to 99.9% |
Malignancy Rates | per patient (%) | per node (%) |
Malignancy Rate (general) | 16.6 | 2.9 |
Malignancy Detection Rate for SLN | 80.0 | 33.3 |
Study | Patients (n) | Tracer | Sensitivity (%) | Bilateral Detection Rate (%) | Negative Predictive Value (%) | False Negative Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballester et al. [22] | 125 | Blue Dye + Tc99 | 84 | 69 | 97 | 3 |
Rossi et al. [7] | 293 | ICG | 98 | 52 | 98 | 5 |
Papadia et al. [23] | 42 | ICG | 90 | 88 | 97 | 10 |
Touhami et al. [24] | 128 | ICG, Tc99, Blue Dye, Blue Dye + Tc99 | 96 | 74 | 98 | 4 |
Soliman et al. [25] | 101 | ICG, Tc99, Blue Dye, Blue Dye + Tc99 | 95 | 58 | 98 | 5 |
How et al. [26] | 100 | Blue Dye + Tc99 | 89 | 62 | 99 | 8 |
SPIO Study | 30 | SPIO | 80 | 70 | 98 | 16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jedryka, M.A.; Klimczak, P.; Kryszpin, M.; Poprawski, T.; Czekanski, A.; Lepka, P.; Matkowski, R. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Tracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020781
Jedryka MA, Klimczak P, Kryszpin M, Poprawski T, Czekanski A, Lepka P, Matkowski R. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Tracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(2):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020781
Chicago/Turabian StyleJedryka, Marcin A., Piotr Klimczak, Marcin Kryszpin, Tymoteusz Poprawski, Andrzej Czekanski, Piotr Lepka, and Rafał Matkowski. 2025. "Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Tracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 2: 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020781
APA StyleJedryka, M. A., Klimczak, P., Kryszpin, M., Poprawski, T., Czekanski, A., Lepka, P., & Matkowski, R. (2025). Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Tracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(2), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020781