Next Article in Journal
Short Synthesis of Structurally Diverse N-Acylhomoserine Lactone Analogs and Discovery of Novel Quorum Quenchers Against Gram-Negative Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiota and Inflammatory Markers: A Review of Their Interplay, Clinical Implications, and Metabolic Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mining the Candidate Transcription Factors Modulating Tanshinones’ and Phenolic Acids’ Biosynthesis Under Low Nitrogen Stress in Salvia miltiorrhiza

Laboratory for Core Technology of TCM Quality Improvement and Transformation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(4), 1774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041774
Submission received: 12 January 2025 / Revised: 16 February 2025 / Accepted: 17 February 2025 / Published: 19 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Mining valuable genes is helpful to breed high-quality Salvia miltiorrhiza exhibiting efficient nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency. In the present study, transcriptome sequencing was introduced to select the candidate transcription factors (TFs) involved in tanshinones’ (TAs) and phenolic acids’ (PHAs) biosynthesis as well as low nitrogen (LN) stress. In totally, 97.71 Gb clean data was obtained from fifteen sequencing samples and 30,975 unigenes were assembled. Among of them, 27,843 unigenes were successfully annotated. Overall, 8663 differential expression genes (DEGs) were identified, among of which 5034 unigenes were up-regulated, and 3629 unigenes were down-regulated. By enrichment of DEGs together with gene co-expression network construction, 10 candidate TFs including HSFB2b, LBD12, ERF1A, ERF98, LBD25, HSF24, RAM1, HSFA4B, TCP8, and WRKY24 were finally retrieved, which are predicted to participate in modulating TA and PHA biosynthesis under LN stress. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) detection was introduced to further detect the expression profile of candidate TFs under LN stress. These findings offer a valuable resource for in-depth study of TAs ‘and PHAs’ biosynthesis under LN stress in S. miltiorrhiza.

1. Introduction

Salvia miltiorrhiza, also known as red sage or Danshen, is one of the most commonly used herbs in China [1,2]. Tanshinones (TAs) and phenolic acids (PHAs) are the major medicinal metabolites in S. miltiorrhiza, and they are validated to have numerous therapeutic effects such as anti-atherosclerotic, anti-hypertension, anti-osteoporosis and anti-tumor activities [1,2,3,4]. A high-quality germplasm resource of S. miltiorrhiza is scarce due to its overexploitation. Therefore, it is imperative to cultivate premium varieties of S. miltiorrhiza based on modern biotechnology.
The biosynthetic pathways of TAs and PHAs have been basically clarified. TAs are fat-soluble diterpenoids that are produced by two distinct biosynthetic pathways: the mevalonate (MVA) pathway and the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway [5,6,7,8,9]. In the MVA pathway, terpene is biosynthesized from the primary precursor acetyl-CoA to form the intermediate precursor isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP). In the MEP pathway, dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) is synthesized from glycolysis products glyceraldehydyde-3-phosphate and pyruvate through seven catalytic reactions. IPP and DMAPP are catalyzed by geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GGPPS) to form geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). GGPP is subjected to a series of enzymatic reactions, catalyzed by either diterpenoid synthase or cyclase and multiple CYP450s, which ultimately results in the synthesis of the final product of TAs. However, the downstream conversion reaction from ferruginol to tanshinone is still not clear. PHAs are synthesized from phenylpropane and tyrosine pathways [10,11]. In the tyrosine biosynthetic pathway, L-tyrosine is catalyzed to form 3,4-dihydroxyphenolactic acid by two catalyzing enzymes. In the phenylpropane pathway, L-phenylalanine generates 4-coumaroyl-coenzyme A through three catalytic reaction steps. The above two intermediates, 3,4-dihydroxyphenyllactic acid and 4-coumaroyl-coenzyme A, undergo further modification by rosmarinic acid synthetase (RAS) and the P450 enzyme CYP98A14 to produce rosmarinic acid (RA), which is then conversed by several unknown enzymatic reactions to form phenolic acid A and B. Discovering and identifying the candidate transcription factors (TFs) targeting the above rate-limiting enzyme genes in the biosynthetic pathway of TAs and PHAs is beneficial to genetic improvement of S. miltiorrhiza varieties through genetic engineering technology.
Nitrogen nutrition plays a vital role in plant growth, development, yield, and primary and secondary metabolites’ biosynthesis [12,13,14]. The high utilization efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer is beneficial for reducing costs and relieving environmental stress in agricultural production. It has demonstrated that TFs play an irreplaceable role in regulating plant nitrogen uptake, growth, development, yield, etc. Overexpressing OsNRT1.1A can elevate nitrogen utilization efficiency and early flowering [13]. In rice (Oryza sativa L.), OsSNAC1 was identified as an upstream regulator of the nitrate transporter gene OsNRT2.1. which can be up-regulated by OsSNAC1, thereby enhancing nitrogen utilization efficiency, growth and yield [15]. In Atropa belladonna, a bHLH TF was identified to positively regulate the tropane alkaloids’ biosynthesis in response to LN stress [16]. LN stress can also promote sterol and withaferin A biosynthesis in Withania somnifera (L.), of which it is validated to be mediated by a jasmonate-responsive WRKY transcription factor [17]. Therefore, elevating the utilization efficiency of nitrogen is crucial to increase plant yield and promote metabolites’ biosynthesis in production. But this research item is relatively poor in S. miltiorrhiza.
Many TFs not only improve nitrogen uptake but also enhance the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in many plant species. It is verified that under low nitrogen (LN) stress, the BR-responsive transcription factor BZR1 promotes anthocyanin biosynthesis by interacting with PAP1/2 in Arabidopsis thaliana [18]. bHLH130 not only regulates flavonoid and lignin biosynthesis derived from two parallel metabolic pathways but also improves the nitrogen uptake efficiency in apples [19]. However, little studies on how candidate TFs regulate TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis in response to LN stress have been reported in S. miltiorrhiza till now.
Transcriptome sequencing has provided a valid research strategy for efficiently mining candidate genes, and it was also widely used to investigate the expression profiles of a large number of genes and identify potential functional genes in the whole genome of plants [20,21]. Based on the transcriptome database of yam tubers from four developmental stages, the candidate genes involved in post-harvest hardening (PHH) have been mined, of which it offers a valuable research basis for breeding new resistant varieties against PHH [22]. Combining the transcriptomics and metabolomics database, the candidate TFs related to nitrogen uptake have been systematically mined in Tinospora sagittata. This provides many important regulatory genes for breeding new varieties to elevate nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency and improve the medicinal substances’ biosynthesis in T. sagittata [23].
In S. miltiorrhiza, many studies have reported that TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis can be regulated by diverse TFs or by plant growth regulators such as abscisic acid (ABA), methyljasmonic acid (MeJA), and salicylic acid (SA) mediated by certain TFs [24,25,26]. Certain miRNAs, DNA methylation modification, and protein phosphorylation have also been validated to effectively regulate TAs’ biosynthesis [27,28]. Mining valid genes to breed high-quality S. miltiorrhiza exhibiting efficient nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency is a valuable research item in production, but this work is poor. In the present study, high throughput sequencing technology was employed to examine differential expression TFs in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots in response to LN stress. Gene co-expression analysis and qRT-PCR detection were independently introduced to mine the candidate TFs related to TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis under LN stress in S. miltiorrhiza. It lays the research foundation to dissect the molecular regulatory network of candidate TFs to improve nitrogen uptake and medicinal substances’ biosynthesis, of which it is also beneficial to cultivate new germplasm resources of S. miltiorrhiza through genetic engineering manipulation.

2. Results

2.1. LN Stress Decreases TAs and PHAs Accumulation

To investigate whether nitrogen affects the accumulation of TAs and PHAs, S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots were induced with LN stress. The results demonstrated that compared with the Mock, tanshinones (DT, CT, and TIIA) and total of tanshinones (TT) decreased after exposure to 7d of LN stress, while RA and total of phenolic acids (TPA) also exhibited a decreasing trend (Figure 1). In conclusion, LN stress inhibits the accumulation of TAs and PHAs in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots.

2.2. Transcriptome Sequencing and De Novo Assembly

To further mine the candidate transcription factors (TFs) involved in TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis under LN stress, transcriptome sequencing was employed to select DEGs in the hairy roots of S. miltiorrhiza after the induction of LN stress. A total of 97.71 Gb of clean data was obtained. Among this, the amount of clean data of each sample was more than 6.03 Gb and the average GC content was 48.72% (Table 1). After filtering adapter sequences, low quality, and short reads, an average of 6.51 Gb of clean reads was obtained and assembled using the Trinity software (version 2.2.3) to generate 30,975 unigenes (Table S1). The clean reads of each sample were all aligned with the reference genome of S. miltiorrhiza, with the alignment rates ranging from 91.6% to 93.13% (Table S2). The coverage of sequencing and length distribution of transcripts indicate that the quality of transcriptome sequencing is fulfilled with data mining (Figure S1a,b). Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed for further evaluating data stability, by which it exhibited stable reproducibility for the biological replicates (Figure S1c).

2.3. Functional Annotation and Classification of Unigenes

To predict the underlying function of all unigenes, 27,843 out of 30,975 unigenes (89.89%) were functionally annotated through blasting the six public protein databases. Of these, 27,815 (89.8%) unigenes in NR, 20,304 (65.55%) unigenes in GO, 23,470 (75.77%) unigenes in EggNOG, 21,980 (70.96%) unigenes in pfam, 21,141 (68.25%) unigenes in Swiss-Prot, and 11,071 (35.74%) unigenes in KEGG databases were annotated, respectively (Figure 2). GO enrichment comprises three categories: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF), which were further subgrouped into 40 subcategories in level 2 GO term annotation. In the BP GO category, cellular processes accounted for the largest proportion, followed by metabolic processes, biological regulation, and response to stimulus. In the CC GO category, cellular anatomical entities followed by protein-containing complexes were the most enriched subcategories. In the MF GO category, binding was the highest represented category followed by catalytic activity and transporter activity (Figure S2a). To further explore the potential function of unigenes in S. miltiorrhiza, all the assembled unigenes were mapped against the KEGG database, which resulted in the identification of 20 main metabolic pathways (Figure S2b). Among them, carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, and metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides were the four most represented pathways.

2.4. Differential Expression Gene and Enrichment Analysis

The normalized expression values of Transcripts Per Million mapped reads (TPM) of each unigene were calculated, and the fold change between the Mock (0 h) and induction groups (induced time points at 1, 4, 12, and 48 h, respectively) > 2-fold and p-adjust < 0.05 was set as the cutoff to choose the DEGs. Overall, 8663 DEGs were identified, among which 5034 unigenes were up-regulated, and 3629 unigenes were down-regulated (Table S3). In total, 1138 unigenes were labeled as DEGs at each induced time point vs. the Mock (Figure 3a). It is noteworthy that the largest number of DEGs was observed under the treatment of LN stress for 1 h vs. 0 h, with a total of 5000 genes identified as DEGs (Figure 3b). GO enrichment analysis was performed to annotate the DEGs. In the cellular component (CC) category, the extracellular region and apoplast were the most enriched subcategories. In the molecular function (MF) category, the enrichment of oxidoreductase activity was the highest, followed by tetrapyrrole binding, heme binding, and oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation of or reduction in molecular oxygen. In the biological process (BP) category, DNA integration, phenylpropanoid metabolic process, secondary metabolic process, phenylpropanoid biosynthetic process, isoprenoid biosynthetic process, and secondary metabolite biosynthetic process were the abundant enrichments (Figure 4a, Table S4). KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that nitrogen metabolism and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were the most significantly enriched pathways, followed by biosynthesis of various plant secondary metabolites and terpenoid backbone biosynthesis (Figure 4b, Table S5). As two pathways of terpenoid backbone biosynthesis and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis are related to TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis, this indicates that LN might regulate TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis.

2.5. Differential Expression Genes Involved in TAs’ and PHAs’ Biosynthetic Pathway

Based on the transcriptome dataset, 38 unigenes encoding 24 synthetase genes involved in TAs’ biosynthetic pathway were found to show significant differential expression between the LN group and the Mock (0 h). Among them, 12 unigenes encoding SmHMGS, SmHMGR2, SmDXS1, SmDXR, SmGGPPS1, SmCPS1, SmKSL1, SmCYP76AH1, SmCYP76AH3, SmCYP71D373, and SmCYP71D375 were significantly up-regulated, whereas only 2 unigenes encoding SmCYP76AK1 and Sm2OGD3 exhibited a down-regulated expression pattern (Figure 5a, Table S6). In PHAs’ biosynthetic pathway, a total of 26 unigenes encoding 7 synthetase genes displayed differential expression, among which Sm4CL2, SmRAS1, SmHPPR1, and SmTAT1 were all up-regulated, while SmTAT1 had the highest induced expression level under the LN treatment and peaked at 1 h induction with a 2.57-fold increase compared to the Mock (Figure 5b, Table S7).

2.6. Differential Expression Profile of TF Family

To explore candidate TFs that regulate TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis under the induction of LN, a total of 1551 unigenes encoding putative TFs in the S. miltiorrhiza transcriptome were annotated and further divided into 48 TF families, among which MYB families had the largest number, followed by ERF, MYB-related, bHLH, and HB TF families (Figure 5c). By DEG analysis, a total of 571 of 1551 TF unigenes were found to be differentially expressed between LN-induced groups (1, 4, 12, and 48 h) and the Mock (0 h). Among them, 325 TF unigenes were significantly up-regulated (Table S8), of which the ERF family represents the largest group, followed by WRKY, bHLH, MYB, and NAC families (Figure S3a). Among the down-regulated expressed TFs, the MYB family members achieved the largest number, followed by the MYB-related and ERF families (Figure S3b).

2.7. Transcription Factors Involved in LN Stress

By DEG analysis, 14 genes including Fd-GOGAT (ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase, Fd-GOGAT) [29], GS1.1 (glutamine synthetase 1.1, GS1.1), GS1.2 (glutamine synthetase 1.2, GS1.2), GS1.3 (glutamine synthetase 1.3, GS1.3), GS1.4 (glutamine synthetase 1.4, GS1.4), AMT1.1 (ammonium transporter 1.1, AMT1.1), NiR (nitrite reductase, NiR), NR (nitrate reductase, NR), NRT2.1 (nitrate transporter 2.1, NRT2.1), NRT2.7 (nitrate transporter 2.7, NRT2.7), NRT2.5 (nitrate transporter 2.5, NRT2.5), NRT1.1 (peptide transporter family/nitrate transporter 1.1, NRT1.1), NPF4.6 (peptide transporter family 4.6, as known as NRT1.2), and NRT3.1 (nitrate transporter 3.1, NRT3.1, as known as NAR) related to nitrogen uptake were mined. Among them, seven of fourteen were up-regulated, while four members were drastically down-regulated (Figure 6a, Table S9). To explore the candidate TFs involved in LN stress, a gene co-expression network was constructed using 325 up-regulated DEGs encoding putative TFs and the above 11 genes associated with nitrogen uptake. The nodes of the network were gene combinations with Pearson correlation coefficients > 0.90. The co-expression network contained 38 nodes and 49 links. All pairs of TFs were positively correlated with nine of the fourteen genes involved in nitrogen uptake (Figure 6b, Table S10). Among the 38 positively correlated TFs, WRKY33 (SMILT020775.1) had the highest relatedness, with the correlation coefficient reaching 0.98, followed by MYB73 (SMILT006582.1), WRKY6 (SMILT015803.1), MYB gene (SMILT006577.1), and WRKY72 (SMILT024196.1), with A. thaliana or other medicinal plants named as the reference [30,31,32].

2.8. Transcription Factors Involved in TAs’ and PHAs’ Biosynthesis

To select the candidate TFs participating in TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis, 325 up-regulated DEGs encoding putative TFs and the biosynthetic genes of TAs and PHAs were employed to construct the gene co-expression network. The Pearson correlation coefficient was set > 0.9 and p-adjust < 0.05 as the cutoff to choose the candidate gene combinations in the nodes of each network. The network of TFs’ and TAs’ biosynthetic genes contained 27 nodes and 37 connections, with SMILT009014.1 (ERF1A) achieving the highest correlation coefficient of 0.975 with TAs’ biosynthetic genes, followed by SMILT012407.1 (RAM1), SMILT008268.1 (ERF98), and SMILT014859.1 (HSFA4b). Of these, their correlation coefficients were all more than 0.95 (Figure 7a, Table S11). Nevertheless, 12 nodes and 12 connections were found in the gene co-expression network of TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthetic genes (Figure 7b, Table S12). The above result implies that the selected 39 TFs may play an important role in modulating TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza.

2.9. Mining the Candidate TFs Modulating TAs’ and PHAs’ Biosynthesis Under LN Stress

To screen candidate TFs that can simultaneously regulate medicinal substances’ biosynthesis and intensively correspond to LN induction in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots, 39 candidate TFs that regulate TAs’ or PHAs’ biosynthesis were intermingled with 38 candidate TFs that are predicted to regulate nitrogen uptake. Eventually, 10 candidate TFs were crosslinked, including HSFB2b (SMILT000752.1), LBD12 (SMILT004403.1), ERF1A (SMILT009014.1), ERF98 (SMILT008268.1), LBD25 (SMILT008917.1), HSF24 (SMILT012063.1), RAM1 (SMILT012407.1), HSFA4B (SMILT014859.1), TCP8 (SMILT019331.1), and WRKY24 (SMILT020775.1).

2.10. Validation of Differential Expressed TFs by qRT-PCR Detection

qRT-PCR detection was introduced to verify the differentially expressed TFs obtained by the transcriptome dataset. Six TFs including HSFB2b (SMILT000752.1), LBD12 (SMILT004403.1), ERF1A (SMILT009014.1), HSF24 (SMILT012063.1), HSFA4B (SMILT014859.1), and WRKY24 (SMILT020775.1) possibly modulating TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis under LN induction were chosen for qRT-PCR detection. As shown in Figure 8, the expression pattern of the six TFs detected by qRT-PCR was consistent with those data obtained by transcriptome dataset (Table S13). Through correlation analysis, a nice coherence between the two datasets was observed, with the correlation coefficient ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 (Figure S4). Thus, it is implied that the transcriptome is credible for mining the candidate TFs related to TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis in response to LN induction.

3. Discussion

Nitrogen, as an essential nutrient element, exerts its irreplaceable function in modulating plant growth and development, even affecting quality and yield [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. How to improve the utilization efficiency of nitrogen has positive significance for green and efficient production of S. miltiorrhiza. However, this research item is relatively poor in S. miltiorrhiza. To efficiently mine the candidate transcription factors involved in TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis in response to LN stress in S. miltiorrhiza, the high throughput sequencing technique was introduced to mine the candidate TFs between the induced groups (1, 4, 12, and 48 h) and the Mock (0 h). In total, 571 TFs were first chosen from the transcriptome dataset of S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots, and the number of up-regulated TFs (325) was more than the TFs exhibiting a down-regulation pattern (246) (Table S8).
Co-expression network analysis of gene combinations is thought to be a reliable strategy to mine the candidate TFs in many plant species [42,43,44]. Through co-expression association analysis, 15 Dof genes were validated to co-express with 7 PHA biosynthetic genes, and 15 other Dofs were dissected to exhibit a co-expression relationship with 6 TA biosynthetic genes in S. miltiorrhiza [45]. In Perilla frutescens, in order to mine the candidate TFs involved in modulating terpene synthesis, several PfTPS genes were employed to construct a co-expression network with up-regulated TFs in the transcriptome dataset [46]. Therefore, in this study, through co-expression analysis, 39 TFs were verified to co-express with TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthetic genes. Among them, two TFs including MYB62 (SMILT001326.1) and NAC2 (SMILT023575.1) were previously reported to regulate TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis by genetic transformation and biological experimental validation in S. miltiorrhiza [47,48]. It is noteworthy that nine TFs including WRI2 (SMILT003037.1), LBD25 (SMILT008917.1), ERF20 (SMILT009843.1), RAM1 (SMILT012407.1), RHL1 (SMILT015592.1), CRF3 (SMILT023065.1), ERF61 (SMILT027065.1), HSFB3 (SMILT028923.1) and RSL4 (SMILT032163.1) are newly identified and their biological functions are unclear. Through sequence similarity alignment, five TFs including MYB62 (SMILT001326.1), WRKY75 (SMILT004863.1), MYB20 (SMILT005518.1), TCP8 (SMILT019331.1) and MYB82 (SMILT010193.1) were identified to share a high sequence homology with A. thaliana and other medicinal herbs, of which their functions were validated to regulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [49,50,51,52,53,54]. In A. thaliana, AtMYB6-overexpressing plants exhibited a characteristic of a gibberellic acid (GA)-deficient phenotype, which was partially reversible through exogenous GA application. In AtMYB62-overexpressing plants, the expression of several phosphonium ion (Pi) starvation-induced (PSI) genes was suppressed, leading to a decrease in total Pi content in shoots [49,50]. AtMYB20 was validated to negatively regulate the expression of the type 2C serine/threonine protein phosphatase gene to enhance salt tolerance [51]. Moreover, AtTCP8 was revealed to directly bind to and activate the promoters of key transcriptional regulators BZR1 and BZR2/BES1 involved in brassinolide (BR) signaling, thereby improving Pi uptake in the A. thaliana plant [52]. HlWRKY1, as a lupulin gland-specific transcription factor and exhibiting high sequence similarity with AtWRKY75 of A. thaliana, could activate the set of promoters driving the genes involved in anthohumol and bitter acids’ biosynthesis in Humulus lupulus L., such as chalcone synthase H1, valerophenone synthase, prenyltransferase 1, 1L and 2 and O-methyltransferase-1 [53]. The expression of MYB82 was suppressed by overexpression of miR828 in Brassica rapa plants, and the anthocyanin content as well as the transcript levels of genes related to anthocyanin biosynthesis were decreased, of which the genes include PAL, CHS, CHI, F3H, F3′H, DFR, and LDOX [54]. The above studies provide a valuable reference to dissect the underlying biological function of the 39 selected TFs in future research.
In rice, overexpression of ammonium transporter (AMT) genes (AMT1 and AMT2) and glutamine synthetase (GS) genes (GS1 and GS2) can improve ammonium absorption efficiency and boost grain yield [41]. NRT1 and NRT2, as the two dominant transport protein families, are mainly responsible for nitrate uptake [55]. Ammonium nitrogen (NH4+) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3) are the main forms of nitrogen uptake by plants from soil. Nitrate absorbed by plant roots can be reduced to ammonium by nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite reductase (NiR), by which the ammonium nitrogen is further assimilated through the GS/GOGAT cycle and then participates in the plant proteins’ biosynthesis [56]. The poplar transcription factor PdGNC has been demonstrated to regulate nitrogen use efficiency by regulating the expression of several genes involved in nitrogen uptake, including PdNRT1, PdNRT2.4b, PdNiR, and PdGS [57]. In the present study, to mine the candidate TFs in response to LN stress, nine marked genes including Fd-GOGAT, NRT2.5, NRT1.1, GS1.1, NiR, NRT3.1, GS1.3, NRT2.7, and AMT1.1, playing vital roles in nitrogen uptake, were employed as the bait to construct the co-expression network with 375 up-regulated TFs. In total, 38 TFs were validated to co-express with the above 9 genes related to nitrogen uptake, with the correlation coefficient >0.9 as the cutoff (Figure 6b, Table S10). Among of the 38 TFs, 21 members were annotated as the WRKY, MYB, bHLH, and AP2-EREBP families, and this number is larger than other TF families (Figure 6). As reported in A. thaliana, through the network of a one-hybrid yeast network for nitrogen-associated metabolism (YNM) and experimental validation, MYB73, TCP8, LBD4, and TGA3 were uncovered to be capable of binding to the promoters of genes involved in more than one nitrogen-associated metabolism and growth process [58]. With high sequence similarity with the above four TFs in A. thaliana, in present study, the four retrieved TFs including MYB73 (SMILT006582.1), TCP8 (SMILT019331.1), LBD4 (SMILT021236.1), and TGA3 (SMILT027373.1) might play similar functions in S. mitiorrhiza.
By integrating the 39 selected TFs that were predicted to regulate TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis and 38 TFs involved in nitrogen uptake, in total, 10 TFs that might not only regulate TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis but also promote nitrogen uptake were obtained. qRT-PCR detection was further introduced to examine the expression profiles of the above six TFs exhibiting the highest correlation coefficient compared to the four other TFs. It was found that the six TFs were all intensively induced by LN stress, of which we obtained a nice collinear relationship with the RNA-seq dataset. Among the 10 retrieved TFs, there were 3 members annotated as the HSF family, 2 in the AP2/EREBP family, and 2 in the LBD family, and the remaining 3 members were in the GRAS, TCP, and WRKY families, respectively. Among them, ERF1A (SMILT009014.1), HSF24 (SMILT012063.1), and ERF98 (SMILT008268.1) have been reported to be associated with salt stress in A. thaliana and other medicinal herbs [59,60,61]. OsLBD37/38/39, belonging to the LBD family, were recognized as key TFs involved in regulating nitrate uptake in O. sativa L. [62]. Sharing the highly homologous sequence with the mining RAM1 (SMILT012407.1) gene, in Medicago, the GRAS family member RAM1 has been demonstrated to be induced by the phosphate starvation response 2 (PHR2) gene related to phosphorus signaling [63]. With high sequence homology to the obtained WRKY24 (SMILT020775.1), AtWRKY33 has been demonstrated to interact with PHR1 to elevate the expression of the DFR gene under phosphorus deficiency, thereby enhancing anthocyanin accumulation in A. thaliana [64]. Low phosphorus stress has also been validated to induce the expression of AtWRKY75 in A. thaliana [65]. In Vitis vinifera L., LN stress can regulate the secondary metabolites’ biosynthesis, including terpenes and phenylpropanoids [66]. As the two most important nutrient elements, nitrogen and phosphorus balance with each other to promote plant growth and development [67,68]. Therefore, it would be an interesting research item to uncover the underlying molecular mechanism of how the 10 retrieved TFs participate in plant nutrient uptake and metabolites’ biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza.
In summary, the present study has mined not only potential TFs related to TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis but also candidate TFs involved in LN stress. The expression profiles of six candidate TFs induced by LN stress were further detected by qRT-PCR. This work provides effective data for dissecting the underlying molecular mechanism of how candidate TFs regulate TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis under the induction of LN and for breeding a new variety with excellent nitrogen utilization efficiency.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Stress Treatment

Each 1 g of S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots was added to 9 conical flasks containing 100 mL of 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) liquid medium, respectively. The flasks were then cultivated in a shaker at 25 °C and 120 rpm for a duration of 40 d. The hairy roots with primary culture were collected, washed with sterilized water, and blotted dry using sterilized paper. Three bottles of hairy roots were set as a biological replicate group (Figure S5). All 9 bottles of hairy roots were transferred to 1/2MS liquid basal medium containing one-twenty of the NO3 compared to the normal usage. Half of the hairy roots at 0, 1, 4, 12, and 48 h time intervals were individually collected, while the other half of the samples were gathered after another induction period of 7 d [15]. All the collected hairy roots were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently stored at −80 °C for further detection of the gene expression and tanshinone and phenolic acid contents with three technical replicates.

4.2. Measuring the TA and PHA Content

Hairy roots were dried in an oven and ground into a fine powder with a mortar and pestle. Each 50 mg of powder sample was subjected to extraction of TAs using 15 mL of methanol/dichloromethane (3:1, v/v), sonicated for 1 h (KunshanKQ-500B, Kunshan UL transonic instruments, Kunshan, China), and centrifuged at 25 °C to obtain the supernatant extract. The primary extract was then evaporated with a rotary evaporator to obtain dry extract powder, dissolved in 2 mL of methanol and filtered by a 0.22 µm 3M membrane. Then, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was introduced to measure the TA content including dihydrotanshinone (DT), cryptotanshinone (CT), tanshinone I (TI), tanshinone IIA (TIIA), and total of tanshinones (TT). The column oven temperature was 20 °C and the detection wavelength was set at 270 nm [26].
To quantify the PHA content consisting of caffeic acid (CA), rosmarinic acid (RA), salvianolic acid (SalB) and total of phenolic acid (TPA) by HPLC, about 50 mg of plant powder was weighed, put into a 2 mL centrifuge tube, and then subjected to ultrasound with 2 mL of 80% methanol for 1 h (KunshanKQ-500B, Kunshan UL transonic instruments, Kunshan, China). The solution was centrifuged with 5000× rpm for 2 min to obtain the supernatant (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, NY, USA) and then filtered with a 0.22 µm filter membrane to obtain the PHA extract to conduct HPLC detection with a column oven temperature of 35℃ and a detection wavelength of 281 nm [26].

4.3. RNA Isolation, cDNA Library Preparation, and Sequencing

Total RNA from 15 hairy root samples was independently extracted using QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) as described previously. The concentration and purity of the obtained RNA were examined by Nanodrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The integrity of the extracted RNA was monitored using agarose gel electrophoresis analysis. By using magnetic beads with Oligo (dT) to match with the ployA tail, the mRNA was further purified from total RNA. In total, 1 µg of total purified mRNA was introduced to conduct transcriptome library construction and sequencing with the Illumina NovaSeq X Plus platform. All the transcriptome sequencing datasets were deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive held by the Beijing Institute of Genomics Data Center (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/), Chinese Academy of Sciences, for preparing the cDNA library, as described previously [69].

4.4. Data Filtering and De Novo Assembly

After transcriptome sequencing, the adapter sequences, repeated, and low-quality reads were filtered to obtain clean reads and a high-quality RNA-sequencing dataset of S. miltiorrhiza. On the basis of the existing reference genome [70], mapped reads were assembled and spliced using the Cufflinks software (https://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/cufflinks/, accessed on 3 July 2024) [71] and StringTie (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/, accessed on 3 July 2024) [72].

4.5. Functional Annotation and Classification

Diamond and HMMER were employed to search for assembled transcripts in six public databases of NR, GO, KEGG, Pfam, EggNOG, and Swiss-Prot with an E-value of 1 × 10−5 as the cutoff. Annotations of DEGs with the highest hit rate were gathered to form an annotation list (Supplementary Table S3).

4.6. Enrichment of Differentially Expressed Genes

To explore differential expression genes (DEGs) between the Mock (0 h) and each induced group (1, 4, 12 and 48 h), the expression level of each transcript was calculated by the Transcripts Per Million mapped reads (TPM) method. The RSEM software, version 1.3.3, was introduced to quantify gene abundances [73]. Essentially, DEGs were mined using DESeq2, version 1.24.0, with |log2FC| ≥ 1 and p-adjust < 0.05 (DESeq2) as the cutoff [74]. Moreover, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed to identify DEGs at the Bonferroni-corrected p-value < 0.05 compared with the whole-transcriptome background by the Goatools (version 0.6.5) and Python (version 3.10) scipy software, respectively.

4.7. Co-Expression Analysis

For the DEG assay, TPM values were used to normalize the gene expression levels. Statistical comparison of TPM values between the Mock and each treatment group was conducted using the Bowtie2 software (version 2.4.1). Statistical analysis was examined using the FDR method with the corrected p-value of 0.05 as the selected threshold. The co-expression network between the candidate biosynthetic enzyme genes involved in TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis and nitrogen uptake genes was constructed with the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) method. Co-expression correlation was defined with p-adjust < 0.05. The heat map was generated by the TBtools software (version 2.056).

4.8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Detection

Primer pairs for qRT-PCR detection were designed by Primer 5.0 using the unigene sequences obtained in this study. First-strand cDNA was generated from 100 ng of total RNA using a reverse transcriptase (Vazymes, Nanjing, China). The cDNA was diluted 10-fold. Real-time PCR was conducted using the 2×Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazymes). The gene expression level was normalized to the control gene of SmActin by the 2−ΔΔCT method. The data presented represent the mean of three independent biological replicate samples.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, a transcriptome sequencing database derived from 15 S. miltiorrhiza hairy root samples together with gene co-expression analysis was employed to mine candidate TFs modulating TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis under LN stress. In total, 10 TFs including HSFB2b, LBD12, ERF1A, ERF98, LBD25, HSF24, RAM1, HSFA4B, TCP8, and WRKY24 were retrieved and qRT-PCR analysis was introduced to further validate the expression profile of candidate TFs under LN stress. This study lays a research foundation to dissect, in-depth, the molecular regulatory network of candidate TFs to improve nitrogen utilization efficiency and medicinal substances’ biosynthesis, of which it is helpful to breed new S. miltiorrhiza germplasm resources through genetic engineering manipulation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26041774/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z. and G.K.; data curation, Y.C., S.G., X.L., C.Z., Y.S. and S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C. and W.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.C., W.Z. and G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fund (82361168637, 82373979) and the Zhejiang Natural Science Fund (LZ24H280002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the great experimental support from the public platform of the medical research center, academy of Chinese medical science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TAsTanshinones
PHAsPhenolic acids
MVAMevalonate
MEP2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate
IPPIsopentenyl diphosphate
DMAPPDimethylallyl diphosphate
IDIIso-pentenyl diphosphate isomerase
GGPPSGeranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase
GGPPGeranylgeranyl pyrophosphate
RASRosmarinic acid synthetase
RARosmarinic acid
CYP98A14Cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase
TFTranscription factor
PHHPost-harvest hardening
DEGDifferential expression gene
qRT-PCRQuantitative real-time PCR
DTDihydrotanshinone
CTCryptotanshinone
TIIATanshinone IIA
TTTotal tanshinones
SmSalvia miltiorrhiza
TPATotal of phenolic acids
CACaffeic acid
SalBSalvianolic acid B
PCAPrincipal component analysis
BPBiological process
CCCellular component
MFMolecular function
TPMTranscripts Per Million
AMTAmmonium transporter
GSGlutamine synthetase
NRNitrate reductase
NiRNitrite reductase
GCNGeneral control non-derepressible
MSMurashige and Skoog
HPLCHigh-performance liquid chromatography
WGCNAWeighted gene co-expression network analysis

References

  1. Li, Z.M.; Xu, S.W.; Liu, P.Q. Salvia miltiorrhiza Burge (Danshen): A golden herbal medicine in cardiovascular therapeutics. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018, 39, 802–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Xue, L.; Severino, R.P.; Gao, S.; Niu, J.; Qin, L.P.; Zhang, D.; Brömme, D. Salvia miltiorrhiza: An ancient Chinese herbal medicine as a source for anti-osteoporotic drugs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 155, 1401–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dong, Y.; Morris-Natschke, S.L.; Lee, K.H. Biosynthesis, total syntheses, and antitumor activity of tanshinones and their analogs as potential therapeutic agents. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, T.H.; Hsieh, C.L. Pharmacological effects of Salvia miltiorrhiza (Danshen) on cerebral infarction. Chin. Med. 2010, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vranová, E.; Coman, D.; Gruissem, W. Network analysis of the MVA and MEP pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Phillips, M.A.; León, P.; Boronat, A.; Rodríguez-Concepción, M. The plastidial MEP pathway: Unified nomenclature and resources. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frank, A.; Groll, M. The methylerythritol phosphate pathway to isoprenoids. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 5675–5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Banerjee, A.; Sharkey, T.D. Methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway metabolic regulation. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bergman, M.E.; Davis, B.; Phillips, M.A. Medically useful plant terpenoids: Biosynthesis, occurrence, and mechanism of action. Molecules 2019, 24, 3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, B.; Sun, W.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Luo, H.; Song, J.; Sun, C.; Qian, J.; Zhu, Y.; Hayward, A.; et al. Genome-wide identification of phenolic acid biosynthetic genes in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Planta 2015, 241, 711–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, M.; Huang, F.; Deng, C.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G. Bioactivities, biosynthesis and biotechnological production of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 953–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alami, M.M.; Guo, S.; Mei, Z.; Yang, G.; Wang, X. Environmental factors on secondary metabolism in medicinal plants: Exploring accelerating factors. Med. Plant Biol. 2024, 3, e016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, W.; Hu, B.; Yuan, D.; Liu, Y.; Che, R.; Hu, Y.; Ou, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, H.; et al. Expression of the nitrate transporter gene OsNRT1.1A/OsNPF6.3 confers high yield and early maturation in rice. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 638–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jing, Y.; Shen, C.; Li, W.; Peng, L.; Hu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Teng, W.; Tong, Y.; He, X. TaLBD41 interacts with TaNAC2 to regulate nitrogen uptake and metabolism in response to nitrate availability. New Phytol. 2024, 242, 641–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qi, J.; Yu, L.; Ding, J.; Ji, C.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Ding, G.; Shi, L.; Xu, F.; Cai, H. Transcription factor OsSNAC1 positively regulates nitrate transporter gene expression in rice. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2923–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gou, Y.; Jing, Y.; Song, J.; Nagdy, M.M.; Peng, C.; Zeng, L.; Chen, M.; Lan, X.; Htun, Z.L.; Liao, Z.; et al. A novel bHLH gene responsive to low nitrogen positively regulates the biosynthesis of medicinal tropane alkaloids in Atropa belladonna. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pal, S.; Yadav, A.K.; Singh, A.K.; Rastogi, S.; Gupta, M.M.; Verma, R.K.; Nagegowda, D.A.; Pal, A.; Shasany, A.K. Nitrogen treatment enhances sterols and withaferin A through transcriptional activation of jasmonate pathway, WRKY transcription factors, and biosynthesis genes in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.H.; Park, T.K.; Kim, Y.P.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, T.W. Transcription factors BZR1 and PAP1 cooperate to promote anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis shoots. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 3654–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Chai, X.; Gao, B.; Deng, C.; Günther, C.S.; Wu, T.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Han, Z.; Wang, Y. Multi-omics analysis reveals the mechanism of bHLH130 responding to low-nitrogen stress of apple rootstock. Plant Physiol. 2023, 191, 1305–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuan, L.; Pan, K.; Li, Y.; Yi, B.; Gao, B. Comparative transcriptome analysis of Alpinia oxyphylla Miq. reveals tissue-specific expression of flavonoid biosynthesis genes. BMC Genom. Data 2021, 22, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiong, W.; Zhang, J.; Lan, T.; Kong, W.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Chen, X.; Mo, B. High resolution RNA-seq profiling of genes encoding ribosomal proteins across different organs and developmental stages in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Direct 2021, 5, e00320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Siadjeu, C.; Mayland-Quellhorst, E.; Pande, S.; Laubinger, S.; Albach, D.C. Transcriptome sequence reveals candidate genes involving in the post-harvest hardening of trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum. Plants 2021, 10, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alami, M.M.; Shu, S.; Liu, S.; Alami, M.J.; Feng, S.; Mei, Z.; Yang, G.; Wang, X. Impact of nitrogen rates on biosynthesis pathways: A comparative study of diterpene synthases in clerodane diterpenoids and enzymes in benzylisoquinoline alkaloids. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 280, 135985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dong, J.; Wan, G.; Liang, Z. Accumulation of salicylic acid-induced phenolic compounds and raised activities of secondary metabolic and antioxidative enzymes in Salvia miltiorrhiza cell culture. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 148, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shi, M.; Hua, Q.; Kai, G. Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis in response to abscisic acid in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2021, 147, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, W.; Huang, Q.; Wu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Ding, M.; Shi, M.; Huang, F.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G. Comprehensive transcriptome profiling of Salvia miltiorrhiza for discovery of genes associated with the biosynthesis of tanshinones and phenolic acids. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, X.; Jiang, Q.; Ma, X.; Ying, Q.; Shen, B.; Qian, Y.; Song, H.; Wang, H. Deep sequencing identifies tissue-specific microRNAs and their target genes involving in the biosynthesis of tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, J.; Li, C.; Deng, Y.; Wei, H.; Lu, S. Characteristics of Salvia miltiorrhiza methylome and the regulatory mechanism of DNA methylation in tanshinone biosynthesis. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zeng, D.D.; Qin, R.; Li, M.; Alamin, M.; Jin, X.L.; Liu, Y.; Shi, C.H. The ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase (OsFd-GOGAT) participates in leaf senescence and the nitrogen remobilization in rice. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2017, 292, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, P.; Liang, T.; Li, X.; Liu, H. UV-B photoreceptor UVR8 interacts with MYB73/MYB77 to regulate auxin responses and lateral root development. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e101928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niu, F.; Cui, X.; Yang, B.; Wang, R.; Zhao, P.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, H.; Fan, X.; Li, Y.; Deyholos, M.K.; et al. WRKY6 transcription factor modulates root potassium acquisition through promoting expression of in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2024, 118, 1652–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fang, Q.; Wang, Q.; Mao, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Hu, H.; He, S.; Tu, J.; Cheng, C.; Tian, G.; et al. AtDIV2, an R-R-type MYB transcription factor of Arabidopsis, negatively regulates salt stress by modulating ABA signaling. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1499–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Boyle, E. Nitrogen pollution knows no bounds. Science 2017, 356, 700–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, R.; Zhong, Y.; Han, J.; Huang, L.; Wang, Y.; Shi, X.; Li, M.; Zhuang, Y.; Ren, W.; Liu, X.; et al. NIN-LIKE PROTEIN3.2 inhibits repressor Aux/IAA14 expression and enhances root biomass in maize seedlings under low nitrogen. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 4388–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, Q.; Liu, H.; He, Y.; Hao, Y.; Yan, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, X.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, D.; Ban, X.; et al. Regulatory mechanisms of strigolactone perception in rice. Cell 2024, 187, 7551–7567.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.; Lan, T.; Liu, F.; Wei, G.; Lv, C.; Kong, F.; Yuan, J. Improved yield by optimizing carbon, nitrogen metabolism and hormone balance in apical kernels under low nitrogen conditions using the low nitrogen–tolerant maize variety. Field Crops Res. 2024, 310, 109358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fan, H.; Quan, S.; Ye, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liu, W.; Zhu, N.; Zhang, X.; Ruan, W.; Yi, K.; Crawford, N.M.; et al. A molecular framework underlying low-nitrogen-induced early leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 756–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Camut, L.; Gallova, B.; Jilli, L.; Sirlin-Josserand, M.; Carrera, E.; Sakvarelidze-Achard, L.; Ruffel, S.; Krouk, G.; Thomas, S.G.; Hedden, P.; et al. Nitrate signaling promotes plant growth by upregulating gibberellin biosynthesis and destabilization of DELLA proteins. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 4971–4982.e74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ötvös, K.; Marconi, M.; Vega, A.; O’Brien, J.; Johnson, A.; Abualia, R.; Antonielli, L.; Montesinos, J.C.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, S.; et al. Modulation of plant root growth by nitrogen source-defined regulation of polar auxin transport. EMBO J. 2021, 40, e106862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jia, Z.; Giehl, R.F.; Hartmann, A.; Estevez, J.M.; Bennett, M.J.; von Wirén, N. A spatially concerted epidermal auxin signaling framework steers the root hair foraging response under low nitrogen. Curr. Biol. 2023, 33, 3926–3941.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, J.; Hang, J.; Wu, B.; Wei, X.; Zhao, Q.; Fang, Z. Co-overexpression of genes for nitrogen transport, assimilation, and utilization boosts rice grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Crop J. 2023, 11, 785–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.; Cui, T.; Niu, K.; Ma, H. Co-expression analyses reveal key Cd stress response-related metabolites and transcriptional regulators in Kentucky bluegrass. Chemosphere 2024, 363, 142937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Xu, F.; Zang, S.; Wang, D.; Sun, T.; Su, Y.; Yang, S.; Ding, Y.; Que, Y. Transcriptional regulation of sugar cane response to Sporisorium scitamineum: Insights from time-course gene coexpression and Ca2+ signaling. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 10506–10520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xiao, X.; Zhu, M.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Cui, Y.; Xiong, C.; Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Cai, H. Phenotypical and gene co-expression network analyses of seed shattering in divergent sorghum (Sorghum spp.). Crop J. 2023, 11, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Hao, S.; Zhu, J.; Kai, G.; Zhou, W. Genome-wide identification and characterization of Dof gene family in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Ornam. Plant Res. 2024, 4, e031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, S.M.; Chu, H.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Guo, B.L.; An, T.Y.; Shen, Q. Analysis of monoterpene biosynthesis and functional TPSs of Perilla frutescens based on transcriptome and metabolome. Med. Plant Biol. 2024, 3, e017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, H.; Jiang, M.; Li, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, C.; Lu, S. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of Salvia miltiorrhiza MicroRNAs reveal the negative regulatory role of smi-miR159a in phenolic acid biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, H.; Xu, J.; Chen, H.; Jin, W.; Liang, Z. Characterization of NAC family genes in Salvia miltiorrhiza and NAC2 potentially involved in the biosynthesis of tanshinones. Phytochemistry 2021, 191, 112932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Devaiah, B.N.; Madhuvanthi, R.; Karthikeyan, A.S.; Raghothama, K.G. Phosphate starvation responses and gibberellic acid biosynthesis are regulated by the MYB62 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meng, J.; Wang, H.; Chi, R.; Qiao, Y.; Wei, J.; Zhang, Y.; Han, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, H. The eTM–miR858–MYB62-like module regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis under low-nitrogen conditions in Malus spectabilis. New Phytol. 2023, 238, 2524–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cui, M.H.; Yoo, K.S.; Hyoung, S.; Nguyen, H.T.; Kim, Y.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Ok, S.H.; Yoo, S.D.; Shin, J.S. An Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB transcription factor, AtMYB20, negatively regulates type 2C serine/threonine protein phosphatases to enhance salt tolerance. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 1773–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Spears, B.J.; McInturf, S.A.; Collins, C.A.; Chlebowski, M.; Cseke, L.J.; Su, J.; Mendoza-Cózatl, D.G.; Gassmann, W. Class I TCP transcription factor AtTCP8 modulates key brassinosteroid-responsive genes. Plant Physiol. 2022, 2, 1457–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Matoušek, J.; Kocábek, T.; Patzak, J.; Bříza, J.; Siglová, K.; Mishra, A.K.; Duraisamy, G.S.; Týcová, A.; Ono, E.; Krofta, K. The “putative” role of transcription factors from HlWRKY family in the regulation of the final steps of prenylflavonid and bitter acids biosynthesis in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 92, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhou, B.; Leng, J.; Ma, Y.; Fan, P.; Li, Y.; Yan, H.; Xu, Q. BrmiR828 Targets BrPAP1, BrMYB82, and BrTAS4 Involved in the light induced anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Brassica rapa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, S. Is auxin the key to improve crop nitrogen use efficiency for greener agriculture? New Phytol. 2024, 244, 2170–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zeng, H.; Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Ding, M.; Xu, F.; Yan, F.; Kinoshita, T.; Zhu, Y. Plasma membrane H+-ATPases in mineral nutrition and crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2024, 29, 978–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shen, C.; Li, Q.; An, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, F.; Chen, L.; Liu, C.; Mao, W.; Wang, X.; et al. The transcription factor GNC optimizes nitrogen use efficiency and growth by up-regulating the expression of nitrate uptake and assimilation genes in poplar. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 4778–4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gaudinier, A.; Rodriguez-Medina, J.; Zhang, L.; Olson, A.; Liseron-Monfils, C.; Bågman, A.M.; Foret, J.; Abbitt, S.; Tang, M.; Li, B.; et al. Transcriptional regulation of nitrogen-associated metabolism and growth. Nature 2018, 563, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, C.; Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Mou, Y.; Sun, Q.; Wang, J.; Yuan, C.; Li, C.; et al. Hsf transcription factor gene family in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis under drought and salt stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1214732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, Z.; Qiao, J.; Quan, R.; Wang, J.; Huang, R.; Qin, H. SALT AND ABA RESPONSE ERF1 improves seed germination and salt tolerance by repressing ABA signaling in rice. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 1110–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, R.; Huang, R. The ethylene response factor AtERF98 enhances tolerance to salt through the transcriptional activation of ascorbic acid synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012, 71, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhu, X.; Wang, D.; Xie, L.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, M.; Wu, W.; Lian, X. Rice transcription factors OsLBD37/38/39 regulate nitrate uptake by repressing OsNRT2.1/2.2/2.3 under high-nitrogen conditions. Crop J. 2022, 10, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, P.; Zhong, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Limpens, E. The phosphate starvation response regulator PHR2 antagonizes arbuscule maintenance in Medicago. New Phytol. 2024, 244, 1979–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tao, H.; Gao, F.; Li, L.; He, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.; Wei, J.; Zhao, Y.; Chi, Z.; Wang, Q.M.; et al. WRKY33 negatively regulates anthocyanins biosynthesis and cooperates with PHR1 to mediate the acclimation to phosphate starvation. Plant Commun. 2024, 5, 100821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Devaiah, B.N.; Karthikeyan, A.S.; Raghothama, K.G. WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1789–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Squeri, C.; Miras-Moreno, B.; Gatti, M.; Garavani, A.; Poni, S.; Lucini, L.; Trevisan, M. Gas exchange, vine performance and modulation of secondary metabolism in Vitis vinifera L. cv Barbera following long-term nitrogen deficit. Planta 2021, 253, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, X.; Wang, H.F.; Chen, Y.; Sun, M.M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.F. The transcription factor NIGT1.2 modulates both phosphate uptake and nitrate influx during Phosphate Starvation in Arabidopsis and Maize. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3519–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ueda, Y.; Kiba, T.; Yanagisawa, S. Nitrate-inducible NIGT1 proteins modulate phosphate uptake and starvation signalling via transcriptional regulation of SPX genes. Plant J. 2020, 102, 448–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ye, D.; Zhang, S.; Gao, X.; Li, X.; Jin, X.; Shi, M.; Kai, G.; Zhou, W. Mining of disease-resistance genes in Crocus sativus based on transcriptome sequencing. Front. Genet. 2024, 15, 1349626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, Y.; Cui, G.; Chen, T.; Ma, X.; Wang, R.; Jin, B.; Yang, J.; Kang, L.; Tang, J.; Lai, C.; et al. Expansion within the CYP71D subfamily drives the heterocyclization of tanshinones synthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Trapnell, C.; Williams, B.A.; Pertea, G.; Mortazavi, A.; Kwan, G.; van Baren, M.J.; Salzberg, S.L.; Wold, B.J.; Pachter, L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pertea, M.; Pertea, G.M.; Antonescu, C.M.; Chang, T.C.; Mendell, J.T.; Salzberg, S.L. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, B.; Dewey, C. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Content of TAs (a) and PHAs (b) in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots under LN stress. DT, Dihydrotanshinone; CT, cryptotanshinone; TI, tanshinone I; TIIA, tanshinone IIA; TT, total of TAs. CA, caffeic acid; RA, rosmarinic acid; SalB, salvianolic acid B; TPA, total of PHAs. Error bars represent SD (n = 3), ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Content of TAs (a) and PHAs (b) in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots under LN stress. DT, Dihydrotanshinone; CT, cryptotanshinone; TI, tanshinone I; TIIA, tanshinone IIA; TT, total of TAs. CA, caffeic acid; RA, rosmarinic acid; SalB, salvianolic acid B; TPA, total of PHAs. Error bars represent SD (n = 3), ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 26 01774 g001
Figure 2. Annotation of unigenes. The bar chart on the left denotes the total number of unigenes; the connecting line represents annotated unigenes; and the number above indicates the number of unigenes annotated in the databases.
Figure 2. Annotation of unigenes. The bar chart on the left denotes the total number of unigenes; the connecting line represents annotated unigenes; and the number above indicates the number of unigenes annotated in the databases.
Ijms 26 01774 g002
Figure 3. DEGs in response to LN stress. (a) Venn diagram for DEGs compared with each of the LN-induced time points (1, 4, 12 and 48 h) and the Mock (0 h), respectively. (b) The gene expression level under LN treatment at 1, 4, 12 and 48 h compared with the Mock (0 h), respectively.
Figure 3. DEGs in response to LN stress. (a) Venn diagram for DEGs compared with each of the LN-induced time points (1, 4, 12 and 48 h) and the Mock (0 h), respectively. (b) The gene expression level under LN treatment at 1, 4, 12 and 48 h compared with the Mock (0 h), respectively.
Ijms 26 01774 g003
Figure 4. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs. (a) GO enrichment analysis of DEG. The y-axis represents the GO terms, and the x-axis represents the level of significance of enrichment. The larger the log10 (p-adjust) value, the more significantly enriched the GO term is. (b) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs. The y-axis represents the KEGG pathway and the x-axis represents rich factor values; the size of the circles denotes the gene number. DEGs were mined using DESeq2 (version 1.24.0), with |log2FC| ≥ 1 and p-adjust < 0.05 (DESeq2) as the cutoff.
Figure 4. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs. (a) GO enrichment analysis of DEG. The y-axis represents the GO terms, and the x-axis represents the level of significance of enrichment. The larger the log10 (p-adjust) value, the more significantly enriched the GO term is. (b) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs. The y-axis represents the KEGG pathway and the x-axis represents rich factor values; the size of the circles denotes the gene number. DEGs were mined using DESeq2 (version 1.24.0), with |log2FC| ≥ 1 and p-adjust < 0.05 (DESeq2) as the cutoff.
Ijms 26 01774 g004
Figure 5. Gene expression and classification of transcription factors. (a) Expression profiles of TAs’ biosynthetic genes. (b) Expression profiles of PHAs’ biosynthetic genes. (c) The top 10 TF families with more than 65 members are listed. Solid arrows represent the confirmed synthetic pathways, while dashed arrows indicate intermediate processes that are uncertain and have not yet been resolved in the synthesis pathway.
Figure 5. Gene expression and classification of transcription factors. (a) Expression profiles of TAs’ biosynthetic genes. (b) Expression profiles of PHAs’ biosynthetic genes. (c) The top 10 TF families with more than 65 members are listed. Solid arrows represent the confirmed synthetic pathways, while dashed arrows indicate intermediate processes that are uncertain and have not yet been resolved in the synthesis pathway.
Ijms 26 01774 g005
Figure 6. DEGs involved in LN stress. (a) Expression profiles of marker genes related to nitrogen uptake. (b) Co-expression network between differentially expressed marker genes involved in nitrogen uptake and candidate TFs. The light purple circles represent transcription factors with a co-expression coefficient greater than 0.9; the orange ones are the final ten selected transcription factors; and the rose-pink circles represent nitrogen-related genes.
Figure 6. DEGs involved in LN stress. (a) Expression profiles of marker genes related to nitrogen uptake. (b) Co-expression network between differentially expressed marker genes involved in nitrogen uptake and candidate TFs. The light purple circles represent transcription factors with a co-expression coefficient greater than 0.9; the orange ones are the final ten selected transcription factors; and the rose-pink circles represent nitrogen-related genes.
Ijms 26 01774 g006
Figure 7. Co-expression relationship of candidate TFs and synthetase genes involved in TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis. (a) Co-expression relationship of candidate TFs with synthetase genes related to TAs’ biosynthesis. (b) Co-expression relationship of candidate TFs with synthetase genes related to PHAs’ biosynthesis.The light purple circles represent transcription factors with a co-expression coefficient greater than 0.9; the orange ones are the final ten selected transcription factors; and the rose-pink circles represent differentially expressed synthases.
Figure 7. Co-expression relationship of candidate TFs and synthetase genes involved in TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis. (a) Co-expression relationship of candidate TFs with synthetase genes related to TAs’ biosynthesis. (b) Co-expression relationship of candidate TFs with synthetase genes related to PHAs’ biosynthesis.The light purple circles represent transcription factors with a co-expression coefficient greater than 0.9; the orange ones are the final ten selected transcription factors; and the rose-pink circles represent differentially expressed synthases.
Ijms 26 01774 g007
Figure 8. qRT-PCR validation of DEGs in RNA-seq dataset. Expression of 6 TFs related to TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis in response to LN induction using qRT-PCR detection and comparison of their expression with RNA-seq dataset. Error bars denote standard error (±SD). All the detections were triply repeated, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8. qRT-PCR validation of DEGs in RNA-seq dataset. Expression of 6 TFs related to TAs’ and PHAs’ biosynthesis in response to LN induction using qRT-PCR detection and comparison of their expression with RNA-seq dataset. Error bars denote standard error (±SD). All the detections were triply repeated, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 26 01774 g008
Table 1. Summary of transcripts induced by different times after LN stress in S. miltiorrhiza.
Table 1. Summary of transcripts induced by different times after LN stress in S. miltiorrhiza.
SampleRaw ReadsRaw BasesClean ReadsClean BasesQ30 (%)GC Content (%)
0h_141,996,1166,341,413,51641,747,5486,277,251,06296.8648.83
0h_244,891,9326,778,681,73244,612,2446,711,502,35096.7849.01
0h_344,646,6046,741,637,20444,364,4666,675,923,76696.7749.12
1h_141,331,9026,241,117,20241,086,5006,187,491,24096.6548.67
1h_247,329,8787,146,811,57847,054,6147,083,282,10796.9148.6
1h_342,129,1346,361,499,23441,895,1706,287,847,01496.7248.74
4h_141,322,2046,239,652,80441,072,7526,160,922,09796.6948.10
4h_243,243,9506,529,836,45042,999,8306,462,453,27396.9148.50
4h_346,512,1967,023,341,59646,232,8326,946,228,89096.8948.87
12h_143,748,0306,605,952,53043,488,5546,535,604,04496.9348.80
12h_244,072,0886,654,885,28843,828,4446,595,059,34396.9348.42
12h_344,827,1006,768,892,10044,562,6326,700,988,68296.9348.73
48h_140,305,9966,086,205,39640,060,1966,026,652,90196.8848.54
48h_244,159,4866,668,082,38643,814,9306,587,029,68896.1248.95
48h_343,280,2746,535,321,37443,000,4306,468,945,75096.7748.89
Total653,796,89098,723,330,390649,821,14297,707,182,207--
Average43,586,4596,581,555,35943,321,4096,513,812,14796.7848.72
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, Y.; Gui, S.; Hao, S.; Li, X.; Zhuang, C.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, W.; Kai, G. Mining the Candidate Transcription Factors Modulating Tanshinones’ and Phenolic Acids’ Biosynthesis Under Low Nitrogen Stress in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041774

AMA Style

Cheng Y, Gui S, Hao S, Li X, Zhuang C, Shi Y, Zhou W, Kai G. Mining the Candidate Transcription Factors Modulating Tanshinones’ and Phenolic Acids’ Biosynthesis Under Low Nitrogen Stress in Salvia miltiorrhiza. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(4):1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Yating, Siqi Gui, Siyu Hao, Xiujuan Li, Chao Zhuang, Yifei Shi, Wei Zhou, and Guoyin Kai. 2025. "Mining the Candidate Transcription Factors Modulating Tanshinones’ and Phenolic Acids’ Biosynthesis Under Low Nitrogen Stress in Salvia miltiorrhiza" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 4: 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041774

APA Style

Cheng, Y., Gui, S., Hao, S., Li, X., Zhuang, C., Shi, Y., Zhou, W., & Kai, G. (2025). Mining the Candidate Transcription Factors Modulating Tanshinones’ and Phenolic Acids’ Biosynthesis Under Low Nitrogen Stress in Salvia miltiorrhiza. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(4), 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041774

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop